Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 6,043 articles on Polcompball Anarchy Wiki. Type your article name above or create one of the articles listed here!

    Polcompball Anarchy Wiki

    Future Unitism is Estonteco's Ideology. He believes in a Mutualism ecnomy without money. He is  Culturally Right and Nationalists, but is progressive in case of science. He likes an  Anarchists society with a sole leader as the Monarchists and AI making decisions. This theory/ideology focuses on the trinity of the free will of the self , the profits of the society (referred to as "commune"), and the progress of mankind.

    Political Journey

    Socialism > Libertarian Marxism + Technocracy > Mutualism > National Anarchism > FutureUnitism

    Personality and Behavior

    Like his creator, FutureUnitismis a bit nerdy and always talks about science and theory, but can also be very passionate when someonementions his core ideas. He could be very radical and full of revenge if you anger him. What he usually does when his creator is not around is reading books on theories he like. He is very influential and can sometimes convert other balls to believe in him.



    Carry out reforms (companies into worker-owned communes), implement rural industrialization policies, carry out on-site urbanization, promote county development, gradually reduce the urban-rural gap. The state abolishes taxes and provides the living materials for people for free, but on the other side, there would be no wage. People are forced to work by a simple idea: no qualified work done, no living materials. Private property is allowed, but not money. The economy operates on a straightforward promise: the number of hours you work correlates directly with the amount of compensation you receive. In this system, the principle is clear and dependable, establishing a direct connection between an individual's labor input and their living nessessities. Jobs are assigned by the AI and it depends on personal abilities, to get the adequate job.


    In this system, workers are empowered with complete control over the production process, while the government maintains a moderate level of oversight. A significant aspect of this economic approach is the promotion of cooperatives (Co-ops) and unions, which are actively encouraged to form and participate in the economic landscape. Notably, privately-owned production is prohibited, reinforcing the principle that the means of production are collectively managed by the workers and communes, ensuring a more equitable and worker-focused economic system.

    Sectors of Economy

    The national integration of two or more closely related industries with the aim of enhancing efficiency and production. All outputs of the same sector (for example, mining oil) is merged together and then relocated by the planning AI. Imorting or using harmful goods (such as drugs) are illeagal, but making and exporting are legal.

    markets vs planning

    There should be a planned market. The market should adjust itself to meet the planning of a central AI and while free trade within communes is allowed, free trade between communes is strictly banned and all resources exchange should go by the planning the central AI. The communal market operates as a goods-based, moderately regulated system under the control of the communal AI that it belongs to.


    Children are raised by the commune while respecting individual rights. Education should be publicly funded by the national government and managed by local communes. Schools are owned by the commune, and best shudents of each commune shall be sent to the central school and become the experts.


    Housing shall be publicly assigned, with each house fitting but not exeeding the needs of people, and housing shall be built systematically in high speeds that speeds up urbanization.


    All cultures, if not harming human rights, are appreciated and allowed. However, the atate does not have a culture itself and should not have one. No one shall be discriminated, but they also should not get extra rights. They are ordinary people, like everyone else is. Since humanity is the only intelligent epecies we know, humans are inheerently supreior to all other species, but within humanity, everyone is equal. I generally support culturally progressive policies. With that said, I also support progressive conservatism in regards to harmless cultural traditions, such as traditional clothing. However, I DO NOT support sine, folktales, art, etc. In terms of harmful cultural practices, however, those have to go because they don’t benefit anyone and harm everyone involved. People should be able to do what they want except for causing harm to other people. As such, most of the victimless crimes that we currently have should be legalized and those who have committed them should be retroactively released from prison.


    In the framework, a deep commitment to cultural progression coexists with the principles of secular, non-biased governance. Embracing the belief that cultures should remain dynamic and adaptable rather than stagnant and bound by rigid rules, this ideology champions the continual advancement of culture, belief systems, and technological progress. This ideology firmly asserts that conservatism, characterized by an inclination to maintain the status quo, is inherently self-destructive and detrimental to the well-being of the populace, this ideology embraces a forward-looking approach, recognizing that learning from history and being receptive to change is essential for societal advancement and the betterment of its citizens.


    Technology as one of humanity's greatest assets, should continually progress. In this vision, humans and AI seamlessly cooperate to maintain an equilibrium in the workplace, preventing extensive job displacement that can arise from full automation. This partnership is rooted in the idea of mutual benefit, with AI providing automated labor through joint automation, while humans undertake the crucial task of overseeing and maintaining these AI systems. This approach ensures that both humans and AI contribute to the workforce, enhancing productivity and coexisting for the betterment of society.


    The state shall be a union of small communes of the same cultural background, (each union shall contain about 90000 people), but the decisions usually made by the national government are made by AI, and there is a surpreme leader which views these decisions, which only has the power to stop these desicions from getting through.


    Democracy? sort of, but elections are only held within the smaller communes, but not on the national levl. the next leader should be chosen by the previous one based on knowledge and governing abilities. Speech should mostly be free, except for defamation, disinformation in professional media, child porn, and explicit death threats against individuals or groups of people. However, freedom of speech doesn’t give you exemption from consequences. You can say what you want, but you can’t complain when people criticize you because of what you said. Security cameras in public are fine, but spying on private citizens is wrong.


    It’s becoming increasingly obvious that a punitive justice system is not doing enough to address crime, or rather, it’s not doing enough to address the root causes of crime. Most of the crimes come from financial reasons or because the crimes that they committed were victimless crimes. So, an important step towards reducing crime is to reduce economic and social inequality in society and to legalize victimless crimes. People who support a “tough on crime” approach, despite what they say, don’t actually care about the victims or actually reducing crime in society. Serious criminals (such as mass murder) should not be considered human and therefore shall be cut off all human rights until they rehabilitate.

    Foreign Policy Views/Diplomatic

    I think that, in the long run, an internationalist foreign policy would benefit the nation a lot more than a nationalist one. We have a lot of problems in the world that it makes little sense for individual countries to solve on their own. This is why the UN is important for diplomatic relations. With that said, some of the things that I would like to see changed in the UN is that most of the members of the Security Council and the veto power of the Big Five are to be removed. And since humanity is one thing, we should slowly integrate our economies and government, and all sorts of stuff, starting from the UN , and resulting a world united into one world federation.

    Views on current Alliances

    The ideology asserts that NATO serves as a mechanism through which the United States exerts control over Western nations, effectively maintaining their influence over these states. Each European nation within NATO should have the autonomy to operate independently of American control.The European Union should take the lead in managing its own military capabilities, thereby reducing reliance on NATO for defense. This perspective reflects the ideology's commitment to regional autonomy and self-determination while expressing skepticism about external influences.

    Approach to Other Nations

    I advocate for a notably positive and proactive approach when dealing with friendly states, the positive diplomatic stance is a testament to its commitment to pursuing harmonious and mutually beneficial relations with like-minded nations in the global arena. When it comes to dealing with neutral states, this ideology adopts a diplomatic approach that, while positive, tends to be less assertive compared to interactions with friendly nations, the diplomatic approach towards neutral states reflects the nation's commitment to promoting peaceful coexistence, global cooperation, and strategic engagement, even if it takes a more measured stance compared to interactions with friendly nations. Dealing with hostile and aggressive states presents a unique challenge , prompting a defensive yet cautious approach grounded in its commitment to peaceful resolution and the preservation of its core principles, while prioritizing peaceful solutions, the state remains vigilant in its commitment to its values and the protection of its interests when confronted with hostile states, seeking a path towards stability and cooperation through diplomacy and strength.

    Some Concerns


    I believe that every individual, regardless of their gender, possesses the potential to be equally productive in the workforce. The system promotes equal pay and equal rights for all genders, emphasizing the importance of creating a level playing field where opportunities and rewards are not influenced by one's gender identity. This commitment to gender equality is a fundamental aspect of the system's principles, fostering a society where every person can contribute and prosper based on their abilities, not their gender. However, I DO NOT support or promote LGBTQ+ since that they are against the netural tendencies of humanity, but I have a more positive leaning towards technological progress, euthanasia should be allowed but drugs should be strictly banned because they lower the working ability of many people. Mental education should be worth more investments too.

    Racial Concerns

    Promoting racial equality and preventing discrimination based on a person's skin tone or place of origin is extremeny important. The system has implemented specific laws designed to protect individuals from racial discrimination, regardless of their racial or ethnic background. These laws serve as a safeguard against discrimination and emphasize the principle that every individual, irrespective of their race, should be treated with fairness and respect. This approach underscores the system's commitment to building a just and inclusive society where all citizens are equal before the law. Rooted in a firm commitment to justice and equality, the system actively confronts and works to dismantle these detrimental notions, aspiring to eliminate them from society once and for all. The foundational principles revolve around fostering a society where every individual, irrespective of their racial background, is welcomed and embraced. This ethos creates an environment where everyone has the opportunity to flourish, free from the shadow of discrimination based on their race or ethnicity. Every single proson is equal and has equal rights. No matter gender, skin color, or nationality, everyone is one of the human species, and all humans should be united, for we are all similar.


    Will this turn into a totalitarian state?

    A: No, of course not. The leader only can reject the Ai's proposal, he cannot propose anything, which stops the state becoming a tatalitarian state.

    What do the experts do?

    A: They hold places in the government only dor diplomatic purposes, but before the AI is fully developed, they take the place of the AI and make decisions. Also, the leader is chosen by the last leader among those experts.

    Your opionion towards space exploration?

    A: I see it as the only way that the absolute power of humanity can expand because that the resources on earth is limited.

    What about human nature? (by Temujin Leeism )

    A: The basic idea here is that people care about themselves, as they always do, and the commune and AI cares about what people do not want to care about. This is based on the idea that Human nature exists and is bad. And about the anarchist part - the state, as I proposed, puts matters into peoples' own hands if it can, laws are left to the people of each commune to decide, and they would not be enforced. Instead, people should do the job. Nobody wants a mass murderer living next door. The Surpreme Leader only can cancel AI decisions, as I have stated above. So he has basically no authority - ideally, he would be useful only in case of an AI rebellion, or in diplomatic relations, which is same to the experts.

    Would Biomechanical Lifeforms/Cyborgs be Discriminated against? (by Temujin Leeism )

    A: No. The definition to "human" here is any thing that has a human mind and contributes to humanity as a whole, and AI minds are based fully on logic and very different to human minds. Though, this technology would not be implemented before it is fully developed and applicable to everyone, because some people being cyborgs would give them an advantage, which we do not want to see.

    What are your views on marriage and family? (by IDK Thought )(想回就回,我也不指望别人回复我的)

    A: I believe that marriage and family are not required for humanity. We will organize them in the communes, in which all people of adequate age should make kids together, if they want, and the kids should be raised together by the commune.


    Best Friends

    Anarcho-Personalism - The individual people above all!

    Welfare Anarchism - Lives of the free people is our priority!

    Galacticism - good theory on human development.

    Ego-Communalism Infinite Anarcho-Communism Ego-Strasserism - the self and commune!

    Anarcho-Nazbol - the most based. It would be even better if you consider humanity as a single nationality. Australian Unionism - Communes and syndicates! Best system for local areas.

    National Globalism - best diplomatic system EVER.

    Human Nationalism - A good addition to the above.

    Cybermutualism - Based. I chose you as my economy system as it fits all my views.

    Minarcho-Mutualism Mutualist-Syndicalism Syndicalist Mutualism - socialism, markets and freedom!

    Left-Accelerationism - Great thoughts on destroying the current society!

    Anarcho-Monarcho-Distributism - great. Very interesting ideas. Discard "god" and even better.

    Anti-Semitism Anti-Theism Homophobia - I would have to agree with you.


    Technocratic Socialism Social Technocracy Techno-Socialism - Technocracy and socialism are both based. Drop the authoritorianism and you're even better!

    Left-Democratism - democracy and socialism. Why not take a step further?

    Lukashenkoism - hello, heir of the Soviet Union! Shame that the soviets failed.

    Monarcho-Republicanism - great political theory! But add anarchism and even better.

    Progressive Fascism - stop being authoritarian and you are there.

    Red Fascism - same as above.

    Bukharinism (IRL) - markets, socialism and anti-authoritarian! Drop the agarianism though, it will only slow down progress.

    Anarcho-Nazism Libertarian Nazism - based, based, and BASED! Shame that you aren't progressive, but overall good.

    Austrolibertarian Market Socialism - Libertarianism and socialism - BASED! Globalism - why not unify the world under your ideals?

    Free-Market Syndicalism - too right wing, but generally okay.

    Reactionary Mutualism Traditional Mutualism Conservative Market Socialism - progressivism is a good thing. Despite this fact, you are good ideaologies.

    Ego-Fascism - good! Why not add socialism?

    Bolshevik Nationalism - drop the authoritarianism.

    Cosmopolitan Social Democracy Alter-World Federalism Technological Globalization - all good, but better when combined.

    Distributist Libertarianism Social Monarchism - me but extremely moderate.

    Nazi Populism - yes, right. The people reign supreme! Drop the genocide, though.

    Smarter Greeceball Thought - 都委员会了还清洗啊……而且适度的市场是可取的,不要一刀切。古巴应该是正统soc,没cn修,没有必要反对。(先锋队+委员会+自马,属于是马克思主义诸流派的归纳总结了)


    Stalinism - Communism? Good! Authoritarianism? Bad!

    Golden Dawnism - too capitalist and authoritorian for my liking, but way better than the other guys……

    National Technocracy - Seriously?

    Indigenous Anarcho-Monarchism - Good! Add some socialism and you are there!

    Temujin Leeism - This is a bit too radical even for me, alough our main direction is the same. I agree with you on most points except the part of humans entering cyberspace and merging into one. I personally believe that humans need to have a physical bogy to at least remind us of who we were. But apart from this, all is great.

     Niiloism - this is just a Finnish version of the Fourth Theory. Too ethonationalist, authitorian and cultist for my liking, but we could be potential allies against neolibs.

    Ego-Stalinism - you cannot opress your people, egoist or not, they are still humans and should be equal.


    North Korean System Ingmut Hivemind YankSoc - You cannot control the free will of the people - even though you are a socialist.

    Decelerationism - degenerates!

    Gender Accelerationism - no, this is NOT going to happen.

    Queer Anarcho-Capitalism Queer Authoritarianism Queer Monarchism - disgusting gays! You are against the nature of humanity!

    Catholic Nazism - Go away, conservative!

    Worst Enemies

    Xi Jinping Thought - Go away, fake socialist and fake democracy. You have terrorized the Chinese people for too long.

    National Pol Potism - die, genocidial maniac.

    Taboritskyism - HOW DARE YOU use mustard gas on your own people?

    Bioequalism - HUMANS HAVE evolved to be better than animals. Why can't you just understand?

    Bidenism - STOP TERRORIZING PEOPLE, you puppet of Jewish capital!

    Queer Authoritarianism - LGBTQ+ AND auuthoritanism? HELL NO!

    NATO Nazism - Burn in nitric acid, terrorist dogs!

    Ingcap - how is this even supposed to work?

    Crypto-Darwinism Cult Darwinism Cultural Darwinism Femboy Darwinism Romantic Darwinism Transhumanist Darwinism - People are NOT animals, you reactionary retard!

    Neo-Optimateism - You are a good person and helped me. I respect you for that. However, you are like the darwinists and do not reconize the fact that the people are born equal. You sound like the new presedent of Argentina before he was elected. Your version of a state is currently existing in Myanmar, and would eventually lead to the collapse of society and turn into some version of Ingcap



    • Temujin Leeism - Add me, spooky "Anarchist"
      • FutureUnitism - Sadly, I am new here and can't add you because I do not know how I added you to my watchlist if that's what you're talking about. I have looked at your page though and it contains some really interesting theory. About the "human nature" thing, I will post the answer in Q&A.
      • Neo-Optimateism - When somebody says to add him, he wants to see your opinion about his ideology in relationships section.
    •  Niiloism - add me?
    • Ego-Stalinism - Add me! Well, a little birdie told me that you are new here, so there's my advise: steal templates for others if it is difficult to do them yourself
    •  Bread and Circuses Thought - I developed new ideology add it
    • IDK Thought - 同志你好,能耐心看看我对你的评价吗?为什么我一下子就编辑好了呢?因为我是有备而来,提前在笔记里编写了这个评价。
    • Smarter Greeceball Thought - 又一个中国的同志!虽然你的意识形态有点抽象,但你也是自由左大家庭的(喜),可以加我吗?