.dotdotdotsam Thought

.dotdotdotsam Thought is the self-insert ideology of user .dotdotdotsam.

It is a Marxist-Leninist, economically far-left, culturally very progressive, and patriotic ideology where socialism in Latin America and in the rest of the oppressed world is advocated. Seeing the world being divided into oppressor nations and oppressed nations, it desires the overthrow of neocolonialist and old-style colonialist exploitation throughout the world. It is heavily anti-capitalist and anti-imperialist, and believes that the inner contradictions of capitalism will accelerate the antagonistic contradiction between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie which will then spiral into a democratic revolution led by a people's vanguard. It also advocates for a cultural revolution to dismantle the patriarchal and racist foundations that capitalist society stands on, combatting all forms of transphobia, combatting climate change, and freedom of religious and cultural expression.

=Beliefs=

Capitalist Imperialism and Neocolonialism
Imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism, is characterized by the expansion of capitalist nations into foreign territories to exploit their resources, labor, and markets. Neocolonialism is characterized by the indirect or covert control of a nominally independent country's economic and political institutions by a larger imperialist power. Neocolonialism gives oppressed nations the appearance of independence while, in actuality, being a continuation of the same colonial/imperialist domination that characterized old-style colonialism. Capitalist imperialism emerged as a result of the inherent drive for capital accumulation within the capitalist system. As capitalist nations seek to overcome the limitations of domestic markets, they expand into other countries and establish control over their economies. This expansion is achieved through military conquest, economic coercion, or political manipulation. Imperialist powers extract resources from colonized territories, such as raw materials and cheap labor, and use them to fuel their own industrial development.

Under neocolonialism, multinational corporations and global financial institutions play a crucial role in maintaining the dominance of capitalist powers. These corporations, often based in imperialist countries, exert economic influence and control over the resources and markets of the neocolonial nations. They exploit cheap labor, extract natural resources, and manipulate trade and investment policies in ways that benefit the capitalist centers while keeping the neocolonial countries in a state of dependency. Both capitalist imperialism and neocolonialism are driven by the pursuit of profit and the perpetuation of class exploitation. These processes are integral to the capitalist system, which inherently generates inequality, uneven development, and the concentration of wealth and power. Overcoming capitalist imperialism and neocolonialism requires a fundamental transformation of the economic and social system itself.

National Liberation and Patriotism
To be a communist is to be an internationalist, however, this does not forbid us from being patriots. The specific content of the patriotism is determined by historical and conditions. There is the petty-bourgeois patriotism of Donald Trump and the American imperialists who utilize patriotic sentiment as a distract from class analysis ("the Mexicans/Muslims/whatever are the real reason for all this unemployment!"). To be patriotic for a settler state such as the United States means to uphold its history of imperialist conquests and invasions. The case of Latin America, however, is different, as it is the victim of foreign aggression. Within the context of an oppressed continent, to be patriotic is to resist imperialism and uphold sovereignty. Only by achieving our national liberation will it be possible for the working men and women of other countries to achieve their own emancipation. Chairman Mao said that in wars of national liberation, patriotism is applied internationalism. That is my view.

Democratic Revolution
Democratic revolution is a necessary phase in the process of achieving socialism and ultimately communism in a predominantly semi-feudal society. Many countries in Latin America are not fully industrialized and thus must go through the process of democratic revolution. We must remember that the primary task is to address the problems of feudalism, imperialism, and bureaucratic capitalism that plague the continent, since this is the primary contradiction. By establishing revolutionary base areas in rural regions and gradually expanding their influence, the revolutionaries will encircle the city by the countryside and capture it. Mass mobilization, especially in the form of the mass line approach, is crucial to the success of any revolutionary movement.

Cultural Revolution
The conclusion of the initial proletarian revolution will not immediately wipe out bourgeois ideology. Initiating a second proletarian revolution, a cultural revolution, is necessary to fully overcome the reactionary/bourgeois elements of the previous capitalist society in order to prevent a fall to revisionism. By continuously engaging in critical self-reflection and challenging existing power structures, a cultural revolution can maintain revolutionary momentum and guard against potential regression.

Secularization
Every religion has something of value that it brings to the table, and many of its more humane precepts are completely beneficial to

Environmentalism
=Short Writings=

“For, when all is said and done, it is the so-called little man, the bent-backed, exploited, malnourished, blood-covered fighter for independence who decides. And he invariably decides for freedom.” - Kwame Nkrumah
 * -|Destroy Liberalism=

Liberalism was not designed for you. Ever since the fall of the USSR, capitalism has entered a new chapter — capitalist realism. Reflected in Margaret Thatcher’s slogan “THERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE”, and Francis Fukuyama’s declaration of the “end of history”, liberalism has created the idea that capitalism is something that must be begrudgingly accepted, that it is simply “human nature”. How unfortunate it must be for the penniless, illiterate, malnourished Ghanian child that human nature has been so cruel to him! Ultimately, the notion that there isn’t an alternative to capitalism is as widespread as the illnesses that pass through colonized communities day by day. To the worker who has not deprogrammed himself from liberalism, it seems as though, in the words of that demon Churchill, “capitalism is the worst economic system except for all the other ones”. However, this is a grave error. In the words of Slavoj Žižek, the act of simply thinking alone can be radical. Spend any time online and it is profound how many are utterly dissatisfied with capitalism — some of the most popular sentiments you will see sound straight from the mouth of Karl Marx himself! To take a line from Žižek for the second time, you feel “free” under capitalism because you lack the language to articulate your unfreedom. Fortunately, there is a language: socialism.

The path for our liberation is placed before us by the works of the great Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, Vladimir Lenin, Mao Zedong, Frantz Fanon, Huey Newton, José Carlos Mariátegui, and so on. Socialism is the sigh of relief that there is something that can be done, even if it is just in one’s local community. The revolutionary potential in a single human being is absolutely profound. Through understanding the materialist dialectic, we can begin to piece together reality: it is human agency that creates change. The material conditions for change are, of course, already put together by changes in the economic base, but it is still up to everyday human beings like me and you to go through with it. Was it not a band of humans who overthrew a decaying and repressive monarchy, orchestrated history’s largest and most successful revolution, and sent the first man into space within 30 years of being a backwards semi feudal hellhole? Was it not humans who were able to abolish illiteracy and elevate 800 million out of poverty and out of the reactionary semi-fascist regime led by Chiang Kaishek and his gang of miserable thieves? Humans that are just as human as me and you did that. At the very least, if fascism does end up winning and every one of your greatest fears comes to fruition, at least you can say that you did something about it no matter how large or small. Recognizing that something can be done, large of small, that is hope in humanity and that is hope in the overthrow of capitalism. They fight for capital, we fight for humans. Death to liberalism! Death to fascism! Death to pessimism! Forward with socialism! Forward with humanity! Forward with optimism!

A common tactic by the modern bourgeoisie is to resort to Malthusianism as a solution to climate change, that is, to place blame on human population growth instead of their own imperialist tactics. Backed by bourgeois scientists and bourgeois politicians, it argues that Thomas Malthus, the 18th century cleric himself, was correct to assume that the inevitable growth of the human species will lead to great ruin. Moreover, they say, we have now reached this level of ruin! Their solution is population control, a mystification of the real problem with its premise being that population growth is an absolute driving consumption and destruction of the planet. Any Marxist, or any human being with intelligence in general, worth their time will dismiss this conclusion as demonstrably false. We must ask ourselves, what has driven this population growth? Have humans suddenly decided to fuck more often without protection? No. This population growth has grown due to the development of the productive forces within capitalism. In short, capitalism has been the reason why this population growth occurred.
 * -|Malthusianism is Eco-Fascism=

As capital continually expands at an increased rate, it requires an ever-increasing pool of human labor to exploit, as capitalism necessitates exploitation due to the tendency for the rate of profit to fall, which is caused by the competition between capitalists to expand productive capacity while the productive forces continually expand. The reality that we face today has been enforced through class exploitation, which is evident in the oppressed nations of the world where miniscule wages force families to rely upon the wages of their children (child labor) for survival. The Malthusian notion that population growth drives overconsumption is pure fiction, world-building on a level that only liberals can reproduce. Purchasing power drives excess consumption; in their personal consumption alone, the richest one-percent are responsible for double the emissions of the poorest fifty-percent! By understanding this, we can begin to understand population control as an imperialist weapon that is propagated in discourse that is created by the bourgeoisie through their monopoly on media, as we must remember how in a capitalist society the capitalist class controls the popular media in their favor. The overwhelming majority of growth in the human population is concentrated in the oppressed world, utterly unable to resolve any contradictions which give rise to such growth. Population control theory is nothing but the attempted legitimization of genocide; even if such measures were to somehow be implemented peacefully, the real crisis in population demographics (that we have an increasingly elder population) would ensure the collapse in production as those capable of laboring to the pace of capital’s dictatorship decline in number relative to the rest of the population. Simply put, Malthusianism births eco-fascism.


 * -|A La Guillotine=

“Like everything else in the world, the revolutionary-democratic dictatorship of the proletariat and the peasantry has a past and a future. Its past is autocracy, serfdom, monarchy, and privilege....Its future is the struggle against private property, the struggle of the wage-worker against the employer, the struggle for socialism....”

The Monarchy - whether it be British, Spanish, Swedish, or Danish - is a reactionary institution, it can only be understood in the present day as a weapon of capitalism. Most of the monarchies of the world, particularly the European, were swept away following the uprisings that preceded the Industrial Revolution. The emerging power of bankers and merchants (the bourgeoisie) began a struggle for power, deadly in France, with these monarchies. In the French Revolution, the emerging bourgeoisie superseded the decaying French monarchy as it had become a hindrance to their interests. The bourgeois-democratic republic that came after the monarchy emerged as the result of the violent struggle - now, the God-given right to rule had been superseded by the God-given right to capital. Since in capitalism, capital is essentially means to rule, it must be understood that any changes since those bourgeois-democratic revolutions have been mainly marginal. The bourgeoisie decided that it could actually be useful to keep those lovely stuffed animals that decorate Buckingham Palace today; meanwhile, as a token of good will they fill up their royal pets’ pockets with profits robbed from the workers they exploited! The monarchy is by definition uninterested in democracy, peace, and socialism, and by necessity uninterested also in changes to the status quo. For the ruling class, the royals are a most powerful, regal, majestic, and noble friend; for those who wish to change society, it is a vicious, cruel, and wicked adversary whose tendrils corrode the seemingly purest of hearts. The monarchy is used to empower the concept of "national unity", exploited as national heritage. Millions upon millions of pounds are made every year from tourists who wish to glance at the royal gold and ivory that stolen from the African continent - brutal colonialism that has not been undone after centuries.

The liars and hypocrites that comprise the bourgeoisie will continue to hoodwink the dull-witted and blind with talk of "equality" and "freedom", of so-called "peace" that is built off the back of slave labor from India, from Egypt, from Ghana, from Nigeria, from Kenya, and from many more oppressed nations around the world today. Equality between what class and what other class? Freedom from what yoke, or from the yoke of what class? These are the questions that the supporters of monarchy cannot answer, as they would expose themselves for what they truly are - a wolf in the clothing of a sheep who is in service to the interests of aristocracy and capital! Enlightenment, civilization, liberty - these are the pompous phrases that decorate the realities of the grotesquely coarse, filthy laws they pass that crush the power of workers, that treat the woman as an inferior being, that fundamentally work to oppress! Down with this despicable, odious, and revolting fraud! Down with monarchy, forward to socialism on Earth!


 * -|Multipolarism is Imperialism=

When the USSR collapsed at the end of the Cold War, the United States was left as the last hegemon standing. Much of bourgeois academia (cough cough Francis Fukuyama) was eager to declare the "end of history", awaiting the new bourgeois world order of liberal democracy with open-armed embrace - unipolarity of Amerikan capital. But now it appears that something is changing, that there is now talk of a multipolar world. It appears that the United States is slowing down to its competitors Russia and China. There is great confusion on how to relate to these new powers; many (liberals) have thrown themselves to the new Cold War of Amerikan imperialism against Russia and China, while others have thrown themselves to the grace of these opponent powers as a counterweight to US imperialism. Multipolaristas may refer to themselves as anti-imperialist, but in reality they prettify the world imperialist system and deny that competition between two imperialist powers will inevitably lead to war. Multipolaristas assume that imperialism is a uniquely Amerikan phenomenon - it is demonstrably not.

Russia is not anti-imperialist, not one bit. Just because it is militarily and economically lacking compared to the United States does not strip it of its imperialist status; Vladimir Lenin referred to Imperial Russia as imperialist even though it was practically a semi-feudal backward nation of peasants. Its war in Ukraine is not motivated by a desire to "denazify" it, it is to control its land, labor, and raw materials before they are seized by another imperialist power. When Russia invaded Ukraine, the struggle of the Russian imperialists against the Ukrainian masses became the primary contradiction. It is for this reason why the Russian imperialist war on Ukraine must be opposed. However, we must oppose Russia in a way that is not resemblant of the manner in which Amerikan imperialist politicians oppose Russia. They give power to the Ukrainian comprador bourgeoisie to poke Russia with a stick for years so that they can trigger a proxy war between their regional stronghold, Ukraine, and their regional opponent, which is Russia. They do not see a struggle for national defense against imperialism by the Ukranians, they see an opportunity to crush Russia instead - how unsurprising that imperialists will consider power before people. This is not to say that the Ukrainians are simply passive chess pieces in the game of imperialism, but it is without a doubt that the Amerikan imperialists have made great effort to manipulate and exploit the Ukrainian movement for defense in their favor. We must oppose the Russian war in Ukraine and support the right of the Ukrainians, with arms, to defend their land against an occupier; however, we must also oppose the effort of the US imperialists to expand into a major imperialist war.

Multipolarity, in whatever form it takes, will lead to war and violence against proletarians. How naive must one be to believe that permanent peace is possible between various major competing powers? Nonetheless in the age of imperialism? Lenin has expertly established that competition for raw materials and markets by different monopoly capitals must lead to imperialist wars of redistribution, and that periods of peace and even cooperation between the imperialist powers can only be preparations for war - to this day he remains gravely correct. As emerging imperialists enter the territory of old imperialists, war is always on the horizon. As Marxists, as Leninists, and as socialists above all, it is our duty to oppose war. The solution is not to support this or that imperialist power over this or that imperialist power, the solution is the abolition of the imperialist system through world socialist revolution. Only through fighting back against capital will we ever see an end to the brutal wars which plague and haunt the capitalist system. Supporting this or that imperialist power simply because it is opposed to an imperialist power you don't like is a form of vulgar, narrow nationalism that has nothing in common with dialectical materialism; fundamentally, war will be upheld. We must not support imperialist powers or blocs over any other, fundamentally, our position is with the international proletariat. The Ukrainian people are bombed and murdered by Russian imperialists, and the Russian people are sanctioned and put in economic distress from western imperialists - the bourgeoisie of both countries remains untouched. To that we say, down with imperialism! No war but class war! The only conflict we support is the conflict against the bourgeoisie!

=Further Information=

PDFs

 * Socialism: Utopian and Scientific by Friedrich Engels
 * State and Revolution by Vladimir Lenin
 * Basic Principles of Marxism-Leninism: A Primer by Jose Maria Sison
 * Marxism-Leninism-Maoism Basic Course by Communist Party of India
 * Nuestra América by Jose Martí
 * On Contradiction by Mao Zedong
 * Revolutionary Intercommunalism by Huey P. Newton
 * Strategy for the Liberation of Palestine by PFLP

Documentaries

 * History is Marching (2018)
 * Tsar to Lenin (1937)
 * How Yukong Moved the Mountains (1976)
 * Inside the New People's Army (2018)

YouTube

 * Hakim
 * Prolekult
 * Michael Parenti Library
 * Jose Maria Sison
 * AfroMarxist
 * The Marxist Project
 * Marxism Today
 * Chapter by Chapter

Websites

 * Anticonquista
 * Abolition Notes
 * Freedom Archives
 * Marxist Archive
 * Liberation School

=Relationships=
 * -|Self-Inserts=

☆☆☆☆☆

 * - I'm basically you but Hispanic. Pan-nationalism, communism, Leninism, MZT, everything perfect. Overall, great stuff plus your art is fantastic plus you're nice.
 * [[file:CheeseCom.png]] - Overall very good. Even though I consider myself an ML and not a Maoist, ML and Maoism are pretty much 95% the same except for a few nitpicks.

☆☆☆☆

 * [[file:MLL.png]] - Your writings on Cuba and Vietnam reek of ultra-left dogmatism (as well as describing Pol Pot as "progressive"), but other than that we're pretty much in ideological conformity. The United $tates is undoubtedly a settler-colonial state, and the task of all communists should be national liberation for the indigenous people who were forcefully displaced from their land.
 * [[file:MiskaAlt.png]] - Pretty much just the average Yugonostalgia type, the market socialism is problematic though.
 * [[file:Baconicon.png]] - Libertarian Marxist, but I like your cultural progressivism and willingness to relinquish anarchism. Overall pretty good, just drop the "libertarian" nonsense and embrace Leninism please.
 * [[File:Murb.png]] Neo-Murba - I'm really liking the stuff on your page, the only thing holding me back from putting you in 5 stars is the fact you're not an ML and you mentioned Bordiga as an influence [you seem kind of leftcommish to me anyways]. Very well read too, though I must say you should rewrite your "Problem of Transitory Phases" section because it's so atrociously worded it's practically unreadable. Overall really liking your stuff.
 * [[File:Jefsynd.png]] - I used to dislike your ideology back when I was Cyberleninism, but now that I'm reading your full page I must say that your stuff is pretty good. Your criticisms of social democracy and the rise of the left that is pro-prostitution are expertly said. However, I still personally oppose unionism as a revolutionary force in favor of vanguardism due to the fact I see unionism as overly economistic and unreliable. That being said, your stuff is pretty good to me.
 * [[File:Neokira2.png]] - Honestly really good stuff, I would put you in 5-star if you weren't a furry.

☆☆☆

 * [[File:O'Langism.png]] - We've had this discussion before but yeah I still don't think anarchism is a solution to the state's inherent oppression. Overall just average anarchosyndicalist.
 * [[File:DragonRed.png]]  - Your page is so damn long and it lacks a brief overview and I don't have any of the time in the world to read this stuff. That being said, you seem too overly bureaucratic, conservative, and xenophobic for my tastes. Your support of Latin American socialists is great and I appreciate it, but seriously cut it out with the reactionary BS.
 * - We've talked before and your actual concrete political views are really not that different from mine. I would place you in 4 stars if it wasn't for your embrace of both empiricism and postmodernism and your rejection of dialectics and rejection of the Russian Revolution.

☆☆

 * [[File:Tomjaz.png]] - Vaushite, advocate of "libertarian market socialism" and has a philosophical outlook almost entirely indebted to liberalism. Overall not terrible but could use some work.
 * [[file:Erissky.png]] - I like the fact you're progressive and pro-technology [and a recovering alt-righter], but other than that we don't really see eye to eye. Anarchism and nihilism are just a bunch of edgy teen nonsense, but anti-humanity? You seriously want to get rid of humans? Anyways, other than that you seem okay to me please embrace Marxism-Leninism already.
 * - Liberal, pro-private property, pro-US, pro-NATO, pro-EU, humanist, the list goes on. Too much of an idealist, you fail to see how the interests of capital inherently contradict environmental sustainability and instead seem to push for the typical liberal "human capitalism". Overall average eco-capitalist.
 * [[file:neohumicon.png]] You come to my page to insult me instead of engaging with my ideas lol typical lib.
 * [[File:Brazlib.png]] - Average liberal imperialist but Brazilian. I critically support Lula but probably for different reasons than you lol
 * [[File:CooperativeLibertarianism.png]] - "free market socialism" lmaooooooo

☆

 * [[File:GanzismIcon2.png]] - "return to hunting and gathering unga bunga" but unironically. Plus you're an ethnonationalist .... ew
 * [[File:NeoGlencoe.png]] - Average gusano. Imperialist garbage, your ideas on "keeping America pure" are sickening, and you expressly say you want to launch a full-scale invasion of Cuba. Fuck's sake, a lot of these views do not deserve place in civil society.
 * [[File:AryanMonarchBow.png]] - "Aryan Monarchism" 🤓🤓🤓 white supremacist, outright racist, monarchist, hedonist, individualist - the Bolsheviks should've blasted the Romanovs harder.
 * [[File:Yves-nicholas.png]] - Theocrat, practically fascist, and corporatist. Plus, you equate black nationalism with white nationalism (the two are not the same).
 * - I'm sorry you will never feel the touch of a woman


 * -|Ideologies=

=Comments= My ideology has changed. Will you comment me again?
 * -|New Comments=
 * [[File:Murb.png]] Neo-Murba - Add?
 * - yeppppp add me back ?
 * Add me?
 * [[file:dotdotdotsam-icon.png]] - sure ! Also how do you make a template
 * You can look the code from here
 * [[File:GanzismIcon2.png]] Ganzism Add me? I've already added you
 * - okay
 * [[File:Tomjaz.png]] - Nobody tell him how Aristole is several thousand years older then liberalism.
 * - when I call you a liberal I'm not mentioning Aristotle, I'm mentioning your interest in Noam Chomsky, Vaush, and Bernie Sanders, and market socialism [which is not really socialism].
 * [[File:NeoGlencoe.png]] Neo-Glencoeism- Add me plz?
 * - sure
 * [[File:Jefsynd.png]] Jefbol Thought - add me? (very cool essays by the way)
 * - thank you ! and yes just added you, add me back [also replace Cyberleninism with this ideology bc that's my old one lol]
 * [[File:Jefsynd.png]] Jefbol Thought - alright, by the way i do support the creation of a vanguard-ish workers’ party to educate the working class and to act as the political representative of the industrial unions before and after the revolution
 * [[File:Neokira2.png]] Meowxism - add me?
 * - yes ofc, add me back btw
 * [[File:Neokira2.png]] Meowxism - sure can do
 * [[File:AryanMonarchBow.png]] Aryan Monarchism - Add me? I will add you back.
 * - got you, get me on yours as well
 * [[File:Brazlib.png]] Brazilian Liberalism - My page is still WIP but you can add me
 * - what happened to your page bro lmao
 * [[File:Yves-nicholas.png]] Yves-Nicholas Thought - add me first then I will add you
 * - sorry it took a while but I just added you
 * Add me.
 * - ew
 * [[File:CooperativeLibertarianism.png]] Cooperative Libertarianism - can you add me as well please?
 * [[File:Waffenik.png]] WaffeniK - can ye add me as well please?
 * [[File:CorpotaristKemalist.png]] Corpotarist Kemalism- Add me.
 * - add me?
 * - welcome back. add me back on yours?
 * [[File:DragonRed.png]] -


 * - I'll add you all when I get around to it. for now, I need someone who can color the button, the header, and the black background brown? please and thank you.
 * [[File:NeoUnopxl.png]] NeoUnoGamerism - Add me back?
 * [[File:Waffenik.png]] WaffeniK - It looks like your page was vandalised somehow, are you okay?
 * - no no, I've decided to redo it lol I'm alright


 * -|Discussions=


 * [[File:DragonRed.png]] - your ideology looks great. Add me.
 * - sure but user page on the main polcompball wiki? dude just make a self insert on this site instead
 * [[File:DragonRed.png]] - Our economic views are almost the same. I'm not reactionary. Reactionary means monarchy, theocracy, on the capitalist side. Nor am I a classical conservative. I am in favor of the Republic, the Secular, and the Socialism. Anti LGBT. I am pro-Socialist Feminist. The side that I am conservative is the culture of the nation, the protection of the borders of the country, family values...
 * - I mean reactionary not as in you want to bring back monarchies and theocracies, I mean it as in you are not progressive and uphold conservative, reactionary idealism. You are anti-LGBT, narrow nationalist, and want to uphold "family values"; that is reactionary.
 * [[File:DragonRed.png]] - You know this too.restore monarchy and theocracy; Defending monarchy and theocracy is reactionary. Defending the secularism of the republic is progressive. I am truly a cultural nationalist. I am only interested in preserving my national culture in my country. You are more nationalistic than me. You are a pan nationalist. You aim to unite all Spanish-speaking nations under the Red flag. I am in favor of the egalitarian family institution, which I call family values. I am in favor of having a family of parents and children. I'm here for their protection.
 * - The family is anything but 'egalitarian', the father is an authoritative model of the bourgeois, while the mother and child are the oppressed model proletariat, expected to carry out his every whims on the basis of his 'hard work' and status as a 'prime mover'. This structure doesn't 'protect' anyone except men in power.
 * [[File:DragonRed.png]] - Family is important. It determines your personality. Everything depends on the environment. You and the family depend on the environment. I do not support the very oppressive family model. Nor do I support the extremely libertarian family model. I mostly advocate the egalitarian democratic family model. The family is the foundation of the people. If the family is corrupt, the people will also be corrupt.
 * - I agree that family affects your personality and decisions, but that's not a good thing. Regardless of what 'model' there is for a family. There is no 'democratic' family. There is no 'libertarian' family. The family unit arose for the simple purpose of making two more subservient classes to men - women and children.
 * [[File:AryanMonarchBow.png]] Aryan Monarchism - Depending on where you are it might be about making men and children subservient to women. People shouldn't be influenced by your family but it does happen.
 * - expertly stated by, there is no "democratic" family. The bourgeois family is a relationship that has been constructed by property relations that degrade the woman in relation to men. While I believe that the subservience of children to an elder guardian is a legitimate hierarchy, the subservience of a woman to a man is the literal definition of a patriarchal, misogynistic relationship.
 * [[File:DragonRed.png]] - The family unit arose for the simple purpose of making two classes - women and children - more submissive to men." In the oppressive family model, one side is dominant, the person who takes every decision alone. This can be the father. It can also be the mother. There are more fathers in these very backward countries. In my opinion, the father-oppressive family model that prohibits saying hello to a man. The father, who told his daughter to come after 12 at night, adopted the extreme libertarian family model. There are indeed such models. Believe me, neither is good.
 * [[File:AryanMonarchBow.png]] Aryan Monarchism - Regardless of gender both parents should have equal say. Misogynistic and misandristic relationships are for idiots. Kids should have some degree of freedom btw.
 * - Before I type this comment up, can you people take this discussion somewhere else? it's literally a disaster having to manage all of this shit. anyways, I don't have the time to go into a full discussion, I'll just copy and paste a line from Friedrich Engels that is a response to the bullshit you're spewing: "The first class opposition that appears in history coincides with the development of the antagonism between man and woman in monogamous marriage, and the first class oppression coincides with that of the female sex by the male. Monogamous marriage was a great historical step forward; nevertheless, together with slavery and private wealth, it opens the period that has lasted until today in which every step forward is also relatively a step backward, in which prosperity and development for some is won through the misery and frustration of others. It is the cellular form of civilized society, in which the nature of the oppositions and contradictions fully active in that society can be already studied."
 * [[File:DragonRed.png]] - I am not advocating that family members submit to each other. Neither should a woman submit to a man, nor should a man submit to a woman. Everyone should understand and help each other.
 * - for the millionth time, the nuclear family INHERENTLY involves subservience of a woman to a man due to its inherent contradictions. I won't continue repeating myself, please stop blowing up my comment section.

Neo-Glencoeism- I am not sure how I am fascist when a major part of my ideology is kicking fascists out of my country.