Post-Avaritionism

Post-Avaritionism is an economically off-compass right, civically off-compass libertarian, and culturally variable (although leaning right) ideology based on the (satirical) beliefs of a few characters. It lies on the blinded compass libertarian right section. Basically about as right-libertarian you can go. It is the child of Avaritionism with Post-Right Anarchism.

Economic Views
Economically, it is social darwinist to the max. It believes in a microcompetitive  omni-market economic model based on the ideas of "survival of the fittest" and selfishness (kind of like  ). Think about the Purge movie series but 10 times more extreme and you basically get this. There will be a battle royale to see who can be the last one surviving and the one who can get the most money and valuables (kind of like plunder in COD: Modern Warfare).

Civil Views
It believes in an  society. It is very  to the point where all morals are seen as "statist". However, it still does have a caste system-like hierarchy.

This is the hierarchy (caste 1 being the highest while caste 5 being the lowest):
 * 1) This is the highest caste. Reserved for [[File:Ego.png]]  and the [[File:Economic Darwinism.png]] and.
 * 2) The second-highest caste. Pretty much [[File:Cap.png]], [[File:Awaj.png]] , and the like.
 * 3) The middle caste. Consists of the [[File:Capcom.png]]  and anything else.
 * 4) The second-lowest caste. [[File:Socdem.png]]  and [[File:Sec.png]] statists would be in that caste.
 * 5) The lowest caste. [[File:Totalitarian.png]], [[File:PolState.png]] , [[File:Soc.png]] , and the whole [[File:Leftunity.png]] economic left would be there.

There is also an above and below the caste hierarchy. Above the caste is reserved for  and the like, whereas below the caste will be reserved for   and the like.

Cultural Views
Culturally, it is syncretic. It wants to abolish most hierarchies but its own hierarchy (seen above) is kept, however it is mainly just a civil/economic hierarchy. Other than that, it is socially syncretic, as it doesn't fit in with  or   values.

Diplomatic Views
Diplomatically, it is, however only on intervention issues. It believes in a more extreme version of  foreign policy, believing that it should be spread worldwide, meaning that it's a more extreme version of   on this issue.