FreeMarketNRx

This is FreeMarketNRx's personal ideological positions. I won't be summarizing here. Read below.

What would the State look like?
The basic idea of the state I would want to achieve is that the current democratic form of government that Western countries have adopted should be replaced by small sovereign and independent countries, each governed by a private corporation without the regard of the tenants' opinions. Each corporation has their own real estate, or patch, they have.

The Purpose of The State
A group of shareholders can vote on selecting a chief executive, to whom all the employees report to, and whose decisions are final. The corporation may also be owned and controlled by its shareholders who interests are to maximize profits. A realm should do a specific action that is deemed profitable and nothing can constrain the realm to do that action. It should state that the private organization should be financially responsible to keep themselves afloat. By this, financial responsibility can lead to moral responsibility of the proprietor.

School of Economic Thought
The school of economics would be dominated by The Austrian School. Prices of goods and services are determined by the subjective nature of private individuals and corporate owners. Every land, body of water, and commodity is owned by the proprietor. Each good and service is bought and sold between the private proprietor and consumer; The goods and services are determined by the supply and demand within the free market.

Monetary Policy
I oppose a federal reserve bank and believe that currency should be decentralized, leaving it up for a market to decide the price of money. This means advocating for cryptocurrency and other forms of commodity money.

The Role of The Family
The traditional family (Whether hetero or non-heterosexual) is the unit of a civilized society. The family should promote values necessary for the preservation of a free society such as self-discipline, cooperation, respect for elders, and paternal love.

Anti-Egalitarianism
This user fundamentally rejects egalitarianism, finding it as morally reprehensible and destructive towards private property rights and social authority. Every business, family, and religious institution should require a hierarchy of command and have the right to expect obedience within their proper sphere of authority. Authority is and always be necessary in society.

Western Culture
The West has undoubtably shaped the current world. Western values such as individualism, free markets, private property rights, and rationalism has been a force to be reckon with in the past 200 years. Simply defending Western culture will make me seem racist and xenophobic according to the Left. I reject any form of identity politics, whether from the Left or Right, as it is a collectivist ideology to undermine the values of the West. Western values, namely economic freedom, private property rights, and the family, are worthy of preserving and defense.

Foreign Policy
Security is rested upon the proprietor, resulting in a market for police. Private security firms, military contractors, and insurance companies will prop up as people has the necessity for want their property secured from threats and violence among others, internally or externally. This means, society wants to keep the people from foreigners and don't want any personhood or property to be harmed. A isolationist policy will be an ideal situation, an opposition to the involvement in the political affairs of other realms unless there's some form of violation private property rights that occured.

Immigration
Private Property rights are the main course of how the flow of immigration can work out. Private proprietors has the right to accept or exclude others from their own property in accordance to their open or closed property titles, otherwise known as covenant communities. Admission might be easy to some territories, while others nearly impossible. There will be as much inclusivity or exclusivity as individuals or property owners desire. For the goal of protecting their private property, no such thing as a right to free unlimited speech exist. For the purpose of preserving and protecting private property, there would be little or no tolerance to Left-Libertarians,  Social Anarchists, and  Democrats. Individuals must secure a path towards restoring the freedom of association and with the institution of private property rights, individuals may have the right to accept or deny any person.