Liberty-Loverism believes society should be organized in a manner in which everyone has as much personal freedom and control as possible. They believe the best way to do this is to this is to create a leaderless society. Along with this they also want to accelerate social and technological progress like FALGSC.
LibLovism believes that society doesn't need leaders to function and therefore advocates for Voluntaryism, Anarchy, or Direct Democracy. They believe that it is important that the people have genuine control over their lives and thus is against types of organizations that are run from top down as opposed to bottom up.
Fighting off Centralization
Liblovism would prefer for either abolition of the state of the creation of non state entities to far to control, However they are unsure about how truly possible it is to have an abstance of a state for any long period of time. Liblovism intends to maintain post statist autonomy by having the powers that would fall under jurisdiction of the state, be instead divided by organizations directly controlled via the people, liblovism hopes this would prevent the anarchist free territories from being a power vacuum waiting to be filled by a warlord.
LibLovism is quite progressive and believes every one should be treated equally and thus wants minority rights to improve. Unlike most progressives they disagree with the idea of idpol. They think identity should not matter, because of this they want all identities existing associations to be defanged to point where your identity barely affects peoples opinions of you if at all.
Liblovism thinks gender is a nonsensical social construct that limits peoples self expression and shouldn't define how one is ought to live their life. They are unsure if it should be abolished based on how many people seem to care about it as a tool of self expression.
Cultural traditions while also having little basis in reality are fine as long as they aren't shoved down peoples throats, which today they often are.
Liblovism believes identity politics are something practiced by both the left and the right, and both sides of the culture war are often insufferable. They believe idpol is a form of state encouraged tribalism meant to divide people and prevent them from allying with each other against the state and corporate elites.
LibLovism highly values technology and thinks its vital to accelerate technology to lead to humanity no longer being confined to the earth, and spread like across the stars.
Technology and Decentralization
They believe that technology will improve the ability to govern, which is terrifying as it means governments will have more power, via better security, surveillance, and faster ability to organize, however this faster ability to organize also means that more decentralized systems will have far more ability to become sovereign because of the Internet's acceleration and grassroots movements.
Ai should be developed and non sapient artificial intelligence should be used to, create a post scarcity and post work society. Any ai which have self awareness and or ability to feel misfortune should be considered sentient entities worthy of rights.
LibLovism thinks that if (we live to) our production will inevitably rise enough to sustain communism on a larger scale. They think this should be used to give people free food, health-care, housing and access to information.
Like all things food would be far more plentiful in a post scarcity society, this would make it even easier to give out free food then it already is. Most food would be produced in either factories or in vertical farms, these factories and farms would be owned by their workers and should be transparent to their consumers.
As a transhumanist it's obivous that liblovism sees the production of technology as a necessity, these technologies should be as accessible to reproduce as possible and should be open source without any way to patient any vital components.
LibLovism believes that a free-market is the best way to allocate most goods and likes free markets because of this. However items or buildings that are needed for survival should be given for free by the local community such as, medical care, food, water, and housing, hopefully this would eliminate or alleviate the work or starve mentality of capitalism.
Liblovism thinks that a universal basic income is vital to any market based economy, they believe that a universal basic income should be established through commune funds, they think its necessary because our a capitalistic job market won't survive automation.
Liblovism believes some goods should be produced for free and some for profit, They believe most goods should be produced for profit since free markets are best for most goods. They believe that non luxury goods should at first be produced simply by what is demanded for survival but later but what is feasible to produce for free.
Liblovism believes that taxes are fine if they are voluntary, Which under Panarchy they would have enough alternative states to be far more voluntary. The amount of taxes should be up to the community to decide.
Liblovism believes that property should be as close to being in the hands of the individual as possible. Because of this they believe property rights should be flat and unhierarchical. They want to maximize the amount use people get out of things and therefore prefer collectivist property for what is publicly used and individual property rights for what is personally used.
They think everyone should be able to own their own home, It doesn't matter if they have to share it in apartments or with roommates. They believe that ideally individual homes and collectives homes should both be options, however most homes should be collective in order to save space and prevent atomization and alienation from each other.
Liblovism believes that just like everyone deserves a house everyone deserves to be able to eat, therefore their should be community cafeterias and grocery "stores" were people can get as much free food as the workers of said cafeterias and grocery stores deem reasonable. However if free alternatives are available they have no problem with restaurants charging for food.
Liblovism thinks workplaces should be owned by the people that use them and be without strict hierarchy. Due to this they are against business as they currently exist and would be opposed to any workplaces or businesses that have a strict manager and employee dichotomy, However organizations that are self employed or are only managed by a few friends who are on equal footing are fine, especially under the conditions where anyone can decide to do this. While ideally workplaces would be run by individuals any other workplace would have to be bottom up collectively owned business in order for each member to have a say over how the business is ran.
Each persons personal belongings belong to them and therefore liblovism would be indifferent whether or not people shared these or keep the items to themselves.
Liblovism determines ownership primarily by its use and therefore sees no reason why building meant for public use wouldn't be owned by the public, ownership of public buildings should be spilt between who works there and uses it.
Liblovism belives that intellectual property in a post fan fiction world should be purely collective as ideas can have founders, but you cannot have naturally have exclusive ownership over an idea. Along side that the attempt to have exclusive ownership over ideas has lead to worse uses of franchises, Disney ceasing ownership over almost half of all fiction, and the patents making it impossible to make insulin or functioning printers.
When it comes to Planned economies vs market economies Liberty-Lover believes that supply and demand work in most circumstances except in the cases, of food water housing and healthcare.
Liblov thinks that economic planning and the centralization that comes with it risks reconstructing the same hierarchical divisions that created the state albeit in a more altruistic form. However on the other hand they believe that markets also may lead to the same centralization that resulted from capitalism. They hope that factors like co-ops and mutual aid should prevent this, but power tends to coalesce over time.
They believe that markets should be regulated to areas that people tend to make rational decisions on and that goods or services that are inelastic should be provided by a multitude of different organizations and as de-centrally planned.
Liblovism believes society should be ideally run by individuals as much as possible, On this basis they oppose both nationalism and globalism. They want things to be divided between areas under control of small groups in urban areas, and areas with control of only peoples own personal property in rural areas.
Is a global anarchist revolution possible?
No, If it does happen which it probably won't, it wouldn't last long because most people want some amount of hierarchy, many groups would stay libertarian for awhile at least.
liblovism believes people exist as individuals however that helping the collective is essentially helping individuals but with extra steps thus they believe in mix of individualism and collectivism. They believe that actions should be done for mutual benifit and not exploitation thus forcing one party to give up for another should be avoided.
Each person should think for themselves and philosophy and politics are no exception to this fact. Self theory is a important part of thinking for yourself because otherwise ideas, memes, spooks, social constructs whatever you call them, will effect how you think. To fight against this everyone will have think for themselves and not follow any ideology to strictly, and take inspiration form various sources.
Liblovism believes that people should have the ability to connect with each other, and that while individual freedom should be preserved as best as possible that, disconnection to each other hurts people more than it gives freedom. Due to this ability to form community and connect with them should be far more easy then it is now.
They believe most ideas in society are fabrications constructed by society. These social constructions made by society haunt people without them even knowing it infecting their brains with what society wants them to think. Because of this all ideas should be examined and over examined by each individual so they can subjectively decide its validity. They believe that society or a nation imposing correct views of these ideas undermines individual autonomy.
We live in a society
Despite society being some what coercive liblovism would in fact prefer to live in a society, as not living in one would be highly impractical to do, and would make it nearly impossible to build an i phone let alone robot arms.
Fuck these people, not every thing is a spook, if it is a spook you can still engage in it because most things made by society are spooks, most ideas are spooks, you can't avoid all spooks.
Liblovism believes that people should determine their own living conditions under which they live and should voluntarily choice via consensus or directly democratically what few rules if any they live by. whether people would live by themselves or in neighborhood wide communes should be up to each individual. they however aren't willing to allow people who clearly aren't actually anarchists or even libertarians such as Anarcho-Monarchism and Anarcho-Fascism.
Liberty-Loverism despite how utopian and idealistic they are doesn't believe anarchy could ever possibly be achived by reformist means. However they do advocate if under a decently democratic society to reform it into an libertarian market socialist society, of course they think representative democracy is an inadequate form of democracy but having economic democracy would strengthen it by alot. Though even if it was possible to reform an economy out of being structurally capitalist it would likely take decades.
In their ideas of revolution liblovism is the polar opposite of Blanquism they believe that if there should be a revolution it should be purely populist and from bottom up and be at a time of crisis. They are quite skeptical of revolution in the modern day, or the idea that a peaceful society can be achieved from it, but are staunchly pro gun in case such action ever happens to be needed.
They are very in favor of separatism due it typically being far more peaceful then revolutionary action and much more practical then reform or finding making inhabited land to move to.
Liberty-Loverism believes that the escaping to uninhabited land is a ideal and peaceful way to establish stateless teritories. Unfortunately there isn't any abandoned land to escape to at least not any land that hasn't been claimed by a nation state except. Because of this liblovism is in favor of seasteading, space colonization, and other forms of homesteading previously uninhabited land as methods to increase the amount of available land for people to use.
They act optimistic and try to look on the bright side despite their internal pessimism and anxiety. They believe in lib unity and will try to unite anarchist factions even if impossible.
How to draw
1st draw a ball
2nd draw a bunch of intersecting stripes, fill the top half purple, and the bottom half blue.
3rd fill in the gaps, half hot pink, half blackish.
4th draw either eyes or orange sunglasses. they should be green robot eyes.
don't care if you add the hat or not
FALGSC -Its futuristic, Socialist, and has a utopian standard of living. (too bad we might die before getting chance to try it.)
Anarcho-Frontierism -What isn't to love about transhumanist anarchist space cow-boys.
Synthesis Anarchism -Based synthetic anarchy is the way to go!
E-Democracy -Direct Democracy via technology is the best kind of government.
Cybermutualism -Independent communes running everything in a market economy, can't agree more.
Mutualism -Mutual aid, markets, and statelessness, based.
Anarcho-Individualism -Both anarchism and individualism are incredibly based.
Anarcho-Syndicalism -Syndicalism but anarchist.
Queer Anarchism -Be gay do crime!
Anti-Centrism -Interesting philosophy.
Anarcho-Communism -Communism but anarchist.
Market Anarchism Free market anarchy for the win, You don't have to be capitalist to enjoy free trade.
Minarcho-Socialism -Minarchist socialism is very based, Especially if directly democratic.
Anarcho-Tinism -Based advocate for tiny anarchist communities.
Post-Anarchism -Sounds pretty based, I think, kinda confusing.
Anarcho-Egoism -The foundational ideas of stirners philosphy are amazing, I don't personally like the idea of getting rid of society altogether, And personally prefer simply flattening the hierarchies of society.
Polyarchy -The peoples choice is very important and if the area isn't being run how the people want they have the right to change it.
Anarchist -Governments are bad and people can run things without them.
Eco-Anarchism -I often disagree with them on the methods but I love their goals.
Communalism -Aligns with most of my views on equality liberty and the environment, However I don't agree his criticisms of other ideologies.
Technogaianism -Understands that progressing technology if done responsibly doesn't need to harm the planet.
Environmentalism -Its very important that we try our best to protect the planet we live on.
Progressivism -I like most of the things you advocate for, You can be kinda morally puritanical some of the time though.
Acid Communism -Fighting the existential horror of capitalist "End of history" with weed and retro-futurism, BASED!
Social Tinism -Based left wing mirco-state enjoyer.
Municipal Socialism -Socialist who thinks people should have ownership of their local area? Based!
Syndicalism -Much like socialism but far more focused on unions.
Xenoequalism -ALIEN RIGHTS!!!
Market Socialism -Socialism has good ideas but I prefer my markets free.
Libertarian Market Socialist -I also prefer my governments or lack thereof free.
Eco-Cooperativism -Based advocate of environmental rights and workers rights.
Transhumanism -Work it harder, make it better Do it faster, makes us stronger, More than ever, hour after hour Work is never over.
Genetic Transhumanism -The key to giving us gatgirls irl.
Furry Transhumanism -Based and pathowogen pilled.
Anarcho-Distributism -Very similar to mutualism however more religious.
Piratism -Copy-right more like copy-wrong. keeps trying to make me torrent one piece.
-Democratic Confederalism -Based, but I prefer less government.
Machajskism -Way too anti intellectual, but a good ideology other than that.
Urbism -Based mirco-state enjoyer, don't like the association with the right though.
Puzzle Piece Politics -Cool I guess, But couldn't you just let people separate from the country?
Tinism -Based anti imperialist mirco-state enjoyer, But I don't really like nationalism.
Agorism -Ancap but more progressive. great ideas about different property owners and counter economics are based.
Left-Rothbardianism -Ancap but more progressive and likes co-ops.
Post-Left-Anarchism -Like their views on idpol and work and strongly think the left right binary is cringe, however I hate the views on technology.
Geo-Syndicalism -Like their views on property
Libertarian Socialism -I like liberty and socialism thus I like Libertarian socialism.
Communism -I like the whole stateless classless thing, but i'm not so sure about the no money thing.
Marxism -Had very great ideas, happened to denounce anarchy more than authority right before a huge rise of authoritarianism, leading to some of the worst leaders know to man.
Socialism -My prefered economics but my opinions can very.
Bookchin Capitalism -Aligns with most of my views on the government and equality, also what the hell is individual property and how is it different then private property.
Market Communism -Based why have a ceo though.
Eco-Capitalism -Protecting the environment doesn't make you that much better, But its helps that you don't only care about short term profits.
Minarchism -I don't want the government to control much and I hate state monopolies, But you often keep only the most draconian parts of the state which often have no replacement in mind.
Conservative Socialism -I don't like conservatism but do like socialism.
Distributist -Nice ideas on equality and ownership don't quite like the traditionalism though.
Social Democracy -One of the best systems within the overton window.
-Anarcho-Capitalism -I like the whole anarchy thing, But why capitalism, more importantly whats with the whole all rights are property rights.
Bleeding Heart Libertarianism -A more progressive form of libertarianism. I like them, they are still too capitalist for me.
Anarcho-Capitalist Transhumanism -I like anarchy and transhumanism, don't really like capitalism.
Democracy -Direct democracy is very based, representative democracy isn't unless I compare them to the other war criminals we call governments.
-Libertarianism -I like you most of the time, but you simp for business owners too much and your conservatism often gets in the way freedom.
Technocracy -As much as I am repulsed by your anti populist rhetoric, I believe your meritocratic elements make you the least horrid out of all of the authoritarian ideologies.
Capitalist Transhumanism -I like the transhumanism but not the capitalism.
Capitalism -Does care about anyone else's freedom and wants to own everything. Still a huge improvement on feudalism.
Objectivism -What if we add more capitalism to the capitalism.
Propertarianism -Land lords are cringe, reducing ethics to property rights is to dumb for to do.
Reaganism -Government isn't the solution to the problem government is the problem. except with war, drugs and crime.
Presidentialism -The worst type of government except all the other ones we tried.
Radical Centrism -Highly variable so it depends.
Centrism -Hate what you support but you yourself aren't at fault.
Anarcho-Primitivism -Why do you want be a caveman? Why?
National Anarchism -I don't like ethno
states communities, But your economics are cool, Your slightly better then tankies because while both you and tankies will probably stop capitalist government oppression you actually might decide to leave me alone.
Anarcho-Nazbol -Same as above but drinks more vodka and has worse economics, both are bad ideologies that take some of the worst ideas of genocidal totalitarians, both are fine as long they are isolationist and leave me the fuck alone.
Kakistocracy -Has the worst policies but their nice and I'm not bulling a twelve year old.
Hive-Mind Collectivism -I DON'T CARE IF "rEsIsAnTaNcE Is FuTiLE" I'LL ACT AS FUTILE AS PLEASE YOU MINDLESS ROBOTIC ANT WANNABES.
Furry Assimilationism -Fuck assimilationism, Fuck primalism, Fuck you horny autonomy disrespecting goo monster. Puro's chill though.
Authoritarian Democracy -Why, Why have you decided to take representative democracy the 1% milk of democracy and fill half the cup with water. Is this supposed help the people?! By this point any power to the people is homeopathic at best.
Corporatocracy -If cyberpunk had a political ideology.
Transhumanist Ego Theocratic Imperialism -Sounds like it might be good to live under, but I hate theocracies and authoritarianism.
Posadism -YOUR GOING TO NUKE ALL THE CAPITALISTS!! ARE YOU INSANE!! They do like aliens and equality though.
State Socialism -I like your intentions but you do almost all things you criticize capitalists for.
Revolutionary Progressivism -The right and left can both be authoritarian and you are proof.
Neoreactionarism -Crazy as hell but I like the tech and can't help but be interested is his weird ass ideas. If objectivism is double capitalist this is capitalism squared.
Post libertarianism -So your going to destroy freedom to project freedom?!? WHAT!?!
State Capitalism The worst economic system.
State Liberalism -MoRe GaY DiCTaToRs!! Truly ground breaking.
Fordism -What if we took the worst aspects of capitalism and progressivism and turned them up to 11.Much like theti could still be fun to live in.
Stransserism -MoRe TrAnS DiCTaToRs!! Truly ground breaking.
Avaritionism -What the average person thinks a anarchist is but unironically.
Anarcho-Monarchism -Anarchy and monarchy truly the most compatable ideas.
Anarcho-Fascism -Ok the idea of national culture being different from the state kinda makes sense. So even if you're authoritarianism is stateless I still hate it.
Futurism -I like art progress and new ideas too, still a fucking fascist.
Primalism -Somehow dumber then both luddites and primitivists.
Imperiumism -FASCIST IMPERIALIST THEOCRACTIC EMPIRE!!!
White Nationalism -Ethonostates are a horrible idea.
Black Nationalism - yes even the minority ones.
Neoluddism -Stopping technological progress isn't going to do any useful its just going to set us back.
Feudalism -I'm sorry state capitalism THIS is the worst economic system!
Imperialism -Conquest though war is the longest running and worst human past time.
Burgundian System -SOMEHOW MORE INSANE THEN POSADISM JFC!!!
Fascism -I hate racial supremacy and the state and thus you!
Eco-Fascism -I DO NOT CARE THAT LOWER POPULATIONS ARE BETTER FOR THE PLANET!! THAT IS NOT ENOUGH REASON FOR AUTHORITARIANISM AND MASS MURDERING PEOPLE!!
National Socialism -LITERATELY HITLER!!
Alt-Right -The only good thing about you is that you are more of a fallure then your dad.
Ingsoc -double plus unbased.
Death Worship -双加糟糕
Absolute Monarchism -VIVA LA REVOLUTION!!!
Pol Potism -Anti intellectual totalitarian garbage!!
Taboritskyism -Burgundian System if their madness was fueled by vodka.
Social Darwinism -Psychotic asshole who has tainted Charles Darwin's name.Anti-Centrism -I hate absolutism in every context without fail.
Liberty-Loverism (////) -Of course I agree with myself.
AlaskanSoup Thought (///) -Incredibly based, Anarcho-Frontierism but applyied to Alaska.
Kimnostic Minarchism (///) -Heavily agree with your views.
HelloThere314ism (////) -Incredibly Great ideas, agree with them on alot on freedom, economics, and broader society.
O'Langism (///) -Based synthesis anarchist who supports unity between Leftist and libertarian ideologies, I like markets more then you but otherwise no real complaints.
Bsaheedism (///) -Not really sure what you believe in, But individualism and anarchy are based.
Ego-Progressivism (////) -I like their criticisms of society at large especially the section on queerness, Obviously as an progressive individualist anarchist another more extreme progressive individualist anarchist is going appeal to me. However I somewhat distaste how militant they are, its no where near as bad as the vanguardist tankies but still we should be careful not to recreate the same violence the state perpetuates, Then again this is nitpick more than anything.
Mr. V Thought (////) -Based libertarian socialism who supports direct democracy and dislikes planned economies, So far I agree with pretty much everything on the page so far.
Neo-Blartism (//) -I seem to agree with him on most issues, Based libertarian socialist has a good critique of state socialism".
Neo-AshleyHereism (///) -I dislike the fact that she abandoned anarchy, But since she's still a socialist libertarian I still enjoy her ideas, at least from what little she wrote about.
Yoda8soup Thought (////) -Enjoys workplace democracy, Progressivism, environmentalism and egalitarianism. I heavily agree with them even if they are a bit moderate for my tastes.
Aaronism (////)-pretty based i'm not sure about how you view things exactly but what I've read sounds good.
-Based Marxist ally, Keeps the best of Marxist thought with advocating for a classless stateless society while updating it to accommodate modern social issues, has a really good section on conservative leftists.
I personally don't like market abolitionism, or their temporary state support, but the leftist economics and progressive views mean they are definitely someone I would ally with.
Neo-Kiraism (////) -I like leftist economics and direct democracy, but, I am very critical of orthodox thought of any form and I believe in rehabilitation over retribution, Based economics based civic system and a overly draconian justice system. Would probably be like a Progressive Marxist form of Athenian democracy in practice.
Uzarashvilism (///) -I like your economics alot and think your governing policy is good. However I'm bit ify on the traditionalism, But you don't seem to like bigotry so its mostly fine.
Owfism (////) -Sad you became social democrat, With how capitalist the world is I can't blame you but still, that being said you I appreciate your georgist tendencies and you are still more libertarian then most socdems.
Neo-humanism (////) -I mostly agree with his ideas on individual freedom and social issues as he seems to progressive in most of the ways that matter in regards to the freedom of minorities. I disagree with his capitalist although thankfully more small business centric economic views, However he seems like someone who genuinely cares about peoples freedom and who likely help fight against authoritarianism.
Iberian Communism (////) -I think you probably want the best for the workers and the best for the oppressed, But I don't like authoritarianism or planned economies, You are better than most Marxist-lenninists due to your support of somewhat democratic control of the government and admittedly reasonable social policies.
National Fracturism (////) -I like mircostates environmentalism and anticapitalism, But I don't like the authoritarianism, isolationism, and anti populist sentiment (Though with how dumb people are the last one is understandable).
Takoyakism (////) -Like a more futuristic and left wing version of social democracy. Very nice friend to talk to.
Pantheonism (////) -I don't really like monarchies like at all, However this mostly democratic and therefore is exceptable. Since this ideology is mostly socialist still it would be better then neoliberalism.
Aurelianism (////) -I like that he supports individualism free-markets and views intellectual property to be illegitimate, However I dislike his support anti democratic sentiment or his embracement of natural hierarchies. I like his rejection of totalitarian but I don't there is such a good thing as freedom under a autocrat, at least not for very long.
oRangism (////) -Surprisingly good for an ethnostate supporter. Social democracy is the best form of capitalism, However I am still very against the idea of separating ethnicities.
Neo-Afunhumaninterism (////) -The libertarianism makes this much a much better ideology then any totalitarian dictatorship, however I still don't find it good. I don't like conservatism or capitalism, and you seem to care more about banning degeneracy then peoples freedom.
Bourgeoisie destroyerism (/ / //) -Ummm, I guess its good that you want poor people to have rights. But the bigotry ethnonationalism and primitivism are horrible and I'd hate to live in the society you want. You are in d tier because you don't hate all poor people, Are an anarchist and presumably wouldn't force this society on to people, and would probably be too isolationist to commit the atrocities other reactionaries did.
BERNHEism (////) -I like the anti plutocratic elements, and they seem to have thought out plan to deal with automation which is good, But ultimately even if it doesn't wish to oppress people needlessly there is no guarantee any successor will see it that way, I can't support an Ideology that supports this level of government centralization.
Technototalitarianism (////) -I hate his social views and enbracement of totalitarianism, but since they welcome technology so much and they seem to value rationality over conservatism I'm more fine with him then most totalitarians.
nullism (///) -like the views on tech, otherwise I go against everything they stand for.
Neo-Majapahitism (/ /// -I like that you have healthcare, Do not suppress women's rights, want a space program, and are marginally populist. I hate your social views Heavily Disagree with your diplomatic views and your authoritarian civic policies ruin what little populist sliver lining their may have been to your ideology. I get you wanting to remove the scars of imperialism but your doing it in such a way were you are forcing the same horrors onto others.
Nickfuentesfan Thought (////) -I hate Russia because they are authoritarian assholes, you hate Russia because they claim to be communist, we are not the same. However not even my worst enemies which would include you deserve to go through what Russia is doing to Ukraine.
Filipino Fuhrer thought (////) -This page is so cartoonishly extreme I'm assuming its a troll until proven otherwise.
If you want me to add your ideology then put it in the waiting list and I'll eventually add it.
- "Your ideology"(Ideology Icon you identify with x 5):
- Liberty-Loverism If anyone wants me to add them I'd be more then happy to.
*Pantheonism - Add me pls.
- Duck-Citizen - Add Individual Voluntaryism
- Liberty-LoverismYou've been added.
- Kimnostic Minarchism - Still incomplete, but can you add me?
- Neo-Kiraism - add me comrade
- Liberty-Loverism -It has been done comrade.
- Liberty-Loverism -Added you now its your turn.
- O'Langism - Incredibly based. Add me?
- Liberty-Loverism -Your incredibly based yourself, I've added you like you asked.
- Atronism - You seem to know what you're saying, add me?
- Liberty-Loverism -Thanks! I took a bit but now its done.
- Liberty-Loverism -Added you.
- Liberty-Loverism -It is done.
- Liberty-Loverism -You've been added, I'll probably redo it when you flesh out your page more.
- Io - Hey did you like the Gurren Lagann reference i made on your section of the relations portion of my page? :)
- Mr. V Thought - Love the page, the glasses are swaggy. I've put myself on the waiting list, if youd like, i can put you in my relations when I'm not depresso-expresso. My page isn't 100% done, but i think you can get a general idea
- Liberty-Loverism -Your page is pretty great too, I can very much get a general idea I really look forward to seeing how you update it.
- Bourgeoisie_destroyerism Can you add me
- Liberty-Loverism done.
- Artelordism - Would you like to join