Cyberdemocracy

Cyberdemocracy is a political system that combines elements of E-Democracy,  Demarchy,  Cyberocracy,  Technocracy and  Anarcho-Communism. It is the political organization of Chaosocialism, but could arguably be incorporated in other types of ideologies.

[[File: Dem.png]] Legislation
Legislative power is directly held by the people. Direct democracy at the level of the state is managed on a public online platform where  Anonymity is guaranteed. The platform's algorithms, among other things, bring to the public debate the subjects that matters for the citizens. Their functionning is completely transparent, and can be debated like any other law. On the platform takes place a constant and live public delibaration on laws and bills. After a determined amount of time, the Borda count is used to take decisions on the debated subject. Aside laws, economical plans at the general scale are decided every 6 years after a full year of public deliberation.

[[File: Technocracy.png]] Executive
Once legislation and economic plans are decided through the democratic process, they are enacted on all of the territory by the executive branch of the state. It is divided in different fields of action and expertise, each composed of scientists and professionals of those fields. They have absolutely no power over the content of what they have to apply, and can be revoked at any time in case of abuse of power or ineffectiveness.

[[File: Demarchy.png]] Supervision
The action and functioning of the state are supervised by a council of citizens that are randomly selected across the whole adult population. They are those who primarily judge of the technocrats' accurate interpretation of the legislation. Every 4 months a third of the council is replaced by a new random selection, thus in one year the council has been completely renewed.

[[File: Ancom.png]] Autonomy
A parallel political system exists within the Cyberdemocratic model, a federation of local communes akin to those of Anarcho-Communism or the Eco-Communes of Bookchin Communalism. As long as the commune's goals and actions don't interact with that of the general interest, local autonomy is what prevails. If it does, however, the state can step in and prevent parasitic particularism from going against collective interest as defined through consensus-based democratic delibaration.