Dingusbingusism

Dingusbingusism is the personal ideology of Dingusbingus, it proposes a set of ethics called "Post-Consequentialism", and combines it with Anarcho-Capitalism, favoring a "privatized polycentric society" as set out in the books "A Spontaneous Order: The Capitalist Case for A Stateless Society" and "Chaos Theory: Two Essays on Market Anarchy".

Post-Consequentialism
Post-Consequentialism is a set of ethics which combines the Non-Aggression Axiom and The Consequentialist Ethic. Basically, whatever is both non-aggressive AND has good consequences, ultimately is ethical. Some actions which are non-aggressive, an example such as lying, can lead to bad consequences, but isn't necessarily "aggressive".

[[File:Panarchy.png]]Privatized polycentric law[[File:Volu.png]]
Essentially, the form of "government" that Dingusbingus prefers is a government where "leadership" is decentralized all the way down to the individual and his property. His property is his "ruling grounds", and anyone can choose voluntarily to live under that supposed property. "Laws" would be decided privately, among property owners and their private defense agencies. "Crime" would be dealt with BY these private defense agencies, which have shown to be more efficient than national police.

[[File:Anpostr.png]]Criticism of modern "libertarians"[[File:Anpostr.png]]
Dingusbingus essentially states that the modern right-wing libertarians have started to become less like their original Rothbardian ideals and more into an electoralist and more left-wing variation of American conservatism. Often, he'll side with the Post-Right Anarchists on such issues as distancing himself from the modern-right wing, but being against their egoist desires.

[[File:Mut_Alt.png]]Pity for the old Libertarian Left[[File:Agorismf.png]]
Dingusbingus also shows compassion and pity for the old branch of Left-Libertarians which were Anti-State, Pro-Market, Pro-Property, and while those old Left-Libertarians eventually came back as Agorists, Dingusbingus shows regret and sorrow for the dying off of old Left-Libertarians which didn't advocate for collectivized property and violence.

Friends

 * [[File:Ancapf.png]] Anarcho-Capitalism You set off the laying grounds for my ideas, but you are too basic for me, simply relying on non-aggression as what is ethical, isn't enough to explain what is ethical. Lying for instance isn't aggressive, but it can lead to bad consequences.
 * [[File:Hoppef.png]] Hoppeanism You have done a great amount of things for the Right-Libertarian Anarchist-sphere, your Argumentation Ethics have done a great deal in explaining objectively why property rights are good. Although, at the same time, it's because of you that several edgy 6th graders have been trying to appropriate your work in order to justify genocide against those who disagreed with them, and they think that "physical removal" means dropping people out of helicopters for god's sake! I respect and adore your work, but you kinda caused an unfortunate niche group of people who say they read Hoppe, and call themselves "Monarchists" without even having READ your fantastic works.
 * [[File:Anmona.png]] Anarcho-Monarchism Your ideology is very much intriguing, while it definitely comes off as a joke, your system could be implemented if the role of "leadership" was shrinked to that of the individual, therefore making every person a "king" or "queen", so by this definition, your system could totally be implemented! Maybe under another name, because I will agree that the name is kinda stupid, and needs to be updated to make more sense by name.
 * [[File:Agorismf.png]] Agorism I adore your ideology which attempts to put in an efficient and working method in order to abolish the state, however, I do believe in the notion that this is a means to GET to a supposed "Ancapistan", because the Agora is simply put, an "Ancapistan reimagined". In short, you are great, but you're not a separate ideology. You're just a method to abolishing the state peacefully.
 * [[File:Panarchy.png]] Your ideas of hyper-decentralized communities competing for the consumer's best interests are SUPER great! I wish that there were a LOT more Anarchist theorists which SUPPORT your position!

Frenemies

 * [[File:Anpostr.png]] Post-Right Anarchism While your ideals of criticizing the right from an extreme standpoint is definitely a great thing, egoism and "anti-ethics" are not a good thing in my mind. If anything, anti-ethics are spooked.
 * [[File:Mut_Alt.png]] Mutualism Your ideas are definitely a product of their time. Classical economics and the labor theory of value are not sufficable economic theories now that the Subjective Theory of Value exists, along with your quote "Property is theft", which you have thankfully clarified that by "property", you meant "state-privileged property" and not ownership and property in general. But you unfortunately have fallen victim to misquotations by the very collectivist anarchists that Proudhon swore to be his enemy. Rest in peace, and I hope your ideals can revive someday, especially if left-anarchists actually READ your works instead of quoting you once and never again.
 * [[File:Clib.png]] Classical Liberalism Very boring, definitely a product of it's time, the myth of a "minimal state" is too risky to achieve. Every instance of a "limited state", eventually transformed into a BIG state which crushes and coerces the lives of their citizens day by day.

Enemies

 * [[File:Communalist.png]] Communalism Jesus fucking Christ, that's disgusting!
 * [[File:Avar.png]] Avaritionism Oh my...you are just the worst, aren't you?