Syntropianism/Relations

__NOCC____NOTC____INDEX__

{{#css:.portable-infobox{border:10px solid #003040;border-radius:10px!important}.portable-infobox.pi-background {background-color:#000c12}.wikitable{border-collapse:separate;border-radius:#003040!important;background:#003040!important}body #mw-content-container {padding-top:3%}#cosmos-banner{background-color:#000c12}.cosmos-header{background-color:#000c12}.cosmos-header:before{background:0}body #mw-content-text {color:#ffffff}.cosmos-button-primary{background-color:#0080c0;color:#ffffff}.ts-inner{padding:0}#mw-content a:not(.new){color:#ffffff;text-decoration:none} {width:-webkit-calc(100%-320px);width:100%}.portable-infobox a:link,.portable-infobox a:visited,.portable-infobox a:hover{color:#ffffff!important}.portable-infobox {color:#ffffff}.portable-infobox{width:350px}#cosmos-footer{margin-bottom:-40px;background-color:#000c12}img{border:0;vertical-align:middle;}}
 * 1) mw-content-wrapper{width:1690px;max-width:100%;padding:0}#mw-content,#catlinks{background:#000c12}:.CosmosRail{width:1200px}#cosmos-pageBody-content

Self - Insert Ideologies will be ordert by which most prominent Anti - Matthist Viewpoint they hold.

= Tyrannical Majoritarians  Reserved for Democrats and non Command Economy Socialists  =


 * And you are the perfect example of a standard German Politician. You loudly proclaim to be a staunched Individualist, yet you want to regulate the most individualistic Structure, the Market, to Death while subjecting the Individual to Mob Rule and supporting Nationalism. Your Economy is atrocious, tyrannical and inefficient and you are a hedonistic Degenerate.


 * Your economic Policies are as good as it gets for Cooperatism, as you still support Markets, private Property and somewhat vertical Structures, but Workplace Democracy and Regulationism are tyrannical and inefficient. Same applies for your Governance, as you support as Technocracy within the democratic Framework. Socially, your Harm Principal is something like my Natural Rights Theory but Secular, so that is good, and you like Science and Technology, but otherwise to inclusive and environmentalist.


 * This is basically the same as Glencoe without the redeeming Qualities of Scientocracy, Technologism and Private Property. In Addition, you claim that two of your Core Values are "Democracy" and "Liberty", which is contradictory as Democracy is literally the Tyranny of the Majority. Generally I am really sceptical of your Overemphasis on Nature and the underlying Tone, that the Individual is not capable of managing its own economic and private Life, while allowing it to decide for others though Voting.

= Overprotective Paternalists  Might get removed due to lack of fitting Ideologies  =

= Blind Collectivists  Reserved for hardcore Socialists and tribalist - Nationalists  =


 * An actually horrible Ideology. Your Economics are the best Part aside from Governance, but your Regulationsim, Welfareism and Nationalisation Efforts are highly immoral and negatively impact Productivity. Technocracy is based, so that is good. But your Totalitarianism and Chauvinism supress Originality, Ambition, Curiosity, the inalienable Rights of the Individual and everything great about Individualism.


 * Your Overemphasis on Identity is super cringe and your understanding of Capitalism is poor. And while your Fight against Degeneracy is admirable, you don't seem to realize that Coercion and Violence is just as immoral as Homosexuality and Zoosexuality. Generally, your Allegiance is not with God and yourself, but with your identarian Group, which is retardet and quite degenerate.



= Fearful Biocentrists  Reserved for Bioconservatives and non technologist Environmentalists  =


 * I cannot get over how contradictory this is. If you destroy industrial Society, but do not implement Regulation to prevent another industrial Revolution, the Capitalists will just reinvent industrial Technology. And if you want to impose such Regulation, you are not a Laissez - Fairist. Also, many of your social Views like Ethic Nationalism, your distaste for Curiosity and Caste Society are in contrast to Christian Teaching. I also get the feeling, but I might be entirely wrong, that you do not support Reaction because you love Freedom, which would be noble Foolishness, but that you love Freedom because you think it is a consequence of Reaction.

= Lawless Anarchists  Reserved for Anarchists duh  =

= Individualist Vanguardists  Reserved for the Vanguard of Freedom  =


 * Even tho we have small differences, for Example regarding Free Speech and hereditary Governance, but we are still both Christian transhumanist Austrolibertarians with a Distaste for Democracy and believe in State - Protected Liberty.


 * While our philosophical staring Points are as different as they could be, we both came to the Conclusions of rugged Individualism and Faustianism. Our political Goals are, consequently, really simmilar. The only Thing I really dislike is your rather . . . extreme Atheism.