Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought


 *  (ลัทธิพิบูลสงครามยุคใหม่) also known as [[File:SiamNeocon.png]] Siamese Neoconservatism (ลัทธิอนุรักษ์นิยมยุคใหม่), [[File:Thainatlib.png]] National Liberalism with Thai Characteristics (ลัทธิเสรีนิยมแห่งชาติ), or [[File:ThaiNeocon.png]] Revisionary Phibunsongkhram Thought (ลัทธิพิบูลสงครามฉบับปรับปรุง) is an ideology of which is based on the ideas of Thai Nationalism by Marshal Plaek Phibunsongkhram, known as Rattaniyom. Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought’s ideas of monarchism is based on the moderate form of Thai Royalism known as Chakriism, as it views H.M. King Bhumibol Adulyadej as the hero who rescued Thailand from the red menace since the Cold War. Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is the ideology that promotes social conservatism, technological progress, environmental protection, and cultural rejuvenation, in order for Thailand to be truly a civilized and prosperous nation. Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought’s economic model is based on the ideas of Ludwig von Mises, Friedrich August von Hayek, and Thomas Sowell, whose ideas were centered around free-market capitalism, such as market deregulations, the use of cryptocurrencies, economic liberalization, tax cuts, privatization of utilities and products, or disablement of central government-based welfare in favor of private charities or local government-based welfare. Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought’s foreign policy advocates for closer relations with other Asian market economies such as India, Japan, Malaysia, Indonesia, Singapore, or the Philippines, and detente with the West, while it seeks hostility with the Eastern dictatorships such as Russia, China, Iran, or DPRK. Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports free trade policy towards Western, Asian, and Third World market economies, while being protectionist towards hostile nations from the East, which results in neo-mercantilism. Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought opposes certain ideological demagogues such as economic socialists, communists, primitivists, fascists, wokeists, neo-progressive hawks, populists, anarchists, totalitarians, republicans, jihadists, abortion advocates, trumpists, putinists, dengists, and pro-eastern sympathizers.


 * [[File:Confucianism.png]] Confucius (551-479 B.C.) [[File:Chine.png]]
 * [[File:Plato.png]] Plato (~428-327 B.C.) [[File:Athdem.png]]
 * [[File:Aristotle.png]] Aristotle (~400 B.C.) [[File:Athdem.png]]
 * [[File:Jesus.png]] Jesus Christ (4 B.C. - 30-33 A.D.) [[File:Zio.png]]
 * [[File:Thomism.png]] Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) [[File:Cball-Italy.png]]
 * [[File:Mach.png]] Niccolo Machiavelli (1469-1527) [[File:Cball-Italy.png]]
 * [[File:Strato.png]] Naresuan (1555/1556-1605) [[File:Cball-Siam.png]]
 * [[File:Classlib.png]] John Locke (1632-1704) [[File:Cball-England.png]]
 * [[File:Classlib.png]] Adam Smith (1723-1790) [[File:Cball-Scotland.png]]
 * [[File:Kant.png]] Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) [[File:Cball-Prussia.png]]
 * [[File:Tradcon.png]] Edmund Burke (1729-1797) [[File:Cball-Ireland.png]]
 * [[File:Washington.png]] George Washington (1732-1799) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:Strato.png]] Taksin (1734-1782) [[File:Cball-Siam.png]]
 * [[File:Jeffersondem2.png]] Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:Chakri.png]] Mongkut (1804-1868) [[File:Cball-Siam.png]]
 * [[File:Lincolnism.png]] Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:Nation.png]] Taras Shevchenko (1814-1861) [[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]]
 * [[File:Enlightab.png]] Alexander II of Russia (1818-1881) [[File:Tsar.png]]
 * [[File:Austrobert.png]] Carl Menger (1840-1921) [[File:Cball-AustriaHungary.png]]
 * [[File:SunYatsen.png]] Sun Yat-sen (1866-1925) [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]]
 * [[File:Coolidge.png]] Calvin Coolidge (1872-1933) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:Church.png]] Winston Churchill (1874-1965) [[File:Cball-UK.png]]
 * [[File:Monkeyzz-Enlightenment.png]] Phra Sunthorn Vohara (1786-1855) [[File:Cball-Siam.png]]
 * [[File:Huhanmin.png]] Hu Hanmin (1879-1936) [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]]
 * [[File:Leftnat.png]] Symon Petliura (1879-1926) [[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]]
 * [[File:Austrobert.png]] Ludwig von Mises (1881-1973) [[File:Cball-Austria.png]]
 * [[File:Kemal.png]] Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (1881-1938) [[File:ROT.png]]
 * [[File:IsmetInonu.png]] İsmet İnönü (1884-1973) [[File:ROT.png]]
 * [[File:ChiangKaiShek.png]] Chiang Kai-shek (1887-1975) [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]]
 * [[File:Gaullismicon2.png]] Charles de Gaulle (1890-1970) [[File:Cball-France.png]]
 * [[File:Hushih2.png]] Hu Shih (1891-1962) [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]]
 * [[File:Phibunsongkhram.png]] Plaek Phibunsongkhram (1897-1964) [[File:Thailand.png]]
 * [[File:Hayek.png]] Friedrich August von Hayek (1899-1992) [[File:Cball-Germany.png]]
 * [[File:AnTory.png]] George Orwell (1903-1950) [[File:Cball-UK.png]]
 * [[File:McCarthy.png]] Joseph McCarthy (1908-1957) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:Goldwaterian.png]] Barry Goldwater (1909-1998) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:Chiang-Ching-kuo.png]] Chiang Ching-kuo (1910-1988) [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]]
 * [[File:Reagan.png]] Ronald Reagan (1911-2004) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:Friedman.png]] Milton Friedman (1912-2006) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:KPNLF.png]] Lon Nol (1913-1985) [[File:Cball-Cambodia.png]]
 * [[File:Revzion.png]] Menachem Begin (1913-1992) [[File:Zio.png]]
 * [[File:Pinochet-hat.png]] Augusto Pinochet (1915-2006) [[File:Cball-Chile.png]]
 * [[File:ParkChungHee.png]] Park Chung-hee (1917-1979) [[File:Cball-South Korea.png]]
 * [[File:Marcos.png]] Ferdinand Marcos Sr. (1917-1989) [[File:Cball-Philippines.png]]
 * [[File:Sadat.png]] Anwar Sadat (1918-1981) [[File:Cball-Egypt.png]]
 * [[File:Pahlavi.png]] Mohammad Reza Pahlavi (1919-1980) [[File:Cball-Persia.png]]
 * [[File:Fiscon.png]] Chatichai Choonhavan (1920-1998) [[File:Thailand.png]]
 * [[File:Papaj.png]] Pope John Paul II (1920-2005) [[File:Cball-Poland.png]]
 * [[File:Suharto.png]] Suharto (1921-2008) [[File:Cball-Indonesia.png]]
 * [[File:HenryKissinger.png]] Henry Kissinger (1923-) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:PAP(Singapore).png]] Lee Kuan Yew (1923-2015) [[File:Cball-Singapore.png]]
 * [[File:GHWB.png]] George H. W. Bush (1924-2018) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:Thatcher.png]] Margaret Thatcher (1925-2013) [[File:Cball-UK.png]]
 * [[File:ElizabethII.png]] Elizabeth II (1926-2022) [[File:Cball-UK.png]]
 * [[File:RamaIX.png]] H.M. King Bhumibol Adulyadej (1927-2016) [[File:Thailand.png]]
 * [[File:AlawiteDynasty.png]] Hassan II (1929-1999) [[File:Cball-Morocco.png]]
 * [[File:Blackcon.png]] Thomas Sowell (1930-) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:Caoky.png]] Nguyễn Cao Kỳ (1930-2011) [[File:Cball-SouthVietnam.png]]
 * [[File:Gorb.png]] Mikhail Gorbachev (1931-2022) [[File:Cball-USSR.png]]
 * [[File:McCain.png]] John McCain (1936-2018) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:Fujimori.png]] Alberto Fujimori (1938-) [[File:Cball-Peru.png]]
 * [[File:Anticommunism.png]] Yuri Bezmenov (1939-1993) [[File:Cball-USSR.png]]
 * [[File:LDP(Japan).png]] Tarō Asō (1940-) [[File:Cball-Japan.png]]
 * [[File:Anticommunism.png]] Vladimir Bukovsky (1942-2019) [[File:Cball-USSR.png]]
 * [[File:Wałęsa.png]] Lech Wałęsa (1943-) [[File:Cball-Poland.png]]
 * [[File:Fortuynism.png]] Pim Fortuyn (1948-2002) [[File:Cball-Netherlands.png]]
 * [[File:Hans Hermann Hoppe.png]] Hans-Hermann Hoppe (1949-) [[File:Cball-Germany.png]]
 * [[File:Bibi.png]] Benjamin Netanyahu (1949-) [[File:Zio.png]]
 * [[File:Thaksin.png]] Thaksin Shinawatra (1949-) [[File:Thailand.png]]
 * [[File:Kaczysmf.png]] Lech Kaczyński (1949-2010) [[File:Cball-Poland.png]]
 * [[File:RevRightKMT.png]] Ma Ying-Jeou (1950-) [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]]
 * [[File:BJP.png]] Narendra Modi (1950-) [[File:Cball-India.png]]
 * [[File:ShinzoAbe.png]] Shinzo Abe (1954-2022) [[File:Cball-Japan.png]]
 * [[File:FPR(Rwanda).png]] Paul Kagame (1957-) [[File:Cball-Rwanda.png]]
 * [[File:Sdssmall.png]] Janez Janša (1958-) [[File:Cball-Slovenia.png]]
 * [[File:PFPRus.png]] Boris Nemtsov (1959-2015) [[File:Cball-Russia.png]]
 * [[File:Soclib.png]] Garry Kasparov (1963-) [[File:Cball-Russia.png]]
 * [[File:Nrx.png]] Curtis Yavin (1973-) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:BrotherOfItaly.png]] Giorgia Meloni (1977-) [[File:Cball-Italy.png]]
 * [[File:RusLolbert.png]] Mikhail Svetov (1985-) [[File:Cball-Russia.png]]
 * [[File:FreedomToons.png]] Seamus Coughlin (1995-) [[File:Cball-USA.png]]
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Roman Abalin (1998-) [[File:Cball-Russia.png]]

  The Police  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is in favor of balancing the funding of the police, as too much unnecessary law enforcements erode an individual’s sovereignity. The police should exist to enforce the law to protect the citizens from having their liberty stripped by criminals and ensure that the NAP will be protected. Local police will have more say in each provinces though.

  The Military  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports mildly increasing the funding of the military. Detente with the hostile powers have been shown in history that it doesn’t work, as it allows those hostile powers to bully smaller nations. However, military leaders tend to do more harm in the economy than good, as they don’t have the knowledge in economics. The military will use force to control the state if they are given too much power, resulting in an authoritarian state. It supports maintaining the mandatory conscription, but also deregulation of the conscription laws, meanwhile the disabled should not be conscripted, and the use of the voluntary conscription system like in the US, while encouraging the partial privatization of the military, such as mercenaries or private military contractors, and the use of robots and artificial intelligence. Thailand should have a military of quality, not quantity.

  Form of Government  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports the concept of federalism, turning Thailand from 77 provinces into 77 federal states, increasing the states’ autonomy. The central government shouldn’t dictate too much on different provinces. Unitary governmental system is way too authoritarian and bureaucratic for a multi-ethnical country.

  Free Speech  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is mixed on the concept of free speech. It is necessary for an individual to have freedom to express his or her opinions. However, too much free speech allows extremists and political demagogues such as communists, fascists, wokeists, or national traitors to have a say. In conclusion, the government must fight against these certain ideologies, by using knowledge to disapprove these political theories. Speaking of the Lese-Majeste Law, it is unnecessary because the government should not be treated like an all-correct god, and H.M. King Bhumibol Adulyadej never endorsed this law.

  The Monarchy  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports retaining the current monarchy. The monarch is not just a tourist attraction, but also the symbol of Thailand’s national identity. However, it doesn’t support the concept of the Lese-Majeste Law. Although an idea of a Monarch-CEO running the country isn’t a bad idea, as the state will be able to make profits with the Joint-Stock Enterprises and Corporation to increase the state fundings in exchange for the population to pay much lower taxes in form of a voluntary one. A Monarch-CEO can be either from the Chakri Dynasty or not based on political circumstances. If a Monarch-CEO isn’t from the Chakri Dynasty, the Chakri Dynasty will be retained but will have their title granted as “Marquis of Extended Grace” based on the Imperial House of Ming after the Qing Dynasty had taken over China in the 17th century.

  Parliamentarianism  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is in favor of Parliamentarian System as this system of government is advantageous because it create a friendly relationship between the executive and legislative arm of the government. This is so because, the two arms of the government are not separated. When the legislative and executive arms of the government in a parliamentary system of government are joint together, it is usually faster and quicker for decisions to be made. The fusion of powers makes parliamentary approval of the policies and programmes of government fast, thereby helping quick decision and implementation of government policies and programmes.

  Rule of the Best  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought prefers Aristocracy and Noocracy over Democracy and Autocracy. Why? This form of government intends to give the leadership into the hands of highly-qualified people, which is laudable. It prevents the rise of a single dictator, by distributing power between members of a council. The patronage of the ruling classes has led to the blossoming of arts and culture in historical kingdoms ruled by aristocrats. The less number of leaders involved increases the efficiency of the government, by reducing chances of political deadlocks and disagreements. Ideally, well-intentioned leaders in an aristocracy can do what is best for the country, without getting swayed by public opinion. This form of government is advantageous in cases of military conflict, since it results in a well-organized chain of command.

  The Constitution  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports constitutionalism as the separation of power as a concept under constitutionalism ensures that the various organs of the constitution are kept under check so that no one organ encroaches upon the jurisdiction of the other organ. Constitutionalism ensures that the government doesn’t become authoritative. As a result, certain limitations are put upon by either giving rights to the people, like fundamental rights or by placing restrictions on the power of the government. The idea of constitutionalism is taken primarily from the theory of the limited state by John Locke. According to this theory, the state is a creation of a social contract, entered into by a man and thus the state is an instrument for fulfilling the aspiration of the man. Constitutionalism ensures that the state is not encroaching upon the people’s life and liberty and is critical for a liberal polity.

  Reform over Revolution  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports Reform, opposed to revolution, as a market economy like Thailand and First World market economies are unnecessary for a bloody revolution, which hurts the populace and the economy in a long term. Revolutions are only necessary against totalitarian governments with command economy like North Korea or Eritrea.

  Economic Liberalism  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought opposes excessive economical regulations, seeing them as stagnative to a thriving market economy (Keynesian Economics have already proven that, such as the US Democratic Party). Economical regulations by a long term only benefits the big businesses more as they lobby with the government for more regulations to crush smaller competitors, because the big corporations can afford the costs, small and medium sized businesses cannot with economic regulations. It is supportive of minimal governmental interference in the economy. People should have the opportunity to start up businesses. The owners and workers should have the rights to freely negotiate in the international and national framework based on the Law of Supply and Demand.

  Alternatives to the Fiat Money  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports free banking and bringing back the Gold Standard. The Central Banks shouldn’t have a large say in the economics. The Central Bank only defends monopolies, and the fiat currency is a tool for the government to control the economy especially Keynesians, because the government prints fiat money such as banknotes, which cause the fiat currency to lose their values each year, causing inflation and net deficit. It is supportive of the competitive crypto-currencies based on the Gold Standard because to make the government stop bossing around in the economy, privatization of currencies is necessary, as what Friedrich August von Hayek said about it.

  Taxation  
 * Taxation is usually a theft, and people shouldn’t pay too high taxes, which can hurt the economy in long term (For example, the Japanese economy, which causes Japan to be one of, if not, the country that suffers population decline the most.) and gives the big government too much of a say. The government should be fiscally responsible so that the country won’t be drown in debt. In short, it supports tax cuts in order to be fiscally responsible without the government wasting taxpayers’ money irresponsibly. The percentage of taxes should be between 10%-15%.

  Private Property  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought views private property as a bulwark to the society. Anyone should have the rights to profit from the land they own, as it’s natural for human beings. In summary, Free Market Economy is necessary for a country to economically thrive. The more freedom to start up businesses, the better the economy is.

  Environmentalism  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is environmentalist in a propertarian way. Pollution is a violation of the other private properties by one. A polluter will be economically punished in one way or another. Green energies and technologies in the 21st century are the results of free-market capitalism that seek to compete in the markets against fossil fuels. Capitalism is the system that will ensure that the environment will be kept green as humans create technologies to sustain the forests, the oceans, or natural resources. Socialists, especially Marxist-Leninists, claim to care about the environment, but in reality, they seek to eliminate the market competition in technology, while replacing it with uncompetitive planned economy that consumes more natural resources than capitalists do, the USSR and the PRC are the proofs of that.

  Gun Rights  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports the idea of gun rights. Citizens shouldn’t rely too much on the police to defend themselves from criminals, as sometimes, the police can collude with the crime syndicates which bribe them to erode the freedom of the common people. Gun control only makes criminals easier to kill someone, as they don’t follow the law. However, the minimum age of a gun owner should be 18.

  Free Trade  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is in favor of Free Trade aka Economic Internationalization. High tariffs and Autarky only hurt the country’s economy than it helps. Autarky can cause economic delay, starvation, and wars. Free Trade allows small countries to gain access on foreign products with higher qualities, and also preserves every nations’ political independence from wars. In order for a country’s economy to be successful, a country should be very permissive on free trade, which allows goods to be exchanged with very few to no restrictions, whether on local, regional, or global levels. It is in favor of free trade with Western, Asian, or Third World market economies for resources that can develop the country’s economy, however, it is protectionist when it comes to trading with hostile nations such as China or Russia, as trading with hostile nations only allow them to be stronger. It is supportive of neo-mercantilism.

  Helping the Poor  
 * Speaking of free healthcare and welfare, Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought believes it should be the local government’s decision to implement one, not the central government. The poor and ill should be helped in this way, or by private charities.

  The State and Religions  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports Secularism, but it should also be up to the 77 states (including the Southern Muslim provinces) if they want to implement religious laws or not. Everyone should be free to worship any religions and beliefs. Both theocracies and countries with state atheism are equally tyrannical as religious leaders don’t make good political leaders as this has been proven in history that focusing too much on religions hinder the technological progress, while countries with state atheism only prop up cults of personalities as the ex-communist states have proven about that.

  Social Conservatism  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought views culture and tradition as what keep our nation unique and what reflects ourselves. It supports the concept of Social Conservatism as a way to preserve our culture and transmit all those values to the country, including national holidays. However, the modern form of conservatism has abandoned most of what made conservatism truly conservative. Thailand needs a cultural rejuvenation, based on Marshal Plaek Phibunsongkhram’s theory of cultural revolution, in order to make the Thai culture civilized and great again.

  Abortion Question  
 * Abortion is not a woman’s right in the eyes of Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought. It is a murder that cuts unborn fetus’ chance to view the world. Abortion should be mostly illegal unless a woman’s life is threatened or a woman is a rape victim.

  LGBTQ+ Individuals  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is neutral leaning negative in terms of LGBT rights. LGB individuals should be treated equally with the Heterosexuals. Gay marriage should be legal or illegal up to the states’ decisions. However, the T and Q parts, it is a bit less tolerant to trans people. It will still accept transmedicalists as equal citizens because these people want to live normally like cisgender individuals. However, the LGBTQIA+ movement should be strongly prohibited as this movement has spread their agenda that turned children into who they shouldn’t be, which has ruined and demolished several families and their agenda seeks to destroy the functional family values built for thousands of years. In conclusion, if you want to be a homosexual or a bisexual, keep your sexual deviance yourself, if you are a transgender, seek a doctor or a surgeon and live like a normal person after gender transition.

  Racism  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought views racism as a very stupid idea. Not every races are born that way, and this stupid ideology of racism is built on a pseudoscience that led to genocides. It also opposes intersectionality aka reverse racism, which only promote national betrayal and divides the country, by dividing the country’s population into two groups, such as the “priviledged” and “marginalized”, which is literally built by a non-existent myth known as “structural racism”. Individuals must combat racism from both sides ASAP.

  Cultural Assimilation  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports civic and cultural forms of Nationalism. Skilled and talented immigrants are welcome to the country, but they should also assimilate into the Thai culture (depends on which provinces). In terms of native minorities, they shall gain equal rights to the majority. It opposes the concept of multiculturalism because a functioning society cannot accept some detrimental external cultures which can divide the country.

  Legalization of Drugs  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports legalization of drugs, as keeping them illegal only make people more unsure about the drugs. This legalization of drugs is the best method to combat drug uses, as drugs’ prices will drop and the drug dealers will actually go bankrupt. However, the minimum age of a citizen who can legally buy drugs is 18.

  Women’s Rights  
 * Speaking of Feminism, Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports the concept of the first and second waves of feminism. Women should have the rights to determine themselves, as they can choose to be anything, including tradwives, nuns, businesswomen, or even the Prime Minister. However, it opposes the concept of the third and fourth waves of feminism, as it only makes gender equality pointless as these type of feminists, especially radical feminists, are as sexist as the Manosphere supporters.

  Death Penalty  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is in favor of retaining the death penalty. Some crimes are so serious that only the death penalty will suffice. Violent and sexual crimes against children, for example. Those who commit such heinous acts will always represent a danger to society. Thus the death penalty is the only appropriate punishment in such cases. The death penalty acts as a deterrent. If people know that they are likely to be executed for the most serious of crimes, then they will be less likely to commit them. The death penalty saves taxpayers' dollars. In comparison with all the money spent on prisoners' upkeep, execution involves relatively little expense. With the best will in the world, some criminals are beyond rehabilitation. Whether they're out on the streets or locked up inside a prison they're always going to represent a danger to someone. The death penalty deals with this problem by removing dangerous elements from society permanently. The death penalty satisfies the natural human desire for vengeance. This may not be one of its stated aims, but it's the main reason why people support it. Executing criminals takes vengeance out of the hands of private individuals, thus maintaining social stability while at the same time satisfying the community's desire for revenge.

  Post-Industrialization Economy  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is supportive in a post-industrialization economy. It increses free trade between the nations. Increases in capital are made which allow investors to finance the country. It allows global mass media ties all around the world. It allows greater ease of transportation of goods and people. It spreads of liberal ideals to other nations. The economy becomes more efficient in environmental protection.

  Technology  
 * Technology and more specifically computers have made the human lives much better in all aspects. Technology is not a dynamic entity, it depends on the user to be applied. Technology should be seen as the greatest accomplishment of the human mind, in the eyes of humanity. Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is very supportive of innovating technologies for the betterment of the nation and the economy as the market competition allows technologies to be developed furthermore.

  Bringing Back the Order of the Past with Futuristic Methods  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is supportive of technological advancements in order to bring back the order and hierarchal system of the past, based on the theories of Nick Land and Curtis Yavin. Technologies are not oxymoronic with traditionalism as good numbers of the reactionaries in the past had supported industrialization such as Pyotr Stolypin. What Marx and the Marxists want in their “progressive” dystopia is not a futuristic world order but a return to the primitive days as those days were the time human hierarchies and civilizations didn’t exist. Religions and Science should not be separated either as history has shown that scientific progress can be made even with religions such as the Islamic Golden Age.

  Green Technology  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is in favor of environment-friendly technologies as technologies are a net positive to protect the environment such as green energies. Renewable resources should be slowly implemented to replace fossil fuels in the future as fossil fuels are limited in this planet and are expected to run out in decades. Climate Change is also a factor that we shouldn’t avoid giving attention as humanity will eventually be drowned in oceans as the Earth’s temperature increases caused by carbon emissions.

  Internationalism  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports co-operating with other countries for the greater good of the nation, as internationalism promotes peace and security, self-determination, economic stability, and humanitarianism within each nations on Earth. Different nations should co-operate on large issues such as economic globalization, military co-operation, solving climate change, sharing technology, and others. Although it is not supportive of World Federalism or extreme globalization, as those things will erode nations’ sovereignties.

  Approaching Towards the West  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought views the West as the better side in the modern-era Second Cold War, as the West tends to favor things such as free-market economy, capitalism, technological advancement, liberty, or free trade, while the East tends to favor things such as collectivism, planned economy, socialism, or totalitarianism. Thailand should make a detente with the Western, Asian, and Third World market economies, and offer an economic co-operation with those certain countries. Thailand will improve relations with certain countries with diplomacy such as the United States, the British Commonwealth, Japan, Republic of China, Republic of Korea, India, the European Union, Brazil, Egypt, Ethiopia, South Africa, or the rest of ASEAN. Thailand will honor its decades-old friendship with the United States with military, economic, and technological co-operation. Thailand will be hostile towards the Eastern-aligned countries such as the PRC, Russia, Iran, DPRK, or Syria, by giving them economic sanctions and diplomatic cuts, causing Thailand not to co-operate with any of these countries. Even if sanctions are made towards China, Thailand will not suffer economic decline, as Thailand will still trade with the West, the rest of Asia, and the rest of the Third World that can offer alternative resources instead of the certain Eastern-aligned nations.

  Thai Nationalism  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is an ideology that promotes Thai National Conservatism. It is proud of the country, nation, religion, and culture to the blood. It will do the best in anything to improve the country, not serving other countries’ special interests. Nation, Culture, and Identity are what ancestors lost their blood in their struggle against any odds, and it will fight to the last breath for my country. It has ZERO tolerance to any types of national traitors including separatists, collaborationists, terrorists, or anti-nationalists. Thailand should expand its borders to restore most of the lost lands such as Kengtung, Laos, Phra Tabong, Phibunsongkhram, Nakhon Champassak, Sibsongbanna, Perlis, Kedah, Kelantan, and Terengganu. Thailand should expand its borders by using private companies and private military contractors to buy those lands, by offering economic prosperity in those lands, while slowly “re-colonizing” the lands, eventually those lands will be given back to Thailand, uniting the lost-Thai lands during the 19th-20th century.

  Regional Alliances  
 * ASEAN is a regional alliance which unites Southeast Asian nations. Although Thailand should cooperate against incoming threats from the PRC, Thailand will not support rogue states like the government of Myanmar or Cambodia. ASEAN should be more than an economic alliance to truly unite South-East Asia. ASEAN should become a military alliance like the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, by offering free trade agreements and military co-operations with ASEAN member-states such as the Philippines, Indonesia, Singapore, Brunei, or Malaysia to build a shield in South-East Asia against the threat from the PRC and its allies like Pakistan or DPRK. ASEAN should be an alliance that promotes cultural preservation, national identity, military co-operation, and free trade to protect South-East Asia from any external threats.

  The Kra Canal  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought supports digging the Kra Canal (which was what Thaksin Shinawatra proposed to improve the Thai economy), as this canal will make the country profit more in international naval transportation, as the ships don’t have to stop at Singapore anymore and pass the Kra canal in Thailand instead, which can boost the Thai economy.

  Space Exploration  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought views Space Exploration as a necessity in the 21st century, for given reasons. Experiments performed in space help us understand health problems on Earth. The space sector generates high-tech jobs for Thais. Satellites data can be used to predict natural disasters and to support emergency relief efforts. Astronauts encourage young people to study science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Satellites provide data on climate change, measure pollution, and help protect our planet. Space technologies improve products we use every day, weather forecasts, and communications worldwide. Scientific breakthroughs are challenging humans’ assumptions and pushing humanity’s boundaries by exploring the unknown.

  Zionism  
 * The Jews have owned the Holy Land for thousands of years before the Romans came. The Jews after being expelled by Emperor Hadrian from the Holy Land faced a lot of persecution under the guise of anti-Semitism for centuries, specially in Europe. This was the reason why the Jews cannot be stateless anymore. The Holy Land has to be returned to its rightful owners, the Jews. The Jews accepted the 1948 UN Partition of the Holy Land, the Arabs refused. Look, what Israel is doing against the Arabs in West Bank and Gaza is bad, but the Palestinian side is not innocent either, as Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, and other Arab terrorist groups want to exterminate every single Jewish citizens of the Holy Land. In this case, Israel must annex the West Bank and Gaza, while also treating the Arabs as their equal citizens. Thailand will offer more co-operation with Israel with trade deals in economy and military, giving some foreign aid to the country, with private charities and companies going there, while the country will suspend the recognition of the Palestinian State, seeing that there is no benefit for Thailand to side with the Arabs against Israelis, as Thailand is not a Muslim country, and it doesn’t share any diplomatic relations with the Palestinian State.

  Realpolitiks  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought’s view on realpolitiks is that the geopolitical arena is dominated by pragmatism with principles and values wielded when useful and disregarded when not. Any attempts to analyse the actions of great powers or even middle powers using a framework of principles and values would result in a ton of contradictions and inconsistencies. As a result trying to justify or analyse actions (or inactions) by these states using a framework of principles and values is a useless endeavour and believers that those are what drive states are the 'homeopathy' practitioners of the geopolitical field. Happy to be convinced otherwise a framework of values and principles when analysing geopolitics of great and middle powers is not absolutely useless.

  Communitarianism  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram’s Thought views the community as what makes the country stable with social cohesions, with these advantages: Increase of acceptance for renewable energy, increase of social capital, socioeconomic regeneration/economic regional development, energy literacy and environmental lifestyle changes, empowerment, access to affordable energy, knowledge and skills development, support for ambitious climate and energy policy, and energy supply resilience.

  Orthodox Christianity  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought views the Orthodox Church as the one and only true church of christ. There’s a lot that could be said here, but the reason why it believe this is that it examined both the Scriptures and the early history of Christianity, and it became convinced that the only church that matches them both is Orthodoxy. Particularly formative for me were the writings of St. Ignatius of Antioch, a disciple of the Apostle John. The church life he described was definitely not what it saw in Evangelicalism. Since he was someone who learned how to be a Christian from the Apostles themselves, it wanted to be in his church. Orthodoxy takes history seriously and doesn’t gloss over the hard stuff. It also doesn’t pick and choose from early Christian witness to develop a streamlined “system” of theology that is easy to swallow. Rather, because Orthodoxy is truly the community descended from the Apostles, within its theological memory are centuries of dogma, doctrine and theological reflection. Not all of it is totally consistent or easy to sort out, but it is nevertheless one great river of truth with an overall unified direction. One doesn’t see that in the same way in Roman Catholicism (there are several major turns in history), and it is impossible to find that in Protestantism. Most Protestants aren’t even concerned with it.

  Confucianism  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is influenced by the Chinese philosopher named Kong Qiu, known as Confucius, as Confucianism believes in ancestor worship and human-centered virtues for living a peaceful life. The golden rule of Confucianism is “Do not do unto others what you would not want others to do unto you.”

  Natural Law Theory  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought believes in Natural Law Theory. It is based on reasoning, and not revelation – this allows making it possible for everyone to follow the principles. It is universal and absolutist; so it is always relevant. It allows for a clear cut approach to morality and establishes common rules.

20??-2018—->2018-2019(///)—->2019-2020(///)—->2020-2021(///)—->2021-2022(///)—->2022(///)—->2022(///)—->2022-Present(///)

  Apolitical Epoch (20??-2018)   
 * This was the era before Nesanel gets involved in politics, when he was a child. He used to only care about studying hard and pursue his own future. Back then, He didn’t know about the concept of politics, so there’s nothing much in this era.

  Nesanel Thought 0.0 (2018-2019) (///)  
 * This was the era when Nesanel was getting into the first stage of politics. He was told by his parents how great Thaksin Shinawatra was when he was the Prime Minister. He was fascinated how he made Thailand an economical power. He used to oppose Free-Market Capitalism and neoliberal economics. So, He turned his eyes on Keynesian economics, and became a social democrat.

  Nesanel Thought 0.1 (2019-2020) (///)  
 * This was the era when He discovered wider politics and became more critical to the West. At that time, he met a friend who is a Wumao simping for the CCP, making him believe that China is an actual functioning market socialist country. He turned him into a Wumao and a Xi Jinping simp. He also supported unbridled free trade as this makes China the new world superpower. Thus, mixing Market Socialism with Third Way economics.

  Nesanel Thought 0.2 (2020-2021) (///)  
 * This was the era when Nesanel realized that authoritarianism is a no-go for me, and that his friend’s ideology was simply stupid as he’d realized that China is actually a State Capitalist state. He quit being a Dengist because of this. This era was the time when the Sam Kib movement (aka Three-Fingers mob) were very popular as Pr*yuth won the elections “fairly”. (Fr it’s not even a real election. The 250 senates who helped him were already selected by him.) So, he decided to tone down his simpery for Dengism and embrace democratic socialism instead.

  Nesanel Thought 1.0 (2021-2022) (///)  
 * After he tried to understand more about socialism, He has realized that equality that the economical system preaches is just equality of outcome, not equality of opportunity, and its end results will always be authoritarianism that pretends to “care” about the poor. He was recommended by his university professor, who was a liberal conservative, into Milton Friedman’s economics. He told me that the West is obviously better than China. He also told him why capitalism is so successful, as other economical systems had failed. The more Nesanel listened to him, the more he became a Neoliberal. Plus, he has had enough of many leftists simping for authoritarian quasi-fascist states like Russia or Iran. So, he becomes supportive of the principles of Neoconservatism.

  Nesanel Thought 2.0 (2022) (///)  
 * This was the era when Nesanel became a full blown Alt-Lite obsessed with supremacist identity politics. I was told by some paleolibertarians that libertarians will not risk other people’s lives in pointless foreign wars. He had become quite skeptical of Milton Friedman’s advocacy of Free Trade. He also thought that he should put his nation, tradition, and liberty first, as they reflect what he is in his nation. Globalism has actually done more negative things than positive things in his POV in this period. He had also extended himself into other libertarian schools of economics, such as the Austrian School of Economics. He was also a full blown right-wing populist and national libertarian. To preserve his freedom, he must put his nation first. I also embraced some parts of the original form of Paleoconservatism. He thought that mindless progressivism would end up into a tyranny, like the USSR, or Revolutionary France. This was where he choose to study more about Paleolibertarianism.

  Nesanel Thought 2.1 (2022) (///)  
 * Months later, after Nesanel had studied more about classical liberal and libertarian philosophy, I have been told by more literate libertarians that supremacist identity politics is not what a true Classical Liberal or a Libertarian will stand for, as identity politics in general is a form of collectivism. Libertarianism in general stands for individuality, freedom, and liberty. He also has realized that populism is just a tool of corrupt politicians to trick people into “fighting the elites”, which is just not different from an ochlocracy. His economic views are now more of Hayek’s than Mises’. He had also come back to embracing free trade, as that thing prevents countries from being involved in wars and conflicts. There is a way to oppose globalism without embracing autarky, such as being diplomatically non-interventionist, or refusing to politically cooperate with other nations. He became a Progressive Conservative leaning to conservative in cultural views, a hardline conservative in economy, and a mixture of civic and cultural nationalist. He identifies himself with the Alt-Lite movement no longer.

  Nesanel Thought 3.0 (2022-present) (///)  
 * This is the current period of Nesanel, as he has already taken the R E A C T P I L L after seeing how chaotic post-modern era has become, although he didn’t become an ultra-traditionalist, he has reverted back to social conservatism even though he still despises populism and populists like Trump or the MAGA cesspool. He views detente with the Eastern tyrannies as obsolete similar to how isolationists like Neville Chamberlain appeased Hitler to “keep Europe peaceful”, which was a completely stupid idea as the evil empires like the Third Reich didn’t stop at Austria or Czechoslovakia, so he takes the NATOpill back, although he still doesn’t like regime chances that much as he prefers NATO and ASEAN being defensive alliances to counter the dangers from the East rather than offensive alliances that Lockheed-Martin innocent Third World countries. Nesanel is now a neoconservative out of pragmatism, not dogmatism. He also has become even more skeptic towards democracy as this system, especially direct democracy, allows uninformed voters to have a say, which is a tool for kleptocrats and oligarchs to rise into power, resulting in a country becoming an immoral dictatorship. He has become supportive of aristocracy and noocracy instead of democracy or autocracy as the former two only allow the qualified, the noble, the intelligent, and the fittest to rule, which make the process in the country faster and more efficient than democracy.

 Ideologies    Based/Green VISA Pass 
 * [[File:Cap.png]] - The one and the only functioning economic system. Even if it’s not flawless, capitalism has already shown to the world that it is the economic system that breeds prosperity and will last longer than it’s arch-enemy, socialism.
 * [[File:Post-Bert.png]] Post-Libertarianism - This is absolutely right about how the society should function. Any Libertarians who are smart and pragmatic enough will realize about that the Austrian Economics actually needs some amounts of statism to function. Dear Anarcho-Capitalists, if you wish to abolish the gubbernment, then who will enforce the Non-Aggression Principle which will protect you guys from the threats of the Left-Wing Anarchists?
 * [[File:3princLib.png]] Liberal Tridemism - The Republic of China should become the Empire of Owners, Liberty, and Free Markets, not an island that wants to eradicate its own identity in favor of an artificial identity. Chiang Kai-shek’s White Terror was not enough to prevent the Maoids from taking away the Mainland.
 * [[File:Reactlib.png]] - Yes.
 * [[File:Arist.png]] and [[File:Nooc.png]]  - Only the qualified, intelligent, suitable, and noble should rule.
 * [[File:Nrx.png]] - The form of Reactionarism that suits better in the 21st century than classical conservatism.
 * [[File:Reactmod.png]] - Reactionarism with technological advancements? Count me in.
 * [[File:Austrobert.png]] - Ludwig von Mises was truly a gem that made the Keynesians and Marxists cope and seethe. Although you are actually suitable for the economy if there’s enough amounts of statism, like what I said above.
 * [[File:Necon.png]] - Military alliances? Free-Markets? International Solidarity? Fighting against political demagogues? Fighting against the CCP and Russians? Fuck Yes. I’m kinda skeptic about the regime changes though.
 * [[File:Neobert.png]] - Now, ain’t I right?
 * [[File:Kemal.png]] - Good job for tearing down the Christ-killer empire known as the Ottoman Empire. Turkey must remain as a member of NATO without the presence of Tayyip Erdogan.
 * [[File:Phibunsongkhram.png]] - มหาอาณาจักรไทยจะต้องยิ่งใหญ่อีกครั้ง! มรดกแห่งความยิ่งใหญ่ของประเทศไทยสมัยจอมพล ป. พิบูลสงครามจะยืนยงยาวนานตราบใดประชาชนชาวไทยยังยืนยัด ระบอบทุนนิยมตลาดเสรีและลัทธิชาตินิยมรัฐนิยมเป็นสิ่งสำคัญที่ประเทศไทยต้องมีเพี่อให้ประเทศพัฒนา
 * [[File:RamaIX.png]] - ในหลวงท่านทรงปกป้องชาติไทยจากพวกปรสิตแดงและท่านทรงงานสละหยาดเหงื่อเพื่อประชาชนไทย แต่ระบบเศรษฐกิจพอเพียงนั้นส่งผลเสียต่อเศรษฐกิจไทยมากกว่า เศรษฐกิจตลาดเสรีนั้นดีกว่าสำหรับประเทศไทย
 * [[File:Natcon.png]] - ประเทศไทยจงเจริญ!
 * [[File:Pan-Nationalism.png]] - เราต้องรวมชาติไทยโดยการยึดคืนดินแดนที่ถูกชิงโดยพวกฝรั่งและพวกปรสิตคอมมิวนิสต์

 Neutral/Tolerable 
 * W.I.P.

 Cringe/Commie Sympathizers 
 * W.I.P.

 Self-Inserts    Allied 
 * W.I.P.

 Neutral 
 * [[File:DoesntExist.png]] Nonexistism (Also known as: Otto Strasser-Kim Il-Sung-Chiang Kai-shek Synthesis) - How can I put a non-existent ideology here? Has some neat ideas like Technoreconstructionism, Social Conservatism, Pan-Nationalism, Confucianism, or Tridemism. The rest of the ideology, especially Strasserism, Juche (even if you don’t simp for today’s politics of DPRK), or the quasi-Nazbol tendencies are not my taste. We are also almost the polar opposite on economy (that’s obvious) and on diplomacy (I prefer economic internationalization and international alliances, although I am not a globalist). Also, I am a neoconservative out of pragmatism (I am still skeptic on regime changes on non-aligned countries).
 * [[File:Pixil-frame-0(27).png]] New Model Of Cheesenism (Also known as: Showa Statism without Corporatocracy) - We share two common enemies on this planet (the Russians and CCP), have similar Pan-Asian Nationalist views (although your interests in the Malacca Strait will have a conflict with mine), or are sympathetic towards Reactionarism (even if our definitions of that word are different, as I am a reactionary in a political sense, while you are one in a cultural sense). However, we disagree on certain things such as your support for corporatism, an economic system that requires large amount of stratification, which reduces the economic freedom and is stagnative to a market economy like Indonesia, your support for the Arab side in the Israeli-Arab Conflict which is not beneficial for my country because Israel will become a much worse enemy for Thailand to handle if it sides with the Arabs, because the Israelis have much better military technology than the Islamic World combined, or your support for over-centralization of the government, which can go out-of-bounds and become an incompetent and tyrannical autocracy, which decreases the motivation and loyalty of the population to the state, which can causes rebellions and will waste too much money on government spendings.
 * [[File:BERNHEism.png]] BERNHEism (Also known as: Techno-Ultranational Capitalism without Fascism) - You have good ideas such as technological advancements, the rule of the best (fellow enjoyer of aristocracy), capitalism (although I don’t really like overly-regulated markets), your disdain for populoids, your disdain for racialism, decent foreign policy, or your views on the LGBTQIA+ community. But you take authoritarianism and eugenicism way too far. Overall, your attempts to mix Bull Moose Progressivism with Dengism and Technocracy are decent.

 Hostile 
 * W.I.P.

 Personality  
 * Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is a silent person that trusts no one as it considers no one as someone that truly care about it, although that it views other ideologues by personality, not by their ideologies. Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought usually gets along with contemporary conservatives and economic liberals, most likely neoconservatives, neoliberals, or neo-libertarians. Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought abhors political demagogues such as socialists, communists, wokeists, populists, science deniers, fascists, jihadists, or pro-Eastern sympathizers. Despite being socially conservative, Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought despises Trumpists and paleoconservatives as those two groups of political demagogues seek to weaken NATO from the inside while submitting to the Russians, which will divide the West, because Trump wants the US to withdraw from NATO had he won the second term in the US Presidential Elections, and paleoconservatives want very similar things Trump wanted, the fact that modern paleocons in the US sympathize for anti-Atlanticist tyrants like Assad or Putin doesn’t help either. In conclusion, Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is fine with everyone in personality as long as you are not a dickhead towards it, because it views people in terms of their personalities rather than their ideologies.

 Flag    General Version  The flag design of Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is based on the rotated flag of Thailand with the Coat of Arms of Mises Institute.


 * 1) Draw a circle
 * 2) Draw the flag of Thailand with horizontal lines rotated by 52 degrees with these following colors: #a51931, #f4f5f8, #2d2a4a
 * 3) Draw the Von Mises Coat of Arms.
 * 4) Draw a 4 quarter Shield.
 * 5) Make Top-Right and Bottom Left quarters Light Blue and the other two light Grey.
 * 6) Through the Grey quarters draw a thick red line.
 * 7) (Optional) Draw an opened Bible in bottom left corner and a Caduceus in the top right
 * 8) Draw the sunglasses and the Royal Thai Army officer cap.
 * 9) (Optional) Draw Heckler and Koch 416 assault rifle next to the ball like it is armed with the rifle.

 Alternate Version  The alternate flag design of Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought is based on the flag of Siam with NATO background color.


 * 1) Draw a circle
 * 2) Paint the ball with navy blue (#022169), the same color used for the background color of the flag of NATO.
 * 3) Draw the Siamese Elephant at the middle of the ball.
 * 4) Draw the sunglasses and the Royal Thai Army officer cap.
 * 5) (Optional) Draw Heckler and Koch 416 assault rifle next to the ball like it is armed with the rifle.

If you want to ask me, please talk in, especially if you want to be added in relations.

DO NOT COMMENT HERE! IF YOU WRITE COMMENT HERE, YOUR COMMENT WILL GET DELETED!