Conseilism

Conseilism is a civically very libertarian/anarchist, cultural far-right and economic left-ideology which is most like social anarchism or libertarian socialism but with significant influence from far right forms of anarchism, primarily Nilssonian anarcho-fascism, national anarchism, quiian anarcho-monarchism and black lilyism. It believes in the economics of reactionary socialism

Civics:
Conseilism believes in not having a monopoly on violence as so governments are unable to impose themselves and people take many of the government's function. The government would ideally be installed by teh people (so if the people like someone they will obey, in a natural way) and exist mostly to protecc liberty through a libertarian paternalist role (influencing choice while still respecting freedom of choice). He also defends a sorta neo-feudal decentralization called the patchwork which is stolen/borrowed from neoreactionarism. In short, multiple societal structures ordered within each other would civically cooperate, be culturally highly interconnected, compete over citizens and retain total economic independence. So several houses/clans would compose a city/urb, several cities would compose a duchy or some similar mediaeval larp and so on. These would all be structured in the way i described at the top. Shiet such as executive function would be turned into teh community giving intolerables the boot, there would be no real formalized law, society would judge what is tolerable case by case,and also we would have trial by combat so if some bitch accuses his son of killing his dog, he'd have to have some backing considering his death is a possibility and wouldn't be wasting time when it's possible to die. Don't assume there would be no government, but conseilism supports radically different government from the status quo. Also if we do have a kang he's be a noocratic dictator of the proletariat because thats based. Conseilism would also most desire a monarchy over democracy because democracies are manipulated by the intellectual elite (media, professors) who are cringe technophillic progressives.

Economics:
Economic Structure
 * [[File:PCB-Guildsoc.png]] Guilds - Conseilism believes in Guild Socialism where Guilds (associations of autonomous workers from the middle ages) exist and have representation in government. Of course he also supports worker's ownership of the means of production. He strongly opposes unions as he sees them inherently rooted in capitalist conditions.
 * Consumers bodies - Conseilism supports comsumers forming bodies which privately regulate the economy in order to protect consumer's interests.
 * [[File:PCB-Councom.png]]Businesses Agar.png - Conseilism supports Council Communism running local businesses, the only ones allowed would be extremely small. These businesses interact in a limited cooperative market working to enrich the community.

[[File:PCB-React.png]][[File:Eugen.png]] Culture [[File:PCB-Trad.png]][[File:PCB-Transphobia.png]]:
Reactionary, as Conseilism believes it's extremely important to preserve/restore traditions, mainly christian law, culture and cultural customs, as well as values, both on merit and age, as betraying the founding principles of a nation is a crime against the metaphysical collectivity, or "soul" theeof (an idea taken from volkisch). Also, conseilism deviates from conservatism believing conservatism is incapable of fighting the progs and also is not regressive enough, because times such as the middle ages had, like, statisically better lives in many ways. He supports positive and cultural eugenics, believing voluntary and cultural removal of certain elements from the gene pool is a societal good and not strictly speaking morally wrong. He is more radical centrist on lgbt issues as he finds them very complicated, and so he allows gay marriage and homosexuality in practice, (provided it conforms to heteronormative parental/marital roles), but opposes gay adoption, public pride, and the lgbt community. Also opposes transgenderism. Lastly, like his influence anarcho-fascism, he is anti-feminist, believing women should conform to biblical sex roles and also be excluded from politics as he believes that in his ideal society people would aggressively participate in politics, and he believes women are incapable of aggression to the same extent as men. Thus, feminism is unnatural. Of course, these wouldn't be enforced by the government, conseilism instead advocates for the destruction of an intellectual elite as to propagate reactionary values through society, eventually making progressivism not tolerated by society, which would open the way for society expunging progressive elements.

Diplomacy:

 * Ethnic nationalism: Conseilism believes borders should be drawn by ethnicity, from the idea of blood and soil, as conseilism believes anything else would lead to the destruction of a race through misgenation, and as a believer in HBD we must preserve each race and their positive characteristics. However as he supports (internal) open borders, borders would be very fluctuating. He does not believe race is the root of nationality, as another break from typical ethnonationalism


 * Cultural nationalism: Conseilism believes in TOTAL cultural homogeny. Eine kultur, eine reich. Parrelel cultures in conflict will culminate in the destruction of one, which will eventually lead to extreme cultural decay.


 * Blood nationalism: Conseilism believes nationality is derived from kin, however he thinks multiple families are in one nation


 * Homonationalism: :troll:


 * American Ultranationalism: He believes in prioritizing america first, although he is very sympathetic to secessionists in the USA as much as elsewhere.


 * Pro-Secessionism


 * Alter-Globalism


 * Pan-Nationalism

Religious views
Conseilism believes in the Anglican church (as an institution), because of it's ecumenical nature, and is also rather esoteric, believing in some mystic practices, viewing nature as a sort of "icon" and thus worthy of ritualistic veneration, and also believing paganism is preferable to both judaism and islam as christianity has been historically closer to paganism, a few shared beliefs, and the belief that pagans will not suffer in the afterlife as opposed to abrahamics.

Environmental views
Conseilism believes in malthusianism and neo-volikist eco-nationalism, viewing the nation as intrinsic to it's nature.

Technological views
Agrarian for neoluddite reasons

Views on Space Colonization
It's an incredibly cool idea, but i think it's both impractical and dangerous

Views on Abortion
conseilism believes abortion is murder, however it's morally permissible in multiple extreme cases, such as rape, sister x brother incest, threat to the life of the mother and/or baby, extreme deformation in the baby, or extremely bad material position (homelessness, destitution). However he believes the male spouse must agree

Views on American founding documents
Conseilism is very jeffersonian, believing that the jeffersonian documents were the best and should be followed. Meaning the bill of rights (making him a supporter of total free speech, near total right to bear arms (up until WoMDs), etc.), the deceleration of independence and the articles of confederation

Views on metric vs. imperial
he thinks that metric is only relevant because of arabic numerals, and imperial is more mathematically sound, being based on 12, a more divisible number, and metric is based on ten, which, again, is only relevant in a base-ten syteme

Views on Covid-19 and measures around it
He is opposed to lockdowns, and thinks that we should instead have a system where if you get infected you have a greater self-eligibilty

Views on the civil war
he is somewhat of a confederate apologist

Friends

 * Minnesotan Distributism: We seem to agree on most things, and he also seems like a nice guy.
 * Iron Daveism: One of my first interactions on pcb(a) and a fellow guild socialist and reactionary

Frenemies

 * Anti-Deathism: ehhhhhhh i'm sympathetic towards immortalism, don't support it for anyone but me tho think it's feasible, not because death is inevitable (its not) but because it would be unable to satiate exponetial population growth, given your plan to colonize the stars is logistically impossible on such a large scale, so basically you'd end up with trillions of people trapped on earth, which would be agonizing for everyone involved. You can imagine many horrific scenarios ending with the eternal torture of mankind. As for your other views, i think the civic stances are good, the economic ones are neutrally based (too extreme ngl) but the cultural ones are very bad

Enemies
[WIP]