Owfism

= Summary = This is the self-insert ideology of the user  Owfed2. Owfism is a culturally progressive, democratic,  economically centre-left to  left-wing , militarily  pacifist,  globalist and is on diplomacy  Cosmopolitan.

Overall, the beliefs of Owfism emphasizes: He seeks to create a fair society which allows for everyone regardless if they are advantaged or disadvantaged in life to get ahead through hard work and co-operation. This is through an economic model known as the Mutually Beneficial Partnership.
 * [[File:Indiv.png]] individual rights
 * [[File:Tripartism.png]] class collaboration
 * [[File:Cooperative_Socialism.png]] worker's self-management
 * [[File:World_Federalism2.png]] global unity
 * [[File:Globnat.png]] international co-operation
 * [[File:SocialProgressive.png]] societal progress

He wants economic fairness to the entire world and to further efforts at global democracy across the world to finally allow world unity and international co-operation.

Create fair societies opressed under Autocratic rule through revolution and to finally bring  world peace.

= Influential Figures =

'People'
Sun Tzu (544 BC-496 BC) Socrates (470 BC-399 BC) Aristotle (384 BC-322 BC) Marcus Aurelius (121 AD-180 AD) Niccolo Machiavelli (1469-1527) Rene Descartes (1596-1650) Voltaire (1694-1778) Adam Smith (1723-1790) Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865) John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) Henry George (1839-1897) Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) Oscar Wilde (1854-1900) Theodore Roosevelt (1858-1919) Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) Sun Yat-sen (1866-1925) Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882-1945) John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946) Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Simone de Beauvoir (1908-1986) Martin Luther King Jr. (1929-1968) Alexander Dubček (1921-1992) Nelson Mandela (1918-2013) Hu Yaobang (1916-1989) Olof Palme (1927-1986) Roger Penrose (1931-) Mikhail Gorbachev (1931-2022) (R.I.P) Ralph Nader (1934-) Bernie Sanders (1941-) James Hansen (1941-) Joseph Stiglitz (1943-) Stephen Hawking (1942-2018) Robert Reich (1946-) Janet Yellen (1946-) Ed Markey (1946-) Al Gore (1948-) Rick Falkvinge (1972-) Andrew Yang (1975-) Jagmeet Singh (1979-) Alexandria Ocasio Cortez (1989-)

Influential Movements
Socratic Philosophy (425 BCE-399 BCE) Enlightenment (1637-1789) Classical Liberalism (1776-1790) Jacobins (1789-1799) Labour movement (1800-) Women's Rights movement (1848-1920) Georgism (1879-) Existentialist Philosophy (1913-1980) Anti-Apartheid Movement (1948-1990) Socialist International (1951-) Civil Rights movement (1954-1964) New Left Movement (1966-1970) Democratic Socialists of America (1982-) Anti-Iraq War Movement (2003-2011) YIMBY Movement (2006-) Solarpunk (2008-) Metamodernism (2010-) Volt Europa (2017-) Progressive International (2018-)

Youtubers

 * [[File:Adam_Something.png]] Adam Something (?)
 * [[File:BrtiMonkey.png]] BritMonkey (?)
 * [[File:Envi.png]] Simon Clark (?)

=Economics=

[[File:Neocorporatism.png]] Mutually Beneficial Partnership [[File:Neocorporatism.png]]
The main goal of Owfism is to create what is to be known as a Mutually Beneficial Partnership, this economic idea seeks to synthesize the ideas of  Geolibertarian Socialism,  Market Socialism and the ideas of a  Mixed-Market Economy. The sections below will mention the main tenets of this Mutually Beneficial Partnership:

[[File:Cooperative_Socialism.png]] Cooperative-Based Socialism [[File:Cooperative_Socialism.png]]
A main tenet of Owfist economics is the idea of Cooperative-Based socialism, this will ensure there will still be markets while still helping the people, believing that the existence of cooperative based socialism will make it easier to achieve socialism in the place.

Owfism believes that unions of today have become corrupted, and as such it believes that  co-operatives serve a better job than unions, who can more easily fight for worker ownership of the means of production, workers self management and eventually the  automatization and  abolition of work itself.

Owfism believes that worker co-operatives are to be shaping the economy of the 4th industrial revolution, a  post-industrial,  post-work society where the  environment is held as equally important and people are not subject to the activity of work, one which can be easily done by a emotionless, perfect machine not a emotionful, imperfect human.

Now, it will take quite some time to abolish work itself, in the mean time,  worker co-operatives will play a role in fighting for self-management, democracy and eventually ownership of production.

There will be co-operatives in all sectors of the economy, with there being co-operative societies in these sectors competing amongst each other, thus the element of the market.

Co-operative societies not only will have competitive power but they would also have political power allowing for pro-worker politicians  to be elected more often and allowing for  big money to get out of politics.

Co-operatives will also play a role in tax collection,  housing construction,  media and many other sectors, including  technology.

Why are co-operatives so good? Well, they are owned by the workers and are thus inherently beneficial to the workers, as it allows them to express themselves more in their workplace, thus increasing their freedoms, their  democratic rights and later the means of production.

[[File:Regulationism.png]] Taxation [[File:Regulationism.png]]
(Disclaimer: Revenue calculations from these taxes will be based on the United States, however, Owfed is not American.)

Owfism supports taxation reform based on  economic justice, and these tax reforms will be used to better fund  welfare programs,  universal healthcare and  free public education just to name a few things.

The first tax Owfism wants to implement is a Land Value Tax. This taxation will follow a progressive structure, which means that land that is not so valuable will be taxed at a lower rate while higher value land will be taxed at a higher rate, in brackets that go like this:

0$-50,000$ - 1%

50,000$-100,000$ - 6%

100,000$-500,000$ - 36%

500,000$-2,500,000$ - 72%

2,500,000$-5,000,000$ - 80%

5,000,000$ and above - 96%

Total land value in the United States is 23T $, and with these current tax brackets, the revenues from this tax would number at approximately 10T $ per year, at least initially. Just with revenues from this tax, a lot of projects that are meant at improving the country can be conducted. This tax will also serve as a replacement to property taxes.

The second tax Owfism wants to implement is a Financial Transactions Tax, this is a tax applied only within the financial sector and the stock market, the rate at which this tax will be is at the rate of 0.1%, this may seem like an insignificant rate but it will ensure that the wealthy pay their fair share and will generate 777B $ over a decade, or 77B $ per year.

Another tax that Owfism wants to levy is a Windfall profits tax, this tax will be levied on oil and gas giants at a rate of 25%, these are taxes on profits that result from a sudden windfall gain to a particular company or industry, examples of these being in wars, disasters or even, periods of high inflation where the consumer is hit the most and the rich are barely hit. This will generate 45 billion $ per year.

Owfism also wants to implement a Inheritance Tax on wealth accumulated through  inheritances. The rate at which this tax will be set will be at 40%, this only applies to assets greater than 5.3M $ per individual or 10.6M $ per couple. The revenue from such tax would be 210B $ per year, this allows the people to have an equal footing over the rich and make wealth generated through hard work, to create a model of work-place Meritocracy.

To prevent unemployed people from just using unemployment insurance as a way from being leeches or social parasites, a unemployment insurance tax will be created and set at a rate of 15% in order to encourage unemployed people to find a job quicker and to get them back into the workforce. This will weed out all of those people who can work and refuse to work, and this tax will only apply to them, and not to people who just cannot work in a job. This will make even the most parasitic person to join the workforce, as it will mean he will pay less in taxes.

Owfism, to fight the climate crisis, supports the implementation of a  carbon tax of 60$ per ton of CO2 emitted. In 2022, the United States emitted a total of 5.2 billion tons of CO2. This would make the yearly revenue from this tax be at 312B $ per year. This tax would be progressively raised over the coming years in order to be in line with the 1.5 degree celsius target of the Paris Agreement.

Owfism also wants a income tax, which will have the poor barely be taxed by it, believing that, as according to Henry George, income tax is society's killer, and is especially a killer to the poorest parts of the population.

People who earn less than <40,125$ will be subject to a earned income tax credit, which means they do not have to pay in taxes. This will lift many people out of poverty, and nearly eradicate poverty itself. The total spending dedicated to this would be 120B $. Not much, considering the amount of revenue other taxes generate that would compensate for this.

0$-9,875$: -12% (EITC)

9,876$-40,125$: -6% (EITC)

40,126$-85,525$: 1%

85,526$-163,300$: 4%

163,301$ - 207,350$: 16%

207,351$ - 518,400$: 24%

518,400$ and over: 48%

The income tax over a 1T $ dollars in revenue, with most of the revenue coming from the upper-middle, higher income and top 1% of Americans while poorer Americans will pay little to no tax, or are subject to the Earned Income Tax Credit.

Owfism also wants to increase the capital gains tax from 15% to 30%, along with ending the  stepped-up cost basis loophole, which allows  wealthy individuals to charge what is their own income as capital gains, thus making them pay less in taxes overall. Another loophole Owfism wants to end is the carried interest loophole. He also wants to end many other loopholes that rich people use to dodge taxes. Ending these loopholes would raise 13B $ per year.

Owfism also wants to dramatically increase tax revenue agencies funding, an example being the IRS, believing it to be too underfunded and too understaffed, and this results in people, especially rich people, to barely be audited, thus barely reporting on their own tax returns. This also applies to their own corporations. With this, tax revenues in a year would be 175B $.

Another tax Owfism wants to have is a Value Added Tax, set at a progressive rate, with healthier, more environmentally friendly products made to pay less in VAT while unhealthy, non-eco-friendly products set to pay more in Value-Added Tax. This will encourage people to use less plastics, drink less alcohol and smoke less cigarettes, as an example. The decision maker in which products are tested if they are eco-friendly or not are set to the Environment Performance Index while products which are healthy or not through the Food Environment Index. This will also serve to reduce obesity and encourage healthier diets. These are the brackets:

Very healthy products: 1.00%

Healthy products: 5.00%

Unhealthy products: 10.00%

Very unhealthy products: 15.00%

This would generate 160B $ per year, and it will also be very hard to dodge, which will mean that most of this revenue actually goes into being revenue, this tax will allow people to be healthier and this tax could prove to reduce obesity, reduce cancer and heart attack deaths as well.

[[File:Welf.png]] Welfare [[File:Socdem.png]]
Workfare

Owfism supports the implementation of Workfare, which would be a welfare program given to people who are at a job. This is a form of welfare reform which seeks to end welfare leeches, who are on welfare and intentionally refuse to have a job and to encourage people to get a job. Workfare also encourages workers not to resign from their jobs, knowing that they could potentially lose out. Workfare only applies to lower-middle and lower class workers. According to Owfism, the ideal unemployment rate is 4%. However, soon after a crisis ends, unemployment can go to levels as low as 3%.

Old-Age Pension

Owfism believes that the retirement age should be decreased from 67 to either 65 or 63, and make sure that there is strong social security funding given to lower-middle and lower class elderly people in order to allow them to get by in life. A pension would be 2,000 $ per person, keep in mind, this only applies to lower-middle/lower-class elderly people. So it will not be as costly.

Universal Basic Income

Owfism believes that every U.S citizen over the age of 18 that earns less than <207,000$ should be eligible for a 1,000$  Universal Basic Income. This Universal Basic Income will be very helpful in a Post-work society, where work would be completely  automated, removing the need for human labor. An Universal Basic Income will allow people to have a base of consumer spending, thus keeping the economy growing, with productivity being picked up by AI, and it being better with them too.

Child Allowance

Owfism believes that each parent should have 160 weeks of paid maternity and paternity leave in order to take care of their own child. This is a rate similar to countries like Finland. This would mean that parents who have to take care of their child and cannot attend work will still get paid and will not enter into financial poverty.

Owfism also believes that each parent should have child allowance, and that the child tax credit should be expanded from 300$ to 3,000$. This will allow families, and struggling families to remain above the poverty line, have a house and be able to properly take care of their own child and deal with the burden of the costs of taking care of the child.

Student Grants

Student grants would be given to adults participating in tertiary education, a.k.a  college. Owfism also supports the abolition of tuition fees believing them to be hindering lower income families and preventing truly smart people from getting into college because they're lower income.

This grant would allow lower income families to get their own children into respective colleges and actually ensure that  Meritocracy is created and the era of  plutocracy to end. This would contribute to fixing such societal problem.

Unemployment Insurance

Owfism wants to have strong unemployment insurance to go towards unemployed people. This will ensure that unemployed people have a stable source of income that they can use towards spending and just generally taking care of themselves as a person. This will prevent unemployed people from falling below the poverty line.

[[File:Newkeynes.png]] Fiscal Policy [[File:Keynes.png]]
Owfism describes itself as a Keynesian ideology when it comes to fiscal and monetary policy, with it supporting strong increases in money supply and deficit spending during recessions along with budget surpluses and steady monetary supply growth during good times.

During times of good economic growth, Owfism believes that there should be high government spending, however, through  taxation there will be  balanced budgets, this is to prevent massive debt and very high  inflation levels.

During recessions however, Owfism will have a expansionary fiscal policy, engaging in  high spending, with there being budget deficits in order to allow for unemployment levels to fall and to allow aggregate demand to bounce back to pre-crisis levels, thus restoring growth and consumer spending.

Owfism supports believes that there should be a Central Bank that runs independently of the government, with it having a dual mandate to maximize employment and to ensure  inflation levels are not high due to excessive stimulus with minor interest rate rises.

During consistent periods of deflation, the independent Central Bank will resort to  massive quantitative easing, in order to bring back inflation to typical Central Bank target levels of 2-3%. Quantitative easing will also be used in cases of a liquidity trap.

[[File:Cooperative_Socialism.png]] Means of Production [[File:Statecap.png]]
Owfism, in the short and medium term believes that mostly the government should own the means of production with there being  worker co-operatives and workplace democracy, however there will still be some  privatized companies, especially in small business.

In the long term however, the workers will own the  means of production through worker co-operatives, workplace democracy and workers' self-management. All of these things allow workers to have true control over their own businesses.

[[File:Social_corpratism.png]] Class Collaboration [[File:Demcorp.png]]
Owfism believes that, in the short and medium term, the economic system should be one based on Social Corporatism, with workers having strong  co-operatives, in which they protect their interests by lobbying for higher wages, job safety, paid leave and other things.

Temporarily, before the full transition to Market Socialism, there will be a  tripartite system of class collaboration, where the  government will mediate arguments between the  corporations and the  workers of that company. This will allow for real wage growth to match with the growth in productivity and with inflation.

[[File:Bankocracy.png]] Monetary Policy [[File:Bankocracy.png]]
Owfism believes that there should be an independent central bank, that means that it is not tied to the  government.

The monetary responsibilities of the central bank is to ensure that  inflation does not spiral out of control. To do this, the central bank will raise interest rates to levels around 2%, in order to not put too much of a burden on the American consumer while inflation does not explode.

While during economic recessions the central bank's goal is to lower interest rates, to levels below 1%, this is to stimulate the economy, boost aggregate demand and bring back consumer spending to levels before the recession.

However, central banks may not even need to use monetary policy, as according to Owfism, a decent chunk of inflation is caused by corporate price gouging, and as such, inflation can be solved through  anti-trust laws and a  windfall profits tax (on corporate giants).

This means that Owfism could be a Neo-Keynesian. As it supported fiscal over monetary policy. (although, I am not really well-versed on what it is.)

[[File:Trustbust.png]] Monopolies [[File:Trustbust.png]]
Owfism believes that corporate monopolies are an inherent evil as they discorage economic competition, and are a likely cause of inflation, as in  capitalism, if there are economic competitors, companies will have to lower prices in order to make them seem the more convincing company over their competitor.

However, once there is a corporate monopoly in an economic sector, there will not be price gouging that causes lowered prices to win up over one competitor, since well, there isn't a competitor. As such, the corporate price gouging will result in very low price decreases or even price increases since they know there isn't an alternative.

So, yea, we must TRUST BUST these monopolies. According to Owfism, there must be an economic constitution like in  Germany, which seeks to prevent the rise of big trusts in the first place. The law being that if a company has over 40% market share over its sector that it operates, then it is thus a monopoly and thus must be broken up.

He also has a number for how many companies the  trust must be broken based on its market share percentage it owns in that sector, if it is over 40% of the market share in that sector. The number of companies a big trust is to be broken up into based on the market share:


 * 40-50% Market Share - The trust is broken up into 10 companies.
 * 50-60% Market Share - The trust is broken up into 15 companies.
 * 60-70% Market Share - The trust is broken up into 20 companies.
 * 70-80% Market Share - The trust is broken up into 25 companies.
 * 80-90% Market Share - The trust is broken up into 30 companies.
 * >90% Market Share - The trust is broken up into 35 companies.

This is in accordance with the economic constitution, with the economic constitution also mentioning that the owner of the once  monopoly cannot own shares of stock within the new companies, believing that results in the previously rich owner to become even richer.

This is a big deal, as it finally allows true economic competition as envisioned by Adam Smith, the founder of  Capitalism himself. Also, companies like Google along with other tech companies and social media companies to name a few will be broken up, as they are, in accordance with the proposed constitution, eligible to be broken up as they exceed 40% market share. This applies to every company which exceeds that threshold.

[[File:Green_Party_(US).png]] Green New Deal [[File:Ectrans.png]]
In the face of the climate crisis, the most severe and most important crisis of the 21st century, we have to implement tough action in order to save our planet,  Earth. So what is the solution?

We need a radical transition to Renewable energy, such as solar and wind but also many other renewable energy sources, like geothermal, tidal, wave along with solar water heating and others. However, Owfism does support hydroelectric power.

To do this, we need a Green New Deal, with the entire fossil fuel sector being temporarily  re-nationalized in order to ease the transition to green energy and to prevent social chaos as a result of the fall of fossil fuels. Owfism wants a 78% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions in order to save the climate. With there being net zero by 2050, with the 22% of emissions left being in hard to decarbonize sectors, from 2030-2050 new technologies are to be worked on to de-carbonize them too.

Owfism supports the idea of green growth, rejecting the idea of degrowth, as some people would say. Believing that the economy should grow even if fossil fuels are being phased out.

He believes that the state should begin to massively subsidize  renewables and the fight against climate change, increasing subsidies from 500B $ a year to 2T $ a year in order to more easily spread renewables across the world and to allow them to spread in poorer parts of the world.

He is also an advocate of Nuclear energy, believing it to be a pretty good baseload energy that will be very useful until renewable energy storage methods become cheaper and more effective overall, and that it must also be subsidized too.

Obviously, Owfism believes that fossil fuel subsidies should be completely phased out and that any new fossil fuel project should be completely halted in order to further stop the destruction of our own  environment.

He is also in favor of carbon taxes, emissions trading schemes and the implementation of a global carbon price, in order to disincentivize the use of fossil fuels globally and to ensure that poorer not just richer nations can de-carbonize, as climate change is a  human problem, not an  American problem or  Chinese problem.

[[File:Transh.png]] 4th Industrial Revolution [[File:Transh.png]]
Owfism believes that a 4th industrial revolution is necessary in order to improve human technology and improve humanity as a whole. So, Owfism what are the tenets of such 4th Industrial Revolution? Simple.

- Green Growth

Green Growth is a main component of the idea of the 4th industrial revolution, believing that everything from energy, transport and agriculture to housing and garbage to be de-carbonized. Owfism believes that most of these sectors if not all can be de-carbonized or have their emissions offset (through Carbon capture or other forms offsets). The aesthetics for this would be similar to Solarpunk.

- Space Exploration

Another main thing Owfism advocates for is drastically ramping up space exploration, and he also wants it to make a  government-owned motive like it was in the 1960s, believing that leaving it to the  capitalists will just allow them to exclude the working class and just use space as a place for their own ventures while the rest of the world suffers due to  climate change. He also wants to increase NASA/ESA funding from 0.4% of GDP to 1.5% of GDP. He also supports the idea of a Space Defense Force The only good thing Trump ever did

- Cooperative-Based Socialism

Owfism believes, that, when work would still be around, for it to be filled with worker co-operatives. Believing them to be the best way workers can finally achieve ownership of the means of production, as such, Owfism believes that this 4th industrial revolution should be the final nail in the coffin for non-worker owned means of production. As such, in nature, Owfism is a due to his support for worker self-management/worker ownership of the means of production.

- Automation

Owfism believes that all workplaces should be automated and that the need of human labor must disappear and also advocates for automation of all jobs and to provide human relief and leisure. Thus Owfism is a post-work ideology, believing work to be no longer a necessity in this upcoming industrial revolution. To help the now many unemployed people, a 1,000$ Universal basic income will be established.

=Society=

[[File:SocialProgressive.png]] Progress and Liberty [[File:Liberty.png]]
Owfist social policy encompasses the ideas of progress and  liberty. This is the main idea behind the social policies of Owfism, believing those two principles to be of utmost importance. This is a comprehensive breakdown of Owfed's societal policy:

[[File:Gay.png]] Marriage [[File:Gay.png]]
Owfism is firmly in favour of equal marriage rights regardless of gender, believing that it is important to ensure that everyone has an individual right to get married in life.

He believes that the opposition to gay marriage is absurd, as it is based on a book made thousands of years ago and a book that could had even been modified later on to hate on  gay people. Jesus himself wanted all men and women to be equal and that included marriage.

However though, while he is fundamentally opposed to religious fundamentalists, with them going against equal marriage because "the bible said so!" I also oppose the opposite of them. The "social justice warriors", believing them to also be radical cultural extremists who believe conservatives should be killed or that homosexuals should have complete superiority over other people or that there should be  state atheism. P.s you are not a social justice warrior you're a guy who sits on twitter all day

So what is my position? My social position is the position of SJW-Lite. SJW-Lites support gay marriage and all, but they do not want state atheism, conservatives to be killed just because they're conservative and all of those things. SJW-Lite is a good middle ground that actually ensures equal rights and does not create a new form of supremacism.

[[File:GRights.png]] Guns [[File:GRights.png]]
Owfism is an advocate of gun rights, believing that under no pretext the people should not have the right to bear a gun. Why? guns act as protection, guns protect your individual liberty. Guns give you safety from criminals just in time before the police arrive.

"To conquer a nation you must first dis-arm its citizens." said Adolf Hitler. The role of guns is important in toppling  tyrannical regimes as an armed populace makes it easier for the people to fight against the keys of the tyrant.

However, I do believe there needs to be some minor regulations to prevent excessive and bad use of  guns. Such as uh... school shootings. As such, I support a minimum age to buy a gun to be set at 20, however, people in the military obviously can have guns at 18, when you can join the military.

Owfism also believes in waiting times, believing that a waiting time of either 1 or 2 months should be necessary as well, believing that it prevents impulsive violence or suicide, and is overall a healthy regulation, that does not infringe on gun rights.

[[File:Liberty.png]] Freedom of Speech [[File:Civlibert.png]]
Owfism is a strong advocate for freedom of speech. He believes that social media should not ban people just because they're right-wing conservatives, believing that the internet should be a free hub where people can express their opinions regardless if they're  right-wing or  left-wing.

The only way to convince right-wingers to stop being, well,   right-wingers is not through banning them but through convincing them with regular and civil debate. Criticism should be constructible criticism and not harsh criticism, which seeks to disrespect, but rather criticism which is calm, and just fundamentally address the flaws while still having no personal grudge against the person himself.

Owfism also wants to abolish the surveillance state, believing that it has over-stepped its purpose of just "stopping terrorists" or "arresting criminals" and instead has become a way for the  government to have information about every single person out there,

Owfism wants to make a new constitutional bill of rights which upholds the  right to privacy, the  right to free speech, the  right to bear arms, the  right to vote, the  right to political participation & petition, the  right to marriage and many other rights in order to create a society that truly upholds  freedom.

[[File:FreeSpeak.png]] Freedom of Information [[File:FreeSpeak.png]]
A main problem Owfism has with the current system of information is that it is against the consumer and for the profit of the  tech corporation, that is also a monopoly. Something which will be broken up under Owfism. (look at Monopolies section above)

He believes that social media and tech companies like Facebook,  Twitter and  Google should be broken up, as they have a stranglehold over social media and online news for example, he believes that they should be broken based on their market share, into 10 (minimum) and 35 (maximum) amount of companies.

This would allow true economic competition and a diversity in media options to choose from and not be left with less than 10 choices to use on what you should communicate on. He believes that the people should be able to able to repair their own electronics, through right to repair laws.

He also wants to fight for privacy rights, believing that tech companies should be forced to stop making a profit from tracking their own users and instead use privacy-respecting forms of advertisement if they want to profit from technology. He believes that the identity of the internet user must be kept Anonymous in most if not maybe all cases, in order to prevent the privacy of the user being broken.

He also believes that internet pirating should be made legal, I am in full support of it, however, I believe that a game or art creator should be compensated by the  government for the money he lost because of the fact someone didn't buy his game and instead pirated it. (That's only for small game creators though, for guys like EA, you get nothing!)

He also seeks to abolish patent laws, believing them to only be used to make a profit off of your invention and ignores the human life it can save with it, an example of an inventor doing the right thing is Jonas Salk, inventor of the polio vaccine. He also wants to dramatically reduce copyright laws from 75 years to 2-5 years, although there would still be few exceptions of 10-20 years copyright lasting time.

[[File:Pro-ChoiceRemade.png]] Abortion [[File:Pro-ChoiceRemade.png]]
Owfism on abortion is fully pro-choice, believing that it is the right of the woman to choose whether it should give birth or not. He is against the recent American supreme court ruling declaring abortion to be illegal, believing that it must be legal, and especially legal in cases of incest, rape and other instances when the woman's life is in danger, as those are the cause of most abortion.

[[File:Fem.png]] Pay Gaps [[File:MLK.png]]
Owfism believes that an end must come to the gender pay gap between men and women but also the  racial pay gap between black and whites, believing that there's no way a country's a meritocracy when your own gender or your own skin color determines whether you get paid a decent salary or not.

Owfism believes that this is disgraceful that people's pay is still judged by their skin color or gender and not based on the capability of their own job, believing that the more you work the more you progress, but sadly, this isn't true. But Owfism wants to make it true.

I am a Meritocrat, a convinced Meritocrat, to some it may be a fantasy, but to me it is my main goal.

[[File:Urbanism.png]] Property [[File:Urbanism.png]]
Owfism believes that the property sector must be nationalized in the short term and put under the control of  worker co-operatives in the medium and long term. Believing that housing is a human right and is not a simple investment, just like how healthcare/education are to be a human right.

Owfism believes that there must be a massive boom in housing construction, believing that solving the housing affordability crisis to be paramount. Owfism also believes that if there is enough affordable homes in the world then homelessness will basically go extinct.

Another main way Owfism seeks to tackle housing price affordability is through land value, more specifically the complete replacement property taxation, believing it to be not just a burden on consumers but also a massive failure. He wants the implementation of a Land value tax to replace it, a.k.a a tax on the unimproved value of land.

Owfism also believes that housing should be made greener overall, many things can be done to green houses, however, I support the  Solarpunk model of housing mostly (just search up solarpunk houses to understand).

[[File:Secular.png]] Religion [[File:Secular.png]]
Owfism is a non-practicing orthodox christian by birth, however, when it comes to the existence of god himself Owfism is an  atheist, rejecting the existence of a higher being, like God.

Owfism is a firm supporter of the separation of church and state and the idea of taxing churches like how other institutions get taxed, believing that it is weird that they have an exception.

He believes that religion should not play a role in the political system of a country, and should basically be kept to your own personal views, believing that there should be no official religion, with everyone being free to practice whatever they want.

[[File:Intercult.png]] Immigration [[File:Intercult.png]]

 * Owfism believes we should be accepting immigrants as they provide for jobs lost due to the fact that workers here retired due to old age. Immigrants also serve as a way to add to talent and to society as a whole.
 * However, he rejects the concept of Multiculturalism, believing it to cause rises in strongman politics, something which he seeks to prevent, as such he advocates for Interculturalism or the Melting Pot Model.
 * This model ensures that all cultures are integrated into one unified culture and do not divide the nation up into many different cultures that only divide the nation politically between populists (who seek to end mass immigration) and the establishment.
 * He wants to end the nature of self-segregating cultures who only create a culture they had, an enclave of their country into the new country they came in. He wants integration between cultures in order to promote unity much easier along with stability and cohesion.

[[File:Acidcomf.png]] Drug Legalization [[File:Acidcomf.png]]

 * Owfism is a firm believer in legalizing and decriminalizing all drugs. Believing that drugs are not a national security issue but rather a public health issue.
 * He believes that if alcohol and tobacco are legal why the hell are drugs not legal?
 * Owfism wants stronger and universal single-payer mental health in order to convince mentally abused users not to try it and also to try to help them go through their problems and overcome them as to not get hooked on them.
 * He believes that drugs should be included in the alcohol/tobacco taxation system, through the Sales Tax proposal by Owfism in order to disincentivize the consumption of it.
 * After legalization, a minimum consumption age will be set of around 18 on all drugs, just like the minimum age to consume alcohol.
 * He believes that the war on drugs was a massive failure that failed to reduce drug consumption and only encouraged illegal un-sanitary consumption of it, and allowed youngsters to illegally try the substance.
 * As such, he supports subsidizing clean needles for consumption, as they are much more healthy and do not damage the life of the consumer.

[[File:Edu.png]] Education [[File:Edu.png]]

 * Owfism is a firm believer in free and universal education for all children regardless of social status, race or gender.
 * He wants to scrap tuition fees for college users, believing them to be harming low income families and preventing them from having a potentially smart child go to the right college he deserves because of his low income.
 * He also wants to have free universal pre-K education along with fully accessible Kindergarten, Elementary, Primary and High School education to all children, believing that education is a human right that must be guaranteed to everyone.
 * Believing that education is the first way to have a productive and competitive work force. This is why the United States for example hired workers from countries with mostly high levels of education to make a new Boeing model.
 * He also wants to reform the time schedule of kids staying in school, going by the following:
 * Kindergarten school students stay from 9:00 to 13:00 or 4 hours
 * Elementary school students stay from 9:00 - 14:00 or 5 hours
 * Primary school students stay from 9:00 - 15:00 or 6 hours
 * High school students stay from 10:00 - 16:00 or 6 hours
 * College students stay from 11:00 - 17:00 or 6 hours
 * There would also be a 1 hour pause to give the students a mental break from all the information they accumulated, this being the recess period. It lasts:
 * K: 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM
 * Elementary: 11:00 AM - 12:00 AM
 * Primary: 12:00 AM - 13:00 PM
 * High: 13:00 PM - 14:00 PM
 * College: 14:00 PM - 15:00 PM
 * Owfism believes that schools should care about their students mental health as the more healthy their minds are the easier they can understand and accumulate new things that they learned in school. Essentially being a win-win.
 * Owfism also supports free school lunch programs which guarantees a healthy, proper lunch to all students regardless of their income or status in society.
 * Owfism also believes that public bathrooms should be regularly cleaned in order to ensure that kids sanitation is respected and that school bathrooms should always have running hot water and soap dispensers for example.

[[File:Ecocent.png]] Transportation [[File:Anticar.png]]

 * First of all, to begin this section I would like to say SCRAP CARS! Cars generate noise pollution, block up the road, cause a shit ton of accidents and also now they are polluting even if electric cars exist (which are less than 10% of all cars in the world).
 * Well, then how will people travel?????
 * Simple, we already have alternatives that existed for quite a decent bit in human history. For short travels within the city you can just walk, take a bicycle (electric or regular, both are pretty good), take a bus (powered by green hydrogen) or a tram/metro (powered by green hydrogen).
 * That is short distance, what about long distance???
 * That is also simple, have you ever heard of a train? Yep. Trains powered by green hydrogen will basically replace cars in long distance travel.
 * But trains are slower than cars!11
 * No, not all trains are slower than cars. Some trains can even reach speeds of 500/600km/h. High Speed trains reach speeds of 200/300km/h. We should invest in such train technology and will probably exist in the future by the 2030s. These are Maglev Trains that go up to fast speeds and are far faster than almost any car out there.
 * But there is no routes that I can choose! With a car I can travel anywhere!
 * Well duh, no wonder there are barely any routes you can use with public transportation. Its because we filled up our roads with cars and have removed all demand from alternatives, if we fight back and bring back public transit, their demand will again go up thus adding more routes for them as well.
 * Ok, ok, but what is this green hydrogen thing?
 * Green hydrogen is hydrogen produced by splitting the H2 from H2O through electrical separation. Green hydrogen is used for energy storage in Renewable energy but rarely, but in my opinion I think we should phase out lithium batteries from transportation and energy and replace it with green hydrogen, it is less polluting and also can be less costly and will be less costly in the future. It also will ensure fully green transportation.
 * But what about planes? How will people go from Europe to America let's say?
 * Well, this is one of the few exceptions where I would not replace plane travel. Typical plane travel in the interior of country or the same continent should be phased out and replaced with Maglev travel.
 * However, trans-continental trips will be used with planes converted to green hydrogen and not Kerosen, as Kerosen pollution happens right up in the air, entering far more easily in the Earth's atmosphere.
 * So yea, abolish cars and (mostly) abolish planes and replace them with bikes, e-bikes, metros, trams, busses and trains. De-carbonization has to happen everywhere and we must change our civilization in order to fight the climate crisis.
 * Another main advantage to replacing cars is the reduction in noise pollution and the increase in air quality. The replacement of car streets/stroads and paving way for walkable areas with some tram/bus lanes (which take up less space) and underground metro lines. Bike/scooter trails are also included.
 * This would also boost the local economy and allow small businesses to prosper as people walk slower in a more walkable area, allowing small businesses to pop up more and to give people more time to enjoy the scenery.

=International Stage =

[[File:World_Federalism2.png]] Unity and Solidarity [[File:Globnat.png]]

 * Unity and Solidarity is the main international policy tenet which comprises of all international policy advocated by Owfed.

[[File:Cball-EU.png]] On EU [[File:Cball-EU.png]]
Owfism is a firm advocate for stronger European integration, supporting the idea of a European Federation.

Owfism believes that the benefits of a federalization would far outweigh the cons to such unions, and there are many examples where I could go on, but let's first begin with:

Immigration. Personally, I think the 2014 migrant crisis could had been handled much better had the European Union been under a federation, as its response to it would had been more united And there wouldn't have been far-right trolls (Orban) who further sabotaged EU immigration for his personal gains, thus resulting in a better policy.

While I may seem pretty Europhile, I reject the European Union's handling of the 2008 recession that involved forced austerity on poorer countries, instead believing that the  European Union should have adopted  keynesian economic stimulus policies as done by the  United States under the  Obama administration.

I believe that an integration of the European Union would do wonders and improve European power over the world and expand European influence, thus ending the duopoly of power that is between the US and  China.

I believe that there should be a European Army, with defense making up 2% of its GDP, similar to the NATO target, as it will allow the EU to stop relying on the United States to solving internal problems and thus allowing it to exercise itself as a world power in its own right.

On elections, I believe that the current system is to be reformed where people can vote on European parties (EPP, S&D, EGP etc.), and to also increase the power of the European parliament, and to make the role of  European Commission President be a symbolic role, like a president. As such, Owfism believes there is to be a European Prime Minister.

[[File:World_Federalism2.png]] A New World [[File:Cball-UN.png]]
Owfism is strongly in favor of reforming the United Nations into a much more  democratic and  popular institution that serves the interests of all  humans across the world and that it must be effective, believing that if it does not reform it is bound to end up like the League of Nations.

How does Owfism want to reform the United Nations? Well, first of all, votes by nations on U.N resolutions should be based on a majoritarian model, meaning that if 99 countries or more support a resolution then it shall be passed and it cannot be vetoed by 1 or 2 nations, believing that system to be entirely unfair.

Owfism believes that the United Nations should integrate  peacefully into an united  World Federation, the way the integration would be done would sort of be similar to  European integration into an  European Federation.

Owfism believes that the reason the United Nations seems so weak when it comes to international affairs is because of its very non-integrated model. Owfism believes that international integration should be done incrementally, through a series of international treaties that integrate the world economy and society.

This is similar to the phases of European integration, and it believes that the integration of the United Nations should mostly be similar to the way the European Union, believing that the end goal is to create a World federation, similar to proposals of a European federation.

He believes that the electoral system should be ranked-choiced voting, with there being elections to parliament, with members being elected by the  people by their own personal rankings and with there being a symbolic  president elected by the  people. Parliament votes on a prime minister, who would have most of the power. This model would be similar to a semi-presidential system.

He also believes that there should be an Earth Supreme Court, with it being the main judicial-related force in a united World Federation under the ideology of  Owfism.

=Other stuff=

[[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]] Ukraine and Russia [[File:Cball-Russia.png]]
First of all, I would like to say: Russia is a Ethnonationalist,  Irredentist country that is probably at this point  Fascist.

This war could had been easily prevented had the entirety of NATO accepted Ukraine in 2009, soon after Romania and Bulgaria. Owfism believes that NATO, EU and the UN should follow a model of voting on legislation based on how national parliaments do it, that being a majority of nations agreeing to something, that means it is accepted.

Ukraine is not the most perfect country and it is not the most democratic, however, it is the lesser of two evils in this situation, and the nation that is attacked by aggressive Russian imperialism.

You may think that I am for American imperialism, but nope, I am opposed to that. I do not want American, Russian or  Chinese hegemony but rather Global hegemony. I want a society not led by a nation, but a society led by humanity. A united world.

I personally believe that Ukraine should be given the weapons it needs so that the war is shorter than it otherwise would have and to finally bring back full-on grain shipments so that the brewing food crisis ends and inflation begins to go back down. Ukraine must be protected from the hands of Russian imperialism and should be helped in repairing its economy and to also integrate it into NATO and  EU.

[[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]] China [[File:Cball-China.png]]
Owfism is firmly pro-Taiwan when it comes to the matter of China. He is sympathetic to Left-Liberal Tridemism, however he rejects the  Irredentist view that Taiwan should take back  mainland China, instead believing Taiwan should be an  independent sovereign nation so that it can escape the shackles of the  People's Republic of China led by Xi Jinping, a leader who is even more fervent on getting Taiwan under mainland control.

As such, Owfism is a firm supporter of the Democratic Progressive Party of Taiwan, led by now current President of Taiwan Tsai Ing-wen, and is opposed to  Chinese attempts at getting Taiwan under it's own control and wants Taiwan to be given military aid, especially from the  United States,  Japan and  South Korea. This is to allow Taiwan to have a chance at blocking China in it's invasion.

=Philosophy=

[[File:Scientocracy_Small.png]]Conformal Cyclic Cosmology[[File:Scientocracy_Small.png]]
So, what is the true origin of our Universe? How did our Universe, the universe that we live in as of right now, get to become a thing? There are many arguments and ideas that try to prove how the Universe was created, however, the one I adhere to is Conformal Cyclic Cosmology.

Now, what is the idea of conformal cyclic cosmology? It is a cosmological framework and model that stands within the framework of general relativity, with this idea, the universe is ititerated through infinite cycles.

The end of a previous universe (and thus our universe) is known as timelike infinity, (which is at its core the latest end of any timescale for any point in space) with each iteration being identified with the Big Bang singularity of the following universe.

Now, how is this a metaphysical belief and how is it a philosophical one, well, as of now, we do not have a good enough way to empirically prove its existence and thus cannot be falsified or proven, thus it is to be in the realm of  philosophy and not that of  science itself.

[[File:Scientocracy_Small.png]] Basic Construction [[File:Scientocracy_Small.png]]
The basic construction of such an idea as Conformal Cyclic Cosmology is based on mathematical frameworks, which is to connect a countable sequence of open FLRW metric spacetimes, with each representing a Big Bang that is thus followed by a future expansion.

As noticed by Roger Penrose (theoretical physician), the past conformal boundary of one copy of FLRW spacetime can be attached to a future conformal boundary of another.

In particular, each individual FLRW metric is multiplied by the square of a conformal factor Omega that approaches zero at a timelike infinity, which thus effectively "squashing down" the future conformal boundary to a conformally regular hypersurface.

The hypothesis (Conformal Cyclic Cosmology) is to require all massive particles to cease from existence, including those who became too widely separated from all other particles. As pointed by Penrose, proton decay is a possibility contemplated in the Standard Model by various speculative extensions.

A main framework of the scientific method is the ability to disprove a theory, something which does not apply to this, which is thus not a scientific hypothesis about the universe, but as said, a philosophical, metaphysical belief.

[[File:Hawking.png]] Multiverse Theory[[File:Hawking.png]]
How many universes are there? Is there a universe, that is just expanding until it will inevitably die (aka our own Observable Universe) or is there one universe which has an infinite diameter? Or, are there more universes?

Well, I believe in the multiverse. Now, let's first begin with the definition of the multiverse: It is by definition, a hypothetical group of multiple universes. These universes comprise everything that exist, including time, space, matter, energy and the physical laws that are to describe them.

The multiverse has been hypothesized in many genres including Science Fiction, cosmology, physics etc. However, let's just get on with the point and why I personally support it as a metaphysical concept.

In my opinion, I believe that our universe, in its history since the beginning of the Big Bang, has had many collisions with other universes we may have not discovered, and will thus continue to have over its existence.

Owfism believes that the laws of physics that apply within our own universe are not to apply to the many other multiple universes as of the multiverse theory, and that the laws of physics we have here are only applicable to our own universe and if we are to somehow enter another universe we may have to discover how its physics work.

Owfism also believes that there are types of multiverses, however, unlike what Brian Greene, believes, he comes to reject the notion that there are only 9 types of multiverses, coming to the conclusion that there are probably an infinite amount of multiverses.

With this, the resulting thing is that there could very well be possibly infinite types of how physics in such multiverses could work, ranging from expansion, relativity etc.

Yet again, people are to be asking, how does this count as philosophical, (after all a famous advocate of this, Stephen Hawking said that philosophy is dead.) However, as said with conformal cyclic cosmology, we cannot prove through simple empiricism, which stands at the core of the scientific method that this is true or false.

Which thus, as a result, proves that this is merely a philosophical and thus metaphysical belief, as it concerns itself with the nature of the universe.

[[File:Cosmocracy.png]] Cyclic Theory [[File:Cosmocracy.png]]
Cyclic Theory is the main way Owfism seeks to combine the metaphysical beliefs of both conformal cyclical cosmology and the idea of the  multiverse theory, and how does Owfism seek to do this? Well:

Owfism believes that the properties use to prove Conformal Cyclic Cosmology (connecting to a sequence of open FLRW metric spacetimes) can be applied to the possibly infinite amounts of multiverses that are out there, despite the fact that they have their own laws of physics.

As such, through the cyclic theory Owfism seeks to combine conformal cyclic cosmology and the multiverse theory to create a new theory, that being well, cyclic theory. This cyclic theory according to Owfism is the only physical law that is abided by the infinity of universes out there.

[[File:Existentialism.png]] Existentialism [[File:Existentialism.png]]
There is no definitive and coherent meaning of life that can apply to all humans regardless of race, gender or nationality. Life is merely the thing that distinguishes a living thing from a non-living thing.

But, what does "life" actually mean? What do we say when we are talking about what your life is? Well, as said before, what you think is the meaning of life will naturally be different compared to someone else's as you lived a different life than them.

As such, I believe that the solution to the meaning of life is that, it is structured up by ourselves, the individual, in order to sum up all of the actions that said individual has done throughout his entire period of him being a living thing.

To simplify, the meaning of life is merely the meaning we want to give to it, even if another person may have a completely different meaning to life, this is merely based on their own perspectives and experiences one has faced in life.

This, is in line with the philosophy of existentialism, the philosophy which states that we, ourselves, create meaning to our own lives, and that there is no coherent meaning of life that is given to us by a higher being (God) or authority (Government).

[[File:Socrates.png]] Socratic Wisdom [[File:Socrates.png]]
People, not just on this site but also in the world in general, have many different views when it comes to the idea of wisdom, in fact, the meaning of  philosophy itself is the love of wisdom.

But what is, you say, true wisdom? What happens if humanity achieves wisdom? The answer can be found through Socrates and respectively Socratic philosophy.

The answer to the first question, (What is true wisdom?) true wisdom is when humanity recognizes that it is to know that it knows little about its own surroundings, including the universe.

Which is he believes philosophy seems to be so theoretical in nature, as it is merely a hypothesis about the truths that we do not know, which includes topics like the human mind, knowledge, the universe and other aspects.

[[File:Rene_Descartes_.png]] Cartesian Rationalism [[File:Rene_Descartes_.png]]
So, while most humans do not have wisdom and do not know of the fact that humans have little knowledge of their surroundings, it is still possible to gain knowledge, even if it is just by a tiny amount, and how do we do that?

Simple. Humans are taught to believe the truths of what they know so far through empirical evidence, and are not taught of the theoretical, the things we do not know if they are real, even if they could or could not be real.

For humans to achieve levels of knowledge that transcend the taught and into the abstract and unknown, Owfism believes that humans, at least once in their life hold a skeptical view of what they knew up to that point.

This was the solution proposed by French philosopher Rene Descartes, and according to Owfism, the rationalism proposed by Cartes is the main way to enhance human knowledge and possibly reach the level of  true wisdom.

With this, Owfism comes to reject empiricism, which states that experience is the source of all knowledge, and rather believes that the main source of all knowledge of a person is reason.

[[File:Kant.png]] Immanent Experience [[File:Kant.png]]
Tying to the above, Owfism also believes that humans have 3 ways that they are able to understand the world around them, those 3 ways being Understanding, Intuition and Reason. This is called immanent experience,

So, now, what is understanding? what is intuition and finally what is reason? What are all of these traits that humans use to understand the world? This shall be answered.

Understanding is the facility that allows us to comprehend things without having to resort to the usage of intuition, meanwhile Intuition is the sensory impression given to us by objects in the outside world. Finally, reason is the logical destination we are able to make off of the sensory impressions.

With this, Owfism believes that reason is the most important and is the source of knowledge, and as said above believes in Rationalism.

Now, why is reason the most important source of knowledge? Reason is how discoveries about the universe have been made, by doubting the current truth, which is not the complete truth and will never will be, a new truth is created and is ingrained in education.

While intuition is the thing which allows understanding and reason to blossom, without reason, knowledge does not blossom along with understanding and reason, and remains trapped in the "flower".

[[File:Philosophy.png]] Syllogism [[File:Philosophy.png]]
The main logical system of Owfism follows the idea of syllogism, now, Owfism, what is syllogism? What does it convey when it comes to systems of logic overall in society?

First, let's begin with the definition of logic itself, it is a form of reason conducted through principles of validity, or in philosophical terms, the study of valid inferences.

Now, we shall begin with the definition of Syllogism itself. Syllogism is a form of deductive reasoning based in logic and it is drawn based on two or more given premises with there being a middle term and then finally a conclusion to it.

Now, what are examples of Syllogism? Well, it is very simple to craft an example of how Syllogism works, now, let's begin: Let's say that I have a car (that is the first premise) and that I also have a fire extinguisher (that is the middle term). Now, what is the conclusion to this? That I have a car and a fire extinguisher.

However, there is a special thing about this philosophy of logic known as Syllogism, it can debunk the existence of the holy trinity, which is supported by well, Christians  and can debunk the existence of god.

How? Well, the holy trinity affirms that: the father is not the holy spirit, the father is god, god is the son, god is the holy spirit, the son is not the holy spirit. This in turn, makes the holy trinity seem oxymoronic and contradictory to itself, as it affirms that while god is the father he is also the son, which is by human nature contradictory.

However, that one isn't the main point, although it is by itself oxymoronic based on current truths. The real one is the affirmation that while the father and son are not the holy spirit, they are god, and god is the holy spirit. So what does this mean? We are left in a conundrum, and this is proof that the holy trinity is logically contradictory to itself.

[[File:Solipsism.png]] On Mind and Body [[File:Solipsism.png]]
What is the role of the mind? What is the role of the body? Is the mind and body separate or connected? These are the main questions in regard to the subject of the nature of being and there are many takes people believe in such as dualism or monism.

To solve the main essential questions shown above, we must first look on what the body and the mind are: The body is the physical structure of a man, which includes bones, muscles, bones, tissue, organs etc. While the mind is the way humans are aware of the world around them, through the mind humans can view the world through immanent experience.

Now, dualists, as the name suggests, believe that the mind and body are inherently separate, as that is the definition of dualism itself. While a famous form of dualism can be found in Cartesian dualism, it is also supported by other philosophies too ranging from Platoism to  Scholasticism.

However, in Owf's ontology, he comes to reject dualism and is in favor of monism, believing that the mind and body are not separate and are in fact connected. Why? Well, Owfism believes that by nature, what the human is actually just the brain, with him having a body as an addition.

As a result, Owfism believes that the mind and body do not conduct separate actions, and believes that the actions of humans, whether they are physical or mental kinds of action, are all done by the brain, without the brain, humans would become like what statues are: things that stand still.

Why? Because of the fact that without the brain, humans cannot conduct any tasks whether it would be talking or walking, as without the brain, the body would basically be just shut down, as it needs the brain to perform the actions it does on a day to day basis.

This, according to Owfism, debunks the idea of dualism as proposed by many philosophers in the past. As it is proof that the mind and body do not conduct separate actions, and rather, the body just conducts the actions of the mind.

Now, does this mean Owfism is determinist? No. First of all, let's define determinism. Determinism is the idea that everything we do is pre-determined by previous events or laws. However, I come to reject that in favor of Indeterminism.

As the name suggests, Owfism believes that the actions of the mind are not determined by previous events or natural laws and are in fact determined by ourselves and not previous events. As such, Owfism believes that free will is real.

The existence of free will can be proven, as he believes that people are the author of their own choices, with this, people are the ultimate cause of their own actions, and this holds up to be true, as free will exists we can conclude:

The fact that god doesn't exist, god is a determining figure and if people are allowed to play freely, then that means people have free will and thus god doesn't exist. Another way to say this is that the holy trinity contradicts itself thus god doesn't exist thus free will exists.

[[File:Histval.png]] Nature of History [[File:Histval.png]]
What is the nature of history? What comes to define who wrote history? Is it the individual or collective? There are many varying views of history and they have changed over time as time has passed.

First, let's take a look at the idea of dialectical materialism. It states that political and historical events are the result of conflict from social forces, with the conflict being caused by material needs. However, this idea isn't the only belief about the nature of history.

Keep in mind, dialectical materialism was never coined by Marx or  Engels. But rather, it was coined by Joseph Dietzgen.

Secondly, we have the cyclical view of history, which believes that everything in history will always repeat and is bound to repeat regardless of what humans do about it. This is a pretty simplistic view, which is why I haven't briefed too much about it.

There are more views and I am completely aware of that, however, I am not gonna go too much in depth.

Personally, I believe that history is written by individuals, believing that the reason why this is the case is because well, the written records of history only manage to persist through the writings of some individuals, whether it would be in  philosophy or in political theory.

While I don't believe that history was meant to be written by individuals, thanks to the creations of writing technologies, history has merely become something that individuals write and that it will be remembered upon over time spans.

Talking does not even last a year, meanwhile the written word can last centuries if well preserved, and the written word is always written down by individuals and not the masses. Which is why history has come to be individualistic in writing.

However, Owfism does believe there to be a struggle: A struggle between globalization or isolation. For most of human history, if one were to do good in society, that would require another person doing worse. This was through agrarianism and  mercantilism, systems which dominated in human history, up until the  industrial revolution.

However, inequality has not been completely eradicated in history, and inequality of outcome is still ever more relevant and it seems like globalization increased it. However, the main problem with globalization of today is that it is not done in human interests.

In history, inequality was driven by the human idea of isolation, the human idea of not globalizing, the human idea of compacting yourself into your own realm which would inevitably lead to inequality of outcome.

As such, Owfism comes to the conclusion that capitalists have co-opted globalization in order to continue suiting their needs and that socialism must use globalization to snatch it back to where it should be as a fundamental idea.

Owfism believes that a next phase is to follow, one which carries out human interests rather than capital interests, and he believes that this could allow the eventual eradication of inequality. literally Star Trek

This is while the next phase achieves space exploration and carries out globalization and interconnection to levels never before seen in human history so far.

Through this interpretation you could argue that Owfism is a dialectical materialist, as he believes that there is a struggle, however, he believes that it is not between social forces like the proletariat and bourgeoise but rather globalization and isolation, which could raise some ideas that Owfism is not a dialectical materialist.

(WIP)

[[File:Indiv.png]] Individual Rights [[File:Indiv.png]]
Owfism believes that to achieve human flourishing and have a good life, individuals should be free to do almost what they want, with them being able to know their limit before it is too late.

He believes that if society is permissive and allows individuals to do what they want and what they desire while also being  virtuous, not only a good life is guaranteed but also a good society, a great society to be exact.

[[File:Indlibsoc.png]] Individualism and Socialism [[File:Indlibsoc.png]]
Now, the question is, through what lens can we achieve the idea of individualism? Through which ideas we can have the individual feel free, not surveilled, not trampled? Through what the individual transmits it's individualism?

The lens in which we can achieve individualism is through socialism. Now how is this possible? Well, how can an individual express himself in capitalism when he is constraint to the idea of oppression, through working for someone seemingly as a slave, but paid a wage which does not even allow him to live life.

As such, work must be phased out in favor of automation, believing that work is a symptom of capitalism, while capitalism seems to have born by classical liberals, classical liberalism is merely a transformation of capitalism that has existed since the dawn of agriculture.

Classical liberalism was a transformation that was merely getting society closer to socialism, however, it was stopped by capitalists from achieving its main goal. And now, we're stuck with our current society.

Being a slave reduces man to a machine, the man is removed of thought and most importantly of freedom. Without thought, a human cannot feel freedom. And how can humans express thought? Through art. With this, art can be classified as individualism.

At work, humans are meant to act like machines, and they obviously will not be perfect, as humans have feelings and are human, so they make mistakes, so what's the point in hiring an animal with feelings to perform the work of a machine, when you can assign a machine to do it instead?

Owfism also believes that individualism is a symbol of resistance against authority, which mostly seeks to tear people apart through inequality thanks to the capitalist system that is engrained within our society of today. As capitalism of today is inherently collectivist.

Owfism also believes that there is another problem with capitalism: It tyrannizes habit. It has control over what humans do each its day, for example, most adults have to wake up and sleep at certain hours of a day just to be ready to perform some tasks imperfectly that could had been performed perfectly by a machine.

He believes that this is peak collectivism, and that through socialism we can liberate people from the hands of  work, and bring them forth into a new era  individualism, one where art, philosophy and theory can blossom without the burden of work on the human mind.

[[File:Anticap.png]] Why Capitalism is Against Individualism [[File:Trustbust.png]]
This is a rather hot take, now, Owfed, how is  Capitalism against  individualism? Simple. Let's first begin with the Classical liberal principles of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. These are all principles which sum up individualism, right? And to that I say yes, they are. However, capitalism has created a system of monopolization, which disincentivizes competition and thus disincentivizes freedom.

Capitalism in the modern world not only serves as completely against any form of business competition, which hinders economic freedom, it also oppresses workers and prevents them from unionizing and ensuring that they have their own self-management and freedom. This is in turn gives the Capitalists control over their workers, going against Individualism.

Capitalism, through worker oppression, through surveillance of the individual in basically every place he is in, whether in the supermarket or on the internet, through refusal to allow workers to have their own self-management, to not protecting workers from workplace harm, Capitalism right now goes against the 3 principles of Classical Liberalism, and is thus  anti-individualist.

[[File:Libms.png]] An Alternative [[File:Clib.png]]
We must transcend classical liberalism while still maintaining principles (Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness). How do we do that? Simple. A solution can already be found through Libertarian Market Socialism.

Libertarian Market Socialism ensures all the three principles are respected: Life (people are to live free from harm), Liberty (people are to be able to enjoy life) and the Pursuit of Happiness (people are to pursue their passions). This as such allows Libertarian Market Socialism to maintain the 3 principles of  Classical Liberalism.

Thus, achieving a society where Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness are truly respected, with people having a right to life, a right to liberty and a right to pursue happiness. This could mean that Owfism is a Liberal Socialist, at least in the historiographical form.

[[File:Constructivist.png]] Human Character [[File:Constructivist.png]]
Owfism is inherently constructivist, believing that the way humans act and understand the world are tied down to their own socio-economic conditions that they have been born with, rejecting  essentialism, which views individuals based on inherent, born traits.

The main reason why blacks for example are paid less than whites or why they are poorer than whites is not down to the traits they have as an individual when they are born, but by the socio-economic conditions they have, as they have been proven to change when those improved.

Owfism also believes that societal action often turns out to be more important than individual action, contrary to essentialist views of society that everything can just be solved by individuals "not being lazy". With problems like climate change contradicting this individual action is the right way in everything.

[[File:Virtue_ethics_icon.png]] Virtue Ethics [[File:Virtue_ethics_icon.png]]
To begin with this section, we first have to define what ethics are. What does it actually mean? In the simplest of terms, ethics are moral principles which govern a person's behavior or conducting of an ability.

Through ethics, a person is able to conclude if an action is in accordance with their moral principles (thus to be conducted) or it is not (thus it is not conducted).

Now, what is the best form of ethics (according to me)? The most ideal form of ethics is virtue ethics. Now, we have established what ethics are but what is virtue? What is it to be virtuous? Virtue is a behavior which shows high moral standards.

To Owfism, virtue is the ideal traits that are to be shown by individuals, believing that a virtuous man is a good man. A man who is not corrupt, a man who can be trusted to conduct proper action when it comes to a certain topic.

Owfism believes that while it is constructivist in the idea that humans have different traits based on socio-economic conditions, it believes that virtue is an ideal to be pursued by anyone, as it is a golden middle between excessive pleasure and no pleasure.

While it believes the idea of what is to be a virtuous man vary, according to Owfism, these 4 are the most important virtues a human can compel and have as moral principles:

- Courage (The ability to have confidence in yourself)

- Justice (The ability to give credit where its deserved)

- Friendship (The ability to form bonds with others)

- Wisdom (The ability to know how little we know)

Through this, Owfism seeks to combine stoic virtues and  aristotelian virtues, forming the basis of Owf's moral principles in general.

The main important role of virtue in its ethics is that it seeks to find a golden middle between excessive usage of all of these traits and the non-usage of any of these. Owfism sees virtue as an important moral middle ground which thus allows a person to live a good life on the right principles.

Through this, Owfism opposes hedonism, which it believes  it has excessive courage, justice and friendship while having no wisdom, thus making it completely non-virtuous. While pessimism it believes has no courage, justice, friendship and also no wisdom. Basically the opposite of hedonism, except for wisdom.

As such, with this, virtue can easily be viewed as a golden middle between those two unorthodox extremes of society, as it believes that those two are bad moral principles for a person to follow in life and it makes them miss opportunities when they come.

[[File:Eudaimonia.png]] Eudaimonia [[File:Eudaimonia.png]]
Now, another main ethics idea of Owfism is the idea of human flourishing, this being famously known as the idea of Eudaimonia. Now, the question is, what is to have human flourishing? What is to have Eudaimonia? While these are the same question, they both raise an important point.

To know what is eudaimonia we must first establish what is F, with F being virtue or pleasure. As such, eudaimonia is to have virtue and pleasure. With this, Owfism is eudaimonistic in its own thinking in this broad sense of the word.

While hedonist philosophers tend to equate Eudaimonia to pleasure, the fundamental truth about Eudaimonia it believes is the aretaic form, the form that emphasizes that human flourishing is not just to have pleasure, but to also be virtuous.

We have established what is to be virtuous, with there being 4 virtues: Courage, Justice, Friendship and Wisdom. Meanwhile, to have pleasure is pretty easy really to define and as such will not define it myself.

With this, Owfism asserts the idea that Eudaimonia is the highest phase of human life, believing it is thus the phase of a truly great life, and to have it, you are to be able to balance both  virtue and  pleasure, believing both are to be equally important and to be held to the same regard.

As such, Owfism's political beliefs mentioned in the section above philosophy all ties down to the idea that society should allow human flourishing (Eudaimonia) to truly occur, believing that Owf's political ideas follow the idea of Eudaimonia, as it ensures a great life for humans, as it makes everyone treated fairer.

[[File:Mill.png]] Harm Principle [[File:Mill.png]]
Another main idea in Owf's ethics is an idea proposed by John Stuart Mill called the Harm Principle. With the Harm Principle, Owfism believes that while freedom is good, it is to have a limit.

Now, what is the definition of harm? This is the main question when bringing up the idea of such principle as the Harm Principle. In simple terms, harm is something that would injure the rights of someone else or something.

Now, what is an example of harm? What qualifies as harm? An example of harm would not just be a physical hit to the face or body by someone else, however. An example of harm is when a person refuses to pay taxes, taxes which will go to helping the country or the citizens through infrastructure projects or government assistance.

A main criticism of the harm principle is it's vagueness in its definition of itself, with the main question being what exactly qualifies as harm under the harm principle? Now, we are going to respond to that.

First of all, this principle only requires to people who are able to exercise their freedom in a responsible manner. Here's an example: Paternalism (parents taking care of their children) is acceptable when it comes to children, since they are not to be able to exercise freedoms properly while for adults this is completely intolerable behavior.

A harmful event is only harmful if it makes an individual worse off overall, there are different ways this can happen, which is why there are different comparative amounts of harm.

With this, the state can only intervene on people's liberty if they pose as a harm to other people, however, thanks to Owf's political beliefs, this is very limited in scope and will not really be all that frequent, thus society still being mostly libertarian, however not absolute libertarian.

I could go on, but I am just gonna stop here since I've already mentioned mostly enough aspects.

Philosophy of War
The philosophy of war is the philosophy devoted to examining issues such as the causes of war, the correlation between human nature and war but also the ethical idea of war.

[[File:Tao.png]] Warfare [[File:Tao.png]]
Now, what is Owf's belief when it comes to warfare, what is his theory of war, well, this probably will not be a surprising belief as it is the main belief followed by historical figures like Napoleon.

The belief that I am talking about is Taoist warfare is created by Sun Tzu, now first we must find what Taoism is. Taoism is thus the philosophy of Lao Tzu which is in advocacy of humility and religious piety.

(WIP)

[[File:Necon.png]] The Cause of War [[File:Cball-China.png]]
What is the cause of war? What causes war? That is the main question that is related to the topic of war. The essential cause of the war itself.

Well, you can just look to the "pretexts" of wars and just say: Oh! that is the cause of the war! But in my opinion, that is completely wrong. The pretext of the war not only completely ignores the main cause of the war, but also the build-up that led to the cause of the war.

In my opinion, the reason for all wars in history and present has always been purely geopolitical in nature. While pretexts may say otherwise, wars have always been for a geopolitical purpose, whether it was to expand a nation's influence on the world stage or to gather new resources the invading nation does not have.

It always ties down to geopolitics in Owf's opinion. However, there is something more fundamental at play, which leads to the next section:

[[File:Antinat.png]] A Warfare Case for Anti-Nationalism [[File:Antinat.png]]
Why does geopolitics always cause wars? Well, there is something at play possibly more important than geopolitics. That is the idea of a nation state. The nation state has always existed since the dawn of the first civilization.

However, as history shows, the rise of the first nation state did not immediately began the first war. So that clearly means that the idea of a nation state has embroiled itself into the cause of wars over time. But why?

The answer is simple, according to Owfism, the inevitable birth of geopolitics by the  nation state, gave rise to the first wars. Why? It's because civilization leaders realized that if they had influence over another nation, they could gain resources they couldn't possibly dream to have here. So, how they gained resources they didn't have? By either conquering or influencing other nations into giving them their resources.

If they don't comply, then a nation would declare war at the non-complying nation and invade it, and this would be the norm for basically many centuries, but not just for resources, but for many other things that are tied to geopolitics.

But, something happened after the end of the Cold War that changed everything: That was globalization. After globalization began to be put into effect, wars that were nation invading another nation became rare if not non-existent, and the wars that were a thing were purely internal wars or civil wars.

The number of casualties in wars has basically decreased to a level never seen before. And this was technically thanks to globalization and opening up in trade, as a war now has consequences for not just the nation being invaded, but also the invader. Through sanctions.

However, as we saw in Ukraine, sanctions are not enough to stop the idea of a nation to nation conflicts and the game of  geopolitics continues to rage on. Which means there is a more fundamental problem at play. That being the nation state.

So, what is the alternative? Well, a united world federation could provide the answer. Such federation would basically abolish not just the nation state but also the need for  geopolitics.

What's the point of fighting over resources or gaining more influence if there is only one nation and there being all kinds of resources because well, its the entire planet under the control of a World Federation. Well, it could be entirely possible that war as a concept may cease to exist, or even be very limited.

[[File:Pragmat.png]] Realpolitik [[File:Mach.png]]
What is Realpolitik? That is the question that springs up to your mind. Real politics is based on practical ideas and not ideological beliefs, this is the reason why ideologies like Communism  have never become a thing or even got close to being a thing.

It is because the people have been convinced by the rulers into believing the things that are practical and not the things that are ideal. People no longer have the pursuit of the idea, but the pursuit of what can be done, what can be done right now, and not fall to moral dogmas.

Why do people want to rule? This is a pretty interesting question, and the main idea is the incentive of power. Power is the driving incentive of rulers and is the way the State has managed to stay for so long and how it will stay for so long. It is the idea of power, the idea to truly stand out among the rest of society, to go down in history, whether it is good or bad.

This is why ideologies like Third Way have become the dominant forces of the Left, instead of  Communism, as the Third Way is deemed the more practical and more realistic ideology to the populace, while Socialism is seen as some utopian idea, an impossible task.

[[File:RomSto.png]] Citizenship [[File:RomSto.png]]
Owfism believes that by nature, humans have two citizenships: Citizenship to their homeland and to the  world. And with this, came two sets of responsibilities: Responsibility to your homeland and responsibility to the world.

As such, Owfism follows a belief that is closer to the ideas of Roman Stoic Marcus Aurelius.

[[File:Cosmo.png]] Globalization [[File:Cosmo.png]]
Owfism, on diplomacy is firmly a cosmopolitan, believing that, globalization is a natural process and it has been shown over history as human civilization has become ever more interconnected, today being more interconnected than it ever was before, with Owfism subscribing to  cosmopolitan international theories.

Globalization right now may have barriers but it can overcome them and the world can become even more globalized, this rise in globalization could potentially give rise to Liberal democracy in previously autocratic countries.

[[File:Liberal_Democracy.png]] Virtuous and Corrupt Governments [[File:Oligarchy.png]]
Owfism believes that a government to be good it must be virtuous, this applies to any form of government and is not relegated to Democracy. Over history, it has been very clear that the governments which were popular, the governments which delivered good results were the governments who had virtue.

So, Owfism do you support Stoic virtues or  Aristotelian virtues? And personally, I support Aristotelian virtues. Owfism believes that the virtues of Wisdom, Justice and Friendship are the main driving forces that allow a government to be virtuous, and a government cannot be virtuous if one of them isn't there.

Good examples of virtuous forms of governments are:  Democracy,  Direct Democracy,  Monarchy and  Security (authoritarianism).

In rest, if one of the virtues or all of the virtues are not there then the government is not virtuous. It is thus a corrupt government.

Examples of corrupt forms of governments are: Oligarchy, Ochlocracy,  Tyranny and  Autocracy.

=Aesthetics=

1. Solarpunk

Owfism subscribes to Solarpunk aesthetics, with these types of aesthetics being used on planets, more specifically, habitable planets in the Goldilocks zone of their own Solar System. With architecture including lots of greenery and emits little if not no CO2 as things are basically electrified, powered on the power of the sun or other renewable powers.

2. Atompunk

This type of aesthetics is used on housing in international space stations, with cities being designed and powered based on the idea of fusion power (In the long-term) or just modern fission power in the short and medium term. These energy sources have little to no CO2 and as such everything will be eco-friendly too.

3. Lunarpunk

This type of aesthetics is used on housing placed on the moon, houses will also be powered by the Sun and other sources of  renewable energy. Houses on the moon will follow the idea of Lunarpunk and fit in with the aesthetic of the Lunar surface.

Yes these are all based according to me.

=Personality=

MBTI
INTP (Introverted, Intuitive, Thinking, Perceiving)

Enneagram
5w4

=Relations= Work in progress

Friends

 * [[File:Tripartism.png]] Tripartism Praxis!
 * [[File:Marketsoc.png]] Even more Praxis!
 * [[File:Civlibert.png]] Civil Liberties now! Civil Liberties tomorrow! Civil Liberties forever!
 * [[File:Social_corpratism.png]] Yes, we need class collaboration!
 * [[File:Libms.png]] Perfection.
 * [[File:Prog-u.png]] We must progress!
 * [[File:Aristotle.png]] Aristotelianism Probably the best philosophy ever.
 * [[File:Virtue_ethics_icon.png]] Virtue Ethics The ethics we need. End hedonism and nihilism!
 * [[File:Keynes.png]] Probably the best capitalist form of economics.
 * [[File:Georgist.png]] Another very good economist.
 * [[File:Socgeo.png]] - Welfare + LVT = Perfect
 * [[File:UBI.png]] - Very necessary measure in a post-work future.
 * [[File:Socliber.png]] - Decent ideology, Libertarian Social Democracy is pretty good though.
 * [[File:PatProg.png]] - The state must be paternalistic and uphold social progress.
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] - Decent first step in achieving my society.
 * [[File:Liberalsoc.png]] - Actually not that bad, Adam Something is pretty based Although Vaush is shit

Frenemies

 * [[File:Bidenism.png]] Bidenism - Your presidency is meh, better than orange man though. DARK BRANDON HECK YEA!!11
 * [[File:Awaj.png]] - Anti-authoritarianism and all are good but a state is still sort of needed.
 * [[File:SocCap.png]] - Could be more regulatory, otherwise not the worst
 * [[File:Starmer2.png]] Starmerism - Literally the British Joe Biden. Pretty meh. Still better than weird hair man.

Enemies

 * [[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] - End the status quo!
 * [[File:Nihil.png]] - Bruh you just want to die and always think life bad.
 * [[File:Hedonism-cloud.png]] Hedonism - Too much pleasure. Please tone it down.
 * [[File:HedCap.png]] Hedonistic Capitalism - Literally the current system.
 * [[File:XiJinpingThoughtf.png]] Xi Jinping Thought - Ruthless authoritarian who spies civilians, bans internet websites and tries to take over the world and insert all of the same things internationally. AAAAAA!
 * [[File:Hitler.png]] - I dont think I have to explain why I hate the Nazis.
 * [[File:Rockwell.png]] - Same as above.
 * [[File:Juche.png]] - Real life NazBol  + excessive totalitarianism
 * [[File:ML.png]] - Planned socialism does not work, class war does not work. Excessive totalitarianism is also pretty terrible.
 * [[File:Dengf.png]] - The only good thing I can credit you with is that you managed to make your country a superpower, however, in rest you are very terrible.
 * [[File:Ingsocf.png]] - The last society I would ever want to happen. DIE.
 * [[File:Markets.png]] - Unregulated Capitalism is the worst form of Capitalism. That is the truth.
 * [[File:Sec.png]] - DO NOT TREAD ON ME.
 * [[File:Corp.png]] - You must be busted. Also, do not tread on my rights!
 * [[File:MegaCorp.png]] - Here it is. An ideology worse than Ingsoc.
 * [[File:DemocratF.png]] Democratism - This is complicated. The Democrats are better than the Republicans and I would had put them in Frenemies, however, we must not ignore that your Centrism and them being also taken over by corporations just result in barely any action in repealing previous Republican legislation. Most Democrats are just in the hands of corporate pockets and are GOP-lite. Only Sanders and other American progressive democrats are really keeping me from not hating it completely like the GOP.
 * [[File:USAGOP.png]] American Republicanism - The GOP is literally a far-right party, it is easily seen by the January 6th insurrection, the GOP-dominated Supreme Court. When the Democrats have a narrow majority in Congress, the GOP does everything to prevent the Democrats from doing actually good actions, and as such, their actions are limited and barely undo previous GOP nonsense laws. Then in the midterms they take over Congress and implement laws which practically undo all the good Democrats implemented.
 * [[File:PSD.png]] - Very bad Romanian political party, the only remotely good thing is their economics I guess, however, their massive amounts of corruption and very terrible social policies and religion policies just makes them worse.

=Relations (Self-Inserts)=

Friends

 * [[File:GeoCat.png]] Georgist Catism Georgism + Cat = BASED
 * [[File:Cat_icon.png]] Catism Cats are cute! I love cats!
 * [[File:Yoda8soup.png]] Yoda8soup Thought You're pretty based, although you're more economically leftist than me.
 * [[File:Cflski_(general).png]] Pretty nice that you oppose Xi Jinping and other autocrats, but you should be more progressive.
 * [[File:MATTball.png]] You are almost the same as me, you're very based!
 * [[File:Uzarashvilism.png]] My more Conservative [[File:Conservative.png]] and more statist [[File:Sec.png]] Georgian [[File:Cball-Georgia.png]] counterpart. Not bad!
 * [[File:Liblovsprite.png]] You are almost my more extreme anarchist part, youre actually not that bad.
 * [[File:Beryism.gif]] Too capitalist, at least you support LVT + Technogaianism
 * [[File:Syntridem2.png]] Syncretic Tridemism You are not that bad, you like Sun Yat-sen, Theodore Roosevelt and Henry George. I just wish you were less statist and nationalist.
 * [[File:Tomjaz.png]] Tomjazzism Pretty based ideology ngl
 * [[File:Panth.png]] Pantheonism I do not agree with some of your takes but pretty good nonetheless
 * [[File:Touseyism_ball.png]] Neo-Touseyism We disagree on some stuff and I am not really into Anarchism, but its still a pretty good ideology.
 * [[File:Atronism-icon.png]] Atronism Typical far-left American commie, while he is too extreme for me sometimes, at least you dont support authoritarian so-called Communist regimes of today. (except Cuba, but its mostly ok)
 * [[File:Glencoe.png]] Glencoeism Pretty based policies overall.
 * Your economics are now decently similar to mine, seems like a more conservative and authoritarian version of me.
 * [[File:EvolvingSoc.png]] Evolutionary Socialism Not gonna lie, you are pretty similar to me economically and socially, the only slightly major difference is our stance towards internationalization. Pretty good!
 * [[File:AROsaIcon.png]] Arosaism SOLARPUNK IS BASED! You hate the right ideologies, although I think you probably don't like Market Socialism, but still, overall you're not too bad even if you are Egoist.

Frenemies

 * [[File:AuthCat_Icon.png]] Authoritarian Catism Cats are nice but why Authoritarianism?
 * [[File:Nihilcat.png]] Nihilist Catism Why are you sad? There are still so many birds and mice to catch!
 * [[File:AshleyHere.png]] AshleyHere Thought Anti-Authoritarianism is based, but how can you even be implemented?
 * [[File:Hamburger.png]] Rejuvenative Hamburg thought You have some good economic policies, you support UBI and all, I like that, but the problem I have with you is the fact that you support making every village independent, it is so difficult to implement and how will the world even co-operate when there are 7,000 or more Liechtenstein sized countries all over the world? How could we do any international-related stuff?
 * I like your support of Democratic Socialism and Market Socialism, but do not like your support of Marxism-Leninism and Dengism. Please tone that down.
 * Ronwelltarianism_icon.png Ronwelltarianism I have pretty mixed opinions about you, I like your support of guns, liberty and welfare but I am not so sure about Childism and Anti-Abortion though...
 * [[File:Councilguy2.png]] Post-Councilism You are an anarchist opposed to capitalism and wants egalitarianism, individualism is based but I do not really like the pessimism.
 * [[File:InexistentIcon.png]] Inexistent Ideology First off it is nice that you like Socialism, Henry George and Theodore Roosevelt. However though I think you take Socialism way too far and while Transhumanism is based I think it is also too extreme. Also cool it down with the Europhobia. Also far too authoritarian for me.
 * [[File:Ultro.png]] Ultroneism I really cannot judge your political beliefs, since well, you literally do not have any. I am gonna judge your philosophical beliefs, first off, I really do not like your opposition to humanism, I also do not like Egoism. I am not that well versed in Hegelianism, Heracliteanism, Nominalism and Post-Modernism to really give a proper opinion on those. Although, to be fair, you managed to make me abandon the fourth Aristotelian cause concept and you are also probably the most literate and informed user out here.
 * [[File:Ioist.png]] Ego-Progressivism You seem to be a more extremist version of me, but you're also an [[File:Ego.png]] Egoist and [[File:Existentialist_Anarchism.png]] Existentialist Anarchist, philosophies which I do not really affiliate with (although I do support Existentialism). So yea, not too bad but not too good for me. Also stop supporting [[File:Vaush.png]] Vaush
 * [[File:MLL.png]] Libra Thought You are pretty close to me putting you in enemies tier, however, at least you are for eco-socialism, semi-direct democracy is good, but sort of deviates from my intended idea of it.
 * [[File:XT.png]] XarTario Thought (I would had put your old self-insert here too but it turns out you're pretty similar so...) Well, you have some good points but in rest you are pretty wacky in my opinion, same with old but new, if I had to choose a better one it'd be the newer one though. Still, both remain in frenemies.

Enemies

 * [[File:Christpop.png]] You are the embodiment of nearly everything I hate! < (I didn't do this edit, but he is actually right)
 * [[File:Nekoismf.png]] FAKE CAT! WEEB!
 * [[File:METBOL.png]] Cringe Trumpist thats all I have to say
 * [[File:Atacc_icon.png]] The disintegration of human experience and thought under the hands of an accelerationist collective cult is the most dystopian thing ever.
 * Cringe
 * [[File:Pixil-frame-0(16).png]] Similar to the other guy above, with some distinctions.
 * How many french far-right reactionaries are there?
 * [[File:pixil-frame-0(27).png]] You barely improved from your last ideology, at least you embrace a bit of Market Socialism I guess?
 * [[File:Technototball.png]] Techno-Ultranationalism - I really hate your authoritarianism, posthumanism and also very right-wing cultural stances. Eh, at least is an environmentalist and corporatist. Although not really enough to put you at Frenemies imo. Transhumanism is not that bad though, although should be voluntary.
 * [[File:Thanat.png]] Thanatism - Your free speech and love for freedom are very tolerable, but your very capitalist economics, egoism, pro-life stance on abortion and support of Objectivism is just terrible. Restricting abortion just restricts people of their liberty, and the free market restricting/regulating the use of drugs is just laughable. With this, the free market will just become a state of its own and just make the state come back, the very thing you sought to die. I could continue to go on about your ideology, but I am just gonna stop here since its already taking up a lot of space.
 * [[File:NekoqingBolsh.png]] Nekoqingist Bolshevism - It's nice that you support Market Socialism, but your support for [[File:AuthSoc.png]] authoritarian socialist figures kinda conflicts with that. Your cultural policies are pretty terrible, your opposition to [[File:Indiv.png]] individualism is terrible. You support eco-socialism, but I hate how you only reserve it to developed countries. Your support for [[File:XiJinpingThoughtf.png]] him I also hate, overall a pretty terrible ideology.
 * [[File:Vermaatism2.png]] Vermaatism - (Sorry for forgetting to add you, kind of overlooked your comment for such a time) First of all, you claim to support [[File:Indiv.png]] individualism, however through post-humanism, ethnopluralism and totalitarianism you just are completely contradictory to the idea of individualism. You love world federalism, space and science, UBI is based but overall your ideology ain't that good imo.

=Figures=

S
Aristotle - Syllogism and virtue ethics are all very based! Truly one of the best philosophers ever in my opinion and also a huge influence on my philosophy. While yes you had your flaws like the 5 elements and geocentrism, those were merely because of your time or a zeitgeist.

Franklin D. Roosevelt - One of the best U.S Presidents ever. The New Deal is pretty based and you are probably the only  democratic socialist president in the United States. Although, leave those japanese people alone, they're not imperialists.

- I like Stephen Hawking, the multiverse theory is something I personally support (in my metaphysical beliefs) and I just love science in general. Pretty funny how you said philosophy was dead but your multiverse theory is philosophical in nature

- Advocated for probably the best form of individualism in my opinion. Proof that Socialism can be individualist.

A
Socrates - The founder of Western philosophy itself. Your epistemological beliefs are pretty based, although your approach to skepticism ain't that good to me, I prefer  Cartesian skepticism instead, but still good philosopher overall.

- You really contributed to the Enlightenment and all, which gave birth to modern Democracy, which I obviously support, but come on, rigging the lottery is bad.

B
Immanuel Kant - Your epistemological beliefs about the way humans perceive the world is pretty correct in my opinion, and you contributed at least a bit to the Enlightenment but, please, stop being so  racist.

C
Friedrich Nietzsche - Your metaphysics about eternal recurrence are really good in my opinion but that's like the only good thing about you, and you may or may not have given rise to the Third Reich.

Rene Descartes - Your views on skepticism are pretty based, but in rest, I have literally no other point that I agree with you, an example being the dualism you believe in.

D
- Your liberalization and thaw that happened under your administration were based, your virgin lands campaign was eh, decent, but I hate your intervention in Hungary against Imre Nagy, your state atheism and opposition to  worker co-operatives.

F
- Evil dictator, who tried to put the entirety of Europe (and possibly the world) under his messed up beliefs. You also started WW2, what would become the most deadly war in the history of mankind, if only they accepted you to that art school

Plato - Your political beliefs are messed up, so are your beliefs about the human body, along with your metaphysics and also your idea of philosopher kings is terrible. Truly a terrible philosophy. Eh, at least you later embraced virtue ethics, but it doesn't make up for your terrible shit.

Test results
Closest match : Democratic Socialism

Closest match : INTP

Closest match : Libertarian Socialism

Closest match : Liberal Socialism

Closest match : Left-Libertarianism

Comment
- Wanna add me? Casagonism - Add me, i added you in my relations. - Add me.
 * [[File:Neo-XarTario.png]] XarTario [[File:XT.png]] - Can you add my current self-insert and former self-insert? NOTE: They're pretty similar, but with several differences and similarities. You can compare them to each other if you want too.
 * Arosa - kinda spooky but I respect you (SLIGHTLY!!!)
 * [[File:pixil-frame-0(27).png]] New Model Of Cheesenism - add me
 * [[File:Pixil-frame-0(16).png]] Reactionary-Cheesenism- add me
 * - Add me?
 * Owfism - Sure!
 * - Add me ? :)
 * Owfism - Sure!
 * - Add me please? Also noticed you needed a ball.
 * Owfism [[File:OwfBall.png]]- Sure, and thank you for the ball!
 * - add catism and variants
 * [[File:OwfBall.png]] Owfism - Thanks for the suggestion!
 * - you forgot [[File:TranshCat.png]] robot cat
 * [[File:Uzarashvilism.png]] - Ay, wanna add me?
 * [[File:OwfBall.png]] - Sure!
 * - Add me?
 * - add me please
 * - Added you. Now add me plez?????
 * [[file:Liblovsprite.png]] Liberty-Loverism Can you me add now that I've added you?
 * - Could you add me?
 * - Heya, I added you, sorry for being so late. Mind adding me back?
 * [[File:Syntridem2.png]] - Add me?

Tomjazzism - Add me?


 * - Add me pls.

Pantheonism - Would you mind to add me? From what I've read about your Ideology I agree with almost everything.


 * Ronwelltarianism_icon.png Ronwelltarianism - Do you mind if you can add me?
 * [[File:Panth.png]]Pantheonism - Sure.

Atronism - Could you add me, as I have added you?
 * [[File:Glencoe.png]] Glencoe- add me ?
 * [[File:Atronism-icon.png]] Atronism - I did.

Atronism - As you requested, here are the drawings. https://bit.ly/3OTuIqW and https://bit.ly/3zgwZ9O.
 * [[File:OwfBall.png]] Owfism - Those are very nice drawings! I am gonna go with the second one.

- Add me?


 * Add me please

- Add me

- May I be added?

- Aaadd meee?

Nekoqing- Add me?


 * [[File:BasedMan.png]]BasedManism - add me?


 * [[File:MLL.png]] CynicalLibra - Add me please.


 * - Mind/Body issue is a problem of substance and thus ontology, Heliocentrism & Universal Attraction is physics not metaphysics (Also universal attaraction is outdated), Immanent realism is awful and fails to account for Individuation. Syllogism is Logic not epistemology. Individual rights, nature of history, and anti-capitalism, harm principle, constructivism is not ontology, it is political or sociological. Ontology is the structure of reality, i.e. if things are abstract or concrete, or they are universal or particular, or whether substances are grounded, etc. Harm principle is too vague to actually dictate anything, Nihilism is not pessimism. I could go on...
 * [[File:OwfBall.png]] Owfism - I had just begun to revamp my page after I had changed my beliefs due to becoming more informed, I have abandoned Immanent realism and have now mentioned in heliocentrism that it is not philosophy and thus I have stop mentioning further about it, I will flesh up the others soon, but right now I am busy with real life stuff and I will also reply to the harm principle criticism later too.