Vermaatism

Self Insert

"People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism
This page is meant to represent Neptunial's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.

Work In Progress

"This page isn't even complete yet, who cares?" - Nihilism
Neptunial is currently working on this page. Please do not interfere with their work. Instead, contact them to propose additional edits.

Explicit Content

"You don't need to see this." -Totalitarianism

This page contains controversial or edgy content from very edgy boys. Be ready to cringe so hard you slip a spinal disk or something.

Topics: Extremist Thoughts and Philosophies

Negative Bias

"This page is cringe, too cringe." - Cringeism
This page has a Negative Bias, so expect the content to be negative.

Vermaatism
Information
Aliases	Self-Inserts AshleyHere - ( Techno-Fascist) Neo Alphadon ialism - ( Genocidal AuthCap) Ataccism - ( Neutrois Sibling) Ultroneism - ( Syncretic Authoritarianism} Canon-Ideologies  Ego-Communism - ( Totalitarian Capitalist)  Auth-Marxists - ( Corpocrats) Dude, switch to Template:DvIdeology/small if you don't want broken templates. [[ National-Transhumanism]] 95.2% 100% 89.9% 96.3% 87.2% 100%
Allignments	Authoritarian Right  Culturally Left  Capitalists Individualists Welfarists  Nationalists  Ultranationalists  Corporatists  Environmentalists Imperialists  Transhumanists  Feminists
Ideological Make-Up	Corporatocracy  Capitalism  Regulationism  UBI'ism  Techno-Capitalism  Cyber-Capitalism  Capitalist Transhumanism  Totalitarianism  Authoritarian Individualism  Authoritarian Capitalism  Authoritarian Transhumanism  Eco-Authoritarianism  Authoritarian Capitalism  Scientocracy  Noocracy  Ethnocracy  Space Colonialism  Techno-Capitalism  Artifism  Post Humanism  Eco-Capitalism  Revolutionary Progressivism  Noveltism  Social Darwinism  Transhumanist Accelerationism  Post Humanism  Eugenicism  Police Statism  Transhumanist Atheism  Postgenderism   Dutch Patriotism  World Federalism  Welfare Chauvinism  Technatism  Eco-Nationalism  Ethno-Nationalism  Techno-Nationalism  Pan-Nationalism  Ultranationalism  Galacticism  Anti-Hellenism  Anti-Communism  Anti-Theism  Anti-Humanism  Anti-Anarchism
Philosophical Make-Up	Hypermodernity  Evolutionary aesthetics  Egoism  Positivism ◦ Analytic Philosophism  Darwinism ◦ Social Darwinism  Nihilism ◦ Ego-Nihilism  Idealism  Structuralism
Derivatives & Alternatives
Song	Vermaatist's Theme
Year	2020-2022
Country	The Netherlands
Founder	Neptunial
Favours	Poltically  Capitalism  Individualism  Authoritative State  Galacticism  Fanatical Technological Progressivism  Evolutionism Socially  Gaming • Minecraft • Call of Duty • Destiny 2  Animeism
Doesn't Favour	Anti-Science Advocates Personally INTJ - Ni Te Fi Se 5w6 LII-INTJ

Vermaatism

, also known as extremely progressive ideology in created by

Neptunial

, is heavily influenced by ideologies such as  Authoritarian Capitalism,  Post Humanist and  Deep Ecology. This ideology is a recipe for a prosperous future society. With the help of  Capitalism and  Authoritarianism , it will create a non-chaotic society that develops rapidly. For a successful progressive society, this ideology will certainly deliver.

While this ideology makes use of extremist methods of achieving their ideological goals, many would retaliate at the thought of  Eugenicism being a factor in my ideology. However this can potential strengthen the human race genetically. Slightly conflicting with  Post Humanist ,it's simply another methods of modifying for what I consider to be a inferior species that has massive amounts of aspects that we can improve our species on. I'll talk more on the subject of eugenics combined with transhumanism down below. As well I go in massive detail about my ideological goals and philosophies. But for now, this is adequate for a simple introduction

Section Under Construction

"Polcompball Construction® LLC is hard at work!" - Syndicalism
This section of the article is currently under construction. If you would like to help, you can propose additional changes and discuss them on the talk page

My Ideological Journey

 Alt-Right >  Reactionary >  Fascism >  Nazism >  Alt-Lite >  Progressive Conservatism >  Social Democracy >  Democratic Socialism >  Social Democracy >  Minarchism >  Minarcho-Socialism >  Anarcho-Communism >  Egoism >  Illegalism >  State-Socialism >  Trotskyism >  Leninism >  Ultravisionary Socialism >  Authoritarian Conservatism

>  Ultravisionary Socialism >

Vermaatism

1: Revolutionising into a technological future

== Reforming Technological Norms==

1.1/1 The inherently conservative and technologic suppressing governance

Living in pre-technological revolutionist society gives conservatism a bigger political platform than a prosperous society would be able to allowed to function under a revisionist view of technology, encompassing from the medical field to a biological one, modifying our systematic processes from a humanist to a post-humanist system, this will provide great efficiency. Having eliminated all humanist error and failure will bring our Dutch society into a superior state in contrast to the largely conservative outer shell. The technological transition will require great effort and strides in order to transition to an Artifistic state and society. Being controlled and edited with robotics, allowing ourselves to be modified. The futuristic society will eliminate all primitivists and conservative thought. Political thought will also be rationalised around and basing our thought on scientific principles and adopting a combination of scientocracy and cybertocracy. No policies should be based on conservative principles, only futuristic thought should be allowed into our decision-making process. We have witnessed a level of incompetence around the discussion of principles and its relation to politics, however, politicians have a lack of knowledge regarding the decision-making strategy applied to scientific applicable methodology, this only suppresses the populace and the overall progression every societal aspect in regards to technology and cybernetic enhancements of the human body. Prime examples of these societies are depicted in multiple cultural movies or subjective dystopian works of fiction, calling technology the evils of society is far-fetched and outraging. We are ever connected by technology to a small but certainly noticeable degree, denying yourself the luxury and the simplism of incorporating technology in society for the individual is denying comfort and societal culture. All processes will and should be replaced using artificial intelligence and post-humanistic entities for efficiency and uniformity throughout the future. There is a general wish for human imperfections to be eradicated from the human gene pool, Accomplishing such a large feat requires a strong authoritative figure to guide them toward these idealistic thoughts. The technological norm shifts towards renewed and sustainable methods of producing energy to fuel the newer and modern methods and systematic changes to our overall technological system. Methods including: 'Fusion energy', 'Nuclear energy', 'Solar energy' are all methods that will allow for CO2 neutral Noteworthy works in this category is games like: 'Cyberpunk 2077' & 'Battlefield 2042'. "Technology will thrive and be a successor to human failure."

1.1/2 The structural suppression from pseudoscientific collectivist

The simple truth of society and human psychology is that the human mind is malleable and easily persuaded into believing falsified information regarding everyday subjects without ever being properly informed by a qualified individual, this ultimately leads to the irrationality these individuals are spreading through family values and ideas. In modern-day society this occurrence is leadingly led by reactionary groups, theological groups and generally pseudoscientific valued groups who reject modern-day science for their own schizophrenic-ridden ideas. This leads to large-scale revolts against the current progression around societal modernity. A prime example was the invention of the 5G technology for faster data transfer, Pseudoscientists saw this an attempt to control the masses and in their feeble minds saw this a threat to human health. As a result hundreds of cell towers were consequently destroyed after a controversial theorist spread their pseudoscientifism around the community spreading beyond any weak-minded that would believe everything at face value. The simple fact these dangerous and sometimes terrorist actions and ideas are so easily spreadable and that not being able to ban these extremist thoughts is upsetting. This is why the collective intelligence of our society is being questioned, how easily is the individual being persuaded by weak-backed claims and willing to spread those ideas, the individual is so easily manipulated not being able to comprehend actual scientific evidence as valid proof of their claims. These ideas need to be publicly suppressed from ever reaching a terrorist level. Theological groups or religions in short are also a base for spreading misinformation, they are easily bated into believing every fact to come from a book without any specific source or backing evidence. Religiosity is a key to ignorance and blindness to factual evidence. These tragedies are all result of freedom of expression since no media is allowed to be censored, only in the context that it is forbidden by the terms of service agreement, some topics are to be censored for reasons of misinformation, the measure Instagram took to prevent the eyes of the weak to view fake news articles or theories, I find this to be an effective method of censoring and protecting the easily swayed, but sadly only partially censoring fake news doesn't stop the spread of misinformation, censoring it from the platforms by surveilling the platforms by the means of artificial intelligence or employees of said company. By the base principles of democracy, we as the rational scientific and technological state are heavily suppressed from infringing on the right of free speech without the fear of suppression, however, this is one of the flaws of the representative democracy currently dominating the governments. By giving the general populace the platform to spread these dangerous and pseudoscientific ideas, we abandon the democracy that has been plaguing modern society for a more authoritarian system, bordering on totalitarianism.

1.1/3 Overcoming the skepticism through coercion

Statist coercion is extremely applicable to todays and historical examples of efficient and self-sufficient societies, for example: Most of the progress that has been achieved through coercive means is the aviation technology, which wouldn't be realistically possible if individuals part of scientific collective, from what I've observed is that coercion equals societal progression. My example may have been controversial to say the least, since it involved extremist concepts and "horrific" eras of time. Persuasion is a tool for compromise and efficiency

== Cybernetic Governance==

Our moderate government bodies only let them regulate on a humanistic level which allows for greater room for human error and general failures. Policies that are grounded in conservatism and deaccelerationism will only result in the human psyche connecting technology and a cybernetic government to a threat to our individual liberty. With our current government structures being too moderate makes our individual right to choose whether or not to adopt superior changes to our pre-modernist government. The branches of security responsibility to uphold social order and lawful nature will be replaced cybernetically enhanced human beings, also being noted as 'Homo-Moderni' equipped with intellectual superiority that borders on the genius level intellect the average intelligence relating to security will be fanatically enhanced. In order for the common cliché, 'less is more to be partially applicable, technology should be incorporated to acquire superhuman strength as this is one of the common qualities of military and police personnel, traits that are praised in these branches of security should be enhanced dramatically to uphold social and individual security. The issue of social surveillance being too outdated in order to provide efficiency to an otherwise idealistic system, to adopt facial recognition as a preventive measure against the currently rising crime rate. Most liberals and libertarians would revolt against this so-called breach of their own privacy even though they occupy public space, privacy is only a valuable concern if the safety of the individual can be guaranteed, the counter-terrorist measures are only for the safety of our own citizens who all sadly occupy the liberal mindset. Adopting facial recognition should be a hybridised system of surveillance and the use of deep learning and building a database of possible criminals, criminals and suspected terrorists within our borders. Using Google's DeepMind AI is a self-learning AI that will be beneficial if we are going to adopt security measures in our society. Individual privacy has no intrinsic value of its own, safety always goes above liberty, with no ideological exceptions. While most liberals and anarchists argue that the state is an immoral hierarchy within our current society where no anarchic society has any realistic aspect to their ideological goals. They argue that individual has a need and the capacity to defend themselves, however, those claims are mostly made by ideological groups with negative experiences in connection with the police and state, & the group where that never needed emergency services specific towards the police, I highly value the movement Blue Lives Matter, simply because if they appear to be competent, safety can be assured and rebelliousness will have no role in here. big> Futuristic Utopianist Thought

 Evolving Beyond Biological Beings

 Achieving Biological and Technological Superiorty in an Ecologic State

 Scientocracy==

2.1 Why it's essential for modern society[edit | edit source] Worldwide our accomplishment has been made realistic due to objectivism and the extensive use of the hard sciences, without these essentials we still would have been a primitive society where the lifespan wouldn't exceed the 40s. Here science has made it possible for creating a safer and more importantly a more objective society, however, there is a mistrust between society and the individuals involved in the practices of modern-day science in the form of hard scepticism. In a Scientocractic society, skepticism should be eliminated rapidly. Most Skepticists are classified as conservative and therefore I heavily discourage men from following the conservative train of thought. This is also known as Deaccelerationism, which is synonymous with conservatism and Primitivism, with the prime example all having the need to return to a more primitive society, but in different gradations.

As society progresses we would heavily be reliant on the sciences to progress. With the use of gene editing (Cas9), we are able to alter our genetic code in the form of DNA. We have a finite number of human aspects that can be improved upon, the extending life span by making human cells degrade a lot slower, which in return would make our lifespan greater than now, which our average is 81,9 years. Focussing on healthcare is continuously improved upon by the curious minds that work in hard sciences themselves, discovering human anatomy, using hyper-modernistic technologies. It has been made possible to fight off different types of cancer, however, this technique isn't widely used, despite it has numerous advantages. The limitations of the law have been affecting the sciences for gigantic period of time, due to like I mentioned before, the scepticism. In multiple countries gene-editing (Cas9) has been forbidden by irrational fears and having a conservative government, it is all disadvantageous to all individuals who live under such corrupt governments, science is our only way of making a superior species and improving humanity itself. If we truly want to proceed, skepticism should be eliminated and objectivism should be instated in all decision-making. 2.2 How it will shape our societal future[edit | edit source] Scientocracy isn't as popularized as it should be, it should be instated in favour of mankind, making us healthier, stronger and ultimately prosper. However, the government as I currently observe its state, decision-making on subjects they have superficial knowledge about is still all too common, even in progressive governments. Instigating wrongful decision-making that ultimately our society isn't at its optimal for this day and age. Scientist and the scientific method is only applied partially and not fully, to truly have a sostocratic society, which means only the most effective measures are made, now who makes the best decisions, it is the ones who are competent in what they have studied to do, for years. Accelerationism is the key for prosperity in a capitalistic environment, more resources allocated for the development of technology and the progression of the hard sciences. Having competent make the decisions instead of conservative politicians who only want deaccelerate society into its previous primitive state. Reactionaries & Decelerationists, ruining it for our future idealistic society.

However, all political decision-making strategies right up until now has been proven effective for moderate progressivism or reformism, but the whole systematic process of a democratic state is inevitable in modern-day society. Scientocracy calls for an approach that will eliminate democracy as follows, political parties are of no use in a scientocratic state and therefore will be eliminated, a large collective will be formed with the science at its core for policy making, therefore authoritarianism is a wishful replacement for such a society. Free speech to a certain degree will be kept, but oppositions specific towards conservatism will be strongly opposed. In the favour of keeping liberty, favouring those who are competent in their respective fields should have the dominance to make the decisions they are qualified for, this having strict requirements in order for to be classified as competent.

The decision-making progress would require some elements of a voting system in order for scientocracy to work effectively but should be minimised to those who have a minimum of a master's degree from a prestigious and elite university, even being required to take an exam that evaluates both theoretical and practical knowledge. After this would wildly influence our societal future in ways, that human beings through genetics en eugenicism can create a superior species, eliminating undesirable traits, mostly focussed on genetic disorders and bodily attributes that would differ from the anatomically correct humans. However the current lifespan of a single human being in a first-world country is around 81,9 years, with the means of genetic engineering as mentioned in '2.1' we could make a ginormous difference in our life spans, and this is not limited to first-world countries. Ideally, a human life span should be around 140-160 years old. Our way of accomplishing this is finding a means for human body cells to degrade slower than previously. Combining both research in main causes of death besides natural causes e.g: Cancer, neuro-degenerative diseases or disorders, STD's & bodily dysfunctioning disorders.

2.3 Why we should adopt this type of government

Having witnessed and read up to multiple types of governing bodies and structures, the main difference being the one to hold authority, technocracy is also a governing structure that has similarities to scientocracy, the latter being more authoritative and more progressive than the previous. An idealistic scenario is that the decisions should be based on efficiency which is only possible for those who are knowledgeable. Whenever knowledge leads to decision, effectiveness is immediately apparent, even though the system isn't widely adopted, the theoretical bases are already proof enough of its efficiency. Wanting to combine Sostocracy and Scientocracy, society will thrive.

2: Revision of the economic standards of Capitalism'

=

(TOIRS))

=

When a self-insert relation request has been issued, the scaling is objectivised and isn't up for subjective thought. I ranked each gradation of each axes to allign with my DozenValue's results. From now on every ideology will be ranked with this system, all the credits go to Joey The maximum score will objectively be 84. I am hugely grateful that JoeyFloppa has created this objective rating system instead of the subjectivised ways

Property~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Market ~~~~~~~~~~~~
+0 +1 +2 +4 +8 +10 +12~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+12 +10 +8 +6 +4 +2 +0

Power~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Autonomy ~~~~~~~~~~~~ +10 +12 +8 +6 +4 +2 +0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+0 +2 +4 +6 +8 +10 +12

World~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Social ~~~~~~~~~~~~ +0 +2 +4 +6 +8 +10 +12~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+0 +2 +4 +6 +8 +10 +12

~~~~~~~~~~Identity~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~+0 +2 +4 +6 +8 +12 +10~~~~~~~~~~

Property~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Market ~~~~~~~~~~~~
+x +x +x +x +x +x +x~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+x +x +x +x +x +x +x

Power~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Autonomy ~~~~~~~~~~~~ +x +x +x +x +x +x +x~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+x +x +x +x +x +x +x

World~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Social ~~~~~~~~~~~~ +x +x +x +x +x +x +x~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+x +x +x +x +x +x +x

~~~~~~~~~~Identity~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~+x +x +x +x +x +x +x~~~~~~~~~~

Superior (74-84)

Alligned (62-73)

Based (49-61)

• BERNHE0504 (58) - Definitely a based ideology and one of my closest counter-parts
• New Model Of Cheesenism (54) - Moderately Traditionalist, but is authoritarian, definitely based

Centrist (37-48)

•  Neo-Afunhumaninterism (42) - Free market capitalism with conservative tendencies.
•  Caressism (38) - Propertarian by nature and authoritarian, a really good start.

Ideological mess (28-36)

• Pantheonism (36) - Ideological mess, nothing else to write about your ideology.
• Glencoe (28) - Great start to explain your ideological beliefs, it just needs expanding upon your current basis

Fever Dream (14-27)

• JoeyFloppa (26) - Popular within the PCBA community, not ideologically.
• HelloThere314 (18) - Intellectually stimulating, and massive intellect in both politics and philosophy, very interesting to read, but ideologically we aren't alligned

Axiomatically Opposed (1-13)

Superior (74-84)

Alligned (62-74)

Based (49-62)

Centrist (37-49)

Ideological mess (28-37)

Fever Dream (14-28)

Axiomatically Opposed (1-14)

Allignments Poltically

Allignments Tests