Note: I'll no longer be doing relations, and will simply limit this page to updating my ideological beliefs
Darknight Yuusha Model is a LeftUnity ideology that is economically left-wing, culturally variable, Civically Moderate, specifically center-statist, and nationalistic ideology, belonging to DarknightYuusha
In it's essence, socialism must embrace a democratic workplace under control and ownership by the workingmen, whether it be from guilds, cooperatives, or into the old and soon to be deservingly phased out traditional capitalist business models, in a structure of this workplace democracy, several sorts of decision making processes like deciding wages, hiring, negotiations within workplace issues, and election of leadership will be by the workers, in regards to leadership within a workplace, there will be a worker-owner head of workplace, functioning within the very purpose of serving as a cohesive negotiating body, ensuring that the power within workplace democracy will be made stable, resisting to the corrosion of division and chaos, further to solidify the balance of power within workplace democracy shall be an economic law of workplace stability, that under the paternalistic watchman role of the government must balance and supervise the power between the head of the workplace(the owner) and the collective of working individuals within, all in which to the contributive elements of the working democracy, the negotiating head, and the watchman do for the sake of preventing exploitation, injustice, and ulterior motives of malice done in the shadows.
Socialism and economic democracy in regards as the answers for an economy by and for the masses, to supplement the basis of a democratic workers economy, the socialist guild shall be one of the prominent models, whether it shall be within the wider expanse of the nation or the smaller areas of locality, the guilds will be made manifest, as in the fashion of the guild, they will be organized through lines of a common profession of contributive talents, bringing with the harkening of artisanship in different enterprises, as in each economic sector shall be brought forth with cohesion of industry by the working guilds, no longer of a prison of wage slavery, but a truly free enterprise of mutuality.
Lines of common industry through the guild, instead of lines by individual workplaces, will serve as a positive force that will induce a mutual effect of unity that strives for a common goal, incentivizing a greater overall effect of increased production in regards to cooperation, communication, ease of business, and role serving, in which those local guilds will be organized, and united cohesively through regional and national guilds, requiring less need for a slower bureau, and increase both efficiency in regards to both market-based and planning-based categories.
There shall be answering to the democratic structuring to ensure the harmonious aura in a guild made possible most often in times, to what should be mustered are the voices of the workers, the voices of the consumers, and the necessary balancing weigh to counteract the malice of greed that shall corrupt the democracy into a self-serving economic ochlocracy, what comes by these are the elements of councils and committees of workers and consumers alike, the democratic workplace of the guild itself, and the occupation of specialized technicians, each playing a part in the ensuring of harmony, with the democratic guild workplace of the workingmen's voices being the hand of decision and democratic processing, where they shall decide and recall the leading disciplinarians through popularity and knowledgeable merit, the technicians in their regards to be assistants and consultants putting a meritocratic and expertise skill in decisions within the area of democratic processing should the threat of a situation that will descend into mayhem, acting not as iron hands of power, but forces of balancing, and the consumers and workingmen committees and councils that contribute to negotiating and partaking of democratic processing regarding the fulfillment of their needs and the guilds needs and functioning, to this end, shall there be a structure of mutuality, as well as democratic forces of mutuality.
The cooperative of the workingmen manifests the essence of an economic democracy, in that essence lies it's core value to contributing to a socialist democratic economy, the value of the workers' self-management, with a skeletal framework formed under a unity in meeting the basic socioeconomic rights and needs, adding the element of autonomy within the mix, balanced with the state's supervision to ensure necessary stability and justice, thus is the workingmen's cooperative a necessary component in the meetings of requirement in the process of economic democratization, by in large shall the democratic cooperatives be synthetic and complimentary to the socialist guild in communication and cooperation, to thee shall this be provisioning and transforming of a process to the larger businesses, the greater major of industrial outlines, and the most essential of services.
Since it's conception, on the paper does the trade union seem potent in the socialist goal, for it's organization through a band of workingmen through individual workplaces, fighting for rights, wages, and the betterment of workplace conditions, can be mustered to call on arms for the workers to strike, pressure, and shock against capitalists of state and corporation alike, these battles fought by the unions can also be a turning driver of class consciousness, further uprising the working men, all qualities considered and the past successes, it can be a sure-fired answer to reach socialism, especially in a shorter portion of the long game, the trade union however, is in actuality a vain solution in the end, especially nowadays.
Despite so much of these qualities showing a potentially positive repertoire, these very qualities can be reversed, turning into a force contradicting to it's and blocking the road to socialism, the motivation of those goals that are often fought for by the syndicates, are also opportunities for capitalists to put a stopgap for their own gains, in which those goals can be simply "addressed" in an inexplicit cloak of concessions, hiding the nature of the false lie of change being brought by those very capitalists, what also fills the malfunctions of unions in general is it's apparent individualistic rhetoric in regards to the workplace and the means of production, it's lack of a wide and broad scale of focus regarding the workers in industry, and it's vulnerability to corruption and incentivization of self-serving and ulterior motives and individuals, which results to a conflicting divide and chaotic disruption that hinders the gathering and conscience of a wider scale of the proletariat, such an issue had since existed even long back in it's historical days where it was primed in it's most necessary role, and becomes problematic in the current and future stages of development, the very conclusion that made unions an afterthought is an irony, for they do not lack because of a socialistic nature, but instead, they lack because their nature is a capitalistic one.
For what use could be even viable for a union to function? they simply lack a more ambitious rhetoric, and their repertoire is too oriented towards capitalistic manners, if a union would be even used, then the only viable purpose and effective it could ever muster is as some sort of means in the short run, what viability that could be mustered however is only possible if they are reinforced with a more radical solution, they shouldn't simply aim to be unions, but rather aim for the transformation towards an actually socialist means of production, in which the socialist means of production manifests in the form of democratic guilds and cooperatives, once that the road to achieving socialism is set, the transformation process to organizing an economically democratic presence in the wide reaches of workplaces should begin, and whatever purpose the syndicate could be used after that point is that of a tertiary use, but in the end, with the meaningful changes to uphold rights and conditions with an accordance to a wage of fair accord into account of hard labor realized, they will fade away, and regarding the case of syndicate busting, any reasons for that matter that are capitalistic in value(eg: suppression due to refusing to give better conditions) are criminal however, it will be done on a green light when the unions strike for self-serving ends otherwise.
Wages of effort and labor
The value of hard work and effort isn't something to forsake, nor is it something that is considered evil, rather, the one to blame more of is the capitalist system that masks the slave wage system with the slogan of hard work, for it refuses to even properly reward it's workers adequate to the labor they have committed and instead focuses on wages dictated by capital and suited for capital, what shall replace it is a wage system that correlates to the reward of one's hard work in the given time, such a wage should not be affected and rewarded by the simplicity of position, to realistically speak of things however, there will be the inevitability of a minimum wage to prevent shortage, but it also must be adjusted to fit the program of the socialist workplace democracy, so at it's lowest, it should be 12$, and this minimum wage can be discussed and decided by the democratic workplace itself.
Markets and Planning, the necessary utilization
To this question, neither markets nor planning are considerably superior to one another, to understand and utilize the true potential and benefits to reap from those mechanisms of allocation, it must be acknowledged that the model of planning and the model of the market were morally grey forces, bringing each to their own tables with both strengths and weaknesses, for the market, it is what allows the community of individuals to be free and independent in their desires of innovation and fulfillment of needs, for planning, shall it provide a necessary allocation to basic rights through the people's decisions in the shortcomings where a market could not, but in turn, when unchecked and untamed, both of them can be seized by despotic and self-serving powers that shall end the liberty and cooperation of the people within, a must-have answer to the question is that both of them shall be played and utilized through two categories, consumer goods; which shall be dealt with a force of a regulated market, and essential services; left to the helms of decentral planning, and to those forces shall they be fulfilling what is necessary, the provision of a free, fair, equal, and just society.
The rights to commerce and the necessitation of a market are what emphasizes man's way of expression in the regard to artisanship, innovation, and freedom, although these expressions are not necessarily limited to just the freedom of commerce and the marketplace, the manifestations of those very expressions will be expanded on thanks to them giving the opportunities and freedoms to do so, to ensure such freedoms expressions can be done so in the fairest and egalitarian manners however, is a necessary question before and when proceeding to loosen the chains and red tapes, what must be done to behest the fair game framework into the market is to ensure that competition shall be made fair for enterprises, especially for the smaller ones, which should compose the backbone of innovation and artisanship under equality, reinforced further with the discipline of the state to ensure that entities in the marketplace must not commit acts of injustice and exploitation that crack and dysfunction the harmony maintained and valued, furthermore, lesser shall be the dependence of larger enterprises be, and that those that commit exploitation shall be facing rightful judgement and be seized, the dependency and engagement of online commerce should be lessened as well, especially with how it has been responsible for breaking down smaller enterprises.
In the areas where the essential rights of man need to be fulfilled, this is where a market often struggles, and where coordination shines, when the services that need greater emphasis to fulfill society's harmony and justice, often does the direct where demand by the marketplace direct it without getting necessary priorities straight, to solve this, the utilization of a planning by a structure of communal and decentral societal forces will be needed, consisting of the communes of workers, neighborhoods, and the greater society in general, and the guilds and cooperatives of which they serve as the alternatives, and the national bodies and the elected popular technicians of the communes that serve as the forces of supervision, cohesion, and emergency merit, brought forth by this structure will be a democratic decision making process composed by all these elements, round after round will there be proposals and discussions of how the plan will proceed until it is decided on, topping it all off with a constitutional law applied to all elements that will put adequate limitations to coordination to prevent excessive bureaucracy.
Breaking down the elites
If the democratic economy of the people is going to be ever realized, it is necessary to break down the oppressive concentration of power and wealth into the hands of the few, any kinds of elites, whether it be statesmen, politicians, bankers, or plutocrats, such criminals are intolerable to society and are a menace to economic democracy as a whole, there must there be an active breakdown of the oligopoly of power and wealth, for corporations must be broken down, landlords be brought to judgement, capitalist bankers facing retribution, criminal politicians be tried and purged, and plutocrats forfeit their rights to their very assets, and even their very rights to existence, as the concentration of power to the elites ceases, so shall the equal redistribution of power and wealth to the masses begin, and to preserve the justice and equity that hath brought new life of freedom to the masses, must be the guarding presence of laws that forbid usury, oppressive wealth accumulation, and hierarchical wealth and power concentration in general, which those laws shall be made absolute for all of society to follow.
The progressive taxation files
A democratized bank system
Banks themselves are among the elements currently corrupted by capitalism that must be transformed to serve the will of the common good, to serve the common good will be done through the democratization of banking, instead of being held by capitalists who run them under the dangerous profit-motive, which have consequently dismayed and backstabbed those who have been served by them, this system will instead be replaced with a democratized bank system of credit unions, mutual savings banks, and cooperative banks, all of which ran by members of the common good, which will fundamentally remove the profit-ran and capitalist structure of the old system of banking, and ultimately, the problems produced by them, now truly serving the masses and destroying the oligopolistic and monopolistic centralization of credit in favor of redistributive mannerisms, there will be a necessity for a national bank however, albeit structured to serve it's purpose as a cohesive force, and will have it's own restraints to ensure that it will not thread on the common man and accumulate power.
The ownership of property must always be at the hands of the many and never the few, no matter what style of elite class that exists, whether it be a band of plutocrats, a cabinet of bureaucrats, or a combination of both, regardless, it shalt be made clear that property as a whole must be redistributed to to the hands of the community of the masses, for smaller things such as smaller scale enterprises, as well as the matter of personal needs, shall they be private, but widespread in distribution in accordance to fulfill the whole mass of individuals consisting the community, for the larger and more important echelons such as large-scale enterprise, as well as essential needs and sectors, shall be collective, and in special cases that require both the individual's ingenuity and liberty to provide an alternative for the community to espouse their own personal freedoms, and the greater collective body providing a grand service of the public in ensuring the fulfillment of needs of the masses, such as housing, education, and healthcare, both private and collective options of property should exist, all done to ensure the safeguard against the commodification and bureaucratization of human rights to a livelihood.
Justice through land reformation
Landlordism, and the rule of land by the elites in general, has been a disaster for humanity as a whole, the rights to a home and the rights of land are essential for man to attain liberty and to attain fairness amongst the common good, landlordism however is a halt to this, and this halt must be discouraged, confiscated, and ultimately dismantled in favor of the widespread redistribution and the provision of land and housing for man to live on, this necessity shall be provided in a collective manner and a private manner, collective in the sense that the state must help the unfortunate(not to the lazy however) via the provision of public housing, and private in the sense that it must be widespread in the manner that suits to have housing be under the ownership of the common man who lives in it, further assisted by LVT which discourages land hoarding and breaks down the oligopoly of land.
The communicative and diplomatic essence of trade as a whole has brought both miraculous and disastrous effects as is consequentially to it's rise, one hand of it brings potential to peace and cooperation amongst peoples within nations to further each other in development, and on the other hand, can this communicative and diplomatic essence be used maliciously as a weapon by imperialists and capitalists to disrupt economic sovereignty and further their means and ends of injustice, this concludes that trade itself is a neutral force that must be utilized maximally to the fairest of intents, meaning the policy and program of action should be mutual in every sense of the word, neither to follow the helms of radically autarkist methodology that isolates peoples to a fanatical point of harm to development and harmony, nor to follow the lenient and even outright exploitative tendencies of strongly liberal trade programs that pave the way for imperialists and capitalists to gain an opportunity to subjugate other peoples sovereignty and livelihoods and enslave them out of their own profits, instead should it take elements of emphasizing cooperative dialogue and deals that help within the development of peoples socioeconomic conditions, but also be reinforced with necessarily small but adequate mutual protections that shall make trade and foreign investment abide by the laws of protecting economic sovereignty and the prohibition of exploitation and dependency, fulfilling both conditions of cooperative networks and economic self-sufficiency.
A welfare of responsibility and opportunity
The provision of society's justice, equity, and liberty makes the requirement of a welfare state, social securities, and social programs a must have to achieve this, although not necessarily limited to this and other legitimate methods of fulfilling said provision like charity will be utilized under care and watch-outs against malicious shadows, and to this must be directed to those who struggle socioeconomically, where the development of society's echelons and structures, whether it be at the urban, scientific, and most especially those on the underdeveloped and rural side be at strong emphasis, and must be fed with the necessary socioeconomic right of an opportunity to successfully live, but also with the addition to being taught to utilize and make good out of such opportunities to succeed through welfare, for opportunities, chances, and pities that are wasted irresponsibly and leeched off at must not be given to those who do not work while at able conditions to do so.
Rights to a livelihood for education and healthcare
Healthcare is an essential service, and to a greater extension, is a human right, thus must it not be driven by profits and only meant to be under the hands for serving the common good, and thus must be under public control for the most part, whether decentral or central, it will be necessary for healthcare to be accessible in a universally widespread manner, provided by the national and local health services, and alternative, non-profit services ran by cooperatives and guilds in case the public services aren't satisfactory, however, both are contractually bound in that they must follow the law that neither shouldn't override the other and must allow one another in order to provide this essential right to the people.
Education is also another essential service that must be under the hands of the masses, and for a good reason, knowledge and learning must not be locked out and sealed away by the few, and thus must also be under public hands, whether in the wider national level, or the smaller regional and local levels, should the right to learning be available, thus, any motive of profit is made taboo for the sake of reducing financial burden, and that should any alternatives exist, they must exist for the very purpose of providing a satisfactory alternative to providing the rights to learn, and never for the sake of ideological agenda, nor by capitalistic motives, the expansion of the rights to knowledge must also come in quality, and thus should the increase of quality education be adequately funded.
Whether society's socioeconomic development stage is agrarian or industrial, or whether should the focus be on farmers, peasants, or the industrial proletariat, the workingmen are workingmen, and by this virtue should socialism in both the agrarian and industrial aspects be emphasized, and in turn, both the agrarian and industrial sectors and modes shall be heralded as important backbones in a socialist society, no matter the greater overall emphasis to either sector of development, to the accordance of a socialist democratic economy, neither must be held under plutocratic or bureaucratic hands, but rather, the hands of the common public, thereby should the rights of the community and working individuals be granted to their own decentralized matters through guild and cooperative formation, to a wider scale should the cohesion of agrarian and industrial sectors be managed under the help of larger guilds and the watchman of the state however, and laws of labor shall be put to ensure infighting and hoarding amongst the workers shall be deemed undesirable.
One pillar that holds the structure of economic democracy and socialism is what also keeps not only those values stable, but also humanity as a whole, is the necessitation of sustainability, the sustenance of the ecosystems and environments is what gives society the qualities of a healthy living, as well as the survival and development of society in general, therefore must energy be under the hands of the public good, and moreover must the rhetoric of energy and sustainability be made bright green, whether the methods would be ranging from be cooperatives and guilds incentivized under a green path, workplaces and industries rejuvenated to transform from wretched and polluted heaps to clean and green havens, the institutionalization of economic laws that put the destruction of nature to a minimum, or to the transitioning of the weaker and destructive fossil fuels to consistently potent sources like nuclear and fusion, the goal remains the same, save mother nature from destruction before this very destruction against the environment becomes severe enough to negate all effective roads of wound healing and societal development.
Equity: the question of application
Equity is a virtue that should be upheld, for it is a value that promotes harmony and justice amongst society, which in turn, will allow a greater degree of true freedom to exist, the application of equity however and what it is another thing to answer, and this question will have to be answered if equity will truly be put into place, for we must find the right lines to equity, if there is a lack of it, either there will be too much leniency against forces of inequality or there will be too much absolute dogma that will make equity lost in time.
The very value in upholding equity first and foremost is to ensure the balance of power in socioeconomic echelons, this is a virtue needed in order to provide the rights of serviceable living conditions for the people, ultimately, whether in regards to individuals possessing greater treasury/earning more than other individuals won't matter so long as gaps are narrow, the reward is equated to one's effort of labor, and the classes realistically horizontal enough to provide equity, equity will be realized, understanding the need to ensure the balance of power in socioeconomic echelons will also need a solution to these matters, the wealth question and the horizontality question
In regards to answering the wealth question, while it doesn't matter that much in individuals having greater riches than others, what does matter is the power behind the possession of wealth, and often does money have a strong correspondence with power, which will mean those with the greatest of riches amongst all others will have the privileges to do and fulfill their selfish desires as they please, this consequence is a danger that must be stopped and quelled, and thus must there be the need for a limit to this sort of wealth, never extending to the ranges of the billions in number or even towards the ranges that are borderline to the billionaire territory, in addition, any special privilege that allows money to talk and accumulate power must also be suppressed.
Class in it's importance
Class was always a very significant force, and is arguably one of(if not) the most significant forces driving the wheel of history and the gears of human society, a force influential enough to influence the direction of culture, diplomacy, and governing politics, and it is also worth mentioning that it is essential to understanding economics, to this end must class be a value recognized, for it not only helps understand the roots and causes of the problems affecting society, but also an analysis that can plot out and lay the groundwork of solutions, which is crucial in paving the way forward to a brighter and more just society.
Quite clearly there are a lot of problems in human society today, and obviously is the oppressive hierarchy and concentration of power and wealth by the oligarchs a menace, and very much will this ruling elite be determined to stop and compromise any meaningful change to it's own selfish goals, and must this outrageous rule of elitism be fought against through class struggle and class consciousness, for too long since the dawn of humanity has society been held back from it's true potential by those very elites, and to muster the forces and rallying the masses in fighting against the despotic oligarchs is a necessity, thus should the hierarchy be dismantled and the classes aligned horizontally, where the living conditions are made fair game and the equity of the rights to an opportunity to serviceable living conditions.
but there are also limits to how far can this horizontal equity go for the matter of class, whilst classes themselves should be re-aligned to fit a more equal and just society, the abolishment of classes is simply a far-fetched thought, it will be inevitable that there will be some richer than others, and that class cannot be destroyed at all since it is an abstract concept, this leads to the question of class collaboration, harmonic in it's attempts to create a cooperative society it may be, this idea is in no good condition to function in order to fulfill equality however, since the upper classes of today are mostly infested with the most exploitative and self-serving barbarians that will do anything to keep their power, making this an afterthought in practice and yet another tool for elitism, simply put, is the Marxist ideology too steadfast in defending it's dogma of absolute equality, and the ideals of class collaboration too lenient and cuckold towards capitalist hierarchy, what matters in achieving equality is not the jealousy of wealth or the collaboration between the rich and poor, but rather the restructuring of society to ensure the fair and equal redistribution of power and wealth for the masses.
While socialism itself is a goal worth striving for to progress humanity into the future stages of development, and to rid the oppressive systems that have enslaved human society, achieving it isn't a simple and easy task, immediate implementation from the top-down isn't a viable solution either, rather, to go down the road of socialism, it is necessary to maintain patience and accept a gradual process of achieving it, although to generally speak of, this is not in the liberal reformist sense, but rather, a more revolutionary sense, and building up a socialist revolution will also need the same patience used to achieve the ends of socialism as a greater whole.
As it was mentioned, reaching socialism isn't a simple task, for the road to pave will come by obstacles and cracks that will hamper the necessary conditions for socialist ends to be met, a factor to consider is the socioeconomic and material conditions a country has, meaning it is inevitable that there will be a need to adopt changes based on the situation, whether it would be more moderate or even more radical depending on the case, usually the main starting point would be a mix between social corporatist and social authoritarian economics due to their pragmatic repertoire that helps trail forward into socialism, but more desperate and critical situations may heed the call for a more Vanguard Marxist framework, particularly in very underdeveloped countries, either way, it will be necessary to implement policies outside the ideal build once the road to socialism has begun, however, keep in mind that these are just means to adapt in order to progress towards socialism, so those adaptive measures will have to move on and phase out into a higher stage, as conditions develop favorably for a democratic workers economy, then shall the implementation of more socialist democratic acts will come by, ascending through each phase of democratization until the goal of socialism has been realized.
Mode of production
Regarding the state's role, in smaller and medium enterprises, the state would only serve a rather minimal role akin to a watchman, doing some small scale supervision to ensure minimalization of exploitation, but on large enterprises, the state will play a more significant role and will play a part in the publicization of said large enterprises as large enterprises in general aren't trustworthy when privatized due to the tendency of significant presence of monopolization and exploitation done by large private businesses, however, he wants publicization, not nationalization, monopolization has proven to create oppressive hierarchies that gear the economy to a select few which can create a thriving state of economic exploitation as mentioned before, whether it be by wealthy businessmen or state bureaucrats, oppressive hierarchies are still oppressive hierarchies regardless, thus, he prefers nationalization as a short term means to transfer enterprises into the public, and into a longer term for the transition towards socialist guilds, the state will still remain in it's paternalistic role to prevent the large guilds from going haywire and chaotic however.
Taxation and Wealth
The disparity of the extremes in wealth can be a huge detriment in society and cause a huge imbalance of power in addition to the denial of rights to a life with the basic needs provided, making it clear equal wealth distribution a must have for society, addressing the wealthy, for millionaires who gained their wealth through legitimate and non-exploitative means in addition to paying their fair share of taxes, they will be spared, but to those who commit vile acts of exploitation, their assets will be seized by the state and redistributed to more ethical enterprises in addition to much of the wealth being redistributed to the people, to prevent unfair wealth accumulation further, a maximum wealth cap of 100 million(250 million if this may not work) shall be implemented
A set of taxes below, mainly with a progressive taxation framework, will be implemented with each of them having a reasonable purpose for it's implementation and function
- Income tax - relatively small to ensure that not only will unfair wealth accumulation be curbed to prevent and oppressive stratified class hierarchy but also to ensure that the income of people will still be enough that they could make a living for themselves
- Wealth tax - Undergoes an economically progressive framework in that it is increased the higher the overall wealth like owned assets, will be adequately high for upper class citizens, somewhat like the income tax, meant to prevent a non-horizontal and oppressive class structure from forming.
- Inheritance tax - Only towards upper class citizens, namely the wealthy ones like millionaires, incentivizes wealth distribution and equal distribution of property to the common good
- Land Value Tax - the more land you own, the greater the taxation, meant to prevent land hoarding and help with the process in redistributing land
- Sales tax - will not be implemented on water, vegetables, fruit, meat, and medicine, which are all healthy necessities, on items like luxury products, junk food, and legal soft drugs like tobacco and non-medical marijuana, it shall be implemented, meant to promote healthy products that suit basic necessities to curb unhealthy consumption.
- Carbon tax - increased taxation on pollutive carbon-based products and non-green economic energy sectors, part of an environmentalist plan to promote green energy and punish capitalists utilizing and incentivizing pollutive means harming the environment
- Parasite tax - To whom those who do not work with the ability to do so, shall not eat or rest, this tax emphasizes this rhetoric by increasing the rate and height of taxation for individuals who leech off from others whilst not contributing with their labor.
Dynamics of The state and the people
There should be a delicate balance of power between the people and the state as to ensure that the people have the power to retain their liberties when society is under peacetime, and that the state is able to safeguard the people and fight against criminals and/or terrorists that dare threaten society in addition to protecting the nation from imperialists and foreign invaders in addition to that, exposing and fighting corruption(eg: whistleblowing) will be a necessity in order to keep the delicate balance in check, such delicate balance of power will also be a key in playing a part in a concept of a dual-failsafe between both the state and the people, in which should either of the two entities fail(the state/people) suffer inefficiency within a situation, the other will be given the ability to deal with the problem the struggling entity is dealing with, for example, if the police force is unable to protect the citizens from criminals, then the citizens themselves will be able to protect themselves thanks to gun rights, another example will be if the people are struggling to fight off terrorists, then the state in addition to the military's strength will counter them, to answer where I am in the civic spectrum, I'm civically moderate, particularly statist in summary.
The question of Vanguardism
Vanguardism, to his eyes, is high-risk and high-reward, as a strong guiding hand, if utilized correctly, can bring the nation to prosperity and quell threats that dare slow or even halt the progress of development entirely, however, the guiding vanguard can also become a threat in of itself if it ever falls into corruption and ends up being a self-serving elite class, and because of that, it's only usable in a niche under situations where a country is faced with threats such as instability, division, terrorism, imperialism, and etc, and due to how he wishes for a government under the rule of the common good, the vanguard party will ultimately step down from power once the country has reached significant development and is on a good enough shape that a democracy can thrive.
He also acknowledges how the dogmatic bureaus of vanguards can tend to put itself in a lose/lose situation, since the concept itself fails to acknowledge that the left is not merely just one party, but one broad coalition consisting of those who fight for the proletarian struggle to seize the means of production against the bourgeois elite, albeit one under differing viewpoints(so long as it doesn't include idpol bullshit), and that tendency to reject this reality from vanguards results in an ideological dogmatic cult under strict idealistic principles or a divided party plagued with hypocritical double standards, either of which result in bureaucratic deficiency and ultimately a descent into corruption, making it clear that the need for other leftists to voice their dissatisfaction against the vanguard is a must have to prevent this, as the party isn't always the smartest and that total dependency on it's self-proclaimed wisdom can prove to be redundant, he also puts the emphasis that the process on the road to socialism is a gradual one, even in the making of an eventual revolution, even as vanguards can prove to be cohesive, a degree of bottom-up decentralization under a participist motif both in economics and government should be done to prevent any top-down bureaucratization attempts.
Even with all these criticisms, the question of cohesiveness should still be addressed, therefore, a degree of a loose movement/organization of a socialist ideology will be needed to prevent disunity.
The Democratic Structure
When finding the ideal structure of government, the best, or the least bad of all of them would be a democratic one, as it would be the main duty for the government to serve it's people, it thus must be governed by the people and be for the people, the answer to democracy will have to be addressing some important things that would affect how the democracy would be structured as, such as how could the differing opinions of people be addressed? how would each of the region and locality's people have their voices recognized and represented through? and what should be the methodology used to maintain the democratic balance within all levels? as these questions are answered, the structure becomes apparent that the overall repertoire must be direct as possible, combined with a constitutional framework.
in all levels, the citizens should at least have a voice in the democracy, from local, to regional, and to the national level, a direct democratic methodology shall be used in the regional and local levels, the local level in particular will be utilizing a participatory system due to the adequate size being there to make it function properly, there shall be people's councils composed without any official head in both the regional and local levels, because once we proceed to the national level, there will be at least some sort of representative, where regions and localities will be represented in the realm of national decision making via a national council composing of secretariats and wards, serving as an intermediary body, these secretariats and wards must however follow the people's desires, in which decision making and voting will be mostly done through referendums via people's committies and popular conferences, and by occasion shall there be some sort of meeting of secretariats and wards, and should they disobey, they will be either recalled or forcibly resigned should they refuse to be ever recalled.
Each level will also have a Constitution of laws, with the local and regional constitutions being decided on by their respective councils to address domestic matters, and a national central constitution, built to hold the country together, written with a blueprint of balancing measures to prevent imbalance of power between the constitutions, which includes restricting itself from abusing power to override the regional and local constitutions but at the same time ensures the necessity of local and regional constitutions to act with cohesion with the national law, laws within constitutions shall be implemented/repealed through either a general consensus(the usual method) or a 3/4 majority agreement(just in case).
On the issue of voting, ranked voting would be the systematic method of processing votes, since unlike first past the post, which is a failed system that greatly limits the freedom of decision to a situation akin to where there is no other choices between yes and no, ranked voting allows the voter to make decisions under much greater freedom, virtually eliminating the dictatorial and oligarchical political polarization apparent under FTPF
The Communal structure
The commune itself shall be the very basis of the democratic government's structure, composing of a national commune, regional communes, and local communes, all in which serve as some sort of coordinating body for guilds and affairs in their respective areas under democratic processing in both a governmental and economical sense, these communes will be equivalent to the state, regional government, and local township respectively.
Likewise, under the commune, it's structure would function under a democratic processing system composed of citizens, though there will be some sort of communal legislation through the means of a ward, which will help serve to elect it's assembly composition under a direct referendum, and that members should undergo a regular routine of reporting and meeting back to the citizens of the commune, in addition to that, checks and balances shall be implemented via a communal constitution that mandates the necessary balance of power between all three levels of communal structure to prevent either accumulation of centralization or incohesive chaos amongst the communes.
Federalism would be considered as the ideal system in the central-decentral government spectrum as it allows regions to represent their people and culture better within the nation through stronger separate regional laws within each regional government, where they will adopt a participatory democratic system calling citizens from it's area as further means to represent this motif, however, despite the call for federalization, the need of social cohesion is a must in society as to prevent chaos and disunity amongst the country, thus it is a necessity for regional governments to be subject to follow national laws and the constitution.
on the occasions where a country is small and homogenous however, a unitarian government is more effective, as it doesn't really make sense to decentralize a country that is rather uncertain to suffer the potential hindrances of a unitarian governmental system due to it's small area and homogenic composition.
Law and the police force
As the very threat of crime can result in criminals causing havoc within society, in which the lives of people can be ruined as a result of this, the police force is a necessity to ensure the protection of lives and the enforcement of law, to ensure this, there shall a competent and potent police force in addition to funding said police force as to ensure that the cops are to be as efficient in dealing with crimes
despite such support, I am also opposed to police brutality and corruption, and because of this, there shall be regulations to ensure that the police won't be corrupted by an overflow of power and that they will not commit acts of abuse against the people they serve to protect, in addition, whilst I support funding for the police, I don't want said spending to go overboard, and that such spending is not meant to transform the police into a tyrannical and corrupt bureaucratic organization, but rather to ensure that the police are to fulfill the role of serving and protecting the people through efficient and benevolent methodological management of power
Penalties for crimes
Generally, I would use a mix of rehabilitative and punitive justice when punishing criminals, as there would be at least some form of rehabilitation when punishing crimes whether minor or major, and it's generally more prevalent on minor crimes, though as crimes get more severe, punitive means would be more often used, and as for the death penalty, it will be instated, but this will only be reserved under the condition of the criminal being guilty of a heinous crime beyond any shadow of doubt
as for fining, whilst I do understand that punishments shouldn't be too harsh, fining is also prone to corruption as it could result in the criminal refusing to stop committing crimes and buying one's way out of justice, because of this, fining will only be used once on the very first time a crime is committed, after this, if repeated for a 2nd time and onwards, community service would be used instead as punishment
News and Media
With the ever growing dangers of polarized media, regardless if private or under the state, resulting in bias, slander, and misinformation, further bolstered by manufactured consent, bringing in a harmful generation of conformist illiteracy, it is a must that the fairness doctrine should be implemented in order to prevent this, as under the power of the fairness doctrine, opposing viewpoints will be represented equally and fairly when serious/controversial matters are discussed in media, which will serve to curb the performative activism omnipresent in the current times.
Freedom of speech
Very much a Staunch supporter of freedom of speech and the free marketplace of ideals, in addition to acknowledging that humans indeed have free will, I am opposed to censorship against ideals most of the time even rather vile ones, not only is it rather immoral to strip the rights to freedom of speech of a person just for views, but also when it comes to countering the aforementioned vile ideologies like wokeness and alt-right, it's very much ineffective due to the risk of legitimizing said movement, all of this is also a major factor in playing a role within the dual-failsafe of the state and the people.
The Paradox of tolerance, whilst decent theoretically as a measure to protect the free marketplace of ideals, has become awful in practice most of the time ever since it has been effectively ruined by several people who use it as a justification to silence all other opinions they oppose, speaking of censorship and protection of the free marketplace of ideals, while I genuinely oppose the former for the most part, it may still be utilized under the following conditions as to fulfill the importance of the latter.
- Condition 1:The threat and it's proponents has gained a significant foothold in the political realm
- Condition 2:Said proponents are going to dismantle the free marketplace of ideals and silence anyone who dares disagree with them.
if only one of those conditions are met, then social ostracization through popular support against such threats would be ideally better as to reduce their power and foothold whilst not running the risk of legitimizing those threats through censorship
As I also oppose censorship for the most part, I'm also a strong opponent of hate speech laws, alongside the aforementioned reasons why I'm generally opposed to censorship usually, hate speech laws can also have a very discriminatory nature, as very often said laws are meant to protect certain people of certain groups from harm, certain individuals that are willing to harm others and get off unpunished for their crimes will abuse those laws to achieve that, while the advocates of those laws argue that it's a good measure to prevent toxicity, those laws only serve the contrary as they outright deny the free will humans have by forcing a conformist aura to the people to nullify any differing opinions of significance, and such is only proven further through supplementation by all of the aforementioned reasons.
To reform or to revolt
The ever growing lust of power of the elite classes which results in reforms becoming overturned or turned into meaningless victories/mere concessions that strengthen their position, in addition to a huge majority the current systems in countries being generally corrupt and/or elitist institutions that corrupts those that participate in them to bring in change, further compounded with the elites and the system spreading divisive political trends favoring the elite system that created as a tool to divide the people and further alienate those who oppose the system has brought the conclusion that reform has been a lost cause and an unviable option to bring in meaningful change for the better, and that revolution is the way to bring in meaningful change to defeat the elites and serve the people, however, for the most part, revolutions would be bloodless, generally resembling forms like civil disobedience, however, should violence be done against those who peacefully revolt, then a revolution of violence will be inevitable, though violence against innocent civilians should be prevented as much as possible in either case
However, achieving goals is best done under a gradual process, yes, even a revolution needs to be gradually built up to pristine and ideal conditions where it would ignite, he also acknowledges that the system is still very aware of it's greedy needs of it's own survival and will do anything to counter change at all costs, which will result in the determination of methods to vary, though a common method involved is through building up popularity in the local level, another method includes pressuring the capitalist institutions via methods like mass strikes and have unions seize those institutions(which will then transform into guilds), despite the varying methods that can change, strengthening the movement and consciousness of a revolutionary movement will still remain unchanged as the desired objectives to build it up.
It should be noted that one must be careful and cautious with the high risk of hate, powerful as a weapon to unite the people against the system it may be, it also runs the potential consequence of degenerating the revolution into a transition of a similarly oppressive system painted under a different color, a consequence most notably demonstrated in the French and Russian revolutions, while they have undeniably made positive long-term effects, such hatred allowed those revolution devolve into a stage of abusive bureaucracy, resulting in them having much less success than anticipated, to avoid this very consequence, the revolution must prioritize the love of the people it was sought to fight for the greater good above the anger and hatred against the system that has dissatisfied and failed the people it has governed with neglect, this prioritization shall also come with the purging of individuals who will drive the revolution under terror and hatred on the highest and most prioritized order.
Progressivism or Conservatism
Darknight Yuusha Model considers himself as a progressive-conservative in a way, infusing both progressive and conservative elements to my societal ideals, another thing to take account is that the terms "progressive" and "conservative" are broad and ultimately arbitrary in meaning and context within his eyes in addition to acknowledging that the politics regarding culture/society aren't one dimensional, and that the situations and material conditions of each separate country should be also taken to account for such(even being argued so far as to be the greatest defining factor of understanding what is progress and what is conservation).
Because of these very reasons, He has leanings depending on how developed an area is, being more conservative on very developed areas and more progressive on underdeveloped ones, for example, in the case of the west, a highly developed region, He leans culturally right, as the west has progressed enough in culture to potentially achieve a prosperous state of being, but many so-called liberal "progressives" in the west want to rid such potential by ridding the beneficial traditions kept and replacing them with intersectional idpol and decadent cultural liberalism backed up by capitalist contradictions, so it's a necessity to conserve the beneficial traditions and cultural values that help western society flourish after decades of societal development, on the flip side, in the case of many third world countries, several of which are underdeveloped, He leans culturally left, seeing how many backward customs such as gender inequality, racial divide, caste systems, rule of the clergy, and literal slavery still exist within them, it doesn't make sense to be a conservative in that issue as third world societies currently are infested with such detrimental customs that it's a necessity that those societies must significantly progress to a point where only the beneficial traditions remain and the detrimental customs are phased out and abolished(ofc without the inclusive idpol and cultural liberal materialism bullshit).
Taking a pro-life stance, Darknight Yuusha is generally opposed to abortion, seeing how the unborn aren't merely clumps of cells, but actual life forms, and thus he wants to ban abortion on every case except for life/health risks, yes, even in the cases of rape and incest, although those crimes are very heinous themselves, to deny the right to life for a fetus is still unjust, so he instead proposes alternatives for recovery, like for instance, caretaking the child, although adoptions will be available in the case one isn't ready to fulfill the purpose of nurturing.
These goals and laws however are more so feasible in the long term under which there are conditions that make these things viable, the same cannot be said when regarding the short term, especially with the issue of unsafe abortions that can prove to be life threatening, so he generally proposes to introduce limited abortion laws that will allow it only during the 1st and 2nd trimesters, 2(3 if necessary) non-rape/life saving abortions are also allowed during a woman's lifetime, under which those amends will counter the issue of unsafe abortions, this will be further backed up by means of assistance to mothers like welfare, comprehensive sex education shall be induced to further prevent unneeded abortions, once the issue of unsafe and risky abortion has been dealt with, more strict abortion laws like the one he proposed above can be finally implemented thanks to improved conditions.
In staying true to the pro-life name, to be pro-life should extend beyond caring just for the unborn, this rhetoric must also care for mothers and families too, citing his genuine disdain for the current "pro-life" movement for it's disregard of this realization and their genuine refusal to provide care for those mothers, which ends up going so far as to defend rape of all things, thus he refuses to side with it, instead hoping to form a new pro-life movement that abolishes such a rhetoric of limited understanding in favor of a clearer one that ensures the sanctity of life for the family and community
Men and women in the end are fundamentally equal to each other, and thus, there must be equal treatment under the law, equal benefits, equal punishments, equal pay, and equal rights, with that in mind, I support the first wave of feminism completely as well as the second wave for the most part(excluding the pro-abortion), however, from the third wave and onwards, will be opposed due to the heavy amount of infectious idpol and how those waves promote individualistic degeneracy that can serve to break the balance of men and women in addition to inflicting harm to women as well, one particular example is their promotion of sex work in general, in which it has a history of harmful exploitation against women.
Gender roles, whilst they shouldn't be abolished with the presence of people willing to fulfill those roles under their consent, shouldn't be strict either, in a sense, I utterly oppose the amount of modern feminists and "red-pilled" masculists whining about the patriarchy/matriarchy in the areas it ceased to exist, but at the same time, oppose the notion of the patriarchy/matriarchy as those concepts serve to prevent gender egalitarianism and create a realm where one gender oppresses the other through a Darwinian hedonist fashion, and in areas that such things exist, there will be a fight to abolish those concepts.
All men, regardless of race, are fundamentally human, and thus must be treated equally in rights, punishments, and benefits, alongside being given the ability to participate within democratic decision making, whilst a significant portion of the world has progressed on the issue of race, the problem of a significant portion of races having poor living standards still remains, in which it is still a certain issue, however, those issues can't be solved through identitarianism and racial guilt, as these solutions only serve to further racial tensions, but rather through solidarity, as the greatest cause of these problems is socioeconomic injustice, and to defeat the root cause is to unite the masses to defeat it, as lower class people even coming from different races that are struggling socioeconomically are still fundamentally the same people who suffer economic injustice, to quote Fred Hampton, "We say you don't fight racism with racism. We're gonna fight racism with solidarity. We say you don't fight capitalism with no black capitalism; you fight capitalism with socialism.".
The LGBT dilemma
The mere emphasis of the issue of LGBT, whether it would be favoring it or antagonizing it has been has been a huge mistake for society, just the simple discussion of it can just spark an explosive aura of toxicity than can utterly ruin the lives of many through heated conflicts where no belligerents are to resolve this through fair matters and only through victory in sheer arrogance, thus, such a matter must be completely depoliticized as a whole where pride culture, the movement, hate rants and discussion about it in general will be taboo in society, although such a fight to depoliticize the subject in addition to it's cultural significance would be best done under a balanced platform where social egalitarianism through equal rights, benefits, and punishments is implemented, to put it simply, if LGBT individuals want equal rights, then it's best to rid oneself of flamboyance, never to talk about this subject at all, and focus on the smaller things in life in addition to more important issues.
speaking of pride month, he wants the entire month to be replaced with a new event called "solidarity month" as a replacement to it, for pride month promotes identity politics that divide the people through an obsession of identity and flamboyance in the facade of "social egalitarianism", under which the capitalists use this facade as a means to spread hyper-consumerism and neoliberal ideals to further their own greedy ends, Solidarity month contradicts those intentions, favoring true social equality by promoting the need to solidify and unite the masses beyond the boundaries of identity against the capitalist class, under solidarity month, a motive to legitimately help the lower class through means like charity shall be present throughout the whole month.
gay marriage's legalization shall be left up to the states, as this matter could be rather divisive amongst the people, despite my support for the traditional nuclear family as both a mother and father figure is needed for children to grow up healthily, since this topic can be quite divisive which could result in toxic societal decay, this matter will be de-emphasized.
to address the issue of transgender matters, whilst I'll recognize them by their gender, there will be conditions if one would have that sort of recognition, one, a person must have genuine gender dysphoria, two, one must not be flamboyant, three, one must be 18+ in age, and four, one must not abuse their gender dysphoria/status as trans as fodder to justify a barbaric display of behavior towards others, in addition, transitioning services should be approved by the state, and even then, to prevent consequences from the aftereffects of post-transitioning discomfort, transitioning shall be reserved as an option when all others have failed.
A generally secular law in regards to religion is preferred, as religion, whilst being good to provide for the first footsteps and frameworks of several laws and morals, should generally stay out of the government for the most part, tolerating Christian/Islamic/Insert Religion here Democracy at most, as it has been constantly used as a tool by theocratic clergymen to alienate and manipulate people into doing things out of their own self-interest, in addition to those very clergymen using religion as a justification to commit their own atrocities and suppress the power of the people, in spite of this, there should also be freedom of religion as one still has the right to believe or not to believe in a religion so long as one respects others, as state atheism is merely an irreligious theocracy in function, as anti-theistic bureaucrats do the same thing clergymen do, and that they use atheism as a tool to fulfill their own greedy ends.
Overall leaning more anti-drug than pro-drug, as the effects of hard drugs have resulted in driving the mentality of people to a point where it harms both the user and the others around, thus, selling hard drugs will be banned(but not possession, this is discouraged however)and that there will be a strong crackdown against drug dealing, however, drug users should be rehabilitated instead of punished as drug users aren't the root cause of drug abuse, merely victims of it, drug dealers on the other hand should be severely punished since they're the main cause of the spread of drug abuse, and as for soft drugs, ideally they should be legal, but not encouraged(unless for medical purposes) and regulated, though that issue can be complicated so the law for soft drugs would vary in regions.
Right to firearms
The right to bear firearms can prove to be a strong benefit, with an armed people readily defensive and worthily responsible, firearms prove to be useful in playing a part in the dual failsafe of the state and the people, further benefits include significantly greater resistance against imperialists that dare ever threaten to subjugate or conquer the nation, although guns rights can prove to bring great benefits, there comes it's problems of unnecessary violence at the wrong hands, even so, this still doesn't justify a strong gun ban, as the reasons why such unnecessary violence happens has more to do with the mentality of the shooters and not the guns themselves, as guns are inanimate and thus cannot have the sentience to shoot by their own.
With that being said to prevent such violence from happening, there will be background and health checks every year to find out if a firearm wielder is eligible to retain the rights to bear those firearms or not, having a one/two strike policy as punishment should there be failure, furthermore, one must gain a license through a test to prove one's worthiness in addition to those with firearms being recommended to ensure that their guns wouldn't be robbed by irresponsible criminals, to top it all off, certain firearms far too dangerous for one to wield like flamethrowers will be banned.
Opposition to sex work
To say that sex work is empowering is incomplete to it's description on how truly awful pornography in general is, as it empowers a continuous cycle of lust and frustration, where men and women are equally degraded in the name of profits done through prostitution, merely showing a facade of "love" through perversion and delusion of the mind, as love partners are now only seen as dolls to masturbate in the descent into sexual frustration, no longer will men and women flesh out themselves as respectable characters in this process, and such an industry will even go to lengths just to harm them to make the most out of it's income, to conclude, prostitution, the porn industry, and sex work in general are truly harmful elements in society that must be rid of for the better.
However, if sex work in it's entirely is to be phased out into obscurity and demonization, the process should be done gradually, not to be destroyed as soon as the dawn of the next day as to ensure the porn industry's untimely end, buyers will be criminalized and sex "workers" that were forced into the industry/joined it because they have no other choice for a providable job will be rehabilitated and opportunities for alternatives will be brought to the table, those who were willing to become prostitutes despite having the opportunities for alternatives will be condemned however, eventually when society has reached a point where it's in the rate where sex work has become an evil, full criminalization shall commence and prostitution as a whole will be deemed unprofitable
The environment and the many ecosystems have been proven to be a crucial necessity to facilitate the earth's health, in which the earth's health has also become an extremely crucial factor to maintaining quality conditions for human society, as without clean air and resources all thanks to nature's providence, virtually all of us will face at best, serious degradation of societal conditions to a point of collapse, and at worst, total extinction, this is further proven with the threat of climate change, pollution, and ecosystem destruction, thus, meaningful actions must be taken to prevent a devastating era of catastrophe from happening.
The following plans are examples of environmental action:
- begin transitioning to green energy for already industrialized nations, for industrializing ones, if there isn't a green alternative, continue industrializing(though there will still be some environmental regulations) and then switch to green energy
- set up a punishment system for anti-environmental acts, minor punishments will be set for more minor punishments like littering, and more severe punishments will be set for major crimes like ecosystem destruction, poaching, deforestation, and maritime pollution
- implementation of a carbon tax that gradually increases based on the level of carbon content
- begin phasing out non-eco friendly products in favor of eco-friendly ones and punish any greedy capitalist or anti-environmentalist in general that dares slow down this process or even prevent/halt it outright
- investment of research into eco-friendly vehicles and technology in general, having them mass produced alongside phasing and banning out fossil-fuel vehicles as soon as possible.
- enact anti-plastic pollution laws, requiring plastic products to be composed of 50%reusable/biodegradable material, otherwise illegal if the requirement is not met, all plastics not meeting the requirement shall be phased out as soon as possible
- taxation rates lowered for renewable energy sources and eco-friendly power plants
- begin a strong tree-planting program in addition to encouraging other air-purifying plants to be planted, with the intent of having more than 5 billion trees planted
- creation of eco-friendly jobs and cooperatives in environmental energy sectors
- place harsh environmental sanctions against industrialized countries committing anti-environmental acts, in addition to monitoring industrializing countries
From using several inventive ways to improve the lives of humans to ensuring that society develops and progresses to ensure the certainty of survival, the advancement of technology has proven to be an overall force of good for humanity as a whole, thus I am considered a technological progressive, as technological advancement can be very useful when solving many of our problems, green technology and space technology especially will be of great help when countering environmental issues and pollution as well as further help in space exploration respectively, both of which will help humanity survive in the long run.
However, whilst technology can be a force of good, there can come it's downsides, one of them is the notion of machines replacing humans in the workplace, which can cause serious unemployment problems, although machines themselves can assist human workers on points where they fall short of efficiency, as for transhumanism, whilst beneficial if done in moderation, as it can rid of disabilities for some and even potentially save lives for those who suffer fatal conditions, shouldn't go to a point where humanity is erased or extremely altered.
A Nationalistic Aura
A nationalist, he puts emphasis on nationalism and believes that the rise of non-chauvinistic and non-identitarian nationalism has been a good thing for humanity, as it allowed a greater sense of community for people to love a nation and solve it's own problems which strengthen the bonds of such a community to achieve a better society, he also believes that it is natural for humans to feel a sense of belonging to the nation, obviously because of his endorsement of nationalism, he despises globalism as globalism, unlike internationalism, disregards the sovereignty and self-determination of nations and peoples and threads on them, which is pretty much imperialist, which he utterly deplores, speaking of internationalism, his strong emphasis on autonomy of nations also makes him supportive of international cooperation and argues that it can be used to preserve nationalism.
he also believes that nationalism has proven itself to be a strong anti-colonial and anti-imperialist force of good as several nationalists from the third world endorse liberation against colonialist oppressors which have resulted in such form of nationalism being responsible for several third world nations gaining independence, he does however, unlike other "anti-colonialists" who embrace reverse chauvinism by justifying oppression against others coming from "oppressor backgrounds", respect nationalists from even major powers like China, Russia, and America that are aware of their nation's shortcomings and atrocities who are also willing to redeem a nation's from it's own flaws and horrors beyond the scope of failure.
A nation is a community of people united under a banner of shared language and patriotic values, and that a patriot to the nation should be based on one's love to the nation itself, not from the limited boundaries of identitarian concepts of racialism and ethnic supremacy, thus, he is a civic nationalist, seeing both racial and ethnic nationalism as foolish and toxic ideologies that can threaten the nation through the implementation of the aforementioned identitarian boundaries that can cause division and injustice, which in turn, will fracture the nation apart and force patriots of differing identities to fight against each other, even going as far to argue that those ideologies are even anti-nationalist themselves, as they prioritize identity more than patriotism, to merely call for worldwide ethnic/racial supremacy and describe yourself as a patriot is oxymoronic.
Cohesion in Country
Whilst he is indeed a civic nationalist, he also emphasizes the need of cohesion to ensure harmony for the nation's inhabitants, because of this, he is an interculturalist, wanting to conserve the national culture(s) but at the same time ensure that other cultures can co-exist so long as they don't override the national culture, as other cultures can help enrich the national culture(s) under moderation.
this sort of emphasis towards preserving the national culture(s) make him a cultural nationalist in a sense, thus his policies towards immigrants and refugees, whilst allowing legal ones to come by, must learn the standards, history, language, and values of the nation should they ever settle here, lest they are forced to leave otherwise, further backed by background checks to ensure none with a criminal record is to ever enter, his policies towards significant native minorities however are different, since natives themselves have been neglected of having their cultures preserved and their living standards have also been poor as well, thus he believes that natives should their culture and languages should be preserved, as well as them being only having to just adopt the patriotism of the nation, no more than that, and even become a plurinational identity in the nation, which leads him to support plurinationalism as a means to help natives gain their self-determination.
When dealing with multiple peoples of differing cultural/ethnic/racial identities in a nation, Darknight Yuusha Model endorses a brotherhood and unity policy, utilizing common patriotism alongside plurinationalism as a way to prevent balkanization and chaotic division, as should the nation's ethnic tensions allow cracks of division to tear it apart, it's overall cohesion to efficiently solve many problems is stripped and it's strength against threats diminished.
Rejection of Intervention
The nation's very own problems are to be put first and foremost from outside problems as the nation itself must take care of it's own people and serve it, not to meddle in the affairs of other regions which have no business, making him a non-interventionist and to a lesser extent, an isolationist, as foreign intervention often incentivizes imperialism and subjugation/destruction against other nations and has almost always resulted in a negative outcome which usually has the nation itself drained of it's honor and resources as well as wreak havoc to nations subject to such intervention, only should a threat against national security will intervention be justified, but even then this shouldn't be used as fodder to spread influence, he further argues that intervention has resulted in the strengthening of imperialist hegemony and advocates that a nation should not have such a harmful concept of power that can cause despair and suffering to other nations, this also results in him opposing military alliances in general and ideological backing as those are often used to spread hegemony or are the outright result of it.
The Question of Military
Despite his opposition towards militaristic imperialism and his somewhat pacifist stance, as well as his dislike towards military juntas for the most part, he believes the military still holds great importance, especially when protecting the nation against threats like terrorists and imperialists, and thus believes that the military should be given adequate funding to fulfill that purpose, with increased training quality and better military technology(albeit not to the point of being too destructive and criminal), however, he want's adequate funding, never emphasizing on overspending as it dissuades the people's needs and incentivizes corrupt bureaucratization and imperialism.
His emphasis on nationalism also means that with the military's purpose to protect the nation's citizens, he believes that the military shall be praised as defenders of the homeland and protectors of the people, however, he also puts emphasis on shame towards the crimes and atrocities done by the military and that he puts the military's role as protectors, not aggressors, this doesn't mean he will support defunding of the military unless on the case of overspending, in which he doesn't support the latter idea either.
It is true that he is indeed a supporter of nuclear, nuclear energy that is, but on nuclear weapons however, such weapons are far too dangerous for any nation to have as the effects of nukes are utterly catastrophic to an area, he further argues that the destructive potential of nukes have been often used to force a nation to concede to it's unfair demands, which is imperialistic, thus most of them should be dismantled for the better, with the few remaining nukes being relegated to a third party that will fulfill very specific, non-military niches, particularly when it comes to destroying incoming large meteors that can significantly damage or even cause extinction on the earth.
Because of his staunch anti-imperialism, he is opposed to every single major power of the world and despises the concept of hegemony as a whole, believing that any country should not have the status of a superpower, let alone the idea of a superpower being a feasible idea at all, since it not only put's a strain to other nations due to imperialist hegemony and exploitation, but also to the nation itself since it put's much of it's resources into maintaining geopolitical dominance instead of solving it's own domestic issues, for these reasons, he hates both the 1st world and the 2nd world equally despite viewing the west as a slightly worse evil due to it's worse overall atrocities, instead, he is thoroughly supportive of the third world, adopting a non-aligned policy and seeks to form international comradery amongst third world nations as a means to fight against imperialism from both sides' imperialist powers and put an end to imperialism once and for all
Darknight Yuusha Model is a constructivist, believing that the nature of humans and their characters were never born with the inherent qualities of being evil or good, but are instead shaped through the differing environments that have molded them, citing how material conditions play a major factor in such shaping process, such constructivist viewpoint also contributes to how he believes in the concept of redemption, believing that for the most part, even malicious individuals could potentially become heroic beings through the maturation of character.
Such is alluding to how he was partially influenced by Classical Marxism thanks to it's emphasis on the idea that class, material conditions, and class conflict have been a significant driving force in history, despite this influence however, he is still non-Marxian as he believes that the goals of Marxism are virtually impossible to reach outside of very small communities, in which there is some sort of potential due to lower population count but you get the idea, the reason for why it is impossible is not because humans are inherently greedy and evil, but rather it requires the total destruction of an abstract concept(namely greed and evil as aforementioned, and that abstract concepts are not concrete and thus cannot be truly destroyed.
Because of how differing material conditions shape differing individuals, he comes to the conclusion that for the most part, determining the true nature of humanity is difficult as with each conclusion from differing determinations will lead to conflicting and inconsistent results, he does however believe that there is one thing consistent in so many human beings and it's how they strive to pursue happiness in some sort of form.
He believes that a sense of community is necessary in human society, as whilst he does acknowledge others like free will and individual ingenuity to be a part of human's being a powerful species, he believes the greatest factor of such success is through humans working together as a community to achieve success, as humans acknowledge one cannot work alone as an island, and that free will and individual ingenuity wouldn't induce those positives without a community, as without a community, there wouldn't be ideals thought of and strived for to improve the lives of humans to be spread, being discontent with individualists on how some of them are claiming that collective methods are a notion of stupidity, failing to realize collective methodology is present in several of the most intelligent and successful animals, especially seen in mammals like primates, whales, elephants, some wild cats, and giraffes, being also discontent on how they focus too much on the individual(or in the case of objectivists, outright promote greed and immorality), which brings to his argument that individualism is an ideology of shamelessness, he is however also discontent with mass collectivism, as it also disregards other factors on why humans are so successful and that they focus too much on the collective and even outright promote the collective to preach for greed.
although he is very much a communitarian, he often is collectivist leaning, as mentioned, collectivist notions are present in some of the most successful and intelligent animals, and very much does he emphasize the community in a higher priority than the individual, in fact, he puts the family as the smallest unit of significant importance, not the individual, as he sees the family unit as a crucial part of society that has been responsible in forming tribes and ultimately nations, entities that have proven themselves to define humanity in it's struggle, however, he dislikes the commodification of the family done in the industrial era, as the resulting corrupt bourgeois family values has strayed away from the original extended family's traits, and how it promotes an individualist and capitalist motif that erode the original values of family as a whole.
The Utilitarian need
It is indeed necessary to focus of providing happiness in the collective community of humans, within a community is the existence of individuals however, and that human individuals themselves have the intelligence of the freedom of will, which leads to the inevitable conclusion that individuals themselves will think differently amongst others in at least some way and have desires and wishes outside the collective community, therefore the right to happiness for individuals should be maintained so long as there aren't any desires or acts that would go negatively against morality and the wellbeing of the people, regarding the line to prevent negative desires against morals and the wellbeing of the community, such a line exists since the acceptance of negative desires would involve the threading of happiness against an individual, which makes it contradictory in regard the right to happiness for individuals within a community.
Moralism in society
When asking about the question of morals, to understand it's necessity in a society is to ask some of these example questions, why is it that innocent families and individual citizens are protected from being murdered, for the law forbids, why is it that kindness thrives under a rhetoric of that one must treat and respect the other like how he treats oneself, why is it that there are norms that man must not discriminate another just for one's identity and judge one for character instead, and to the culmination of all of these questions, why is it that those norms and laws help prevent destructive toxicity from becoming a completely dominating force in all of humanity, this is the answer, morals, for they serve as the blueprints of laws that keep and shun society from individuals who dare harm the people in it, such morality can also serve as the basis for egalitarianism of several forms which are necessity in a community, no matter the factor of the different thinking and mindsets of individuals, the objectivity of morals still remain necessary to prevent harm.
With the aims of achieving a new stage in human development, where there will be a patriotic and democratic society for the people, one where the youth will not suffer abusive trauma during their genesis, one where the grown ups are not burdened in their values to strive for hard work, and one where the elderly can live their last days with a smile, he endorses populism and cites it as a necessary driving force to achieve change for the better, and thus emphasizes the need to rally the people to achieve greater heights and to fight against malignant tumors present in society, most especially the elite capitalists who are responsible for omnipresent problems in humanity such as imperialism, social and economic injustice, and corrupted bureaucracies, all of which he uses populism to unite the people to fight against these aforementioned plagues, he further proves his argument in that the many revolutions that were responsible for bringing in significant and necessary change such as the American Revolution, Russian Revolution, French Revolution, Chinese Revolution, and the 1848 revolutions, all of which brought beneficial long term effects that better society as a whole.
He does however acknowledge that populism can also be used as a tool to fulfill malicious and self-serving ends of individuals that are keen in betraying the people's will as they please, and thus is wary to be careful that populism should only be spearheaded through those that serve the people, this results in him being a left populist, seeing how many right-"populists" often betray the promises made by the people and end up endorsing capitalist systems that contradict their rhetoric, in addition to how many of them embrace a disgusting obsession over culturally right idpol in general, which adds up to become even worse in that some of them are cucked towards imperialistic blocs and powers, namely the west, but sometimes the east, those reasons are further backed by his argument in that several left populists often stay true to their promises more often that right wing ones even with their flaws, which often does result in getting the job to change things meaningfully done, although he does acknowledge how some left-wing populists in the west like AOC betray the name of populism and become outright hypocritical elitists, who at times also result in them endorsing a disgusting culturally left idpol rhetoric.
DNY model's personality is a mix between positive and negative energies, whether it be from calmness to a more feisty and angry rhetoric, he is usually shown as fun-going and light-hearted towards most, which gains him a lot of respect from others, resulting in him gaining a lot of friends and friendly acquaintances, to at point where he may be even referred to as one of the most respected individuals in the community, if not the most respected, from laughing to memes to going with the flow in debates through this light-hearted manner, he is proven to be a nice guy to have around
however, as he is a mix between positive and negative energies, he can also be incredibly feisty and fierce, towards his enemies, whilst he does indeed follow a conduct and code of dignity, he will not hesitate to become nigh merciless towards those he hates, most especially the status quo, and he will gleefully execute them with pleasure with varying methods of execution, one such is the Yugoslav fashion of death pits, but another more recent method is the utilization of wave motion guns to incinerate and atomize said enemies, this menacing side of personality is often found most prominent during times he is especially at a huge distress, often caused by very undignified acts of individuals or by the continuous destruction done by the elites, giving him a fearful and dangerous reputation that one must account for should one be a foe
despite having a very tough exterior at times, he can also be incredibly kind and warmhearted, in addition to following a code of dignity of his own, generally does this warmhearted character show up under times of reconciliation, kinder and modest discussions, or wholesomeness towards his several comrades, displaying a modest, compassionate, dignified, and tender personality in times like these, this more wholesome and calm side seems to be more significant as of recently as after months of hatred, arrogance, madness, and selfishness in his past experiences, enduring so many bad experiences, finally does he drops much of those things to enjoy life more often added with a greater respect to his conduct of dignity, this newfound calmness also resulted in his consideration to adopt apoliticism more
Answering Political/Quadrant Unity
Throughout the very experiences he has gone on throughout a year, from his more moderate iteration to the present day, he has concluded that the entire concept of political/quadrant unity, and to an extent, ideological unity, is virtually a sham to him, not even left unity is favorable to his standards thanks to how it is infested with greedy opportunists, dogmatic ramblers, and naive cowards, in which any of these character examples are found on(but are not limited to) Bolsheviks, Reformists, baizuos, Dengists, Hardliners, Ultras, and Trots, all of which he very often distrusts, and it isn't just left unity he is dissatisfied with, he shames on Auth Unity for being a union of unlawful bureaucrats, fascistic maniacs, reactionary preachers, and narcissistic imperialists, dislikes Libunity for it's frequently erratic hatred for any form of an adequate state, and the lack of morals for several of those within it, not to mention his refusal to adhere to anarchism, and there wouldn't be a need to explain his sheer hatred for right unity, instead preferring to be in unison with his own convictions and a few comrades he sees as genuine by his standards, he won't make the mistake of drawing the line of a genuine comrade through ideology alone however.
- Anime enthusiast, though not a straight up weeb or otaku, especially loves Space Battleship Yamato
- Swears allegiance to Los Pollos Hermanos
All hail Gus the I
- despite being an agnostic deist, he is sympathetic to Christianity and Islam
(WTF Filipino Assad!?!?!?!?!?!)
- really loves to purge politicians and billionaires
- Likes biking at times
read the notice
- will be revising
- not really in the "liberal" sense, but more or less my tendency to emphasize progress and identify as a progressive more(at least to my own definitions)
- I hate this whole intersectional idpol bullshit, but twitter baizuos are the least of my concerns when compared to the threat of the omnipresence of crony bureaucrats and plutocrats
- why yes I believe globalism is satanic, how can you tell?