Aperson14 Thought

Aperson 14 Thought also known as Canadian Liberalism with Transhumanist Characteristics, is the self-insert ideology of user Aperson 14. It is a  and   ,  , and    ideology which advocates for   and   style of government. Enjoy, or don't.

It advocates for a  economy with moderate , an extensive   and  , along with   and   economics.

As mentioned earlier, I support an extensive welfare state and moderate  regulations. Why? Corporations aren't just gonna sit down and shut up if there's no regulation and let poor people be, they're gonna exploit the hell out of them! We need some basic things to make life a letter fairer around here. Like what? I'm glad you asked.
 * Free Education and [[File:Welf.png]] Healthcare. Includes post-secondary education. Cry about it [[File:Libertarian.png]] libertarians, I'm so sorry that I want to help people, the horror. Also free education makes it easier for [[File:Arist.png]] to advance in society, instead of being stopped by a paywall.
 * State-subidized housing for the homeless and the like. Private housing is fine, it's just that I'd like the government to purchase/develop some apartments and then either [[File:Statecap.png]] sell them to those in need at lower prices (which will also force the rest of the [[File:Cap.png]] market to drop their prices too) or straight-up hand them out for free (with some conditions of course).
 * [[File:Welf.png]] Social Assistance. Title. It's fine if the government lends some money to the poor to help them out, with the condition they are either searching for work, working, seeking education or currently enrolled in post-secondary. You can't just sit around and do nothing. If you don't find a job soon, the government will be forced to either delay or terminate [[File:Welf.png]] welfare payments (this is to prevent leeches).
 * New regulations about the minimum wage. Title. Raise the minimum wage with inflation and also increase it to make it so you can actually live on it.
 * Maximum Wage. Might sound crazy to some of you [[File:Libertarian.png]] idiots out there, but fucking Jeff Bezos isn't going to die if he loses money, he literally makes about two-thousand dollars per second but we got children starving to death on the streets. If there's more then a 300% wage difference between the highest-paid employee and the lowest-paid employee, that extra cash is going to be subject to a 100% tax. That [[File:Corp.png]] company is also going to be forced to change their wages so it'll be more fair unless they'll like to have [[File:Krit.png]] legal action brought against them.
 * [[File:Krit.png]] Public legal representation [[File:Statecap.png]]. Might sound a bit confusing, but we'll keep going. Basically to simplify, I want all forms of legal defense to be publicly owned and provided free of charge. It's not fair if a poor person wants to sue a more wealthier person and then has to deal with his 20-man legal team while he gets a fucking homeless person for legal advice. The state should provide both parties with competent legal representatives, plus this would also solve the issue with public defenders in the United States and other countries. (Underpaid, overworked, etc.)
 * [[File:Postkeynes.png]] Post-Keynesian economics. I don't have much to say here, google it if you don't know what it is.
 * [[File:Envi.png]] Environmentalism. We gotta protect the Environment man, we need more regulations and investment in green technologies, and maybe even a carbon tax. Our environment is falling apart, climate change is real dude, this isn't [[File:Libtard.png]] liberal propaganda dude this is real life, and I don't want to die.
 * [[File:NeoMerc.png]] Protectionism through Neomercantilism. We gotta support local businesses and expand our economy to bring in extra money, it's time we become the new economic powerhouse of the world and a autonomous market easily exploited by foreign companies and governments alike isn't going to do that. (We'll touch on this a bit more, Keynesian economics too.)
 * [[File:Synd.png]] Not really related to welfare, but I do support the right to unionize, if workers want to form a union, go for it!

I believe that when necessary, the state should nationalize certain industries (not every company in that industry however, keep some businesses private, an industry dominated by SOEs can easily lead to economic crisis). Most of these nationalization processes would be temporary, and once the goal the state set out has been completed, the business can be privatized. The only industries that would remain permanently (semi) nationalized would be banking. Banking must be (partially) handled by the state to educate the consumer and ensure that large financial interests are being with the nation in mind and it won't cause a global recession. Along with this, I want to remain (semi) state-ran so we can focus on developing public transport because public transport can be used by everyone, is more environmentally friendly, and costs the user a few dollars or so. Moving on, power should be (partially) nationalized so we can keep making improvements in power production, distribution and consumption (plus we can develop  green technology faster). The last industry I would want (semi) nationalized is research, because  private businesses are, well, privately owned, and private owners tend to value their own profit over the good of the nation, so the government's gotta step in. Besides that, industries may be nationalized during a crisis so that the government can handle it. I also support SWFs and the government should invest and maybe even buy businesses if they're profitable.

I'm personally fine with subsidizing businesses if there's a good reason for it (e.g the agricultural industry is taking a massive hit so we subsidize it) but I don't necessarily like bailing out massive corporations, it just lets corporations stay at the top while  smaller ones stay at the bottom, we gotta  trust-bust those motherfuckers to encourage competition! I don't wanna hear any libertarians saying "WELL AKSCHUALLY MONOPOLIES ARE CAUSED BY STATE INTERVENTION-" shut up dude, a free market easily leads to monopoly because eventually someone beats the other competitors and dominates the market, and even if monopolies are caused by state intervention, we can do some  trust-busting, thereby getting rid of those monopolies and replacing them with  smaller businesses who will then restart the cycle of competition again.

This part is going to be spilt into two sections, one about my taxation and spending policies, and the other will be about Keynesianism. We'll start with the taxation shit. What are the taxes I support? Well, I'll give you a short list.
 * [[File:Property.png]] Property Tax
 * [[File:SocCap.png]] Income Tax (obviously includes progressive taxation along with a additional [[File:EconProg.png]] "wealth tax" for individuals above a certain threshold)
 * [[File:Cap.png]] Capital Gains Tax
 * [[File:Corp.png]] Dividend Tax
 * [[File:Property.png]] Inheritance Tax
 * [[File:SocCap.png]] Windfall Profits Tax
 * [[File:SocCap.png]] Value Added Tax
 * [[File:Cap.png]] Sales Tax
 * [[File:Envi.png]] Carbon Tax (This is a maybe, although it's still likely)
 * [[File:NatProg.png]] Corporate Tax
 * [[File:NeoMerc.png]] Import Duties/Tariffs
 * I do not support a [[File:SocCap.png]] FICA Tax or anything similar like it, I believe that paying into a pension should be rather voluntary, just the more you pay, the more money you'll get later in life.

I know Libertarians are dying right now but we need some way to get the cash for the  welfare state and other basic services like  police. State Capitalism will help though. Moving on to spending, I mean there's nothing much to talk about. I am a Keynesian, the state should actively regulate the economy and inject funding into it during economic "busts". The type of Keynesian I subscribe to would either be New Keynesianism or  Post-Keynesianism, seeing as they actively reject the neoclassical models of other forms of Keynesian, with  Post-Keynesianism (at least in my opinion) preferring to adapt more realistic models (such as the rejection of rationality of agents.)

Unless you're a total absolute globalist, you understand to a certain degree that the country should be a bigger concern then the rest of the world. I mean, it's your country, it's where you live. We as a nation have to reject, because it makes our country poorer and lets our people by exploited by foreign companies. We have to adopt a system of Neomercantilism to counteract the aforementioned  free trade.

Why Neomercantilism you may ask? Neomercantilism encourages self-reliance by restricting imports (and enforcing duties on those that make it through, giving us cash), encourages exports (giving us even more cash), controls the movement of capital and centralizes major currency decisions to a central government, letting the entire nation have some extra wiggle room when it comes to spending, letting us achieve that sweet sweet welfare. Neomercantilism with its restrictions on imports also supports local businesses and raises both domestic employment and income, and the expansion of exports creates further jobs and money.

You may think that with all this regulation and  welfare I am against  Economic Liberalism. I am not, to a certain extent, I'm not for any of that neoliberal bullshit, but I do support economic freedom. I believe that we have to establish a fair and free market by achieving the core characteristics of capitalism. I believe that starting and running a business should be easy and fair, and one of the core values that drives capitalism is competition. This is why I support trust-busting laws, because they make it easier for smaller, newer businesses to have a fighting chance against the global  megacorporations of today. Along with this, I support the right to own property, the right to  spend your money on whatever, the right to a  competent and fair  law system and  general contractual freedom. This is why I consider myself a liberal, because they do not focus on the class conflict or collaboration of  Marxism or  Fascism, they focus on the indiviualist ideals of the Enlightment, that your life is yours and you can do whatever, and unlike  Libertarians, I actually want to give you a shot at your life dreams, and instead just say "Aw sorry, looks like your family is too poor, looks like you can't become a doctor now little Timmy, better luck next time." Because, the truth is, Libertarianism is a pipe dream. There, I said it, looked at how fucked up America is right now dude, the shit with the private healthcare and the inability to afford a one-bedroom apartment if you're working federal minimum wage. Seriously, dude, you think sitting back and letting the megacorporations of today handle things is going to work? We need to let the best of the best be able to properly rise to the top without them being locked behind a stupid paywall, we need to help those at the bottom, not just because it's humane but because it benefits us too. If they can land a steady paycheck, they can help others with their taxes and even became a top scientist and maybe find the cure for cancer, or become some genius military leader or a brave politician or something. My idea of liberty is something like a  idea of liberty, you should be free from the big scary government (sometimes), but you should also be free from shit like your dad getting fired and now you have to starve to death in a slum.

Aperson14 Thought advocates for a democratic style of governance mainly revolving around the protection of civil liberties and  semi-direct democracy.

A majority of the nations in our world are either democracies or  dictatorships, with a small fraction being  monarchies, although one could argue that these fall under  democracy or  dictatorship, and that's what we'll stick with for now. Both of these styles of government have their own various flaws, although I will state that authoritarianism is worse. Authoritarianism usually results in brutal violations of human rights, rule of a minority, and favoritism even though dictators tend to claim their system is built upon by merit. Democracy, on the other hand, is a fairly well-thought out idea, but one of the critical flaws is the people themselves. There is a famous quote: "Democracy is of the people, by the people, and for the people, but the people are retarded." Populist ideas tend to lead people into irrational actions, such as the 2021 storming of the United States Capitol. However, the people deserve to have a say, they deserve to have freedom and a voice within their government, we can't just restrict that because we're afraid they might be an idiot. Now you may remember that earlier, I mentioned monarchies, I am entirely against monarchies in every shape and form. Monarchies do not promote merit or  skill, they only they promote is their family. I believe that every monarchy should be abolished, even a ceremonial monarchy is too much because all it does is put people in undeserved positions of wealth.

What we need is a form of democratic style of governance, I'm not gonna lie, living under dictatorships are bad and the people should be able to voice their opinions about the government. My ideal form of government would be a        ,  ,   combined with a  technocratic style of governance for the executive and judicial. I'm gonna go through each of these point by point, except for republicanism, you already know why (GOD DAMN THE KING!).
 * [[File:Secular.png]] Secularism: Why? Well first things first, I'm an atheist, but atheism aside, there's no reason, theocracies are bad. We need a separation of church and state, we have no right to force a religion on someone, that's their own choice, keep it out of the government (and the schools).
 * [[File:Consti.png]] Constitutionalism: We need a constitution to lay out the basic framework of our government, simple, but the constitution is to be considered a [[File:Krit.png]] living document and it will changed when necessary.
 * [[File:Parl.png]] Parliamentarianism: Nothing much to say here, I just like having a legislature I guess? Also I'd prefer to have an unicameral form of legislature. Why? A) We don't need two houses of parliament if they're both going to be elected and B) If one house is going to be appointed then no, there's no point, a legislature represents the people, appointed officials can't do that.
 * [[File:Parti.png]] Multi-party: Me personally? Not a fan of political parties, don't think they do such a good job anymore, I think people just vote for whatever party sounds the coolest rather then actually listen to the facts, but I'm not gonna abolish/criminalize them or anything, that's fucking dumb, let people organize themselves if they have similar beliefs.
 * [[File:Fed.png]] Federalism: Regions should have power over their respective area and be able to govern it themselves, but they should still have to answer to a federal government. My ideology simply believes what the federal bare minimum should be, provinces should then have the choice to stick with the minimum or go further.
 * [[File:Semidirect.png]] Semi-Direct Democracy: The people deserve to have a voice, [[File:Totalitarian.png]] dictatorships [[File:Sec.png]] are fucking stupid (I've already said why) and the people *NEED* a voice! I would go for a representative democracy, but representative democracies are kinda fucking stupid and (usually) don't represent the people well enough, so I'll go for semi-direct democracy so that the people can excerise their will properly through the government, under the threat of recall for representatives.

While I am democratic, I still advocate for a powerful military and police force (not US standards jesus fucking christ), but I don't support militarized police. Militarized police simply do not work, and we need to return to a more community-focused approach to earn the trust of the people and ensure officer responsibility (SWAT Teams and the like can be militarized). I do support a federal police force, but advocate for the decentralization of this force with local governments being tasked with primarily managing their police detachments. While yes, we do need a cop every now and then, we don't need heavily armed SWAT teams patrolling the streets and executing criminals on sight. I also support gun rights and the right to form a militia, cause why the fuck not (as long as the militia isn't a literal terrorist group). I also support the limitation (or complete removal) of surveillance, yes I know Google tracks us, BUT IT DOESN'T MEAN ITS OKAY DUDE, FUCK THE NSA I DON'T CARE ABOUT STOPPING THOSE TERRORISTS, WE HAVEN'T CAUGHT ANY OF THOSE  WHITE SUPREMACIST SHOOTERS! So, I don't really see the point it doesn't seem to be working.

Also torture is bad and it should be illegal, torture just tends to make people say whatever you want them to say.

Not much to say here, I support free speech in all circumstances (as long as it doesn't lead to any violent action  and the like.) There should be absolutely *zero* consequences for free speech, well, state-sponsored consequences, we aren't throwing you in prison (unless you threaten to bomb a building and then shoot up the survivors). I do support the "Fuck around, find out" policy. You were caught drunkenly advocating for white supremacy  and got fired and kicked out of your apartment? Too bad, that's karma for you, you fucking racist bitch.

For all you commies out there, I'm not talking about your definition of anarchism, I mean straight-up literally  anarchism. The sad reality (not that sad to be honest) is that anarchism is a pipe dream, it can never work. You need a government or some form of centralized society if you want to do whatever your ideology is. You can try your hand at anarchism, but your society's gonna collapse in about a week when it gets invaded by your neighbors. It's just the truth, sorry. (Also, fuck off with your ACAB shit, yes I know there's a problem with police, I would like to solve that problem, BUT THAT DOESNT MEAN ABOLISHING THE POLICE AND THEN REPLACING IT WITH ANOTHER POLICE FORCE BUT CALLING IT A MILITIA)

Aperson14 Thought is your usual libtard who has mostly  progressive culture beliefs, actually nah, I'm pretty much fully 100%  progressive, fuck your conservatism.

Equal. Give them equal rights man, even transgender people. Right to be free from discrimination, right to marry, right to adopt kids, all that shit. No, for all of you folks out there, it's not sexually immoral for the following: Sorry Marie, I hate to tell you (I don't really), but  gay people are not forcing it on us. If they were, it would be justified because we've forced on it on them for so long (this is only partially genuine). Last time I checked, you can be straight anywhere on Earth, but there's about 72 countries where homosexuality is punished. No Marie, a  pride parade or your  kid's second grade teacher telling your son about how gay people *actually* exist is not forcing it on you either. We could easily get rid of pride parades if you stopped with the homophobia and just LET GAY PEOPLE EXIST. Pride parades only exist to fuck with assholes  and actually let people be themselves instead of being oppressed and forced to isolate. So, you wanna get rid of pride parades, just normalize homosexuality until gay people can express themselves everywhere.
 * A). Go fuck yourselves, stop judging others.
 * B). You cannot claim to have the moral high ground when your religious text accepts slavery (Ephesians 6:5) or believes the punishment for rape should be a fine (Deuteronomy 22:28-29). There are so many quotes more like this, I think I remember seeing a quote about how you should go to a nearby town and steal all the little girls there and take them back to your city to do with them as you please (which has some MESSED up implications, I think the quote was in Deuteronomy). Deuteronomy 21:10-14 *does* say something similar about taking women as POWs and making them your wives. 1 Timothy 2:12 says that women should shut up and listen to men. Also, here's a bunch of quotes where God kills (or tries to) babies for no reason: 1 Samuel 15:3, Numbers 31:17, Hosea 13:16, 2 Kings 15:16, Psalms 135:8, Leviticus 20:9, 2 Kings 6:28-29, Genesis 22:9-10, Proverbs 13:24, Exodus 12:29, Psalms 137:9, Jerimah 19:7-9, Leviticus 26:30, Proverbs 19:18, 1 Samuel 15:11-18, Numbers 5:11-21, Hosea 9:11-16, Deuteronomy 21:18-21, Psalms 136:10, Judges 11:30-40, 2 Kings 2:23-24, 1 Kings 3:24-25, Lamentations 2:20-22, Proverbs 23:13-14. Also I'd like to mention God has killed a verified 2,821,364 people (estimated is 24,994,828 kills) compared to Satan's kill count of TEN. TEN FUCKING PEOPLE COMPARED TO GOD WHO HAS KILLED AT LEAST, AT THE VERY MINIMUM 2 MILLION PEOPLE.
 * C). I will admit here that in the bible it says that homosexuality is a sin, but do you know why it says that? In God's perspective, sex is reserved specifically for the purposes of human reproduction and thus (because those damn [[File:Libtard.png]] liberal [[File:Gay.png]] gays can't have kids), gay sex is thus considered a sin because they can't reproduce. HOWEVER, THIS MEANS ANY TYPE OF SEXUAL ACTIVITY FOR ANY REASON BESIDES REPRODUCTION IS AS WORSE AS [[File:Gay.png]] GAY SEX AND WILL HAVE YOU SENT TO HELL FOR ALL ETERNITY. This includes performing sexual activity by yourself, you have to cut off the limb you did it with or else your entire body will be thrown into hell (Matthew 18:8).
 * D). We as a society have moved past a lot of ancient religious practices, and there's no reason to keep beating the dead horse and continue homophobia. We don't pray to rocks anymore and to the Egyptian Sun God Ra anymore, we don't stone people to death for having sex while under the age of consent, we don't eat the dead or perform animal sacrifices or mutilate ourselves. It's time to move on and LET PEOPLE LIVE THEIR FUCKING LIVES.

No dude, there is no liberal brainwashing plot to make people gay. Homosexuality is completely natural (it's been documented in at least 65ish species of mammals) and we can find evidence of it happening in Ancient Sparta (where it WAS LITERALLY MANDATED LMAO). I do understand that gender dysphoria is *technically* a mental illness, but the only way to "fix" it is by letting them transition, that's it. Option B is they don't transition and they go into a depressive spiral (which will probably end in suicide). So, give gender afirming care to the transgender folks! Also, give it to kids as well, "BUT THEY HAVEN'T EVEN FINISHED PUBERTY YETT!". For a conservative who talks a lot about  science and shit, you interestingly don't know how science tells us kids have decided their gender by age ten, so......

Also I don't really give a fuck about protecting " based traditional masculinity". Our concept of masculinity has always been evolving and changing, pink was historically considered a masculine color. We have records of trans people existing in the Roman Empire, pre-1400s America, early African societies and even as natives on the Philippines. If you really cared about the past you would have us go back to cavemen when gay and  transgender people were respected and allowed to exist, and how we all lived under  democratic and " primitive  communist" societies.

Yes, I support feminism. I see the whole conservative shit about how bad feminism is as just a bunch of  losers who can't pull bitches. The whole shit with " modern feminism and it's consequences", well I just see that has women's natural reaction to being given equal rights after centuries of oppression by losers. I support basically every right in the book for women, reproductive rights (yes this includes abortion), equal pay and treatment as men, maternity leave etc. No, no many how many times you tell me about the " RAPIDLY DECREASING DIVORCE RATE!!!", I still don't care, sorry that a women isn't in love anymore and wants to see someone else. Same for men too, if they want a divorce, just give them the divorce man. My abortion stance is abortion is legal. At. All. Times. If you're giving birth literally tomorrow, you can get an abortion. I don't see the problem (although I find it weird that you waited so long). That's how it is in my country, abortion is legal all nine months.

I don't care. Legalize pornography (only with 18+ actors you perverted son of a bitch) and sex work, it's an actual business and it's already happening anyways, ( OnlyFans shit and actual illegal sex work.) To quote Family Guy (not the best source) "No way. You should've thought of that before you committed a victimless crime between consenting adults in a commercial arrangement which also created jobs and contributed tax dollars to the community." Prostitution is only dangerous because it's illegal, because if something is illegal then why stop at just prostitution, why not physically beat your employees until they go out and service some clients? It's extra money!

As for the Right to Die, if you  want to die, go to a doctor and request to be euthanized. Unfortunately, this might be a bit of a bummer, but I feel like you should have a genuine reason for euthanasia. You shouldn't want to because your depressed, get a therapist, get some pills, get the proper treatment. You should be allowed to die if you are suffering from a terminal disease, have chronic pain, or if you're in a coma or something (usually done by the family I guess?). I feel that passive euthanasia is inhumane because you're kinda just stranding the person there and leaving them to die, a simple poison needle or whatever is much better.

As for smoking weed, legalize all hard drugs. I don't wanna hear it, I don't wanna hear it. Think of the prohibition dude, 'Murica criminalized alcohol and then crime syndicates started selling it everywhere. If you aren't going to sell it legally in stores, people are going to sell it in the alleyway behind the Walmart. Legalizing drugs takes drugs out of the hands of criminals and places it in  responsible business owners who can be easily  regulated and held responsible for anything, and it makes it easier for us to prepare, manufacture and utilize the drugs in a safer manner (because the  government is watching!) and help the addict get off the drugs and learn to be much more healthier, plus, some drugs like weed aren't bad for you at all and so it's fine if you want to smoke it.

Nationalize all prisons in our country and pursue a reform-oriented method. Ensure the criminal is provided with the proper care to handle any issues they might have, educate them and have them learn skills so they can learn how to survive (70% of crimes are committed out of necessity), and teach them responsibility and how to control themselves properly.

Prisoners should be allowed to work jobs for cash (real-life wages) and be able to buy items as a reward for working, and to get them used to day-to-day life. Basically fucking norway.

Also solitary confinement is inhumane and bad, it just makes you go fucking insane because being trapped in a small concrete box with nothing but a toilet and a bed (bed is only for like 50% of the time) is usually not the funniest experience. Although I do support the death penalty, I know, I know, "what if they did it!"

The death penalty should be used carefully, very carefully, only for horrible crimes like genocide or usage of chemical weapons, because it's A) wrong and B) gonna be really hard for a pregnant women to be framed actively using chemical warfare against civilian targets. The death penalty is not a deterrent (it kinda is), but it's main purpose is to be a punishment. You have done terrible crimes that the average man cannot imagine, you do not deserve to live. Method of execution is to be lethal injection.

I live in Canada, so we don't have a Second Amendment, but I do support the right to own a gun. Yes, yes, there should be basic restrictions like background checks and maybe you should get a license or something, and you should have to register restricted weapons (I think Canada's licensing system is fine right now..), besides that, it should be fairly easy to get your hands on a gun! Guns are cool and shit, and we don't need no dang libtard government sticking it's nose in our business! I also agree with castle laws, if someone knowingly trespasses on your property, you have the right to kill that motherfucker, fuck off with that "ONLY IN SELF DEFENSE" crap, it's stupid and can get innocent folks killed, plus the threat to be shot is a pretty good deterrent for would-be  criminals.

Complete separation of church and state, keep it out of the public's eyes, the usual. Make it entirely a personal matter that you choose, nobody else. I want French Secularism or Laicism to be exact which is based on three core beliefs: State neutrality on religion, freedom of religion/conscience, and pluralism. I don't want to be seeing massive "GOD LOVES YOU" banners hanging up on the streets, just let a man think what he wants. Also, no religious instruction in schools, all schools are to be publicly owned, and are to be taught in a scientific, secular manner. I don't care if you want your child to learn about Jesus or  "why the jews are public enemy #1", you can teach that themselves (last one is kinda fucked up tbh).

We have to protect Earth. I'm sorry, I know, it's such a horrible thing. Regulate the market to protect the environment a bit more, give animals some more rights, maybe do a carbon tax, invest in green technologies, the usual and whatnot.

Yes. It's good. Tell kids (NOT ACTUAL KIDS like maybe 6th grade-ish?, maybe a bit older) how to have safe sex, stuff about biology, puberty, and LGBTQ shit. That's it.

Aperson14 Thought's view on the world and the  country is a combination of     and.

Racial Nationalism is stupid, like it's genuinely fucking stupid (keep in mind this is mainly for white supremacists and fascists  so we won't touch much on the idea of " black supremacy", but it still kinda exists). In order to be a racial nationalist you have to maintain the idea that your race is separate and distinct, correct? Well, that's not true; like at all. If we examine human bones or whatever you wanna call them, the oldest ones (which are 300,000 years old) were discovered in the horn of Africa. This leads to the idea that humans first lived in Africa, so how can white people exist when native Africans are not white? Boom. Literally just disproved racial nationalism in a few sentences. The truth is that race is completely arbitrary, it's an evolutionary adaptation to your environment. Native Africans emigrated from Africa some thousand years ago, settled in Europe, and to survive their skin color changed to white, that's why white people tend to be found in colder climates (and can live comfortably in them) and why black people tend to be found in warmer climates (and can live comfortably in them as well). So, that's about it, there's only so far you can take an evolutionary adaption in order to justify racial warfare. "But- but despite being 13% of the population-" shut the fuck up. I said earlier how 70% of crimes are committed out of necessity so that means most of the crimes black people commit are because *THEY* need to commit it in order to survive. You also ever note how white people are convicted for crimes more? "But look at modern-day Africa and black-populated areas!". You don't think that colonization, slavery, genocide, racist laws  meant to give white people political, social and economic advantages have anything to do that? Also, there was a lot of advanced African societies, literally the richest man to live (he had about 400 trillion dollars) was an African leader. Here's a list of early African societies that were very advanced and whatnot: Egypt, Nubia, Ghana, Mali, Carthage, Zimbabwe and the Kongo. Here's a list of " empires" or regional powers in early Africa or whatever: Kingdom of Kush, Land of Punt, Carthage (they fought against the early Roman Empire), Kingdom of Askum, Mali Empire, Songhai Empire, Great Zimbabwe.

Less stupid then racial nationalism but still pretty stupid. The concept of a "special and distinct blood" flowing through your veins that defines you as a member of an ethnic community is pretty dumb IMO. Ethnicity isn't really based on any concrete science and is pretty much a social concept built on the ideas of preserving/organizing traditions,  culture,  language, or some shared history together, and you all probably know by this point how I feel about that, so fuck  ethnic nationalism (especially because it tends to result in  genocide).

I live in Canada so I can't really be a cultural nationalist, because our country is really  intercultural. I don't care about preserving your culture, cultures change and adapt all the time and it's perfectly natural, so why not mix your already beautiful culture with a foreigner's and create a wonderful hybrid? If culture didn't change, this text would be illegible, the only reason modern English exists is because the culture of Anglo-Saxon England changed when it was conquered by the Norman French, with the two mixing together and forming, well, modern-day English. Our culture has changed so much throughout history, like seriously, y'know back in the day homosexuality was like really common and mandated in some places, you don't see that anymore. So I say fuck it, why waste your time desperately trying to preserve some hybrid of a hybrid of a hybrid-ass culture when you could just go with the flow? I personally prefer because I see no point in preserving culture or forcing every culture to co-operate, plus interculturalism breaks down social barriers and forms a stronger communal bond.

The one thing that unites a country is citizenship, it just straight up is. The shared values, institutions and beliefs is what almost every country is founded on. The (allegedly) socialist principles of countries like  China or the  patriotic,  liberal, and  neoconservative values of the  United States. That's straight up what unites a nation, and for intercultural nations like my own, that's the only form of nationalism that makes sense. Why Ultranationalism though? Ultranationalism puts your nation at the forefront, your country is more important, yes we are all humans and deserve the same rights, I get that, but it's *YOUR* country, it's the land that you can govern and rule over, and while helping other countries is export, it's best to focus on yourself because that's where things really matter. A revolution in China won't set off a revolution here, so it's best to think about what your country needs.

I don't care about how there's oil in Iraq or WMDs (which I don't believe), I'm not sending my own people to go die in a war that doesn't benefits us. I want to take on a form of global third positionism, fuck the US and fuck Russia, I just want my own country to be left alone. Alliances/trade deals/wars will only be made if absolutely necessary, all countries will be pretty much be subject to tariffs and protectionism, free trade will only be given to a small handful of countries (said free trade can and probably will be canceled if we feel like it's not benefiting us). No random ass imperialism just for the sake of imperialism. Invading a country because they are strategically threatening us? HELL YES! I also want to develop nuclear weapons and increase military spending, just a bit. We might be isolationist, but we should be ready at a moment's notice (not to American standards).

As for the whole shit with immigration, let them in as long as their papers are valid and whatnot, I don't see a problem with it.

I'm gonna talk about the Ukraine War/Russia, Kosovo, Israel, China and America. Might add more later.


 * Russia is in the wrong here, it's basically [[File:Imp.png]] imperialism at this point and they're doing so fucking bad anyways. Yes, Ukraine does have a problem with [[File:Neonazi_ball.png]] Nazis, no it's not such a problem that you launch a war and commit war crimes against their people (although Ukraine is committing war crimes back). I don't care much for how the Donbas is ethnically Russian, my ideal solution would be to establish the Donbas as an autonomous region of Ukraine, but if the people want to it can be handed over to Russia. Ukraine would be exempt from the [[File:NeoMerc.png]] protectionism and allowed to have free trade to support them, we'll also send over some weapons and cash from time to time. Russian business will be subject to the protectionism and forced to pay even more on top of that just cause we can. [[File:Troll.png]] Maybe as a troll all the money from Russian businesses being taxed will be sent over to Ukraine.
 * Not much to say here, I don't know that much about this shit but I would like for Kosovo to be established as an autonomous region, be given to Albania, or just straight-up be free. Nobody is getting free trade or sanctioned though.
 * Israel is also in the wrong here. They're killing innocent civilians and calling those who fight back terrorists, not to mention the fact they are an apartheid state, so that's really fucked up. Israel is getting extra taxes on top of the protectionism (and maybe we'll send money and assist the Palestinian forces). Two state solution works I guess.
 * China. Nope, fuck China, fuck them. They're a dictatorship, lie about being communist, committing genocide against the Uyghur people (although probably not to the extent the US wants you to believe), make children work in sweatshops, and they're also being a cocky bitch. It's time we try to focus on non-Chinese alternatives to stop being dependent on them, China will be subject to standard protectionism, maybe a bit more because their sending over spy balloons 'n shit.
 * America. FUCK YOU YOU PIECE OF SHIT! Your an imperialist asshole who likes to stick their nose in other people's business, the Republicans are basically just being Pinochetists but with even less economic regulation, the Democrats on the other hand are just a bunch of third-way imperialist assholes who do the bare minimum to solve the problems at hand. Your healthcare is a mess, 48% of Americans can't afford a surprise 500$ expense, it is literally impossible to survive on the federal minimum wage, there has been more shootings then days this year, the elderly are being forced to go back to work and most people have to work two jobs to survive, the income inequality is higher then pre-revolution France and nobody gives a fuck about how corporations are exploiting the hell out of you, fucking Amazon makes people pee in bottles for 15 bucks an hour and even invested money in a booth for employees to scream and cry in. Your country is absolutely subject to the protectionism, but it might be less severe because you've got our economy by the balls. Same thing with China I guess, find non-American alternatives and use those instead.

Will be done once Diplomacy is done.


 * -|Ideologies =

[[File:Yes.png]] Ideologically Based

 * [[File:Dem.png]] : Pretty good government, you are literally the best style of government throughout history.
 * [[File:Civilib.png]] : Protect civil liberties!
 * [[File:Cap.png]] : Ah, the free market. You're certainly better then any other economic system on the planet.
 * [[File:Regulationism.png]] : That free market needs to know where it can and can't go.
 * [[File:Welf.png]] : Not gonna lie, making sure the poor don't starve to death is a good idea.
 * [[File:CivUltranat.png]] : The best and most logical form of nationalism.
 * [[File:Prog-u.png]] : I don't know about you, but equality sounds pretty cool.
 * [[File:NeoMerc.png]] : We gotta keep our country's economy prosperous.
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] : I like the welfare kid.
 * [[File:Cybercr.png]] : In the future, robots will be able to rule for us (with some human supervision and intervention of course).
 * [[File:Posth.png]] : Leave behind your flesh and embrace the metal.
 * [[File:Eugen.png]] : Get rid of anything genetic that doesn't benefit us.
 * [[File:Artifism2.png]] : It's fine if we transform the Earth for our benefit, as long as we don't kill it.
 * [[File:Envi.png]] : Read above.

[[File:Meh.png]] Neutral

 * [[File:Econlib.png]] : Interesting, but you could go a bit further.
 * [[File:Lib.png]] : So close to perfection!
 * [[File:Isolation.png]] : Just leave us alone.
 * [[File:Civnat.png]] : Respect the nationalism, but too moderate.
 * [[File:Better-Transhumanism(1).png]] : Awesome! But abandon the flesh ALL the way. Don't be scared.
 * [[File:Technocracy.png]] : You're okay, sometimes..

[[File:No.png]] Ideological L

 * [[File:Neolib.png]] : Too liberal.
 * [[File:Cultural Nationalism.png]] : Oh fuck your culture.
 * [[File:Ethnonat.png]] : AND YOUR ETHNICNITY!
 * [[File:Libertarian.png]] : Bruh, you think this is an actual good idea?
 * [[File:Minarchist.png]] : You have got to be joking.
 * [[File:Conservative.png]] : Take a good luck at yourself in the mirror, just for me.
 * [[File:Soc.png]] : Just stop, stop, you're not needed, welfarist capitalism is fine. All you and your supporters do is complain about the rich, sometimes you have valid reasons, other times you don't.
 * [[File:Commie.png]] : No, just no.
 * [[File:Awaj.png]] : Too idealistic, good try though, maybe write a book about your society?
 * [[File:Sec.png]] : Good day sir! You are clearly a 12 year old who has just discovered politics! Please walk into your room and stay there for the rest of time.

[[File:Mega_No.png]] Genuine Danger to the World and the Progress of Mankind as a whole

 * [[File:Racenat.png]] : Idiotic. You are such a massive bitch who hates people based on their skin color WHEN IT DOESN'T EVEN MATTER!
 * [[File:Fash.png]] : Afternoon, now shut up and stop talking.
 * [[File:Nazi.png]] : You ever consider dying? The failed painter you obsess over did.
 * [[File:Totalitarian.png]] : I prefer not to live under a brutal dictatorship, maybe another time though.
 * [[File:Libcon.png]] : Why? Why do you suck in so many ways?
 * [[File:Nazbol.png]] : You are somehow worse then the guy above.
 * [[File:React.png]] : Why don't you build a time machine and go see how the Dark Ages were?
 * [[File:Ancapf.png]] : On a scale of 1-10 how often do you go outside? Negative seven? Alright.
 * [[File:Anprim.png]] : Die. Technology is good you stupid caveman.

Relations are based off your ideology only, just ask to be added in the comments I guess, might not be the most active person ever though.
 * -|Self-Inserts =

[[File:Yes.png]] Ideologically Based

 * [[File:Mini-hex.png]] Based Socdem???: There's not *that* much on your page, but from what I can see it's pretty based.

[[File:Meh.png]] Neutral

 * [[File:Amm1.png]] Conservative Anarcho-Socialist: You're on pretty thin ice. You're literally an anarchist, which is fine at the local level. You did specify that your uh- mega communes were actually alliances, and that's does make more sense although still, the lack of centralization is unbased. Your economics are fine I guess, although worker co-ops are not as efficient as ESOPs and traditional businesses, and socialism seems a bit extreme, welfarist capitalism can do so much more for the people of the nation. Your rejection of (some) technology, cultural nationalism, and general conservatism bring this ideology down. Why stay stuck in the past when you can PROGRESS?



Hexagonianism Awesome, I agree with most of this, I added you to my self-insert relations, add me frl frl
 * [[File:CLTC2.png]]: Done.

- It's progressive BERNHEism! Anyway, add me please.
 * [[File:CLTC2.png]]: Done!
 * - I think I should have clarified some things on my page a little better, "mega-communes" essentially refers to an alliance of communes (like EU but actually good but for thousands of little mini-communes), my bad for not explaining that
 * [[File:CLTC2.png]] Aperson14 Thought - Oh, alrighty then, I'll change up my thingy, and yes I am pretty much progressive BERNHEism, he inspired me a bit lol.