×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 6,319 articles on Polcompball Anarchy Wiki. Type your article name above or create one of the articles listed here!



    Polcompball Anarchy Wiki


    Pantheonism is a Leftist, Culturally variable, Ideology. It is the Self-Insert ideology of the Wiki user Pantheon.

    Pantheonism seeks to unite Humanity within a federal government with an economy built around the principles of Progressive utilization theory, Distributism and Guild Socialism, under one banner in order to explore and conquer the stars and to end violent conflicts on earth.

    Influencial Persons

    Note: I don't agree with everything those figures said or did but these had in some form an impact on my ideology and/or philosophy.

    Iron Age

    • Abraris the Hyperborean (8th to 6th century BCE)
    • Solon (638 BCE-558 BCE)
    • Thales of Miletus (624/623–548/545 BCE)
    • King of Kings of Persia, of Anshan, of Media, of Babylon, of Sumer and Akkad, of the four corners of the world Cyrus the Great  (600–530 BCE)
    • Confucius/Master Kong (551–479 BCE)
    • General Sun Tzu (544-496 BCE)
    • Socrates (470 BCE-399 BCE)
    • Plato (424–348 BCE)
    • Aristotle (384–322 BCE)
    • Mencius/Mengzi (372–289 BCE)
    • Chakravarti Ashoka the Great (304–232 BCE)

    Pax Romana

  • Tribune Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus (163-133 BCE)
  • Philhellene King of Kings Arsaces Mithridates I the Great (165-132 BCE)
  • Tribune Gaius Sempronius Gracchus (154 - 121 BCE)
  • Emperor Gaius Octavius Augustus Ceasar (64BC-14AD)
  • Emperor Marcus Aurelius Antoninus (121-180)
  • Emperor Flavius Claudius Juilanus Apostata (331–363)
  • Middle Ages

  • Jigonhsasee (Between 1142 and 1450)
  • Skennenrahawi (12th or 15th Century)
  • Elder of Sakala Lembitu (?-1217)
  • Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274)
  • Renaissance

  • Holy Roman Emperor Maximillian I. (1459–1519)
  • Thomas More (1478-1535)
  • Holy Roman Emperor Charles V. (1500-1558)
  • Baroque

  • René Descartes (1596-1650)
  • Age of Enlightenment

  • Charles Louis de Secondat, Baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu (1689-1755)
  • King Frederick the Great of Prussia (1712-1786)
  • Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte I. of the French (1769-1821)
  • La Belle Époque

  • President Theodore "Teddy" Roosevelt (1858–1919)
  • President Dr. Sun Yat-sen (1866-1925)
  • The Great Wars

  • Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961)
  • Reza Shah the Great (1878–1944)
  • President-Regent Konstantin Päts (1874-1956)
  • Gleb Ivanovich Bokii (1879–1937)
  • General Johannes Albrecht Blaskowitz (1883–1948)
  • General Yan Xishan (1883-1960)
  • Meherban Shrimant Raja Bhawanrao Shriniwasrao Pant Pratinidhi (1868–1951)
  • Bapu Mahatma Gandhi (1869-1948)
  • Otto Johann Maximilian Strasser (1897–1974)
  • Atom Age

  • Josip Broz Tito (1892-1980)
  • George Orwell (1903-1950)
  • King of Kings, Light of the Aryans Mohammad Reza Pahlavi (1919-1980)
  • Baba Prabhat Ranjan "Shrii Shrii Ánandamúrti" Sarkar (1921-1990)
  • King of Kings, Brotherly leader and guide of the revolution of the Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Colonel Muammar Muhammad Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi (1942-2011)
  • President Mikhail Gorbachev (1931–2022)
  • Information Age

  • George Soros (1930-)
  • Senator Bernard "Bernie" Sanders (1941-)
  • Sahra Wagenknecht (1969-)
  • Hamed Abdel-Samad (1972-)
  • Professor Yuval Noah Harari (1976-)
  • Edward Joseph Snowden (1983-)
  • Rutger Bregman (1988-)
  • Gregory "jReG" Guevara (1997-)
  • Joseph "Kraut" Lancaster (?-)
  • Austin Lind (?-)
  • Duy Quang Nguyen Pham (?-)
  • User relationship quiz

    Mode of Government:
    I support Federalism (+1 point)
    I support Confederalism/Devolved Unitarianism (+0.5 points)
    I support centralist Unitarianism (+0 points)

    Form of Govuernment:
    I support Constitutional Monarchism/Ceremonial Monarchism and/or Semi-Constitutional Monarchism in most developing countries (+1 point)
    I support Semi-Constitutional Monarchism globally (+0.5 points)
    I support Absolutism/Republicanism (+0 points)

    Economics:
    I support Anti-Capitalism (+1 point)
    I support Regulated Capitalism and/or Georgism (+0.5 points)
    I support unregulated Capitalism and/or Corporatocracy (+0 points)

    Human Rights:
    I support the Universal declaration of Human Rights (+1 point)
    I support another form of International Law (+0.5 points)
    I don't support International Law (+0 points)

    Diplomacy:
    I support World Federalism (+1 point)
    I don't support World Federalism, but I support other forms of Internationalism and/or strenghening diplomatic ties with other countries (+0.5 points)
    I believe in total national souvereignity (+0 points)

    Foreign trade:
    I support fair and ecological trade and a self-sufficient economy (+1 point)
    I support unrestricted trade (+0.5 points)
    I support total Economic Isolation or Interdependency (+0 points)

    Culture:
    I support Progressive Conservatism (+1 point)
    I support Progressivism (+0.5 points)
    I support Conservatism (+0.25 points)
    I support Reactionarism/Revolutionary Progressivism (+0 points)

    Immigration:
    I support legal Immigration and Integration of Immigrants (+1 point)
    I support limiting Integration and/or tolerating Immigrants (+0.5 points)
    I support an Ethnostate/an reverse Ethnostate/unrestricted Immigration/illegal Immmigration (+0 points)

    Authority:
    On the Civic Axis I support Statism and/or Liberalism (+1 point)
    I support Libertarianism/Minarchism (+0.75 points)
    I support Anarchism (+0.5 points)
    I support Authoritarianism or Egoism (+0.25 points)
    I support Totalitarianism (+0 points)

    Space:
    I support space exploration and its colonisation (+1 point)
    I support space exploration but not colonisation (0.5 points)
    I don't support space exploration (+0 points)

    Results:

    Beliefs

    Ideological-Philosophical-Religious summary

    Economics

    Social Programms

    Promotion of collective ownership


    Widespread ownership of Property

    Proutism

    Trade Unionism

    Fair Trade

    Land Value Taxation

    Tenant Unionism

    Diplomacy

    Just War Theory

    International Cooperation

    Patriotism

    Imperialism

    Anti-Neocolonialism

    Government

    Mixed government

    Constitutionalism

    Federalism

    Localism

    Technology

    Transhumanism (to an extent)

    Culture

    Progressivism

    Traditionalism (kinda)

    Interculturalism

    A E S T H E T I C S

    Philosophy

    • Humanism
    • Altruism
    • Utilitarianism
    • Confucianism
    • Skepticism
    • Platonism (partly)
    • Stoicism (partly)
    • Cartesianism (mostly)
    • Thoreauism (partly)
    • Atomism
    • Radical Constructivism

    Religion

    • Theism
      • Polytheism
        • Paganism
          • Animism
            • Shamanism
          • Neo-Paganism
    • Omnism
      • Eclectic Paganism
    • Mysticism/Esotericism
      • Quantum Mysticism
      • New Ageism (somewhat)

    Principles

    "Harmony through Solidarity."
    "Freedom through Subsidarity."
    "Peace and Unity through Universality."

    Economics

    On Socialism, Capitalism, Anarchism and Marxism

    I am for Socialism because I am against Capitalism.
    Q:Why am I against Capitalism?
    A:A system built on infinite growth and profit cannot work in a world with limited ressources and profit alone shouldn´t be the driving factor of economics, but rather the well-being and happiness of the people
    Q:Why do I reject Marxism?
    A:While I do recognize Marx as a great philosopher and economist I don´t identify myself as a Marxist because of several reasons:
    1. Not even Marx himself called him a Marxist, he either called himself a Scientific Socialist or a Communist.
    2. I don´t think a large scale stable moneyless and stateless society in the modern world is realistic or even desirable since a State can benefit the people through Welfare and Public works, as history has shown attempts at Anarchism/Statelessness usually got crushed in a few years, however there were some exeptions of such societies that had one thing in common, they were all protected by states in some way examples:
    Zapatista ("protected" by Mexico)
    Rojava (America/Syria)
    Freetown Christiania (Denmark) and others.
    3. Marx opposed religion and thought that families will become obsolete. He also said that the workers have no fatherland, since I consider myself a patriot I don´t agree with that and also many workers associate themselves with their home country.
    4. Inviteablity of monopolsation. While it´s true that it´s a natural tendency of Capitalism Marx seemed to see it as invitable and under Socialism the monopoly wouldn´t be abolished but simply controlled by the workers and any resistance against this monopolisation would be reactionary and he classified Petit Bourgeois Socialism as a part of reactionary Socialism in the Communist Manifesto (you could consider me as a Petit Bourgeois Socialist). That´s at least what I understood from it.

    5. Violent Revolution. Marx seemed to see a violent revolution as invitable and maybe even desirable, but I think violence should always be the last resort. Many may argue that the ruling class will never volunarily give up their power but it actually often happened in history that bloodless revolutions against a elite or a autocrat succeded if it was popular enough(Revolutions of 1989, Indian Independence, the end of Apartheid etc.). Despite that, I agree with the quote of J. F. K. "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution invitable".

    My Economics

    My Economics are a mix of Distributism, Corporatism, Guild Socialism, Market Socialism, Georgism with elements of a Gift Economy.

    Natural Ressources&Monopolies

    Natural resources (like Air, Land, Oil, Water, Natural gas, Minerals) should be owned directly by the state while infrastructure and key industries should be owned by state-owned worker-controlled guilds.

    Anti-Trust Laws

    Large Companies (with over 1000 employees) should be broken up into smaller and local ones, also every company over 50 employees (including state owned ones) should have a works council made up primarily of elected worker union members, which will be elected by the Workers and represent them.

    Regulations

    Regulations should be only done if they're neccesary to protect consumers, the environment, the workers ect.

    Economic Coordination

    Regulations as well as some Economic planning shall be made in a process I call Coordination, it consists of agreements between multiple companies or co-ops organized into economic sectors.

    Cooperatives

    Co-ops should be encouraged through tax incentives and small subsidies.

    Mutual Aid

    Local Communities should practise mutual aid.

    Divide et impera in the Class war: A theory of limited Class Collaboration

    As most Socialists already know the owning class, known as the Bourgeoisie often tries to divide the Working class, usually by factors like race, nationality, income, cultural views, political opinions and gender. What many however don't seem to realize is that the Bourgeoisie is internally divided just as much. Under the Capitalist market economy the Bourgeoisie constantly has to compete with other members of their own class, both domestic as international. And here's the thing: When the Working class starts a violent revolution on their own against the owning class in it's entirity it causes them to rally together against a common enemy in an effort to preserve their wealth, property and even life and causes them to abandon their usual rivalities, then they ally with members of the working class, militant groups, foreign powers and institutions that are still loyal to them and attempt to crush the Revolution by any means neccesary. By this approach the counterrrevolutionary forces will be likely to organize a much more stable defense and be much more likely to win. Since the Bourgeoisie is usually divided, if they didn't already monopolize and cartelize the economy as a whole, why not exploit this division in favour of the Working class? I advocate for an alliance not only between the working people but also with the Petite Bourgeoisie and some of the National Bourgeoisie against the top 1%, tyrants and potential foreign invaders. Although allies should be picked carefully, they could try to exploit this collaboration in their favour and betray the workers when it suits them. Therefore this movement should be organized along three major groups:

    • Worker Organisations (like Trade Unions, Tenant Unions, Communes, Cooperatives, Parties, Worker's Guilds etc.) in which the Working class is already in control. this should be the core and leading bloc of the movement. Division is to be avoided, remember, unity is strengh.
    • The Petit Bourgeoisie (small business owners) also known as the middle class makes up a significant part of the population in most European countries but exists in others as well. These members of Bourgeoisie often work at their own business instead of letting it be run by managers. They often have trouble competing against the High bourgeoisie. They can be good or bad allies but they're far more reliant on individual workers than the High Bourgeoisie can therefore can be influenced far more easily.
    • Allied members of the Bourgeoisie (those of the Bourgeoisie with big businesses but treat their workers relatively well). Alliances with them should be only made in the short term to achieve a certain economic goal, resist a foreign invader, or drive out foreign competition. However they are the most likely to betray the working class but they can be useful in the short term.

    A good example of a similar tactic being employed is the Tunisian National Dialogue Quartet, an alliance of Trade Unions, Employers, Lawyers and Human Rights organisation, which was instrumental in establishing Democracy in Tunisia after the Jasmine Revolution.

    However it needs to be noted that the goal shouldn't be to uphold this classicist construct in perpetuity and instead move towards the abolishment of classes.

    The Abolishment and Leveling of Economic Classes

    The establishment and consolidation of economic classes in each society follows specific societal and socio-economic patterns. To some it might be obvious, but I find it important to state that every class system has a tendency towards Stratification and Oligarchic Elitism, which paralyses societal and economic development while also supressing various rights of the population in so far as they exist. For that reason we should move towards the abolishment of the (economic) class system in favour of a classless society based on free and artistic professionalism and merit. Economic classes largely exist based on three different factors:

    • Land (and collections of rents thereof)
    • Capital (ownership of the means of production aside from land)
    • Labour (operation of the means of production)

    Each of these factors must be made irrelevant for the class system to ultimately cease existing.

    Emancipation from Land ownership

    Land-based class systems (as can be found in feudal, colonial and timocratic systems) can be abolished in two ways:

    • The introduction of a LVT high enough to discourage unproductive landholding or excessive rent-raising
    • The outright socialization of land and the concession of its benefits to the general public.

    In this cause it makes sense for the working class and the owning class of productive enterprised to team up, so both don't have to pay rent for living on land, just as we don't have to pay rent for breathing air.

    Abolishment of the Dominion of Capital

    Abolishing land-based hierarchies, infact, doesn't fix all hierarchies. As in a Capitalist system productive property owners compete with each other and thus need to constantly increase their own productivity by increasing their profit and invest that increased profit to further increase productivity to not be outcompete, Capital has an incentive to monetize more and more aspects of life, for an example privatize more and more industries, gather private information about potential customers, demand payment for the usage of esstential services. For the abolishment of capital-based class system I prefer a non-violent combination of revolutionary reformism (ie. Reformism within the system with the intention of abolishing Capitalism) and eroding Capitalism:

    • Revolutionary reformism is to be done by relentlessly pushing for labour rights, environmental protections and indigenous rights within a electoralist framework insofar as possible.
    • Eroding Capitalism is to be done by creating alternative power structures in what Libertarian Socialists refer to as "counterpower" which is done by creating and connecting trade unions, cooperatives, credit unions, usage of alternative currencies, mass organizations and assemblies of local communities.

    However, should the state, private corporations or other use violence against such meassures, a violent revolution and/or at least civil disobedience via counter-economics and the like should be considered.

    Abolishment of the Dominion of Labour

    In previous eras every society with a dedicated class of administrators and thinkers needed an underclass to supply them with essentials, however with increasing automatization it will be possible in the future to provide all people with products of all kind without them working themselves. That however will require the abolition of labour-based class systems or "dictatorships of the proletariat" as Marx called them. As automatization increases productivity this process is already happening somewhat automatically as less people will be needed to fulfill more tasks. However there is already resistance to be seen to such a vision for the future, people fear that they will loose their jobs or even that machines will rule over them, which shows that people are already aware of the power of their labour. This is why before a labour-based class system is abolished, a society must be created which provides for all and makes people materially independent of their occupation in order to increase acceptance by reducing the impact of this change.

    Once this is achieved, people will be free to follow their own will and can focus on hobbies as well as cultural and artistic matters.

    Guilds

    I propose creating vocational chambers, made up of Guild-like professional associations which are meant to advise the decisions of the government, to make sure these are based on expertise, merit and consensus of those affected. Generally the vocational chambers are meant to self-govern their respective economic affairs but would also replace most functions of both lobbies and ministries.

    Literati (Scholars and Officals)
    • Universities
    • Civil Service Examination Commission
    • Chamber of Culture, Sports and Entertainment
    • Chamber of Navigation
    • Chamber of Communication
    • Chamber of Household
    • Chamber of Law
    • Chamber of Agronomes
    • Chamber of Land
    Defense Corporation (Military and Arms industry)
    • General staff
      • Army staff
      • Navy staff
      • Air staff
    • Supreme Council of Soldiers, Sailors and Pilots
    • Chamber of Arms Manufacturing
    Syndicates (Urban Industries)
    • Chamber of Commerce
    • Chamber of Heavy Industry
    • Chamber of Energy
    • Chamber of Electronics
    • Chamber of Water
    • Chamber of Transportation
    • Chamber of Urban Construction
    • Chamber of Engineering
    • Chamber of Handicraft
    • Chamber of Clothes and Textiles
    • Chamber of Hospitality
    • Chamber of Medicine
    • Chamber of Women
    Rural Organizations (Rural Industries)
    • Chamber of Agriculture and Food Production
    • Chamber of Rural Construction
    • Chamber of Fishery
    • Chamber of Forestry
    • Chamber of Dairy-masters

    Diplomacy

    Preconditions

    Let me be clear: I do not think that any form of World Federation will be achieved within the next 100 years, yet I also think it will be fatal for humanity as a species in the long run, if we remain fractured and don't even attempt to move towards closer cooperation in order to solve our common problems. If you don't take it from me, or other famous World Federalists, maybe you'll listen to Vladimir Putin, an icon of modern Nationalism and a statesman with whom I have many disagreements with, but with whom I agree on the following:
    "Listen, you said that the world is divided into two hemispheres. A human brain is divided into two hemispheres: One is responsible for one type of activity, the other is more for creativity and so on. But it's still one and the same head. The world should be a single whole, security should be shared and not destined for the "golden billion". That is the only scenario in which the world could be stable, sustainable and predictable. Until then, splitting the head in two is a disease, a serious negative condition. It is a phase of serious illness that the world is currently going through."

    Before the question of global unification can be answered, there are two important questions to be answered before that. The social question and the national question. If the social question isn't answered a united world would be united only in name due to disparities in wealth, standard of living and lack of communication.

    If the National Question isn't answered, people will use their right to self-determination as a pretext for bringing down any effective global cooperation on a higher level in the long run.

    Another World is possible

    The social question should be answered by building international networks of solidarity across borders in order to campaign and coordinate for matters of common interests at home and abroad and raise awareness. These international networks, which in part already exist should form the basis for the civil society of the future Global Federation. Among other things the goals of these organizations should include:

    • Advocacy for public accountability and democratization of international institutions
    • Global collective bargaining
    • Advocacy for an ecological, fair and free form of trade
    • Advocacy for a just distribution of global water supplies
    • Advocacy for environmental protection, ecological justice and sustainable ressource management
    • Advocacy for the protection and autonomy of indigenous cultures
    • Promotion of decentralized cooperative local communities

    Views on Nationalism

    Nationalism is a double-edged sword, on one hand it can unite and liberate people, on the other it can oppress and divide them. Both on the basis of nationality. I view Culture and Language both as the defining factors of nationality in contrast to ethnicity, race and citizenship alone since Racial "science" is outdated, ethnicity is too exclusive to outsiders and can lead to disastrous events (for an example the Yugoslav wars), Citizenship is a good basis for nationality if it involves integrating into the native culture of the land, since an identity card alone doesn't automatically create a shared identity, which is neccesary for any kind of nation. I am also sceptical about the concept of souvereignity since it is often used by Autocratic leaders as an excuse to justify their human rights violations or by Anti-Environmentalists that want to harm nature. Seperatists are often hypocrites that want their nation to be independent but at the same time they usually deny independence to national identities within their land and also often ally with countries that supress certain independence movements.

    How to achieve World Federalism

    I suggest World Federalism shall be done in a gradual approach, it begins with supporting Pan-Nationalist movements (Pan-Africanism, Pan-Europeanism, Pan-Asianism and Pan-Americanism for an example) that seek to unite with their neighbors, so that there are less and less states to the point where all countries unite, of course there would be some countries that likely wouldn't be willing to unite but they should be left alone for the most part. Also meanwhile a World Parliament should be established within the United Nations Organisation which would be granted more and more power over it. Also the Security Council should be abolished (a veto either for everyone or no one).

    Military Structure

    Organization

    The Military would be divided into three main branches and three assistance branches with their respective sub-brances. The main branches will work together in a corps system with a combined arms doctrine, each corps will have their own Infantry, Artillery, Cavalry, Armor, Auxillary, Special and Logistics units (as far as it makes sense), to ensure that these units can work independently in battle.
    Main branches:

    • Army
      • Border Guard
      • (Ground) Infantry
      • Field Artillery
      • Genarmerie
      • Special Ground Operation Forces
    • Navy
      • Costal Guard
      • Marines (Naval Infantry)
      • Naval Artillery
      • Aircraft carriers
      • Special Naval Operation Forces
    • Aerospace Force
      • Air Force
        • Airborne forces
        • Special Air Operation Forces
      • Space Force
        • Special Space Operation Forces

    Assistance branches:

    • Intelligence services
      • Cyber force
    • Logistics services
      • Medical services
    • Emergency services

    Ranks

    (WIP)

    Finances

    The military would be primarily funded by the state, but also donations and war bonds. They would get a budget of 2% of the countries GDP in most countries, countries in conflict zones might have a budget of 5% or more and after the unification (at least most) of Earth the budget would be lowered to 0.5% to reduce costs of an already massive Military. How the military spends its money would be largely left to itself although there would be strict regulations against corruption and favoritism.

    Government

    Legislature

    Cellular Democracy+Parliamentarianism

    My ideal government structure is a Cellular Democracy in combination with a parallel parliamentary system in which society would be organised bottom-up by a decentralized council/assembly structure to a certain point. At the municipal level and beyond the Councils will need the consent of their respective Parliament to implement a law.

    Election Law

    • All humans are permitted to vote in Global elections every 10 years.
    • All citizens of a specific nation are allowed to vote in National elections every 3-6 six years.
    • All permanent residents of a specific region or muncipality are allowed to vote in that region or muncipality every 1-4 years.
    • All legal inhabitants of a commune or district are allowed to vote in the elections of their respective commune or district every month to every year.
    • The elections for the World Parliament are based on proportional representation, in which each candidate who gained more than a million signatures can create an election list of the people he intends to grant a seat in Parliament to.
    • The elections for the Supreme Council are based on a first-past the post system, in which people can vote on which member of their National Council should represent their country in the Supreme Council.
    • The elections for national and local parliaments are based on their respective constitution, basic law or charter.

    Parliaments

    There should be a muncipal, regional, national and global parliament which would be elected by the people in a representative manner, with the Parliaments needing to approve decisions of the councils and the Parliament having the ability to veto decisions of the executive with a 2/3 majority.

    Councils

    Communal/Factory/Barrack Council=

    The Communal Council is made up of members of a Commune and is responsible for adminstrating it and elects a delegate to a District Council or a Village Consort depending if it is situated in an urban or rual area.

    District Council/Village Consort

    A District Council will administer a district and elect a delegate for a Muncipal Council. While the Village Consort will do the same in a village.

    Municipal Council

    A Municipal Council is responsible for administrating a City and elects a delegate for a provincial/regional gouvernment.

    Regional/Provincial Council

    The Regional Council consists of representatives of Municipal Councils of a region and a regional parliament, it will take care of regional affairs and elect a delegate for the National Council.

    National Council

    The National Council conists of elected regional councillors and elects a delegate for the General Assembly

    Supreme Council

    The Supreme Council serves as the upper Chamber of the World Gouvernment.


    Chancellor

    The Chancellor, who is nominated by the parliament and formally appointed by the Monarch acts as the head of government and therefore also the parliament. He is responsible for leading the day-to-day business in the government.

    Imperative Mandate

    Furthermore all representatives and delegates should be subject to an imperative mandate mandate which means they can be recalled by those that elected them.

    Executive

    Monarchy

    I believe that a ruler who was raised from birth to rule and rules for lifetime or until abdication could be beneficial in certain limits, set by the constitution and serve as an unifing figure for the people.

    A Universal Monarchy

    Due to no historical dynasty having ruled all of earth I propose an elective Monarchy in which the candidate, who is nominated by the Perpetual Diet needs to be approved first by the majority of the General Assembly, and by a majority of the Parliament (if they fail to agree on a candidate within a month they will get their pay cut)

    The powers and responsibilites of the Monarch

    The monarch’s core constitutional powers and duties should include:

    • Appointment of the prime minister and ministers
    • Calling and dissolution of parliament and calling new elections
    • Promulgation of laws
    • Lead coalition negotiations as a neutral arbiter
    • Hold weekly meetings with the government and chancellor
    • Formally appoint officers, high ranking civil servants and judges
    • Act as a general moderator of the state institutions and government
    • Be the nation’s chief diplomat and symbol abroad
    • Be a unifying and neutral symbol at home, a representation of the nation.
    What if the Monarch is rubbish?

    If a Monarch is not able or not willing to fullfill his duties his power can be limited up to the point of a purely ceremonial figure. If the Monarch truly acts in a tyrannical manner, the Constitutional guard has the right to arrest and depose him and replace him with the next in the line of succession.

    The Perpetual Diet

    (WIP)

    Judicative

    The International Court of Justice would act as the World court also and be responsible for interpreting if laws are constitutional or not.

    The Constitutional Guard

    The Constitutional Guard would be a elite military unit seperate from the regular millitary meant to protect the Constitutional Order in a case of emergency.

    The Medial Consortium

    The Media is often called "the Fourth Estate" and for good reason. It holds the important duty of providing information to the population about political affairs and holding the gouvernment accountable, which is why I see it as irresponsible to leave that duty to private Companies that do it for profit, which is why a Consortium of news outlets should be established as the offical fourth pillar of the state and be included in the system of checks and balances.

    Auditory Commission

    (WIP)

    Civil Service Examination Commission (CSEC)

    (WIP)

    Ministry of Examination

    Administers examinations for civil servants and contract personnel

    Ministry of Civil Service

    Oversees the pay, promotion, and retirement of civil servants

    Civil Service Protection Comission

    Is responsible for protecting the rights of civil servants

    Civil Service Training Comission

    Is responsible for training civil servants

    Public Service Pension Fund Supervisory Board

    Policies

    A new form of nobility

    (WIP)

    Housing

    JUST BUILD MORE HOUSES DAMNIT! (And give it to the homeless)

    Taxation

    Global Taxes

    Land Tax

    There should be a progressive tithe tax on the unimproved value of land (minimum 0.1%, maximum 50%). The tax incomes will be used to fund local governments, housing and infrastructure construction, as well as certain welfare programms.

    Wealth Tax

    There should be wealth tax of an annual 1% of total wealth of persons that have more than 1 million Euros, 2% on those with more than 10 million, 5% on those with more than a hundred million, 10% on those with more than a billion and a wealth cap on 10 billion, unless that wealth can be justified to society. This money would be used to fund an Universal Basic Income.

    Financial Transaction Tax

    There should be a global FTT of 0.1% on all financial transactions including banknotes, promissory notes, processing of payments by way of telegraphic transfer, EFTPOS, internet banking or other means, bank drafts and bank cheques, money on term deposit, overdrafts, installment loans, documentary and standby letters of credit, guarantees, performance bonds, securities underwriting commitments and other forms of off balance sheet exposures, safekeeping of documents and other items in safe deposit boxes, currency exchange, sale, distribution or brokerage, with or without advice, unit trusts and similar financial products.

    National Taxes

    Certain forms of taxation are open for national governments to adopt.

    Negative Income Tax
    Sumptuary Tax
    There should be a 2-10% excise tax on products which are harmful to individuals and society at large, such as alcohol, tobacco, drugs, candies, soft drinks, fast foods, coffee, sugar, gambling, and pornography. The Revenue from that tax should be used to fund public healthcare, with a particular focus on addiction prevention.

    For a Fair Trade

    While free trade does generally have a tendency to lower the cost of products due to competeing enterprised vying for consumers, it still often has a downside for foreign workers due to encouraging wage dumping to increase profit, which in turn increases pressure on domestic companies to also lower wages in order to stay competitive. It can also harm the environment by incentivizing importing cheap goods which are produced under suboptimal environmental conditions.

    Which is why I advocate for codifying environmental and labor strandards into every Free Trade Agreement and developing an economic strategy for every nation to become a "Free Trade Nation".

    Gun Rights

    If you want to own a gun you should be able to earn it by military service (unless it's a gun specifically meant for hunting or a certain sport for which there would be specialized trainings and licences.). Other than that similar regulations on guns as in Switzerland should be implemented.

    Philosophy

    What can we know?

    Nothing, probably. Everything has the potential to be an illusion, the best we can do is to use mental constructs (aka. views or lenses) as a means to explain the things we witness based on their usefulness. All knowledge we have comes from this.

    What can we hope for?

    Something, hopefully.

    Personality

    Usually a calm and friendly guy, although sometimes he can provoke others or get triggered because of things he doesn't likes. He's a devout Pagan but doesn't tries to enforce his religion on others but gets very mad when others want to force their religion on him (which is why you often see him ranting about Emperor Theodosius). He often calls Fascists bundles of sticks. And is a secret Estonian Chauvinist.

    Reading List

    WIP

    Have Read

    • A brief History of Mankind by Yuval Noah Harari, Israel
    • 21 Lessons for the 21st Century by Yuval Noah Harari, Israel
    • Homo Deus by Yuval Noah Harari, Israel
    • The Art of War by Sun Tzu, Zhuo Dynasty (China)
    • The Analects by Confucius, Zhuo Dynasty (China)
    • Tao Te Ching by Laozi, Zhuo Dynasty (China)
    • The Green Book by Muammar Gaddafi, Libya
    • Freedom Instead of Capitalism by Sahra Wagenknecht, Germany
    • The Self-Righteous by Sahra Wagenknecht, Germany
    • Utopia for Realists by Rutger Bregman, The Netherlands
    • Humankind: A Hopeful History by Rutger Bregman, The Netherlands
    • Barons, Locals and Bolsheviks in Estonia by Carl Mothander, Sweden
    • 1984 by George Orwell, The United Kingdom
    • Animal Farm by George Orwell, The United Kingdom
    • 2084: The End of The World by Boualem Sansal, Algeria
    • Out of Love for Germany by Hamed Abdel-Samad, Germany
    • Muhammad – A final reckoning by Hamed Abdel-Samad, Germany
    • Islamic Fascism by Hamed Abdel-Samad, Germany
    • Dangerous Tolerance by Samuel Schirmbeck, Germany
    • The Borders of Tolerance by Michael Schmidt-Salomon, Germany
    • I Am Malala by Malala Yousafzai, Pakistan
    • Democracy Kills by Humphrey Hawksley, The United Kingdom
    • Media Control by Noam Chomsky, The United States of America
    • Ami, It's Time to Go! by Oskar Lafontaine, Germany
    • The Kangaroo Chronicles by Mark-Uwe Kling, Germany
    • The Kangaroo Manifest by Mark-Uwe Kling, Germany
    • The Kangaroo Revelations by Mark-Uwe Kling, Germany
    • The Kangaroo Apocrypha by Mark-Uwe Kling, Gemany
    • Quality Land by Mark-Uwe Kling, Germany
    • Quality Land 2 by Mark-Uwe Kling, Germany
    • World With Future by Franz Josef Radermacher and Bert Beyers, Germany
    • The Crash Comes by Max Otte, Germany
    • The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, Kingdom of Prussia
    • The Bourgeois Revolution by Markus Krall, Germany
    • The Quran by Muhammad, Mecca

    Am Reading

    • The Persian Letters by Montesquieu, Kingdom of France
    • Germany Tomorrow by Otto Strasser, Germany
    • Das Kapital by Karl Marx, Kingdom of Prussia
    • The Bible according to Martin Luther, Holy Roman Empire

    Planning to Read

    Relations

    Ideologies

    Friends

    Frenemies

  • Ruralism - I don't mind you but Cities are important, y'know?
  • Pahlavism - While I see you as a net positive you still were too Autocratic and did you really have to support Pakistan back then in 1971? Anyways you're still way more preferable to the current Reactionary Republic and I hope Reza Pahlavi will reclaim his throne someday, Javid Shah!
  • New Democracy - One of Mao's less shit ideas. I like the idea of the bloc of the four classes but this still has too much emphasis on party rule for me.
  • Proto-Omegaism - I think you and my former self would've gotten along really great.
  • Post-Libertarianism - I am kind of a left-wing version of you.
  • Ceremonial Monarchism - Maybe you should idk. do something? However if the Monarch is too incompetent it might be best to adopt this system.
  • Ordoliberalism - Some good ideas but (regulated) Capitalism isn't the solution in the long run.
  • Globalism - Global problems need global solutions! However Economic Globalization is mostly cringe.
  • Zionism - My secret master. You managed to establish a sucessful and long lasting Democracy in the middle east, congrats on that. But maybe you need to put more effort into making peace with the Palestinians. Also I prefer the Isratin solution, although it's pretty unlikely.
  • Technocracy - Giving experts a say in governance seems like a great idea, however you don't realise that every government requires support from its people to exist in the long term and you also don't realize that Populism is a good strategy to gain political power. And letting Unions and vocational Guilds gouvern themselves pretty much ensures decisions are in the hand of experts. R-right?
  • Tribalism - Long live the Tribe, long live the Tribe elder and praise Sun God! On the other hand... Look I respect most of your Traditions but you should learn to use Technology, embrace the State and... Wait, what are you doing?! Don't EAT MEEEEE...
  • Georgism - Good ideas, but not enough.
  • Pagan Theocracy - Look, I get that you want to protect your traditional way of life but Involving religious institutions in gouvernance will make them attractive for Corruption and Manipulation, your tribal variant is a bit more based however, also stop sacrificing Humans, the Gods don't need us to feed them.
  • Chinese Theocracy - The Mandate of Heaven is a very interesting institution, it forged China into an united superpower, but also gave the people the ability to hold their rulers accountable for their mistakes at the cost of years of war and millions of deaths . Get rid of that whole Absolutism thingy though.
  • State Socialism - Sometimes it can be efficent, but often not. Which is why I prefer Cooperatives and Guilds for the means of production.
  • Black Nationalism - BLACK LIVES MATTER! but Black Supremacy and Black Seperatism are cringe. I also don't like Nationalism based on skin color that much tbh.
  • Dengism - As much as I criticize and complain about you, I can't deny that you have done a good job reversing Maos disastrous policies, lifting people out of poverty, expanding infrastructure and turning China into a great Power again. But there is a dream that will never die, always remember that.
  • Hindutva - Glory to India, fuck P*kistan Uhhhh, I mean shoo evil Fascist, shoo! It's not like I like you or anything baka
  • Soulism - Well, I can't say that I hate you or don't understand you and I like your Esoteric variant but you're very, well let's say far fetched and you... you really need to rethink your Drug consumption.
  • Metaxism - You're a quasi-Fascist and a Totalitarian, but I have to admit banning your own party along with all others is a kinda chad move. And I love the way how you protected your homeland against the Invaders. Also your social programms were quite nice too.
  • Gaddafism - Fellow convoluted Democracy enjoyer. You're right about the problems of class rule and party rule. But I don't think Israel killed JFK...
  • Hoxhaism - The least bad Anti-Revisionist, make out of that what you will.
  • Khrushchevism - Not revisionist enough!
  • Collectivism - Now that I think about it, you're not that great.
  • Enemies

  • Urban Accelerationism - Horrible Urbanites.
  • Dahmerism - WHAT. THE. FISH. IS. THIS. DEGENERACY?
  • Sexual Liberationism - You want to normalize ALL Sexual fetishes? Oh, not on my watch...
  • Somethingism - Your struggle will be in vain.
  • IMESFA - This is the future those bundles of sticks want.
  • Horror Theocracy - YOU SHALL PERISH! My worst enemy.
  • Germanophobia - Sprich Deutsch, du Hurensohn.
  • Hyperborea - No, I won't become your slave also Finno-Ugric people are the true Hyperboreans and not some silly Russians .
  • White Guilt - You're just making a clown out of yourself.
  • Dark Pantheonism - Shut up your goofy LARPer ass.
  • IRA - The Army of THEM and a Nazi collaborator!
  • Ultra-Liberalism - You are an enemy of mine.
  • Golden Dawnism - Remember what the Nazis did to your people!
  • Ingsoc - Literally 1984
  • Fascism - You might've been better than the Nazis and the Stalinists but you still were a totalitarian dictatorship that comitted many atrocities in Africa and the Balkans. And you opressed Germans in South Tyrol!
  • Esoteric Fascism - You ruin the reputation of our ancestors ancient religions!
  • National "Socialism" - You ruined my country. At least you improved animal welfare
  • Stalinism - You may have beaten the guy above and industrialized the Soviet Union further but for your atrocities you still deserved to die in piss. Also Destalinisation was BASED. And why did you have to kill Gleb Bokii???
  • Marxism-Leninism - Almost the same as above. Some of you might've been kinda based but I still don't view your version of a "transitional state" as very desirable.
  • Maoism - The literal definition of "the road to hell is paved with good intentions" (Your "New Democracy" has some good points, though.)
  • Pol Potism - We're reaching levels of Tyranny that shouldn't even be possible! You're even worse than IngSoc! yet you greatly reduced carbon emissions and Urbanites are kinda cringe
  • Unitarism - Absolute sc*m! hUrR dUrR i nEeD tO oPrEsS mInOrItIeS fOr "eFfIcIeNcY"
  • Particracy - A system that either tries to divide or control the people, it's no coincidence that the worst tyrannies that are known to Earth used this system.
  • Republicanism - You don't want equality, you just want power for yourself!
  • Jacobinism - You're literaly the same guy as above! DISGUSTING GENOCIDAL TOTALITARIAN DEGENERATE TERRORISTS THAT RUINED FRANCE EVEN MORE THAN IT ALREADY WAS THE DAY ON WHICH ROBBESPIERRE SUFFERED THE SAME FATE HE PUT THOUSANDS OF INNOCENT CIVILIANS UNDER SHOULD BE CELEBRATED!
  • Banana Republicanism - Weak and divided Recucklics Republics being controlled and exploited by large private Corporations and foreign powers? Why am I not suprised...
  • Pinochetism - Aren't you literaly the guy above?
  • Neoliberalism - Thanks for the gender neutral toilets! Macron is somewhat based though...
  • Autocracy - No man rules alone...
  • Absolute Monarchism - Same as above. Some Absolutists were based though.
  • Seperatism - Hypocritical Chauvinist traitor, REEEEEEEEE!!! I have sympathies to some of you though
  • Anti-Japaneseism - This is not very Kawaii.
  • Showa Statism - I mean... the idea of a Pan-Asian Monarchy that provides a counter balance to the Christian west sounds based BUT WHY THE FISH DID YOU HAVE TO KILL SO MANY PEOPLE?
  • Christian Theocracy - OH YOU ARE THE WORST IHATEEMPERORTHEODOSIUSIHATEEMPERORTHEODOSIUSIHATEEMPERORTHEODOSIUSIHATEEMPERORTHEODOSIUSIHATEEMPERORTHEODOSIUSIHATEEMPERORTHEODOSIUSIHATEEMPERORTHEODOSIUSIHATEEMPERORTHEODOSIUSIHATEEMPERORTHEODOSIUSIHATEEMPERORTHEODOSIUSIHATEEMPERORTHEODOSIUSIHATEEMPERORTHEODOSIUSIHATEEMPERORTHEODOSIUSIHATEEMPERORTHEODOSIUSIHATEEMPERORTHEODOSIUSIHATEEMPERORTHEODOSIUSIHATEEMPERORTHEODOSIUSIHATEEMPERORTHEODOSIUSIHATEEMPERORTHEODOSIUSIHATEEMPERORTHEODOSIUSIHATEEMPERORTHEODOSIUSIHATEEMPERORTHEODOSIUSIHATEEMPERORTHEODOSIUSIHATEEMPERORTHEODOSIUS Remove REMOVE REMOVE!!!
  • Clerical Fascism - You're literaly the guy above. Also stop LARPing as a goth! INTO THE CUCK PIT WITH YOU!
  • Crusadism - King Lembitu did nothing wrong...
  • Avaritionism - Your Chaotic Crapitalist Tyranny shall not last long.
  • Anarcho-Capitalism - Negative Rights without positive rights is just tyranny by another name.
  • Agorism - "Voting is violence". Ok, f*ck domestic violence, we're going global.
  • Corporatocracy -
  • 'ate Fiat
    'ate Bailouts
    'ate Trusts
    'ate ☘️☘️☘️Usury☘️☘️☘️
    'ate Intellectual property
    'ate ☘️☘️☘️Big Corp☘️☘️☘️
    'ate Monopolies unless the state does it
    'ate ☘️☘️☘️Multinationals☘️☘️☘️ (not racist just don't like 'em)
    'ate Pinkertons
    luv Socialism
    luv Subsidarity
    luv Trust Busting
    luv Protectionism
    luv Small Business
    simple 'as

    • Anti-Humanism - Face the wall, M*santhrope!
    • Authoritarian Conservatism - Unfortunally most of you have proven to be shitty people. But sending people to Horny jail is based.
    • Jihadism - ISIS? More like waswas.
    • Khomeinism - ژن، ژیان، ئازادی! Your Regime must fall for the Iranian people to be free! I miss Khatami, though.

    Users

    Friends

    • Evolutionary Socialism - You honestly inspired me quite a bit. Your ideology is well thought out and you're really friendly too!
    • Tomassciism - Ayyy, fellow Pagan leftie! We actually have lot in common and you even somewhat influenced me a few years ago, when I first visited the Anarchy Wiki.
    • Saoirseism - Another one! I like you (but I am sceptical about Theocracy).
    • Addycakesball Thought - Somehow this seems like a strawman of my Ideology... But it seems we agree on a lot of things. But why do you hate Penguins? And why are you Absolutist?
    • AshleyHere - Overall based Economics, Anarchism is meh and hating on Orwell for snitching on Stalinists is cringe what do you mean he also put Civil rights activists and Homosexuals on his list?. But you're generally a good person, so you end up here.
    • Novoscarletism - Based Guild Socialism and Progressive Conservatism, but I think you hate Reformists too much.
    • Glencoe - I agree with many of your ideas but I am not interested in abolishing inheiritance. And invading Israel is a really stupid idea.
    • Yoda8soup - He's a guy who I get along well and we share some ideas.
    • Sílas Carrasco Thought - Mmmm, not bad. I agree with a lot of your ideas but you're a tad too Fundamentalist to me.
    • Profectism - Interesting.
    • BasedManism - Not a fan of Egoism but I respect your Esotericism and your vast knowledge on Philosophy.
    • Council Minarchism - I do wonder how you can be a Capitalist and a Socialist at the same time.
    • Celfloskyism - Very based, almost a Chinese version of me!
    • Rocksism - Not bad.
    • JacksonTheBear - I don't mind you.
    • Patrick thought - I think we get along quite well, even though you might be more conservative than I am.
    • Omegaism - A good friend of mine and a fellow Anti-Totalitarian. You're a bit more pro-Western than me, though. Glory to the Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya!
    • Inexistenism - Now that I think of it, you're generally tolerable.
    • Waffenikism - The one based Fascist. I disagree with Isolationism, but at least that would mean Japan under your rule wouldn't engage in wars of conquest like it did in the Second Great War, but you're a Pan-Asianist anyways, so I guess it's fine. And you're maybe slightly more Authoritarian than me but we're both Left-Post-Libertarians.
    • Artelord - Very based overall, there's little I could disagree with.
    • Great British New Left - Overall quite agreeable. Just the fact that you have such a high opinion of Tiberius and Jefbol makes me suspicious.
    • DDD Thought - Based Ideology.
    • Bastionism/Uzarashvilism - I can work with this.
    • Temujin Leeism - Funny and nice Ukrainian guy. Your Ideology is too far out there for me but it goes broadly into the right direction.
    • Blue Nephalemism - Very based overall. You probably don't understand Strasserism, though.
    • Piegionism - Pretty cool, even though I have different opinions on Technology.
    • Hysteria thought - I don't really know what to say.

    Frenemies

  • Ronwelltarianism - I disagree with some of your ideas (Anti-Zionism, children at pride etc.) but I can see that you're a true American Patriot.
  • Syncretic Tridemism - While there's not too much bad stuff in your Ideology you're still a bit too Authoritarian to me and you're a staunch Nationalist also Biji Rojava, Biji Kurdistan! Ey, Reqîp! Her mawe qewmî kurdziman, naysikênê danerî topî zeman.
  • Ethnic Welfarism - A lot of your ideas are nice but Ethnostates are cringe.
  •  Xirlan Thought - Some ideas of yours are quite well, but you're still to Capitalist for me and too Reactionary.
  •  07 - You might be a fellow Technoprimitivist and Socialist but being against Civilisation as a whole is cringe.
  • Ego-Progressivism I dislike Egoism and Ultraprogressivism, but we're both leftists who like Dom Pedro II.
  • File:Neo-ArctoismIcon.png Neo-Arctoism - Your Ideology is overall a mixed bag in my eyes and I think you were better when you still were a leftist. But you still have some based ideas.
  • reginald thought - Kind of stupid, but you seem to have well intentions.
    • Southern Integralism - Decent Economics, but he's a Reactionary Papist and a Paddy puppet.
    • Calculustism - Freedom is important and you're a fellow Polytheist, but Technology is not always good (especially not if we loose what makes us human).
    • Stilluserr's Thought - I remember also being a supporter of Technocracy like you... putting all political power into the hands of an Aristocracy of experts will not magically fix all problems. Also, what would stop the Technocratic council from abolishing the term limits you are envisioning? Still mostly based.
    • Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought - Some based ideas in regards to Gouvernment and Technology, but your economy is horrific (at least you support a stable currency) and Corporatocracy, really? And stop being resentful against Manchus, Mongols and Khmer people.
    • Neo-Majapahitism - An improvement for sure, still Suhartoism ain't that great.
    • National Fracturism - Sigh, I need to try to get along with people. So at least you support a small global gouvernment and care for the people. But I still don't like your tendency towards Seperatism and the Authoritarianism that comes with it.
    • Davidism - Well, you're definetly too reactionary and primitivist for me but ok. On the other hand some of the people you support were and/or are awful please keep paying me shekels, master .
    • Corpotarist Kemalism - Not too bad... however, about Enver Pasha...
    • Brazilian Liberalism - Except for your Woke Neoliberalism you're not too bad. BUT REMEMBER IRAQ!
    • Aurelianism - Well, I can certainly tell that we have disagreements over economics but it's relatively tolerable, since we both distrust Corpos and Copyright (although you consider Corporations to be inherently public entities and I would like to abolish corporate personhood for private companies in its entirety). On culture we're not too far from each other since I consider language to be the basis of culture. We also can both agree that Freedom, Security and Equality before the law are good, but that those things are meaningless at best and destructive at worst when their only purpose is to expand themselves. But still, your Anti-Democracy is horrble. Letting smart people run things sounds good in practise but it can easily lead to corruption, manipulation and opression due to the power dynamics of elitist organizations. The people can be educated to know better what and who to trust. I saw how you quoted Wilson Churchill to justify your opposition of Democracy, but don't forget that he also said: "Democracy is the worst form of goverment, except all the others that have been tried from time to time".
    • Serbian Socialism - Socialism, Decentralization and Pan-Balkanism are decent but Stalin wouldn't have risen to power if it wasn't for Lenin.
    • Miškaism - Similar to the above. About the EU: Sure, it has its flaws but I see it generally as a good way to promote International Cooperation. It should be more united and more economically leftist, though.
    • Neo-Glencoeism - So you decided to follow the path of Tiberius to become a State Liberal Atlanticist and you lost your faith into humanity? Sigh, all I think I can really do now is give you this quote of Mahatma Gandhi: "You must not lose faith in humanity. Humanity is an ocean; if a few drops of the ocean are dirty, the ocean does not become dirty". I hope you can figure out the right path for yourself.
    • Hydra'ism - Kind of a weird and insane Esoteric Fascist version of me. And let's not talk about your 'unorthodox' opinions on AOC.
    • Syntropianism - I like your Trade Unionism, Georgism and Advocacy for Freedom, but you're way too Capitalist (A🤢strian) and Oligarchic (at least you seem to mean it in more of an Meritocratic-Aristocratic sense, but a mixed government is still better) for me (and allowing animated child p*rn is cringe).
    • Owfism - We used to agree on almost everything... BUT YOU HAD TO BECOME A NEOLIBERAL!!! WHY???
    • Corwin Schott Theory - Okay, some of your ideas are good but your ruthless desire to spread American influence at any cost kinda scares me.
    • Niiloism - Funny Finnish guy. But I'm not a big fan of Euroscepticism and Ethnonationalism. We will unite Greater Finland when the time comes, though...
    •  Neo-Afunhumaninterism - Good takes on culture, meassurement and governance, pretty horrid economics.
    •  2x2Master - Decent views on Governance and okay views on culture. But your economic system isn't that great f*cking landleech friend grrr . Sorry for taking so long to add you btw.

    Enemies

  • Casagonism - Despite a few based views you're still a Reactionary Fascist.
  • Casagon Thought - It was a good decision of you to abandon Feudalism. But you remain a fascist enemy of my faith and homeland nontheless. Keep coping
  • New Model Of Cheesenism - You claim to support Pan-Asianism yet you also support Sinophobia, curious.
  • Reactionary-Cheesenism - An Islamic Unitarist Fascist? Oh no...
  • File:Nastyism Icon.png Nastyism - You have some based opinions but you're also a Hitlerite, so...
  • Cantonese Montagnardism - Totalitarian freak! Ugh, I am not someone who usually advocates for violence but you make me think that the Thermidorians didn't go far enough...
  • Implianium - Tyrannical Degeneracy. You're mad!
  • Neo-Kiraism - I am not crazy! I know he stole those coconuts. I knew it was Fat Ian. Coercion after the plane crashed. As if I could ever make such a mistake. Never. Never! I just - I just couldn't prove it. He covered his tracks, he got SakeTanuki to donate to him. You think this is something? You think this is bad? This? This Vaushite? He's done worse. That Tactical N word! Are you telling me that a man just happens to use the hard r like that? No! He orchestrated it! IrishLaddie! He had sex with a horse! And I saved him! And I shouldn't have. I took him into my own debate panel! What was I thinking? He'll never change. He'll never change! Ever since he was 9, always the same! Couldn't stop being homophobic to that one annoying kid! But not our Vaush! Couldn't be precious Vaush! Stealing them coconuts blind! And HE gets to be a leftist? What a sick joke! I should've stopped him when I had the chance! Him? You think the... Coconut Man? What a joke. The CIA has been paying me for years -- years. But you know what? I would've said it hard R for free, because I hate every last one of you Twitter Leftist sacks of shit. I told JK Rowling to shut up. And I would do it again. And I'm glad Keffals ratio'd her. She's a soulless Terf. And I wish I told Biden about this malarkey. And you know what else, Trump? I put you out of that office. Oh, yeah. Your Georgia votes? I rigged the entire election. You were dead and buried, and I had to watch this Capitol Riot try to bring you back. So when you are sitting in your shitty golfing course, and you're suckin' down on my desert island coconuts night after night for the rest of your life, you think of IrishLaddie, you orange fuck!
  • I was only 9 years old. I loved Vaush so much. I had all the merchandise and VODs. I’d pray to Vaush every night before I go to bed, thanking for the life I've been given. “Vaush is love”, I would say, “Vaush is life”. My dad hears me and calls me a liberal. I knew he was just jealous for my devotion to Vaush. I called him a tankie. He slaps me and sends me to go to sleep. I'm crying now and my face hurts. I lay in bed and it's really cold. A warmth is moving towards me. I feel something touch me. it's Vaush! I'm so happy. He whispers in my ear, “Marx was a liberal.” He grabs me with his powerful streamer hands and puts me on my back. I mentally prepare for his interrogation. He asks me, “Are you aware…of Alden's number” The question hurts so much, but I answer it for Vaush. I answer, “I believe so.” he roars a mighty roar, as he screams the N-word. My dad walks in. Vaush looks him straight in the eye, and says, “It's all theory now”. Vaush fucks my dad. Vaush leaves through my window. Vaush is love. Vaush is life.

    • Atronism - Reject Ideological Orthodoxy, embrace Revisionism.
    • Lancebarnett - Und weil der Mensch ein Mensch ist, drum hat er Stiefel im Gesicht nicht gern!
    • Lanceism- Down with Fascism! Up with the people!
    • Aldathism - J*nahism and it's consequences...
    • BERNHEism - There cannot be freedom without justice, or justice without freedom.
    • National Pol Potism - Aj Karmela!
    • Normal Supremacism - Not everythimg that differs from the norm is bad m'kay?
    • Bourgeoisie destroyerism - You claim to be an anti-semite, yet you still worship a Jew on a stick, curious 🧐.
    • Iberian Communism - "Freedom only for the members of the government, only for the members of the Party — though they are quite numerous — is no freedom at all. Freedom is always the freedom of dissenters. The essence of political freedom depends not on the fanatics of 'justice', but rather on all the invigorating, beneficial, and detergent effects of dissenters. If 'freedom' becomes 'privilege', the workings of political freedom are broken." - Rosa Luxemburg
    • Neo-Murba - Similar to the above.
    • One Nation Libertarianism - Another Fundamentalist Neo-Nazi Pole? Where the heck do you people come from? Anyways, a bunch of cringe, maybe Diocletian had a point... your Hero shot and shat himself, get over it.
    • Aryan Monarchishm - I could say that you've slightly improved, however fantazising about killing all Christians and Muslims will just feed their persecution complex and escalate violence. Also you're a Degenerate R*ndian.
    • Ganzism - Okay, leaving your regressive and exclusionary beliefs aside. How am I, even in your eyes, worse than him or him?
    • Comrade Phil thought - Why is it Filipinos that have the most batshit insane opinions aside from Poles ofc?
    • Rayonianism - Stop being a degenerate, I beg you.
    • Bsaheedism - Yes, I do support organizations of the working class, problem?
    • Super-Market-Capitalism - When the Union's inspiration through the worker's blood shall run, there cannot be any power greater beneath the sun!
    • Jefbol Thought - The revolutionary terror scares me :(
    • [Accursed Biological Anarchism - I feel like your Ideologies can be nothing more than Archenemies, even though we're both Internationalist Leftists, kinda.
    •  Meadowsin's Basilisk - I know you're an Armchair person, but your ideology seems pretty schizo to me. Also I have a dislike for violence and Anti-Humanism.
    • Ego-Stalinism - Yiu're a Marquis de Sade fan, a Machiavellian Sralinist, you dislike Altruism and you want to turn the former Soviet Union into a massive Megacorporation while calling yourself socialist? Vile Cretin. At least we both like Gaddafi, somewhat...
    • Constantine Thought - Listen, usually I would've put you in frenemies (Ultracapitalism is bad enough, though), but you're a f*cking Theodosiusite! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

    Navboxes

    Comments

    New Comments

    Ganzism - Zionists still consider Pagans as Demon worshippers due to their religion, plus a lot of Zionists hate Indians despite Indians supporting them, they are not fond of them.

    • Pantheonism - 1. Don't write comments into The Archive
      2. Jews never faced persecution by Hindus, neither are there any records of Hindus facing persecution at the hands of Jews as both communities share a history of being oppressed, discriminated & forced to convert.
      3. JEWITCHES!

    Bsaheed527 - "And why would you even make a self-insert if you're nothing more than an Orthodox Marxian" it's a wip m8 (+ I still haven't read/watched enough to come to a definite conclusion on everything)

    • Pantheonism - Ok. But write into the correct section next time yourself.

    WaffeniK - Oh.Thank you add me, open borderd Mirror. Well, you're right, I'm against imperialism However, I do support Indigenous ultranationalist groups, though.

    • Pantheonism - Maybe I'd critically support them if they weren't such racists. Please write into the correct comment section next time, okay?
      • WaffeniK - I think I wrote that in the wrong place, sorry.Oops, I never discriminated "racially", at least not in my own country. What? Religious discrimination? You can't speak for others, can you?

    DDD Thought- Hey! Your ideology and mine are really similar. Could you add me also? I added you already.

    • - Hello, please help me, they blocked me on the main page of the wiki. Tell them I will remove the Holocaust article. Tell them I didn't read the rules. Please talk to the administrators.🙏🏼🙏🏼
      • Pantheonism - Huh, I am suprised to see my enemy beg me for help. But okay, I'll see what I can do.
      • - Hello, thank you very much, someone blocked me, her name was Athena, please help me. Besides, I have no personal enmity with you and I became an enemy with you because of the Pahlavi issue. But I like some aspects of your ideology. Please help me if you can.🙏🏻
        • Pantheonism - I talked with one of the mods and it seems like what you wrote about that certain event can not be forgiven so easily, sorry m8. Btw. do you have Discord?
      • - I don't have a dispute, but I have a reddit, please tell them that I will accept any condition they say, even I will completely delete my relationship page, I will accept any condition they put.🙏🏻and thank you for helping me.🙏🏻
      • - Just please tell them that I accept all their terms.
      • - Did you talk to them?
        • Pantheonism - They didn't reply. So, would you be willing to tell me the name of your Reddit account?
      • - u/Ok_Procedure7002
      • - Do you think I can get out of being blocked?
      • - Hello, did the managers answer?
        • Pantheonism - Sadly they didn't answer, I think it might take quite a while if you can ever rejoin.

    Relationship requests

  • Hysteria thought - Add me?
  • User:Khomeinism - Hello, dear Tajparast enemy, I have added you, if possible, add me too.
  • Comrade Phil thought- add me?
  • Neo-Murba I added you, me?
  • Corpotarist Kemalism Add me?
  • Brazilian Liberalism - I already added you now you can add me
  • Im not Dead nor Drunk - add me
  • Add me (I've already added you)
    • Pantheonism - Pls. link your self-insert. I've added you anyways.
  • Neo-Glencoeism- add me
  • Bsaheed527 - add me mofo
    • Pantheonism - Don't write into the Archive. But you're added.
  • Super-Market-Capitalism- Add me.
  • Jefbol Thought - add me
  • Artelord - Add me?
  • Great British New Left - Add me?
  • DDD Thought- Can you add me? I'm almost you.
  • Piegionism add me please?
  • Blue Nephalemism - Add me please, your majesty.
  • Niiloism - Add me?
  • Temujin Leeism - Add me, btw: what is your opinion on Unironic FALGSC?
  •  Neo-Afunhumaninterism - Add me?
  •  Meadowsin's Basilisk - me too :3
  •  2x2Master - This is probably long overdue, but add me broski
  • Ego-Stalinism - A D D M E P L S
  • NeoMontagnardism - ADD ME Aploism - add me?

    CHROMATISM - Add me too.

    The Archive

    New Model Of Cheesenism - add me

    Casagonism - Add me, i added you in my relations.

      • Pantheonism - I added you. To answer your question, I am a Socialist because I seek to end Capitalist exploitation and I support worker's rights, I also have elements of other alternative Economic systems like Corporatism and Distributism in my Ideology since I tolerate small buisnesses, family buisnesses and in some cases the economy must be coordinated to achieve a certain goal. As for Liberalism, I usually don't call myself one but I also don't mind beign called one, I usually associate the term Liberalism with freedoms for the averange citizens and civil rights (which I think is good) while others rather think of it as Capitalist (which I think is bad)
    • Applethesky2021 - Add me?
    • Tomassciism - Curious about your opinion on me. I already added you so no worries about that.
    • Reactionary-Cheesenism- add me
      • Pantheonism - Oops, I forgot about you, but now I added you. Can you add me back?

    File:Nastyism Icon.png Nastyism-I added you now can you add me?

    - Add me?
    

     Xirlan Thought - Add me.

    Novoscarletism - pls add me

    Glencoe- add me

    • Pantheonism - Add me back, pls.
    • Yoda8soup - Add me?
    • BasedManism - add me?
    • Sílas Carrasco Thought - My ideas changed, can you update your relationships?
    • BasedManism - i added more about you on my relations (as much as i could add, as i dont really get politics all that much), sorry for not doing it earlier, i was busy at the time so i just speedran the relations thing, sorry if i offended you or anything
    • Neo-Kiraism - add me
    • New Model Of Cheesenism- wait i just realized it why i am sinophobia? do you understand what happend in indonesia do you know since suharto fell this chinese people is steal the indonesia people money and a very big corruptor who can escaped justice and bribe the useless corupt indonesia *national* police.in the end i am a islamic relegious man i dont hate all chinese i like islamic sino and permanent living chinese. also is normal in indonesia culture to hated chinese because they see as corrupt bastard and foreigner.just search 1998 crisis and masa bersiap in google.my father is like me have same view on chinese people he also have help some indochinese and islamic sino on crisis of 1998 i just want to kick all foreign chinese is sad that my goverment import upon thousand of chinese worker went indonesia have largest population is southeast asia and fourth in the world.i want united all malaya speaking nation and southeast to fight the real enemy of asia the western world
      • Pantheonism - Why don't just punish those that commit crimes and exploit the people instead of all Chinese people.
        • New Model Of Cheesenism - yes that i will do but i dont want to kick all chinese like i said above permanent living chinese,islamist chinese and indo-chinese will not get any harm they still hve right.i want only to kick all Chinese worker immigrant.
    • Atronism - Hullo, coulda add me?
    • JacksonTheBear - Add me? Also, sorry for taking so long to add you

    File:CasagonThought.png CasagonThought - Add me pls (Use google trad to translate french)

    • Pantheonism - Didn't I already add you?+Your page doesn't exist anymore.
    • Lancebarnett - add me
    • A dude on this place - Can you add me? I have added you.
      • Pantheonism - Where's your page?
        • A dude on this place - https://polcompballanarchy.miraheze.org/wiki/Patrick_thought
          • Pantheonism - Thanks.
            • A dude on this place - Do you have a discord account because it will be easier to answer your question that way?
              • A dude on this place - You could probably say that Anarchy, not Democracy, is the closest match to Hell, but you could always argue that Anarchy is the most constant form of Democracy. That though would always depend on what you mean by Democracy as Democracy can mean many different things to different people. But here St. John is referring to Democratic presuppositions. Or at least that is how I interpret the quote. Does that make sense or do we need to talk in discord?
                • Pantheonism - I don't have Discord. Anyways Democracy, as I understand it means the rule of the people (what exactly is considered "the people" changed over time) either directly or indirectly.

    The berlin wall is not a wall of shame, it's a wall of honor.

    DuyQuangNguyenPham - Hey man, I have added you at long last.

    • Pantheonism - Thank you! But if I may ask, what took you so long?
      • DuyQuangNguyenPham - Sorry, I had to study so I couldn't really add you. That and re-organizing my page during that time.
        • Pantheonism - Ah, that's reasonable, no need to apologize for that.

    Normal_SupremacismCan you add me?

    Stilluserr's Thought - Can you add me

    Calculustism - Add?

    Hydra'ism - Please add me Pantheon :).

    • Pantheonism - As you wish, Hydra. But add me back, if that's no problem.

    = Neo-Majapahitism - add me

    Bourgeoisie destroyerism You wanna add me I’ll add you

    • Hey, thanks for changing your relation to me!

    Aryan Monarchishm - Add me please?

    Meridionalism -add me

    Schumacherianism (////) - Hello, old friend. Been a while since we've talked. Would you kindly add me, please?

    Pantheonism - Since the relationships section is not meant for discussions I'll move the discussions from there down here and archivise the whole thing afterwards.

    Addycakesball Thought: Reddit was brainwashing me into hating them...
    • Pantheonism - lul wut XD. Anyways could you add me to your relations?
      • Addycakesball Thought: Yes, plus I don't hate penguins anymore. XD
    • - Losing our humanity is a good thing. So many people have died in the name of humanity or some sub-category of it. And for what? Us to do the same again? To kill another? I see "Humanity" as flawed. If we become more than human, we will lose the primal urges that are what make us violent and cruel. We will become not just more than human, but better than human.
      • - You claim the solution to humans being treated inhumanely is to make them not human anymore? All the freedoms humans have have their root in their freedom to be a human and by extension to be treated as such. People have died for humanity so that their children might live another day. Contrary to Marqui de Sade I reject the idea that we resort to cruelty and violence solely because its "our nature", it's true that there were times where violence was the norm but today most humans live in peace. As Mahatma Gandhi said: "You must not lose faith in humanity. Humanity is an ocean; if a few drops of the ocean are dirty, the ocean does not become dirty."
    • Cantonese Montagnardism: Lmao cope and seethe monarkiddie, also I may be turning egoist and I'm not too deeply into the guillotine stuff lol. think of it as a Gorbachev life-stage
      • Pantheonism - You'll fall victim to the Great Replacement as well? WHEN DOES THE TERROR END?
    • Bourgeoisie destroyerism You’re joking right?
      • - How so?
        • There is no way you can think that modern khazar Judaism is the same as the ancient Israelite religion that Christianity came from lol
          • - Genetic studies on Jews have found no substantive evidence of a Khazar origin among Ashkenazi Jews. Doron Behar and other geneticists have concluded that such a link is unlikely, noting that it is difficult to test the Khazar hypothesis using genetics because there is lack of clear modern descendants of the Khazars that could provide a clear test of the contribution to Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry, but found no genetic markers in Ashkenazi Jews that would link them to peoples of the Caucasus/Khazar area. This and other studies have instead found evidence that the Ashkenazi have mixed Near Eastern and Southern European/Mediterranean origins.
            • Lol literally just compare modern fake satanic Judaism to the religion of the ancient Israelites that Christianity came form they are completely different
              • - Yes they are different, modern jews are much more European than the old Isrealites. But in terms of religion they are the same.
    • Ganzism - You got some nerves to call me "unrealistic", btw you got a point, you happen to be less worse than them, but you are still a LARPagan who simps for the Zionists, that hate Pagans A LOT. And do not get me started on what Judaism thinks about Pagans.
      • - Zionists hate Pagans a lot less than their Neighbors, and they are allies with the strongest Pagan country in the world (India) the only people I've met that hate Pagans were either Christians, Muslims or Atheists. You know what? I'll drop the "unrealistic" part, I was just looking for an adjective to provoke you (also Pol Pot was a thing after all).
    • File:TemujinLeeIcon.png Temujin Leeism - Add me, mista Post-Libertarian Universal Monarcho-MarkSoc with German Pagan Characteristics (Basically a based File:Ismism icon.png Ismist).
    Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

    Recent changes

  • TheOmni • 19 minutes ago
  • Chcknwngs • 21 minutes ago
  • Kuztral • 36 minutes ago
  • Stroop • 53 minutes ago
  • Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.