Paelianism

Paelianism is a moderate Libertarian to Libertarian-Right ideology in support of free markets, a positive right to life, and negative rights to most other things. It also thinks space is cool.

Lazy Government
The government should only do what is necessary, mostly because the government is lazy and people can usually take care of themselves.

Antifragility
Antifragility is a concept introduced in Nassim Nicholas Taleb's book Antifragile, which states that some systems gain from uncertainty, stress, and disorder, as opposed to fragile or robust systems that are harmed from them or resistant to them. An example would be evolution versus a robot. Evolution changes creatures to fit their environment, and when the environment changes, creatures adapt with it. A robot on the other hand, would be unsuited for the new environment and wear down or become less useful over time. Systems such as the capitalist economy, decentralized government, evolution, and your body are antifragile systems and are therefore based because they have a harder time collapsing.

Capitalism
Capitalism is based because it has positive consequences for individuals, respects rights, and is the most antifragile economic system. It could always be improved of course.

Meritocracy
Paelianism wishes there was an easy way to do this.

Rights
Every citizen has the positive right to life, meaning the government ought to maintain their existence, and a negative right to most other things, including privacy, bearing arms, speech, religion, press, etc. The reason that citizens have a positive right to life is because death is bad.

Cultural Policy
In the vast majority of instances, cultural policy doesn't matter according to Paelianism. He thinks LGBTQ+ people exist, they can do whatever they want as long as nobody is harmed, and abortion is bad unless the mother would be harmed a lot. Also, there are so many other kinds of birth control, killing babies should be an absolute last resort.

SPAAAACE
Space is cool and you can't change Paelianism's mind. Space exploration ought to be encouraged. The

Experimental policies
Paelianism supports the government setting up experimental zones to try out different policies, so that way objective evidence-based policy is decided. Policies can be anywhere from trying out a UBI or LVT for a year, or complete anarchy (within the zone) temporarily. Following is a list of policies that Paelianism would like to experiment with

UBI
The easiest and laziest way for the government to provide a positive right to life is a UBI. UBI increases economic activity, encourages people to increase their income rather than stay poor, and has minimum bureaucracy. If there is a better system, Paelianism will adopt that instead, but so far this one seems like the way to go for him.

LVT
Paelianism thinks Georgism and LVT is probably based. It, like capitalism, makes sense as it relates to natural rights and may have good consequences, however the rapid urbanization of everywhere and the liability of owning land may in fact harm sustainable development. Also, what about seasteading or artificial islands?

Ideal
All sentient creatures are uploaded to a virtual space, in which they will be free to do whatever they desire, with no harm to others. Interaction with other individuals would also be possible, but they may perceive their interaction differently based on their desires of what the interaction would be. Essentially Hive-Mind Individualism.

An Example
A current test of this system is Paeliopolis, which is currently going fairly well. A current experiment the government is trying is the populace voting for policies rather than people, which is why according to the game it is technically an autocracy. It is more of a Technoliberal system in actuality.

Based
Social Libertarianism: UBI? Free markets? Freedom in general? BASED!

Classical Liberalism: Where I was before I found UBI, still very based. Also, nice monocle.

Hive-Mind Individualism: Essentially the ideal version of me.

Mixed
Libertarianism: Nice free markets and liberty, but what about poor people? NAP makes sense though.

Georgism: I like your analysis of rights as they relate to land, makes a lot of sense. However, I'm not certain that a very high LVT would be good, as it would make owning land a liability. A moderate to low one makes sense.

Cringe
Conservatism & Democratism: Ewww, two party system, yuck.