×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 3,995 articles on Polcompball Anarchy Wiki. Type your article name above or create one of the articles listed here!



    Polcompball Anarchy Wiki


    Hello, and welcome to my page! My ideology is Mattism. The Self Insert Icon.png self-insert of the user MATTball.png Matteel. Mattism is Liberty.png civically liberal, Semidirect.png democratic, Prgess.png culturally progressive, economically CLeft.png center-left, militarily Pac.png non-Interventionist, Modnat.png patriotic, Lpop.png left-populist, and diplomatically Cosmo.png cosmopolitan.

    Overall, his beliefs emphaize the Civlibert.png right of the individual, Corptism.png class collaberationism, Globnat.png international co-operation, and Prog-u.png societal justice. Seeking to create a more fair society for both the economically disadvantaged and the socially disadvantaged. While, wanting economic fairness for the world at large, and to further the efforts of Dem.png globalizing democracy to create fair societies oppressed under authoritarian rule, Pac.png which will bring about world peace.

    He is against Rightunity-yellow.png economc rightist, Awaj.png anarchist, Imp.png imperialist, Anprim.png anti-technologist, Authunity.png authoritarian, Ultranat.png chauvinisitic, Conservative.png conservative, Theocrat.png theocratic, and Isolation.png isolationist ideologies.

    Philosophical Views

    • Moral.png Moralism
    • Consequentialism.png Consequentialism
    • Utility.png Utilitarianism
    • Humanismpix.png Humanism
    • Indiv.png Individualism
    • Pragmat.png Pragmaticism
    • MoralUni.png Moral Universalism
    • Cosmo.png Cosmopolitanism
    • Hedonism-cloud.png Hedonism
    • Materialism.png Materialism
    • Constructivist.png Constructivism
    • Pop.png Populism
    • Antinil.png Anti-Nihilism

    Philosophy.png Philosophy Philosophy.png

    Anin.png Overall Anin.png

    My entire philosophy maximizes my own personal lifestyle liberty from all forms of authority, and is built of off philosophical hedonism, materialism, and individualism. With the core justification being ethical utilitarianism. I reject government authority, community authority, and religious authority. If it's a form of authority that puts itself above me, then I outright reject it without much thought. I want to be in full control of myself when I can, I only live for myself. And, while my ideology is individualistic, I disavow mass individualism as well, as some authority is needed for harm prevention for things like pandemic outbreaks and whatnot, along with needing the government to be centralized enough to provide people services and ect. But my overall attitude is a "live and let live". So, it's naturally progressive due to this, as progressives are tolerant of what others do and alternate lifestyles, I'm a progressive on social issues, as conservatives think they can tell you what to do with your body and exercise authority over you. However, I realize progressivism has elements in it that are inherently anti-individualist as well, like with the modern day progressive focus on things like identity politics and political correctness, I reject parts of progressivism, but that doesn't make me socially conservative, it just means I'm upholding my individualist stances, and they happen to align more with social progressivism than they do with social conservatism. I've always have been a naturally individualistic person do to what I will mention below in these bits, and I don't want to be told what to do unless it's something that I absolutely have to do for the benefit of everyone else. However, I am personally conflicted with this ideology, as well it still works, I've been considering more romanticist and idealistic philosophies as well, as those can also go together with philosophical hedonism and individualism as well. But, I will ultimately need to read more on philosophy to decide that (My reasoning is that my ideas not being grounded in reality are more compatible with hedonism as a concept, but I would prefer my ideals to be more reality grounded.).

    Metaphysics

    Envi.png Metaphysical Naturalism Envi.png

    I am a philosophical naturalist, and while I believe the material world is the only world to exist, I also believe it's more accurate to measure what is in the material world than just claim that the material world is the only world to exist, as that is not measurable. I still know all forms of spiritually created by humans aren't real. So, this would follow metaphysical naturalism, as it's more logically coherent than metaphysical materialism is.

    DeterminismIcon.png Metaphysical Determinism DeterminismIcon.png

    I am a determinist, and believe that individuals do not have free will. This view is in line with my metaphysical view of the universe and utilitarianism. As, In a world that is only ran on natural laws, all actions would be naturally results of material factors. There is no freedom of choice when the past influences the future, meaning we only act as if we have free will.

    Morality

    Moral.png Moralism Moral.png

    Morality is important for society, as humans need to have a sense of what is right or wrong for society to function. There are things that humans know naturally, such as not causing harm to others, this is what has kept us as a species alive up until the present day. How morality should function will be mentioned below this bit.

    Consequentialism.png Consequentialism Consequentialism.png

    My morality comes from consequentialism, actions should be looked at through a lens of the consequences of one's actions. However, this is the baseline of my morality, as pure consequentialism in of itself is flawed, as the intent of one's actions should also be considered as well, actions should also consider what makes everyone as a group happy. So, my morality branches off from consequentialism at this point.

    Utility.png Utilitarianism Utility.png

    This is where my morality branches off from consequentialism, I believe that morality is dictated by what causes the most and least harm to individuals. The ethical theory of utilitarianism is a theory is a branch of consequentialism by John Stuart Mill, that states that actions should be judged based on how much good or harm an action causes. And as such, actions and policies should be looked and lens that to increase the happiness of individuals and decrease suffering. This can largely sum up my views on welfare and state regulation in the economy. As, I view welfare as necessary for the creation of a happy society free from inequality and poverty. If equality of opportunity can be achieved through this, then that creates a happier population overall, and economic statistics overall back this as a fact. This is were some of my collective takes come from. Things abortion and other services create happier societies overall, so from a utilitarian standpoint, I would be completely opposed to banning such services, and would be morally wrong to do so.

    MoralUni.png Moral Universalism MoralUni.png

    I'm a moral universalist, my moral universalism comes from my cosmopolitanism and utilitarianism. I believe these ethical theories could be applied globally to all humans regardless of their status. With this, I'm opposed to moral nihilism or moral relativism. Believing that, if something creates happiness, then it has moral worth. Something like human rights, for example, should be applied universally for all countries, as these rights are what grant others right to have a good life free from persecution. Progressive western values of egalitarianism and societal permissiveness are what the values of all countries should be globally. As. these values have created the happiest societies compared to those under authoritarian oppressive dictatorships.

    Epistemology

    Constructivist.png Social Constructivism Constructivist.png

    Being a social constructivist, I believe societal factors and the upbringing of individuals are important in determining the behavior of said individuals, and that there are no traits to people that are "inherent". This reasoning should be used when observing the behavior and nature of society at large to address the needs of people in said society.

    Technocracy.png Rationalism Technocracy.png

    I believe it's important to rely on reason for actions we do as humans, and not forms of past authority. And, is essential to ethical decision making.

    Antireligion.png Anti-Religion Antireligion.png

    As stated on my metaphysics page, I am a philosophical naturalist. The closest thing I am to religiously is atheism. Neither hard or soft atheism. As, I know for absolute certainty that God and all forms of spiritually are not real. But, to make a claim that the material world is the only word to exist for parts of the universe we cannot observe is absurd. So, while materialism as a metaphysical concept can be used to accurately describe our observable universe, it cannot be used to describe the entire universe, as that is not observable. So, a more accurate way of looking at the universe would be through a naturalistic lens.

    I myself am not religious for a couple of reasons. The first one being, my moral worth as a person is above all forms of authority, which includes spirituality, so I naturally put myself above it, as it doesn't make sense to gauge my morals off of it when it isn't real. Second being, I've never been religious to begin with, nor have I ever saw the appeal of religion, as I've never been able to conceptualize anything outside the material universe, I've been a materialist my entire life, and that isn't changing. The third one being, I don't like the idea of being told what to do, I like to have fun and do what makes me happy, and this has always been my natural train of thought due to my ADHD, which has always made me an impulsive person, so the idea of appealing to some imaginary spirits that do not exist is not appealing to me at all, and never has been for this reason. Fourth being, I've never liked or understood any of the ideas that religious doctrines advocate for, as I've always have seen these as being written by humans and nothing else, making everything in them written to how humans wanted to envision them, so religion from this perspective has never made any sense to me.

    Political

    Cosmo.png Cosmopolitanism Cosmo.png

    I view myself as a citizen of the world, and I get a lot of my international theory from cosmopolitanism, as I believe the world should be internationally united. I would combine cosmopolitan views with the global justice movement that seeks to combat the damage done by economic globalization while promoting international co-operation between countries. Anything that encourages international co-operation between countries is in-general good, and should be encouraged to promote peace between different countries, this form of globalization would follow the alter-globalist model of globalization. Along with having mutual respect for each other's differences were it's due, given, you're willing to provide the same respect as well.

    Metamodernism.png Meta-Modernism Metamodernism.png

    Modernism and Post-Modernism both make good points, but I can't fully subscribe to either of them. And, as such, I subscribe to the idea of Meta-Modernism. Believing that, the discoveries of both modernism and post-modernism are not ignorable, but the current post-modern attitude is not desirable. He holds that the narratives of modernism are social constructs in of themselves, but still believes that the values of said narratives hold value.

    Ethics

    Humanismpix.png Humanism Humanismpix.png

    My humanist ways of thinking can largely come from utilitarianism. That being, all people on this planet come from the same place, and are entitled to be treated with the same dignity and standards. There's a human identity that inherently surpasses all other identities, like nationality or race, It's important to uphold human dignity and standards for this reason.

    Indiv.png Individualism Indiv.png

    I am an individualist, and believe that individualism is important for society. Individuals should be free to desire their own passions and hobbies free from any sort of higher authority. Whether it be clerical authority, governmental authority, or community authority, the individual worth triumphs over all of that. With this, I support the expansion and preservation of civil liberties, like Freedom of Speech, as those civil liberties are important for any free society to thrive under. Some would argue that individualism and economic leftism are incompatible with each other, but I would argue that having the state provide you with everything would allow people to pursue their own interests and hobbies without the fear of poverty or unemployment and ect. So, individualism is more compatible with economic leftism than it is with economic rightism in my opinion.

    This is also were my progressivism comes from, as ideologies like conservatism are very anti-individualist, conservatives believe they can tell you what you can do with your body, who you can marry, ect. With leftists having a more "live and let live" attitude, I will side with them, as they don't feel the need to boss me around and are the least opposed to me living my lifestyle as to how I want to not based on pointless dogmatic attitudes. I believes everyone regardless of their back rounds are equal and are deserving of the same civil rights and liberties. I'm also opposed to authoritarianism because in most of those authoritarian regimes throughout history I would've at best been socially excluded and lived a horrible life or killed in. So, I have no reason not to be an individualist by the very nature of my existence as a person. I know my rights aren't guaranteed in democratic societies, but I will take my chances in a democratic society over an authoritarian society any day of the week. I serve my own interests and my own interests alone above all authority unless I absolutely have to serve the interests of others. (Of fucking course I go outside and touch grass and have friends outside the internet you fucking dumbasses, but I'm not naturally inclined towards community things as I'm not a naturally sociable person, so I like to be with myself more often than I like to be with others)

    However, with all of this in mind, one might ask why I'm not a libertarian (in a civic sense) who is opposed to governmental authority playing a role in the daily lives of citizens. This would mostly be because, I believe that for the trade off of individual liberty of people and for individual rights to be upheld, the government has to be there to protect said individual liberty whenever threats to individual liberty arise.

    Mill.png Harm Principle Mill.png

    I combine the ethical theory of utilitarianism with the harm principle, which states that for as long as an individual is not harming others, than an individual should be allowed to do what they please. This is were my individual takes come from. I am a staunch supporter of things like freedom of speech and expression, and I'm against most forms of government censorship, If an individual is not harming others, then they should be allowed to do what they want to do regardless if I personally find it disgusting or not, because trying to stop the person from doing what they are doing is immoral than trying to stop them due to what I said previously, regardless of what some form of authority tells me (this means any authority, spirituality, community, ect, all forms of authority besides the government which grants us these rights are above the harm principle). All within reason of course, because sometimes it is necessary for the state to intervene on behalf of the daily lives of citizens for harm reduction, but even then, the most it should be is just encouragement, unless there's a deadly plague or something.

    Hedonism-cloud.png Hedonism Hedonism-cloud.png

    I would consider myself someone who has no restraint when it comes to topics like sex and material desires, my way of thinking is borderline libertine in this aspect. However, I still respect basic human decency and common sense of morality, so it would be a moderate version of libertinism. This is largely due to my ADHD, which causes me to have a harder time controlling my impulses. So, for a lack of better words, I am a very horny person, I love masturbating and other things like that because it is super fun and it is of great sensual pleasure for me personally, so I'm naturally going to do it, and see no reason otherwise, which is what my morality is built off of. Hedonism has always been one the core pillars of my beliefs largely due to my impulsivity, which has naturally has made me a very individualistic person as well.

    Antinil.png Anti-Nihilism Antinil.png

    Despite my hedonistic stances on ethics, I am opposed to pessimism and nihilism. Now, this may sound strange, because hedonism as a philosophy is usually followed up with nihilism as a justification, because we have no greater in purpose in life and nothing matters, I can do whatever I want with there being no grounded moral justification against it otherwise. I don't agree with this, just because life is pointless doesn't mean the future is pointless, nor is their no purpose in living. The meaning of life is what you make it to be, and creating our own joy in life. Even if said joy itself won't amount to anything, it's better to use your own existence to enjoy your life than it is to be pessimistic or nihilistic.

    Praxis

    Pop.png Populism Pop.png

    Populism is a good way to achieve political power and to unite the world using pan-nationalist movements. So, I would incorporate populist heretic for both political praxis and international praxis. However, the creator of the page personally disagrees with populism to a certain extent, and many populist leaders in history have failed to deliever on their promises and actually just ended up serving the elite themselves, he views it as a good way to achieve his objectives.

    Pragmat.png Pragmaticism Pragmat.png

    I am a political realist, the best way to make change is through a pragmatic approach. So, I am opposed to both romanticism and idealism. As, while idealism is to an extent, necessary, you have to do things that go against your own ideas to inspire change. Even if it means compromising on your own ideals, it's better to have some of the change you wanted, compare to having nothing at all. And as such, harm reduction is very much necessary to achieve change.

    Main Influences

    Hedonism-cloud.png Epicurus (341BC-270BC)
    FDRismF.png Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882-1945)
    NatProg.png Theodore Roosevelt (1858-1919)
    Glib.png Al Gore (1948)
    Classlib.png John Locke (1632-1704)
    Gorb.png Mikhail Gorbachev (1931)
    Einstein.png Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
    Obamium.png Barack Obama (1961)
    CIA.png Edward Snowden (1983)
    Thar.png Julian Assange (1971)
    Long.png Huey Long (1893-1935)
    RussiaOfTheFuture.png Alexei Navalny (1976)
    SwedenSocDem.png Olof Palme (1927-1986)
    Cball-Belarus-old.png Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya (1982)
    Socdem.png Roman Albertovich Abalin (1998)
    Mill.png John Stuart Mill (1806-1873)
    Nordmodel.png Joseph Lancaster (?)
    Keynes.png John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946)
    Antcent.png Greg Guevara (1997)
    Sanders.png Bernie Sanders (1941)
    Vaushism2.png Ian Kochinski (1994)
    Steinval.png Petter Vallentyne (1952)
    Corbynism-ball.png Jeremy Corbyn (1949)
    Soclib.png Elizabeth Warren (1949)
    Steinval.png Hillel Steiner (1942)
    FDF-Pirate.png Rick Falkvinge (1972)
    Shoecialism.png June Nicole Lapine (1991)
    Thar.png Joshua Wong (1996)
    Thar.png Agnes Chow (1996)
    Thar.png Nathan Law (1993)

    My beliefs

    My page is going through a serious rework as I want to reformat it, so I will rewrite it entirely. For the meantime, if you want to see the edits I've made, [here to see them].

    Relations

    Ideological Relations

    Mega Yes.png Very Based

    • Socdem.png Social Democracy - We both love progressivism and equality, mega based.
    • Civnat.png Civic Nationalism - Liking your country while not putting it above others is mega based.
    • Cosmo.png Cosmopolitanism - I can be a citizen of my own country and a world citizen at the same time, it's not contradictory to hold both nationalist and internationalist beliefs.
    • AntiNazbol.png Anti-Nazbol - Resist the evil commies!
    • Cultsec.png Cultural Secularism - Based, religious authority is not legitimate.
    • Civlibert.png Civil Libertarianism - The harm principle is based.
    • Humanismpix.png Humanism - Human rights ftw.
    • Globnat.png Alter-Globalization - Based. Global solidarity without the Neoliberal-icon.png neoliberal globalism. If globalization is to happen, then we need a world were national sovereignty is respected, with global co-operation that doesn't serve the interests of corporatocractic neoliberal elites.
    • Gay.png LGBTism - Yes, Love is love and should be legalized, and many of you guys are fairly chill. But, the LGBT movement itself is riddled with cancerous idpol that doesn't help anyone.
    • Trans.png Transgenderism -Once again, I support your validity. But, the movement itself is a false facade of progressiveness and equality for the LGBT community.
    • Plannedp.png Planned Parenthoodism - Abortion is a form of healthcare, and should be legalized.
    • Leftnat.png Left-Wing Nationalism - Noice. Left wing ideals, national sovereignty, global solidarity, and anti-neoliberalism.
    • Pac.png Pacifism - Wars should almost never be fought unless they have to be fought. No more shall we entangle ourselves into endless wars.
    • ProgressiveInternationalismIcon.png Progressive Internationalism - You are my foreign policy. And, just as based as above. Humanity must Internation.png work together.
    • Ecoglob.png Environmental Globalization - We must save the environment through international co-operation.
    • Marketsoc.png Market Socialism - Not ideal to transition too, but I don't mind you.
    • Polycult.png Polyculturalism - You're the perfect balance. Focus on what unites different cultures. Better alternative to Multicult.png multiculturalism.
    • Sixlib.png Sexual Liberationism - What I do in the privacy of my own property is my own business, not the government's.
    • NatHed.png National Hedonism - My kind of nationalism. Western civilization is superior due to its permissiveness in its society. Basically me but not an ethnonationalist or cultural nationalist.
    • Fed.png Federalism - The decentralization of power is necessary for a democratic government.
    • Intercult.png Interculturalism - Perfection. Of course, anyone should be allowed to enter our country. But, if they don't learn our values and way of life, then problems will arise. And, some cultures do hold fundamentally backwards and authoritarian views. Those views gotta go if they want to come here, otherwise, they can still practice their stuff.
    • Statecap.png State Capitalism - State involvement in the economy is a necessity. Just don't get addicted to debt, like you see in places like China, please.
    • Prog.png Progressivism - You're the only logical conclusion to the future. And therefore, I side with you. It's important to look forwards, not backwards.
    • Fem.png Feminism - Of course, women's rights are still important today.
    • Protect.png Protectionism - You gotta P R O T E C C.
    • Social corpratism.png Social Corporatism - Perfection.
    • Thar.png Anti-Authoritarianism - Based, and freedom pilled.
    • Dem.png Democracy - One of the best governmental systems. And, the only way any government should be ran.
    • Menslib.png Men's Liberation - Shares my love of social equality and catboys.
    • CatgirlUwU.png Catgirlism - Based, epic, and hawt :3
    • Catboy.png Catboyism - Still epic, but I prefer women.
    • Modnat.png Patriotism - Nothing wrong with having pride in your country as long as you aren't putting other countries down.
    • Keynes.png Keynesianism - Your economic model has been tried and tested, and proven to work the best. However, he could be less short-term and more long-term, but that's my only complaint.
    • Socgeo.png Social Georgism - Welf.png Welfare and Georgist.png land value tax? Man, this is near peak basedness. But, could be obviously more Regulationism.png regulatory. Cball-Denmark.png Denmark is pretty cool.
    • Tripartism.png Tripartism - You are my economic model.
    • Soclib.png Social Liberalism - Prog.png Progressivism, Lib.png liberalism, and Welf.png welfare? Based. However, World.png globalism is kinda cringe, you gotta embrace Globnat.png alter-globalism.
    • SocCap.png Social Capitalism - Me, but less regulatory or welfarist. Honestly, I will work with you.
    • AntiDengism.png Anti-Dengism - China is an imperialist rogue state that is a threat to world peace that needs to have its hegemony curbed.
    • PanAmer.png Pan-Americanism - Ok, this is epic, and based. This needs to happen.
    • Panscan.png Pan-Scandinavianism - If only this could be...
    • Nordmodel.png Nordic Model - I've taken so much inspiration from you, and I think the Nordic countries are pretty cool. But, why this Monarch.png monarchist crap? Outside of these very few issues I take with you, you're pretty based. And, have created the happiest countries on Earth, which is something to take note of.
    • Envi.png Environmentalism - Conserving our environment is important.
    • Abort.png Abortionism - The ultimate choice lies on a woman to abort a fetus, not the government. Hands off my body.
    • Leftpop-0.png Left-Wing Populism - You understand my hatred of the current status quo. But, you tend to buy into conspiracy theories and support dictators just because they go against western hegemony a bit TOO much. Which is sorta why I dislike populism, but you're still necessary to get into political power. Without you, the progressive movement in the Untied States would be far worse off.
    • Republicanismpix.png Republicanism - I will personally find every single living monarch in the 21st century and behead them. We want a republic, and we want a full functioning republic now!
    • Sanders.png Sandersism - Based man, with based politics. You should've been what the 2020 presidency was. However, some of the things you did during the 2020 presidency were pretty cringe for me, outside of the few grips I have with you as a politician, you are by far the most respectable one our political climate has to offer. If only the establishment wasn't literally gop-lite and tried to sabotage you.
    • CapAnti Clerical.png Anti-Clericalism - Based, and dear I say it, redpilled?
    • Lib.png Liberalism - You're OK. But, way to much Oligarchy.png oligarchical presence for me.
    • Shoecialism.png Shoecialism - One of the original people who redpilled me, although your earlier years of being an "anti-sjw" were really cringe. Your newer content is actually worth watching.
    • Monkeyzz-Enlightenment.png Enlightenment - You gave birth to Lib.png liberalism and defeated Feud.png feudalism. Without you, none of this would be possible.

    Yes.png Based

    • Corptism.png Corporatism - Very nice economics. However, become more Welf.png welfarist, and you'll be truly perfect.
    • Bhl.png Bleeding-Heart Libertarianism - Honestly, out of all libertarians, you are the most tolerable, just get more Welf.png welfarist. Prog.png Progressivism is hella based.
    • Geolib.png Geolibertarianism - You're also sorta based for a libertarian. You realize Georgist.png land value tax is a good way to pay for government expenses, but you need to become more Welf.png welfarist and Prog.png progressive. Combine this with Socliber.png Social libertarianism and Bhl.png bleeding-heart libertarianism, and you have a surprisingly based combo.
    • Euroscept.png Euroscepticism - The European Union is in desperate need of updating if it wants to survive in the modern times, but I'm more soft. I oppose leaving the Union, but still think there is a lot for improvement.
    • Honk.png Satirism - Of course, being funny is a good quality. But, saying edgy stuff for shock humor even from a non-politically correct point of view isn't funny and just gets boring after a while, nor is it humor. That would be an insult to people who are actually funny.
    • Progus.png Progressive Americana - You're kinda me. As, I've lived in small towns in Missouri for what seems like half of my life. But, I like urbanism. But, at least you are progressive.
    • Pan-Nationalism.png Pan-Nationalism - Right idea, countries of similar origins should be encouraged to work together. But, some of your followers are too Ethnonat.png ethno-centric a lot of them are Altr.png alt-right retards as well. Outside of those groups of people, your Liber.png liberal variants are based. We need to work together to fight against the neoliberalism. Borders should be kept though.
    • Merit.png Meritocracy - Of course, society should allow those who have the most merit to succeed, but you need welfare to achieve equality of opportunity so everyone has a chance to succeed as well. People can only succeed through merit if they are free from things like poverty.
    • HumanNat.png Human Nationalism - You have the right idea, but be less humancentric please. Also, not to keen on that World Federalism2.png world government thing.
    • Panhumanism.png Panhumanism - Of course, we should care for humans globally. But, once again, not too keen on establishing a World Federalism2.png world government.
    • Socliber.png Social Libertarianism - You realize the need to be free from poverty and social inequality with HumanisticCapitalism.png human centered capitalism, which is good. But, I'm skeptical of UBI.png UBI. Outside of that, really solid Libertarian.png libertarian.
    • Cap.png Capitalism - You're a good system, but you need to held to Regulationism.png some standards.
    • DemcrL.png Left-Democratism - Honestly, you're the only good faction left in the democratic party. Even then, some of you guys parrot anti-american talking points too much. I will still support you.
    • Sjwliteicon.png SJW-Lite - Ngl, kinda based, just get rid of the more SJWish bits and you're good.
    • GeoCat.png Georgist Catism - Free land, and free cats :3 (but why the free trade???)
    • ApolitSocdem.png Apolitical Social Democracy & AProg-u (Fixed).png Apolitical Progressivism - Sometimes, I just go apolitical to avoid the current shitfest that is politics.
    • Kemal.png Kemalism - One of the only good dictators, even if you went too far on secularism, you were still in many ways based.
    • Corbynism-ball.png Corbynism - Honestly, I would take you over the austerity loving neoliberal fucks in the labour party. And don't in theory mind you. But damn, some things you do are pretty cringe, even for me.
    • SocDist.png Social Distributism - An even better version of distributism? Remove the religious clerical governance and be more progressive, you would be mucho basedo if you did so.
    • Euronaticon.png European Nationalism - The idea is based, and European Civilization has shown itself to be one of the best to ever exist. But, why do so much far-right retards subscribe to you? And even then, borders should be kept.
    • Laicism.png Laicism - I prefer secularism that only separates religion from the government, but I also realize that it should be separated from the public as well, the state shouldn't need to do that however.

    Meh.png Bringe

    • Nation.png Nationalism - Nationalism has been forces for both good and bad. And, I'm not against having pride for your country, but just pure nationalism is bad, as I'm against putting my country first above others, be more accepting of international co-operation. And, me being anti-nationalist was just a reflection of how much I hated my own state government.
    • Glibr.png Green Libertarianism - You care for the environment, but your free market capitalism has to go.
    • Truscum.png Transmedicalism - While you do make some good points, your overgeneralization is also harmful as well.
    • HyperBidenicon.png Hyperborea Bidenism - What if Joe Biden actually had a spine? based schizo gaming
    • 3princ.png Tridemism - Mixed bag of an ideology, SunYatsen.png Sun Yat-Sen was cool, but some of you guys support the PRC and like lolicon.
    • Bidenism.png Bidenism - You as a person lack any sort of commitment and leadership, and the democratic party as a whole doesn't stand up to republicans enough. You've failed on progressive agenda's, and I have very little hope you can turn your presidency around. Better than Trump, but that says nothing. Resign.
    • Antthe.png Anti-Theism -I understand your hatred of organized religion, but hating religious people now, why?
    • Bernst.png Reformist Marxism - One of the least bad Ormarxf.png Marxists, doesn't say a whole lot.
    • Distributist.png Distributism - Widespread ownership of property is interesting, and I like the idea myself, but landlords have to go. And, remove the religious governance trash will you? Even if the catholic social teachings are better than the prosperity bible junk, religion and politics do not mix well ever.
    • Patcon.png Paternalistic Conservatism - Based Welf.png welfare, but Conserv.png conservatism and Paternalism.png paternalism are cringe.
    • Islamophobia icon.png Islamophobia - While yes, I do understand the issue with mass immigration without any sort of assimilation programs from countries that do not tolerate western or progressive values, but racism also ain't cool as well.
    • Utsoc.png Utopian Socialism - Your rejection of Ormarxf.png Marxism is nice, but socialism still isn't desirable.
    • European Federalism.png European Federalism - I very much like the idea of an alliance that unites the whole of Europe. But that should be more of a forum instead of a federation of states. And, the economic union is really hit or miss.
    • World Federalism2.png World Federalism - Once again, caring about global unity is cool. But, a world government isn't feasible, nor would we should try to pursue it. As, humanity will always be always tribalistic to the extent that this extreme internationalism wouldn't be possible to achieve, nor would the logistics be possible either,
    • Cdem.png Christian Democracy - Meh, some Christian democrats throughout history were pretty based. Outside of the communitarian economics which I do like, to base your governments ethics off of a book that has no ground for reality is flat out retarded, to be frank.
    • Islamic Democracy.png Islamic Democracy - Slightly more theocratic and conservative version of the above. And, many of your adherents like Erdoğan have used being a "moderate" as a ploy to install theocratic governments. Outside of the economics, barf. Get rid of the religious governance.
    • Soc.png Socialism - I take a lot from you, but you're not desirable to implement. I will work with some of your adherents to achieve political goals though.
    • Econat.png Eco-Nationalism - Caring about your environment is nice and all, but you will benefit more from Internation.png international co-operation and alliances.
    • Socauth.png Social Authoritarianism - You're one the least bad Sec.png authoritarians. But, that doesn't ultimately say much. And, some of your leaders have been forces for good. But, many of you guys have been Conserv.png conservative as well.
    • Multicult.png Multiculturalism - Don't get me wrong, society can be multicultural. But, why focus on things that cause pointless infighting? I prefer Polycult.png poly culturalism. Not to mention, you cause the rise of Rpop-tinfoilhat.png right-wing populists. We don't need more far-right zealots taking political power.
    • Antifa.png Antifa - I hate Fash.png fascism too. but violence is not the answer.

    Kinda No.png Kinda Cringe

    • Anmark2.png Market Anarchism - One of the least bad anarchists, that doesn't say a whole lot though.
    • Anin.png Anarcho-Individualism - Another least bad anarchist. But, once again, that doesn't say a whole lot.

    No.png Cringe

    • Zio.png Zionism - I'm not opposed to you existing. But, you need to fend for yourself, stop using our foreign aid to fund your military.
    • Isolationist.png Isolationism - You make no sense as a foreign policy in the modern day. The only remotely tolerable thing is your non-interventionism. You ramble about national sovereignty when you fail to realize that Internation.png international alliances have prevented the deaths of millions, while isolationism has only increased conflicts globally, which actively threaten your sovereignty more than any alliance ever could. Simply put, this foreign policy has failed every single time it has been tried.
    • Confem.png Conservative Feminism - Not a real feminist.
    • Confess.png Confessionalism - Church authority is not legitimate, nor should it govern anyone's lives.
    • Sinophobia.png Sinophobia - Hating the Chinese government is cool, but being racist against Chinese people isn't.
    • DemocratF.png Democratism - Oh for fuck sakes. Just because I hate conservatism doesn't mean I like you guys. Almost all of my criticism of the republican party could be applied to you. People are too caught up this culture war BS to realize that there is no real difference between republicans and democrats. Being the lesser evil doesn't make you good. Not to mention, how the establishment works to undermine progressive democrats and their causes, like how they've sabotaged Bernie multiple times. I HATE THE DNC, I HATE THE DNC, I HATE THE DNC!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Libfem.png Liberal Feminism - Some elements are based, but some of you guys just legitimately hate men for no reason. And, your idea of gender equally is equal ratio of drone pilots who commit acts of neo-imperialism in the middle east?
    • USAGOP.png American Republicanism - I can't wait for the day this two party system comes crashing down on itself.
    • Necon.png Neoconservatism - What have you conserved other than endless amounts of debt and endless foreign wars?
    • 3way.png Third Way - Basically just neocon but with *some* welfare. Erosion of civil liberties, foreign interventions, job outsourcing. Man, I cannot believe I am forced to vote for you. You're just unsocialized social democracy.
    • Culchrist.png Cultural Christianity -God doesn't exist lmao.
    • Libertarian.png Libertarianism - Taxation isn't theft you moron.
    • Xbert.png Christian Libertarianism - Combine the horrible economic views with "muh fictional fairy tale said so" makes the worst possible ideology that is not politically extreme.
    • Libcon.png Libertarian Conservatism - Communitarianism, conservatism, free-market capitalism. Name me a more barf ideology, will you?
    • World.png Globalism - I support international co-operation, but economic globalism is mostly cringe.
    • Conserv.png Conservatism - What has modern day conservatism conserved? Every time there is some victory you could make, it's almost reverted in due time. Quite the losers ideology.
    • Rwsjw.png Right-Wing SJW & *SJW.png SJW - The culture war was a mistake. Different sides, basically the same tactics. identity politics are bad no matter if it is supremacist idpol or intersectional idpol.
    • Neoliberal-icon.png Neoliberalism - ENSLAVOR OF THE GLOBAL POOR! I don't hate the global poor you retard, I am doing them a favor.
    • Luxem.png Luxembourgism - You rebelled against the SDP, and got tried as a traitor. What did you expect?
    • Pat.png Patriarchy - This helps literally no one lmao.
    • Fiscon.png Fiscal Conservatism - Sure, a fiscally responsible government that doesn't overstep its boundaries in social services is a good thing. As, shown in many times in history were government finances collapse due to them overspending their budget. But, for the economy to come at the expensive of the people, really now?
    • Ormarxf.png Marxism - Marx was a moron. Not to mention, Tripartism.png class collaborationism has proven to eliminate class conflict better than "class struggle" will.
    • Homophobia.png Homophobia - Yes, I support the fag agenda. And?
    • Antiabort.png Anti-Abortionism - Imagine thinking that you are even remotely morally right forcing Women to give birth, now that's just flat out disgusting, and the fact that people celebrate overturning abortion laws is abhorrent.
    • Hillaryism Sprite.png Hillaryism - Trump was bad but you were equally as shit and an embarrassing politician, keep seething over 2016.
    • Mat.png Maternalism - Anyone who idealizes this as a perfect women outside of fantasy is probably an incel.
    • Mansphere.png Manosphere - No bitches?
    • Radfem.png Radical Feminism - No dick? Also, how do things like Porn only objectify women but when women objectify men it's okay? I support feminism and womens rights, but this gives feminism a bad look.
    • Cultural Nationalism.png Cultural Nationalism - While immigrants should learn our values, you focus too much on mono culturalism. Which, leads to xenophobia and being unaccepting of other cultures. And, often than not, you're racist as well.
    • Hcon.png LGBT Conservatism - Bruh. Why do you side with people who literally use moral arguments to dehumanize your existence? And, many of you guys are interventionists, which is just awful.
    • Consocf.png Conservative Socialism - If you unironically label anything that is remotely progressive as "western decadance", I can't take your opinion seriously. I just can't. Not to mention, the amount of Dengf.png Dengists, and how many of you guys support anything that goes against Lib.png liberalism like Russia and Belarus is just hilarious.
    • Ultraprogressivism.png Ultraprogressivism - Not all traditions are bigoted you moron, I will support you in smashing reactionaries though.
    • Corp.png Corporatocracy - You're just effectively neo-feudalism. Everyone should have the right to succeed in life, not just a few wealthy business men. And, also, get out of my government.
    • Sec.png Authoritarianism - You've been forces for good, but you should still fuck off.
    • Natcon.png National Conservatism - You don't care about Internation.png international co-operation or Prog.png progressive values. And, even some of your supporters who WelfChauvin.png support welfare are notably very xenophobic.
    • Ancom.png Anarcho-Communism - I would prefer to live under this system than an ancap system, but that doesn't say a lot when you're looking at which ones are least shit, and both are very shit. Mass collectivism and utopianism, nah. I normally don't say that people who are left-wing don't want to work because there are very much legitimate reasons for opposing our current neolib system, but you just don't wanna work.
    • Altl.png Alt-Lite - Pov: ur stuck in 2016. Like, how can you be caught up in the same PC and Idpol culture that you criticize leftists for being in?

    Mega No.png Very Cringe

    • Nazi.png National Socialism - Your life is nothing! You serve zero purpose! You should follow your leader, and kill yourself, now!
    • Showa.png Showa Statism - Why did you have to kill so much innocent Chinese people?
    • Fash.png Fascism - Thanks for making Corptism.png corporatism associated with fascism. Now, ML.png tankies call us Socdem.png social democrats social fascists because of you!
    • Austrobert.png Austrolibertarianism - Retardation taken to the extreme. Pitting an unironic austrolibbert against a marxist-leninist would be interesting, as both are about the same amounts of being completely retarded.
    • Anti-Socdem.png Anti-Social Democracy - REEEEEEEEEEE!
    • AntiLibIcon.png Anti-Liberalism - REEEEEEEEEEE!
    • React.png Reactionarism - Imagine thinking any sort of societal progress is degenerate when the real degenerate is the person who wants to unironically return to pre-enlightenment ways of rationality. And, you only like western civilization because it is white. Although, we do both like western civilization, for different reasons of course.
    • Ultranat.png Ultranationalism - You're no nationalist. You're just a degenerate, nothing more. You're a complete diservice to your own country men, and give nationalism a bad name, you should be ashamed of yourself.
    • XiJinpingThoughtf.png Xi Jinping Thought - Cry harder Winnie the pooh, Taiwan is the only legitimate China.
    • Theocrat.png Theocratism - Your fictional book is no basis for any form in government.
    • CountEn.png Counter Enlightenment - Moron who romanticizes irrelevant times that have long since past.
    • 3P.png Third Positionism - "ReVoLt AgAiNsT tHe MoDeRn WoRlD, ReSiSt MoDeRnIsM" Lol fascism lost cope and seethe, and the only thing you're revolting against is your parents who tell you to get out of the house. Also, half of you guys are degenerates who like jerking off to lolicon
    • RelNat.png Religious Nationalism - Combination of your baseless fairytale plus your retarded nationalistic lens on it has lead to nothing but suffering.
    • Racenat.png Racial Nationalism - Why would you take pride in something that couldn't even be more made up?
    • Ethnonat.png Ethnic Nationalism - Once again, taking pride in your ethnicity is one the lowest forms of tribalism, like religion or race. We are one nation, one people, not this.
    • PCB-Hyperborea.png Hyperborea - What.
    • Esofash.png Esoteric Fascism - Yeah Himmler wasn't an epic gamer he was just insane.
    • Totalitarian.png Totalitarianism - Yeah, I like Civlibert.png individual liberty. Also, you're batshit insane. Anyone who defends you in any capacity should be ashamed of themselves.
    • Statesoc.png State Socialism - Your system has resulted in nothing more than stagnation. Sure, you may have been forces for good in developing countries. But, outside of that, you're just awful.
    • Cfash.png Clerical Fascism - I don't care about your book has to say, let alone using it as an excuse to commit genocide and crimes against humanity.
    • AntiMattismBall.png Anti-Mattism - MY OPPOSITE!
    • Putin.png Putinism - Slava Ukraini!
    • Identi.png Identitarianism - It's funny, because I want the same thing you want to an extent. But, to combat edgy retards like you. Also, you are the embodiment of identity politics.f
    • Burgsys.png Burgundian System - Evil dystopian ideology.
    • Altr.png Alt-Right - Screams "I'm an edgy 13 year old who just discovered politics whose looking for attention". I'm glad your influence is declining. Also, I know you masturbate to Femboy.png femboy hentai, everyone knows.
    • Statlib.png State Liberalism - You're not a liberal, you're just an autocratic imperialist with pink pant.
    • Anti-Semetic.png Anti-Semitism - Yes, all of our world governments and institutions are controlled by (((them))), is that a problem?
    • Antiporn.png Anti-Pornism - The censorship of media just because you disagree with it personally is childish and stupid (also I'm so fucking horny aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa)
    • Euras.png Fourth Theory - [Comment removed by moderator]
    • Ancapf.png Anarcho-Capitalism - This is just stateless feudalism.
    • Plcn2.png Paleoconservatism - You're proof cultural religion is no longer necessary for society. And, the amount of far-right zealots that are you who are in-reality neo-nazis is concerning, but not surprising.
    • Dengf.png Dengism - National Socialism with Chinese characteristics. Stop your horrific human rights abuses you totalitarian maniac. Also, stop pandering yourself as a Marketsoc.png market socialist, you're just Statecap.png state capitalist, and everyone knows.
    • Reactlib.png Reactionary Liberalism - Liberalism is a product of the Enlightnenment.png enlightenment.

    Friends

    • PCB-Utility.png Utilitarianism - The well being of everyone matters.
    • MoralUni.png Moral Universalism - If it makes individuals happy, then it is morally right.
    • Hedonism-cloud.png Hedonism - Drugs, sex, lifestyle liberty. It's you're life, you live it how you want too.
    • Materialism.png Materialism - Combine this with hard determinism, and this is basically how I see the world. It makes no sense for the universe not to only consist of material elements.
    • Mach.png Machiavellianism - Good praxis to achieve political change, but morality shouldn't be irrelevant.
    • Indiv.png Individualism - Individuals should be allowed to do as they please as long as they aren't harming others.
    • Humanismpix.png Humanism - Humans are the measure of everything.
    • Metamodernism.png Metamodernism - Combines the best of post modernism and modernism, beautiful.
    • Absurd.png Absurdism - Realizes that you can create meaning in life without having to be pessimistic.

    Neutral

    • Postmodernicon.png Post-Modernism - I don't agree with you on the nature of humans or morality, but you do make some good points.
    • Positivism.png Positivism - yes, empirical evidence is good, but you also have some things to be desired for lack of words.
    • Libertine.png Libertinism - Kinda based, but morals should still exist. Y'know?
    • Nietzsche-icon.png Nietzscheanism - His philosophy is really interesting, even if I don't agree with a whole lot of it.
    • Col.png Collectivism - I'm a fan of communitarian economics, but not in social matters. You're needed to a certain extent for harm control and to keep the population safe, but individuals should still be allowed to do as they please.
    • Existentialism.png Existentialism - I don't agree with you on moral relativism, but I do agree with you in other areas.
    • Ego.png Egoism - You should care for your own well being, but you should also consider the well being of other people around you as well.

    Enemies

    • RomSto.png Roman Stoicism -
    • Community.png Communitarianism - Individual interests will always be different from what's best for society, and to think otherwise is ignorant.
    • Nihil.png Nihilism -The meaning to life is what you make it.
    • Theocrat.png Fundamentalism - Why should I believe in your fictional fairytale? And, the majority of religious fundamentalists are alt-right retards.
    • Paternalism.png Paternalism - Why would I want some overly reaching government deciding what's right for me personally as an individual in social matters? That's what lead to the destruction of civil liberties like the right to privacy. It's clear, the government a lot of the time doesn't have the best intentions for us as individuals.
    • Anti-Humanism.png Anti-Humanism -
    • Virtue ethics icon.png Virtue Ethics - I get excess pleasure is bad and focusing on myself entirely isn't a good thing, but when I'm not harming anyone then I can be as self-indulging as I want to be. Like, who am I harming by enjoying myself the privacy of my own private property?

    Political Parties Relations

    Mega Yes.png Based

    Meh by buni.png Bringe

    • Volt.png Volt Europa - Interesting idea, and it is fun to tease. But, that would be extremely unlikely. The only tolerable bit is the progressiveness, outside of that, you would be put in cringe.
    • Demcr.png Democratic Party - Left democrats are the only tolerable faction, the rest of this party is a circus and has its pockets filled with corporate money. And, in reality, I would be independent.
    • TrudeauLib.png Liberal Party of Canada - I would take you over the conservatives, but that doesn't say a whole lot.
    • JapCom.png Japanese Communism - Good social policies and (some) foreign policies, everything else here is pretty much cringe though.
    • Green Party (US).png American Greenism - Too culturally left-wing and too left-wing on economics. Not seeming as bad as the DSA since i'm convinced they are just a bunch of larping feds.

    No.png Cringe

    • LDP(Japan).png Japanese Liberal Democracy - I enjoy a lot of media that comes from Japan, but its government and society are absolutely shit and my anti-thesis. Also, stop denying Japanese war crimes committed during WW2.
    • USABert.png American Libertarianism - Very weird group of individuals might I say. Even If I agree with social individualism, economic individualism is bad. Also, don't agree with dismantling social security for private charity for obvious reasons.
    • USASolidarity.png American Solidarity Party - Aside from a few good poliices, hardly makes up for the rest of this dumpster fire you call a political party. Better than republicans, but that doesn't say a whole lot.
    • Alternative for germany ball.png Alternative für Deutschland - Denies climate change, economic privatization, hard euroscepticism, full of german ultranationalists, very cringe and delusional.
    • FIDESZ.png FIDESZ - Actively destroying your own country and everything else this stands for is my polar opposite.
    • Pis.png PiS - Basically a less cringey version of Hungary's government. Welfare is cool, outside of that, my anti-thesis and utterly barf. Destroying your own country is not worth destroying the entirety of the European Union in the process.

    Mega No.png Very Cringe

    Self-Insert Relations

    Mega Yes.png Based

    These ideologies are compatible with Mattism

    • BeryAbLib.png Beryism (Geolib.png/Bhl.png/Civlibert.png/Nalib.png) - Our ideologies both share the same principles even if worship the free market too much. Your also a really friendly user, one of the most pleasant people I've seen on this site. At least your a libertarian who doesn't seem to hate all leftists. So overall, you're about as based as a libertarian rightist can be.
    • Chirotesla (new).png - You you could be slightly less statist and more progressive, but your economics are agreeable.
    • Cflski.png Celfloskism.pngCelfloskyismCflski (general).png - Agreeable economics and you're pro-roc aswell. You'd definitely be better off ruling mainland china than the current chinese government. Although, that interventionism nonsense has to go.
    • EvolvingSoc.png Evolutionary Socialism - Definitely the most agreeable socialist on economics! We support alot of the same issues too but you're just more economically left than I am.
    • Mebrouk.png Mebroukism Mebrouk-2.png - Same ideology and is progressive, nice.
    • Tony.png Retroliberalism - Liberalism and progressivism are both based.
    • AaronSH.png Aaronism - A market socialist, which happens to be one of the most based socialists. But, you gotta chill out with the world federalism nonsense, as that is pretty cringe. Outside of that, there's not a whole lot I can complain about, other than you making hedonism your entire personality. Which, even as someone who is very fond of having fun myself, I think that should be kept to one's own personal business.
    • YellingLiber.png Neo Social Libertarianism - Pretty based for an interventionist, most of your ideology isn't even that bad. I like your foreign policy, but drop the interventionist stuff please. And, embrace alter-globalism.
    • ProgNeoCorp.png Progressive Neo-Corporatism - Incredibly based, and nearly identical to me. Please, cut with the world federalism and multiculturalism stuff. You'd be truly based if you became an alter-globalist.
    • Eurocorp.png European Corporatism - Too authoritarian for me personally, but I really like what I see here.
    • Uzarashvilism.png Uzarashvilism - Ok ideology. I like your cultural takes. But economics are bit too left for me along with your stances on agarianism, atleast you oppose tankies and the such.
    • Yoda8soup.pngYoda8soup Thought - Environmentalism and progressivism are both good, although socialist economics for me are meh. I'm not a fan of Marxism.
    • OwfBall.png Owfism (World Federalism2.png/Civlibert.png/Libms.png) - Your system is really interesting, and your economic tripartism and market socialism is very tolerable. But, the world federalism stuff is whack to say the least. Tone the former down to internationalism and it would be basically good. Also, not a fan of virtue ethics, but that's basically it.
    • TheIced.png Icedism - Based Georgist. But, free-market capitalism is kinda cringe ngl. Atleast you're against authoritarianism and are culturally left-wing.
    • TonyNew.png South Floridan Socialism - Socialism for me is meh, although, your economics aren't bad. But, you should really drop the independence stuff, as that is never happening. At least your cultural takes are good.

    Yes.png Kinda Based

    These ideologies are mostly compatible with Mattism

    • Tomjazz.png Tomjazzism - Too leftist for me, but being culturally progressive is based, along with being civically libertarian.
    • TAM icon.png Third Aquarian Model - Your environmentalism and cultural takes are based. But, at the end of the day, I'm still a liberal and you're a socialist. But, that can be put aside for everything else I see, which I like. Although, too third worldist.
    • Ethwelball.png Ethnic Welfarism - Umm, where do I begin? Firstly, I like your geopolitical stance and alternative globalism and welfare. But, ethnic pluralism is something I seriously cannot get behind.

    Meh by buni.png Bringe

    These ideologies are ambivalent with Mattism

    • Councilguy2.png Post-Councilism )- While I admire not letting things holding you back and wanting to live your life how you want to live it. But even I wouldn't agree with such a lifestyle. Not my authority to tell you how you want to live, but, I would personally see this as too far.
    • TIMUAAAism.png ThisIsMyUsernameAAAism - Cringe ancom, but, is culturally progressive.
    • Corplibswap.png Left Corporatocracy - Bruh, this is just effectively market socialism. Why is Corporatocracy necessary?
    • HelloThere314Icon.png HelloThere314ism - Being culturally left is cool, anarchism isn't.
    • Hamburger.png Rejuvenative Hamburg thought - Cultural takes are based, but what's with this ethnopuralism and separatism stuff? Also, too left-wing and utopian.
    • Liblovsprite.png Liberty-Loverism - Pretty utopian ideology, anarchism won't ever work. But, being culturally left-wing is its saving grace.
    • NeoAlphadonialism.png Neo Alphadonialism - Your anarchist and egoist stances are really cringe. But, being culturally left is good.
    • AshleyHere.png AshleyHere Thought - Not a fan of what I see, only good thing is being culturally left-wing.
    • Ultro.png Ultroneism - It's weird how you take such great inspiration from Max Steiner, but I find your philosophical knowledge impressive, even if I don't agree with it.
    • AlaskanSoup.png AlaskanSoup Thought - Not even sure what to say about mutualist economics. I will say that being against authoritarianism is quite based, even if it's because you're an anarchist.
    • - Quebec Fr*nchoid, but a nice dude. Also, I don't like your interventionism nor your state enforced secularism, being a social liberal myself, enforcing lifestyles upon people to fit your world view is that no different of conservatism which you claim to be against. But, at least some of your culture takes are good. Progressive social technocracy is ok I guess,
    • NguyenreichismIcon.png Bruhman Thought - Cringe ultra who thinks everything they don't like is a liberal. Only saving grace is being culturally left.
    • Ronwelltarianism icon.png Ronwelltarianism - Your support individual liberty, civil service reform, a non-interventionist and diplomatic foreign policy, and civil liberties are nice. But, you're more socially conservative than I am. Also, it's not contradictory to support vaccine mandates and individualism because vaccine mandates have existed before the corona pandemic and abortions aren't spreadable.
    • Syntridem2.png Syncretic Tridemism - Typical chud who uses baseless arguments like "morality" to justify their backwards view as a way of malding over the fact modern day conservatism doesn't conserve anything. At least we both like LVT and Welfare.
    • Atronism-icon.png Atronism - Based progressivism, but I dislike Marxism and communism. Tone the former down to socialism and your ideology would be good.
    • Neokira2.pngNeo-Kiraism - environmentalism and internationalism are based, even if progressivism is good I don't like how much you take it. And communism is cringe and idealistic.
    • BasedMan.png BasedManism - I don't really know what to say cuz all your beliefs are big boy words I know next to nothing about so uhhh.... Environmentalism is based?

    Meh.png Kinda Cringe

    These ideologies have little compatibility with Mattism

    • DN Adm.png Darknight Yuusha Model - You're ideology has some saving graces. With being environmentalist, free speech (although wanting to restrict expression that you don't personally like is contradictory to that), political freedom, secularism, ect. But, your first world conservatism, your anti-western and anti-liberalism rants, and all of that. Yeah, that is pretty cringe for me. Not to mention, your economics are too left-wing for me.
    • SSTicon.png Novoscarletism - Too left-wing, conservative, authoritarian, and anti-west. With the same saving graces as Darknight. Firstly, idealizing authoritarianism, conservativism, and the eastern Hegemony powers (even if you claim to be against them, you would still pick them over the west. Which is a pretty cringe take). Those are all massive bruh moments. A long with being against NATO and defensive alliances as a whole? Yeah, that's really cringe. The United States still needs to influence on the global stage, as it's pretty ungreatful to just circle jerk "uS BaD". I'm saying that as a left-populist, were I do nothing but shit on my government and its elites.
    • Novochirotesla.png Chirotesla Thought - You went from a somewhat respectful old leftist to having next to none of your redeeming qualities left. To start, justifying the censorship of things you don't like under emotional arguments like "degeneracy" is childish and cringe. Along with a lot of your social views being pretty cringe, with some saving graces. And, your economics are too left-wing for me, as I'm still a capitalist at the end of the day.
    • NeoArctoismIcon.png Neo-Arctoism - Pretty typical self-described "Anti-SJW" cringe talking points. Along with your economics being a downgrade of what it was previously.

    No.png Cringe

    These ideologies have no compatibility with Mattism

    • Neoafun.png Neo-Afunhumaninterism - Interventionist, isolationist, conservative, and Austro-libertarian economics. How does one manage to make an ideology that is such a clusterfuck?
    • JoeyFloppa boo.png JoeyFloppaism - A conservative libertarian who calls himself an individualist while hardly being one, also, there's sympathizes to neo-colonalism, which is bad.
    • SomeCrusade.png SomeCrusaderism - Essentially, my opposite in almost everything that is still moderate. At least you seemingly oppose authoritarian regimes in the world, unlike some people in your camp. Outside of that, complete and utter barf ideology. (And, I have bad days too. Sorry if I was overly and unnecessary aggressive at times when I really shouldn't have been.)
    • SGS Icon.png Savage Granny Smithism - One of the only good things about this ideology is its populism and democracy. Other than that, no.
    • Duckf.png Duck-Citizen - My exact opposite, the only redeeming thing being anti-authoritarian. Even then, it just hardly makes up for the rest of this ideology.

    Mega No.png Very Cringe

    These ideologies are directly opposed to Mattism

    • Krano.png Kranoterism - Authoritarian conservative, I physically recoiled in cringe reading this.
    • PATS.png Pan-Asian Tridemism with Socialist Characteristics (PanAsian.png/Totalitarian.png/Statecap.png/XiJinpingThoughtf.png/CNNeocon.png) - Totalitarian dengoid, do I need to say more.
    • Heinrich.png Heinrich-Cheungism - Totalitarian larper.
    • R-i.png Neo-Bannnedism - Cringe fundamentalist theocrat and clerical fascist (yeah it's not up for debate you are a clerical fascist) who stands against progress. Although I'll give you SOME credit. Your original page inspired me to make my own so without you ever joining this wiki I would've never gotten inspired to make my own page.
    • Cheesenism (PB).png Cheesenism - Authoritarian, wants sharia law unironically. I have nothing but bad things to say about this ideology.
    • Palos.png Palostiusism (Mansphere.png/Darwinist.png/React.png/Ingsocf.png) - HOLY SHIT GO OUTSIDE!!!! I REFUSE TO BELIEVE THIS IS ANYTHING BUT A LARP, YOU WANT CRIMETHINK TO BE A REAL THING AND PRIVACY TO BE NONEXISTANT??? AND YOU'RE SEXIST TOO.
    • METBOL.png Metbolism (Rwsjw.png/Reactlib.png/Plcn2.png/Austrobert.png) - Very cringe Trumper who believes in just some flat out retarded stuff, and is pretty much the definiton of a right-wing SJW.
    • Chimp.png Silly Chimpism (Altr.png/Rwsjw.png/Corptism.png) - Atleast you can admit you're not a liberal. Still, basically a fash.
    • Based Autism Icon.png Based Autism (0/100) - Neo-nazi moment, bruh.
    • GenShrekf.png General Shrekretary Thought - A literal red fascist. Like bro, your ideology is legitimately so dystopian it's actually concerning. Marxist-Leninism was cringe enough as it is but Nazbol? Cringe does not do justice to how bad this ideology is.
    • Mikolayism Pixel.png Mikolayism - Now, this is why playing too much paradox games is bad for your brain. Open strasserite and anti-semite who claims not to be racist while still supporting Otto Strasser. And thanks to people like you, I'm gonna create a multiethnic globalist corporation ran by the Jews, and there's nothing you can do to stop me!
    • Technototball.png Techno-Ultranationalism (Altr.png/Rwsjw.png/Corptism.png) - Now, you've gotten just, ever slightly more tolerable in terms of your ideology not being a totalitarian larper. But, that's basically it, average terminally online internet fascist, there's not a whole lot I can commit on, as this is my anti-thesis in almost every conceivable way, with the same amount of technophillia as quark. Not even your corporatist economy is good, because of its extreme dirigisme, which is too much for me. Also, I really don't like your stance on mix racing, for reasons that are obvious.
    • Nastyism Icon.png Nastyism (Altr.png/Identi.png/Rwsjw.png/Guildsoc.png) - You are a Nazi. What do you expect me to say.
    • Pixil-frame-0(16).png Reactionary-Cheesenism - Touch some grass and go outside edgelord.
    • Xirlan-alt.png Xirlan Thought - As if being French wasn't bad enough, you had to make it worse with this Monarchist crap. Also, expects to remain in the European Union after this ideology would be hypothetically instated? Also, you're proof normal secularism doesn't go far enough.
    • Pixil-frame-0(27).png New Model Of Cheesenism - Economic centrism doesn't make up for the rest of this garbage can of a self-insert that is still very horrible.
    • NekoqingBolsh.png Nekoqingist Bolshevism - Yeah there's nothing positive I can say about a totalitarian state capitalist socialist, so I won't say anything at all.

    Architecture Relations

    Based

    WIP

    Neutral

    • International - Too bland, but not the worst.
    • Cyberpunk - Futuristic aesthetics get old after a while.
    • Steampunk - Meh, not terrible. But, the 1900s have long since passed.
    • AestheticPaleocon.png 50's Vintage Aesthetic - Again, not horrible. Some aspects of this are pretty nice like the old cars, which cars now feel bland. But, the time has ultimately passed.

    Cringe

    • Fash.png Fashwave - Edgy 14 year old who just discovered politics legitimately be like:
    • Mansphere.png Incelcore - Why?

    Based

    Centrist-yellow.png Centrists - Extremism on both sides are cringe, and incorporating the best from the left-wing and the right-wing has shown to create the happiest societies.

    Libunity.png Libertarian Unity - Centrist economics and respect for individual liberty? What can I say, but, sheer, and utter, BASEDNESS! I would be this in all reality, but I still think the state is necessary to a certain degree to keep people safe, which is why I'm center-lib on the civic axis. But, you're the second most respectable quadrant on the political compass. However, please get rid of the anprims, these guys give this quadrant a bad name as people only associate it with "reject civillization, return to monke".

    Bringe

    Libright-yellow.png Libertarian Right -Some of you guys can be based, like socberts. But, outside of that, way too capitalistic. However, civil liberties and non-interventionism are based. So, basically just a rightoid with a brain. However, there is a fairly mixed amount of you guys who are conservative as well, which is just awful. At least you don't want to enforce that through overbearing state mandates.

    Leftunity.png Left Unity - Some of you guys can be based, like the market socialists. However, get rid of the Marxists and other commies please. Outside of that, not the worst, even if I prefer capitalism. Classical social democracy is respectable.

    Libleft.png Libertarian Left - Socialism if it wasn't shit, some of you guys are quite based. And, I would prefer this over a libright society, but that doesn't say a whole lot, as at least I would have my basic needs covered and wouldn't be left to fend for myself. And, a lot of you guys by into this pointless intersectional idpol culture war bs, which is pretty cringe. At least your quadrant is overall progressive.

    =Cringe

    Rightunity-yellow.png Right Unity - Interventionism, free-market capitalism, and neoliberal imperialism. YOU SHOULD KILL YOURSELF, NOW!

    Authleft.png Authoritarian Left - DIEDIEDIE! There is no redeeming qualities about this quadrant, from all the Dengists to the shitty state "socialists" and the like. This has failed all the time, with no respect for political rights or individual freedom under a stagnant system that helps no one, just as bad as free-market capitalism.

    Authright.png Authoritarian Right - Slightly more tolerable than Authleft, due to the market allocation of goods. But, even that doesn't say anything when many of you guys, when you aren't first-world neolibs, are cuckservatives who take both too far. Some even supporting monarchy and other forms of anti-democratic governments. Overall, with many of you guys being authoritarian conservatives, this has to be one of the worst quadrants to have existed.

    Authunity.png Authoritarian Unity - Sadly, your centrist economics will not make up for everything else. There have been some forces of good within this quadrant, but many of you guys are Neo-Nazis, and social collectivism is cringe and helps nobody.

    Libright-purple.png Purple Libertarian Right - Lmao, fuck off pedo scum. You're not needed anywhere in the political compass.

    Test Results

    Navboxes