History
12 September 1980 coup d'état
When the fights between Rightists and Leftists that broke out in Turkey started to become bloody and armed and the Demirel government did nothing about it, the Army played military marches on the radios on September 12 and announced that the army had taken over the government.
As a result of the coup on September 12, 1980,[1] Turkey was ruled by a military dictatorship for 3 years. The military then thought that the politicians were extremely incompetent and would not be able to improve the difficult situation they were in, so the Presidential Cabinet connected it to the technocracy in a way that was subordinate to the military. "
Nationalism" because society was polarized. Instead of the liberal Constitution of 1961, the more authoritarian Constitution of 1982[2] was accepted by referendum.
The ideology of September 12 is based on three pillars:
Kemalism[3], 
Turkish-Islamic Synthesis[4][5], 
Neoliberalism[6][7]
Relationships
Friends
Kemalism - Ataturk my biggest idol!
Cultural Nationalism - Turkish language and culture are superior.
Chiangism & 
Pinochetism - Based military leaders who showed commies who is the real boss, and together we will eliminate the communist threat!
Frenemies
Erdoganism - We have many similarities but you have to be an Islamist and an anti-Kemalist scum.
Enemies
Marxism-Leninism - Communist scum!
Ecevitism - You deserved the coup because you were a dirty leftoid.
PKK - Kurdish separatist scums, prepare to be eradicated!
Turkish Idealism - Islamo-fascist extremist scums!
 Turkish Ideologies - Bayır Domuzu gibi oldum amk
| |
 Authoritarian Left
|
 Kaypakkayaism
|
|---|---|
 Authoritarian Unity
|
 Pekerism
|
 Authoritarian Right
|
 Ottomanism |
 Right Unity
|
|
 Libertarian Right
|
|
 Libertarian Unity
|
|
 Libertarian Left
|
|
 Left Unity
|
 Socialist Kemalism
|
 Centrist
|
 Liberal Kemalism
|
 Opposite Unity
|
|
 Off-Compass
|
|
 Non-Quadrant
|
 Anti-Kemalism
|
 Fictional
|
|
 Self-Inserts
|
 Corpotarist Kemalism
|
.png){kind=small}
.png){kind=small}
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=icon}
.png){kind=small}
.png){kind=small}
- ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1980_Turkish_coup_d%27état
- ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_Turkey
- ↑ Kenan Evren said: “In these times, many people approach you and want to instill ideologies with an "-ism extension". We know these very well. If it is necessary to instill an ideology with an "-ism extension", there is the Kemalism ideology of the Great Leader Atatürk. Adopt it. Related article:https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2241346
- ↑ (...) the historical discourse of the synthesisists is based on assumptions that form the underlying tension of the whole story; Some innovations introduced by Ibrahim Kafesoglu, such as the similarities between the religion of the ancient Turks and Islam, are used as indisputable facts to conclude that the Turks were predestined to this path. Regarding the use of Kemalist contributions to historiography, they completely integrated the geographical assumption developed during the Ataturk period, which claimed that everything coming from Central Asia was Turkish, and the Asian and ethnic view of history with their own views, and at the same time they adopted a very linear approach to the history of the Turks. They accepted that there was an unbroken continuity from the Asian Huns to the Republic. By perverting the Kemalist assumption that Turks come from a superior origin for the benefit of their own ideology, they explained how the first Muslim-Turkish states introduced new concepts to Islam, especially the concept of state organization. Likewise, they adopted Kemalist claims about the eternal tolerance of Turks, their sense of justice, and the equality of men and women, which are claimed to exist in Turkish societies, for the sake of Turkish-Islamic synthesis. These claims were used to characterize an Islam with a Turkish flavor as opposed to an Arab Islam that was assumed to be more fanatical. This means that there is a "Kemalist-Islamic synthesis" in many respects, at least in historical discourse; This understanding was gradually settled into the textbooks in an uninterrupted process and without the need to deny the history theses of 1931-1932. In summary, it can be said that school history discourse is no longer secular. But this is not a religious discourse; In the narration of the history of the Turkish nation, the history of Islam, not its dogma, was used. Belonging to Islam gives meaning to Turkishness, but it does not lead to a loss of identity. This basic idea is spreading through schools and partly through mosques both in Turkey and in Europe, where it gains more meaning due to immigration. see: Étienne Copeaux, From the Turkish History Thesis to the Turkish-Islamic synthesis, pages 308, 309.
- ↑ The September 12 military government was in good relations with the Turkish-Islamic synthesis Intellectuals' Heart (Aydınlar Ocağı in Turkish). https://ejoss.euras-edu.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/EJOSS-Nisan-2022-V2-1-4.Makale.pdf
- ↑ https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2877631
- ↑ During the military dictatorship of the September 12 supporters, Turgut Özal was the deputy prime minister responsible for the economy. Then he founded a party and became prime minister through free elections. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turgut_Özal