Mattism

Hello, and welcome to my page! My ideology is Mattism. The self-insert of the user  Matteel. Mattism is,  ,  , economically  , militarily  non-Interventionist,  ,  , and diplomatically.

Overall, his beliefs emphaize the,  ,  , and. Seeking to create a more fair society for both the economically disadvantaged and the socially disadvantaged. While, wanting economic fairness for the world at large, and to further the efforts of  to create fair societies oppressed under authoritarian rule,  which will bring about world peace.

He is against economc rightist, ,  ,  ,  authoritarian,  ,   ,  theocratic, and   ideologies.

Governmental Views

 * [[File:Liberal_Democracy.png]] Liberal Democracy


 * [[File:Fed.png]] Federalism


 * [[File:Semidirect.png]] Semi-Direct Democracy


 * [[File:Semiprez.png]] Semi-Presidential System


 * [[File:DefDem.png]] Defensive Democracy


 * [[File:Reform.png]] Reformism (In democracies)


 * [[File:Revolution.png]] Revolution (In autocracies)


 * [[File:Consti.png]] Constitutionalism


 * [[File:Republicanismpix.png]] Republicanism


 * [[File:Secular.png]] Secularism


 * [[File:Lpop.png]] Left-Wing Populism


 * [[File:Civilib.png]] Civic Liberalism

Economic Views

 * [[File:Neocorporatism.png]] Neo-Corporatism
 * [[File:Dirigisme.png]] Dirigisme
 * [[File:Lange.png]] Lange Model
 * [[File:Cooperative Socialism.png]] Encouraged Cooperative Economy
 * [[File:Regulationism.png]] Economic Regulationism
 * [[File:Welf.png]] Welfare Statism
 * [[File:Keynes.png]] Mixed Market Economy
 * [[File:EconProg.png]] Economic Progressivism
 * [[File:Socgeo.png]] Welfare Georgism

Foreign Views

 * [[File:Globnat.png]] Alter-Globalism
 * [[File:Cosmo.png]] Cosmopolitanism
 * [[File:Ecoglob.png]] Environmental Globalization
 * [[File:Postconan.png]] Anti-Colonialism
 * [[File:Pac.png]] Non-Interventionism
 * [[File:Protect.png]] Fair-Trade Protectionism
 * [[File:Leftnat.png]] Left-Wing Nationalism
 * [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]] Pro-ROC
 * [[File:Native.png]] Indigenous Rights
 * [[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]] Pro-Ukraine
 * [[File:Cball-Albania.png]] Albanian Reunification
 * [[File:Demcon.png]] Pro-Kurdish Independence
 * [[File:AntiBaath.png]] Anti-Assad
 * [[File:Zio.png]] Two State Solution [[File:Cball-Palestine.png]]
 * [[File:Euroscept.png]] Euroskepticism
 * [[File:Necon.png]] Pro-NATO Membership
 * [[File:Intercult.png]] Interculturalism (In terms of Immigration)
 * [[File:Pan-Nationalism.png]] Pan-Nationalism

Cultural Views

 * [[File:SocialProgressive.png]] Social Progressivism


 * [[File:Civnat.png]] Civic Nationalism


 * [[File:Civlibert.png]] Civil Libertarianism


 * [[File:Gay.png]] Pro-LGBTQ+


 * [[File:FreeSpeak.png]] Freedom of Speech


 * [[File:Indiv.png]] Individualism


 * [[File:DvPermission.png]] Permissive Society


 * [[File:7AA75006-F094-416A-8824-CCA033321FA3.png]] Drug Legalization/Decriminalization


 * [[File:Utility.png]] Rule Utilitarianism


 * [[File:Humanismpix.png]] Humanism


 * [[File:Fem.png]] Feminism


 * [[File:Menslibnoears.png]] Men's Liberation


 * [[File:Pro-ChoiceRemade.png]] Pro-Choice


 * [[File:MLK_Jr.png]] Racial Egalitarianism


 * [[File:CapAnti_Clerical.png]] Anti-Clericalism


 * [[File:Polycult.png]] Polyculturalism

Philosophical Views

 * [[File:Moral.png]] Moralism
 * [[File:Consequentialism.png]] Consequentialism
 * [[File:Utility.png]] Utilitarianism
 * [[File:Humanismpix.png]] Humanism
 * [[File:Indiv.png]] Individualism
 * [[File:Pragmat.png]] Pragmaticism
 * [[File:MoralUni.png]] Moral Universalism
 * [[File:Cosmo.png]] Cosmopolitanism
 * [[File:Hedonism-cloud.png]] Hedonism
 * [[File:Materialism.png]] Materialism
 * [[File:Constructivist.png]] Constructivism
 * [[File:Pop.png]] Populism
 * [[File:Antinil.png]] Anti-Nihilism

Main Influences
Epicurus (341BC-270BC) Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882-1945) Theodore Roosevelt (1858-1919) Al Gore (1948) John Locke (1632-1704) Mikhail Gorbachev (1931) Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Barack Obama (1961) Edward Snowden (1983) Julian Assange (1971) Huey Long (1893-1935) Alexei Navalny (1976) Olof Palme (1927-1986) Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya (1982) Roman Albertovich Abalin (1998) John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) Joseph Lancaster (?) John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946) Greg Guevara (1997) Bernie Sanders (1941) Ian Kochinski (1994) Petter Vallentyne (1952) Jeremy Corbyn (1949) Elizabeth Warren (1949) Hillel Steiner (1942) Rick Falkvinge (1972) June Nicole Lapine (1991) Joshua Wong (1996) Agnes Chow (1996) Nathan Law (1993) =  Philosophy ==

[[File:Materialism.png]] Metaphysical Materialism [[File:Materialism.png]]
I am a philosophical materialist, and believe that matter is the fundamental substance of all things in the universe. The closest thing that I would identify with religiously is gnostic atheism. I know there is no God or spirituality that exists in any literal sense, and that the material world is the only world to exist. I've personally have never read any theological books or have been religious due to my naturally materialistic outlook on the world, nor do I want to read any theological books. As, theology is boring as shit to me, doesn't interest me in anyway, or explains anything about our existence that is actually comprehensive to me. So, it only makes sense that I reject these concepts entirely when they are fundamentally at odds with how I view human nature and the universe at large, and are of no interest to me personally. As. there really isn't a single time in my life were I ever considered anything outside the material universe existing, nor was I raised religiously (not that it would've mattered, due to said fundamentally materialistic view of the world that wasn't changing regardless), so I've effectively have been a materialist my entire life. Although, I was not an atheist in a literal sense, as I never made any questions on god itself up until high school, which would've technically made me agnostic. But, I have been effectively a practical atheist up until that point due to this. So, being someone who has never been religious, has never taken theology seriously, or has even read any of these books, it was easy for me to come to conclusion to that of gnostic atheism without much thought put into it.

[[File:DeterminismIcon.png]] Metaphysical Determinism [[File:DeterminismIcon.png]]
I am a determinist, and believe that individuals do not have free will, as there is nothing that gives us individuals free will, all actions are inevitable consequence of antecedent states of affairs. This way of thinking would follow hard determinism. As in a world that is only material, this would be the logical conclusion to come to.

[[File:Absurd.png]] Absurdism [[File:Absurd.png]]
Our existence is absurd, we will never know how we came to existence no matter how hard we try to the nature of this topic. My ways of thinking would follow absurdism.

[[File:Moral.png]] Moralism [[File:Moral.png]]
Morality is important for society, as humans need to have a sense of what is right or wrong for society to function. There are things that humans know naturally, such as not causing harm to others, this is what has kept us as a species alive up until the present day. How morality should function will be mentioned below this bit.

[[File:Utility.png]] Utilitarianism [[File:Utility.png]]
My morality comes from Utilitarianism, I believe that morality should be looked through a lens of what causes the most and least harm to individuals. The ethical theory of utilitarianism is a theory that is a branch of consequentialism by John Stuart Mill, that states that actions should be judged based on how much good or harm an action causes. And as such, actions and policies should be looked and lens that to increase the happiness of individuals and decrease suffering. This can largely sum up my views on welfare and state regulation in the economy. As, I view welfare as necessary for the creation of a happy society free from inequality and poverty. If equality of opportunity can be achieved through this, then that creates a happier population overall, and economic statistics overall back this as a fact. This is were my individual takes come from. Things abortion and other services create happier societies, so from a utilitarian standpoint, I would be completely opposed to banning such services, and would be morally wrong to do so.

[[File:MoralUni.png]] Moral Universalism [[File:MoralUni.png]]
I'm a moral universalist, my moral universalism comes from my cosmopolitanism and utilitarianism. I believe these ethical theories could be applied globally to all humans regardless of their status. With this, I'm opposed to moral nihilism or moral relativism. Believing that, if something creates happiness, then it has moral worth. Something like human rights, for example, should be applied universally for all countries, as these rights are what grant others right to have a good life free from persecution. Progressive western values of egalitarianism and societal permissiveness are what the values of all countries should be globally. As. these values have created the happiest societies compared to those under authoritarian oppressive dictatorships.

[[File:Constructivist.png]] Social Constructivism [[File:Constructivist.png]]
Being a social constructivist, I believe societal factors and the upbringing of individuals are important in determining the behavior of said individuals. And, should be used when observing the behavior and nature of society at large.

[[File:Cosmo.png]] Cosmopolitanism [[File:Cosmo.png]]
I view myself as a citizen of the world, and I get a lot of my international theory from cosmopolitanism, as I believe the world should be internationally united. Despite being a patriot who loves my country. I would argue that being a nationalist and a cosmopolitan are not contradictory views to hold, as you can still like your country, but want international co-operation. And, as long as we can have mutual respect for each others differences, then I can mutually respect you as well. However, while I do support globalization, and see it as the best way to reduce economic equality for all countries, I do not support economic globalization, as it only benefits large companies. Along with rejecting Multiculturalism, as it has shown to never work in any country it has been practiced in.

[[File:Metamodernism.png]] Meta-Modernism [[File:Metamodernism.png]]
Modernism and Post-Modernism both make good points, but I can't fully subscribe to either of them. And, as such, I subscribe to the idea of Meta-Modernism. Believing that, the discoveries of both modernism and post-modernism are not ignorable, but the current post-modern attitude is not desirable. He holds that the narratives of modernism are social constructs in of themselves, but still believes that the values of said narratives hold value.

[[File:Humanismpix.png]] Humanism [[File:Humanismpix.png]]
My humanist ways of thinking can largely come from utilitarianism. That being, all people on this planet come from the same place, and are entitled to be treated with the same dignity and standards. There's a human identity that inherently surpasses all other identities, like nationality or race, It's important to uphold human dignity and standards.

[[File:Indiv.png]] Individualism [[File:Indiv.png]]
I am an individualist, and believe that individualism is important for society. Individuals should be free to desire their own passions and hobbies free from any sort of higher authority. Whether it be clerical authority, governmental authority, or community authority, the individual worth triumphs over all of that. With this, I support the expansion and preservation of civil liberties, like Freedom of Speech, as those civil liberties are important for any free society to thrive under. Some would argue that individualism and economic leftism are incompatible with each other, but I would argue that having the state provide you with everything would allow people to pursue their own interests and hobbies without the fear of poverty or unemployment and ect. So, individualism is more compatible with economic leftism than it is with economic rightism in my opinion.

This is also were my progressivism comes from, as ideologies like conservatism are very anti-individualist, conservatives believe they can tell you what you can do with your body, who you can marry, ect. With leftists having a more "live and let live" attitude, I will side with them, as they don't feel the need to boss me around and are the least opposed to me living my lifestyle as to how I want to not based on pointless dogmatic attitudes. I believes everyone regardless of their back rounds are equal and are deserving of the same civil rights and liberties. I'm also opposed to authoritarianism because in most of those authoritarian regimes throughout history I would've at best been socially excluded and lived a horrible life or killed in. So, I have no reason not to be an individualist by the very nature of my existence as a person.

However, with all of this in mind, one might ask why I'm not a libertarian (in a civic sense) who is opposed to governmental authority playing a role in the daily lives of citizens. This would mostly be because, I believe that for the trade off of individual liberty of people and for individual rights to be upheld, the government has to be there to protect said individual liberty whenever threats to individual liberty arise.

[[File:Hedonism-cloud.png]] Hedonism [[File:Hedonism-cloud.png]]
I would consider myself someone who has no restraint when it comes to topics like sex and material desires, my way of thinking is borderline libertine in this aspect. However, I still respect basic human decency and common sense of morality, so it would be a moderate version of libertinism. As a person, largely due to ADHD, I don't have a lot of self control in these aspects, and things like sensual pleasures are of great joys to me because of this. In other words, I'm a very horny person, and I love doing things like jacking off and whatnot. I like to have fun, and I don't let anything hold me back. I'm very permissive in this regard, and don't care what others do. I only care about my material desires, if that wasn't obvious. So, no arguments were going to stop me from doing any of this because of the lack of aforementioned self-control that I don't have. (Which is why I'm very irreligious myself, as that way of thinking greatly contributed to my world view as a child)

[[File:Antinil.png]] Anti-Nihilism [[File:Antinil.png]]
Just because life is pointless doesn't mean the future is pointless, nor is their no purpose in living. The meaning of life is what you make it to be, and creating our own joy in life. Even if said joy itself won't amount to anything, it's better to use your own existence to enjoy your life than it is to be pessimistic or nihilistic.

[[File:Pop.png]] Populism [[File:Pop.png]]
Populism is a good way to achieve political power and to unite the world using pan-nationalist movements. So, I would incorporate populist heretic for both political praxis and international praxis. However, the creator of the page personally disagrees with populism to a certain extent, and many populist leaders in history have failed to deliever on their promises and actually just ended up serving the elite themselves, he views it as a good way to achieve his objectives.

[[File:Pragmat.png]] Pragmaticism [[File:Pragmat.png]]
I am a political realist, the best way to make change is through a pragmatic approach. So, I am opposed to both romanticism and idealism. As, while idealism is to an extent, necessary, you have to do things that go against your own ideas to inspire change. Even if it means compromising on your own ideals, it's better to have some of the change you wanted, compare to having nothing at all. And as such, harm reduction is very much necessary to achieve change.

[[File:Dem.png]] Overview [[File:Dem.png]]
Mattism is a Believing that, democracy has shown itself to be the least worst system, at least compared to all other forms tried. And, that countries without democracy are bound to fail compared to those with democratic institutions. Along with favoring  to our current system to make it more democratic and have an electorial system that is inclusive to more parties, and to fight corruption. He supports,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  semi-presidential system, and.

[[File:Liberal_Democracy.png]] Liberal Democracy [[File:Liberal_Democracy.png]]
Mattism prefers a government that is built for the common good for the people, and thus, a. Specifically, a  However, he wants to give the population more say in government, and thinks introducing policies that bring direct democracy into the government are a good idea. And, is supportive of a. Seeing it as the ultimate compromise between either a representative democracy, and a  direct democracy. So, Representatives should be largely responsible for governance, while citizens can have more autonomy through popular initiatives and referendums, ect.

[[File:Semiprez.png]] Semi-Presidential System [[File:Semiprez.png]]
Mattism takes issues with the current  we currently have, believing that this system gives too much power to one person compared to a. He would seek to combine elements from both of these governmental systems to create a semi-presidential system, were a  president and a  separate parliamentary system co-exist in the government.

[[File:Consti.png]] Constitutionalism [[File:Consti.png]]
Mattism supports the creation of a. The constitution will be interpreted as a living document and will be subject to change to fit the times. In this regard, he takes issue with the current constitution in our government, because it was written during a time that has long sense passed. He would write a new constitution to fit the modern day politics of the country.

[[File:Merit.png]] Civil Service Reform [[File:Merit.png]]
Mattism seeks to abolish the electoral college, seeing it as nothing more than an relic of the past that is barely functioning the modern day, and is disproportionately effecting third parties ability to compete, contributing to the duopoly we have between the two major parties, and the further elitism within these parties. With the ever increasing amount of people being disillusioned by our system, and not identifying with either democrats or republicans, he views this as a system that has to go. His first reform would to replace the electoral college vote with the popular vote. His other reforms would be to abolish the senate, seeing it as nothing more than upholding the elitism within the government, and preventing a lot of necessary reform. Along with a ban on. These reforms I would propose would, along with my other reforms, strengthen American democracy, prevent, and give more people say in the government. As I believe our government shouldn't be for sale by massive corporations, it should be for the people, and make our overall system more meritocratic.

[[File:E-Democracy.png]] Electronic Voting [[File:E-Democracy.png]]
Mattism believes we need to push forwards technology that allow us to vote via things like, a phone, computer, ect. He is a supporter of an  in this regard. However, realizing how vulnerable these methods are to outside influence, he opposes implementing these policies until we have the technology necessary to go through with it, but overall, he is supportive of the development of said technology. Voting via other methods will still be available and not be phased out. However, these policies would only be done on a local level, with things like national elections having to be done in-person or by mail.

[[File:Anti-Corrupt.png]] Whistle Blowers [[File:Anti-Corrupt.png]]
Mattism believes that people who expose government corruption shouldn't have to fear persecution, as the government and its institutions have a right to be  with the population that is being governed. And, that any functioning democracy should work on ridding itself of corrupt officials in office.

[[File:Fed.png]] Federalism [[File:Fed.png]]
In terms of how the bureaucracy is administered, Mattism prefers  compared to a , mainly due to how ineffective a unitary government would preform in the United States due to its size. Along with the fact that, federalism is inherently more democratic and less wasteful in terms of bureaucracy, the state's governments will know what their citizens know more than what the federal government will. But, states governments have to abide by the national laws, and the constitution.

[[File:DefDem.png]] Defensive Democracy [[File:DefDem.png]]
Mattism believes the government should actively protect its institutions from, as we cannot give them the freedom to tear down our democracy. This would function like a. If your party actively poses a threat to democracy, it shouldn't be included in government. Believing that freedom of assembly and speech has its limits, and where they use their voices to silence the voices of other people is enough to warrant this.

[[File:Intercult.png]] Interculturalism [[File:Intercult.png]]
Mattism used to support the idea of a, believing that all cultures could live in harmony with each other. But, upon further research, this way of thinking was idealistic for many reasons. Mainly being: the toleration of cultures that go against western and progressive ideals just for the sake of diversity, causing the rise of the  as seen during the European migrant crisis of 2015, and the pushing of pointless identity politics onto people which only entrenches mindless tribalism. So, with how immigrants will be handled, he supports. As, he opposes how multicultural societies tend to self-segregate, and how  ethnic centric societies are very bigoted towards outsiders. So, it allows for diversity at the local level, while still allowing for a shared sense of national identity.

However, from a cosmopolitan point of view, he's not concerned with protecting our cultural heritage from immigrants as much as he just wants to prevent infighting betrween different cultural groups, which is why he supports   in terms of assimilation, believing that they only have to adopt the language and national identity. As, we can all have our differences, said society should focus on what unifies them together instead of what emphasises their differences to challenge the self-segregation nature of cultures, this will make people more tolerant of each others cultures than outright stressing the differences between said cultures, which just leads to segregation. He opposes, as societies that stress one unified culture are too exclusionary to foreigners even when said foreigners could provide a massive benefit for the country. So, both multiculturalism and  monoculturalism are scams, society should be welcoming of foreigners, but those foreigners should have to learn our values and stress the similarities of other cultures to form a melting pot, were said cultures contribute to the national identity.

However, he supports the protection of  and focusing on improving their quality of life in indigenous reserves, believing that they have been trampled on enough.

[[File:Civnat.png]] Immigration [[File:Civnat.png]]
Mattism takes a pro-immigration stance, and is in favor of liberalizing immigration, as immigrants help contribute to the labor force that is slowly shrinking each decade as America's population continues to age, while the birth rate declines. With addition to this, he supports giving illegal immigrants a legal pathway to citizenship. However, there will be a wait list where the immigrants have to be assimilated values before they can access any of the government programs, such as the. He also thinks it helps contribute to maintaining the, as seen in the. However, with less racism. Along with it being less destructive to the progressive movement, as cultures that do not tolerate our values will not peacefully coexist with us or a progressive culture.

In terms of how refugees will be handled, he thinks the United States should take in refugees, but we can't obviously take them all in, even if he does greatly sympathize their current situation. He doesn't oppose taking in refugees from countries that are culturally more likely to get along. Now, there is were his most controversial view may be for some progressives, but refugees from places like the middle east are more likely to cause trouble, with their ways of life and attitudes being backwards and authoritarian. Not saying we shouldn't take them in, and he is staunchly against  racism or  xenophobia. But, he also sees how they are the most trouble to deal with as well, as their cultures are fundamentally anti-progressive and anti-democratic. So, if they are to come here, they should be vetted tightly and have to modernize their beliefs, or find somewhere else to go. But, outside of that, he opposes the unnecessary spying programs put into place to monitor these individuals. He doesn't care about mass immigration himself, and doesn't see it as a threat to his way of life, as long as those immigrants contribute to the national identity.

[[File:Secular.png]] Secularism [[File:Secular.png]]
Mattism is against any religious organization playing a role in government, or the government subsidizing religious organizations through a tax exempt status. Which is why he seeks the complete separation of church and state. He's opposed to, or  religious governance. As well, he thinks that people who deny basic science based on their religious beliefs are very cringe, and only hold society back. And in this regard, he holds distrust of, seeing as many third-world Islamic countries are riddled with  reactionaries  who use religion as a mean to further sentiment their rule. Not to say this doesn't apply to other religions, but, Islam in the modern day holds more relevancy. However, this is not to say he's against Islam or the people, he believes that they should be allowed to follow their beliefs. And is against the talking points of  that excessively demonize the people, as many of them do nothing wrong as people. And, are most prominently racist and xenophobic talking points.

On organized religion itself, he holds a negative view of it. And, is a pretty staunch anti-clericalist in this regard. Noting the nepotism and elitism seen within these organizations. And how, historically, religious organizations have used their influence to further their needs of the clergy men over the people while using said beliefs to justify the most heinous actions. He is vehemently opposed to them having any sort of political sway, and would favor their influence in the public sphere be minimized.

[[File:Civilib.png]] Civil Liberalism [[File:Civilib.png]]
On the civic axis, Mattism is. Believing the expansion of the surveillance state in the United States hasn't been for the best interest of the people, but for the government to further its control over the general populace. He would enact reforms that weaken the surveillance state so it isn't so invasive into people's daily lives. This would include revoking the patriot act, and getting rid of other unneeded spying programs. As, he believes the government should be big enough to protect the people from harm, and to keep them safe, but also respect the personal privacy of daily citizens lives.

[[File:Socdem.png]] Overview [[File:Socdem.png]]
On economics, Mattism takes inspiration from several ideologies, being:,  ,  ,  , and.

So, overall, he's your pretty average. And, despite being pretty left-wing in his economic beliefs, he is still skeptical of most forms of, believing that   as ultimately shown itself to be the best economic system in most of its forms, with having the longest longevity compared to such economic systems. In spite of this, he believes that numerous  are necessary to keep this success, and to make the economy work for everyone. He wishes to create a  in the United States that focuses on  the ease of doing business,  wealth redistribution, and  the wellbeing of every citizen.

[[File:Keynes.png]] Fiscal Policy [[File:Keynes.png]]
In terms of macroeconomics, Mattism is self-described as a, he believes that the government should actively take a hand in the market and create fiscal programs that increase spending to boost growth in the economy. Supporting increases of spending during times of crisis to dampen the damage done during said crisis, to recover the economy. The type of keynesian economic branch he subscribes to would be closest to that of.

[[File:Social_corpratism.png]] Mode of Production [[File:Social_corpratism.png]]
Mattism's mode of production would combines elements from,  , and the. He believes that the government should have its share in the market through  in sections of the economy that are naturally monopolistic, such as railways and electric grids. And, in sections of the private sector as well, which will compete with businesses within the market to guide the economy, which would be invested into through a sovereign wealth fund.

He advocates for  over , seeing as classes do provide a benefit to society. And as such, the state should  to negotiate terms, with the state acting as a mediator between the two, seeing it as the best way to abolish class conflict.

[[File:SyndieSam.png]] Unions [[File:SyndieSam.png]]
Mattism supports, seeing the collapse of unions in the United States as disaster for both worker rights and the  progressive movement. So, in the labor market, there would be, viewing unions as a favorable means to achieve working rights, along with it being necessary for the  progressive movement to keep political power. Trade unions and how they would be organized would be through democratic representation. With state-owned unions and state-owned businesses making tripartite agreements even easier to ensure economic growth. However, he is skeptical of public unions, as their interests have often collided with the interests of society.

He is also against union busting, believing that it is unconstitutional. Only being allowed when there is legitimate reason to do so, like when the union in question doesn't have the best interest of the workers they are representing. And, he thinks that companies that partake in such practice should be severely punished.

[[File:Cooperative Socialism.png]] Worker Co-operatives [[File:Cooperative Socialism.png]]
Mattism defends, and believes that  worker co-ops as a business model have shown to be superior to other forms of traditional business models. And, is in favor of an economy which has its primary business model made up of worker co-ops. Medium to small-sized enterprises should be ran as worker co-operatives, although, this won't be enforced, as he realizes that an economy made up entirely up of this business model cannot sustain itself, and other forms of traditional business models will be allowed. This will be encouraged through things like tax breaks and subsidizes. Along with being a supporter of workplace democracy, as he believes that workers should be allowed to democratically control the workplace the workers work in. It will allow the workers to have more say in the production they produce, while not directly handing over the means of production to the workers. With the further democratization of the workplace and economic control given the workers via these means, this would ensure the increase of working wages and the creation of more jobs. The state would have control over some factors of production to distribute goods as for the Lange Model of production, but the market would be mostly responsible for controlling the allocation of the goods themselves.

[[File:Univhealth.png]] Healthcare [[File:Univhealth.png]]
Mattism is supportive of a Universal Healthcare system, believing that it is detrimental to the nation to have people who cannot afford to pay for healthcare to be indebted just because they cannot pay. With the current healthcare system we have being more expensive with providing less coverage than it if it was just universal. He defends healthcare acts like Obamacare that expand healthcare coverage for people, but would prefer to transfer them into a universal healthcare system. Private healthcare options would still exist, as luxury for those who choose it, with the universal healthcare being the main option. However, preventable self-inflicted injuries such as drug abuse or being unvaccinated will not be covered, and that will directly come out of insurance or pocket.

[[File:Welf.png]] Welfare State [[File:Welf.png]]
Mattism believes that the state should play a paternal role in one's life in terms of economics, to provide for the people, actively redistribute wealth, and promote equality of opportunity. With this, he is supportive of the, and for the government to provide for goods and services to the people. He favors a  as a way of redistribution of the wealth. Despite this, however, he isn't against private charities, and they will still exist. Given, they are certified to be a legitimate charity. As, he realizes the importance private charities play in both his life and the lives of many others, which would still be there. But, he prefers government solutions for redistributing income, seeing it as more effective.

[[File:Trustbust.png]] Monopoly Busting [[File:Trustbust.png]]
Mattism supports breaking up massive monopolies. As everyone knows, it is not good to have monopolies dominating an economy. In this case, he would support bringing back the strong anti-trust laws that were present during the. Along with this, the CEO's of said companies shouldn't be allowed to own any shares in the companies that are broken up. It's not good for any economy to have huge businesses dominating the market as it lowers the competitiveness and the ease of doing business in said economy, which is bad for economic output and growth of the economy. The banking sector should be controlled by  to ensure that it stays effective.

[[File:Plutocrat.png]] Wealth [[File:Plutocrat.png]]
Mattism seeks the creation of, this will further weaken the influence of   while redistributing wealth for our  social systems. However, he isn't opposed to billionaires existing, and realizes the benefits they have for our economy, but also realizes that. So, if they are to exist, they should fairly contribute to the economy in taxes, respect environmental regulations, not offshore their wealth in other countries for tax avoidance, and not outsource our jobs to countries with lower wages. The wealthy people that do partake in these practices should be severely punished, and have all their assets nationalized by the government

[[File:Bankocracy.png]] Banking [[File:Bankocracy.png]]
Mattism believes in the creation of a  to regulate the supply of monetary units, as if the banking sector fails, then that brings our economy down too. This will ensure the economic stability of our economy. However, private banks will still be allowed to exist, given under extensive regulation. And, how the banks and credit unions would be ran would be dependent on the size of said bank.

[[File:Georgist.png]] Housing [[File:Georgist.png]]
On housing, Mattism views housing as a basic human right. And believes that this is were the market fails the most. He wishes to establish a  to replace  property taxes. He supports. However, land value tax cannot be the only tax. As, the tax on its own wouldn't be enough to fund welfare programs. But, the reveune generated from this tax would contribute to the welfare state, making him a.

With zoning laws, he would relax single-family zoning to allow for the development of income housing, which is more mixed for home buyers with different types of income. As, the housing crisis that this country is facing is causing social instability. He doesn't believe it makes a whole lot of sense to regulate land use. The land value tax coupled with the liberalization of zoning laws would fight off land speculation and.

[[File:Corp.png]] Corporate Welfare [[File:Corp.png]]
Corporate welfare can be accurately described as "socialism for the rich, capitalism for the poor", and should end. He is against bailing out firms that are deemed "too big to fail". If a business is "too big to fail", then it is too big to exist. Seeing it as contributing to, and favoritism within the economy. Were the wealth is being concentrated to the top one percent, with small businesses being left in the dust. He supports ending corporate welfare for big businesses. However, other forms of industry would still be subsidized, as he doesn't support ending corporate welfare entirely, just for those big businesses.

[[File:Regulationism.png]] Taxation [[File:Regulationism.png]]
Mattism favors high amounts of taxation to fund a universal welfare state, and the upkeep in social services for the population. And, these taxes will better help achieve equality of opportunity .The list of taxes that would be introduced would include:
 * [[File:Georgist.png]] Land value tax - This is to decommodify land ownership, the tax will be between 80 - 100%. As well, being a landlord can no longer be considered a full time job, but private ownership of land will still exist.
 * [[File:EconProg.png]] Wealth tax - The rich will be significantly taxed more through a progressive tax system. But, we cannot rely on just taxing the rich alone, as that isn't sustainable towards funding a welfare state. There will be various other methods used to get the most out of wealth redistribution.
 * [[File:Soccap.png]] Value added tax - A VAT tax will be used, as they've shown to be better at raising funds. And, with the added benefit that they are less easier to dodge.
 * [[File:Apolit.png]] Personal income tax - The personal income tax rate would be at 40%, this would be applied progressively as well, but that would be the median tax rate overall.
 * [[File:Envi.png]] Carbon tax - This tax would be to stop companies from polluting the environment with carbon emissions, it will be progressive.
 * [[File:DvCoordination.png]] Payroll tax - The payroll tax will be used to tax employ and employer income.
 * [[File:Religious.png]] Church tax - Churches will be taxed progressively based on their size. And, there will be more ways of taxing religious sites other than just directly taxing them.
 * [[File:Long.png]] Corporate tax - The ideal corporate tax rate would be 30 - 40%. Green technology companies would have a significantly lower corporate tax rate, as to encourage innovation.
 * [[File:Protect.png]] Import duties - This is to protect vital industry from foreign competitors. But, how high or low the duty is were it depends on where the goods come from. Like say, from a country we are on good terms with, there would be significantly lower import duties. But, countries that are used by companies for cheap labor or those that politically threaten us would have significantly higher import duties, to make those practices unprofitable, and protect the interest of American workers.
 * [[File:Krit.png]] Sin tax - Sin tax is needed to fund social programs. However, the former should be low as the tax is quite regressive and doesn't contribute a lot towards taxation. With only the most harmful goods (like drugs) being taxed at a significant rate, things like junk food and ect will be notably lower.

[[File:Social-ism.png]] Employment [[File:Social-ism.png]]
Mattism believes that employment should be handled through government programs that help the unemployed find employment in the labor market, through active labor market policies, such as  welfare to work. Ideally, the unemployment rate should be somewhere around 5 - 6%.

[[File:EconProg.png]] Minimum Wage [[File:EconProg.png]]
Mattism believes that Minimum Wage should be adjusted for yearly inflation, with wages being different for each job field you want to be employed in. The base line standard being a wage that allows you provide for yourself at the bare minimum, with states adjusting it to fit the needs of their population retrospectively.

[[File:Progress.png]] Overview [[File:Progress.png]]
Overall, Mattism is a  ideology that opposes. He believes that tradition stems from the past, and is not to be held sacred. And thus, favors a culture of permissiveness and tolerance, and is a  cultural progressive. He is supportive of,  LGBT Rights,  drug decriminalization,  ,  cultural secularism, ect. His beliefs largely following that of  and  Utilitarianism. Where individual rights and liberty are respected when they pose little harm to others, and the harm principle is upheld. Believing that, as long as the individual is not harming anyone, then in most instances, they should be allowed to do as they please. He seeks to create a humanist state, based on  utilitarian ethics.

[[File:Gay.png]] LGBT Rights [[File:Gay.png]]
Mattism views the LGBT commmuity with sympathy, seeing as they have been historically trampled over, and with no representation in the public sphere. With traditional views of morality further adding the  hostility towards their existence. He is in favor of complete marriage equality between those of heterosexuality and  homosexual couples. Seeing the definition of marriage is between two loving souls, as it wrong to give people who had no control over what they were born with fewer rights.

Additionally, he is in favor of trans rights, seeing gender dysphoria as a real thing that has been historically unaccounted for due to said views that historically has demonized these people. However, he does realize the dangers of putting children on things like hormone therapy, and wants to put restrictions on gender-affirming healthcare to prevent such dangers from happening, these restrictions would make it so that you have to be an adult to go through such. But, the surgeries and things associated with it will be provided for by healthcare givers, seeing it as a form of healthcare. He's pretty neutral towards transmedicalism, believing for it to hold some truth, but to be overgeneralizing as well. He's more liberal on this issue, but not liberal to the point were he accepts everyone just for the sake of inclusiveness. As, that only devalues the experience of actual trans people who go through gender dysphoria. He also believes trans people should be allowed to legally change their gender on legal documents for as long as they go through surgery and the like to cure their dysphoria. With all of this, while he does think transgender people can change their gender on legal documents, he's skeptical of the more radical concepts like gender fluidness and self-identification.

However, he personally dislikes, as he views it as only serving  , and not the actual interests of the LGBT community themselves. Along with not liking identity politics, because he sees it as a form of tribalism that pointless divides people (this would also include straight pride btw, if that wasn't obvious). He would prefer things like pride culture and other movements like them to be eventually replaced with other events that do not rely on identity politics that bring people together in the same way. However, despite him not liking pride culture, he won't whine about it like some "based and redpilled anti-sjw" whenever he sees it, because he doesn't care as it doesn't effect him. There be no restrictions placed onto these events themselves, as that's all freedom of speech that anyone has full right to exercise.

[[File:DvPermission.png]] Permissive Society [[File:DvPermission.png]]
Mattism defends a permissive society. And, believes that, as long as an individual's lifestyle doesn't violate the, then no government or community should be allowed to impose a specific lifestyle onto individuals. With this, he would decriminalize most victimless crimes, as there's no point in enforcing a law that cannot be enforced effectively. Along with it not making any sense to waste law enforcement resources on things that can be easily regulated to earn untapped money which could be used for things like government programs. As, societies that have  have higher rates of  egalitarianism in many fields, so it contributes to a more happier society overall.

[[File:Fem.png]] Feminism [[File:Fem.png]]
Mattism is a, and a staunch supporter of women's rights. He's against, seeing them as a product of society, and not that of nature. Thinking it's best that women break free the constraints of them, as this would ultimately contribute to a society were women are more free to decide their own paths in life. Along with those roles being harmful towards men as well. As, there is no fundamental difference between a man and a women, both should be treated the same.

He is firmly in the pro-choice camp in terms of the abortion debate. Believing that, the choice ultimately lies with the women, and is morally right in most to all instances regardless of what the context is. And, as such, is for the liberalization of reproductive rights. Seeing as, a mother that bears a child she cannot financially support will strain our welfare services further, which will be detrimental to the welfare state. Along with seeing the label  as inherently untruthful. As, many pro-lifers don't even care about the mothers health, or the welfare of the baby after they are born. And, even defend it in cases of rape or incest, which is just abhorrent in many ways. Along with not being supportive of  that help mothers, while supporting things like the  death penalty. And, while this isn't the case with all pro-lifers, as they come in many shapes and sizes, he still finds it awful that people defend forcing a mother to give birth all together, period. As, life doesn't start at conception, and is just a bundle of cells. So, it isn't murder. As well, banning abortion doesn't end abortion, but only ends safe abortions. So, he supports the legalization of first, and second term abortions. With third-term abortions being regulated where the women's life is in danger, rape or incest, ect. He is also for the wide spread availability of contraception, as being pro-choice doesn't mean pro-abortion, he wants comprehensive sex education to reduce the amount of abortions. He prefers abortions to be safe, legal, and rare. With this, he sees the overturning of Roe v. Wade as a disaster that has wasted decades of civil rights progress, and hopes that abortion rights get reinstated in the future.

However, he is against affirmative action, seeing it as the employers decision to hire based on  merit, instead of things like gender, race, ect. Along with opposing femcels and  incels.

[[File:GRights.png]] Gun Rights [[File:GRights.png]]
Mattism is neither pro-gun or anti-gun, he believes that people should be allowed to own guns, given they have no criminal back round. But, with this, he is a supporter of gun control, and believes in expanding things like backround checks and ect to make sure bad actors cannot get their hands on guns, which is what could be seen for the extensive gun violence problem this country faces due to the permissive gun laws of some of the states. And, while not wanting to outright ban weapons that are deemed "for war" like assault rifles, he wants extensive regulations on them, and should be made really difficult to get. Seeing as the majority of people will never own these types of fire arms, but still believing that people who want to own them and can actually afford them should be allowed to own them.

[[File:Scientocracy_Small.png]] Education [[File:Scientocracy_Small.png]]
Mattism believes our education system is in desperate need of reform. And, that education should be free from K-12, with college tuition being free as well, seeing tuition fees as stupid. With how things are taught, he is in favor of impartially, as things like History shouldn't be taught through a nationalistic lens. Along with teaching politics to our children to avoid the current gerontocracy our government is, but should be done in a neutral way that encourages students to pick their own beliefs. Public schools will be secular and based on  humanism. And, while he thinks it's good to teach students about injustices in society, he opposes the more radical concepts like he said previously, such as intersectionality as a lens to teach such topics.

In terms of schools and how they are administered, he believes that there should be a mix of private and public schools, with private schools as luxury, but shouldn't be funded through things like vouchers. With the attention going to meeting the upkeep of public schools.

[[File:Autism.png]] Disability Rights [[File:Autism.png]]
Being on the spectrum himself, he's greatly sympathetic towards those with disabilities. Seeing as, their chance to live a meaningful life gets drastically reduced, along with the quality of living. With this, he would propose more funding towards social programs that help those in need, for things like schools, nursing homes, expanding accessibility in things like the job market, ect. As, while, he is obviously better off than a lot of people within this group, and is pretty capable of providing for himself, he still recognizes that there are many who less fortunate than him, and thinks its unfair for them to be at the bottom and vulnerable of society. However, he is against things like self-identification, and believes that people have to get medically diagnosed for mental disabilities to be apart of the mentally disabled community. As, self-identification only devalues the actual experiences of being mentally disabled (like the creator of this page) and makes it look like a complete joke. Along with this, it's also offensive to the creator of the page to be lumped into lower functioning autists, because while they as people obviously should get the help they need, to automatically be grouped with those people just undermines his own abilities and is dehumanizing.

[[File:Youth.png]] Youth Rights [[File:Youth.png]]
Mattism thinks its wrong to deny the rights of people based on their age, seeing the current system as too strict, and is supportive of youth rights. He believes that the voting age for local issues should be lowered to 16, with things like the presidency staying at 18. Along with more inclusion in things like the workplace, where there is a notable preference towards older people compared to younger people.

[[File:Equality.png]] Racial Egalitarianism [[File:Equality.png]]
Mattism views the notions of race or  ethnicity as something that is entirely irrelevant. Things like racial discrimination should be looked down heavily within society, and shouldn't be a factor towards things like immigration. With this, he is a, seeing a country is defined by a common way of life, and to a certain extent, culture. So, he is favor of complete racial equality, seeing racial and ethnic inequality as determinantal to a country that should be actively fought. As, all men, regardless of their back round, are created equal, and are entitled to the same rights with due respect for their differences. However, he's neutral towards movements like, as the organization itself makes good points about police brutality that he does agree with, he also disavows the violence on both sides, which only furthers racial tensions (even if the former has been overall less egregious), and more radical concepts like  white guilt. Along with not liking the concepts of intersectional identity politics. Believing that attention should be drawn to the more socially disadvantaged in society, but also believing the former doesn't actually do a whole lot in addressing systemic reform. So, he also opposes things like critical race theory, due to their heavy reliance on said things, and sees it as not giving an accurate world view towards people.

[[File:Health and Safetyf.png]] Public Health and Safety [[File:Health and Safetyf.png]]
For health crisis's like drugs or obesity, Mattism doesn't think outright shaming the people themselves is a good idea, as it just leads to them being rejected by society without being able to integrate or easily get help. But, he also doesn't think these things should be idolized as well, the state should, but the state should never step in directly to correct the behavior of individuals themselves. He realizes the need for a paternalistic government for things like disasters such as pandemics for harm reduction, but when there isn't a serious harm to public health posed by an individuals lifestyle that directly harms other people, then the government should mostly lay off the general population. Things like sin taxes should still exist, as some milder forms of harm reduction that don't outright intervene in the daily lives of citizens are needed for society.

[[File:Multicult.png]] Identity Politics [[File:Multicult.png]]
Mattism is different in his approach to societal reform compared to many progressives, as he doesn't support the idea of  politics, believing that one's own identity should not matter, and gets in the way of any  societal reform for socially disadvantaged people. This whole culture war  itself is manufactured by  massive corporations that seek to divide people for their own gain. People shouldn't be bound to an identity that they feel the need represents them, everyone should be allowed to have their differences, but we should also realize what brings us closer together as well, as there is no such thing as collective rights for individuals, there are only individual rights. He sees the rise of identity politics from both the left-wing and the  right-wing as destructive for American politics as a whole. With the left-wing focusing on pointless identity traits like "muh black lesbian trans" and the right focusing on "muh white straight conservative Christians". Both sides of the political debate are annoying, full of essentialist bullshit, and suppress individuality.

[[File:FDF-Pirate.png]] Copyright & Internet Reform [[File:FDF-Pirate.png]]
Mattism has views how large companies are abusing their power to infinitely extend copyright so their intellectual property stops from going into public sphere as unacceptable. Along with how giant tech companies mass farm users internet data just to increase their already massive profit margins, which creates many issues in of itself, and just the fact that it is unethical to do that. He is supportive of. Seeing them as, monopolistic, greedy, and corrupt.

[[File:Egirl.png]] Pornography and Prostitution [[File:Egirl.png]]
Mattism believes that Pornography constitutes, and should be allowed for those who are legally old enough to view it. On Prostitution, he believes it's the women's choice to sell her body or not. As long as it's done consensually, then it's perfectly fine, and should be legalized. He thinks the anti-porn movement is stupid, even more stupid and pointless than prohibition.

[[File:Civlibert.png]] Euthanasia [[File:Civlibert.png]]
Mattism supports the, believing that if a mentally ill person chooses to voluntary end their own life, then that is their choice and their choice alone, and for it to be immoral & inhumane to let someone who is suffering when they choose to end their own life to let them continue living.

[[File:Klep.png]] Criminal Justice Reform [[File:Klep.png]]
Mattism believes that systemic racism is still well alive and present within the American justice system, despite how long we've come since Jim crow laws. And, as such, is a supporter of criminal justice reform. For police unions, he believes that police unions should still exist, but with their negotiating powers restricted. As, the importance of collective bargaining for cops is just as important for any job field, but realizes that the interests of society and police unions often collide, with it having been used to obscure criminal justice reform. With this, he would redirect wasteful spending to social programs. But, opposes the more radical notions of abolishing or defunding the police.

On prisoners and prisons, he opposes capital punishment, and believes that it should be outlawed in all the states. The justice system should focus on. With prisoners being allowed to vote once they've finished their prison sentence and have payed the price for their crimes. Along with the state having programs that aid convicts that are released to help them reintegrate into greater society. However, he realizes that some crimes are too bad to forgive. In this case, he would support punitive justice, but with the chance of parole. He opposes the, as privatized prisons are bad for a rehabilitative justice system were the private contractors are only encouraged to make money, and not help with the reintegration of prisoners into greater society and disregard their own wellbeing makes public safety and the wellbeing of society worse off. However, while he does support racial sensitivity training for police, he believes it shouldn't be based on  or other  radically progressive things like it.

[[File:Envi.png]] Environmentalism [[File:Envi.png]]
Mattism believes that world governments aren't doing enough to combat climate change. All the world countries must globally co-operate with each other to put greater investments into green technology. However, he opposes how some green parties opposes nuclear power. As, while it's not perfect, the technology has come a long way, and is the most cost effective and efficient way of combatting global warming right now. Of course, we should work on transitioning out of nuclear power, but until that technology comes, and there's a cost effective way of doing that, we're going to have to rely on it for the time being. Along with supporting government initiatives like the green new deal, even if he has some disagreements with the former. He sees as a necessary step to transitioning out of fossil fuels for the near future, along with the trade deals for our country needing to respect environmental standards, as  free-trade neoliberal capitalism has lead to the exploitation of the environment. The government must start subsidizing green alternatives to weaken the fossil fuel industry. Although, he would prefer for the government to just nationalize most of these industries relating to natural resources, were these state owned businesses would contribute to a sovereign wealth fund which would go to things like the welfare state and other government expenditures.

[[File:Modtransh.png]] Technology [[File:Modtransh.png]]
Mattism supports the development of green technology to combat climate change, along with being supportive of   in terms of things like job automation, as if it is to happen, then that money should go to  social programs to combat the unemployment caused by job automation. However, he can't consider himself a transhumanist because of many reasons. But, he opposes those who think that technological development is bad. So, he's an overall technological moderate, realizing the both good and bad of technological development, he opposes technological acceleration because of the effect it would have on things like the environment, for example. But, he doesn't support slowing technological development as well.

[[File:Reform.png]] Reformism [[File:Reform.png]]
Mattism is a. And, in the context of liberal democracy,   would be used to achieve my ideological goals. Seeing as, revolutionary means of achieving ideological change has often resulted in complete failure. However, there are some exceptions to this, being, places were democratic reform isn't possible. In that case, he would support a revolution against the government. Some of these places would include, China,, Russia,  Cuba, and other autocracies in the world that don't respect due process and political rights.

[[File:Blacknat.png]] Slavery Reparations [[File:Blacknat.png]]
Mattism doesn't support slavery reparations, as they are largely unfeasible. And, even if they were feasible, he still wouldn't support them. As, nobody in the present day is responsible for slavery or the actions of their ancestors. But, he does propose increased social funding for neighborhoods, along with getting rid of discriminatory zoning laws that disproportionally effect minority groups. As, this is an actual practical solution compared to just giving effected groups money outright.

[[File:Cball-CSA.png]] Confederate Statues [[File:Cball-CSA.png]]
Mattism supports the tearing down of confederate statues. They were traitors that succeeded from this country that shouldn't be glorified. Any self-described patriot should support the dismantling of the  confederate statues. Along with banning them from being displayed on things like government property. Like, what's next? Are we gonna start building statues for the British monarchy during the war of 1776?

[[File:Deepe.png]] Animal Rights [[File:Deepe.png]]
Mattism supports animal rights. As, animals are living beings at the end of the day. And, while not on the same level as. He supports the the banning of most animal testing. As, animal testing isn't even guaranteed to produce good results, at the cost of inflicting unnecessary suffering to other living beings. He would also improve the living standards of animals being farmed for food, as the way they get treated is just excessively horrific. Although, he isn't going vegan, and doesn't expect anyone else to either.

[[File:Covidism-icon.png]] Vaccine Mandates [[File:Covidism-icon.png]]
Mattism believes that mandating vaccinations is necessary for the eradication of diseases. And, is both pro-vaccination and pro-mandate, but not on the same level as some countries like. But, he views lockdowns as unfavorable, as they cause economic slowdown. With that, they should only be used during the start of a pandemic when there no vaccine development, with anything further from the release of a vaccine being a betrayal of the vaccinated people. As, while the government should be there to protect people in these types of situations, the excessive use of governmental power leads to the unnecessary expansion of things like surveillance services, as could be seen during the covid pandemic, which he is against.

[[File:FreeSpeak.png]] Freedom of Speech [[File:FreeSpeak.png]]
Mattism supports Freedom of Speech, seeing it as necessary for a country to keep the market place of ideas running. However, there will be notable restrictions on freedom of speech, such as things like defamation, hate groups, and protecting the public welfare of citizens. So, overall, he thinks freedom of speech should be near absolute, but not absolute. Seeing as a society were all ideas are tolerated would be a society that would eat itself alive, and would fall to the minority of intolerant people who would seek to undue those liberties that allow people to express themselves. He doesn't think outright censoring these groups of people is the right thing to do, he would prefer social ostracism to counter such movements. He is against hate speech laws, seeing them are inherently coercive to civil liberties, and not actually protecting the people said laws seek to protect the people that they are aimed towards. He does, however, hold a couple of exemptions with this view. Like in Germany for example, where it is a crime to deny  the holocaust, given the context of what happened in that region and where it happened, that should indefinitely stay a crime. But, he dislikes how the governments where laws like these are implemented go overboard with these laws as well, so he would loosen up those laws so they're not as strict. But, not eliminating them. So, outside of this few specific circumstances were these laws happen to be in some countries, he would oppose implementing them in other countries.

[[File:Mediastocracy_flair.png]] News and Media [[File:Mediastocracy_flair.png]]
Mattism believes that mainstream media is a decisive tool that has allowed for corporate money to stay on top, with the population being ever so clueless about alternative options, or the way they are being manipluated. Despite this, he thinks bringing back the Fairness Doctrine wouldn't do a whole lot to counteract this problem, mainly due to it being in a time period where it could actually be enforced. A better solution would to directly break up the hegemony of corporate media.

[[File:Laicism.png]] Cultural Secularism [[File:Laicism.png]]
Mattism is an anti-clerical ideology, believing that organized religion has been often used as an excuse to suppress individual rights and liberties while contributing to the elitism within our political environment. He is completely opposed to any sort of religion being the basis for morals of society, and would prefer for religion to decline. As that contributes to the weakening of organized religion and secularization. Although, nothing that forces the secularization of society, as there will still be religious freedom. He argues that secularism will rise on its own without the state separating it from the public. This would be achieved through developing the material needs of population to the point were, religious influence subsides, with a rise of  follow up with it. As, this can be seen in many developed western democracies. Religion and religious beliefs themselves are of no concern to him, but he is strictly opposed to clerical authority.

[[File:NarcLib.png]] Drugs [[File:NarcLib.png]]
Mattism believes that drug war was unilateral disaster that put many innocent lives in jail and only contributed to the prison industrial complex. He supports the complete decriminalization of all drugs, with soft drugs being completely legalized. Seeing as the "law" cannot even be enforced properly, it being a law in the first place is quite useless. Along with this, all non-violent drug offenders would be released from jail to free up law enforcement resources. However, there should be government programs available that encourage drug addicts to get off of drugs, and find healthier alternatives. As, drugs are a societal problem, not a legal problem. And, throwing people in jail for using these substances only further propagates the core issues at heart.

[[File:World.png]] Overview [[File:World.png]]
Mattism, despite his  influences, isn't  Anti-American like how would you expect some of them to be. In fact, despite of what he thinks of the elites, the government, and ect. He sees that the West is the lesser evil between the major world powers, as the powers of the West uphold his views more than compared to those of the East. However, he doesn't support. Because, while he would prefer to live under Western hegemony compared to the hegemony of other world powers, seeing them as being more often than not, authoritarian, oppressive, and conservative, he sees the West as being exploitative as well, and believes that no country deserves its hegemony. Along with this, he supports pro-democracy movements globally that actively challenge said oppressive authoritarian states.

He is a diplomatic. Believing that globalization and progress is an inevitability that cannot be stopped even if you tried, due to the nature of it. And, subscribes to international theories related to cosmopolitanism. With this, he is in favor international co-operation and allying with other  in the world to promote peace and unity between them as a way to actively combat the rise of authoritarian states. In this regard, he is opposed to, believing that it has failed nearly each time it has ever been practiced in history, and the  United States has an obligation to help the world through. But, he isn't against nationalism, he would consider himself a. Along with supporting, seeing as countries that have similar culture ties have the most to gain through co-operation, although without abolishing borders. Despite this, he has a rather  view of trade, as world powers have used trade as a means to in-debt countries, he sees it as. So, with this, he supports, and doesn't support economic globalization, believing that it only serves the interests of massive corporations and major powers. In terms of the military, he is a non-internventionist, believing that a policy of pacifism as a major power would be Disastrous, and thinks that the military influence of the United States should be kept, albeit in a limited form.

[[File:Globnat.png]] Alternative Globalization [[File:Globnat.png]]
Mattism is a diplomatically globalist ideology, believing that globalization is inevitable and that the end goal of humanity should be to eventually unite together in some sort of global alliance as opposed to   to combat the problems of the modern day. And, shuns the label "anti-globalist", as that is very much not true. He views a globalized world as an inevitability that should be embraced. However, he opposes the bad side effects of globalism, and what he calls. Such as: environmental degradation, worker exploitation, wealth inequality, and more. So, he would call himself an. Believing that, "a new world is possible", and that globalism can be shaped to serve the people globally, and not the interest of wealthy corpocratic elites. Were, national sovereignty, culture, economic equality, and all of the above I did not mention are respected. With international co-operation still in effect. As, some sort of global alliance that unites humanity could introduce things like universal tax codes that make offshoring wealth for the elites impossible, the benefits are really endless.

His international theories follow that of, such as democratic globalization and cosmopolitan democracy. He believes that globalization and progress are inevitable, and shouldn't be stopped. However, he does oppose multiculturalism and economic globalization as stated, neither of them lead to good outcomes. He could be described as a cosmopolitan social democrat.

[[File:SocialistPatriot.png]] Social Patriotism [[File:SocialistPatriot.png]]
Mattism argues that being a cosmopolitan and a  nationalist are not contradictory points to hold, as loving ones nation doesn't immediately equal chauvinism or wanting to put it above others. In fact, he loves the United States because of its global achievements on bringing western powers together on the international stage, and how its contributed to the further globalization of the world. So, he would consider himself a  and a , as a love for one's nation is what keeps its cultures and society at large together, and has contributed to anti-imperial contributions by countries fighting for their independence against imperial powers. However, he opposes  as well, believing it to be too exclusionary and closeminded, which leads to  cultural chauvinism and not being accepting of foreigners even if they could provide a great benefit to the host country. As said in the immigration part of his page, he prefers a melting pot model were other cultures different from that of the national culture contribute to a greater national identity. This model also contributes to pan-nationalist movements as well. He also despises, not seeing them as real  patriots of their country, but just as. One's nation and values should be shared off of a  instead of pointless things like  ethnicity or  race.

[[File:Ecoglob.png]] Environmental Globalization [[File:Ecoglob.png]]
Mattism defends climate treaties like the Paris Agreement and other ones that  further coordinate environmental efforts between countries} believing that we have to , as it is an issue that will effect more than just us. Developed countries should be actively pressured to adopting climate protections and work together with other countries to develop technology that can solve global warming. However, developing countries won't be pressured as much, as they should still conserve their environment, but world powers are the greater evils in this situation. So, some destruction of developing countries environments for economic growth is fine, if it means they industrialize so they can be pressured into conserving their environment in the same way global powers will.

[[File:Atlanticism.png]] Bloc Politics [[File:Atlanticism.png]]
Mattism doesn't like the idea of subscribing to bloc politics, stemming from his anti-imperialist stances, he believes that no country deserves the right to have any hegemony. However, despite him not liking bloc politics, he believes that the west is the lesser evil between the powers of the east, as those eastern powers are more often than not oppressive authoritarian conservative regimes that do not respect human rights. With the west having contributed more to progressive values and being overall better places to live compared to such countries, he will side with them. However, he realizes the current system of the West is just neoliberal garbage as well, which he wants to change. He will not give his full support towards the West. As, he very much has his own issues with the current atlanticist system, which has been used to further the needs of developed countries over the needs of developing countries. He believes there should be an alternative system to the atlanticist system that includes a collective security council for all countries that doesn't rely on hegemony of any country, which would bring world peace and encourage international co-operation. However, for the time being, he will support the United States against regimes like China or Russia.

[[File:Protect.png]] Trade [[File:Protect.png]]
Mattism advocates for what he calls free and  fair-trade. Believing that, international trade with countries is an overall net-positive, and countries should be encouraged to integrate with each other in terms of economics to raise the standard of living and promote peace between them. However, he is opposed to. So, trade should be mostly free between countries, but there should be tariffs here and there to maintain a level of beneficiary between countries, so trade doesn't become unbalanced. With this, he is in favor leaving free-trade agreements like NAFTA. Seeing these free-trade agreements as only benefiting massive corporations and being destructive for  center-left movements. With the increasingly free flow of capital, labor, goods, and services that the EU is all about, increases the power of Capital, and decreases the power of Labor, which has caused the European parties to abandon their traditional social democratic values to compromise with  neoliberals, leaving these parties in an identity crisis were they are no longer recognizable to what their original purpose was supposed to be, causing said voters to flee to alternatives like  green parties. All future trade-agreements between countries should respect things like worker's rights and environmental protections.

He encourages developing countries to form  that rival both eastern and western powers, as a way to keep both of the blocs from exploiting them. This would improve things like wages and environmental protections for said countries, with the added benefit of not being too reliant on either bloc.

[[File:Pac.png]] World Peace [[File:Pac.png]]
Mattism subscribes to the idea that world peace is achievable. Now, while it seems very unlikely, as wars haven't stopped even in the modern day, the amount of wars being fought has significantly decreased over years due to the United States led international liberal world order. However, while this world order is better than the hegemonic powers of the East, it is not desirable in the same way hegemony from Eastern powers is not desirable, world powers will always be after their own self gain. And thus, will be the biggest threats to world peace. So, despite seeing the West as the lesser evil, the countries that pose the biggest threats to world peace are: China, Russia, and the United States. There's more to this, corporate power also poses a threat as well. He believes the hegomony of all these powers should slowly fade in replacement for a world system that relies on all countries to globally work together for the interests of the world. This is a pretty utopian way of thinking, and because it is. But, the first step we could achieve is by curbing the hegemony of the United States and China, as neither of them are deserved. However, Western values have contributed to the happiest populations and most successful countries, and should be the universal values for each country.

[[File:Cball-China.png]] China [[File:Cball-China.png]]
The  is a pseudo-fascist   that. And, is actively commiting the largest human rights abuse since the holocaust, which is not up for debate, cope and seethe 50 cent army retards. Along with having no respect for their own environment or workers rights. Mattism believes that, with all of this in mind, and a lot more, he thinks it's the best interest of the West to contain the influence of the CCP, and their evil practices from spreading. As, the Chinese government has shown to not care for the welfare of its people, and has proven the world time and time again that it is the biggest threat to world peace. The international community should work together to actively condemn China, and to stop their human rights abuses. As well, he would support a democratic uprising against the current Chinese government, similar to that of the Tiananmen Square protests. As, the CCP is not the legitimate ruling party of China. Not even the  redeems the country, as it's all built off of fraud and corrupt that feeds off of being addicted to debt to keep its system running, with previously stated not having any significant welfare systems or workers protections, it is an authoritarian capitalist state.

However, despite how bad China is and how satisfying it would be for the real China to take over the mainland, we can't just go in a dick-swinging contest with the CCP just because we can, as we need to maintain some level of mutual relationship with the CCP, while also condemning their actions. There are some areas we need to co-operate with the Chinese government on, such as environmental issues, as China is a major power that is contributing to global warming. We should be pursuing a policy of realpolitik with the CCP.

[[File:Cball-US.png]] United States [[File:Cball-US.png]]
Mattism is a, and he likes the country he was born in obviously, as it's one he has managed to live a good life in compared to other authoritarian states. However, he still wants to greatly changed how the things are and US foreign policy The United States to stop meddling in the affairs of other countries, and start pursuing closer diplomatic ties with them to achieve world peace and internationally pressure countries like  China, as that will be more beneficial towards us as a nation on the geopolitical stage. With this, he also supports the idea of a  between all of the countries on the American continent.

[[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]] Taiwan [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]]
Mattism fully supports Taiwan over this dispute, and believes that the  Chinese government has no legitimate authority in claiming the Taiwanese island or messing with the national sovereignty of another country. Taiwan itself is the most based state in East Asia compared to its neighbors like Japan or South Korea, with it being the most progressive and an actual functioning democracy that respects human rights. He is also a staunch supporter of Taiwanese independence on the international stage, along with giving his full and critical support for the , and the  Hong Kong Protesters. Along with this, he supports the United States in militarily defending  Taiwan if the  CCP ever launched a military invasion of the Island. As, we have to make it clear that the West is willing to stand up to authoritarian states in the world. Although, that probably would never happen anyways, as the Chinese government is a paper tiger that's all talk and no bite. Suck it, pseudo-fascist fifty cent army dengoids, Taiwan is a real country, cope and seethe.

[[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Russia [[File:Cball-Russia.png]]
Mattism believes that Russia's territorial expansions should, in absolutely zero way, be recognized. And, that all the lands stolen should be given back to their neighbors. And, he condemns the invasion of Ukraine, believing that this war must be a devastating defeat for  Putin. He supports the Russian opposition party to that of United Russia, being. Along with this, he supports other opposition parties like the.

[[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]] Ukraine [[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]]
While Mattism obviously doesn't support Russia, as they are an oppressive  authoritarian conservative dictatorship, he also doesn't fully support  Ukraine either. As, both of our governments have common enemies that we should work together against, he also realizes that Ukraine suffers the same issues Russia does, as the government is an oligarchical state that doesn't care about worker rights, like a lot of post-soviet states. But, because Ukraine is fighting a defensive war imposed onto it by the Putin regime, he will support Ukraine against Russian expansion. With this, he would favor Ukrainian admission into, as that's what has kept Eastern Europe from falling into chaos like Ukraine after Putin invaded and has kept peace in the region, but he doesn't take a stance on Ukrainian admission into the  , and believes that should be left up for the people to decide themselves. As, he has his own issues with the organization.

[[File:Cball-Belarus.png]] Belarus [[File:Cball-Belarus.png]]
Mattism sides with the, believing that   is not the legitimate ruling party of Belarus. And, is supportive of. As, the Belarusian people deserve fair and free elections, and a legitimate government. Not some Putin backed puppet dictatorship that doesn't have the best interest of the people's minds at heart. With all of this, he supports Belarus in joining, but believes that the decision to join the  European Union should be up to the people, and won't take any stance on it.

[[File:Cball-Hungary.png]] Hungary [[File:Cball-Hungary.png]]
Mattism is against the current ruling party of FIDESZ. As, it is slowly chipping away the remaining democracy Hungary has, and is a  Russian asset as well. He supports the sanctioning of Orban's government by the  European Union. As, Europe doesn't need any pointless infighting, and the current government of Hungary is destroying it's own country in the process. He supports the opposition coalition that oppose his government. And, would support a peaceful revolution by the opposition as well, as Hungary is in dire need of some political change to keep it from going down the destructive path it's going.

[[File:Cball-Iraq.png]] Iraq [[File:Cball-Iraq.png]]
Despite how bad  was, the military invasion had no grounds for happening, wasted billions of tax payer dollars, completely failed at nation building and establishing a functioning  republic, and lead to the complete destabilization of the region which caused  to take control of the territory they did. He is against the invasion done by the neocons. He will support Rojava against   and , ect.

[[File:Cball-Poland.png]] Poland [[File:Cball-Poland.png]]
The polish government needs to open up its government, stop its  corrupt, and destructive practices. He supports the opposition party to Law and Justice, being. As, Poland doesn't need to go down the same fate  Hungary will go down if they don't stop. And, would support a peaceful revolution against the current Polish government by the opposition parties.

[[File:Cball-Greece.png]] Greece [[File:Cball-Greece.png]]
Mattism realizes that both the European Union and the  Greek government are at fault for the situation. As, the Greek government was corrupt as shit, and lied about its debt so it could get into the economic union. While, the Greek government was further indebted by bad loans given to it to try to bail it out. So, he leans on siding with the European Union in this case, but still realizes that both sides were bad. Overall, it is important that we help Greece out of their financial crisis, because they play an important role for our strategy in the Mediterranean.

[[File:Cball-Kosovo.png]] Kosovo [[File:Cball-Kosovo.png]]
Mattism supports Kosovo in their right to self-determination and independence. However, Kosovo would be better off integrating into  Albania. As, it's very unlikely to get internationally recognized as an independent country, so that would be the second best outcome to achieve its independence from Serbia.

[[File:Cball-Syria.png]] Syria [[File:Cball-Syria.png]]
Mattism supports withdrawing most of our troops from Syria, and its related regions. We should focus on working together with other countries to defeat ISIS and other related terrorist groups in the region, as that should take priority first. Along with supporting the Kurdish rebels, as they deserve independence and the right to self-determination for everything they've been through in this conflict. Assad's regime must be opposed, as Assad has started this entire conflict, and is a corrupt and brutal dictator. Fighting the humanitarian crisis caused by the civil war and the displaced people's should also take priority as well, as the mass immigration of refugees from the Middle East has to stop.

[[File:Cball-Saudi.png]] Saudi Arabia [[File:Cball-Saudi.png]]
Mattism doesn't support allying ourselves with Saudi Arabia, a country with no records of human rights or political freedom. We shouldn't be cozying up to dictators who go against our own values because they have something to offer us, especially with what happened with the news reporters, funding terrorist groups, and stuff related to that.

[[File:Cball-Iran.png]] Iran [[File:Cball-Iran.png]]
Mattism supports the United States in working together with Iran were it is needed, like the  nuclear arms disarmament, but opposed in other Areas like their horrific human rights records. It is important that we maintain diplomatic relations with the Iranian government due to these reasons.

[[File:Cball-Afghanistan.png]] Afghanistan [[File:Cball-Afghanistan.png]]
While Mattism doesn't support the Taliban taking over Afghanistan, he supports the withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan. Because, we were fighting an endless war we were never bound to win, that was costing us billions of dollars every year. We should've pulled out as soon as we got the guy we wanted. However, he doesn't support how president Biden withdrew troops from Afghanistan in the way that it happened. As, it wasn't carefully thought out, and we just ended up intervening in other places anyways. He would support a full withdrawal from these conflicts. Ideally, Afghanistan should have a democratic and  secular government to combat the Islamo fundies and other religious conflict in the region.

[[File:Cball-Yugoslavia.png]] Yugoslavia [[File:Cball-Yugoslavia.png]]
Mattism supports the military intervention in  Yugoslavia. As, it was a humanitarian intervention that was necessary to stop the ethnic genocide by  Serbian troops in  Kosovo.

[[File:Thailand.png]] Thailand [[File:Thailand.png]]
WIP

[[File:Cball-India.png]] India [[File:Cball-India.png]]
Mattism supports allying ourselves with India, but oppose Modi and other   as well. As, the caste system in India's society has largely been shaped by the. India is an important player in world politics, and it is important to uphold democratic institutions within the country and  peace within the region.

[[File:Cball-Venezuela.png]] Venezuela [[File:Cball-Venezuela.png]]
Mattism doesn't support the current government of Venezuela, but also doesn't support the  United States meddling in the affairs of  Venezuela as well. We should try to amend the relations between our government and theirs while actively condemning the violence and everything else that has happened. Ideally, the rule of law and fair elections should be reestablished, and the current government should step down. He personally supports the opposition party towards the government.

[[File:Cball-Libya.png]] Libya [[File:Cball-Libya.png]]
Mattism is against the intervention in Libya. Because, despite how bad  was, it doesn't justify what the  neoconservatives did. As, going in and destabilizing the country further just replaced Gaddafi's regime with  terrorists groups.

[[File:Cball-North_Korea.png]] North Korea [[File:Cball-North_Korea.png]]
Mattism obviously doesn't like North Korea as a state, they are our foreign adversary. And, he considers the concept of  to have completely failed in its entirety, as it isn't even socialist in the modern day, just more closer to  state capitalism and  Third Positionism. So, North Korea is by most definitions, and failed state, and has no real right to exist on the geopolitical stage.

[[File:Cball-South_Korea.png]] South Korea [[File:Cball-South_Korea.png]]
Mattism would support South Korea in taking over  North Korea over this dispute, but that doesn't mean he support South Korea fully. As their society is his anti-thesis and rampant with corrupt oligarchical rule and is a late capitalist hell scape. So, South Korea as a government and as a society needs to greatly improve if they want his full unconditional support to take over the Korean Peninsula. But, given the choice next is a country that is a totalitarian hell hole which is a failed state with no respect for  human rights, he would choose the lesser evil in this instance.

[[File:Strato.png]] The Military [[File:Strato.png]]
Mattism is in favor of defunding the national budget of the military, as it is way too bloated for the national security of our country. Along with the thousands of lives that are taken each year in conflicts we intervene in that only benefit the military industrial complex. But, the military should still receive adequate funding for the defense of our national security, as we still need to defend our allies and our international interests, but we can't go bossing other countries around just because we have the diplomatic weight to do so.

[[File:Isolation.png]] Non-Interventionism [[File:Isolation.png]]
Mattism rejects entangling our troops into other countries just for the sake of combatting the rise of authoritarian states and spreading "democracy". As, this leads to forever endless wars that waste billions of dollars in tax payer money just for the military industrial complex without any actual plans for nation building, which our government doesn't have a good track record with. And, while he holds no sympathies towards said authoritarian states, and would prefer for them to be overthrown and turn into liberal democracies, he is supportive of a non-internventionist foreign policy. Believing that pacifism as a major power would be destructive and open a power vacuum for other more destructive countries to take hold of. We should abandon most of our military bases outside of our allies to save billions of dollars in tax payer money. Instead of focusing on wasting our resources in other countries, we should focus on our own domestic affairs. The only time military intervening in other countries is justifiable is if it is for humanitarian reasons, the backing of civil unrest groups in undemocratic countries, or if a country has attacked our allies. The presence of our military in the world has caused nothing but suffering for developing countries, and we cannot police the world in this aspect, and we should accept that.

[[File:Internat.png]] Foreign Aid [[File:Internat.png]]
Mattism views foreign aid as a double edged sword. On one hand, when use rightly, it can actually helped underdeveloped countries in need and prevent the deaths of thousands of people through humanitarian aid. But, on the other, it can be used by corrupt officials to further their own wealth, while leaving very little of the population it was intended to be given too. But, in spite of all of this, he still has a rather favorable view of foreign aid, seeing as the United States has helped prevent the deaths of countless people through its foreign aid programs, he is very much in favor of increasing the amount of foreign aid given to countries. Seeing it as a tool that can be used to further positive relations with the US, and for peaceful diplomacy. So, that money that is given through foreign aid will pay itself back in international influence, which is critical for the foreign policy of the  United States on the international stage.

[[File:Cball-EU.png]] European Union [[File:Cball-EU.png]]
Mattism supports the European Union as an idea, seeing how it has brought Europe closer together, has been a force for good for the  progressive movement, and has brought peace and prosperity to Europe. So, he has no issue with EU membership itself, and believes for it to be an overall net-positive for the countries in the union. However, he does oppose the more neoliberal policies of the union, seeing it as increasing to the wealth inequality within Europe, along with the ever increasing globalization causing the center-left parties in Europe to abandon their roots for more third-way style economics which has caused them to become unfavorable with voters of said parties. He supports economic co-operation between the member states, but not the neoliberal style free-trade globalization that is seen within organization, as it actively harms said social democratic movements in Europe. So, he would be a soft-euroskeptic in this regard, and believes that the bureaucratic bodies of the union must go through reforms to fit the modern day if it is to survive the future. He supports the Schengen area the most out of all policies within the European Union, believing that free travel between its member states is an overall net good, but would like to have some policies be transferred to the countries within the European Union like immigration and trade policy. He is more open to reforming the institutions he takes issue with than outright abolishing it. He opposes the idea of, seeing as it is largely impratical, and would either become undemocratic, or fall apart entirely due the massive amounts of disagreements within and between European governments. And, with this, he is supportive of the European Union in sanctioning authoritative governments that are faltering on having democracy like. As, the union should do everything in its legal authority to uphold human rights and democracy in the countries residing in it.

On Brexit and other movements that want to leave the European Union, he is against them. Mostly because, they are neo-nationalist movements that will only leave the country off in a worse state than if the country had stayed in the economic union. And on left-wing populists that want to leave the European Union, he opposes that too, as he is a  reformist in this regard as mentioned. And, while he doesn't have a problem with immigration, as it is a good way to fix our demographic crisis, he dislikes what happened during the immigration crisis of 2015. Because, letting in that much immigrants at once for any country would cause immediate conflict, and caused the rise of said right-wing populists to take hold in Europe. So, he would take a more of a culturally conservative  attitude when it comes to immigrants coming to European countries from the Middle east. He defends the immigration policies of European countries, as they've shown to not assimilate well into the societies they are placed in, which only causes racism and hatred of foreigners to skyrocket. Although, he still disagrees with the hardline stances some of the member states have, believing that they turn away refugees and immigrants even when they could be of massive utility for the country just out of xenophobia, and would agree with liberalizing immigration from these countries, so long as there are programs there for the immigrants that come from these countries to assimilate so they don't disrupt the way of life for people. With this in mind, he completely disregards alt-right racial theories like this "great replacement" bullshit, as he's not interested in race or ethnicity.

[[File:Cball-UN.png]] United Nations [[File:Cball-UN.png]]
Mattism believes that the  doesn't really do a whole lot, but sees the organization as a useful tool for peaceful diplomacy. And, as such, is supportive of the United States to remain within the  United Nations. But, he would reform the institutions of the United Nations to be more democratic, more representative of its members. As, the UN in its current states only represents the 5 big members. The organization should be used to further diplomatic means for things like environmentalism and co-operation were it is desperately needed to prevent things like war from happening.

However, he is skeptical of using international organizations like the United Nations to. And, while not despising the concept of this, he sees it as largely impractical, and a tool of neoliberal globalists to further push their agenda. Although, if it was done under alternative globalist means, he wouldn't have a whole lot of an issue with it. Given, the process is entirely voluntary.

On it's agencies like the, ect. Mattism opposes them. As, these organizations have indebted third world countries and contributed to economic exploitation of said countries by developed countries.

[[File:Cball-Japan.png]] Japan [[File:Cball-Japan.png]]
Mattism, while liking a lot of the media that comes from this country, also realizes that its society and government are his anti-thesis in a lot of ways. He supports the complete abolition of the Japanese monarchy, and the establishment of a fully functioning  republic. Along with this, the current  needs to stop denying its war crimes committed during World War 2, and formerly apologize to all of its neighbors effected by such crimes. Along with being less xenophobic. As, the only practical way to save Japan's economy from its aging population is to let immigrants in to replace the workforce, which the current government refuses to do. But, even then, that probably wouldn't save Japans stagnating and failing society. And, while the media of the country is good, the society is my anti-thesis in a lot of ways. The current party is just a neo-con imperialist party and is a one party dominant system, although it is considerably better than the alternatives. He will support Japan against forces like  China,  Russia, ect. As, Japan plays a very important and strategic role in the  east Asia for the  United States, and other allies related in that region. And, would support the creation of some Pan-Asian union between all the countries in the region that would include Japan to defend against Russian and Chinese influences in the region.

[[File:Pan-Nationalism.png]] Pan-Nationalism [[File:Pan-Nationalism.png]]
Mattism encourages countries of similar cultures to, as they have the most to gain from international co-operation. The one's he would support the most is pan-americanism. As, he wants to use United States hegemony to promote peaceful co-existence in American continent. Other pan-nationalism movements he would support are pan-oceanianism and  pan-europeanism. seeing this as a useful means of countering the Imperial powers of that of the East. And, this could, hypothetically speaking, be praxis to achieve a world government. But, he just wants more international co-operation between these countries, not to abolish borders. But, if this method was done through democratic means, then he would have very little issue with abolishing borders and turning the countries into federations.

[[File:Castro.png]] Cuba [[File:Castro.png]]
In spite of what he thinks of the Cuban government, he thinks that the blockade against them is unjust, and should be lifted. However, the current government isn't some anti-imperialist baston that is "resisting westoid imperialism", it's just a brutal dictatorship that surpresses any personal rights of its citizens. And, with this, he promptly sides with the. And, would support a revolution against the current Cuban government by the Cuban people, as they deserve a lot better than what they currently have. Not some authoritarian, corrupt, and brutal dictatorship. They deserve a democratic and fair government.

[[File:Necon.png]] NATO [[File:Necon.png]]
Mattism supports the continued existence of  as an alliance, as NATO is necessary for the defense of Europe. But, with this in mind, he doesn't like some aspects of the alliance. That mainly being, the alliance not requiring its members to maintain its democratic status, not being a purely defensive alliance, and NATO being too centric on the United States. He would've been in favor of abolishing the alliance for a collective security council, but seeing the way things are recently going with current events, the alliance has shown to still have a purpose, and he will still continue to support its existence. However, he would prefer this alliance to eventually be replaced for a collective security council and reduce the alliance to a purely defensive one, as NATO in its current form is to hegemonic and reliant on the Untied States. But, for as long as there are authoritarian dictatorships in the world that threaten the peace and stability within Europe and other regions related, some alliance uniting all of these countries against them will need to exist.

[[File:Zio.png]] Israel [[File:Zio.png]]
Mattism doesn't support Israel, their government needs to stop its brutal policies of neo-colonialism against the  Arabs. Along with dropping our international support for Israel, and stop giving them our tax paying dollars. As, the current government is strong enough on its own to fend for itself. But, he's not opposed to Israel existing as a state, as Israel has the right to self-determination, like all countries do. And, in all honesty, a part of him would prefer Israel over Palestine personally as it is a functioning western democracy that is secular with respect for western values, but ultimately refrains from taking a stand of being against or for Israel as Israel is an ethnostate that is committing crimes against humanity. He just wants to pull out of this region because It's not our fight to fight. We should be supporting Israel and Palestine together in peace deals that stabilize the region from further conflict.

[[File:Cball-Palestine.png]] Palestine [[File:Cball-Palestine.png]]
Mattism doesn't support Palestine, as their government needs to drop Hamas, and other terrorist organizations related to its government. As, the brutality shown by the Palestinian government is on par with that of Israeli government. As, he's not opposed to Palestine existing, but they need to drop their ethnic centrism down to  civic nationalism, like  Israel should. Ideally, both governments should collapse. And, in their place, a democratic government that is based on secular governance and  civic nationalism that is made for both Israelis and Palestinians. But, seeing as that's idealistic, he would support a two state solution with similar terms. As, Palestine should be allowed to peacefully co-exist with Israel, and have the right to self-determination.

Relations
Ideological Relations =

[[File:Mega_Yes.png]] Very Based

 * [[File:Socdem.png]] - We both love progressivism and equality, mega based.
 * [[File:Civnat.png]] - Liking your country while not putting it above others is mega based.
 * [[File:Cosmo.png]] - I can be a citizen of my own country and a world citizen at the same time, it's not contradictory to hold both nationalist and internationalist beliefs.
 * [[File:AntiNazbol.png]] Anti-Nazbol - Resist the evil commies!
 * [[File:Cultsec.png]] Cultural Secularism - Based, religious authority is not legitimate.
 * [[File:Civlibert.png]] - The harm principle is based.
 * [[File:Humanismpix.png]] - Human rights ftw.
 * [[File:Globnat.png]] - Based. Global solidarity without the [[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] neoliberal globalism. If globalization is to happen, then we need a world were national sovereignty is respected, with global co-operation that doesn't serve the interests of corporatocractic neoliberal elites.
 * [[File:Gay.png]] LGBTism - Yes, Love is love and should be legalized, and many of you guys are fairly chill. But, the LGBT movement itself is riddled with cancerous idpol that doesn't help anyone.
 * [[File:Trans.png]] Transgenderism -Once again, I support your validity. But, the movement itself is a false facade of progressiveness and equality for the LGBT community.
 * [[File:Plannedp.png]] Planned Parenthoodism - Abortion is a form of healthcare, and should be legalized.
 * [[File:Leftnat.png]] - Noice. Left wing ideals, national sovereignty, global solidarity, and anti-neoliberalism.
 * [[File:Pac.png]] Pacifism - Wars should almost never be fought unless they have to be fought. No more shall we entangle ourselves into endless wars.
 * [[File:ProgressiveInternationalismIcon.png]] - You are my foreign policy. And, just as based as above. Humanity must [[File:Internation.png]] work together.
 * [[File:Ecoglob.png]] Environmental Globalization - We must save the environment through international co-operation.
 * [[File:Marketsoc.png]] - Not ideal to transition too, but I don't mind you.
 * [[File:Polycult.png]] - You're the perfect balance. Focus on what unites different cultures. Better alternative to [[File:Multicult.png]] multiculturalism.
 * [[File:Sixlib.png]] Sexual Liberationism - What I do in the privacy of my own property is my own business, not the government's.
 * [[File:NatHed.png]] National Hedonism - My kind of nationalism. Western civilization is superior due to its permissiveness in its society. Basically me but not an ethnonationalist or cultural nationalist.
 * [[File:Fed.png]] - The decentralization of power is necessary for a democratic government.
 * [[File:Intercult.png]] - Perfection. Of course, anyone should be allowed to enter our country. But, if they don't learn our values and way of life, then problems will arise. And, some cultures do hold fundamentally backwards and authoritarian views. Those views gotta go if they want to come here, otherwise, they can still practice their stuff.
 * [[File:Statecap.png]] - State involvement in the economy is a necessity. Just don't get addicted to debt, like you see in places like China, please.
 * [[File:Prog.png]] - You're the only logical conclusion to the future. And therefore, I side with you. It's important to look forwards, not backwards.
 * [[File:Fem.png]] - Of course, women's rights are still important today.
 * [[File:Protect.png]] - You gotta P R O T E C C.
 * [[File:Social_corpratism.png]] - Perfection.
 * [[File:Thar.png]] - Based, and freedom pilled.
 * [[File:Dem.png]] - One of the best governmental systems. And, the only way any government should be ran.
 * [[File:Menslib.png]] - Shares my love of social equality and catboys.
 * [[File:CatgirlUwU.png]] Catgirlism - Based, epic, and hawt :3
 * [[File:Catboy.png]] Catboyism - Still epic, but I prefer women.
 * [[File:Modnat.png]] - Nothing wrong with having pride in your country as long as you aren't putting other countries down.
 * [[File:Keynes.png]] - Your economic model has been tried and tested, and proven to work the best. However, he could be less short-term and more long-term, but that's my only complaint.
 * [[File:Socgeo.png]] - [[File:Welf.png]] Welfare and [[File:Georgist.png]] land value tax? Man, this is near peak basedness. But, could be obviously more [[File:Regulationism.png]] regulatory. [[File:Cball-Denmark.png]] Denmark is pretty cool.
 * [[File:Tripartism.png]] Tripartism - You are my economic model.
 * [[File:Soclib.png]] - [[File:Prog.png]] Progressivism, [[File:Lib.png]] liberalism, and [[File:Welf.png]] welfare? Based. However, [[File:World.png]] globalism is kinda cringe, you gotta embrace [[File:Globnat.png]] alter-globalism.
 * [[File:SocCap.png]] - Me, but less regulatory or welfarist. Honestly, I will work with you.
 * [[File:AntiDengism.png]] Anti-Dengism - China is an imperialist rogue state that is a threat to world peace that needs to have its hegemony curbed.
 * [[File:PanAmer.png]] Pan-Americanism - Ok, this is epic, and based. This needs to happen.
 * [[File:Panscan.png]] Pan-Scandinavianism - If only this could be...
 * [[File:Nordmodel.png]] - I've taken so much inspiration from you, and I think the Nordic countries are pretty cool. But, why this [[File:Monarch.png]] monarchist crap? Outside of these very few issues I take with you, you're pretty based. And, have created the happiest countries on Earth, which is something to take note of.
 * [[File:Envi.png]] - Conserving our environment is important.
 * [[File:Abort.png]] Abortionism - The ultimate choice lies on a woman to abort a fetus, not the government. Hands off my body.
 * [[File:Leftpop-0.png]] - You understand my hatred of the current status quo. But, you tend to buy into conspiracy theories and support dictators just because they go against western hegemony a bit TOO much. Which is sorta why I dislike populism, but you're still necessary to get into political power. Without you, the progressive movement in the Untied States would be far worse off.
 * [[File:Republicanismpix.png]] - I will personally find every single living monarch in the 21st century and behead them. We want a republic, and we want a full functioning republic now!
 * [[File:Sanders.png]] Sandersism - Based man, with based politics. You should've been what the 2020 presidency was. However, some of the things you did during the 2020 presidency were pretty cringe for me, outside of the few grips I have with you as a politician, you are by far the most respectable one our political climate has to offer. If only the establishment wasn't literally gop-lite and tried to sabotage you.
 * [[File:CapAnti_Clerical.png]] Anti-Clericalism - Based, and dear I say it, redpilled?
 * [[File:Lib.png]] - You're OK. But, way to much [[File:Oligarchy.png]] oligarchical presence for me.
 * [[File:Shoecialism.png]] Shoecialism - One of the original people who redpilled me, although your earlier years of being an "anti-sjw" were really cringe. Your newer content is actually worth watching.
 * [[File:Monkeyzz-Enlightenment.png]] - You gave birth to [[File:Lib.png]] liberalism and defeated [[File:Feud.png]] feudalism. Without you, none of this would be possible.

[[File:Yes.png]] Based

 * [[File:Corptism.png]] - Very nice economics. However, become more [[File:Welf.png]] welfarist, and you'll be truly perfect.
 * [[File:Bhl.png]] - Honestly, out of all libertarians, you are the most tolerable, just get more [[File:Welf.png]] welfarist. [[File:Prog.png]] Progressivism is hella based.
 * [[File:Geolib.png]] - You're also sorta based for a libertarian. You realize [[File:Georgist.png]] land value tax is a good way to pay for government expenses, but you need to become more [[File:Welf.png]] welfarist and [[File:Prog.png]] progressive. Combine this with [[File:Socliber.png]] Social libertarianism and [[File:Bhl.png]] bleeding-heart libertarianism, and you have a surprisingly based combo.
 * [[File:Euroscept.png]] Euroscepticism - The European Union is in desperate need of updating if it wants to survive in the modern times, but I'm more soft. I oppose leaving the Union, but still think there is a lot for improvement.
 * [[File:Honk.png]] - Of course, being funny is a good quality. But, saying edgy stuff for shock humor even from a non-politically correct point of view isn't funny and just gets boring after a while, nor is it humor. That would be an insult to people who are actually funny.
 * [[File:Progus.png]] Progressive Americana - You're kinda me. As, I've lived in small towns in Missouri for what seems like half of my life. But, I like urbanism. But, at least you are progressive.
 * [[File:Pan-Nationalism.png]] - Right idea, countries of similar origins should be encouraged to work together. But, some of your followers are too [[File:Ethnonat.png]] ethno-centric a lot of them are [[File:Altr.png]] alt-right retards as well. Outside of those groups of people, your [[File:Liber.png]] liberal variants are based. We need to work together to fight against the neoliberalism. Borders should be kept though.
 * [[File:Merit.png]] - Of course, society should allow those who have the most merit to succeed, but you need welfare to achieve equality of opportunity so everyone has a chance to succeed as well. People can only succeed through merit if they are free from things like poverty.
 * [[File:HumanNat.png]] Human Nationalism - You have the right idea, but be less humancentric please. Also, not to keen on that [[File:World_Federalism2.png]] world government thing.
 * [[File:Panhumanism.png]] Panhumanism - Of course, we should care for humans globally. But, once again, not too keen on establishing a [[File:World_Federalism2.png]] world government.
 * [[File:Socliber.png]] - You realize the need to be free from poverty and social inequality with [[File:HumanisticCapitalism.png]] human centered capitalism, which is good. But, I'm skeptical of [[File:UBI.png]] UBI. Outside of that, really solid [[File:Libertarian.png]] libertarian.
 * [[File:Cap.png]] - You're a good system, but you need to held to [[File:Regulationism.png]] some standards.
 * [[File:DemcrL.png]] Left-Democratism - Honestly, you're the only good faction left in the democratic party. Even then, some of you guys parrot anti-american talking points too much. I will still support you.
 * [[File:Sjwliteicon.png]] SJW-Lite - Ngl, you're my social views, and the name is kinda based. But, gives a bad rep as well, even if it is an overused talking point to strawman anything [[File:Prog.png]] progressive.
 * [[File:GeoCat.png]] Georgist Catism - Free land, and free cats :3 (but why the free trade???)
 * [[File:ApolitSocdem.png]] & [[File:AProg-u_(Fixed).png]] Apolitical Progressivism - Sometimes, I just go apolitical to avoid the current shitfest that is politics.
 * [[File:Kemal.png]] - One of the only good dictators, even if you went too far on secularism, you were still in many ways based.
 * [[File:Corbynism-ball.png]] Corbynism - Honestly, I would take you over the austerity loving neoliberal fucks in the labour party. And don't in theory mind you. But damn, some things you do are pretty cringe, even for me.
 * [[File:SocDist.png]] Social Distributism - An even better version of distributism? Remove the religious clerical governance and be more progressive, you would be mucho basedo if you did so.
 * [[File:Euronaticon.png]] European Nationalism - The idea is based, and European Civilization has shown itself to be one of the best to ever exist. But, why do so much far-right retards subscribe to you? And even then, borders should be kept.
 * [[File:Laicism.png]] - I prefer secularism that only separates religion from the government, but I also realize that it should be separated from the public as well, the state shouldn't need to do that however.

[[File:Meh.png]] Bringe

 * [[File:Nation.png]] - Nationalism has been forces for both good and bad. And, I'm not against having pride for your country, but just pure nationalism is bad, as I'm against putting my country first above others, be more accepting of international co-operation. And, me being anti-nationalist was just a reflection of how much I hated my own state government.
 * [[File:Glibr.png]] - You care for the environment, but your free market capitalism has to go.
 * [[File:Truscum.png]] Transmedicalism - While you do make some good points, your overgeneralization is also harmful as well.
 * [[File:HyperBidenicon.png]] Hyperborea Bidenism - What if Joe Biden actually had a spine? based schizo gaming
 * [[File:3princ.png]] - Mixed bag of an ideology, [[File:SunYatsen.png]] Sun Yat-Sen was cool, but some of you guys support the PRC and like lolicon.
 * [[File:Bidenism.png]] Bidenism - You as a person lack any sort of commitment and leadership, and the democratic party as a whole doesn't stand up to republicans enough. You've failed on progressive agenda's, and I have very little hope you can turn your presidency around. Better than Trump, but that says nothing. Resign.
 * [[File:Antthe.png]] Anti-Theism - Yes, you make good points on religion being a useless divider of humanity that only further submits our tribalisitc differences, and people will often choose useless identities like religion to preside over attributes which harms the mutual respect we as humans form with each other that gets in the way of globalization. But, hating religious people and being the exact opposite of a fundamentalist is gay.
 * [[File:Bernst.png]] - One of the least bad [[File:Ormarxf.png]] Marxists, doesn't say a whole lot.
 * [[File:Distributist.png]] - Widespread ownership of property is interesting, and I like the idea myself, but landlords have to go. And, remove the religious governance trash will you? Even if the catholic social teachings are better than the prosperity bible junk, religion and politics do not mix well ever.
 * [[File:Patcon.png]] - Based [[File:Welf.png]] welfare, but [[File:Conserv.png]] conservatism and [[File:Paternalism.png]] paternalism are cringe.
 * [[File:Islamophobia icon.png]] Islamophobia - While yes, I do understand the issue with mass immigration without any sort of assimilation programs from countries that do not tolerate western or progressive values, but racism also ain't cool as well.
 * [[File:Utsoc.png]] - Your rejection of [[File:Ormarxf.png]] Marxism is nice, but socialism still isn't desirable.
 * [[File:European_Federalism.png]] - I very much like the idea of an alliance that unites the whole of Europe. But that should be more of a forum instead of a federation of states. And, the economic union is really hit or miss.
 * [[File:World_Federalism2.png]] - Once again, caring about global unity is cool. But, a world government isn't feasible, nor would we should try to pursue it. As, humanity will always be always tribalistic to the extent that this extreme internationalism wouldn't be possible to achieve, nor would the logistics be possible either,
 * [[File:Cdem.png]] - Meh, some Christian democrats throughout history were pretty based. Outside of the communitarian economics which I do like, to base your governments ethics off of a book that has no ground for reality is flat out retarded, to be frank.
 * [[File:Islamic Democracy.png]] - Slightly more theocratic and conservative version of the above. And, many of your adherents like Erdoğan have used being a "moderate" as a ploy to install theocratic governments. Outside of the economics, barf. Get rid of the religious governance.
 * [[File:Soc.png]] - I take a lot from you, but you're not desirable to implement. I will work with some of your adherents to achieve political goals though.
 * [[File:Econat.png]] - Caring about your environment is nice and all, but you will benefit more from [[File:Internation.png]] international co-operation and alliances.
 * [[File:Socauth.png]] - You're one the least bad [[File:Sec.png]] authoritarians. But, that doesn't ultimately say much. And, some of your leaders have been forces for good. But, many of you guys have been [[File:Conserv.png]] conservative as well.
 * [[File:Multicult.png]] - Don't get me wrong, society can be multicultural. But, why focus on things that cause pointless infighting? I prefer [[File:Polycult.png]] poly culturalism. Not to mention, you cause the rise of [[File:Rpop-tinfoilhat.png]] right-wing populists. We don't need more far-right zealots taking political power.
 * [[File:Antifa.png]] - I hate [[File:Fash.png]] fascism too. but violence is not the answer.

[[File:Kinda No.png]] Kinda Cringe

 * [[File:Anmark2.png]] - One of the least bad anarchists, that doesn't say a whole lot though.
 * [[File:Anin.png]] - Another least bad anarchist. But, once again, that doesn't say a whole lot.

[[File:No.png]] Cringe

 * [[File:Zio.png]] - I'm not opposed to you existing. But, you need to fend for yourself, stop using our foreign aid to fund your military.
 * [[File:Isolationist.png]] - You make no sense as a foreign policy in the modern day. The only remotely tolerable thing is your non-interventionism. You ramble about national sovereignty when you fail to realize that [[File:Internation.png]] international alliances have prevented the deaths of millions, while isolationism has only increased conflicts globally, which actively threaten your sovereignty more than any alliance ever could. Simply put, this foreign policy has failed every single time it has been tried.
 * [[File:Confem.png]] - Not a real feminist.
 * [[File:Confess.png]] - Church authority is not legitimate, nor should it govern anyone's lives.
 * [[File:Sinophobia.png]] Sinophobia - Hating the Chinese government is cool, but being racist against Chinese people isn't.
 * [[File:DemocratF.png]] Democratism - Oh for fuck sakes. Just because I hate conservatism doesn't mean I like you guys. Almost all of my criticism of the republican party could be applied to you. People are too caught up this culture war BS to realize that there is no real difference between republicans and democrats. Being the lesser evil doesn't make you good. Not to mention, how the establishment works to undermine progressive democrats and their causes, like how they've sabotaged Bernie multiple times. I HATE THE DNC, I HATE THE DNC, I HATE THE DNC!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 * [[File:Libfem.png]] - Some elements are based, but some of you guys just legitimately hate men for no reason.  And, your idea of gender equally is equal ratio of drone pilots who commit acts of neo-imperialism in the middle east?
 * [[File:USAGOP.png]] American Republicanism - I can't wait for the day this two party system comes crashing down on itself.
 * [[File:Necon.png]] - What have you conserved other than endless amounts of debt and endless foreign wars?
 * [[File:3way.png]] - Basically just neocon but with *some* welfare. Erosion of civil liberties, foreign interventions, job outsourcing. Man, I cannot believe I am forced to vote for you. You're just unsocialized social democracy.
 * [[File:Culchrist.png]] Cultural Christianity -God doesn't exist lmao.
 * [[File:Libertarian.png]] - Taxation isn't theft you moron.
 * [[File:Xbert.png]] - Combine the horrible economic views with "muh fictional fairy tale said so" makes the worst possible ideology that is not politically extreme.
 * [[File:Libcon.png]] - Communitarianism, conservatism, free-market capitalism. Name me a more barf ideology, will you?
 * [[File:World.png]] - I support international co-operation, but economic globalism is mostly cringe.
 * [[File:Conserv.png]] - What has modern day conservatism conserved? Every time there is some victory you could make, it's almost reverted in due time. Quite the losers ideology.
 * [[File:Rwsjw.png]] Right-Wing SJW & *[[File:SJW.png]] SJW - The culture war was a mistake. Different sides, basically the same tactics. identity politics are bad no matter if it is supremacist idpol or intersectional idpol.
 * [[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] - ENSLAVOR OF THE GLOBAL POOR! I don't hate the global poor you retard, I am doing them a favor.
 * [[File:Luxem.png]] - You rebelled against the SDP, and got tried as a traitor. What did you expect?
 * [[File:Pat.png]] - This helps literally no one lmao.
 * [[File:Fiscon.png]] - Sure, a fiscally responsible government that doesn't overstep its boundaries in social services is a good thing. As, shown in many times in history were government finances collapse due to them overspending their budget. But, for the economy to come at the expensive of the people, really now?
 * [[File:Ormarxf.png]] - Marx was a moron. Not to mention, [[File:Tripartism.png]] class collaborationism has proven to eliminate class conflict better than "class struggle" will.
 * [[File:Homophobia.png]] Homophobia - Yes, I support the fag agenda. And?
 * [[File:Antiabort.png]] Anti-Abortionism - Imagine thinking that you are even remotely morally right forcing Women to give birth, now that's just flat out disgusting, and the fact that people celebrate overturning abortion laws is abhorrent.
 * [[File:Hillaryism_Sprite.png]] Hillaryism - Trump was bad but you were equally as shit and an embarrassing politician, keep seething over 2016.
 * [[File:Mat.png]] - Anyone who idealizes this as a perfect women outside of fantasy is probably an incel.
 * [[File:Mansphere.png]] - No bitches?
 * [[File:Radfem.png]] - No dick? Also, how do things like Porn only objectify women but when women objectify men it's okay? I support feminism and womens rights, but this gives feminism a bad look.
 * [[File:Cultural_Nationalism.png]] - While immigrants should learn our values, you focus too much on mono culturalism. Which, leads to xenophobia and being unaccepting of other cultures. And, often than not, you're racist as well.
 * [[File:Hcon.png]] - Bruh. Why do you side with people who literally use moral arguments to dehumanize your existence? And, many of you guys are interventionists, which is just awful.
 * [[File:Consocf.png]] - If you unironically label anything that is remotely progressive as "western decadance", I can't take your opinion seriously. I just can't. Not to mention, the amount of [[File:Dengf.png]] Dengists, and how many of you guys support anything that goes against [[File:Lib.png]] liberalism like Russia and Belarus is just hilarious.
 * [[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]] - Not all traditions are bigoted you moron, I will support you in smashing reactionaries though.
 * [[File:Corp.png]] - You're just effectively neo-feudalism. Everyone should have the right to succeed in life, not just a few wealthy business men. And, also, get out of my government.
 * [[File:Sec.png]] - You've been forces for good, but you should still fuck off.
 * [[File:Natcon.png]] - You don't care about [[File:Internation.png]] international co-operation or [[File:Prog.png]] progressive values. And, even some of your supporters who [[File:WelfChauvin.png]] support welfare are notably very xenophobic.
 * [[File:Ancom.png]] - I would prefer to live under this system than an ancap system, but that doesn't say a lot when you're looking at which ones are least shit, and both are very shit. Mass collectivism and utopianism, nah. I normally don't say that people who are left-wing don't want to work because there are very much legitimate reasons for opposing our current neolib system, but you just don't wanna work.
 * [[File:Altl.png]] - Pov: ur stuck in 2016. Like, how can you be caught up in the same PC and Idpol culture that you criticize leftists for being in?

[[File:Mega_No.png]] Very Cringe

 * [[File:Nazi.png]] - Your life is nothing! You serve zero purpose! You should follow your leader, and kill yourself, now!
 * [[File:Showa.png]] - Why did you have to kill so much innocent Chinese people?
 * [[File:Fash.png]] - Thanks for making [[File:Corptism.png]] corporatism associated with fascism. Now, [[File:ML.png]] tankies call us [[File:Socdem.png]] social democrats social fascists because of you!
 * [[File:Austrobert.png]] - Retardation taken to the extreme. Pitting an unironic austrolibbert against a marxist-leninist would be interesting, as both are about the same amounts of being completely retarded.
 * [[File:Anti-Socdem.png]] Anti-Social Democracy - REEEEEEEEEEE!
 * [[File:AntiLibIcon.png]] Anti-Liberalism - REEEEEEEEEEE!
 * [[File:React.png]] - Imagine thinking any sort of societal progress is degenerate when the real degenerate is the person who wants to unironically return to pre-enlightenment ways of rationality. And, you only like western civilization because it is white. Although, we do both like western civilization, for different reasons of course.
 * [[FIle:Ultranat.png]] - You're no nationalist. You're just a degenerate, nothing more. You're a complete diservice to your own country men, and give nationalism a bad name, you should be ashamed of yourself.
 * [[File:XiJinpingThoughtf.png]] Xi Jinping Thought - Cry harder Winnie the pooh, Taiwan is the only legitimate China.
 * [[File:Theocrat.png]] Theocratism - Your fictional book is no basis for any form in government.

Philosphy Relations =
 * [[File:CountEn.png]] - Moron who romanticizes irrelevant times that have long since past.
 * [[File:3P.png]] Third Positionism - "ReVoLt AgAiNsT tHe MoDeRn WoRlD, ReSiSt MoDeRnIsM" Lol fascism lost cope and seethe, and the only thing you're revolting against is your parents who tell you to get out of the house. Also, half of you guys are degenerates who like jerking off to lolicon
 * [[File:RelNat.png]] - Combination of your baseless fairytale plus your retarded nationalistic lens on it has lead to nothing but suffering.
 * [[File:Racenat.png]] - Why would you take pride in something that couldn't even be more made up?
 * [[File:Ethnonat.png]] - Once again, taking pride in your ethnicity is one the lowest forms of tribalism, like religion or race. We are one nation, one people, not this.
 * [[File:PCB-Hyperborea.png]] Hyperborea - What.
 * [[File:Esofash.png]] - Yeah Himmler wasn't an epic gamer he was just insane.
 * [[File:Totalitarian.png]] - Yeah, I like [[File:Civlibert.png]]  individual liberty. Also, you're batshit insane. Anyone who defends you in any capacity should be ashamed of themselves.
 * [[File:Statesoc.png]] - Your system has resulted in nothing more than stagnation. Sure, you may have been forces for good in developing countries. But, outside of that, you're just awful.
 * [[File:Cfash.png]] - I don't care about your book has to say, let alone using it as an excuse to commit genocide and crimes against humanity.
 * [[File:AntiMattismBall.png]] Anti-Mattism - MY OPPOSITE!
 * [[File:Putin.png]] Putinism - Slava Ukraini!
 * [[File:Identi.png]] Identitarianism - It's funny, because I want the same thing you want to an extent. But, to combat edgy retards like you. Also, you are the embodiment of identity politics.
 * [[File:Burgsys.png]] Burgundian System - Evil dystopian ideology.
 * [[File:Altr.png]] - Screams "I'm an edgy 13 year old who just discovered politics whose looking for attention". I'm glad your influence is declining. Also, I know you masturbate to [[File:Femboy.png]] femboy hentai, everyone knows.
 * [[File:Statlib.png]] - You're not a liberal, you're just an autocratic imperialist with pink pant.
 * [[File:Anti-Semetic.png]] Anti-Semitism - Yes, all of our world governments and institutions are controlled by (((them))), is that a problem?
 * [[File:Antiporn.png]] Anti-Pornism - The censorship of media just because you disagree with it personally is childish and stupid (also I'm so fucking horny aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa)
 * [[File:Euras.png]] - [Comment removed by moderator]
 * [[File:Ancapf.png]] - This is just stateless feudalism.
 * [[File:Plcn2.png]] - You're proof cultural religion is no longer necessary for society. And, the amount of far-right zealots that are you who are in-reality neo-nazis is concerning, but not surprising.
 * [[File:Dengf.png]] - National Socialism with Chinese characteristics. Stop your horrific human rights abuses you totalitarian maniac. Also, stop pandering yourself as a [[File:Marketsoc.png]] market socialist, you're just [[File:Statecap.png]] state capitalist, and everyone knows.
 * [[File:Reactlib.png]] - Liberalism is a product of the [[File:Enlightnenment.png]] enlightenment.

Friends

 * [[File:PCB-Utility.png]] Utilitarianism - The well being of everyone matters.
 * [[File:MoralUni.png]] Moral Universalism - If it makes individuals happy, then it is morally right.
 * [[File:Hedonism-cloud.png]] Hedonism - Drugs, sex, lifestyle liberty. It's you're life, you live it how you want too.
 * [[File:Materialism.png]] Materialism - Combine this with hard determinism, and this is basically how I see the world. It makes no sense for the universe not to only consist of material elements.
 * [[File:Mach.png]] - Good praxis to achieve political change, but morality shouldn't be irrelevant.
 * [[File:Indiv.png]] Individualism - Individuals should be allowed to do as they please as long as they aren't harming others.
 * [[File:Humanismpix.png]] - Humans are the measure of everything.
 * [[File:Metamodernism.png]] Metamodernism - Combines the best of post modernism and modernism, beautiful.
 * [[File:Absurd.png]] Absurdism - Realizes that you can create meaning in life without having to be pessimistic.

Neutral

 * [[File:Postmodernicon.png]] Post-Modernism - I don't agree with you on the nature of humans or morality, but you do make some good points.
 * [[File:Positivism.png]] Positivism - yes, empirical evidence is good, but you also have some things to be desired for lack of words.
 * [[File:Libertine.png]] Libertinism - Kinda based, but morals should still exist. Y'know?
 * [[File:Nietzsche-icon.png]] Nietzscheanism - His philosophy is really interesting, even if I don't agree with a whole lot of it.
 * [[File:Col.png]] Collectivism - I'm a fan of communitarian economics, but not in social matters. You're needed to a certain extent for harm control and to keep the population safe, but individuals should still be allowed to do as they please.
 * [[File:Existentialism.png]] - I don't agree with you on moral relativism, but I do agree with you in other areas.
 * [[File:Ego.png]] - You should care for your own well being, but you should also consider the well being of other people around you as well.

Enemies
Political Parties Relations =
 * [[File:RomSto.png]] Roman Stoicism -
 * [[File:Community.png]] - Individual interests will always be different from what's best for society, and to think otherwise is ignorant.
 * [[File:Nihil.png]] Nihilism -The meaning to life is what you make it.
 * [[File:Theocrat.png]] Fundamentalism - Why should I believe in your fictional fairytale? And, the majority of religious fundamentalists are alt-right retards.
 * [[File:Paternalism.png]] Paternalism - Why would I want some overly reaching government deciding what's right for me personally as an individual in social matters? That's what lead to the destruction of civil liberties like the right to privacy. It's clear, the government a lot of the time doesn't have the best intentions for us as individuals.
 * [[File:Anti-Humanism.png]] -
 * [[File:Virtue_ethics_icon.png]] Virtue Ethics - I get excess pleasure is bad and focusing on myself entirely isn't a good thing, but when I'm not harming anyone then I can be as self-indulging as I want to be. Like, who am I harming by enjoying myself the privacy of my own private property?

[[File:Mega_Yes.png]] Based

 * [[File:NDP_icon.png]] New Democratic Party - Based, Canada needs you.
 * [[File:Blanchet.png]] Bloc Québécois - Pretty based.

[[File:Meh_by_buni.png]] Bringe

 * [[File:Volt.png]] - Interesting idea, and it is fun to tease. But, that would be extremely unlikely. The only tolerable bit is the progressiveness, outside of that, you would be put in cringe.
 * [[File:Demcr.png]] Democratic Party - Left democrats are the only tolerable faction, the rest of this party is a circus and has its pockets filled with corporate money. And, in reality, I would be independent.
 * [[File:TrudeauLib.png]] Liberal Party of Canada - I would take you over the conservatives, but that doesn't say a whole lot.
 * [[File:JapCom.png]] Japanese Communism - Good social policies and (some) foreign policies, everything else here is pretty much cringe though.
 * [[File:Green_Party_(US).png]] American Greenism - Too culturally left-wing and too left-wing on economics. Not seeming as bad as the DSA since i'm convinced they are just a bunch of larping feds.

[[File:No.png]] Cringe

 * [[File:LDP(Japan).png]] Japanese Liberal Democracy - I enjoy a lot of media that comes from Japan, but its government and society are absolutely shit and my anti-thesis. Also, stop denying Japanese war crimes committed during WW2.
 * [[File:USABert.png]] American Libertarianism - Very weird group of individuals might I say. Even If I agree with social individualism, economic individualism is bad. Also, don't agree with dismantling social security for private charity for obvious reasons.
 * [[File:USASolidarity.png]] American Solidarity Party - Aside from a few good poliices, hardly makes up for the rest of this dumpster fire you call a political party. Better than republicans, but that doesn't say a whole lot.
 * [[File:Alternative_for_germany_ball.png]] Alternative für Deutschland - Denies climate change, economic privatization, hard euroscepticism, full of german ultranationalists, very cringe and delusional.
 * [[File:FIDESZ.png]] FIDESZ - Actively destroying your own country and everything else this stands for is my polar opposite.
 * [[File:Pis.png]] PiS - Basically a less cringey version of Hungary's government. Welfare is cool, outside of that, my anti-thesis and utterly barf. Destroying your own country is not worth destroying the entirety of the European Union in the process.

[[File:Mega_No.png]] Very Cringe
Self-Insert Relations =
 * [[File:Nazi.png]] - I shouldn't have to explain why I dislike the Nazis, now should I?
 * [[File:Dengf.png]] - The NSDAP reincarnated. And, not even socialist, just a state capitalist hiding under a market socialist mask.

[[File:Mega_Yes.png]] Based

 * [[File:BeryAbLib.png]] Beryism ([[File:Geolib.png]]/[[File:Bhl.png]]/[[File:Civlibert.png]]/[[File:Nalib.png]]) - Our ideologies both share the same principles even if worship the free market too much. Your also a really friendly user, one of the most pleasant people I've seen on this site. At least your a libertarian who doesn't seem to hate all leftists. So overall, you're about as based as a libertarian rightist can be.
 * - You you could be slightly less statist and more progressive, but your economics are agreeable.
 * - Agreeable economics and you're pro-roc aswell. You'd definitely be better off ruling mainland china than the current chinese government. Although, that interventionism nonsense has to go.
 * [[File:EvolvingSoc.png]] Evolutionary Socialism - Definitely the most agreeable socialist on economics! We support alot of the same issues too but you're just more economically left than I am.
 * [[File:Mebrouk.png]] Mebroukism [[File:Mebrouk-2.png]] - Same ideology and is progressive, nice.
 * - Liberalism and progressivism are both based.
 * - A market socialist, which happens to be one of the most based socialists. But, you gotta chill out with the world federalism nonsense, as that is pretty cringe. Outside of that, there's not a whole lot I can complain about, other than you making hedonism your entire personality. Which, even as someone who is very fond of having fun myself, I think that should be kept to one's own personal business.
 * [[File:YellingLiber.png]] Neo Social Libertarianism - Pretty based for an interventionist, most of your ideology isn't even that bad. I like your foreign policy, but drop the interventionist stuff please. And, embrace alter-globalism.
 * [[File:ProgNeoCorp.png]] Progressive Neo-Corporatism - Incredibly based, and nearly identical to me. Please, cut with the world federalism and multiculturalism stuff. You'd be truly based if you became an alter-globalist.
 * [[File:Eurocorp.png]] European Corporatism - Too authoritarian for me personally, but I really like what I see here.
 * [[File:Uzarashvilism.png]] Uzarashvilism - Ok ideology. I like your cultural takes. But economics are bit too left for me along with your stances on agarianism, atleast you oppose tankies and the such.
 * - Environmentalism and progressivism are both good, although socialist economics for me are meh. I'm not a fan of Marxism.
 * [[File:OwfBall.png]] Owfism ([[File:World_Federalism2.png]]/[[File:Civlibert.png]]/[[File:Libms.png]]) - Your system is really interesting, and your economic tripartism and market socialism is very tolerable. But, the world federalism stuff is whack to say the least. Tone the former down to internationalism and it would be basically good. Also, not a fan of virtue ethics, but that's basically it.
 * [[File:TheIced.png]] Icedism - Based Georgist. But, free-market capitalism is kinda cringe ngl. Atleast you're against authoritarianism and are culturally left-wing.
 * [[File:TonyNew.png]] South Floridan Socialism - Socialism for me is meh, although, your economics aren't bad. But, you should really drop the independence stuff, as that is never happening. At least your cultural takes are good.

[[File:Yes.png]] Kinda Based

 * [[File:Tomjazz.png]] Tomjazzism - Too leftist for me, but being culturally progressive is based, along with being civically libertarian.
 * [[File:TAM_icon.png]] Third Aquarian Model - Your environmentalism and cultural takes are based. But, at the end of the day, I'm still a liberal and you're a socialist. But, that can be put aside for everything else I see, which I like. Although, too third worldist.
 * [[File:Ethwelball.png]] Ethnic Welfarism - Umm, where do I begin? Firstly, I like your geopolitical stance and alternative globalism and welfare. But, ethnic pluralism is something I seriously cannot get behind.

[[File:Meh_by_buni.png]] Bringe

 * )- While I admire not letting things holding you back and wanting to live your life how you want to live it. But even I wouldn't agree with such a lifestyle. Not my authority to tell you how you want to live, but, I would personally see this as too far.
 * [[File:TIMUAAAism.png]] ThisIsMyUsernameAAAism - Cringe ancom, but, is culturally progressive.
 * - Bruh, this is just effectively market socialism. Why is Corporatocracy necessary?
 * [[File:HelloThere314Icon.png]] HelloThere314ism - Being culturally left is cool, anarchism isn't.
 * [[File:Hamburger.png]] Rejuvenative Hamburg thought - Cultural takes are based, but what's with this ethnopuralism and separatism stuff? Also, too left-wing and utopian.
 * [[File:Liblovsprite.png]] Liberty-Loverism - Pretty utopian ideology, anarchism won't ever work. But, being culturally left-wing is its saving grace.
 * [[File:NeoAlphadonialism.png]] Neo Alphadonialism - Your anarchist and egoist stances are really cringe. But, being culturally left is good.
 * [[File:AshleyHere.png]] AshleyHere Thought - Not a fan of what I see, only good thing is being culturally left-wing.
 * [[File:Ultro.png]] Ultroneism - It's weird how you take such great inspiration from Max Steiner, but I find your philosophical knowledge impressive, even if I don't agree with it.
 * [[File:AlaskanSoup.png]] AlaskanSoup Thought - Not even sure what to say about mutualist economics. I will say that being against authoritarianism is quite based, even if it's because you're an anarchist.
 * - Quebec Fr*nchoid, but a nice dude. Also, I don't like your interventionism nor your state enforced secularism, being a social liberal myself, enforcing lifestyles upon people to fit your world view is that no different of conservatism which you claim to be against. But, at least some of your culture takes are good. Progressive social technocracy is ok I guess,
 * [[File:NguyenreichismIcon.png]] Bruhman Thought - Cringe ultra who thinks everything they don't like is a liberal. Only saving grace is being culturally left.
 * Ronwelltarianism_icon.png Ronwelltarianism - Your support individual liberty, civil service reform, a non-interventionist and diplomatic foreign policy, and civil liberties are nice. But, you're more socially conservative than I am. Also, it's not contradictory to support vaccine mandates and individualism because vaccine mandates have existed before the corona pandemic and abortions aren't spreadable.
 * [[File:Syntridem2.png]] Syncretic Tridemism - Typical chud who uses baseless arguments like "morality" to justify their backwards view as a way of malding over the fact modern day conservatism doesn't conserve anything. At least we both like LVT and Welfare.
 * [[File:Atronism-icon.png]] Atronism - Based progressivism, but I dislike Marxism and communism. Tone the former down to socialism and your ideology would be good.

[[File:Meh.png]] Kinda Cringe

 * [[File:DN_Adm.png]] Darknight Yuusha Model - You're ideology has some saving graces. With being environmentalist, free speech (although wanting to restrict expression that you don't personally like is contradictory to that), political freedom, secularism, ect. But, your first world conservatism, your anti-western and anti-liberalism rants, and all of that. Yeah, that is pretty cringe for me. Not to mention, your economics are too left-wing for me.
 * [[File:SSTicon.png]] Novoscarletism - Too left-wing, conservative, authoritarian, and anti-west. With the same saving graces as Darknight. Firstly, idealizing authoritarianism, conservativism, and the eastern Hegemony powers (even if you claim to be against them, you would still pick them over the west. Which is a pretty cringe take). Those are all massive bruh moments. A long with being against NATO and defensive alliances as a whole? Yeah, that's really cringe. The United States still needs to influence on the global stage, as it's pretty ungreatful to just circle jerk "uS BaD". I'm saying that as a left-populist, were I do nothing but shit on my government and its elites.
 * [[File:Novochirotesla.png]] Chirotesla Thought - You went from a somewhat respectful old leftist to having next to none of your redeeming qualities left. To start, justifying the censorship of things you don't like under emotional arguments like "degeneracy" is childish and cringe. Along with a lot of your social views being pretty cringe, with some saving graces. And, your economics are too left-wing for me, as I'm still a capitalist at the end of the day.
 * [[File:NeoArctoismIcon.png]] - Pretty typical self-described "Anti-SJW" cringe talking points. Along with your economics being a downgrade of what it was previously.

[[File:No.png]] Cringe

 * - Interventionist, isolationist, conservative, and Austro-libertarian economics. How does one manage to make an ideology that is such a clusterfuck?
 * [[File:JoeyFloppa_boo.png]] JoeyFloppaism - A conservative libertarian who calls himself an individualist while hardly being one, also, there's sympathizes to neo-colonalism, which is bad.
 * [[File:SomeCrusade.png]] SomeCrusaderism - Essentially, my opposite in almost everything that is still moderate. At least you seemingly oppose authoritarian regimes in the world, unlike some people in your camp. Outside of that, complete and utter barf ideology. (And, I have bad days too. Sorry if I was overly and unnecessary aggressive at times when I really shouldn't have been.)
 * [[File:SGS_Icon.png]] Savage Granny Smithism - One of the only good things about this ideology is its populism and democracy. Other than that, no.

[[File:Mega_No.png]] Very Cringe
Architecture Relations =
 * [[File:Krano.png]] Kranoterism - Authoritarian conservative, I physically recoiled in cringe reading this.
 * [[File:PATS.png]] Pan-Asian Tridemism with Socialist Characteristics ([[File:PanAsian.png]]/[[File:Totalitarian.png]]/[[File:Statecap.png]]/[[File:XiJinpingThoughtf.png]]/[[File:CNNeocon.png]]) - Totalitarian dengoid, do I need to say more.
 * [[File:Heinrich.png]] Heinrich-Cheungism - Totalitarian larper.
 * [[File:R-i.png]] Neo-Bannnedism - Cringe fundamentalist theocrat and clerical fascist (yeah it's not up for debate you are a clerical fascist) who stands against progress. Although I'll give you SOME credit. Your original page inspired me to make my own so without you ever joining this wiki I would've never gotten inspired to make my own page.
 * [[File:Cheesenism_(PB).png]] Cheesenism - Authoritarian, wants sharia law unironically. I have nothing but bad things to say about this ideology.
 * [[File:Palos.png]] Palostiusism ([[File:Mansphere.png]]/[[File:Darwinist.png]]/[[File:React.png]]/[[File:Ingsocf.png]]) - HOLY SHIT GO OUTSIDE!!!! I REFUSE TO BELIEVE THIS IS ANYTHING BUT A LARP, YOU WANT CRIMETHINK TO BE A REAL THING AND PRIVACY TO BE NONEXISTANT??? AND YOU'RE SEXIST TOO.
 * ([[File:Rwsjw.png]]/[[File:Reactlib.png]]/[[File:Plcn2.png]]/[[File:Austrobert.png]]) - Very cringe Trumper who believes in just some flat out retarded stuff, and is pretty much the definiton of a right-wing SJW.
 * [[File:Chimp.png]] Silly Chimpism ([[File:Altr.png]]/[[File:Rwsjw.png]]/[[File:Corptism.png]]) - Atleast you can admit you're not a liberal. Still, basically a fash.
 * [[File:Based_Autism_Icon.png]] Based Autism (0/100) - Neo-nazi moment, bruh.
 * - A literal red fascist. Like bro, your ideology is legitimately so dystopian it's actually concerning. Marxist-Leninism was cringe enough as it is but Nazbol? Cringe does not do justice to how bad this ideology is.
 * [[File:Mikolayism_Pixel.png]] Mikolayism - Now, this is why playing too much paradox games is bad for your brain. Open strasserite and anti-semite who claims not to be racist while still supporting Otto Strasser. And thanks to people like you, I'm gonna create a multiethnic globalist corporation ran by the Jews, and there's nothing you can do to stop me!
 * [[File:Technototball.png]] Techno-Ultranationalism ([[File:Altr.png]]/[[File:Rwsjw.png]]/[[File:Corptism.png]]) - Now, you've gotten just, ever slightly more tolerable in terms of your ideology not being a totalitarian larper. But, that's basically it, average terminally online internet fascist, there's not a whole lot I can commit on, as this is my anti-thesis in almost every conceivable way, with the same amount of technophillia as quark. Not even your corporatist economy is good, because of its extreme dirigisme, which is too much for me. Also, I really don't like your stance on mix racing, for reasons that are obvious.
 * [[File:Nastyism_Icon.png]] Nastyism ([[File:Altr.png]]/[[File:Identi.png]]/[[File:Rwsjw.png]]/[[File:Guildsoc.png]]) - You are a Nazi. What do you expect me to say.
 * [[File:Pixil-frame-0(16).png]] Reactionary-Cheesenism - Touch some grass and go outside edgelord.
 * [[File:Xirlan-alt.png]] Xirlan Thought - As if being French wasn't bad enough, you had to make it worse with this Monarchist crap. Also, expects to remain in the European Union after this ideology would be hypothetically instated? Also, you're proof normal secularism doesn't go far enough.
 * [[File:Pixil-frame-0(27).png]] New Model Of Cheesenism - Economic centrism doesn't make up for the rest of this garbage can of a self-insert that is still very horrible.

Based
WIP

Neutral

 * International - Too bland, but not the worst.
 * Cyberpunk - Futuristic aesthetics get old after a while.
 * Steampunk - Meh, not terrible. But, the 1900s have long since passed.
 * [[File:AestheticPaleocon.png]] 50's Vintage Aesthetic - Again, not horrible. Some aspects of this are pretty nice like the old cars, which cars now feel bland. But, the time has ultimately passed.

Cringe

 * [[File:Fash.png]] Fashwave - Edgy 14 year old who just discovered politics legitimately be like:
 * [[File:Mansphere.png]] Incelcore - Why?
 * -| Quadrants =

Based
- Extremism on both sides are cringe, and incorporating the best from the left-wing and the right-wing has shown to create the happiest societies.

- Centrist economics and respect for individual liberty? What can I say, but, sheer, and utter, BASEDNESS! I would be this in all reality, but I still think the state is necessary to a certain degree to keep people safe, which is why I'm center-lib on the civic axis. But, you're the second most respectable quadrant on the political compass. However, please get rid of the anprims, these guys give this quadrant a bad name as people only associate it with "reject civillization, return to monke".

Bringe
-Some of you guys can be based, like socberts. But, outside of that, way too capitalistic. However, civil liberties and non-interventionism are based. So, basically just a rightoid with a brain. However, there is a fairly mixed amount of you guys who are conservative as well, which is just awful. At least you don't want to enforce that through overbearing state mandates.

- Some of you guys can be based, like the market socialists. However, get rid of the Marxists and other commies please. Outside of that, not the worst, even if I prefer capitalism. Classical social democracy is respectable.

- Socialism if it wasn't shit, some of you guys are quite based. And, I would prefer this over a libright society, but that doesn't say a whole lot, as at least I would have my basic needs covered and wouldn't be left to fend for myself. And, a lot of you guys by into this pointless intersectional idpol culture war bs, which is pretty cringe. At least your quadrant is overall progressive.

Cringe
- Interventionism, free-market capitalism, and neoliberal imperialism. YOU SHOULD KILL YOURSELF, NOW!

- DIEDIEDIE! There is no redeeming qualities about this quadrant, from all the Dengists to the shitty state "socialists" and the like. This has failed all the time, with no respect for political rights or individual freedom under a stagnant system that helps no one, just as bad as free-market capitalism.

- Slightly more tolerable than Authleft, due to the market allocation of goods. But, even that doesn't say anything when many of you guys, when you aren't first-world neolibs, are cuckservatives who take both too far. Some even supporting monarchy and other forms of anti-democratic governments. Overall, with many of you guys being authoritarian conservatives, this has to be one of the worst quadrants to have existed.

- Sadly, your centrist economics will not make up for everything else. There have been some forces of good within this quadrant, but many of you guys are Neo-Nazis, and social collectivism is cringe and helps nobody.

- Lmao, fuck off pedo scum. You're not needed anywhere in the political compass.

Navboxes
Alignments =

Tests =

Comments

 * - Also, I'm moving the comment section back here. And all previous comments have been cleared. Sorry for being really inattentive towards this page. If you want to be added, ask here.

Thoughts on cultural views of hardline MLs?

XarTario - Can you add my current self-insert and former self-insert? NOTE: They're pretty similar, but with several differences and similarities. You can compare them to each other if you want too.
 * [[File:Neokira2.png]]Neo-Kiraism - Add me?
 * - Alright, I'll do that here tomorrow.


 * [[File:Casagonism2.png]] Casagonism - Add me, i added you in my relations.
 * - Your request has been taken into account, and will be added when I get around to finishing this page.


 * [[file:Syntridem2.png]] Syncretic Tridemism - Add me?
 * - Alright.
 * [[File:Nastyism_Icon.png]] Nastyism-I added you now you add me.
 * - Noted. Will do.


 * [[File:Pixil-frame-0(16).png]] Reactionary-Cheesenism- Add me


 * - Add my self-insert please, I added yours in my page
 * - I was getting around to adding self-inserts now, so you'll be added.


 * I added you, pls add me -
 * - You've been added.

Why do you think that ataturk's secularism went too far and he committed genocide against ethnic minorities?
 * - Wait wait wait, I just have to know, is my ideology or Reactionary Cheesenism worse in your opinion? You said that they were both your antithesis and I wanna know who is the most antithesis-ish.
 * - Well, cheesenism because of his attitude towards things like technology and religion. Outside of that, you guys are on par with each other
 * - I have added you. So add me pls.
 * - Done.
 * [[File:SCT.png]] Sílas Carrasco - I have added you to my relationships. Can you add me too?
 * - Will do.
 * Add me.
 * - Sure.
 * - Well because I said, I'm not fond of authoritarianism or forcing people to live certain life styles, and that's what Laicism basically goes against. Even if getting rid of all the theocratic ottoman crap was based. And, on the genocide bit, he was involved in policies that were directly related to what I am talking about.

I find it necessary for the state to impose a certain way of life in order to modernize the nation. Modernization does not always come from the bottom. It is necessary for this. It wasn't enough to get rid of all the theocratic Ottoman nonsense. The Ottoman dynasty and caliphate had to be completely liberated. It has nothing to do with genocide. Atatürk did not commit genocide as you think. If I were in Atatürk's place, I would secularize faster and harder. I would time it. I would crush the reactionaries. I wouldn't switch to democracy. I would establish a dictatorship. It completely erases religious nationalism. I would substitute extreme civic nationalism.

Pantheonism - Yo!


 * Ronwelltarianism_icon.png Ronwelltarianism - Your turn to add me. I would love to see your thoughts on my foreign policy & my abortion policy on young girls thing to the relationship thing.
 * - Added.
 * Ronwelltarianism_icon.png Ronwelltarianism - Thanks... Although to be honest, I was waiting for someone to criticize my abortion policy like I was forcing a child to give birth since you're pro-choice although I'm allowing states to decide on abortion law as a libertarian anti-statist way for me to do and I'm fine with pro-choice people being consistent against the vaccine mandates. LOL!
 * - Well, once again. I'm completely unsure as to why you're comparing two things which are not comparable, and is not contradictory. As, vaccine mandates have been used for a long time for the eradication of diseases, you can thank being mandated for a flu shot as a child for why you don't have an adverse reaction to the flu and other diseases related.
 * [[File:OwfBall.png]] Owfism - My ideology changed, what do you think?
 * - Very based.
 * [[File:OwfBall.png]] Owfism Can you change my section of self-insert relations?
 * - Done.
 * [[File:Atronism-icon.png]] Atronism - I've added you into my relationships, could you add me back?
 * [[File:pixil-frame-0(27).png]] New Model Of Cheesenism- add my new ideology pls

Glencoe- Add me plz?
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo Touseyism- I added you could you add me now
 * - Hey, you didn't add me in the end.
 * - Sorry, will do that here shortly after I've finished my page which I've already gotten done, just have to copy paste it onto this site.
 * - Could you add me to your self-insert relations?

Nekoqingist Bolshevism- Add me pls