Zhahravaughanism



Zhah’s thought is an ontological anarchism that consists of a critical evaluation of capitalism and ideology. It advocates an insurrectionary response to the capitalist realism of control societies in the differentiated replication of a thought of nomadic schizophrenia. Zhahravaughanism is a politics that deterritorializes and reterritorializes politics itself in a mode of flux upon the plane of immanence in the creation of noveltous lines of flight. The Rhizome is central to the philosophy of Zhah, particularly in reterritorialization, for it is the plane of nomadologic chaosophy, the fluid multiplicity of the multitude.

Desire here is referring to the machinic and productive Desire of Deleuze and Guattari. D+G’s desire may appear similar to Foucault’s Power, and there is no doubt there are parallels between the two. Baudrillard noted that both act solely as the mirror of the fluxus immanence that is capital and thus are nonrevolutionary. Though, the Desire of D+G differentiates itself from Foucault’s Power in that it must be liberated, for the Schizoid of Nomadology deterritorializes desire itself in a fluid, muliplicitious liberation of desire. Desire is channeled toward a politics of anti-politics of autonomy, contrary to the commodities of capital. The politics will be deterritorialized in an anti-politics and reterritorialized in a politics of novelty, embodied by the rhizome. Such is applied to economism following the insurrection of the social realm. Though is this but a simulation of hyperreality? Is such a condition inescapable, for does the terrorist remain hostage to insurgency; the nomadic schizoid to insurrection? If so, what is the fault? Perhaps the insurrection itself is a mode of creation, of conceptualization. Perhaps the insurrection is itself a manifestation of the fluctuating, multiplicitious, multitudinous rhizomatic plane of immanence spearheading new lines of flight.