Neo-Touseyism

I'll type something here soon.

= Overview =

'''Meta anarchy is unique among other anarchist ideologies, while anarcho-communism, mutualism, or anarcho-capitalism support getting rid of the stereotypical state, it still follows a certain system, a specific way of doing things that still imits the true freedom of the individual in the same manner that the traditional state would. Meta Anarchism is no system, it is no program, it isn't way of doing things, or a society to be achieved. It represents the expression of desire through multiple anarchist societies constantly being destroyed and recreated to represent the needs and wants of those within with no specific plan for the future.''' '''The meta anarchist society most likely features multiple unique anarchist societies interacting and coexisting, each of these societies would be unique and be created by those within and the values they hold, the individual does not rely on this society, nor are they obliged to forever stay in it, these organizations only exist for as long as those within it are part of it. Unique anarchists societies for the unique individuals within them.''' '''Fragmentation is the opposition to consensus and direct democracy as a way to for anarchist societies to be organized, now direct democracy is all individuals voting through referendums as a form of legislation in the anarchist society, this system has multiple flaws, such as putting too much power in the majority and those who have the time to research and show up to vote. While this new idea of the census democracy is both impractical, time consuming, and most people wouldn't want to sit in a room for 7 hours a week discussing politics. The society that pectises fragmentation relies on individuals freely choosing how they want to live and living bound by no externall force, for example one neighbor may be a user of a wide variety of drugs as they take pleasure in using them while another may highly principled, sober, and has never taken drugs, it would be authoritarian to force either of them to give up their habits principles when regarding drugs or alchahol. In the instance that the actions of one individual is detrimental to another, such an issue could be resolved, most likely in which the indivuals themselves negotiotiating or solving the problem themselves, or one individual disacociating with such organization.'''

'''The spectacle is a form of exerting control over individual thought through mass media and images, now the developments of modern capitalism and importantly modern technology are crucial to the spectacle and its development. An example of this is the culture around "cool" clothes, an article of clothing can be uncomfortable and made of cheap materials but yet if able to be advertised and promoted correctly, we are in a way coerced to want to by this as a way of making us seem "cooler" and promoting social status. But it is important to note that the spectacle has existed long before modern technology, examples of these spectacles where the roman gladiators or Jesus on a cross, both ways of trying to portray the slave gladiators, or the insurrectionary and disobedient Jesus as worth dying. The spectacle is ever present and inescapable, for as long there is a society with hierchy, those in power will use the spectacle and images to keep themselves in power and potentially gain more power in the process, and modern technology and its uses have made things worse. The spectacle is ever present and powerfull, and it is (unfortanently) here to stay.'''

= Recommendations =

Theory
 My favorite books/essays on theory (I might put a full list of all the thoery I've read on my user wiki)    = Test Results =
 * [[File:Nova.png]]Towards The Creative Nothing
 * [[File:Postsitu.png]]It's Crazy How Many Things Don't Exist
 * [[File:antwork.png]]The Abolition Of Work
 * [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]]Deluze And Anarchism
 * [[File:Situ.png]]Society Of The Spectacle
 * [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]] Chaosophy

=Relations= Ideologies=

Liiteral Fascist
Self-Inserts=

[[file:Mega_Yes.png]] Based

 * Based Anti Economics, Absurdism, Situationist, and Deleuzoguattarianism.
 * Quite intellectual, post-structuralist, existentialist, insurrectionist, and anti-civ. I confess my knowledge of Lacan is limited but I probably should start reading more on him and freud.
 * Obviously philosophically intellectual, as for political views, anti work and horizontal association as well as open borders and small voluntary associations are agreeable with my beliefs.

[[file:Yes.png]] Good

 * [[File:Vita.png]] Vitarchism: Even further off compass libleft than me, Transhumanism is not one of my main focuses but good nonetheless.
 * I like the post structuralism, but you seem to believe in the necessity of work and morality.

[[file:Meh.png]] Neutral

 * [[File:OwfBall.png]] Owfism: Libretarian Market Socialist, not the best not the worst.
 * [[File:Glencoe.png]] Glencoe: You remind me a lot of but maybe slightly better.

[[file:No.png]] Bad

 * [[File:MLM.png]] NotLibra:Not the worst for an authleft. You want to relieve the workers of capitalism but replace it with another authoritarian force. At least relatively socially progressive.
 * Now I could give a long winded speech about how I dislike your regulatory capitalist liberal democracy, but instead I'm just gonna mention that barack obama is one of your influences and leave it at that.
 * [[File:Panth.png]] Pantheon: Constitutional Monarchist and distributionst, ugh! At least mildly socially progressive and equal.
 * Ronwelltarianism_icon.png Ronwelltarianism - Could have said U.S Repulblican Party.

[[file:Mega_No.png]] Fascist

 * You describe my ideolegy as a fever dream, but don't you support eugenics, racial darwinism, and totalitarianism. Anyway, you seem intelligent though which makes you immediately better than all other auth rights on this wiki, cool looking page too (why do the authrights have the best looking pages).
 * I like the archeofuturism, but your sorta a less inresting.
 * [[File:pixil-frame-0(27).png]] New Model Of Cheesenism: Corporitist, reactionarry, fascist, bigot. Just leave this wiki.

=Comments:=

"I am quite possibly the worst polcomball artist ever."
 * [[File:Tomjaz.png]] Tomjazzy - You dare challenge me mortal?
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism- Lol
 * [[File:Panth.png]]Pantheonism - A M A T E U R S
 * [[File:Astro.png]] AstroTime - add me? here's the link to my ideology:


 * [[File:Panth.png]]Pantheonism - Add me Marxian.
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - Alright add me too
 * [[File:Panth.png]]Pantheonism - Ok.
 * - Could you add me please
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - alright add me to it now
 * - Add me? I'll do the same when I get around to it.
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - Sure
 * [[File:OwfBall.png]] Owfism - Add me?
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - Alright, add me too
 * [[File:OwfBall.png]] Owfism - I added you back, but I still dont see my ideology in your self-insert relations tab
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - I added you. Maybe refresh?
 * [[File:OwfBall.png]] Owfism - Its fine now.
 * [[File:pixil-frame-0(27).png]] New Model Of Cheesenism- add me
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - Sure thing fascist
 * - add me?
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - Sure could you add me too.
 * [[File:pixil-frame-0(27).png]] New Model Of Cheesenism - wait why i cant see me in your relation?
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - Sorry forgot to add you, will do so now.
 * Ronwelltarianism_icon.png Ronwelltarianism - Can you please add me?
 * Ronwelltarianism_icon.png Ronwelltarianism - Wait a minute, I don't see my ideology in there.
 * [[File:Touseyism.png]]Neo-Touseyism - Bro have a little patience I've been busy I'll do it tomorrow
 * Ronwelltarianism_icon.png Ronwelltarianism - Oh! Sorry, my bad!
 * - Add Please?
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - Sure thing, could you add me as well
 * [[File:Glencoe.png]] Glencoe- add me
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - Yeah, sorry it took a while
 * - It is in reverse, Meta-Anarchism rejects morality and doesn't describe any society to be achieved, because it would be a form of fascism not only to tell "build meta-anarchy", but even to say "meta-anarchy is better than other systems", just do whatever you want, meanwhile panarchy is sort of Kantian Kingdom of Ends.
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - Good point, however never did i argue we must all be forced to become meta-anarchists, never too did i say some form of society i want to achieve. In: A Broader View Of This Society, i am merely painting a picture from my limited prospective. But yet, i would argue if their is one fundamental of meta-anarchy that is universal it is "the free flow of desire", your statement that meta anarchy is simply do whatever you want is true but to me it is a fact that you cannot simply, "do whatever you want" in the world we currently live as all institutions such as an organized state, police, borders and miltiary limit this expression of desire. As such is stated that the world could be described more as a a panarchy, a jumble of different ideolegies each with imaginary border lines, while yes meta-anarchy is not "a system" but it is the absence of one, thus differintiating panarchy and our present world from meta-anarchy. (Also an ironic critisim from someone who sais we "must all become post strucutralist")
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - Also do you want to be added to reltions?
 * - I don't mind it
 * Can you add me?
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - sure
 * Add me this'll be good
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - ok lol, add me too