×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 6,778 articles on Polcompball Anarchy Wiki. Type your article name above or create one of the articles listed here!



    Polcompball Anarchy Wiki
    Polcompball Anarchy Wiki
    6,778Articles
    in:
    Self-Insert, Work in Progress, RightValues,
    and 18 more

    Aristocratic Socialism/old




    BEWARE, HERETICS AND HEATHENS!

    This page contains possibly disturbing content for:

    Cartesians (Rejection of human pride)

    Individualists (Preference of dasein)

    Progressives (Actual political structure)





    𝕬𝖗𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖔𝖈𝖗𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖈 𝕾𝖔𝖈𝖎𝖆𝖑𝖎𝖘𝖒 is basically an “ideology” (it’s more like a personal thought or beliefs) that exists after Constantine Thought took a hiatus from PCB stuffs for two months. It is basically the same as the latter except Aristocratic Socialism completely rejects unfettered technocapitalism in favor of putting strong emphasis on tradition, spirituality, community, country, and organic hierarchy, taking influences ranging from the thinkers of the conservative revolution like Werner Sombart, Oswald Spengler, or Martin Heidegger, to those of the traditionalist school like Julius Evola, René Guénon, or Aleksandr Dugin.

    These are the five icons that describe my current beliefs: (////)

    Influences

    • Lao Tzu (571-471 BC), China
    • Plato (424/423-348/347 BC), Ancient Greece
    • Aristotle (382-322 BC), Ancient Greece
    • Qin Shi Huang (259-210 BC), China
    • Marcus Tullius Cicero (106-43 BC), Ancient Rome
    • Gaius Julius Caesar (100-44 BC), Ancient Rome
    • Augustus (63 BC-14 AD), Ancient Rome
    • Jesus Christ (6/4 BC–30/33 AD), Ancient Rome
    • Domitian (51-96), Ancient Rome
    • Marcus Aurelius (121-180), Ancient Rome
    • Aurelian (214-275), Ancient Rome
    • Diocletian (242/245–311/312), Ancient Rome
    • Nicholas of Myra (270-343), Ancient Rome
    • Constantine I (272-337), Ancient Rome
    • Theodosius I (347-395), Ancient Rome
    • Augustine of Hippo (354-430), Ancient Rome
    • Justinian I (482-565), Byzantium
    • Heraclius (575-641), Byzantium
    • Li Shimin (598-649), China
    • Irene Sarantapechaena (752-803), Byzantium
    • Basil II (958-1025), Byzantium
    • Volodymyr I Sviatoslavych (958-1015), Kyivan Rus’
    • Alexios Komnenos (1057-1118), Byzantium
    • Louis IX (1214-1270), France
    • Zhu Yuanzhang (1328-1398), China
    • Zhu Di (1360-1424), China
    • Mehmed II (1432-1481), Ottoman Empire
    • Suleiman I (1494-1566), Ottoman Empire
    • Melchior von Osse (1506-1556), Holy Roman Empire
    • Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679), England
    • Michael I (1596-1645), Russia
    • Louis XIV (1638-1715), France
    • Aisin-Gioro Xuanye (1654-1722), China
    • James Francis Edward Stuart (1688-1766), England
    • Aisin-Gioro Hongli (1711-1799), China
    • Edmund Burke (1729-1797), Ireland
    • Johann Georg Hamann (1730-1788), Prussia
    • Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832), Holy Roman Empire
    • Joseph de Maistre (1753-1823), France
    • Louis XVI (1754-1793), France
    • Klemens von Metternich (1773-1859), Holy Roman Empire
    • Alexander I (1777-1825), Russia
    • Carlos María Isidro de Borbón (1788-1855), Spain
    • Thomas Carlyle (1795-1881), Scotland
    • Nicholas I (1796-1855), Russia
    • Mongkut (1804-1868), Rattanakosin Kingdom
    • Benjamin Disraeli (1804-1881), United Kingdom
    • Leo XIII (1810-1903), France
    • Fyodor Dostoevsky (1821-1881), Russia
    • Konstantin Pobedonostsev (1827-1907), Russia
    • John of Kronstadt (1829-1909), Russia
    • Henry George (1839-1897), United States
    • Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900), Prussia
    • Alexander III (1845-1894), Russia
    • Georges Sorel (1847-1922), France
    • Vilfredo Pareto (1848-1923), France
    • Chulalongkorn (1853-1910), Rattanakosin Kingdom
    • Pyotr Stolypin (1862-1911), Russia
    • Werner Sombart (1863-1941), Germany
    • Charles Maurras (1868-1952), France
    • Nicholas II (1868-1918), Russia
    • Hilaire Belloc (1870-1953), France
    • Gilbert Keith Chesterton (1874-1936), United Kingdom
    • Giovanni Gentile (1875-1944), Italy
    • Boworadej Kridakorn (1877-1953), Rattanakosin Kingdom
    • Oswald Spengler (1880-1936), Germany
    • Ikki Kita (1883-1937), Japan
    • Ivan Ilyin (1883-1954), Russia
    • René Guénon (1886-1951), France
    • Carl Schmitt (1888-1985), Germany
    • Martin Heidegger (1889-1976), Germany
    • G.D.H. Cole (1889-1959), United Kingdom
    • Ernst Niekisch (1889-1967), Germany
    • J.R.R. Tolkien (1892-1973), United Kingdom
    • Ernst Jünger (1895-1998), Germany
    • Oswald Mosley (1896-1980), United Kingdom
    • Otto Strasser (1897-1974), Germany
    • Julius Evola (1898-1974), Italy
    • Karl Otto Paetel (1906-1975), Germany
    • Mircea Eliade (1907-1986), Romania
    • Lev Gumilev (1912-1992), Russia
    • Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (1918-2008), Russia
    • Henry Kissinger (1923-2023), Germany
    • Bhumibol Adulyadej (1927-2016), Thailand
    • Seraphim Rose (1934-1982), United States
    • Franco Freda (1941-), Italy
    • Alain de Benoist (1943-), France
    • Guillaume Faye (1949-2019), France
    • Xi Jinping (1953-), China
    • Aleksandr Dugin (1962-), Russia
    • Lene Rachel Andersen (1968-), Denmark
    • Curtis Yarvin (1973-), United States
    • Lavader (???-), Bosnia & Herzegovina
    • Dovahhatty (???-), Brazil
    • Maiorianus (???-), Germany
    • Spectrum (???-), Portugal

    Opinions

    S
    • Cameralism
      Corporatism with a crown? Pretty much a perfect economic model for a functioning kingdom.
    • Corporatism
      Reject the bourgeois-proletarian false dichotomy, embrace the third position.
    • Monarchism
      ”Hell is a democracy, Heaven is a kingdom.” - St. John of Kronstadt
    • Orthodoxy
      The objectively correct denomination of Christianity.
    A
    • Distributism
      A bit too decentralized but pretty great for a traditional economic system.
    • Ethnic Federalism
      A great alternative to both bourgeois nationalism, Darwinite racialism, and rootless cosmopolitanism.
    • Heideggerianism
      The ideas that the main subject of politics should not be one of individualism, class, or nation, but one of Dasein.
    • Mercantilism
      Capitalism without the bad parts? Excellent. A bit too thalassocratic though.
    • Platonism
      The philosophy that paved the way for Christianity to become the beacon of civilization. Excellent.
    B
    • Catholicism
      Too schismatic and rationalistic but we often are allies against progressive “Christians” and secular humanists nowadays.
    • Deontology
      Duty and rules for the sake of virtue are much more important than pleasure and happiness. Better than utilitarianism but I still prefer virtue ethics over you.
    • Islam
      Islam, as an Abrahamic faith, has very interesting forms of traditions that us Christians can learn from. Although, you should recognize that Jesus is the son of God.
    • Lutheranism
      My favorite Protestant denomination. We have many things in common, like mysticism, or our views on metaphysics or ontology. Although you still wish to remain separated from the true Church.
    C
    • Anti-Humanism
      I don’t like your materialistic variants but I admire your religious variants.
    • Aristotelianism
      Plato is much better than you, but you still stayed in line with reality.
    • Georgism
      You have very good takes against NIMBYs but you’re still a free marketeer, a free trader, as well as a rootless cosmopolitan.
    • Nationalism
      Some forms of it are good for fighting against rootless cosmopolitanism but we shouldn’t deny that this Jacobin ideology destroyed the old regimes to create a state that’s in favor of standardized homogeneity based on abstract concepts such as citizenship, civil code of law, secularism, and language.
    D
    • Dark Enlightenment
      Have some good takes against Enlightenment philosophy but I dislike your nihilism, technicism, and individualism. Also Landian philosophy is pretty terrifying.
    • Nietzscheanism
      I admire your aristocratic values as well as your attempt to combat nihilism, but your philosophy must not be taken as a whole, as that would just lead to nihilism.
    • Thomism
      You kinda have some good contributions to Christianity but I strongly dislike your rationalism and extreme Aristotelianism.
    E
    • Capitalism
      If the technocapital is left unfettered by the state, society will degrade into decadency, self-centrism, and the worst of all, totalitarianism. However, it is more preferable as economic system compared to communism.
    • Humeanism
      The only coherent philosophical skeptic. Hume isn’t someone I agree with but he is certainly much more respectable than Descartes.
    F
    • Alt-Lite
      Stop hijacking the Right with your defense of classical liberalism as well as engaging in petty identity politics.
    • Calvinism
      The theology that started the downfall of Christian values and morality.
    • Fascism
      Wicked Hegelian filth that hijacked idealism into promoting modernist lies.
    • Racialism
      In the medieval times, there were only things like ethnic groups, religions, or hierarchies, not biological races that are invented by the Enlightenment.
    F-
    • Accelerationism
      Postmodern nihilism devoid of morality at its peak. This philosophy will only lead us to self-destruction in the end.
    • Cartesianism
      The man who started the decline of the West, and subsequently, the entire planet.
    • Enlightenment Philosophy
      The embodiment of the Faustian Spirit. The thing that turned man away from God in favor of worship of technics and abstraction.
    • Individualism
      The poison that corrupted man away from true human nature by turning him into a decadent self-centered person who pursue unlimited greed.
    • Marxism
      The man who tarnished the reputation of socialism by reducing everything to economic conditions aka replacing God with dialectical materialism.

    My beliefs, I guess?

    Here are the core beliefs that I can explain for ya:

    • Anti-Enlightenment: The Enlightenment has destroyed critical thinking and rational behavior for the sake of “technological development” by replacing God with reason, which led to hundreds of millions of body counts and numerous atrocities such as the Holocaust.
    • Archeofuturism: Modern bourgeois technology is destroying society as a whole, but technological development itself isn’t a bad thing as long as it improves our society and tradition, hence why I am supportive of limited transhumanism but not the kind that puts machine above God.
    • Aristocracy: The elites must be the people who are principled with morality and nobility in order to keep society stable. Aristocrats should be the people from military class, philosopher class, artist class, or such, which are chosen by merit and not just wealth or popularity.
    • Communitarianism: Societal organicism is what keep society healthy, moral, and stable. We are not simply just individuals who should indulge ourselves in self-centrism, hedonism, materialism, envy, or greed. We are a collective that are meant to serve in natural hierarchies, to be interconnected with God himself.
    • Corporatism: I am firmly against class struggle narratives of capitalism and communism as class struggle does nothing but to alienate the people from their own realm, which cause division within society as both capitalism and communism prefer one class’ dominance over another without valuing the realm. Hence why we need class collaboration to bind the three economic classes into the state to unify the realm. (In other words, the technocapital must serve the state, not the other way around.)
    • Dasein: My worldview is not aligned with individual, class, or nation, but rather with dasein. Dasein is a Heideggerian concept that can be translated as "being here/there", and it is Heidegger's understanding of human nature. It is a human Being which is always embedded in concrete historical, temporal, cultural and local reality. Dasein is particular, not universal. It is shared with other members of a community, but not with all of humanity. It can be understood as subjectivity. Subjectivity, particularly cultural, shapes a large part in how Fourth Theory sees the world.
    • Ethnic Federalism: Different cultures and ethnic groups that are interconnected with the realm should be separated from each other while being united in their allegiance for the King, in order to keep organic cultural diversity within the realm, however, the state doesn’t have to be in line with any specific ethnic group as that would lead to creation of artificial concept of nation-states which seek to replace natural hierarchies and local cultures with standardized bourgeois homogeneity based on abstract concepts like citizenship, code of law, language, and secularism.
    • Eurasianism: I view the East as lesser evils to the West, simply because the West is the stronghold of liberal, enlightened values that have diverted humanity away from God in favor of technology worshipping, and I think that non-aligned policy or isolationism is too idealistic considering the geographical location of my country. The East is not completely perfect though, as the East suffers from the communist legacy in their states that have destroyed their societal organicism decades ago.
    • Imperialism: Imperialism has been a thing since the birth of humanity and there is no way to get rid of it, as it’s a process of building the state that has been practiced for entire history of humanity. However, modern imperialism is nothing more than just economic wars that distract us away from social cohesion and tradition in favor of globalism. Hence, I prefer to return to traditional, heroic, and tellurocratic forms of imperialism or multipolarity, rather than indulging for nation-states or thalassocratic global hegemony.
    • Localized Democracy: Of course, democracy on a national level will always corrupt into chaos, inflation, and debt as presidents are just renters of the state who will irresponsibly use government fundings on useless stuffs like national elections that only favor the rich, and divert the country away from God in favor of political ideologies by creating an illusion that power comes from the people, as well as choosing leaders who don’t have any true long term visions that monarchs actually have. However, localized elections are fine as long as political parties do not exist.
    • Militarism: I believe that war and civilizational conflicts are two of the best things to strengthen civilizations and nations. Civilizations around the world have never been at peace for the whole history and that all civilizations in history have their rise, golden age, stagnation, and death. Militarism can indeed boost patriotic and nationalistic sentiments of the people, which give them reasons to be more proud of their identities, creating national myths for each nations. When civilizations clash, it doesn’t destroy civilizations as a whole, but rather it strengthens them, and when a civilization is “destroyed”, it will be reborn and regenerated from ashes like a phoenix.
    • Monarchism: The King is the embodiment of the realm. Tyrannical and incompetent kings do not last for long since those types of kings do more harm than good for the realm’s reputation. The Christian views on authority is that authority does not come from the people, or some politicians, or some shady elites, or intellectuals, but from God himself.
    • Natural Hierarchy: The division of society must not be determined with classes based on wealth like in modern bourgeois society. Rather, it must be determined with jobs and skills, basing on ranks like in a heroic warrior society of the past, with the aristocracy or warrior class at the top of the hierarchy.
    • Non-Marxist Socialism: I am firmly opposed to Marxism as it bases its socialism on the English worldview that encourages materialistic class egoism that pits one economic class against another, which divides the country and pursues for rootless cosmopolitanism. Marxism also bases itself on duty to oneself, rather than duty to the collective good. Marxism, like liberal egalitarianism, also bases itself on envy and resentment of the successful, revolving around the slave morality and the revolt of the oppressed, which is in contrast to the aristocratic nature of true socialism in organic societies. Therefore, Marxism is capitalism of the working class. True socialism, based on Spenglerian worldview, transcends classes through a higher social order and raises up the entirety of society as seen in traditional societies like Rome or Prussia. True socialist society will not acknowledge bourgeois or proletariat but soldiers in different ranks.
    • Peri-Urbanization: The worst-off poors are the ones in urban areas, because you can't hunt, forage or farm in those areas, which means your survival is inevitably going to depend upon precarious jobs/government handouts/goodwill of passerbys. Deurbanization and the scattering of the population into peri-urban settlements (small town/village-sized settlements with urban infrastructure and amenities) will make a town to have the local clinic, grocery shop, bar, train station, countryside and wilderness all within the same walking distance from your house, which is a pretty neat idea, and so is being able to have a vegetable garden in your backyard.
    • Reconstruction of National Myth: As the modern world is slowly globalizing, the bourgeois decadence has completely destroyed the concept of national myth by replacing organic culture and identity with mindless consumerism and globalism. National myth is a mythical past of the nation that inspires an individual to be proud of their identity. Only through Sorelian myth-making and anti-intellectual violence can a national myth be rebuilt to strengthen the realm and identity again.
    • Symphonia: The church and the state are to complement each other, exhibiting mutual respect with neither institution presuming to dominate the other. Society must be run by morality guided by God, not some abstract enlightened stuffs like political ideologies, human rights, or liberal democracy.
    • Traditionalism: We must keep the organic roots of the society and defend it from any progressive ideologues, although some reforms are needed if it means to upgrade our society.

    How to draw

    Flag of Aristocratic Socialism/old (Palaiologoi Banner Design)
    1. Draw a ball
    2. Fill it dark red
    3. Add a gold cross in the middle
    4. Draw 2 reversed B's on the top left and bottom left of the ball
    5. Draw 2 B's on the top right and the bottom right of the ball
    6. Add the eyes with girly eyelids
    7. Add the Eastern Roman crown
    8. Add the red bow on the right of the crown
    9. Add the medieval longsword on the right hand
    10. Add the Orthodox Christian cross on the left hand and you’re done!
    Color Name HEX RGB
    Dark Red #890014 137, 0, 20
    Gold #ffcb10 255, 203, 16


    Relations

    Note: I don’t judge you on personality, only ideology matters here.

    I like it!

    Altemism

    • My Lutheran counterpart. I agree on pretty much everything with you.

    Caesar12ism

    • Pretty based, although not really a fan of world federalism.

    Jadedism

    • My moderate counterpart. Although you are a bit too industrialist but nuclear energy doesn’t seem too bad. Both of us are resentful towards the Anglo-Saxon worldview too, so that’s a plus. You should read Prussianism and Socialism by Oswald Spengler though, if you want an another good argument against the Anglo-Saxon worldviews.

    National Distributism

    • You’re mostly good despite being Catholic and economically decentralist. Keep up the good work, brother.

    Neocarlism

    • You’re mostly good. I think you should just let go of chauvinism though.

    Patrick Thought

    • We’re basically the same, except you’re a bit more isolationist and economically decentralized. Thanks for inspiring me to finally see the errors of unfettered technocapitalism and become more ruralist.

    Alright

    Candelarismo

    • Better than your last self-insert but I’m not a fan of your social views. Decent economics though.

    Inexistism

    • I think we agree on opposing economic materialism and rootless cosmopolitanism but you are still not ontologically good as you don’t seek to restore tradition, but rather, you advocate for alternate modernity, which is one of the core beliefs of fascism.

    Radenism

    • Too chauvinistic and revolutionary for my taste but some of your beliefs are alright.

    Social Authoritarian Bonapartism

    • Alright for a republican. Both of us agree that capitalism and communism are two sides of the same coin and we both value our identities, but I’m not really a fan of revolutionary nationalism, especially the one based on Hegelian philosophy.

    Nah

    Chromatism

    • Technocapitalism with a human face.
      • - So true.

    Danielism

    • You remind me of my old self-insert. How on Earth can you be a free marketeer, a monarchist, and a fascist at the same time?

    DECBism

    • Economically like the GOP, socially like the Democrats. Yeah, no.

    Illiterate Socialism

    • You’re on the right track, but you seem too sympathetic towards the current system.

    Meowxism

    • A generic Marxist. There’s nothing much to say about.

    Schumacherianism

    • Literally my opposite. Atleast you support limited transhumanism and ruralism though.

    Third Aquarian Model

    • Both of us may criticize capitalism by using morality and ethics, but you just advocate for another form of economic materialism, but with different economic class controlling the economy.

    Ultra-Vperedism

    • Absolutely horrifying. The only thing we agree on is anti-capitalism.

    Comment



    If you want to ask me to add you, please talk in my user talk page.


    DO NOT COMMENT HERE! IF YOU WRITE COMMENT HERE, YOUR COMMENT WILL GET DELETED!



    Navigation Boxes

    Political Tests






    Ideology Alignments