Aggressivism

Aggressivism, Ego-Combatocracy or shortned to Aggre is an off-the-compass  Libertarian Right and Stalwart ideology that believes that an individual should be able to do anything they desire, resulting in the strongest individuals subjugating the weak to their desires. Aggressivism believes that as individuals act in their personal interests the stonger, more capable individuals will be able to exercize their desires more than the weak creating, as aggressivism calls it, a "hierarchy of ego".

Belies
Aggressivism believes in the right to rule of the strong like Combatocracy and  Kraterocracy, but ultimatly rejects the state, opting for  Egoism instead, He desires in the individualization of the violence in his system similarly to  Nilssonian Anarcho-Fascism but unlike it, Aggressivism opposes the very existence of the state for it being a spook that would ultimately intervene with the ego's of the strong.

[[File:DuelValue.png]] The Duelist Principle
The Duelist Principle states that any 2 to more consenting individuals may start combat amongst each other to seetle disputes or whatever other reason. This principle works as al alternative to the NAP, allowing the initiation of violence, while not allowing for meaningless murder and aggression.

[[File:Stalwart.png]] Stalwartism without state
In an aggressivism the strong dictate everything, but not by a state. As individuals may do whatever they desire it is inevitable two uniques with clashing interests will meet, naturally the strongest of the two will win and get to fufil their desires, in this way an aggressivist society has a "hierarchy of freedom", the "strong" being the ones on top as they may defend and exercise their egos, the weak having no options other than being subordunate to the will of those stronger.

[[File:Anmona.png]] Aggressivist Society [[File:AnComb.png]]
How does a aggressivist society work? As mentioned in the previous section, the strong rule, not throught the state but throught the natural hierarchy, an aggressivist community could be seen similarly to a form of anarcho-monarchy, one or a group of individuals on the top of the "strenght hierarchy" get to do as they please, the weak are indirectly subjugated, as they may do what they want until their desires clash with a stronger individual, or directly as aggressivism sees it's in the best interest of the strong to subjugate the weak to achieve what their desires. Inside the group of strong individuals duelism still happens but more fair.

[[File:Agress.png]] Aggressivism vs Avaritionism [[File:Avar.png]]
Avaritionism believes it's in the best interest of the strong to eliminate the weak, Aggressivism believes the strong have no universal interest towards the weak but believes it would be more beneficial if they subjugated the weak to their will. Avaritionism commits violence mindlessly like an animal, aggressivism has, as he describes it "a more civilized form of violence".

How to draw

 * 1) Draw a ball
 * 2) Fill the space with a lighter shade of Black (#141414) or a Light Gray (#333D3D)
 * 3) Draw four arrows pointing to the cardinal directions colored with Orange (#FB9602)
 * 4) Add the eyes.
 * 5) Done.

Wacky Gang

 * [[file:EthicDarwin.png]] Ethical Darwinism - You see the benefits of violence but you think "morality" isn't just a social contruct.
 * [[File:medi1.png]] Medievalism - You're authoritarian and I don't really understand your "god" thing but violence based.
 * [[File:Analtru.png]] Anarcho-Altruism - You claim to want people to be free but I'm not allowed to punch random people on the street?

Positive

 * [[File:Avar.png]] - My best brother, but do you not see the many benefits the weak have for the strong?
 * [[File:Ego.png]] - You're mostly correct father, but why must you reject hierarchy?
 * [[File:Comb.png]] - The state is a spook father.
 * [[File:Anfashf.png]]  - I like you, specially [[File:Anarcho-Fascismalt.png]] That version of you.
 * [[File:Anmona.png]] - Our systems are similar in practice.
 * [[File:Nrx.png]] - Egalitarianism sure is spooked, but why embrace the government?
 * [[File:Illeg.png]] - If the strong want something, they will take it!?

Neutral

 * [[File:Darwinist.png]] - I do not desire the extermination of the weak, also you are a statist
 * [[File:Soul.png]] - Egoist, but you're system ultimately embraces weakness.
 * [[File:Krater.png]] - Might does make right, but you're too authoritarian to my liking.
 * [[File:Ancapf.png]] - Property isn't a "right", it's a privilege for the strong!
 * [[File:Oligarchy.png]] - You could serve the needs of the strong or protect a weak elite.
 * [[File:Cap.png]] - I also enjoy hierarchies, but luxury eventually leads to weakness.

Negative

 * [[File:Anpacf.png]] - If you're too cowardly to fight for your freedom you deserve to be oppresed!
 * [[File:Communalist.png]] - The literal worshiping of weakness.
 * [[File: Dem.png]] - Oppresion by the weak, what a hellish system.
 * [[File:Hmind.png]] - Weakling that seeks strenght in numbers.