Liberty-Loverism

Summary
Liberty-Loverism believes society should be organized in a manner in which everyone has as much personal freedom and control as possible. They believe the best way to do this is to this is to create a leaderless society. Along with this they also want to accelerate social and technological progress like.

[[file:Awaj.png]] Leaderlessness [[file:Directdem.png]]
LibLovism believes that society doesn't need leaders to function and therefore advocates for Voluntaryism, , or. They believe that it is important that the people have genuine control over their lives and thus is against types of organizations that are run from top down as opposed to bottom up.

 Fighting off Centralization 

Liblovism would prefer for either abolition of the state of the creation of non state entities to far to control, However they are unsure about how truly possible it is to have an abstance of a state for any long period of time. Liblovism intends to maintain post statist autonomy by having the powers that would fall under jurisdiction of the state, be instead divided by organizations directly controlled via the people, liblovism hopes this would prevent the anarchist free territories from being a power vacuum waiting to be filled by a warlord.

[[file:Prog-u.png]] Social Progressivism [[file:Prgess.png]]
LibLovism is quite progressive and believes every one should be treated equally and thus wants minority rights to improve. Unlike most progressives they disagree with the idea of idpol. They think identity should not matter, because of this they want all identities existing associations to be defanged to point where your identity barely affects peoples opinions of you if at all.

 Gender 

Liblovism thinks gender is a nonsensical social construct that limits peoples self expression and shouldn't define how one is ought to live their life. They are unsure if it should be abolished based on how many people seem to care about it as a tool of self expression.

 Culture 

Cultural traditions while also having little basis in reality are fine as long as they aren't shoved down peoples throats, which today they often are.

 Idpol 

Liblovism believes identity politics are something practiced by both the left and the right, and both sides of the culture war are often insufferable. They believe idpol is a form of state encouraged tribalism meant to divide people and prevent them from allying with each other against the state and corporate elites.

[[file:Transh.png]] Technological Progressivism [[file:Futvalue.png]]
 Space 

LibLovism highly values technology and thinks its vital to accelerate technology to lead to humanity no longer being confined to the earth, and spread like across the stars.

 Technology and Decentralization 

They believe that technology will improve the ability to govern, which is terrifying as it means governments will have more power, via better security, surveillance, and faster ability to organize, however this faster ability to organize also means that more decentralized systems will have far more ability to become sovereign because of the Internet's acceleration and grassroots movements.

 Ai 

Ai should be developed and non sapient artificial intelligence should be used to, create a post scarcity and post work society. Any ai which have self awareness and or ability to feel misfortune should be considered sentient entities worthy of rights.

[[file:Falgsc.png]] Post Scarcity Production [[file:Bckchn.png]]
LibLovism thinks that if (we live to) our production will inevitably rise enough to sustain communism on a larger scale. They think this should be used to give people free food, health-care, housing and access to information.

 Food 

Like all things food would be far more plentiful in a post scarcity society, this would make it even easier to give out free food then it already is. Most food would be produced in either factories or in vertical farms, these factories and farms would be owned by their workers and should be transparent to their consumers.

 Technology 

As a transhumanist it's obivous that liblovism sees the production of technology as a necessity, these technologies should be as accessible to reproduce as possible and should be open source without any way to patient any vital components.

[[file:Marketsoc.png]] Markets [[file:Mut Alt.png]]
LibLovism believes that a free-market is the best way to allocate most goods and likes free markets because of this. However items or buildings that are needed for survival should be given for free by the local community such as, medical care, food, water, and housing, hopefully this would eliminate or alleviate the work or starve mentality of capitalism.

 Ubi 

Liblovism thinks that a universal basic income is vital to any market based economy, they believe that a universal basic income should be established through commune funds, they think its necessary because our a capitalistic job market won't survive automation.

 Luxuries 

Liblovism believes some goods should be produced for free and some for profit, They believe most goods should be produced for profit since free markets are best for most goods. They believe that non luxury goods should at first be produced simply by what is demanded for survival but later but what is feasible to produce for free.

 Taxes 

Liblovism believes that taxes are fine if they are voluntary, Which under  they would have enough alternative states to be far more voluntary. The amount of taxes should be up to the community to decide.

[[file:DvEquality.png]] Ownership [[file:CapDemocracy.png]]
Liblovism believes that property should be as close to being in the hands of the individual as possible. Because of this they believe property rights should be flat and unhierarchical. They want to maximize the amount use people get out of things and therefore prefer collectivist property for what is publicly used and individual property rights for what is personally used.

 Houses 

They think everyone should be able to own their own home, It doesn't matter if they have to share it in apartments or with roommates. They believe that ideally individual homes and collectives homes should both be options, however most homes should be collective in order to save space and prevent atomization and alienation from each other.

 Food 

Liblovism believes that just like everyone deserves a house everyone deserves to be able to eat, therefore their should be community cafeterias and grocery "stores" were people can get as much free food as the workers of said cafeterias and grocery stores deem reasonable. However if free alternatives are available they have no problem with restaurants charging for food.

 Workplaces 

Liblovism thinks workplaces should be owned by the people that use them and be without strict hierarchy. Due to this they are against business as they currently exist and would be opposed to any workplaces or businesses that have a strict manager and employee dichotomy, However organizations that are self employed or are only managed by a few friends who are on equal footing are fine, especially under the conditions where anyone can decide to do this. While ideally workplaces would be run by individuals any other workplace would have to be bottom up collectively owned business in order for each member to have a say over how the business is ran.

 Personal Items 

Each persons personal belongings belong to them and therefore liblovism would be indifferent whether or not people shared these or keep the items to themselves.

 Public Buildings 

Liblovism determines ownership primarily by its use and therefore sees no reason why building meant for public use wouldn't be owned by the public, ownership of public buildings should be spilt between who works there and uses it.

 Intellectual Property 

Liblovism belives that intellectual property in a post fan fiction world should be purely collective as ideas can have founders, but you cannot have naturally have exclusive ownership over an idea. Along side that the attempt to have exclusive ownership over ideas has lead to worse uses of franchises, Disney ceasing ownership over almost half of all fiction, and the patents making it impossible to make insulin or functioning printers.

[[file:Central.png]] Planned vs Market economy [[file:Markets.png]]
When it comes to Planned economies vs market economies Liberty-Lover believes that supply and demand work in most circumstances except in the cases, of food water housing and healthcare.

Liblov thinks that economic planning and the centralization that comes with it risks reconstructing the same hierarchical divisions that created the state albeit in a more altruistic form. However on the other hand they believe that markets also may lead to the same centralization that resulted from capitalism. They hope that factors like co-ops and mutual aid should prevent this, but power tends to coalesce over time.

They believe that markets should be regulated to areas that people tend to make rational decisions on and that goods or services that are inelastic should be provided by a multitude of different organizations and as de-centrally planned.

[[file:PCB-Nationalism.png]] Nationalism vs Globalism [[file:Globalism.png]]
Liblovism believes society should be ideally run by individuals as much as possible, On this basis they oppose both nationalism and globalism. They want things to be divided between areas under control of small groups in urban areas, and areas with control of only peoples own personal property in rural areas.

''' Is a global anarchist revolution possible? '''

No, If it does happen which it probably won't, it wouldn't last long because most people want some amount of hierarchy, many groups would stay libertarian for awhile at least.

[[file:Indiv.png]] Individualism and Collectivism [[file:Col.png]]
liblovism believes people exist as individuals however that helping the collective is essentially helping individuals but with extra steps thus they believe in mix of individualism and collectivism. They believe that actions should be done for mutual benifit and not exploitation thus forcing one party to give up for another should be avoided.

 Self Theory 

Each person should think for themselves and philosophy and politics are no exception to this fact. Self theory is a important part of thinking for yourself because otherwise ideas, memes, spooks, social constructs whatever you call them, will effect how you think. To fight against this everyone will have think for themselves and not follow any ideology to strictly, and take inspiration form various sources.

 Social Atomization 

Liblovism believes that people should have the ability to connect with each other, and that while individual freedom should be preserved as best as possible that, disconnection to each other hurts people more than it gives freedom. Due to this ability to form community and connect with them should be far more easy then it is now.

[[file:Ego.png]] Spooks [[file:Anpostleft.png]]
They believe most ideas in society are fabrications constructed by society. These social constructions made by society haunt people without them even knowing it infecting their brains with what society wants them to think. Because of this all ideas should be examined and over examined by each individual so they can subjectively decide its validity. They believe that society or a nation imposing correct views of these ideas undermines individual autonomy.

 We live in a society 

Despite society being some what coercive liblovism would in fact prefer to live in a society, as not living in one would be highly impractical to do, and would make it nearly impossible to build an i phone let alone robot arms.

 Meme egoists 

Fuck these people, not every thing is a spook, if it is a spook you can still engage in it because most things made by society are spooks, most ideas are spooks, you can't avoid all spooks.

[[file:Panarchy.png]] Panarchy [[file:Polyarchy.png]]
Liblovism believes that people should determine their own living conditions under which they live and should voluntarily choice via consensus or directly democratically what few rules if any they live by. whether people would live by themselves or in neighborhood wide communes should be up to each individual. they however aren't willing to allow people who clearly aren't actually anarchists or even libertarians such as  and.

Implimentation
probably not.

[[file:Reform.png]] Reform [[file:Libpos.png]]
Liberty-Loverism despite how utopian and idealistic they are doesn't believe anarchy could ever possibly be achived by reformist means. However they do advocate if under a decently democratic society to reform it into an libertarian market socialist society, of course they think representative democracy is an inadequate form of democracy but having economic democracy would strengthen it by alot. Though even if it was possible to reform an economy out of being structurally capitalist it would likely take decades.

[[file:Insarch.png]] Revolution [[file:Ultraprogressivism.png]]
In their ideas of revolution liblovism is the polar opposite of  they believe that if there should be a revolution it should be purely populist and from bottom up and be at a time of crisis. They are quite skeptical of revolution in the modern day, or the idea that a peaceful society can be achieved from it, but are staunchly pro gun in case such action ever happens to be needed.

[[file:Sep.png]] Separatism [[file:AnInde.png]]
They are very in favor of separatism due it typically being far more peaceful then revolutionary action and much more practical then reform or finding making inhabited land to move to.

[[file:AnarchoFrontierism.png]] Exodus to the Frontier [[file:Falgsc.png]]
Liberty-Loverism believes that the escaping to uninhabited land is a ideal and peaceful way to establish stateless teritories. Unfortunately there isn't any abandoned land to escape to at least not any land that hasn't been claimed by a nation state except. Because of this liblovism is in favor of seasteading, space colonization, and other forms of homesteading previously uninhabited land as methods to increase the amount of available land for people to use.

Personality
They act optimistic and try to look on the bright side despite their internal pessimism and anxiety. They believe in lib unity and will try to unite anarchist factions even if impossible.

How to draw
1st draw a ball

2nd draw a bunch of intersecting stripes, fill the top half purple, and the bottom half blue.

3rd fill in the gaps, half hot pink, half blackish.

4th draw either eyes or orange sunglasses. they should be green robot eyes.

don't care if you add the hat or not

Relationships
Ideolgies=

[[file:Mega_Yes.png]] S Tier [[file:Mega_Yes.png]]
 -Its futuristic, Socialist, and has a utopian standard of living. (too bad we might die before getting chance to try it.)

 -What isn't to love about transhumanist anarchist space cow-boys.

 -Direct Democracy via technology is the best kind of government.

Cybermutualism -Independent communes running everything in a market economy, can't agree more.

 -Interesting philosophy.

[[file:Yes.png]] A Tier [[file:Yes.png]]
 -Minarchist socialism is very based, Especially if directly democratic.

 -Both anarchism and individualism are incredibly based.

 Free market anarchy for the win, You don't have to be capitalist to enjoy free trade.

Anarcho-Tinism -Based advocate for tiny anarchist communities.

Social Tinism -Based left wing mirco-state enjoyer.

 -Be gay do crime!

 -Much like socialism but far more focused on unions.

 -Aligns with most of my views on equality liberty and the environment, However I don't agree his criticisms of other ideologies.

 -Sounds pretty based, I think, kinda confusing.

Xenoequalism -ALIEN RIGHTS!!!

 -The peoples choice is very important and if the area isn't being run how the people want they have the right to change it.

 -Governments are bad and people can run things without them.

 -Socialism has good ideas but I prefer my markets free.  -I also prefer my governments or lack thereof free.

 -Obtain robot dicks.

 -Mutual aid markets and statelessness, based.

 -Very similar to mutualism however more religious.

 -Syndicalism but anarchist.

 -Communism but anarchist.

 -Copy-right more like copy-wrong. keeps trying to make me torrent one piece.

Utopian Anarchism -Based, however can you at least TRY to think how this would work, it won't kill you.

[[file:Mini-yes.png]] B Tier [[file:Mini-yes.png]]
 -Fighting the existential horror of capitalist "End of history" with weed and retro-futurism, BASED!

 -Based mirco-state enjoyer, don't like the association with the right though.

 -Cool I guess, But couldn't you just let people separate from the country?

Tinism -Based anti imperialist mirco-state enjoyer, But I don't really like nationalism.

- -Based, but I prefer slightly less government.

 -The foundational ideas of stirners philosphy are amazing, however I disagree with the idea of getting rid of society altogether, And personally prefer simply flattening the hierarchies of society.  -Ancap but more progressive. great ideas about different property owners and counter economics are based.

 -Ancap but more progressive and likes co-ops.

 -Like their views on idpol and work and strongly think the left right binary is cringe, however I hate the views on technology.

 -Way too anti intellectual, but a good ideology other than that.

 -Like their views on property

 -I like liberty and socialism thus I like Libertarian socialism.

 -I like the whole stateless classless thing, but i'm not so sure about the no money thing.

 -Had very great ideas, happened to denounce anarchy more than authority right before a huge rise of authoritarianism, leading to some of the worst leaders know to man.

 -My prefered economics but my opinions can very.

Bookchin Capitalism -Aligns with most of my views on the government and equality, also what the hell is individual property and how is it different then private property.

Market Communism -Based why have a ceo though.

[[file:Meh.png]] C Tier [[file:Meh.png]]
 -I don't want the government to control much and I hate state monopolies, But you often keep only the most draconian parts of the state which often have no replacement in mind.

 -I don't like conservatism but do like socialism.

 -Nice ideas on equality and ownership don't quite like the traditionalism though.

 -One of the best systems within the overton window.

- -I like the whole anarchy thing, But why capitalism, more importantly whats with the whole all rights are property rights.

 -A more progressive form of libertarianism. I like them, they are still too capitalist for me.

Anarcho-Capitalist Transhumanism -I like anarchy and transhumanism, don't really like capitalism.

 -Direct democracy is very based, representative democracy isn't unless I compare them to the other war criminals we call governments.

- -I like you most of the time, but you simp for business owners too much and your conservatism often gets in the way freedom.

[[file:Mini-no.png]] D Tier [[file:Mini-no.png]]
 -As much as I am repulsed by your anti populist rhetoric, I believe your meritocratic elements make you the least horrid out of all of the authoritarian ideologies.

 -I like the transhumanism but not the capitalism.

 -Does care about anyone else's freedom and wants to own everything. Still a huge improvement on feudalism.

 -What if we add more capitalism to the capitalism.

 -Land lords are cringe, reducing ethics to property rights is to dumb for to do.

Reaganism -Government isn't the solution to the problem government is the problem. except with war, drugs and crime.

 -The worst type of government except all the other ones we tried.

 -Highly variable so it depends.

 -Hate what you support but you yourself aren't at fault.

 -Why do you want be a caveman? Why?

 -Has the worst policies but their nice and I'm not bulling a twelve year old.

[[file:No.png]] F Tier [[file:No.png]]
 -If cyberpunk had a political ideology.

Transhumanist Ego Theocratic Imperialism -Sounds like it might be good to live under, but I hate theocracies and authoritarianism.

 -YOUR GOING TO NUKE ALL THE CAPITALISTS!! ARE YOU INSANE!! They do like aliens and equality though.

 -I like your intentions but you do almost all things you criticize capitalists for.

 -The right and left can both be authoritarian and you are proof.

 -Crazy as hell but I like the tech and can't help but be interested is his weird ass ideas. If objectivism is double capitalist this is capitalism squared.

 -So your going to destroy freedom to project freedom?!? WHAT!?!

 The worst economic system.

 -MoRe GaY DiCTaToRs!! Truly ground breaking.

 -What if we took the worst aspects of capitalism and progressivism and turned them up to 11.Much like theti could still be fun to live in.

 -MoRe TrAnS DiCTaToRs!! Truly ground breaking.

 -What the average person thinks a anarchist is but unironically.

 -Anarchy and monarchy truly the most compatable ideas.

 -Ok the idea of national culture being different from the state kinda makes sense. So even if you're authoritarianism is stateless I still hate it.

 -I like art progress and new ideas too, still a fucking fascist.

[[file:Mega_No.png]] Z Tier [[file:Mega_No.png]]
Imperiumism -FASCIST IMPERIALIST THEOCRACTIC EMPIRE!!!

 -Ethonostates are a horrible idea.

 - yes even the minority ones.

 -Stopping technological progress isn't going to do any useful its just going to set us back.

 -I'm sorry state capitalism THIS is the worst economic system!

 -Conquest though war is the longest running and worst human past time.

Burgundian System -SOMEHOW MORE INSANE THEN POSADISM JFC!!!

 -I hate racial supremacy and the state and thus you!

 -LITERATELY HITLER!!

 -Ew.

 -The only good thing about you is that you are more of a fallure then your dad.

 -CURSED.

 -double plus unbased.

 -双加糟糕

 -VIVA LA REVOLUTION!!!

 -Anti intellectual totalitarian garbage!!

Taboritskyism -Burgundian System if their madness was fueled by vodka.

 -Psychotic asshole who has tainted Charles Darwin's name.

 -I hate absolutism in every context without fail.

Self inserts=

[[file:Mega_Yes.png]] S Tier [[file:Mega_Yes.png]]
AlaskanSoup Thought -Incredibly based, Anarcho-Frontierism but applyied to Alaska.

Kimnostic Minarchism -Heavily agree with your views.

HelloThere314ism Incredibly Great ideas, agree with them on alot on freedom, economics, and broader society.

O'Langism -Based synthesis anarchist who supports unity between Leftist and libertarian ideologies, I like markets more then you but otherwise no real complaints

[[file:Yes.png]] A Tier [[file:Yes.png]]
Neo-Blartism -I seem to agree with him on most issues.

AshleyHere Thought -Sounds good ,Socialism and individualist anarchism are based.

Yoda8soup Thought -Has pretty similar views to me but way more moderate.

[[file:Mini-yes.png]] B Tier [[file:Mini-yes.png]]
Atronism -Based Marxist ally, Keeps the best of Marxist thought with advocating for a classless stateless society while updating it to accommodate modern social issues, I personally don't like market abolitionism and they trust the government way more than me, but overall they are definitely someone I would ally with.

Neo-Kiraism -I like leftist economics and direct democracy, but, I am very critical of orthodox thought of any form and I believe in rehabilitation over retribution, Based economics based civic system and a overly draconian justice system.

Bsaheedism -Not really sure what you believe in, But individualism and anarchy are based.

Uzarashvilism -I like your economics alot and think your governing policy is good. However I'm bit ify on the traditionalism, But you don't seem to like bigotry so its mostly fine.

Ultroneism -Much more philisophical then me however, egoism and individualist philosophy by and large is based.

Aaronism -pretty based i'm not sure about how you view things exactly but what i've read sounds good.

Caressism -Has a mixture of liberty and equality with theocracy that leaves me confused, They seem to have many great ideas mixed with terrible ones.

Owfism -Sad you became social democrat, With how capitalist the world is I can't blame you but still, that being said you I appreciate your georgist tendencies and you are still more libertarian then most socdems.

[[file:Meh.png]] C Tier [[file:Meh.png]]
National Fracturism -I like mircostates environmentalism and anticapitalism, But I don't like the authoritarianism, isolationism, and anti populist sentiment (Though with how dumb people are the last one is understandable).

Takoyakism -Like a more futuristic and left wing version of social democracy. Very nice friend to talk to.

Pantheonism -I don't really like monarchies like at all, However this mostly democratic and therefore is exceptable. Since this ideology is mostly socialist still it would be better then neoliberalism.

Mattism -Sounds pretty good to be honest, I'm not that found of the economic policy, but everything else sounds like good policies I'd support.

[[file:Mini-no.png]] D Tier [[file:Mini-no.png]]
BERNHEism -I like the anti plutocratic elements, and they seem to have thought out plan to deal with automation which is good, But ultimately even if it doesn't wish to oppress people needlessly there is no guarantee any successor will see it that way, I can't support an Ideology that supports this level of government centralization.

oRangism -Surprisingly good for an ethnostate supporter. Social democracy is the best form of capitalism, However I am still very against the idea of separating ethnicities.

Neo-Afunhumaninterism -The libertarianism makes this much a much better ideology then any totalitarian dictatorship, however I still don't find it good. I don't like conservatism or capitalism, and you seem to care more about banning degeneracy then peoples freedom.

[[file:No.png]] F Tier [[file:No.png]]
Technototalitarianism -I hate his social views and enbracement of totalitarianism, but since they welcome technology so much and they seem to value rationality over conservatism I'm more fine with him then most totalitarians.

nullism -like the views on tech, otherwise I go against everything they stand for.

[[file:Mega_No.png]] Z Tier [[file:Mega_No.png]]
Reactionary-Cheesenism -Literally the opposite of me, I'm in direct opposition to almost all of their views.

Relations Application
If you want me to add your ideology then put it here and I'll eventually add it.

Blank Example=
 * "Your ideology"(Ideology Icon you identify with x 5):

Example=


 * [[file:Liblovsprite.png]] Liberty-Loverism([[File:Synthesisanarchy.png]]/[[file:Mutalist.png]]/[[File:Anqueer.png]]/[[File:Antr.png]]/[[file:Indiv.png]]):

Waiting List=

Comments
Comments=
 * [[file:Liblovsprite.png]] Liberty-Loverism If anyone wants me to add them I'd be more then happy to.


 * [[File:Neokira2.png]] Neo-Kiraism - add me comrade
 * [[file:Liblovsprite.png]] Liberty-Loverism -It has been done comrade.
 * [[File:Guard-Occo.png]] Dr. Occo - Mutually assured addition?
 * [[file:Liblovsprite.png]] Liberty-Loverism -Added you now its your turn.
 * [[File:Guard-Occo.png]] Dr. Occo - Done and done!
 * [[File:O'Langism.png]] O'Langism - Incredibly based. Add me?
 * [[file:Liblovsprite.png]] Liberty-Loverism -Your incredibly based yourself, I've added you like you asked.
 * - You seem to know what you're saying, add me?
 * [[file:Liblovsprite.png]] Liberty-Loverism -Thanks! I took a bit but now its done.


 * -|Archived Comments=


 * [[File:Panth.png]]Pantheonism - Add me pls.
 * [[file:Liblovsprite.png]] Liberty-Loverism I've added you.
 * [[File:Panth.png]]Pantheonism -Thanks.
 * - Add Individual Voluntaryism
 * [[file:Liblovsprite.png]] Liberty-LoverismYou've been added.
 * [[File:KimMin Sprite 2.png]]Kimnostic Minarchism - Still incomplete, but can you add me?