Pantheonism

Pantheonism is a Leftist, culturally variable, statist Ideology. It is the self-Insert ideology of the Wiki user Pantheon.

Pantheonism seeks to unite humanity within a federal gouvernment with a Social Distributist and Guild Socialist Economy, under one crown (well technically many) and banner in order to explore and conquer the stars and to end violent conflicts on earth.

History
Through the vast and dark depths of the Cosmos, there is no life known except one one planet, known as earth where a civilisation known as humanity emerged.

=Beliefs=

Ideological summary
Welfarism

Socialism Distributism Corporatism Internationalism
 * Monarcho-Socialism
 * [[File:Guildsoc.png]]Guild Socialism
 * [[File:Marketsoc.png]]Market Socialism
 * [[File:Union.png]]Syndicalism
 * Social Distributism
 * [[File:MonDist2.png]]Monarcho-Distributism
 * Social Corporatism
 * [[File:Tripartism.png]]Tripartism
 * Socialist Corporatism
 * [[File:Guildsoc.png]]Guild Socialism
 * [[File:World.png]]Globalism
 * [[File:Globnat.png]]Alter-Globalisation
 * [[File:Cosmocracy.png]]Cosmocracy
 * [[File:Cosmocracy.png]]Alter-Cosmocracy
 * Perphistocracy
 * Alter-Perphistocracy
 * World Federalism
 * Galactic Federalism
 * Omni Federalism

Monarchism Transhumanism Nationalism (kinda) Progressivism Conservatism
 * Constitutional Monarchism
 * Social Monarchism
 * [[File:Unimon.png]]Universal Monarchism
 * Archeofuturism
 * [[File:Modnat.png]]Patriotism
 * [[File:Pan-Nationalism.png]]Pan-Nationalism
 * [[File:Humanismpix.png]]Pan-Humanism
 * [[File:Euronaticon.png]]Pan-Europeanism
 * [[File:European_Federalism.png]]European Federalism
 * [[File:PanGerman.png]]Pan-Germanism (somewhat)
 * Pan-Nordism
 * [[File:PanAsian.png]]Pan-Asianism
 * Pan-Africanism
 * Indigenism
 * Progressive Conservatism
 * Civil Libertarianism
 * Progressive Conservatism

Socialism and Marxism
I am for Socialism because I am against Capitalism. Why am I against Capitalism? Well, a system built on infinite growth and profit cannot work in a limited world and profit alone shouldn´t be the driving factor of economics. Why do I reject Marxism? While I do recognize Marx as a great philosopher and economist I don´t identify myself as a Marxist because of several reasons: 1. Not even Marx himself called him a Marxist, he either called himself a Scientific Socialist or a Communist. 2. I don´t think a large scale stable moneyless and stateless society in the modern world is realistic or even desirable since a State can benefit the people through Welfare and Public works, as history has shown attempts at Anarchism/Communism usually got crushed in a few years, however there were some exeptions of such societies that had one thing in common, they were all protected by states in some way examples: Zapatista ("protected" by Mexico) Rojava (America/Syria) Freetown Christiania (Denmark) and many others. 3. Marx opposed religion and thought that families will become obsolete. He also said that the workers have no fatherland, since I consider myself a patriot (but not a nationalist) I don´t agree with that and also many workers associate themselves with their home country. 4. Inviteablity of monopolsation. While it´s true that it´s a natural tendency of Capitalism Marx seemed to see it as invitable and under Socialism the monopoly wouldn´t be abolished but simply controlled by the workers and any resistance against this monopolisation would be reactionary and he classified Petit Bourgeois Socialism as a part of reactionary Socialism in the Communist Manifesto (you could consider me as a Petit Bourgeois Socialist). That´s at least what I understood from the Communist Manifesto. 5. Violent Revolution. Marx seemed to see a violent revolution as invitable and maybe even desirable, but I think violence should always be the last resort. Many may argue that the ruling class will never volunarily give up their power but it actually often happened in history that bloodless revolutions against a elite or a autocrat succeded if it was popular enough. I somewhat agree with the quote of J. F. K. "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution invitable" though.

My Economics
My Economics are basically a weird mix of Social Distributism, Corporatism, Guild Socialism, Market Socialism, Georgism with a bit of Gift Economy.

Natural resources (like Air, Land, Oil, Water, Natural gas, Minerals), infrastructure and key industries should be owned by state-owned worker-controlled guilds Large Companies should be broken up into smaller and local ones, also every company over 50 employees (including state owned ones) should have a works council which will be elected by the Workers and represent them. Regulations should be only done if they're neccesary to protect consumers, the environment, the workers ect. These Regulations as well as some Economic planning shall be made in a process I call Coordination, it consists of agreements between multiple companies or co-ops organized into economic sectors called Corporations (by the Corporatist definitions) or Guilds with the Gouvernment and Worker/Trade Unions. Also co-ops should be encouraged. For the Gift Economy part, local Communities should practise mutual aid.

Divide et impera in the Class war: A theory of limited Class Collaboration
As most Socialists already know the owning class, known as the Bourgeoisie often tries to divide the Working class, usually by factors like race, nationality, income, cultural views, political opinions and gender. What many however don't seem to realize is that the Bourgeoisie is internally divided just as much. Under the Capitalist market economy the Bourgeoisie constantly has to compete with other members of their own class, both domestic as international. And here's the thing: When the Working class starts a violent revolution on their own against the owning class in it's entirity it causes them to rally together against a common enemy in an effort to preserve their wealth, property and even life and causes them to abandon their usual rivalities, then they ally with members of the working class, militant groups, foreign powers and institutions that are still loyal to them and attempt to crush the Revolution by any means neccesary. By this approach the counterrrevolutionary forces will be likely to organize a much more stable defense and be much more likely to win in open combat. Since the Bourgeoisie is usually divided, if they didn't already monopolize and cartelize the economy as a whole, why not exploit this division in favour of the Working class? I advocate for an alliace not only between the working people but also with the Petite Bourgeoisie and some of the National Bourgeoisie against the top 1%. Although allies should be picked carefully, they could try to exploit this collaboration in their favour and betray the workers when it suits them. Therefore this movement should be organized along three groups: Worker Organisations (like Trade Unions, Tenant Unions, Communes, Cooperatives, Parties, Worker's Guilds etc.) in which the Working class is already in control. this should be the core and leading bloc of the movement. Division is to be avoided, remember, unity is strengh. The Petit Bourgeoisie (small businesses, small landowners and family businesses) also known as the middle class makes up a significant part of the population in most European countries but exists in others as well. These members of Bourgeoisie often work at their own business instead of letting it be run by managers. They often have trouble competing against the High bourgeoisie. They can be good or bad allies but they're far more reliant on individual workers than the High Bourgeoisie can therefore can be influenced far more easily. Allied members of the Bourgeoisie (those of the Bourgeoisie with big businesses but treat their workers relatively well). Alliances with them should be only made in the short term to achieve a certain economic goal, resist a foreign invader, or drive out foreign competition. However they are the most likely to betray the working class but they can be useful in the short term.

Views on Nationalism
Nationalism is a double-edged sword, on one hand it can unite and liberate people, on the other it can oppress and divide them. Both on the basis of nationality. I view Culture and Language both as the defining factors of nationality in contrast to ethnicity, race and citizenship alone since Racial "science" is outdated, ethnicity is too exclusive to outsiders and can lead to disastrous events (for an example the Yugoslav wars), Citizenship is a good basis for nationality if it involves integrating into the native culture of the land, since an identity card alone doesn't automatically create a shared identity, which is neccesary for any kind of nation. I am also sceptical about the concept of souvereignity since it is often used by Autocratic leaders as an excuse to justify their human rights violations or by Anti-Environmentalists that want to harm nature. Seperatists are often hypocrites that want their nation to be independent but at the same time they usually deny independence to national identities within their land and also often ally with countries that supress certain independence movements.

How to achieve World Federalism
I suggest World Federalism shall be done in a gradual approach, it begins with supporting Pan-Nationalist movements (Pan-Africanism, Pan-Europeanism, Pan-Asianism and Pan-Americanism for an example) that seek to unite with their neighbors, so that there are less and less states to the point where all countries unite, of course there would be some countries that likely wouldn't be willing to unite but they should be left alone for the most part. Also meanwhile a World Parliament should be established within the United Nations Organisation which would be granted more and more power over it. Also the Security Council should be abolished (a veto either for everyone or no one).

Cellular Democracy
My ideal government structure is a Cellular Democracy in which society would be organised bottom-up by a decentralized council/assembly structure. It'll work like this: The Communal assembly is responsible for adminstrating the Commune and they elect a delegate to the District council or the Village consort depending if you live in a urban or a rual area, the district council will administer the district and elect a delegate for the Senate of the Muncipality, which is responsible for administrating the City, the Senate will elect a delegate for the provincial/regional/local gouvernment, the local gouvernment will elect a delegate for the National gouvernment, which will elect a delegate for the Supreme Senatorial Council. The Councils will have the power to veto the decisions of their respective Parliament.

Parliament
Now this might bring the problem that at a certain level the averange person wouldn't have any say in decisions and would be gouverned by representatives of representatives of representatives etc. which is why the should be a muncipal, regional, national and global parliament which would be elected by the people in a representative manner, with the Parliaments having the power to veto the decisions of the councils at their respective level and the Parliament has the ability to veto decisions of the executive with a 2/3 majority.

Prime Minister/Chancellor
The Prime Minister, who is nominated by the Parliament and formally appointed by the Monarch acts as the head of Gouvernment and therefore also the Parliament. He is responsible for leading the day-to-day buissness in the Gouvernment.

Guild Chambers
I propose adding a third layer of legislature which consists of Chambers, made up of professional associations called Guilds which are meant to make sure that the decisions of councils and parliament are based on expertise, merit and consensus of those affected, therefore they have the power to veto the decisions of both. But generally the chambers are meant to deal with their respective affairs. These Chambers would include: And many more...
 * Chamber of Agricultural Workmen
 * Chamber of Small Landowners
 * Chamber of Agriculture
 * Chamber of Agronomes
 * Chamber of Commerce
 * Chamber of Industry
 * Chamber of Co-operation
 * Chamber of Dairy-masters
 * Chamber of Engineering
 * Chamber of Fishery
 * Chamber of Handicraft
 * Chamber of Household
 * Chamber of Pharmacists
 * Chamber of Physicians
 * Chamber of Teachers
 * Chamber of Veterinary Surgeons
 * Chamber of Navigation
 * Chamber of Knowledge
 * Spacing Guild

Imperative Mandate
Furthermore all representatives and delegates should be subject to an imperative mandate mandate which means they can be recalled by those that elected them.

Monarchy
My most controversial opinion on this matter is my support for Constitutional Monarchy because I believe that a ruler who was raised from birth to rule and rules for lifetime or until abdication could be beneficial in certain limits, set by the constitution and ideally serve as an unifing figure for the people, however, I wouldn't necessarily mandate a Monarchy for all member states of the Global Federation.

Universal Monarchy
The ruler of my ideal society shall be known as "the ruler over everything and nothing". Everything because he is nominally the souvereign of the entire Universe and nothing because almost all decisions are delegated to local authorities For the Supreme Emperor I propose an elective Monarchy in which the candidate, who is nominated by the Nobility for the office of the Supreme Emperor needs to be approved first by the majority of the Supreme Senatorial Council (the highest organ of the Cellular Council Democracy), and by a majority of the Global Parliament (aka. Planetary assembly) (if they fail to agree on a candidate within a month they won't get payed anymore.)

The powers and responsibilites of the Monarch
The monarch’s core constitutional powers and duties should include: Appointment of the prime minister and ministers  Calling and dissolution of parliament; calling new elections  Promulgation of laws (including the right to veto)  Be commander in chief of the armed forces  Lead coalition negotiations as a neutral arbiter  Hold weekly meetings with the government and/or prime minister  Formally appoint officers, high ranking civil servants and judges  Act as a general moderator of the state institutions and government  Be the nation’s chief diplomat and symbol abroad  Be a unifying and neutral symbol at home, a representation of the nation.

What if the Monarch is rubbish?
If a Monarch is not able or not willing to fullfill his duties his power can be limited up to the point of a purely ceremonial figure. If the Monarch truly acts in a tyrannical manner, the people should have the right to depose him and replace him with someone they see more fit to rule. On the other hand it's important to make sure that not some demagogic revolutionary tyrant comes to power with even more opression than the former ruler. Therefore it's important to teach the people the value of liberty and implement a defensive Democracy.

Housing
JUST BUILD MORE HOUSES DAMNIT!

Land Tax
There should be a progressive tithe tax on land (minimum 0.1%, maximum 5%). The tax incomes will be used to fund local gouvernments, housing and infrastructure construction, as well as certain welfare programms.

Wealth Tax
There should be wealth tax of an annual 1% of total wealth of persons that have more than 1055450 US Dollar (I am using this amount because that's 1000000 Euros and I live in Europe). This would be used to fund an Universal Basic Income.

Autarky
Ideally every single town should not only be self-gouverning but also self-sufficent so they don't have to be dependent on others and can survive crisises much more easy.

Personality
Usually a calm and friendly guy, although sometimes he can provoke others or get triggered because of things he doesn't likes. He's a devout Pagan but doesn't tries to enforce his religion on others but gets very mad when others want to force their religion on him. He often calls Fascists bundles of sticks. And is a secret Estonian Chauvinist.

=Relations=

Positive/Friends

 * [[File:SocDist.png]]Social Distributism - Based Economics!
 * [[File:Neotribe.png]]Neotribalism - I agree with you that Tribal communities are generally better than mass society, but I am not the biggest fan of Neo-modernism
 * [[File:Space.png]]Galacticism - I like your spirit.
 * [[File:Tau'vaicon.png]] Tau'va - FOR THE GREATER GOOD!
 * [[File:CultComm.png]] Cult Communalism - W E A R E T H E P U R E O N E S
 * [[File:Zelensky.png]] Zelenskyism - Слава Україні!

Negative/Enemies

 * [[File:Dahmer.png]] Dahmerism - WHAT. THE. FISH. IS. THIS. DEGENERACY?
 * [[File:Somethingism.png]] Somethingism - Your struggle will be in vain.
 * [[File:IMESFA-icon.png]] IMESFA - This is the future those bundles of sticks want.
 * [[File:Horror_theo.png]] Horror Theocracy - YOU SHALL PERISH! My worst enemy.

Positive/Friends

 * [[file:Tomassciism-icon.png]] Tomassciism - Ayyy, fellow Pagan leftie! We actually have lot in common and you even somewhat influenced me a few years ago, when I first visited the Anarchy Wiki.
 * Saoirseism - Another one! I like you (but I am sceptical about Theocracy).
 * Addycakesball Thought - Somehow this seems like a strawman of my Ideology... But it seems we agree on a lot of things. But why do you hate Penguins? And why are you Absolutist?
 * Addycakesball Thought: Reddit was brainwashing me into hating them...
 * [[File:Panth.png]]Pantheonism - lul wut XD. Anyways could you add me to your relations?
 * Addycakesball Thought: Yes, plus I don't hate penguins anymore. XD
 * - Overall based Economics, Anarchism is meh and hating on Orwell for snitching on Stalinists is cringe what do you mean he also put Civil rights activists and Homosexuals on his list? . But you're generally a good person, so you end up here.
 * [[File:OwfBall.png]] Owfism - We agree on almost everything.

Neutral/Frenemies

 * Ronwelltarianism_icon.png Ronwelltarianism - I disagree with some of your ideas (Anti-Zionism, children at pride etc.) but I can see that you're a true American Patriot.
 * [[file:Syntridem2.png]] Applethesky2021 - While there's not too much bad stuff in your Ideology you're still a bit too Authoritarian to me and you're a staunch Natioanlist also Biji Rojava, Biji Kurdistan! Ey, Reqîp! Her mawe qewmî kurdziman, naysikênê danerî topî zeman.
 * [[File:Ethwelball.png]] Ethnic Welfarism - A lot of your ideas are nice but Ethnostates are cringe.
 * - Some ideas of yours are quite well, but you're still to Capitalist for me and too Reactionary.
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism - You might be a fellow Technoprimitivist and Socialist but Egoism and especially being against Civilisation as a whole is cringe.
 * [[File:SCT.png]]Sílas Carrasco - Too Christian and Capitalist for me and I also don't like Ronald Reagan but otherwise you're fine.
 * - Egh, I don't exactly know what to think of you but you seem somewhat cringe unfortunally.
 * [[File:Hamburger.png]] Rejuvenative Hamburg thought - The Seperatism is pretty much the worst part of your ideology imo. Don't you realize that unity is a good thing, which creates peace and prosperity? But your economics and cultural takes are overall based.

Negative/Enemies
- Despite a few based views you're still a Reactionary Fascist. Reactionary-Cheesenism - An Islamic Unitarist Fascist? Oh no... Nastyism - You have some based opinions but I just realized you're a literal Nazi and as a German I can't tolerate such shit.

=Navboxes=

=Comments= New Model Of Cheesenism - add me

Casagonism - Add me, i added you in my relations. Nastyism-I added you now can you add me? - Add me? - Add me.
 * [[File:Panth.png]]Pantheonism - I added you. To answer your question, I am a Socialist because I seek to end Capitalist exploitation and I support worker's rights, I also have elements of other alternative Economic systems like Corporatism and Distributism in my Ideology since I tolerate small buisnesses, family buisnesses and in some cases the economy must be coordinated to achieve a certain goal. As for Liberalism, I usually don't call myself one but I also don't mind beign called one, I usually associate the term Liberalism with freedoms for the averange citizens and civil rights (which I think is good) while others rather think of it as Capitalist (which I think is bad)
 * [[file:Syntridem2.png]] Applethesky2021 - Add me?
 * [[File:Panth.png]]Pantheonism - I did it, now add me back.
 * [[file:Tomassciism-icon.png]] Tomassciism - Curious about your opinion on me. I already added you so no worries about that.
 * [[File:Pixil-frame-0(16).png]] Reactionary-Cheesenism- add me
 * [[File:Panth.png]]Pantheonism - Oops, I forgot about you, but now I added you. Can you add me back?
 * [[File:Panth.png]]Pantheonism - I did.
 * [[File:Panth.png]]Pantheonism - Finished.
 * [[File:Panth.png]]Pantheonism - Alright, but please add me back afterwards.
 * [[File:Touseyism ball.png]]Neo-Touseyism Add me ?
 * [[File:Panth.png]]Pantheonism - Yes.
 * [[File:OwfBall.png]] Owfism - I added you, add me back?
 * [[File:Panth.png]]Pantheonism - Sure.
 * Ronwelltarianism_icon.png Ronwelltarianism - I added you. Can you add me back?
 * [[File:Panth.png]]Pantheonism - Just did it.
 * [[File:SCT.png]]Sílas Carrasco - Can you add me pls?
 * [[File:Panth.png]]Pantheonism - Sure.
 * - Could you add me to your self-insert relations?
 * [[File:Panth.png]]Pantheonism - Okay, but add me back later on.