Omegaism

Diplomatic Policy
I consider myself both a Patriot/Moderate Nationalist and both an  Internationalist. I personally see the concept of Nation as important for a population's identity: just like a family has to take care of their children, a Nation has to take care of his people. I see the concept of a " united Humanity" not bad in theory but too unfunctional in pratice, as 8 billion of people are too hard to rule under one government. One of my major criticism of  Globalism is cultural homologation: a world where everyone is equal, without too many differences, a boring world. Hence why I see the concept of National Identity as important. To preserve Humanity's variety.

However, on the other side, one of my main issues with Nationalism, is the blind hostility of certain Nationalists (mostly the more radical types) towards other populations and nations in general. I personally see International/Regional alliances (like NATO and the  EU) as a good potential for friendships between other nations. We can see the success of these alliances in Europe, as a example. No major wars broke out in the heart of Europe for decades, and major enemies ended up improving their relationships in the last decades, such as France and  Germany.

What I propose is this: A form of soft Nationalism (Mostly a mix of  Civic Nationalism and  Interculturalism, to promote both National unity and integration at the same time) combined with  Internationalism, a soft Globalism and a foreign integration between various nations around the World, in respect of every country's identity.

Love your country but also try to look at the rest of the Globe.

Foreign Policy
My foreign policy is generally Pro-West, Pro-NATO,  Pro-USA and  Pro-EU. The Western Bloc is the one that gets the closest to the ideals of Liberal Democracy, and if compared to the alternatives (Theocratic Regimes like  Iran, One Party Regimes like  China or   Cuba, Crony Kleptocracies like  Russia or  Belarus...), then the  United States are a much more preferable superpower for the ideals of  Liberalism.

However, it should be noted that certain foreign actions done by the Americans and other Western Nations can range from "Questionable" to "Absolutely Fucked Up", mostly done to protect Western interests and influence. We can mention the clusterfucks that were the War in Vietnam or the invasion of Iraq, the support for cronies and dictators such as Pinochet, Suharto,  Batista and others, coups in non-Western aligned countries ( Operation Condor is a major example) and more. Obviously Neoconservative foreign policy can really dirty, and some of its actions only ended up being bad for the West's PR.

I'm pretty glad that more recent presidents, such as Biden, are less "hawkish" in terms of foreign policy, but without ditching Neoconservatism as whole.

That being said, I don't see this ideology as entirely bad. We can mention some positive contributes too, such as helping Europe recover Post-WW2 through the Marshall Plan, stopping Serbia's Ethnic Massacres in Yugoslavia, bringing back the order in countries like Panama ( Even though the Noriega shenanigans weren't the best before, mostly a Reagan thing ofc ), Grenada and Kuwait, generally supporting the ideals of Liberalism against its opponents and protecting Eastern European and Eastern Asian countries from Russian and Chinese soft power and hegemonic ambitions.

The United States should definitely find a balance in political toughness and peaceful diplomacy. As Theodore Roosevelt once said:

"Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far"

The US should try to improve the relationships with Non-Western aligned countries such as Latin American and African ones, possibly prefering Liberal Democracies. But also try to improve the relationships with more stable Anti-American countries, such as Cuba (ending the Embargo too) and  Bolivia; by being more open about its past foreign policy too.

But at the same time, the Western Countries should maintain a tough line against countries such as Russia and China (these two in particular are a major threat to the Liberal Democratic Order). The latter country is definitely tougher, considering its economic soft power and better PRs, especially if compared to its neighbor post-2022.

To make it short: improve relationships with democracies and less powerful Authoritarian States (possibly incouraging for the latter ones a liberalization of the State, kind like how the USA did towards Francoist Spain), be tougher towards Authoritarian Regimes, especially the more powerful ones.

Economic Policy
I am supportive of Free Market Capitalism. While flawed, I still believe that this economic system, through Free Trade and Property Rights is able to make a society prosperous. This is also proved by the support of the free market in the Developing Countries. That being said, I still find myself against the more unfettered forms of Capitalism, as I believe that they are not sustainable for Human living conditions. For example, regarding Neoliberalism, while I generally support global trade, which did improve living conditions in the world, I am critical of the "deregulated, privatized economy" part of it, as it did lead to aspects like  social inequalities, especially in countries like the United States and Italy , and  environmental degredation. I would like to see economic intervention from the State, to fix some of the flaws of the Free Market, possibly reverting some Neoliberal policies, through slow  reforms and also watching out for the  economic deficit. I also support a major economic regulation for the Developing Countries in the world, to watch out for Neo-Colonialist policies from  Corporations and other entities

Cultural Policy
While I lean Left, in terms of Culture, I generally seek a  cultural balance. I personally see a Nation's culture (Folk traditions, language, history...) as its backbone, and I would like to see a world where the national identities of every population gets preserved. Personally, what I consider one of the main problems of Modern Globalization  is the cultural homologation of every population. I don't want to entirely eliminate Globalization, but I want to watch out for these elements too.

But on the other side, I also value a lot Social Progress (Civil liberties, social equality...), as I believe that advancing as society is an important objective and that culture is dynamic, we don't go anywhere by keeping it static. I don't think that Tradition and Progress have to be polar opposites, and a balance between the two is possible and ideal. (Same discourse for Nationalism and  Globalism). We should keep an eye both to the past and to the future, as society. Keep the past but also go forward.

For example, regarding the modern LGBT community, while I do have some criticism, such as the general Wokeness or the sympathesis for  Far-Left ideologies  (especially in the  Trans community), I can understand a good number of demands and points. I wouldn't absolutely mind a legalization of LGBT marriage and adoption as well, as a sign of progress too.

And going in specific on the "T" of "LGBT", while I have a couple doubts about certain requests, such as transitioning for minors, I still believe that the community and its members should be helped. Bullying them is absolutely not the case. That being said, "Xenogenders", "Neo-pronouns" and the like are all ridiculous stuff that shouldn't be recognized as actually valid, as they don't make any sense. I also have some doubts about Non-Binary stuff in general.

Another particular issue is the abortion one. Let's see how Pro-Life people and  Pro-Choice people think of this:

I don't think that an abortion is something to celebrate, and people should be more responsible in terms of sex. The use of contraceptives, when people aren't ready to have a child, should be more incouraged. That being said, I absolutely oppose an abortion ban, because it's an individual choice, not something up to the State. For the rest, I don't want to change too much the Status Quo in my country, regarding that matter.

A similiar stance is adopted on Pornography. It should be noted that the abuse of Porn and Masturbation can definitely cause addiction. I seek a better sexual education, regarding this matter and others. But I still oppose a ban of it, rather treat it as something like sweet foods: it's fine sometimes but don't abuse it. Regarding kinks, as long is something harmful and done in real life, like Pedophilia, people can and should keep those for themselves.

Another take of mine is the use of Federalism to expand Democracy at a local level. You are going to have both a Socially Progressive side and a  Socially Conservative side of population in a Nation, a lot of times (Example: big cities VS rural areas), and that's fine for me, diversity of thought is generally a good thing for me (as long is not something really messed up like "murder is cool" ofc). Ideas like Conservatism,  Nationalism or  Religion can all be used as a force for good, especially when it's done by your own will, instead of being under the pressure of an external force, such as the State. For example, Christian moral values can be used as a vehicle for self improvement and to promote social responsibility. Even so, I personally see religion as a personal affair, that shouldn't be forced against anyone. Same discourse regarding Atheism and any lack of belief. Don't force anything and let people believe in what they want.

Returning to the discourse of Federalism, I would give more autonomy to the regions to allow the people in that region to choose what they think it's best for them, while maintaining more important policies at a National level, to allow both social progress but at the same time maintain the support of the more Conservative population

Civic Policy
I am strongly in favor of Liberal Democracy. While flawed, I still consider it the best form of government that we have. I also value civil liberties such as freedom of expression a lot too, being strongly against "Hate Speech Bans" and similiar stuff. Authority check is also a good thing, I personally find the culture of "distrust towards the State/Government" ,which is common in the people, as healthy, and I absolutely seek to preserve that culture. My focus on Anti-Authoritarianism comes from the malevolence and/or incompentence of a lot of  Authoritarian/  Totalitarian states. That being said, there are also cases of benevolent and competent Authoritarian states, such as Kemalist Turkey, Singapore,  Tridemist China and various others. As well as competent Statist/Authoritarian leaders. If there it was a hypothetical "Perfect and Incorruptible Authoritarian State", I would definitely side with it. However, with the good examples that we have in history, we can also find a lot of awful examples. We can mention Nazi Germany,  Soviet Union under Stalin,  Maoist China,  Imperial Japan,  Pol Pot's Cambodia and many others. It goes like this: Pure and Flawless Authoritarianism > Democracy > Corrupted Authoritarianism. This is why I seek to protect the Liberal Democratic system. Power easily corrupts, and it must be kept in check. Freedom must be protected from both the  Communist Far-Left and the  Fascist/Reactionary  Far-Right, as both of them seek to destroy Liberal Democratic institutions and hurt and/or oppress the people, despite the general differences between the two groups.

I also support the use of Federalism, as expressed in the Cultural Policy part, to expand Democracy at a local level, not only regarding cultural issues but on issues in general.

That being said, authority powers  aren't necessarily evil. Especially regarding emergency situations, such as pandemic outbreaks, wars or terrorism, I am willing to use them. Sometimes, to protect a Democracy, tough forces are needed. What I oppose is the subversion of Democracy through said forces. Because, like I said before, power easily corrupts

First Version

 * Civic Axis
 * [[File:Anego.png]] Egoist (+0)
 * [[File:Awaj.png]] Anarchist (+1)
 * [[File:Minarchist.png]] Minarchist (+3)
 * [[File:Libertarian.png]] Libertarian (+7)
 * [[File:Moder.png]] Moderate (+10)
 * [[File:Statist.png]] Statist (+6)
 * [[File:Sec.png]] Authoritarian (+3)
 * [[File:Totalitarian.png]] Totalitarian (+0)
 * [[File:Ingsocf.png]] Orwellian (+0)
 * Type of Rule Axis
 * [[File:Dem.png]] Representative Democracy (Can be Presidential, Parliamentary...) (+10)
 * [[File:Semidirect.png]] Semi-Direct Democracy (+10)
 * [[File:Directdem.png]] Direct Democracy (+5)
 * [[File:DemML.png]] "People's" "Democracy" (+0)
 * [[File:Authdem.png]] Authoritarian Democracy (+3)
 * [[File:Technocracy.png]] Technocracy or Similiar (A.K.A. Rule by Experts) (+4)
 * [[File:AntiDem.png]] Anti-Democracy (+0)
 * [[File:Totdem.png]] Totalitarian Democracy (+0)
 * Economic Axis
 * [[File:Commie.png]] Communist (+0)
 * [[File:Soc.png]] Socialist (+5)
 * [[File:Welf.png]] Welfarist (+10)
 * [[File:Moder.png]] Moderate (+10)
 * [[File:Lib.png]] Economic Liberalism (+7)
 * [[File:Cap.png]] Capitalist (+5)
 * [[File:Darwinist.png]] Darwinist (+0)
 * Economic Freedom
 * [[File:Anpostleft.png]] Anti-Economy (+0)
 * [[File:Dirigisme.png]] Dirigisme (+5)
 * [[File:Keynes.png]] Regulated (+10)
 * [[File:Hayek.png]] Free Market (+6)
 * [[File:Austrobert.png]] Laissez-Faire (+2)
 * Diplomatic Axis
 * [[File:World Federalism2.png]] World Federalist (+4)
 * [[File:World.png]] Globalist (+4)
 * [[File:Cosmo.png]] Cosmopolitan (+6)
 * [[File:Internation.png]] Internationalist (+10)
 * [[File:Moder.png]] Moderate (+10)
 * [[File:Modnat.png]] Patriotic (+10)
 * [[File:Nation.png]] Nationalist (+7)
 * [[File:Ultranat.png]] Chauvinist (+0)
 * [[File:Ethnonat.png]] Ethno-Nationalist/Racial Nationalist [[File:Racenat.png]] (+0)
 * Geopolitics
 * [[File:Cball-NATO.png]] West [[File:Cball-US.png]] [[File:Cball-EU.png]] (+10)
 * [[File:NeoComBall.png]] East [[File:Cball-Russia.png]] [[File:Cball-China.png]] (+0)
 * [[File:Isolationist.png]] Other/Non-Aligned [[File:NAM.png]] (+5)
 * Cultural Axis
 * [[File:Violnovelt.png]] Revolutionary (+0)
 * [[File:Prgess.png]] Progressive (+5)
 * [[File:Rfrm.png]] Reformist (+10)
 * [[File:Moder.png]] Moderate (+10)
 * [[File:Conservative.png]] Conservative (+5)
 * [[File:Trad.png]] Traditionalist (+2)
 * [[File:Reactcross.png]] Reactionary (+0)
 * Technological Axis
 * [[File:Prim.png]] Primal (+0)
 * [[File:Anprim.png]] Primitivist (+0)
 * [[File:Farm.png]] Pre-Industrial (+2)
 * [[File:Decel.png]] Deceleration (+5)
 * [[File:Moder.png]] Moderate (+10)
 * [[File:Accel.png]] Acceleration (+8)
 * [[file:Post-Industrialism.png]] Automated (+5)
 * [[File:Transh.png]] Transhumanist (+4)
 * [[File:POSTHUMANISMICON.png]] Posthumanist (+0)
 * Environmental Axis
 * [[File:VHMent.png]] Human Extinction (+0)
 * [[File:Ecofash.png]] Eco-Fascism (+0)
 * [[File:Deepe.png]] Deep Ecology (+3)
 * [[File:Envi.png]] Environmentalist (+10)
 * [[File:Moder.png]] Moderate (+10)
 * [[File:Indust.png]] Industrialist (+8)
 * [[File:HumanNat.png]] Anthropocentric (+5)
 * [[File:AnEn.png]] Pollution (+0)
 * [[File:Posadist.png]] Planetary Destruction (+0)
 * Neurological Axis
 * [[File:Utsoc.png]] Utopian (+0)
 * [[File:Hoxha.png]] Dogmatic (+1)
 * [[File:Idealist.png]] Idealist (+5)
 * [[File:Moder.png]] Moderate (+8)
 * [[File:Mach.png]] Realist (+10)
 * [[File:Pragmat.png]] Pragmatist (+10)
 * [[File:Technocracy.png]] Rational (+6)
 * [[File:Dystoball.png]] Dystopian (+0)

Post your results here:


 * [[File:Omega1065.png]] Omega1065 - 100/100

Second Version

 * Section One: Economy

1: Important industries should be nationalized. The more secondary ones, however, can be privatized.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

2: Capitalism generally works, but it has obviously its problems to check out.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

3: Communism is a fool's dream. Almost every attempt to establish it flopped hard.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

4: Private Property is a human right.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

5: Watch out for Neo-Colonialism (from any entity) and other negative aspects of Modern Globalization, especially in Second and Third World countries.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

6: Free Trade, generally talking, is great for making a society prosperous, but some pragmatic protectionism can be needed.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

7: Important services, such as Healthcare, should remain public.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

8: Give a decent emphasis on worker rights (have a decent minimum wage, have a robust Welfare State, allow unions representation, allow some Workplace Democracy, etc...).


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

9: We should reform economic Neoliberalism to create a more Human-centered Capitalism.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)


 * Section Two: Civic

10: Democracy isn't perfect, but is still the best system by far.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

11: A constitution is essential for the government not to become too powerful or centralized.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

12: Federalism > Unitarism


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

13: Free Speech is a human right and Near-Free Speech Absolutism is the way to go. "Hate Speech" laws and similiar are liberticide. Stuff like racial discrimination and pedophilia should be opposed through education and social ostraction. Law enforcement can and must be used when they try to hurt innocent people.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

14: Anarchism is far too unfunctional to work, especially in larger scales.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

15: Totalitarianism is an evil system that should be avoided at any cost.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

16: Authority forces (such as the military and the police) and figures are necessary and important, but watchout over any attempt of power abuse.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)


 * Section Three: Culture

17: I believe in cultural balance, in opposition to Reactionarism, Bigotry, Revolutionary Progressivism and SJW Culture.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

18: State Atheism is as tyrannical as Theocracies, since religious expression and secularism are both important concepts for a Nation.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

19: I have mixed feelings on the LGBT Community, but I still support LGBT rights (Primary the right to let them be). Pride month should be reduced to one day though.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

20: Abortion is fine, but we need better sexual responsibility.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

21: Pornography shouldn't be banned, but better sexual education on the argument is needed.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

22: The Harm Principle is generally a good principle. Live and let live.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

23: Anti-SJW and SJW movements are equally annoying groups that only care about bullshit culture wars.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

24: Interculturalism = Polyculturalism > Multiculturalism > Xenophobia.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

25: Preserve the traditional family structure and gender roles, but don't judge too much anyone that wants to live in a different way.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

26: A nation’s culture and traditions are important, but ignoring progress (both social and technological) only leads to cultural stagnation. Focus on the future but also keep the past.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

27: Fascism and Nazism are trash-tier genocidal ideologies. Modern forms of Fascism (such as Alt-Right movements) shouldn't be ignored.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)


 * Section Four: Diplomacy

28: Costant regime changing (such as Operation Condor) only brings more harm, especially in the long range.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

29: Immigration can be a net positive, but we need a better border control and integration for immigrants into our society. An Open Borders policy is too impratical.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

30: It's important to put your nation's interests first.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

31: Internationalism is strongly needed, but Globalism has its problems. World Federalism is too utopian, for example.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

32: Extreme forms of Nationalism (Ultranationalism, Racial Nationalism, Ethnic Nationalism) can't be tolerated.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

33: It is better for us to peacefully trade with non-aligned Third World countries, as long as they aren't particularly oppressive regimes or strongly aligned to Nations like Russia or China. (Example: ending the Cuban Embargo)


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

34: The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) should continue to exist for now, especially to counter the Russian threat to the East.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

35: The Iraq War in the 90s was justified, but not in 2003.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

36: The European Union should be reformed in certain aspects (such as Austerity and Bureaucracy). And if it ever unites, it should be confederal or federal, allowing a large autonomy to its members.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

37: The USA and the Western Bloc suffer from various problems, but they are still better than other blocs (such as Russia, China, Iran...).


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

38: Assad is a scumbag but the Syrian Opposition isn't a good alternative.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

39: The Iranian Revolution of 1979 and its consequences have been a disaster for Iran.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

40: Chavismo and its consequences have been a disaster for Venezuela.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

41: Russia has zero business in countries like Ukraine and Georgia. Sending support (military, diplomatic and economic) for these countries is important.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

42: Republic of China > "People's" Republic of China. Retake the homeland.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)


 * Section Five: Other/Miscellaneous

43: Blind loyalty to political dogmas is dumb. Pragmatic politics are the way to go.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

44: Political compromise and moderation can be very good in many situations.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

45: Seek a balance between Populism and Elitism. Too much Populism can lead to demagogic policies.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

46: Political corruption (from the State, Corporations and other major entities) must be avoided.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

47: Organized crime (such as Italian Mafia Groups) must be opposed at all costs.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

48: The deployment of renewable energy sources (including Nuclear energy), eventually getting away from fossil fuels, and environmentalism in general, should be a priority.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

49: Terrorism of all kinds should not be tolerated.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

50: Slow change is generally more preferable to revolutions, outside of extreme situations, obviously.


 * Strongly Agree (+2)
 * Agree (+1.5)
 * Neutral (+1)
 * Disagree (+0.5)
 * Strongly Disagree (+0)

Post your results here:


 * [[File:Omega1065.png]] Omega1065 - 100/100
 * [[File:BERNHEflash.gif]] BERNHE0504 - 80.5/100