Geopaleolibertarian Distributism

Geopaleolibertarian Distributism is the ideology of user Dumnorix. It is culturally right while being in the libertarian left quadrant.It advocates for widespread ownership of capital goods, limited government,Land Value Tax and Pigovian Taxes ,Decentralisation,Republicanism,Non-Intervention,Traditionalism,Cultural Nationalism,Individualism,Technophilia, Merito-Democracy and Gold backed-Currency.

=Ideology and Beliefs =

Economy
It believes that Capitalism and Socialism are both flawed systems and that we need a third way(Social Geodistributism)

[[File:Distributist.png]]
He is a Distributist,meaning he believes that Capitalism and Socialism are both flawed because they concentrate ownership in the hands of the few(Capitalists or State Bureaucrats). He instead believes that Ownership of Capital Goods(Goods that produce wealth ) should be as widespread as possible,which means small businesses and co-ops for industries that produce products that can't be produced by small businesses. He wants to achieve this through trustbusting on a huge scale.

[[File:Georgist.png]]
He is a Georgist,meaning he believes that all taxes are to be replaced with LVT and Pigovian Taxes. The value goven by nature should be shared and polluters should be punished with fees. This also allows to not tax labor.

[[File:Regulationism.png]]
He believes that the Government should intervene in the economy thorugh laws that secure rights for workers,trustbusting and spending in times of crisis,while saving in boom years(a la New Deal). The Free Market doesn't work on it's own(even if the free market isn't capitalist) ,thus there should be rules.

Government
Government's role should be to minimise dominance.Government.There shouldn't be a standing army ,rather militias, which the government could use as an army in case of war. The Government should also be either directly by the people(direct democracy) or when the level of government is too high  to allow direct democracy,it should  be trough directly elected representatives. He also believes in Montesquieu's separation of powers and checks and balances. He in particular loves the German Basic Law,which he prefers to call fundamental law,since it stems from the Latin "Lex fundamentalis",viewing it as one of the greatest constitution ever written.

Legislature
He believes that the legislature should have two chambers. One should be similar to tthe Bundestag in Germany,having both direct and indirect mandates and it's approval being necessary for every law. He also wants this chamber to be able to replace the Chancellor if there is a majority for another candidate. His second chamber would be representative of the states with every state government sending representatives. This chamber exists to guarentee that issues which concern the states are approved by both the people and the states.He wants elections every 5 years and term limits(2 terms)

Executive
He wants the executive to have a president,elected by both chambers and only serving as the figurehead while being the chief of state. He wants the chancellor to guide the politics of the country and appoint the ministers and being commander in chief(but not being able to go to war without Legislative Approval).

Judiciary
The Constitutional Court should be consist of Judges, approved by 2/3 of both chambers. The Court decides in cases were the constitution might  not be clear.

Decentralisation
It believes that every issue must be tackled at the lowest level possible,the lowest being the inidvidual,who governs himself. If a problem cannot be solved by level (X) level (X+1) should try to solve it and so on.

Overview
He is relatively socially conservative from a modern western context. Whilst he isn't an ultra-traditionalist, he has a profound dislike of modern woke progressivism, believing its obsession with identity, diversity, and victimhood is a major cause of the west's cultural and moral decline.

These ideas became mainstream because of the counter-culture and New Left movements of the 1960s, which took hold of university campuses and gained the support of the majority of students, who then went on to occupy the establishment. This enabled their ideas to become increasingly hegemonic in the decades since, with what leftist student activist Rudi Dutshke called the  'long march through the institutions'  having been allowed to take place by complacent moderates.

He believes the state needs to counteract this force via a promotion of a patriotic, anti-woke culture amongst citizens, particularly the youth, with the hope of re-establishing traditional western values.

He wishes to usher in a counter-revolution in culture as successful as the counter-revolution in economics brought forth by Margaret Thatcher and  Ronald Reagan in the 1980s, where it becomes the new cultural hegemony that even the opposition is forced to adhere to. He however hates Neoliberalism's free market fundamentalism and socially liberal inclinations, and laments how the left won the culture war and the right the economic war since the 1960s. He wants a total reversal with a new economically left, socially conservative status quo.

To enable this, there should be a focus on building non-state actors to promote opposition to woke, so that anti-woke beliefs continue being influential even if a socially progressive government is in power. The 'intersectional alliance' would be divided through government focus on the incompatibility in the goals of transgender activists, feminists, and conservative Muslims. Social conservatism would also be repackaged with 'progressive' language and advertising, emphasising words like 'moderation', 'tolerance', 'free speech' 'freedom of choice' and 'democracy'. Social conservatives would also be portrayed as the victims and woke activists as aggressors in the media.

Youth
He pays special attention to the youth. This is because woke progressives often taunt about how young people support their agenda, and that it's only a matter of time before they succeed at getting their latest demand. Terrified by this prospect, and social attitude surveys and the pattern of the last half century suggesting the taunters may be right, he believes it is vital to raise a generation that is more socially conservative than their parents. He plans to:


 * Make compulsory the teaching of traditional western values like patriotism, individual free will, christian ethics, and anti-communism in schools. These should be introduced at the earliest age possible.


 * Outlaw interaction of LGBT associations with children.


 * An active campaign to discourage social media usage, to both improve mental health but also stop the spread of destructive ideas.


 * The creation of large networks of youth associations that teach traditional values and opposition to woke.


 * Promote [[File:Apolit.png]] Apoliticism amongst the youth, teach them to focus on  'getting their own houses in order before they criticise the world.' 


 * Use charismatic and attractive young people to promote traditional, patriotic values, particularly women.

Religion
He admires the historical influence of Christianity on shaping western culture, and recognises that organised religion is the only force that has been effective at getting broad sections of society to actively oppose social progressivism.

The decline of Christianity in the west to him has created a culture without direction or values, and one that is decadent, nihilistic, selfish, sexually deviant, and hateful. In the Anglo-Saxon world, 'secularism' has almost always meant giving cultural influence to woke identity politics, and whilst he respects and admires Laicism in countries like  France, and strongly defends it against attempts by Islamo-leftists to call it racist, he does not advocate it worldwide due to it's typical ineffectiveness at fulfilling a nation's desire for moral guidance.

He would like to re-emphasise christian values as a uniting force. He wants  to have its cultural significance re-established, with a more youthful, confident, and evangelising membership that would fuse Christian and nationalistic values.

Race
He believes that racism (which he defines as discrimination and hatred based on skin colour or ethnic origin) is evil, obscene and totally unacceptable in a civilised society. He believes people of all ethnic backgrounds should be treated with the same level of dignity and respect, and first and foremost as fellow individuals and human beings. He strongly supports the principle of Martin Luther King that people should  'not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character' .

Because of this, he strongly opposes Critical Race Theory and Intersectionality, which he views as American ideologies that have spread like viruses across the developed world. He believes that they have worsened race relations and are of themselves racist, as they constantly attempt to categorise people based on certain characteristics rather than viewing them as individuals, and with this, are judging people by skin color and not their character.

He feels that whilst such theories may make a degree of sense in the USA, where slavery and legal racial discrimination were a major part of their society for centuries and there being numerous occasions where police have murdered black people (with him initially supporting  Black Lives Matter when focused on this issue), it does not carry the same weight in European countries like  Germany Whilst he does not deny that there are individual people that are racist in Europr, and believes incidents of racist behaviour should be punished, he thinks that woke activists use racist comments made by a small minority of individuals as 'proof' that an entire country is racist.

The woke activists who claim to be fighting for racial equality in fact ignore all evidence that doesn't suit their agenda, such as Asian students performing better than white students. They also create and merge artificial categories like BAME and constantly agitate to stir up ethnic tension, being a 'solution looking for a problem'.

Their constant referencing of the legacy of slavery is totally irrelevant as slavery was an institution that existed for millennia in Africa, but yet white christian activists succeeded in abolishing. The self deprecating, 'original sin' conception of 'white privilege' of woke activists he views as a joke attempt to substitute Christianity with anti-western, post-colonialist, anti-white racist garbage. To him, a 'colorblind' society is the goal, with constant discussions about race only serving to make people see the differences between people of different ethnicities and therefore increase levels of racism.

He thinks its impossible for racism to be stamped out completely, as it is a part of human nature to favour members of one's own 'in-group', but this should be minimised through education and exposure to people of different ethnicities, focusing on what unites rather than divides them.

Immigration
He is relatively tolerant about immigration, seeing it as important for sectors of the economy where there is a real shortage of qualified native workers. However, he always thinks that natives should be prioritised for roles and that immigrants should not used as a means of bringing down native wages.

He views it as important that immigrants integrate into the host country, and opposes Multiculturalism, believing it to be divisive and an obstacle to integration, for instance with conservative Muslims. He instead favours Polyculturalism, where minority groups can keep their distinct cultural identity but still actively participate in and integrate into the institutions, values, and culture of the nation as a whole. In regards to this he is a Civic Nationalist.

He supports the points based immigration systems of Britain, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. He is prepared to accept some refugees, but believes that the 'right to asylum' means that one has the right to flee persecution and settle in the nearest 'safe' country, not any country that they choose. He therefore does not believe that this applies to refugees that leave surrounding countries to come to Europe and claim asylum in order to have a better life. Whilst he sympathises with that desire for opportunity on a personal level, he thinks that the wellbeing and safety of a nation's citizens have to come first.

Feminism & Abortion
Hd is a supporter of Conservative Feminism. He views the tendency of young women to be more supportive of woke activism, and the inability to attract them to conservative causes, as a major obstacle to his goals. Women are the most important element of the 'intersectional alliance' to get on side, as they are half the population and heavily influence the thoughts and opinions of men.

He wants to water down the meaning of the word 'feminism' so that it can become a vague term to describe the advocacy of women's interests. His plan also involves promoting certain strands of the feminist movement to attack others, particularly TERFs, who he sees as 'useful idiots' in the fight against transgenderism. His own branch of feminism would emphasise the individual agency of women, the supremacy of the west compared to other cultures in regards to women's rights, and that genderfluid doctrine is a threat to the safety and rights of women.

He believes women should have equality of opportunity with men in regards to education and jobs, and be completely equal in the eyes of the law. He also believes that women deserve every right to achieve individual self-realisation without the constraint of their sex. With this, he strongly supports the goals of First Wave Feminism and a majority of the goals of Second Wave Feminism. He supports some of the goals of more recent feminism such as emphasising the importance of sexual consent, being against sexual harassment, and strongly condemning violence against women, though these were also goals of the Second Wave.

This being said, he is concerned about the low birthrate of western countries, and wishes to bring it up to the replacement rate of 2.1 children per woman. This is to prevent the crippling economic effects of an ageing population and the need to keep on bringing in immigrant workers which could threaten societal cohesion. The traditional heterosexual family should be re-emphasised, with motherhood celebrated and seen as a goal for women. The 'model woman' in an Arctoist society would be a dual-breadwinner with her husband, be independent and self reliant, but also be a mother. There would be extensive childcare provision to support working mothers, in addition to paid family leave and the 500+ benefit.

He opposes positive discrimination as well as government promotion of men and women being equally represented in all sectors of employment. He is perfectly comfortable with the idea that some jobs are primarily male and others are primarily female, so long as women are given the opportunity to do traditionally masculine jobs if they have the same qualifications. He supports 'equal pay for equal work', and believes companies should be prosecuted for paying women less than men, but sees the 'gender pay gap' as misleading and virtually impossible to completely close as it does not take into account type of work.

On the issue of abortion, he is surprisingly pro-choice. This is partly because he views legal abortion as safer than illegal abortion, as well as because he believes bringing severely disabled children, lacking the means for a fulfilling life, into the world to be immoral. He is a Eugenicist, believing its non-racist and non-murderous advocates at the beginning of the 20th century were entirely rational and well intentioned. He views its discrediting by the Nazis, who used it for racist and genocidal ends, to be a tragedy for the human race.

LGBT
He believes that the LGBT movement (not individuals) is a subversive, toxic, and dangerous influence on western culture. It uses institutional infiltration, guilt-tripping, public shaming, and cancel culture to get the support of state and corporate actors, and no matter how many concessions are given, the movement only grows more unhinged and extreme. The goalposts are constantly moved, so that things that were almost universally ridiculed as too far 10 years ago, like non-binary gender, are obliged to be normalised under the threat of ostracism today.

Behind this are organisations like Stonewall and Mermaids in Britain, and the vast amount of LGBT organisationsin the United States (covering virtually all fields and institutions). He believes that this cannot continue, and that the west's traditional values should be proudly stood up for against these organisations that wish to destroy them.

He doesn't have an issue with gays, bisexuals, and lesbians as individuals, and he thinks they should be left alone and protected from hate crimes, so long as they don't try to influence mainstream society or are sexually deviant in public. However, he hates the degeneracy of Pride Parades and the LGBT organisations that historically promoted gays and lesbians now using their platform to promote gender fluidity.

He believes that Transgenderism is a mental illness like Schizophrenia and Anorexia, and its removal from the list of mental disorders by the WHO being nothing more than ideological submission to the transgender lobby. He believes non-binary gender, gender neutral pronouns, and all other gender identities outside male or female, are nothing more than ultra-individualistic expressions of victimhood that discredit the very few number of genuine gender dysphoria sufferers. According to him, ‎Transmedicalism is the only legitimate form of transgenderism, with him believing gender transition should be an absolute last resort after intense psychological analysis and therapy, and even then believes that the medical profession and the public may have been misled as to the correct treatment by lobbyists.

He would put through the following measures in an attempt to weaken the power of the LGBT movement, which he wants to deal with like how '' 'Thatcher dealt with the unions'. ''


 * Create a 'Free Speech Act' which would allow employees to sue employers for unfair dismissal based on political beliefs, including beliefs regarding LGBT rights.


 * Reclassify Transgenderism as a mental disorder, and make legal gender change dependent on thorough psychological analysis and through the consent of medical professionals.


 * Make it illegal to give sex hormones to under 18s.


 * Ban the recognition of non-binary gender and gender neutral pronouns in public sector workplaces.


 * Make it illegal to teach the idea that gender is fluid to children, and require the teaching of the binary nature of gender and alignment to biological sex in schools, as well as teaching against gender fluidity.


 * Ban LGBT movement's presence in primary schools.


 * Ban the LGBT presence in children's programming.


 * LGBT school teachers must operate on a 'don't ask, don't tell' policy.


 * Ban corporate promotion of LGBT pride and use of the rainbow flag, unless they are an explicitly LGBT oriented business.


 * Shorten pride month to a single weekend.


 * Ban the presence of children at pride parades where there is nudity, exhibitionism, fetishism, or any open adult sexual behaviour.


 * Gay pride parades must happen on a set day nationwide, and cannot be in city centres.


 * Make it illegal to fly the rainbow flag on government buildings outside of the specified weekend. On the weekend, the flag cannot be placed above the national flag.


 * Ban news publications from using they/them pronouns and recognising the identity of non-binarism.


 * Dissolve LGBT organisations with disproportionate economic, cultural, or political influence.


 * Record gay marriages on a separate registry, and call it 'same-sex marriage' or 'civil partnership' instead of just 'marriage', the latter term being exclusively used for opposite sex couples.


 * Promote alternate social media platforms that don't actively promote LGBT on their platforms.


 * Make clear the distinction between gays, lesbians, bisexuals, and gender dysphoria sufferers, who are individuals that should be treated with respect, and the LGBT movement as a whole, that are subversive ideologues.


 * Focus on building up support amongst the youth with youth associations building a nationalistic counter-narrative to LGBT, in a hope to 'reverse the demographic tide'.

Drugs & Euthanasia
He is strongly in favor of passive and active euthanasia. He believes that it is both morally wrong and cost ineffective to have people who want to end their lives being denied the right to. He would go so far as to promote euthanasia for elderly patients with long term degenerative illnesses, particularly Alzheimer's, who's minds have left their bodies.

He views the prohibition of drugs like marijuana to have been a massive failure, with the law being so frequently broken it makes a mockery of law enforcement. He is therefore pro-legalisation for both medical and recreational uses of cannabis, and pro-decriminalisation for harder substances.

He however does not like the positivity that legalisation advocates have about drugs, and still wants society to be overwhelmingly hostile to recreational drug use, only that it should move from being the responsibility of law enforcement to the responsibility of the individual to not take these harmful substances. If people need medical attention or rehabilitation as a result of substance abuse, it should come out of their own pocket. People would be made well aware of the consequences of drug use and how drug use will affect them financially via a large scale public information campaign.

Criminal Justice
His views on criminal justice are mixed. He generally believes in an 'eye for an eye' and the principles of retributive justice, with the punishments of criminals proportionate to the damage caused. For instance, people who commit cold blooded premeditated murder should be subject to life imprisonment without parole.

However, he also understands the diversity and complexity of criminal sentencing, and believes judges should look at the specific situation and context as opposed to putting a blanket punishment on an offence. For example, a woman who was continuously abused by her husband and then snapped and murdered him would be treated much less harshly than someone who sadistically raped, tortured, and murdered an innocent woman or child.

He does believe that people make mistakes and should have a chance to turn their life around, but that this should not mean that prison is like a hotel, as he feels it is in Norway. Those convicted of crimes other than first degree murder should have the opportunity to learn new skills, find employment, and rebuild their lives, with him opposing punitive criminal registries that limit rehabilitation, but they must show personal initiative to in this and be made aware that this is their final chance. He does not support voting rights for criminals whilst serving their sentences, believing those who have broken the law should not get a say in deciding it, though thinks it should be restored when released.

He also recognises that there are highly manipulative and malicious individuals who will fool the authorities of rehabilitation only to commit more crimes. He believes that repeat offenders should be treated more harshly than first time offenders, as by reoffending they have proven that they did not take rehabilitation seriously, and wants those who have re-offended separated from first time offenders to avoid them negatively influencing the latter.

European Federalism
He believes that Europe should be one country as a Confederation.

Philosophy
He is a catholic and inspired by Christian Values(and makes Mary Tudor anti-Protestant jokes lol)also believes liberty to be freedom from Dominance. He is also both a ,meaning he believes that institutions must be made with the worst possible people in mind  and a Stoic,meaning he believes that only you can make yourself happy.

Foreign Policy
It is anti-interventionist meaning he believes one should only fight a war when one is attacked. It believes we ought to follow a golden rule in foreign policy,don't do to other countries what we don't want to be done to our country. He also is a strong believer in free trade.

Technophilia
It is a huge supporter of Technological and Scientific progress,believing in things like Transhumanism, Space Colonisation and genetic engeenering.

Merito-Democracy
It believes that everyone must pass a test before running for office,but that the people should have the choice between the candidates ,who have passed the test.

Isocracy
He also believes in Isocracy(equal distributioon of power and limiting public governance to the public sphere and private governance to the private sphere)

= Relationships =

Friends
We need to make ownership of Capital goods widespread to prevent wage slavery

Land Value Tax is themost efficient and fair form of taxation

Jefferson was the greatest political thinker ever. His message on the issue of economics has been completly forgotten,despite idolization,sadly

Geopaleolibertarianism Me,but capitalist and without welfare. Based.

The best system of Government.

Based,aslong as you don't deny the fact that the American Civil War WAS about Slavery.

My continent must survive and march on in the modern geopolitical era. We need to stand strong together as a Confederation

We should decentralize to the point of Ward Republics

Equal distribution of power(political and economical) is one of my main goals

Based,but culturally left-wing

Distributist Social Democracy Welfare+Distributism+Democracy. Based, I'm pretty much you with more liberty and an LVT. Geo Social Libertarianism Based,minus the Capitalism. Aristotelianism Politeia is based af. Chomskyism Great political thinker.Still kinda skeptical about this anarchism thing.

Based Socialist ,who actually understands the left-wing ,anti-capitalist nature of the Enlightenment. Ron Paul changed my mind on so many issues,despite being bad on many economic issues. One of the best things to ever happen to humanity

Left Anti Communism Yes,please. Send those state capitalists to hell

Rooseveltianism Great president,but too authoritarian.

John Locke?Adam Smith? Destutt de Tracy?Baron de Montesquieu? Thomas Paine? Thomas Jefferson? John Stuart Mill? Based

Enemies
Wage Slavery IS real,you're an enemy of democracy and republicanism cause you lead to

Hurts the environment massively and doesn't treat human beings like humand beings

The best form of Capitalism(at keeping Capitalism alive and well) and that's not a good thing

Stop fighting wars for   and expanding government.

Fuck off, Government that does not maximise Liberty can go die.

Islamophobia I refuse to believe that the religion of Islam is our enemy. Islamic Terrorism is a consequence of Western foreign policy.

Wage Slavery,Loss of Values,Global Warfare and  no liberty,my worst nightmare.

Pragerism Oil-funded,enlightenment-bashing warmongers

END THE FED

Normal Protestants should be burned if they don't convert and the leaders should have a harder punishment. Mary Tudor showed me the way to deal with you,heathen scum.

= Literature = Thomas Jefferson 's letter to Thomas Cooper from the 10th of September 1814 by

Thomas Jefferson's letter to John Taylor from the 28th of May  1816 by

Thomas Jefferson's letter to Samuel Kercheval from the 12th of July 1816 by

Thomas Jefferson's letter to James Madison from the 28th of October 1785 by

War is A Racket by Smedley Butler

Wealth of Nations by

Progress and Poverty by

Two Treatises on Government by

Rerum Novarum by