Middletownianism

Middletownianism is the precedent for the Self-Insert of Great-clarinet. It is a middling left, spiritually Anglo-Catholic, consentez-a-faire social democracy. Its civic neutrality is born of his desire for a government structure to balance man’s tyrannical-autocratic and liberal democratic-anarchic wishes (tyrannos and demokrator). It is culturally third position, advocating more democratic control over technical progress and social progress, but also seeing whatever traditions may lie behind apparent “novelty/ies” as worth knowing about. It is diplomatically micro-patriotic, alter-nationalist and interregnalist.

His all-time favorite negative phrase toward other ideologies is “I don’t hate you, but I am very mad at you”. He sees active hatred as an extremely stupid emotion to have, making people hurt others for not even apparent gain of their own. His all time most maddening ideologies are individualists who claim to be on the bottom of the political compass. They madden him so much because they fundamentally defy the origins of the idea of liberal democracy in sociocentric Ancient Greece and the title of an absolute monarch as “The First Individual in History”. He will not hesitate to enlighten them into aspiring toward isonomy.

Overall
Middletownianism is on middling left-wing on the economic scale, and his economics overall are described as consentez-a-faire social distributist economics combined with georgist, and social-democratic policies, willing to protect the working class' well being as well as ensure equity and happiness amongst the populace whilst ensuring an economy strong enough to sustain those very things, the reason why he supports equity is because he believes it can be beneficial to society overall, as it emphasizes the need of cooperation, a key component to why human societies have been able to survive, and it's general promotion of happiness, in which he sees this as something humanity seeks, whilst the end goals of his might be idealistic to some he would adopt some pragmatist points as well in order to achieve this end, as whilst he understands that greed is an evil that must be shunned, it cannot be rid of due to it being an ideal sadly, as ideals are but abstract and are products of the mind and therefore cannot be removed, but what he can do is significantly limit it's influence, although he is against the idea of a large wealth gap between the rich and the poor, he also sees the total equality of outcome to be somewhat foolish and utopian, and prefers equality of opportunity, in which people are to be given the chance to be happy, because of this, he rejects the solutions of communism and conventionally-regulated market socialism or welfare capitalism and instead prefers to be a consentez-a-faire social distributist, though he is also willing to adopt he does not know what else so as to be more flexible in options in achieving the society he would envision.

[[File:ML.png]] Command Economy [[File:Keynes.png]] or Free market? [[File:Marketsoc.png]]
In a case like this, Middletownianism is preferrably a mixed market economy that leans towards markets, He takes some elements of economic planning since he is supportive on the equal distribution of resources but doesn't support an economy primarily based off state economic planning as it can be stagnant due to it being dependent over the government for spreading goods and can lead to it being overly bureaucratic at times, thus he adopts privatish planning and elements of a market economy to prevent such stagnation, as he believes that it can ensure efficiency through independent enterprises spreading goods through the promotion of the availability of multiple brands, however, there should be measures if a market economy would truly be efficient, thus, he would apply anti-trust, anti-usury, and consumer protection laws, as well as some supervision not only to ensure the survivability of the competitive spirit on the market, but to prevent exploitation as well.

[[File:Welf.png]] The welfare state
Middletownianism Advocates for a strong, Universalist welfare state, Believing that what people need like water, food, shelter, and healthcare are deserving of easy access as he cares for the well being of the people, although he believes that most of the welfare should go to people struggling on a socioeconomic level such as lower class citizens with a Job and those in poverty.

Whilst he prefers welfare to private charity, he will allow private charities to exist provided they are not a scam.

Healthcare
Middletownianism is an avid supporter of Universal and Free healthcare, for it greatly fits in with his beliefs in egalitarianism, however, citizens should still pay for medicine in order to cover restocking costs, and that those who must drink, smoke, or overeat should still pay for surgery, since they are the ones at fault for ending up in those conditions, He also believes that one must be a citizen/permanent resident should he receive free healthcare, He wishes to increase funding towards the healthcare industry

He also wishes to prevent people from abusing the system and that people are expected to take measures of responsibility, he does this through methods such as: He also wishes to adequately fund and staff the healthcare system as well as make the primary care services of the healthcare system owned fully by the public (although some specialist services are allowed to be provided privately).
 * Fining people for a significant amount to those who miss out on two or more GP appointments
 * Charging people that are abusing drugs, Obese, Smoking, and being Alcoholics for the treatments that are responsible for their horrid conditions.

[[File:Synd.png]] Worker Rights
Middletownianism Believes that Workers are Important for society and are very contributive to it, therefore, their well being is also important, With this, he supports the promotion of self-managed worker cooperatives with the elements of semi-direct workplace democracy with state intervention primarily in the interests of the workers and their employees akin to Democratic Corporatism and Titoist Yugoslavia's self-governing socialism, he is also promotive of good working conditions, as he believes that toxic working conditions make workers less productive due to wage slavery and is the reason why horrid movements such as antiwork exist.

Unions
As he is supportive of Worker Rights, he also supports unionization as well, most especially in interparochialized (i. e. representatively nationalized)/heavily regulated enterprises, but are also allowed in smaller ones, he will also recommend them, although they are not a requirement, as Unionized workers can fight exploitation and gain strength that is not possible for individual workers, he also supports widespread ownership in major industries and essential services.

He is sympathetic the armament of workers, as Karl Marx put it: "Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered: any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary." as an armed workforce can fight against the government (or weaken it) should it take a turn for the worse and defend their rights.

He wishes to add an amendment making it a constitutional right to join a union, although this will only apply to major industries and big businesses representative with unions present. Small and medium businesses may become representative or unionized if they wish to do so, but it won’t be required, although one will have full rights to join a union, believing that it is a worker exercising their right to work, and such unions aren’t present in countries like North Korea. Union-busting would become an unconstitutional act.

[[File:Socdem.png]] Enterprise [[File:Soccap.png]]
In this scenario, the amount of regulations an enterprise would have to face is depending on it's size, on larger ones, they will be subject to heavy regulations/interparochialization in the cases where it is an essential service and therefore owned by both the state and by unions, whilst small to medium ones would be subject to only a little or a modest amount of them and are allowed to be privatized, however, there would be some small scale supervision and that unions would be granted the allowance to be formed as well as workplace democracy being implemented, although they wouldn't be really required for those small to medium businesses.

On to the topic of farms, he is an advocate for land reform and wants to have farmlands publicly owned to redistribute food for the poor, but will allow some private farms so one can grow his/her own crops and store his/her own food to prepare for a national food shortage just in case, in that matter, he fuses both communalism and individualism, as he believes that not only should food not be hoarded by a select few and allow the people to unite for cooperation on labour and civil matters, but allow individual liberty and prevent one from losing self-reliance in the event that misfortune falls upon them.

[[File:Geokitty.png]] Housing
Middletownianism is sympathetic to Georgism in this regard, believing that the house should belong to it's occupier, and advocates for a land value tax alternately to a property tax, and a assessing a universal basic value for the purpose of either tax, in this regard, he opposes propertarianism and landlordism, as he sees that landlords could be but lazy land hoarding exploiters who contribute rather little to society but for having to pay property taxes.

He is also thinks that homelessness is a major problem, so he combats this through the construction of government built houses that are to be suited to provide the basic needs for a citizen, although despite the rather anti-landlord and anti-homelessness sentiment, he also believes that if a person refuses to work, that person wouldn't get those very benefits.

Trade
Middletownianism is balanced towards free trade and protectionism, he supports trade between nations but also supports some sort of protectionism in the form of some tariffs, the reason why is because whilst he sees trade between nations as beneficial due to allowing economic growth, he only sees it as beneficial if it's mutual and not one sided, and he doesn't like the idea of unrestricted free trade as it can allow foreign dominance that can discourage local production and thus allow foreign powers to take advantage by treading on the sovereignty of a nation economically therefore subjugating it by making it in debt on those very powers which offsets the benefits of said economic growth (This is also true for free trade within individual nations), he doesn't like the ideas of extreme protectionism and total self-reliance either, as it can prevent economic growth as seen in North Korea.

Wealth
As it was said before, Middletownianism wishes for economic equity and thus wishes to lower the wealth gap and get rid of both the extremes of the rich and poor scale as with a small middle class, this can lead to a massive disparity of power, he is alright with some being richer than others provided the wealth they gained is through ethical methods and hard work, he is tolerant towards millionaires but not billionaires, as the wealth of billionaires are gained through shady methods, thus, the wealth earned by those who done shady methods shall be redistributed and be given to healthcare, welfare, environmental programs, infrastructure, housing, and so on.

A program similar to the share the wealth programs of Huey Long combined with some elements of Duterte's Ten-point agenda would be implemented, he would implement a wealth tax on the wealthy and thus redistribute the wealth gained by those exploitative to help the poor through the improvement and funding of welfare, education, healthcare, housing infrastructure, and rural development programs, as well as use some of that wealth for technological and scientific development.

Taxation
As he believes that extreme inequality can put a strain to society, he wishes to prevent this through the implementation of high level taxation, the following taxes and their usages are examples on how he would prevent such problems: those taxes would be used to reduce economic inequality, fund the social safety net, and for the reduction of debt to a tolerable and acceptable level.
 * Progressive income tax: prevent the negative effects of wealth accumulation
 * Land Value tax: put a halt on land hoarding
 * Carbon tax: incentivize companies to be less carbon-oriented and reduce pollution
 * Minimum Corporate tax rate: prevention of capital flight
 * Value tax: raises revenue and raises the difficulty of tax evasion
 * Digital service tax: greatly strengthen the difficulty of tax evasion done by Multinational corporations.

As for sales tax, for true goods such as groceries, it shall be kept allowed to charge to buyers, but will be converted into a fine to the seller for everything else, a table shall be shown on how Middletownianism would apply the sales tax which it shall allow localities to set for themselves:

True goods: Potential and Actual Ills: He is sympathetic towards the implementation of a 15-dollar minimum wage as for people to make a living wage, but it may potentially force companies to fire employees to prevent bankruptancy which can lead to unemployment, so just in case for the time being the minimum wage would be around 12-13 dollars, 11-12 dollars on small companies. He is also sympathetic towards the implementation of a Universal Basic Income to supplement raising the minimum wage.
 * Water and nutritious drinks
 * Alcohol
 * Household and Hygenic supplies that contain few suspected toxins
 * medicine
 * Nutritious food
 * School and Work supplies
 * Furniture
 * Unhealthy food and drinks
 * Plastic materials that aren't at least 50% biodegradable/reusable
 * Non-medical Marijuana
 * Tobacco
 * (Semi-)Automatical firearms

Usury
Middletownianism wishes to strengthen protection against exorbitant banking charges as well as usurious interest rates and start a tough crackdown on Usury and punish individuals, companies, and most especially corporations that dare do such acts, he will also force those who do such like major companies to pay their fair share of taxes.

The punishment of such crime will range from a prison sentence to the death penalty depending on how severe the crime, the latter of which will be reserved on those who commit human trafficking and anything related to such, but require the removal and irrevocable exclusion from public office of judges who abuse criminal justice to try to get away with domestic terrorism themselves.

Overall
Middletownianism considers himself at the middle of the road in terms of authority, He promotes a government structure to balance man’s tyrannical-autocratic and liberal democratic-anarchic wishes (tyrannos and demokrator) not only for order, but also to protect and respect civil liberties as well, in fact promoting the idea that a truly strong government inherently respects civil liberties and authorities, he's neither a fan of totalitarianism nor an advocate of anarchism, as he views the former as not only narcissistic and immoral but also overly bureaucratic and inefficient, and the latter being incredibly chaotic and idealistic.

Unitary or Federal
In the question on Middletownianism having a mainly Central or Decentral government, He is a federalist unless on the case if a country is homogenous or small such as Singapore and both Koreas, believing that every decision shouldn't always be made in the capital and that overcentralization can cause major issues and that it would be inefficient, he is however against confederalism as it gives loval governments too much power which often results in them surpassing what the central authority on what they can do and override national/state laws.

He also supports semi-direct democracy. He believes that it should be implemented on the city/town level (and district level for big cities), and county level. But believes that implementing it on the state and national level may cause the country to be dysfunctional, Although direct democracy can be implemented on the national level if the country is very small. An example of such would be Singapore.

Local communities
The idea of popular assemblies, particularly on villages and small towns is something that interests Middletownianism, as it can be potentially efficient on decision making on those very subdivisions, the way how these assemblies work will be similar to the basic people's congresses in Gaddafi's Libya, where those assemblies will still abide to national laws, although the state and national government wouldn't make the personal decision making unless such assembly contradicts national law and that the degree of influence by the state would be little and that the assembly, he will make the state and national government provide some support to those assemblies however, essentially creating a semi-federal governmental system.

He also believes that rejection of the excesses of the woke agenda should start from the bottom up, with those very communities rejecting and condemning the excesses of the woke agenda and it's attempts to influence and indoctrinate as well as protecting the populace against advocates of such threat with online influencers being one of them, such influence of those communities will reach the state level and finally the national level.

The justice system
He is supportive of rehabilitation, as he believes that people have a chance to reintegrate back into becoming useful and respectful members of society, although there are limits to how many chances he will give, as he also believes that whilst people do have a chance to reintegrate, there are also people who can lie and manipulate the authorities through the rehabilitative system and continue their criminal actions, thus, the punishment for a crime will be harsher every time it's repeated and every time rehabilitation is done, they will have to do community service for a period of time, he also doesn't want prisons to be neither hellholes for prisoners, nor hotel style like Norwegian prisons, as to minimize brutality and the chance of escape for prisoners

On minor crimes, he believes that the punishment should be light, where as on more serious crimes, rehabilitation will still be applied, but the punishment will be harsher. The death penalty will be applied, but only if those serious crimes were to be repeated often. Moreover, mandatory removal and irrevocable exclusion from public office will be applied to judges for overusing it to try to get away with domestic terrorism themselves.

Police
He likes the idea of a well equipped police force, as a strong police force may help combat criminal activity more effectively, he is however against police brutality, and is personally fine with an unmilitarized police as long as they are still armed and can fulfill their role effectively.

He also believes in police reform, as he believes that the police for should not only be less brutal and less corrupt, but also to be more efficient and effective on fulfilling it's role on maintaining public order and safety, enforcing the law, and preventing, detecting, and investigating criminal activities.

[[File:GRights.png]] Gun Ownership
Gun Ownership is allowed, as it becomes much harder for foreign imperialists to subjugate and conquer an armed populace, however, he understands the negative effects of gun rights, but still wishes to maintain it, so his solution is that a gun license is required if you were to own one, those with a criminal record or are mentally unfit however are not permitted to own a gun, plus, a mental health test will be done yearly for gun owners to prove if a citizen is still responsible enough to wield firearms, a gun safe is also required for all those who bear firearms.

Despite such regulations and background checks implemented to prevent criminals from taking advantage for such, he refuses to let a law-abiding citizen denied having the right to bear arms, for it would be considered tyranny to him as to deny one the right to wield firearms would be unjust if one is responsible and goodwilled.

[[File:Dem.png]] Type of government
Depending on the situation, if it's on a nation that is still stable, he supports a semi-direct democratic republic, and is willing to adopt an aristocracy or monarchy so as to be more flexible in options in where to achieve the society he would envision, that would crack down hard on nepotism, lobbying, usury, and corruption so it can stay true to it's name of "rule of the people", to further ensure this, he would implement a cardinal voting system, though he is mixed on the issue of term limits.

When it's on a nation that is unstable and poor, he supports a modified Vanguardist-Coastguardist system that would adopt libertarian aspects such as direct democracy, freedom of speech, net neutrality, cultural and informal freedoms, and the allowance of the criticism of the government, likening to the idea of a benevolent dictatorship, in which that dictatorship will ultimately transition into the semi-direct democracy as he mentioned earlier once the situation is stabilized, the reason why those modifications are in place is because not only to prevent the vanguardx-coastguard party from being corrupt, overly bureaucratic, and inefficient, but to make the transition to democracy possible, although some of those elements wouldn't be implemented until some time on the early stages of the formation of the Avante-garde-côté-garde state on certain cases where the situation of the country is very unstable.

Voting
Middletownianism is a supporter of voting rights and believes that a voting ID that is free of charge is required where the only requirement being documents and proof of citizenship.

He is supportive on a multi-party democracy, on the idea of having an electoral college or popular vote however, he is opposed to having an electoral college alone, as he doesn't want big and influential areas deciding the choice of presidency, but also wants to prevent plurality voting and let the most popular be elected for office.

Republicanism
Middletownianism believes that there should be a republic, as he wants a constitutional government ruled by the people and that political power should be obtained through effort, he also wants to promote that a leader must have his limits when ruling, thus he is against almost all forms of monarchism, as he is belligerent and disavowal on the idea of that one must obtain power and leadership just through a royal background and that one must rule till abdication/death, he also believes that it encourages elitism, but this is something Middletownianism goes for, within limits.

Vanguardism-Coastguardism
Middletownianism believes that a truly democratic government should actively represent a concensus of its citizens. To achieve this, he wants a government where all of the parties share a plank in their platforms (plures super unum). In addition to all supporting religious freedom, they shall all commit to “stating the Major scale with the certainty of Modern theory”. In more direct terms, this amounts to promotion of upper structures as valid modes of it. However, this does not mean treating them in an absolutely egalitarian way. This is a physical absurdity, a solo human voice can generally reach beyond an eleventh neither easily nor comfortably. Apart from these two planks, the parties may and should have political positions all over the map.

Balancing the tyrannos and demokrator
Though Middletownianism permits authoritarian political parties, he wants strong checks to prevent them from dominating his politics. Although having all of the parties eligible to contest elections share a plank in their platforms would be considered enough of a check by common standards, the Middletownian vision is exceptional on the side of strength in this regard. Not only do authoritarians have to share a plank in their platforms with libertarians and Middletownians, they contest authoritarian-only elections on a separate schedule from libertarians and Middletownians. Libertarian and Middletownian officeholders may also semi-summarily override any laws the authoritarian division of the government passes.

[[File:Mediastocracy_flair.png]] News and Media
Middletownianism is heavily opposed to the polarization of media as it would result in society becoming totalitarian and illiterate through manufactured consent and bias, with this in mind, he supports the fairness doctrine, where in discussing serious matters, opposing viewpoints would be represented proportionally (as he is aware that proportionality tends to be fairer than precise equality) and fairly in order to prevent such negative effects from happening.

Freedom of speech
Middletownianism is a firm believer of freedom of speech, and is a defender towards the free marketplace of ideals, however, he believes in the paradox of tolerance, in that belief, if society is tolerant without limit, the intolerant shall destroy any semblance of tolerance, thus, he will not support anyone that wishes to destroy the honest marketplace of ideals, he will also not support speech that is defamation or incitement, he believes in this because if you try to damage a person's reputation for no good reason, encourage a person to hurt any group of people, or deny the right to freedom towards others all because of differing ideological beliefs, you will face punishment, to describe this belief in his own words, The only ones that are allowed to be intolerant are those who are willingly going to suffer intolerance.

He does not despise hate speech laws, but finds it very maddening that they are discriminatory in favor of enforcing the excesses of the woke agenda, as hate speech laws wish to protect certain groups from harm, but only by others, through safe spaces, the supremacists of said groups can take advantage of this and discriminate others not affected by those laws and get off scot-free without harm.

Populism
Though a constitutional elitist himself (left-wing constitutional elitist specifically), Middletownianism endorses it (left-wing populism specifically) as he believes that populism can be a force of good, as it can be used to unite and rally the people as well as promote meaningful change for the better against problems such as social injustice, wealth inequality, corruption, and most especially imperialism, which is why he supports people such as Evo Morales and Huey Long, as they wanted to reform their respective countries for the better through a nationalist and anti-imperialist rhetoric alongside left-wing economic reforms that help the struggling populace.

He does understand that populism can be a double-edged sword however, as populism can also be used as a tool by those who wish to further cause problems and ruin the name of populism, notably by reactionaries and more especially neoliberal economists masked as populists, which explains why he isn't fond of most right-wing populists such as Bolsonaro and Modi, as both have used it to gain power and use such power to implement horrendous policies such as elitist neoliberal economics that would worsen the socioeconomic conditions of the people.

Means of achievement
As it is situation dependent, Middletownianism prefers either reform or revolution, he would prefer reform whenever possible, but in cases where any attempt of reform is dire, when the implementation of reforms are too slow, or when it is in a dictatorship, he will advocate for a revolution, on a revolution, he would mainly use non-violent tactics, but will resort to violence if those peaceful methods are being suppressed, as those that make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution, as distinct from naked revenge, inevitable. However, he also believes in the paradox of permission, in that belief, if a dictatorship never substantially suppresses a peaceful revolution, the revolution itself may destroy any semblance of pacifism for the dictatorship and become violent anyway.

Once in power, he would try to make a slow, gradual and steady process implementing his ideals, he would reject forcefully indoctrinating the populace to follow his ideals, as it may weaken the support for the system, instead he will demonstrate the strengths of his ideals, as if the strengths of some of them didn’t already demonstrate themselves, through the populace as it may increase the support for the system.

Overall
In regards to this, Middletownianism Prefers to be closer to the Center in this regard, as he has a notable anger at extreme progressivism and reactionary thought. The former angers him by being so Invested against reactionaryism all for the sake of progress that it ends up becoming regressive and xenophobic, and the latter angers him by being against any sort of development of society due to him being fanatical and zealous in defending tradition, because of that, this can result in an endless cycle of hatred where the actual problems in society are left largely unchecked and in which the populace would be heavily divided by fanatical identity politics, in which the only ones who would benefit from the cycle are those greedy and powerful in which those very people would fuel the fire all for their personal gain.

With that being said, He supports a delicate balance between conservatism and progressivism, wanting to preserve tradition whilst also valuing societal progress, as he believes that the preservation of tradition helps keep human values and morality as it's what makes humans unique and that societal progression is necessary for the development of not only a nation, but to humanity as well, and that it helps us to be accepting of others. He also believes in the inevitability of conservatism as it is a deeply personal and particular phenomenon

An opponent of new leftism, but not an old leftist, he sees the adherents of new leftism as radlibs who shill for the plutocratic establishment as they have abandoned the working class and the fight for economic egalitarianism all in favor bullshit-Identity Politics brought in by the neoliberal elite, he also believes that SJWs are a plot done by the managerial elite to prevent meaningful change for the greater good by starting a meaningless war on the basis of identity politics.

Racism
Middletownianism opposes racism and sees it as stupid, as he sees viewing a man for his/her race and/or ethnicity as an act of abandoning morality, as people should be considered by the content of their character, neither by the color of their skin nor by the blood of their ancestors, with this, he wants to have a colorblind society where all races and ethnicities to be equal under the law and have the same treatment.

A supporter of BLM, but an opponent of the woke culture advocates, black supremacists, and police abolitionists who took over the movement just because the movement had some good points such as their opposition against unjust police brutality, he also opposes racially motivated crimes and wishes to make the harshness of those crimes greater, thus he will go against ethnic and racial supremacist groups such as the alt-right, he also goes against woke methods of countering it such as critical race theory/critical legal studies, the latter at least as they are, the reasons why are that both the Alt-right and the Woke Left want to have a society reformed with the bases of racial obsession and hatred and that their methods only serve to fuel the fire of a continuous cycle of hatred that can halt societal progression.

[[File:Gay.png]][[File:Bix.png]] Opinion on LGBT [[File:Les.png]][[File:Trans.png]][[File:Enby.png]]
As this topic is extremely contentious, He feels nervous when talking about it, in his beliefs however, He believes That LGBT individuals are equals and willingly allows them to live so long as they remain respectful to others and do not force their own agenda, he is very mad about the idea that LGBT people should either be Idolized and Glorified like literal deities  or Ostracized and Demonized like  barbaric monsters  by people who don’t even see themselves as such and believes that those individuals shouldn't be judged by their identity, but the content of their character. He also believes that the “homophobic” passages of the Bible are mostly due to a man who has sex with men wanting to condemn a “lesser”, even if non-abusive, way of men having sex with men.

Middletownianism however, is very mad about pride month and wishes to regulate it, not only because it focuses on the promotion of excessively bullshitty Identity Politics, but more importantly, it allows the greedy to further their interests and prevent the populace from realizing that such oppressive establishment wants to make society conform into their unjust ambitions. In order to combat this, he will mandate including information on non-anal male-male sex at the event, on pain of prohibiting the bringing of children on that pride month, as he sees this as a bad influence for the youth.

He would allow Homosexuals to have civil unions/marriages and also approves the right to transition as long as the person has gender dysphoria but he won't make it the first method of dealing with dysphoria unless the case of dysphoria is severe and will only use it after other methods of treatment have failed (although he will accept tucutes for the time being), but he will only recognize trans genders as variations on two basic genders, just as sexual/romantic attraction based on sex or character is, and is against the abolition and discouragement of traditional marriage and family, as he sees this as a part of what made humanity rise up to the ashes and become a powerful species, and he is very discontent with the current LGBT community and agenda as it endorses things such as xenogenders, neopronouns, genderfluidity, and wedlock-free polyamory (though he doesn’t mind henogamy bisexuals/biromantics practicing polygamy), but especially neopronouns because there is theoretically already a “majestic they”, in which he wouldn't consider these ideas progressive at all, but rather the manifestation of the negative aspects of identity politics, in which it would make identity far more important than anything else and would promote the aforementioned endless cycle of hatred, thus, he would discourage the populace from being promotive of those ideals.

Whilst he will allow conversion therapy to help individuals suffering from gender dysphoria, he doesn't want it to be mandatory and enforced on the aforementioned individuals, as it may potentially only cause insult to injury.

He is interested in the idea of promoting LGBT movements that are against LGBT supremacism and the woke agenda, as they can prove useful to not only combat discrimination against LGBT individuals, but also fight against the ever growing threat that is woke plague at the same time.

Physical and Mental Health
Middletownianism wishes to kickstart an anti-smoking and anti-obesity, but not pro-drug campaign, wishing to make the populace as healthy as possible, both mentally and physically, on his opinion towards mental disorders, he wishes to give adequate support and treatment to those suffering with them (IE: gender dysphoria, depression including bi-polarity, overanxiety, schizophrenia, autism, and eating disorders), He however quietly rages about the utter glorification of mental illnesses and the issue of mental health overall, especially amongst woke groups and wishes to discourage the population of such Romanticization, but he finds it foolish to mad at those that self-diagnose just because they tend to have no credentials.

On a personal level, Middletownianism is an autist, as while he may have been gifted with potential intellect and talents such as swimming and drawing, this has hindered his social skills as well as the ability to communicate and understand with others which has made him become prone to exploitation through constant teasing in the past, so much to the point it actually becomes bullying at times, which has resulted in his confidence being shattered often. The worst of this teasing has been unintentional teasing by entities set up help him.

Drugs
Marijuana will be legalized and tolerated by Middletownianism, as Marijuana hasn't killed as much people as alcohol and cigarettes would in the last 5 years, other drugs however will be banned, at least outside of scientific research. Similar to the stance on LGBT rights, this wouldn’t apply to countries where it’s illegal and frowned upon. but it, alongside Tobacco will be fined by taxes, and that the minimum age for both the aforementioned substances above will be 21. Whilst they would be legal, they would also be discouraged for their unhealthiness and environmental damage, tobacco in particular would be the worst offender of such. While alcohol would not be so discouraged on the grounds that the offensive part is removed by cooking it, the minimum age for personally buying it will be 21.

He will however greatly support cannabis used for medical purposes, despite emphasizing little on recreational marijuana, as it can be proven useful to medically treat some conditions

But anything past that would be illegal outside of scientific research unless such research would prove it medically useful and cracked down on strictly, at least where it involved bad faith, especially toward the government. Him dealing with drug dealers and drug users like this will prevent an outright black market for drugs without formally decriminalizing them, for drug users, he is aware that few are thinking about any high science and some have lived in a bad environment and doesn’t want to attack people just for how they grew up, but also doesn’t want to let those who purposely buy drugs slip free, thus he will treat them through a strictly rehabilitative system. Drug dealers on the other hand will be punished, insofar as having to assist in uncreating the addicts would be considered a punishment, thus he would use mainly rehabilitative ways in dealing with them mixed with this “punitive” method in an attempt to convince them give up their ways, but failure in redemption however will result in house arrest, if the drug dealer would be of high ranking however, there would be an immediate house arrest imposed. Cases of bad faith on the other hand will result in outright imprisonment, but only in a minimum security prison. Even if official attempts to sanction a Nixon-like War On Drugs are highly unlikely to pass all the government, this will not be enough to stop police officers and judges from prosecuting personal drug wars. Thus, he will require the removal and irrevocable exclusion from public office of police officers and judges for this.

Youth
A moderate Adultist, Middletownianism believes Parents should have control over their child(ren) since Adults have significantly greater experience and knowledge, however, he also believes that Parents should also give their child(ren) love and happiness and they should teach them morals such as kindness as well as disavow any sort of misinformation given to their child(ren). Giving their child(ren) love and happiness entails that Parents should reject any unnecessary infantilization of their pubescent (and older) child(ren).

He wants to avoid promoting politics to the youth before they start thinking about it independently of their parents as he wants them to enjoy their lives and believes that politics should be recommended and tackled once they reach adulthood, thus he will discourage all political media aimed towards the younger youth, and younger youth activism in general(he will also eventually prohibit them all once a certain point has reached) seeing how both of these things are often used to enforce an agenda through indoctrination (eg:calling a ideology objectively correct and flawless), in which he strongly disavows, he also wants to strictly limit teachers bringing political gear to social studies and mainly mock-up or historical articles, and on the topic of that, he wants to encourage teaching politics in history and literature without strictly limiting teaching politics to history or literature only, and on the topic of that, he wants history and literature to be taught without bias and without misinformation, he will also disavow schools from promoting political agendas, especially if the agenda promoted is dedicated to destroying the honest marketplace of ideals (eg: woke "progressivism" and Alt-Right "conservatism"), being against the abolition and discouragement of teaching the nation’s traditional literary canon (the Lord knows some of those writers had been persecuted enough while they lived).

[[File:Envi.png]] Environmentalism
Middletownianism believes that the environment is sacred and wishes to combat climate change and pollution, believing that it is integral to the earth itself and without it, may cause a great deal of negative effects such as drought, rising of sea levels, and erosion that can potentially devastate communities and nations, he combats this through means such as the the following: On a sense, his environmentalist stance is a synthetic union between eco-capitalism, eco socialism, bright-green environmentalism, eco-authoritarianism, and eco conservatism, but he would be primarily a bright-green environmentalist.
 * implementation of a carbon tax
 * lowering the tax of renewable energy
 * transitioning to renewable energy with nuclear power being the primary source of energy
 * begin a gradual dismantling process of all coal fired and oil fired plants and ban them entirely once the aforementioned transition to renewable energy is done.
 * requiring mining industries to submit plans to phase out on coal and oil and replace it with green hydrogen
 * encouragement on recycling at waste management end
 * planting millions to billions of trees and restore habitats
 * punish those that were to do harm to the environment and enforce laws such as the prohibition of illegal mining, illegal logging, illegal fishing, and poaching
 * introduction and promotion of eco-friendly products
 * creating eco friendly jobs and gradually promote and expand said jobs
 * begin a gradual transition to zero-emission transport
 * usage of a climate change commission
 * the promotion of research on eco-friendly technology
 * educating the populace of the dangers of climate change and begin defunding media and politicians that actively downplay climate change.
 * gradually discourage the usage of single-use, non biodegradable and non reusable plastic materials and eventually ban it entirely.
 * building national parks in order to preserve wildlife
 * Eliminate Fracking and redirect the funds from that into research for renewable energy
 * Give natural meadows and wildflowers to threatened populations of pollinators such as bees and butterflies
 * Repeal subsidies that encourage urban sprawl and discourage local farming and production, and encourage local media outlets and chambers of commerce to promote buying locally
 * Prioritize new distribution technologies for waste, with particular concern for the oceans which are vital to a healthy earth
 * Strengthen laws against animal abuse and neglect, including stricter regulation of factory farms and stockyards and the repeal of food disparagement laws and so-called ag-gag laws that prohibit free speech regarding animal agriculture
 * Never let a single home in the nation lack access from clean drinking water and fresh food

Religious matters
In this matter, Middletownianism supports Secularism and Religious Democracy Believing that freedom of religion should be allowed and allows people to convert to other faiths or leave them as well but also supports the separation of church and state as well as significantly limiting the influence of clergy and religious organizations where their influence is small scale, he is against both a Religious Theocracy nor State Atheism, as he is against the former because having laws heavily based off Religion alone will impede on significant progress, and he is against the latter because it has a tendency to adhere to state worship and ultimately Extreme Authoritarianism (as demonstrated in some Marxist-Leninist states), in which he opposes as well, such policies will be softer on religious countries however but will get harder gradually.

Businesses will have the right to close on Sundays, but he doesn't want to force that law on all businesses and is alright if a business wishes to not close on a Sunday.

He is fine with some religious influence on the government due to his Catholic beliefs particularly in religious countries, as long as it isn't theocratic or biased towards any other part of the political map and that it allows others to practice their beliefs freely, he also wants to introduce some sectors on ideals like cultural Christianity/Islam/Buddhism/etc depending on the country, as he likes some cultural impacts of religion with the promotion of morality being one of them (even if it's not a necessity to be religious in order to adhere to morals).

Stances on Abortion and euthanasia
Abortion is seen as rebellion, as he believes that life’s power to end itself is legitimate, thus he believes that abortion exists mainly to save lives and will disavow abortion done just for hedonism, and therefore, ideally, he will only allow it on cases where the mother's life/health are at risk, the baby is at risk, or on the ocurrence of premature pregnancy.

Abortion would be also be legalized for cases such as rape/incest, seeing how most anti-abortion politicians support it being legalized in such cases, and is more sympathetic to those that abort in such cases and understands their struggle, but will discourage it because despite both rape and incest being reasonably despicable and traumatizing, even if incest is not inherently non-consensual, he still sees abortion as murder nonetheless and wants to have recovery that would not involve killing third-party innocents(the baby) and thus he will provide alternatives such as birth control or the allowance of adoptions should the mother not want it, but with children of rapes prohibited from having the rapist’s surname, it will be however illegal in all other cases. despite such views forging a moral opposition to it due to it still involving the killing of an infant, he is tolerant on other countries allowing it on the case of rape/incest or himself doing such even if it's not ideal.

He also wants to implement strong pro-family welfare policies which include mass assistance towards mothers with a child and respect towards parent groups who want to raise all their children in common, because although he understands the reason why mothers are forced to abort their infants due to terrible socioeconomic conditions, he still opposes abortion nonetheless, rather he would help mothers trying to care for their children to be lifted from their horrible socioeconomic status instead of forcing them to commit rebellion due to the lack of opportunities of raising a child under good conditions.

He is aware that it won’t happen overnight, and therefore, wishes to do the following, starting from beginning to end:
 * Increase access to healthcare mainly in areas with little access to health services
 * Make birth control more widely available in case one was to get raped
 * Have local communities, especially rural ones, denounce abortion. Rural ones in particular are chosen due to their more conservative nature
 * Implement a nationwide law criminalizing pro-abortion propaganda
 * Promote anti-abortion ideals, comparing it to rebellion
 * Decrease allowance to get an abortion to the first 3 months of a pregnancy
 * Clarify that Roe V Wade, only applies in all the aforementioned cases

Pornography
Middletownianism is an opposer of the biases in mainstream pornography, as well as non-consensual prostitution, as he seems them as bad for several reasons, mainstream pornography is a revolt against people’s power over how they have same-gender sex, while non-consensual prostitution, to a certain degree, forces people into the same “bed” who would not otherwise have wanted to be. Thus he wants to make non-consensual sex work in general illegal and criminalized for those who impose it, where those who do such will be punished and therefore subject to rehabilitative treatment and re-education, while he would free and give empathy to those whom it is imposed upon due to the exploitation they shall have suffered in that case. He will also subject gay/lesbian porn sites from his nation to a Fairness Doctrine, because even “wicked” thoughts deserve an honest marketplace, and discourage gay porn being viewed strictly between women or lesbian porn being viewed strictly between men, but not even legally restrict it outright.

On a personal level however, he is fine with temporary consensual sex as long as it's not meant for cheating, but this does not mean he would abolish or discourage traditional long term relationships. Being sexually attracted based on character himself, Middletownianism has acknowledged that the biases in mainstream Pornography make it insidious toxic heterosexual propaganda.

Science and Technology
Middletownianism is a supporter to scientific advancements, as he believes it can bring many positive effects to society, with science enhancing the overall intelligence of the populace and helps with the advancement of technology, in which it could keep society advance with those very technologies being helpful to solving problems, he is however against transhumanism and automation, as he is intolerant of the populace turning into robots and AI taking over jobs and increasing unemployment.

He is an adherent to the policies technoliberalism, as he believes that technological progress should be promoted and be available to the general public, and that he also cherishes civil liberties as well and use that technology to preserve it.

Big tech and corrupt elitists overall on technology
However, he believes that the power of technological advancement shouldn't be concentrated to the elites, as it can negatively affect society due to those very elites using this power to control and dictate society on their own horrid terms as seen in big tech, where they use such technology to promote aspects of woke culture as seen evident by the constant promotion of things such as xenogenderism, genderfluidity, neopronouns, and the normalization of the LGBT agenda unsympathetically to real LGBT people in general, making products sympathetic to the calling of wokeness, the call-out and ostracization of individuals who do not support such horrid agenda, and the abolishment of free speech and discrimination of those sympathetic to the honest marketplace of ideas and political opinions all in favor of "political correctness" advocated by elitist radlibs under a leftist facade.

he is sympathetic to pirate politics and is promotive of laws that put people before corporations and wishes to implement the following things to greatly limit the influence of corrupt elites on the internet: On other things such as Child porn, especially that of prepubescent children or not done by the children themselves, and the dark web, he will put a ban on them however, seeing them as things that can potentially harm the populace.
 * Significant copyright and patent law reforms that favor the people over corporations
 * direct E-democracy
 * Laws that protect personal information and data of individuals
 * net neutrality
 * pro-free speech laws that give people the right to sue companies that censor them
 * strong freedom of information laws
 * anti-monopolization laws
 * Digital service tax
 * Hold big tech companies liable for their crimes
 * promote alternatives to counter the woke agenda
 * create strong anti trust laws and regulations as well as force big companies to pay taxes on a fair share, those that do not abide shall be dismantled, such taxes will go to welfare, education, healthcare, housing, infrastructure and rural development programs, as well as technological and scientific development.
 * put an end to corporate welfare and redirect it to the masses as well as promote Unionization and worker cooperative formation within corporations, thus creating an anti-corporate and pro-worker cooperative policy.
 * a Fairness Doctrine for gay/lesbian porn sites

Interculturalist ideals
Middletownianism adheres to interculturalism because he sees this as the perfect unity between the acceptance of different cultures and a unified cultural identity, he seeks to fight both the self-segregationist and divisive tendencies of multiculturalism and the imperialistic and discriminatory notions of pauciculturalist and monoculturalist assimilation through the notions of brotherhood and unity.

The reason behind this is because interculturalism can bring in the benefits of a common identity and cohesion a primarily multicultural society wouldn't have as different cultures would self-segregate and ultimately fight against each other due to a lack of unity whilst fighting the discriminatory and prejudicial notions of pauciculturalist and monoculturalist policies that would oppress the lives of other people with different cultures and start a cycle of continuous hatred where the values of people such as empathy, ingenuity, compassion, and ETC are all cast aside for identity.

Middletownianism’s interparty system will have a large advantage in achieving these ideals because he has designed it in order to unite the acceptance of dissent and a unified governing ideology. He sees multi-party systems as too easy prey to tyranny by dissent and even subsequent backslide into single-party tyranny. The reason behind this is because tyranny by dissent is a chameleon and will change its colors to camouflage itself within the party system of each country and no one will ever be able to call it out until it is (nearly) too late to build a meaningful resistance.

Overall
A localist, he supports the right of local self-determination within a larger nation as he believes that a locality should have the right to maintain sovereignty, he is also skeptical towards most forms of globalism, and even most forms of nationalism, whilst uniting humanity may seem like a cool idea to him, due to most globalists disregarding national sovereignty and self-determination, and most nationalists local sovereignty and self-determination, he sees this as imperialist which is unacceptable to him, the one major exception to this is alter-globalization and alter-nationalization, as they advocate for a world free from evils of imperialism and is sympathetic to preserving the sovereignty and self determination of nations and localities, because of his anti-imperialist and proportionalitarian rhetoric, he is also skeptical towards xenophobic and extreme forms of nationalism and localism, with ultranationalism, racial nationalism, and especially most (if not all) forms of fascism being examples of such.

Civic Localism
He considers himself a civic localist, believing that a person's citizenship shouldn't be based on arbitrary ethnic and racial identity, but instead through common values, where micro-patriots regardless of race and ethnicity are all united as a community through brotherhood, unity, and local pride where they help others struggling in their locality and solve the locality's apparent struggles such as economic inequality and the threat of imperialism.

Immigration
Middletownianism is tolerant to those that wish to immigrate to the nation and thus wants to ease the process of legal immigration, however, he also believes that they shouldn't go in willy nilly scot free and self-segregate, thus he expects that immigrants must be required to learn the nation's culture, history, and language, and recommended to maintain and teach their own culture, history, and language within the nation at large, if they are to stay in the nation, this will be done and proven through a test which is also a requirement to obtain citizenship, he will also crack down on bad faith immigration including not allowing anyone with a criminal record to enter.

He still prioritizes citizens over immigrants and wishes for most citizens to be employed, as a nation is lacking of a meaning without native citizens, non-citizens are also not allowed to vote other than in popular assemblies in villages and small towns if they ever live at these areas. The big cities will also have popular assemblies on a district level so non-citizens living there will not be totally unable to vote in the nation. However, non-citizens will be required to be living at the areas where they are voting in the popular assemblies while citizens may visit anywhere in order to vote in popular assemblies.

[[File:Globnat.png]] Foreign Policy
Preferably an acolonialist, Middletownianism prefers to mainly solve the nation's own problems, and therefore to intervene in foreign nations only to solve their problems in their favor, and because of his interregnalist/anti-imperialist rhetoric, he will help and aid nations in a struggle against imperialism through counter-interventions if the time comes, thus he is an Alter-Globalist as well, as he works with other countries for mutual cooperation to advance technology while fighting both imperialism and economic globalization. Aware that Alter-Globalization can just end up as a world federation of microempires, he also adopts anti-microimperialist rhetoric and therefore will help and aid localities in a struggle against microimperialism through counter-interventions if the time comes, thus he is an Alter-Nationalist as well, as he works with other subcountries for mutual cooperation to advance technology while fighting both microimperialism and economic nationalization

He doesn't like forcing ideas on other (sub)countries, as he considers it as an act of subjugation and therefore a(n) (micro)imperialist motive, instead, he prefers to spread his ideology not through force, but by demonstrating the successes and strengths of his ideals and allowing other (sub)countries to learn it and give the choice to adopt his ideals or not through free will.

He is sympathetic to Democratization on Countries having protests, but goes against anything that supports major powers (IE:the EU and NATO), as he believes that democracy should be brought with the leadership of the people of their own nation whether ultimately by themselves alone or by the forces of foreign powers and thus supports backing protests in other nations only with the permission of the people of the other nations themselves.

Military
He is a centrist on the militarist-pacifist scale, as he believes that a strong military is needed to protect the nation from terrorists and imperialists, but believes that it should primarily be used for defense and that he doesn't want to go overboard on military spending.

He is discontent with the Concept of Conscription as he believes that people should serve the military through free will and not by force, and only wishes to apply it on dire situations as a last resort.

On the idea of nukes, he supports the dismantling of nuclear weaponry, as the effects of a nuclear weapon can cause potential harm and can be potentially used by imperialists to coerce a nation into it's demands through the threat of annihilation and manipulate the world map for their own advantage, though in practice, it may not end well since it was among the reasons why Imperial Japan was forced to surrender without having to divide between capitalism and Stalinism (not that many Japanese would have wanted that succeed a Fascist empire) and that all countries must comply to denuclearization

Middletownianism is also supportive of civilian militaries and paramilitias, since they can be used to protect the (sub)country from threats such as (micro)imperialists and insurgent terrorists.

He also endorses the glorification of the military, as they are a key component in defending the nation and has no problem with such events being held at schools or places in general that honor special forces, he is against the glorification of crimes and atrocities committed by military forces however and wants to teach the horrors of those very crimes and give them reasons on why they are horrible.

[[File:Cball-US.png]] [[File:European Federalism.png]] [[File:Necon.png]] West vs East [[File:Cball-China.png]] [[File:Cball-Russia.png]]
He supports the first world (led by great powers of the west being the US, France, Germany, The UK, and Japan), but only outside of its fight with the second world (led by great powers of the east being Russia and China) over the third world, instead aligning with united fronts like China-Japan-Korea for Go because he sees it as compatible for the strengthening of the interregnalist motive and wishes to protect the sovereignty of weaker nations, seeing how NATO and the EU have treaded on the sovereignty of other nations (through foreign intervention and installation of puppet dictators for NATO's case and Neoliberal economic and social policies being forced on European nations for the EU's case) and both Russian and Chinese aggression potentially threatening the national self-determination of other nations (with Ukraine and even Belarus as examples for Russia's case, and Southeast-Asian nations as an example for China's case).

The United Nations
He is mad at the UN for the reason of being a tool by great powers to further imperialist acts and intentions regardless of whether reasons of backing such are self-serving excuses or not, much like how he would do with the EU he doesn't want to destroy the UN, rather implement significant reforms that put greater emphasis on ideas such as economic self-reliance and national self-determination akin to the proposal of a new international economic order, whilst maintaining policies such as defense of human rights and cooperation between nations with those very polices being tweaked to favor economic self-reliance and national self-determination.

Afghanistan
The U.S war in Afghanistan unlike other American interventions had at least some sort of reasonable justification, but the way the war was handled was pretty horrible, although he sees that pulling home the troops might have some reason, leaving the Afghan people unarmed and defenseless against the Taliban wouldn't be something that would be supported by him as it would be no turning back once Afghanistan is left behind, as he thinks if the US army should really leave, they should only do this once the Afghan people are armed and readily defensive against the Taliban.

Artsakh
Artsakh belongs to Armenia, for Azerbaijan's treatment on it can be called nothing but cruel for it's unjustified racism against ethnic Armenians on the region.

Belarus
Whilst Middletownianism understands that the Belarusian people want civil liberties and democracy, he doesn't want Belarus to fall into the hands of the EU, seeing how Berlin and Paris have swayed their damn dicks and impeded on the sovereignty of other nations in the EU, thus he is against EU-backed Belarusian protestors, his opinion on Lukashenko is mixed though leaning positive, he is sympathetic to his economic policies and his nationalist stance, but is antipathetic to his brutality, corruption, and as of recent events, the border war with Poland and weaponization of immigrants.

Taiwan
Although Taiwan may be an independent nation at it's own right, he believes that it should drop the claim to the mainland and forge a path of it's own, as both the PRC and ROC have noticeably different social and economic systems and that annexation caused by either will result in major internal problems, thus he proposes an organization similar to the Union state of Russia and Belarus as a method for the unification of China instead.

Hong Kong
He believes that Hong Kong is a part of China, and is against any sort of notion that believes Hong Kong was better under Britannia, he also saw the violent methods of the protestors as unacceptable and thus doesn't support the Hong Kong protestors, although he understands their advocation for liberty and civil rights, he nonetheless acknowledges that it is destiny for Hong Kong to be a part of China and that Hong Kong was stolen by the British Imperialists.

East Turkestan and Tibet
He believes in the federalization of China and that both regions deserve some degree of autonomy, and is against the persecution of those minority groups done in those regions, although he is also against any notion that calls it Genocidal as it's considered by him as overexaggerated bias, he's also against both the Dalai Lama and the Islamic Terrorists.

Cyprus
Middletownianism supports Cyprus over Northern Cyprus, seeing how Northern Cyprus lacks an actually good reason to exist as a legitimate state since it's basically a laughable excuse of a failed Turkish puppet state.

The EU
Middletownianism is a soft Eurosceptic, seeing how the EU has treaded on the national sovereignty of European nations through forcing horrid neoliberal economic and social policies, although he accepts things such as free travel policies and economic cooperation, thus, he wants to reform the EU where it still maintains the free travel policies and economic cooperation it has, but put greater emphasis on national self-determination and economic self-reliance, in short, the EU is horrid and if the nations of Europe are to be united, then the EU must be reformed.

Israel
Middletownianism understands that the Jews wish to escape antisemitism, but he is very mad at the concept of Zionism as it is ethnic nationalist, and he wants to protect innocent Palestinians from the wrath of the Israeli government and military, he doesn't favor Hamas' rather anti-semitic and extremely islamist rhetoric either, so his proposal is either a two state solution where both nations can equally coexist peacefully, or a one state solution where both Israel and Palestine are unified under a multi-ethnic, secular-religious democratic, interculturalist, civic nationalist, civic localist, and interregnalist state under the slogan of brotherhood and unity akin to like Tito's Yugoslavia

Kosovo
The conflict between Albania and Serbia on the very nation of Kosovo shows the dreadful negatives of ethnic nationalism, thus in order to prevent this, Middletownianism advocates that the majority Albanian areas belong to Albania and that the Majority Serbian areas belong to Serbia, though the minorities of those areas should be given respect.

Somaliland
Middletownianism believes that Somaliland is a sovereign nation that has the right to self-determination, and is more prosperous and stable than the country having a claim to it's sovereignty, Somalia, a failed state where lawlessness and corrupt and abusive authoritarianism are rampant, AKA, the typical Anarcho-Capitalist society when put into practice where there are very little economic regulations or maybe even none.

Syria
He supports Rojava as well as Assad to an extent (although he isn't fond of Assad's gas attack tactics), as both are fighters against imperialism, he opposes the current Turkish government, ISIL, and the Syrian opposition, his reasons why are being Erdogan having imperialist ambitions, ISIL for being a fanatical war crime loving jihadist terrorist organization and the Syrian opposition for being backed by imperialists such as the aforementioned Turkish government.