Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 4,933 articles on Polcompball Anarchy Wiki. Type your article name above or create one of the articles listed here!

    Polcompball Anarchy Wiki

    Aggressivism, Ego-Combatocracy or shortned to Aggre is an Offcompass.png off-the-compass Libright-yellow.png Libertarian Right and Stalwart.pngStalwart ideology that believes that an individual should be able to do anything they desire, resulting in the strongest individuals subjugating the weak to their desires. Aggressivism believes that as individuals act in their personal interests the stonger, more capable individuals will be able to exercize their desires more than the weak creating, as aggressivism calls it, a "hierarchy of ego".


    Aggressivism believes in the right to rule of the strong like Comb.png Combatocracy and Krater.png Kraterocracy, but ultimatly rejects the state, opting for Ego.png Egoism instead, He desires for the individualization of the violence in his system, similarly to Anarcho-Fascismalt.png Nilssonian Anarcho-Fascism but unlike it, Aggressivism opposes the very existence of the state for it being a spook that would ultimately intervene with the ego's of the strong.


    Stalwart.png Stalwartism without State

    Aggressivism is naturally Stalwartist, and believes stalwartism doesn't need a state to rise and persist, AnKrater.pngAnarcho-Kraterocracy to put it simply. If individuals may do whatever they desire it's only a matter of time before two uniques with opposing desires meet, aggressivism understands that the strongest individual will be the one on top and therefore, as Aggressivism understands it, in a totally free world there is one natural "Hierachy of Strenght".

    DuelValue.png The Duelist Principle

    Aggressivism believes that in a completly free society without any intitutions (public or private) individuals would use of aggression to get what they need/desire, for this reason Aggressivism chooses to create an alternate system to the NAP that states "Any 2 or more consenting individuals may decide to duel/fight each other to seetle whatever disputes they may have", this system would be widely followed as it brings much more stability than avarationism while minimazing the reduction of freedom.

    Anmona.png Aggressivist Society AnComb.png

    Where does all of this lead us? To the Aggressivist society, a society where individuals combat each other and the stronger ones get to excert their desires over those weaker and naturally the strong rise to dominance in their respective communities, the strong don't purge the weak and instead benefit from them when needed and maybe the weak, desiring more freedom, are incentivised to become stronger, eventually leading to most individuals being strong.

    Agress.png Aggressivism vs Avaritionism Avar.png

    Avaritionism believes it's in the best interest of the strong to eliminate the weak, Aggressivism believes the strong have no universal interest towards the weak but believes it would be more beneficial if they subjugated the weak to their will. Avaritionism commits all sorts of violent acts randomly, chaotically and self-destructive, aggressivism has a system that allows for aggression that is also more stable.

    How to draw

    1. Draw a ball
    2. Fill the space with a lighter shade of Black (#141414) or a Light Gray (#333D3D)
    3. Draw four arrows pointing to the cardinal directions colored with Orange (#FB9602)
    4. Add the eyes.
    5. Done.


    Wacky Gang

    • EthicDarwin.png Ethical Darwinism - You see the benefits of violence but you think "morality" isn't just a social contruct.
    • Medi1.png Medievalism - You're authoritarian and I don't really understand your "god" thing but violence based.
    • Analtru.png Anarcho-Altruism - You claim to want people to be free but I'm not allowed to punch random people on the street?


    • Avar.png Avaritionism - My best brother, but do you not see the many benefits the weak have for the strong?
    • Ego.png Egoism - You're mostly right father, but why must you reject hierarchy?
    • Comb.png Combatocracy - The state is a spook, father.
    • Anfashf.png Anarcho-Fascism - I like you, but reject the government!
    • Anmona.png Anarcho-Monarchism - Our systems are similar in practice.
    • Nrx.png Dark Enlightenment - Egalitarianism sure is spooked, but why embrace the government?
    • Illeg.png Illegalism - If the strong want something, they will take it!


    • Darwinist.png Social Darwinism - I do not desire the extermination of the weak, also you are a statist.
    • Soul.png Soulism - Fellow egoist, but you're embraces weakness and degeneracy.
    • Krater.png Kraterocracy - Might does make right, but you're too authoritarian to my liking.
    • Ancapf.png Anarcho-Capitalism - Property isn't a "right", it's a privilege for the strong!
    • Oligarchy.png Oligarchy - You could serve the needs of the strong or protect a weak elite.
    • Cap.png Capitalism - I also enjoy hierarchies, but luxury eventually leads to weakness.


    • Anpacf.png Anarcho-Pacifism - If you're too cowardly to fight for your freedom you deserve to be oppresed!
    • Communalist.png Communalism - The literal worshiping of victimhood.
    • Dem.png Democracy - Oppresion by the weak, what a hellish system.
    • Hmind.png Hive-Mind Collectivism - Authoritarian that wishes to assimilate the strong into the weak.

    Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
    Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.