User:Chirotesla/Chirotesla Thought (Old design 2)

__NOCC____NOTC____INDEX__

{{#css:.portable-infobox{border:10px solid #ffffff;border-radius:10px!important}.portable-infobox.pi-background {background-color:#202020}.wikitable{border-collapse:separate;border-radius:#ec1d26!important;background:#ec1d26!important}body #mw-content-container {padding-top:3%}#cosmos-banner{background-color:#b3151d}.cosmos-header{background-color:#b3151d}.cosmos-header:before{background:0}body #mw-content-text {color:#c0c0c0}.cosmos-button-primary{background-color:#b3151d;color:#ffffff}.ts-inner{padding:0}#mw-content a:not(.new){color:#b3151d;text-decoration:none} {width:-webkit-calc(100%-320px);width:100%}.portable-infobox a:link,.portable-infobox a:visited,.portable-infobox a:hover{color:#b3151d!important}.portable-infobox {color:#c0c0c0}.portable-infobox{width:350px}#cosmos-footer{margin-bottom:-40px;background-color:#b3151d}img{border:0;vertical-align:middle;}}
 * 1) mw-content-wrapper{width:1690px;max-width:100%;padding:0}#mw-content,#catlinks{background:#202020}:.CosmosRail{width:1200px}#cosmos-pageBody-content

   

The Chirotesla Thought ball alt.png

is an ideology which succeeded, economically , civically (leaning on  authoritarian), culturally  (in general), , and. I have a strong focus on economics and working classes because I think that economic issues are matter.

I'm against, , , , , , and ideologies.

I'm still somewhat same to. That's why I have to start refreshment of his ideology view. Tip: Click an element to scroll to it

We must judge others based on their merits or abilities instead of their group identities (eg: genders, races, ethnics, etc), their wealth, etc. All people must have equal opportunity to fulfill their potential. Their positions should be appointed based on their merits or abilities.

We must focus on the practical or logical response. We must address problems with logical and practical approaches and solutions. We must reject or revise ideas that are utopian, unrealistic, unlogical, and unpractical.

We must punish crimes based on punishments that fit on crimes with an "eye for an eye" being the guiding, but not absolute, principle behind the justice system. An individual who has injured others must be punished with the same injury.

We must accelerate to lead people to prosperity. We must maintain our culture while progressing society to prosperity and modernity. It is important for a nation and society to develop.

The nation should be free to govern itself and independent from outside interruption (self-determination). We should protect and promote the moral, spiritual, and humanistic values of our nation. We'll be proud of our nation for what they have achieved, but we should acknowledge our failures and mistakes. We must believe in   that obeys to, , , and has no. Unity and integrity are important for the nation because the nation will be able to maintain its existence and support it as a state or nation. That's why we must refuse to let arbitrary, , , and divide and tear the nation apart. People who oppose nationalism and patriotism will get recognized as self-haters or "people that are going against themselves".

I'm civically centre-authoritarian. I support direct democracy and civil liberties. The government should represent the people.

Unitary.png Federal.png
I belive that a moderate amount of federalism is way for me. Unitary government is always frequent inefficiency in solving internal problems. I'm against over-centralization government (just unitary) because it can't representative people as well. I believe that local government should exist, but they should have to follow national laws.

Reform.png Revolution.png
I'm mixed between reform and revolution. In democratic society, I frequently prefer reformism. He also prefers revolution when situations is like (eg: Cuba under Batista dictatorship, etc). Bloodless revolution is preferable to bloody revolution. And more

Dem.png Revolution.png
The government's duty is to serve the citizens it governs. The citizens will have the right to choose their leaders, decide laws, enact laws, etc. True democracy should be achieved through the sovereignty of people, there shall be direct law through democratically elected councils. Democratic councils will have the participation of citizens and function similarly to popular conferences and people's committees proposed to Gaddafi. Said councils will range from a short level (district) to the highest level (the national level). I support direct democracy. Direct democracy is when the citizens have sovereign rule. I oppose "liberal/representative" democracy because the ideals of liberal/representative democracy are nothing but dictatorial in essence and misrepresentation of the people. I support the right to vote. I believe that voters should be adult citizens.

=== === I believe in preservation of civil liberties and firmly support the freedom of speech. Free speech is almost absolute. Right to free speech shall not to get infringed. I despise the anti-hate speech law because I believe that they are discriminatory in nature and they enforce the woke agenda, as hate speech laws wish to protect certain groups from harm through safe spaces, the supremacists of said groups can take advantage of this and discriminate others not affected by those laws and get off scot-free without harm.

I wish to do in order to implement freedom of speech act:
 * Protection of online privacy. (The government shouldn't be able to punish you, except you're part of an armed militant that tries to organize on Telegram or advocate violence and terrorism in general)
 * Repealment of most online hate speech laws that prohibit insulting/mocking other sexual orientations, etc.

I also think that the safety of the people is important, which is why I support the national security. I'm against current cultural liberalism and economic liberalism and seeing them as degenerate.

I support left-wing economics (but pro-market) that comprise of a fusion between, , , and. I believe that workers must own the means of production through workers' cooperatives in a. In short terms, will be implemented. The switch to cooperative will be in long terms. The traditional business model will be eliminated, not outlawed. I'm a supporter of the cooperative, strong welfare state, trade union, guild, economic democracy, balance between free trade and protectionism, and workers' self-management.

I acknowledge the flaws of and. However I believe that some good capitalists and some good communists exist. In generally speaking, I hate communism for creating a bigger government that could lead to totalitarianism, extensive bureaucracy, focusing on workers too much while not giving shit about economics, and not letting the minds of people walk free when it comes to production, and capitalism for allowing exploitative practices to exist.

Planned.png Markets.png
I prefer a market in order to be efficient. will be implemented as altenative to and. Regulations are necessary in order to keep market humane. Co-ops would be encouraged them, but not forced. He thinks that multiple versions of a product are a good thing, as it will encourage a company to create better quality of products and that it will inspire innovation, which is good for the economy.

=== === I believe that workers must own the means of production through workers' cooperatives in. Workers will be encouraged to form their own cooperative, NOT force. The workers must not have the lowest level of control and they should have a notable control via democratic economic representation. The workers also must be able to decide how they are treated and how they want to operate the business. The workers also must be able to manage the enterprise through assemblies. The goal of the self-management is improving performance by granting workers greater autonomy in their day-to-day operations, boosting morale, and reducing alienation. That's I support workplace democracy and workers' self-management

Synd.png
I support the right to form/join an union. Union can provide workers protections, improve workers' rights, and be part of the free market. I'm also aware that there are pros and cons of union. Union also can become corrupt. I wish to stop those incidents, but see billionaires as worse offenders.

Welf.png
I support the welfare state. I believe in a strong welfare state. I support free healthcare, but with multiple providers and all covered by taxes. I support welfare for the disabled people. I believe that one capable of working that refuses to do so should not expect society's support. I follow the quote "one who does not work, neither shall he eat" which was stated by Vladimir Lenin.

Col.png Lfree.png
There will be a mix of private and public enterprises. Public enterprises will include big businesses, major industries, any essential services, education, healthcare, energies, and public transportation. Those public enterprises will have guilds formed based on which category each of them fits into. Private property should be exist. Places like houses, some farms, and small/medium businesses should be private.

Energy should be public and the state will begin transitioning to green energy. All other industries that produce carbon footprint should be forced to make the transition as well.

Georgist.png
I oppose landlords because I see how landlordism puts property into the hands of a few elitists. Rent should be abolished or eliminated and land should no longer be capitalized. Land Value Tax should be implemented. The practice of landlordism will be outlawed. All landlords will get real jobs. Housing will be given via guilds. I'm.

Plutocrat.png
I'm alright with millionaires provided that they get rich through hard work and ethical methods, but it's impossible to become a billionaire through that way. The extreme scales of both the rich and poor should be addressed and eliminated.

=== === I call myself a supporter of fair trade policy. I believe in a balance between free trade and protectionism. I oppose both free trade and autarky (closed economy) because I acknowledge the flaws of free trade and autarky (closed economy). I see how autarky (closed economy) always leads to economic stagnation (North Korea is an example of a country that adheres to closed economy) and how free trade allows exploitative practices to exist. Bad foreign influences should be encountered.

Corp.png
Subsidies for large corporations, can be known as "socialism for the rich and capitalism for the poor should be eliminated. Corporations should have no power over society because society isn't theirs to dictate. I strongly support the anti-trust law and breaking up the monopolies in line with the ideas of Theodore Roosevelt. Fair competition is a must and corporate monopolies must be broken. Lobbying and usury must be outlawed. Corporate usury must be punished. All major companies will be nationalized by the government. Corporations that do heavy exploitation will be punished harsher. In a truly free market, there will be no mega corporations or corporations that could take over the society and kill beneficial competition. The idea of co-operatives and worker-owned businesses will be promoted.

I'm culturally centrist in general. I'm lean on either side of the cultural spectrum depending on the any regions. I will be culturally conservative in the west, but I also will be culturally progressive in the third world. I advocate social equality and wants lead society to prosperity and advanced. I belive that progression and tradition are important. I have progressive aspects (eg: techological progression, legalization of soft drugs, respect for LGBT individuals, secularization, gender egalitarianism, anti-racism, removal of detrimental traditions, etc) and conservative aspects (eg: pro-family, anti-LGBT ideology, anti-sexual "liberation", preservation of non-detrimental traditions, etc). I support interculturalism and polyculturalism as alternative to assimilationism and multiculturalism because interculturalism allows cultural diversity. I fight against taking over the society and sees it as threat to modern society and hypocrite. ,, and are also threat modern society and should be fought effectively. I reject   and see it as inhumane. I also oppose both and. I support colorblind meritocracy which justifies every individual's merits rather than genders, ethnics, races, sexual orientations, etc.

Mansphere.png Fem.png
I strongly support gender equality. I see sexism as very stupid idea. I belive that sexism should be eliminated effictively in order to secure the modern society. I strongly believe there are 2 genders (especially male and female). I believe that it should be illegal to abuse women or pay one more/less for their gender. There will be no wage gap between genders, or will be any so-called "patriarchy." I support the first and second wave of feminism.

I oppose the notion that women must be homemakers (unless a baby is being raised) in addition to strict gender roles (but I don't want to abolish them).

To me, the perfect combination is (particularly in the west, without Karen style),, and.

Ethno.png RacismIcon.png
I strictly believe that racism and ethnocentrism are evil and unacceptable in a civilized society. People of all ethnic/race backgrounds should be treated with the same level of dignity and respect. I support racial egalitarianism and the principle of that people should not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their characters, and therefore wishes for a colorblind society.

I strictly oppose and, which I view as American ideologies that have spread like viruses across the world. I believe that they have worsened race relations and are themselves racist, as they attempt to categorize people based on certain characteristics rather than viewing them as individuals, and judging people by their skin color and not their character.

should be banned from being taught in schools or universities. I support the "colorblind" society where the people always justify other people's characters instead of their ethnic/race.

===     === I approve the right to sexuality. People with different sexual orientations shouldn't be discriminated against in the society as long they are willing to keep their sexual orientations private. I view "it's right to judge people because of their sexual orientations" as unacceptable because he believes in colorblind meritocracy. They shall have civil unions. I will only strongly recognize two genders, male and female. and will be strongly discouraged and recognized as woke ideas. I wish to ban recognition of and  in any public places.

For transgender issues, Sex reassignment surgery and hormone replacement will be allowed and trans people also will be allowed to identify as the gender what they wish to. I believe that there are gender dysphoria as the result of the mismatch between gender identity and sex at birth. I feel sympathy for transgender people and people with gender dysphoria. I want to expand access to gender-affirming healthcare, like sex reassignment surgery above age 18, and as long I can think. I strongly support gender-affirming healthcare for people with gender dysphoria, due to. However, I will ban people under 18 from transitioning and believe that sexual reassignment surgery should only be done on adults with regulations. Trans people will deserve recognition in official documents as well as free treatment, in case of gender dysphoria.

In conclusion, I really hate people when they either treat LGBT people as   or. I view LGBT movement as pretty toxic and subversive because I feel that LGBT community is always being infested with. I oppose the LGBT ideology and sees it as harmful to the society. will be repealed in the western world and not to be implemented in non-western world. LGBT pride and hate rants both should be frowned upon. I only know that there are three sexual orientations, especially, , and. I believe that marriage is between one man and one woman. I believe that heterosexuality should be promoted to protect the value of traditional family. can be accepted and welcomed.

Religious.png
I advocate total separation between religion and state. I oppose because I see it as absolutely soulless. I extremely oppose because I see how theocratic laws can stifle progress, such as denying reproductive care for women, etc. I'm the supporter of. Freedom of religion would be granted. Every individual should be able to worship. will be suppressed if they are a threat to modern society. also will not be suppressed.

I'm tolerant towards Christian/Buddhist/insert religion here democracy. I'm neutral over culturally religion, but I personally accept for topics regarding family, the environment, hedonism, to a degree. I'm also aware of some bad religious influences from religion, especially religious fanatics, who make their beliefs a bad name. He hates some religious people deny or reject the basic of science.

I'm kind of distrustful of due to its dominance by fundamentalists, and even  has often been used as a facade for the promotion of extremist beliefs. I don't hate Muslims. Muslims should be able to practice their faith.

Abort.png Abortion-icon.png
I'm suprisingly moderate on abortion issues. I kind of believes that abortion should be legal, but see hedonistic abortion or "muh abortion is human right!1!!!1!!1" as murder and calling it "infanticide". I view pro-choice as more practical to allow safe and legal access to abortion than to restrict it. When a mother bears a child that she can't support, that will burden the entire society.

Despite I defend the right of mother to abort fetus, I want to reduce abortion incidence as well. Comprehensive sex education and affordable birth control are necessary for this to happen. Mothers will be encouraged not to abort except some cases. After all, abortions should be safe, legal, and rare. Any pro-life people are allowed to express their pro-life views.

Assimil.png Multicult.png
I support as the alternative to  and  because  allows cultural diversity. I see how tend to be bigoted. Immigrants must learn our culture, values, and way of life, and adapt to it, but don't want them to abandon their previous culture, and thinks that foreign cultures can enrich ours if done in moderation.

As for very diverse countries (eg: Indonesia, India, etc), I prefer and believe that everyone has their differences and that it will be hard to please all cultures, especially making a singular one official.

Acidcomf.png
I support legalization of soft drugs (like cannabis, etc) and illegalization of hard drugs. I wish to reduce use of drugs by encouraging society to stop use drugs. I believe that government should provide health program for drug addicts. The drug trafficking should be fought effectively. I believe that alcohol should be legal to drink. The buyer of alcohol must be adult.

I'm surprisingly almost far pro-technology on the technological spectrum/axis. I strongly support the progression of technology and science. I want to accelerate technology in order to make a better living standard and lead society to prosperity. I believe that technology will solve a lot of problems. I'm opposed to pseudo-science and believe that pseudo-science should be eliminated. I support environmentalism and believe that clean environment is very important for humanity.

Corp.png Big Tech.png
I'm against the most of big tech companies, seeing them as not only exploitative, tax evading, monopolistic, data thieves, but as tools for the to gain power over the society. He believes that the power of technological advancement shouldn't belong to the elites because it can cause negative effects for society. He sees how those elites use the technology to dictate the society on their own terms as seen in big tech. They use technology to promote woke elements such as, , , , the abolishment of free speech, removal of anti-woke individuals from their workplaces, removal of individuals who don't support woke agenda, and persecution of opposing opinions from their platfroms while allowing radical liberals to thrive. Therefore can gain power over society through that.

I'm supporter of, believing that the copyright is bad and supports the freedom of internet. I believe that laws should put people before corporations, and plan on making it illegal for corporations to get and steal personal information and data.

To me, I wish to limit the power of the corrupt big tech elites:
 * The government will break up monopolies.
 * Implement Anti-monopolization laws.
 * Implement Anti-trust laws in line with the ideas of Theodore Roosevelt.
 * Implement digital service tax.
 * Create a "free speech act".
 * Create laws that protect the data of individuals.
 * Promote alternative social media platforms that counter the woke agenda and don't actively promote wokeness.
 * Create the policy of anti-corporate and pro-workers' cooperatives
 * Promote unionization and workers' cooperatives within the corporations.

Ectrans.png
I wish to get rid of pollutive sources and to get rid of carbon footprint by advocating technology such as solar, wind, and nuclear energy. In addition, I also support using technology for de-extinction (resurrection of extinct animals).

Space-ball.png
As a long term goal, I want to make space colonization possible by creating space city base and terraforming planets. Space colonization is important to our humanity. Human can't survive in many years from now without colonizing space because Earth will run out of space and that people will have to move elsewhere.

Envi.png
I support environmental protection. I wish to ban littering and sanction someone who has caught littering. I wish to keep the city clean. Climate change and global warming are both real and the biggest threat to humanity. I view climate change/global warming denial as stupid. I support environmental regulation and carbon tax. I strongly oppose fossil energy and want to replace them with renewable energies (eg: electric, nuclear energy, etc).

I'm. I want to work with other countries to build new technology and have good relations with the world. I'm also avoiding economic globalization and seeing it as harmful.

I'm, being proud of the country, but still respecting and taking inspiration from others. I also oppose the most forms of nationalism, especially, , , etc.

Mil.png Pac.png
I'm centrist on the axis between military and pacifism. I believe that military is needed to protect the nation from any threats. I oppose the stratocracies and the idea of military should be used to play role in invasion/unnecessarily entering foreign conflicts. I don't want to waste of money for military spending and dislike conscription. If country is at very dangerous situations, I will only endorse military spending more and conscription.

World.png Isolationist.png
I support the national self-determination. I wish to get rid of in order to make humanity better. I'm and opposing, but I'm pro international cooperation. I believe that intervention is only necessary in cases such as a country struggling fight against (counter-imperialism), a country commiting genocide (eg: Nazi Germany committed genocide against people Nazis consider inferior), etc.

I want to make society prosperous by progressing technology, supporting environmentalism, creating more new jobs, improving living standards, and encouraging them to innovate. I want to create a developed society while preserving culture and non-detrimental traditions. I want to end climate change and global warming by progressing technology, discovering new technology, and protecting the environment. I want to strive for colorblind meritocratic society where every individual's merits will be judged instead of religion, race, ethnic, sexual orientation, gender, and any other factor.


 * -|General=

- Literally me! - a based leftist against woke imperialist neolibs and cappies! Let's fight for the BRIGHTER future! - National unity is based! we shall never let arbitrary ethnic, racial, religious, and cultural divisions divide and tear the nation apart! - other chad nationalism! Socialism + Nationalism = Megabased combination! We must defeat imperialism and colonialism. FOR NATION AND EQUALITY! - LVT? Welfarism? Economic leftism? Chad! Sun Yat Sen and Jeremy Corbyn are hella based! - KUASA UNTUK RAKYAT!!! - not gonna lie, this ideology is chad. Widespread Private Ownership! - Chad! True democracy should be achieved through the sovereignty of people! "Liberal/representative" democracy are nothing but dictatorial in essence! - my exact social views! cultural extremism is indeed cringe. There should be a culture balance. - Progression and tradition are important! We must conserve past glory things and progress to the brighter future! Yes I lean on either side of the cultural spectrum depending on the any regions.

- based, but you need to be more revolutionary. - I'm against communism because it is too utopian. We should respect some commies (eg: Thomas Sankara, Ho Chi Minh, etc). - umm that's good! plus, we should open market! Amogus! - we should use green technology to protect the environment. Bright green environmentalism is the best way to protecc the Earth!

- alright, but really moderate on economic terms and soft. I like Poland. - Fellow workplace democracy enjoyer. Based economics if you are pro-market (but regulated). Sadly, many of your adherents are cringe, such as Vaushite, AOC, etc. Nelson Mandela was based. This is tolerable libtard here. Don't confuse me with this ideology. It is not my ideological component. - I agree with your ideas mostly except your civic views. We both like decentralization, workplaces that are worker-owned and independent, popular assemblies, free-speech, and anti-vanguardism. However, I still prefer you over. - Same as above, but more based. You would be more based if you disavow vaushites.

- -  - Honestly, this is cringe ideologically. I would give credit to you because I like how you improved living standards, healthcare, women rights, and ousted rightoids. This ideology will cause economic stagnation which is not good. You're still easily far better than because you'd got more done than the.

- Imagine shitting on other leftists, calling them "fake socialist", and telling them to read Amadeo Bordiga's theory for not agreeing with your ideals. Why don't you focus on overthrowing your shitty system and replace them with your ideal system? I know that you always keep shitting on MLs. MLs can get MORE DONE than you. - Literally red neocon! You would have done worse than Stalin in the long term. That's you deserved the ice pick. and - Stop pointless war and economic liberalism in the name of democracy! Please read the meaning of democracy! - Liking welfare doensn't make you better than above. still cringe! stop compromise with neolibtards! Foreign interventionism is cringe!


 * -|Regional=

(Only the left) - Soekarno was the father of a successful modern Indonesia. He was also the most brave statesman in history because he had fought for the independence of Indonesia from colonizers (especially Dutch). Your foreign and non-aligned policies are based. Sadly, the genocidal Suharto and his neocuck friends took you down and destroyed Indonesia. Left-Pancasila is indeed based. - Soekarno was indeed very based. - The goal to improve living standars is based. NEM seems interesting and based. market? socialism? decentralized economy? Based! Then, Janos Kadar is based. This is the best ideology of the eastern bloc! - Gigachad anti-colonial hero. You're a hero to the human race and a brave fighter.

- You had based economic views. Fighting for a united Yugoslavia and resisting ww2 fashoids (nazis and ustasoids) were based. Please cool down with IMF loans, Macedonization, and a large unemployment rate.

- I would give credit to you for industrializing Soviet Union and defeating Nazi bandits. The crimes that you've committed are implementation of totalitarian state, Great Purge, Holdomor, gulags, and mass-deportations. However, you were still better than Tr*tsky in long terms. Libertarians and anti-authoritarians, Stop saying that less auth means better.


 * -|Self-Inserts=

NOTES: THIS IS STRICTLY ABOUT USERS' SELF INSERT IDEOLOGY, NOT PERSONALITY!

Share a lot of similar views with Chirotesla Thought, but there are little bad parts. - Megabased, but there are little differences, especially stance on abortion. - Same as above. - Based, but you're too progressive. - almost same as above.

Share a lot of similar views with Chirotesla Thought, but there are some bad parts. - based! Some differences are that you're too supportive of multiculturalism, agrarianism, and too culturally progressive. - almost similar ideals for me! Anti-imperialism, market socialism, and nationalism are based. Some differences are that you're too authoritarian, dirigisme, anti-LGBTQ, and stance on abortion.

Are leaning positive. - really moderate for me. You don't go far enough. your social view is fine (cuz you've gone more conservative, which is based for me) and your civic view is based. I believe that trans is not gender. I know you want to respect other culture. I think interculturalism is must because it allows diversity, but polyculturalism is also good for any countries which are very diversity. Utopianism, Chiang Kai Shek, Western-style progressivism, youth politic, and military interventionism are cringe ngl. At least you can accept me because I dislike Chiang Kai Shek. - based economics, technology views, and georgism, but your social views caused me to put you in this section because I dislike cultural individualism. I am not sure how I dislike your South Floridan separatism. - Very based economics, but you're too libertarian and progressive. Your social view is rather cringish-cringe because progressivism in the first world is cringe, but your some social views are good. Just drop libertarianism and become cultural centrist plz, then your ideology would be megabased.

Some good and bad parts. - you have good ideas, but you're too extreme. Plus, calm the fuck down, and ochlocracy and communism are cringe. - - We both have some similar beliefs. Some differences are that you're too civically liberal, anti-anti-colonialist, and economically right for my taste. Your social view is good-bringe (not much as based) if it is too anti-LGBT. Although georgism, market, environmentalism, interculturalism, gender equality, family values, and welfare are based. Of course, we both hate SJWs. Sham, you put cultural war above economics. well, goodbye :( -  Fascism, autarky, xenophobia, autocracy, ultranationalism, and imperialism are cringe. You're too authoritarian and economically right for my taste. Your economic view is bringe. Although transhumanism and science are good. At least, you dislikes racism and SJW. I know your ideology is quite old. You've turned into  now...  - Totalitarianism, command economy, ultranationalism, and fascism are cringe. Your economic view is bringe and too right for me. I'm not fan of your social view, but gender equality, racial equality, and secularism are based. Your social view is too conservative for me. Although transhumanism and science are good. We both hate  and like egalitarianism and technocracy.  - Too economically right for my taste, but based georgism. I don't like the concept of free market. I believe that market should be regulated in order to keep it humane. Too civically libertarian for my taste, but direct democracy is based. Social view is fine (although more feasible when it's on the third world). Transhumanism is also good. Globalism is cringe (atleast you opposed ultranationalism and interventionism). overall decent trollsome economics and based anti-landlordist gang! gang! - A bit too economically right and too culturally far-left for my taste. Social Corporatism is fine. Hating environment is not good idea. State Atheism is also cringe. Bruh you're already imperialist because I heard that you've said "Rational Imperialism is based" in discord. That's very cringe. Technocracy, transhumanism, technological advancement, georgism, welfarism, civic nationalism, and populism are based, however. - glad Tony567 finally back to original ones! you're getting more based for me :D your economic view is bringe if it is too economically right for my taste. You social view is cringish if it is too culturally left/progressive for my taste because progressivism in the first world is cringe. Overall meh ideology. - Not bad economics, but late stage of your ideology's economic view is hella based. Based technology views and pragmatism, but cringe anti-nationalism and libertarianism. Your social view is really too progressive for my taste. - your economics, environmentalism, transhumanism, and cultural centrism are good, but cringe anarchism. - Not really fan of your economics. too culturally right for me. There are some good parts, especially nationalism, georgism, etc. - same as above, but Algerian.

Most bad parts and some good parts. - Your economic view is really moderate, but it fail to compensate with your hedonism, anti-nationalism, and liberalism. Your social view is cringe, but it has some good parts. Sham, you openly believe that NATO should exist. That's cringe. Although non-interventionism, free speech, gun right, fair-trade, welfarism, and opposition to economic austerity are all based. NOTES: I only judge your ideology only, NOT your personality. - Chicago school of economics and anti-populism are cringe ngl. Your social view is too progressive for my taste. Your civic view is too libertarian for my taste ngl. Civic nationalism, patriotism, semi-direct democracy, anti-imperialism, market, georgism, international co-operation, non-interventionism and anti-NATO are good. We both agree that EU needs reforms.

Directly opposing the views of Chirotesla. - cringish to cringe economic view, but market is based. Anti-georgism, economic globalism, and letting big corporations do their crap? no no no! they are krinj. Scientific researchment is based. I would think that you can't have social equality using welfare while letting big corporations do their crap. Your societal view is ehhh, but it is too progreesive for my taste and cringe theocracy. I believe that every irreligious people shouldn't be forced to be religious. Atleast you respect other religions. Bruh, your identity axis is intersectional in the DozenValues, which is very cringe. I rather secularism which supports separation between religion and state. Utopianism is cringe in my opinion. - I used to be extremely krinj, very individualist, and overly serious when I first entered Politic and studied about only economic view (eg: communism, socialism, capitalism, etc). Thank god, I transitioned out of that phase. - WIP - individualism and anarchism? cringe. but I will have explanation about your ideology if you have finished your page. - Influenced by cybercapitalism, individualism, pink capitalism, queer authoritarianism, hyperprogressive (noveltism), postgenderism, and world federalism? no. but your technology view is really too extreme for me and you're also too regulationist. - I really disagree with your major parts, but you have some good ideas.

Almost bad parts and very little good parts - very disgusting page! 🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮 what a heresy! Opressing people by your disgusting theocrat ideology. You want to push people to an absolute hell. You're just an another type of Satan. I'll destroy you. Thanks God, you were quited by your founder anymore... - HOLY SHIT! GET OUTA FROM INTERNET! AHHH SEXIST ORWELLIAN SOYBOY! I'm sure you're 100% larper! - I'm sure that you're orwellian PlenderLARP! Go outside and take shower! - Eww degenerates! - Nevermind, you're the most typical ultroid in this community. - Honeslty, your ideology is megacringe... I disagree with your major parts. - Honestly, Corporatocracy is very vomiting 🤮, but you have cringish-cringe social views because first world progressivism is cringe. Also based environmentalism and democracy. yes finally, you dumped your old sh*tty ideology Tony. - NRx on steroids, omni-market, and social darwinism? huge no!

Chirotesla is often pretty friendly. He often speaks softly and politely. He oftens does not care about each other's political views in real life, any PCB wikis, and other wikis. He is pretty and rejecting ideas that are very utopian, such as,  (I think that stateless classless moneyless society seems unrealistic to get achieved), and more. He oftens being enraged when coming across. He sees pink ideologies (like, , etc) as degenerate and a threat to modern society. He can be more friendly towards moderate pink ideologies (like, etc). He also can accept. He is also sometimes enraged when coming across reactionary ideologies (like feudalism, anti-enlightenment, reactionarism, etc). He sees reactionary ideologies as inhumane and scary. He also sometimes gets being uncomfortable towards unironic and. He can be friendly towards when they are not extreme, but he hates traditionalism as ideologically in general. He dislikes and sees it as degenerate. Honestly, he views people's character content instead of their political views (such as conservative, fascist, tankie, pink cap, etc).

Chirotesla Thought flag 2.png
 * WIP


 * -|Picture=

{|
 * -|Full Size=
 * Chirotesla SapplyValues 25 04 22.png  (leaning on )
 * Chirotesla's DozenValues 27 04 22.png Postkeynes.png
 * Chirotesla's LeftValues 05 04 22.png Leftnat.png
 * Chirotesla's ConservaValues 04 04 22.png Consocf.png
 * Chirotesla's ConservaValues 04 04 22.png Consocf.png


 * -|Picture=

{|
 * -|Full Size=
 * National Geo-MarketSoc fixed.png
 * Chirotesla killing wokeism.png
 * Chirotesla by Ganyu.png
 * Chirotesla by Ganyu.png


 * -|Literature=

A Cure for Capitalism by Richard D. Wolff (still reading) - It seems interesting. I agreed with the flaws of capitalism according to this book. I like how WSDE (workers' self-directed enterprises) works. The Green Book by Muammar al-Qaddadi (still reading) - It seems interesting. I agreed with this book about parliament and "representative democracy". Why Socialism? by Albert Einstein (Planned) Luck Egalitarianism (Planned)


 * -|Wikipedia=

If you want to ask me, please talk in. It is feel free to ask Q&A :D

DO NOT COMMENT HERE! IF YOU WRITE COMMENT HERE, YOUR COMMENT WILL GET DELETED!