Liberty-Loverism

Summary
Liberty-Loverism believes society should be organized in a manner in which everyone has as much personal freedom and control as possible. They believe the best way to do this is to this is to create a leaderless society. Along with this they also want to accelerate social and technological progress like falgsc.

[[file:Awaj.png]] Leaderlessness [[file:Directdem.png]]
LibLovism believes that society doesn't need leaders to function and therefore avocates for voluntarism, anarchy, or direct democracy. They believe that it is important that the people have genuine control over their lives and thus is against types of organizations that are run from top down as opposed to bottom up.

[[file:Prog-u.png]] Social Progressivism [[file:Prgess.png]]
LibLovism is quite progressive and believes every one should be treated equally and thus wants minority rights to improve. Unlike most progressives they disagree with the idea of idpol. They think identity should not matter, because of this they want all identities existing associations to be defanged to point where your identity barely affects peoples opinions of you if at all.

[[file:Transh.png]] Technological Progressivism [[file:Futvalue.png]]
LibLovism highly values technology and thinks its vital to accelerate technology to lead to humanity no longer being confined to the earth, and spread like across the stars. They believe that technology will improve the ability to govern, which is terrifying as it means governments will have more power, but also means that more decentralized systems will have far more ability to organize. They think social media and companies have done great harm to society and think all the social results of technology should be thoroughly analyzed to find out if they should be discarded or not.

[[file:Falgsc.png]] Post Scarcity Production [[file:Bckchn.png]]
LibLovism thinks that if (we live to) our production will inevitably rise enough to sustain communism on a larger scale. They think this should be used to give people free food, health-care, housing and access to information.

[[file:Marketsoc.png]] Markets [[file:Mut Alt.png]]
LibLovism believes in a free-market where people can produce goods in exchange for money. This would however be supplemented with the free goods that the community would be giving out, because the community would be giving out necessities like heathcare, food, water, and housing this hopefully would eliminate the work or starve mentality of capitalism.

[[file:DvEquality.png]] Ownership [[file:CapDemocracy.png]]
liblovism is ambivalent about the idea of ownership being torn between the far-left and right-wing views on the subject. They think private property should exist, but FAR less things should be private property and that unused and unoccupied private property should be public. Intellectual property however shouldn't have property rights and should always be public, Intellectual property being private limits peoples freedom to create and is vaguer and harder to really enforce that physical property.

[[file:Indiv.png]] Individualism and Collectivism [[file:Col.png]]
liblovism believes people exist as individuals however that helping the collective is essentially helping individuals but with extra steps thus they believe in mix of individualism and collectivism. They believe that actions should be done for mutual benifit and not exploitation thus forcing one party to give up for another should be avoided.

[[file:PCB-Ego.png]] Spooks [[file:Ego.png]]
They believe most ideas in society are fabrications constructed by society. These social constructions made by society haunt people without them even knowing it infecting their brains with what society wants them to think. Because of this all ideas should be examined and over examined by each individual so they can subjectively decide its validity. They believe that society or a nation imposing correct views of these ideas undermines individual autonomy.

[[file:Panarchy.png]] Panarchy [[file:Polyarchy.png]]
Liblovism believes that people should determine their own living conditions under which they live and should voluntarily choice via consensus or directly democratically what few rules if any they live by. whether people would live by themselves or in neighborhood wide communes should be up to each individual. they however aren't willing to allow people who clearly aren't actually anarchists or even libertarians such as anarcho monarchy anarcho fascism and hoppeans

Personality
They act very optimistic. Claim confusing wacky bullshit. Are highly curious and will try to learn from all across the compass. '''

How to draw
1st draw a ball

2nd draw a bunch of intersecting stripes, fill the top half purple, and the bottom half blue.

3rd fill in the gaps, half hot pink, half blackish.

4th draw either eyes or orange sunglasses. they should be green robot eyes.

don't care if you add the hat or not

S Tier
 -Its futuristic, Socialist, and has a utopian standard of living. (too bad we might die before getting chance to try it.)

 -What isn't to love about transhumanist anarchist space cow-boys.

 -Direct Democracy via technology is the best kind of government.

Neo-Blartism I seem to agree with him on most issues.

Cybermutualism Independent communes running everything in a market economy, can't agree more.

-Interesting philosophy.

A Tier
Anarcho-Buniism -has very good points on philosophy and a great sense of aesthetics.

-Be gay do crime!

-Much like communism but far more focused on unions, probably far less likely to swing right.

 -Aligns with most of my views on the government and equality, still more based then then his kid.

 -Sounds pretty based, I think, kinda confusing.

Xenoequalism -ALIEN RIGHTS!!!

 -The peoples choice is very important and if the area isn't being run how the people want they have the right to change it.

 -Governments are bad and people can run things without them.

 -Socialism has good ideas but I prefer my markets free.  -I also prefer my governments or lack thereof free.

 -Obtain robot dicks.

 -Mutual aid markets and statelessness, based.

 -Syndicalism but anarchist.

 -Communism but anarchist.

 -Copy-right more like copy-wrong. keeps trying to make me torrent one piece.

Utopian Anarchism -Based, however can you at least TRY to think how this would work, it won't kill you.

B Tier
Takoyakism pretty nice, even if i'm not as religious as them they have some very good beliefs.

- -Based, but I prefer slightly less government.

 -Based, however I like morals more, even if they are spooks.  -Ancap but more progressive. great ideas about different property owners and counter economics are based.

 -Ancap but more progressive and likes co-ops.

Aaronism pretty based i'm not sure about how you view things exactly but what i've read sounds good.

 -Like their views on idpol and work and strongly think the left right binary is cringe, however I hate the views on technology.

Post-Councilism very well read and has various good ideas. Far too nihilistic for my taste but i'm probably just deluding myself by being an optimist.

 -Like their views on property

 -I like liberty and socialism thus I like Libertarian socialism.

 -I like the whole stateless classless thing, but i'm not so sure about the no money thing.

-My prefered economics but my opinions can very.

Bookchin Capitalism -Aligns with most of my views on the government and equality, also what the hell is individual property and how is it different then private property.

Market Communism -Based why have a ceo though.

Caressism -Binge and blursed, has a combination of amazingly good ideas and ideas i dislike. Could probably learn alot from them.

C Tier
 -Nice ideas on equality and ownership don't quite like the traditionalism though.

 -Had very great ideas, happened to denounce anarchy more than authority right before a huge rise of authoritarianism, leading to some of the worst leaders know to man.

-I don't like conservatism but do like socialism.

- -I like the whole anarchy thing, But why capitalism, more importantly whats with the whole all rights are property rights.

 -A more progressive form of libertarianism. I like them, they are still too capitalist for me.

Anarcho-Capitalist Transhumanism -I like anarchy and transhumanism, don't really like capitalism.

 -Direct democracy is very based, representative democracy isn't unless I compare them to the other war criminals we call governments.

D Tier
 -I like the transhumanism but not the capitalism.

 -Does care about anyone else's freedom and wants to own everything. Still a huge improvement on feudalism.

 -What if we add more capitalism to the capitalism.

 -Land lords are cringe, reducing ethics to property rights is to dumb for to do.

Reaganism -Government isn't the solution to the problem government is the problem. except with war, drugs and crime.

- -I like you most of the time, but you simp for business owners too much and your conservatism often gets in the way freedom.

 -Way too anti intellectual, but ok other than that.

 -The worst type of government except all the other ones we tried.

 -Highly variable so it depends.

 -Hate what you support but you yourself aren't at fault.

 -Why do you want be a caveman? Why?

 -Has the worst policies but their nice and I'm not bulling a twelve year old.

F Tier
Technototalitarianism -I hate his social views and enbracement of totalitarianism, but since they welcome technology so much and they seem to value rationality over conservatism I'm more fine with him then most totalitarians.

-If cyberpunk had a political ideology.

nullism -like the views on tech, otherwise I go against everything they stand for.

Imperiumism -FASCIST IMPERIALIST THEOCRACY EMPIRE!!! However I'm way too fond of rome and space too put them in Z.

Transhumanist Ego Theocratic Imperialism -Sounds like it might be good to live under, but I hate theocracies and authoritarianism.

 -YOUR GOING TO NUKE ALL THE CAPITALISTS!! ARE YOU INSANE!! They do like aliens and equality though.

 -I like your intentions but you do almost all things you criticize capitalists for.

 -The right and left can both be authoritarian and you are proof.

 -Crazy as hell but I like the tech and can't help but be interested is his weird ass ideas. If objectivism is double capitalist this is capitalism squared.

Post-Libertarianism -So your going to destroy freedom to project freedom?!? WHAT!?!

 The worst economic system.

 -MoRe GaY DiCTaToRs!! Truly ground breaking.

 -What if we took the worst aspects of capitalism and progressivism and turned them up to 11.Much like theti could still be fun to live in.

 -MoRe TrAnS DiCTaToRs!! Truly ground breaking.

 -What the average person thinks a anarchist is but unironically.

 -Anarchy and monarchy truly the most compatable ideas.

 -Ok the idea of national culture being different from the state kinda makes sense. So even if you're authoritarianism is stateless I still hate it.

 -I like art progress and new ideas too, still a fucking fascist.

Z Tier
 -Ethonostates are a horrible idea.

 - yes even the minority ones.

 -Stopping technological progress isn't going to do any useful its just going to set us back.

 -I'm sorry state capitalism THIS is the worst economic system!

 -Conquest though war is the longest running and worst human past time.

Burgundian System -SOMEHOW MORE INSANE THEN POSADISM JFC!!!

 -I hate racial supremacy and the state and thus you!

 -LITERATELY HITLER!!

 -Ew.

 -The only good thing about you is that you are more of a fallure then your dad.

 -CURSED.

 -double plus unbased.

 -双加糟糕

 -VIVA LA REVOLUTION!!!

 -Anti intellectual totalitarian garbage!!

Taboritskyism -Burgundian System if their madness was fueled by vodka.

-Psychotic asshole who has tainted Charles Darwin's name.

-I hate absolutism in every context without fail.