Neo-Touseyism

I'll type something here soon.

= Overview =

1: The Basics
Fragmentation can be seen as less of a system and more of a none system, the meta anarchist and fragmented society has no one universal system, no one set of laws, no single leader. This society is one of which organization, if any at all is done out of direct consent and interest of all parties involved, different people able to create societies based on different principles reflective of their own ideals. There is no one ever present organization as organization itself is constantly destroyed and recreated to represent the new values and ideals of those within.

Let me just paint a picture of what this society would look like. I imagine most people will live in a communist or communalist lifestyle, the adventurous might live a post-civ or tribal lifestyle. Those who believe in more progressive values might form a progressive anarchist commune, while those following more traditional or religious values might form a conservative anarchist community. Maybe a larger community of artisans might form a mutualist community, while farmers create an anarchist agrarian society. Different anarchist societies for different values and ways of life.

This was LordComposts argument against my ideas, "my ideal society is the already existing one", this isn't really intended to be a criticism of his assessment, i found it interesting so I wanted to touch on this because i thought it was a good criticism. Now i think it is a fair argument that we live in a panarchist world and meta-anarchy is a brother of panarchy however i find the distinctions between the two quite relevant, the meta anarchist, deluzigattarian society requires a representation of free flow of desire to function, in a world where we have border laws, property rights, and dictatorships it doesn't represent the free flow of desire. While our current nation states may represent the desire of the past, they now stand for nothing less than the property and authority of the present. Ultimately a panarchist system does not necessarily rely on anarchist principles of autonomy and self-governance, that is the clear difference. In the end the world we live in can be described as a panarchy, and meta anarchy is a panarchy, but not all panarchies can be called a meta anarchy. So yeah, i guess this could be best summurized as follows, meta anarchy is not a specific system or way of doing things, however it is the abotion of any system or way of doing things.

2: Statements on Econemy
= Influences =

= Recommendations =

Theory
 My favorite books/essays on theory (I might put a full list of all the thoery I've read on my user wiki)    = Test Results =
 * [[File:Nova.png]]Towards The Creative Nothing
 * [[File:Postsitu.png]]It's Crazy How Many Things Don't Exist
 * [[File:antwork.png]]The Abolition Of Work
 * [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]Deluze And Anarchism
 * [[File:Situ.png]]Society Of The Spectacle
 * [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]] Chaosophy

=Relations= Ideologies=

Liiteral Fascist
Self-Inserts=

[[file:Mega_Yes.png]] Based

 * Based Anti Economics, Absurdism, Situationist, and Deleuzoguattarianism.
 * Quite intellectual, post-structuralist, existentialist, insurrectionist, and anti-civ. I confess my knowledge of Lacan is limited but I probably should start reading more on him and freud.
 * Obviously philosophically intellectual, as for political views, anti work and horizontal association as well as open borders and small voluntary associations are agreeable with my beliefs.

[[file:Yes.png]] Good

 * [[File:Vita.png]] Vitarchism: Even further off compass libleft than me, Transhumanism is not one of my main focuses but good nonetheless.

[[file:Meh.png]] Neutral

 * [[File:OwfBall.png]] Owfism: Libretarian Market Socialist, not the best not the worst.
 * [[File:Glencoe.png]] Glencoe: You remind me a lot of but maybe slightly better.

[[file:No.png]] Bad

 * [[File:MLM.png]] NotLibra:Not the worst for an authleft. You want to relieve the workers of capitalism but replace it with another authoritarian force. At least relatively socially progressive.
 * Now I could give a long winded speech about how I dislike your regulatory capitalist liberal democracy, but instead I'm just gonna mention that barack obama is one of your influences and leave it at that.
 * [[File:Panth.png]] Pantheon: Constitutional Monarchist and distributionst, ugh! At least mildly socially progressive and equal.
 * Ronwelltarianism_icon.png Ronwelltarianism - Could have said U.S Repulblican Party.

[[file:Mega_No.png]] Fascist

 * [[File:pixil-frame-0(27).png]] New Model Of Cheesenism: Corporitist, reactionarry, fascist, bigot. Just leave this wiki.

=Comments:=

"I am quite possibly the worst polcomball artist ever."
 * [[File:Tomjaz.png]] Tomjazzy - You dare challenge me mortal?
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism- Lol
 * [[File:Panth.png]]Pantheonism - A M A T E U R S
 * [[File:Astro.png]] AstroTime - add me? here's the link to my ideology:


 * [[File:Panth.png]]Pantheonism - Add me Marxian.
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - Alright add me too
 * [[File:Panth.png]]Pantheonism - Ok.
 * - Could you add me please
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - alright add me to it now
 * - Add me? I'll do the same when I get around to it.
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - Sure
 * [[File:OwfBall.png]] Owfism - Add me?
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - Alright, add me too
 * [[File:OwfBall.png]] Owfism - I added you back, but I still dont see my ideology in your self-insert relations tab
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - I added you. Maybe refresh?
 * [[File:OwfBall.png]] Owfism - Its fine now.
 * [[File:pixil-frame-0(27).png]] New Model Of Cheesenism- add me
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - Sure thing fascist
 * - add me?
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - Sure could you add me too.
 * [[File:pixil-frame-0(27).png]] New Model Of Cheesenism - wait why i cant see me in your relation?
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - Sorry forgot to add you, will do so now.
 * Ronwelltarianism_icon.png Ronwelltarianism - Can you please add me?
 * Ronwelltarianism_icon.png Ronwelltarianism - Wait a minute, I don't see my ideology in there.
 * [[File:Touseyism.png]]Neo-Touseyism - Bro have a little patience I've been busy I'll do it tomorrow
 * Ronwelltarianism_icon.png Ronwelltarianism - Oh! Sorry, my bad!
 * - Add Please?
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - Sure thing, could you add me as well
 * [[File:Glencoe.png]] Glencoe- add me
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - Yeah, sorry it took a while
 * - It is in reverse, Meta-Anarchism rejects morality and doesn't describe any society to be achieved, because it would be a form of fascism not only to tell "build meta-anarchy", but even to say "meta-anarchy is better than other systems", just do whatever you want, meanwhile panarchy is sort of Kantian Kingdom of Ends.
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - Good point, however never did i argue we must all be forced to become meta-anarchists, never too did i say some form of society i want to achieve. In: A Broader View Of This Society, i am merely painting a picture from my limited prospective. But yet, i would argue if their is one fundamental of meta-anarchy that is universal it is "the free flow of desire", your statement that meta anarchy is simply do whatever you want is true but to me it is a fact that you cannot simply, "do whatever you want" in the world we currently live as all institutions such as an organized state, police, borders and miltiary limit this expression of desire. As such is stated that the world could be described more as a a panarchy, a jumble of different ideolegies each with imaginary border lines, while yes meta-anarchy is not "a system" but it is the absence of one, thus differintiating panarchy and our present world from meta-anarchy.
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - Also do you want to be added to reltions?
 * - I don't mind it