Ethnic Welfarism (shortened to EthWel or EthWelf) is an economically center-left, culturally right, ethnic nationalist and internationalist ideology that supports a strong Welfare State, but also the creation of independent ethnostates. Unlike in most culturally right-wing ideologies, Ultranationalism, Imperialism, or any other supremacist ideas are completely abandoned. Instead, the core belief of Ethnic Welfarism is that although each and every single ethnicity is different, all of them are fully equal, and should be treated as equals. He thinks that a welfare state with open borders can't function in the long term, so creating ethnostates by voluntarily separating ethnicities into their own homogeneous states is the best way to maintain a strong welfare state. These ideas would be applied worldwide to avoid economic inequality between ethnic groups, and the creation of a strong economic and political alliance that would represent every ethnostate is required. Every nation would be required to cooperate with each other both economically and diplomatically, completely eliminating both economic and diplomatic isolation. One of the main goals of Ethnic Welfarism is to limit unnecessary human suffering to the lowest it can possibly be, and one of the biggest steps towards it is world peace, which could be achieved by justifying the existence of borders by redrawing them based on ethnic lines.
Ethnic Welfarism wants to ensure that every member of each ethnostate can meet basic human needs such as food and shelter. He believes in Social Welfarism and wants to establish a strong Welfare State, with a Welfare Capitalist economy. Work wouldn't be a necessity for everyone who wants to live a normal life. Instead, work would grant the opportunity for everyone to buy luxury items, that the unemployed couldn't, so there's still motivation to work. This is only possible in the future when robots could replace humans in every workforce. Providing welfare, implementing taxes and new laws will require a big but democratic government, which makes this ideology not incompatible with other ideologies that are against a big government, like Anarchism and Libertarianism.
Ethnopluralism is the belief that every ethnicity has the right to govern itself. The only way to stop ethnic hatred and racism is the separation of ethnicities into ethnically homogeneous states. Ethnic Welfarism rejects Segregation (Systematic separation), but believes in Separation, with tax cuts and more welfare benefits for the people willing to move out, so the separation is beneficial to everyone. Ethnic Welfarism is Interventionist but is against imperialism.
Ethnic Welfarism wants a global alliance, to limit the wealth gap and inequality between each ethnostate to the lowest possible. Ethnic Welfarism rejects both isolationism and imperialism. Creating an Ethnostate economically and diplomatically isolated from the rest of the world would only amplify racism and ethnic hatred, and increase inequality. Instead of uniting every country into a decentralized world government, Ethnic Welfarism would unite every country with a global alliance.
oRange System or brOwn System is the self-insert ideology of oRange. Other than believing in all 3 beliefs of Ethnic Welfarism ( Ethnopluralism, welfarism and alter-globalism ), he also believes in the following ideologies:
oRange System wants a republic as the form of government, which is a presidential republic, meaning that the head of state and government leads the executive branch, which is separate from the legislative branch. The president can suggest new laws and policies, but can only enforce them if it gets voted on by the legislative branch of the government. Just like in the Roman Republic, a constitutional dictatorship could be established, but only under one circumstance, if the country is getting attacked by another power, and is losing in that war. The reasoning is that the survival of the nation is the most important thing, so sacrifices should be made if it's in danger. This would speed up the process of making laws, so more changes can be made to protect the country. The dictator's authority still remains limited by the constitution, and the role of a dictator is temporary until the war is over.
oRange System believes in Liberal Democracy, with a representative democratic system. He also respects basic human rights, and some other, non-essential rights too, but also freedoms as well. Social equality and social equality are two very important concepts, which should be strived towards.
oRange System wants to separate religion from state and culture. This would include taxing religious institutions the same as other institutions. Teaching evolution in schools would be mandatory, while teaching Creationism would be optional, describing it as nothing more than just a theory. He respects the freedom of religion, so he naturally rejects State Atheism, he instead wants a secular, laicist state.
oRange System deeply cares about the environment, and one of his main objectives is to stop global warming, which requires cooperation on a global level. He wants to establish regulations, taxes, and laws to protect the environment.
oRange System is a Post-Keynesian ideology, he thinks that a market economy should be regulated and boosted by government spending. He believes in both fiscal and monetary policy theories. Unlike in Neo-Keynesianism, he disapproves of neoclassical economic models.
oRange System wants gender equality in fields like economic participation and decision-making. He wants to grant equal opportunity to everyone, regardless of gender and any other traits. Equal responsibility is also included in gender equality.
oRange System approves of technology and does not want to slow down technological progress in most cases. He also wants to cure or slow down the negative effects of aging. He also supports Space Exploration, because colonizing another planet could be a good solution if the problem of Overpopulation ever becomes a problem too dangerous to ignore.
How to draw
- Draw a ball
- Color the ball with dark grey
- Draw a light grey rose on the ball
- Add the eyes, and you're done!
|Very Dark Grey||25,25,25||#191919|
|Very Light Grey||225,225,225||#E1E1E1|
- Draw a ball
- Color the ball with red
- Draw a white flag on the ball
- Add the eyes, and you're done!
Relationships of Ethnic Welfarism
Ideologies from the Main Wiki.
Only adding ideologies related to at least one of the three beliefs of Ethnic Welfarism.
- Welfarism - Welfare and a utilitarian approach should be a top priority. Every person should receive free and equal education, free healthcare, a living space granted for everyone, a strong social safety net, and a lot more. Even if it means we'll need to impose more taxes and regulations.
- Ethnopluralism - Creating a homeland for every ethnicity big enough to sustain itself would be a good solution to solve all immigration and ethnic/racial issues present in almost every multicultural country. This would solve the issue of racism combined with cooperation between each ethnostate.
- Alter-Globalism - I support global cooperation, which will lead to prosperity for all nations. Unlike Economic Globalization, which will increase inequality and unfairness even more.
- Social Democracy - Regulations and Taxes are necessary to sustain a strong welfare state.
- Ethnic Nationalism - Borders should be drawn along ethnic lines, instead of the often arbitrary borders today. Although it can become a very dangerous idea if combined with chauvinist ideas, like Racism, Ethnocentrism, Imperialism or Irredentism.
- Left-Wing Nationalism - Mixing welfarism with Nationalism should be the norm. For example, a welfare state can only sustain itself with almost or fully closed borders, Friedman got it right!
- Nationalism - Nationality is based on common ethnicity.
- Social Capitalism - The best economic system we tried so far.
- Capitalism - The least bad economic system. Can be reformed into a good system, like Welfare Capitalism
- Reformism - As I said, Capitalism should be reformed, instead of abandoned.
- Welfare Chauvinism - Combining welfarism with nationalism will unite the people. But uniting people under the idea of Supremacy and Chauvinism will amplify the already existing racism in every country, which will divide and pit people against each other. Instead of this, we should realize that although every ethnicity is different, they are all equal to one another.
- Cultural Nationalism - Close enough, would be better than the current status quo. Although a nation should be defined by common ethnicity, instead of common culture.
- Paternalistic Conservatism - Decent, but should focus on Nationalism instead of Conservatism.
- Kemalism - Good economic ideas, but a civic nationalist.
- Nasserism - Good cultural ideas, but a socialist.
- Tridemism - China should unite all Han people, but every other ethnicity like Tibetan, Uyghur, and Manchu should be independent. Good economic policies otherwise.
- Peronism - Your economic policies are decent, but Protectionism only leads to inequality both globally and nationally.
- Socialism - You have some good ideas, but the right to property is a right of every human, which I won't give up on.
- Racial Nationalism - Race is an outdated and flawed concept. I understand that the basis of nationality should be moved from the current status quo, but race isn't it.
- Ultranationalism - Even though every ethnicity is different, there's no superior or inferior ethnicity. Supremacism is why every form of Nationalism gets labeled as racist and gets frowned upon, unjustly.
- Urbism - Urbism on a global scale would quickly devolve into Anarchism, and fully isolated states. This would take the issue of having arbitrary borders to a whole new level.
- Anationalism - Universalism is good, a global language could benefit humanity, but Anarchism, Globalism, and anti-nationalism is all awful. A mixed bag, but the disadvantages outweigh the positives by a lot.
- Multiculturalism - Multiculturalism is killing the ethnic identity of every person. Although I don't necessarily have a problem with mixing cultures if it's not forced, it's also killing every unique ethnicity, especially the smaller ones with their multiethnic ideas.
- Protectionism - Autarky is a bad economic system, it increases inequality.
- Anarchism - You can't achieve any goals without a state, which will lead to degradation, chaos, and suffering.
Relationships of oRange System
I'll add everyone who added me as well, comment here if you added me.
All opinions are fully based on ideology, not personality.
- Colombian Social Democracy - You're just a regular socdem, which is cool. You picked the worst branch of it though.
- Mattism - You're a bit too progressive and non-interventionist, but the rest of your ideas are good.
- SajZeal Model - I don't like the idea of Technocracy, but other than that you're cool.
- Braun Spencer Thought - We agree on most things, and we have a similar view on how things should work internally, although I'm more to the left. But we support a vastly different kind of Nationalism, and I completely reject the idea of Global Hegemony, and the moral duty of superpower states to intervene in other countries solely based on their own interest.
- - - - You support establishing a Theocracy, and you somehow support both the best and the worst ideology about culture and ethnicity, Ethnopluralism and Multiculturalism, even though they're completely mutually exclusive. Other than that you're cool, just a bit too utopian.
- Progressive Neo-Corporatism - Surprisingly good ideology. I don't love any of your ideas, but none of them are bad either.
- Yori Model - Surprisingly good for a socialist. Same as above, but a bit worse.
- Rutabagism - Democratic Socialism is meh, so is Technocracy. Not good, but not bad either.
- Tomassciism - I like half of your ideas, but hate the other half, but the negatives outweigh the positives.
- Ganzism - Mixing one of the best ideologies ( Ethnopluralism ) with one of the worst ones ( Anarchism ) will get you in the middle.
- Green Minarchism - We both care a lot about the environment, and both of us are transhumanists. But a Night Watchman State is not enough to provide enough welfare to the people and enforce the rules and policies. Also, we're pretty much on the two opposing ends of Capitalism. And Multiculturalism is awful, especially when combined with Globalism.
- Pantheonism - Both of us find ending violent conflicts on Earth an important goal, but we have radically different solutions. You want a world government, and a guild socialist economy. But you still support welfarism, alter-globalism and a moderate form of Nationalism, so you're not that bad.
- Dylanism - You believe in one of the worst types of Capitalism, and you're against any type of Ethnic Nationalism.
- EdPatrumism - You're at least an ethnic nationalist, I guess.
- Animalisticism - I'm a huge supporter of animal welfare, and I'm an environmentalist myself. But Anarchism will get you nowhere.
- Liberty-Loverism - You still want markets, you support LGBTQ rights and you believe in Transhumanism, all of these are good. The rest of your ideas are awful though, especially Anarchism.
- Inkyism - Both Anarchism and Communism are awful, though I support LGBTQ rights. The old you was better.
- Liuanism - What. What even are you? Everything is wrong with your ideology, especially Anarchism.
- Anarcho-Altruism - You care for human emotion, which is the only thing that makes you slightly better than Hive-Mind Collectivism, one of if not the worst ideologies.
|Roman Republicanism||Social Democracy||Alter-Globalization||Ethnic Nationalism|
Tribalism - Great-Great-Grandfather
Athenian Democracy - Great-Great-Grandfather
Demarchy - Great-Great-Grandmother
Authoritarianism - Great-Great-Grandmother
Marxism - Great-Great-Grandfather
Liberalism - Great-Great-Grandmother
Enlightenment - Great-Great-Grandfather
- Radical Ethnopluralism.png
A comic about Radical Ethnopluralism.
A comic about Ethnic Welfarism and Black Nationalism