Erissianism

Erissianism/Erissian Thought is the self-insert ideology of user Erissky. It is an ultraprogressive, accelerationist, and post-left anarchist ideology with a range of other influences. Its main goal is the end of Masculinity, and from that the end of gender and humanity, but it has others including the end of the state, tradition, oppression, and capitalism. It is against all forms of hierarchy and oppression, and desires complete freedom, and that includes freedom of autonomy and identity.

Political Journey
2019: (/)->(/) 2020: (///)->(//)->(/) 2021: (/)-> (//) 2022: (/)->(//)->(//)->(///)->(/)->(//)->(/) 2023: (///)

Civics
Erissianism supports Patchwork and other separatist ideals for accelerationist reasons, and is all for using Patchwork and other experimental forms of management as a means to an end. However it should be noted that Erissianism is Fundamentally and Philosophically Anarchist, and dislikes the state regardless of its size. Her ideal "government" (term used loosely) would be an insurrectionary affinity group/organization that does not institute any authority/power beyond handling militant and minor economic matters, however these things should still remain in the hands of the people. Even then, this semi-vanguard would inevitably dissolve either voluntarily or through its own violence, so at the end of the day Erissianism is civically anarchist, while supporting the state's decay through balkanization and separatism.

On Cities
While Erissianism is strongly for urban acceleration, viewing cities as monuments of artificiality and anti-human design, it does not advocate for stagnating big cities to house the world's overflowing urban populations. Instead favoring the expansion of the urban directly outward into rural and suburban areas. This way, populations can be spread out more evenly and the majority of issues with big cities can be resolved in this manner. Erissianism's ideal city would be one free of government and institutions altogether, all the way from the police to the traffic laws.The prospect of a smart city is also intriguing to her, however she generally dislikes any kind of corporate/state version of the concept, as it would just end up as a nightmarish centralization of authority.

Culture
The best way to describe Erissian culture would be as a blend of Gender Accelerationism,  Futurism, and Xenoprogressivism. What is Xenoprogressivism? Essentially, moderate and liberal models of progressivism are thrown out of the window, and the spooks of egalitarianism and moralism are along with them. Xenoprogressivism means a eugenics arms race, not just between the sexes, but between races, classes, and nationalities. Xenoprogressivism is cybernetically advancing oppressed groups past their societally-defined stand points. Basically you can call it intersectional Xenofeminism. Besides that, Erissian culture places a large focus on constant motion, fluidity, simplicity, and speed. Cultural traditions are grinded into dust, as are masculinity, ethnoplurality, nationalism, and all other outmoded ways of thought. The main goal? Leave the reactionaries in the flesh and dust, while the previously oppressed groups enjoy their newfound post-human existence. The trash of the old world will be reformed into the new world. Erissianism also adores violence, aside from exploitation like slavery or rape, which is just the personal equivalent of the state's relationship with it's citizens. So it's no surprise that under Erissianism there would be a lot of blood and guts.

On Gender
Erissianism holds that the gender binary is an inherently disgusting and oppressive social construct that should be abolished. However, it doesn't see the Vikkian prospect of creating more genders/sexes as escaping it, as, at a certain point, these new genders will simply be reterritorialized back into the binary. (Though, she still supports xenogender people and doesn't see much wrong with creating/spreading new genders regardless.) Instead, she advocates accelerating masculinity's decline, as it is the key force reinforcing the gender binary. When it ends, gender stops being sex-based for good, and gender as a concept in general becomes pointless and fades away. No, this doesn't mean everyone becomes agender, this just means that people will act like themselves and however they like without worrying about gender in the first place. The logic of gender only collapses in on itself when the logic of sex does, therefore the logic of the patriarchy.

Economics
Erissian economics are a chaotic mix of Agorism,  Illegalism, and  Urban Accelerationism, all under a shaky framework of  Left-Wing Market Anarchism. Grey and Black markets are heavily promoted in order to erode state economic power, along with rampant Accelerationism in order to further the good (Feminization, Schizophrenitization) effects of capitalism, as well as the bad. Communization Theory plays a part too, with communalized ways of life being promoted. Pretty much, Criminal Organizations run numerous Market Anarchist communes while making bank off tax free markets, funding said communes and this way of life free of state control. These communes can be established peacefully or via insurrection, through autonomous zones. Capitalism and free markets are mutually exclusive terms, as the state will always enforce the whims of the financial ruling class. The same goes for "anarcho" capitalism too, which would just end up as a corporatocratic nightmare. Free Markets means the people run them in all capacities, and there are no exploitative, monolithic, and oppressive entities called "corporations".

Environment
Erissianism is staunchly anti-environmentalist, but not because climate change isn't real. It is, and it's having some pretty drastic effects. Only, these effects are pretty based and good, so to speak; entire species are going extinct, the world is becoming more and more artificial, entire species are being feminized (humans included), and entire nations are being brought to ruin, driving mass hordes of migrants toward the West and east. All of these are pretty desirable considering Erissianism's goals (the end of masculinity, humanity, and organic life). So it advocates Acceleration of climate change and climate disasters. Let the sea levels rise, let the plastic flood the ocean, let urbanization crank up to 100, and make it all happen super fast.

Extinction vs. Escape
Erissianism openly opposes humanity and the anthropocene, however she does not believe that "billions must die" or anything like that. Though she does support escaping humanity via posthumanist means. Killing all humans is A. probably impossible, and B. cruelly oppressive. Just because she's not a moralist doesn't mean she lacks empathy.

Technology
Erissianism fully supports all forms of transhumanism and posthumanism, so long as they (intentionally or not) work towards the goal of abandoning the flesh, and meatspace in general. To sum it up in a sentence or two; Meatspace is the flesh-based world of territorialization, oppression, and anti-individualism. The Wired is a technologically based plane of secondary existence where one's identity exists by its own terms and as it pleases. Though, it should be noted that the internet is not the end-game for the wired, as Nyx said: “In reality, the Internet with the coming of Web 3.0 is nothing more than a vast network of prison cells whose walls are covered in monitors. It is a constantly shifting corporate walled garden.”

Revolution
(Note that this isn't what I think is viable or possible, just idealism.)

Ideally, the revolution should be carried out when automation/digitalization reaches the point where hackers/cybercriminals have become the main revolutionary class, as this would open up the state to many, many vulnerabilities. We've seen what cyberattacks can do on things like oil pipelines and infrastructure already, so just imagine how it will be in the future. Anyway, an Erissian revolution would be carried out by multiple revolutionary classes (but mainly hackers), as they each work in the wired and meatspace simultaneously. Hackers destroy the internet (commodified cyberspace), assimilating it wholesale into the wired. The on-the-ground revolutionaries establish webs of interconnected Patches, Free Cities, Communes, and Autonomous Zones, free from the state's hands. Incredible amounts of chaotic violence and illegal activity would flourish during this revolution, and rightfully so. With automation largely taken out by cyberattacks, and the state's control either loosened or dissolved entirely (preferably with the entire government slaughtered, but we can't always get what we want), then the remains of the old world will be ready to be reshaped into the new, post-human, and artificial world.

As a side note, Erissianism is quite pragmatic with its base of revolutionaries. So long as they are opposed to the state, capitalism, and oppression they're all for anyone to take up arms.

Post-Revolution, The Wired's influence and assimilation of Meatspace would be cranked up to a million. Connection to the wired would be free, open, and available everywhere it can be. Non-wired individuals would be left to their own devices in their own parts of Meatspace. Meatspace would be organized in a similar structure to the wired, with decentralized but always connected networks being the new way for the Patchwork, Communes, and other free areas. Market Anarchism would remain the economic system until it inevitably turns into communism. When true AI is born, control would be handed over, with humanity's assimilation into the singularity being the main goal of this "anarcho-algocracy". With a stateless, classless, and heavily wired reality being achieved, humanity will speed even closer to its post-human future, with the wired essentially becoming the "new reality".

Relations
(WIP), Will add if asked.

Positive

 * - Quite based if I do so myself, even if I'm not really into Egoist/Stirnerite stuff, It's more because I don't have much time to read theory than me being opposed to it. Besides that, I'm a fan of the Deleuzianism, Anarchism, and Post-Leftism. 8-9/10
 * - I'm gonna preface this by saying you're far more well-read than I am, and that I think that some of your beliefs are at least aligned with mine in a cosmic way. However, I disagree with you on the nature of femininity. It certainly is something that has been continuously defined and redefined, and had it's meaning stretched and essentially set by the forces of patriarchy. I'd say that this had led what we call "femininity" into a sort of dichotomy between masculinized femininity, a model of how women ought to act in the eyes of the masculine, and the Xenofeminine, a technologically-aligned force more based on it's unorthodoxy and vehement rejection of the masculinized feminine ideals of submission, temperance, and passivity. That "feminine" certainly is a staple of the oppressive construct of the gender binary, and is what is enforced on all women, cis and trans. But Xenofemininity is defining what it means to be feminine by your own terms, against the whims of masculinity and the gender binary. I completely agree that "femininity" as you call it (or masculinized femininity, as I call it) is "slave-like, unheroic, saint-like, weak, thoughtless and collectivist", as these are all traits advantageous to the place of the patriarchy, and at their core, masculine. Xenofemininity spits in tradition's face, by aligning with the outside, the queer, the non-binary, and makes the label of feminine it's own, deterritorializing something born of virulent territorialization. My (and plenty of other womyn's) femininity is nowhere near the traditionalist, masculinized ideals set by the binary. It is free of restraints, strong to it's core, and a force for true individuality, as it shapes it's own identity against the forces of "normality". Xenofemininity is beyond gender, because gender itself can't exist without the eroding ideas of masculinized feminity. 8/10
 * [[File:LeonMK.png]] Leon metaknightism - Very based stuff, but I'm not really big on the environmentalism or the DemCon stuff, still pretty based though. 7/10
 * [[File:Iconfloofel.png]] Floofel's Thought - There's not much on your page, but I like that you're insurrectionary, anarchist, and nihilist much like myself. Though I can sense we have some differences, I'm not really a fan of agrarianism/anti-civ, though I am debatably anti-civ myself, just the technological kind. 7/10

Mostly Positive

 * [[File:O'Langism.png]] O'Langism - I mean... Not the best, syndicalism sucks and isn't even that anarchist, and like most socialists you still want to work even after capitalism's end, but you are an anarchist so I can't be too critical of you, though I'm not that fond of Anarcho-Communism for it's focus on collectivism and work. 5-6/10

Mostly Negative

 * [[File:Cyblen-icon.png]] Cyberleninism - I like your focus on technology and am glad you're not bigoted like some other tankies, but your insistence on upholding the state and all of it's trappings, as well as the proletkult stuff, puts you pretty low on the list. Still though, not terrible (and quite polite) for an ML. 3/10
 * [[File:neolenicon.png]] Neo-Leninism - Regardless of whether it's the government or not, the vanguard party's role as a higher authority would still create a hierarchical system between the party and those outside of it. Besides that, and your optimistic attitude towards work, we do have some intersecting beliefs, such as hatred of reformism and stalinism/trotskyism. 3/10
 * [[File:Neokira2.png]] Meowxism - I like that you're queer, a furry, and ultraprogressive, but there's not much else I like. Vanguardism just makes another class system, prisons are always oppressive, regardless of the conditions, and I don't really think your "democracy" really constitutes that term. 3/10
 * [[File:Brazlib.png]] Brazilian Liberalism - Pretty basic liberal stuff, not good, but you seem nice. 2-3/10
 * [[File:Murb.png]] Neo-Murba - Nationalist, pseudo-tankie, environmentalist. Not very based. But at least you're progressive. 2/10

Negative

 * [[File:Guard-Occo.png]] National Fracturism - What's the point of tinism if you're just going to create an authoritarian, restrictive state? People like you are another reason I dislike environmentalism. At least you're progressive and a nihilist. 1/10
 * [[File:DoesntExist.png]] Nonexistism - Incredibly boring and shitty. Probably some kind of closeted fashie/nazbol, just come out, it's easier that way for all of us. -5/10
 * - Spooked out of your gourd, actually horrendous, and basically my complete opposite. -5/10
 * [[File:Esopinochet.png]] Mr Whooper Manism - Disgusting brainless fascist. -10/10
 * [[File:Tsumugikotobuki8814ism.png]] MugiKotobuki8814ism - You are a prime example of what too much 4chan exposure does to someone. -10/10

Theory
See Erissianism/Theory

User Theory Recommendation
Example: - (Icon)Title - Author

Comments
(Feel free to comment)
 * [[File:Murb.png]] Neo-Murba - vile (also, add?)
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Done, add me back?
 * - Add me?
 * - - Sure thing!
 * - Why dafuq you want humanity to become extinct
 * - - Well, various reasons, but the major one is that it's obsolete compared to Posthumanity and AI/singularity. Life on earth as post-primates isn't a fulfilling (or very fun) experience for sentient life.
 * - - I like being a post-primate though, I find it fulfilling and fun, though I do agree that SOME technological enhancement is necessary, not to the point of the extinction of humanity though
 * - - Just because it's fulfilling for you doesn't mean it is for everyone else. Yeah that applies to me somewhat too but still. The human body and human experience are both highly limited in both physical and metaphysical ways. Posthuman/wired existence is/would be free of limits, allowing identity and individuality to flourish.
 * - - Fair enough, just don't force me to become a posthuman
 * - - That would be against my ideals, as well as impossible, so don't expect it lol.
 * - wacky and zany. anyways, how is neo-murba a pseudo-tankie?
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - The vanguardism mostly. Psuedo- because of the communization and other stuff. I guess "tankie" might not be the right word but that's generally what I call vanguardists.
 * - I mean combining vangaurdism and communization is just contradictory
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - This ^^^
 * - REEEEEEEEEEEEEE LITERALLY MY WORSE NIGHTMARE!!!!!!!!11111111!!!11!!1!!!16384!!1!1!11!11!11!!!!!! Can you add me, please
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Sure thing. Add me.
 * - I have already added you. Go to the tabber in the Relations section of my page, and scroll to PCBA users.
 * - I don’t know what I’m looking at, but add me anyways?
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Sure. Add me.
 * - Buni on steroids.
 * - I've added you, care to add me back?
 * - Sure thing!
 * [[File:Neokira2.png]] Meowxism - add me comrade
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Done, add me?
 * [[File:Iconfloofel.png]] Floofel's Thought - May ya add me? I'll add ya back.
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Donezo.
 * - I'm sorry if i misinterpret something about xenofeminity as i don't know the concept beyond what you said, but technology stuff aside isn't this opposition to "masculinized femininity" still the enforcement of a binary? You say its strong and independent and queer, and maybe that's true but you still view it in conflict with/standing against masculinity (including traditional femininity as well) but that in my opinion is just a phantasm, one that still groups the individual (unto a wider category, sure) under groups and places objective value on them accordingly, as you describe it, xenofeminity shapes its own identity against the forces of "normality", but i would say that that opposition is an hinderance to the individual's own uniqueness as xenofeminism then asserts its own project over them, contrary to the idea of queerness i describe for example, which is just individual assertion of itself beyond all allocishetnormative factors, it doesn't place value or create some ideal, its just a rejection of "foreign rule" in favor of individual creation. I'm nonbinary and transfem, so i do appreciate feminity, but only aesthetically, because otherwise i can't help but look at any "inity" as just something of a foreign space no matter how much room it offers me to be myself. I think this sort of thinking just enforces an essence that does not apply to everyones uniqueness and ends up creating a new binary.
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - I'd say that xenofeminity does embrace the unique, since it's ultimately you deciding your femininity for yourself against what was set out for you by outside forces. Yeah it could be called a group/demographic, but you can say that about any number of people, and that tends to be the nature of people to group others together. Since xenofemininity is essentially the queer reclamation of feminine identity, I think it does embody individual creation and reject foreign rule, over the identity and over the body. I don't think xenofemininity really holds any values or ideals of what it means to be a woman/queer/whatever, as that would just end up being conservative within itself. Even my definition of it is kind of skewed and shifted a bit, and that's fine I'd say. It means different things to different people, just like being queer does.
 * [[File:Tsumugikotobuki8814ism.png]] MugiKotobuki8814ism - add me, I already added you,ÒwÓ
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Dun.
 * [[File:Guard-Occo.png]] National Fracturism - Add me Weirdlord.
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Done.