TDRHism

TDRHism is a variant of Liberal Conservatism and the de-facto ideology of ThatDudeRightHere. It is economically center-right, Civic Nationalist, slightly statist, slightly Confessionalist with a bit of  secularism, and culturally center-right (with a bit of progressivism). It seeks to establish European-style Christian Democracy and  One-Nation Conservatism in the United States.

Although following the Chicagoan school of economics and somewhat of the  Third Way, TDRHism doesn't refer to himself as a  Neoliberal, instead he prefers to stick more with  Classical Liberals.

Beliefs
TDRHism believes in what most Americans would call "compassionate conservatism", meaning that he's a more moderate conservative, similar to a Rockefeller Republican. He's slightly patriotic, leaning more towards civic nationalism. He believes in a mostly free-market economy with slight regulations in order to prevent bad stuff from happening in the economy, an example would be the exploitation of workers. He believes in a mix of Chicagoan economics and  Keynesian, meaning he is somewhat of a  Neo-Keynesian.

Philosophical Beliefs
TDRHism is, philosophically a Liberal Conservative. He believes that while humans are naturally tribalistic and hierarchal, are more rational than emotional, and utopian ideologies never worked in practice, he also believes in some more liberal policies such as the enlightenment.

He also follows Petersonism, as he believes that humans have free will and should focus on improving themselves before they blame others.

Overview
TDRHism believes in a mixture of Chicagoan economics and  Keynesianism, thus creating what is called  Social Capitalism. He believes in a mainly free-market economy with some regulations in it, so that both workers and consumers will be protected.

He is, despite being somewhat regulationist and interventionist, not a socialist, as he's very skeptical of socialism and its variants, seeing that most versions of it were massive failures every time they were attempted. However, he doesn't hate market socialism, believing that co-operatives are useful for the economy.

Fiscal Policy
TDRHism believes that most government funds should be spent on welfare programs. These include things like healthcare, housing, education, and infrastructure. He also believes that a centralized bank should exist and private banks can exist as well, even though they would be subject to regulations. However, he believes that governments shouldn't spend outside of their means, with budget and debt being kept lower than 60% of the national GDP.

On taxes, he believes in a mixture of flat and progressive. This is because although he wants taxes to go up for how wealthy you are, he also wants to divide it into groups, all of which will be taxed the same. The groups are:
 * Very poor (will be offered the most tax breaks, and will receive the most benefits from taxes)
 * Poor (will be offered tax breaks a lot and will be receiving a lof of benefits, but not as much as the people on the very poor classification)
 * Middle class (in between poor and rich, and will be taxed slightly more than poor and slightly less than rich)
 * Rich (will be taxed more than middle class but not as much as very rich)
 * Very rich (will be taxed the most)

As for other taxes other than an income tax, his system will have:
 * Sales tax (abolished for necessities, like food, but will be for other things, and will be higher for luxury goods)
 * Corporate tax (Rebated for green innovation companies)
 * Land value tax (not high emphasis on it)
 * Land use tax (also not a very high emphasis on it)
 * Capital gains tax
 * Carbon tax
 * Digital services tax
 * Import tax
 * Recreational substances tax (for alcohol, tobacco, marijuana and other recreational drugs)
 * Financial services tax (a small 0.1-0.5% charge on every trade of financial assets)
 * Currecny transaction tax

Corporate tax evasion would also be highly illegal on his system, with companies being forced to pay tax on the profits they gain, or else they lose their business licenses. Legal firms that assist in coprorate tax avoidance will also be illegal and they will suffer harsh penalties.

Banking
TDRHism, like Arctoism, believes in the independence of the central bank and wants to keep inflation levels below 5% as much as possible. He rejects money creation just for funding fiscal expenditure, but in times of recession and severe economic deflation, he supports quantitative easing of money creation.

Private banks will be allowed to exist, albeit with some regulations, such as all trades of financial securities being subject to the financial services tax and all short term currency exchange will also be subject to the currency transaction tax.

He supports crypto-currency such as Bitcoin, and supports plans to move on from physical currency, or fiat money, to a purely digital currency. This is because he feels that digital transactions are much easier to trace than those involving fiat money, and thus it will be easier for police to catch tax evaders, speculators, drug dealers, and various other criminals.

Public or Private Ownership?
TDRHism's economic model is a social capitalist one, and is thus a mixed capitalist one. He believes that natural monopolies should be state-owned and run without any concern for profit. Instead of politicians running these, technical experts and specialists will run them. These services in question include:
 * Electricity
 * Water and sanitation systems
 * Most public transportation systems (ex. bus systems and railways)
 * Mail services
 * Health services
 * Certain TV channels, such as some news outlets
 * Government-run software and algorithms

However, he believes that the larger the state is, the harder it will be to regulate those. He is also aware of competition and private enterprise, thus for large states, he will make sure that the state takes care to maintain the ease of doing business and red tape laws and wasteful bureaucracy will be cut to the bare minimum.

Children and People with Disabilities
TDRHism supports something similar to Poland's 500+ program, or a universal child benefit. This is because he believes that every child should be given the opportunity to succeed as well as the system is useful for combatting the low birthrates in most western nations.

As for people with disabilities, they will receive the most welfare benefits of his economic system, along with the very poor.

Unemployment
For the unemployed, he supports the Danish A-Kasse system, also known as flexicurity, where a worker voluntarily joins a trade union managed fund for a year while they are working, and then receives 90% of their previous income for a maximum of two years when they are unemployed, so long as they are actively looking for a job or gaining employable skills.

The reason why he thinks this is a good system is because it promotes personal responsibility, gives the worker and their family more financial security, and allows employers to hire and fire workers easily, which creates low levels of unemployment.

For anyone who has not previously enrolled in a fund yet, he supports what is called a subsistence level supplementary income benefit, also known as a Revenu de solidarité active (RSA), which is currently implemented in France. This is a welfare benefit aimed for the unemployed to return to work. It also depends on claimants that are looking for work as well, and is gradually reduced as income from work increases. This is to prevent any claimants from falling into the benefit trap. He believes that those who are able to work but also refuse should be denied welfare from the state until they show that they are ready to work. This is due to the belief that personal prosperity also comes from the want of a person to improve themselves and "stand up straight with their shoulders back". Also, those who are heavy drinkers, drug addicts, heavy smokers or morbidly obese will be denied welfare until they show personal initiative to improve their own situation.

Pensions
For workplace pensions, he believes that it would be much simpler if the employer contribution was removed, with companies paying more taxes and with the proceeds going towards state contribution to retirement benefits.

Trade Unions
He supports collective social bargaining, with empolyment advertising agencies by law requiring to red-list companies that do not pay unions the rates of pay. This is because he believes that it's the most effective way of ensuring things like fair wages across the economy as well as making businesses more innovative as they will be unable to to undercut competitors by simply lowering wages.

Unions will manage the social funds, making membership in a union compulsory if the person wants to sign onto a fund. The right for a person to join a union will be required by law. They protect the employees from being abused, and they will be responsible for making and enforcing employment laws.

However, this still requires unions to co-operate with the state and also be politically independent, not allowed to associate with political parties or donating to any political campaigns. They must accept the government's wage controls if it needs to reduce inflation without striking, striking must be for a general grievance, and sees striking as a political weapon as sedition.

Housing
TDRHism sees housing as a basic right to citizens and not as a financial asset. Therefore, he supports high regulations on the housing center.
 * Banning foreigners who don't have a residence in the country they're present in from buying properties.
 * Banning people from leaving properties vacant to ride a speculative wave and selling them at a higher price.
 * Any vacant properties should be bought out by the government and let out.
 * Individuals can have a maximum of three properties, with second and third homes being charged at a higher rate of LVT and LUT and required to let out any tenants when unoccupied. Only housing associations can own unlimited amounts of properties.
 * Being a landlord shouldn't be a full-time job.
 * Landlords/housing associations would be set rental controls by the local authorities, who also set the construction of houses and apartments.
 * Supporting tenant association to protect tenant's rights against landlords.
 * Prioritizing house builders to build houses for first-time home buyers.

Foreign trade and economic globalization
TDRHism's view on economic globalization is unflattering, as he views it as "too utopian" because of the fragility of supply chains and global finance. In addition, the offshoring of industry has led to the workers' union movement and manufacturing being killed, leading to lack of wage growth. However, he knows that countries can be economically self-sufficient and enjoy a comfortable standard of living, and attempts at an autarky had led to economic disasters.

He mainly supports low tariffs and free trade with countries that have similar labor and environmental and currency strength, while high tariffs towards poorer countries. While he does recognize that globalization benefited the third world, he still believes that the needs of the first world should come first.

Overview
TDRHism's government system is a mixture of  and. This is because he believes while the populace should get a voice in government, it should be slightly limited. He is also opposed to, as he sees having populist leaders run a country as an equivalent to "having the children run the household instead of the parents" due him seeing it as dangerous to a country's democracy (ex.  Hungary under  Orban, the country is shifting towards illiberalism), politics (ex. the  United States under  , the political divide was worsened) and economy (ex.  Venezuela under  , the economy got screwed up and now it's in a crisis).

TDRHism prefers a, however, if his system is under a  , then he believes it should be purely  , like in the  UK and    Scandinavia. His system will be a semi-presidential one, like in France, meaning that the  president and the  parliament have equal power.

How big/small?
Medium sized. Not too small, but not too big. This is because he feels too much government would lead to  (or in even worse cases,   and very little state would lead to , both of which he opposes. So, he wants to combine the right amount of state and liberty to create an ideal society.

Executive Branch
The head of state would be the, elected popularly by the people in a two-round voting system and can serve for two four-year terms. Their role is to uphold the constitution and safeguarding the nation against tyranny. In case they are caught in wrongdoing or are mentally ill, they can be impeached via a two-thirds majority in both legislatures. In case the president dies in office or is impeached, the vice president will serve as a replacement, also serving a maximum of two four-year terms alongside the president.

The head of government would be the prime minister, elected by the lower legislature of congress and typically belonging to the largest party of the ruling coalition.

The cabinet would be comprised of secretaries, mainly from members of the ruling coalition. However, unlike most parliaments, like the Westminster variant, the secretary cannot be an MP at the same time, are usually outside experts in their field (ex. the secretary of finance being a businessman or an economist, the secretary of health being a doctor, the secretary of education being a teacher, the secretary of agriculture being a farmer and so on) and are elected for the entirety of their parliamentary term unless they either resign or lose control, with full scale cabinet shuffling not occuring.

Legislature
TDRHism's legislative branch would be a bicameral parliament.

Upper House (Senate)
The upper house of the parliament would be the Senate. Each state will have a total of 2 senators, and it will function like the German Bundesrat. The 2 senators will be from the ruling party (or parties) of the states, elected for 8-year terms and half of them being elected into the House of Representatives.

It cannot initiate most legislation. However, it can only amend or delay for a maximum of one year bills coming from the HoR. It also confirms supreme court justices by a two-thirds majority and has almost exclusive power over the operation, direction, and management of the civil service.

Lower House (House of Representatives)
Funtioning = The lower chamber would be known as the House of Representatives and it would be the more predominant chamber. It would elect the prime minister, instigate laws, have power to pass the budget, and would be comprised of members of political parties. Elections would be held every four years, unless in situations where there have been more than three failed attempts to form a government and the house votes for a new election through a two-thirds majority. The house cannot simply vote against the government through a 'vote of no confidence', instead they have to propose a replacement government in a constructive 'vote of confidence'.

Debates will be chaired by a non-political speaker, who is elected via a two-thirds majority, who would ensure civility in the House, with the seats being laid out in a Hemicycle arrangement as opposed to comformation. The number of seats is also determined by the state's population. The system used to elect the House of Representatives is through Mixed-member proportional representation, but with the added feature of open lists for both constituency and regional elections.
 * -| Electoral Processes =

Half of the MPs would be elected in single-member local constituencies using an open-list plurality system, where all parties have to stand three candidates each, and the party who has the largest vote share combined wins that seat.

The other half would be elected in 7-member regions using Open List Proportional Representation, where voters vote for a candidate on a party list to determine the order of priority for each seat that party wins, and allocated via the D'Hondt method, taking into account the number of constituency seats within that region that each party has won to ensure an overall proportional result. In order to gain a regional seat, a party must receive 5% of the vote nationally, and the ordering of the lists that are presented to voters could have a maximum gender imbalance of 2, since 7 is an odd number.

Congressional districts would be drawn up by the census bureau and the election board via population from the latest census.

Parties and Financing
TDRHism advocates for a democracy voucher system, where ordinary cash funds to campaigns would be banned, but every voter will be given a small voucher they can redeem on the electoral commission site to donate to a political party. This is to end corporate influence in politics.

Supreme Court
The supreme court would consist of nine justices, each one would have non-renewable, staggered 14-year terms with a new justice being appointed every 2 years. Their age range should be 45 to 65 and would be granted generous pensions.

Selecting the justices would be done by a system similar to the UK's Judicial Appointments Commission, that would appoint justices at all levels and would mainly appoint former justices. The justices would be separate from partisan politics. The nominee must be confirmed via a 50% or more majority in the House of Representatives and a two-thirds majority in the senate.

Constitution
The constitution would mainly be the same as the U.S. one but easier to amend. It would summarize how the government would function and state rights.

Amendments to the Constitution
For most articles, a simple two-thirds majority both houses of parliament would be needed.

For changes to the electoral system, however, a citizens' assembly, managed and overseen by a committee of MPs from all political parties in an equal amount, and confirmed by a simple majority in both houses of parliament, or a three-fifths majority of the HoR if the Senate downs it.

Civil Service
TDRHism respects the role of civil service, however still thinks that it's important that it doesn't become parasitic, unaccountable or managerial.

Like most countries, civil servants would be hired on a meritocratic basis, however it would be more focused on individuals from  STEM backgrounds. The organization that would hire them would be overseen by a civil service council, elected by the senate, and it would work like a corporation's board of managers. There would also be a civil service efficiency commission, which would publish reports to the senate.

Anti-Corruption
TDRHism believes that any form of corruption should be eradicated from all corners of the government, both national and local. He would empower an anti-corruption agency to have near-unlimited power to investigate any suspicions of corrupt activities. If found guilty, the person convicted would immediately be forced to resign and get prosecuted.

He believes that parliamentary immunity has outlived its purpose, only serving to shield the political class for crimes and corruption-based offenses. He would abolish it, meaning that all and every politician at government levels would be persecuted if they are caught with a corruption charge.

The ACA would introduce these measures:
 * All tax returns in the nation, regardless of ordinary individuals, corporations and politicians, should be posted on a government website.
 * All government officials should have their bank statements, medical records, employment history and everything under their ownership posted under their own website.
 * People working in government cannot own profit-making financial assets of any kind.
 * Currency would be purely digital.
 * Government officials who report corrupt or rule-breaking actions from their colleagues would be financially rewarded.
 * Lobbying groups would have to be civilly registered, with their access to politicians heavily restricted. Also a civil register for companies who receive government contracts.
 * Total freedom of information for everything other than classified documents crucial to national security.

Federal or Unitary?
TDRHism prefers a federal state, yet at the same time, he thinks that   are more suitable for nations which are either very small, not populous, not very ethnically diverse, or all three.

Mainstream Media
TDRHism believes that the  isn't reliable due to the sheer amount of bias it has. Thus, he promotes a fairness doctrine so that all sides will be presented as equal.

Overview
TDRHism is culturally syncretic, meaning his views on social issues can vary for the issue. He believes that  any      is bad.

Youth
TDRHism has a special emphasis on the youth. This is because woke progressives often flaunt about how young people support their agenda, and he is horrified at that. Thus, he wants to introduce these measures to raise a generation that is more socially conservative than their parents:
 * Ban teaching of [[File:SJW.png]] woke ideas like [[File:Blm.png]] critical race theory and [[File:Gender Accelerationism.png]] gender fluidity in schools.
 * Funding the creation of societies that teach the youth traditional values and opposing woke culture.
 * Promoting [[File:Apolit.png]] to the youth. This is because he believes that kids should be taught to get into their own houses before they criticize the world
 * Use charismatic, young people to promote [[File:Conserv.png]] traditional and [[File:Modnat.png]] patriotic values to the youth.
 * Discouraging use of social media towards teens, seeing it as not only good for mental health, but preventing the promotion of woke ideas.

Religion
TDRHism is a Christian himself. However, he believes that the existence of a god or higher deity would remain unknown to mankind. He does admire how Christianity had an influence on western culture.

TDRHism, despite this, supports secularism. While he admires  in countries such as  France, he believes that Anglo-American secularism is more suited for him because while it prevents the state from having a state religion, it doesn't water down religion to a purely personal matter. He does, however defend Laicism against fundamentalists from calling it "bigoted", and promotes it mainly in the Middle East. However, he does allow the wearing of religious headwear.

He also would like to re-emphasize Christian values, since he believes that ever since the decline of Christianity in the west, it has built a society that's ridden with degeneracy.

Race
TDRHism believes that racism (which he defines as discrimination based upon skin color or ethnic origin) is utterly evil, obscene and totally unacceptable in any civilized society. He advocates for a racially colorblind society that's based upon the Martin Luther King Jr. quote that people should "not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character". Thus, he opposes Critical Race Theory and  Intersectionality, seeing them as having worsened race relations themselves and are themselves racist, because they constantly attempt to categorize people by certain characteristics and not as individuals, which, in other words, is judging people by the color of their skin.

He, however, does recognize that racism has left a horrible legacy in the west. He does acknowledge that there are racist people in the United States, and acts of racism shall be punished. However, he thinks that woke activists stir up racial tensions instead of helping them. Them bringing up the legacy of slavery in the west is irrelevant to him, as slavery existed for millennia in Africa, but was abolished by white Christian activists. He thinks that while the George Floyd protests had a good point on institutional racism, he doesn't support them because they've become more focused on intersectionality and destroying history (although he does support the removal of Confederate symbols such as statues).

LGBT
Neither extreme "TrAnS rIgHtS" or "HaNg AlL f**S" can describe his opinion on this issue. He's fine with anyone's sexual orientation. You're a guy that loves guys or a girl that loves girls? Well, good for you, he doesn't care. However, he does hate the constant identity politics that the LGBT movement often promotes. Under his system, the government would only recognize three genders: male,  female and  transgender. The "transgender" classification is only used for people who are trans or are intersex. He also thinks that while pride month isn't a bad idea on paper, he dislikes it in practice because not only does it promote pointless identity politics, but also allows the greedy woke Californian elites to further push their agenda.

To him, transgenderism is a mental illness, and its declassification as one is nothing but pandering to the woke lobby. He believes that Transmedicalism, along with inter-sexuality, are the legitimate forms of transgender, and for the former, gender surgery is seen as a last resort, and for the latter, gender surgery is optional.

He wants to implement measures that will weaken the power of the LGBT movement, similar to how Margaret Thatcher dealt with the unions.
 * Create a nationwide "free speech act" which will allow employees to sue employers for unfair dismissal on political beliefs, which includes LGBT rights.
 * Reclassify transgenderism as a mental illness, with gender surgery required physical (if intersex)/psychological (if suffering from transgenderism) analysis and through the consent of doctors.
 * Make it illegal for people to give sex hormones to anyone under the age of 18.
 * Ban recognition of non-binary and gender-neutral pronouns in public sector workplaces.
 * Make it illegal to teach children about gender fluidity, and instead teach them about the gender binary and alignment to biological sex in schools, as well as teaching against gender fluidity.
 * Shorten Pride Month to just a single weekend.
 * Ban the presence of children at pride parades when there is nudity, exhibitionism, fetishism, or any openly sexual behavior.
 * Gay pride parades must happen on a set day nationwide, and cannot be in city centers.
 * Ban the pride flag being flown on government buildings except on the specified weekend, and it cannot be above the national flag.
 * Ban the teaching of gender fluidity on children's shows.
 * Make the clear distinction between lesbians, gay men, bisexuals, gender dysphoria sufferers and intersex people are human too and shall be treated with respect, and the LGBT movement as a whole, who are subversive ideologies.
 * Ban the LGBT movement's presence in schools.
 * Dissolve LGBT organizations with disproportionate economic, cultural or political influence.
 * Promote alternate social media platforms which don't promote LGBT on their platforms.

Immigration
TDRHism is actually pretty lenient on immigration, seeing it as an important sector for the economy to grow. However, he thinks that native citizens should be prioritized and immigrants shouldn't be used as an excuse to bring down native wages.

He thinks that it's necessary for immigrants to integrate into the national culture of the host country, and thus, he opposes, instead prefering. This is because he believes that multiculturalism is an obstacle to integration (ex. conservative Muslims), while interculturalism allows the minorities to keep their distinct cultural identity while actively participating and integrating into the nation's values, institution and culture as a whole, and is thus a.

He supports point-based immigration system. He is prepared to accept some refugees, but also believes that the "right to asylum" means fleeing persecution and traveling to the nearest safe country and not any country they choose.

Intersectionality
TDRHism supports. He believes that young women are more supportive of woke activism, and the inability to attract them to more conservative causes a major obstacle to his end goals. Women are an important part of the 'inter-sectional alliance' as they are half of the population.

He also wants to water down the term 'feminism' to a vague term describing anything that advocates for women's rights, and he sees TERFs as 'useful idiots' to combat transgenderism while also opposing them.

Equality with men
He believes that women should have equal opportunities to men in terms of education and jobs, and completely equal in the eyes of the law. He also believes that women should have the right to achieve self-realization, and thus supports first and second wave feminism, and supporting some of the goals of more recent feminism, such as the importance of sexual consent, being against sexual harassment and strongly condemning violence against women, though those were also goals of second-wave feminism as well. However, he opposes women using feminism as an excuse to shame men and control them when they don't get what they want, which he feels that many modern feminist movements do.

Abortion and Birthrates
He is concerned with the declining birthrates of western countries, as he is concerned about the aging population's effect on the national economy as well as the need to keep on bringing immigrant workers into the nation could threaten social cohesion. Thus, he wants to raise the birthrate to 2.1 children per woman.

As for abortion, he is, surprisingly, pro-choice. However, he believes that abortion should mainly be used for cases such as when the woman's life and health are at risk, rape, incest, birth defects, and socio-economic factors. The reason why he is pro-choice is because not only does he believe that legal abortions are safer than illegal ones, but also bringing severely disabled children, who lack the means of a fulfilling life, into the world immoral.

He is somewhat of a, believing its non-racist and non-murderous philosophers in the early 20th century to be good intentioned and viewing its ostracism in the west after it was used by the  , who used it for racist and genocidal ends, to be a tragedy.

However, he somewhat supports Texas's abortion law, however he does think it goes too far in some aspects, mainly not allowing it in the cases of rape and fetal defects, as it could happen at any time. He believes that 6 weeks is just enough to get rid of an unwanted pregnancy, and if a heartbeat is detected, then it's considered alive.

Positive Discrimination
TDRHism opposes positive discrimination as well as government promotion of men and women being represented equally in all sectors of employment.

He is perfectly comfortable with some jobs being male-dominated and others being female-dominated, however he doesn't mind females to be given the opportunity to do male-dominated jobs if they have the same qualifications and vice versa with males. He supports "equal pay for equal work", and believes that companies should be prosecuted for paying women less than men. However, he sees the "gender pay gap" as misleading and virtually impossible.

Guns
TDRHism is pro- gun rights, as he believes that, "A well regulated militia, necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed", as defined in the second amendment of the U.S. constitution. However, he does realize that there are some negative effects to gun ownership. Therefore, he is okay with some gun control regulations on the state level. He believes that most guns should be legal, however, not these weapons, unless given a special license:
 * Firearms that are classified as "weapons of war", for example, tanks, rocket launchers and heavy machine guns
 * Firearms designed to look like an everyday object to conceal their true nature
 * Fully-automatic firearms

However, firearms that are banned by the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988 should be banned without exception. For concealed carry, it is a shall-issue, however open carry is a may-issue. For both cases, a bullet should not be in the chamber, unless for law enforcement. Anyone who is mentally ill or has a criminal record are not allowed to purchase a gun, as they are proven to be too dangerous to carry guns. Background checks would be implemented, as well as annual mental health tests to check if a person's mental health has not deteriorated to the point where they can't be trusted to own a gun anymore.

Policing
TDRHism believes that if a law cannot be enforced, than it might as well not exist in the first place. He supports a well-funded, large and efficient police force that will ensure that the law is abided by and criminals punished, included offenses such as shoplifting and burglary. CCTV cameras will be installed to catch crimes, and the police will collaborate with neighborhood watch schemes to tackle disorderly behavior like disturbing the peace and lower crime rates.

He doesn't have that much of an issue with 'stop and search', if it helps lower crime rates, and somewhat opposes the defund the police movement, as he believes that while some funds from the police can be redirected to welfare and social programs, stripping the police of too many funds is bad, as he thinks that it can cause a rise in crime rates. He also believes that the police shouldn't be armed outside of necessary cases, wants excessive force banned, opposes qualified immunity, and believes that a police conduct authority should be implemented to bring corrupt cops such as Derek Chauvin to justice,

Criminal Justice
TDRHism believes in an 'eye for an eye' and the principles of retributive justice, where the punishments for criminals is equivalent to how much damage they caused. For instance, someone who commits first-degree murder in cold blood should be subject to either life imprisonment with no parole or death.

However, he also understands the diversity and complexity of criminal sentencing, and believes judges should look at the specific context as opposed to putting a blanket punishment on an offense. For example, a woman who was constantly abused by her husband and snapped and murdered him should be treated less harshly than someone who raped, tortured and murdered an innocent woman or child.

Death penalty
TDRHism is mainly opposed to the death penalty. However, he does not have any ethical issues with it in cases of first-degree murder, terrorism or war crimes. The strongest argument he sees against it is wrongful execution. He believes that the arguments against execution inconsistent, with some criticizing it for being too lenient but also too harsh, and with some people often remarking that they want to 'see criminals suffer'.

This goes against his policy that the punishment must fit the crime, and thinks that in rare cases the death penalty can be more merciful. For example, a criminal who has too spend the rest of their lives in prison can be given the option of the death penalty.

Rehabiliation
TDRHism believes that people have made mistakes and should have the chance to turn their life around, however he doesn't think that prison should be like a hotel, as he feels it is in Norway. Those convicted of crimes other than first-degree murder, terrorism or war crimes should be given the opportunity to learn new skills, find employment and rebuild their life, with him opposing punitive criminal registries that limit rehabilitation, but they must show personal initiative in this and be made aware that this is their final chance. He also opposes voting rights for people that are currently in prison, believing that those who have broken the law shouldn't get a say in deciding it, however, thinks that it should be restored when they're done serving their sentences.

He also knows that there are highly manipulative and malicious individuals who will fool the authorities of rehabilitation in order to commit more crimes. He believes that repeat offenders should be treated more seriously than first-time offenders, as by repeat offending they have proven to not take rehabilitation seriously, and wants re-offenders to be seperated from first-time offenders, as he doesn't want the former to negatively influence the latter.

Environmental Views
WIP

Education
WIP

Diplomatic Views
WIP

How to draw
WIP

Relationships
Actual Ideologies =

Z Tier (Worst of the f***ing Worst)
WIP
 * -| Self-Inserts =