Neo-Touseyism

{{#css:.portable-infobox{border:10px solid #1B3D39;border-radius:10px!important}.portable-infobox.pi-background {background-color:#000c12}.wikitable{border-collapse:separate;border-radius:#003040!important;background:#000000!important}body #mw-content-container {padding-top:3%}#cosmos-banner{background-color:#044743}.cosmos-header{background-color:#000000}.cosmos-header:before{background:0}body #mw-content-text {color:#077A74}.cosmos-button-primary{background-color:#ffffff;color: #616161}.ts-inner{padding:0}#mw-content a:not(.new){color:#044743;text-decoration:none} {width:-webkit-calc(100%-320px);width:100%}.portable-infobox a:link,.portable-infobox a:visited,.portable-infobox a:hover{color:#0080c0!important}.portable-infobox {color:#ffffff}.portable-infobox{width:350px}#cosmos-footer{margin-bottom:-40px;background-color:#0F0F0F}img{border:0;vertical-align:middle;}}
 * 1) mw-content-wrapper{width:1690px;max-width:100%;padding:0}#mw-content,#catlinks{background:#0F0F0F}:.CosmosRail{width:1200px}#cosmos-pageBody-content

Stuff

= Overview =



= Beliefs =

[[File:AntiDem.png]] The Flaws of Democracy
There is a lot than can be said on the flaws of democracy, when i dpeak of democrac i follow the defoniton Cammatte prvides us, " one can define democracy as the behaviour of humans, the organization of those who have lost their original organic unity with the community.", here I will lay out a critique of democracy, and I hope it will be found quite thorough.

In his essay, The Democrtic Mystification, Jacques Camatte points out that, " Democracy was born from the moment that there was a division between men and the allocation of possession. That is to say, it arose with private property, individuals and the class division of society, with the formation of the state. It follows that it becomes increasingly pure as private property becomes more general and as classes appear more distinctly in society." How can we hope to move past the forces of capitalism if we seek to preserve the same system that rose with it.

Now lets take a look at the American revolution, the liberal bastion of a democratic revoloutiom. But i ask, how democratic was this? 56 people signed the declaration of independence but the entirety of America had to go to war with England, even after its success, still very few where alowed to vote in the biggening, the peasant gained no freedom. Even today, he still doesnt, his vote is influenced and controlled by those above, the decision isn't his, he is merely the pawn of those abouve him. Democracy has never been "democratic" the existence of creating a "democratic democracy" is imposable, as what is necessary to create such a large structure, will ultimately lead to another ruling class system, but this time under the justificatin of laws and rights, just as fuedilisms justification was religion.

Under democracy I am nothing less than a number, Bush beat Gore for florida by 537 votes, do we actually know these people exact perspective, why they voted the way they did, or what their motivation is, no they are merely a "Bush supporter", in democracy you become, a democrat, a republican, a torie, a labour party supporter, regardless of your own complex interests you must limit yourself to one vote, one number on a graph.

Democracy doesnt just preserve a ruling class, but imbed a ruling class into the very fabric of society, we are tricked into believing, we have power, we are tricked into believing we have choice, that its our decision. Democracy is merely a nother way for the ruling class to rule, while playing into the illusion that it is our decision they are in power.

[[File:Post-Autonomism.png]] Communization and Autonomism
Here I would like to lay out what could be best described as my "political ideas", I identify. Autonomism is a movement originating in Italy around the 1960's, that draws heavy insperation from the works of thinkers like, Antonio Negri, Mario Tronti, and Sergio Bologna. Communization can be seen as the modern follow-up to this Autonomist thought, which proposes a new way theory of communism for a world in a state of collapse.

Central to communization theory is the recognition that we are in a crisis, not only is inflation high, we are heading for a recession, and the threat of nuclear warfare exists every day, but yet no politicians seem to care about solving these but rather stigmatize these issues, even worse is the fact that even if we solve these we are heading for a climate collapse anyway. Now with their massive difference in wealth, the burgiouse stands a far greater chance of surviving this collapse than the proletariat, in this way the proletariat needs a tactic.

Bruno Astarian says when speaking of communization, "It is the solution of the difficulties that the proletariat encounters in order to reproduce itself during the course of its activity within the context of the crisis. It is a struggle against capital to assure its own survival, nothing more." This can be seen as the main goal of the Communization process now Bruno Astarian later goes on to elaborate on this, "During the stage of descent into the hell of the crisis, the reproduction of the proletariat will be assured primarily by means of the indiscriminate seizure of goods. Even in a “just-in-time” economy, there are stocks of goods in stores and warehouses", the justification behind this seems obvious, cant afford to to buy goods anymore, then take them, what justification do they have to sit upon what could feed a starving family, only giving in on the premise that It would make them richer. This exemplifies the revolutionary tactics but what are we to make of the society that exists during and after the revoloution?

"In the communist revolution, the act of production will never be solely a productive act. If some individuals decide to construct a bakery, they will not construct it in order to produce a certain number of loaves of bread, but to socialize, and to cultivate their shared affinities by producing bread.", See communization theory is strongly against value, I view value as an evil, why should the act of producing bread be based off the creation of value, why can't the production of bread be based off the mere fact that producing bread makes the person happy. Bronu Astarian goes on to say, "At least during an initial period, communization will be achieved locally, not because it will have been the work of “autarchic communauts”, but because it will consist in initiatives that are totally under the control of the participants. Communization will be a constellation of local initiatives. It is, so it seems to me, at this local level where communization can show that it immediately improves the lives of the proletarians. And this aspect is fundamental: the proletarians will carry out the revolution to live better, not from loyalty to an ideal."

To now quote a different thinker of communization, Endnotes in his essay, what are we to do, says this, ". What is most at stake, rather, is the question of what the revolution is; ‘communization’ is the name of an answer to this question. The content of such an answer necessarily depends on what is to be overcome: that is, the self-reproduction of the capitalist class relation, and the complex of social forms which are implicated in this reproduction – value-form, capital, gender distinction, state form, legal form, etc. In particular, such an overcoming must necessarily be the direct self-abolition of the working class, since anything short of this leaves capital with its obliging partner, ready to continue the dance of accumulation. Communization signifies the process of this direct self-abolition, and it is in the directness of this self-abolition that communization can be said to signify a certain ‘immediacy’."

WIP

Aesthetics
=Relations= Each user will be ranked base don three metrics, Similarity to me in their ideas, how interesting their ideas are/intelligence, and themselves as a user, they will be scored as (?/10,?/10,?/5) 

[[File:Philosophy.png]] Fascinating (25-23)
(////) {9/10/4}

We have similar ideas with regards to autonomism and communization, we are both inspired by similar people like, Voyer, Deluze, Kämpa Tillsammans!, etc. While some of our philosophical views are different you have undeniably based ideas when it comes to politics, philosophies, and sociolegy.

Without a doubt you are very well read,and your ideas are intellegent and well thought out.

Haven't had any interactions really, but you seem like a cool person.

[[File:Self.png]] Unique (22-20)
 (////) {6/10/4.5}

While your analysis of capital is great, and your recognition of the dire situation we are in is admirable I am highly opposed to your support for vanguardism. The main issue with vanguardism is the issue of corrupt leaders, I find it unlikely that those with a position of as high importance will be able to remain a stable instrument of the working class. It is often true that those drawn to power are most likely to misuse it, and to put the fate of the proletariats success on a few individuals worries me. Now I admire that you do to some extent recognize this, however in response to this you say, "To become ‘ideologists of the working class’ (Lenin), ‘organic intellectuals’ of the proletariat (Gramsci), intellectuals have to carry out a radical revolution in their ideas: a long, painful and difficult re-education. An endless external and internal struggle" but I am dubious of this or really what this entails.

Nonetheless, you are really intelligent and probably the most well read person on here.

Also a cool person.

[[File:Kak.png]]Stupid (10-0)
= Recommendations =

[[File:Post-Autonomism.png]]Autonomism and Communization

 * [[File:Communization.png]]Bruno Astarian: Communization as a way out of the crisis
 * [[File:Communization.png]]Endnotes: What are we to do
 * [[File:PostMarxism.png]]Negri and Guattari: Communists like us
 * [[File:Communization.png]]Kämpa Tillsammans: Do Chefs Dream of Cloned Sheep
 * [[File:Communization.png]]Kämpa Tillsammans: Faceless Resistance
 * [[File:Post-Autonomism.png]]Kämpa Tillsammans: Possibilities are Found Outside the Unions
 * [[File:Communization.png]]Kämpa Tillsammans: No Peace in the Class War

WIP

=Comments:=

"I am quite possibly the worst polcomball artist ever."
 * [[File:Tomjaz.png]] Tomjazzy - You dare challenge me mortal?
 * [[File:SamTouseyShading.png]]Neo-Touseyism- Lol
 * [[File:Panth.png]]Pantheonism - A M A T E U R S
 * [[File:Astro.png]] AstroTime - add me? here's the link to my ideology:


 * [[File:Panth.png]]Pantheonism - Add me Marxian.
 * - Alright add me too
 * [[File:Panth.png]]Pantheonism - Ok.
 * - Could you add me please
 * - alright add me to it now
 * - Add me? I'll do the same when I get around to it.
 * - Sure
 * [[File:OwfBall.png]] Owfism - Add me?
 * - Alright, add me too
 * [[File:OwfBall.png]] Owfism - I added you back, but I still dont see my ideology in your self-insert relations tab
 * - I added you. Maybe refresh?
 * [[File:OwfBall.png]] Owfism - Its fine now.
 * [[File:pixil-frame-0(27).png]] New Model Of Cheesenism- add me
 * - Sure thing fascist
 * - add me?
 * - Sure could you add me too.
 * [[File:pixil-frame-0(27).png]] New Model Of Cheesenism - wait why i cant see me in your relation?
 * - Sorry forgot to add you, will do so now.
 * Ronwelltarianism_icon.png Ronwelltarianism - Can you please add me?
 * Ronwelltarianism_icon.png Ronwelltarianism - Wait a minute, I don't see my ideology in there.
 * - Bro have a little patience I've been busy I'll do it tomorrow
 * Ronwelltarianism_icon.png Ronwelltarianism - Oh! Sorry, my bad!
 * - Add Please?
 * - Sure thing, could you add me as well
 * [[File:Glencoe.png]] Glencoe- add me
 * - Yeah, sorry it took a while
 * Can you add me?
 * - sure
 * Add me this'll be good
 * - ok lol, add me too
 * - Add me? please 🥺
 * - Lol, sorry didnt see you, will add now.


 * [[File:BasedMan.png]]BasedManism - add me?
 * [[File:OwfBall.png]] Owfism - I changed my ideology
 * - Add me?

Glencoe- re add me
 * [[File:Rocksismicon.png]]  - Add me?
 * [[File:pixil-frame-0(27).png]] New Model Of Cheesenism- readd me
 * - Hey do you mind if I borrow your formatting for relations? It's a good system.
 * - Sure