Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought


 *  (ลัทธิพิบูลสงครามยุคใหม่) also known as [[File:SiamNeocon.png]] Siamese Neoconservatism (ลัทธิอนุรักษ์นิยมยุคใหม่), [[File:Thainatlib.png]] National Liberalism with Thai Characteristics (ลัทธิเสรีนิยมแห่งชาติ), or [[File:ThaiNeocon.png]] Revisionary Phibunsongkhram Thought (ลัทธิพิบูลสงครามฉบับปรับปรุง) is an ideology of which is based on the ideas of Thai Nationalism by Marshal Plaek Phibunsongkhram, known as Rattaniyom. Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought’s ideas of monarchism is based on the moderate form of Thai Royalism known as Chakriism as it views H.M. King Bhumibol Adulyadej as the hero who rescued Thailand from the red menace since the Cold War, combined with the proposed neoreactionary economic model called neocameralism, which is based on the Prussian model of cameralism. Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is the ideology that promotes social conservatism, extreme technological development, environmental protection, and cultural rejuvenation, in order for Thailand to be truly a civilized and prosperous nation. Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought’s economic model is based on the ideas of Ludwig von Mises, Friedrich August von Hayek, and Thomas Sowell, whose ideas were centered around free-market capitalism, such as market deregulations, the use of cryptocurrencies, economic liberalization, tax cuts, privatization of utilities and products, or disablement of central government-based welfare in favor of private charities or local government-based welfare. Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought’s foreign policy advocates for closer relations with other Asian market economies such as India, Japan, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, or the Philippines, and detente with the West, while it seeks hostility with the Eastern dictatorships such as Russia, China, Iran, or DPRK. Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports free trade policy towards Western, Asian, and Third World market economies, while being protectionist towards hostile nations from the East, which results in neo-mercantilism. Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought opposes certain ideological demagogues such as economic socialists, communists, primitivists, fascists, wokeists, neo-progressive hawks, populists, anarchists, totalitarians, republicans, jihadists, abortion advocates, trumpists, putinists, dengists, and pro-eastern sympathizers.


 * [[File:Confucianism.png]] Confucius (551-479 B.C.) [[File:Chine.png]]
 * [[File:Plato.png]] Plato (~428-327 B.C.) [[File:Athdem.png]]
 * [[File:Aristotle.png]] Aristotle (~400 B.C.) [[File:Athdem.png]]
 * [[File:Jesus.png]] Jesus Christ (4 B.C. - 30-33 A.D.) [[File:Zio.png]]
 * [[File:Constantine.png]] Constantine I (272-337) [[File:SPQR.png]]
 * [[File:Monarch.png]] Rurik (???-879) [[File:Cball-KyivanRus.png]]
 * [[File:Monarch.png]] Oleg (879-912) [[File:Cball-KyivanRus.png]]
 * [[File:Orth.png]] Olga of Kyiv (~890-925 - 969) [[File:Cball-KyivanRus.png]]
 * [[File:Monarch.png]] Sviatoslav I (943-972) [[File:Cball-KyivanRus.png]]
 * [[File:Monarch.png]] Vladimir the Great (980-1015) [[File:Cball-KyivanRus.png]]
 * [[File:Thomism.png]] Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) [[File:Cball-Italy.png]]
 * [[File:Mach.png]] Niccolo Machiavelli (1469-1527) [[File:Cball-Italy.png]]
 * [[File:Strato.png]] Naresuan (1555/1556-1605) [[File:Cball-Siam.png]]
 * [[File:Classlib.png]] John Locke (1632-1704) [[File:Cball-England.png]]
 * [[File:Classlib.png]] Adam Smith (1723-1790) [[File:Cball-Scotland.png]]
 * [[File:Kant.png]] Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) [[File:Cball-Prussia.png]]
 * [[File:Tradcon.png]] Edmund Burke (1729-1797) [[File:Cball-Ireland.png]]
 * [[File:Washington.png]] George Washington (1732-1799) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:Strato.png]] Taksin (1734-1782) [[File:Cball-Siam.png]]
 * [[File:Jeffersondem2.png]] Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:Joseph-Marie.png]] Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821) [[File:Cball-France.png]]
 * [[File:Hamiltonianism.png]] Alexander Hamilton (1755/1757-1804) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:Chakri.png]] Mongkut (1804-1868) [[File:Cball-Siam.png]]
 * [[File:Lincolnism.png]] Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:Nation.png]] Taras Shevchenko (1814-1861) [[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]]
 * [[File:Enlightab.png]] Alexander II of Russia (1818-1881) [[File:Tsar.png]]
 * [[File:Austrobert.png]] Carl Menger (1840-1921) [[File:Cball-AustriaHungary.png]]
 * [[File:Nietzsche-icon.png]] Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) [[File:Cball-German Empire.png]]
 * [[File:SunYatsen.png]] Sun Yat-sen (1866-1925) [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]]
 * [[File:Coolidge.png]] Calvin Coolidge (1872-1933) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:Church.png]] Winston Churchill (1874-1965) [[File:Cball-UK.png]]
 * [[File:Monkeyzz-Enlightenment.png]] Phra Sunthorn Vohara (1786-1855) [[File:Cball-Siam.png]]
 * [[File:Huhanmin.png]] Hu Hanmin (1879-1936) [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]]
 * [[File:Leftnat.png]] Symon Petliura (1879-1926) [[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]]
 * [[File:Austrobert.png]] Ludwig von Mises (1881-1973) [[File:Cball-Austria.png]]
 * [[File:Kemal.png]] Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (1881-1938) [[File:ROT.png]]
 * [[File:IsmetInonu.png]] İsmet İnönü (1884-1973) [[File:ROT.png]]
 * [[File:ChiangKaiShek.png]] Chiang Kai-shek (1887-1975) [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]]
 * [[File:Gaullismicon2.png]] Charles de Gaulle (1890-1970) [[File:Cball-France.png]]
 * [[File:Hushih2.png]] Hu Shih (1891-1962) [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]]
 * [[File:Phibunsongkhram.png]] Plaek Phibunsongkhram (1897-1964) [[File:Thailand.png]]
 * [[File:Superfash.png]] Julius Evola (1898-1974) [[File:Cball-Italy.png]]
 * [[File:Hayek.png]] Friedrich August von Hayek (1899-1992) [[File:Cball-Germany.png]]
 * [[File:AnTory.png]] George Orwell (1903-1950) [[File:Cball-UK.png]]
 * [[File:Obj.png]] Ayn Rand (1905-1982) [[File:Tsar.png]]
 * [[File:McCarthy.png]] Joseph McCarthy (1908-1957) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:Goldwaterian.png]] Barry Goldwater (1909-1998) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:Chiang-Ching-kuo.png]] Chiang Ching-kuo (1910-1988) [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]]
 * [[File:Reagan.png]] Ronald Reagan (1911-2004) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:Friedman.png]] Milton Friedman (1912-2006) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:KPNLF.png]] Lon Nol (1913-1985) [[File:Cball-Cambodia.png]]
 * [[File:Revzion.png]] Menachem Begin (1913-1992) [[File:Zio.png]]
 * [[File:Pinochet-hat.png]] Augusto Pinochet (1915-2006) [[File:Cball-Chile.png]]
 * [[File:ParkChungHee.png]] Park Chung-hee (1917-1979) [[File:Cball-South Korea.png]]
 * [[File:Marcos.png]] Ferdinand Marcos Sr. (1917-1989) [[File:Cball-Philippines.png]]
 * [[File:Sadat.png]] Anwar Sadat (1918-1981) [[File:Cball-Egypt.png]]
 * [[File:Pahlavi.png]] Mohammad Reza Pahlavi (1919-1980) [[File:Cball-Persia.png]]
 * [[File:Fiscon.png]] Chatichai Choonhavan (1920-1998) [[File:Thailand.png]]
 * [[File:Papaj.png]] Pope John Paul II (1920-2005) [[File:Cball-Poland.png]]
 * [[File:Suharto.png]] Suharto (1921-2008) [[File:Cball-Indonesia.png]]
 * [[File:HenryKissinger.png]] Henry Kissinger (1923-) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:PAP(Singapore).png]] Lee Kuan Yew (1923-2015) [[File:Cball-Singapore.png]]
 * [[File:GHWB.png]] George H. W. Bush (1924-2018) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:Thatcher.png]] Margaret Thatcher (1925-2013) [[File:Cball-UK.png]]
 * [[File:ElizabethII.png]] Elizabeth II (1926-2022) [[File:Cball-UK.png]]
 * [[File:RamaIX.png]] H.M. King Bhumibol Adulyadej (1927-2016) [[File:Thailand.png]]
 * [[File:AlawiteDynasty.png]] Hassan II (1929-1999) [[File:Cball-Morocco.png]]
 * [[File:Blackcon.png]] Thomas Sowell (1930-) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:Caoky.png]] Nguyễn Cao Kỳ (1930-2011) [[File:Cball-SouthVietnam.png]]
 * [[File:Gorb.png]] Mikhail Gorbachev (1931-2022) [[File:Cball-USSR.png]]
 * [[File:McCain.png]] John McCain (1936-2018) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:Fujimori.png]] Alberto Fujimori (1938-) [[File:Cball-Peru.png]]
 * [[File:Anticommunism.png]] Yuri Bezmenov (1939-1993) [[File:Cball-USSR.png]]
 * [[File:LDP(Japan).png]] Tarō Asō (1940-) [[File:Cball-Japan.png]]
 * [[File:Anticommunism.png]] Vladimir Bukovsky (1942-2019) [[File:Cball-USSR.png]]
 * [[File:Wałęsa.png]] Lech Wałęsa (1943-) [[File:Cball-Poland.png]]
 * [[File:Fortuynism.png]] Pim Fortuyn (1948-2002) [[File:Cball-Netherlands.png]]
 * [[File:Hans Hermann Hoppe.png]] Hans-Hermann Hoppe (1949-) [[File:Cball-Germany.png]]
 * [[File:Bibi.png]] Benjamin Netanyahu (1949-) [[File:Zio.png]]
 * [[File:Thaksin.png]] Thaksin Shinawatra (1949-) [[File:Thailand.png]]
 * [[File:Kaczysmf.png]] Lech Kaczyński (1949-2010) [[File:Cball-Poland.png]]
 * [[File:RevRightKMT.png]] Ma Ying-Jeou (1950-) [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]]
 * [[File:BJP.png]] Narendra Modi (1950-) [[File:Cball-India.png]]
 * [[File:ShinzoAbe.png]] Shinzo Abe (1954-2022) [[File:Cball-Japan.png]]
 * [[File:FPR(Rwanda).png]] Paul Kagame (1957-) [[File:Cball-Rwanda.png]]
 * [[File:Sdssmall.png]] Janez Janša (1958-) [[File:Cball-Slovenia.png]]
 * [[File:PFPRus.png]] Boris Nemtsov (1959-2015) [[File:Cball-Russia.png]]
 * [[File:Soclib.png]] Garry Kasparov (1963-) [[File:Cball-Russia.png]]
 * [[File:Nrx.png]] Curtis Yavin (1973-) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:BrotherOfItaly.png]] Giorgia Meloni (1977-) [[File:Cball-Italy.png]]
 * [[File:RusLolbert.png]] Mikhail Svetov (1985-) [[File:Cball-Russia.png]]
 * [[File:FreedomToons.png]] Seamus Coughlin (1995-) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Roman Abalin (1998-) [[File:Cball-Russia.png]]

  The Police  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is in favor of increasing the funding of the police, while decentralizing it to enhance the efficiency of the police force. The police should exist to enforce the law to protect the citizens from having their liberty stripped by criminals and ensure that the NAP will be protected. The police should have the rights to fight against domestic terrorists like Antifa or the Alt-“Right” militia. Local police will have more say in each provinces though.

  The Military  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports mildly increasing the funding of the military. Detente with the hostile powers have been shown in history that it doesn’t work, as it allows those hostile powers to bully smaller nations. However, military leaders tend to do more harm in the economy than good, as they don’t have the knowledge in economics. The military will use force to control the state if they are given too much power, resulting in an authoritarian state. It supports maintaining the mandatory conscription, but also deregulation of the conscription laws, meanwhile the disabled should not be conscripted, and the use of the voluntary conscription system like in the US, while encouraging the partial privatization of the military, such as mercenaries or private military contractors, and the use of robots and artificial intelligence. Thailand should have a military of quality, not quantity.

  Federalism  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports the concept of federalism, turning Thailand from 77 provinces into 77 federal states, increasing the states’ autonomy. The central government shouldn’t dictate too much on different provinces. Unitary governmental system is way too authoritarian and bureaucratic for a multi-ethnical country.

  Free Speech  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is mixed on the concept of free speech. It is necessary for an individual to have freedom to express his or her opinions. However, too much free speech allows extremists and political demagogues such as communists, fascists, wokeists, or national traitors to have a say. In conclusion, the government must fight against these certain ideologies, by using knowledge to disapprove these political theories. Speaking of the Lese-Majeste Law, it is unnecessary because the government should not be treated like an all-correct god, and H.M. King Bhumibol Adulyadej never endorsed this law.

  The Monarchy  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports retaining the current monarchy. The monarch is not just a tourist attraction, but also the symbol of Thailand’s national identity. However, it doesn’t support the concept of the Lese-Majeste Law. Although an idea of a Monarch-CEO running the country isn’t a bad idea, as the state will be able to make profits with the Joint-Stock Enterprises and Corporation to increase the state fundings in exchange for the population to pay much lower taxes in form of a voluntary one. A Monarch-CEO can be either from the Chakri Dynasty or not based on political circumstances. If a Monarch-CEO isn’t from the Chakri Dynasty, the Chakri Dynasty will be retained but will have their title granted as “Marquis of Extended Grace” based on the Imperial House of Ming after the Qing Dynasty had taken over China in the 17th century.

  Rule of the Best  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought prefers Aristocracy, Noocracy, and Technocracy over Democracy and Autocracy. Why? This form of government intends to give the leadership into the hands of highly-qualified people, which is laudable. It prevents the rise of a single dictator, by distributing power between members of a council. The patronage of the ruling classes has led to the blossoming of arts and culture in historical kingdoms ruled by aristocrats. The less number of leaders involved increases the efficiency of the government, by reducing chances of political deadlocks and disagreements. Ideally, well-intentioned leaders in an aristocracy can do what is best for the country, without getting swayed by public opinion. This form of government is advantageous in cases of military conflict, since it results in a well-organized chain of command.

  The Constitution  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports constitutionalism as the separation of power as a concept under constitutionalism ensures that the various organs of the constitution are kept under check so that no one organ encroaches upon the jurisdiction of the other organ. Constitutionalism ensures that the government doesn’t become authoritative. As a result, certain limitations are put upon by either giving rights to the people, like fundamental rights or by placing restrictions on the power of the government. The idea of constitutionalism is taken primarily from the theory of the limited state by John Locke. According to this theory, the state is a creation of a social contract, entered into by a man and thus the state is an instrument for fulfilling the aspiration of the man. Constitutionalism ensures that the state is not encroaching upon the people’s life and liberty and is critical for a liberal polity.

  Economic Liberalism  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought opposes excessive economical regulations, seeing them as stagnative to a thriving market economy (Keynesian Economics have already proven that, such as the US Democratic Party). Economical regulations by a long term only benefits the governmental bureaucracies and it usually causes economic delay and lesser productions in the market which can cause poverty. It is supportive of minimal governmental interference in the economy. People should have the opportunity to start up businesses. The owners and workers should have the rights to freely negotiate in the international and national framework based on the Law of Supply and Demand.

  Alternatives to the Fiat Money  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports free banking and bringing back the Gold Standard. The Central Banks shouldn’t have a large say in the economics. The Central Bank only defends monopolies, and the fiat currency is a tool for the government to control the economy especially Keynesians, because the government prints fiat money such as banknotes, which cause the fiat currency to lose their values each year, causing inflation and net deficit. It is supportive of the competitive crypto-currencies based on the Gold Standard because to make the government stop bossing around in the economy, privatization of currencies is necessary, as what Friedrich August von Hayek said about it.

  Taxation  
 * Taxation is usually a theft, and people shouldn’t pay too high taxes, which can hurt the economy in long term (For example, the Japanese economy, which causes Japan to be one of, if not, the country that suffers population decline the most.) and gives the big government too much of a say. The government should be fiscally responsible so that the country won’t be drown in debt. In short, it supports tax cuts in order to be fiscally responsible without the government wasting taxpayers’ money irresponsibly. The percentage of taxes should be between 10%-15%.

  Private Property  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought views private property as a bulwark to the society. Anyone should have the rights to profit from the land they own, as it’s natural for human beings. In summary, Free Market Economy is necessary for a country to economically thrive. The more freedom to start up businesses, the better the economy is.

  Environmentalism  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is environmentalist in a propertarian way. Pollution is a violation of the other private properties by one. A polluter will be economically punished in one way or another. Green energies and technologies in the 21st century are the results of free-market capitalism that seek to compete in the markets against fossil fuels. Capitalism is the system that will ensure that the environment will be kept green as humans create technologies to sustain the forests, the oceans, or natural resources. Socialists, especially Marxist-Leninists, claim to care about the environment, but in reality, they seek to eliminate the market competition in technology, while replacing it with uncompetitive planned economy that consumes more natural resources than capitalists do, the USSR and the PRC are the proofs of that.

  Gun Rights  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports the idea of gun rights. Citizens shouldn’t rely too much on the police to defend themselves from criminals, as sometimes, the police can collude with the crime syndicates which bribe them to erode the freedom of the common people. Gun control only makes criminals easier to kill someone, as they don’t follow the law. However, the minimum age of a gun owner should be 18.

  Free Trade  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is in favor of Free Trade aka Economic Internationalization. High tariffs and Autarky only hurt the country’s economy than it helps. Autarky can cause economic delay, starvation, and wars. Free Trade allows small countries to gain access on foreign products with higher qualities, and also preserves every nations’ political independence from wars. In order for a country’s economy to be successful, a country should be very permissive on free trade, which allows goods to be exchanged with very few to no restrictions, whether on local, regional, or global levels. It is in favor of free trade with Western, Asian, or Third World market economies for resources that can develop the country’s economy, however, it is protectionist when it comes to trading with hostile nations such as China or Russia, as trading with hostile nations only allow them to be stronger. It is supportive of neo-mercantilism.

  Helping the Poor  
 * Speaking of free healthcare and welfare, Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought believes it should be the local government’s decision to implement one, not the central government. The poor and ill should be helped in this way, or by private charities.

  The State and Religions  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports Secularism, and the religious organizations should have a little say in the government, although it opposes nationalization and taxation of the religious organizations. Everyone should be free to worship any religions and beliefs. Both theocracies and countries with state atheism are equally tyrannical as religious leaders don’t make good political leaders as this has been proven in history that focusing too much on religions hinder the technological progress, while countries with state atheism only prop up cults of personalities as the ex-communist states have proven about that.

  Cultural Rejuvenation  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought views culture and tradition as what keep the Thai nation unique and what reflects the Thai nation, although it views modern Thai culture as corrupted and regressive culture revolved around senseless collectivism. It supports some parts of Social Conservatism as a way to preserve the good parts of the Thai culture and transmit all those values to the country, including national holidays. However, the modern form of conservatism conserves nothing but regressive policies combined with the promotion of populist demagoguery. Thailand needs a cultural rejuvenation, based on Marshal Plaek Phibunsongkhram’s theory of cultural revolution, in order to make the Thai culture civilized and great again.

  Abortion  
 * Abortion is not a woman’s right in the eyes of Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought. It is a murder that cuts unborn fetus’ chance to view the world. Abortion should be mostly illegal unless a woman’s life is threatened or a woman is a rape victim. Although it supports birth control as an alternative to prevent such thing to happen at first place.

  LGBTQ+ Individuals  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is neutral leaning negative in terms of LGBT rights. LGB individuals should be treated equally with the Heterosexuals. Gay marriage should be legal or illegal up to the states’ decisions. However, the T and Q parts, it is a bit less tolerant to trans people. It will still accept transmedicalists as equal citizens because these people want to live normally like cisgender individuals. However, the LGBTQIA+ movement should be strongly prohibited as this movement has spread their agenda that turned children into who they shouldn’t be, which has ruined and demolished several families and their agenda seeks to destroy the functional family values built for thousands of years. In conclusion, if you want to be a homosexual or a bisexual, keep your sexual deviance yourself, if you are a transgender, seek a doctor or a surgeon and live like a normal person after gender transition.

  Opposing Racialism  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought views racialism as a very stupid idea. Not every races are born that way, and this stupid ideology of racialism is built on a pseudoscience. The reason why some certain people from the Third World are inferior in intelligence is only because education and technology aren’t present as much as in the First World. It also opposes intersectionality aka reverse racism, which only promote national betrayal and divides the country, by dividing the country’s population into two groups, such as the “priviledged” and “marginalized”, which is literally built by a non-existent myth known as “structural racism”. Individuals must combat racialism from both sides ASAP.

  Cultural Assimilation  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports civic and cultural forms of Nationalism. Skilled and talented immigrants are welcome to the country, but they should also assimilate into the Thai culture (depends on which provinces). In terms of native minorities, they shall gain equal rights to the majority. It opposes the concept of multiculturalism because a functioning society cannot accept some detrimental external cultures which can divide the country.

  Legalization of Drugs  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports legalization of drugs, as keeping them illegal only make people more unsure about the drugs. This legalization of drugs is the best method to combat drug uses, as drugs’ prices will drop and the drug dealers will actually go bankrupt. However, the minimum age of a citizen who can legally buy drugs is 18.

  Women’s Rights  
 * Speaking of Feminism, Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports the concept of the first and second waves of feminism. Women should have the rights to determine themselves, as they can choose to be anything, including tradwives, nuns, businesswomen, or even the Prime Minister. However, it opposes the concept of the third and fourth waves of feminism, as it only makes gender equality pointless as these type of feminists, especially radical feminists, are as sexist as the Manosphere supporters.

  Death Penalty  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is in favor of retaining the death penalty. Some crimes are so serious that only the death penalty will suffice. Violent and sexual crimes against children, for example. Those who commit such heinous acts will always represent a danger to society. Thus the death penalty is the only appropriate punishment in such cases. The death penalty acts as a deterrent. If people know that they are likely to be executed for the most serious of crimes, then they will be less likely to commit them. The death penalty saves taxpayers' dollars. In comparison with all the money spent on prisoners' upkeep, execution involves relatively little expense. With the best will in the world, some criminals are beyond rehabilitation. Whether they're out on the streets or locked up inside a prison they're always going to represent a danger to someone. The death penalty deals with this problem by removing dangerous elements from society permanently. The death penalty satisfies the natural human desire for vengeance. This may not be one of its stated aims, but it's the main reason why people support it. Executing criminals takes vengeance out of the hands of private individuals, thus maintaining social stability while at the same time satisfying the community's desire for revenge.

  Post-Industrialization Economy  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is supportive in a post-industrialization economy. It increses free trade between the nations. Increases in capital are made which allow investors to finance the country. It allows global mass media ties all around the world. It allows greater ease of transportation of goods and people. It spreads of liberal ideals to other nations. The economy becomes more efficient in environmental protection.

  Technology  
 * Technology and more specifically computers have made the human lives much better in all aspects. Technology is not a dynamic entity, it depends on the user to be applied. Technology should be seen as the greatest accomplishment of the human mind, in the eyes of humanity. Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is very supportive of innovating technologies for the betterment of the nation and the economy as the market competition allows technologies to be developed furthermore.

  Bringing Back the Order of the Past with Futuristic Methods  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is supportive of technological advancements in order to bring back the order and hierarchal system of the past, based on the theories of Nick Land and Curtis Yavin. Technologies are not oxymoronic with traditionalism as good numbers of the reactionaries in the past had supported industrialization such as Pyotr Stolypin. What Marx and the Marxists want in their “progressive” dystopia is not a futuristic world order but a return to the primitive days as those days were the time human hierarchies and civilizations didn’t exist. Religions and Science should not be separated either as history has shown that scientific progress can be made even with religions such as the Islamic Golden Age.

  Biological Ascension  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought views machines as essential things to evolve human biology, as one day, if technology is advanced enough in few centuries ahead, humans will evolve from mere biology into superior forms of machines that have higher intelligence quality, durability, and strength that will prepare themselves to conquer and colonize the Outer Space.

  Green Technology  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is in favor of environment-friendly technologies as technologies are a net positive to protect the environment such as green energies. Renewable resources should be slowly implemented to replace fossil fuels in the future as fossil fuels are limited in this planet and are expected to run out in decades. Climate Change is also a factor that we shouldn’t avoid giving attention as humanity will eventually be drowned in oceans as the Earth’s temperature increases caused by carbon emissions.

  Nuclear Power  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports the use of nuclear power. It is generally considered to be the safest and most efficient energy source for generating electricity. This source of power is used to power almost 20% of the world. It’s one of the most inexpensive and environmentally-friendly sources of energy. In 2018, the cost of nuclear power was just $35/MWh. This is less than half the cost of coal- and gas-fired power plants. The price of nuclear power will be even more competitive in the future. Nuclear power is an efficient and environmentally safe energy source. It doesn’t produce greenhouse gases and can be used in a wide range of applications. Nuclear power plants do not produce any significant amount of greenhouse gases or pollutants. This energy source is safer and more cost-effective than fossil fuels such as coal and gas. It’s one of the cleanest and most inexpensive energy sources on earth. It is an effective way to reduce carbon emissions. It doesn’t generate any greenhouse gases. In fact, the generation of one MW of nuclear power is equivalent to the renewable energy that is produced by 400 acres of trees. Nuclear power will be the most effective resource for curtailing global warming and climate change.

  Eugenics  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is in favor of CRISPR-based Eugenics as this type of eugenics is very effective to improve the lives of the next generations of the Thai people by removing genetic deflections/imperfections and enhancing the human efficiency and intelligence by using biological cheat codes via manipulating certain genes. It opposes race-based types of Eugenics, although interestingly enough, it can enhance the genes of the next generations of the Thai race.

  Internationalism  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports co-operating with other countries for the greater good of the nation, as internationalism promotes peace and security, self-determination, economic stability, and humanitarianism within each nations on Earth. Different nations should co-operate on large issues such as economic globalization, military co-operation, solving climate change, sharing technology, and others. Although it is not supportive of World Federalism or extreme globalization, as those things will erode nations’ sovereignties.

  Approaching Towards the West  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought views the West as the better side in the modern-era Second Cold War, as the West tends to favor things such as free-market economy, capitalism, technological advancement, liberty, or free trade, while the East tends to favor things such as collectivism, planned economy, socialism, or totalitarianism. Thailand should make a detente with the Western, Asian, and Third World market economies, and offer an economic co-operation with those certain countries. Thailand will improve relations with certain countries with diplomacy such as the United States, the British Commonwealth, Japan, Republic of China, Republic of Korea, India, the European Union, Brazil, Egypt, Ethiopia, South Africa, or the rest of ASEAN. Thailand will honor its decades-old friendship with the United States with military, economic, and technological co-operation. Thailand will be hostile towards the Eastern-aligned countries such as the PRC, Russia, Iran, DPRK, or Syria, by giving them economic sanctions and diplomatic cuts, causing Thailand not to co-operate with any of these countries. Even if sanctions are made towards China, Thailand will not suffer economic decline, as Thailand will still trade with the West, the rest of Asia, and the rest of the Third World that can offer alternative resources instead of the certain Eastern-aligned nations.

  Thai Nationalism  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is an ideology that promotes Thai Nationalism. It is proud of the country, nation, and heritage to the blood. It will do the best in anything to improve the country, not serving other countries’ special interests. Nation, Culture, and Identity are what ancestors lost their blood in their struggle against any odds, and it will fight to the last breath for the country. It has ZERO tolerance to any types of national traitors including separatists, collaborationists, terrorists, or anti-nationalists. Thailand should expand its borders to restore most of the lost lands such as Kengtung, Laos, Phra Tabong, Phibunsongkhram, Nakhon Champassak, Sibsongbanna, Perlis, Kedah, Kelantan, and Terengganu. Thailand should expand its borders by using private companies and private military contractors to buy those lands, by offering economic prosperity in those lands, while slowly “re-colonizing” the lands, eventually those lands will be given back to Thailand, uniting the lost-Thai lands during the 19th-20th century.

  Regional Alliances  
 * ASEAN is a regional alliance which unites Southeast Asian nations. Although Thailand should cooperate against incoming threats from the PRC, Thailand will not support rogue states like the government of Myanmar or Cambodia. ASEAN should be more than an economic alliance to truly unite South-East Asia. ASEAN should become a military alliance like the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, by offering free trade agreements and military co-operations with ASEAN member-states such as the Philippines, Indonesia, Singapore, Brunei, or Malaysia to build a shield in South-East Asia against the threat from the PRC and its allies like Pakistan or DPRK. ASEAN should be an alliance that promotes cultural preservation, national identity, military co-operation, and free trade to protect South-East Asia from any external threats.

  The Kra Canal  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports digging the Kra Canal (which was what Thaksin Shinawatra proposed to improve the Thai economy), as this canal will make the country profit more in international naval transportation, as the ships don’t have to stop at Singapore anymore and pass the Kra canal in Thailand instead, which can boost the Thai economy.

  Space Exploration  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought views Space Exploration as a necessity in the 21st century, for given reasons. Experiments performed in space help us understand health problems on Earth. The space sector generates high-tech jobs for Thais. Satellites data can be used to predict natural disasters and to support emergency relief efforts. Astronauts encourage young people to study science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Satellites provide data on climate change, measure pollution, and help protect our planet. Space technologies improve products we use every day, weather forecasts, and communications worldwide. Scientific breakthroughs are challenging humans’ assumptions and pushing humanity’s boundaries by exploring the unknown.

  Zionism  
 * The Jews have owned the Holy Land for thousands of years before the Romans came. The Jews after being expelled by Emperor Hadrian from the Holy Land faced a lot of persecution under the guise of anti-Semitism for centuries, specially in Europe. This was the reason why the Jews cannot be stateless anymore. The Holy Land has to be returned to its rightful owners, the Jews. The Jews accepted the 1948 UN Partition of the Holy Land, the Arabs refused. Look, what Israel is doing against the Arabs in West Bank and Gaza is bad, but the Palestinian side is not innocent either, as Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, and other Arab terrorist groups want to exterminate every single Jewish citizens of the Holy Land. In this case, Israel must annex the West Bank and Gaza, while also treating the Arabs as their equal citizens. Thailand will offer more co-operation with Israel with trade deals in economy and military, giving some foreign aid to the country, with private charities and companies going there, while the country will suspend the recognition of the Palestinian State, seeing that there is no benefit for Thailand to side with the Arabs against Israelis, as Thailand is not a Muslim country, and it doesn’t share any diplomatic relations with the Palestinian State.

  Realpolitiks  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought’s view on realpolitiks is that the geopolitical arena is dominated by pragmatism with principles and values wielded when useful and disregarded when not. Any attempts to analyse the actions of great powers or even middle powers using a framework of principles and values would result in a ton of contradictions and inconsistencies. As a result trying to justify or analyse actions (or inactions) by these states using a framework of principles and values is a useless endeavour and believers that those are what drive states are the 'homeopathy' practitioners of the geopolitical field. Happy to be convinced otherwise a framework of values and principles when analysing geopolitics of great and middle powers is not absolutely useless.

  Communitarianism  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram’s Thought views the community as what makes the country stable with social cohesions, with these advantages: Increase of acceptance for renewable energy, increase of social capital, socioeconomic regeneration/economic regional development, energy literacy and environmental lifestyle changes, empowerment, access to affordable energy, knowledge and skills development, support for ambitious climate and energy policy, and energy supply resilience.

  Orthodox Christianity  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought views the Orthodox Church as the one and only true church of christ, although it doesn’t want the religion to become the majority of the country’s population. There’s a lot that could be said here, but the reason why it believe this is that it examined both the Scriptures and the early history of Christianity, and it became convinced that the only church that matches them both is Orthodoxy. Particularly formative for me were the writings of St. Ignatius of Antioch, a disciple of the Apostle John. The church life he described was definitely not what it saw in Evangelicalism. Since he was someone who learned how to be a Christian from the Apostles themselves, it wanted to be in his church. Orthodoxy takes history seriously and doesn’t gloss over the hard stuff. It also doesn’t pick and choose from early Christian witness to develop a streamlined “system” of theology that is easy to swallow. Rather, because Orthodoxy is truly the community descended from the Apostles, within its theological memory are centuries of dogma, doctrine and theological reflection. Not all of it is totally consistent or easy to sort out, but it is nevertheless one great river of truth with an overall unified direction. One doesn’t see that in the same way in Roman Catholicism (there are several major turns in history), and it is impossible to find that in Protestantism. Most Protestants aren’t even concerned with it.

  Confucianism  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is influenced by the Chinese philosopher named Kong Qiu, known as Confucius, as Confucianism believes in ancestor worship and human-centered virtues for living a peaceful life. The golden rule of Confucianism is “Do not do unto others what you would not want others to do unto you.”

  Natural Law Theory  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought believes in Natural Law Theory. It is based on reasoning, and not revelation – this allows making it possible for everyone to follow the principles. It is universal and absolutist; so it is always relevant. It allows for a clear cut approach to morality and establishes common rules.

  Individualism  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought believes in Individualism as having a sense of individualism is having a concrete set of beliefs about yourself. You know what you want and what you don’t. Because of this, you get to do the things that you love without worrying what others may think that free us from too much emotional attachment in our surroundings. Individualism is also inclined to Self-Improvement. The more you know about yourself the more you are willing to improve yourself. You’re more likely to engage in some activities to develop skills that you are interested in. Individualism develops a solid foundation inside us. People can’t easily destroy you by their judgments and opinions about your personality. You know your personality so well that people can’t use that as a weapon against you. Someone who have a strong sense of individualism can’t be easily influence by others rather they are the influencers. They have vivid picture of what they want from color, smell to smallest details. They show that being unique is cool that one reason people adore them.

20??-2018—->2018-2019(///)—->2019-2020(///)—->2020-2021(///)—->2021-2022(///)—->2022(///)—->2022(///)—->2022-Present(///)

  Years Before Nesanel Thought Existed (Also known as: Apolitical Epoch) (20??-2018)   
 * This was the era before Nesanel gets involved in politics, when he was a child. He used to only care about studying hard and pursue his own future. Back then, He didn’t know about the concept of politics, so there’s nothing much in this era.

  Nesanel Thought 0.0 (Also known as: Thaksinist Epoch) (2018-2019) (///)  
 * This was the era when Nesanel was getting into the first stage of politics. He was told by his parents how great Thaksin Shinawatra was when he was the Prime Minister. He was fascinated how he made Thailand an economical power. He used to oppose Free-Market Capitalism and neoliberal economics. So, He turned his eyes on Keynesian economics, and became a social democrat.

  Nesanel Thought 0.1 (Also known as: Liberal Dengist Epoch) (2019-2020) (///)  
 * This was the era when He discovered wider politics and became more critical to the West. At that time, he met a friend who is a Wumao simping for the CCP, making him believe that China is an actual functioning market socialist country. He turned him into a Wumao and a Xi Jinping simp. He also supported unbridled free trade as this makes China the new world superpower. Thus, mixing Market Socialism with Third Way economics.

  Nesanel Thought 0.2 (Also known as: Sam Kib Epoch) (2020-2021) (///)  
 * This was the era when Nesanel realized that authoritarianism is a no-go for me, and that his friend’s ideology was simply stupid as he’d realized that China is actually a State Capitalist state. He quit being a Dengist because of this. This era was the time when the Sam Kib movement (aka Three-Fingers mob) were very popular as Pr*yuth won the elections “fairly”. (Fr it’s not even a real election. The 250 senates who helped him were already selected by him.) So, he decided to tone down his simpery for Dengism and embrace democratic socialism instead.

  Nesanel Thought 1.0 (Also known as: Neoconservative Populist Epoch) (2021-2022) (///)  
 * After he tried to understand more about socialism, He has realized that equality that the economical system preaches is just equality of outcome, not equality of opportunity, and its end results will always be authoritarianism that pretends to “care” about the poor. He was recommended by his university professor, who was a liberal conservative, into Milton Friedman’s economics. He told me that the West is obviously better than China. He also told him why capitalism is so successful, as other economical systems had failed. The more Nesanel listened to him, the more he became a Neoliberal. Plus, he has had enough of many leftists simping for authoritarian quasi-fascist states like Russia or Iran. So, he becomes supportive of the principles of Neoconservatism.

  Nesanel Thought 2.0 (Also known as: Alt-Lite Libertarian Epoch) (2022) (///)  
 * This was the era when Nesanel became a full blown Alt-Lite obsessed with supremacist identity politics. I was told by some paleolibertarians that libertarians will not risk other people’s lives in pointless foreign wars. He had become quite skeptical of Milton Friedman’s advocacy of Free Trade. He also thought that he should put his nation, tradition, and liberty first, as they reflect what he is in his nation. Globalism has actually done more negative things than positive things in his POV in this period. He had also extended himself into other libertarian schools of economics, such as the Austrian School of Economics. He was also a full blown right-wing populist and national libertarian. To preserve his freedom, he must put his nation first. I also embraced some parts of the original form of Paleoconservatism. He thought that mindless progressivism would end up into a tyranny, like the USSR, or Revolutionary France. This was where he choose to study more about Paleolibertarianism.

  Nesanel Thought 2.1 (Also known as: Pragmatic Libertarian Epoch) (2022) (///)  
 * Months later, after Nesanel had studied more about classical liberal and libertarian philosophy, I have been told by more literate libertarians that supremacist identity politics is not what a true Classical Liberal or a Libertarian will stand for, as identity politics in general is a form of collectivism. Libertarianism in general stands for individuality, freedom, and liberty. He also has realized that populism is just a tool of corrupt politicians to trick people into “fighting the elites”, which is just not different from an ochlocracy. His economic views are now more of Hayek’s than Mises’. He had also come back to embracing free trade, as that thing prevents countries from being involved in wars and conflicts. There is a way to oppose globalism without embracing autarky, such as being diplomatically non-interventionist, or refusing to politically cooperate with other nations. He became a Progressive Conservative leaning to conservative in cultural views, a hardline conservative in economy, and a mixture of civic and cultural nationalist. He identifies himself with the Alt-Lite movement no longer.

  Nesanel Thought 3.0 (Also known as: Neoreactionary or Post-Libertarian Epoch) (2022-present) (///)  
 * This is the current period of Nesanel, as he has already taken the R E A C T P I L L after seeing how chaotic post-modern era has become, although he didn’t become an ultra-traditionalist, he has reverted back to social conservatism even though he still despises populism and populists like Trump or the MAGA cesspool. He views detente with the Eastern tyrannies as obsolete similar to how isolationists like Neville Chamberlain appeased Hitler to “keep Europe peaceful”, which was a completely stupid idea as the evil empires like the Third Reich didn’t stop at Austria or Czechoslovakia, so he takes the NATOpill back, although he still doesn’t like regime chances that much as he prefers NATO and ASEAN being defensive alliances to counter the dangers from the East rather than offensive alliances that Lockheed-Martin innocent Third World countries. Nesanel is now a neoconservative out of pragmatism, not dogmatism. He also has become even more skeptic towards democracy as this system, especially direct democracy, allows uninformed voters to have a say, which is a tool for kleptocrats and oligarchs to rise into power, resulting in a country becoming an immoral dictatorship. He has become supportive of aristocracy and noocracy instead of democracy or autocracy as the former two only allow the qualified, the noble, the intelligent, and the fittest to rule, which make the process in the country faster and more efficient than democracy.

''Note: There are 50 questions you can answer to rank your total score, the full score is 100. Ten Questions for each sections.''  Tiers    Section One: Economics   ''' Question No.1: Capitalism may not be perfect, but it is the best economic system humanity has ever invented in history.   Question No.2: The freer the markets, the freer the people.   Question No.3: Taxation is theft.   Question No.4: Private Property is a human right. Without it, the society will end up into a collective tyranny.   Question No.5: The private sectors are more efficient on managing large economic entities than the worker cooperatives.   Question No.6: Increasing the Universal Basic Income will do more harm on the economy than help.   Question No.7: Communism is an economic theory that was, is, and will never work.   Question No.8: The Federal Reserve and the Central Banks are the main culprits for most of the US’ economic problems.   Question No.9: Healthcare and utilities like roads or electricity should be privatized.   Question No.10: A Free-Market Economy is better at getting rid of poverty than a Planned Economy.   Section Two: Authority  ''' ''' Question No.11: Democracy, especially Direct Democracy, is just a tool for the political demagogues to manipulate, resulting in a dictatorship or a kleptocracy.   Question No.12: Expertise, not popular approvals, is the best way to determine how good or bad a leader is.   Question No.13: Monarchies tend to be more stable than Republics (especially the “People’s Republics”).   Question No.14: Free Speech is a human right, but absolute free speech is way too utopian to work.   Question No.15: The people should have the rights to bear arms. Without gun rights, a society will always end up into a tyranny.   Question No.16: Anarchism in general (including Anarcho-Capitalism) is an ideology based on contradictions.   Question No.17: Terrorism of all kinds should not be tolerated.   Question No.18: Federalism is superior to Unitarism.   Question No.19: A constitution is essential for the government not to become too powerful or centralized.   Question No.20: State Atheism is as tyrannical as theocracies, as countries with that policy always end up into cults of personalities.   Section Three: Culture  ''' ''' Question No.21: A nation’s culture and traditions should be protected, but focusing too much on them can be harmful too, and changes should be enacted for the better outcome by progress.   Question No.22: A society cannot be moral without religions, but theocracies can also corrupt religions as well.   Question No.23: Preserve the Nuclear Family structure.   Question No.24: The French Revolution was a mistake.   Question No.25: We should protect and preserve the Environment.   Question No.26: Prohibit the LGBTQ+ Pride Parades, but don’t persecute the LGBTQ+ individuals just because of their sexual orientations.   Question No.27: It should be voluntary whether a woman wants to be a traditional wife or a working woman but men should always be masculine.   Question No.28: Technological Developments are necessary for improvements of human lives.   Question No.29: The Alt-Lite and Alt-Right movements can be as bad as the “Social Justice Warriors” they swear to fight against in the culture war.   Question No.30: Multiculturalism is bad for a country as some cultures are more harmful than others.   Section Four: Diplomacy  ''' ''' Question No.31: My country’s interests come first.   Question No.32: Free Trade is always a superior trade policy compared to Protectionism.   Question No.33: The North Atlantic Treaty Organization nowadays may not be as good as what it was during the Cold War, but it should still exists to protect smaller countries from foreign threats like Russia or the PRC.   Question No.34: My country should expand its borders.   Question No.35: Colonialism as a foreign policy is sensible (not exclusively refering to European colonialism in the 19th century).   Question No.36: A singular world government is unfeastable at best.   Question No.37: Constant regime changes like Operation Condor do more harm than good.   Question No.38: Immigration is a net positive to the country if it’s only based on immigrants’ skills and intelligence and not for the sake of diversity.   Question No.39: We should explore the Outer Space and find new resources there as Earth’s natural resources aren’t abundant.   Question No.40: It is better for us to peacefully trade with non-aligned Third World countries (including democratic socialist regimes) if they aren’t aligned with foreign adversaries like Russia or Iran.   Section Five: Geopolitics  ''' ''' Question No.41: Russia has absolutely zero rights to dictate over Ukraine.   Question No.42: I recognize the ROC as true and legitimate China, not the PRC.   Question No.43: ASEAN should become a military alliance.   Question No.44: Assad is a villain and a mass murderer in Syria, but the Syrian opposition groups aren’t better than him.   Question No.45: Thailand should retake its lost territories in the 19th and 20th century like Laos or Kengtung.   Question No.46: The Three-Fingers Movement in Thailand is not that different from the Ultra-Royalists as they are both populists.   Question No.47: I prefer the Pahlavi Dynasty over the current Iranian theocracy.   Question No.48: The European Union should be reformed and decentralized, but not fully dissolved.   Question No.49: The Iraq War in the 90s was justified, but not in 2003.   Question No.50: Pinochet was the lesser evil compared to Allende, but he wasn’t a saint either.   Results  ''' Follow the format as below:
 * [[File:Yes.png]] 81-100: The Based and Goldpilled
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] 61-80: The Honorary Capitalist
 * [[File:Meh.png]] 41-60: The Boring Centrist
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] 21-40: The Suspicious Socialist
 * [[File:No.png]] 0-20: The Communist Counterforce
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * [[File:Yes.png]] Strongly Agree (+2)
 * [[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Agree (+1.5)
 * [[File:Meh.png]] Neutral (+1)
 * [[File:Kinda No.png]] Disagree (+0.5)
 * [[File:No.png]] Strongly Disagree (+0)
 * - 100/100
 * [[File:Syntridem2.png]] Apple - 64/100
 * [[File:Poraj.png]] Poraj - 77/100
 * [[File:Omega1065.png]] - 66.5/100
 * [[File:Ptrot.png]] - 37/100
 * [[File:Evolan NRx.png]] Heinrich Cheung - 65/100
 * [[File:Balshikism.png]] - 50.5/100
 * [[File:Pixil-frame-0(27).png]] New Model Of Cheesenism - 75.5/100
 * [[File:Noelism-icon.png]] Noel21231 - 75.5/100
 * [[File:OwfBall.png]] Owfism - 55.5/100
 * [[File:NekoqingBolsh.png]] Nekoqingist Bolshevism - 39.5/100
 * [[File:SomeCrusade.png]] SomeCrusaderism - 80/100

 Ideologies    Based/Green VISA Pass 
 * [[File:Cap.png]] - The one and the only functioning economic system. Even if it’s not flawless, capitalism has already shown to the world that it is the economic system that breeds prosperity and will last longer than it’s arch-enemy, socialism.
 * [[File:Post-Bert.png]] Post-Libertarianism - This is absolutely right about how the society should function. Any Libertarians who are smart and pragmatic enough will realize about that the Austrian Economics actually needs some amounts of statism to function. Dear Anarcho-Capitalists, if you wish to abolish the gubbernment, then who will enforce the Non-Aggression Principle which will protect you guys from the threats of the Left-Wing Anarchists?
 * [[File:3princLib.png]] Liberal Tridemism - The Republic of China should become the Empire of Owners, Liberty, and Free Markets, not an island that wants to eradicate its own identity in favor of an artificial identity. Chiang Kai-shek’s White Terror was not enough to prevent the Maoids from taking away the Mainland.
 * [[File:Reactlib.png]] - This is my favorite form of liberalism because it’s not actual liberalism.
 * [[File:Arist.png]] and [[File:Nooc.png]]  - Only the qualified, intelligent, suitable, and noble should rule.
 * [[File:Nrx.png]] - The form of Reactionarism that suits better in the 21st century than classical conservatism.
 * [[File:Reactmod.png]] - Reactionarism with technological advancements? Count me in.
 * [[File:Austrobert.png]] - Ludwig von Mises was truly a gem that made the Keynesians and Marxists cope and seethe. Although you are actually suitable for the economy if there’s enough amounts of statism, like what I said above.
 * [[File:Chilib.png]] - Another based school of economics. Thomas Sowell is one of my favorite non-white economists. The Austrians are still superior to you, though.
 * [[File:Hayek.png]] - Austrian-Chicagoan Synthesis? I love this.
 * [[File:Necon.png]] - Military alliances? Free-Markets? International Solidarity? Fighting against political demagogues? Fighting against the CCP and Russians? Fuck Yes. I’m kinda skeptic about the regime changes though.
 * [[File:Neobert.png]] - Now, ain’t I right?
 * [[File:Kemal.png]] - Good job for tearing down the anti-Christian empire known as the Ottoman Empire. Turkey must remain as a member of NATO without the presence of Tayyip Erdogan.
 * [[File:Phibunsongkhram.png]] Phibunsongkhram Thought - มหาอาณาจักรไทยจะต้องยิ่งใหญ่อีกครั้ง! มรดกแห่งความยิ่งใหญ่ของประเทศไทยสมัยจอมพล ป. พิบูลสงครามจะยืนยงยาวนานตราบใดประชาชนชาวไทยยังยืนยัด ระบอบทุนนิยมตลาดเสรีและลัทธิชาตินิยมรัฐนิยมเป็นสิ่งสำคัญที่ประเทศไทยต้องมีเพี่อให้ประเทศพัฒนา
 * [[File:Thaksin.png]] Thaksinism - ท่านนายกทักษิณควรกลับมาบริหารประเทศแทนไอ้ตูบ ท่านแม้วทำให้ประเทศไทยพัฒนาสู่การเป็นเสือเศรษฐกิจเอเชียตัวที่ห้า เรารักสินค้าโอท็อป
 * [[File:Nation.png]] - ประเทศไทยจงเจริญ!
 * [[File:Pan-Nationalism.png]] - เราต้องรวมชาติไทยโดยการยึดคืนดินแดนที่ถูกชิงโดยพวกฝรั่งและพวกปรสิตคอมมิวนิสต์
 * [[File:Moncap.png]] - Monarchism + Capitalism = Yes.
 * [[File:Ecocap.png]] - Free Markets will eventually produce green products for the future of the world.
 * [[File:Captrans.png]] - Elon Musk is based.
 * [[File:SpaceCol.png]] Space Colonialism - The reason why Imperialism is good and necessary in some occasions. Earth’s natural resources are limited and countries should consider doing space exploration.
 * [[File:Reagan.png]] Reaganism and [[File:Thatcher.png]] Thatcherism - You two were heroes of the 80s as you brought the world into economic prosperity and ended the Evil Empire known as the Soviet Union.
 * [[File:Ilminism.png]] - Thanks for saving South Korea from the red menace from the North and turning the country into an Asian economic tiger.
 * [[File:LDP(Japan).png]] Japanese Liberal Democracy - Rest in Peace, Shinzo Abe. You will always be a great friend of Thailand.
 * [[File:Zio.png]] - The Jews are indeed based people. I am fully supportive of this to resist the Ba’athists, Jihadists, and Khomeinists.
 * [[File:Cball-Hetman.png]] - The Cossack Hetmanate was the ideal society for a libertarian monarchy.
 * [[File:Natlib.png]] - Liberty and Nation must co-exist for the sake of national economic development.

 Neutral/Tolerable 
 * [[File:Distributist.png]] - My favorite left-wing economic theory.
 * [[File:Reactcross.png]] - Depends on how you define the word “Reactionarism”. I agree that the Enlightenment has some faults such as inventing s*cialism or f*scism. Although you take traditionalism way too far and some of your variants are anti-technology so I guess NRx suits more in the 21st century than this.
 * [[File:Tradcon.png]] - What I said above. Although some of your arguments against cultural liberalism and democracy make sense.
 * [[File:Nazcap-Hat.png]] - You take nationalism way too far. Can you tone down your fascist simpery please?
 * [[File:Pinochet-hat.png]] - You were better than Allende and you indeed made Chile the richest country in Latin America, but your support for Colonia Dignidad concerns me.
 * [[File:ChiangKaiShek.png]] Chiang Kai-Shek Thought - 反共抗俄、消滅朱毛、收回大陸！ Why are you an anti-capitalist? Atleast anyone with a brain knows that you were way better than Mao.
 * [[File:RegCap.png]] Regulationist Capitalism - Why are you into regulations? Don’t you know that it is harmful to a functioning market economy? Atleast you are still a capitalist and a good amount of you don’t fall into Keynesian-tier regulationism.
 * [[File:Protect.png]] - You are still a bad economic policy but you can be sometimes useful if it means to protect the country from hostile countries like the PRC or Russia.
 * [[File:Dengf.png]] - This is my favorite form of socialism because it’s not actual socialism. I prefer your original self as you opened the PRC into the free-markets in the 80s and 90s. Get rid of the hardline vanguardists like Xi and we will talk.
 * [[File:IslamCap.png]] Islamic Capitalism - The Gulf market economies like the UAE or Qatar are based but stop being so cuddly with the Jihadists or the Eastoids.
 * [[File:RamaIX.png]] Network Monarchy - ในหลวงท่านทรงปกป้องชาติไทยจากพวกปรสิตแดงและท่านทรงงานสละหยาดเหงื่อเพื่อประชาชนไทย แต่ระบบเศรษฐกิจพอเพียงนั้นส่งผลเสียต่อเศรษฐกิจไทยมากกว่า เศรษฐกิจตลาดเสรีนั้นดีกว่าสำหรับประเทศไทย
 * [[File:Classlib.png]] - You may have created Capitalism and I still follow some of your ideas but you also allowed socialism and fascism to rise.
 * [[File:Libertarian.png]] - Same as the above.
 * [[File:Bism.png]] - I am not a fan of your overly-centralized government or paternalism but you made the frog eaters cope and seethe in 1871.
 * - Why are you a protectionoid, a regulationoid, and a populoid? Atleast you held up some good ideas for me.
 * - You are too utopian and naive to have your ideas function. Be more pragmatic like me.
 * - Pragmatism is based but you are too pacifist, anti-statist, and moderate on culture.
 * [[File:Orth.png]] - Orthodox Christianity is the only true church of Christ. Still, theocracy is an impractical governmental system for political realism, as religious leaders (for example; patriarchs, clerics, or priests) don’t make good political leaders.
 * [[File:Mach.png]] - Fellow Realpolitiks enjoyer. Despite how inhumane this ideology is, pragmatism is still necessary for the country’s national interests.
 * [[File:Imp.png]] - I find conquests, colonialism, and installing banana republics quite based if Thailand is the country that does it and not Eurocucks. However, what made me put you here is that excessive military interventions usually don’t end well (The 2003 Iraq War was a proof of that). Still, you’re overhated by those seething commies and the conquered themselves.
 * [[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] - What I said above about Reagan and Thatcher, although a lot of your modern followers are too culturally liberal. Atleast we agree on economic imperialism and propping up banana republics to flex the country’s economic muscle though.
 * [[File:Church.png]] Churchillism - If we don’t talk about how you viewed Indians and Chinese people, you were pretty based. Saved Britain from Ch*mberlain’s retardation, as well as contributed a lot on defeating the Axis Powers. Operation Unthinkable should have happened because that thing would avoid most catastrophic results happened after WWII.
 * [[File:Tito.png]] - To be honest, you weren’t that as bad as what Sralinists and dogmatic Marxist-Leninists painted you. Thanks for making Yugoslavia the most prosperous Eastern European country during the Cold War as well as opening up with the West and making the Sralinists cope and seethe. Still, that doesn’t justify what you did to the South Slavic cultures and the religious people.
 * [[File:Zelensky.png]] Zelenskyism - You are pretty much nothing besides resisting the Muscovite invasion of Ukraine.
 * [[File:OUN-B.png]] Banderaism - Соборна Українськая держава — Вільна й міцна, від Сяну по Кавказ! Kinda based but you take Ukrainian nationalism way too far. What you did to the Poles and Jews was still unforgivable.
 * [[File:Statlib.png]] - Cool name but cringe social takes. Take the R E A C T pill and you’ll be more based like Pinochetism. Good for pissing off the regressive socialists though.
 * [[File:Bhl.png]] - Basically the above without the gubbernment. Neoclassicalism is weird though. I’d rather have a moderate pink capitalist as a friend than an unironic Nazbol.
 * [[File:Paleolib.png]] - Why are you an isolationist? Good social views though.
 * [[File:Ancapf.png]] - This is my favorite form of anarchism because it’s not actual anarchism. You are way too utopian to actually work though.
 * [[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]] - I agree that some traditions especially in the modern day have lost its value, and we must accelerate our economic and technological development. Although I don’t agree with getting rid of everything related to the past. Your Marxist-Leninist variants are awful though.

 Cringe/Commie Sympathizers 
 * [[File:Consocf.png]] - Your social and cultural views don’t redeem this ideology. You literally used to be the Maoists that terrorized the country while collaborating with the North Vietnamese. The fact that modern day CPT sympathizers are supportive of the Pr*yuthists just because Prayuth opposes the West does not make you a real nationalist just like the Pr*yuthists, who are selling the country to the CCP and the Russians. Scums from the CPT should have been purged by Marshal Plaek Phibunsongkhram, Marshal Sarit Thanarat, and Thaksin Shinawatra.
 * [[File:Directdem.png]] - You are the shittiest form of the God that failed. Imagine trying to contaminate the votes with uninformed voters to further your populoid propaganda.
 * [[File:Soc.png]] - The worst economic system on planet. I’d rather live under feudalism or corporatism than this.
 * [[File:ML.png]] - Dear tankies, if you love subjugation and oppression of the population under your vanguard party rule, overly-centralized government, planned economy, and constant genocides so much, then you should also bootlick the fascists too, because they also share very similar economic and governmental beliefs with you. Oh wait, the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact happened.
 * [[File:Stalin.png]] Stalinism - I don’t have to explain.
 * [[File:Mao.png]] - This demon literally turned China into a chaotic living hell where cannibalism was common during your rule. You anti-environmentalist scum also destroyed the Chinese ecology by killing sparrows. I wonder why there are still so many western tankies who simp for this.
 * [[File:MLM.png]] - You criticize me for thinking that Pinochet was great for Chile, while your online followers praise the psycho who murdered ten more times than Pinochet did.
 * [[File:Mao3word.png]] - This is the highest stage of a collective commie copium from various uncivilized states.
 * [[File:Neoml.png]] Neo-Marxism–Leninism - Oh Sweet Jesus.
 * [[File:Ancom.png]] - You will never succeed in creating your own ideal society. You’re just a doormat for the tankies, and that has been proven in history such as Catalonia or Makhnovia.
 * [[File:LeftCom.png]] - Your demagoguery will never succeed. Keep coping, you will never be relevant.
 * [[File:Nazbol.png]] - Die.
 * [[File:Fash.png]] - MLism but replaces extreme egalitarianism with extreme nationalism. Rather you than the above though.
 * [[File:Nazi.png]] - A shame for nationalism everywhere.
 * [[File:Strasser.png]] - A Nazi with shittier economic takes.
 * [[File:Reactsoc.png]] - Ultra-Traditionalism + Planned Economy + Collectivism + Religious Fundamentalism = Tribalism Incarnate
 * [[File:Baath.png]], [[File:Jihad.png]] , and [[File:Khom.png]] - Keep coping and seething when the Israelis and the Saudis kicked your asses several times.
 * [[File:Putin.png]] Putinism - Ukraine has existed as Kyivan Rus' long before the Grand Duchy of Muscovy which is your excuse of a country did. Shame that Jiang the Toad has stopped the PRC’s claim on Outer Manchuria.
 * [[File:Showa-kanmuri.png]] - Fuck off, traitor. You forced us to side with you in WWII. You claimed that the Thai people are your “brothers” yet you treated us like how you treated the Chinese. Pan-Asianism is based though.
 * [[File:Plcn2.png]] - Thrashing the American pride while praising literal enemies of America like Assad or Putin is so patriotic and nationalist. You serve nothing but to make the Right look like a joke. What Ben Shapiro said about your pathetic followers like Nick Fuentes was absolutely right.
 * [[File:Altr.png]] - Nazbols disguised as “based and redpilled traditionalists”. Stop clinging to capitalism when your purpose is just to thrash the reputation of the Right while secretly working with Marxist-Leninists.
 * [[File:Awaj.png]] - You will never work. Just face it. A stateless society will just let a third party to create a government.
 * [[File:Totalitarian.png]] - You and Anarchism are two sides of a same coin.
 * [[File:Trot.png]] - I don’t care if you oppose tankies, you are no better than them. Thanks for giving us Irving Kristol, sucker.
 * [[File:FDRismF.png]] - You were the main reason why liberalism in the US is painted as an ideology aligned with egalitarianism and socialism. If I have to agree with anything with the paleoconservatives, The New Deal was a mistake that allowed the Feds to control the economy. You Keynesian scum are the reason why the US economy keeps inflating each year. I don’t care if you helped the Allies win WWII. Because of YOU, we had to deal with the red menace for decades after that war.
 * [[File:Trump.png]] Trumpism - You made the Right look like a joke. Tried to sabotage the GOP by inserting your populoid rhetorics while calling those who are truly loyal to the GOP like John McCain or Mitt Romney “RINOs”. You literally wanted the US to leave NATO and submit to the Russians, dividing the West furthermore. I hope Ron DeSantis rescues the GOP from the mess you caused for years. You’re a bit better than Dementia Joe but that’s a low bar.
 * [[File:Ottoman.png]] - Turkish Trump. Wants not only to divide NATO from the inside (by trying to sabotage Sweden or Finland’s entry to NATO, or literally threatening Greece, a truly loyal NATO member state, with military threats), but also wants Turkey to side with the Eastern-aligned countries such as the PRC or Iran, and flood Europe with jihadists and illegal immigrants alongside with his comrade Putin. Stop trying to thrash the legacy of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk and the Turkish economy for fuck’s sake. Why do progtards think we are the same?
 * [[File:PalangPracharat.png]] - ขอบใจมากสำหรับการที่มึงขายชาติให้พวกจีนแดง ไอ้คอมมี่ใส่หน้ากากรอยัลลิสต์ ทักษิณควรกลับมาบริหารประเทศแทนมึง
 * [[File:Euras.png]] - Finally, A Worthy Opponent! Our Battle will be Legendary!
 * [[File:3wayDeng.png]] - Who are you? Who is this CCP-bootlicking baizuo? Why do you look at me like that, young guy?
 * [[File:Altl.png]] and [[File:Rpop-tinfoilhat.png]]  - P*pulism is a demagoguery copium. Also you should focus more on the real issues like the economy or protecting the environment, and don’t focus too much on your “own da libz!1!1!!1!1!” cultural stuffs. Some of you like the Trumpists/MAGA Cesspool in the United States or Salims/Ultra-Royalists in Thailand are good reasons why you can be as f@ggoty as your left-wing variant.
 * [[File:YellowShirts(Thailand).png]] - The gubbernment should not be worshipped like a god you illiterate. The fact that a lot of you are economic populists that keep ruining the Thai economy doesn’t help either. Atleast Thaksin Shinawatra revived the Thai Economy, while you and your master Prayuth barely did anything good.
 * [[File:SamKibGuy icon.png]] - You and the Salims are truly menaces of a society. “Hurr durr we must accept le woke foreign cultures because Thainess is le bad bad!1!1!!1!1!🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓” Literally shut the fuck up, please? Left-Wing populoids like you are the worst.
 * [[File:Native.png]] - Haha Manifest Destiny goes brrr.
 * [[File:Caesar.png]] - You got what you deserve, proto-leftist.

 Self-Inserts    Allied 
 * [[File:BERNHEism.png]] BERNHEism ([[File:Technocracy.png]]/[[File:Statecap.png]]/[[File:WelfChauvin.png]]/[[File:CivUltranat.png]]) (Also known as: Techno-Ultranational Capitalism) - You have good ideas such as technological advancements, the rule of the best (fellow enjoyer of aristocracy), capitalism (although I don’t really like overly-regulated markets), your disdain for populoids, your disdain for racialism, decent foreign policy, or your views on the LGBTQIA+ community. But you take authoritarianism and anti-traditionalism way too far. Overall, your attempts to mix Bull Moose Progressivism with Dengism and Technocracy are decent. (86/100)
 * [[File:MonPatconSun.png]] Patrick thought ([[File:Tradcon.png]]/[[File:Orth.png]]/[[File:Monarch.png]]/[[File:Patcon.png]]) (Also known as: [[File:H.png]]) - Has a lot of neat ideas such as monarchism, social conservatism, aristocracy, and so on. Though we disagree on paternalism and your support for th*ocracy. We both have strong disdain for the God that failed too. Also fellow Orthodox Christian and [[File:H.png]]amer. (68/100)
 * [[File:NewMatthism3.1.png]] Matthism ([[File:Austrobert.png]]/[[File:Libtrans.png]]/[[File:Obj.png]]/[[File:Xbert.png]]) (Also known as: My Ideological Twin from Europe) - I hardly find any differences between our ideologies. Fellow Austrolibertarian Transhumanist. This is certainly more based than I thought. You are also one of the wise capitalists who know that capitalism is not compatible with the God that failed aka Democracy too. (97/100)
 * [[File:Evolan NRx.png]] Evolan Dark Enlightenment ([[File:Nrx.png]]/[[File:Esofash.png]]/[[File:Showa-kanmuri.png]]/[[File:Superfash.png]]) (Also known as: Neo-Phibunism on steroids) - Based gamer from the Chinese PCB community. We are similar in many things but you take things way too far. Perhaps you can become more moderate like me in one day. Please drop your simpery for Imperial Japan and F*scism too. Fellow Asian Neoreactionary. (70/100)

 Neutral   Hostile 
 * [[File:Syntridem2.png]] ([[File:Kemal.png]]/[[File:3princ.png]]/[[File:Socauth.png]]/[[File:FDRismF.png]]) (Also known as: Literally FDR’s Reincarnation) - We both admire such figures like Ataturk, Sun Yat-sen, Hu Shih, Hu Hanmin, and so on. You also have some good takes like civic/cultural nationalism, opposition to the Taiwanese and HK Independentists, technophilia, opposition to the Eastern tyrannies, environmentalism, etc. But you are way TOO regulative when it comes to the economy, especially that it comes from your admiration for one of, if not, the MOST overrated POTUS in history known as Franklin Delano Roosevelt, your sympathy for some socialists, and non-interventionist foreign policy. Your old self was better than what you’re now. Sorry, but I’ll put you in this tier. (56/100)
 * [[File:Noelism-icon.png]] Noelism ([[File:Altl.png]]/[[File:SocCap.png]]/[[File:Plcn2.png]]/[[File:Rpop-tinfoilhat.png]]) (Also known as: Nesanel’s Malaysian Populist Pal) - You have very good takes such as opposing the cursed Taiwanese independentists (although you should be a bit less supportive of the CCP), being socially conservative, nationalism, Tridemism, admiration of LKY, etc. But you also have some bad takes such as supporting systems of demagogues like Democracy or Populism, or your support for the Russian side in the 2022 Russo-Ukrainian War. I’m not a fan of your economic views either. Overall, you’re like Applethesky but with better social takes but shittier foreign policy. (60/100)
 * [[File:DoesntExist.png]] Nonexistism ([[File:ChiangKaiShek.png]]/[[File:Strasser.png]]/[[File:Juche.png]]/[[File:Confucianism.png]]) (Also known as: Syncretic Tridemism on steroids) - How can I put a non-existent ideology here? Has some neat ideas like Technoreconstructionism, Social Conservatism, Pan-Nationalism, Confucianism, or Tridemism. The rest of the ideology, especially Strasserism, Juche (even if you don’t simp for today’s politics of DPRK), or the quasi-Nazbol tendencies are not my taste. We are also almost the polar opposite on economy (that’s obvious) and on diplomacy (I prefer economic internationalization and international alliances, although I am not a globalist). Also, I am a neoconservative out of pragmatism (I am still skeptic on regime changes on non-aligned countries). (53/100)
 * [[File:Pixil-frame-0(27).png]] New Model Of Cheesenism ([[File:Reactcross.png]]/[[File:Islamfash.png]]/[[File:Panc.png]]/[[File:Kita.png]]) (Also known as: Pancasila-Kita Synthesis) - We share two common enemies on this planet (the Russians and CCP), have similar Pan-Asian Nationalist views (although your interests in the Malacca Strait will have a conflict with mine), or are sympathetic towards Reactionarism (even if our definitions of that word are different, as I am a reactionary in a political sense, while you are one in a cultural sense). However, we disagree on certain things such as your support for corporatism, an economic system that requires large amount of stratification, which reduces the economic freedom and is stagnative to a market economy like Indonesia, your support for the Arab side in the Israeli-Arab Conflict which is not beneficial for my country because Israel will become a much worse enemy for Thailand to handle if it sides with the Arabs, because the Israelis have much better military technology than the Islamic World combined, or your support for over-centralization of the government, which can go out-of-bounds and become an incompetent and tyrannical autocracy, which decreases the motivation and loyalty of the population to the state, which can causes rebellions and will waste too much money on government spendings. (48/100)
 * [[File:Neo-XarTario.png]] Neo-XarTario Thought ([[File:Opposite Unity.png]]/[[File:SocDist.png]]/[[File:Transh.png]]/[[File:PROG.png]]) (Also known as: Catch-All Progressive Distributism) - Your ideology concept is weird for me to understand. Transhumanism and Technogaianism are based. There are some good takes that I can tolerate while there are good amount of bad takes that I don’t. (43/100)
 * [[File:Stilluserricon.png]] Stilluserr's Thought ([[File:Technocracy.png]]/[[File:Socauth.png]]/[[File:Progconf.png]]/[[File:Kemal.png]]) (Also known as: Technocratic Kemalism) - You have some good ideas such as secularism, technocracy (duh, we’re fellow Rule of the Best enjoyers), some of your cultural views, nationalism, and your disdain for Democracy. Although you also have bad takes such as your support for pl*nned economy, which is harmful for a country’s economy to develop, as without the free-market mechanisms, the population would be less likely to do their jobs in the economy, which decreases the diversity of products in the markets, or your pro-workers sentiment, which I’ll not explain why socialism is inferior to capitalism because I’m tired of arguing with those socialists who think that socialism would make their country better than capitalism as an economic system. (52/100)
 * [[File:Cflski.png]] Celfloskyism ([[File:3princ.png]]/[[File:Socdem.png]]/[[File:Ectrans.png]]/[[File:Progconf.png]]) (Also known as: Sandersism with Chinese Characteristics) - You sound like a typical Bernie-supporting social democrat but there are some redeeming qualities such as Technogaianism, Tridemism, some amounts of social conservatism, and nationalism. Atleast we can be allies against the Green Taliban and the CCP shills though. (46/100)
 * ([[File:EcoLiberalSoc.png]]/[[File:Classprog-u.png]]/[[File:LeftSocdem-Alt.png]]/[[File:Demsocstar.png]]) (Also known as: Libertarian Dubček-Djilas Thought) - First of all, I’m not a fan of egalitarianism, as the idea of social equality cannot be truly achieved. Inequality and hierarchies are a human nature that always exist to make a society function in a large scale. Market Socialism, even if better than State Socialism, is not a good economic system, as worker cooperatives are not efficient on managing large economic entities (Yugoslavia under Tito for example). Also, your support for unfettered democracy is very harmful for a large country like the US, as direct democracy allows everyone including the incompetent, illiterate, and morally corrupt to have a say in politics, which will results into a mindless ochlocracy. Non-interventionism is not a good foreign policy either. If the US isolates itself from the rest of the world diplomatically and economically, there will be a power vacuum for even worse imperialist states such as Russia or the PRC to fill, and an another Nazi Germany will eventually rise up, and without the US containing those would-be Third Reichs, those powers will eventually come to the US like what happened in Pearl Harbour. Overall better than the tankies, but that’s still not good. (20/100)
 * [[File:MrvLIT.png]] Mr. V Thought ([[File:Prog-u.png]]/[[File:Libms.png]]/[[File:Councom.png]]/[[File:AntiParti.png]]) (also known as: Sablinism of the 21st Century) - You are similar to the above in a lot of things such as unfettered democracy, market socialism, civil libertarianism, etc. and so on. I’ll not go on the arguments about the LGBTQ+ question though because it didn’t end well last time when we met each other long time ago . Although I’d admit that you’re better than some libertarian socialists, and I like your opposition towards the Sralinoids too. If anything, I’m not a fan of your ideology, but rather you than unironic Nazbols or tankies. (17/100)
 * [[File:OwfBall.png]] Owfism ([[File:World Federalism2.png]]/[[File:Dsa.png]]/[[File:Socgeo.png]]/[[File:Marksoclibdem.png]]) (also known as: Neo-Einsteinism) - I’m not really a fan of this ideology at all. First, you resort to the shittiest type of globalism aka World Federalism. Since I’m tired of explaining why nationalism and patriotism are necessary for one nation to develop, I’ll say this: Why cooperate when you can have S U P R E M A C Y instead? Second, you are an environmentalist, which is good, but socialism is not a good economic system to save the ecosystem. Green energies are the results of free-market mechanisms of capitalism that want to compete against fossil fuels in the market economy. Third, you’re a Market Socialist which is better than a State Socialist but still not that good. Fourth, you take civil liberties way too far, as too much civil liberties will cause chaos and disorder. In conclusion, almost my opposite but has some saving graces like your support for market economy, environmentalism, and transhumanism. (14/100)
 * [[File:NekoqingBolsh.png]] Nekoqingist Bolshevism ([[File:Stalin.png]]/[[File:Natcom.png]]/[[File:LeftKMT.png]]/[[File:Progconf.png]]) (Also known as: Sralinism with Gamer Characteristics) - I’ll not explain the reason why I loath your main ideological inspiration as much as I loath the cursed “National” Socialists. Although you have some good takes like transhumanism, cultural nationalism, or your opposition to the mainstream politics of both the PRC and ROC. In my experience of facing so many Sralinoids, you are easily the most tolerable Sralinoid to me because of your gigachad and gamer personality. Bruh, your page’s color make my eyes bleed. (11/100)
 * [[File:7588.png]] WMS7588 thoughts ([[File:Hfash.png]]/[[File:Statecap.png]]/[[File:China-blueshirt.png]]/[[File:AnEn.png]]) (Also known as: Least Degenerate Fascist) - Combining what’s worst of fascism with immorality and degeneracy are what I’ll always oppose, as much as I’ll oppose tankies who are obsessed with intersectionality. Tolerable in personality and you have few good takes such as transhumanism and imperialism. Atleast we have common enemies like the treacherous anti-nationalists or intersectional tankies. (16/100)
 * [[File:Neokira2.png]] Neo-Kiraism ([[File:Neostalin.png]]/[[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]]/[[File:Erga.png]]/[[File:Directdem.png]]) (Also known as: The True Antithesis of Neo-Phibunism) - Oh my god, Simpery for Sralin? State-Mandated Altruism? MLism? Authoritarian Intersectionality? The worst form of unfettered democracy? Ergatocracy? Oh my god. This mustn’t be true. Literally the antithesis of me. Finally! A Worthy Opponent! Our Battle Will Be Legendary! The only redeeming quality of your ideology is Technogaianism. You are not that different or even worse than the above. (4/100)
 * [[File:O'Langism.png]] O'Langism ([[File:Ancom.png]]/[[File:GE.png]]/[[File:Mutualist.png]]/[[File:Synthesisanarchy.png]]) (Also known as: Your typical Anarchist) - Your ideal society won’t last for weeks as anarchism in general will allow a third party to take over the territories. Your economy is also atrocious as gift economy will never, EVER, function, as attempts to implement this economic system will end up into a labor slavery. Also, free speech absolutism is just a populist copium that will stall the country’s economic development, let the state and private sectors do their jobs. I won’t elaborate about how unfettered democracy is very harmful. In conclusion, has few redeeming points, as you are not as genocidal as the tankies, but I don’t see how your society will last less than a month. (4/100)

 Personality  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is a silent person that trusts no one as it considers no one as someone that truly care about it, although that it views other ideologues by personality, not by their ideologies. Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought usually gets along with contemporary conservatives and economic liberals, most likely neoconservatives, neoliberals, or neo-libertarians. Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought abhors political demagogues such as socialists, communists, wokeists, populists, science deniers, fascists, jihadists, or pro-Eastern sympathizers. Despite being socially conservative, Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought despises Trumpists and paleoconservatives as those two groups of political demagogues seek to weaken NATO from the inside while submitting to the Russians, which will divide the West, because Trump wants the US to withdraw from NATO had he won the second term in the US Presidential Elections, and paleoconservatives want very similar things Trump wanted, the fact that modern paleocons in the US sympathize for anti-Atlanticist tyrants like Assad or Putin doesn’t help either. In conclusion, Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is fine with everyone in personality as long as you are not a dickhead towards it, because it views people in terms of their personalities rather than their ideologies.

 Flag    General Version  The flag design of Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is based on the rotated flag of Thailand with the Coat of Arms of Mises Institute.


 * 1) Draw a circle
 * 2) Draw the flag of Thailand with horizontal lines rotated by 52 degrees with these following colors: #a51931, #f4f5f8, #2d2a4a
 * 3) Draw the Von Mises Coat of Arms.
 * 4) Draw a 4 quarter Shield.
 * 5) Make Top-Right and Bottom Left quarters Light Blue and the other two light Grey.
 * 6) Through the Grey quarters draw a thick red line.
 * 7) (Optional) Draw an opened Bible in bottom left corner and a Caduceus in the top right
 * 8) Draw the sunglasses and the Royal Thai Army officer cap.
 * 9) (Optional) Draw Heckler and Koch 416 assault rifle next to the ball like it is armed with the rifle.

 Alternate Version  The alternate flag design of Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is based on the flag of Siam with NATO background color.


 * 1) Draw a circle
 * 2) Paint the ball with navy blue (#022169), the same color used for the background color of the flag of NATO.
 * 3) Draw the Siamese Elephant at the middle of the ball.
 * 4) Draw the sunglasses and the Royal Thai Army officer cap.
 * 5) (Optional) Draw Heckler and Koch 416 assault rifle next to the ball like it is armed with the rifle.

 Books That I Have Read 
 * Principles of Economics by [[File:Austrobert.png]] Carl Menger
 * Human Action by [[File:Austrobert.png]] Ludwig von Mises
 * Individualism and Economic Order by [[File:Hayek.png]] Friedrich A. Hayek
 * The Road to Serfdom by [[File:Hayek.png]] Friedrich A. Hayek
 * 1984 by [[File:AnTory.png]] George Orwell
 * Reflections on the Revolution in France by [[File:Tradcon.png]] Edmund Burke
 * The Wealth of Nations by [[File:Classlib.png]] Adam Smith
 * The Invisible Hand by [[File:Classlib.png]] Adam Smith
 * Race and Culture by [[File:Sowell.png]] Thomas Sowell
 * Black Rednecks and White Liberals by [[File:Sowell.png]] Thomas Sowell
 * Basic Economics by [[File:Sowell.png]] Thomas Sowell
 * Democracy: The God That Failed by [[File:Hans Hermann Hoppe.png]] Hans-Hermann Hoppe
 * End the Fed by [[File:RonPaul.png]] Ron Paul
 * For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto by [[File:Rothbard.png]] Murray N. Rothbard
 * The Ethics of Liberty by [[File:Rothbard.png]] Murray N. Rothbard

 Books That I Want To Read 
 * Thus Spoke Zarathustra by [[File:Nietzsche-icon.png]] Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche
 * Revolt Against the Modern World by [[File:Superfash.png]] Julius Evola
 * Ride the Tiger: A Survival Manual for the Aristocrats of the Soul by [[File:Superfash.png]] Julius Evola
 * The Fountainhead by [[File:Obj.png]] Ayn Rand
 * Anthem by [[File:Obj.png]] Ayn Rand
 * Atlas Shrugged by [[File:Obj.png]] Ayn Rand
 * The Thirst for Annihilation: Georges Bataille and Virulent Nihilism by [[File:Landian Accelerationism.png]] Nick Land
 * An Open Letter to Open-Minded Progressives by [[File:Nrx.png]] Mencius Moldbug
 * From Aristocracy to Monarchy to Democracy: A Tale of Moral and Economic Folly and Decay by [[File:Hans Hermann Hoppe.png]] Hans-Hermann Hoppe

If you want to ask me, please talk in, especially if you want to be added in relations.

DO NOT COMMENT HERE! IF YOU WRITE COMMENT HERE, YOUR COMMENT WILL GET DELETED!