Nazworth Populism

Nazworth Populism is the Idelogy of Sir Schober. It more or less advocates for the

It dislikes the Elites

The quarkist philosophy is meant to follow the scientific method strictly, both by the analysis of past events and by the application of models that encourage its use in decision making. It is deeply skeptical of anything seen as not being hard, scientific, empirical claims, and hates the dogmatism of those who refuse to change their beliefs when faced with proof that they should do so, as it goes against scientific methodology to remain in disproven theories.

As it views as a byproduct of religious moralism, Quarkism is consequentialist, believing an action is good if and only if its consequences are good, and that a bad action is one whose results are undesirable, no matter the nature or the intentions behind the act. This does not mean that criminals who fail their crime remain free, as leaving dangerous individuals free to harm people is in itself a negative consequence.

Quarkism, more than anything, belives the state is required to provide for everyone, as it sees it as the biggest factor in bringing stable prosperity. However, while it excludes as a possible system, it also rejects, as fearing getting killed by a random stranger is as unsettling than fearing a police state to do so. Therefore, Quarkism aims for a to be established, where people consent to giving up their freedom of causing harm to others in exchange of guaranteed protection from those same others, creating a safe society.

Quarkism is a heavy proponent of. It asserts that all truth can only be derived from sensory experience, and denies the validity of other types of metaphysical claims. It is also, meaning that it rejects the possibility of the existence of any non-material or non-energetic entity, only recognizing the energy-matter continuum as forming reality. With science at the core of its beliefs, Quarkism holds the same position as, as in, the total faith in technological and scientific advancement to fix most if not all human problems.

With those beliefs in mind come the conclusions, which take form into these policies. They are meant to happen naturally, as Quarkism believes they are the logical evolution of the current world situation, and that sooner or later, historical progress will lead to governments either adopting resolutions close to them, or fail to maintain their power due to the changing world. Indeed, states want to remain strong, or else they begin to loose influence on their population, and eventually, get replaced. In order to avoid that, they aim to keep understanding how to keep their grasp on people, and the 21st century has brought so much quick changes to the world that the average elected politician, tyrannical dictator or revolutionary leader has a hard time keeping up. Obviously, a single person cannot get everything, so governments have to rely increasingly more on experts to assume those functions, increasing the part of decisions being taken or greatly influenced by opinions of expertise, which leads to more and more technocracy. Without experts, nowadays, it would be unthinkable to handle pandemics, hacking attacks, or simply the growing part of the economy under cyber-control, via internet for example.

Quarkism rejects the notion of economic class, and as such, the whole concept of. Instead, it bases its economic norms off pragmatic concepts, by attributing each sector to the ownership in which it would be managed the most efficiently, in this case, by handing education, healthcare, energy, natural resources and infrastructure to, large-scale mass production sectors to a , and small businesses to , with unions being empowered in. As it values efficiency above idealism, it believes the fairest economy, where profit is purely caused by, is also the most prosperous. Therefore, any disadvantage outside of an invididual's control, whether it is a disability, accidental health issues, or anything else that wasn't preventable, will be fully covered using, as unfairness reduces the incentive of taking good decisions, reducing productivity in the long run. To complete this, a 100% and  will be applied, to ensure both the collective refund of negative externalities by the market and the effective use of land. Funds gained from the pigovian tax would be invested back in pigovian subsidies for positive externalities, and money from the LVT, reinvested in development projects of infrastructure. Other than that, a flat 50% income tax completes government funding, with no consumption tax or other, to simplify tax codes, all of this using a centralized informatic bank, with only.

In order to achieve true efficiency, Quarkism sees as imperative that the leaders are skilled in the exercise of their function. It therefore wants to implement a, where a central commitee is charged with separate branches for different functions of the state administration (Examples: Budget, military, enforcement, diplomacy, investment, research). Despite this centralized decision-taking system, it remains very important that policy gets constantly fact-checked, by an whose job is to make sure that laws are scientifically valid before enactment. For example, if the commitee wanted to make use of a pesticide to get rid of parasites, it would be mandatory to first ensure it is efficient and non-risky to do so. to lead research on their own is also encouraged to avoid corruption. Moreover,

Due to its unwavering confidence in science, Quarkism ultimately seeks to use to get rid of the, viewing it as the unimproved state of the world, and exceed , transcending beyond diseases, disabilities and other unwanted bodily disadvantages. Besides, it also forcefully rejects, and wishes to eradicate any form of spirituality through aggressive , ranging from mandatory atheist public education to physical removal of. The same way, it opposes the, viewing it as a perversion of real struggles for selfish gain, and deeply unscientific most of the time. As such, any form of discrimination based off unchosen factors is made illegal, no matter what "side" it may take.

Quarkism's opinions on other ideologies. Please note that this is strictly ideological, and has nothing of a personal level between 🇺🇳 and the founders of the ideologies. Wanna get added to this section? Say it, on. You can then also add me to yours, using.


 * − A, without the cringe. Extremely similar, just slightly more democratic, and socialist.


 * − A nice who understands the benefits of a strong techno-nation for the people. A bit too, and too , though.
 * − A, with very good cultural stances, but has way too much emphasis on , and is way too for my taste.
 * − put aside, based  transhumanist with who i can agree on some things.
 * − Very agreeable, almost everything needed to be excellent would be to be more radical and authoritarian.


 * − Average, except much more based as he likes his nation and technology, and isn't a nor a.
 * − A progressive libertarian, like most of them, focuses more on social welfare than unions, which is tolerable, but what downgrades you is excessive . Otherwise, good social views.
 * − A who would gain a lot by becoming more left-wing, pro-tech and firmer on governmental issues.
 * −, for all the wrong reasons, whose political philosophy radiates pure hedonism, at least the final product is not incredibly awful.
 * − Based fellow authoritarian, but other than that, we don't agree on much except on what to do with native americans.
 * − Despite the extreme, all of its other views, such as neoclassical , and pragmatism are too based to be ignored. Surprisingly decent.


 * − A culturally right, pretty cringe, at least you're not as crazy as , and also, uamee.png.
 * − A who is environmentalist and likes guns. Bad.
 * − You are a, and, uuuuh... idk, that's about it, really. Very unbased.
 * − Fake socialist who is just another.
 * − would normally cause this to be a mortal enemy, but Post-Genderism.png:polcompball:Technogaianism prevents that. At least embrace limited markets and a little state power.
 * − Not a big surprise, is very, very cringe. You're also in favor of, which is not tolerable.
 * − Same as above, but.
 * − The rejection of all -isms, despite opposing my enforcement of values, is still extremely coherent philosophically, and ends up indiretly causing more progress than many ideologies listed here, so it is somewhat agreeable.


 * − Chara icon-alt.png "Babe, it's 7 PM, time to come in your armchair to read page 342,784,129,547 of the !" NguyenreichismIcon.png "Yes honey..."
 * − Your looks like it's more of a pile of emotive opinions rather than a coherent thought.
 * − reactionary, ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww!
 * Councilguy2.pngAshleyHere.pngChronicFemcel-newicon.png − You want to, yet oppose my will to build that will work for you. Curious...
 * − Christian ? Huge no.
 * − Average pseudo-materialist.
 * − The "" you denounce about me aims to eradicate such bigotry, and will be way more successful at that than your.

In comics, will act like an  /  person, serious, boring, focused on efficiency and facts. It will disregard any consideration of worth from anything non-empirical, treat spiritual or loose people as silly, and often act superior to them in an unhinged manner. In confrontations, it will be represented having the typical behavior of "Reddit atheists", and/or like a mad scientist with a cold attitude, caring little for things it sees as idiotic. It will also be seen mocking elites, and claiming to be a "man of the people" or "of the nation", and saying that "science belongs to the people/nation". Additionally, it will be very rude towards reactionary ideologies, leading to violent actions and/or words directed to them, calling them "LARPers", "retarded HOI4 kid", or, simply, any combination of a word + the suffix "theist", as derogatory terms. It is prude, and attacks ideologies it deems "horny" or "degenerate" such as.


 * 1) Draw a ball.
 * 2) Draw, in the middle, a power fist, meaning power to the common man.
 * 3) Fill the top right triangle with capri and the one at the left with dark grey.
 * 4) Fill the background with "Emerald".
 * 5) Draw the eyes and you're done!