You are currently viewing the self insert of liberal to libertarian ideology that is also seeking for a democratic regime, Moderate Progressivism, Economic Liberalism and globalism while still being against a world federation.
As a classical liberal, I wholeheartedly support a liberal democracy. The democratic system has given us constitutional rights and civil rights that protect citizens from government overreach and promote social justice. Liberal democracy has also played a critical role in advancing equality for all genders and races, creating a more inclusive and fair society. In addition, liberal democracies typically promote freedom of speech, religion, and assembly, allowing for diverse opinions and ideas to be heard and considered. Overall, I believe that a liberal democracy is the best way to ensure that the government serves the interests of the people and protects individual liberties.
thoughts on monarchy
I am personally opposed to most monarchies and believe that democratic governance is preferable. In my view, the only tolerable forms of monarchy are those that serve a purely ceremonial function or those that are strictly constrained by a constitution. I feel that hereditary monarchies, where power is passed down through family lines, are an outdated and undemocratic concept that are at odds with the values of equality and meritocracy. In contrast, ceremonial monarchies can provide a sense of national identity and tradition without interfering with the functioning of the democratic process. Constitutional monarchies, which limit the monarch's role to symbolic and ceremonial duties, can also work in conjunction with democratic governance. Ultimately, I believe that democraties are the most legitimate and effective forms of government, but I am open to the possibility of some forms of constitutional monarchy under specific circumstances.
Parliamentary or Presidential
From my perspective, a parliamentary system is the superior form of government compared to a presidential system. While both systems can have their advantages, a parliamentary system is more conducive to protecting individual freedoms and preventing the centralization of power. In a presidential system, the head of state and head of government are often the same person, giving them significant authority and control over the government. This level of centralization can create opportunities for corruption and abuse of power, which can threaten civil liberties. In contrast, a parliamentary system separates the head of state and head of government, limiting the power of the executive branch and creating a more balanced distribution of power across the different branches of government. The parliamentary system also allows for the possibility of coalition governments, which can promote compromise and cooperation among different political parties. Overall, I believe that a parliamentary system is a more democratic and stable form of government that is better suited for protecting individual liberties and ensuring a fair and just society.
In my opinion, the number of political parties should not be limited by anyone, and a limited party system is not an effective way to ensure popular representation. Political parties are a crucial element of a democratic system, allowing for a diversity of opinions and ideas to be represented and debated. Limiting the number of parties can lead to a concentration of power among a few dominant groups and stifle political competition. This, in turn, can lead to a lack of representation for certain communities and prevent the full expression of political views. Moreover, a diverse range of political parties can better reflect the views and needs of citizens, providing a more representative and responsive government. Ultimately, I believe that a vibrant and competitive party system is essential for a healthy democracy and should not be artificially constrained by anyone.
As a classical Liberal, I strongly believe that the role of government should be limited, and individuals should have the freedom to make their own choices. I am opposed to mass government surveillance as it can be invasive and undermine personal privacy. However, I believe that surveillance in public places can be useful in preventing criminal activity and enhancing public safety. Centralization is also a concern for me, as it can lead to an overly powerful and potentially authoritarian government. Nevertheless, I recognize that some government programs, such as a moderate healthcare system, can have benefits if implemented carefully and without excessive taxation. Access to quality healthcare is essential for a healthy and prosperous society. In summary, as a classical liberal, I believe that limited government, individual freedom, and personal responsibility should be at the core of any political system.
As a secularist, I firmly believe that religion is a private matter that should not be involved in government affairs. In my view, there should be no place for religious authorities or ministers of religion within the government. The state should remain neutral in matters of religion, providing equal treatment to people of all faiths and none. I believe that this approach is necessary to ensure that the government represents and serves all citizens fairly, regardless of their religious beliefs. Furthermore, I believe that religious buildings should be taxed at the same rate as other buildings, as they are not performing a public function that would justify special treatment. This can help to ensure that the tax burden is distributed fairly and that no one group receives preferential treatment. Ultimately, I believe that a secular government is the best way to guarantee individual freedom of religion and ensure that government serves the interests of all citizens equally.
I believe that a constitution is a critical document that should be put in place to limit the power of the government and ensure civil liberties. A constitution can establish the basic framework of government, set forth the rights and freedoms of citizens, and define the limits of government power. It can provide a foundation for a fair and just society that protects individual freedoms, promotes equality, and safeguards against the abuse of power. Without a constitution, there is a risk that governments may act arbitrarily and disregard the rights of citizens. Moreover, a constitution can provide a stable and predictable framework for government, enabling citizens to have confidence in their government and trust that their rights will be protected. Therefore, I believe that a constitution should be a fundamental component of any democratic society, serving as a bulwark against tyranny and an affirmation of individual rights and freedoms.
In my view, it is essential to grant states, provinces, and regions a certain level of autonomy to avoid centralization of power. The centralization of power can lead to a concentration of decision-making authority in the hands of a few, which can undermine democratic governance and accountability. By contrast, giving states, provinces, and regions the power to make their own decisions on issues that affect their citizens can promote local decision-making and provide a check on the power of the central government. It can also allow for greater diversity in policies and practices across different regions, enabling experimentation with new ideas and approaches. Additionally, decentralization can encourage citizen participation and engagement in decision-making, leading to more responsive and accountable governance. Therefore, I believe that a healthy balance between centralization and decentralization is necessary for a functional and democratic government, and that states, provinces, and regions should have a certain degree of autonomy to ensure that power is distributed fairly and effectively.
I strongly believe that whistleblowers play a crucial role in exposing corruption and wrongdoing within governments and other organizations. Whistleblowers often take great personal and professional risks to bring important information to light, and they should not face persecution or retaliation for their actions. In my view, whistleblowers should be treated like normal citizens and afforded the same legal protections as anyone else. This means that they should be shielded from harassment or discrimination, and their actions should not be criminalized or punished in any way. Instead, they should be encouraged and supported in their efforts to expose wrongdoing and bring about positive change. By protecting whistleblowers, we can help to ensure that our governments and organizations operate in a transparent and accountable manner, and that the public interest is safeguarded. Therefore, I believe that strong protections for whistleblowers are essential for maintaining a healthy and democratic society.
I believe that immigration can be a tremendous benefit to any society. It can bring new perspectives, talents, and ideas, enriching the cultural fabric of a nation and strengthening its economy. Immigrants can contribute to the growth of businesses, the creation of jobs, and the generation of new wealth, benefiting both themselves and the broader community. However, I also believe that immigration should be conducted in a legal and controlled manner, with proper screening and vetting processes in place to ensure the safety and security of all citizens. Illegal immigration can pose serious risks, both in terms of national security and public safety, and it can also create challenges in terms of social integration and cultural assimilation. Therefore, I believe that illegal immigration should not be legalized, but that there should be a clear and transparent path to legal immigration for those who wish to come to our country and contribute to our society. By embracing immigration and promoting legal and controlled migration, we can create a more diverse, dynamic, and prosperous society for all.
As an individual, I find myself leaning towards subscribing to Hayek's fiscal policies and, at times, the Austrian school of economics as advocated by Mises. However, I do not entirely agree with the Austrian school of thought as I believe in the need for some regulations in the economy. While I am against extensive government intervention in the market, I recognize the importance of having some regulations in place to prevent unfair monopolies and the emergence of large corporations with disproportionate power. As such, I believe that a balance between free market principles and reasonable regulations is necessary for a thriving and equitable economy.
In my opinion, the idea of free healthcare is not a bad one, especially if it can effectively compete with private healthcare in the market and is not overly taxing on the economy. Access to quality healthcare is a fundamental right, and providing it free of charge would go a long way towards ensuring that everyone has access to the care they need regardless of their financial status. While some argue that free healthcare could be too costly for the government, there are examples of countries where it has been implemented successfully without significantly impacting their economies. Moreover, the competition created by free healthcare in the market could lead to improvements in the quality of care and efficiency in the healthcare system overall. Therefore, I believe that free healthcare, when implemented properly, can be a beneficial policy for the society.
The Free Market
As an individual, I strongly support a free market economy where the government's role is limited to ensuring competition and preventing market failures. However, I also believe that a sustainable working environment is necessary to ensure the welfare of both workers and employers. This means that there should be fair labor laws that protect workers' rights while also promoting job creation and economic growth as I could slightly be in favor of employers. I strongly oppose dirigisme and state-owned industries as I believe that they stifle competition and hinder economic growth. Instead, I believe that private enterprise should be encouraged to drive innovation and create wealth, while government intervention should be limited to ensuring a level playing field and promoting the welfare of the society as a whole. In summary, I support a free market economy with minimal government intervention, fair labor laws, and a sustainable working environment for all.
Although I am against excessive taxation I have some tolerable taxes which can stay:
- Land value tax - A land value tax to encourages the efficient use of land, reduces speculation, and generates revenue for public goods and services.
- Value added tax - A value-added tax to spreads the tax burden across all levels of production and consumption, generates revenue for public goods and services, and can be adjusted to promote economic growth
- Carbon tax - A carbon tax to provides a financial incentive for individuals and companies to reduce their carbon footprint, encourages innovation in clean energy technologies, and generates revenue that can be used to fund environmental projects and mitigate climate change impacts.
- Corporate tax (only for bigger corporations and monopolies) - A corporate to big monopolies to ensures fairness between small businesses and large corporations by requiring them to contribute a proportionate share of their profits to public goods and services, funding government programs.
Thoughts on Big Corporations
As an individual, I strongly dislike huge monopolies and big corporations as I believe they stifle competition and hinder economic growth. In my view, smaller businesses should be privileged, as they often contribute more to the economy, provide more job opportunities, and are more likely to innovate and adapt to changing market conditions. Additionally, smaller businesses often have closer ties to their communities, making them more responsive to local needs and concerns. I believe that government policies should be geared towards promoting a level playing field for small businesses to thrive and grow, and that measures should be taken to prevent the undue concentration of economic power in the hands of a few large corporations. Overall, I strongly believe in the importance of supporting small businesses and fostering a diverse and dynamic economy that benefits everyone.
In my opinion, unions can exist and can be beneficial for workers as they can provide a collective voice and bargaining power to negotiate better working conditions and wages. However, I strongly believe that joining a union should be a voluntary choice, and workers should not be forced to join or pay union dues as a condition of employment. Forced unionization can lead to a lack of accountability and transparency, as well as hinder individual freedoms and undermine the principles of a free market. Instead, unions should focus on providing value to their members and convincing them of the benefits of joining voluntarily, rather than relying on government mandates or coercion. In summary, I support the idea of unions, but only if membership is voluntary and based on individual choice.
privatization and thoughts on nationalization
In my view, the economy should never be nationalized as it stifles competition, leads to inefficiencies and waste, and undermines individual freedoms and property rights. Nationalization of industries can also result in a lack of innovation and poor performance due to the lack of market incentives and competition. Moreover, state-owned enterprises can be subject to political interference and mismanagement, which can lead to corruption, waste, and poor service delivery. Instead, I believe in the importance of Privatization, where a private enterprise is encouraged to drive innovation, create wealth, and provide goods and services that meet the needs of consumers. This ensures that the economy remains dynamic and responsive to changing market conditions, and that individual freedoms and property rights are respected and protected.
I believe that agriculture could be an important industry, especially with the use of modern machines and technology. The adoption of modern farming practices can improve yields, reduce waste, and increase efficiency, allowing farmers to produce more with less labor and resources. This can help to ensure food security, reduce prices, and create job opportunities in rural areas. Furthermore, modern agriculture can also contribute to sustainable development by promoting the use of renewable energy, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and protecting natural resources such as soil and water. Overall, I believe that agriculture has the potential to play a significant role in driving economic growth and promoting sustainable development, provided that modern practices and technologies are embraced and adopted by farmers and policymakers alike.
I strongly believe that small businesses should be the backbone of the economy. Small businesses are often more nimble and innovative than their larger counterparts, and are better positioned to respond quickly to changing market conditions. They also tend to have closer ties to their communities, making them more responsive to local needs and concerns. Additionally, small businesses create jobs and opportunities for local residents, which can help to reduce unemployment and boost economic growth. By promoting the growth and success of small businesses, we can create a more diverse and resilient economy that benefits everyone. Therefore, policies should be geared towards supporting small businesses, including reducing regulatory burdens, providing access to financing, and promoting entrepreneurship and innovation.
In my view, wealth should not be regulated as individuals should be free to earn and accumulate wealth through their own efforts and ingenuity. However, I strongly believe that wealth should not gain undue advantages in the government, and that the government should act to ensure a level playing field for all individuals and businesses, regardless of their wealth or influence. This means preventing the concentration of economic power in the hands of a few, and ensuring that everyone has an equal opportunity to succeed and thrive. The government should also ensure that the tax system is fair and progressive, and that everyone pays their fair share to support public goods and services. Overall, while wealth should not be regulated, it is important for the government to take steps to prevent the undue influence of wealth on government policies and decision-making.
Anti Monopoly laws
I strongly believe that laws should be in place to prevent monopolies and promote healthy competition in the marketplace. Monopolies can stifle innovation, limit consumer choice, and lead to higher prices and reduced quality of goods and services. Therefore, it is important for the government to take action to prevent the concentration of economic power in the hands of a few dominant firms. This can be achieved through the enforcement of antitrust laws, which prohibit anti-competitive behavior such as price-fixing, exclusive dealing, and predatory pricing. In addition, the government should also promote transparency and openness in the marketplace, ensuring that all firms have access to essential resources and information. By preventing monopolies and promoting competition, we can ensure a vibrant and dynamic economy that benefits everyone.
In my view, land is a finite resource that should be freely accessible to all members of society. Therefore, I believe that land should be held in common and not subject to private ownership. However, if land is to be owned, it should be subject to a land value tax, which is based on the unimproved value of the land. This tax can be an effective tool for promoting efficient land use and preventing the concentration of land ownership in the hands of a few wealthy individuals or corporations. By discouraging land speculation and encouraging the productive use of land, a land value tax can help to create a more equitable and sustainable economy. Additionally, the revenue generated from a land value tax can be used to fund public goods and services, such as infrastructure and education, which benefit everyone in society.
I support the concept of wage labor and reject the labor theory of value, which argues that the value of a product is solely determined by the amount of labor required to produce it. Instead, I believe that the value of a product is determined by a complex set of factors, including supply and demand, technological advancements, and market competition. However, I also believe that the minimum wage should be adjusted with inflation every year to ensure that workers receive fair compensation for their labor. A living wage can help to reduce poverty, increase consumer demand, and stimulate economic growth. Additionally, a fair wage can also promote social justice and reduce inequality, creating a more equitable and sustainable society. By supporting wage labor and advocating for a living wage, we can create a more prosperous and just economy that benefits everyone.
I firmly support the principles of free trade and economic globalism, which have been proven to promote economic growth and international cooperation throughout history. The post-World War II period saw the establishment of institutions such as the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), and later, the World Trade Organization (WTO), which facilitated the expansion of international trade and investment. By reducing trade barriers and increasing economic integration, these institutions have contributed to the growth of the global economy and helped to lift millions of people out of poverty. In contrast, protectionism and autarky have been shown to be ineffective and harmful, leading to reduced economic growth, higher prices, and decreased consumer choice. However, I do believe that certain tariffs can be justified in cases where countries engage in human rights violations or environmental destruction. Additionally, I support most trade alliances, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement, which have been successful in promoting economic growth and cooperation among member countries. Overall, I believe that free trade and economic globalism are essential for promoting prosperity, reducing poverty, and creating a more peaceful and interconnected world.
I firmly believe in the power of free markets and competition to drive innovation and growth. However, I also recognize the potential benefits of worker cooperatives as an alternative business model. In a worker cooperative, employees collectively own and manage the company, sharing in its profits and decision-making processes. This model can provide workers with greater autonomy and control over their working conditions, which can lead to increased job satisfaction and productivity. Moreover, worker cooperatives can be just as competitive as more traditional business models Which is great for competition. Ultimately, the choice of whether to adopt a worker cooperative model or not should be left up to individual workplaces and their employers, rather than being forced upon them by external actors. For example, an employer could choose to institute a system of democratic elections to choose their successor after they resign, as a means of empowering their workers and promoting workplace democracy.
As a person, I believe that all individuals deserve the same fundamental rights and freedoms, regardless of their sexual orientation. We should embrace diversity in all its forms. But I still think that stuff like pride month are a bit too much and should be reduced to one day or so and that homosexuality is something to be de-politicized.
Transgenders and non-binaries
While I understand and support the importance of transgender rights and equality, I must admit that I sometimes find non-binary and neo-gender identities a bit perplexing. As someone who grew up with a binary understanding of gender, the concept of non-binary or neo-gender identities can be challenging to comprehend, especially as a french speaker where most adjectives are gendered.I support transgender rights and I'm not transphobic.
I firmly believe in the principle of individual freedom and autonomy. This includes the right of women to exercise their own choices and to have the same opportunities and legal protections as men. Women should be free to pursue their own goals, whether it be in the workplace, in politics, or in their personal lives. The government should not interfere in women's decisions about their own bodies, nor should it impose any restrictions on their rights to access healthcare or other necessary services. I support women's rights because I believe that every individual, regardless of gender, should be free to do whatever they want to do, as long as they are not harming others or infringing on their rights. Although I believe that Women's rights is something to be de-politicized.
I am a strong advocate for technology and automation, as I believe that these innovations have the potential to greatly improve our lives and make the world a better place. However, I do acknowledge that there are concerns about the impact of these advancements on employment and the workforce. As such, I support the responsible implementation of technology and automation, with careful consideration given to the potential consequences on people's jobs and livelihoods. I do not believe that technology is inherently bad, but I do oppose those who blindly support it without consideration for the potential negative effects. It is important to strike a balance between technological progress and social responsibility, in order to ensure that everyone can benefit from the advantages that technology has to offer.
I am a firm advocate of space colonization. While some may see it as a far-off dream, I believe that it is a necessity if we are to ensure the survival and continued prosperity of the human race. The fact is that resources on Earth are finite, and as our population continues to grow, we will need to find new sources of raw materials, energy, and other essential resources. Space colonization offers us the opportunity to do just that, while also providing the potential for new scientific discoveries and technological advancements. By investing in space exploration and colonization, we can ensure that our civilization continues to thrive for generations to come.
In my personal opinion, I do not think that artificial intelligence is as big of a deal as some people make it out to be. While AI certainly has the potential to bring about significant changes in various aspects of our lives, including the workforce and economy, I believe that much of the hype around AI is overblown. While there are certainly some legitimate concerns regarding the ethical implications of AI, I do not think that we need to fear the technology itself. Instead, I believe that we should focus on understanding how AI works and how it can be used to benefit society. By taking a rational and level-headed approach, we can ensure that AI is developed and implemented in a responsible and ethical manner.
As a piratist who values the free exchange of information and ideas, I believe that copyright laws are often too strict and used in a way that amounts to censorship. While copyright laws do serve an important purpose in protecting the intellectual property of creators and incentivizing innovation, I think that they are often applied in a heavy-handed manner that stifles creativity and restricts access to information. In particular, I believe that copyright laws have been used to unfairly restrict the use of content for educational and research purposes, and to suppress criticism and dissent. As such, I think that copyright laws should be reformed to strike a better balance between protecting the rights of creators and promoting the free flow of information. This could involve measures such as shorter copyright terms, greater flexibility in fair use and other exceptions, and more effective enforcement mechanisms that do not infringe on individual rights and freedoms.
As someone who believes in individual freedom and bodily autonomy, I am a strong supporter of women's right to choose whether or not to have an abortion. I believe that it is not the place of the government or any other external authority to dictate what a woman can or cannot do with her own body, and that each woman should have the right to make decisions about her reproductive health based on her own values and circumstances. Women's health and well-being are paramount, and access to safe and legal abortion services is a critical component of comprehensive healthcare. I also believe that the decision to have an abortion is deeply personal and should not be subject to judgment or interference from others. Ultimately, I support a woman's right to make the best decision for herself, without fear of legal or social consequences.
Freedom of Speech
As a firm believer in the principle of freedom of speech, I believe that everyone has the right to express their opinions and ideas, even if they are unpopular or controversial. While I may not always agree with the viewpoints of certain groups, such as social justice warriors (SJWs) or the alt-right movements, I would prefer to use ostracism rather than government censorship as a means of dealing with their ideas. In other words, I believe that individuals and communities have the right to criticize, challenge, and condemn speech they find objectionable, and that this can be an effective way to discourage harmful or offensive ideas without resorting to government censorship. This approach allows for the free exchange of ideas and fosters a culture of intellectual debate and critical thinking. Ultimately, I believe that the best way to combat hate and bigotry is through open dialogue and engagement, rather than through heavy-handed censorship or suppression of dissenting views.
As someone who believes in individual freedom and personal autonomy, I support the right of adults to make their own decisions regarding their sexuality and sexual preferences. This includes the freedom to watch pornography and to engage in consensual sexual activities, including prostitution. I believe that the criminalization of prostitution and the regulation of pornography are misguided and counterproductive, and that they only serve to perpetuate stigma and discrimination against sex workers and consumers of pornography. By legalizing and regulating prostitution, we can provide sex workers with greater protection, safety, and legal recourse, while also reducing the risk of exploitation and trafficking. Similarly, by decriminalizing the possession and distribution of pornography, we can promote sexual health and education, while also protecting the rights of individuals to consume adult material without fear of legal consequences. Ultimately, I believe that individuals should be free to make their own decisions about their bodies and their sexual lives, without fear of judgment or persecution.
I support the legalization of euthanasia and the right to die. I believe that each person has the right to make decisions about their own life, including the decision to end their own suffering and to die with dignity. The ability to control one's own end-of-life care is an essential aspect of individual autonomy, and it is important that individuals have the legal right to make such decisions without fear of legal or social repercussions.Furthermore, I believe that the option of euthanasia can provide a compassionate and humane alternative to prolonged suffering and painful medical treatments, particularly in cases of terminal illness or irreversible conditions. By legalizing euthanasia, we can provide individuals with the choice to end their lives in a peaceful and dignified manner, surrounded by loved ones and in accordance with their own values and beliefs.Ultimately, I believe that the right to die is a fundamental aspect of individual freedom and personal autonomy, and that it is necessary to ensure that individuals have control over their own lives and their own bodies, even at the end of life.
I support the right of law-abiding citizens to own guns for self-defense, hunting, and recreational purposes. I believe that responsible gun ownership can promote safety and security, and that individuals have a right to protect themselves and their loved ones from harm. However, I also believe that reasonable restrictions and regulations on gun ownership are necessary to prevent dangerous individuals from obtaining firearms.One possible approach to this issue is to allow individuals without highly criminal backgrounds to own guns, but to impose strict penalties for those who use them to commit crimes. In this way, individuals can enjoy the benefits of gun ownership while also being held accountable for their actions. If a person is found to have used their gun in the commission of a crime, their gun could be confiscated and they could face serious legal consequences.Overall, I believe that the right to own guns is an important aspect of individual freedom and personal safety, but that this right must be balanced with the need for public safety and the prevention of gun violence. By implementing sensible gun regulations and enforcing strict penalties for gun-related crimes, we can promote responsible gun ownership while also protecting our communities from harm.
News and media
I do not typically rely on mainstream news sources for information. However, I recognize that many people do turn to these sources for news and that they can provide a valuable service in informing the public about important issues. That being said, I do believe that the mainstream media can be biased and that this can limit the public's ability to make informed decisions. I think that it is important for news sources to provide balanced and accurate reporting, free from political or corporate influence, in order to ensure that the public has access to a diverse range of viewpoints and perspectives. Despite these concerns, I do not believe that mainstream news should be abolished or censored. Rather, I think that we should strive for greater transparency and accountability in the media, and work to promote alternative sources of news and information that can provide a more diverse and independent perspective. By supporting a free and open marketplace of ideas, we can foster a culture of intellectual curiosity and critical thinking, and promote a more informed and engaged citizenry.
I believe that the current education system is in need of reform. Our current system is outdated and often fails to adequately prepare students for the challenges of the modern world. I believe that we need to rethink our approach to education and work to create a system that is more flexible, personalized, and responsive to the needs of individual students.In addition, I believe that while private schools should be free to set their own curricula and standards, public schools should be secular and focused on providing a well-rounded education that prepares students for a diverse and pluralistic society. Public schools should be places of inclusion, where students of all backgrounds can come together to learn and grow, free from the influence of any particular religious or political ideology.Finally, I believe that there should be competition between private and public schools, as this can foster innovation and improve the quality of education for all students. However, I also believe that public schools should be adequately funded and supported to ensure that all students have access to high-quality education, regardless of their background or socioeconomic status. By working together to create a more responsive, inclusive, and competitive education system, we can ensure that all students have the opportunity to reach their full potential and contribute to a better future for us all.
I believe that the so-called "culture war" is largely a manufactured conflict that is being exploited by various groups for political gain. Alt-rights, right-populists, neo-Marxists, and SJWs are all guilty of using this narrative to advance their own agendas and to create division within society.
I believe that indigenous people should have the right to become citizens of the countries in which they reside. For too long, indigenous communities have been marginalized and excluded from the political and economic life of their nations, often as a result of historical injustices and systemic discrimination. I believe that it is our moral and ethical duty to recognize the unique contributions of indigenous people and to work to redress the harm that has been done to them. By granting indigenous people the right to citizenship, we can help to break down the barriers that have prevented them from fully participating in society and from realizing their full potential.
As someone who values individual freedom and personal responsibility, I believe that the war on drugs has been a disastrous failure that has caused immense harm to individuals, families, and communities. Rather than reducing drug use or promoting public health, it has instead led to widespread criminalization, mass incarceration, and the perpetuation of a black market that fuels violence and corruption. I believe that a more effective approach would be to decriminalize all drugs. By treating drug use as a public health issue rather than a criminal justice problem, we can help to ensure that people who struggle with addiction receive the support and treatment they need, rather than being stigmatized and punished. Moreover, I believe that the decriminalization of drugs would promote greater individual freedom and autonomy, by allowing people to make their own choices about what substances they choose to consume. This approach would also reduce the power of criminal networks and the violence associated with drug trafficking, creating a safer and more just society for everyone.
I believe that it is possible to support both a green environment and a thriving industrial economy. While some may see these as conflicting goals, I believe that with the right approach and technologies, we can achieve both.I am a big fan of green technology, which harnesses the power of renewable resources such as wind, solar, and hydro power to generate clean energy without harming the environment. By investing in these technologies and promoting greater energy efficiency, we can reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and help to mitigate the impact of climate change. At the same time, I believe that industrialism and economic growth are important drivers of human progress and prosperity, providing jobs, opportunity, and innovation that benefit us all. By embracing sustainable practices and promoting greater environmental responsibility, we can ensure that our industries and economies are both thriving and environmentally responsible. Ultimately, I believe that a green environment and a thriving industrial economy are not mutually exclusive, but rather complementary goals that can be achieved through smart policies, innovative technologies, and a commitment to environmental responsibility. By working together in this way, we can create a better future for ourselves and for generations to come.
I believe that a blue environment is just as necessary as a green environment
While I am not a vegan, I believe that animal testing is unnecessary and should be avoided whenever possible. While I don't believe that animals should have the same rights as humans, I do believe that they deserve to be treated with respect and compassion.
I strongly believe that every person should be treated as an individual, regardless of their race, ethnicity, or background. I am firmly against any form of racialism or discrimination, and I am committed to promoting racial equality in all areas of society.
I firmly believe in the importance of treating people as individuals, rather than defining them solely by their race or other immutable characteristics. While I support efforts to promote racial equality and challenge discrimination, I also believe that race-based identity politics are ultimately counterproductive and divisive.I am deeply troubled by the current trend towards racial identity politics, both on the cultural left and the cultural right. While I support efforts to address historical and ongoing racial injustices, I believe that too often, modern progressive movements and activists have reduced people to their racial identity, rather than recognizing and celebrating the full diversity of human experience. In particular, I am concerned about the rise of Black Nationalism and the use of the Black Lives Matter movement who went from a noble cause to a tool to promote separatist and divisive ideas. While I support efforts to address police brutality and other forms of racial injustice, I believe that this should be done in a way that promotes unity and equality, rather than sowing division and resentment. At the same time, I also strongly oppose the alt-right race theory and critical race theory, which similarly reduce people to their race and promote a divisive and ultimately destructive view of society. I believe that we must work towards a colorblind society, where every person is judged based on their individual character and actions, rather than their race or other immutable characteristics. Ultimately, I believe that we must reject all forms of identity politics and work towards a more inclusive and unified society, where every person is valued and respected as an individual. By promoting equality, diversity, and inclusion, we can build a stronger and more just society, where every person can reach their full potential, regardless of their race, gender, or background.
I do not support the idea of slavery reparations. While I recognize the deep and lasting harm that slavery inflicted on individuals and communities, I believe that the concept of reparations is largely unworkable and unnecessary. Slavery reparations would require vast sums of money to be paid out, with little clear indication of who should pay and who should receive. Furthermore, such reparations would not address the underlying issues of systemic racism and inequality that continue to plague our society.
Reforms or Revolutions
I generally prefer reformism over revolution. I believe that in modern societies, where institutions are well established and democratic processes are in place, there are more effective ways to bring about change than through violent revolution. However, in situations where authoritarian regimes or totalitarian ones suppress individual freedoms and violate human rights, a
sometimes peaceful, anti-authoritarian revolution may be the only viable option. I firmly believe that such revolutions should be as bloodless as possible, and that the ultimate goal should be to establish a just and equitable society where freedom is respected and protected. Overall, I think that Reforms are good and useful most of the times but revolutions should be used when its N E C E S S A R Y
I believe that children's rights are an important issue that often goes overlooked. While some may argue for lowering the voting age or other similar measures, I believe that the focus should be on protecting children from harm and ensuring that their basic needs are met. This includes protecting children from physical and emotional abuse, preventing them from being groomed without their consent, and ensuring that they have access to education and healthcare. By prioritizing children's rights in this way, we can create a safer and more equitable society for everyone, regardless of age.
I recognize the importance of cooperation on a global scale in order for the world to prosper. While I value personal freedom and independence, I do not see globalization as a threat to these values. In fact, I support economic globalization as it has the potential to bring about significant benefits such as increased trade, improved technology, and greater cultural exchange. I believe that a global approach to problem-solving is necessary in today's interconnected world, and that we must work together to address issues such as climate change, and inequality. While there are certainly challenges to be faced, I am optimistic about the potential for globalization to bring about positive change for all.
West or East
When it comes to conflicts between the East and West, I tend to lean towards the West. While I recognize that there are complex historical, cultural, and political factors at play in each of these conflicts, I generally believe that values such as democracy, human rights, and freedom of expression are worth upholding and defending, But sometimes I agree that the east could be right like in Iraq. That being said, I also believe in the importance of dialogue, mutual understanding, and cooperation between those different regions in order to address the underlying issues that contribute to conflicts between the East and West.
Thoughts on Nationalism
I believe that nationalism, as an ideology, can be harmful and often fueled by xenophobia and racism. However, I do recognize that not all nationalists hold extreme or negative views, and that some forms of nationalism, such as Civic Nationalism, can be a positive force for promoting a sense of shared identity and community among people. On the other hand, I reject the idea that globalism necessarily leads to a loss of national identity or a lack of concern for one's country or culture. In fact, I believe that a healthy sense of patriotism can be a positive thing, so long as it doesn't veer into jingoism or ultranationalism chauvinism. Ultimately, I believe that it's important to find a balance between a sense of national identity and a recognition of the interconnectedness and interdependence of the global community.
I strongly support the idea of Environmental Globalization as a means to foster greater cooperation between countries in addressing global environmental issues such as climate change and other ecological catastrophes. While some may argue that national sovereignty should take precedence over international environmental agreements, I believe that the scale and urgency of these issues necessitate a global approach. By working together to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, protect biodiversity, and promote sustainable practices, we can help to safeguard the health of our planet for future generations. Moreover, I believe that environmental globalization can also serve as a platform for promoting greater social and economic equity, as well as for advancing human rights and other progressive values. Overall, I see environmental globalization as a key tool for building a more just, equitable, and sustainable world.
I am a firm believer in the potential of technological globalization to promote greater cooperation and innovation in the realm of science and technology. By breaking down barriers to communication and collaboration between researchers, engineers, and entrepreneurs around the world, we can accelerate progress in fields such as renewable energy, biotechnology, artificial intelligence, and more. This can not only benefit individual countries, but can also contribute to solving some of the most pressing global challenges we face, from healthcare and food security to climate change and cybersecurity. However, I also recognize that the benefits of technological globalization are not evenly distributed, and that there are significant ethical, social, and political considerations that must be taken into account. Therefore, I believe that any efforts to promote technological globalization must be accompanied by a commitment to equity, transparency, and responsible stewardship of our collective technological resources.
I am a supporter of efforts towards nuclear disarmament, as I believe that the risks and potential consequences of nuclear war are simply too great to ignore. However, I also recognize that there may be situations in which a small number of nuclear weapons could serve as a deterrent against aggression or as a means of responding to rare, catastrophic events. That being said, I believe that any decision to retain nuclear weapons must be made with the utmost caution and care, and only after exploring all other viable alternatives. Additionally, I believe that efforts to reduce the global nuclear stockpile must be accompanied by a commitment to promoting peaceful conflict resolution, building trust between nations, and investing in alternative means of defense and security. Ultimately, my hope is that we can move towards a world where the threat of nuclear war is no longer a looming specter, but rather a distant memory of a bygone era.
Thoughts on a World Federation
While I am generally supportive of the idea of globalism and greater international cooperation, I do not believe that this necessarily means advocating for the formation of a world federation. Such an approach would likely be fraught with challenges, including issues of representation and accountability, and could potentially lead to greater instability and inner conflicts rather than unity. Instead, I believe that the goal of globalism should be to promote collaboration and dialogue between nations, to work towards shared goals such as peace, prosperity, and sustainability, and to respect the diversity of cultures and perspectives that make up our world. By working together in a spirit of partnership and mutual respect, I believe that we can build a more just, equitable, and peaceful global community, without sacrificing the unique strengths and identities of individual nations and peoples.
When it comes to foreign aid, I believe that it is important to prioritize approaches that do not create a cycle of dependency or burden recipient countries with unsustainable levels of debt. While aid can be a valuable tool for promoting development, alleviating poverty, and addressing humanitarian crises, it must be delivered in a way that empowers communities and builds local capacity, rather than perpetuating a reliance on outside assistance. This may involve investing in education, healthcare, infrastructure, and other long-term projects that lay the foundation for sustainable development, as well as promoting policies that reduce corruption and ensure that aid is distributed fairly and transparently. Additionally, I believe that aid should be delivered in a way that respects the agency of recipient countries, and that is sensitive to local cultures and values. By adopting an approach to foreign aid that prioritizes sustainability, self-reliance, and partnership, I believe that we can make a real difference in the lives of people around the world, while promoting a more equitable and just global community.
I am generally skeptical of the idea of allocating large portions of the national budget towards military spending. While I recognize that there may be situations in which a strong national defense is necessary to ensure the safety and security of citizens, such as in the face of a hostile neighboring force or a significant threat to national security, I also believe that military interventions can be costly, destabilizing, and morally questionable. Furthermore, I believe that there are often more effective and efficient ways to achieve the same goals as military force, such as diplomacy, economic sanctions, or humanitarian aid. Therefore, I would generally advocate for reducing military spending and redirecting those resources towards areas such as healthcare, education, infrastructure, and social services, which have a more direct and positive impact on the lives of citizens.
I believe that military interventions should be approached with caution and reserved as a last resort. While I recognize that there may be situations in which the use of military force is necessary to protect human rights, prevent genocide, or respond to a grave threat to national or international security, such interventions should be undertaken only after all other viable alternatives have been explored. In cases like Bosnia, where ethnic cleansing and genocide were occurring, I believe that military intervention was justified and necessary to prevent further atrocities. However, in cases like Iraq, where the justifications for intervention were less clear and the aftermath of the conflict was marked by chaos and instability, I believe that military intervention should have been avoided. Ultimately, I believe that military interventions should be guided by a commitment to protecting innocent lives, promoting justice and stability, and respecting the sovereignty and self-determination of affected communities. By approaching interventions with humility, caution, and a deep commitment to human dignity, I believe that we can help build a more peaceful and just world for all.
I generally support the mission of NATO as a defensive alliance aimed at deterring aggression and promoting security among its member countries. I recognize that NATO has played an important role in maintaining souvreignty, particularly in the face of threats from Russia under Vladimir Putin, and I believe that the alliance can be an effective tool for promoting shared interests and values among its members. However, I also believe that the power of NATO should be limited and that the alliance should always act in accordance with international law and norms. This means avoiding unnecessary military interventions, promoting diplomatic solutions to conflicts, and respecting the sovereignty of neutral/innocent nations. Additionally, I believe that NATO should be constantly evaluating its mission and effectiveness, and working to ensure that it remains a relevant and responsive organization in a rapidly changing global context. By balancing the need for security and stability with a commitment to human rights and international law, I believe that NATO can continue to play an important role.
The United Nations
I generally see the United Nations as a useful association. The UN provides a platform for countries to work together on issues such as peace and security, human rights, and sustainable development, and its various agencies and programs have helped to make significant progress in these areas. Additionally, the UN serves as a forum for countries to share ideas and perspectives, and to work towards common goals in a spirit of collaboration and mutual respect. While I recognize that the UN has its limitations and challenges, such as bureaucracy and a lack of enforcement mechanisms, I believe that it remains a valuable tool for promoting international cooperation and addressing complex global problems that require a coordinated response. I also believe that it is important for the UN to be constantly evaluating and improving its effectiveness, and to remain responsive to the evolving needs and priorities of its member states. By working together through the UN, countries can build a more peaceful, prosperous world for all.
The European Union
I generally support the European Union and the benefits it has brought to its member states, such as increased economic integration, greater political cooperation, and enhanced cultural exchange. However, I am somewhat skeptical of the idea of a fully united European country. Instead, I would prefer to see a European confederation of semi-independent nations with different governments, united by a democratically-elected central government that has the authority to coordinate on issues of common interest, such as defense, and environmental protection making me soft pro-european. This confederation should be structured in a way that ensures that member states retain a significant degree of autonomy and decision-making power, while still allowing for effective cooperation and coordination at the European level. By striking a balance between unity and diversity, I believe that Europe can build a strong and prosperous future that benefits all its citizens.
I view China as a concerning and repressive regime that actively undermines human rights. The Chinese government's record on human rights is abysmal, with well-documented abuses against its own citizens, including Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang province. Furthermore, China's aggressive behavior in the South China Sea and its efforts to expand its influence across the Indo-Pacific region pose a threat to regional stability and security. In response, I believe that it is important for the international community to take a firm stance against China, including through the imposition of targeted sanctions, diplomatic pressure, and the creation of a regional security framework, similar to NATO, to counter Chinese aggression and protect the interests of countries in the Indo-Pacific region.
The United States
I generally have a positive view of the United States. However, I oppose unjust military interventions, such as the invasion of Iraq, which I believe undermine global stability and can lead to unnecessary loss of life. Despite this, I recognize that the United States plays an important role in shaping the international system and promoting human rights, and I support efforts to strengthen transatlantic relations and work towards common goals that benefit all nations.
I strongly support Taiwan's right to exist as an independent nation and reject any claim by China to exert authority over Taiwan. The people of Taiwan have the right to choose their own political system and should be recognized as a legitimate nation on the global stage. However, I also recognize the political and military realities that make it unlikely that Taiwan will ever be able to reunify with mainland China. Despite this, I believe that it is important for the international community to continue to support Taiwan's sovereignty and promote democratic values in the region.
I strongly condemn Russia's military expansion and the invasion of Ukraine. I do not recognize Russia's annexation of Crimea . I support the opposition to Putin's regime in Russia, including groups like Russia of the Future, the Anti-War Movement, and the Russian United Democratic Party. It is my hope that these groups will help to bring about a more democratic and peaceful future for Russia, and that the neighboring countries can live in peace and security without fear of external aggression.
While I support the territorial integrity of Ukraine, I also recognize that the country has its own set of challenges and issues to address, such as oligarchy and corruption. However, I believe that Ukraine is moving in the right direction towards becoming a more democratic and open society. It is my hope that Ukraine will continue to make progress in addressing these issues and that the international community will support their efforts towards reform and positive change.
I fully support the opposition in Belarus and their efforts towards establishing a free and fairer system. The current regime of Lukashenko is illegitimate and has repeatedly violated the rights of its citizens. It is essential that the the democratic aspirations of the Belarusian people and opposition puts pressure on the Lukashenko regime to respect their human rights and allow for a more democratic future.
I strongly oppose FIDESZ, the ruling party of Hungary, and their authoritarian policies that undermine the rule of law and threaten democracy in the country. I believe that the EU's sanctions against Hungary are justified, as they send a clear message that such behavior will not be tolerated in a democratic society. It is important that the EU continues to hold FIDESZ accountable for their actions and for a more democratic and open society.
Although I recognize the brutality of Saddam Hussein's regime, I strongly believe that the war in Iraq was an unnecessary and catastrophic event. The invasion and subsequent occupation failed to achieve its stated objectives of creating a stable democratic government in Iraq, and instead, it destabilized the region, leading to the rise of terrorist groups like ISIS. It is important that we learn from the mistakes of the past and strive for peaceful and diplomatic solutions to conflicts, rather than resorting to military interventions that often result in more harm than good.
I think it's important for Poland to address its issues with corruption and open up its political system. I strongly oppose the Law and Justice Party and instead find myself aligning with the Alliance of Democrats or .Modern . While I may occasionally agree with some fiscal policies of the New Hope Party, I am often put off by the reactionary social policies espoused by Korwin's party.
I believe that the situation in Syria is complex and multi-faceted. However, I think that our efforts should primarily be focused on defeating the terrorist groups such as ISIS and supporting the Free Syrian Army, who are fighting for democracy and freedom in the country. While I recognize that the situation is difficult, I believe that we should come together to provide humanitarian aid to the Syrian refugees who are suffering from the violence and displacement. I also believe that there is a need to stop the atrocities committed by the regime of Bashar al-Assad, which has caused the current civil war. However, any action taken against the regime must be done carefully to avoid further destabilizing the region.
I firmly believe that human rights and political freedom are non-negotiable values that should never be compromised in the interest of economic gain. Therefore, I am against allying with Saudi Arabia, a country that has a long record of human rights violations and suppression of political freedom. The fact that they have oil should not give them a free pass to violate the basic human rights of their citizens. I believe that we should work towards finding alternative sources of energy to reduce our dependence on oil and not give in to the pressure to maintain an alliance with Saudi Arabia at the cost of our moral values.
I strongly condemn the Iranian government's appalling human rights record and the suppression of their people's basic freedoms. The Iranian government has shown time and time again that it does not care about the well-being of its citizens and has repeatedly violated their rights. I support the current protesters who are bravely speaking out against this oppressive regime and demanding change. It is important that we stand in solidarity with those fighting for their basic human rights and continue to put pressure on the Iranian government to change its ways.
As much as I condemn the Taliban's takeover of Afghanistan, I support the withdrawal of international troops as the war was endless and ultimately futile. The assassination of Osama bin Laden should have been the sign to retreat. Ideally, Afghanistan should be a democratic and secular state, but it seems unlikely under Taliban rule. The situation is tragic, especially for the Afghan people who are once again living under the oppression of a fundamentalist regime. We must continue to provide aid to Afghan refugees and support for the brave Afghan activists who are fighting for a better future.
I fully support the military interventions in Yugoslavia. The humanitarian intervention was necessary to prevent the ethnic cleansing of Serbian troops in Bosnia, Kosovo, and Croatia. I believe in rare interventionism, and this intervention was justified to protect the innocent lives that were at risk. It was a necessary move to maintain peace and stability in the region, and I am grateful for the efforts of those who worked to make it possible. It is important to intervene only when human rights are being violated and genocides are getting committed , and this intervention was an example of that.
I support the anti-government opposition movement in Thailand and believe that the Thai monarchy should be overthrown. The Thai monarchy has been accused of numerous human rights violations, and the government has been criticized for cracking down on dissent and limiting freedom of expression. I believe that the people of Thailand deserve a government that respects their rights and freedoms, and I support their efforts to achieve this through peaceful and democratic means.
I do not support the Venezuelan government and I strongly believe that their socialist policies have contributed to the current state of the country. The economic crisis, hyperinflation, and lack of basic necessities for citizens are all evidence of the failure of the current government. I support the quest for a more democratic and free society, and I believe that there should be more free and fair elections in Venezuela.
I believe that the military intervention in Libya was unjustified, despite the atrocities committed by Gaddafi's government. The intervention resulted in the overthrow of Gaddafi's regime but left the country in chaos and replaced his government with terrorist organizations. The situation in Libya remains unstable to this day, and I think it is important to consider the long-term consequences of military interventions before taking action. Instead of intervening militarily, I believe that diplomatic efforts should have been made to find a peaceful solution to the conflict in Libya.
I am against the Cuban government and their oppressive regime, and I fully support the Cuban opposition in their fight for democracy and human rights. However, I do not believe that the embargo against Cuba is an effective way to promote change in the country. The embargo has been in place for decades and has failed to bring about significant political reform in Cuba. Instead, it has mostly harmed the Cuban people and created economic difficulties. I believe that diplomacy and engagement with the Cuban government and people is a more effective way to promote positive change in the country.
I tend to lean towards Israel over Palestine, but I understand that both sides have valid historical claims to the land. Ideally, I would support a confederation that allows both Muslims and Jews to live together with equal rights and opportunities. However, given the current political and social climate in both countries, I understand that this may not be feasible in the near future.
As someone based in France if that wasn't clear enough, I strongly believe that France should adopt more inclusive policies towards marginalized communities such as the gypsies and immigrants. The forced deportation of thousands of innocent gypsies during the regime of Nicola Sarkozy was a violation of their human rights and undermines the principles of democracy and equality. Instead, France should prioritize policies that promote social inclusion and cultural diversity, and address the root causes of discrimination. Only through such measures can France build a more just and equitable society that is resilient to the threats of populism and extremism.
Flag and How to Draw
Drawing Neo-humanism is fairly easy
- Draw a ball
- Draw a tricolour of Dark Blue, Gold and White.
- Add a Human shape in the center.
- Draw eyes and fill with white.
|White||#FFFFFF||255, 255, 255|
|Yellow||#FFDB28||255, 219, 40|
|Dark Blue||#39386E||57, 56, 110|
|Black||#141414||20, 20, 20|
Ideologies I strongly agree with
- Classical Liberalism - My main influence!
- Hayekism - A great philosopher, I read a lot of Hayek's books and mostly agree with him, especially in terms of free market and the need of some interventions in economy, Anyway my fiscal policy.
- Moderate progressivism - I hate SJW and cancel culture too.
- Liberalism - I agree with almost everything about you.
- Civil Libertarianism - Human rights are important.
- Anti-Authoritarianism - Centralized power is what really corrupts.
- Social Liberalism - A Good form of Left wing liberalism.
- Globalism - for a better future.
- Anti-Communism - Communism as an idea, completely failed but just refuses to die.
- Georgism - Land value tax is the most useful tax.
- Piratism - Copyright laws are sometimes way too strict.
Ideologies I agree with
- Progressivism - You can never stop progress.
- Social Democracy - Good intentions, I still see you as a second option whenever I vote.
- Social Capitalism - A bit too regulationist but okay.
- Ordo-Liberalism - Same as above but a bit better.
- Civic Nationalism - I do not hate all nationalists.
- Social Georgism - Better than socdem.
- Social Feminism - also better than socdem, I guess.
- Interculturalism - Good but keep focusing on uniting what already is, but done a great job in america.
- Multiculturalism - Keep focusing on identity politics makes cultural extremists rise and gain power.
- Capitalism - A really good system but definitely not perfect.
- Neoliberalism - A very flawed ideology.
- National Liberalism - Fine, but nowadays is slowly turning into Alt-lite. This ideology was better during the 19th century.
- Libertarianism - I guess that I agree more than I disagree.
- Libertarian Conservatism - Without any doubt the best conservatives, I also like to watch south park.
Ideologies I am mixed about
- Patriotism - better than most nationalists.
- Green Liberalism really depends on wich country it is. Like for example: it is based in Germany but not in France.
- Anarcho-Capitalism - Isn't it going too far.
- Market Socialism - Coops are good but cannot be the center of all economics.
- World Federalism - It's not because I am globalist I agree with your, I honestly think it would be a terrible idea.
- Austrian School - total Laissez faire cannot work, we still need some regulations to prevent monopolies.
Ideologies I disagree with
- Left Social Democracy - You're a bit too lefty for me.
- Distributism - I don't really agree with economic nor cultural values of this ideology.
- Socialism - A bad system overall.
- Reformist Marxism - I don't care if you are "reformist", You're a COMMUNIST
- Cultural Nationalism - I understand that it is better if immigrants like me integrate, but assimilation?
Ideologies I strongly disagree with
- State Capitalism - Capitalism done wrong.
- Left-Wing Nationalism - no.
- Protectionism - Neo-mercantile scum
- Isolationism - Countries need to cooperate.
- Social Authoritarianism - What the hell is this?
- Alt-Right - Consider going outside.
- Fascism - Never Again!
- Reactionarism - What is the point of trying to make life worse.
- Dengism - F**K THE CCP!
- SJW - That's why I don't like to be attributed to radical progressivists.
- Propertarianism - You know ethics count too and property rights aren't the only rights.
- Marxist Leninism - The Soviet Union is Dead LMAO XD!!!
- Right-Wing Populism - A plague to humanity and democracy.
- Ethnic Nationalism - It's only when I see genocides caused by you that I start agreeing with Neocons.
- Pinochetism - Your dictatorship was horrible.
- Stratocracy - Nothing but power hungry dictators.
Gigachads! (S Tier)
- Beryism - My German counterpart.
- Pirate Tails - A nice and pretty funny guy who hates globalism but not really diferrent to Bery.
- 2x2Master - An honorable Libertarian conservative
who did some legal tomfoolerywith very decent humor.
- omegaism - A more centrist and pragmatic fella.
- Brazilian Liberalism - A brazilian third way theorist who's somewhat based!
- Icedism - Literally me but unlike me you are a transhumanist.
- Neo-Arctoism - Basicallly the same as me.
- Adamtheuseless - A nice guy really similar to me, I am waiting 'till you finish writting your theory!
Based (A Tier)
- Repontualicism - A Social Libertarian who gets me, especially in terms of economics
- Owfism - Reading through your page I see that we would agree on most things but may be way more regulationist.
- Aaronism - The best socialist in the wiki, its a shame you lost your page.
- Lexsiek A very radical guy.
- Individual Voluntaryism - Another anarchist, very similar to Lexsiek.
- Neo-TDRHism - Now this is what I call character developpment
- ChronicLiberalism - There is not much on your page but it based for now, I am just not fond of the new deal.
- SomeCrusaderism - I agree on your fiscal, racial, and narcotic stances. In an other way you are more conservative than me which I can get past on.
Tolerable (B Tier)
- Market Syndicalism - Democracy is good, Markets are good, Progressivism is good but socialism messed up everything of your politics.
- Yoda8soup Thought - A better Democratic Socialist But populism is trully harmful.
- Polfax Thought - I am not a fan of nationalism nor of a society with 0 forced taxation but atleast you're a fellow libertarian.
- TDRHism - Very based indeed, yet we might disagree on suff like social issues.
- Syncretic Tridemism - So close from being based but too traditionalist and authoritarian.
- Tomjazzism - A surprisingly ok socialist.
- Evolutionary Socialism - Finally a good socialist alternative.
- Neo-Afunhumaninterism - A bit too much Laissez-Faire and too harsh on LGBTs.
- Uzarashvilism - Could be good but too much centralised and anti-Libertarian.
- BERNHEism - A very mixed Ideology, I agree that Laissez-Faire would not work in a long term but I also hat state capitalism, Protectionnism does not protect anything exept high prices, Authoritarianism is shit but I guess it is just to implement your ideology, I like transhumanism but not post-humanism, I love your way of handling racial issues and conflicts between genders but I hate ultranationalism and eugenics with a loving passion, atleast it isn't cringe nationalism and a great and funny person on discord. Overall it is kinda meh but leaning toward basedness, And it feels good to see an actually serious ideology on this community.
- Neo-Glencoeism - The hell happened to you? You were based but now...
alright (C Tier)
- Liberty-Loverism - A better anarchist but still an anarchist.
- O'Langism - An average Ancom but slightly better.
- American Social Democracy - A protectionnist and regulationist, atleast you're a lib.
Not terrible but... (D Tier)
- Borker - A anti-immigration ancom? But hating on M*rx helped you not being in F tier.
- Brazilian Progressivism - Not a big fan of State capitalism nor using lethal police forces against political opponents nor regulationism nor authori.. I actually think you've changed for the better.
- Erissky - This is how I would describe anarchist dystopia.
- Nightmare Brazilian Liberalism - Litteraly the great reset.
- .dotdotdotsam Thought - Yeah I kinda forgot to add you BEFORE adding what I think of you in the alias section, but you're still a disgutingly average commie.
Cringe (F Tier)
- Neo-Calculustism - I do not approve your rejection of democracy and misanthrophy.
- Post-Acceleration Thought - How the fuck did changed so much and so quickly! I guess you're slightly worse than before but it really isn't much worse.
- National Fracturism - We disagree on most of our policies including Socialism and nationalism, and I'm not really an equivalent to the status quo, I guess were both progressive.
Trash Tier (Z Tier)
- Comrade Phil Thought - Rest in Piss my polar opposite, if there is someone who deserves to be in trash tier it would you. Actually I think you are going to PRIVATELY own the trash tier, there is literally nothing good I can say about you.
You can put yourself in the waitlist down below if you want to be added
|Libertarians - Don't Tread On Me!|
|Main||• Police Abolitionism • Prison Abolitionism •|
|Socialists||• Austrolibertarian Market Socialism • Geolibertarian Socialism • Minarcho-Mutualism • Queer Bookchin Communalism • Queer Libertarian Socialism • Tomjazzism •|
|Lassiez-Faire||2x2Masterism • Austrolibertarian Market Socialism • Heinrich-Cheungism JoeyFloppaism • •|
|Culturally-Right||2x2Masterism • JoeyFloppaism • •|
|Culturally-Left||• Queer Bookchin Communalism • Queer Libertarian Socialism • Tomjazzism •|
|Self-Inserts||2x2Masterism • Tomjazzism •|
- Brazilian Liberalism - Go to my new User Page User:Killer_Kitty
- Neo-Glencoeism- add me ?
- Adamtheuseless Add me I already added you.
- Dr. Occo - Must be an easy ride when your political ideology is just The Status Quo.
- 2x2Master - This is nowhere near to anything the status quo.