HelloThere314ism

HelloThere314ism also called HTh314ism believes in Post-Anarchism but believes society must take structure to defend itself before it can be achieved. They specifically like Geomutualism, believing that it is the best way to have society function but believing it should be up to individuals to choose. They strongly value individual choice.

[[File:Post-an.png]]Praxis[[File:Demcon.png]]
They believe that individuals should distance themselves from authority and take their freedom for themselves; not committing philosophical suicide and acting in bad faith by not giving in to authority. Individuals early on would form Democratic Confederalist structures to defend themselves and secure a society of choice. When that is done they would only serve as a stage to manage disputes and external threats.

[[File:Demcon.png]]Organization[[File:Ego.png]]
They believe that different free associations should be organized in a Democratic Confederalist structure. These associations would be similar to Stirner's union of egoists and would only serve to defend and manage the newly freed territory. Councils at the level of the associations manage things and send up representatives that can be recalled at any time. Higher councils would manage the associations and handle other duties to keep the region stable. At the top would be a high council which would have representatives from all across the region. The more authoritarian functions of the councils would wither away with victory with the only remaining jobs being to manage disputes and trade between associations.

[[File:Georgist.png]]Taxation
One of the duties of the higher levels would be to to manage money derived from taxation. A Land Value Tax would be issued on each association. How each association manages this tax is up to them. They may place it on those who own or occupy the most land or on those who are the richest or have it be distributed evenly. This of course is to fund the protection of the region. All remaining money would be distributed across the associations who can divide them amongst their citizens how they please. While they would prefer that something similar happens in each association that is up to the associations to decide. This would dissolve after victory is secured.

[[File:GE.png]]Moneyless Associations[[File:Ancom.png]]
Some associations might chose to adopt moneyless societies. In this case they would pay in resources with its corresponding price being set by higher councils taking into context the resources the association relies on along with the needs of the higher councils.

[[File:Synd.png]]Military
The high council will oversee a democracy of soldiers unions; both will confer and make decisions based on the strategic needs of the battle and the needs of the soldiers. Soldiers can disobey orders based on a two thirds majority. When victory is secured the soldiers unions would no longer be governed by the councils and instead be fully voluntary and self governing.

[[File:Geomut.png]]Ideal Association
They believe that the ideal association would apply Geomutualism. Free markets of individuals and cooperatives along with mutual credit banking would be best. Along with this a limited gift economy would be established for basic resources but these could still be freely sold. This would provide a safety net and make sure all needs are met while still having a completely laissez-faire economy in all other ways. Along with this compensation to society should be owed for occupying land as that land naturally belongs to society. How this compensation is worked out is up to the associations.

[[File:Post-an.png]]Future Structure
Democratic Confederalism is only the most practical way to defend this society of choice form external forces. Once the oppositions of this new society of choice is defeated Post-Structuralist Anarchism will take root.

[[File:Situ.png]]Spectacle[[File:Situationalistinternationalism-icon.png]]
While Capitalism, the creator of the spectacle, is allowed to be practiced in the associations the large scale of capitalist culture, along with its culture against choice, is contradictory to the culture of choice in the associations. Hence, Capitalism is not a problem in this framework.

Personality
They are very into mathematics and philosophy, going into rants on both subjects as well as politics in excruciating detail. They are known to be annoyingly convoluted. They are friendly with everyone on the Libertarian Left and Libertarian Center quadrants.

[[File:Camus.png]]Albert Camus[[File:Absurd.png]]

 * 1942 - The Myth of Sisyphus: And Other Essays
 * 1951 - The Rebel
 * 1960 - Resistance, Rebellion, And Death

[[File:Neomarx.png]]John Paul Sartre[[File:Existentialism.png]]

 * 1946 - Existentialism Is A Humanism

[[File:ExistFem.png]]Simone De Beauvoir

 * 1947 - The Ethics Of Ambiguity

[[File:Nietzsche-icon.png]]Friedrich Nietzsche

 * 1892 - Thus Spoke Zarathustra

[[File:Debord.png]]Guy Debord[[File:Councom.png]]

 * 1967 - Society Of The Spectacle

[[File:Republicanismpix.png]]Jean-Jacques Rousseau[[File:Radlib.png]]

 * 1762 - The Social Contract

[[File:GeoSynd.png]]William Schmack

 * 2014 - Geo-syndicalism

[[File:Demcon.png]]Abdullah Öcalan

 * 2011 - Democratic Confederalism

[[File:Chom.png]]Noam Chomsky[[File:AnSynd.png]]

 * 2005 - On Anarchism

[[File:ExistFem.png]]Simone De Beauvoir

 * 1949 - The Second Sex

[[File:Georgist.png]]Henry George

 * 1879 - Progress And Poverty

[[File:Ego.png]]Max Stirner

 * 1844 - The Ego And Its Own

[[File:Mutalist.png]]Pierre-Joseph Proudhon

 * 1840 - What Is Property?

[[File:Goldman.png]]Emma Goldman[[File:Egocom.png]]

 * 1910 - Anarchism And Other Essays

[[File:Chom.png]]Noam Chomsky[[File:AnSynd.png]]

 * 1990 - Profit Over People

[[File:Mill.png]]John Stuart Mill[[File:Liberalsoc.png]]

 * 1859 - On Liberty

[[File:Poststruct.png]]Michel Foucault[[File:Postmodernicon.png]]

 * 1975 - Discipline And Punish

[[File:Žižekism.png]]Slavoj Žižek

 * 1989 - The Sublime Object Of Ideology