Waspism is a self-insert ideology that isn't really an ideology, its more of a set of beliefs that I set, the maker of this page believes in. The main basis for this ideology is that a 
agriculture-based with 
open-field system and the moderate 
Christian democracy with 
social-market economy alongside with some 
weird mixes.
Economics (?)
In general terms it is application of reforms such as 
modernization railway in which the state plays an imperative role in directing and coordinating through public policy although privatization might be allowed, 
any UBI, and 
free healthcare which where people pay a fee that accumulates to pay for medical care at a bulk cost, that can be provided by state-owned institutions, other government body-owned institutions or a private institution.
It uses welfare states that also use 
family based mechanisms and national insurance policies and also cash transfers and needs based systems of welfare in which constitute a element in said policy. It aims through reforming 
limited state intervention and 
social reforms. In a somehow similar vein to 
Third-Wayers and 
Compassionate Conservatives, it believes in 
fiscal responsibility and balanced budgets to avoid excessive government debt while also advocating for a social market economy.
It also applies the principles of Christian democracy way of economy however policies derive from political 
Protestanism.
Although contradictory it is fundamentally different from other 
social democracts and 
American modern progressives with social authoritarian tendencies etc which it would gives the state an important role in providing some public services, utilities, and social benefits, and also stating some policies such as mandatory conscription may be legitimately employed by the state.
Agriculture
Given agriculture on the peasants, it would give credits fund and investing in modern farm equipment, introducing the unconditional right of individual landownership, if I was in the past, I would abolish the collectivization of farms or serfdom systems such as 
obshchina system or 
collectivization in the eastern bloc and replaced it with a highlighting private ownership and consolidated modern farmsteads such as:
Development of large-scale individual farming.
Attempt of agricultural cooperatives.
Dissemination of new methods of land improvement.
Limiting EU's laws such as 
human impact on the nitrogen cycle by down-scaling industrial livestock production and reducing levels of crude protein in fodder directly through other anti-trust legislation 
.
However it believes in 
the diversification of the green land such organic farming and sees mixed crop farming as the key to making organic farming mainstream inorder to reduce tensions between 
farmers, 
urbanists, 
environmentalists and 
EU in general.
Why these reforms are important to this ideology and to the agricultural sector, including improvements to the rights of individuals on a broad level and had the backing of the police is that these are crucial as they lay the groundwork for a market-based agricultural system, needing an internal market, capital, and political will to drive infrastructure investments and land reforms to boost participation in the industry, similar to the Prussians, British, French, and Russians in history etc. Improved agricultural efficiency would lead to a population shift to cities in search of work and encourage farms to invest to drive modernization. A focus on creating industrial and agricultural banks rather than expansive foreign policy could further support this growth.
Social
While unorthodox it may represents the 
more moderate wing of conservatism (including beliefs that may resemble more close to Civil Liberalism, closer to the center. In addition to fairly unchanged cultural policies but with a leaning towards preserving the status quo and current political and social traditions. Compared to others, it supports the expansion and preservation of civil liberties as in focused on for a legal system centered around the 
harm principle, civil & human rights without any interest in 
Intersectionality etc. While in favor of 
some socially progressive positions but maintain that more 
fringe progressive positions or rhetoric is taking things to far.
Although non-dogmatic it views family and religions as being central to society, with the social development along the lines of subsidiarity and sphere sovereignty, with a stated emphasis on local communities, and voluntary associations including reformed 
limited local governance/municipalities as a way to test in small areas different politics.
The reason for the Progressive Conservatism position is because its distaste for revolutionary progressives, 
left-wing populists including fusion and right-populists who it thought overcomplicated issues. For this reason, he appealed to 
the moderates who are the backbone of stability. When 7th Oct incident happened, he permanently changed his version of 
realpolitik.
Governmental
It would consists of bicameral legislature of 
Romania, consisting of the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate in which legislative power is entrusted to Parliament and 
the King who delegated it to the Council of Ministers (realistically calling it Prime Minister); and judicial power to the central and local judicial organs. The right to vote would expanded beyond the 1991 constitution, it would be universal for all, equal, direct, compulsory and secret, based on majority representation with First-past-the-post although with mixed system with closed-lists voting in which prime-minister and parliament hold the ultimate power in the country (that is, power to decide on any questions within jurisdiction) and some of passage of and amendment of the Constitution, approval of the Prime Minister and the holders of the highest public offices, selection of the members of the committee of constitutional supervision, declaration of referendums, impeachment, etc is exclusive powers of Parliament exercised solely by it. It would entrust with the power to pass laws, ratify treaties, declare amnesty, and approve decrees. The laws passed by Parliament would to be signed by the leader of Deputy with no right to veto. Afterwards the prime-minister could gain the right to a delaying veto, which could be bypassed by through a simple majority vote.
The Senate would also act although restricted by reforms, the more formal chamber. Because of its some voting franchise and more of the power of Senate being strictly limited into elected senators, it could be less susceptible to radical changes and excessive unnecessarily power to the senate. Instead it could be charging with cooperating with the Deputy in completing and voting on draft laws. Laws concerning budgets, customs regulations, credit monitoring, and the ratification of international treaties etc etc are to be considered by the Senate after they have been adopted by the Deputy, where most legislation/laws is introduced.
It advocates for 
the anti-corruption drive in Romania and the activity of the National Anticorruption Directorate (DNA). It is against the modifications to the justice laws initiated by the government coalition 
PSD (and also and requested the rejection of OUG 13 since 2019.
PNL)
Relations
Friends
Jacques Chaban-Delmas & Jacques Chirac 
- My French counterpart.
PNTCD - Such as a cool opposition party that I've seen, such as a shame you became a ECR microparty after scandals years later and the fact 
Ion Iliescu became a president winning against 
Vadim Tudor.
Venizelism - My Greek liberal counterpart that I like for some reasons.
Decembrism - The revolt may be chaotic if actually succeeded but your sacrifice will not be forgotten, but history will vindicate you.
Mixed
Nu-Right - Somehow overall pretty tolerable Alt-Lite. Plus Diesel is chill, it's just them drawing closer from more dramas and believe in less concrete evidences same as the 
art community without politics.
Mentiswave - Do I need to explain more above again?- Ion Iliescu - Many of your ideas such as joining the EU and Afghanistan are compelling, but some of your policies in the long-term are far too dogmatic to be a useful guide right now.
Traian Băsescu while okay but their policies had collided with it resulting in 
Liviu Dragnea which was final nail in the coffin. Don't even mention the reason the fact you gave PCR sympathizers political immunity still after the revolution, political and miner strikes.
Enemies
- Liviu Dragnea - Another scumbag who infiltrated inside the Romanian politics.
Left-Wing Populism - Your weird social and emerging foreign policies after 2021 were the reasons I lost all my hopes for you. Accuses us of being spoiled but literally gets steamrolled by opportunism.
Breadtube - Have you realized how much a tool you are?
Krautism - Ironic you made statements while building a certain narrative that have no solid bearing in history and that are never mentioned in the sources you cited, quite a reason someone accusing you using political theory instead of history.
Alt-Lite 
- I know you some of the sexual minority communities are so bad but Jesus Christ keep your problem about trans men out of your fucking mouth now because people won't be treated like abused punching bags anymore, 
cough cough.
Revolutionary Nationalism - Since on what I've seen on 
Palestine Twitter 
including 
Israel if you ever question whether we’re the actually correct sect of ironically Balkan nationalism as in rhetoric, I think this shit is proof enough.
Revolutionary Progressivism - "Muh Elon Musk" that, "muh fujoshis" there; bickering, shitting on each other with either on whatever shit you're saying, I would honestly have choose 
this over you.
JT Chapman - "YOu sUpPoRt tHe LefT-WiNG bUt HaTe ThE LenINIsts" Yeah whatever.
