HelloThere314ism

HelloThere314ism also known as HelloThere314 Thought is a philosophy and political theory heavily influenced by Max Stirner and Albert Camus. Its main belief is the fundamental disunity of everything. It can be viewed as a philosophy concerning the synthesis of all disunities, from the Absurd, the Lack Of Coherent Frameworks, to the Lack Of Metanarratives, etc.

=Summery= Anarchism Egoism Socialism Anti-Economy Progressivism Philosophy
 * [[File:Anin.png]]Individualist Anarchism
 * [[File:Anpostleft.png]]Post-Left Anarchism
 * [[File:Post-an.png]]Post-Anarchism
 * [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]Meta-Anarchism
 * [[File:Ego.png]]Egoistic Anarchism
 * [[File:EgoUnion.png]]Union Of Egoists
 * [[File:Self.png]]Ownness
 * [[File:Egocom.png]]Egoistic Collectivity
 * [[File:Marx.png]]Marxism
 * [[File:Neomarx.png]]Neo-Marxism
 * [[File:PostMarxism.png]]Post-Marxism
 * [[File:Žižekism.png]]Žižekism
 * [[File:Acidcomf.png]]Fisherism
 * [[File:Situ.png]]Situationism
 * [[File:Postsitu.png]]Post-Situationism
 * [[File:EgoMarx.png]]Stirnerite Marxism
 * [[File:Fem.png]]Feminism
 * [[File:Postfem.png]]Postfeminism
 * [[File:Voidism_Small.png]]Metaphysical Incompleteness
 * [[File:Self.png]]Stirnerite Unique
 * [[File:Existentialism.png]]Existentialism
 * [[File:Absurd.png]]Absurdism
 * [[File:Sartre.png]]Sartrian Phenomenology
 * [[File:Existentialist_Anarchism.png]]Existentialist Anarchism
 * [[File:Postmodernicon.png]]Post-Modernism
 * [[File:Poststruct.png]]Post-Structuralism
 * [[File:Solipsism.png]]Schopenhauerian Solipsism

=Influences=

Theorists

 * [[File:Tao.png]]Lao Tzu (571BC)
 * [[File:Diogenes.png]]Diogenes (323BC)
 * [[File:Philan.png]]William Godwin (1756-1836)
 * [[File:Ricardosoc.png]]David Ricardo (1772-1823)
 * [[File:Fourier.png]]Charles Fourier (1772-1837)
 * [[File:DepressionMale.png]]Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
 * [[File:Ego.png]]Max Stirner (1806-1856)
 * [[File:Mutualist.png]]Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (1809-1865)
 * [[File:Karl_Marx.png]]Karl Marx (1818-1883)
 * [[File:Georgist.png]]Henry George (1839-1897)
 * [[File:Nietzsche-icon.png]]Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900)
 * [[File:Indlibsoc.png]]Oscar Wilde (1854-1900)
 * [[File:Egomut.png]]Benjamin R. Tucker (1854-1939)
 * [[File:Freud.png]]Sigmund Freud (1856-1939)
 * [[File:Awaj.png]]Voltairine De Cleyre (1866-1912)
 * [[File:Goldman.png]]Emma Goldman (1869-1940)
 * [[File:Heidegger.png]]Martin Heidegger (1889-1976)
 * [[File:Illeg.png]]Renzo Novatore (1890-1922)
 * [[File:Ego-Existential.png]]Herbert Read (1893-1968)
 * [[File:Socan2.png]]Aldous Huxley (1894-1963)
 * [[File:Lacan.png]]Jacques Lacan (1901-1981)
 * [[File:Sartre.png]]Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980)
 * [[File:ExistFem.png]]Simone De Beauvoir (1908-1986)
 * [[File:Camus.png]]Albert Camus (1913-1960)
 * [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]Gilles Deleuze (1925-1995)
 * [[File:Poststruct.png]]Michel Foucault (1926-1984)
 * [[File:PostMarxism.png]]Jean Baudrillard (1929-2007)
 * [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]Félix Guattari (1930-1992)
 * [[File:Debord.png]]Guy Debord (1931-1994)
 * [[File:Situ.png]]Raoul Vaneigem (1934-???)
 * [[File:Postsitu.png]]Jean-Pierre Voyer (1938-???)
 * [[File:Žižekism.png]]Slavoj Žižek (1949-???)
 * [[File:Anpostleft.png]]Bob Black (1951-???)
 * [[File:Post-an.png]]Todd May (1955-???)
 * [[File:Postfem.png]]Judith Butler (1956-???)
 * [[File:Acidcomf.png]]Mark Fisher (1968-2017)
 * [[File:Post-an.png]]Saul Newman (1972-???)
 * [[File:Egocom.png]]For Ourselves: Council for Generalized Self-Management (1974)
 * [[File:Gender_Accelerationism.png]]Vikky Storm (???-???)

Groups/Movements

 * [[File:YngHeg.png]]Young Hegelians (1835-1846)
 * [[File:Frankfurt.png]]Frankfurt School (1923-)
 * [[File:Situationalistinternationalism-icon.png]]Situationist International (1957-1972)
 * [[File:Antwork.png]]Youth International Party (1967)
 * [[File:Egocom.png]]For Ourselves: Council for Generalized Self-Management (1974)

=Beliefs=

[[File:ConNil.png]]The Fundamental Disunity Of Existence
The world is fundamentally in a state of disunity. Any meaning, metanarrative, ideology, etc is a mere distraction to fill the human urge for unity, to have a framework to understand reality, confronted by the pure disorder of existence. The subsequent sections will be devoted to the many disorders found in existence.

[[File:Voidism_Small.png]]The Circular Reasoning Of All Things
There is circular reasoning to all principles, all structures of truth or unity. Take science for example, science offers observations about the representation and seeks to understand it and dissect it in a pragmatic way. Scientists commonly make the claim that science offers explanations, yet sciences explanations is based on itself. If the explanations for observations are based on on past observations, that does not constitute an explanation unless the referenced observation has an explanation not based on another observation. In the case of science it does not. Sciences explanations to its observations are based only on observations. An infinite justification happens were no initial proof is found. This is the same for all things. Any principle of morality, for example, is self referential in its justification. Let's say I take it as a principle to never lie. Why do this? Well beside some arguments of practicality in social relations it can be chalked up to "because it's good". This is how it goes for all principles, all systems. All are based on circular reasoning and self-referentiality.

[[File:Sartre.png]]The Unique And Sartrian Phenomenology[[File:Self.png]]
There is no apt way to describe the self. All labels we place on ourselves is fundamentally a describing act, made to place any sort of unity over the fundamental state of disorder known as the self. The self is unique, the creative nothing. This applies to all other things as all descriptions of any object are merely labels placed on it, only to put any sort of unity to the world. These labels are in a symbiotic relationship with the unique, for the unique cannot be recognized without these labels and the labels cannot exist without a unique to describe. While the unique is fundamentally without nature it can certainly be observed. Unlike what Husserl says one is not always conscious of consciousness. As Sartre rightly points out you can easily be conscious, even when perceiving details pertaining to oneself. For example as one talks about themself are they conscious of oneself. Or as I write am I conscious of myself, my existence? No, I may reference myself and my ideas but I am not actively perceiving myself. Or just as one goes about everyday activities are they conscious of themself? They are clearly conscious of the exterior world yet not conscious of themself. One is conscious without the consciousness of consciousness. This leads to the ego being generated merely out of conscious of it. Its being is simply constituted by itself. When one is not conscious of it it simply does not exist, the one disappears and becomes one. On other matters of the self, the self is not unified, instead it has a mere pseudo-unity. It merely holds the appearance of unity. The ego is a bundle of abstractions made by the interior desires and inherited human nature and the molding of the exterior world. Thus the ego itself is just a line created just to be able to function that separates the interior and exterior. When one references themself they are referencing the interior and exterior influences that constitute the ego. They are not unified but held together to function. They are only held together, only unified by consciousness of the self. This disorder of even the consciousness of this unique shows the pure disorder of the self.

[[File:Lacan.png]]Lacanian Lack
There is a fundamental lack to humans. This is not due to any nature of the unique but out of a perception of disunity and a desire for unity out of the mere comfort of unity. This lack is found in everyday life, simply out of things like the pursuit of food, all the way to grand perceptions of meaning and ideology. While the larger facets of lack shall be analyzed in the subsequent sections the facets of lack that are far more simple, mostly everyday desires will be discussed here. Desire in all forms leaves one unsatisfied due to this lack. One can never be satisfied by desire for one must always desire, one is slave to desire. This lack of satisfaction from desire comes from this lack. One puts all of these things in this hole, may it be ideology, meaning, desires, but it always ends up short, never able to sway this insatiable hunger.

[[File:Absurd.png]]The Absurd
We, from Lacanian Lack, have a desire for meaning, some framework to understand are lives, yet the world offers none. The world is so without reason, so disunited, it creates a conflict between our desire for meaning and the lack of meaning in the world. While their prefered reaction to the absurd will be discussed in a further section, they view most of the perils of the world as a reaction to this absurdity. Again, further analysis of this will be in further sections. This absurdity constitutes literally everything in life, it is the fundamental disunity of human existence.

[[File:Postsitu.png]]Spectacle
Spectacle is the depersonalization and commodification of social life. This spectacle is inherently alienating and creates great pain. It is the extension of Marxist alienation to the entirety of society. They think that the Situationist International did a good job analysing spectacle, but they failed to consider if this Capitalist spectacle is just a facet of a generalized problem of society. "There is no society of the Spectacle, but rather a spectacle of society" - Jean-Pierre Voyer. Society is one of alienation from each other. We feel an inherent otherness that causes lack of communication. We are all oppressed by society, we are enslaved to it in all ways. One would think that we actively participate in society but we only view it. The spectacle is the way we distract ourselves from this alienation caused by all society. The spectacle in the modern sense, with its focus on looks instead of utility and blatant consumerist awfulness is only a form of the spectacle for our modern Capitalist world. It has existed in many forms throughout history, with the general theme being "bread and circuses." This spectacle is the fundamental disunity of anything social, any relation between the one and society. Its alienating forces constitute all of social relations.

[[File:Postciv.png]]Post-Civilization
Civilization is authoritarian, alienating, and as said before is the basis of spectacle. Its collective culture creates a harmful atmosphere for anyone to live in, with its customs, expectations, etc. It also is quintessentially alienating, as it maintains a sense of otherness in social life, giving a constructed stage for every social action. This alienation creates the conditions for spectacle to emerge. Thus civilization should be abandoned, with free social relations pursued instead.

[[File:AntiEconomy.png]]Anti-Economy
The economy is a pure idea. Economics is the ideology of the idea. Economics is the dominant theory of the world in a Marxist sense. Other social sciences are viewed as the conflict between diffrent theories while economics is viewed as a material science, getting progressively closer to truth. Just as sociology comprises theories about social activity, economics comprises theories about economic activity. Just like material sciences, and other social sciences, economics should never be put on a pedestal or it becomes a devolved religion. The economy is just like class or society, an economy is just a grouping of economic activity. Thus a theory grouping these into a science is an attack on ownness similar to Marxist class reductionism. What does this imply towards economic activity? Economic activity should thus be spontaneous, with those participating in economic action seeking it out of mutual self benefit, forming a instantanius Union Of Egoist. This could take the form of Gift Economic Activity, Mutualist Economic Activity, or bartering. They personally prefer Mutualist Economic Activity however reject any economic ideology ever taking hold, holding that it should always be spontaneous. This economy constitutes a pseudo-unity to material conditions and is the main disunity of such.

[[File:Žižekism.png]]Zizekian Critique Of Ideology
Just as there is a lack with meaning and the like, frameworks of understanding the political landscape are just as such. The landscape of everything political contains just as much disunity as everything else, one can only conceive of the utter depravity for so long, and thus ideologies form to make sense of it all. These ideologies must contain contradictions as any principle in politics is utterly disproved by the total disunity. Take Trump's Followers who claim that Mexicans are simultaneously will take their jobs and are too lazy to get a job. This contradiction is quite clear, however it still finds itself in all ideologies. Ideology is a distraction from the total disunity of anything political, putting goals and principles in to the lack to try desperately to secure a framework.

[[File:Poststruct.png]]Poststructuralism
They, following from their thesis of the total disunity of everything, suggest that structures, and groupings are illegitimate. They are fervently opposed to the modern custom of the endless classification of everything, seeing this as illegitimate. That being said they still find endeavors into science very useful, however oppose it being placed on a pedestal.

[[File:Postmodernicon.png]]Postmodernism
Any metanarrative or consistent set of societal principles and ideas are mere illusions. History is random and messy, it may have a logic in the Hegelian sense however this does not imply a set metanarrative that society will follow.

[[File:Postfem.png]]Postfeminism And Gender Abolitionism
Gender is not an inherent part of oneself. It is a mere collection of traits both physical and psychological that are socially constructed. There has been many diffrent gender systems throughout history. All of them are preformed, all just people fulfilling their assigned role in the sexual division of labor. Gender thus has no basis and should never be forced upon anyone. This leads us to the conclusion of gender abolitionism, as the grouping of traits called gender only leads to limiting identity, instead traits should exist without labeling besides being part of the person that exudes those traits. Identity politics in general falls into this trap.

[[File:Solipsism.png]]Schopenhauerian Representation
"Reality", as we call it, is only what we see. Who is to say that there is anything real about our perceptions. Why then do we observe and where do these observations come from? These observations are are own representation of reality, the mind and ego's feeble attempt to place order to the unorderly. This representation shows that even observations are in a state of disunity.

[[File:Poststruct.png]]The Incompleteness Of Objects
What defines an object? There is no essense of an object, we place that essense on it ourselves. Well objects are made with other objects. The computer from which I write this is comprised of many diffrent types of circuits. These circuits are considered just as much an object as the computer they comprise. This is commonly accepted in everyday life, these are just parts of a wider hole. What then of something like a bikini which comprises other objects, the top and bottom yet they are not physically touching. This can also easily be accepted. What then of the catree, a new object I just thought up comprising a cat and a tree. Most would dismiss this as nonsense however it is the same as the bikini. Is there anything fundamentally diffrent about the bikini? Nothing but the fact that humans gave the bikini objecthood by recognition. Nothing is an object till we recognize it as such. Just, as will be seen later, they view humanity's imbued purposes as useful to the context of everyday life, however they offer nothing when it comes to trying to analyze reality. This means that the whole concept of objects are abstractions created by humanity. What does this imply? As discussed in the previous section there is an alienating separation between one and all. This one also can be observed but is simply an illusion. What can be concluded from this is a state of chaotic uniqueness, of complete difference. Objects are illusions.

[[File:PostMarxism.png]]Marxism And The Problem Of Class Reductionism[[File:Ego.png]]
Marx and those who succeeded him had the idea of class struggle. This analysis of class struggle and the following theory of dialectical materialism has had impact on much of history. Class, as Marx describes it is the relation to the means of production. In Capitalism there are two main classes in the relations of production - the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. Marx argues that these classes define oppression, the main oppression being economic oppression. It is important to note that Marx does not view economic oppression as the most important form of oppression, just the basis of oppression. From this Marx argues that class should be rejected, giving way to communism. This argument, while certainly having many good points is quite essentialist. The first problem is class reductionism. Marx makes it quite clear, unlike others claims, that there is great difference inside classes. This is not the problem, merely that the grouping itself is essentialist. If some grouping, some identity, in this case class, defines history then this is quite dogmatic. Dialectical materialism is the main problem of Marxism. Its collectivism is also a central problem. Marx argues that communism will lead to the true freedom of the individual; this is a fine view which they hold much respect for; however, the collectivist view of history and political struggle is extremely problematic. Along with this, the principle "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" is very bad. It shows contradiction to his proclamation of individualist communism. The main basis of Marxism is the economy. The problems of economy can be seen in a previous section. This focus of the economy and economic activity found in Marxism is its own undoing. Marx is a hugely influential philosophy with many of its principles aligning with their own, yet it is fundamentally essentialist and dogmatic as well as being alienating to the individual in its political struggle.

[[File:Egophil.png]]Egoism
While the facets of their egoism, which is strongly influenced by Stirner, will be explored in the subsequent sections, first we must differentiate them from psychological and moral egoists. Moral egoism assumes that one should act egoistically, yet this damages the individual by assuming something one should do. Psychological egoism assumes that humans inherently act egoistically wich assumes an essence. As established previously they label no essense on anything, seeing everything as unique. Thus their egoism is a distinct form of egoism.

[[File:Self.png]]Ownness
Ownness is the assertion of oneself. It is to place yourself under no authority, to become fully ones own, fully unique. It is important to note that this ownness is not synonymous with freedom. Freedom is permission from outside authority, in the case of negative freedom, and protection from outside forces, in the case of positive freedom. Ownness is permission from oneself, protection by oneself and their property. It can be viewed as freedom fully from the self, especially when viewing it from an Existentialist lense.

[[File:EgoUnion.png]]Unions Of Egoists
Many things cannot be done alone, or would be more enjoyable if done together. If this case arises then a Union Of Egoists would form. This union is literally any union in which is completely voluntary, doesn't sacrifice individuality, and holds individual interests above collective interests. This would be how one organizes in an Egoist world. It is important to note that this can exist at all times, even with the existence of authority and outside pressure. Kids playing is a Union Of Egoists for example.

[[File:EgoNihil.png]]The Relentless Critique Of Everything
Look they are a contrarian, however they have ideological justification for such. Placing anything outside of the individual above the individual is a sacred cause, plain and simple. Even the individuals cause is heavily influenced by interior averitions and desires. These are just as authoritarian as the exterior causes. Thus literally every cause is harmful. With this they critique all causes, holding that earthly desires, and exterior causes are authoritative and harmful. Social structures hold the same warrant, same with interior structures and so called "human nature". Thus they critique everything, all causes, all structures.

[[File:Egocom.png]]Egoistic Collectivity
Humans are social animals, whether we like it or not. Thus a collective is always necessary. The collective if we look hard enough is only individuals; the individual if we look hard enough is only the collective. While unlike the individual comprising society the collective is what defines the individual. How could one define oneself without comparing oneself to others? The individual cannot exist without the collective and the collective cannot exist without the individual. Narrow egoist is when one focuses only on the individual and narrow socialism is when one focuses only on the collective. One does not have to make compromises between the individualism and collectivism rather a synthesis can be made. Just as Stirner labels property as an extension of the ego, relationships between egos are just as much extensions. The Union of Egoists aligns itself through all's self interest. The otherness between the ego's in a union is narrow. To treat all in the union as property makes them just as much one's ego. It extends the ego and creates an egoistic collective. A superego can be formed that extends the ego of all. Thus a selfish community can be found. The group which they find this concept, For Ourselves! labels Stirner as a narrow egoism but this is more nuanced. Stirner may focus his ideology on merely one side of this coin but the method he proposes, the Union Of Egoists, is the perfect basis for this society. An expansion of ego, of the unique will only result in the full fulfillment of the individual. Social creatures we are, and thus societies will form. Narrow egoism is more represented by Randian Thought. The narrow socialist are like Marx focusing only on the collective. Both approaches are alienating and misguided. A synthesis of the collective and the individual must happen. A firm critique of collectivity from Individualists and Egoists is that collectivity puts some cause of the community above the individual, thus creating a sacred cause and authority. This in many cases can be true and it is a legitimate concern in many collective environments. A sustained collective environment can easily devolve into something no sustaining the owness of people. This means that this collective must be greedy, must be a Union Of Egoist. Collectives if spontaneous and with common interests can separate the inherent alienation of humanity and allow for social individuality. If one always holds themself to be greedy collectivity can function with ownness.

[[File:Absurd.png]]The Dialectic Of One And All[[File:Ego.png]]
In this world there is all and there is one. Both constitute each other; what is all but a collective of one and what is one but its definition from the all. Both cannot exist without the other, if all is without one the contents of all can never be and if one is without all, one becomes all. All and one is forever at conflict, one desires meaning while all offers none, one is forever free while all forever restricts. The conflict defines everything. Out of this conflict we find the Absurd, which as has been already established constitutes much of life. There is more to be found in this conflict then the Absurd, all conflict in the world is essentially an extension of the conflict between all and one. Take the conflict of freedom. The one is free in its decisions yet the all is forever conflicting. The power exerted by the all is so far reaching it constitutes everything. Culture is an extension of the all, the state is, everything external of the individual is the all. This all constitutes all power structures. Thus the free individual, the active egoist is diametrically opposed to the all. The one, as they are fundamentally just an expression of the all, has a desire to become all. The separation of all and one is the ego. The ego separates the one from the all. The ego allows for freedom, allows for separation. The one is social and desires an ego death. The expansion of the ego makes the all one and the one all.

[[File:Awaj.png]]Anarchism
Anarchism is simply the rejection of state power. They are an Anarchist because they wish to not be ruled by anyone. The details of their Anarchism can be seen below.

[[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]Meta-Anarchism
Any framework for how any society works is incomplete. Different ways of social organization shall satisfy diffrent people, thus all frameworks should be available. This also follows from Egoism as they would like to have all politics available to them. This complete openness forms the basis of scizopolitics, a politics of chaos and complete openness. A web of ideas form the basis of ideology and frameworks in Meta-Anarchism forming the basis of an infinite amount of ideas to be applied. The only anarchy is the one that can not be defined, the simultaneous use of diffrent ideas and frameworks provide the ultimate logical conclusion of Egoism and Poststructuralism.

[[File:Anpostleft.png]]Post-Left Anarchism
Leftism and its collectivism has left a stain on anarchism. Leftism and its politics are no longer relevant. Unions have been pacified, the remnants of leninism are just cringe tankies, capitalist realism has taken over. While their are leftist solutions they take at heart, leftism is dead. The radical youth are all just social democrats. Along with this leftism has an essentialist past and present. Placing the collective and so called equality (I know Marx didn't like egalitarianism). This is fundamentally incompatible with anarchy. Leftism found within Anarchism should be rejected.

[[File:Ismism_Icon.png]]Other Opinions
These are just opinions that don't fit with the other sections.

[[File:AcidCom.png]]Doorways Of Perception
=Relations= I will be redoing this section, if I forget to re-add you please comment.
 * -| Ideologies/Philosophies=

[[File:Mega_Yes.png]]Based

 * [[File:Absurd.png]]Absurdism - Your theories of the conflict in the need for meaning and the lack of meaning present is extremely based. You're a core tenet of my philosophy.
 * [[File:Existentialist_Anarchism.png]]Existentialist Anarchism - While I don't agree with the existentialist theory of meaning, its theory of choice is amazing; this combined with anarchism makes a very based ideology.
 * [[File:Situ.png]]Situationism - Based analysis of the spectacle, and many of your subsequent theorists are very based. Can be too marxist though.
 * [[File:Ego.png]]Egoism - BASED!!! Ownness is the main principle of my individual philosophy.
 * [[File:Egocom.png]]Ego-Communism - While I don't agree with communism your theories of egoistic sociability only improves Stirner's conception of egoism.
 * [[File:Poststruct.png]]Post-Structuralism - Structure is a cancer! You greatly influenced me.
 * [[File:Postmodernicon.png]]Post-Modernism - I agree on the lack of metanarratives. History is pure chaos.
 * [[File:Post-an.png]]Post-Anarchism - The structural cancer found within classical anarchism has been extremely detrimental. Your ideas of freedom seem to be a restating of stirnerite ownness and sartrian radical freedom, based!
 * [[File:PostMarxism.png]]Post-Marxism - Marx has some good ideas but we must remove its dogma.
 * [[File:Žižekism.png]]Žižekianism - Your theory of ideology works quite well with my theory of fundamental disunity.
 * [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]Meta-Anarchism - Schizo-Politics are based! Having any one framework just limits possibilities.

[[File:Yes.png]]Good

 * [[File:Soul.png]]Soulism - Your conception of oneness contradicts ownness. Other then that, you're pretty based.
 * [[File:Acidcomf.png]]Acid Communism - Different goals but based way to achieve them. Capitalist realism is an amazing theory.

[[File:Mega_No.png]]Cringe

 * -| Self-Inserts=

[[File:Mega_Yes.png]]Based

 * [[File:Councilguy2.png]]Post-Councilism - Far to pessimistic, but other then that based.
 * [[File:Ultro.png]]Ultroneism - Got me to a consistent view of egoism, and we agree a lot on metaphysics, based!
 * [[File:AshleyHere.png]]AshleyHere Thought - Very similar to me, don't know why you left egoism though.
 * [[File:PostChronic.png]]Post-ChronicFemcelism - Based post-anarchist and post-marxist, and from your icon you seem to be a situationist, based!

[[File:Yes.png]]Good

 * [[File:NeoAlphadonialism.png]]Neo Alphadonialism - Kinda inconsistent but your good, also a nice person.
 * [[File:Liblovsprite.png]]Liberty-Loverism - I agree on a lot of stuff, but your quite dogmatic and likes private property.
 * [[File:TipuiSmall2.png]]Tipism - From your influences you look based. Your page is very bare though.
 * [[File:Anbun.png]]Anarcho-Buniism - I like your meta-ethics though I don't like syndicalism even in praxis and futurism is very dogmatic.

[[File:Kinda_Yes.png]]Fine

 * [[File:Anarcho-Immortalism.png]]Anti-Deathism - Alright anarcho-communism but bad views on death.
 * [[File:NguyenreichismIcon.png]]Bruhman Thought - Best orthodox marxist I've ever seen.

[[File:Kinda_No.png]]Meh

 * [[File:Duckism-icon.png]]Duckism - Based machiavellianism and anarchism, but capitalism is a cancer and you misunderstand a lot.

[[File:No.png]]Bad

 * [[File:Atacc_icon.png]]Ataccism - I like anti-humanism but everything else is a cancer.

[[File:Mega_No.png]]Cringe

 * -| Figures=

[[File:Mega_Yes.png]]Based

 * [[File:Ego.png]]Max Stirner - Unequivocally based. Your ideas of egoism and ownness have been a big influence.
 * [[File:Egocom.png]]For Ourselves! - While not being a communist myself, social egoism is a great concept, along with the narrow socialism and egoism dynamics.
 * [[File:Egocom.png]]Emma Goldman - Your ideas have great influence on me. Your individualist communism is really good.
 * [[File:Egomut.png]]Benjamin Tucker - While I haven't read much of you, your ideas on egoism and mutualism are cool, even if I reject economics.
 * [[File:Situ.png]]Raoul Vaneigem - Your situationism and analysis of the spectacle is far better then Debord's. Best member of the Situationist International by far.
 * [[File:Postsitu.png]]Jean-Pierre Voyer - Your anti-economics is based as well as your analysis of Marx and the Situationism International.
 * [[File:Postfem.png]]Judith Butler - Gender is indeed preformative. Finally a feminist without all the identity politics.
 * [[File:Post-an.png]]Saul Newman - Postanarchism is very based. The morality and essentialism found in anarchism has harmed it substantially. I need to read more of you.

[[File:Yes.png]]Good

 * [[File:Camus.png]]Albert Camus - Your absurdism is extremely based, way to humanistic though.
 * [[File:Sartre.png]]Jean-Paul Sartre - Great philosophy of existentialism. Became way to marxist and was quite hypocritical. Need to read more from your marxist period and you in general.
 * [[File:ExistFem.png]]Simone De Beuvoir - Your ideas of othering is amazing, and while I don't agree with your existentialist ethics, it's still pretty based.
 * [[File:Anpostleft.png]]Bob Black - Great critiques of classical anarchism, kind of a prick though.
 * [[File:Post-an.png]]Todd May - Based postanarchism, though I don't like your views on death.
 * [[File:Debord.png]]Guy Debord - The one who got me into situationism, but your analysis of the spectacle is the most lacking, plus your marxism led you astray.
 * [[File:Socan2.png]]David Graeber - Based anti-economics and your analysis of bullshit jobs is amazing. Don't align on social anarchism though.

[[File:Kinda_Yes.png]]Fine

 * [[File:Ancom.png]]Peter Kropotkin - Anarcho-Communism is alright, your quite outdated though.
 * [[File:BakuninHeg.png]]Mikhail Bakunin - Based critique of Marx, but I don't like collectivism or your currency.

[[File:Kinda_No.png]]Meh

 * [[File:Marx.png]]Karl Marx - Has some very based opinions, but quite dogmatic and essentialist. Also kinda a prick. Glad you got more libertarian as you got older.
 * [[File:Marx.png]]Friedrich Engels - Same with Marx, but On Authority is a cancer.
 * [[File:Chomsky.png]]Noam Chomsky - Thanks for getting me into anarchism, but your really dogmatic and structuralist.
 * [[File:Mutualist.png]]Pierre-Joseph Proudhon - I like mutualism, but you're really racist and sexist, an Stirner destroyed you.
 * [[File:Georgist.png]]Henry George - Land is indeed the biggest factor in production and you're slightly libertarian, but everything else ranges from meh to awful.
 * [[File:Heidegger.png]]Martin Heidegger - Your critique of the enlightenment view of being is based. I don't agree with your conservatism and have some problems with your framework of dasein. Your philosophy is quite good, but we don't talk about THAT period.

[[File:No.png]]Bad

 * [[File:Rawls.png]]John Rawls - Your theory of justice is insanely essentialist. Better than a regular liberal though.

[[File:Mega_No.png]]Cringe
=Theory=

[[File:Situ.png]]Raoul Vaneigem[[File:Ego.png]]

 * [[File:Situ.png]]The Revolution Of Everyday Life

[[File:Socan2.png]]Aldous Huxley[[File:Post-an.png]]

 * [[File:Socan2.png]]Island

Theory I Plan To Read

 * [[File:Žižekism.png]]The Sublime Object Of Ideology
 * [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]Capitalism And Schizophrenia
 * [[File:ExistMarx.png]]Search For A Method
 * [[File:ExistFem.png]]The Second Sex
 * [[File:Heidegger.png]]Being And Time
 * [[File:Nietzsche-icon.png]]Beyond Good And Evil
 * [[File:Nietzsche-icon.png]]The Gay Science
 * [[File:Existentialism.png]]Being And Nothingness
 * [[File:DepressionMale.png]]The World As Will And Representation
 * [[File:AcidCom.png]]Capitalist Realism
 * [[File:Postmodernicon.png]]Discipline And Punish
 * [[File:Mutualist.png]]What Is Property?
 * [[File:Georgist.png]]Progress And Poverty
 * [[File:Marx.png]]Das Kapital
 * [[File:Chomsky.png]]Profit Over People
 * [[File:Postmodernicon.png]]Simulacra and Simulation
 * [[File:Drug-Addict.png]]The Doors Of Perception
 * [[File:Aristotle.png]]Nicomachean Ethics
 * [[File:Utilit.png]]Utilitarianism
 * [[File:Civilib.png]]On Liberty
 * [[File:libms.png]]The British Cooperative Movement In A Socialist Society
 * Many More

[[File:Camus.png]]Albert Camus[[File:Absurd.png]]

 * [[File:Absurd.png]]The Myth of Sisyphus: And Other Essays
 * [[File:Existentialist_Anarchism.png]]The Rebel
 * [[File:Humanismpix.png]]Resistance, Rebellion, And Death

[[File:Lib.png]]Thomas Nagel[[File:Absurd.png]]

 * [[File:Absurd.png]]The Absurd

[[File:Sartre.png]]John Paul Sartre

 * [[File:Existentialism.png]]Existentialism Is A Humanism
 * [[File:Existentialism.png]]The Transcendence Of The Ego: An Existentialist Theory Of Consciousness

[[File:ExistFem.png]]Simone De Beauvoir

 * [[File:Existentialism.png]]The Ethics Of Ambiguity

[[File:Nietzsche-icon.png]]Friedrich Nietzsche

 * [[File:Nietzsche-icon.png]]Thus Spoke Zarathustra

[[File:Socan2.png]]David Graeber[[File:Globnat.png]]

 * [[File:AntiEconomy.png]]Against Economics

[[File:Debord.png]]Guy Debord[[File:Councom.png]]

 * [[File:Situ.png]]Society Of The Spectacle

[[File:Postsitu.png]]Jean-Pierre Voyer[[File:AntiEconomy.png]]

 * [[File:AntiEconomy.png]]The Economy is Only an Ideology in Marx’s Sense

[[File:Indlibsoc.png]]Oscar Wilde[[File:Anqueer.png]]

 * [[File:Indlibsoc.png]]The Soul Of Man Under Socialism

[[File:Ego.png]]Max Stirner

 * [[File:Ego.png]]The Ego And Its Own

[[File:Ego-Existential.png]]Herbert Read

 * [[File:Ego-Existential.png]]Existentialism, Marxism and Anarchism

[[File:Post-an.png]]Saul Newman

 * [[File:Post-an.png]]The Politics of Postanarchism

[[File:Egocom.png]]Emma Goldman[[File:Anfem.png]]

 * [[File:Egocom.png]]Anarchism And Other Essays

[[File:Egocom.png]]Matty Thomas

 * [[File:Egocom.png]]The Relevance Of Max Stirner To Anarcho-Communists

[[File:Egocom.png]]For Ourselves![[File:Postsitu.png]]

 * [[File:Egocom.png]]The Right To Be Greedy

[[File:Egomut.png]]Benjamin R. Tucker[[File:Anin.png]]

 * [[File:Ricardosoc.png]]Henry George And Interest

[[File:Anpostleft.png]]Bob Black[[File:Antwork.png]]

 * [[File:Antwork.png]]The Abolition Of Work
 * [[File:Postsitu.png]]Imputationism
 * [[File:Postfem.png]]My Preferred Gender Pronoun Is Negation

[[File:Postciv.png]]Strangers In a Tangled Wilderness

 * [[File:Postciv.png]]Post-Civ! A Brief Philosophical and Political Introduction to the Concept of Post-civilization
 * [[File:Postciv.png]]Post-Civ! A Deeper Exploration

[[File:Cball-British_India.png]]George Orwell

 * [[File:Cball-British_India.png]]1984
 * [[File:Cball-British_India.png]]Animal Farm

[[File:Socan2.png]]Aldous Huxley[[File:Post-an.png]]

 * [[File:Ford.png]]Brave New World

[[File:Republicanismpix.png]]Jean-Jacques Rousseau[[File:Radlib.png]]

 * [[File:Republicanismpix.png]]The Social Contract

[[File:GeoSynd.png]]William Schmack

 * [[File:GeoSynd.png]]Geo-syndicalism

[[File:Bckchn.png]]Murray Bookchin

 * [[File:Bckchn.png]]Post-Scarcity Anarchism
 * [[File:Postsitu.png]]From Spectacle To Empowerment

[[File:Demcon.png]]Abdullah Öcalan

 * [[File:Demcon.png]]Democratic Confederalism

[[File:Ectrans.png]]J.D. Moyer

 * [[File:Ectrans.png]]A Solarpunk Manifesto

[[File:Chom.png]]Noam Chomsky[[File:AnSynd.png]]

 * [[File:AnSynd.png]]On Anarchism

[[File:Einstein.png]]Albert Einstein[[File:Soc-h.png]]

 * [[File:Soc-h.png]]Why Socialism?

[[File:Karl_Marx.png]]Karl Marx And Friedrich Engels[[File:Marx.png]]

 * [[File:Marx.png]]The Communist Manifesto

[[File:Gender_Accelerationism.png]]Vikky Storm and Eme Flores[[File:Xenofeminism.png]]

 * [[File:Gender_Accelerationism.png]]Gender Accelerationist Manifesto
 * [[File:Awaj.png]]It’s Time For “Mad Anarchism”

[[File:Anqueer.png]]Alyson Escalante[[File:Postfem.png]]

 * [[File:GenderNihil.png]]Gender Nihilism: An Anti-Manifesto

[[File:Steinval.png]]Peter Vallentyne

 * [[File:Steinval.png]]Left-Libertarianism: A Primer
 * [[File:Steinval.png]]Left-Libertarianism as a Promising Form of Liberal Egalitarianism

=Recommendations=

[[File:Monkeyzz-Enlightenment.png]]Philosophy

 * [[File:Camus.png]]Albert Camus - The Myth Of Sisyphus
 * [[File:Sartre.png]]John Paul Sartre - Existentialism Is A Humanism
 * [[File:ExistFem.png]]Simone De Beauvoir - The Ethics Of Ambiguity

[[File:Awaj.png]]Anarchism

 * [[File:AnSynd.png]]Noam Chomsky - On Anarchism
 * [[File:Egocom.png]]Emma Goldman - Anarchism And Other Essays

[[File:Ego.png]]Egoism

 * [[File:Ego.png]]Max Stirner - The Ego And Its Own
 * [[File:Egocom.png]]For Ourselves! - The Right To Be Greedy

[[File:Soc-h.png]]Socialism

 * [[File:Indlibsoc.png]]Oscar Wilde - The Soul Of Man Under Socialism
 * [[File:Einstein.png]]Albert Einstein - Why Socialism?

[[File:Anqueer.png]]Gender/Queer[[File:Anfem.png]]

 * [[File:Gender_Accelerationism.png]]Vikky Storm and Eme Flores - Gender Accelerationist Manifesto
 * [[File:GenderNihil.png]]Alyson Escalante - Gender Nihilism: An Anti-Manifesto

[[File:Situ.png]]Situationism And Subsequent Writings[[File:Postsitu.png]]

 * [[File:Debord.png]]Guy Debord - Society Of The Spectacle
 * [[File:Situ.png]]Raoul Vaneigem - The Revolution Of Everyday Life
 * [[File:Postsitu.png]]Jean-Pierre Voyer - The Economy Is Only An Ideology In Marx's Sense

Youtube Channels

 * [[File:Neomarx.png]]Tom Nicholas
 * [[File:Absurd.png]]Sisyphus 55
 * [[File:Mutualist.png]]Then & Now
 * [[File:GeoSoc.png]]Unlearning Economics
 * [[File:BrtiMonkey.png]]BritMonkey
 * [[File:Awaj.png]]Great Anarchists
 * [[File:Libsoc.png]]YourBoiMason
 * [[File:Existentialism.png]]Eternalised
 * [[File:Ego.png]]Kane B
 * [[File:Ancom.png]]Radical Reviewer
 * [[File:PostMarxism.png]]Jonas Čeika - CCK Philosophy
 * [[File:Anqueer.png]]Zoe Baker
 * [[File:Egocom.png]]Radical EgoCom

[[File:Ego.png]]Max Stirner

 * [[File:Ego-nihil.png]]"All things are nothing to me."
 * [[File:Ego.png]]"I love men too - not merely individuals, but every one. But I love them with the consciousness of egoism; I love them because love makes me happy, I love them because loving is natural to me, because it pleases me. I know no commandment of love."
 * [[File:Illeg.png]]"The state calls its own violence law, but that of the individual, crime."
 * [[File:Egocom.png]]"I am not at all against socialism, but against consecrated socialism... not against socialists, but against sacred socialism."

[[File:Camus.png]]Albert Camus

 * [[File:Existentialist_Anarchism.png]]"The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion."
 * [[File:Absurd.png]]"You will never be happy if you continue to search for what happiness consists of. You will never live if you are looking for the meaning of life."

[[File:Debord.png]]Guy Debord

 * [[File:Situ.png]]"In our society now, we prefer to see ourselves living than living."

[[File:Anpostleft.png]]Bob Black

 * [[File:Antwork.png]]"Work is the source of nearly all the misery in the world."
 * [[File:Antwork.png]]"Play is always voluntary. What might otherwise be play is work if it's forced"

Comments
HelloThere314 - Comment if you want to discuss or if you want to be added. I will be deleting old comments.


 * - Add catism and variants
 * My new self insert is South Floridan Socialism- tony
 * - wanna add me?
 * - Wanna add me?
 * - If you want to read only part about what Benjamin Tucker thinks on egoism, read Individual Liberty, chapter: Economics, II. Land And Rent, part: Liberty, Land, and Labor. Everything else is just mutualism with modern understanding of value.
 * - Individual Liberty contains a singular reference to Stirner's work. Otherwise the 'Egoist' of 'Liberty, Land, and Labor' is another author in relation to Henry George. Most Probably James L. Walker, as tucker says "Egoist’s acquaintance with Liberty is of comparatively recent date", seeing as Stirner was dead 30 years prior. As well as how whenever he talks about Egoist it has nothing to do with Stirner. If one were to read Tucker's Stirnite or Ego-Mutualism, might I suggest "Instead of a Book, by a Man Too Busy to Write One" or selections from Liberty.