Aggressivism

Aggressivism, Ego-Combatocracy or shortned to Aggre is an Off-The-Compass  Libertarian Right and Stalwart ideology that believes that an individual should be able to do anything they desire, resulting in the strongest individuals exercing their egos over those weaker. Aggressivism believes that the strong rightfully deserve to impose their wills since they are capable of doing it and proposes a Duelist Principle (DP) as opposed to the NAP.

Belies
Aggressivism believes in the right to rule of the strong like Combatocracy and  Kraterocracy, but ultimatly rejects the state, opting for  instead, He desires the individualization of the violence in his system thus similarly to  Nilssonian Anarcho-Fascism opposes the government monopoly on violence, tho unlike it, Aggressivism also opposes the very existence of the state for it being a spook that would ultimately intervene with the ego's of the strong.

The Duelist Principle
Very simply, the Duelist Principle states that 2 to more consenting individuals may start combat, to win a duel one may beat the opponent ultil they can no longer fight or until the opponent is deceased. The rewards to the winner and punishement to the loser are also decided by the combatants. Aggressivism preferes this principle over the NAP for unlike the NAP the Duelist Principle allow the initiation of non-defensive violence, Aggressivism specially criticizes the NAP for limiting the strong from doing as they desire and giving unrightful protection to the weak.

Stalwartism and Culture
In an Aggressivist society the strong dictate society, but not by a state but by the fact the strong naturally are more capable of expressing their ego's unoposed, as they also can rid of their opposition by the fact they are strong. Therefore, an aggressivist society is heavily Stalwart with the culture revolving around the strong and their desires.

Aggressivism vs Avarationism
One may come at first glance that Aggressivism is simply a copy of avaritionism, but in reality there are many diferences to both ideologies. Avaritionism calls for the complete extermination of the weak, seeing the weak as incapable of having a tolerable existence while Aggressivism desires the subjugation of the weak to the ego's of the strong, it also believes the weak can achieve tolerable existence by becoming strong themselves and thus under the DP being able to express their desires. Avaritionism embraces economic darwinist principles while Aggressivism is cautious with them, as a life of luxury may eventually lead to the strong degenerating into weaklings.

How to draw

 * 1) Draw a ball
 * 2) Fill the space with a lighter shade of Black (#141414) or a Light Gray (#333D3D)
 * 3) Draw four arrows pointing to the cardinal directions colored with Orange (#FB9602)
 * 4) Add the eyes.
 * 5) Done.

Wacky Gang

 * [[file:EthicDarwin.png]] Ethical Darwinism - You see the benefits of violence but you think "morality" isn't just a social contruct.
 * [[File:medi1.png]] Medievalism - You're authoritarian and I don't really understand your "god" thing but violence based.
 * [[File:Analtru.png]] Anarcho-Altruism - You claim to want people to be free but I'm not allowed to punch random people on the street?

Positive

 * [[File:Avar.png]] - I'm not really for killing the weak, but you're still based.
 * [[File:Ego.png]] - Also doesn't believe morality is objective.
 * [[File:Comb.png]] - The state is a spook father,
 * [[File:Anfashf.png]]  - I like you, specially [[File:Anarcho-Fascismalt.png]] That version of you.
 * [[File: Feud.png]] - The good old days.

Neutral

 * [[File:Darwinist.png]] - I do not desire the extermination of the weak, also you are a statist
 * [[File:Soul.png]] - Egoist, but you're system ultimately embraces weakness.
 * [[File:Krater.png]] - Might does make right, but you're too authoritarian to my liking.
 * [[File:Ancapf.png]] - Property isn't a "right", it's a priviledge of the strong!
 * [[File:Oligarchy.png]] - You could serve the needs of the strong or protect a weak elite.
 * [[File:Cap.png]] - I also enjoy hierarchies, but luxury eventually leads to weak men.

Negative

 * [[File:Anpacf.png]] - If you're too cowardly to fight for your freedom you deserve to be oppresed!
 * [[File:Communalist.png]] - The literal worshiping of weakness.
 * [[File: Dem.png]] - Oppresion by the weak, what a hellish system.
 * [[File:Hmind.png]] - Send how many drones you like, I'll kill them all!