Ego-Progressivism

Ego-Progressivism is the current of thought followed and created by Io, it essentially seeks to combine traditional Ego-Communism with Ultraprogressivism, viewing that the struggle for gender, race and sexual liberation should come hand in hand with individual sovereignty and egoism.

Ideological Influences

 * [[File:Socrates.png]] Socrates (470-399 BCE)
 * [[File:ThomHobbes.png]] Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679)
 * [[File:Rousseau.png]] Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778)
 * [[File:HegelianPhilosophy.png]] Georg Wilhelm Friederich Hegel (1770-1831)
 * [[File:Stirner.png]] Johann Kaspar Schmidt (1806-1856)
 * [[File:Ormarxf.png]] Karl Marx (1818-1883)
 * [[File:Nietzsche.png]] Friederich Nietzsche (1844-1900)
 * [[File:Goldman.png]] Emma Goldman (1869-1940)
 * [[File:Sartre.png]] Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980)
 * [[File:Vaush.png]] Ian Kochinski (1994- )

Beliefs
English=

The Unique and its Liberation
Each individual is the owner and the creator of its own life, of its own world and its own identity, from the creative nothing all else stems and thus why shouldn't the creative nothing seek to follow its own cause and to own all which it creates? the individual is the center of their own world, but it is not alone, society and numeral other "things" seek to oppress and chain the individual to its cause, making the individual labor not for himself but for "God" or "Mankind" or the "Proletariat" that is of course, an attack on the individual, if it wishes to be freed from this it should seek its own liberation and fight for freedom, in the name of itself it should seek to combat the fixed ideas that try to chain them, Ego-Progressivism as an ideology believes that the individual is always in a struggle, the struggle between the creative nothing and all else outside, and that joy, if that is what they seek, can be found in that struggle, as such Ego-Progressivism opposes all that which tries to put the individual in a box and decide its identity for itself, conservatism, religion, and humanism as such are all ideas opposed by Ego-Progressivism. And so from this conflict society organizes itself, a complex web of social contracts is made as individuals fight for their own cause while other causes are created that seek to subjugate them.

The Ideal and the Real
As the creative nothing is that which creates everything to claim that there is a concrete reality that is objective and knowable is rejected by Ego-Progressivism, as reality varies from the perspective of the individual, as the individual perspective is the only perspective the individual can have and thus create its reality around it, but each individual is different, with different experiences and different perspective, and all those realities are absolute to the own individual but not to anyone else, of course, there is an external world out there, with real "things" but as a group we can't ever say with total objectivity what it is, what we do is to agree on what it is and accept that definition as what it is.

Why Oppose Conservatism
Ego-Progressivism views conservatism as its main enemy, as it is conservatism and conservative thought that tries to chain the individual to whatever society expects of them rather then allowing them to be liberated and fight for their own cause, the main belief of Ego-Progressivism is that individuals can do as they want and live their life true to themselves and conservatism punishes the individual for it, believing that each individual should dedicate itself to the cause of society, or order, or tradition rather than themselves and seeks to destroy all that stands by itself.

Identity and Tribalism
Identity is a two-pronged sword however, and while it is important to the individual it can also be used a tool, to make the individual follow its identity and exist as part of a "tribe", identity should be a tool of the individual used to further its own cause, but a consequence of conservative thinking is tribalism, the belief that the individual should exist for its identity and serve it, thus being part of a tribe and dedicating itself to that tribe, this chains the individual and prevents it from fighting for its own cause, Ego-Progressivism rejects all forms of tribalism, while believing that people of similar identities are in ways connected, they should never let that connection chain them and define them, Ego-Progressivism believes that to liberate a given identity isn't enough for the individual cause, but liberating the individual from its tribe and allowing people to be people separate from all other fixed ideas or "spooks" is total liberation.

To Fight for a Cause
The Individual, if it seeks to further its own cause, needs to fight for it, the world is in a constant struggle between different causes, and if the individual seeks its total liberation it must too fight, fight against the ideas of authority, conservatism and whatever else chains the individual, Ego-Progressivism then claims that for the individual to achieve its total liberation it must abolish that which chains it, Ego-Progressivism aims for the elimination of the state, of race, of gender, of sexuality and whatever else, and this must be done by always fighting against this systems, existing in constant insurrection, not letting yourself be governed, but Ego-Progressivism seeks pragmatism too, as to better achieve its total liberation the individual should seek clever ways to better its own condition, and engage in methods that could reduce the harm they feel, such as voting or fighting to change its society to a form that is better for the individual, even if not perfect.

Civic Egoism
Liberation is, of course, closely tied with liberty, the cause of the individual, for its realization necessitates liberty, and as such the ideals of liberty and freedom are the basis for Ego-Progressivism, as it centers its fight for social progress in the idea that all must be free to do as they desire, unchained from the conservative and collectivist ideals that prevent them from doing so, Ego-Progressivism as such is not only civically anarchist but views most conflicts, such as the ideal of economics, social problems and such to have to do with the struggle between liberty and authoritarianism, to fight against progressivism or in the name of private property is inherently authoritarian.

Economics
As mentioned in the above section the question of economics is too tied to liberty, as different economic systems greatly impact how an individual can forward its cause, Ego-Progressivism is opposed to all economic system that remove freedom from the individual in whatever way, capitalism, feudalism and state-capitalism is rejected as they prevent the individual from being free and true to itself by making it bow down to someone or something else, be it the will of lords, of the free market, or of bureaucrats, Ego-Progressivism advocates for a non-coercive economy, a sort of mutualism without markets where individuals freely choose what they want or not to work on and thus what they want or not to obtain, however even engaging in said social contract will steal from the individual some of its freedom, so if they wish to be freer they must too take what it wants for itself without regarding whatever system is put in place.

Culture
Ego-Progressivism is of course, progressive in nature, and as such rejects all traditionalism or conservative thought, seeking instead to progress society to a more accepting and free state where individuals are free to be what they want.

Environment
The environment is precious to the individual in the sense that its good health is physically necessary for the individual to continue its existence, as such protecting the environment is in the self-interest of everyone, but, if this is to somehow change, and it is no longer in the individuals self-interest to protect the environment then its up to the individual to decide what it wishes to do with it, as it should be seen as property of the individual and not the other way around.

The Trap of Nations
Nations are a classic example of a spook, a fixed idea that serves nothing more than its own cause and seeks to subjugate the individual to said cause, it is a net-negative for the individual in every way, nationalism prevents us from helping eachother, for standing by eachother and claiming all the benefits that that would entail, and thus Ego-Progressivism is anationalist, believing in the abolishing of nations all together, and that the individual should operate as if there were no nations.

The Religion Question
Religion is something that alienates the individual, makes it work not for itself but for a holy cause, to reach for and create a heaven that is external and the "good" all the while the individual itself is reduced to something unsacred, uncreative, and merely a subject of an external ideal, the individual must free itself from religion to find itself free, but to force others to abandon it is no less authoritarian than forcing others to be religious, as such although Ego-Progressivism believes that in the decision making processes of a government religion should be excluded always, the individual belief in religion shouldn't be fought against with force, instead it is up to each individual to free itself from it.

Morphological Freedom
Liberty is not something that is born from or maintained by only ideals, our material conditions affects greatly how free we can be from whatever binds us, and while that may be obvious for things such as material goods or needs, one way that our material conditions makes us less free is our own body, the individual is trapped by natural laws and forced labour under a set standard, the natural standard, that is not absolute however, and with the development of technology we can break free from this, take glasses for example, someone with problem seeing is in a way less free then one who can see well, as the one with problems seeing has less access to many things around life, with glasses or contact lenses however, one can see better, interact with the world better, not only is this beneficial in the sense of survival, it also enables greater freedom as it removes many impediments one might have, so if we can use technology to better our freedom and our quality of life then why only stop at making as as good as we "should", at the grand scheme of things there is no "should", this is biological conservatism that claims we "should" be what is "natural" or "right", there is no "right" however, so what to prevent the individual from bettering itself in such a way if it so does wishes? it is an expression of freedom to chase further freedom, and technological enhancements can deliver the individual greater freedom of the material world around it and its own body.

On Gender
Gender is many things all at once, and at the same time, nothing at all, it is in its essence an abstraction, a phantom or spook that is performed by the individual, its an idea that is imitated though it lacks original form, at the same time it organises itself through a class structure, with males being the dominating class, females the dominated and queers those who don't conform and break the structure, all those things combined lead to an idea such as gender having enormous impact on the life of the individuals, since we are born we are forced into either male and female, and since then we are pressured to fit into the mold of our given gender identity and ostracized as queer if we ever choose not to follow said mold, as such gender in all its forms is an authoritative structure, one that rules over the individual, no wonder that system lead to so many oppressive structures across our history, but even when gender is at its least important it still continues being an oppressive and conservative structure, as gender, as long as it exists will force on us an arbritary set of rules we are meant to follow not for our own sake but simply because we must, because it is tradition and so we should, gender is an authoritative structure through and through and as long as it exists it will be, thats why feminism and men's liberation fail, because they do not wish to free us from gender, but free gender, making gender, a thing that oppresses us, free, no, it is not enough to simply liberate gender, but liberating yourself from gender is what would lead to greater freedoms, that is not to say gender as an identity should be completely abolished, its coercive forces should but to take gender as one's property, picking it up as conscious choice and using it for it own cause is also liberation. Português=

O Único e sua Liberação
Cada individuo é o dono e o criador de sua própria vida, de seu próprio mundo e sua própria identidade, do nada criativo todo mais sai e por isso por que não deve o nada criativo procurar seguir sua própria casa e tornar criativo tudo que ele cria? O individuo é o centro de seu próprio mundo, mas não se encontra sozinho, sociedade e numerosas outras "coisas" procuram oprimir e acorrentar o individuo para a sua causa, fazendo o individuo trabalhar não para si mesmo, mas para "Deus" ou "Humanidade" ou o "Proletariado", isso é um ataque ao individuo, se ele deseja se livrar disso ele deve procurar sua própria liberação e lutar pela liberdade, em seu nome ele deve procurar combater as ideais fixas que tentam acorrenta-lo, Ego-Progressismo como uma ideologia acredita que o individual está sempre em uma luta, a luta entre o nada criativo e tudo mais de fora, e que a felicidade, se é isso que busca, se encontra nessa luta, desse modo Ego-Progressismo opõe tudo aquilo que tenta botar o individuo em uma caixa e decidir sua identidade por si, conservadorismo, religião, e humanismo dessa forma são todas ideias que o Ego-Progressismo se opõe. E a partir desse conflito a sociedade se organiza, uma teia complexa de contratos sociais é feita enquanto individuos lutam por sua própria causa enquanto outras causas são criadas que procuram subjuga-lo.

O Ideal e o Real
Como o nada criativo é aquilo que cria tudo para uma realidade concreta que é objetiva e sabivel é rejeitado por Ego-Progressismo, como a realidade varia pela a partir da perspectiva do individuo, já que a perspectiva do individuo é a única perspectiva que o individuo pode ter e assim criar sua realidade por volta dela, mas cada individuo é diferente, com experiências diferentes e perspectivas diferentes, e todas essas realidades são absolutas para o próprio individuo mas não para outra pessoa, claro, existe um mundo externo, com "coisas" de verdade mas como um grupo não podemos dizer com total objetividade o que isso é, oque fazemos é concordar em o que é e aceitar tal definição como oque isso é.

Porque opor o Conservadorismo
Ego-Progressismo vê o conservadorismo como seu principal inimigo, já que é o conservadorismo e o pensamento conservador que tenta acorrentar o individuo em o que seja que a sociedade espera dele em vez de deixar eles ser liberados e lutar por sua própria causa, a principal asserção do Ego-Progressismo é que individuos devem poder fazer oque querem e viver suas vidas fieis a si mesmo e o conservadorismo puni o individuo por isso, acreditando que cada individuo deve dedicar se mesmo para a causa da sociedade, ou ordem, ou tradição em vez de se mesmo e procurando destruir tudo aquilo que vive por si só.

Identidade e Tribalismo
Identidade é uma espada de duas faces, e enquanto é importante para o individuo ela pode ser usada como uma ferramenta, para fazer o individuo seguir sua identidade e existir como parte de uma "tribo", identidade deve ser uma ferramenta do individuo usada para sua causa, mas a consequência do pensamento conservador é o tribalismo, a crença que o individuo deve servir sua identidade e servi-la, assim sendo parte de uma tribo e se dedicando para a tribo, isso acorrenta o individuo e o preveni de lutar por sua causa, Ego-Progressismo rejeita todas as formas de tribalismo, enquanto acredita que pessoas de identidades similares são de certa forma conectadas, eles não deveriam deixar essa conexão o acorrentar e o definir, Ego-Progressismo acredita que liberar uma dada identidade não é suficiente para a causa individual, mas liberar o individuo de sua tribo e permitir pessoas ser pessoas separado de todas outras ideias fixadas ou "spooks" (ideias fixadas que existem como fantasmas e assombram o individuo, conceito stirnerita) é liberação total.

Para Lutar por uma Causa
O Individuo, se ele procura promover sua causa, precisa lutar por ela, o mundo existe em uma constante luta entre diferente causas, e se o individuo procura sua liberação total ele também precisa lutar, lutar contra ideias de autoridade, conservadorismo e seja lá oque acorrenta o individuo, Ego-Progressismo assim fala que o individuo para conseguir sua total liberação ele necessita abolir aquilo que o acorrenta, Ego-Progressismo procura a eliminação do estado, de raça, de gênero, de sexualidade e qualquer outra coisa que prende o individuo, e isso precisa ser feito sempre lutando contra esses sistemas, existindo em constante insurreição, não se deixando ser governado, mas Ego-Progressismo procura pragmatismo também, para melhor atingir sua liberação total o individuo devia procurar maneiras espertas de melhorar sua condição, e engajar em metodos que podem reduzir o dano que sentem, como votar ou lutar para mudar a sociedade para uma forma que é melhor para o individuo, mesmo que não seja perfeita.

Egoismo Civico
Liberação é, claramente, ligada a liberdade, o causa do individuo, para sua realização necessita liberdade, e por isso ideais de liberdade são a base do Ego-Progressismo, já que ele centra sua luta por progresso social na ideia de que todos devem ser livres para fazerem oque desejam, livres dos ideais conservadores e coletivistas que não permitem isso, Ego-Progressismo assim não é apenas civilmente anarquista mas vê a maioria de conflitos, como os ideais de economia, problemas sociais e tal tem haver com a luta entre liberdade e autoritarismo, lutar contra o progressismo ou no nome da propriedade privada é inerentemente autoritário.

Economia
Como mencionado na seção acima a questão de economia é também ligada a liberdade, já que diferente sistemas econômicos impactam muito como um individuo pode existir por sua causa, Ego-Progressismo opõe todos os sistemas econômicos que removem liberdade do individual de qualquer maneira, capitalismo, feudalismo, e capitalismo-de-estado são rejeitados já que eles impedem o individuo de ser livre e fiel a si mesmo fazendo que ele tenha que se ajoelhar para alguém ou algo, seja a vontade de lordes, do mercado livre, ou de burocratas, Ego-Progressismo defende uma economia não coerciva, um tipo de "mutualismo sem mercados" onde indivíduos livremente escolhem em oque querem ou não trabalhar e assim oque querem ou não obter, mas engajar em dito contrato social ainda vai tirar do individuo um pouco de sua liberdade, desse modo se deseja ser mais livre ele também precisa tomar oque quer para si sem se importar com qual sistema está instalado.

Cultura
Ego-Progressismo, é obviamente, progressista por natureza, assim rejeita todo o tradicionalismo ou pensamento conservador, procurando em vez disso progredir a sociedade para um estado mais livro e aceitante de diferenças onde indivíduos são livre para serem oque querem.

Meio Ambiente
O Meio Ambiente é precioso para o individuo no sentido que sua boa saúde é fisicamente necessário para o individuo continuar sua existência, assim proteger o meio ambiente está no interesse de tudo mundo, mas, se isso mudaria, e não está mais no interesse do individuo proteger o meio ambiente então é o individuo pode decidir oque deseja fazer com o meio ambiente, já que tal deve ser visto como propriedade do individuo e não o contrário.

A Armadilha de Nações
Nações são um exemplo clássico de um spook, uma ideia fixada que serve nada mais que sua própria causa e procura subjugar o individuo para tal causa, é um negativo líquido para o individuo de todo jeito, nacionalismo nós impede de ajudar uns aos outros, de ficarmos um ao lado do outro e atingirmos todos os benefícios que isso levaria, e assim Ego-Progressismo é anacionalista, acreditando na abolição de todas as nações, e que o individuo devia operar como se já não tivessem nações.

A Questão Religiosa
Religião é algo que aliena o individuo, faz ele trabalhar não pra si mesmo mas para uma causa sagrada, para atingir ou criar um céu que é externo e o "bom" tudo enquanto o individuo é reduzido a algo não sagrado, não criativo e meramente um súdito a um ideal externo, o individuo precisa se livrar da religião para se encontrar livre, mas força outros a abandonar religião não é menos autoritário que força outros a serem religiosos, Assim enquanto o Ego-Progressismo acredita que em um processo de fazer decisões de um governo religião deve ser excluída sempre, a crença individual não deve ser lutado contra com força, em vez disso cabe a cada individuo se livrar disso.

Liberdade Morfológica
Liberdade não é algo que nasce de e é mantido apenas por ideais, nossas condições materiais afetam muito quão livre nos podemos ser de oque nos prende, e enquanto isso possa parecer obvio para tais coisas como bens e necessidades materiais, um jeito que nossas condições materiais nós fazem menos livre são o nosso próprio corpo, o individuo está preso por leis naturais e forçado a trabalhar sobre um dado padrão, o padrão natural, mas isso não é absoluto, com o desenvolvimento de tecnologia nós podemos se livrar disso, pense em óculos por exemplo, alguém com problema de vista é de certo modo menos livre que alguém que pode ver bem, já que alguém com problema de vista tem menos acesso a coisas da vida, mas com óculos ou lentes de contato podemos ver melhor, interagir com o mundo melhor, não apenas isso é beneficial no sentido de sobrevivência, ele também permite maior liberdade já que remove muito impedimentos a pessoa pode ter, Então se podemos usar a tecnologia para melhorar nossa liberdade e nossa qualidade de vida então por que apenas parar fazendo coisas serem tão boas como "devem"?, no grande esquema das coisas não existe um "deve", isso é conservadorismo biológico que fala que "devemos" ser oque é "natural" ou "certo", mas não existe um "certo", então porque prevenir o individuo de se melhorar de um modo que deseja? é uma expressão de liberdade procurar mais liberdade, e melhorias tecnológicas podem nós entregar maior liberdade individual sobre o mundo material em volta do individuo e seu próprio corpo.

Sobre Gênero
Gênero é várias coisas ao mesmo tempo, e ao mesmo tempo, nada, é em essencia uma abstração, um fantasma ou spook que é uma performance do individuo, é uma ideia que é imitada por mais que não possui forma original, e ao mesmo tempo ele se organiza através de uma estrutura de classe, com homens sendo a classe dominadora, mulheres a dominada e "queers" (termo do inglês, originalmente significava "estranho" e de "fora" e foi usado como um termo preconceituoso contra pessoas LGBTQ mas com o progresso social se tornou um termo positivo para se referir ao grupo) aqueles que não sujeitão-se e quebram a estrutura, todas essas coisas combinadas levam a uma ideia como o gênero tendo enorme impacto na vida de indivíduos, desde que nascemos somos forçados a ser ou homem ou mulher, e a partir dai somos pressionados a se encaixar no molde do nosso dado gênero e condenados ao ostracismo como queer se escolhermos não seguir dado molde, assim gênero em todas suas formas é uma estrutura autoritativa, uma que domina o individuo, não é difícil imaginar que esse sistema levou a tantas estruturas opressivas através de nossa historia, mas até quando gênero está no seu menos importante ele ainda continua sendo uma estrutura opressora e conservadora, já que gênero, desde que exista vai força na gente regras arbitrárias que devemos seguir não pela nossa causa mas simplesmente porque devemos, porque é tradição e assim devemos, gênero é totalmente uma estrutura autoritativa e desde que exista ele vai ser, é por isso que feminismo e liberação dos homens falham, porque desejam não nós livrar de gênero, mas liberar gênero, fazendo gênero, uma coisa que nós oprimi, livre, não, não é suficiente simplesmente liberar gênero, mas se liberar de gênero é oque levaria a maiores liberdades, não é pra dize que gênero como uma identidade deve ser completamente abolida, suas forças coercivas devem mas para tomar gênero como sua propriedade, escolhendo por escolha consciente e usando-o para sua próprio causa também é liberação.

Personality and Behaviour
Ego-Progressivism acts exactly like its founder, Io

Relations
Canon ideologies=

Friends

 * [[File:Anqueer.png]] Queer Anarchism - The fight for queer liberation is one inherently linked to individualism
 * [[File:Egocom.png]] Ego-Communism - Basically me
 * [[File:Anfem.png]] Anarcha-Feminism - A progressive individualist anarchist, nice! we should abolish gender tho
 * [[File:Awaj.png]] Anarchism - Mommy anarchy
 * [[File:Front.png]] Anarcho-Frontierism - Space cowboys are cool!
 * [[File:Anin.png]] Anarcho-Individualism - I love i
 * [[File:Antr.png]] Anarcho-Transhumanism - The only form of transhumanism that wouldn't let to a dystopian society
 * [[File:Anat.png]] Anationalism - Nations are bad and ugly and i hate them
 * [[File:Thar.png]] Anti-Authoritarianism - Authorities are ugly and i hate them
 * [[File:Anti-Humanism.png]] Anti-Humanism - Humans good, Humanism bad
 * [[File:SecSat.png]] Atheistic Satanism - I liked trolling christians back in the day
 * [[File:Autarch.png]] Autarchism - Every man a government!

Neutral

 * [[File:Ancom.png]] Anarcho-Communism - Of course, a stateless and classless society based on mutual aid is incredible, but why are so many of your followers so spooked?
 * [[File:Agorismf.png]] Agorism - Black markets sound cool but why have markets at all?
 * [[File:AnAg.png]] Agrarian Anarchism - Ok lets say we're free, then why limit ourselves to agrarianism? i don't see the point, i love cities
 * [[File:Agsoc.png]] Agrarian Socialism - Socialism? ok, Agrarianism? Why???
 * [[File:Globnat.png]] Alter-Globalization - If we are going to globalize its good we do it in a better, less harmful way
 * [[File:Annil.png]] Anarcho-Nihilism - We are similar of course, but why despair at this meaningless universe? i prefer to laugh, laugh for it is that meaninglessness that allows me to be my own
 * [[File:Anpacf.png]] Anarcho-Pacifism - You won't accomplish anything with that "warm heartedness"
 * [[File:AnSynd.png]] Anarcho-Syndicalism - Yeeaah i like social anarchism and all but im more than just a worker and don't want a state that allows me to be free *as long as* im a worker
 * [[File:Antifa.png]] Anti-Fascism - Bash the Fash! some of your followers are too religious tho
 * [[File:Antcomp.png]] Anti-Realism - Weed.
 * [[File:Apolit.png]] Apoliticism - Fine
 * [[File:Auton.png]] Autononism - A little bit based, too religious tho
 * [[File:Avar.png]] Avaritionism - I don't think a world where everyone does what they want would end up like this ideology is often portrayed

Enemies
Self-Inserts=
 * [[File:ML.png]] Marxism-Leninism - Of course, i am a proletariat, so the cause of the proletariat is also my cause, but i am more than just proletariat, i am i, so why should i believe in a government that claims that proletarians should rule? i do not wish for the proletariat to rule me, i do not wish to be ruled by anyone
 * [[File:Fash.png]] Fascism - The enemy of the individual and oppressor and vanquiser of all that do not wish to sacrifice themselves for the state
 * [[File:Abmon.png]] Absolute Monarchism - Death to the king!
 * [[File:Accel.png]] Accelerationism - A strategy that can never work and is only supported by the priviliged, i'll not suffer greatly for the small possibility that "progress" means a better society
 * [[File:Farm.png]] Agrarianism - You can not make me live on a farm, nooooo
 * [[File:Altl.png]] Alt-Lite - No! Bad! Go back to 2016 were you belong
 * [[File:Altr.png]] Alt-Right - You made the internet a shitty place, i've grown stronger due to the savagery of that time, but i sure do you hope you never come back and new people don't have to deal with your degeneracy anymore
 * [[File:Ancapf.png]] Anarcho-Capitalism - Free market theocrats
 * [[File:Acol.png]] Anarcho-Collectivism - Collectivist!!! REEEEEEEEE
 * [[File:Ancon.png]] Anarcho-Conservatism - What if we all oppressed each other without the help of the state?
 * [[File:Andist.png]] Anarcho-Distributism - Pious anarchist
 * [[File:Anfashf.png]] Anarcho-Fascism - Yeah thats very yikes sweaty
 * [[File:Anarcho-Fascismalt.png]] Nilssonian Anarcho-Fascism - Average ancap
 * [[File:Jackanfash.png]] Donovanian Anarcho-Fascism - I might be a "bundle of sticks" but i'm not gonna be a stick for your stateless "bundle of sticks"
 * [[File:Anmona.png]] Anarcho-Monarchism - Whatever happened to no gods no masters?
 * [[File:AnNatur.png]] Anarcho-Naturism - No
 * [[File:Anprim.png]] Anarcho-Primitivism - I like my glasses, thank you
 * [[File:Antot.png]] Anarcho-Totalitarianism - Average twitter ancom /j
 * [[File:Antcent.png]] Anti-Centrism - I never liked Jreg that much
 * [[File:AnEn.png]] Anti-Environmentalism - I like trees, fuck you
 * [[File:Anrad.png]] Anti-Radicalism - I will be as radical as i want, fuck you
 * [[File:Arist.png]] Aristocracy - More like Shitstocracy
 * [[File:Austrobert.png]] Austrolibertarianism - Bad economics
 * [[File:Authcap.png]] Authoritarian Capitalism - All capitalism is authoritarian
 * [[File:Authoritarian_Conservatism.png]] Authoritarian Conservatism - All conservatism is authoritarian
 * [[File:Authdem.png]] Authoritarian Democracy - All democracy is authoritarian
 * [[File:Sec.png]] Authoritarianism - Fuck you
 * [[File:Auto.png]] Autocracy - Fuck you also
 * [[File:Baath.png]] Ba'athism - Arab Nazbol
 * [[File:Banana_Republicanism.png]] Mh:polcompball:Banana Republicanism - This is just colonialism
 * [[File:Bankocracy.png]] Bankocracy - Bank deez nuts
 * [[File:BarrCom.png]] Barracks Communism - This is actually dystopian
 * [[File:Biopos.png]] Bio-Posadism - Never got covid 💪
 * [[File:Blacknat.png]] Black Nationalism - Ethnic nationalism is why so many people have such horrible lifes, we don't need more of it
 * [[File:Blanqui.png]] Blanquism - This is what most vanguardists are
 * [[File:Bhl.png]] Bleeding-Heart Libertarianism - Right-Libertarians are extremely shitty and more progressivism won't solve it
 * [[File:Bonaparte.png]] Bonapartism - The French Revolution wasn't the best already but you just ruined everything
 * [[File:Bckchn.png]] Bookchin Communalism - Damn collectivist
 * [[File:Bud.png]] Buddhist Theocracy - I'll have to say "theocracy bad" many times in this page so i'll keep it short: theocracy bad

Me

 * [[File:Ioist.png]] Ego-Progressivism - Always putting me first

Like

 * [[File:HelloThere314Icon.png]] HelloThere314ism - We agree on pretty much most things
 * [[File:Councilguy2.png]] Post-Councilism - We may disagree on certain things such as whether a synthesis is reachable or not, or the nature of politics but we are very close ideologically even with those differences
 * [[File:Ashley.png]] AshleyHereism - We are pretty similar politically but she's a little more moderate, great ideology though
 * [[File:Touseyism_ball.png]] Neo-Touseyism - I very much agree with the idea of Meta Anarchy
 * [[File:Ultro.png]] Ultroneism - I suppose orthodox stirnerism and ego-communism aren't as compatible as i previously thought, that said even if he says im a pious progressive i very much agree with most of his ideas and i do admit he has been an influence for my ideology
 * [[File:Postean.png]] Post Ego Anarcha-Nihilism - Very based but i'm not really a big fan of nihilism

Kinda Like

 * [[File:Duckf.png]] Individual Voluntaryism - You make a good point on the nature of political structures and coercion, but your solution to it is not to advocate for the individual to freed from said structures but for individual to be free to choose which structure they wish to be oppressed by
 * [[File:Yoda8soup.png]] Yoda8soup Thought - While the society this ideology would lead to is preferable to and would be an improvement of the current one in many ways, it still fails to fundamentally solve the many problems inherent with this system, with democracy, production and states

Neutral

 * [[File:OwfBall.png]] Owfism - Typical american demsoc, proposes solutions to problems but doesn't go as far as it is necessary to really solve them
 * [[File:Glencoe.png]] Glencoeism - Surely, the problems with the current system is that its not "optimal" enough, we should organize it differently so it would be better, no, i say it will never be good enough and we should just throw the whole thing away

Dislike

 * [[File:Syntridem2.png]] Syncretic Tridemism - Attaturk failed, so did Sun Yat-Sen, nationalism will always lead to suffering and the oppression of the individual, no matter how much welfare you try to shove at my face
 * [[File:Panth.png]] Pantheonism - Pan-Humanist Social Monarchism, to say this ideology is haunted by phantasms (spooked) would be an understatement, and also, why monarchy? if you believe a leader should be competent surely you would defend meritocracy or technocracy
 * [[File:BasedMan.png]] BasedManism - What objectivity? what truth? why should i care about that? surrender myself and my being to the whims of logic and "higher truth"? life is an absurd, and its an absurd to find some true and objective system

Enemies

 * [[File:pixil-frame-0(27).png]] New Model Of Cheesenism - Fascist cringe

Comments

 * [[file:Postean.png]] Post Ego Anarcha-Nihilism - Seems to be based except that you focus too much on culture that looks like average SJW and still identifying as socialist when you want to abolish economy. Still it's very good because I don't care about cultural stuff.
 * - It seems to me, that union of egoists is a tribe as well, just all people sharing enough to not feel oppressed, at some point tribe will fall apart because people are changing all the time in different ways. So, I don't see why I am different, since I want people to change tribes constantly, destroying them and creating new.
 * [[File:Ioist.png]] Io - Well i don't really see it that way, the union of egoists is not a tribe as its not a force that makes the individual live for it, as it would be voluntary and non-coercive.
 * - "The union will assuredly offer a greater measure of liberty, as well as (and especially because by it one escapes all the coercion peculiar to State and society life) admit of being considered as "a new liberty"; but nevertheless it will still contain enough of unfreedom and involuntariness. For its object is not this — liberty (which on the contrary it sacrifices to ownness), but only ownness". Freedom and Voluntary association are not the goals of the union.
 * [[File:Ioist.png]] Io - Yeah i understand that the union wouldn't necessarily be completely devoid of unfreedom and such, i've already stated that any such organization will still be unfree in certain ways, but the point being made towards Duck is that such Union would be free enough to not be considered a "tribe", admitelly i do have to read more about this, which is why i didn't even really talk about a hypothetical union of egoists in this page.
 * - About Agrarian Anarchism. There is a theory that industrial society opress individual, I asked you before about anarchism being mildly primitivist. But that's just me, who thinks cooperation is fine, but some go even further and want to atomize society, destroy it, city just requires a lot of mandatory collectivization, living on land allows to be self sufficient.
 * [[File:BasedMan.png]]BasedManism - are you people not able to read past the first god damn paragraph of my page, why does everyone only talk about it, is it the only one yall can understand? "What objectivity?" - objective is something which can be recognized as such by everyone, math for example. "what truth?" -true is something which makes logical sense. "why should i care about that?" i never said you, as a mediocre person who will never achieve anything of significance, should care about it, i just said that's the philosopher's job and philosophy has forgotten the search for truth. (edit: also, by asking "why?" you already seem to care about the truth, as you cannot ask "why?" without wanting to receive a true answer) "surrender myself and my being to the whims of logic and "higher truth"?" - i said quite the opposite, but perhaps your brain was on its way out by then: "AFFIRM THE BODY, FOR IT IS THE GIVER OF PASSIONS" (Life and body affirmation as a response to pessimism), i dont know how much anti-logic you can go than advising someone to embrace their passions. "life is an absurd, and its an absurd to find some true and objective system" absurdism seems to claim to be a true and objective system for life, does it not?
 * [[File:Ioist.png]] Io - Well i can't really write everything i disagree with you on the relations page, thats why me and the other stirnerites focus on that, because thats the main fundamental thing that we disagree on, i'm sorry that you see a denial of the sacredness of philosophy to be such a sin that you have to respond with anger but as long as its just an angry rant i can't really be convinced, also saying that absurdism claims to be a true and objective system for life is like saying that atheism claims to be the true religion, there is a difference between affirming something and denying the veracity of something, also maybe the word logic there was a misnomer but the "higher truth" point still stands and you still believe we should "embrace our passions" well what does that mean? should i then only follow what my body desires? why can't i follow what *i* desire, or whats in my "self-interest"?