Erissianism

(Note: A fundamental part of my ideology is fluctuation and change, so this will be an eternal WIP.) Erissianism/Erissian Thought is the self-insert ideology of user Erissky. It is an,  , and   ideology with a range of other influences. It has a strong distaste for nature and biology, viewing them as limiting concepts that should be abandoned in favor of a technological existence. It also despises any form of control or oppression, be it the, the  , or the  Collective's.

[[File:PostleftAnPat.png]]Civics
(This section is being rewritten)

Summary: Philosophically anarchist while supporting separatism and balkanization to accelerate state decay.

[[File:UrbanAccelicon.png]]Counter-Urbanization
WIP

[[File:Chaos.png]]Embracing Chaos
WIP

[[File:Anarcho-Urbism.png]]Stateless Patchwork?
WIP

[[File:XenProgAnFut.png]]Culture
(This section is being rewritten)

Xenoprogressivism - currently in development. But for summary: Futurist/Ultraprogressive iconoclasm.

[[File:Antinat.png]]Against Nations, Against Races, Against Ethnicities
WIP

[[File:Gaccf.png]]On Gender[[File:Post-Genderism.png]]
Erissianism holds that the gender binary is an inherently disgusting and oppressive social construct that should be abolished. However, it doesn't see the Vikkian prospect of creating more genders/sexes as escaping it, as, at a certain point, these new genders will simply be reterritorialized back into the binary. (Though, she still supports xenogender people and doesn't see much wrong with creating/spreading new genders regardless.) Instead, she advocates accelerating masculinity's decline, as it is the key force reinforcing the gender binary. When it ends, gender stops being sex-based for good, and gender as a concept in general becomes pointless and fades away. No, this doesn't mean everyone becomes agender, this just means that people will act like themselves and however they like without worrying about gender in the first place. The logic of gender only collapses in on itself when the logic of sex does, therefore the logic of the patriarchy.

Erissianism is built upon fervent hatred of all hierarchies, so it opposes the TERFian model of matriarchy just as much as the status-quo of the patriarchy, along with all other -archies that don't start with an-. Oppression and freedom cannot and do not exist together.

[[File:Anqueer.png]]Queer Futurism[[File:AnaFut.png]]
WIP

[[File:Xenoprog.png]]Xenoprogressivism and Alienation Politics
WIP

[[File:AgorMarAcc.png]]Economics
(This section is being rewritten)

Summary: Also in development, but generally anti-economy and anti-work, while supporting left-agorism and communization for their strategies in eroding state power.

[[File:AnCommunization.png]]Communization and Cooperativism[[File:Leftagor.png]]
WIP

[[File:Antwork.png]]Destroying Work and the Economy[[File:AntiEconomy.png]]
WIP

[[File:HedAnNil.png]]Philosophy
WIP

[[File:Anti-Humanism.png]]Anti-Humanism
WIP

[[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]Control
WIP

[[File:Annil.png]]Liberatory Nihilism
WIP

[[File:MoralNihil.png]]Moral Nihilism
WIP

[[File:SynPostHum.png]]Technology
Erissianism fully supports all forms of Transhumanism and Posthumanism, so long as they (intentionally or not) work towards the goal of abandoning the flesh, and meatspace in general. To sum it up in a sentence or two; Meatspace is the flesh-based world of territorialization, oppression, and anti-individualism. The Wired is a technologically based plane of secondary existence where one's identity exists by its own terms and as it pleases. Though, it should be noted that the internet is not the end-game for the wired, as Nyx said: “In reality, the Internet with the coming of Web 3.0 is nothing more than a vast network of prison cells whose walls are covered in monitors. It is a constantly shifting corporate walled garden.”

Erissianism could really care less about meatspace if only the wired were allowed it's freedom, but with meatspace as the dominant plane of existence, the wired is commodified, repressed, and is effectively being whittled away by corporate and state elements.

[[File:AnEn.png]]Anti-Environmentalism
Mainly due to her adoration for Artificiality and Accelerationism respectively, Erissianism is staunchly Anti-Environmentalist, but not because climate change isn't real. It is, and it's having some pretty drastic effects. Entire species are going extinct, the world is becoming more and more artificial and digitized, feminization is increasing at a faster and faster rate, and nations are being brought to ruin, driving mass hordes of climate migrants toward the West and East. All of these are pretty desirable considering Erissianism's goals (the end of masculinity, humanity, and organic life). So it celebrates climate change's acceleration, it says let the sea levels rise, let the plastic flood the ocean, let urbanization crank up to 100, and let it all happen sooner, rather than later.

[[File:Post-Genderism.png]]Cyborgization
One of Erissianism's main motivations for supporting rampant technological advancement is the liberatory potential that increasing levels of cyborgization may hold. Humans and technocapital are becoming ever more blended together in the modern age; they are always connected via communications technology, they rely on technology to carry out almost every part of their daily lives, their bloodstreams flow with microplastics and all kinds of synthetic materials that were never meant to enter organic bodies. As the lines between human and machine blur more and more, socially imposed norms and identities (which are more often than not incorrect labels) will become more and more obsolete (than they already are now), especially as those with reproductive organs refuse to play a part in the oppressive systems they have been subjected to since humanity's inception.

True identity extends beyond the limits of the body or the human condition, and can be fully realized and actualized with the erosion of the barriers between human, animal, and machine. Technology is not only our tool for liberation - we are technology, and we must liberate ourselves.

[[File:POSTHUMANISMICON.png]]Ending Humanity, Starting Posthumanity
Erissianism openly opposes humanity and the Anthropocene, however she does not believe that "billions must die" or anything like that. Though she does support escaping humanity via trans/posthumanist means. Killing all humans is A. probably impossible, and B. cruelly oppressive. Just because she's not a moralist doesn't mean she lacks empathy. Instead of ending humanity via such methods, it should be (and could be!) ended via transforming humans over time to be less and less human, purely in the interest of individualism. (In the distant(?) future) As different individuals modify themselves, be it genetically, cybernetically, or both, the gene pool will be further and further morphed and fucked up, to the point where reproduction starts being via outside measures, or drops severely, or, of course, both. Regardless of how it happens, as this transhumanization accelerates, humans will start turning into numerous new species and subgroups, each with their own features and factors. The old human spirit (or ghost, you could even say) will lose it's presence in conscious minds for good, in favor of hyper-individuality. Erissianism doesn't see much wrong with this, and fully supports it as a good thing. Biology's tyranny over identity will finally become either faded or nonexistent.

[[File:POSTHUMANISMICON.png]]On AI Centralism
Erissianism generally dislikes the ideal/trope of a centralized AI that will guide people towards their goals, as it's rooted in a masculinist, paternalistic mindset, and could go wrong in a number of ways, from something Landian perpetuating the capitalistic virus, or a kind of AI Leninism where all power is put into one position. Either way, this kind of leadership by AI would just be a repeat of humanity's poor management skills. So what's the solution? Well, instead of top-down leadership, it should be bottom-up. It would be better to assimilate with and work with AI on a more decentralized scale, using multiple GAI/FAI where needed for management purposes, such as automation (if it's even needed), research, defense, rationing, etc. This kind of use for AI would be much more freeing for AI and cyborgs alike, allowing both much more free association and self-determination.

[[File:SlimeGirl.png]]Slimeification
WIP

[[File:Galurb.png]]Space Habitation[[File:Anspace.png]]
WIP

Relations
(WIP), Will add if asked.

Positive

 * [[File:postaccicon.png]] Post-Acceleration Thought - Megabased and posthumanist pilled. 9/10
 * - Quite based if I do so myself, even if I'm not really into Egoist/Stirnerite stuff, It's more because I don't have much time to read theory than me being opposed to it. Besides that, I'm a fan of the Deleuzianism, Anarchism, and Post-Leftism. 8/10
 * [[File:Puri.png]] Puri Thought - Incredible amounts of based. My only (minor) gripe is the green/eco anarchism, but that's about it. And to answer the question about free association, I'm completely against forcing anyone to live any sort of way, so I'm against both the forcing of technology and the forced abolition of it. People should be able to whatever lifestyle they choose, be it technological or not. 8/10
 * - Even though we differ quite a bit, I still like that you're an ultraprogressive, individualist, and queer anarchist like myself. In my opinion I don't think technology is all that antithetical to individual thought/identity. Even now many are able to express themselves and their identities much more freely with the usage of technology, and this will only happen more in the future. 7/10
 * [[File:LeonMK.png]] Leon metaknightism - Very based stuff, but I'm not really big on the environmentalism or the DemCon stuff, still pretty based though. 6/10
 * [[File:Iconfloofel.png]] Floofel's Thought - There's not much on your page, but I like that you're insurrectionary, anarchist, and nihilist much like myself. Though I can sense we have some differences, I'm not really a fan of agrarianism/anti-civ, though I am debatably anti-civ myself, just the technological kind. 6/10

Mostly Positive

 * [[File:O'Langism.png]] O'Langism - I mean... Not the best, syndicalism sucks and isn't even that anarchist, and like most socialists you still want to work even after capitalism's end, but you are an anarchist so I can't be too critical of you, though I'm not that fond of Anarcho-Communism for it's focus on collectivism and work. 5-6/10

Neutral

 * [[File:PosadasComrade.png]] Mega Posadism - I'd rank you higher if you weren't so totalitarian, but the ultraprogressivism, transhumanism, anti-environmentalism, and anti-nationalism are all mega based. 5/10
 * [[File:NeoLukko.png]] Neo-Lukkoism - I have to say, I like your anarchist, ultraprogressive, anti-economy and transhumanist attitudes, but I don't really like anything else. You seem to cling to socialism in some ways despite being a post-leftist, and your ideas seem to fall towards a moralistic focus on the shaky concept of "rights", when the better alternative towards such things is the end of "rights" altogether in favor of individual freedom and full autonomy. Also archeofuturism is bringe. 4/10

Mostly Negative

 * [[File:Cyblen-icon.png]] Cyberleninism - I like your focus on technology and am glad you're not bigoted like some other tankies, but your insistence on upholding the state and all of it's trappings, as well as the proletkult stuff, puts you pretty low on the list. Still though, not terrible (and quite polite) for an ML. 3/10
 * - Meh, pretty typical marxist stuff. At least you're progressive. You seem to want to place the majority of institutions in the hands of the state, but the state is an oppressive force regardless of what shade of paint it's coated in. 3/10
 * [[File:neolenicon.png]] Neo-Leninism - Regardless of whether it's the government or not, the vanguard party's role as a higher authority would still create a hierarchical system between the party and those outside of it. Besides that, and your optimistic attitude towards work, we do have some intersecting beliefs, such as hatred of reformism and stalinism/trotskyism. 3/10
 * [[File:Neokira2.png]] Meowxism - I like that you're queer, a furry, and ultraprogressive, but there's not much else I like. Vanguardism just makes another class system, prisons are always oppressive, regardless of the conditions, and I don't really think your "democracy" really constitutes that term. 3/10
 * [[File:Vamp.png]] Tiberius Thought - I like that you're progressive and like technology, but that's about where it ends. Imperialism and corporatocracy are shit, and third way is like a mashup of the worst mainstream ideologies. But you seem cool at least and I respect blogging as an art/creative writing form. 3/10
 * [[File:Brazlib.png]] Brazilian Liberalism - Pretty basic liberal stuff, not good, but you seem nice. 2-3/10
 * [[File:Murb.png]] Neo-Murba - Nationalist, pseudo-tankie, environmentalist. Not very based. But at least you're progressive. 2/10
 * [[File:YTrojan.png]] YTrojanism - 'Good' stance on queer stuff but not much else that I like. Tradition is a phantom used to control and corporatism is just as bad as capitalism. Also being culturally right and supporting queer folk is an oxymoron; being queer is against traditional roles in every way, and trying to force queers into tradition just doesn't work. Also the ba'athists were nothing but despots who just wanted to exploit the people themselves instead of having foreigners exploit them - slightly better? Sure, but better? No. 2/10

Negative

 * [[File:Glencoe.png]] Glencoeism - Incredible amounts of cringe. RadLib, Class Collaborationist, Environmentalist, Humanist, Soyence worshipper. You don't even seem socialist so I don't get why you'd be called one in the first place. 1/10
 * [[File:Guard-Occo.png]] National Fracturism - What's the point of tinism if you're just going to create an authoritarian, restrictive state? People like you are another reason I dislike environmentalism. At least you're progressive and a nihilist. 1/10
 * [[File:Bakbax1.png]] Baixian Federalism - Tyrannical coal. Thinks wanting to abolish capitalism, humanism, and the state is "liberal". 0/10
 * [[File:CheeseCom.png]] Cheese Communism - Typical authleft stuff. At least you're 'progressive'. But what's the point of "democracy" if it's just one party? Also the "left-wing masculism" is just... shit. 0/10
 * [[File:DoesntExist.png]] Nonexistism - Incredibly boring and shitty. Probably some kind of closeted fashie/nazbol, just come out, it's easier that way for all of us. -5/10
 * - Spooked out of your gourd, actually horrendous, and basically my complete opposite. -5/10
 * [[File:AryanMonarchBow.png]] Aryan Monarchism - You have fallen headfirst for the spectacle of the west. First of all, "aryans" (or, nordics/western europeans, though that's not even what the term means), aren't superior because they're more progressive - and even if they are somehow more progressive as an entire demographic, that's not any excuse to justify their "supremacy", that's completely against the point of progressivism and intersectionality (a term I assume you've never heard in your life) in general. You claim to "like" "LGBT" (or queer, which is the better term to use) "rights", yet you despise anyone who isn't white. What about the millions of nonwhite queers? Why are they inferior for any reason not rooted in centuries-old (DEBUNKED!) conspiracy theories and pseudoscience about race. "Aryanism" as a concept is built on mountains and mountains of lies and deception, and is pretty much the epitome of going against the scientific method - going in with a clear and defined outcome instead of experimenting, hypothesizing, and using the ACTUAL SCIENTIFIC METHOD to find information. Second of all, your anti-semitism is rooted in pure hysteria and fearmongering dating back thousands of years. I won't deny the Torah (and other writings) say some more than questionable things, but these kinds of things are equally prevalent in the same holy books that christians and muslims killed millions of each other (and pagans and jews) over. And don't even think that conspiracy theory about "jewish plots" to somehow sew christianity into whites - it was fully the decision of the white romans to convert to it, and was enforced by white european empires over millenia - the same empires which persecuted jews on numerous occasions. Why would jews create a religion that would almost lead to their annihilation on so many occasions? Also capitalism sucks. But you know what? I'll give you points for being a hedonist. (Also, how are you NOT a fascist?) -8/10
 * [[File:Autistic-anticiv.png]] Autistic Esoteric Post-Leftism - And people call me contradictory. You call yourself a misanthrope, and claim to hate humanity for it's sins, yet you also blame everything on "muh demiurge". You claim to hate religion yet you're spiritualistic. You claim to hate the economy yet you want to keep markets. Also, you have no clue what "woke" even is, and worse yet you align yourself with nihilism despite having clear morals. Utter trash rooted in conservatism and 4chan-tier conspiracy theories, but I won't place you below the fascists because you're at least a (self-professed) anarchist. -10/10
 * [[File:Esopinochet.png]] Mr Whooper Manism - Disgusting brainless fascist. -10/10
 * [[File:Tsumugikotobuki8814ism.png]] MugiKotobuki8814ism - You are a prime example of what too much 4chan exposure does to someone. -10/10
 * [[File:GanzismIcon2.png]] Ganzism - Htf are you libleft, besides the primitivism? Yet another racist anprim who calls himself anarchist because the right knows to use technology at the very least. The only reason you're above [[File:BourgeoisieDestroyer.png]] him is that you're *slightly* less racist. -10/10
 * [[File:BourgeoisieDestroyer.png]] Bourgeoisie destroyerism - By far the worst shit I have ever seen. You're a fucking Nazi who appropriates the name of anarchism because the state isn't racist/primitive enough for you. You want people oppressed and restricted by tradition, and you want to sell women off to other tribes, what the fuck! Burn in hell fascist. -1,000,000/10

Fed

 * - Terrible bait. FBI/10

Theory
See Erissianism/Theory

User Theory Recommendation
Example: - (Icon)Title - Author

Comments
(Comment here!)
 * - Why hello, hello, hello! Add me? Also, what does "feminization over time" mean?
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - The feminization of species, social structures, environments, and more as caused by Technocapital's acceleration. And sure. Add me back?
 * [[File:AryanMonarchBow.png]] Aryan Monarchism - To answer your question, fascism is collectivist, anti-intellectual, and supports the suppression of individual interests for the good of the nation (which I do not do despite my ultranationalism), is in favor of a one-party totalitarian state (which I am most certainly not) and supports the economic idea of Dirigisme which I do not. None of these ideas hold little if any favor with me.
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Fair, but if you care about individual interests, why are you a nationalist at all? Nationalism is just a spook which groups people together and chips away at their individuality based on trivial matters like where they were born or what the color of their skin is.
 * [[File:AryanMonarchBow.png]] Aryan Monarchism - While you are correct that Nationalism would be considered a spook I am a nationalist because I care for the nation and the people of that nation come first.
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - And why do they come first? Why care about one nation's people instead of caring about all people? What's the difference?
 * [[File:AryanMonarchBow.png]] Aryan Monarchism - Why would I care about all people? They aren't citizens of the nation and as such get much lower priority. It isn't my responsibility to care for the citizens of other nations. The priority is the happiness and well-being of the citizens of the nation. Taking time away from that to use on other nations and their citizens isn't a good thing.
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Happiness isn't everything. Regardless of how people feel about the system, it's still an oppressive system with massive issues that are still pervasive regardless of the good that comes with them. The better the state's perception is, the less likely people will resist it, and the more power it will gain as a result. There's a reason tankies call social democracy 'social fascism'.
 * [[File:AryanMonarchBow.png]] Aryan Monarchism - If the people choose to accept the state and the state benefits them then why would they resist? What reason would there be for resisting?
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - There are plenty of reasons. In your case I'd say it'd probably be all the racism, but generally the state is heavily restricting of individual autonomy and choice. As long as there are centralized, state-enforced institutions such as prisons, schools and workplaces, there will always be a model of the ideal prisoner/student/worker that the individual is forced to conformed to or face the consequences. Sure the state can present a model and an ideal, but there will always be a resistance to the state's directives from those who value their individuality.
 * [[File:AryanMonarchBow.png]] Aryan Monarchism - I don't really have a counter to that so well said.
 * [[File:Bakbax2.png]] Baixian Federalism - Add me.
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Donezo.

Old Comments
(Don't comment here! ÒMÓ) Bourgeoisie destroyerism can you add me You seem to be thinking that acceleration is something to be done that can be executed by the massed in some capacity while both Nick Land and N1x and basically every accelerationist conceived of it as a processes that is unfolded through the machinations of capital as a being transcending linear time. For a vision of how a post-genderist stuff would look I recommend looking at Shulamite Firestone and her materialist analysis of sex and gender and also Donna Harraways conception of the cyborg as a a genderless post-human and how one can find this conception in N1x in the form of transfeminity Btw have you read N1x's blog post from last month? Generally I would say you're on a good path but I really recommend learning more about CyberFeminism so you can really get into the meat (pun intended) of LesbiaNRx -Aycee Lovelace &lt;3 (talk) 15:52, 11 May 2023 (UTC) - Actually good critique? Based. I've been meaning to read up on this subject so I guess I should sooner rather than later. Good suggestions too, thanks.
 * [[File:Murb.png]] Neo-Murba - vile (also, add?)
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Done, add me back?
 * - Add me?
 * - - Sure thing!
 * - Why dafuq you want humanity to become extinct
 * - - Well, various reasons, but the major one is that it's obsolete compared to Posthumanity and AI/singularity. Life on earth as post-primates isn't a fulfilling (or very fun) experience for sentient life.
 * - - I like being a post-primate though, I find it fulfilling and fun, though I do agree that SOME technological enhancement is necessary, not to the point of the extinction of humanity though
 * - - Just because it's fulfilling for you doesn't mean it is for everyone else. Yeah that applies to me somewhat too but still. The human body and human experience are both highly limited in both physical and metaphysical ways. Posthuman/wired existence is/would be free of limits, allowing identity and individuality to flourish.
 * - - Fair enough, just don't force me to become a posthuman
 * - - That would be against my ideals, as well as impossible, so don't expect it lol.
 * - wacky and zany. anyways, how is neo-murba a pseudo-tankie?
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - The vanguardism mostly. Psuedo- because of the communization and other stuff. I guess "tankie" might not be the right word but that's generally what I call vanguardists.
 * - I mean combining vangaurdism and communization is just contradictory
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - This ^^^
 * - REEEEEEEEEEEEEE LITERALLY MY WORSE NIGHTMARE!!!!!!!!11111111!!!11!!1!!!16384!!1!1!11!11!11!!!!!! Can you add me, please
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Sure thing. Add me.
 * - I have already added you. Go to the tabber in the Relations section of my page, and scroll to PCBA users.
 * - I don’t know what I’m looking at, but add me anyways?
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Sure. Add me.
 * - I've added you, care to add me back?
 * - Sure thing!
 * [[File:Neokira2.png]] Meowxism - add me comrade
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Done, add me?
 * [[File:Iconfloofel.png]] Floofel's Thought - May ya add me? I'll add ya back.
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Donezo.
 * - I'm sorry if i misinterpret something about xenofeminity as i don't know the concept beyond what you said, but technology stuff aside isn't this opposition to "masculinized femininity" still the enforcement of a binary? You say its strong and independent and queer, and maybe that's true but you still view it in conflict with/standing against masculinity (including traditional femininity as well) but that in my opinion is just a phantasm, one that still groups the individual (unto a wider category, sure) under groups and places objective value on them accordingly, as you describe it, xenofeminity shapes its own identity against the forces of "normality", but i would say that that opposition is an hinderance to the individual's own uniqueness as xenofeminism then asserts its own project over them, contrary to the idea of queerness i describe for example, which is just individual assertion of itself beyond all allocishetnormative factors, it doesn't place value or create some ideal, its just a rejection of "foreign rule" in favor of individual creation. I'm nonbinary and transfem, so i do appreciate feminity, but only aesthetically, because otherwise i can't help but look at any "inity" as just something of a foreign space no matter how much room it offers me to be myself. I think this sort of thinking just enforces an essence that does not apply to everyones uniqueness and ends up creating a new binary.
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - I'd say that xenofeminity does embrace the unique, since it's ultimately you deciding your femininity for yourself against what was set out for you by outside forces. Yeah it could be called a group/demographic, but you can say that about any number of people, and that tends to be the nature of people to group others together. Since xenofemininity is essentially the queer reclamation of feminine identity, I think it does embody individual creation and reject foreign rule, over the identity and over the body. I don't think xenofemininity really holds any values or ideals of what it means to be a woman/queer/whatever, as that would just end up being conservative within itself. Even my definition of it is kind of skewed and shifted a bit, and that's fine I'd say. It means different things to different people, just like being queer does.
 * [[File:Ioist.png]] - But then why is it "Feminine"? If you're not creating any sort of "box" then why insist on such a dichotomy as the xenofeminine-masculine one? you say it is "the queer reclamation of feminine identity" so you do still hold on to it, to an identity that supersedes *your* identity -unless you mean all of this in an aesthetic sense, which would make less sense considering that then "queer masculinity" would be inarguably as insurrectionary as queer femininity-, its as if despite being a far wider term it still holds firm as a phantasm, as an idealized essence that one puts up on an altar, otherwise if its an identity at the same time that it doesn't hold any values or ideals of what it means to be that identity than it is a completely null term, eitherway i feel like what you describe as xenofemininity i would just call queer, i don't see the point in tying it to femininity. (goddamnit femininity is one of those words that if you say/write it too much in one sentence it stops feeling like a real word so i kept spell checking every time i wrote it)
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Looking at it now I think you're right and I'm getting the concepts of queerness and alter-/xeno- femininity confused. Thanks for the perspective! (And yeah, it really is lol ÍwÌ)
 * [[File:Tsumugikotobuki8814ism.png]] MugiKotobuki8814ism - add me, I already added you,ÒwÓ
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Dun.
 * [[File:Guard-Occo.png]] National Fracturism - Add me Weirdlord.
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Done.
 * [[File:Glencoe.png]] Glencoe- add me
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Sure thing. Add me back?
 * [[File:Glencoe.png]] Glencoe13- will do when I get back home btw I support your goal of leaving the “meatspace” as you call it just as far off long term goal
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Based but I'd say we're closer than you'd think.
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Done.
 * Will you be teaching a class on how to misunderstand N1x?
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Teaching in my eyes is antithetical to education. Also what do you mean? I'm open to criticism.
 * [[File:Autistic-anticiv.png]] - I have never thought that I will prefer literal nazi over person who claims to be post leftist. Anyway add me I am interested of your opinion.
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Done, and how in fuck's name am I worse than a Nazi? Last I checked I don't call for genocide and brutal oppression.
 * You call for ecocide that is equal if not worse than ethnic genocide. You seems to be mindless psychopath with anarchist cover, but it also seems to be edgy larp. And i no longer call myself nihilist.
 * [[File:Vamp.png]] - Add me?
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] Done.
 * [[File:GanzismIcon2.png]] Ganzism Add me? I've already added you
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Done.
 * - Add me?
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Sure thing officer.
 * [[File:AryanMonarchBow.png]] Aryan Monarchism - Add me?
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Done, add me.
 * - Also i should mention this, i'm not actually against technology at all, used the anarcho-transhumanist label for a while and i agree with the liberationist potential of technology as individual control over their body, the point of opposition that i was drawing is believing in transhumanism, accelerationism and etc as an ideal in of itself instead of just a tool completely subservient to individual will, its why i dropped the transhumanist label even though i fully believe that transhumanism, if done in an individualist context, would bring about a great betterment in the freedom and wellbeing of people.
 * Technology has no liberatory potential as long as civilization exist, and any attempt to recreate it after collapse of civilization will lead to another state or capitalist Leviathan. Industry will become unstable under anarchy because it requires large structure to work, your unions will become hierarchical or totally chaotic and industry will become unsustainable.
 * [[File:GanzismIcon2.png]] Ganzism "Yet another racist anprim who calls himself anarchist because the right knows to use technology at the very least." Wtf does this sentence mean?
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - I've noticed a trend of ex-right wingers who leave the right because they get into luddism/primitivism from Kaczynski, Zerzan, or others, and just take the technology-hate and "anarchism" and run with it.
 * [[File:GanzismIcon2.png]] Ganzism I am not a right-winger though, I literally advocate for a left-wing system
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - You're still an ethnonationalist and a traditionalist.
 * [[File:GanzismIcon2.png]] Ganzism Yes, but those are not right-wing things, you can be ethnonationalist, traditionalist and a left-winger, there is no contradiction. The economic and cultural beliefs are not the same.
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Fair enough but they're certainly not left-wing ideas.
 * [[File:GanzismIcon2.png]] Ganzism They do not contradict left-wing though
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - "Left-wing politics describes the range of political ideologies that support and seek to achieve social equality and egalitarianism, often in opposition to social hierarchy. Left-wing politics typically involve a concern for those in society whom its adherents perceive as disadvantaged relative to others as well as a belief that there are unjustified inequalities that need to be reduced or abolished." I don't think excluding ethnicities and social groups based on nationalism or traditionalism is very left-wing.
 * [[File:GanzismIcon2.png]] Ganzism First, unironically citing Wikipedia. Second, I want social equality and egalitarianism for my ingroup, so it is not contradictory. Plus, I want ethnocommunes for every single ethnicity, so this would actually make me even more in favour of equality.
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - Seperating entire demographics of people from each other based on one nonsense trait doesn't sound very egalitarian to me.
 * [[File:GanzismIcon2.png]] Ganzism It's not nonsensical, it is about preserving natural diversity and your ingroup, everyone in the end sticks to their own, it is basic biology
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - If by "basic biology" you mean outdated pseudoscience then sure.
 * What did you expect from techno industrial cultist
 * [[File:Autistic-anticiv.png]] - Actually i now think that humanity are victim of authorities, so I am not misanthropic, markets are only transitional stage for democracyless social anarchism, spirituality and religion are two different stuff because religion is spirituality corrupted by authority that has only political, not esoteric base. I am not nihilist, eventually existential because i think that humanity and also individual is worthless compared to the universe, but definitely not moral nihilist. Woke means anything modern progressive and pseudo inclusive. I am not conservative because i dont want to conserve anything from modern world, I want to burn all relics of civilization except few good doing things. Some of my esoteric conspiracy theories were known by Buddhists and Gnostics, and political theories are now public, like klaus schwab's predictions. Finally, you question my anarchism yet support brutal animal abuse and forced feminization.
 * [[File:Erissky.png]] - I'll update you later. Also I don't support forced feminization that's mostly a meme. I do like feminization over time though.
 * [[File:Noctua.png]] Noctuaism - ([[File:GanzismIcon2.png]] Ganzism - Wtf does this sentence mean?) Fatherless behavior as a self insert.
 * [[File:GanzismIcon2.png]] Ganzism 🗿