HelloThere314ism

is a philosophy and political theory concerned with the disunity between the ideal and the void, the spectacle that is created from that, along with the radical political implications that comes with that.

=Influences=

Theorists

 * [[File:Heraclitus.png]]Heraculitus (535-475 BC)
 * [[File:Tao.png]]Lao Tzu (571-400s BC)
 * [[File:Diogenes.png]]Diogenes (404-323 BC)
 * [[File:Ockhamism.png]]William of Ockham (1287-1347)
 * [[File:Philan.png]]William Godwin (1756-1836)
 * [[File:HegelianPhilosophy.png]]Georg Hegel (1770-1831)
 * [[File:DepressionMale.png]]Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
 * [[File:YngHeg.png]]Ludwig Feuerbach (1804-1872)
 * [[File:Ego.png]]Max Stirner (1806-1856)
 * [[File:BakuninHeg.png]]Mikhail Bakunin (1814-1876)
 * [[File:Karl_Marx.png]]Karl Marx (1818-1883)
 * [[File:Marx.png]]Friedrich Engels (1820-1895)
 * [[File:Nietzsche-icon.png]]Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900)
 * [[File:Indlibsoc.png]]Oscar Wilde (1854-1900)
 * [[File:Freud.png]]Sigmund Freud (1856-1939)
 * [[File:Goldman.png]]Emma Goldman (1869-1940)
 * [[File:Existentialist Anarchism.png]]Franz Kafka (1883–1924)
 * [[File:Heidegger.png]]Martin Heidegger (1889-1976)
 * [[File:Ego-Existential.png]]Herbert Read (1893-1968)
 * [[File:Socan2.png]]Aldous Huxley (1894-1963)
 * [[File:Marcuse.png]]Herbert Marcuse (1898-1979)
 * [[File:Lacan.png]]Jacques Lacan (1901-1981)
 * [[File:Adorno.png]]Theodor W. Adorno (1903-1969)
 * [[File:Sartre.png]]Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980)
 * [[File:ExistFem.png]]Simone De Beauvoir (1908-1986)
 * [[File:Camus.png]]Albert Camus (1913-1960)
 * [[File:StructMarx.png]]Louis Althusser (1918-1990)
 * [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]Gilles Deleuze (1925-1995)
 * [[File:Poststruct.png]]Michel Foucault (1926-1984)
 * [[File:PostMarxism.png]]Jean Baudrillard (1929-2007)
 * [[File:Poststruct.png]]Jacques Derrida (1930-2004)
 * [[File:PostMarxism.png]]Félix Guattari (1930-1992)
 * [[File:Debord.png]]Guy Debord (1931-1994)
 * [[File:Auton.png]]Antonio Negri (1933-)
 * [[File:Situ.png]]Raoul Vaneigem (1934-)
 * [[File:Postsitu.png]]Jean-Pierre Voyer (1938-)
 * [[File:Žižekism.png]]Slavoj Žižek (1949-)
 * [[File:Anpostleft.png]]Bob Black (1951-)
 * [[File:Post-an.png]]Todd May (1955-)
 * [[File:Postfem.png]]Judith Butler (1956-)
 * [[File:Acidcomf.png]]Mark Fisher (1968-2017)
 * [[File:Post-an.png]]Saul Newman (1972-)

Groups/Movements

 * [[File:Tao.png]]Taoism (571 BC-)
 * [[File:YngHeg.png]]Young Hegelians (1835-1846)
 * [[File:Frankfurt.png]]Frankfurt School (1923-)
 * [[File:Existentialism.png]]French Existentialism (1930-1980)
 * [[File:Situationalistinternationalism-icon.png]]Situationist International (1957-1972)
 * [[File:Poststruct.png]]French Post-Structuralism (1967-2004)

=Beliefs=

WIP. My beliefs haven't changed, I just want to structure them better.

Metaphysics
Metaphysics is the philosophy of objects, both abstract and physical, making conclusions on how objects come into being, their nature, etc.

[[File:ExistPhenom.png]]Being In Itself[[File:ExistPhenom.png]]
Being in itself, as the name implies, is where the being of some particular object is found only in itself. This mode of being is directly opposed to the being offered by structuralism and Post-Structuralism, as the construction of being offered by structuralism and Post-Structuralism draws being from all around it, forming a structure that by reference to other objects within the structure defines objects. This type of being can be said to be a being outside itself. Structuralism is not the pure form of the being outside itself, as it either offers a starting point to structure or only considers a finite structure, which in both cases creates a being in itself, in the former having a prerequisite to the structure and in the latter having the structure itself claim objecthood whithout a sorounding structure, both of which lead to a being in itself. Post-Structuralism deals with structures in a Rhizomatic fashion, whithout a starting point and thus whithout any being in itself. I myself uphold a Post-Structuralist metaphysics, that will be explored in further sections. Why then discuss the being in itself if I subscribe to Post-Structuralism? Well at the center of all philosophy there requires a being in itself towards its understanding. This is not a metaphysical statement in the sense that reality operates through being in itself, which of course is quite dogmatic, but rather that with the human condition they become apparent. It is the same in Mathematics where axioms are placed towards set theory, which of course is the basis of much of Formal Logic. There is a trifold structure that composes the being in itself found in philosophy and the human condition, the components of this trifold structure are the ego, logic and being. These components form a structure that operates as the being in itself. The ego in this case does not refer to the contents of the ego, but rather the ego as the individual itself. The individual forms its part of this trifold being in itself by being the base for all phenomena, both as the exercizer of phenomena and the exercise. Heidegger's dasein forms the basis of how phenomena is classified within the individual, and while I may disagree on numerous fronts to how he categorizes dasein, I do follow the same template in my exploration of the modes of ontology. Secondly is logic, logic is how one understands the world, how one categorizes the world. It forms its part in the trifold being in itself by being how one perceives being, one cannot view the world without it. Even if one deteriorates from logic, a new logic takes its place; it is like the individual, it is not the contents that are the being in itself but rather the object itself. Finally being; being cannot be described, unlike the others in this trifold being in itself. An attempt to describe being was created by Heidegger, however it was never finished and for good reason; being, same as logic, same with the individual, is a prerequisite to all analysis. This forms the trifold being in itself. All in this structure are codependent, if we remove one it all falls apart. It is a rhizome operating as a fundamentally unrhizomatic concept. This structure forms the basis of the human condition, and when looking at ontology and metaphysics through the situation of the individual, this being in itself will be held as priori.

[[File:Skepticism2.png]]Nominalism[[File:Poststruct.png]]
We have discussed being in itself and how things come into being, yet how does one be? This is not an attempt to define being, but rather an exploration of how being is expressed. Being is expressed through essence, essence is what an object is. Let us explore essence. As we have explored previously, the essence of an object is determined by a surrounding structure of objects. Yet as the Post-Structuralist points out the sorrounding structure as a multiplicity requires essence, and the sorrounding points in the structure requires essence; along with this, the structure must never end to have a complete picture of essence, as if even one line of the structure has an end, all can have no definition. Even if we have a complete structure, there is an essentialism to the structure as a multiplicity, as it itself forms an object. If we are to view this from a Mathematical perspective, sets (which are analogous to Deleuzian multiplicities) can be viewed as objects in other sets and are not equivelant to having all of there contents in another set, put in Mathematical terms {S}≠{a,b,...}, S={a,b,...}. The multiplicity is an object itself. Where then can we source essence, if at all. If we go back to our analysis of the being in itself, we can source it from those sources of being. Yet our trifold being in itself falls to the same problem of essence just analyzed. We can say that it may be the source of essence in the superstructure of the human condition, yet the human condition is an arbitrary superstructure. Even if we consider the structure of the human condition to be a totality, we would still conclude a lack of expressed essence in all within the structure, the only essence of the structure being the pressence of the being in itself. In this structure the being in itself is what constitutes all other objects in the structure, thus all other elements lack a base essence they are unique in the sense; along with this the rhizomatic structure of the being in itself are constituted out of the  unique as well. As will be explored later, the ego as subject is the body without organs, it is unique; logic cannot be described as it is the totality to all understanding; likewise, being cannot be described as it is the totality to all objects. The structure of the human experience has no base essence. Outside of this, in the land of the rhizome, it operates the same way, just without a structure of the being in itself. What then is the rhizome, if no essence can be drawn from it? How can the rhizome simultaneously be a collection of objects, yet also constitute the unique and the body without organs? The rhizome cannot be like the dialectic, being on a stage of void, as it constitutes this void. The rhizome, like the body without organs, can be viewed as a non essence, the rhizome and its processes are a structure of nothing, and thus itself nothing. The rhizome is this nothing, it is down there with the unique and the body without organs. It forms itself into a trifold non-essence. All in this trifold are a shadow to the trifold being in itself, the unique being the shadow of being, essentialy being a non being, the rhizome is the shadow to logic, rhizomatic logic is a logic of nothingness, and finaly the body without organs is the individual stripped of essence. All of this considered, it should be blatantly obvious what my position on essence is, simply that there is none.

[[File:Absurd.png]]Disunity And The Absurd[[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]
From these two trifold structures, it forms a disunity; the disunity of being and nothingness. This being and nothingness is not the same being and nothingness discussed by Hegel,, etc but rather a structural being and nothingness , more in line with what was explored by Deleuze and. My opinions of the being and nothingnes discussed by Hegel,, etc can be found in work Being And Nothingness, though I have some slight diffrences. This disunity arises from the structure of the human condition, being the structure of the being in itself, and the trifold non-structure, forming a shadow to all beings. The human condition is defined by structure, yet it holds the possibility of the realization of the lack of structure, a lack of meaning and purpose. The conflict between structure and the lack of structure is known as the absurd. This absurd is slightly different in its structure the the absurd of, with it removing the infectious tendency of human nature found in work. One might protest that this kicks the can down the road, defining human nature rather than the human itself. However, the human condition is structured, as to have a human condition is to structure some condition upon the human subject, which we know occurs from our Phenomenology occurring through the being in itself. So yes, the human condition is structure, but this structure is not metaphysically true, but rather forces being on top of the nothingness of structure. The absurd can be realized at any time, and leads to a total overhaul of oneself, pushing oneself into an existential crisis. This disunity is not just in the subject but also in the objects observed by the subject. The meaning found in a rock per say is in disunity to the void of structure, same with all objects. This disunity constitutes all of the problems of oneself that we will grapple with in upcoming sections, it is gravely important. What of the effects of disunity on oneself? Well the entire notion of oneself is structure, thus disunity between oneself and the lack of structure, thus the entire notion of the absurd is inherently alienating. This leads individuals to both suicide and philosophical suicide; this will be expanded upon in the next section, yet it is interesting to note the conception of suicide and philosophical suicide in relation to the Heideggerian being towards death. Both of these points will be expanded in further sections. Finally, what should be noted is the relationship between the absurd and the relationship between difference and repetition. Deleuze's main metaphysical principle is that of difference, there is an infinite amount of ways we differentiate from each other, my hand is slightly diffrent then yours, along with my mind, etc. The same goes for human nature, which Deleuze and agree on. This is juxtaposed with repitition, a unity to attributes, an assemblage. This is similar to Baudrillard's conception of the simulacra, the simulacra is always a copy, so much that the real is lost in the hyperreal, based on signifiers. There is a strong conflict between difference and repetition, so much that it is a generalization of our project of juxtaposing the being in itself (being as a source, as a source to structure and expressed essences) and the being as itself/being outside of itself (being as simply itself, without any source or expressed structure). The concept, or the idea in Deleuzian terms, is at firm odds with diffrence, the unique, flux, etc.

[[File:Postsitu.png]]Spectacle And Hyperreality[[File:PostMarxism.png]]
Spectacle is the reaction to disunity, to the absurd. It seeks to place some order on the world, to dilute the reality of pure uniqueness. It places things such as metanarratives and structures to reality just as a form of escape. These spectacles inherently have the effect of transforming being to appearing. , while falsely placing spectacle wholly at the hand of, shows correctly that spectacle transforms from being to appearing. Take the conception of meaning,  himself saying that life is like a melody. We construct stories and live for the appearance of the story While spectacle appears individually, much of spectacle is determined by facticity. The ideals of our current age forms other spectacle. consumerism is tied to the Baudrillardian system of objects, resistance in the form of heaven storming is inherently tied to it, etc. These form the modes of spectacle. Spectacle could be compared to conception of ideology as ideology is a state of distraction from the logic of the dialectic, yet unlike what  suggests it does not arrive from the mode of production; some like  share a similar thought - "The Only Illusion in Capitalist Society is the Apparent Freedom of the Slaves. The Only Spectacle is That of the Freedom of the Slaves", on the contrary, the mode of production arises from spectacle. provides a great analysis of spectacle, not falling into the essentialism of, yet he fails to consider its source. While spectacle might be constituted around the current mode of production, the mode of production and the structure around it is spectacle in itself. They are self constituting, as spectacle arises from the mode of production, yet regarding a mode of production at all is inherently spectacular. While I have been focusing on the mode of production, it is not the basis of all historical modes of spectacle. Previously in feudal times, religion was the justifier of the spectacle of feudalism, the mode of production is constituted by exterior forces. It is similar to how it is today, as economic forces are revered as the new god. What of the reactions to the mode of spectacle, are they themselves spectacular? Yes. It could be considered a meta-spectacular predicament as it is a layer down from the original basis of spectacle, yet placing itself in relation to the mode of spectacle creates a situation where the antithesis of the mode of spectacle is pursued, falling into contorted visions. Some reactions, such as situations, give realization of spectacle yet can never replace it. To finish this section off, we must consider our conception of spectalce's relation to Baudrillardian hyperreality. Hyperreality is a reality placed atop reality, it is a forced conception of reality. It is very similar to spectacle, as spectacle is a structure placed atop the lack of structure. What our conception of spectacle has over Baudrillardian hyperreality is its concideration of a phenomenological source in the trifold being in itself.

[[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]Deleuzian Bodies And Machines[[File:Ego.png]]
Let us outline, from the trifold being outside itself, a metaphysics of the being outside itself. Now, as a reminder, the components of the being outside itself is the unique, the rhizome, and the body without organs; this is in contrast to being, logic, and the individual. All in this trifold is self constituting, the unique is the base for all being, as it outlines being without structured expression, of course to understand being there must be logic, the rhizome forms a basis for a non-structured logical system, and the body without organs is the same as the unique, yet territorialized onto the body, which constitutes the individual. Now how does the trifold being outside itself operate in a metaphysical system? As outlined in a previous section it is opposed to the trifold being in itself, which is the imalgamation of the structure of the human experience, giving rise to spectacle. The trifold being outside itself is a pure being, a being with itself as principle. This may give way to confusion, as this seems to outline a being for itself, heavily associated with being in itself, but I mean a being which is not territorialized into structure. This is not the embracing of being, as like the unique, one cannot embrace it, it is already there, with or without one's realization, but rather being without expression, hence being simply as itself. But how does being go from being simply as itself, to being for others. Again being for others is differentiated from being outside itself, as being outside of itself is with the body and machines, as is about to be defined, already held as priori, it is a end to the machine and the begining of detteritorialization, while this is being being territorialized upon bodies and machines. Now, as we have used the terms bodies and machines quite persistently, it is high time we define them. The body is no territorialization, it does not constrict or define, but is just an area of study. The body has no definition, just as in Set Theory a set can have no definition, to remain undefined beside its components. The set, unless defined, is a mere grouping, same with the Deleuzoguattarian body. Now the body is defined by its machines. If we are to continue this mirroring of Mathematical termonology and our metaphysics, the machine is the definition of the set, for example: S={x|x²=abs(erf(x)), U=R}, S={-0.89, 0,89}. Machines are stratifications of being, to put it to analogy, being is a flow, and machines are blockings of that flow. This applies to all machines, desiring machines stratifying desire, physical organs controlling the flow of nutrients, energy, etc, through the body, and abstract machines stratifying diffent conceptions. These machines are territorialized upon the body, producing a stratified essence. The body and the machine form the building blocks for concepts and being, with the body without organs forming being as itself, and the body with machines producing concepts and creating stratifications.

Ontology
Ontology is a branch of metaphysics, though it is what I consider to be the most important field of metaphysics so it gets its own section. Ontology deals with being, its nature, how one comes into being, etc.

Epistemology
Epistemology is the philosophy of knowledge. The main questions of this field is the nature and definition of knowledge, how one finds it, and if it even can really exist.

Logic
Logic is the prerequisite to any belief system. Its true nature cannot be truly observed, as any analysis of logic is based on logic. It is the same as Heidegger’s attempt to define being, it cannot be viewed without already being in its own context. It is a being in itself. That being said, one can still try to obtain its operation, and many philosophers have done this. This section outlines my philosophical views toward logic.

Aesthetics
Aesthetics is the philosophy of appearance and beauty. Its fundamental question is the nature of beauty, specifically its role in the human condition.

Sociology
Sociology is a social science which studies the nature of society. This section outlines my views on wider society.

Ethics
Ethics is the philosophy of value, specifically value in human action. It is commonly equated with morality, however morality is but a subset of ethics, with many ethical positions, such as mine, being against morality.

[[File:Nietzsche.png]]Masters Without Slaves[[File:Situ.png]]
=== Moral Nihilism===

Politics
Politics needs no introduction, seeing the site that we are on, but I will give a comprehensive definition regardless. Politics deals with structures of power, how they are utilized, and if they should be utilized at all.

[[File:Auton.png]]Politics Of Everyday Life[[File:Situ.png]]
=Relations=

[[File:Mega_Yes.png]]Based

 * [[File:HelloThere314Icon.png]]HelloThere314ism - Duh.
 * [[File:ChronicNietzsche.png]]Post-ChronicLunaism - Nietzschian philosophy is amazing and we agree a lot on politics. Very based.
 * [[File:TipuiSmall2.png]]Tipism - A mix of individualist and collectivist philosophies, paired with egoism is great.
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - Fellow Post-Situationist, and has some very based ideas.
 * [[File:Ultro.png]]Ultroneism - Your philosophy is great, though it differs to mine in some aspects. You've dropped the philosophical anarchism, which is a shame, though your political analysis is still very interesting. I of course always like the egoism. Pretty based.
 * [[File:Smallinneralism.png]]Inneralism - While egoism is great, your theory of ideals and beliefs is amazing. The unpopulistic manner by which you express that you are following your own cause, your own ideals.

[[File:Yes.png]]Good

 * [[File:Bsaheedism-icon.png]]Bsaheedism - Post-Leftism generally is pretty good as it seeks to move beyond the ideological boundries of leftism. Besides that your ideas don't seem that constructed, though mutualism is alright as an economic framework, though it can easily turn into a commodity system if one lets oneself be sucumbed to the spectacle of the market.
 * [[File:SituBlart.png]]Situation-Blartism - Syndicalism, even only in practice, creates a structure that creates some abstraction of communitarianism, which in the sensablilty of Voyer is inherantly embroiled in spectacle, wich you claim to go against. Your conception of spectacle is narrow, failing to see the capitalist mode of spectacle as a subset of a larger concept. However it is nice to see a fellow situationist.
 * [[File:RG.png]]RaGhoism - A ranting egoist on weed, what can I say but based. In all seriousness, your focus on revenge is troubling as revenge can often become a sacred cause, a forced cause to some higher ideal of equalizing the situation.
 * [[File:Ioist.png]]Ego-Progressivism - The view of egoism as the seeking of "the good life" is generally alright, if not an oversimplification, as it forces one to put value to some mode of life, which while as described by nietzsche it is nessesary, however it removes the option to simply live, to live just to live. This of course places some value towards causes, which inherently goes against egoism. However it is only a small divergence, so overall pretty good.
 * [[File:Postean.png]]Post Ego Anarcha-Nihilism - Egoism is based, and your political apathy is justified. Only thing I can find to be problematic is the nihilism, which as a metaphysical position is great, but in individual life it is best to rebel against it. Nihilism is the ideology against meaning structures, yet as Beuavoir points out, this creates a meaning structure in one's critique. If it is impossible to avoid meaning structures, yet meaning structures are inherantly alienating, shouldn't one seek to simply live and embrace oneself as a cause, rather then pretending to have no cause at all?
 * [[File:PostAlphadonialism.png]]Post-Alphadonialism - Intresting combonation of ideas, but while I like Deleuze, the anti-civ (in this case refering to the goal of abolishing civilization, rather then being against it philosophicaly) seems to be somewhat of a sacred cause, destroying civilization just to create a rhizomatic one. While it may free desire, it is viewed as sacred. We are already living in a Deleuzian assemblage, whether it is free and rhizomatic is up to the individual and its deteritorialization. Still pretty based.

[[File:Kinda_Yes.png]]Fine

 * [[File:Ashley.png]]AshleyHereism - Your ideology is fine, basically an average anarcho-narcho with a bit of individualist flair. Could be worse.
 * [[File:NguyenreichismIcon.png]]Bruhman Thought - Best orthodox marxist on here by far. While I'm personally an anarchist, I've always held a respect for council communism and left communism in general. Your understanding of dialectics in the marxist sense has the same problems of Marx's understanding of dialectics, that being the placement of survival on a purely material plane, associating the production focused nature of capitalism to apply to all stages of society. Along with that the problem of the ideolization of some state of society still stands, with revolution being advocated. Overall alright.
 * [[File:BasedMan.png]]BasedManism - I fundamentally disagree that the existentialists tell one how to live. The only one I could see that does this to some extent is Beauvoir in her ethics of ambiguity, which while offering a great coverage of ambiguity just throws in her own personal ethics without much justification. Most existentialist critique of Beauvoir is that existentialism is incompatible with ethics. Sartre supports Marxism in his later years, yet he never argues that marxism is the fundamental cause, arguing in Critique Of Dialectical Reason that dialectical materialism is not a metaphysical backdrop, but a cause one can pursue. In Camus's rebellion, Sartre's Marxism, Beauvoir's feminism, etc, these are mere suggestions towards liberation, it doesn't infect their metaphysics, which is one of the least essentilist in the history of philosophy. The occultism is worrying, along with the kantianism. You also fall into much metaphysical essentialism, not considering the stirnerite unique; without it your analysis of dialectics is incomplete and falls to essentialism and idealism
 * [[File:Council.png]]Post-Councilism - Hmm, what to make of this? You're obviously very intelligent and have a deep understanding of philosophy and politics. Lacan is a great improvement to Freud, but it remains oedipedal. I like your interpretation of Freud in a symbolic sense, as it removes some of the rather crackpot things found in Freud, it serves more as an analysis than a theory of the psyche. I disagree with the Lacanian notion of desire, desire is a flow, lacanian desire is desire territorialized to an object of desire. I don't like how you've drifted away from Stirner, though his influence is clearly still there. Your theory of the dialectic is good, though it differs from mine. The communist stuff hasn't been much elaborated on, though it seems like a leftcom postmarx synthesis, which I respect. Overall I prefer your previous ideology but this one is still good, even if I disagree; I respect it more than I agree.

[[File:Meh.png]]Neutral

 * [[File:Inky.png]]Inkyism - Anarcho-Communism is alright, though some of your positions seem quite rad libby, your page is quite bare so I can't make a definitive judgment. Platformism just places structure to the supposedly anarchic societies. The usual problems with social anarchism and revolution also apply, ideolizing some state of society over some ideal of minimizing highrarchy or whatever, instead of asserting oneself as ones own.
 * [[File:MrsVzrFlag.png]]Chaotic Communism - Very intresting, a synthesis of the chaos apparent within us and a structured view of society. While very interesting, it falls to the pitfalls of any statist view and has many philosophical quarrels, all generally leading to the alienation of the individual. Also your critique of egoism is just laughable.

[[File:Kinda_No.png]]Meh

 * [[File:Yoda8soup.png]]Yoda8soup Thought - The economics of Wolff suck. Wolff assumes that the reasons behind capitalism's problem is the boss not the firm. Commodity production still goes on when the workers are behind the wheel. At least you're anti-authoritarian.
 * [[File:Neoairisu.png]]Neo-Airisuism - It always confuses me when anarchists praise Bookchin. Dude intentionally diverged from anarchism, and besides social ecology, most of his ideas are explicitly anti-anarchist. Then rojava is far better then the rest of syria, but that's not saying much.
 * [[File:Duckf.png]]Individual Voluntaryism - The war of all against all never ended. This is true in the sense that political structures are a war of all against all, which seems to be the point you are making. You seek to enthral oneself in these power structures, or to merely create new ones in your voluntary associations, rather than distancing oneself from these structures entirely.
 * [[File:OwfBall.png]]Owfism - You're politics are better than the status quo, but still fall into a ton of sacred causes. Don't like the Cartesianism or Kantianism, but you are quite philosophically literate, which I can respect.
 * [[File:Glencoe.png]]Glencoeism - Average Pseudosocialist

[[File:No.png]]Bad

 * [[File:Panth.png]]Pantheonism - The guild system may be more cooperative then capitalism, removing exessive theft of surplus value, yet it is still a forced system, in wich one is subjected to diffrent economic deleuzian organs. Besides that progressive conservatism falls into the same problems as progressivism and conservatism, ideolizing some state of social relations. While all of the other systems, while I don't necessarily agree with them, have clear lines of logic, with your advocacy of monarchy I don't see that. Overall your justifications for everything are not included on your page so I can't make that clear of critiques besides just the positions themselves.
 * [[File:MATTball.png]]Mattism - Quirky american progressive. Not much better than the status quo. Also you really misrepresent absurdism, what you follow is existentialism.
 * [[File:Revequom-newicon.png]]Atronism - How bad can one butcher Marx? Rights, equality, are given by the borgious state, both of which Marx hates. Marx and Engels hate the socialist with their goals in equality, in rights, instead material liberation from these conceptions is communism. You're just a utopian, sacred socialist.

[[File:Mega_No.png]]Cringe

 * [[File:GenShrekf.png]]General Shrekretary Thought - The worst part of Marxism-Leninism all combined into one ideology.
 * [[File:Vermaatism2.png]]Vermaatism - Your "individualism" is the exact antithesis to an actual individualism. You idealize some higher state of the individual, to progress the individual. This is a quintessential sacred cause, the ideolization of some goal. You don't allow the individual to follow their own cause, or follow no cause at all. Your individualism is the advocacy of some higher goal, not the sublime goals of everyday individuals.
 * [[File:pixil-frame-0(27).png]]New Model Of Cheesenism - Literal fascist.
 * [[File:Polpot.png]]Implianium - Wtf

=Theory=

Theory I Have Written

 * [[File:EgoQueer.png]]Gender Abolition: Praxis And Analysis

Theory I Am Writing

 * [[File:HelloThere314Icon.png]]The Dialectic Of One And All

Theory I Plan To Write
This Is Subject To Change At Any Time
 * [[File:Skepticism2.png]]Pure Categorization: A Nominalist Analysis Of Mathematics
 * [[File:HelloThere314Icon.png]]Defending The Dialectic
 * [[File:HelloThere314Icon.png]]A Manifesto For Anti-Control Politics

Theory I Am Reading

 * [[File:DepressionMale.png]]The World As Will And Representation
 * [[File:DepressionMale.png]]Volume 1

[[File:Demcon.png]]Abdullah Öcalan

 * [[File:Demcon.png]]Democratic Confederalism

[[File:Camus.png]]Albert Camus[[File:Absurd.png]]

 * [[File:Absurd.png]]The Stranger
 * [[File:Absurd.png]]The Plague
 * [[File:Absurd.png]]The Fall
 * [[File:Absurd.png]]The Myth of Sisyphus
 * [[File:Existentialist_Anarchism.png]]The Rebel
 * [[File:ExistHum.png]]Resistance, Rebellion, And Death

[[File:Einstein.png]]Albert Einstein[[File:Soc-h.png]]

 * [[File:Soc-h.png]]Why Socialism?

[[File:Socan2.png]]Aldous Huxley[[File:Drug-Addict.png]]

 * [[File:Socan2.png]]Brave New World
 * [[File:Socan2.png]]Island
 * [[File:Drug-Addict.png]]The Doors Of Perception
 * [[File:Drug-Addict.png]]Heaven And Hell

[[File:Anqueer.png]]Alyson Escalante[[File:Postfem.png]]

 * [[File:GenderNihil.png]]Gender Nihilism: An Anti-Manifesto

[[File:Postciv.png]]An-ok Ta Chai[[File:Ego.png]]

 * [[File:Ego.png]]Max & I

[[File:Egomut.png]]Benjamin R. Tucker[[File:Anin.png]]

 * [[File:Ricardosoc.png]]Henry George And Interest

[[File:Anpostleft.png]]Bob Black[[File:Antwork.png]]

 * [[File:Antwork.png]]The Abolition Of Work
 * [[File:Postsitu.png]]Imputationism
 * [[File:Postfem.png]]My Preferred Gender Pronoun Is Negation

[[File:Antao.png]]Bào Jìngyán

 * [[File:Antao.png]]Neither Lord Nor Subject

[[File:Council.png]]Councilguy[[File:PostMarxism.png]]

 * [[File:Freud.png]]The Ego In Freud And Its Opponents
 * [[File:Bahnsen.png]]The Tragic Worldview of Julius Bahnsen

[[File:Socan2.png]]David Graeber[[File:Globnat.png]]

 * [[File:AntiEconomy.png]]Against Economics

[[File:Egocom.png]]Dr. Bones

 * [[File:Egocom.png]]Egoist-Communism: What It Is and What It Isn’t

[[File:Goldman.png]]Emma Goldman[[File:Anfem.png]]

 * [[File:Egocom.png]]Anarchism And Other Essays
 * [[File:Egocom.png]]Individual, Society And The State
 * [[File:Egocom.png]]What I Believe
 * [[File:AnSynd.png]]Syndicalism

[[File:Leftagor.png]]Eric Fleischmann

 * [[File:Leftagor.png]]Toward a Cooperative Agorism

[[File:Egocom.png]]For Ourselves![[File:Postsitu.png]]

 * [[File:Egocom.png]]The Right To Be Greedy

[[File:Existentialist_Anarchism.png]]Franz Kafka

 * [[File:Existentialist_Anarchism.png]]The Trial

[[File:Nietzsche-icon.png]]Friedrich Nietzsche

 * [[File:Nietzsche-icon.png]]Thus Spoke Zarathustra
 * [[File:Nietzsche-icon.png]]Beyond Good And Evil
 * [[File:Nietzsche.png]]Twilight Of The Idols
 * [[File:Nietzsche.png]]The Antichrist

[[File:PostMarxism.png]]Félix Guattari[[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]

 * [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]Chaosophy

[[File:HegelianPhilosophy.png]]Georg Hegel

 * [[File:HegelianPhilosophy.png]]The Science Of Logic

[[File:Cball-British_India.png]]George Orwell

 * [[File:Cball-British_India.png]]1984
 * [[File:Cball-British_India.png]]Animal Farm

[[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]Gilles Deleuze[[File:Nietzsche-icon.png]]

 * [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]Postscript On The Societies Of Control

[[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]Gilles Deleuze And Félix Guattari[[File:PostMarxism.png]]

 * [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]Capitalism And Schizophrenia
 * [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]Anti-Oedipus
 * [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]A Thousand Plateus

[[File:Debord.png]]Guy Debord[[File:Councom.png]]

 * [[File:Situ.png]]Society Of The Spectacle

[[File:AnOnto.png]]Hakim Bey[[File:Post-an.png]]

 * [[File:AnOnto.png]]Ontological Anarchy in a Nutshell

[[File:Thoreau-alt.png]]Henry David Thoreau

 * [[File:Thoreau-alt.png]]Civil Disobediance
 * [[File:Thoreau-alt.png]]Walden

[[File:Heraclitus.png]]Heraculitus

 * [[File:Heraclitus.png]]Fragments

[[File:Ego-Existential.png]]Herbert Read

 * [[File:Ego-Existential.png]]Existentialism, Marxism and Anarchism

[[File:Ectrans.png]]J.D. Moyer

 * [[File:Ectrans.png]]A Solarpunk Manifesto

[[File:PostMarxism.png]]Jean Baudrillard[[File:Postmodernicon.png]]

 * [[File:Postmodernicon.png]]Simulacra And Simulation

[[File:Republicanismpix.png]]Jean-Jacques Rousseau[[File:Radlib.png]]

 * [[File:Republicanismpix.png]]The Social Contract

[[File:Postsitu.png]]Jean-Pierre Voyer[[File:AntiEconomy.png]]

 * [[File:AntiEconomy.png]]The Economy is Only an Ideology in Marx’s Sense

[[File:Egomut.png]]John Robinson

 * [[File:Ego.png]]The Land of the Altruists

[[File:Left-Nietzsche.png]]Jonas Ceika[[File:Libmarx.png]]

 * [[File:Left-Nietzsche.png]]How To Philosophize With A Hammer And Sickle

[[File:Sartre.png]]John Paul Sartre

 * [[File:ExistPhenom.png]]The Transcendence Of The Ego: An Existentialist Theory Of Consciousness
 * [[File:Existentialism.png]]Being And Nothingness
 * [[File:ExistHum.png]]Existentialism Is A Humanism
 * [[File:ExistMarx.png]]Search For A Method

[[File:Menshevik.png]]Julius Martov[[File:Marx.png]]

 * [[File:Menshevik.png]]The World's Social Revolution And The Aims of Social Democracy
 * [[File:Menshevik.png]]A Contradiction

[[File:Communization.png]]Kämpa Tillsammans![[File:Antwork.png]]

 * [[File:Communization.png]]Hamburgers vs Value

[[File:Karl_Marx.png]]Karl Marx

 * [[File:Marx.png]]Wage Labour And Capital
 * [[File:Marx.png]]Value Price And Profit
 * [[File:Marx.png]]Conspectus Of Bakunin's Statism And Anarchy

[[File:Karl_Marx.png]]Karl Marx And Friedrich Engels[[File:Marx.png]]

 * [[File:Marx.png]]The Communist Manifesto

[[File:EgoMarx.png]]Kristian Lamprecht[[File:EgoQueer.png]]

 * [[File:EgoMarx.png]]A Critique of Capitalism and other Established Systems: An Introduction To Stirnerite Marxism
 * [[File:EgoQueer.png]]Sexual Egoism: A Critique Of Labels

[[File:Postsitu.png]]Larry Law

 * [[File:Postsitu.png]]Spectacular Times

[[File:AcidCom.png]]Mark Fisher[[File:PostMarxism.png]]

 * [[File:PostMarxism.png]]Capitalist Realism

[[File:Heidegger.png]]Martin Heidegger[[File:Nazi.png]]

 * [[File:Heidegger.png]]Being And Time

[[File:Egocom.png]]Matty Thomas

 * [[File:Egocom.png]]The Relevance Of Max Stirner To Anarcho-Communists

[[File:Ego.png]]Max Stirner[[File:YngHeg.png]]

 * [[File:Ego.png]]The Ego And Its Own
 * [[File:Ego.png]]Stirner's Critics
 * [[File:YngHeg.png]]Art And Religion
 * [[File:YngHeg.png]]You Only Have The Courage To Be Destructive

[[File:BakuninHeg.png]]Mikhail Bakunin

 * [[File:BakuninHeg.png]]What is Authority?

[[File:Bckchn.png]]Murray Bookchin

 * [[File:Bckchn.png]]Post-Scarcity Anarchism
 * [[File:Postsitu.png]]From Spectacle To Empowerment

[[File:Bukh.png]]Nikolai Bukharin

 * [[File:Bukh.png]]The New Economic Policy Of Soviet Russia

[[File:Chom.png]]Noam Chomsky[[File:AnSynd.png]]

 * [[File:AnSynd.png]]On Anarchism

[[File:Indlibsoc.png]]Oscar Wilde[[File:Anqueer.png]]

 * [[File:Indlibsoc.png]]The Soul Of Man Under Socialism

[[File:Steinval.png]]Peter Vallentyne

 * [[File:Steinval.png]]Left-Libertarianism: A Primer
 * [[File:Steinval.png]]Left-Libertarianism as a Promising Form of Liberal Egalitarianism

[[File:Ancom.png]]Pëtr Kropotkin

 * [[File:Ancom.png]]Are We Good Enough?

[[File:Situ.png]]Raoul Vaneigem[[File:Ego.png]]

 * [[File:Situ.png]]The Revolution Of Everyday Life

[[File:Illeg.png]]Renzo Novotare[[File:EgoNihil.png]]

 * [[File:EgoNihil.png]]Towards The Creative Nothing

[[File:Post-an.png]]Saul Newman

 * [[File:Post-an.png]]The Politics of Postanarchism

[[File:ExistFem.png]]Simone De Beauvoir

 * [[File:ExistHum.png]]The Ethics Of Ambiguity

[[File:Postciv.png]]Strangers In a Tangled Wilderness

 * [[File:Postciv.png]]Post-Civ! A Brief Philosophical and Political Introduction to the Concept of Post-civilization
 * [[File:Postciv.png]]Post-Civ! A Deeper Exploration

[[File:ChristExist.png]]Søren Kierkegaard

 * [[File:ChristExist.png]]Fear And Trembling

[[File:Lib.png]]Thomas Nagel[[File:Absurd.png]]

 * [[File:Absurd.png]]The Absurd

[[File:Gender_Accelerationism.png]]Vikky Storm and Eme Flores[[File:Xenofeminism.png]]

 * [[File:Gender_Accelerationism.png]]Gender Accelerationist Manifesto
 * [[File:Awaj.png]]It’s Time For “Mad Anarchism”

[[File:Lenin.png]]Vladimir Lenin[[File:Orthlen.png]]

 * [[File:Orthlen.png]]The Three Sources and Three Component Parts of Marxism
 * [[File:Orthlen.png]]The Tasks of the Proletariat in the Present Revolution

[[File:Communization.png]]Wildcat[[File:AntiDem.png]]

 * [[File:AntiDem.png]]Against Democracy

[[File:GeoSynd.png]]William Schmack

 * [[File:GeoSynd.png]]Geo-syndicalism

=Recommendations=

Writings

 * [[File:Postmodernicon.png]]Simulacra And Simulation
 * [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]Chaosophy
 * [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]Postscript On The Societies Of Control
 * [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]Capitalism And Schizophrenia
 * [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]Anti-Oedipus
 * [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]A Thousand Plateus
 * [[File:Post-an.png]]The Politics of Postanarchism
 * [[File:Ego.png]]The Ego And Its Own
 * [[File:Ego.png]]Stirner's Critics
 * [[File:EgoNihil.png]]Towards The Creative Nothing
 * [[File:Ego-Existential.png]]Existentialism, Marxism and Anarchism
 * [[File:Egocom.png]]Anarchism And Other Essays
 * [[File:Egocom.png]]Individual, Society And The State
 * [[File:Egocom.png]]The Right To Be Greedy
 * [[File:Situ.png]]Society Of The Spectacle
 * [[File:Situ.png]]The Revolution Of Exeryday Life
 * [[File:Postsitu.png]]Spectacular Times
 * [[File:PostMarxism.png]]Capitalist Realism
 * [[File:ExistMarx.png]]Search For A Method
 * [[File:Existentialism.png]]Being And Nothingness
 * [[File:ExistPhenom.png]]The Transcendence Of The Ego
 * [[File:Heidegger.png]]Being And Time
 * [[File:ExistHum.png]]The Ethics Of Ambiguity
 * [[File:Existentialist Anarchism.png]]The Trial
 * [[File:Existentialist Anarchism.png]]The Rebel
 * [[File:Absurd.png]]The Myth Of Sisyphus

Youtube

 * [[File:Ego.png]]Kane B
 * [[File:Poststruct.png]]Then & Now
 * [[File:PostMarxism.png]]CCK Philosophy
 * [[File:Neomarx.png]]PlasticPills
 * [[File:Neomarx.png]]Tom Nicholas
 * [[File:LeftCom.png]]Xexizy
 * [[File:ExistMarx.png]]Epoch Philosophy
 * [[File:Existentialism.png]]Eternalised
 * [[File:Absurd.png]]Sisyphus 55

Artists

 * [[File:Drug-Addict.png]]Pink Floyd
 * [[File:Thar.png]]Tears For Fears
 * [[File:Socan2.png]]Chumbawamba
 * [[File:Situ.png]]Gang Of Four
 * [[File:DepressionMale.png]]Gorillaz
 * [[File:Liberaltarianism.png]]Weezer
 * [[File:Moder.png]]Blink-182
 * [[File:Moder.png]]Queen
 * [[File:Libsoc.png]]Green Day
 * [[File:Dsa.png]]Cage The Elephant
 * [[File:Conservative.png]]The Offspring
 * [[File:Progconf.png]]The Killers
 * [[File:Prog-u.png]]The Smiths
 * [[File:Prog-u.png]]The Cure

Songs
=Gallery=

=References=

=Navigation=

=Comments= - Comment if you want to discuss or if you want to be added. I will be deleting old comments.

Glencoeism - How can I be a Pusedosocialist if i don’t identify as one?