Tomjazzism

Tomjazzism is the ideology of user Tomjazzy. It is a libertarian, economically and culturally left wing ideology, which encompasses both a set of political beliefs, and a more broad philosophical system.

[[File:LibACC.png]]TLDR[[File:Leftac.png]]
Tomjazzism takes an  and rationalist view of the foundations of knowledge, claiming that we should trust in our own reason. He also believes in a form of Virtue Ethics based on achieving the fulfillment of human potential.

In terms of politics, he supports a form of  and , but he is willing to work with anyone who will best promote the interests of the working class and civil liberties. He thinks we should build up duel power by creating/gaining control of local institutions.

[[File:Descartes 2.png]]Epistmolgy[[File:Kant.png]]
Tomjazzism believes in a form epistemic internalism based on the epistemology of various different  thinkers like  Rene Descartes, , and  Immanuel Kant; as well as some more modern philosophers like  William Clifford. He thinks that without trusting in your own capacity to arrive at truth using reason, you can not trust in anything else, and are therefor unable to build a firm philosophical foundation.

Unlike enlightenment figures such as Descartes however, Tomjazzy thinks that human knowledge is historically conditioned. There are universal truths, but the human mind is limited in it's access to them, except in the case of things like mathematics. Our view of reality is historically conditioned, but that doesn't mean we should blindly embrace our culture, or reject universal truth. Instead, we should have the courage to trust in our own biased perspective, and the courage to question that bias as much as we can.

[[File:Virtue ethics icon.png]]Ethics[[File:NatLaw.png]]
From this, Tomjazzism argues that we can see how we are fundamentally oriented towards cretin goods, and arrives at a kind of  Virtue based  Ethical Naturalism, mostly based off of the modern  Analytic revival of  Aristotelian Ethics, but with some influence from  Stoicism. He doesn't think a complete or final list of the virtues is possible, but he thinks some good guess's might be justice, curiosity, wisdom, autonomy, and comradery.

[[File:Capability.png]]Rights[[File:LeftBert.png]]
Tomjazzism views human rights as deriving from his concept of Eduominia or the potential for human flourishing. He thinks that these conditions are based off of the ability to become more virtues you're self, and to practice those virtues with other people, as well as the ability to peruse things of interest to you, and to have a balanced emotional state. If you violate the rights of others, you thereby forfeit you're own rights, in so far as is necessary to protect the rights of innocent people.

[[File:Sex Positive.png]]Social Issues[[File:QLibsoc.png]]
Tomjazzy is in favor of social progress, where queerphobia,  racism,  sexism, ,   amatonormativity, and  organized religion can hopefully all become things of the past. He views radicalism as a carrying forward of the traditions of the, and is therefor a form of.

[[File: Libms.png]]Political Model[[File:Bckchn.png]]
Tomjazzy's ideal society would be a form of  and   influenced by the ideals of   and. Tomjazzy recognizes that political ideology must adapt it's self to material conditions, and that "no plan survives first contact with the enemy." As such, this plan should serve not as a checklist of requirements, but as an place to explore ideas.

[[File:Demcon.png]]Civic Structure[[File:Raddem.png]]
Tomjazzism thinks that modern  is incompatible with a truly democratic society. Therefor, he believes that the only way to avoid exploitation and promote human flourishing is to ensure people all have direct, democratic control over the institutions in which they live there lives. This includes both the economic, and public spheres. Representative democracy can be justified only at higher levels of governance, where the sheer number of people would make direct democracy impractical. For this reason, it is important that higher levels of government be dependent on lower levels.

Tomjazzism bases his ideas of how a government should function largely on. Ideally, the government would consist of municipalities or cantons, and the higher level confederal government which would unite them. There would be as many locally elected officials as were necessary to keep things running, while also having elected representatives at the conferral level. All locally elected delegates would be re-callable through a referendum of no confidence, and all representatives would have short term limits. The legislative branches would be decided entirely through municipal direct democracy.

[[File:Civlibert.png]]Civil Liberties[[File:Liberty.png]]
Tomjazzism thinks that you should be able to do whatever you want with you're own body, so long as you don't interfere with other peoples bodily autonomy. This includes the right to an abortion, to sleep with other consenting adults, to freedom of movement, to get a tattoo, the right to free assembly, and the right to end you're life with dignity. He also believes in the right to bare arms, as a check against tyranny. These rights may not apply to those who lack cretin mental capacities, such as children, but even they should be given as much autonomy as possible.

He also thinks people should be protected from discrimination due to factors like their ethnic background, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability status. It's wrong and degrading to treat people poorly, or look down on them due to these qualities.

[[File:MunicSoc.png]]Economic Policy[[File:GeoSoc.png]]
Tomjazzism views property rights as deriving from what is necessary to fulfil Eduominia. Or, as the  put it, "it is not the product of his or her labor that the worker has a right to, but to the satisfaction of his or her needs, whatever may be their nature". Tomjazzism just so happens to thing think that humans need some form of meaningful work, the ability to sustain themselves, and control over the institutions in which they live. As such, he advocates that people should have a democarctic say to those insutions to which they have contributed there labor, and within which they live. The limits to this right is when the the control of property will make others subservient to you, such as control over the only functioning well for miles. Natural Resources belong to all, and so if you use them, you should have to repay people for them.

Each municipality would be able to define it's own economics, so long as there economy remained mostly none  (see below). However he thinks there would ideally be a mixture of   and  ; with widespread workers coops, and mutual credit unions existing alongside municipal control of most natural resources, public utilities, public banks, and some municipally owned business. State owned industry would exist soley where it is absolutly necesary, and would have worker representation. Things like taxes, and regulations would differ based on ownership model and firm size. Taxes would most likely be much higher on any, which would probably be allow to exist on a small scale early on, purely as a paramagnetic measure; like they did in   or in present day. Hopefully, this could be phased out over time. He also thinks there should be  taxes, a , and a  progressive income tax.

Municipal Governments should work with local none profits to fund cooperative start ups, similar to the polices from. Taxes should also go towards things like roads, welfare programs, public healthcare, and a robust educational system, with an emphases on social sciences (including history and philosophy.) Most taxes should go to local municipalities, with those being collected at a federal level being used to pay for administration, and largely redistributed back to local municipalities to do with as they see fit.

[[File:Krit.png]]Law Enforcement[[File:Antipolice.png]]
Tomjazzism ideas of how a legal system should work is mostly based off of.

Most issues would be solved through local community reconciliation and restorative justice. If all affected parties of a crime agreed to community reconciliation, they would come together to discus there issues, with local judges acting as third parties. If the parties involved are unable to come to an agreement of punishments or reparations required, the case would then go to trial, where punishments like fines, community service, or imprisonment might be imposed. These should be in no way privatized, and life sentienties shouldn't be imposed. Soicitey should move toward Prison Abolitionism. Tomjazzy does think the long term incarceration or even the death penalty can be justified if alternatives to remove dangerous people from society aren't practical. However, he would hope it would be unnecessary, and therefor not be an option on the table.

Law Enforcement should be a municipal, elected, and volunteer position. Important judicial positions should also be elected, with municipal and confederal judges.

[[File:Antiimp.png]]Foreign Policy[[File:Globnat.png]]
Defense would most likely be dealt with by citizens militia, similar to the  in Rojava. All commissioned officers should be elected by by those they lead.

Due to the likelihood that this new libertarian socialist government will have many struggles and new problems, he suspects it will be be best to adopt a Non-Interventionist foreign policy. If confederation is ever in a situation where they are able to provide military aid, they should do so by taking a supporting role to existing governments or resistance movements.

Tomjazzism firmly believes that everyone should be able to move about the earth as they please, and as such, advocates for open boarders.

[[File:Revolution.png]]Praxis[[File:Left Reformism.png]]
Tomjazism recognizes that any immediate attempts to implement his ideology within the first world would probably result in catastrophe. He also no longer believes that high level government reform will be a major part of establishing. Instead, he advocates for  concept of dual power. He thinks we should bide our time as we wait for the state and capitalism to weaken within our local regions, in the meantime creating alternative institutions and using electoralism to try and build working class consciousness and to hamper reactionaries until the time becomes ripe to seize the means of production.

Tomajazzy thinks the best way to build up these institutions of dual power is through  and , but they could also be anything from  , to  , or even the odd.

[[File:Leftunity.png]]Notes on Unity[[File:Libunity.png]]
One of the most difficult questions in political organizing is deciding who to ally with. Most people in the Libleft quadrant will try and work with one of three factions, while shunning the others. Tomjazzism thinks we should work with all three quadrants, but with differing degrees of cooperation. He is willing to work with basically anyone in the Libleft quadrant, but he thinks that people should refuse to work with anyone of any quadrant if they are using immoral/counterproductive tactics, or if there reactionaries. Tomjazzism advocates working with any who rejects. So basically So basically   and most. He may be willing to tolerate the less authoritarian and reactionary  and   so long as they are contributing to a wider movement, but he would probably not be willing to support or work with any organization or movement representing these except in the case where it's necessary to ally with them in order to fight against a far ,  ,   (just to give some examples.) Tomjazzism thinks there are basically 3 kinsd of Libertarian Capitalists, who we will from here on out call "Right-wing libertarians."
 * -|Left Unity =
 * -|Libertrain Unity =

The first type are those who either think that implementing some kind free market capitalism along with a small or nonexistent state is the best way to work toward egalitarian goals and give power to the marginalized. This group includes,  ,  as well as most  , and a good deal of. This is the group towards which Tomjazzism is most sympathetic towards; although even here he may not be willing to cooperate if he thinks that implementing an ideology will result in more unjust hierarchies then freedoms. Still, he remains sympathetic and recognizes there trying there best.

The second type are those who do recognize the dangers of unregulated capitalism, but for whatever reason, still view it as a moral impartive. This group includes most right libertarians, and all. There can be overlap between the first and second group. This group probably shouldn't be allied with, as doing so will pretty much always be counterproductive.

The third type is made up of those who agree with Tomjazzism, in that they think unregulated capitalism will result in massive social inequality. However, for them, the inequality is kind of the point; they use capitalism as a mechanism for weeding out the "undesirables." ,,  ,   and to some extent   are all examples of this third kind of Right Libertarianism. These kinds of libertarians should be a opposed, always and everywhere, because they do not value true freedom.


 * -|Democrat Unity =

An oft overlooked but fairly often used method is for Libertarian Left ideologies to ally themselves with more reform based methods of political change. Although electoralism will never bring about socialism, they can implement small  to help the marginalized, perform damage control against , and sometimes even use   to build class solidarity. Naturally Tomjazzism will most likely advocate voting for None-State Socialism or other  Left Libertarians as a first choice,  but will generally be willing vote for the most   viable candidate running. In the United Sates, he thinks it's important to acknowledge that voting third party in a federal election is basically throwing you're vote away, but thinks this might be sensible under cretin circumstances to send a message.

Relationships

 * -|Political Ideologies =

Friends

 * [[File:Libsoc.png]]  - Excellent principle to bring diverse groups together into direct action.
 * [[File:Marketsoc.png]] - The only way I've found to realistically archive socialism.


 * [[File: Dsa.png]] - I'm a DSA member. Not quite what I want, but we'd be doing extremely well if we could arrive at the more decentralized versions of this.
 * [[File:Socgeo.png]] - A bit moderate, but I like how they approach LVT.
 * [[File:FDF-Pirate.png]] - Fuck patents!
 * [[File:Radlib.png]] - The original Radlibs. We must complete what you started.
 * [[file:Prog.png]] - When the time comes, you'll have come around to our side. Keep pushing left! The ark of history is long but it moves towards progress!


 * [[File: Thar.png]] - Fuck yeah, screw authoritarianism!
 * [[File:Internation.png]] - Valueing peoples lives less becuse of imganary lines in the sand is stupid.


 * [[File:Antiimp.png]] Anti-Imperialism - "I’m sorry, but I don’t want to be an emperor. That’s not my business. I don’t want to rule or conquer anyone. "

Frenemies:

 * [[File:Lib.png]]  - Preferable to no democracy at all, but still has a fair bit of [[File:Oligarchy.png]]  mixed in if you ask me.
 * [[File:Pop.png]] - Populism is just a rhetorical strategy, it's all in what you advocate for.
 * [[File:Distributist.png]] - Chesterton helped shape my emphases on decentralizing economic power, but I wish you'd drop the whole "family values" crap and go full market socalist already.
 * [[File:Classiccom.png]] - Right about many of the problems of [[File:Cap.png]], but there solutions don't work, and there class analysis is a bit dated at this point.
 * [[File:Leftac.png]] - Will this work? Possibly. Is there any way I can justify starving people to death so they implement my political ideology? Hell no.
 * [[File:LeftAntiSocdem.png]] Left Anti-Social Democracy - Soc dems arn't leftists, and they empower captialism, but there are worse things.
 * [[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]] - I don't have a problem using violince to defend the oppresesed, but there's no need to attack people just for holding conservative ideas. Stick to defensive violence.
 * [[File:Awaj.png]] - I like a lot of there ideals, but even I have to admit, not always the most realistic.
 * [[File:Austrobert.png]] - I appreciate how you definitively showed the failure of centralized planing, but I'm pretty sure you're ideas don't work either.


 * [[File:Bhl.png]] - Sincerely wants equality for all. Bless you're poor, naive little heart.
 * [[File:Civnat.png]] and [[File:Leftnat.png]]  - Can both be acceptable forms  of nationalism, but none state governments are still superior.
 * [[File:Blacknat.png]] - The [[File:BlackMarxism.png]] Panthers were pretty based for the most part, but I hate the versions of you that want to form a black ethnostate.
 * [[File:World.png]] - Global solidarity and freedom of movement is cool, destroying individual cultures and hurting people is not.
 * [[File:Progconf.png]] - Having traditions and being careful is good, but desperate times call for desperate measures, and we can't stand still forever.
 * [[File:Laicism.png]] - Really, really tempting. But this has way to much capability for abuse.

Enemies:

 * [[File:Sec.png]] - Fuck you, I won't do what you tell me!


 * [[File:Imp.png]] - That [[File:Pirat.png]]  who talked to [[File:Alexander.png]] Alexander the Great was right you know. You're awful.


 * [[File:Monarch.png]] - Strange women in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!
 * [[File:Theocrat.png]]  - No, your magic book does not mean you get to tell people what to do.
 * [[File:Discrim.png]] - This is just stupid and wrong.


 * [[File:Cap.png]] - The global system that's currently ravaging the world.
 * [[File:Terrorist.png]] Terrorism - This is not an acceptable means of political change.
 * [[File:Anpostleft.png]] - Do you even care if you're ideas work?
 * [[File:Conserv.png]] - The funny thing is, the arguments he uses are the exact same as the ones that would have been used against the institutions he's defending back when they were enacted.
 * -|Regonial and Political Comentators=

Pro:

 * [[File:Demcon.png]] - A great model.
 * [[File:Zapa.png]] - Subcomandante Marcos is probably one of the coolest people in existence.
 * [[File:Swhf.png]] Socialism with a Human Face - Closest [[File:ML.png]] ever gottten to actual socialism. It would have been great.
 * [[File:Green Party (US).png]] American Greenism - A shame Americas electoral system is shit, otherwise I'd probably end up voting for you a lot more.
 * [[File:Andist.png]] - Deeply principled, but never tried to force her values on anyone. Fiercely revolutionary, yet, still gentle and kind. A true saint if there ever was one.
 * [[File:Sanders.png]] Sandersism - You may not be a socialist, but I can't help but respect you're dedication.
 * [[File:Corbynism-ball.png]] Corbynism - Despite how disappointing I find his response to Ukraine, he still has been an overall force for good, and I agree with him on the majority of issues.
 * [[File:Gonzo.png]] Gonzo Thompsonism - Favorite author.
 * [[File:Beau.png]] - This guy is like an anrchist Mr. Rogers. Keeps my hopeful, even in my darker moments without talking down to his audience.
 * [[File:Vaush.png]] Vaushism - The reason I'm a socialist. Even if he has some dumb takes, I like his pragmatic attitude toward political change.

Mixed:

 * [[File:Demcr.png]] Democratism - *sigh* I'm going to have to work with you aren't I?
 * [[File:Jeffersondem2.png]] - Wise enough to oppose slavery in his time, and just enough of a hypocrite to keep them anyway. Complicated legacy to say the least.
 * [[File:NatProg.png]] - Teddy was my favorite president, but a bit racist. Also, fuck Woodrow Wilson.
 * [[File:3princ.png]] - Sun Yat-sen was based, but it seems like this went downhill really quickly.
 * [[File:Guevara.png]] - A great revolutionary tactician who I respect, but also kinda ended up supporting a [[File:Castro.png]], and execution without fair trail is not okay. Hard to find an unbiased perspective on him.
 * [[File:Hochi.png]] - You may have been better then those [[File:Necon.png]] and there [[File:Persondignity.png]], and I'm glad you're moving towards a more market based system, but you're still a dictator who treats the [[File:Native.png]]  terribly, and at this point you're basically just have the kind of mixed economy you could find in any social democracy.
 * [[File:Khrusch.png]] - De-stalinfcation was good, but you outlawed coops and invaded [[File:Swhf.png]] them
 * [[File:Tito.png]] - I like how you killed [[File:Nazi.png]] Nazis and implemented [[File:Marketsoc.png]], but you were still a dictator who's meddling stifled the coops.

Anti:

 * [[File:USAGOP.png]] Republican Party - Boy, you guys have really gone off the rails, huh?
 * [[File:USABert.png]] American Libertarianism - Just as crazzy as the above, but they are a lot less malcious and dangrous.
 * [[File:Jacksonian Democracy.png]] Can someone please remove this peice of shit from the $20 dollar bill?
 * [[File:FDRismF.png]] Rooseveltianism - White suprmeist who dumb liberals worship becuse he impmented basic welfair reforms for white people.
 * [[File:Lyndon B. Johnson.png]] LBJ Progressivism - Fucking violent lunatic.
 * [[File:NixonismF.png]] - "If the right people had been in charge of Nixon's funeral, his casket would have been launched into one of those open-sewage canals that empty into the ocean just south of Los Angeles. He was a swine of a man and a jabbering dupe of a president. Nixon was so crooked that he needed servants to help him screw his pants on every morning. Even his funeral was illegal. He was queer in the deepest way. His body should have been burned in a trash bin." [[File:Gonzo.png]] Hunter S. Thompson
 * [[File:ReaganismF.png]] Reaganism - The embodiment of every "small government" bootlicker who came after him.
 * [[File:Thatchericon.png]] Thatcherism - The above, but Br*tishm, so 1000% more degenerate.
 * [[File:Trumpism.png]] - An authoritarian reactionary who tried to kill what little democracy we have in this country.
 * [[File:BoJo.png]] Borisism - He's not as bad as some of the other [[File:Rpop-tinfoilhat.png]], but still seems kinda racist.
 * [[File:Shapiroism.png]] Shapiroism - Just kind of an obnoxious idiot.
 * [[File:Petersonism.png]] Petersonism - I feel bad for you, but youre ideas are still nonsense.
 * [[File:Prager.png]] Pragerism - Propagandists funded by oil lobbyists.
 * -|Philosophies=

Friends

 * [[File:Aristotle.png]] Aristotelianism - Yeah, at this point my ethics is almost closer to yours then the [[File:RomSto.png]] Stoics.
 * [[File:RomSto.png]] Roman Stoicism - Stoicism is a big influence on my own ethics, even if I do prefer the [[File:AthSto-icon.png]] Greek version.
 * [[File:Ancyn.png]] Cynicism - I strive to be as independent and brave as Diogenes.
 * [[File:Humanismpix.png]] - Man is indeed the measure of all things.
 * [[File:Virtue ethics icon.png]] Virtue Ethics and [[File:NatLaw.png]] Natural Law Theory - The two pillar of my ethical theory.
 * [[File:Analytic.png]] Analytic Philosophy - I'm broadly a part of this, even if you do need to accept that all thought is historically conditioned.
 * [[File:Chom.png]] Chomskyism - Some cringe forigin policy, but great linquistic and politcail theory.
 * [[File:Ormarxf.png]] - Brilliant theory of history, I especially like his early stuff.
 * [[File:Descarte.png]] Rene Desecrates - My favorite philosopher, and a good man to boot.
 * [[File:Monkeyzz-Enlightenment.png]] - I can not possibly say this enough; thank you. For everything.
 * [[File:Kant.png]] Kantianism - You may have been a racist, judgmental hypocrite, but I'll be damned if you weren't brilliant.

Frenemies:

 * [[File:Cosmic.png]] - Created a fascinating mythos, but you were somehow even more racist then the guy above.
 * [[File:Nietzsche-icon.png]] Nietzscheanism - Great philosophers, despite the fact I disagree with him on pretty much everything.
 * Plato.png Platonism - I'd consider myself a Platonist in terms of metaphysics, but the modern version of that is pretty different from the original thinker himself. Also, the Republic is a dystopia, even if it is one of the greatest works of philosophy ever written.
 * [[File:Ego.png]] - Steiner has had some influence on my ethics, but in the end, he can't really justify why his own individualism shouldn't be regarded as a "spook."
 * [[File:Mach.png]] - He's right about the nature of the state, but I think death is a preferable alternative to living unjustly.
 * [[File:Fishe.png]] Hobbesism - Had some good idea, but to hell with you're leviathan.

Enemies:

 * [[File:Postmodernicon.png]] Post-Modernism - This sounds like a bunch of incoherent gibberish.
 * -|Self Inserts =

Based

 * [[File:O'Langism.png]] O'Langism - Pretty cool.
 * [[File:neoairisu.png]] Neo-Airisuism - Seems pretty well read, and a fellow Bookchin fan. Just make sure the cat boy thing is consensual, okay?
 * [[File:SituBlart.png]] Situation-Blartism - I genuinely can't tell you the difference in between this and [[File:NeoBlartf.png]] his last ideology, still the same old Chumbawumba loving Syndi.
 * [[File:Liblovsprite.png]] Liberty-Loverism - A bit decentralized and extreme, but still pretty based.
 * [[File:Silasf.png]] Silasism - I agree with him on most issues, even if he is a bit moralistic and overly individualistic about public health.
 * [[File:Geosoclib.png]] Geo Social Libertarianism - Very similar to the above, but slightly more right wing. He also likes the mountain goats, so he's cool.
 * [[File:Tomassciism-icon.png]] Tomassciism - Fellow Tom and Market Socialist.
 * [[File:TAM icon.png]] Third Aquarian Model - Joined radial socialist gang. There willing to tolerate markets, so there good in my book.
 * [[File:EvolvingSoc.png]] Evolutionary Socialism - Basically you're average [[file:Socgeo.png]].
 * [[File:Left-Enlightenmentf.png]] Left-Enlightenment - I'm not entirely sure what you stand for, but a mixture of market socialism and enlightenment values seems pretty cool.
 * [[File:Yoda8soup.png]] Yoda8soup Thought - Only difference is there more moderate.
 * [[File:Neorock.png]] Neo-Rocksism - Another social ecologist who at least tolerates markets.
 * [[File:Ashley.png]] Neo-AshleyHereism - Yet another fellow [[File:Bckchn.png]] and [[File:Globnat.png]].

Mostly Based

 * [[File:CosmicBing.png]] Bingusian System - A moderen day Charles Fourier. Pretty whacky, but good hearted.
 * [[File:Anti-Deathism-icon.png]] Anti-Deathism - A fellow libertarian socialist, but forcing people to live forever is nightmarish. The human mind wasn't designed to live that long, and people should have a right to do what they want with there bodies, including end there lives.
 * [[File:GPLDist.png]] Geopaleolibertarian Distributism - Direct democracy, subsidiarity, and the the Enlightenment are all awesome. As uncomfortable as the cultural chauvinism makes me, I have a hope he'll come around.
 * [[File:Panth.png]] Pantheonism - He has a lot of good idea, but his constitutional monarch seems to lack checks and balances, especially for the executive branch of the entire world.
 * [[File:Uzarashvilism.png]] Uzarashvilism - Fellow geosoicalist and alt globalist. Unfortunately, he's a bit to authoritarian and homophobic.
 * [[File:SGS Icon.png]] Savage Granny Smithism - A bit statist, but overall a deeply compassionate, old school [[File:Ethsoc.png]].
 * [[File:Novochirotesla.png]] Chirotesla Thought - Has moved to supporting free speech to "own the wokes." Oh no... don't do that...
 * [[File:BeryAbLib.png]] Beryism - Combines some of the best of [[File:Clib.png]] and [[File:Soclib.png]], but places way to much trust in the capitalist "free market."
 * [[File:OwfBall.png]] Owfism - He became a liberal.
 * [[File:KingJac.png]] KingJacobinism - E Democracy is a bad idea, rest is decent for a liberal.
 * [[File:World Dis.png]] World Distributionism - Mostly has the right idea, but has way to much centralized power.
 * [[File:MattBall1.png]] Mattism - Center left liberal. He's mostly alright, except for the capitalism.
 * [[File:Coop Clib.png]] Coop Classical Liberalism - Market Socialism can't be achieved through "lazie fair" capitalism. Either the capitalists will crush the coops, or the means of production will be violently seized. Still, market loving lib left buddy.
 * [[File:IndVoluf.png]] Individual Voluntaryism - Could stand to get a bit more organized, but his heart is in the right place.
 * [[File:HelloThere314Icon.png]] HelloThere314ism - Like the above basically. Glad he also likes LVT.

Mostly Cringe:
Neo-Glencoeism - State Capitalist. Only thing keeping them form Absolute Cringe is their vehiment anti-consevatism. Serously, censoring censorship? What?
 * [[File:YellingLiber.png]] Neo Social Libertarianism - Neoliberal, neocolonialist.
 * [[File:NeoArctoismIcon.png]] Neo-Arctoism - A perfect example of the pure stupidity of "anti-woke" ideology; continually fighting an enemy which does not exist. This is made even more ironic by the fact that in terms of policy, he's basically just you're average democrat.
 * [[File:Neokira2.png]] Neo-Kiraism - Welp, she's basicly gone full tankie.
 * [[File:Murb.png]] Neo-Murba - I'm glad you support queer rights and oppose global cpatialism, but democratic centralism and getting rid of money are both terrable ideas. Overall, slightly better then your average ML.
 * [[File:Dotdotdotsam-icon.png]] .dotdotdotsam Thought - Tankie again. He seems to think the end result will be a lot more democtic then it acttualy would in reality.
 * [[File:DN Adm.png]] Darknight Yuusha Model - I dodn't know it was possible to be a tankie enlightened cetnrist, but here we are I guess.
 * [[File:Typicalfan.png]] Neo-Typicalfan1ism - One of the better [[File:RightPop.png]], but that's not a high bar.
 * [[File:Sebism icon.png]] Sebism - Consevtism and monarchism is cringe. Otherwise just typical center right (so far.) Serously, catholic talibain? What?

Absolute Cringe:

 * [[File:vesselism_icon.png]] Vesselism - Starts form a good ethical foundation, only to end up a raging misogynist.
 * [[File:JoeyFloppa boo.png]] JoeyFloppaism - An unpleasant individual if there ever was one, with a worse ideology.
 * [[File:Neoafun.png]] Neo-Afunhumaninterism - Basicly just the above. Seems to dislike me in particular for some reason.
 * - This kid is just barley clinging to any semblance of liberal or democratic ideals. Hope he doesn't go full gamer.
 * [[File:GenShrekf.png]] General Shrekretary Thought - I don't see why a reactionary Tankie is better then a normal Tankie.
 * [[File:Lpyapersonicon.png]] Lpyapersonism - Doesn't believe this anymore, so hopefully he's better, but still, cringe funndie. I've been there tho.
 * [[File:Technototball.png]] Technototalitarianism - There basically a cartoon sci fi villain.
 * [[File:Shaggerism-icon.png]] Shaggerism - The embodiment of all I hate! A [[File:Statecap.png]] State Capitalist, [[File:Fash.png]] Fascist, [[File:Monarch.png]] Monarchist, [[File:Theocrat.png]] Theocrat!
 * [[File:Oiboioiismicon.png]] Oiboioiism - I take it back, this is worse. It's probably a troll though, and a damn good one.
 * [[File:AntiTomjazz.png]] Anti-Tomjazzism - Shockingly, the ideology I made up to be the embodiment of everything I hate is one I don't like very much.

Rate Yourself
Govermnet Civics Economy Cutlrual Envormental

Cooperation Axis

User Results

 * [[File:youricon.png]] Ideolgy Name: ?/300

Important Texts
Lives of the Eminent Philosophers, Book 7, Chapter 1: Zeno, by Diogenes Laertius (Early 3rd Centry)

Meditation on First Philosphy by Rene Descartes (1641)

What is Property? by Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (1840)

Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844, Estranged Labour, by Karl Marx (1844)

The Federative Principle by Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (1863)

The Ethics of Belief by William Clifford (1876)

The Use of Knowledge in Society by F. A. Hayek (1945)

Libertarian Municipalism by Maury Bookchin (1980)

After Vitute by Alasdair Macintyre (1981)

The Natural Law Tradition in Ethics Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2002)

The Will to Change by Bell Hooks (2004)

What is Social Ecology? by Maury Bookchin (2007)

To what extent does the EZLN political economy framework offer a viable development alternative to its followers? by James Wilhelm (2010)

Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach and Its Implementation page 71-82, by Martha C. Nussbaum (2011)

Social Contract of the Democratic Federation of Northern Syria (2014)

Welcome to the Dark Side: A Classical-Liberal Argument for Economic Democracy by Alex Gourevitch (2014)

The Cleveland Model: How the Evergreen Cooperatives Build Community Wealth by Democracy Collaborative (2015)

Cosmopolitan Localism: The Planetary Networking of Everyday Life in Place by Gideon Kossoff (2019)

Politics 101 w/ Professor Vaush by Vaush (2019)

Comments
Neo-Murba - add
 * Done

Rocksism - Add me please?
 * Done

- Add me
 * I'm not fucking reading this.

- Yo, wanna add me?
 * Done

- Add please. I'll get around to adding you back next time I edit my page. Also I think that you have misunderstood Stirner and his 'individualism'.
 * To be fair, still haven't gotten around to finishing The Ego and It's Own.

- Add me?
 * Done

- Wanna add me please?
 * Done

- i changed ideology also are you a Moral Universalist? Silas: Add?
 * I think so, although I'm not entirely sure. I wanna look into ethical naturalism.
 * Done.

Pantheonism - Add me pls?
 * Done

- Add me
 * Done

- Add me (Neo-Afunhumaninterism)
 * Done

Owfism I changed my ideology
 * Updated

Tony567- i have incooped the technocratic accepts in to my civic structure
 * Updated

Applethesky2021 - Add me.
 * Done.

- Add me.
 * Done.

Owfism - What do you think of my philosophical beliefs?
 * Updated

Ronwelltarianism - Add me. Glencoe- add me - Could you add me to your self-insert relations? Neo-Kiraism - add me Glencoe- i no longer use IQ - At this point you probably already knew what I believe nowadays, though some parts may be outdated(though I'm not very motivated to develop my self-insert), anyways, my self-insert now is, pls add me update relationships?
 * Done.
 * Done
 * Done
 * Done
 * Updated, dosn't change much
 * Done
 * Done. I gueniunly like you kid, please get out a little more.

O'Langism - Add me?
 * Done.

Bingusian System - Add me?
 * Done.

KingJacobinism - Remember me? seb - I know I'm a work in progress but could you add me? thanks :3 - add me ? Neo-Glencoeism- Add me plz?
 * Oh hey! Done.
 * Done.
 * I don't understand your ideolgy. Are you in favor of deomcratic centralism? What rights and civil liberties will be granted in you're society?
 * - yes, I'm in favor of democratic centralism. Ideally I'd like to allow as many civil liberties [freedom of speech, expression, whatnot] as possible, but I recognize that in times of siege these must be curtailed in the name of security.
 * Done
 * Done