Conseilism

Am rewriting (slightly): Reason: Idk i guess i don't think it was written well. Also a few economic and philosophical changes

Conseilism is a civically very libertarian/anarchist, cultural far-right and economic left ideology which is most like social anarchism or  libertarian socialism but with significant influence from far right forms of anarchism, primarily Nilssonian anarcho-fascism, national anarchism, quiian anarcho-monarchism and black lilyism. It believes in the economics of reactionary socialism. It is the self-insert of User:Rechtewig honestly i'm just a really insane version of national anarchism

[[File:PCB-NatAn.png]] [[File:PCB-Anarcho-Fascismalt.png]] Civics:
Conseilism believes in extreme decentralization and elimination of monopoly on violence/state, to be replaced by a hyper-populist government alongside extreme vigilantism, meaning he can be labeled as anarchist. However, not only is this contested by left-anarchists, but Conseilism focuses not only on liberty, but also incentivizing socially beneficiary policy, mostly viewing liberty as a means, granted by some extrnal group's recognition thereof, (so he does not believe in natural liberties) to what he views as ultimate morality: the pursuit of happiness, and (slightly more importantly) societal good. Because liberty can be used to promote societal good and is a means for the pursuit of happiness, in that the individual can (generally) well judge what brings happiness for themselves. In a slightly less terribly cringe philosophical way, I can explain this.

Conseilism believes that we should abolish state, defined as monopoly on violence, and instead install a government which does not exist through imposition, but rather through society voluntarily recognizing a naturalist and uber-populist evolution of societal standing, or, in less of a pedantic way, a system where the leaders rule through the people's backing, so people voluntarily interact with leadership, and if people like someone, they will support him, if they don't, he is disposed of. This leader would be me a philosopher king. These It's the backing of the people through which progression on the social level develops, although i hate voting for reasons below

I hate voting because it's idiotic that a completely powerless politician who exists solely through making false promises towards the majority of a tiny part of the country even exists. And what's more it leads to a progressive shadow elite I.E the intellectual elites who we all know are technophillic progressives.

On the role of the government, he believes in that the government should use a libertarian paternalist role with ensuring liberty as the sole goal, as Conseilism views liberty as something granted rather than natural, and adhocracy where problems are solved by those who understand them.

He opposes police, favouring communal enforcement by physical removal, he opposes the court system, favouring trial by combat, and he opposes a formalized law, rather a hyper-particularist sort of vague "covenant". In practice this would work with society case by case judging and expelling people for violating a sort of "covenant", and with said "verdict" being able to be challenged with the barrel of a gun (or the blade of a sword for extra-cool effect).

This covenant would basically just be a founding principle which is followed as voluntarily as living in said community

He also supports the Neoreactionary concept of patchwork, in which multiple municipalities, alongside each other in various layers, or in a normal human language way, multiple cities, competing over citizens, being culturally interconnected, retaining economic autarky and civically cooperating, would compose the next level, so a county, and in turn multiple counties, competing over citizens, being culturally interconnected, retaining economic autarky and civically cooperating, would compose the next level, so a duchy or some mediaeval larp, and so on. This system has been observed as neo-feudal, which Conseilism positively agrees with as another justification for his larpism reactionarism. The lowest level would be family/house/clan

[[File:PCB-Reactsoc.png]] Economics:
Economic Structure Incidentally, this market would be limited by a public sector, which would be the modern public sector, however, natural resources would be part of the public sector, while schools would not, because Conseilism believes the profit motive in natural resources directly incentivizes mismanagement, whereas private and public schools both serve corporate and government interests respectively, Conseilism instead believes in homeschooling and the apprentice system.
 * [[File:PCB-Guildsoc.png]] Guilds - Conseilism believes in Guild Socialism where Guilds (associations of autonomous workers from the middle ages) exist and have representation in government. Of course he also supports worker's ownership of the means of production. He strongly opposes unions as he sees them inherently rooted in capitalist conditions. These guilds would also be democratic
 * Consumers bodies - Conseilism supports comsumers forming bodies which decentrally regulate the economy in order to protect consumer's interests.
 * [[File:PCB-Councom.png]]Businesses Agar.png - Conseilism supports Council Communism running local businesses, the only ones allowed would be extremely small. These businesses interact in a limited cooperative market working to enrich the community.

The market would not be limited by regulation. On prostitution, he believes in a radical neo-abolitionist stance in which everybody involved with the exception of the prostitute should be penalized.

This means he believes in total legalization of firearms and narcotics/drugs.

He is third positionist as he opposes both marxism and capitalism, although he does take some elements from both as he sees them as extrmely hyperstitious. So while he rejects the centralized property and voluntarist internal competition of capitalism, he believes in markets, and stock markets.

Whether Conseilism is socialist is debatable, as he wants an economy controlled by the workers in guilds which engender wealth redistribution, however, he believes the MOP should be widespread managed by meritocratic worker's representatives rather than direct ownership (or lack thereof) by the workers.

The only contraband which would remain illegal is illicit pornography, WoMDs and the slave trade.

[[File:PCB-React.png]] [[File:Eugen.png]] Culture [[File:PCB-Trad.png]] [[File:PCB-Transphobia.png]]:
Reactionary, as Conseilism believes it's extremely important to preserve/restore traditions, mainly christian law, culture and cultural customs, as well as values, both on merit and age, as betraying the founding principles of a nation is a crime against the metaphysical collectivity, or "soul" theeof (an idea taken from volkisch). Also, Conseilism deviates from conservatism believing conservatism is incapable of combatting progressivism and fails to positively address the state of liberties in the distant past (namely medieval europe). He supports positive and cultural eugenics, believing voluntary and cultural removal of certain elements from the gene pool is a societal good and not strictly speaking morally wrong. He is more radical centrist on lgbt issues as he finds them complicated, due to factors such as historical acceptance, which was extremely varied, concerns towards psychology of homosexuals and people associated with homosexuals, and simple facts and reality, and so he allows gay marriage and homosexuality in practice, (provided it conforms to heteronormative roles), but opposes gay adoption, public pride, and the lgbt community. Lastly, like his influence anarcho-fascism, he is anti-feminist, believing women should conform to biblical sex roles and also be excluded from politics as he believes that in his ideal society people would aggressively participate in politics, and he believes women are incapable of aggression to the same extent as men. Thus, feminism is unnatural. Of course, these wouldn't be enforced by the government, Conseilism instead advocates for the destruction of an intellectual elite as to propagate reactionary values through society, eventually making progressivism not tolerated by society, which would open the way for society expunging progressive elements. He supports christian law, however more amoral, so focusing more on immutable characteristics than morality.

[[File:PCB-Ultranat.png]] [[File:PCB-BloodNat.png]] Diplomacy:

 * Ethnic nationalism: Conseilism believes borders should be drawn by ethnicity, from the idea of blood and soil, as conseilism believes anything else would lead to the destruction of a race through misgenation, and as a believer in HBD we must preserve each race and their positive characteristics. However as he supports (internal) open borders, borders would be very fluctuating. He does not believe race is the root of nationality, as another break from typical ethnonationalism


 * Cultural nationalism: Conseilism believes in TOTAL cultural homogeny. Eine kultur, eine reich. Parrelel cultures in conflict will culminate in the destruction of one, which will eventually lead to extreme cultural decay.


 * Blood nationalism: Conseilism believes nationality is derived from kin/bloodline, however, unlike traditional blood nationalism, he believes multiple families constitute one nation.


 * Homonationalism: :troll:


 * American Ultranationalism: He believes in prioritizing america first, although he is very sympathetic to secessionists in the USA as much as elsewhere. Conseilism believes that America is a nation based around the similarities of it's individual states.


 * Pro-Secessionism: Conseilism supports a vast majority of secessionists


 * Alter-Globalism: Conseilism believes we should cooperate with other nations while remaining militarily and economically withdrawn


 * Pan-Nationalism: Conseilism believes we should advocate for pan-nationalist commonwealth(es) on multiple levels.


 * Irredentism: TBA

[[File:PCB-ProtTheo.png]] Religious views
Conseilism believes in ecumenicalism, because he believes schism of the churches has produced degenerate branches of christian. Thus, he believes in the anglican church as institution, He is also rather esoteric, believing in some mystic practices, viewing nature as a sort of "icon" and thus worthy of ritualistic veneration, and also believing paganism is preferable to both judaism and islam as christianity has been historically closer to paganism, a few shared beliefs, and the belief that pagans will not suffer in the afterlife as opposed to abrahamics. Conseilism also believes in many ancient greek myths, and differentiates between the God of the Christians and the god of the jews. Conseilism could obviously be viewed as christian right because of his usage of biblical passages to justify his cultural right views (although it's more of a secondary thing), however he breaks from them economically and on matters of discrimination he is nearly the opposite, being (arguably, kinda, maybe (don't cancel me oh god oh fuck)) racist and also sexist but not (totally) anti-gay.

[[File:PCB-Envi.png]] Environmental views
Conseilism believes in malthusianism and neo-volikist eco-nationalism, viewing the nation as intrinsic to it's nature. He, however believes people and nature should interact antagonistically, because of natural selection, however we need to make that substainable through envioroenmatilsm

Technological views
Agrarian for neoluddite reasons. Conseilism believes that reliance on industrial technology is disastorous, although tech is in of itself inevitable, so the logical idea is to distance ourselves from said reliance, which was coined by Biocentrism as neo-agrarianism

Views on Space Colonization
It's an incredibly cool idea, but i think it's both impractical and dangerous

Views on Abortion
conseilism believes abortion is murder, however it's morally permissible in multiple extreme cases, such as rape, sister x brother incest, threat to the life of the mother and/or baby, extreme deformation in the baby, or extremely bad material position (homelessness, destitution). However he believes the male spouse must agree

Views on American founding documents
Conseilism is very jeffersonian, believing that the jeffersonian documents were the best and should be followed. Meaning the bill of rights (making him a supporter of total free speech, near total right to bear arms (up until WoMDs), etc.), the deceleration of independence and the articles of confederation

Views on metric vs. imperial
he thinks that metric is only relevant because of arabic numerals, and imperial is more mathematically sound, being based on 12, a more divisible number, and metric is based on ten, which, again, is only relevant in a base-ten syteme. He supports imperial to clarify

Views on Covid-19 and measures around it
He is opposed to lockdowns, and thinks that we should instead have a system where if you get infected you have a greater self-eligibilty. He does not believe covid was synthesized in a lab, but he does not doubt that it was taken advantage of. On vaccines, he is somewhat sceptical, believing that we (the general populace) honestly don't know if they're a placebo, or rushed or some crap like that.

Views on the civil war
he is somewhat of a confederate apologist

Views on race/ethnicity
Conseilism believes in blood and soil and HBD meaning that he is generally viewed as racist by many progressives. While he does not identify as such, he is not necessarily adverse to being called as such. However, most white nationalists reject him because he promotes colour blindness and also vehementally dislikes many european ethnicities, namely balto-uraltaic (viewing them as armies of gog and magog) and french, viewing them as gomerites (cimmerians) although said francophobic attitude also extends to the morrocans, and irish, (although excludes quebecois and american-irish)

Strategy
Conseilism is opposed to both reform and revolution and either supports independence, accelerationism or agorism as a way to achieve Conseilism. A note is i think that most of these can be used to make revolution possible.

Independence
simple as seperating from the gubbermant, like chaz but actually sucessful. How did chaz fail? A. it focused too much on culltural issues and gay rights (TM) B. it failed at economic self-sufficiency because it was in a city and not farmland (which also meant the state was closer to fuck things up) C. it was too violent and should have compromised with the gubbermant, while remaining very seperate on every level. The zapatistas are also great a great example, but probably harder to apply to america, so ideally this process would work through A. establishing farming commune B. sealing off from outside world C. compromising with usa so it's exepmt from national laws without the government paying much attention D. ??? E. Profit!

Accelerationism
make sheiet real bad until Conseilism is reached

Agorism/Illegalism
if i do violence outside the state monopoly on violence will be no more. Also the dark web is epic

Philosophy
Conseilism draws from many different philosophies. Namely, r/acc (landian), platonism and christian cosmicism. Conseilism basically believes that while God created the universe, it is distant from His light and thus the universe is governed by fate and certain patterns composed of synchronicities and hyperstition which are gradually dragging us into an apocalyptic (that is revelatory) chaos in which the defining characteristics of reality (forms) are revealed, merging heaven and earth in communion. The only real way to stop this is to destroy the material form, which would be impossible as it would destroy the extraphysical as well which would mean this is an illusion of a death, as the extraphysical would even have to project it's own post-mortem condition. Conseilism views some ideologies as hyperstitious, (namely communism (scientific socialism) and capitalism (or just markets in general)), which he uses to justify his economic beliefes as literally, (in a metaphysical sense), close to God/universal salvation. On morality, he believes we should view societal happiness as the only morality, as God does nothing in Man's affairs and thus biblical morality is actually irrational (despite this Conseilism still supports christian law).

Political unity
Conseilism believes that since all extremists hate the current form of the state, they can work with anarhcists. He doesn't actually support anarcho-anti-centrism, he mostly uses it as an example. He actually advocates for unity between reactionary socialists, reactionary libertarians, and libertarian socialists, and (emphasized much less, sometimes) unity between reactionaries, socialists, and libertarians

Drugs
Under Conseilism all drugs would be legal.

Arms
Under Conseilism all arms would be legal and normalized except WoMDs. And rifles would be subsidized for all fathers.

Subsidies
Subsidies would not be given to urban livings or businesses, but rifles and farmland would be widely subsidized for the people.

Bodily Autonomy
Conseilism opposes prostitution, sexually perverse material and public promiscuity, (although prostitution and promiscuity wouldn't necessarily be disallowed), but bodily autonomy would be generally allowed.

Wartime Policy
Conseilism supports what he calls "uber-swiss" war policies, in which all travel routes are promptly destroyed, gun ownership becomes compulsory (but government funded) for all males over fourteen, effectively making a very substantial portion of the nation's population soldiers. However this war would be solely defensive

Theoretical views
Views which are discarded for reasons

Death penalty for the sexually perverse
Pedoes, zoophiles, etc. This is waay to authoritarian, and i think that society should generally do as they wilt with these "people" which would ideally still involve death, preferably extremely gruesome, but that wouldn't be a formalized practice

Outlaw everything i dislike
Waaaay too totalitarian and larpy

Based Friends

 * [[File:PCB-MinnDistIcon.png]]Minnesotan Distributism: We seem to agree on most things, and he also seems like a nice guy. Also, woman hater gang!
 * [[File:PCB-Ancom.png]] - mutual aid and commune based society are incredibly based and probably the only way to synthesise liberty and equality. Though twitter ancoms are cringe af and you can be waaay too radical
 * [[File:PCB-NatAn.png]] National Anarchism - virtually identical, fellow third positionist.
 * [[File:PCB-Reactsoc.png]] - basically me, if sometimes too statist and hierarchial
 * National Feudalism - i really need to go outside someday....
 * Iron Daveism: One of my first interactions on pcb(a) and a fellow guild socialist and reactionary
 * [[File:PCB-Nrx.png]] Mencius Moldbug - the only idea i don't totally agree with is your stance on police and sovcorp, even then sovcorp can be partially based (operative words are can and partially)

Bacrisednge frenemies
definitely not the best
 * Anti-Deathism: ehhhhhhh i'm sympathetic towards immortalism, don't support it for anyone but me tho think it's feasible (unless coupled with antinatalism), not because death is inevitable (its not), but because population thingies. As for your other views, i think the civic stances are good, the economic ones are neutrally based (too extreme ngl) but the cultural ones are very bad.
 * [[File:PCB-Oiboioiicon.png]]Oiboioiism: This ideology is both an incredible utopia and an incredible dystopia. Nice guy also
 * LogicalGreyism: Not the worst, but also
 * Nick Fuentes - would be based but sometimes annoying but sometimes funny but sometimes gay
 * Nick Land - genius but also really, really insane

Cringe Enemies

 * every president for the last twenty years - nobody can convince me you aren't statelib-lite
 * Socdems - profit fascists
 * [[File:PCB-Nazi.png]] Imperial Capitalists - kinda based in some ways, but generally extremely cringe
 * [[File:MAP.png]] Pedophiles - Subhuman.

[WIP]