HelloThere314ism

HelloThere314ism also known as HTh314ism is a anarchist ideology believing in Post-Situationism, Ego-Mutualism, Absurdism, and a mix of Individualist and Social Anarchist thought. They have a strong love of the community and others while seeking to create for oneself. They prefer Geomutualism as an economic system but honestly doesn't care.

Ideological Summary
Anarchism
 * [[File:Anin.png]]Individualist Anarchism
 * [[File:Anpostleft.png]]Post-Left Anarchism
 * [[File:Antwork.png]]Work Abolitionism
 * [[File:Post-an.png]]Post-Anarchism
 * [[File:Postmodernicon.png]]Postmodernism
 * [[File:Postfem.png]]Post-Feminism
 * [[File:Poststruct.png]]Poststructuralism
 * [[File:Ins.png]]Insurrectionism
 * [[File:Postsitu.png]]Post-Situationism
 * [[File:Ego.png]]Egoism
 * [[File:Ego.png]]Egoistic Anarchism
 * [[File:EgoUnion.png]]Union of Egoists
 * [[File:Socan2.png]]Social Anarchism
 * [[File:Demcon.png]]Democratic Confederalism
 * [[File:Globnat.png]]Alter-Globalism
 * [[File:Postconan.png]]Post-Colonial Anarchism
 * [[File:Anfem.png]]Anarcha-Feminism
 * [[File:Xenofeminism.png]]Xenofeminism
 * [[File:Anqueer.png]]Queer Anarchism
 * [[File:Gender_Accelerationism.png]]Gender Accelerationism
 * [[File:Mutalist.png]]Mutualism
 * [[File:Egomut.png]]Ego-Mutualism
 * [[File:Geomut.png]]Geomutualism
 * [[File:Cybermut.png]]Cybermutualism
 * [[File:Existentialist_Anarchism.png]]Existentialist Anarchism
 * [[File:Absurd.png]]Absurdism
 * [[File:Aneco.png]]Eco-Anarchism
 * [[File:Ectrans.png]]Technogaianism

[[File:Postsitu.png]]Spectacle
Spectacle is the basis of society. Authentic social life is dead. Commodity fetishism in the Capitalist sense and general bootlicking to authority. Orthodox Situationism posits that Capitalism is the main source of this spectacle but really it is the essential basis of any society. "There is no society of the spectacle, but rather a spectacle of society" - Jean-Pierre Voyer.

[[File:Situ.png]]Situations
Instead of any convoluted revolution that is almost destined to fail they support living one's life without spectacle and authority by seeking to create situations without their influence. For them this is usually art, writing, and mathematics.

[[File:Egomut.png]]Economy[[File:Geomut.png]]
They believe in a Mutualist economy with free markets of individuals and cooperatives, which are Unions of Egoists. They also believe in mutual credit banks and the right of contract. Land Value Dues would be issued for how long one has occupied land. This is merely their prefered economy, they would be fine with any economy or no economy at all, as long as it is consensual.

[[File:EgoUnion.png]]Union of Egoists[[File:Camus.png]]
They believe that Stirner's idea of a Union of Egoists is the best and fairest way to run a society. They differ from Egoism in that they prefer a morality between those in the union under the Absurd and other authorities. Stirner identifies this as a sacred cause but if it aligns with their cause then so be it. They are most comfortable in a Union with morality but that is only their preference.

[[File:Demcon.png]]Social Contract
They believe that a decentralized collective organized in a Democratic Confederalist framework is the best way to manage society. This would be consensual and one can leave at any time. All local councils would be Unions of Egoists. This framework is only what they prefer and anyone else could have no organization or something else entirely.

[[File:Anpostleft.png]]Abolition of Work[[File:Antwork.png]]
Work is a burden that should be eliminated. We live in a economy where every basic need could be met just by automation so their really is no need for compulsory work on the economic sense. Instead people should do as they please. Instead all should play, stimulating the economy only by participation and never relying on it.

[[File:Absurd.png]]Absurdism
We live in a world so dismissive to our needs. We strive for meaning yet we live in a world so deprived of meaning, we are free yet the entire rest of the universe hinders us. The one is fundamentally at conflict with the all. This conflict is known as the absurd. When we realize this absurdity there are three options, two of wich they dismiss. The first is physical suicide. Suicide is an act not of overcoming nor even of escape; it is saying you have given up. They have extreme sympathy for those who take their lives but they see it as not a proper solution. The second is acts of denial such as religion and the like. They are ways to escape it without facing the absurdity by placing their faith in something without any basis of truth. This is an act of bad faith in the Sartrian sense and philosophical suicide in the Camusian sense. The only true way is to face the absurd, stare so long into the void that it stares back. To face it you are putting yourself above it. You have truly overcome it. Live in spite of the absurd and continue to chase meaning, even with the knowledge meaning will never come. Live life just for life's sake!

[[File:Postmodernicon.png]]Postmodernism
There is no metanarrative that society follows. No end of history or utopia that's ever going to come. Besides that our notions of "truth" change throughout history. Things we take for granted now will most likely be seen as barbaric by our descendants (assuming humanity survives that long). As such taking principles and the like of our culture is tremendously stupid and instead people should mostly focus on themselves.

[[File:Existentialist_Anarchism.png]]Freedom[[File:Post-an.png]]
People are radically free. We are always free to make choices, and appealing to any authority to make our decisions for us is fundamentally an act of bad faith. The authorities found everywhere only show the lack of freedom of the world and how the free individual and the rest of the world are fundamentally opposed. So do whatever you want, you're free to do so.

[[File:Absurd.png]]Morality[[File:Ego.png]]
While believing that morality is merely a social construction, they find it useful to act with some morality. This is merely a morality of respect of others freedoms, to respect contracts, etc. They think that this will make relations with others and oneself far more rewarding. While agreeing with Stirner that morality is a spook they still find it rewarding so they keep it. They also feel sympathy for all under the Absurd.

[[file:Kak.png]]Kakistocracy
I knew nothing about politics.

[[File:Lib.png]]Liberalism
Thought that everyone deserves equal rights and liked Capitalism.

[[File:Cybercr.png]]Cyberocracy
Thought that computers could design the most equitable economy and laws. Still liked Capitalism and thought that the government should sell things at a low price but low quality to generate revenue and to make sure everyone gets what they need. Had an idea of a law market that acted like a social media platform practicing market based Liquid Democracy with those with the most successful laws getting higher advertisement. All decisions would have to be approved by the AI running the government. Wants a UBI. Might turn this into a self insert in the future as I find this period very interesting.

[[File:E-Democracy.png]]E-Democracy
Same as previous period but I valued liberty much more. Still thinks computers are best for planning but wants the people's will to come first.

[[File:Georgist.png]]Georgism
Took the land pill. Stopped liking computer planning and started to prefer free markets. Values liberty far more.

[[File:Auslibm.png]]Austrolibertarian Market Socialism
Still loved the LVT but embraced free markets and worker cooperatives. Started to read theory.

[[File:Geolibsoc.png]]Geolibertarian Socialism
Started to move away from austrian economics but still liked markets (regulated ones). Got really into philosophy, specifically Camus

[[File:Demcon.png]]Democratic Confederalism
Abandoned markets and started really liking Rojava. Really liked Chomsky.

[[File:Geomut.png]]Geomutualism
Embraced anarchism and moved back to markets.

[[File:Awaj.png]]Anarchism Without Adjectives
Still prefered Geomutualism but thought that we shouldn't force an economic system on people.

[[File:HelloThere314Icon.png]]HelloThere314ism
Got really into theory and philosophy. Started to prefer Egoist organization methods while developing my own opinions on a lot of topics. Now really likes Situationism.

Personality
They are very into mathematics and philosophy, going on annoyingly convoluted rants on both subjects as well as politics in excruciating detail. They are friendly with everyone on the Libertarian Left and Libertarian Center quadrants.

Based

 * [[File:Existentialist_Anarchism.png]]Existentialist Anarchism - The Existentialist idea of choice is a great theory. Freedom is everything.
 * [[File:Absurd.png]]Absurdism - Albert Camus is based. While I don't personally embrace [[File:AnSynd.png]]Anarcho Syndicalism you're great nonetheless.
 * [[File:Geomut.png]]Geomutualism - The best way to govern people. People should owe society for the land they occupy (just don't force people to use this framework.)
 * [[File:GeoSynd.png]]Geosyndicalism - The best way to do property.
 * [[File:Post-an.png]]Post-Anarchism - The moralism and structuralism found in classical anarchism has only harmed them. While you are a bit impractical I agree that Anarchism is a way of life.
 * [[File:Gender_Accelerationism.png]]Gender Accelerationism - Your analysis of gender is great. Also communism with respect to markets is awesome. Your dictatorship of the queer is a bit too marxist but your based nonetheless.
 * [[File:Anbun.png]]Anarcho-Buniism - Fellow [[File:Camus.png]]Camus fan and [[File:Anpostleft.png]]Post-Leftist leftist. Just stop with the Kantianism.
 * [[File:Bsaheedism-icon.png]]Bsaheedism - Based [[File:Mutalist.png]]Mutualist and [[File:Anpostleft.png]]Post-Leftist leftist. Just cut back on the [[File:Nihil.png]]Nihilism and embrace [[File:Absurd.png]]Absurdism
 * [[File:Cybermut.png]]Cybermutualism - Probably the best economy we could work under. Also digital economies allow for far more decentralization and competition; based!
 * [[File:Polyarchy.png]]Polyarchy - Any form of governance that is not completely consensual is tyranny.
 * [[File:Situ.png]]Situationism - Spectacle is pervasive in every part of modern life. Just stop kissing up to [[File:Ormarxf.png]]Him
 * [[File:Liblovsprite.png]]Liberty-Loverism - Shares my views on most things, just a few hiccups here and there.
 * [[File:Councilguy2.png]]Post-Councilism - Bit iffy on the [[File:Nihil.png]]Nihilism but besides that you are very based. Fellow [[File:Situ.png]]Situationism lover.
 * [[File:Ultro.png]]Ultroneism - [[File:Ego.png]]Egoism is based. Bit to [[File:Indiv.png]]individualist for my taste, but hey, whatever floats your boat.[[File:Postmodernicon.png]]Postmodernism is based, and I agree, [[File:Prog-u.png]]Bob Dylan[[File:Postmodernicon.png]] is awsome.
 * [[File:Annilfemalev5.png]]AshleyHere Thought - Fellow [[File:Camus.png]]Camus lover and post leftist and anarchist, very based.
 * [[File:ChronicFemcel-newicon.png]]ChronicFemcel Thought - Based individualist.
 * [[File:PostChronic.png]]Post-ChronicFemcelism - Now a [[File:Situ.png]]Situationist, even more based!
 * [[File:TipuiSmall.png]]Tipism - Another based [[File:Situ.png]]Situationist!

Fine

 * [[File:Yoda8soup.png]]Yoda8soup Thought - Bit too moderate and statist as well as having some bad economic and organization takes. Needs to get into philosophy and read some theory. Overall fine.
 * [[File:NeoAlphadonialism.png]]Neo Alphadonialism - Still a fake [[File:Ego.png]]Egoist but getting their. Overall some decent takes but very incoherent. Nice dude from what I can tell.
 * [[File:AbEntball.png]]Absolute Entertainism - My problems with [[File:Annilfemalev5.png]]AshleyHere took up to 11. Still seems cool just way to hedonic.

Meh

 * [[File:Bckchn.png]]Bookchin Communalism - Your view of a future society is very based but your generall dogma and hatred of [[File:Anin.png]]Anarcho Individualism and [[File:Situ.png]]Situationism cannot be ignored
 * [[File:NewTony.png]]Tony567 Thought - Reminds me of me a when I was a [[File:Georgist.png]]Georgist. Too economically right and far too statist.
 * [[File:MattBall1.png]]Mattism - Also reminds me of me when i was a [[File:Georgist.png]]Georgist. Way to moderate and statist.

[[File:Camus.png]]Albert Camus[[File:Absurd.png]]

 * 1942 - The Myth of Sisyphus: And Other Essays
 * 1951 - The Rebel
 * 1960 - Resistance, Rebellion, And Death

[[File:Sartre.png]]John Paul Sartre

 * 1946 - Existentialism Is A Humanism

[[File:ExistFem.png]]Simone De Beauvoir

 * 1947 - The Ethics Of Ambiguity

[[File:Nietzsche-icon.png]]Friedrich Nietzsche

 * 1892 - Thus Spoke Zarathustra

[[File:Debord.png]]Guy Debord[[File:Councom.png]]

 * 1967 - Society Of The Spectacle

[[File:Ego.png]]Max Stirner

 * 1844 - The Ego And Its Own

[[File:Ego-Existential.png]]Herbert Read

 * 1949 - Existentialism, Marxism and Anarchism

[[File:Republicanismpix.png]]Jean-Jacques Rousseau[[File:Radlib.png]]

 * 1762 - The Social Contract

[[File:GeoSynd.png]]William Schmack

 * 2014 - Geo-syndicalism

[[File:Demcon.png]]Abdullah Öcalan

 * 2011 - Democratic Confederalism

[[File:Chom.png]]Noam Chomsky[[File:AnSynd.png]]

 * 2005 - On Anarchism

[[File:Gender_Accelerationism.png]]Vikky Storm and Eme Flores[[File:Xenofeminism.png]]

 * 2019 - Gender Accelerationist Manifesto
 * 2017 - It’s Time For “Mad Anarchism”

[[File:Steinval.png]]Peter Vallentyne

 * 2000 - Left-Libertarianism: A Primer
 * 2009 - Left-Libertarianism as a Promising Form of Liberal Egalitarianism

[[File:Georgist.png]]Henry George

 * 1879 - Progress And Poverty

[[File:Sartre.png]]John Paul Sartre

 * 1943 - Being And Nothingness

[[File:ExistFem.png]]Simone De Beauvoir

 * 1949 - The Second Sex

[[File:Mutalist.png]]Pierre-Joseph Proudhon

 * 1840 - What Is Property?

[[File:Goldman.png]]Emma Goldman[[File:Egocom.png]]

 * 1910 - Anarchism And Other Essays

[[File:Chom.png]]Noam Chomsky[[File:AnSynd.png]]

 * 1990 - Profit Over People

[[File:Mill.png]]John Stuart Mill[[File:Liberalsoc.png]]

 * 1859 - On Liberty

[[File:Poststruct.png]]Michel Foucault[[File:Postmodernicon.png]]

 * 1975 - Discipline And Punish

[[File:Žižekism.png]]Slavoj Žižek

 * 1989 - The Sublime Object Of Ideology

[[File:Ego.png]]Max Stirner

 * [[File:Ego-nihil.png]]"All things are nothing to me."
 * [[File:Ego.png]]"I love men too - not merely individuals, but every one. But I love them with the consciousness of egoism; I love them because love makes me happy, I love them because loving is natural to me, because it pleases me. I know no commandment of love."
 * [[File:Illeg.png]]"The state calls its own violence law, but that of the individual, crime."

[[File:Camus.png]]Albert Camus

 * [[File:Existentialist_Anarchism.png]]"The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion."
 * [[File:Absurd.png]]"You will never be happy if you continue to search for what happiness consists of. You will never live if you are looking for the meaning of life."

[[File:Debord.png]]Guy Debord

 * [[File:Situ.png]]"In our society now, we prefer to see ourselves living than living."

[[File:Anpostleft.png]]Bob Black

 * [[File:Antwork.png]]"Work is the source of nearly all the misery in the world."
 * [[File:Antwork.png]]"Play is always voluntary. What might otherwise be play is work if it's forced"

Comments

 * - wanna add me?


 * - Add please, I'll do the same.


 * - add me?


 * User:Tony567- add me please


 * - “dogmatic Egoism” - hmmm how strange, I wonder if you gartered this opinion from actually reading Stirner (which you say you are currently doing - albeit a terrible translation). If so I really must have penetrated in the very depths of Stirner’s very mind to find his Socratic Ethics, His Baurian Critique of Religion, his concept of the Gaze which he time traveled to read from Sartre and above all his Debate with Zizek. Otherwise you would have failed to notice my idiosyncratic philosophy that is influenced by Stirner - and if being original is dogmatic than any thinker is - let alone someone who follows doctrines of pre-built political ideology such as an Anarchist like yourself.
 * [[File:HelloThere314Icon.png]]HelloThere314 - Fair enough. You are right that every ideology and even every principle is in some way dogmatic; dogmatic was probably the wrong word. I meant more that your full commitment to individualism is a bit short sighted. Egoism is nihilistic however with this realization it turns to oneself. This self and its needs and wants can be just as corrupting and authoritative as any outside authority. There is authority everywhere, everything is authoritative. That is what I meant by egoism being short sighted. However the ego is in many ways separate to these desires and only satisfying what it believes will fulfill it the most. I will change my comment. Sorry, feel like an idiot.
 * - "I meant more that your full commitment to individualism is a bit short sighted." In what way? That I regard Individuals as themselves, as autonomous while still a part of their social and historical environment. Or perhaps because I don't lessen myself before the sacred of humanity, or the community like a religious slave. If I am too individualist, you are nothing but a collectivist that wishes to actualise me into shoulds and oughts. "Egoism is nihilistic" No it is not. Please do not fall into the Nihilism as Egoism trap that so many anarchist writers have please. "This self and its needs and wants can be just as corrupting and authoritative as any outside authority." Yes - which is why Stirner has already beaten you to your own criticism, "Oh if only Stirner had realised that the self can be itself possessed he would have never have written his work" - except that Stirner spoke about a one-sided narrow egoism of say the greedy or hedonistic man that lets himself get carried away by his own desires and instead keeps an ironic distance from himself in a "self-forgetfullness" - See the sacred externally forced idea can be killed and destroyed - but the internal idea can be dropped and left.  Last point - you say that you differ from Egoists on the contention of Solidarity within the Union of Egoists, and yet once again Stirner has beaten you to the ball game "is a union in which most of those involved are hoodwinked about their most natural and obvious interests, a union of egoists? Have "egoists" come together where one is the slave or serf of the other? There are, it's true, egoists in such a society, and in this sense, it might in some aspects be called an "egoistic union"; but the slaves have not really sought this society from egoism, and are instead, in their egoistic hearts, against these lovely "unions," as Hess calls them"." Stirner's Critics. Which is to say that unless everyone forming the Union wants to be there, and agrees for mutual interest i.e. Solidarity between them - then it cannot be called a Union of Egoists - it is instead an involuntary and inautonomous society.
 * [[File:HelloThere314Icon.png]]HelloThere314 - Again I do differ from egoism in that regard. I merely think that solidarity is the best way to form a sustainable collective. This could be left at anytime and is only what I prefer. If you or stirner do not consider these to be "proper" unions of egoists so be it. I act in my own self interest as I enjoy working in a collective. It is an active decision I am making and not forced by some outside authority. I would not force you to join it if you do not wish to. Also stirner is a nihilist he literally said "I have set my cause on nothing" and "all things are nothing to me". Egoism isn't necessary nihilistic but stirner is. Also yes stirner has beat me to the corrupting of the self by desires. I read that passage two days ago. I was just laying out what I meant in the moment, I do not believe them now. Also I am not a filthy collectivist, you can do as you please, I merely like acting in a collective fashion.
 * - "Again I do differ from egoism in that regard." No I'm saying you don't differ - you are arguing what Stirner argued and then saying you are different. Stirner does argue for solidarity. "Also stirner is a nihilist he literally said "I have set my cause on nothing" and "all things are nothing to me"." Wrong - The quote "I Have Based My Affair on Nothing" is the same quote as  "all things are nothing to me" (which is a bad translation) as is taken from Goethe the German Romantic Poet who Stirner was influenced by. The Quote is actually a basis of I have based my affair on nothing, nothing but myself - Stirner says "The sultan has based his affair on nothing but himself...God and humanity have based their affair on nothing, on nothing but themselves. I likewise base my affair on myself, this I who just like God am the nothing of all others, this I who am my all, this I who am the Unique." That is to say that Stirner's Nothing is himself - which is a nothing... a Creative Nothing. A non-concept, non-category, and non-thing. It is to say that the word Unique and Creative-Nothing is nothing other than a word which is made up of the content which I am, and that content is a nothing, it is not a concept such as individual or human it is me - which changes and negates itself in each moment, being a nothing. A negative space for creation. It is Nominalist and Hegelian, Not Nihilist. Stirner is not a Nihilist - for he also values life, meaning, and self-creation.  "Also I am not a filthy collectivist, you can do as you please, I merely like acting in a collective fashion." If I am TOO Individualist, then to me, you are TOO Collectivist. You wish to value things above each individual - a sacred external cause that has no relation to the Individuals that are a part of it. A Seperate, external, and oppositional conscious to their self-consciousness. Nothing more than a Religious fellow with their sacred cause - But I have based my affair on nothing, nothing but myself and my own cause.
 * [[File:HelloThere314Icon.png]]HelloThere314 - Fair enough, after reading up on it I don't have the best translation out their also yes by that stirner is not a nihilist. Also when I say you are too individualistic for my taste that is only my own individual opinion on how I'd like to live my life. That may be different then yours and that is fine to me. Stirner's critique of sacred causes is very based, I personally find myself most happy and fulfilled in a collective environment. You may say that that itself is a sacred cause but if I find myself happiest their then that's where I would like to be. My cause aligns with a sacred cause and to me that is fine. So yes I can be to collectivist to you and you could be to individualist for me. Also yes me and stirner don't seem to differ on solidarity wich is fine and based.
 * - Discord? I want to know how to demolish the entire state of my ideology.
 * [[File:HelloThere314Icon.png]]HelloThere314 - HelloThere314
 * - And the tag?
 * [[File:HelloThere314Icon.png]]HelloThere314 - 0691
 * - HelloThere314#0691 didn't work.
 * [[File:HelloThere314Icon.png]]HelloThere314 - helloThere 0691
 * - Look out for AlphaBeta906Alt, I sent a friend request.

- Can you add me, i'll add when I get around to doing it.

AshleyHere - Add me?

- I’m not a hedonist btw.

- wanna add me?