Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought/Self-Insert Relations

This is Neo-Phibunism’s opinions on self-inserts throughout PCB, note that this is a view on ideologies, not personalities. (Reserved for inserting views on Self-inserts) (////)      (Reserved for Democrats and Non-Planned Economy Socialists) (////)   (////)    (////)
 * W.I.P.
 * Your disregard for identity politics and your pragmatic views on diplomacy are things I can synchronize with you, but there are also negative things such as your support for humanism, democracy, Keynesian economics, or hedonism. As for humanism, it is a form of cowardice based on an arbitary concept of “human rights”, because humans are neither the same nor they are the center of the universe.
 * First of all, I am not a fan of this ideology, because we already disagree on economics. Tripartism, in my honest opinion, isn’t a good economic model, as it needlessly increases the size of bureaucracy, making the population more reliant on the government. However, I agree with you on Bright-Green Environmentalism and decentralization. But even that, I still don’t like your support for unfettered democracy, as it is literally a tyranny of the mediocre that values popularity over efficiency.
 * For a Left-Libertarian like you, this is actually a decent ideology. We agree on liberty, bright-green technology, decentralization, rational governance, or science. Although there are also things that I don’t like, such as workplace democracy or co-operatives. Market socialism, even if it’s better than state socialism, is incompatible with huge countries like the US. I don’t have to explain why unfettered democracy is vile here either.

(Reserved for Paternalists who restrict the individuals from facing their consequences) (////)   (////)    (////)    (////)       (Reserved for Hardcore Socialists and Hardcore Nationalists) (////)   (////)    (////)       (Reserved for Bioconservatives and Anti-Tech Environmentalists) (////)   (////)       (Reserved for Revolutionary Progressives and Intersectionalists) (////)      (Reserved for Anarchists of any types) (////)      (Reserved for self-inserts based on a philosophy rather than an ideology) (////)      (Reserved for Fedposters and LARPers) (////)   (////)       (Reserved for self-inserts deemed excellent for Neo-Phibunism) (////)   (////)    (////)
 * Actually a vile non-extremist ideology. You either think that “the people” should rely on an unhealthy obsession with the bureaucracy, or you hate the Faustian Spirit, because you support the high form of the tyranny of the mediocre, while condemning the successful by wanting to extort their wealth and give it to the inefficient politicians. The Three Principles of the People are also an ideology that cannot work in China and Taiwan especially nowadays, because it advocates for centralization, democracy, and socialism. Don’t get me wrong, I still support the ROC’s claim on the mainland, but I don’t see how Tridemism will work in modern China. Your country, Australia, needs a capable leader and a decentralization of the state, not more inefficient bureaucracies.
 * You are a walking stereotype of a typical Third Positionist tradcon. You claim to care about “the people” yet you want to restrict their freedom and liberty for the sake of “security”. It’s good that you have moved away from fascism, but your simpery for Bonapartism and especially C*esarism are vile and atrocious, as those two ideologies inspired Mussolini’s model of fascism. Also, care to explain how aristocracy and populism are compatible with each other, because populism allows the deceitful to have a say in the government, which is contradictory to the definition of aristocracy.
 * Both of us are Orthodox Christians, Traditionalists, and Monarchists. Those are the good parts that I like. Good that both of us also have a strong distaste for democracy too. However, what I don’t like about you is your paternalistic approach on society or economy, as well as your theocratic tendencies. Atleast both of us loath humanism, hedonism, or universalism.
 * And you’re an example of a standard Thai conservative politician, supporting the PRC and Russia because “the West le bad”, preserving the parliamentarian system which is just a stronghold of politicians, supporting already ineffective economic theory known as Keynesianism just for the sake of utilitarian means, opposing free trade policy in favor of “fair-trade” protectionism (aka “Sufficiency Economy” in Thailand), or having a populist sentiment. Really, you have to spill out generic anti-capitalist talking points like a filthy socialist? The only things we agree on are interculturalism, monarchism, traditionalism, or patriotism.
 * This is actually funny. You say that Neoreaction is your core principle, yet you support ideologies deemed incompatible with it such as fascism or over-centralism. If this man rules China in the future, Death Worship nightmare will become a real thing, and that’s not a good thing at all, especially looking at how totalitarian modern China under Xi’s tyranny already is. Have you even read what Moldbug thinks of fascism or supremacist identity politics?
 * Pretty funny to say that Western imperialism is vile while you’re literally a Stalinist who praises everything Stalin did, including various atrocities he did such as Holodomor or the enslavement of Eastern Europe after WWII. Sure, the Western imperialists are vile for plundering the Third World, but they are not as vile as filthy Stalinists like Lysenko, Beria, or Goloshchyokin were. Stalin alone indirectly caused many problems in the Third World by spreading his disgusting ideology everywhere, and inspired demons like M*o Tse-tung or Enver Hoxha, which costed atleast a hundred millions of lives.
 * "We must take from the right nationalism without capitalism and from the left socialism without internationalism." This phrase is literally a tribalist copium from the regressive socialists. Although there are some stances I can go along with, such as patriotism, traditionalism, or your disdain for identity politics. Still, I don’t really like your quasi-Nazbol tendencies.
 * Hahahaha, you claim to support a market economy, yet you use the very same regulator known as the state to regulate it to death. Also, the idea of Yugoslavia as a unified “nation” was nothing more than a Greater Serbia under “South Slavic unity” mask, and Titoism cannot work especially nowadays. To make the matter even worse, you are also a huge biocuckservative, by supporting agrarianism, or even luddism. Seriously, how much regression do you really have to smoke on, just to strangle the institutions of the Faustian Spirit?
 * Ultranationalism, Anarchism, Primitivism, or Racialism, it’s already atrocious. Not only those, you also mix it with religious fundamentalism, like mixing the worst aspects of both left-wing anarchism and supremacist identity politics. By far, tribalists like you are just standing in the way of the Faustian Spirit and the Techno-Capital.
 * W.I.P.
 * W.I.P.
 * Atleast we agree that the markets will always be with our planet, or about the sacredness of the individuality. You’re correct about anarchism being incompatible with transhumanism and planned economy, which is why I don’t call myself an anarchist due to NRx’s views on authority. Those are the things we probably only agree on.
 * Probably a fed. This page is one of the pages in PCBA.
 * Pretty much nothing besides right-wing identity politics. This is what staying on 4chan the whole day does to a 13 years old. Also, I found it quite ironic that you name your ideology after Nick Fuentes, who is a huge Russophilic mouthpiece in the United States, despite being a “based Ukrainian neo-Nazi”.
 * Apart from our small differences, such as your support for merit-based oligarchy, our different approaches on the freedom of speech, or your more moderate approach on property, we are pretty much very similar. Both of us are Austro-libertarian transhumanists who believe in some Christian values and Objectivism and have strong disdain for democracy and mediocrity.
 * We agree on a lot of things such as decentralization, free-market economy, moderate nationalism, or free trade. The only differences between us are that you’re too moderate on private property, your simpery for hedonism, or your somewhat support for democracy.
 * I found a lot of things based in your ideology, such as rational governance, elitism, free-market economy (despite being too regulative for my taste), post-humanist technology, artifism, economic imperialism, or patriotism. Although we disagree on such things like authority, which I prefer state-mandated liberty rather than full-blown authoritarianism, or your disregard for traditions, but that can be forgiven because the United States is just a civil nation, without its own culture.

__INDEX__