Pantheonism

Pantheonism is a Leftist, culturally variable, statist Ideology. It is the self-Insert ideology of the Wiki user Pantheon.

Pantheonism seeks to unite humanity within a federal gouvernment with a Social Distributist and Guild Socialist Economy, under one crown (well technically many) and banner in order to explore and conquer the stars and to end violent conflicts on earth.

History
Through the vast and dark depths of the Cosmos, there is no life known except one one planet, known as earth where a civilisation known as humanity emerged.

=Beliefs=

Ideological summary
Welfarism

Socialism Distributism Corporatism Internationalism
 * Monarcho-Socialism
 * [[File:Guildsoc.png]]Guild Socialism
 * [[File:Marketsoc.png]]Market Socialism
 * [[File:Union.png]]Syndicalism
 * Social Distributism
 * [[File:MonDist2.png]]Monarcho-Distributism
 * Social Corporatism
 * [[File:Tripartism.png]]Tripartism
 * Socialist Corporatism
 * [[File:Guildsoc.png]]Guild Socialism
 * [[File:Necon.png]]Interventionism (Sometimes)
 * [[File:World.png]]Globalism
 * [[File:Globnat.png]]Alter-Globalisation
 * [[File:Cosmocracy.png]]Cosmocracy
 * [[File:Cosmocracy.png]]Alter-Cosmocracy
 * Perphistocracy
 * Alter-Perphistocracy
 * World Federalism
 * Galactic Federalism
 * Omni Federalism

Monarchism Transhumanism Nationalism (kinda) Progressivism Conservatism
 * Constitutional Monarchism
 * Social Monarchism
 * [[File:Unimon.png]]Universal Monarchism
 * Archeofuturism
 * [[File:Modnat.png]]Patriotism
 * [[File:Pan-Nationalism.png]]Pan-Nationalism
 * [[File:Humanismpix.png]]Pan-Humanism
 * [[File:Euronaticon.png]]Pan-Europeanism
 * [[File:European_Federalism.png]]European Federalism
 * [[File:PanGerman.png]]Pan-Germanism (somewhat)
 * Pan-Nordism
 * [[File:PanAsian.png]]Pan-Asianism
 * Pan-Africanism
 * Indigenism
 * [[File:Pan-Amerindianism.png]]Pan-Indianism
 * Progressive Conservatism
 * Civil Libertarianism
 * Progressive Conservatism

Socialism and Marxism
I am for Socialism because I am against Capitalism. Why am I against Capitalism? Well I think a system built on infinite growth and profit cannot work in a limited world and profit shouldn´t be the driving factor of economics in my opinion. Why do I reject Marxism? While I do recognize Marx as a great philosopher and economist I don´t identify myself as a Marxist because of several reasons: 1. Not even Marx himself called him a Marxist, he either called himself a Scientific Socialist or a Communist. 2. I don´t think a large scale stable moneyless and stateless society in the modern world is realistic or even desirable since a State can benefit the people through Welfare and Public works, as history has shown attempts at Anarchism/Communism usually got crushed in a few years, however there were some exeptions of such societies that had one thing in common, they were all protected by states in some way examples: Zapatista ("protected" by Mexico) Rojava (America/Syria) Freetown Christiania (Denmark) and many others. 3. Marx opposed religion and thought that families will become obsolete. He also said that the workers have no fatherland, since I consider myself a patriot (but not a nationalist) I don´t agree with that and also many workers associate themselves with their home country. 4. Inviteablity of monopolsation. While it´s true that it´s a natural tendency of Capitalism Marx seemed to see it as invitable and under Socialism the monopoly wouldn´t be abolished but simply controlled by the workers and any resistance against this monopolisation would be reactionary and he classified Petit Bourgeois Socialism as a part of reactionary Socialism in the Communist Manifesto (you could consider me as a Petit Bourgeois Socialist). That´s at least what I understood from the Communist Manifesto. 5. Violent Revolution. Marx seemed to see a violent revolution as invitable and maybe even desirable, but I think violence should always be the last resort. Many may argue that the ruling class will never volunarily give up their power but it actually often happened in history that bloodless revolutions against a elite or a autocrat succeded if it was popular enough. I somewhat agree with the quote of J. F. K. "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution invitable" though.

My Economics
Okay, my Economics are basically a weird mix of Social Distributism, Corporatism, Guild Socialism, Market Socialism, Georgism with a bit of Gift Economy.

I think natural resources (like Air, Land, Oil, Water, Natural gas, Minerals), Infrastructure and key industries should be owned by state-owned worker controlled guilds Large Companies should be broken up into smaller and local ones, also every company over 50 employees (including state owned ones) should have a works council which will be elected by the Workers and represent them. Regulations should be only done if they're neccesary to protect consumers, the environment, the workers ect. These Regulations as well as some Economic planning shall be made in a process I call Coordination, it consists of agreements between multiple companies or co-ops organized into economic sectors called Corporations (by the Corporatist definitions) or Guilds with the Gouvernment and Worker/Trade Unions. Also co-ops should be encouraged. For the Gift Economy part, local Communities should practise mutual aid.

Cellular Democracy
My ideal government structure is a Cellular Democracy in which society would be organised bottom-up by a decentralized council/assembly structure. It'll work like this: The Communal assembly is responsible for adminstrating the Commune and they elect a delegate to the District council or the Village consort depending if you live in a urban or a rual area, the district council will administer the district and elect a delegate for the Senate of the Muncipality, which is responsible for administrating the City, the Senate will elect a delegate for the provincial/regional/local gouvernment, the local gouvernment will elect a delegate for the National gouvernment, which will elect a delegate for the Supreme Senatorial Council. The Councils will have the power to veto the decisions of their respective Parliament.

Parliamentarianism
Now this might bring the problem that at a certain level the averange person wouldn't have any say in decisions and would be gouverned by representatives of representatives of representatives etc. which is why the should be a muncipal, regional, national and global parliament which would be elected by the people in a representative manner, with the Parliaments having the power to veto the decisions of the councils at their respective level.

Guild Chambers
I propose adding a third layer of legislature which consists of Chambers, made up of professional associations called Guilds which are meant to make sure that the decisions of councils and parliament are based on expertise, merit and consensus of those affected, therefore they have the power to veto the decisions of both. But generally the chambers are meant to deal with Economic affairs. These Chambers would include: And many more...
 * Chamber of Agricultural Workmen
 * Chamber of Small Landowners
 * Chamber of Agriculture
 * Chamber of Agronomes
 * Chamber of Commerce
 * Chamber of Industry
 * Chamber of Co-operation
 * Chamber of Dairy-masters
 * Chamber of Engineering
 * Chamber of Fishery
 * Chamber of Handicraft
 * Chamber of Household
 * Chamber of Pharmacists
 * Chamber of Physicians
 * Chamber of Workers
 * Chamber of Teachers
 * Chamber of Veterinary Surgeons

Imperative Mandate
Furthermore all representatives and delegates should be subject to an imperative mandate mandate which means they can be recalled by those that elected them.

Monarchy
My most controversial opinion on this matter is my support for Constitutional Monarchy because I believe that a ruler who was raised from birth to rule and rules for lifetime or until abdication could be beneficial in certain limits, set by the constitution and ideally serve as an unifing figure for the people, however, I wouldn't necessarily mandate a Monarchy for all member states of the Global Federation.

Universal Monarchy
For a Global Monarchy I propose an elective Monarchy in which the candidate, who is nominated by the Nobility for the office of the Supreme Emperor needs to be approved first by the majority of the Supreme Senatorial Council (the highest organ of the Cellular Council Democracy), and by a majority of the Global Parliament (aka. Planetary assembly), if they fail to agree on a candidate within a month they won't get payed anymore.

The Powers of the Monarch
The monarch’s core constitutional powers and duties should include: Appointment of the prime minister and ministers  Calling and dissolution of parliament; calling new elections  Promulgation of laws (including the right to veto)  Be commander in chief of the armed forces  Lead coalition negotiations as a neutral arbiter  Hold weekly meetings with the government and/or prime minister  Formally appoint officers, high ranking civil servants and judges  Act as a general moderator of the state institutions and government  Be the nation’s chief diplomat and symbol abroad  Be a unifying and neutral symbol at home, a representation of the nation.

Housing
JUST BUILD MORE HOUSES DAMNIT!

Personality
Usually a calm and friendly guy, although sometimes he can provoke others or get triggered because of things he doesn't likes. He's a devout Pagan but doesn't tries to enforce his religion on others but gets very mad when others want to force their religion on him.

=Relations=

Positive/Friends
Social Distributism Social Corporatism Guild Socialism Market Socialism Constitutional Monarchism Monarcho-Socialism Alter-globalisation Progressive Utilisation theory

Negative/Enemies
=Navboxes=