Conseilism

Am rewriting (slightly): Reason: Idk i guess i don't think it was written well

Conseilism is a civically very libertarian/anarchist, cultural far-right and economic left ideology which is most like social anarchism or libertarian socialism but with significant influence from far right forms of anarchism, primarily Nilssonian anarcho-fascism, national anarchism, quiian anarcho-monarchism and black lilyism. It believes in the economics of reactionary socialism. It is the self-insert of User:Rechtewig

Civics:
Conseilism believes in extreme decentralization and elimination of monopoly on violence/state, to be replaced by a hyper-populist government alongside extreme vigilantism, meaning he can be labeled as anarchist. However, not only is this contested by left-anarchists, but Conseilism focuses not only on liberty, but also incentivizing socially beneficiary policy, mostly viewing liberty as a means to what he views as ultimate morality: the pursuit of happiness, and (slightly more importantly) societal good. Because liberty can be used to promote societal good and is a means for the pursuit of happiness, in that the individual can (generally) well judge what brings happiness for themselves. In a slightly less terribly cringe philosophical way, I can explain this.

Essentially, without a monopoly on violence society picks up most of the government's role. However, some government must remain as to defend life, liberty and happiness. As government can't at all impose itself, it is only through the people government reigns. So if the people deplore a leader they have every right to leave him. If they adore him they have every right to follow him. This means the government must keep the trust of the people, which in turn demands benevolence. Back to leaving the leader, this can be done collectively, through revolution and disposal, or individually, by a dissenter hitching up a ride and leaving to a different municipality with a different leader. This brings us to the decentralization. Basically, Conseilism believes in the Neoreactionary concept of patchwork, in which multiple municipalities, alongside each other in various layers, or in a normal human language way, multiple cities, competing over citizens, being culturally interconnected, retaining economic autarky and civically cooperating, would compose the next level, so a county, and in turn multiple counties, competing over citizens, being culturally interconnected, retaining economic autarky and civically cooperating, would compose the next level, so a duchy or some mediaeval larp, and so on. This system has been observed as neo-feudal, which Conseilism positively agrees with as another justification for his larpism reactionarism. Also, the government would posess a few economic powers, (which will be monologed about in the next section). Conseilism, on actual government structure, doesn't think any one structure should be imposed on the people, but ideally the government would be a philosopher kang and represent the workers

[[File:PCB-Reactsoc.png]] Economics:
Economic Structure Incidentally, this market would be limited by a public sector, which would be the modern public sector, however, natural resources would be part of the public sector, while schools would not, because Conseilism believes the profit motive in natural resources directly incentivizes mismanagement, whereas private and public schools both serve corporate and government interests respectively, Conseilism instead believes in homeschooling and the apprentice system.
 * [[File:PCB-Guildsoc.png]] Guilds - Conseilism believes in Guild Socialism where Guilds (associations of autonomous workers from the middle ages) exist and have representation in government. Of course he also supports worker's ownership of the means of production. He strongly opposes unions as he sees them inherently rooted in capitalist conditions.
 * Consumers bodies - Conseilism supports comsumers forming bodies which privately regulate the economy in order to protect consumer's interests.
 * [[File:PCB-Councom.png]]Businesses Agar.png - Conseilism supports Council Communism running local businesses, the only ones allowed would be extremely small. These businesses interact in a limited cooperative market working to enrich the community.

The market would not be limited by regulation, as Conseilism believes only slavery, child pornography, and weapons of mass destruction should be outlawed. On prostitution, he believes in a radical neo-abolitionist stance in which everybody involved with the exception of the prostitute should be penalized.

This means he believes in total legalization of firearms and narcotics/drugs.

he opposes wealth redistribution, believing in a voluntary tax, and (sometimes, depending on the taxes received) a voluntary welfare.

[[File:PCB-React.png]] [[File:Eugen.png]] Culture [[File:PCB-Trad.png]] [[File:PCB-Transphobia.png]]:
Reactionary, as Conseilism believes it's extremely important to preserve/restore traditions, mainly christian law, culture and cultural customs, as well as values, both on merit and age, as betraying the founding principles of a nation is a crime against the metaphysical collectivity, or "soul" theeof (an idea taken from volkisch). Also, conseilism deviates from conservatism believing conservatism is incapable of fighting the progs and also is not regressive enough, because times such as the middle ages had, like, statisically better lives in many ways. He supports positive and cultural eugenics, believing voluntary and cultural removal of certain elements from the gene pool is a societal good and not strictly speaking morally wrong. He is more radical centrist on lgbt issues as he finds them very complicated, and so he allows gay marriage and homosexuality in practice, (provided it conforms to heteronormative roles), but opposes gay adoption, public pride, and the lgbt community. Also opposes transgenderism. Lastly, like his influence anarcho-fascism, he is anti-feminist, believing women should conform to biblical sex roles and also be excluded from politics as he believes that in his ideal society people would aggressively participate in politics, and he believes women are incapable of aggression to the same extent as men. Thus, feminism is unnatural. Of course, these wouldn't be enforced by the government, Conseilism instead advocates for the destruction of an intellectual elite as to propagate reactionary values through society, eventually making progressivism not tolerated by society, which would open the way for society expunging progressive elements.

[[File:PCB-Ultranat.png]] [[File:PCB-BloodNat.png]] Diplomacy:

 * Ethnic nationalism: Conseilism believes borders should be drawn by ethnicity, from the idea of blood and soil, as conseilism believes anything else would lead to the destruction of a race through misgenation, and as a believer in HBD we must preserve each race and their positive characteristics. However as he supports (internal) open borders, borders would be very fluctuating. He does not believe race is the root of nationality, as another break from typical ethnonationalism


 * Cultural nationalism: Conseilism believes in TOTAL cultural homogeny. Eine kultur, eine reich. Parrelel cultures in conflict will culminate in the destruction of one, which will eventually lead to extreme cultural decay.


 * Blood nationalism: Conseilism believes nationality is derived from kin/bloodline, however, unlike traditional blood nationalism, he believes multiple families constitute one nation.


 * Homonationalism: :troll:


 * American Ultranationalism: He believes in prioritizing america first, although he is very sympathetic to secessionists in the USA as much as elsewhere.


 * Pro-Secessionism: Conseilism supports a vast majority of secessionists


 * Alter-Globalism: Conseilism believes we should cooperate with other nations while remaining militarily and economically withdrawn


 * Pan-Nationalism: Conseilism believes we should advocate for pan-nationalism


 * Irredentism: TBA

[[File:PCB-ProtTheo.png]] Religious views
Conseilism believes in ecumenicalism, because he believes schism of the churches has produced degenerate branches of christian. Thus, he believes in the anglican church as institution, He is also rather esoteric, believing in some mystic practices, viewing nature as a sort of "icon" and thus worthy of ritualistic veneration, and also believing paganism is preferable to both judaism and islam as christianity has been historically closer to paganism, a few shared beliefs, and the belief that pagans will not suffer in the afterlife as opposed to abrahamics. Conseilism also believes in many ancient greek myths, and differentiates between the God of the Christians and the god of the jews. Conseilism could obviously be viewed as christian right because of his usage of biblical passages to justify his cultural right views (although it's more of a secondary thing), however he breaks from them economically and on matters of discrimination he is nearly the opposite, being (arguably, kinda, maybe (don't cancel me oh god oh fuck)) racist and also sexist but not (totally) anti-gay.

[[File:PCB-Envi.png]] Environmental views
Conseilism believes in malthusianism and neo-volikist eco-nationalism, viewing the nation as intrinsic to it's nature.

Technological views
Agrarian for neoluddite reasons. Conseilism believes that reliance on industrial technology is disastorous, although tech is in of itself inevitable, so the logical idea is to distance ourselves from said reliance, which was coined by Biocentrism as neo-agrarianism

Views on Space Colonization
It's an incredibly cool idea, but i think it's both impractical and dangerous

Views on Abortion
conseilism believes abortion is murder, however it's morally permissible in multiple extreme cases, such as rape, sister x brother incest, threat to the life of the mother and/or baby, extreme deformation in the baby, or extremely bad material position (homelessness, destitution). However he believes the male spouse must agree

Views on American founding documents
Conseilism is very jeffersonian, believing that the jeffersonian documents were the best and should be followed. Meaning the bill of rights (making him a supporter of total free speech, near total right to bear arms (up until WoMDs), etc.), the deceleration of independence and the articles of confederation

Views on metric vs. imperial
he thinks that metric is only relevant because of arabic numerals, and imperial is more mathematically sound, being based on 12, a more divisible number, and metric is based on ten, which, again, is only relevant in a base-ten syteme. He supports imperial to clarify

Views on Covid-19 and measures around it
He is opposed to lockdowns, and thinks that we should instead have a system where if you get infected you have a greater self-eligibilty. He does not believe covid was synthesized in a lab, but he does not doubt that it was taken advantage of. On vaccines, he is somewhat sceptical, believing that we (the general populace) honestly don't know if they're a placebo, or rushed or some crap like that.

Views on the civil war
he is somewhat of a confederate apologist

Views on race/ethnicity
Conseilism believes in blood and soil and HBD meaning that he is generally viewed as racist by many progressives. While he does not identify as such, he is not necessarily adverse to being called as such. However, most white nationalists reject him because he promotes colour blindness and also vehementally dislikes many european ethnicities, namely balto-uraltaic (viewing them as armies of gog and magog) and french, viewing them as gomerites (cimmerians) although said francophobic attitude also extends to the morrocans, and irish, (although excludes quebecois and american-irish)

Friends

 * [[File:PCB-MinnDistIcon.png]]Minnesotan Distributism: We seem to agree on most things, and he also seems like a nice guy.
 * Iron Daveism: One of my first interactions on pcb(a) and a fellow guild socialist and reactionary

Frenemies

 * Anti-Deathism: ehhhhhhh i'm sympathetic towards immortalism, don't support it for anyone but me tho think it's feasible, not because death is inevitable (its not) but because it would be unable to satiate exponetial population growth, given your plan to colonize the stars is logistically impossible on such a large scale, so basically you'd end up with trillions of people trapped on earth, which would be agonizing for everyone involved. You can imagine many horrific scenarios ending with the eternal torture of mankind. As for your other views, i think the civic stances are good, the economic ones are neutrally based (too extreme ngl) but the cultural ones are very bad
 * [[File:PCB-Oiboioiicon.png]]Oiboioiism: This ideology is both an incredible utopia and an incredible dystopia. Nice guy also
 * LogicalGreyism: Not the worst, but also definitely not the best

Enemies
[WIP]