HelloThere314ism

HelloThere314ism also known as HelloThere314 Thought is a philosophy and political theory heavily influenced by Max Stirner and Albert Camus. Its main belief is the fundamental disunity of everything. It can be viewed as a philosophy concerning the synthesis of all disunities, from the Absurd, the Lack Of Coherent Frameworks, to the Lack Of Metanarratives, etc.

=Summery= Anarchism Egoism Socialism Anti-Economy Progressivism Philosophy
 * [[File:Anin.png]]Individualist Anarchism
 * [[File:Anpostleft.png]]Post-Left Anarchism
 * [[File:Post-an.png]]Post-Anarchism
 * [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]Meta-Anarchism
 * [[File:Ego.png]]Egoistic Anarchism
 * [[File:EgoUnion.png]]Union Of Egoists
 * [[File:Self.png]]Ownness
 * [[File:Egocom.png]]Egoistic Collectivity
 * [[File:Marx.png]]Marxism
 * [[File:Neomarx.png]]Neo-Marxism
 * [[File:PostMarxism.png]]Post-Marxism
 * [[File:Žižekism.png]]Žižekism
 * [[File:Acidcomf.png]]Fisherism
 * [[File:Situ.png]]Situationism
 * [[File:Postsitu.png]]Post-Situationism
 * [[File:EgoMarx.png]]Stirnerite Marxism
 * [[File:Fem.png]]Feminism
 * [[File:Postfem.png]]Postfeminism
 * [[File:Voidism_Small.png]]Metaphysical Incompleteness
 * [[File:Self.png]]Stirnerite Unique
 * [[File:Existentialism.png]]Existentialism
 * [[File:Absurd.png]]Absurdism
 * [[File:Sartre.png]]Sartrian Phenomenology
 * [[File:Existentialist_Anarchism.png]]Existentialist Anarchism
 * [[File:Postmodernicon.png]]Post-Modernism
 * [[File:Poststruct.png]]Post-Structuralism
 * [[File:Solipsism.png]]Schopenhauerian Solipsism

=Influences=

Theorists

 * [[File:Tao.png]]Lao Tzu (500sBC)
 * [[File:Plato.png]]Plato (300sBC)
 * [[File:Diogenes.png]]Diogenes (300sBC)
 * [[File:Philan.png]]William Godwin (1756-1836)
 * [[File:HegelianPhilosophy.png]]Georg Hegel (1770-1831)
 * [[File:Ricardosoc.png]]David Ricardo (1772-1823)
 * [[File:Fourier.png]]Charles Fourier (1772-1837)
 * [[File:DepressionMale.png]]Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
 * [[File:Ego.png]]Max Stirner (1806-1856)
 * [[File:Mutualist.png]]Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (1809-1865)
 * [[File:Karl_Marx.png]]Karl Marx (1818-1883)
 * [[File:Georgist.png]]Henry George (1839-1897)
 * [[File:Nietzsche-icon.png]]Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900)
 * [[File:Indlibsoc.png]]Oscar Wilde (1854-1900)
 * [[File:Egomut.png]]Benjamin R. Tucker (1854-1939)
 * [[File:Freud.png]]Sigmund Freud (1856-1939)
 * [[File:Awaj.png]]Voltairine De Cleyre (1866-1912)
 * [[File:Goldman.png]]Emma Goldman (1869-1940)
 * [[File:Heidegger.png]]Martin Heidegger (1889-1976)
 * [[File:Illeg.png]]Renzo Novatore (1890-1922)
 * [[File:Ego-Existential.png]]Herbert Read (1893-1968)
 * [[File:Socan2.png]]Aldous Huxley (1894-1963)
 * [[File:Lacan.png]]Jacques Lacan (1901-1981)
 * [[File:Sartre.png]]Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980)
 * [[File:ExistFem.png]]Simone De Beauvoir (1908-1986)
 * [[File:Camus.png]]Albert Camus (1913-1960)
 * [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]Gilles Deleuze (1925-1995)
 * [[File:Poststruct.png]]Michel Foucault (1926-1984)
 * [[File:PostMarxism.png]]Jean Baudrillard (1929-2007)
 * [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]Félix Guattari (1930-1992)
 * [[File:Debord.png]]Guy Debord (1931-1994)
 * [[File:Situ.png]]Raoul Vaneigem (1934-???)
 * [[File:Postsitu.png]]Jean-Pierre Voyer (1938-???)
 * [[File:Žižekism.png]]Slavoj Žižek (1949-???)
 * [[File:Anpostleft.png]]Bob Black (1951-???)
 * [[File:Post-an.png]]Todd May (1955-???)
 * [[File:Postfem.png]]Judith Butler (1956-???)
 * [[File:Acidcomf.png]]Mark Fisher (1968-2017)
 * [[File:Post-an.png]]Saul Newman (1972-???)
 * [[File:Egocom.png]]For Ourselves: Council for Generalized Self-Management (1974)
 * [[File:Gender_Accelerationism.png]]Vikky Storm (???-???)

Groups/Movements

 * [[File:YngHeg.png]]Young Hegelians (1835-1846)
 * [[File:Frankfurt.png]]Frankfurt School (1923-)
 * [[File:Existentialism.png]]French Existentialists (1930-1980)
 * [[File:Situationalistinternationalism-icon.png]]Situationist International (1957-1972)
 * [[File:Antwork.png]]Youth International Party (1967)
 * [[File:Egocom.png]]For Ourselves: Council for Generalized Self-Management (1974)

=Beliefs=

[[File:EgoNihil.png]]Metaphysical Disunity
There is no unity to any phenomenon in the world. Any sort of unity posed to explain phenomena are inherently essentialist. They take things and place them into groupings assuming some base unity between the activity between them. Labels on singular objects have just as much disunity. All objects are fundamentally indescribable; all labels we place on it are mere categorizations. Take the couch in wich I sit on as I write this, is it inherently comfy, or did I just place that label on it. One might say that this label comes out of the subjective experience of comfiness and that all could label it differently, yet this label still remains truthful, however this falls into the same trap, the whole feeling of comfiness is merely a label. An object is fundamentally unique, no label can aptly describe it. The word unique itself, in this context, is used merely as a placeholder for a non-object. Even the differentiation between things are just other labels. What makes a chair a chair? Might it instead be just the legs, the seat, the backrest, etc? This labeling of things as things is in itself a mere labeling act. This is not to imply a unity in a singular object, or even one based on a common basis of disunity, all are fundamentally disunited. Even the self, the basis of all phenomenon, is full of disunity. Unlike what Husserl says one is not always conscious of consciousness. As Sartre rightly points out you can easily be conscious, even when perceiving details pertaining to oneself. For example as one talks about themself are they conscious of oneself. Or as I write am I conscious of myself, my existence? No, I may reference myself and my ideas but I am not actively perceiving myself. Or just as one goes about everyday activities are they conscious of themself? They are clearly conscious of the exterior world yet not conscious of themself. One is conscious without the consciousness of consciousness. This leads to the ego being generated merely out of conscious of it. Its being is simply constituted by itself. When one is not conscious of it it simply does not exist, the one disappears and becomes one. On other matters of the self, the self is not unified, instead it has a mere pseudo-unity. It merely holds the appearance of unity. The ego is a bundle of abstractions made by the interior desires and inherited human nature and the molding of the exterior world. Thus the ego itself is just a line created just to be able to function that separates the interior and exterior. When one references themself they are referencing the interior and exterior influences that constitute the ego. They are not unified but held together to function. They are only held together, only unified by consciousness of the self. This disorder of even the consciousness of this unique shows the pure disorder of the self. All of this constitutes pure disorder, pure disunity.

[[File:Lacan.png]]Lacanian Lack Towards Disunity And The Absurd[[File:Absurd.png]]
From this disunity we have a reaction of lack. Lack in the Lacanian sense is one of longing. These forms the basis of desire, of will in the Schopenhauerian sense. This will is directed in the form of a desire for unity. Unity leads to the feeling of purpose, of structure, all very beneficial to us. Yet we live in a world that offers no unity, no purpose. This creates a conflict between the individual and the world, between one and all; this conflict is known as the Absurd. This absurdity is not inherent to humanity, or towards the world, instead it forms out of the conflict between the desire for unity and a world that offers none. This absurdity is the fundamental conflict, it forms the basis of questions such as - is life worth living, is it worthwhile to do anything at all? While these are certainly interesting questions, ones that will be answered in later sections, they are not of relevance right now.

[[File:Postsitu.png]]Spectacle And Stirnerite Abstractions[[File:Ego.png]]
With this absurdity comes many responses from individuals. The first is one of suicide. Suicide makes the absurd stronger, submitting to it; it is one of mere escapism. I have great sympathy for those who commit suicide, however it is one that is not philosophically sound. The second is philosophical suicide in the Camusian sense, bad faith in the Sartrian sense, or, as I will call it, spectacle. Spectacle is a mere act of distraction from the absurd. This includes many external factors, such as the spectacle identified by Debord and the rest of the Situationist International, other forms of spectacle that have existed throughout history in similar vein to the capitalist spectacle present through consumerism, such as gladiatorial battles in ancient rome, state and cultural forms of meaning systems, such as religion, nationalism, humanism, etc. These spectacles come just as much from the outside as from oneself. Existentialist personal meaning is a form of spectacle brought on by oneself. In fact, all forms of spectacle are placed upon oneself by oneself. One cannot stand to look straight into the void an and so they construct diffrent pseudo-unities in order to be able to be partially satiated. Spectacle is also inherently focused on appearance instead of being. While Debord might have said that Capitalism was the cause of the shift from being to appearing, it is inherent to all forms of spectacle (It is true that modern consumerism and media have certainly elevated this.) Take the Sartrian concept of life being like a melody, people constructing their own stories to structure their life. If one is constructing a story for their lives they will focus on the appearance of the story. The spectacle of meaning is just as much transformative towards appearances as the modern mass media spectacle. While most forms of spectacle, such as the aforementioned spectacle analyzed by the Situationist International are alienating, some such as the Existentialist conception of personal meaning are generally a net positive. These conceptions are in no way inherently bad, merely obtrusive, creating a pseudo-satisfaction towards Lacanian lack. Yet if one wants to assert oneself as purely oneself in the vein of Ownness, as will be discussed in further sections, spectacle is inherently problematic. Furthermore, it is inherently problematic towards effective philosophical discourse as it creates essentialist illusions and obstructions that only create black splotches on the pages of philosophy.

[[File:Postsitu.png]]Dialectic Of Spectacle[[File:PostMarxism.png]]
While, as stated in the previous section, spectacle constitutes all states as one cannot live with the pure disunity. One creates spectacle as a state to live in that provides pseudo-satisfaction. There is still great importance to the original works of the Situationist International, however. While economics may be a mere abstract grouping, any desire requires first survival. In the general sense, to survive requires economic activity. This is why, in the Marxist perspective, economics is the dominant theory of the world. The main means of exterior spectacle, is purely economic. This spectacle is the one analyzed by the Situationist International. There have been many basis of spectacular systems throughout history, the religiously motivated feudal justifications have been the means of spectacle for the majority of the middle ages, and before that tribal customs dominated in the forms of spectacle. As stated before, these dominant spectacular frameworks are driven by economic means. One might suggest, out of the theory of dialectical materialism, that spectacle is the prerequisite to economic and power structures. This would be incorrect, instead a dialectic of spectacle is engaged in. The justification of power is the spectacle, the ones in power are just as engaged in the spectacle. A feudal king thinks he's been chosen to rule by god; he, just as much as his subjects, is embroiled in spectacle. How does this dialectic of spectacle function, like economic systems it is driven by the survival drive. The spectacle is the basis of these economic conditions. It is in a codependent state of being. Take the modern condition of spectacle, survival is no longer at the front of mind for most people in the western world, so corporations establish spectacular rhetoric to institute a reaction of survival necessity. Spectacle decides the flow of the survival drive. Thus spectacle is the dominant force of the dialectic. The fundamental distraction and reaction to disunity constitutes the dialectic.

[[File:Ego.png]]Stirnerite Analysis Of Idea And Labels
For all things there is a unique and ideas associated with the unique. These are dependent on each other, one cannot describe the unique without labels, and labels cannot exist without some unique to be labeled. The goal of philosophy in the Platonian sense is pure idea. Philosophy deals with the pure idea in all forms. Even if those such as the Situationists and the Phenomenologists focus on everyday life, the sublime, they do it in context of the pure idealized groupings of these everyday activities. Or as I am analyzing the unique and the labels we place to it I view a generalized version of it, I deal with the idea of it. This is not to say the idealized state of systems are inherently better or more unified, only that it deals with a generalized form of it. If philosophy is the study of pure idea how does one deal with these pure ideas, how does one analyze pure idea? As established before the unique and ideas are fundamentally linked, dependant on each other. How then is pure ideas pictured. Take mathematics, it is a structure of pure categorization. Mathematics takes placeholders of numbers and relies on objects known as numbers, operators, and other symbols. This creates placeholders, creative nothings, to find representations of pure ideas. This world of ideas can only be peered into through representations. It is important to note that this "world of forms" is not a literal world, or more "real" then the world we perceive, merely that idealized systems are the subjects of philosophy. To understand anything one must first view it in terms of ideas.

[[File:DialectEgo.png]]Egoism
My egoism is strongly influenced by Stirner. Before we explore my egoism we must first we must differentiate them from psychological and moral egoists. Moral egoism assumes that one should act egoistically, yet this damages the individual by assuming something one should do. Psychological egoism assumes that humans inherently act egoistically wich assumes an essence. As established previously I label no essense on anything, seeing everything as unique. Thus my egoism is a distinct form of egoism. The fundamental facet of my conception of egoism is ownness. Ownness is the assertion of oneself. It is to place yourself under no authority, to become fully ones own, fully unique. It is important to note that this ownness is not synonymous with freedom. Freedom is permission from outside authority, in the case of negative freedom, and protection from outside forces, in the case of positive freedom. Ownness is permission from oneself, protection by oneself and their property. It can be viewed as freedom fully from the self, especially when viewing it from an Existentialist lense. Many things cannot be done alone, or would be more enjoyable if done together. If this case arises then a Union Of Egoists would form. This union is literally any union in which is completely voluntary, doesn't sacrifice individuality, and holds individual interests above collective interests. This would be how one organizes in an Egoist world. It is important to note that this can exist at all times, even with the existence of authority and outside pressure. Kids playing is a Union Of Egoists for example. What of collectivity in Unions Of Egoists? Humans are social animals, whether we like it or not. Thus a collective is always necessary. The collective if we look hard enough is only individuals; the individual if we look hard enough is only the collective. While unlike the individual comprising society the collective is what defines the individual. How could one define oneself without comparing oneself to others? The individual cannot exist without the collective and the collective cannot exist without the individual. Narrow egoist is when one focuses only on the individual and narrow socialism is when one focuses only on the collective. One does not have to make compromises between the individualism and collectivism rather a synthesis can be made. Just as Stirner labels property as an extension of the ego, relationships between egos are just as much extensions. The Union of Egoists aligns itself through all's self interest. The otherness between the ego's in a union is narrow. To treat all in the union as property makes them just as much one's ego. It extends the ego and creates an egoistic collective. A superego can be formed that extends the ego of all. Thus a selfish community can be found. The group which they find this concept, For Ourselves! labels Stirner as a narrow egoism but this is more nuanced. Stirner may focus his ideology on merely one side of this coin but the method he proposes, the Union Of Egoists, is the perfect basis for this society. An expansion of ego, of the unique will only result in the full fulfillment of the individual. Social creatures we are, and thus societies will form. Narrow egoism is more represented by Randian Thought. The narrow socialist are like Marx focusing only on the collective. Both approaches are alienating and misguided. A synthesis of the collective and the individual must happen. A firm critique of collectivity from Individualists and Egoists is that collectivity puts some cause of the community above the individual, thus creating a sacred cause and authority. This in many cases can be true and it is a legitimate concern in many collective environments. A sustained collective environment can easily devolve into something no sustaining the owness of people. This means that this collective must be greedy, must be a Union Of Egoist. Collectives if spontaneous and with common interests can separate the inherent alienation of humanity and allow for social individuality. If one always holds themself to be greedy collectivity can function with ownness.

[[File:Phenomenology.png]]Phenomenology
=Relations= I will be redoing this section, if I forget to re-add you please comment.
 * -| Ideologies/Philosophies=

[[File:Mega_Yes.png]]Based

 * [[File:Absurd.png]]Absurdism - Your theories of the conflict in the need for meaning and the lack of meaning present is extremely based. You're a core tenet of my philosophy.
 * [[File:Existentialist_Anarchism.png]] - While I don't agree with the existentialist theory of meaning, its theory of choice is amazing; this combined with anarchism makes a very based ideology.
 * [[File:Situ.png]] - Based analysis of the spectacle, and many of your subsequent theorists are very based. Can be too marxist though.
 * [[File:Ego.png]] - BASED!!! Ownness is the main principle of my individual philosophy.
 * [[File:Egocom.png]] - While I don't agree with communism your theories of egoistic sociability only improves Stirner's conception of egoism.
 * [[File:Poststruct.png]] - Structure is a cancer! You greatly influenced me.
 * [[File:Postmodernicon.png]] - I agree on the lack of metanarratives. History is pure chaos.
 * [[File:Post-an.png]] - The structural cancer found within classical anarchism has been extremely detrimental. Your ideas of freedom seem to be a restating of stirnerite ownness and sartrian radical freedom, based!
 * [[File:PostMarxism.png]]Post-Marxism - Marx has some good ideas but we must remove its dogma.
 * [[File:Žižekism.png]]Žižekianism - Your theory of ideology works quite well with my theory of fundamental disunity.
 * [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]Meta-Anarchism - Schizo-Politics are based! Having any one framework just limits possibilities.

[[File:Yes.png]]Good

 * [[File:Soul.png]] - Your conception of oneness contradicts ownness. Other then that, you're pretty based.
 * [[File:Acidcomf.png]] - Different goals but based way to achieve them. Capitalist realism is an amazing theory.

[[File:Mega_No.png]]Cringe

 * -| Self-Inserts=

[[File:Mega_Yes.png]]Based

 * [[File:Councilguy2.png]]Post-Councilism - Far to pessimistic, but other then that based.
 * [[File:Ultro.png]]Ultroneism - Got me to a consistent view of egoism, don agree on much else though.
 * [[File:AshleyHere.png]]AshleyHere Thought - Very similar to me, don't know why you left egoism though.
 * [[File:PostChronic.png]]Post-ChronicFemcelism - Based post-anarchist and post-marxist, and from your icon you seem to be a situationist, based!

[[File:Yes.png]]Good

 * [[File:NeoAlphadonialism.png]]Neo Alphadonialism - Kinda inconsistent but your good, also a nice person.
 * [[File:Liblovsprite.png]]Liberty-Loverism - I agree on a lot of stuff, but your quite dogmatic and likes private property.
 * [[File:TipuiSmall2.png]]Tipism - From your influences you look based. Your page is very bare though.
 * [[File:Anbun.png]]Anarcho-Buniism - I like your meta-ethics though I don't like syndicalism even in praxis and futurism is very dogmatic.

[[File:Kinda_Yes.png]]Fine

 * [[File:Anarcho-Immortalism.png]]Anti-Deathism - Alright anarcho-communism but bad views on death.
 * [[File:NguyenreichismIcon.png]]Bruhman Thought - Best orthodox marxist I've ever seen.

[[File:Kinda_No.png]]Meh

 * [[File:Duckism-icon.png]]Duckism - Based machiavellianism and anarchism, but capitalism is a cancer and you misunderstand a lot.

[[File:No.png]]Bad

 * [[File:Atacc_icon.png]]Ataccism - I like anti-humanism but everything else is a cancer.

[[File:Mega_No.png]]Cringe

 * -| Figures=

[[File:Mega_Yes.png]]Based

 * [[File:Ego.png]] - Unequivocally based. Your ideas of egoism and ownness have been a big influence.
 * [[File:Egocom.png]] - While not being a communist myself, social egoism is a great concept, along with the narrow socialism and egoism dynamics.
 * [[File:Egocom.png]] - Your ideas have great influence on me. Your individualist communism is really good.
 * [[File:Egomut.png]]Benjamin Tucker - While I haven't read much of you, your ideas on egoism and mutualism are cool, even if I reject economics.
 * [[File:Situ.png]] - Your situationism and analysis of the spectacle is far better then Debord's. Best member of the Situationist International by far.
 * [[File:Postsitu.png]] - Your anti-economics is based as well as your analysis of Marx and the Situationism International.
 * [[File:Postfem.png]]Judith Butler - Gender is indeed preformative. Finally a feminist without all the identity politics.
 * [[File:Post-an.png]] - Postanarchism is very based. The morality and essentialism found in anarchism has harmed it substantially. I need to read more of you.

[[File:Yes.png]]Good

 * [[File:Camus.png]] - Your absurdism is extremely based, way to humanistic though.
 * [[File:Sartre.png]] - Great philosophy of existentialism. Became way to marxist and was quite hypocritical. Need to read more from your marxist period and you in general.
 * [[File:ExistFem.png]] - Your ideas of othering is amazing, and while I don't agree with your existentialist ethics, it's still pretty based.
 * [[File:Anpostleft.png]] - Great critiques of classical anarchism, kind of a prick though.
 * [[File:Post-an.png]] - Based postanarchism, though I don't like your views on death.
 * [[File:Debord.png]] - The one who got me into situationism, but your analysis of the spectacle is the most lacking, plus your marxism led you astray.
 * [[File:Žižekism.png]]Slavoj Žižek - Your critique of ideology is AMAZING! Huge part of my analysis of general spectacle. The rest of your opinions seem to be just general ideological chaos, where one is so awakened to the reality of ideology and yet must live with it. Pure ideological noise.
 * [[File:Socan2.png]] - Based anti-economics and your analysis of bullshit jobs is amazing. Don't align on social anarchism though.
 * [[File:Gender_Accelerationism.png]] - You claim to be a stirnerite however with your essays I have read you seem quite essentialist. Still very good, your gender accelerationism is too marxist though.
 * [[File:Gender_Accelerationism.png]] - Same as Storm, I don't know much about you besides your gender accelerationism.

[[File:Kinda_Yes.png]]Fine

 * [[File:ChristExist.png]] - Based existentialist, but you fall into the pits of spectacle through your religion and conservatism.
 * [[File:Ancom.png]] - Anarcho-Communism is alright, your quite outdated though.
 * [[File:BakuninHeg.png]] - Based critique of Marx, but I don't like collectivism or your currency.

[[File:Kinda_No.png]]Meh

 * [[File:Marx.png]] - Has some very based opinions, but quite dogmatic and essentialist. Also kinda a prick. Glad you got more libertarian as you got older.
 * [[File:Marx.png]] - Same with Marx, but On Authority is a cancer.
 * [[File:Chomsky.png]]Noam Chomsky - Thanks for getting me into anarchism, but your really dogmatic and structuralist.
 * [[File:Mutualist.png]] - I like mutualism, but you're really racist and sexist, an Stirner destroyed you.
 * [[File:Georgist.png]] - Land is indeed the biggest factor in production and you're slightly libertarian, but everything else ranges from meh to awful.
 * [[File:Heidegger.png]] - Your critique of the enlightenment view of being is based. I don't agree with your conservatism and have some problems with your framework of dasein. Your philosophy is quite good, but we don't talk about THAT period.

[[File:No.png]]Bad

 * [[File:Rawls.png]] - Your theory of justice is insanely essentialist. Better than a regular liberal though.

[[File:Mega_No.png]]Cringe
=Theory=

Theory I Have written

 * [[File:Post-Genderism.png]]Gender Abolition: Praxis And Analysis

[[File:Nietzsche-icon.png]]Friedrich Nietzsche

 * [[File:Nietzsche-icon.png]]Beyond Good And Evil

Theory I Plan To Read

 * [[File:Žižekism.png]]The Sublime Object Of Ideology
 * [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]Capitalism And Schizophrenia
 * [[File:ExistMarx.png]]Search For A Method
 * [[File:ExistFem.png]]The Second Sex
 * [[File:Heidegger.png]]Being And Time
 * [[File:Nietzsche-icon.png]]Beyond Good And Evil
 * [[File:Nietzsche-icon.png]]The Gay Science
 * [[File:Existentialism.png]]Being And Nothingness
 * [[File:DepressionMale.png]]The World As Will And Representation
 * [[File:AcidCom.png]]Capitalist Realism
 * [[File:Postmodernicon.png]]Discipline And Punish
 * [[File:Mutualist.png]]What Is Property?
 * [[File:Georgist.png]]Progress And Poverty
 * [[File:Marx.png]]Das Kapital
 * [[File:Chomsky.png]]Profit Over People
 * [[File:Postmodernicon.png]]Simulacra and Simulation
 * [[File:Drug-Addict.png]]The Doors Of Perception
 * [[File:Aristotle.png]]Nicomachean Ethics
 * [[File:Utilit.png]]Utilitarianism
 * [[File:Civilib.png]]On Liberty
 * [[File:libms.png]]The British Cooperative Movement In A Socialist Society
 * Many More

[[File:Camus.png]]Albert Camus[[File:Absurd.png]]

 * [[File:Absurd.png]]The Stranger
 * [[File:Absurd.png]]The Myth of Sisyphus: And Other Essays
 * [[File:Existentialist_Anarchism.png]]The Rebel
 * [[File:Humanismpix.png]]Resistance, Rebellion, And Death

[[File:Lib.png]]Thomas Nagel[[File:Absurd.png]]

 * [[File:Absurd.png]]The Absurd

[[File:Sartre.png]]John Paul Sartre

 * [[File:Existentialism.png]]Existentialism Is A Humanism
 * [[File:ExistPhenom.png]]The Transcendence Of The Ego: An Existentialist Theory Of Consciousness

[[File:ExistFem.png]]Simone De Beauvoir

 * [[File:Existentialism.png]]The Ethics Of Ambiguity

[[File:Nietzsche-icon.png]]Friedrich Nietzsche

 * [[File:Nietzsche-icon.png]]Thus Spoke Zarathustra

[[File:Socan2.png]]David Graeber[[File:Globnat.png]]

 * [[File:AntiEconomy.png]]Against Economics

[[File:Debord.png]]Guy Debord[[File:Councom.png]]

 * [[File:Situ.png]]Society Of The Spectacle

[[File:Situ.png]]Raoul Vaneigem[[File:Ego.png]]

 * [[File:Situ.png]]The Revolution Of Everyday Life

[[File:Postsitu.png]]Jean-Pierre Voyer[[File:AntiEconomy.png]]

 * [[File:AntiEconomy.png]]The Economy is Only an Ideology in Marx’s Sense

[[File:Indlibsoc.png]]Oscar Wilde[[File:Anqueer.png]]

 * [[File:Indlibsoc.png]]The Soul Of Man Under Socialism

[[File:Ego.png]]Max Stirner

 * [[File:Ego.png]]The Ego And Its Own

[[File:Ego-Existential.png]]Herbert Read

 * [[File:Ego-Existential.png]]Existentialism, Marxism and Anarchism

[[File:Post-an.png]]Saul Newman

 * [[File:Post-an.png]]The Politics of Postanarchism

[[File:Egocom.png]]Emma Goldman[[File:Anfem.png]]

 * [[File:Egocom.png]]Anarchism And Other Essays

[[File:Egocom.png]]Matty Thomas

 * [[File:Egocom.png]]The Relevance Of Max Stirner To Anarcho-Communists

[[File:Egocom.png]]For Ourselves![[File:Postsitu.png]]

 * [[File:Egocom.png]]The Right To Be Greedy

[[File:Egomut.png]]Benjamin R. Tucker[[File:Anin.png]]

 * [[File:Ricardosoc.png]]Henry George And Interest

[[File:Anpostleft.png]]Bob Black[[File:Antwork.png]]

 * [[File:Antwork.png]]The Abolition Of Work
 * [[File:Postsitu.png]]Imputationism
 * [[File:Postfem.png]]My Preferred Gender Pronoun Is Negation

[[File:Postciv.png]]Strangers In a Tangled Wilderness

 * [[File:Postciv.png]]Post-Civ! A Brief Philosophical and Political Introduction to the Concept of Post-civilization
 * [[File:Postciv.png]]Post-Civ! A Deeper Exploration

[[File:Cball-British_India.png]]George Orwell

 * [[File:Cball-British_India.png]]1984
 * [[File:Cball-British_India.png]]Animal Farm

[[File:Socan2.png]]Aldous Huxley[[File:Post-an.png]]

 * [[File:Ford.png]]Brave New World
 * [[File:Socan2.png]]Island

[[File:Republicanismpix.png]]Jean-Jacques Rousseau[[File:Radlib.png]]

 * [[File:Republicanismpix.png]]The Social Contract

[[File:GeoSynd.png]]William Schmack

 * [[File:GeoSynd.png]]Geo-syndicalism

[[File:Bckchn.png]]Murray Bookchin

 * [[File:Bckchn.png]]Post-Scarcity Anarchism
 * [[File:Postsitu.png]]From Spectacle To Empowerment

[[File:Demcon.png]]Abdullah Öcalan

 * [[File:Demcon.png]]Democratic Confederalism

[[File:Ectrans.png]]J.D. Moyer

 * [[File:Ectrans.png]]A Solarpunk Manifesto

[[File:Chom.png]]Noam Chomsky[[File:AnSynd.png]]

 * [[File:AnSynd.png]]On Anarchism

[[File:Einstein.png]]Albert Einstein[[File:Soc-h.png]]

 * [[File:Soc-h.png]]Why Socialism?

[[File:Karl_Marx.png]]Karl Marx And Friedrich Engels[[File:Marx.png]]

 * [[File:Marx.png]]The Communist Manifesto

[[File:Gender_Accelerationism.png]]Vikky Storm and Eme Flores[[File:Xenofeminism.png]]

 * [[File:Gender_Accelerationism.png]]Gender Accelerationist Manifesto
 * [[File:Awaj.png]]It’s Time For “Mad Anarchism”

[[File:Anqueer.png]]Alyson Escalante[[File:Postfem.png]]

 * [[File:GenderNihil.png]]Gender Nihilism: An Anti-Manifesto

[[File:Steinval.png]]Peter Vallentyne

 * [[File:Steinval.png]]Left-Libertarianism: A Primer
 * [[File:Steinval.png]]Left-Libertarianism as a Promising Form of Liberal Egalitarianism

=Recommendations=

[[File:Monkeyzz-Enlightenment.png]]Philosophy

 * [[File:Camus.png]]Albert Camus - The Myth Of Sisyphus
 * [[File:Sartre.png]]John Paul Sartre - Existentialism Is A Humanism
 * [[File:ExistFem.png]]Simone De Beauvoir - The Ethics Of Ambiguity

[[File:Awaj.png]]Anarchism

 * [[File:AnSynd.png]]Noam Chomsky - On Anarchism
 * [[File:Egocom.png]]Emma Goldman - Anarchism And Other Essays

[[File:Ego.png]]Egoism

 * [[File:Ego.png]]Max Stirner - The Ego And Its Own
 * [[File:Egocom.png]]For Ourselves! - The Right To Be Greedy

[[File:Soc-h.png]]Socialism

 * [[File:Indlibsoc.png]]Oscar Wilde - The Soul Of Man Under Socialism
 * [[File:Einstein.png]]Albert Einstein - Why Socialism?

[[File:Anqueer.png]]Gender/Queer[[File:Anfem.png]]

 * [[File:Gender_Accelerationism.png]]Vikky Storm and Eme Flores - Gender Accelerationist Manifesto
 * [[File:GenderNihil.png]]Alyson Escalante - Gender Nihilism: An Anti-Manifesto

[[File:Situ.png]]Situationism And Subsequent Writings[[File:Postsitu.png]]

 * [[File:Debord.png]]Guy Debord - Society Of The Spectacle
 * [[File:Situ.png]]Raoul Vaneigem - The Revolution Of Everyday Life
 * [[File:Postsitu.png]]Jean-Pierre Voyer - The Economy Is Only An Ideology In Marx's Sense

Youtube Channels

 * [[File:Neomarx.png]]Tom Nicholas
 * [[File:Absurd.png]]Sisyphus 55
 * [[File:Mutualist.png]]Then & Now
 * [[File:GeoSoc.png]]Unlearning Economics
 * [[File:BrtiMonkey.png]]BritMonkey
 * [[File:Awaj.png]]Great Anarchists
 * [[File:Libsoc.png]]YourBoiMason
 * [[File:Existentialism.png]]Eternalised
 * [[File:Ego.png]]Kane B
 * [[File:Ancom.png]]Radical Reviewer
 * [[File:PostMarxism.png]]Jonas Čeika - CCK Philosophy
 * [[File:Anqueer.png]]Zoe Baker
 * [[File:Egocom.png]]Radical EgoCom

[[File:Ego.png]]Max Stirner

 * [[File:Ego-nihil.png]]"All things are nothing to me."
 * [[File:Ego.png]]"I love men too - not merely individuals, but every one. But I love them with the consciousness of egoism; I love them because love makes me happy, I love them because loving is natural to me, because it pleases me. I know no commandment of love."
 * [[File:Illeg.png]]"The state calls its own violence law, but that of the individual, crime."
 * [[File:Egocom.png]]"I am not at all against socialism, but against consecrated socialism... not against socialists, but against sacred socialism."

[[File:Camus.png]]Albert Camus

 * [[File:Existentialist_Anarchism.png]]"The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion."
 * [[File:Absurd.png]]"You will never be happy if you continue to search for what happiness consists of. You will never live if you are looking for the meaning of life."

[[File:Debord.png]]Guy Debord

 * [[File:Situ.png]]"In our society now, we prefer to see ourselves living than living."

[[File:Anpostleft.png]]Bob Black

 * [[File:Antwork.png]]"Work is the source of nearly all the misery in the world."
 * [[File:Antwork.png]]"Play is always voluntary. What might otherwise be play is work if it's forced"

Comments
HelloThere314 - Comment if you want to discuss or if you want to be added. I will be deleting old comments.

Liberty-Loverism Earler you called me dogmatic, could you tell me which beliefs I'm dogmatic about so I can work on being less dogmatic?
 * [[File:HelloThere314Icon.png]]HelloThere314 - It is not really any singular belief, most of witch can be easily justified in numerous circumstances, but the philosophy behind them. It seems that you put liberty on a high platform, wich I would most definitely agree with; however, placing it at the center of political relations is dogmatic. I am, just as you are, an anarchist; however, my anarchism comes not out of concrete policies with sacred causes behind them but out of the general seeking of the lack of leadership, wich I find to be generally in accordance with stirnerite ownness. Also, your analysis of Stirner is pretty good but lacks the logical conclusion, of course no one should be forced to reject abstractions, however the rational among them shall reject them. These abstractions, such as community, wich I, like you, find beneficial, must not be placed sacred, above oneself. This is the general dogma found behind your ideas. Again, I love the majority of your ideas, they just have an incomplete philosophical basis.

- Imagine placing Stiner's Philosophy - the most radical nominalist philosophy in history in relation to Platonism. Must be trolling on god...
 * [[File:HelloThere314Icon.png]]HelloThere314 - My platonism is not with some essentialist hegemony of "the world of forms". It is merely a study of labels and ideas related to uniques that are labeled. I don't think these ideas are more "real" merely that the study of philosophy are these idealized states.
 * - Platonism is inherently involved in 'the idea' the 'form' is it abstract, it is absolute. It is a world of thoughts. Awful system of philosophy. Opposed in everyway to Stirner, Post-Structuralism/Modernism, Existentialism, Marxism, and nearly everything that isn't Neo-Platonism or Mathematics.
 * [[File:HelloThere314Icon.png]]HelloThere314 - Then perhaps I have named my theory of ideas wrong. I merely take from plato that the focus of philosophy is idea. As stated before I am substantially against most of Plato's ideas.

- Could you add me?