Dingusbingusism

Dingusbingusism is the personal ideology of Dingusbingus, it proposes a set of ethics called "Post-Consequentialism", and combines it with, favoring a "privatized polycentric society" as set out in the books "A Spontaneous Order: The Capitalist Case for A Stateless Society" and "Chaos Theory: Two Essays on Market Anarchy".

Post-Consequentialism
Post-Consequentialism is a set of ethics which combines the Non-Aggression Axiom and The Consequentialist Ethic. Basically, whatever is both non-aggressive AND has good consequences, ultimately is ethical. Some actions which are non-aggressive, an example such as lying, can lead to bad consequences, but isn't necessarily "aggressive".

[[File:Panarchy.png]]Privatized polycentric law[[File:Volu.png]]
Essentially, the form of "government" that Dingusbingus prefers is a government where "leadership" is decentralized all the way down to the individual and his property. His property is his "ruling grounds", and anyone can choose voluntarily to live under that supposed property. "Laws" would be decided privately, among property owners and their private defense agencies. "Crime" would be dealt with BY these private defense agencies, which have shown to be more efficient than national police.

[[File:Anpostr.png]]Criticism of modern "libertarians"[[File:Anpostr.png]]
Dingusbingus essentially states that the modern right-wing libertarians have started to become less like their original Rothbardian ideals and more into an electoralist and more left-wing variation of American conservatism. Often, he'll side with the Post-Right Anarchists on such issues as distancing himself from the modern-right wing, but being against their egoist desires.

[[File:Mut_Alt.png]]Pity for the old Libertarian Left[[File:Agorismf.png]]
Dingusbingus also shows compassion and pity for the old branch of Left-Libertarians which were Anti-State, Pro-Market, Pro-Property, and while those old Left-Libertarians eventually came back as Agorists, Dingusbingus shows regret and sorrow for the dying off of old Left-Libertarians which didn't advocate for collectivized property and violence.

Personality & Behavior
He often is seen making long tangents about economics, politics, and even music at times, mainly while listening to 90s indie rock. He's serious about his ideology, and gets super pissed off at socialists and others who disagree with his ideology, when they haven't even read any literature that needs to be read in order to understand him. He also is often seen conversing with Post-Right Anarchism about how the modern right-wing is collapsing, and even debating about ethics. He also seems to be  de facto therapist for some reason. Along with that, he's also often seen in a lecture hall, radicalizing moderates into Anarcho-Capitalism and hating the state.

Treatises & Literature written by Dingusbingus
The Ego and Its Place In Anarchism

Argumentation Ethics Simplified

Friends

 * [[File:Ancapf.png]] You set off the laying grounds for my ideas, but you are too basic for me, simply relying on non-aggression as what is ethical, isn't enough to explain what is ethical. Lying for instance isn't aggressive, but it can lead to bad consequences.
 * [[File:Hoppef.png]] You have done a great amount of things for the Right-Libertarian Anarchist-sphere, your Argumentation Ethics have done a great deal in explaining objectively why property rights are good. Although, at the same time, it's because of you that several edgy 6th graders have been trying to appropriate your work in order to justify genocide against those who disagreed with them, and they think that "physical removal" means dropping people out of helicopters for god's sake! I respect and adore your work, but you kinda caused an unfortunate niche group of people who say they read Hoppe, and call themselves "Monarchists" without even having READ your fantastic works.
 * [[File:Anmona.png]] Your ideology is very much intriguing, while it definitely comes off as a joke, your system could be implemented if the role of "leadership" was shrinked to that of the individual, therefore making every person a "king" or "queen", so by this definition, your system could totally be implemented! Maybe under another name, because I will agree that the name is kinda stupid, and needs to be updated to make more sense  by name.
 * [[File:Agorismf.png]] I adore your ideology which attempts to put in an efficient and working method in order to abolish the state, however, I do believe in the notion that this is a means to GET to a supposed "Ancapistan", because the Agora is simply put, an "Ancapistan reimagined". In short, you are great, but you're not a separate ideology. You're just a method to abolishing the state peacefully.
 * [[File:Panarchy.png]] Your ideas of hyper-decentralized communities competing for the consumer's best interests are SUPER great! I wish that there were a LOT more Anarchist theorists which uphold you!
 * [[File:AnInc.png]] Anarcho-Incentivism I just fucking adore you. You put so much time into improving Anarcho-Capitalism, but I do wish you'd take a bigger liking to Post-Consequentialist ethics. But anyway, I can't BELIEVE I'm saying this, but you're the most BASED ideology on this earth we live on!
 * [[File:LeftRothbardianismPix.png]] While I'm not the biggest fan of the left-wing, you at least advocate the ORIGINAL message of the Libertarian Left, that being "Anti-State, Pro-Market, AND Pro-Property". While your principles can get muddled at times, you generally get the job done, and I'm even tempted to call you the model of the original Libertarian Left updated to today!

Frenemies
again.
 * [[File:Anpostr.png]] Post-Right Anarchism You're a good friend to converse with, and while your ideals of criticizing the right from an Right-Anarchist perspective is definitely a great thing, egoism and "anti-ethics" are not a good thing in my mind. If anything, anti-ethics are spooked.
 * [[File:Mut_Alt.png]] Your ideas are definitely a product of their time. Classical economics and the labor theory of value are not sufficable economic theories now that the Subjective Theory of Value exists, along with your quote "Property is theft", which you have thankfully clarified that by "property", you meant "state-privileged property" and not ownership and property in general. But you unfortunately have fallen victim to misquotations by the very collectivist anarchists that Proudhon swore to be his enemy. Rest in peace, and I hope your ideals can revive someday, especially if left-anarchists actually READ your works instead of quoting you once and never
 * [[File:Clib.png]] Very boring, definitely a product of it's time, the myth of a "limited state" is too risky to achieve. Every instance of a "limited state", eventually transformed into a BIG state which crushes and coerces the lives of their citizens day by day. Although, you were definitely needed when Monarchies and Autocracies were the mainstream thing
 * [[File:AnHein.png]] Anarcho-Heinrich-Cheungism Look buddy. This is just a phase, you'll grow out of it eventually. You gotta stop simping for [[File:Fallenism.png]] her. Other than that, you're a cringe anime-obsessed moron, but you're not the worst ideology. You at least understand that Hoppe didn't want to forcibly remove people with helicopters and such. Good job at actually reading Hoppe. But please move on from [[File:Fallenism.png]] her for god's sake.
 * [[File:Annil.png]] Hey kiddo, you'll be alright. Have a seat, and let's talk it out.
 * [[File:Indlibsoc.png]] Individualist Socialism What the fuck?

Enemies

 * [[File:Communalist.png]] Oh no...
 * [[File:ML.png]] Oh GOD no...
 * [[File:Polpot.png]] OH FUCK NO...
 * [[File:Ingcom.png]] Ingcom AAAAAAAAAAAAAA-
 * [[File:Avar.png]] Oh my...do you need a hug or something? You need serious help..
 * [[File:Fallenism.png]] Fallenism Limited states are impossible, and I am NOT a simp for you unlike [[File:AnHein.png]]this dweeb.
 * [[File:YugoPart.png]] YugoslavPartisanism Your economics are absolutely stupid, and your positions contradict your set ideals in several ways. Why would an Anarchist be for restricting guns?? You are like the real life version of a strawman argument a US Republican congressman would make in their head when talking about the Democratic Party. Also, Capitalism DOES equal freedom, I'd rather be "Exploited" under a system where everyone is rich, rather than starve under a moral system where I can't even own a toothbrush without getting my heat beat into the sidewalk.