Bsaheed Thought

Bsaheedism is an off-compass, far-left, civically egoist, technologically post-humanist, socially progressive, culturally post-civ, and philosophically nihilist ideology that seeks to synthesize many post-leftist ideas such as xenofeminism, individualism, anti-work, post-civ, nihilism and soulism with more traditional leftist ideas such as mutualism and syndicalism as well as combining ideas such as immortalism and post-humanism

Beliefs

Anarchism: What it is, and what it is not

The definition of Anarchism is when there is no hierarchical form of governance over the individual or the community, hierarchies are a form of political strcuture in where a collective or individual has power over another collective or individual. The state or government is a form of hierarchy which can be arranged in many different ways but usually has an individual leader with a collective of people ruling alongside that leader. This can often be oppressive and limiting of liberty, which is why it should be abolished and discarded. This next part will be seeing which types of Anarchism are actual anarchism: Firstly, regarding capitalism: Capitalism is a hierarchical economic system in where the means of production are privatized, this is incompatible with anarchism as capitalism is an inherently hierarchical economic system, however to give it some bonus points, Capitalism is sometimes voluntary and can be considered a voluntary hierarchy. However, ideologies like agorism and left-rothbardianism are not hierarchical and are real anarchists. Secondly, regarding conservatism and traditionalism: Unlike capitalism, conservatism/traditionalism is not a hierarchical ideology, it is when traditions and heritage are preserved and encouraged in a society. This usually manifests in a hierarchical form such as enforcing traditional values through a hierarchical state however thsi does not always have to be the case, traditional values can be kept through education, nationalization of traditional holidays and other. Thirdly, regarding monarchism and fascism: First, monarchism. Monarchism can only be compatible with anarchism if the monarch in question is a ceremonial monarch with no power and nothing else. Constitutional monarchies and more-over, absolute monarchies are incompatible with anarchism as they function under a hierarchical system. Fascism is also very incompatible with Anarchism, anarcho-fascism is an oxymoron and people who call themselves anarcho-fascists are dum-dums.

Egoism

This ection will cover philosophical egoism into anarchism and incorporating ideas such as the union of egoists. First, the philosophy of egoism applied to anarchism: Egoism is the belief that the individual should not be constraint to morals or social constructs, egoism is all about empowering the individual and following their deepest desires and pleasures. Social constructs and morals are completely subjective with no actual basis in science or the natural world, therefore they should not constraint the individual in question and should not be used as authoritative laws. However, while egoism does promote selfishness, it is not necessarily a contrast to altruism and egoism vs altruism is a false dichotomy that should be noted. Since people can often act altruistic out of self-interest. This is where I deep dive into psychological egoism, the belief that all (or atleast most) intentional human actions are out of self-interest, this in-fact is true, as all actions have to have reason behind them. If you are FORCED to do something then you are also still acting put of the self-interest that you don't want to be punished, because most of the time when people are forced to do stuff, there is a punishment. Acts of altruism are also out of the self-desire to help others. Anyway you like it, most actions are out of self-interest. Going back to what I was saying about social constructs, social institutions such as the state utilize these social constructs and turn them into hierarchies such as using morality, a social construct, to determine law and such. This is why the social institution of the state or teh government should be abolished in its entirety. Another part of Egoism, is the union of egoists. A union of egoists is a voluntary and non-systematic association in which is a relation between egoists which is continually renewed by all parties' support through an act of will, this union is completely sub-ordinate to the will of the indivdiual and does not take precedence over the individual's action itself. Another thing to note here is self-hierarchy, which I define as the hierarchy one has over themselves, a set of rules that they themselves have given, a set of moral codes that no one enforces but themselves. In my opinion, self-hierarchies are cringe but if it is in the desire of the individual to have a set of rules for themselves, that is okay.

Mutualism, Syndicalism and Post-Leftism

This section will be covering most of my economic beliefs: Capitalism is an economic hierarchical system in which private corporations own the means of producing and production operating under a free market system, as well as private property. It is a system that is incompatible with anarchism as it is a hierarchy, even if it is a voluntary one. As an alternative, the means of production and the economy as a whole, should be maintained by the people by local decentralized worker unions and self-managing worker co-operatives under a free market system. When discussing land, land should not be a commodity to bought and sold with usufruct-based infrastructure being an alternative. Property (private property as defined by Marx) would also be abolished in favour of personal property. However, this is a transitional state from mutualism to syndicalist anarchism to post-left anarchism. One way to achieve functional communism, or in this case, syndicalism is through a theoretical economic situation known as post-scarcity, in which is the evolution and development of post-industrialism. Essentially, goods and services such as food and water are produced in abundance by rapid technological development and increased production through automation to the point where most goods and services come very cheaply or even for free. By this stage, most resources would be readily available for people to take and decentralized and very much local worker unions would form the basis of an anarcho-syndicalist society, and then the abolishment of work. Technological developments and accelerated productivity would lead to the rise of automation and the abolishment of work, the average individual could choose whether he wanted to work or not without his future and/or life on the line and would be able to easily get enough resources to sustain himself and possible his family.

Post-Humanism, Techno-Quantumism, Immortalism and Soulism

To destroy civic hierarchies is not enough as we are still constraint to the authoritarian forces of the capitalistic buisnesses and corporations, to destroy economic hierarchies is not enough as well are still subject to the social hierarchical spooks such as morality. To destroy social hierarchies is not enough either as well are still subjective to the unforced hierarchies that we still have to follow, natural hierarchies such as mortality, biology and gravity. To achieve eternal and absolute freedom, we need to exterminate these forces as well using the power of accelerated technology and advanced science. Human biology should be replaced with superhuman robot parts that allow super-strength, super-sized and so much more. Mortality should be extinguished using advanced medicine and finding away to revive cells. And the laws of physics should be abolished by having control of the quantum world and quantum physics itself by using advanced technology ands such.

Xenofeminism, Postgenderism and Egalitarianism

This section will cover my social and/or cultural values: The thought of egalitarianism stems from the idea that all humans are born equal, and that all human beings are on the same level as each other (at least when they are born). Genetically and biologically however, some people are just better and worser then others: Whether it be that they were just born stronger or that they have a hole in their chest, scientifically, not everyone is equal. However, some types of egalitarianism are not all false and should definitely be supported. These types of egalitarianism include economic and political egalitarianism, racial egalitarianism, ethnic egalitarianism, sexual egalitarianism, gender egalitarianism and religious egalitarianism. However, some certain concepts like gender and race are meaningless and all they bring are just another couple of differences between fellow humans that make use discriminate against each other: This is my prime reasoning for xenofeminism and postgenderism, the abolition of both gender, sex and race should all strongly be encouraged (Note: I still think this should all be voluntary), and therefore we can somewhat reach true egalitarianism.

Nihilism

Nihilism is objectively true, as there is no actual meaning in the universe or in our lives. The only meaning is the meaning we give ourselves, which is ultimately meaningless. We are creatures founded on accidental biological evolution made to survive, our existence was not created with a purpose, the only purpose was to survive. Since everything is meaningless, we should not constrain ourselves with meaning and social constructs, which is why the individual should be free from such things.

Post-Civillizationism

Our current society, is now a capitalist and statist hell-hole where the individual suffers at both the hands of his employer and his nation and the environment has become devastated at the hands of corrupt buisnesses and wealthy capitalists, to truly achieve freedom for the individual and for the worker, we must destroy civillization itself and liberate the earth from corrupt humans. After that, we must re-build society from the ashes in a new world. A post-civ society would mainly consist of local, small and decentralized egoist communes scattered across the now liberated Earth. This does not mean however, we will have to revert back to pre-industrial technology, instead we will have more advanced technology in a sort of anarcho-frontierist society:

Anarcho-Frontierism

An anarcho-frontierist society would be ideal in a post-civillizationist aftermath and would work a sort like technologically-advanced tribalism: Essentially, people will live in tribal eco-communities and communes scattered across the liberated Earth with highly-advanced technology created by independent scientists and Tech engineers who would also help develop space technology and advance space colonialism. From there, tribal communities with advanced-tech would reach out to space and start new communities and eco-communes there as well while maintaining peace with the locals

Relationships

SSSS+++ Tier (Best Friends and More)

Eyepatch Piism.png Neo-Piism - Person scale: Probably one of the most chillest dudes I have ever met, a very nice person and never at all that mean or offensive or anything of the sorts. I'm proud to consider him my friend and I hope he does as well. Ideology scale: Very based and good ideology, I love the combination of austrian and chicagoan economics with leftist rhetoric and mutualist theory, anarchism is also very based. Overall, a very based ideology that I fully appreciate

SSS+ Tier (Holy Basedness)

Accel.png Accelerationism - Accelerating civillization and statism to the brink of collapse? Absolutely and undeniably based, accelerationism is how we will inact the post-left utopia. Truly a very based ideology.

Leftac.png Left-Accelerationism - Same as the above, since leftism and acclerationsim are both based however I want to accelerate civillization, capitalism is more of a side-enemy. Socialism can only fully develop in a post-civ society. Other then that, you're pretty based.

SS+ Tier (The Post-Left Commune)

Indiv.png Individualism - The individual is not subservient to anyone, the individual is not subservient to the nation state as no such things actually exists, the individual is not subservient to humanity or the collective, the individual is not subservient to the government, to his employers or even his family. The individual is also not subservient to the universe, for the individual is free and does not need to answer to anyone.

Anin.png Individualist Anarchism - Anarchism is the best way to promote individual liberty and individualism as a whole, as it allows the individual to do anything without having to be forced constraint to any hierarchy where he is at the bottom. No constraint, not subservient to the government or the employer, the capitalists or the authoritarians. No one.

Egoism.png Egoist Anarchism - Morality is just an excuse used by radical theocrats and cucked atheists to enforce their un-relentless authoritarian dictatorships. To create a lie and then enforce that on to to others is absolutely ridiculous and unheard of, however please realize that objective ethicalism still exists. Spooks like these should be countered and destroyed, pitiful, very pitiful.

Illeg.png Illegal Anarchism - To be honest, I quite dislike and even hate your terrible economics, both markets and communism are both insanely based and yet you dislike both of them. You also hang out away to much time with that avaritonist darwinist bitch (who I'm going to fucking bash one day) and put too much emphasize on theft. That being said, I love doing crime and being gay.

Annil.png Nihilistic Anarchism - Morality does not exist, meaning also does not exist. Humans create meaning in this world because they are scared cowards, to scared to face the truth that our lives are meaningless and that there is no reason for us to exist. Yet existence is good, however non-existent can be as equally good.

Anprim.png Primitive Anarchism - Your organisation of tribal environmental communities as well as your abolishment of the state is indefinitely very based, plus you hate civillization like me, so based. However, I dislike your critique and hatred of technology, technology will help us destroy civilisation and the state!

Insarch.png Insurrectionary Anarchism - Violence and revolution are needed to ensure total libertarianism for the individual, the community and the worker. Since people are so brainwashed by neoliberal and pink capitalist propaganda, violence is the only way we can move forwards through society. We should reject anarcho-pacifism and utopian socialism as they are not and will never be able to ensure freedom.

Anpostleft.png Post-Leftism - Post-leftism is what true anarchism is like, where we focus more on the liberation of the individual from forces such as religion and the government instead of focusing on pointless economic ideas. Dont get me wrong, economic leftism is a big part of actual anarchism however, individual liberty is what makes anarchism, anarchist.

Post-an.png Post-Anarchism - Your ideas are often confusing, a mix and an array of of convoluted philosophies with splacthes and pledges of post-modernist and post-structuralist ideas all tied with a loose tie into an incoherent ideology that takes some political inspiration from Anarchism. Post-structuralism and post-modernism however are both based and good ideas that should be implemented.

Xenofeminism.png Post-Feminism - I wish you would stop labelling yourself as a "feminist" or a "xenofeminist". Feminism is another leftist concept that we should do away with, instead race and gender abolitonism is the way to go. These pointless constructs that serve no purpose other then discrimination shall be extinguished and freedom shall be acquired.

Postmodernicon.png Post-Modernism - To be honest, I do not like your critique of arts and architecture, post-modern art just seems off to me. I like classical and ancient art better, much more romantic and soothing for the eyes. I do quite like however, your philosophical stance and your departure from the modernist era, for we should move on to a new era. The POST-MODERN era.

S+ Tier (Uberus-Basedus)

Ricardosoc.png Classical Socialism - Your ideology has some few flaws here and there but it's mostly very based indeed. A combination of markets and socialism are always good however I want to gradually move away from the markets, also usufruct-based infrastructure is very based, I'm not sure why you would hate it. And also, I dont really know about the labor theory of value, anyways pretty based.

Left-Enlightenmentf.png Left-Enlightenment - Alot of right-libertarians and capitalist individualists may say that indvidualism is incompatible with leftist ideas as leftism is inherently collectivist, however they are wrong for indvidualism is about liberating the individual from the grasps of authority including that of the capitalists. You are mostly very individualistic and market socialist, both of which are extremely based.

S Tier (The Libertarian Left Commune)

Socan2.png Social Anarchism - Extremely based, but you focus waaaaaaaaay too much on economic egalitarianism and leftists, alot of you even consider leftist unity. You should focus more on individual liberty and liberation of the individual from needless social constructs.

Ancom.png Anarcho-Communism - Your ideology is tremendously based, however most of your so-called "followers" are just a bunch of alt-left SJW antifa radlibs trying to be special. Also, you don't seem to focus on individual liberty and the abolishment of social constructs that much and focus more on economic egalitarianism, like social anarchism, also Mutualism is a good transitional ideology.

A Tier (Based Spooks)

B Tier (Neutrality, 100)

C Tier (Cringe Spooks)

Clib.png Classical Liberalism - You were very extremely based for your time, I love your dedication to free markets and indvidualism as well as your anti-monarchist stance against the horrid monarchists (1776 will commence again!), however as time moved on, people realized that Capitalism sucks. Ricardian socialism is much better then you.

Synclib.png Syncretic Liberalism - Cringe syncreticism, the incorporation of ideas from the right-wing of the political spectrum is dangerous and cringe. It's better to just stick with left-wing ideas, apart from that you're okay in most places but terribly cringe in America, fucking Democrat kak-lites. Anyways, okay-ish ideology but kinda cringe

Radcent.png Radical Centrism - What teh fuck, this is literally just syncretic liberalism, theres not any actual difference between these two ideologies. And also, compromising with the right is a terrible idea and should be rejected, bad ideologu but also okay-ish.

D Tier (The Cringe Department)

Lib.png Liberalism - The only good quality that you have is egalitarianism, which is an okay ideology but needs some working into. Other then that, you're mostly cringe, capitalism is a hierarchical and ineffective system that ruins the spirit of the people and liberal democracy is cringe and needs to be replaced with more effective versions of democracy.

Civnat.png Liberal Nationalism - Scummy collectivist social construct supporter AND an evil neo-imperialist democratic hierarchical capitalist libtard!? Remember, you can only choose one incorrect option however you are pretty okay when applied in the real world, so you get a pass but you're a still cringe fuck.

NeoBingo.png Neo-Bingoism - Person scale: Pretty alright, a good friend to talk to and sometimes a very nice and kind person, however I don't like it when you throw tantrums over useless things and also I didn't like how you were obsessed for Yori for a long time and vandalized his page and user page. Ideology scale: Absolutely fucking cringe, traditions and nations are both spooky social hierarchies that don't actually exist and only in your mind, absolute monarchism is the most bullshitty ideology I have seen. Authoritarianism is complete grabge and state socialism isn't even socialist.

E Tier (Uberus-Cringeius)

Nation.png Nationalism - Shut the fuck up with your nation-state bullshit, you scummy imperialistic son of a bitch. The nation is a collective, a collective that is cringe and bullshit. Self-Nationalism is way better then this bullshit. Overall, cringe collectivism.

World.png Globalism - You want an even bigger collective then the last guy! I absolutely hate your hyper-collectivist stance, you're also a tool for Neoliberal-icon.png Neolibbert.png them Trot.png Necon.png to spread their bullshit imperialism for the sake of "lIbErAl dEmOcRacy". Fuck liberal democracy!

Neoliberal-icon.png Pink Imperialism - Scummy neoliberal scum! Not only do you support a terrible economic system with no welfare and lots of capitalism, you're also a neo-imperialist cuck who invades Middle Eastern countries for the sake of spreading "liberal democracy" and "progressive values". I hate you!

Necon.png Conservative Imperialism - You're just like the same as above but even more terrible and putrid! You want to enforce your own traditional values not just on to others but other countries as well! Absolutely cringe, traditions are spooks. Atleast neoliberalism supports cultural egalitarianism.

Neobert.png Libertarian Imperialism - Having a minimalistic state and promoting negative liberty wont save you from the fact that you're a scummy cappie who deserves to be burnt in hell! You have some cringe foreign views as well, basically the same as above.

F Tier (Burn in Hell)