Nekoqingist Bolshevism

Nekoqingist Bolshevism is an economically far-left, culturally center, civically Authoritarian ideology. In short it is a Marxist Leninist, Culturally Variable and Nationalist Ideology that favours a Marxist-Leninist model of economy.

Who Inspired me?

 * [[File:Karl_Marx.png]] Karl Marx (1818-1883)
 * [[File:Orengelsf.png]] Frederick Engels (1820-1895)
 * [[File:Sun_Yat-Sen.png]] Sun Yat Sen(1866-1925)
 * [[File:ICA.png]] James Connolly (1868-1916)
 * [[File:Lenin.png]] Vladimir Lenin (1870-1924)
 * [[File:ML.png]] Wilhelm Pieck (1876-1960)
 * [[File:Statesoc.png]] Liao Zhongkai (1877-1925)
 * [[File:JosephStalin.png]] Joseph Stalin (1878-1953)
 * [[File:CPUSA.png]] William Z. Foster (1881-1961)
 * [[File:Cball-PRBulgaria.png]] Georgi Dimitrov (1882-1949)
 * [[File:LeftKMT.png]] Mikhail Borodin (1884-1951)
 * [[File:ML.png]] Ernst Thalmann (1886-1944)
 * [[File:HoChiMinh.png]] Ho Chi Minh (1890-1969)
 * [[File:ML.png]] Harry Pollitt (1890-1960)
 * [[File:Stalin.png]] Vyacheslav Molotov (1890-1986)
 * [[File:Bierut.png]] Boleslaw Bierut (1892-1956)
 * [[File:Cball-PRHungary.png]]Mátyás Rákosi (1892-1971)
 * [[File:SoongChingling.png]] Soong Ching Ling (1893-1981)
 * [[File:JapCom.png]] Kyuichi Tokuda (1894-1953)
 * [[File:Mariateguism.png]] Jose Carlos Mariategui (1894-1930)
 * [[File:Choibalsan.png]] Khorloogin Choibalsan (1895-1952)
 * [[File:Sandinism.png]] Augusto César Sandino (1895-1934}
 * [[File:Gottwald2.png]] Klement Gottwald (1896-1953)
 * [[File:SocKemal.png]] Şevket Süreyya Aydemir (1897-1976)
 * [[File:ZhouEnlai.png]] Zhou Enlai (1898-1976)
 * [[File:JapCom.png]] Inejiro Asanuma (1898-1960)
 * [[File:ML.png]] Andrija Hebrang (1899-1949)
 * [[File:Cball-PRBulgaria.png]] Valko Chervenkov (1900-1980)
 * [[File:ML.png]] Maurice Thorez (1900-1964)
 * [[File:Cball-SRRomania.png]] Gheorghe Gheorghiu-Dej (1901-1965)
 * [[File:Sukarno.png]] Sukarno (1901-1970)
 * [[File:EnverHoxha.png]] Enver Hoxha (1908-1985)
 * [[File:Nkrumah.png]] Kwame Nkrumah (1909-1972)
 * [[File:Mao.png]]Phayom Chulanont (1909-1980)
 * [[File:Juche.png]] Kim Il-sung (1912-1994)
 * [[File:ML.png]] Jack Shulman (1914-1999)
 * [[File:ML.png]] Wang Dongxing (1916-2015)
 * [[File:ML.png]] Shibdas Ghosh (1923-1976)
 * [[File:ML.png]] Chin Peng (1924-2013)
 * [[File:Habash.png]] George Habash (1926-2008)
 * [[File:Antiimp.png]] Yeung Kwong (1926-2015)
 * [[File:Castro-M-26-7.png]] Fidel Castro (1926-2016)
 * [[File:Hujintao.png]] Hu Jintao (1942-)
 * [[File:Sankara.png]] Thomas Sankara (1949-1987)
 * [[File:Hoxha.png]] Eduardo Artés (1951-)

Economics:
In terms of economy, I views that Right Wing Liberal Capitalist economics can never work, and some form of degree of planning and Socialist-styled bureaucracy is required for the economy to function, hence, in terms of economy, I support some degree of State Socialism and Bureaucracy, all of which managed by the most well-educated workers and economists, for that shortages and such could be avoided at all costs. A planned economy can only work out when the best of the best suited workers are in charge. With that said, since I support a large worker's state, owned by the Proletariat, Workers under the banner of the Party, I still support some production of consumer goods, with the workers owning all enterprises, and the workers owning all of the means of production, hence, I am very much for mass nationalization.

The government also takes corporate crimes and exploitation very seriously and all companies and corporations found doing that will have all their assets in the country nationalized and their operations suspended, and possibly an execution of the heads of those corporations. Public goods like water, electricity, healthcare, education, housing, land, etc. is viewed as a fundamental human right, and not a tool for businessmen to use greed and to earn profit off.

I also oppose the profit motive, as it just guides the economy forward with an evil motive that is profits and greed. An economy should be built to serve the people and benefit the people, not for businessmen to earn and profit off from. An example of the evils of the profit motive is Leopold II, who committed horrendous crimes in the Congo just because he profitted off it. I support a more worker co-op based economy as they truly work for the people, like the Vietnamese Socialist-Oriented Market Economy model.

State Socialism:
Despite the fact that I believe State Socialism can be filled with inefficiency, which is a severe problem in many planned economies, like Maoist China, but I think that State Socialism is an excellent way to develop and industrialize a country. The USSR under Lenin and Stalin's State Socialist directions had turned it from a hellhole falling 200 years back into an industrialized power, same for the DPRK, which developed better than South Korea during the 50's and 60's. My main problem is that in many StateSoc economies, it could evolve into inefficiency with the less competent people in charge (examples are Maoist China), but, with the right people and under true worker's democracy in charge of the economy (like Kim Il Sung's DPRK, Georgiu Dej's Romania, Stalinist Russia etc, has oversaw great successes in each of the countries implemented). I am also against the forces of the market, believing that they are a force of evil. To avoid inefficiency, the only way to run an efficient planned economy is have experts run the country, for example, the failures of Maoist China wouldn't have happened if Zhou Enlai (more of a political and economic expert compared to that of Mao) were in power instead of Mao.

The Planned Economy:
Continuing what I said above, the failures of many state socialist countries of the 20th Century could also be attributed to the lack of the nation's technocrats effectively planning the nation's economy (like Maoist China), even if I find that the presence of a revisionist clique (like Khruschev in the USSR, Le Duan in Vietnam, etc.) and Western and Globalist interference (in the case of the DPRK, Cuba, and Much of Eastern Europe), to effectively run a planned economy and avoid the inefficiencies in many State Socialist economies, I would put the nation's technocrats into good use, using Mathematicians, Scientists, Engineers, Economists, etc. to plan the economy while being fully loyal to the Party lines. However, all the Technocrats will do is plan the economy effectively, they will have zero influence over the Vanguard Party and Politics, after all, one example of Technocrats abusing their power and position is China under Jiang Zemin, who made China one of the most kleptocratic countries under his Authcap reign, and I want to avoid that completely.

Corporations:
I support trust busting laws and I want to impose extremely heavy regulations on corporations if they want to operate in the country. Corporate Usury will be severely punished, and all their property nationalized by the state, since Corporations that disregard human lives and do exploitation do not deserve a place on earth. In my society, only worker-owned enterprises and corporations will be allowed in the country.

Banks:
Banks are an element that are currently completely corrupted by the structure of capitalism and the borgeoise. Banks, under my society, will be transformed to serve the common good of the society, and getting rid of the capitalists who run banks with the exploitative, immoral profit motive, all of which harm the common person, and only serve the interests of the elite of the borgeoise. Banks under my rule will be democratically owned by the workers, and driven by a combination of that and mutual savings banks, all owned by the workers under the guidance of the Party. This system will completely destroy the corrupted old capitalist structure of banking run via the profit motive. A Central Bank will also be required to manage currency and monetary affairs of the country, but have to be owned by the State, which, is the Communist mass people's party that I advocate for.

The Welfare State:
I generally support a welfare state that provides for everyone their basic needs. However, there are conditions that I'd like to put out that Welfare and Pension programs only apply to those that need help, or are unable to work. Those that are able to work but chose not to do not deserve to benefit from the welfare programs (for a matter of fact, I will implement a Social Parasite Tax, see below). I will also help students with poor backgrounds to give them the right to education, for example.

Taxation:
I support a progressive tax, depending on the individual's income and so one. As such, only the working population will be taxed by the government based off their income level. For people with very low income, they are excused from taxation. Tax Fraud can be punished relatively heavily with even heavier taxes, or even imprisonment. The tax money gained by the government shall be allocated to improving infrastructure, education, and invest in the country. I also support a "Social Parasite Tax" as shown in Belarus and Stalinist USSR, taxing those who laze off government welfare and being useless eaters.

Trade:
I oppose free trade and complete autarky. Trade is a good way for our country to create stable and beneficial relationships with the rest of the world and also a good way to export our products out and to improve our economy. With that said, I also oppose the idea of "Free Trade" since Free Trade almost practically forces the country's economy to be dependant on another country. An example of this is the EU, where many countries become economic slaves of Germany and France as a result of the free trade. Free Trade is another codename for economic Imperialism. The kind of trade I support is beneficial trade with some forms of tariffs on foreign goods to protect the interests of local producers, since our people comes first, after all.

Progressive Income Tax Social Parasite Tax Carbon Emissions Tax Sales Tax Excise Duties Custom Duties Inheritance Tax Windfall Tax

Land:
The common person should have a place to stay, and the people should have a piece of land for themselves. It is a fundamental human right in the state. Rent can be comparable to theft, and I will be as harsh on landlords like how Maoist China was against them. Being a landlord isn't a real job. Housing should be subsidised and provided by the state, but as for living conditions, it is fully up to the worker-owned and nationalized businesses to improve the housing conditions there.

Wealth:
He views that wealth disparity is a severe problem in all societies and must be combatted in all ways, and therefore, rich people and powerful companies, regardless of how much they did, shall pay their fair share of tax and they would be specifically taxed more so in return, the poor could enjoy the money that the rich has. Tax evasion will be fined with even more tax and the Rich who got their money through illegitimate forms will have every last inch of their wealth be confiscated by the state, and I believe in extensive wealth redistribution for that I can reduce the wealth gap.

However, I think that millionaires should exist, provided if they earnt their money through hard work, pay their fair share of taxes, and work for the benefit of society and the country as a whole. Billionaires however, shouldn't exist as most if not all of them are exploitative, and even so, wealth accumulation is bad. Imo, a wealth cap of around 700M Chinese Yuan (approximately 104M USD) will do, and billionaires will have their money redistributed to the poor, or used to provide for public and merit goods.

Worker's Democracy:
One of the pillars of my economic ideology is the adherence to Worker's Democracy, otherwise known as workplace democracy for short. Under this system, the true Worker's Democracy shall be realized (Workers owning the means of production, and a complete destruction of markets and everything that represents the capitalist mode of production). Under this system. There will be a manager to drive production and efficiency, but they'd have to listen to the demands of the workers, and be highly qualified to make wise decisions to boost production, efficiency, while giving workers the means of production. There will also be no independent trade unions, for that they can corrupt society into becoming at worst Social Democratic or Welfare Capitalist, and all unions have to be owned by the Worker's Party and State.

Take note that "workers having more say" is not worker's democracy. There is no democracy for the workers if they don't own the means of production, unlike what social democrats and welfarists that cuck to the system tell you. To add on, without the complete abolition of any sign of capitalism (yes this includes 'market socialism'), real worker's democracy cannot be realized.

Subsidies:
Subsidies is something that I take into concern, for that I'd like to make a balance between spending, while also making sure that the economy does not go into deficit. Thus, I'd only subsidize some of the most important sectors of the economy, for example, healthcare, education, housing, etc, and the main industry of the country. Otherwise, I will only subsidize some other nationalized, worker-owned industries if they really do social benefits to the society as a whole, and that they desperately need some kind of financial help.

Value of Work, Wages, and Working Hours:
I believe in the Marxian Labor Theory of Value, and I'm very much against the system of wage labour, since the ultimate way for compensating is the value and effort of work that one puts in. Wage Labour is exploitative, and it is not fair to the working class as it just judges by hours worked. Some fatso can just sit in their office shaking their legs yet earn more than someone working their asses off. However, I support a minimum wage and it will be adjusted to how much one works, and I support a 100 Yuan (15 USD approx.) Minimum wage, varying on different jobs, and the ones that work harder, earn better.

Agarianism vs Industrialism:
For this, I'd like to compare the Socialist movements in two countries, one being the Soviet Union, and India. Before the Leninism Bolshevik Revolution, majority of Russia are peasants, starving, living under slave-like conditions and most of them die before the age of 40. But once Lenin (and later Stalin) took over, the country oversaw massive industrialization and improvement of it's conditions, and the lives of the peasants drastically improved as a result of such. No more famines since the Soviet famine in the 1930's, as the country had already developed into an industrial powerhouse, and peasants, being the backbone of the entire country, liberated. As compared to India's socialist movement, rejecting industrialism has failed to elevate the lives of the peasants, and many still live in poverty and desperate conditions until today in India. This is also why many Indian Communists criticize the modern Indian state as a whole. The point I'm trying to make here is that Agarianism cannot be used for a long term goal for a socialist country, and that industrialism and industrialization is necessary, while elevating the lives of the peasants in the countryside, since one cannot focus more on either side, both peasants and the industrial workers are worthy parts of the people's proletariat. Both has to be liberated, and play a part in building the People's State.

Post Revolutionary Siege Era:
After a socialist revolution comes a tumultuous time. As authoritarian as I already am, during the first years of the revolution will see me leaning even Totalitarian stances, for that chaos is the last thing anyone wants to build a Socialist society. This time will be characterised with having total government and party control, mass people's militarization, and harsh controls over the civic axis. My ideology will go through this stage especially in politically unstable countries just recovering from chaos or civil war, or when under threat of war by imperialist or foreign powers. However, despite so, I will still continue with some kind of centralized federalism and people's democracy, for that we don't evolve into some kind of hive-mind collectivist country.

Centralized Federalism:
To summarize it all, 'Centralized Federalism' is basically how I'd implement my government structure, for as I believe the central government should still be the central deciding body for the country, while allowing certain areas to have some degree of autonomy, while they have to be completely loyal to the central government, with absolutely no tolerance to any attempt of separatism. However, my 'Centralized Federalism' varies country by country. In some countries (mainly in East Asia, for example, Japan, I'd go unitary, for that federalism cannot work well in countries like those), but even then, I'd still have a tiny degree of federalization to local authorities to pursue socialism that fits the interest of said state best, while following the direction of the party and the central government, and not deviating from it too much.

Collective Leadership:
Like most Marxist-Leninist political structures, I support the concept known as 'Collective Leadership', in which the powers of the Party's General Secretary are dispersed among the Politburo's Standing Committee, which are comprised of the nation's best, and most expert of the proletariat, this is to prevent the problem of over-bureaucratization and will serve as a check to prevent abuse of power. However, all members of the Standing Committee (elected by the Politburo, which is also elected by the Party's Central Committee) all have to remain firm to the Communist Party's line, and that factionalism and revisionism will never be tolerated.

Regarding Democracy:
The Ideology firmly believes that the Western concepts of Liberal Democracy is utter nonsense and easily corruptible, and although supports it, views Western Democracy as either weak, corruptible, incompatible with Asian values or (mostly) seen as an imperialist, Western parasite used to corrupt Asia and should be wiped out by the people, instead, the ideology's democracy comes from the Leninist principle of Democratic Centralism and People's Democracy, while at the same time accepts the Maoist Ideal of New Democracy to be 'ideal', purging Western Democracy, instead implementing a Democratic System based on the conditions of the country that is implemented.

Even so, the Democratic system should be set on Asian Values as well as principles of Socialism. The principle in Chinese culture that "Social Security is Greater than Personal Freedoms" as well as the frowning on greed and the concept of 'freedom', both of which are seen as degenerate and corrupt ideals that had brought upon nothing but suffering to the world. A true Democratic system shouldn't be of representative democracy and liberal democracy with parties who only share liberal values bickering and shitting on one another getting nothing done while the average person is losing hope (and those that truly want to change don't get a chance to stand in elections) a true democratic system should be something similar to a United Front of parties following a central ideology guiding the country forward to work for the common good of the people, as seen in the PRC, DPRK, and DDR.

Guided Authoritarian Direct Democracy:
This is more or less the system I follow. In socialist countries, there is a true system of Direct Democracy, except the people would only be allowed to vote for the members in the Vanguard Party. The people will have influence over the Politburo. That's how the democratic system in the USSR under Stalin worked out, same for many other socialist states, like the DPRK under Kim Il Sung, Cuba under Castro, and Vietnam under Ho Chi Minh are also similar examples. The authoritarian part comes in relation to my desire for a strong government to implement effective policies and changes in a country, and that not just that, the Party, led by a board of well-educated, suitable members of the proletariat, will serve as a kind of guide for this kind of democracy. As long as it doesn't threaten the Socialist structure (which, obviously, capitalists, liberals, fashoids, rightoids, etc are out of the question), it will be allowed, and all of them have to prove themselves to be strong, disciplined figures and politicians.

Democratic Centralism and Vanguardism:
Many libertarian viewpoints of Vanguardism about how the left isn't one party is true, despite the fact that I think that the Communist Party should lead the country with a firm hand, I believe that there shouldn't be just a single Vanguard Party alone, but rather a coalition led by the Vanguard Party, with all it's parties binded together to follow one central principle. This is known as Democratic Centralism, and this is the system I support. All parties registered in the state should be a part of this united coalition as seen in many Marxist-Leninist states, like the United Front in China, the National Front in the German Democratic Republic and the Democratic Front for the Reunification of the Fatherland in the DPRK. with all the Leftist Parties that participated in the revolution binded together, this way they have a strong party to lead it (the Vanguard Party, which is the Communist Party), while having all of the socialists swearing allegiance to the central ideology.

To elaborate more on my stance on Vanguardism, I see it as necessary since Socialist countries and movements have constantly been targeted by Borgeoise Imperialists and Fascists alike, and without a strong party to protect the United Left and the Popular Front, it won't last long, and can be easily crushed by the Imperialist forces. Indeed, the Left shouldn't consist of just one single party, which is why I take my model from the GDR's Popular Front, which even Democratic Socialists are included. Provided that they serve the country and the people and do not engage in liberal pluralism, they can serve inside the Popular Front. To conclude, Vanguardism is something to be used to defend the country and the entire movement as a whole from Imperialism.

Party Discipline:
One of the greatest dangers to a Vanguard party is factionalism, and as seen in what happened in the CPC during the late 70's to the early 80's saw a lot of infighting and factionalism. That is not how a people's party should look like. What a party should have is mantain firm party discipline. Factionalism can be tolerated but keep it to a minimum degree to not divide the Vanguard party. Party members who cannot mantain party discipline by following the party line, upholding the party's ideology and programs and keeping it's objectives (like serving the people and whatnot) at the first priority are proven to be unfit to be in the People's Party that leads the people, thus have to be expelled, practising Democratic Centralism.

Self-Criticism and Dissent:
In Marxism-Leninism, I believe in the principle of Self-Criticism. Under a mass worker's party leading the worker's state, unlike what you'll see in liberal democracies that embrace the so called "liberal pluralism", where the elites, billionaires and the borgeoise of the nation are the de facto leaders of the country. Plus, under liberal democracies, all sorts of different parties will only work for their individual agenda rather than for the greater good of the nation. I do not support all that. In theis case, the Vanguard party is not the simple political party in liberal pluralism, but rather, the party is the people, the state is lead by the vanguard party consisting of all workers and people. To improve on party policies, workers will submit criticsims and suggestionsto the worker's party, consisting full of workers themselves. However, despite having this kind of system, we cannot afford to allow the Borgeoise and Capitalist systems to still remain in the nation, therefore liberalism, capitalism, interventionism, trotskyism and such, will be repressed.

The Revisionist Question:
What revisionism means in the Marxist sense is deviation from the initial principles, or deviation from the basic principles of Marxism Leninism. Examples of these are Nikita Khrushchev, who abandoned the DOTP concept of Marxism-Leninism and made the USSR social imperialist and couping Malenkov, this caused a chain effect along with Brezhnev's stagnation, corruption, and imperialism and it all ended with Gorbachev finally nailing the final straw. Revisionism should be fought against at all costs. But, I think it's fine to create your own variant of Marxism-Leninism and apply it according to the material conditions of the country while being inside the Marxist-Leninist framework, like Honecker in East Germany for example adapted Marxism Leninism to his country's conditions, that's fine, that isn't revisionism but rather Scientific Socialism. I'm fine with Marxism Leninism being developed by other individuals, but stay firm to the core principals of it. Revisionists are like humans who still call themselves human beings by betraying morals and ethics that humans have that other species don't.

Marxist End Goal:
There are a lot of misconceptions about the end goal of Marxism being a "Stateless, Classless, and Moneyless" society, when in reality it isn't just that one sentence. Marxism is a lot more complicated than just "Stateless, Classless and Moneyless" Society, which is anarchism and that is very clearly a failed ideology. What Marxism advocates for the the destruction of the neoliberal capitalist status quo, as his entire work is actually a critique of the era he's in. What us Socialists want isn't a utopian society, but rather a removal of the current status quo.

Revolution or Reform?
Revolution in general is the way. Socialism is revolutionary, and in Capitalist countries, reform simply will not work as it merely gives short-term benefits to the people and workers only to get overthrown by another borgeoise under the sham 'liberal democracy', plus, reforming a capitalist society doesn't work, the existence of social democracy being corrupted by liberals and the capitalist class is an example to prevent people from making true change. Examples are like how people like Bernie, Corbyn and the JCP cannot take power.

Case against Electorialism:
Similar to the above, and as I said, a Capitalist society is irredeemable. No matter how much sugarcoating is put onto a capitalist society, and no matter how much welfare is put in and how strong trade unions are, the national borgeoise can simply reverse them easily, and even then, in some Welfare Capitalist societies like in the Nordic Countries, the benefits it's people enjoy cannot be successful if it weren't from them leeching from the resources of Third Way Imperialism. Plus, even if electorialism succeeds, true socialism cannot be achieved through working with the capitalist system. For as long as the borgeoise class and the capitalist system still exists, Socialism could be overturned. To secure the idea of Socialism, every capitalist system has to be razed down, and a Socialist system has to be built new. Examples of these are Allende, Palme, Katayama, and such, who tried to work with the system but in the end had everything they had done completely reversed. Hence, a true Socialist party cannot resolve to working with the Electorial Systems in capitalist liberal "democracies", as the liberal democratic system will destroy any attempt to establish true people's control.

Trade Unions:
I personally don't think that Trade Unions can be the very base of a Socialist revolution, as, for the first point, they don't advocate enough. They merely advocate for better conditions, while not fighting against the dirty conditions that their employers tend to use, and they rarely form co-operatives. Another problem I have with Unions is that they also tend to focus on the individual workplace instead of the common industry of the country, so even if they manage to free themselves from capitalist exploitation, many others working in the same industry might be exploited too, and rarely build socialism. Worse, Trade unions may be used as a tool for Welfare Capitalists and Social Democrats to delay and stop the socialist revolution and prevent the proletariat from taking power in order to preserve the system. They may be a force of good compared to other capitalists, but right now I don't think they can be the backbone of a socialist revolution, and with social democrats, welfare capitalists, and such, they can be very easily corrupted.

Who shall be the ones leading the revolution?
In the process of a revolution, or a pre-socialist society, I believe that there should be a revolutionary vanguard of class-conscious, well-educated workers leading the united left, and the people, under the guidance of the mass party, consisting of the proletariat and the masses, install revolutionary values into the masses, making them class conscious, for that they can realise the evil of Capitalism and the current status quo. Plus, I'm not in favour of decentral planning of a revolution, as we all know how poorly-planned revolutions (or mass spontaneous unplanned actions in a revolution went), therefore, there needs to be the group of class-conscious, well-educated workers to plan and guide the masses towards a successful people's revolution to overthrow the national borgeoise.

Who shall be the ones leading the Worker's State?
I believe in a strong, powerful control of the revolutionary party of the Left, with the masses, the proletariat, the farmer, and the common person all being a part of the Worker's Party, for that all people in the country can be represented in the Worker's State. However, the top decisions have to be democratically decided by the well-educated, most able, and the most class-conscious workers in the Worker's Party, and whatever action they make, through firm party discipline and zero tolerance to factionalism, has to be collectively carried out by the People of the nation. That is known as Democratic Centralism. So, in a sense, with liberal pluralism eliminated, and the worker's state now embraces true democracy, rather than the borgeoise democracy full of nonsensical party politics and ideological bickering, this kind of democracy helps with meaningful progress to help the country develop. For improvements of policy, in Marxism-Leninism, I will adopt self-criticism for any policies (that have some failures) to minimize it's flaws and maximize it's positive effects.

Media:
Realizing the dangers of Mediacracy, and the access to information is now controlled by the Mainstream Media, who serves the Overton Window, controlled by the private sector and the Neoliberals, brainwashing the common masses and preserving the current status quo, and later brainwashing people to embrace their hellish neoliberal dystopia, which is dangerous. Those who control the media, control the information sent to the people. Hence, we cannot afford to let media and the control of Information in the hands of the Private Sector. Hence, since I advocate for a mass worker's and people's state, Media should be nationalized, controlled by the people, and the state.

To elaborate more, I do not believe in all those "press freedom" which liberals talk about. Since the right to distribute information shouldn't be in the hands of the borgeoise capitalist mega-corporations publishing news of their agenda (which is the case for many news sites now), but rather, the press and media should be owned by the workers and the worker's state, distributing media mantaining to the party line, and that is important. I will also some degree of autonomy to smaller, local newspapers to publish those that are more positive towards their local areas while staying firm in the Party's ideological line.

The Question of "Freedom of Speech":
Freedom of speech is an abstract concept. There is no line drawn in so called "Freedom of Speech", and particularly, that concept does not exist in any capitalist society. The line of tolerance of the "Freedom of Speech" isn't properly drawn. Plus, nowadays, Private entities dominate "freedom of speech" and the line of tolerance do not apply to them since the common person has their lives deeply connected with corporations, and with that, corporations manipulate the concept to fit their agenda. Hence why, as Hoxha said, "a society where a man is afraid to criticize another is not a socialist society", I'd tolerate criticisms and concerns as long as it's within the party line. However, those actively threatening the construction of socialism (like reactionaries, liberals, capitalists, and such), will be purged completely.

Authoritarianism:
It's basic knowledge that every ideology requires authority, structure, and bureaucracy for it to be properly carried out. Including Anarchism. Makhnovia, for example was pretty much a military dictatorship cult state not any different from the Revisionist DPRK we have today. Anarchists just do not want to admit that the force they use to implement their ideology is authoritarian. Same goes to all liberals. Anti-Auths and Lolberts merely do not understand that force is what gets things done effectively, rather than the borgeoise definition of "democracy" which they hold onto like a literal deity. The problem comes when we're talking about who holds the power to authority. If it's a singular man, then probability is he might abuse his power, like Pinochet, for example. However, what I advocate for is the power to be in the hands of the Mass People's Party, the Worker's and the People's state, just like genuine, true democracies like Kim Il Sung's DPRK where there are legitimate worker's control.

Environmental Policy:
Preserving the environment is indeed important, but I view that having better living standards and having the country to be industrialized to be more important than the environment, so in countries that are still poor or in need of development, Industrialism will take priority, even so, companies that do harm to the environment will be penalized for doing so. In developed countries, as they are already industrialized, they should work to transfer to greener sources of energy and reduce carbon emissions. It will take time, but it still has to be done.

Energy:
Mainly, in terms of Energy, it's deeply connected to my economic views, since I view that energy, like literally everything else in the economy, should not be remained in private hands, and all parts of the energy sector should be in control of the Worker's state. Even so, in terms of energy, it depends on the stage of development and the economic situation a country is in, hence, in most poorer countries (mainly in Africa), the usage of fossil fuels is a necessary evil. Once they have reached a certain level of development, I'd have them fully transition to a reliable, renewable source of energy. Nuclear sources of energy are some of my top choices.

In the case of nuclear energy, while I understand the concerns of the dangers of using nuclear energy, such as the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster in Japan and the disaster in Chernobyl in the USSR, with this, I'd have measures to address this as well. Like most industries, I'd have a manager, a well-trained, educated, and verified manager to manage the field of energy, especially when it comes to nuclear energy, to boost the harnessing of nuclear energy to benefit the common people (as nuclear energy can bring enormous benefits), while getting everything built properly and prepared in case of a natural disaster (to prevent what happened in Fukushima happen again)

Climate Change:
As a person living in a third world country and experiencing it myself, I can very safely say that, unlike what Rightoids claim, Climate Change is indeed happening, and it's caused by Industrial Capitalism, with their zero care for the world we live in, and absolute disdain for the rights and the lives of humanity, and with liberalism prevailing, the world will soon be doomed from capitalism. For the planet that we live in and for humanity, it's beneficial for us to work together to combat climate change, and address issues regarding the environment (but without the Globalist agenda of trying to create a neoliberal dystopia). However, despite so, countrie's material conditions need to be taken into account, for example, if a country is rapidly developing, let's say, China (which have been also doing something for the environment) it is very hypocritical for the West to condemn China for that while they have done the same (and even worse)

Sustainable Socialism:
Based off what I said above, once a country has reached a certain stage of development, I'd have the country progress into what I'd call 'Sustainable Socialism'. Through complete transformation into true green energy (specifically, nuclear energy), which is much more efficient, and much more reliable compared to other sources of energy (suck it liberals), the Party should also encourage sustainable living, and add on policies to guide the people to live a sustainable lifestyle, along with protecting the environment, and trying to reduce pollution and carbon emissions by a lot, while at the same time also using green sources to support the development of the country and an improvement in the country's living standards, guided by the worker's state.

Social Axis:
The social axis is mainly based on Hu Jintao's Eight Honors and Eight Shames to serve as a kind of "Socialist Guiding Model" for a moral society. However so, the social policy I follow depends on region and material conditions. Politics are more than just a 1 dimensional line, it is a science that has to be adapted to the conditions of the certain country.

以热爱祖国为荣　以危害祖国为耻 以服务人民为荣　以背离人民为耻 以崇尚科学为荣　以愚昧无知为耻 以辛勤劳动为荣　以好逸恶劳为耻 以团结互助为荣　以损人利己为耻 以诚实守信为荣　以见利忘义为耻 以遵纪守法为荣　以违法乱纪为耻 以艰苦奋斗为荣　以骄奢淫逸为耻

Honor to those who love the motherland, and shame on those who harm the motherland. Honor to those who serve the people, and shame on those who betray the people. Honor to those who quest for science, and shame on those who refuse to be educated. Honor to those who are hardworking, and shame on those who indulge in comfort and hate work. Honor to those who help each other, and shame on those who seek gains at the expense of others. Honor to those who are trustworthy, and shame on those who trade integrity for profits. Honor to those who abide by law and discipline, and shame on those who break laws and discipline. Honor to those who uphold plain living and hard struggle, and shame on those who wallow in extravagance and pleasures.

Difference between Progressivism and Cultural Liberalism:
Here, I will make my stand that Progressivism does not equate to cultural liberalism. Progressivism refers to the general improvement in a country's material conditions, alongside equality amongst all people, regardless of their identity, like race, gender, religion and culture, for example, leaders like Stalin, Hoxha, Gottwald, etc are progressive in all of these aspects. While Cultural Liberalism, refers to what most people call, the acception of porn, sex work, drugs, etc. All of which do not at all contribute to the well-being of the country, for the former two, you can't call yourself supporting women's rights and a progressive if you back porn and sex work (as it exploits women and objectifies them as tools for sex rather than being a human with dignity. This is no way empowering). A regime like the United States and Canada (along with most Western governments) are Cultural Liberal, claiming to support 'LGBT rights' and all that bs when they are merely used by a tool for the borgeoise (for example, pride) to divide the people, and corporations take advantage of them to profit off, are not at all progressive. Plus, bombing the middle east and interfering in other countries are not at all progressive as well. On the other hand, an authoritarian, socialist country like Sankarist Burkina Faso, Stalinist Russia and (kind of) Xiist China, who have improved their country, yet also decriminalizing LGBT, those were true progressive countries.

Identity Politics:
Identity Politics is something that I personally oppose, regardless on which extreme end it is. One side we have Baizuo Woketards obsessed with Black Trans Women and care more about intersectional bullshit rather than anything else, while on the other hand we have White Supremacists, Nazis, Ethno nationalists, and so on. A symbol of this is how America is now and the Baizuo left parties like the DSA do not serve the people at all. Both sides are the same shit, and they should be rooted out from the system as a whole.

The Progressive-Conservative Axis:
As stated before, Progressivism and Conservatism isn't just one line and one axis. It's way more complicated than that. In a way, I'm progressive and in other ways I'm conservative. I'd apply my progressive-conservative axis based on the conditions of each country, and even then, I'd progress on parts that truly require progress (in the case of Third World Countries, I'd have the material conditions of the country progress into improvement, like how Gaddafi, Sankara, etc. did), while being restrictive on parts like LGBT marriage, pride, and such, which I am particularly harsh against. So, you could say I'm progressive-conservative, like Teddy, Sun Yat Sen, and MLK.

Religion:
In terms of religion, it varies upon region, if it is a society where religion has little to almost no influence like in East Asia, religion will be completely separated from the government, and all officials of the government have to be either agnostic or atheist to take office. despite that, freedom of religion is guaranteed, and for new religions, they have to go through strict monitoring from the government, in case of insane cults like Falun Gong coming up. As for Insane cults or Doomsday Cults, they will be brutally and violently suppressed for terrorism. Regardless of religion, they have to swear loyalty to the government, be obliged to surveillance and national security laws and many more.

Even in countries where religion is prominent, it has to be separated from the government in fear of becoming a Saudi Arabia-like Theocracy. And all religions have to be tolerated, as long as it is legal and follows the regulations of the country.

Gender Identities/LGBTQ:
I'm generally fine with them provided if they keep it private and that they aren't flamboyant about such. I'll allow them to live their lives without being attacked by the state provided if they don't do the pride shit and force everyone to support their agenda, I however, am against gay marriage since I see that marriage is between a man and a woman and that children need to grow up with a father and a mother figure, then only they can be true people to society. As for transgenders, they should only be allowed to remain at their legal gender, and they will receive therapy to cure all these "gender dysphoria".

I however do not recognize this "non-binary" bullshit, as they are just something made by attention-seeking progtards who want to take advantage of the woke mob to build their own agenda, and it's existence is just plain nonsense. Regarding xenogenders and other kinds of bullshit, I strongly oppose them.

In conclusion, I support the de-criminalization of LGBT, but that's it. I will not implement laws to specifically protect them since I view them as no different than the common person and therefore shouldn't be specifically protected by the state, and I don't have a problem with them if they keep it private and not flamboyant. If they go further than that, I will not entertain them.

Sex, Porn, and such topics:
Sex work is not work, and porn should be restricted as much as possible. Since I view porn as an unnecessary evil that corrodes society and turns people who watch them into sex-addicted fucks and it objectifies women as tools for sex. If you support porn and sex work, you do not at all view women as human beings. As a supporter of women's rights and I view that equality between men and women to be a main part in the socialist revolution, I very much oppose porn and sex 'work'. It is in no way empowering and it just objectifies people. As I see it as a poison, I will put extensive censorship and monitoring on the net to take down every single porn site.

As for people who were forced into doing it because of human traffiking and poverty, I'd have an approach that attacks pimps, brothel owners, and those that engage in the prostitution business, while helping those victims of human traffiking just to be sex slaves escape. Again, to do this, I support a strong police force that shows zero mercy to criminals and extensive surveillance to fight crime in general, not just prostitution.

Gun Ownership:
This may come off as a surprise but I support Gun Ownership with certain exceptions. For one thing that with the ownership of guns, people are able to defend themselves from criminals, or imperialist invaders, and it will be easy to fight off imperialists trying to invade the homeland.

Despite supporting gun ownership, I have a few requirements and checks for the person if they want to own a gun, namely they have to be above the age of 21, absolutely no criminal record (even the slightest criminal record will not allow you to own a gun), no mental disorders, and all have to receive a background check. Even so, all guns require a tracker, and a code for each of them, in case shootings or crimes occur.

Education:
My Education would be completely different compared to the education policies pursued by most countries. I take inspiration from the system of Japan, which, while educational smarts are highly respected, I would focus on nurturing the character of the youth and the children, hence, I will enforce extra-curricular activities for children (sometimes to help them find their individuality, like for example, artists, game designers, engineers, etc will all be supported, provided that they work within the Socialist line), while also sometimes have activities organized by the Party's Youth Wing, like cleaning rubbish from the streets, or doing volunteer work. In school, I would have teachers, highly trained by the state, teach children with not just the basics of languages, mathematics, sciences and humanities, but also practical skills as well. Others like ideological studies (to guide the youth to build the Socialist state and the revolution to a new height with the right values and ideologies), and sex education (to give children the correct idea about sex, gender and all that stuff, as well as to reduce degeneracy, AIDS, youth pregnancies and all that bs)

Individualism and Hedonism as a Threat:
Individualism is something that disconnects a person from wider society, and from other people, and in general is a philosophy of selfishness. Individualism is Egoism-lite. The principle is frequently used as justification for bugs that want to destroy society in the name of "freedom of speech", or degenerates who think jerking off to children is "fun", these principles are poisonous and should be seen as a threat. I'm not for hive-mind collectivism, but Individualism should be countered. Hedonism is even worse, since it's more or less a justification for people to be an asshole and do absolutely unacceptable things in the name of "doing what they want" and "fun". People of these kinds are absolutely deplorable, selfish fucks. These principles should be seen as threats that destroy society and the nation.

Racial Discrimination:
Racial discrimination is publicly frowned upon, and propaganda will be spread to condemn the usage of racial discrimination. Doing racial discrimination will result in the loss of access to benefits like welfare and a good education. Racially-aggravated crimes will also be taken seriously, and the perpetrator will resort to public torture and beating by the police.

Regarding Police brutality because of race, the policeman (or any authority figure for that matter) will be completely removed from their position, not to be able to apply for jobs, and lose all benefits from the government.

Immigration:
I'm quite indifferent when it comes to Immigration, as I believe in a balanced solution. We should open our borders for people with legitimate reasons to enter, like students, or people looking for work to enter here, but we shouldn't let literally everyone in. For one thing, if they were to immigrate, or enter, for a matter of fact, require background checks of some sort. People with a criminal record are not allowed to enter.

As for refugees fleeing percecution or war, there's one thing that's for sure, I sympathise with their condition, but not everybody should be allowed in. Those that are allowed in should only be people with valuable skills, like doctors, scholars, and such, and even then, their backgrounds are very important, and not all will be allowed entry, since it may result in hatred as immigrants might take away jobs from the native population, causing racial hatred, xenophobia and such.

Jail System:
The principle of the jail system is based on the principle "a tooth for a tooth". Sentences depends on the harm and damage caused to the victim. If it ruins a life, it will be resort to life imprisonment and sometimes torture. If it is extremely heinous like child sexual assault, mass rape, massacre, serial killing, etc. These will be punishable by public execution, public shaming, and be made as an example of, to ensure that no one in the country ever does it again.

The usage of torture is also legalized in the police force, but not during interrogation. But it is legalized in prisons, as the government views criminals as "people that deserve every single loathing, and punishment from the world, and that's if you can call them 'people'."

Interculturalism:
I believe that in a country with diverse cultures, I strive to protect all the cultures, and protecting their identity, and I oppose both assimilation, and I also am against multiculturalism, as multiculturalism emphasises on more division, and it is a liberal and globalist ploy to pull each other apart, hence, I am against the modern concept of multiculturalism, instead, what I strive for is interculturalism, building a common identity for all people, similar to Indonesia's Sukarno, on how he advocated "Brotherhood and Unity", yet protecting other cultures. Other such examples are the regimes of the USSR and the PRC, whose Interculturalism are all I take inspiration from.

Abortion:
Abortion is seen as a moral evil and very frowned upon in my ideal society. Many cases of aborting the baby is mainly due to irresponsible people who desire sex, and if you want to have sex and don't want the baby, take every bit of necessary measure possible and even then you're fully responsible for what happens in sex. However, in the case of mother's health and incest, the case is pardoned.

As for rape, although rape is a tragedy and a horrible thing to happen to anyone, an innocent soul should not be harmed for the sins of the rapist. A way to cure victims of rape is to raise the baby properly, viewed by the government.

Irresponsible abortion however, is seen as a crime more heinous than murder as it is done out of pure irresponsibility of the couple. With that, I support the repealing of Roe v. Wade, despite the fact that I think it is repealed at the worst time since social conditions in America for women aren't good.

Despite that, socioeconomic conditions are something that is needed to take into account when it comes to abortion. To reduce the amount of abortion, I'd take a few measures, like granting welfare and support to pregnant women and families with economic hardship, and help rape victims and those who were pregnant through it by giving them therapy. Moreover, to reduce the amount of abortion, I support more social programs so that people won't have to do it illegally, and as for rape, I'd make pepper spray for women widely available to protect themselves from rapists.

Propaganda:
Propaganda is characterized mainly to enhance the morale of the people in the country, as a means to help the people in the country have confidence in the government and work hard in programs. One main front of propaganda is propaganda that promotes national unity, economic output, and combating problems like poverty and pollution. While regarding foreign propaganda, the country should be marshalled up against the Western powers and propaganda will be frequently aiming for the absolute destruction of American Imperialism, Atlanticism and SJW degeneracy.

Sometimes, popular media (i.e Anime) will be used as a means to enhance national unity and enhance morale of the people in the country, and views mainly Eastern popular media as a weapon that could be used to destroy the Imperialist, Atlanticist Western World Order responsible for humanity's suffering and the spread of wokeism, which must be combatted.

West or East?
To put it simply, despite being a patriot to China and a staunch supporter of the CPC, I'm not standing with the East nor the West, since the East (despite being trillions of times better than NATO and the West), has it's fair share of shitty people and regimes and acts, namely the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and Czechoslovakia, the Sino-Vietnamese War and such, plus, some Pro-East regimes like Russia, Iran and Zimbabwe are horrible and do not deserve my support. So, I take a similar take to Fidel Castro, who hated Bloc Politics and trying to enhance the Third World and empower the NAM, like how Sukarno and Nkrumah did. I love my country and the Party, but what I'd prefer the CPC to do is take the path of Zhou Enlai to support the third world instead of promoting social imperialism during our revisionist years of Deng and Jiang.

However, if I had to pick in between the two, even if you kill me, I will still pick the East. Sure, the Warsaw Pact has done it's fair share of shitty things, but, one thing is for sure. They haven't vaporized entire countries for no reason unlike the Atlanticists. There is not a single reason to support NATO, which is objectively the modern day Axis Powers, not even sympathise or see them as a lesser evil. Even if your country hasn't been fucked by Atlanticoids and the West, some other country nearby probably has. Russia and China haven't caused the deaths of three million Iraqis because of a lie, have they, or the Vietnam War, one which the Americans had done one of the most horrifying crimes in humanity by slaughtering entire villages and murdered children, causing deaths and long term effects and lasted until today. 18-20 Million Indochinese people died because of the Neocucks. These are just two examples. Look at the 20% of Koreans killed by the Americans in the Korean War, the countless crimes they backed in Latin America, the Middle East, Asia, and Africa, etc.

"but muh authoridarianism and my liberal universal values that everyone has to follow or get your entire country genocided!!!!!!" What other countries do is NONE of the Superpower's business. America is the single most genocidal country still around today, and the death toll that Neocucks have caused can easily exceed the ones caused by Nazi Germany. There is a clear greater evil here even if both sides are not good.

Alter-Globalization:
Although I oppose the idea of Economic Globalism, World Federation, Anationalism and such, I still believe that the world should work together and co-operate with each other. I take the model of Alt-Globalization as my ideal model regarding Globalism. Globalist organizations have been doing shady things like converting independent nations into neoliberal slaves and causing them to suffer, and Globetards are Imperialists with a human face, aiming to destroy any country independent from their agenda, as how they are currently starving the DPRK and stopping them from any possible development. The Nation comes before others.

Doctrine of Scientific Socialism:
As I said before in the previous section in the Revisionist Question one, Socialism is a science, not to blindly follow what Marx had said. Blindly following Marx's book will not get you anywhere. That's the different between all the "Ultra-Marxist" ideologies like Left Communism, compared to Marxism-Leninism, who treats the ideology of Marx like a science. Material Conditions completely define how a country should be ruled, and thus, Socialism should be applied to said country according to their specific conditions. That's how many regional ideologies came to place. Kim Il Sung, Castro, Sankara, Bac Ho, etc. are examples of people who adopted Socialism to their country's specific conditions, and they have seen some of history's biggest successes.

Socialist Patriotism:
The Nation is a force that gives a sense of uniformity in society. A cause that binds the workers of the nation together, and therefore, loving the country and doing everything to protect it and everything it stands for should be a duty of the Party and the people. No matter how bad said country is (excluding illegitimate states like Israel and Taiwan), it is a duty for Socialists and the People of the Nation to protect it, while destroying their borgeoise government.

Rejection of Liberal "Human Rights" and embracing True "Human Rights":
"Human Rights" as proposed by the Liberal Globalists are an absolute farce. They are always chanting about all these individualistic bullshit that have nothing to do with improving the lives of people and country like "freedom of speech" and all those bullshit. Like, why does "free elections" matter when your entire family is starving? why does "freedom of speech" matter when you can't even have access to food and healthcare? All of those individualistic bullshit shouldn't be considered human rights, and even so, "freedom of speech" is a stepping stone to chaos.

Instead, I pursue a true "human rights" doctorine that should be upheld instead of the liberal, individualistic ones. It'll be what I call 'Rights of Humanity', similar to one proposed by Castro. Instead, I'll focus on the rights of humanity, like the accessibility to food, jobs, healthcare, housing and so on. That is what human rights should be. It's ridiculous that you have "free speech" while you are suffering from a terminal illness not having any medicine and starving because you have no food. Don't get me started on how genocidal, neocuck imperialists use "human rights" as an excuse to commit genocide and raze down entire countries.

Opposition to Interventionism:
I believe Interventionism in general is very unnecessary and it's another tool for imperialism. No cases of Intervention has been justified apart from the Liberation of Tibet. What other countries do and their policies are NONE of the superpower's business. "But muh authoritarianism!!!!!!" some countries are just simply not fit for the corrupted, individualistic model of liberal democracy. Just see how the Arab Spring turned out, and how most of Asia's "democracies" are either failed, filled with nonsensical party politics and bickering politicians (like Malaysia and 'Taiwan'), or turned to a dominant party state instead (like Japan and the Philippines), and those with a strong hand actually get more shit done.

The only cases where I support interventionism is when being against counter-imperialism, or against a genocidal enemy, slave state, or to unite the country. Otherwise, I oppose all other kinds of intervention, unless when said country is provoked, like the Pearl Harbor Attacks and the Khmer Rouge forces massacring Vietnamese villages. Interventionism has done more chaos and suffering than good, and what third-world countries do, do not at all require a superpower to write the rules for them. What gives them the right to do so, anyway?

Proletarian Internationalism and Socialism in One Country:
"Socialism in One Country means Capitalism in All countries" is outright false. Socialism in One Country is to put the nation at first, not isolate and lock it all down to the rest of the world. Socialism in One Country is to build up Socialism in their own country first, to create ourselves as a model socialist state, and care for the conditions and improving our own country first, providing a model. That's how the DPRK under Kim Il Sung did, so did Stalinist Russia and Maoist China. Building a model for the world to follow.

After building a strong socialist model inside the country and finishing with the projects necessary to build our country up, I pursue Proletarian Internationalism. Note, that this doesn't mean Globalism or World Communism, nothing of that sort, I do not believe in forcing ideologies upon other countries unlike Trotskyites and Western Liberal Hawks, the entire concept of Proletarian Internationalism is solidarity with the peoples oppressed by imperialism, colonialism, and capitalism, as well as to support other fellow socialists in building their nationalist, socialist republic by the people, while not trampling on national sovereignty, which is a fatal mistake by the USSR. I pursue a policy similar to what Cuba did in terms of proletarian internationalism.

I'll stress again I do NOT advocate for globalism, since I strongly oppose an international world government and anti-nationalism. Proletarian Internationalism is similar to Alter-Globalization, as it truly respects national sovereignty and calls for the world to support each other's national liberation, and building socialism together as well as supporting each other in the fight against imperialism and capitalism.

Architecture:
Traditional Chinese, Traditional East Asian, and a mixture of  Stalinist Architecture

Art:
Anime and Manga, mixed with a bit of Russian Futurism and  Socialist Realism

Music:
Nationalist, Anime and Popular Culture Music, and  Communist

Philosophy:
Long story short, I'm a Collectivist, Communitarian and Paternalist who strongly opposes the ideas of Individualism and especially Hedonism. Although I don't support Hive-Mind Collectivism, I hate Individualism and I will fight against it.

Collectivism:
Humans are by nature collectivist, and humans are meant to work together as groups, and as a community. Selfishness is not human nature, and Individualism is not a human's true state. If it weren't for collectivism, humans would be either extinct, or be as a failed species. All the major, prosperous civilizations are not build from one single individual, but rather thousands and millions of people.

Communitarianism:
The Community is inherently very important, as it focuses on mutual support between peoples, working forward towards a common goal. It is a win-win situation, where the community is able to help and fulfill what's best for each individual.

Paternalism and Legalism:
I believe not everything should be up to the individual to decide. As humans, we are not perfect either, and humans tend to make mistakes that make them regret for their entire life, or walk down a bad road. Hence, I support the state guiding the people towards a positive path, this applies in Politics too. Paternalism gets countries and nations thriving with the state trying to guide the people.

Virtue Ethics:
I believe that virtue is a trait that all humans must share, to be the best they can be, and that forms good collectives and communities. However, I oppose what is known as "universal values".

Moralism:
Morality is important for society to thrive. Some acts, like murder, rape, exploitation, corruption, etc are inherently immoral, while others, like filial piety, selflessnesss, etc are moral acts, and I believe the moral should be upheld while the immoral should be shunned and those who commit those acts punished.

[[File:Cball-Afghanistan.png]] Afghanistan:
Afghanistan should have a strong, secular and authoritarian government as majority of the problems in Afghanistan are caused by religious conflict and religious conservatism holds back Afghanistan from modernization and industrialization. If not, a model of strong Islamic Socialism like Najibullah's ideas should be implemented. The Taliban, tribal conflict and other such groups should be crushed to unite Afghanistan from the Imperialists like Biden, who is an enemy of all Afghan people that the people of Afghanistan should unite and crush.

[[File:Cball-Belarus.png]] Belarus:
Whilst I don't really like him, Lukashenko is the main reason why Belarus did not fall into the sorry state of Ukraine and Russia after the collapse of the USSR due to Lukashenko's economic policies. The rioters are national traitors that want Belarus to become an EU slave (which will never happen). However, despite that, I'm not fond of Lukashenko's over dependence on Putin (even if he literally had no choice but to do so) and his support to the Imperialist war in Ukraine. However, despite that I myself have problems with Lukashenko and the Belarusian Government, like their corruption, oligarchy, and their reliance on Putin, I'd pick them over the Antiauth globalist simping Tsikhanouskaya. Lukashenko is easily the least bad of all the Post-Soviet leaders, but he is not a good man.

[[File:Cball-Bolivia.png]] Bolivia:
I will rather jump off a 7-storey building than recognize the illegal government of Jeanine Anez. Evo Morales improved Bolivia more than any Bolivian leader has ever did before, and his anti-imperialist stance is right as the Americans supported narco-traffiking neoliberal dictators like Hugo Banzer in Bolivia. Like the Carribean, Africa and Latin America, Latin Americans by blood should be opposed to Imperialism and those that support the Americans are traitors to their own people. The US will pay for installing that neoliberal bitch Jeanine Anez (who will rot eternally in jail), whilst he is indeed a progressive figure, I do have criticisms of Evo and the Bolivian regime, he is way too moderate, and should take the ML pill asap, for that capitalism and other borgeoise ideals can be quickly killed off.

[[File:Cball-China.png]] China:
Even if I don't like the revisionist Communist Party of China and I have a lot of criticisms for them, the Mainland Chinese government is the real China and the real representative of the Chinese people. Taiwan is a pathetic state that cucks themselves off to Japan and the Westerners, both of whom stern enemies of the Chinese people and are imperialists. The Taiwanese government is a race traitor for doing so and should be ashamed of themselves on that. the CPC brought China up from humiliation by the Imperialists and had a lot of positive and progressive policies such as industrialization, women's rights, and the removal of feudal culture, even if nowadays China is revisionist and is exporting social imperialism.

Tibet and Xinjiang are inseperable parts of China and the Chinese have treated them with full autonomy. They did good killing seperatists and feudalists trying to destroy the Chinese nation. Westoids can cry and cope over China's rightful ownership of both Tibet and Xinjiang. "FreeTibet" "FreeXinjiang", go outside and get some friends, both are already freed. Plus, in Xinjiang I admit there is tightening of security, but the media does not report why China is tightening grip over Xinjiang, that being Uyghur militants fleeing China to fight for terrorists in Syria. There have also been deadly terrorist attacks by the ETIM and other Uyghur Extremist groups. So I think tightening security is pretty justifiable. That said, it is not a genocide. People aren't being killed for being Muslim unlike what you're seeing in Israel. Uyghur culture is still very much still present there. But with that said, there are mass incarcerations, but they are in absolutely no way genocide. Plus, I find it hypocritical how the West condemns China for tightening it's security from terrorists when they have slaughtered millions of Iraqis and Afghans in the "War on Terror". I believe that through tightening security is clearly a better way compared to randomly bombing other countries. Even so, the media is full of lies when it comes to Xinjiang. Condemning us for not opening up when we have sent invitations to various NGOs and even the EU (UN's Human Rights Commisionner Bachelet just visited China and she never said it's a genocide, inb4 "ebil CPC must have forced her to lie!!!!!") being a massive cope. Tibet however, no Tibetan has asked for independence and they haven't been living more free. Those that ask for independence are the Dalai Lama and his band of slave dogs and benefitted from slavery of the Tibetan people. Just check this. If you support Lincoln in the American Civil War, you should support China destroying a Slave State. I've been to both Tibet and Xinjiang when I'm living in China and they are great places and have been doing well under Beijing's control. Even if I back them in the cases of Tibet, Taiwan and Xinjiang, I do have quite the number of points that I oppose China in (mainly in the South China Sea, their domestic (economic policies mainly) policies, and their debt trapping of third world nations and social imperialism)

Regarding foreign affairs, I do agree that China has some steps to take back, like South China Sea and some political influencing the Belt and Road project (even if a lot of African countries choose China thanks to the French and the Americans destroying whatever they got), and I would clearly pick China over the West any time of the day, but we should not be interfering in other affairs, and we should go back to our anti-imperialist and third-worldist roots like how Zhou wanted, supporting the Third World. Social Imperialism is never acceptable, even if it's done by the Party which I am loyal to. However, that said, I'd clearly prefer China than the West any time of the day and I'd rather owe debt to them than the Westerners, but Chinese Social Imperialism (via the belt and road project) is shady, and not good. They are an imperialist power, even if they are the least bad among all superpowers.

[[File:Castro.png]] Cuba:
The Cuban rioters are your typical Gusanos brainwashed by liberal media and influence trying to sell Cuba to the United States. The United States is the true enemy of the Cuban people, the embargo proves so, and Cuba would be as successful in terms of economy like how Japan or Netherlands is if it weren't for the American embargo. The mere fact about how they are successful compared to many other Latin American countries prove so. Cubans by blood are born to hate the United States who had done nothing but destroy the freedom of the Cuban people. The United States is genocidal and is always seeking to undermine Cuban Sovereignty and topple the legitimate Castroist government which had done tremendous progress for Cuba, and any attempt to undermine Castroist rule in Cuba is another word for subjugation against the Cuban people. Even so, I want the Cuban Communist Party to get rid of it's revisionist-leaning policies (like opening up to markets), so Cuba isn't exactly perfect either.

[[File:Cball-Eswatini.png]] Eswatini:
I back the Eswatini protests against the corrupt, British-Taiwanese Imperialist puppet of Eswatini. Fuck Mswati III and his regime.

[[File:4thReichEU.png]] European Union (aka the 4th Reich):
I fullheartedly support the destruction of the European Union. Everything from debt slavery, economic globalization and imperialism, funding terrorism, meddling in the affairs of countries like Poland, Hungary, and Belarus to force them to adopt their globalist ideology and if not they starve them via sanctions, opposing nationalism and pride to the nation, enslaving all of Eastern Europe to have them serve as punching bags and plague those countries with corrupt, pro-EU slaves.


 * Eastern Germany: Many miss the times of East Germany where the people truly had equality
 * Poland: There is a reason why Poles want to forge an independent path, despite bad experiences under communism
 * Czechia and Slovakia: Idk a whole much about them although they're selling their sovereignty to the EU which is gay
 * Hungary: People miss Kadar for a reason, and there is a reason why the vast majority of people supports an euroskeptic like Orban despite his faults
 * Former Yugoslavia: Constant chaos
 * Albania: raped by crime and civil war after the fall of communism, now only recovering even if there are huge problems
 * Romania: raped with corruption
 * Bulgaria: Communist Nostalgia is high since the Bulgarian government rn is an EU slave that practically hasn't done anything for Bulgaria since the Communists have done it all
 * Greece: Raped economically by the Germans and constantly threatened by the Turkish (an Atlanticist Ally btw)

The EU's control over Eastern Europe can easily be compared to the Japanese Imperialist's idea of "Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere", bunch of puppets to serve the imperialist agenda.

[[File:Cball-HongKong.png]] Hong Kong:
There is no reason for Hong Kong to be independent, nor for it to be treated seperately from the rest of China. First off, fuck the Brits for illegally stealing our city and oppressing our fellow countrymen there, second off, I wish the 1967 Anti-Colonial rebellion succeeded because the British Imperialists are not human after what crimes they did in the Opium Wars. Third off, the people in Hong Kong that wave the British flag and destroy the city are not true citizens of Hong Kong. They are terrorists. Joshua Wong is basically the Hong Kong version of Osama Bin Laden. His group consist of degenerates, pedophiles, coomers, rapists, racists, Neo-Nazis, Neo-Colonialists and all sorts of disgusting people there is. Whoever that backs them, you really do need to reconsider being born. Those spineless cowards beat up the elderly for simply being against vandalism and wanting to continue with normal life, harass Mainland Chinese tourists and go even far as to hating people for speaking Mandarin and Chinese culture, supporting Imperial Japan, War and Genocide. After the fight against Imperialism by the Chinese people, these cucks should receive something worse than the Tiananmen treatment. Hong Kong should be absorbed back to China this moment and the slaughter of every bit of those terrorists are necessary.

Note: They plant bombs in train stations, brainwash children into their agenda, harass journalists for not liking them (or just simply being Chinese), force restaurants to stop serving Mandarin speakers, get angry for not being able to molest children and jack off to CP, beat up people for wanting to feed their family, how can anyone even support such a disgusting group? Not even ISIS is as bad as them.

[[File:Cball-India.png]] India:
I can't stand the Western hypocrisy of treating China as "le ebil hellhole" while India is in all ways worse. India used to be based Pro-Soviet in the Cold War but now they are ruined and ruled by a corrupt Hindu extremist, Narendra Modi, who is arguably borderline feudalist and actively enables the suffering of the Indian peasants and Non-Hindu males. India is known as the rape capital of the world thanks to him, extreme poverty (one of the worst in the world) and people in the countryside are fanatically conservative to a point of beyond retardation, as well as the Caste system holding India back, I view this as a legacy of British Imperialism and how fuckers like Modi and the BJP ruin the country.

If it had a strong, centralized, socialist authoritarian leadership, India would be as strong as Russia and China against the imperialists. A purge against these reactionary elements left behind by Imperialism, full unification of the Indian subcontinent, industrialization will do great. Even many Indians say that this isn't the India that they fought for. I admire Gandhi and all, but the bad thing about him is that his system is too agarian and do not advocate for large industrialization, which is necessesary for a large country like India.

[[File:Pahlavi.png]][[File:Cball-Iran.png]] Iran:
Both Pahlavist and Khomeinist Iran are cringe. I won't support Khomeinist Iran as it is a classic near-reactionary Islamic Theocracy, even if it opposes the West. They are better than how they were before but that's still a very low bar. Khomeini had destroyed whatever hope for change is left for Iran, and I despise the Khomeinist Reactionary government with every fibre of my being, but yet I don't want Iran to be a Western puppet. Iran should build a Socialist republic modified to it's material conditions, and I think the Tudeh Party will be the best candidate for that.

[[File:Cball-Iraq.png]] Iraq:
Regardless of how Saddam was, what Iraq ended up being like shouldn't happen to anyone. One good thing Saddam did was develop his country and had some achievements (although he's awful) until the Neocucks razed Iraq down to the ground, implemented a corrupt puppet government that can't do jackshit, and ask why do the Iraqis hate him and wonder why ISIS and other Jihadists are gaining more influence. I support a popular revolution by the Iraqi people to chase the Jihadists and the Americans (alongside their puppets out), to rebuild a strong, prosperous Iraq under the Socialistic,Ba'athist banner, and later, should evolve into socialism.

[[File:Cball-Ireland.png]] Ireland:
The IRA would be based if they were not terrorist. The British have slaughtered the Irish people like insects and with extremely inhumane methods. The mere fact that Ireland and Britain are somewhat friendly now is pure mental retardation. Does the Irish government not know that the British are the one who slaughtered their people and countrymen like barbarous imperialist savages? Ireland should launch a war to reclaim Northern Ireland from the British Imperialists, and possibly help fellow Scots, Welsh and Celts in France to break free from the Imperialists and form a Pan-Celtic Union to fight against the Imperialist bastards. Britain do not deserve to have existence nor do they deserve any praise after the genocide and madness which they unleashed to the world, just like the Nazis.

[[File:Cball-Japan.png]] Japan:
I like their culture, food, people, entertainment and games, but their government and politics are one of the worst things still existing on earth. They are the biggest threat to peace in the Far East and a puppet of the Western Imperialists threatening peace and stability in the Eastern Asian region. They want to re-establish an imperialist empire with support from the west to unleash slaughter on Asia.

In the case of Japan, I believe the Left should take more drastic actions on taking and dismantling the Japanese monarchy, establish a republican government, purge against the Japanese Right, establish a socialist republic with the model of Market Socialism, purge against degenerate pornographic media, rejoin it's asian allies by rejecting any ambition of Imperialism and Militarism, chase out all prescence of American Degenerate influence, and become an economic bastillion against the Atlanticist Agenda.

[[File:Cball-North_Korea.png]][[File:Cball-South_Korea.png]] Korea
Although viewing the DPRK as the lesser evils of the two, I still firmly believe that Korea should unite independently from their respective powers (although South Korea is more of a puppet than the DPRK) and America should get the fuck out of Korea (and asia as a whole) and South Korea should pave their own path and treat their social problems more seriously while the DPRK should end with their state capitalist, revisionist, champagne "Socialism". Juche as a concept is based though.

However, If I had to pick, I'd Pick the DPRK, since at the very least they are a strong government and built according to the wishes of the Korean Workers and peasants, and truly upholds worker's rights and human rights (not liberal "human rights", but true human rights) and at the very least also upholds traditional Korean culture unlike the South who willingly destroyed their own culture to please the West. Even so, the failures of the DPRK are mainly caused by corruption under Kim Jong Il, deviation from Marxism-Leninism, and the neocons constantly threatening and sanctioning it, literally starving and genociding an entire country. The North Korean famine was also indirectly caused by the West. Even so, I want North Korea to return back to the true Nationalist, Socialist ideal of Juche under Kim Il Sung, for Kim Il Sung have practically turned the DPRK into a "model state" in the Eastern Bloc

[[File:Cball-Libya.png]] Libya:
Gaddafi has his faults alright, but it doesn't justify what the murderous Neocon terrorist organization did to Libya. Even then, Gaddafi brought more good to Libya than any western-backed leader in Africa ever can do. Gaddafi is a true patriot and a champion of anti-imperialism in the Third World. I will support Saif Al-Islam Gaddafi to bring Libya back to it's former glory and re-establish his father's regime.

[[File:Cball-Malaysia.png]] Malaysia:
There isn't any big issues regarding where I currently live on an international scale, but one thing is for sure. I absolutely despise our current clown government that do not serve the people and our clown politicians. Firstly, the current government is founded off with British Imperialist values that neglect the popular demands of Malayan Peasants and the Malayan People's Liberation Army. Off to a bad start, isn't it? That's not all. Currently, even after the economic growth and the social progress that strongman leader Mahathir did, Malaysia is still plagued with stupid politicians that use racial politics and nonsensical liberal political pluralism that hold our country back while countries ruled by strongmen like in Vietnam, Philippines and Indonesia have been moving forward while we're staying in the very same spot. Many people I know are already tired of all those baboons who do nothing in Putrajaya, with some even encouraging child marriage, deportation of Chinese and Indians, and establishing an Islamist state in Malaysia similar to Iran. Honestly, Malaysia is a clear cut example of the failure of liberal political pluralism. Better off than most since there is no fierce chaos, but, that's a very low bar.

For my approach to Malaysia, I'd pursue these policies: - A massive destruction and purge of all Malaysian politicians right now and a purge of corrupt politicians similar to the one conducted by Xi, establishment of a Socialist republic, with the Malay, Chinese, Indian, and Orang Asli under the banner of one party, one nation, pursuing a Socialist Program of "Satu Malaysia", promoting unity between all races. The democratic structure has to be based on Democratic Centralism, since Decentralism will not work out when it comes to big projects. - Build railways and infrastructure across all states instead of it being centered around the Klang Valley Area, while also negotiating with a complete construction of a railway that connects Malaysia to Singapore. - Redistribute wealth from the extremely rich people (particularly the Bangsar Bubble) to the poor and elevate their standards of living, as well as improving the living conditions of Chinese people still living in New Villages and Rural Malays in the countryside. - Ensure a system of Market Socialism as similar to the ones tried in Stalinist Russia, Cold-War DPRK and most of Stalinist Eastern Europe. A lot of big corporations will be broken down and corporations that form oligopolies must be prevented from forming, as well as the nationalization of many essential services. - Withdraw from the British Commonwealth and take a strong hand and emphasising on the importance of the Third World to stand together against bloc politics, negotiate to an end to the dispute of Sabah with the Philippines, and force China to back off from Malaysian waters in the South China Sea, but respect the islands that are actually rightfully belonging to China, while at the same time also rejecting American, British and Australian Prescence in the Area. I will also try to work for more constructive and friendly relations with Third World countries, namely Cuba and many Middle Eastern countries, like Syria for example, and re-establish friendly relationships with North Korea and Mongolia after the diplomatic rows we had with both countries, while breaking ties with Atlanticist powers, especially the US, Canada, Australia and Britain. - Build a strong and powerful army to protect Malaysia from foreign threats. (Especially considering my anti-atlanticist stance, the Atlanticoids will likely threaten like how they did with Cuba)

[[File:Cball-Myanmar.png]] Myanmar:
As much as I dislike the Tatmadaw regime, I will neither support Aung San Soo Kyi and the Burmese Democratic movement. (despite the Tatmadaw being the more evil imo) The NLD is incompetent in solving the issues that the Ne Win regime has left behind after fucking over Myanmar, and they should've at least tried to resolve the issues that Myanmar faced, they didn't do that. However, the Tatmadaw's distrust towards China is used by the Neocucks to take control of Myanmar in order to cut off our economic supply. As much as I wish we would take down the Tatmadaw regime like how we did in Korea 1950's, it's always better to let the people take out the Tatmadaw from the inside, however, I support a people's dictator, a strongman that'll actually solve Myanmar's issues and lead Myanmar to a path of prosperity and anti-imperialism.

[[File:Neocuckservative.png]]North Atlantic Terrorist Organization:
No reason for it to exist. NATO is Nazi Germany reincarnated. NATO's very foundation is founded off preserving the interests of the Western borgeoise, imperialism, genociding the third world and destroying true people's democracies in Russia, Eastern Europe, and Asia. They foreign policy is identical and just as genocidal as how the Nazis done. Millions, maybe even billions died as a result of their bombings, interventions, and their support to the war while not caring about the common person. If you support NATO, you're a Nazi. As simple as that. NATO is the main terrorist force in the modern world and I will support almost anything to see the destruction of the modern Nazi Germany. Say that to the millions of Vietnamese, Yugoslavs, Somalis, Iraqis, Libyans, Latinos, Koreans, Africans, Afghans, Laotians, Cambodians, Timorese, etc. that died because of the West that this is good. It's like Hailing Hitler in front of a Jew. I support almost anything to destroy their influence, and I will not show any mercy to those sympathising (or see NATO) as a lesser evil. NATO is objectively the biggest evil of the modern day. Fuck everything about them, fuck their universal values, and fuck every single soldier serving under them.

[[File:Cball-Pakistan.png]] Pakistan:
Just because I hate India does not mean I like Pakistan automatically. The only good part about Pakistan is them being away from Westerners, that's it, other than that, fuck them for ruining Afghanistan and Bangladesh. Hell, Pakistan's existence is based off sectarian and religious conflict, a legacy left behind by the British Imperialists. For Pakistan, I support them to join India back, put aside their differences, and work together for a better future for a Great India. Similar to how I view most of Southern Asia, they should reunify to become a singular country, a singular India under a Socialist Strongman to develop the country, solve it's problems, and serve as a bastillion against Imperialists.

[[File:Cball-Palestine.png]] Palestine:
I'm pretty much in every way opposed to Israeli Settler Colonialism and doing what the Nazis had done to them against the native Palestinians. Just because the Jews been through something horrific doesn't mean they can do the same to Palestinians. The idea of a Jewish nation state isn't bad, but how Modern Israel carries it out makes me oppose them to the core. What is ideal is a united, secular state in Palestine uniting Arabs and Jews together under a strong, Anti-Imperialist, Civic Nationalist government, while Hamas and the current government of Israel should be crushed.

[[File:Cball-Poland.png]] Poland:
Whilst I'd pick the current Polish government over the neoliberal and globalist EU, I still strongly oppose the Atlanticist government of Poland and their obsession with Right Wing Idpol. Duda and the PiS is better than much of Europe, but it's a very low bar. I advocate for a return of the People's Democracy in Poland under the Leadership of Boleslaw Bierut, which will be achieved through destroying Poland's current political structure thoroughly and building a new structure, emphasising on class consciousness and socialist ideology

[[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Russia:
I despise NATO but I don't see Russia in a good light either. Russia is in no way Communist nor is it Socialist whatsoever, Russia merely is a corrupt, autocratic, right wing capitalist oligarchy ruled by Putin. I hate Putin and I think that it would be better if he was taken down, but not from any liberal, hence why I dislike Navalny, as one of the few only good things about Putin (that being serving as an anti-atlanticist fort) will be gone and they'd be another western puppet, which is bad. Russia should fight against the current right wing oligarchy, and get rid of all liberal "democratic" elements in the country, instead, the people should build up true, Soviet-era Marxism Leninism, along with the opposition to Social Imperialism and Revisionism.

With that said, I strongly oppose the Russian Invasion of Ukraine, since as bad as Ukraine is, Russia shouldn't have trampled on the sovereignty of another nation. It's just like the Neocucks in the West justifying using some shitty or made-up excuses to ravage third-world countries. Putin has to go, and that Russia needs a change in leadership and politics. The CPRF would do the best job in that, imo.

[[File:Cball-Saudi.png]] Saudi Arabia:
Saudi Arabia is an Imperialist, Genocidal, Wahhabist Slave State and a Western puppet that has been one of the greatest contributors to misery and suffering in the Middle East, and there is absolutely zero reason to support what they are doing in Yemen and Syria. They are also the primary backers of terrorists and assisting the Americans in destroying the middle east.

Domestically they are shitty too, It's funny how they oppress their own people by implementing near-reactionary sharia laws and treated foreign workers (and their own) workers like literal slaves, yet I've heard that Saudi Arabia has a high consumption of hentai and the Saudi Royal Family has participated in gay clubs and such. The Saudi Royal Family and Saudi Arabia as a whole is a joke of a nation. Proof that Reactionaries like the Saudis and degenerate liberal hedonists are the same degenerates.

[[File:Cball-Syria.png]] Syria:
Assad has his faults but the FSA and the Western backed rebels are the clear greater evil as the FSA is a terrorist organization that allied with Islamists to take down Assad's government. The Chemical attacks allegations are quite iffy considering that Assad have been critical of using overly heavy weapons against his own people, and I believe it's either used by the Islamists and Westoids and blamed it on Assad's shoulder. The actions by the West in Syria is proof that Western Atlanticists have no morality whatsover, and Assad's criticism of them is absolutely correct. Syria should rebuild by the will of the people under the banner of Ba'athism. The Yankee, Zionist and Wahhabi pigs should get out of Syria. To conclude it all, even if I support Syria's government in the civil war, Syria still requires a change, as Assad is still a corrupt pro-russian authcap leader.

[[File:Thailand.png]] Thailand:
I stand with neither side in Thailand here. Despite the fact that I hate that incompetent, corrupt ass King, I do not want to stand with Western-backed Sinophobic liberals that sympathize with that terrorist Joshua Wong and extremist Uyghur Organizations, and the Tibetan Slave Owners. However, one thing I want to acknowledge is that Thailand needs a major change in it's politics. I support a third side to emerge in Thailand, against both the King and the Western Backed Liberals to build Thailand.

[[File:Ottoman.png]] Turkey:
Honestly, it's a shame to see that Erdogan (an Atlanticist puppet) is converting Turkey into it's Reactionary, Ottomanist roots. Plus I am in absolutely zero way surprised that the West still backs him. Erdogan is one of the worst people still alive today. Committing genocide against the Kurds, Invading Syria and destroying people's livelihood there, wanting to invade Armenia, causing tensions with Greece, backing the Taliban, and being a NATO puppet. Overall, what can I say? For peace to truly prevail in the Middle East, Erdogan's evil government has to be dismantled, and a return of Kemalism is necessary.

[[File:Cball-UK.png]] UK:
Words simply cannot describe my hatred to the British. They show zero remorse over the crimes and genocide (which are on par if not worse than the Nazis) they have committed over the world, and right now they are extending their filthy neocuck hands into our Hong Kong, Xinjiang, and they want to interfere with Asia as a whole by increasing tensions and advocating for war. These bastards think they are all high and mighty because they used to have an Empire that presided over the suffering, genocide, and murder of millions, maybe even billions of innocents, and yet genocidal maniacs from here (Victoria, Churchill, etc.) to name a few are still praised like heroes by libtards (keep in mind Churchill had sympathies to fascism and he even killed people in Greece for praising the allies that liberated them from Nazism)

The British by far is the country whose genocidal effects still scar the world today, ranging from the famines and ethnic divisions and fights in India and Palestine, Brainwashing a part of our people to be "Hong Kongers", Genociding Irish people, causing severe problems in various parts of Africa, Myanmar, Malaysia, and such. There is a reason why Washington revolted from the Brits, and yet people still praise Britain for being "free" apparently, what's next? Nazi Germany being the bastillion of freedom and democracy? The Congo Free State being a utopia? The Khmer Rouge being heaven?

In my ideal society, those that simp for the British Empire get the bullet, and phrases like "Rule Britannia", "God save the Queen/King" will be prohibited, and waving the British flag will be banned. They are as vicious as the Nazis and countries should take a radical and harsh stance on them. Neo-Colonialists in general deserve to die. If the British butchered millions and billions of random people on earth and caused a 100 year century of humiliation to my people and paint themselves as the hero, I think it's fair that we kill their sympathizers.

[[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]] Ukraine:
I oppose the Russian invasion of Ukraine and I strongly condemn Russia and anyone that supports this kind of blatant invasion of another sovereign state, but it doesn't mean I support Zelensky at all. Zelensky is trying to defend his country, but at the same time I dislike how he's aligning himself too much into NATO and the EU (even if he more or less doesn't have a choice to) and that he's another puppet of the American Military-Industrial Complex, plus, how he decided to repress Pro-Russian people in Donbass, Repressing Pro-Left Parties (yes including the Ukrainian nationalist ones), and sympathizing with the Azov Battalion (Ukrainian Nazis) etc and how he provoked Putin by breaching the promise of neutrality by advocating to join NATO, so, he kind of also had some faults (even If the invasion is bad). What I support is a Left-Nationalist Ukraine against the EU, NATO, Zelensky, and Putin.

Imo, I believe that Crimea is Russian as the people there had opted to join Russia, and Donbass, Luhansk, etc should remain independent as the Ukrainians clearly haven't been treating them very well considering how Zelensky had repressed them, but everything else is Ukrainian.

[[File:Cball-US.png]] USA:
I see the United States as a genocidal, capitalist, neoliberal and imperialist power and the greatest obstacle to world peace and the main hub of degenerate cultural capitalism, liberalism, and the evil system of liberal "democracy". I oppose literally every single part of American foreign policy and I want them out of everywhere they have bases or influence in. They do not deserve the right to write the rules of the world. Hell, the crimes that Neocons had done is comparable to the Nazis, considering how many Iraqis, Libyans, etc all died because of America's selfish, imperialistic desires, and also the crimes they did by still holding onto Guatanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib camp, which are comparable to Auschwitz and Dachau, and also killing reporters who document their crimes out (or are on their tail). Plus, they do not at all care for domestic problems. American Taxpayer's money are dumped into meaningless wars and into starting a new cold war while homelessness, social inequality, political polarization and extremism and all sorts of different problems still plague American society, with millions of blacks incarcerated for the smallest of reasons and used eugenics as a tool to root out the black population (see how abortion clinics are in black neighbourhoods while American Capitalist government fucks over their living standards), while all the billionaires and corpcucks like Bezos influence the country while enslaving their own workers. America is a fucked up country, and desperately needs a complete destruction of the current system. This is not the America that Washington had wanted. Instead, Liberal Hawks had turned it into the very antithesis of Washington's anti-imperialist ideals. I support a complete destruction of America's current system, the termination of all kinds of relationships and diplomatic partnerships with the United States, until America's current, pure evil system is demolished.

[[File:Chavismo.png]] Venezuela:
I am against both the kleptocratic false "socialist" government of Nicolas Maduro and I also oppose Western puppet Juan Guaido's attempts to undermine Venezuela's sovereignty to the West. Maduro is incompetent and destroyed socialism in Venezuela (his economy is more private than that of the Nordic countries btw), and printed money for no reason, like Mugabe, giving Socialism a bad reputation. I do not consider him a good man, and should be ousted, but not by a Western puppet who would be at best just as bad since at least Maduro didn't actively sell his country to neoliberal forces.

Similar to how I view Thailand, I support a Third Side led by the Communist Party of Venezuela, whom are true Communists, establishing true Socialism in Venezuela by going against both Guaido and Maduro. Plus, I also support ending the US imperialist blockade on Venezuela.

East Asia:

 * [[File:Cball-China.png]] China (including Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao) (lived here before)
 * [[File:Cball-South_Korea.png]] South Korea
 * [[File:Cball-Japan.png]] Japan

Southeast Asia:

 * [[File:Hochi.png]] Vietnam
 * [[File:Cball-Laos.png]] Laos
 * [[File:Cball-Cambodia.png]] Cambodia
 * [[File:Thailand.png]] Thailand
 * [[File:Cball-Malaysia.png]] Malaysia (currently live here)
 * [[File:Cball-Singapore.png]] Singapore
 * [[File:Cball-Indonesia.png]] Indonesia

Oceania:

 * [[File:Cball-Australia.png]] Australia

North America:

 * [[File:Cball-Canada.png]] Canada
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] United States

Europe:

 * [[File:Cball-UK.png]] Britain
 * [[File:Cball-France.png]] France
 * [[File:Cball-Belgium.png]] Belgium
 * [[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Russia

Relationships:
(Note: I will no longer be doing any more self-insert relationships, I'm just here to finish up some work I left off here)

Ideologies:

Very Based:

 * [[File:Leftnat.png]]- Has to be one of the best ideologies ever created in the history of mankind. National-self determination, combined with Left-Wing Politics, very based, alongside anti-globalism.
 * [[File:ML.png]]- The most progressive force that humanity should follow in their fight against neoliberal capitalism and other borgeoise forces. Oversaw huge improvements in countries where Marxism Leninism is improved, and oversaw the liberation of billions throughout it's history. Soon, the winds of history will come, and Marxism-Leninism should be seen as the liberator of mankind.
 * [[File:Natcom.png]]- Even better than Marxism-Leninism. Nationalism is integral to building a communist society, and true communists should bear a feeling of love for their motherlands. That is the way for all communist leaders and heroes who freed their countries, like Ho, Castro, Kim Il Sung, etc.
 * [[File:Ormarxf.png]]- Karl Marx is the greatest economist and philosopher of our time. It's your works that inspired billions of people and helped them to the path of liberation.
 * [[File:Soc.png]]- Socialism will never die in the hearts of all human beings.
 * [[File:Erga.png]]- Dictatorship of the Proletariat and Democratic Centralism are among the best systems created for mankind. [[File:Gigachad.png]]
 * [[File:DemML.png]]People's Democracy- The only true Democracy for the people is a People's Democracy. Borgeoise Democracy and Liberal "Democracy" is democracy for the slave owners and borgeoise only, while only in a Marxist-Leninist system, the People's system of Democracy reigns supreme.
 * [[File:Sec.png]]- The most based civic ideology there is. This is the one which I follow.
 * [[File:Secular.png]] - Religion and Politics should remain as completely seperated. Theocracies and religion ending up to interfere with politics almost never ends up well.
 * [[File:Stalin.png]]- Joseph Stalin has to be one of one of history's greatest men, ever. The achievements he made for the USSR, building the most progressive force on earth, doing what took other countries 200 years to do in just one single decade, and had very good approaches to the country, your political system, your social system, etc, all of which had extremely good contributions. A true giant and symbol of progress. Neocucks, Neolibs, and Fashoids can slander you all they want, but my respect and favour to Joseph Stalin will never die.

Based:

 * [[File:Hoxha.png]]- Comrade Hoxha's achievements are immortal. The benevolent ruler of Albania, the Leader of the Albanian people, and an international symbol of heroism and loyalty to your own people. Enver Hoxha Tungjatjeta!
 * [[File:Ecosoc.png]]- After an industrialized society, the environment has to be protected. It is for the sake of preventing climate change and rescuing our big, blue, earth.
 * [[File:Statesoc.png]]- Yes. The worker should own all of the means of production, and the workers should establish a proletariat people's democratic dictatorship. No other system is better than this system, ensuring the complete abolishing of Capitalism and liberal economics, while led by the most capable, and most educated of the proletariat. What else can I say but [[File:Gigachad.png]]? "but nooooo the government is doing stuff!!!!!" yes the more shit the people's government does, the better it is. Problem?
 * [[File:Authdem.png]]- All systems require authoritarianism and strength for it to work out, and a People's Democracy, which I advocate for, is no different. What is the use of electing useless liberal politicians who sit around and do nothing all in the name of "muh liberal pluralism and freedum", while you can elect the most able and strong person in the mass worker's and people's party, with no degenerate elements, like the borgeoise inside?
 * [[File:Envi.png]]- Yes, I support preserving the environment. Sustainable Socialism is the way to go.
 * [[File:Intercult.png]]- A country, with one common identity, yet protecting different cultures and customs of different races, is what I strive for, and in all ways better than Neoliberal 'M*lticulturalism'.
 * [[File:Newdem.png]]New Democracy- The most based theory Mao has ever made in his entire lifetime. This kind of Democracy is kind of what I'd support too.
 * [[File:Marxfem.png]]- "The revolution and women’s liberation go together. We do not talk of women’s emancipation as an act of charity or out of a surge of human compassion. It is a basic necessity for the revolution to triumph." - Thomas Sankara
 * [[File:PostColFem.png]]- A true Post-colonial society is where a country's women should be liberated from the reactionary past, and abolishing all colonial customs to progress forward.
 * [[File:Modnat.png]]- prefer nationalism, but I love my country and I salute the land which I am born in.
 * [[File:Laicism.png]]- My religious policy, need I say any more?

Basedish:

 * [[File:Socauth.png]]
 * [[File:Pan-Nationalism.png]]
 * [[File:Socgeo.png]]
 * [[File:Commie.png]]
 * [[File:Consocf.png]]
 * [[File:Luxem.png]]
 * [[File:Republicanismpix.png]]
 * [[File:Indust.png]]
 * [[File:Cultural_Nationalism.png]]
 * [[File:Unitary.png]]

Neutral:

 * [[File:GeoSynd.png]]
 * [[File:Georgist.png]]
 * [[File:Technocracy.png]]
 * [[File:Confucianism.png]]
 * [[File:Agsoc.png]]
 * [[File:Civnat.png]]
 * [[File:Fed.png]]
 * [[File:Auto.png]]-

Cringish:

 * [[File:Mao.png]]- You were a based revolutionary in your early days, what happened? You had a series of very good ideas, like your revolutionary plans, New Democracy and all that stuff seem promising, alongside your early programs and progressive acts, like getting rid of foot binding and doing massive improvements to China's material conditions, but later on is where all the shitshow begins. You had no theoretical understanding on how to build a proper State Socialist economy (you didn't even read Das Kapital), and your incompetencies led to huge failures (combined with natural disasters), whilst you did try to solve, it was all too late. The damage has been done, but my main problem is your Maoism-Third Worldism theory, the Cultural Revolution's unnecessary violence against the elderly, the teachers, and destroying of historical artifacts, alongside supporting some of the world's worst people, like Pol Pot, Mobutu, etc., and shaking hands with Kissinger. It's a shame really, how an excellent revolutionary like you can end up being such a massive laughingstock. To conclude you up, I give you a quote by Hoxha. However, despite so, I'd pick you over capitalist dengoids and the illegitimate government of Taiwan.

"The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution was neither a revolution, nor great, nor cultural, and, in particular, not in the least Proletarian."
 * [[File:Councom.png]]
 * [[File:Demsocstar.png]]
 * [[File:Corptism.png]]
 * [[File:Keynes.png]]
 * [[File:Patcon.png]]
 * [[File:Marketsoc.png]]
 * [[File:Natbol.png]]
 * [[File:Yellsoc.png]]
 * [[File:Distributist.png]]
 * [[File:Soccorp.png]]
 * [[File:Guildsoc.png]]
 * [[File:Totalitarian.png]]

Cringe:

 * [[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]]
 * [[File:MLM.png]]
 * [[File:Mao3word.png]]
 * [[File:Antifa.png]]
 * [[File:Liberalsoc.png]]
 * [[File:Bernst.png]]
 * [[File:Libsoc.png]]
 * [[File:Synd.png]]
 * [[File:Libmarx.png]]
 * [[File:Utsoc.png]]
 * [[File:Minsocf.png]]
 * [[File:Strato.png]]
 * [[File:Geolib.png]]
 * [[File:Cdem.png]]
 * [[File:Islamic_Democracy.png]]
 * [[File:Neotech.png]]
 * [[File:Plcn2.png]]
 * [[File:Multicult.png]]
 * [[File:Monarch.png]]
 * [[File:Abmon.png]]
 * [[File:Moder.png]]
 * [[File:Statecap.png]]
 * [[File:Farm.png]]

Please just die already:

 * [[File:Euras.png]]
 * [[File:Gaccf.png]]
 * [[File:Bud.png]][[File:Christy.png]] [[File:Muslim_2.png]][[File:Hind.png]]
 * [[File:StateathFedora.png]]
 * [[File:Conservative.png]]
 * [[File:Authcap.png]]
 * [[File:Natcon.png]]
 * [[File:Authoritarian Conservatism.png]]
 * [[File:Klep.png]]
 * [[File:Ethnonat.png]]
 * [[File:Raddem.png]]
 * [[File:Socliber.png]]
 * [[File:Soccap.png]]
 * [[File:Socdem.png]]
 * [[File:Soclib.png]]
 * [[File:Altl.png]]
 * [[File:Glib.png]]
 * [[File:Mediastocracy_flair.png]]
 * [[File:Clib.png]]
 * [[File:Reactlib.png]]
 * [[File:Abmon.png]]
 * [[File:Altr.png]]
 * [[File:React.png]]
 * [[File:Moncap.png]]
 * [[File:Nalib.png]]
 * [[File:Arist.png]]
 * [[File:Oligarchy.png]]
 * [[File:Conmon.png]]

Burn in hell for eternity, retards:

 * [[File:Trot.png]]- Absolutely deserved the pick. Rip Bozo and burn in hell.
 * [[File:LeftCom.png]]- "Stalin building socialist construction to a new height and inspiring people to build revolutionary socialism bad! Sitting on your armchair, stuffing your mouth with lasagna while not doing anything apart from being dogmatic fucks good!"
 * [[File:Thar.png]] and [[File:Civlibert.png]]- I Thread on wherever I fucking like, cope. You fucks are not at all heroes, neither do you want any freedom for your people, all you want is reject all authority, want to create chaos, and serve the genocidal, neoliberal world order. "muh ebil genocidal totalitarian stalinist dictator", I'll make what Zhang Xianzhong did seem soft, pathetic fucks.
 * [[File:Lib.png]]
 * [[File:Awaj.png]]
 * [[File:Fash.png]]
 * [[File:Ego.png]]
 * [[File:Libertarian.png]]
 * [[File:Cap.png]]
 * [[File:Synclib.png]]
 * [[File:Anat.png]]
 * [[File:Ford.png]]
 * [[File:Illeg.png]]
 * [[File:Hfash.png]]
 * [[File:Nazi.png]]
 * [[File:World_Federalism2.png]]
 * [[File:World.png]]
 * [[File:Libfem.png]]
 * [[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]]
 * [[File:3way.png]]
 * [[File:Liberal_Democracy.png]]
 * [[File:Bankocracy.png]]
 * [[File:Agorismf.png]]
 * [[File:Hoppef.png]]
 * [[File:Fiscon.png]]
 * [[File:Minarchist.png]]
 * [[File:Pinkcap.png]]
 * [[File:Austrobert.png]]
 * [[File:Bhl.png]]
 * [[File:Obj.png]]
 * [[File:Neobert.png]]
 * [[File:Corp.png]]
 * [[File:Esofash.png]]
 * [[File:Imp.png]]
 * [[File:Nazcap-Hat.png]]
 * [[File:Necon.png]]
 * [[File:Darwinist.png]]
 * [[File:Statlib.png]]
 * [[File:Ford.png]]
 * [[File:Krater.png]]
 * [[File:Conlib.png]]
 * [[File:Liberalconservative.png]]
 * [[File:Ethnonat.png]]
 * [[File:Racenat.png]]
 * [[File:Confed.png]]

Avaritionism:
Regional Ideologies:
 * [[File:Avar.png]]

Very Based:

 * [[File:Orthlen.png]]- Chadimir Lenin has never done anything wrong. You are objectively one of the best things to have happened in Russian History. A brave revolutionary and the most progressive force of mankind of his era. Without your bravery and resolute struggle for your country, the world will be a dystopian hellhole. I will forever respect you, revolutionary gigachad. [[File:Gigachad.png]]
 * [[File:HoChiMinh.png]]- The trees speak Vietnamese, and Bac Ho has came to his ancestral homeland, Vietnam, paving a path for the liberation of Vietnam, and the liberation from imperialist colonizers and traitors. One of the greatest heroes and bravest men ever existed. A son of Southeast Asia's anti-imperialist struggle to liberation, a shame Vietnam after you became revisionist. Hồ Chí Minh muôn năm!
 * [[File:Afrsoc.png]]- The people of Africa is finally free from their genocidal imperialist colonizers. The people of Africa shall be victorious in their heroic fight. Salute to the people!
 * [[File:SocKem.png]]Socialist Kemalism- The original ideals of Ataturk, combined with Marxism-Leninism. Extremely based. This is the future for Turkey which I want.
 * [[File:3princ.png]]- You were one of the most based people of your time. Embracing Socialism and it's leftist ideas and tried to apply to China, Nationalistic, Anti-Imperialist, Anti-Capitalist, and later on in your life embracing Leninist Communism too is also very good. You were the hero of my motherland. Dr. Sun's legacy will never die. If you lived longer, the butcher, Chiang Kai Shek will be gone, and China would've been an actual genuine socialist country.
 * [[File:LeftKMT.png]]- The future which Dr. Sun wants. Keep coping, rightoids. The real Kuomintang is the Left-Wing of the Kuomintang. Your [[File:RevLeftKMT.png]] modern variant is too friendly to Dengoids though, but otherwise, there is no problem. [[File:Gigachad.png]]

Based:

 * [[File:Juche.png]]- Kim Il Sung is the eternal sun and the forever respected People's Leader and hero for the Korean nation. Immense respect to Generalissimo Kim Il Sung! However, Juche became shit after the cold war. quite a shame.
 * [[File:Guevara.png]]- An icon of the people's movements in Latin America. A people's hero and rebel. I've always admired you and I never will stop admire you. Che Guevara, the hero of the people.
 * [[File:Hujintao.png]]Scientific Outlook on Development- The most tolerable Revisionist and the best Paramount leader of China. Turned the revisionist CPC into a socialist party, had strong 10-year economic boom, handled Tibet and attempted Color revolutions well, living standards increased, massive reduction of poverty, extremely based social policies, took a strong hand against DPP neoliberals and kleptocrats (although it's a shame how Jiang blocked your more leftist policies), had good handling of the 2008 olympics and the Shanghai expo, got rid of that pest Liu Xiaobo, drawing away from kleptocrat Putin, supporting a revival of Socialism and Tridemism, among all other based policies, what else can I say but [[File:Gigachad.png]]? My only problem with you is not being radical enough in economics and the influence of Jiang and his cronies are still at large (even if that toad forced you down and blocked a lot of your more radical policies)
 * [[File:Castro.png]]- The People's Hero of Cuba. Fought bravely against Atlanticism, supported Revolutionary and anti-colonial third worldist movements worldwide, had extremely based domestic policies when it comes to supporting Cuba, same for your social policies, I will forever support your continued struggle against the American and Western imperialists. Those that deny Castro is an imperialist. Castro never did anything wrong. Gusanos (prostitutes for imperialists) can cope and seethe, but still, you do have one or two flaws that prevent me from completely liking you.
 * [[File:Bolivarism.png]]- Gran Colombia should be realized in the hearts of all the people of South America, one of the true heroes in the fight against colonialism.
 * [[File:Sukarno.png]]- Non-Marxist Socialism is cringe, but I can make an exception for this. Sukarno's achievements are one of the most glorious in history.
 * [[File:ClassicalKemalism.png]]- Whilst you do have some points which I don't like, and that modern day Kemalism has been utterly corrupted due to how much a pile of rubbish Turkish politics were, original Kemalism has done tremendous efforts to modernize and progress was brought to Turkey under Ataturk's rule. Overall, there are still room for improvement, but still good.
 * [[File:Buddhist_Socialism.png]]- The Dalai Lama is cringe and barely even 'socialist', but otherwise very good.
 * [[File:Ghandi.png]]- Peaceful Revolution is too soft, and that Agarianism is not a viable way to properly build a modern Socialist state, but Gandhi should be saluted as the hero of India.
 * [[File:Islamic_Socialism.png]]- Similar to Buddhist Socialism, but Islamic.
 * [[File:Long.png]]- One of the best figures in American History. Huey Long Dong is the top choice for all Americans who love their country.
 * [[File:RevLeftKMT.png]]- Too revisionist and chummy with the Dengoids, but otherwise, I can go with this. Just go back to Left-Tridemism and oppose Dengoid revisionism.
 * [[File:Lincolnism.png]]
 * [[File:Malenkov.png]]
 * [[File:Yugoslav_Partisans.png]]


 * [[File:Evo.png]]

Basedish:

 * [[File:Christcom.png]]
 * [[File:Absoc.png]]
 * [[File:Nguyễn_Phú_Trọng.png]]
 * [[File:Chiang-Wei-Shui_icon.png]]
 * [[File:Pron.png]]
 * [[File:Chiang-Ching-kuo.png]]
 * [[File:Mandelaism.png]]
 * [[File:Bundis.png]]
 * [[File:Zapa.png]]
 * [[File:LeftPeronism.png]]
 * [[File:XiJinpingThoughtf.png]]Xi Jinping Thought- Before I start with the bad things about you, I'll start with the more positive aspects of you, socially, you are very based, as you are exceptionally harsh on cultural liberalism and other degeneracies, alongside with purging a lot of corruption and getting rid of a lot of Jiang cronies, and domestically, you eradicated extreme poverty, continued economic growth, outlawed 996 and purged a lot of capitalists, while also having a lot of solid, promising plans for China, and foreignwise, you're decent, and I especially liked your policy to Taiwan and the West, alongside with your handling of issues in Xinjiang (even if a little too far), and even if there are some areas I criticize, like the South China Sea affair and the Belt and Road initiative (partially), and also not being far enough on economics (but similar to Hu, you had to get rid of Jiang's influence), along with allying with some billionaires, not being harsh enough on these fucks, etc. Still overall good and I'd always prefer Xi over any Western leader, better than 90% of revisionists, but there is still room for improvement, start with taking the ML pill, maybe?
 * [[File:Getulism.png]]Getulism
 * [[File:CBall-Peru-militaryhat.png]]Juan Velasco Thought
 * [[File:KPThought.png]]
 * [[File:HuaGuofeng.png]]
 * [[File:Gaddafi.png]]
 * [[File:Allende.png]]
 * [[File:Cardenas.png]]
 * [[File:Francis.png]]
 * [[File:BenChifley.png]]
 * [[File:Taraki.png]]

Neutral:

 * [[File:Triequism2.png]]
 * [[File:Khama.png]]
 * [[File:Sanacja.png]]
 * [[File:JapCom.png]]
 * [[File:Najibullah.png]]
 * [[File:Panc.png]]
 * [[File:Honecker.png]]
 * [[File:Goulash.png]]
 * [[File:FDRismF.png]]
 * [[File:NatProg.png]]
 * [[File:Baath.png]]
 * [[File:Taiwan_People%27s_Party.png]]
 * [[File:BoXilai.png]]
 * [[File:Jeffersondem2.png]]
 * [[File:Pahlavi.png]]
 * [[File:Jaruzelski.png]]
 * [[File:PAP(Singapore).png]]
 * [[File:Nehru.png]]
 * [[File:Andropov.png]]
 * [[File:FLN.png]]
 * [[File:Yugonostalgiaism.png]]
 * [[File:Cball-DRAfghanistan.png]]
 * [[File:ItalianResistance.png]]
 * [[File:CDSP.png]]
 * [[File:GoughWhitlam.png]]

Cringish:

 * [[File:Hushih.png]]
 * [[File:Jacobin.png]]
 * [[File:Chavismo.png]]
 * [[File:ChenDuxiu.png]]
 * [[File:Bism.png]]
 * [[File:Lukash.png]]
 * [[File:Nagy3.png]]
 * [[File:Huhanmin.png]]
 * [[File:Huism.png]]
 * [[File:Swhf.png]]
 * [[File:TodorZhivkov.png]]
 * [[File:NicolaeCeaușescu.png]]
 * [[File:CHNNeocon.png]]
 * [[File:Nazarbayev.png]]
 * [[File:Mahathir.png]]
 * [[File:Lula.png]]
 * [[File:HongKongPro-BeijingCamp.png]]
 * [[File:USASolidarity.png]]
 * [[File:Alia.png]]
 * [[File:Zyu.png]]

Cringe:

 * [[File:Đổi_Mới.png]]
 * [[File:Venizelos.png]]
 * [[File:Khrusch.png]]
 * [[File:Dengf.png]]- You. Fucking. Ruined. Everything. Opportunistic, Capitaloid scum. You are a State Capitalist hidden behind a Socialist mask. Whilst I get that the reforms were kind of necessary to save China from the chaos in the Cultural Revolution, you turned China into a social imperialist, capitalist, corrupt dictatorship. Hell, you allied with the West too, and you didn't do anything about the factionalism in the party under you, and the massive drop in worker's rights all because of that "line go up" bullshit. Honestly, Deng Xiaoping is just a laughable figure. "The People's Billionaires", "The People's Sweatshops", "The People's Exploitation", there's so much I could do to slander you, revisionist fuck. Xi moving away from what you implemented is a fucking good thing. Keep coping, revisionists.
 * [[File:LibKemSmall.png]]
 * [[File:ConKemal.png]]
 * [[File:ClementAttlee.png]]Attlee Socialism
 * [[File:LibleftKem.png]]
 * [[File:RightKMT.png]]
 * [[File:RevRightKMT.png]]
 * [[File:3princLib.png]]
 * [[File:Eurocom.png]]
 * [[File:Pahlavi.png]]
 * [[File:Gaullismicon2.png]]
 * [[File:Metaxi.png]]
 * [[File:Strasser.png]]
 * [[File:Nordmodel.png]]
 * [[File:Orlib.png]]
 * [[File:Dijlas2.png]]
 * [[File:Bonaparte.png]]
 * [[File:Trumpism.png]]
 * [[File:ParkChungHee.png]]
 * [[File:Ausfash.png]]
 * [[File:Tito.png]]
 * [[File:Demsocstar.png]]
 * [[File:Onenatcon.png]]
 * [[File:AnTory.png]]
 * [[File:LeeTengHui.png]]
 * [[File:ALP.png]]
 * [[File:Kaczysmf.png]]
 * [[File:Kochikai.png]]
 * [[File:FIDESZ.png]]
 * [[File:MarineLePen.png]]
 * [[File:INC.png]]
 * [[File:OneNatFem.png]]
 * [[File:Obamium.png]]
 * [[File:YeshAtid.png]]

Please just die already:

 * [[File:ChiangKaiShek.png]]
 * [[File:Hamiltonianism.png]]
 * [[File:Right-Panc.png]]
 * [[File:Mug.png]]
 * [[File:Fashkemal.png]]
 * [[File:Zio.png]]
 * [[File:BritFash.png]]
 * [[File:LêDuẩn.png]]
 * [[File:NguyễnTấnDũng.png]]
 * [[File:ThreeRepresents.png]][[File:Jiangism.png]]Three Represents- You are the worst leader to ever come from the PRC. Economic growth came at the expense of the workers rights, extremely corrupt and cronyist (and later you blocked the Socialist policies of Hu and Xi), allying with Yeltsin and Milosevic, demolished whatever welfare system there is left in China, and effectively turned China into this corrupt capitalist dictatorship. Yeah, screw you, toad. "I did it for the workers" you say, huh? So are you going to talk about the "People's Billionaires", the "People's Mega-Corporations" and shit? The only good thing about you is getting HK and Macao back, Anti-Atlanticist (although you allied with Yeltsin and Milosevic, which I am kind of discrediting) alongside getting rid of the Falun Gong.
 * [[File:Hun.png]]
 * [[File:Shinto_Theocracy.png]]
 * [[File:Gorb.png]]
 * [[File:LDP(Japan).png]]Japanese Liberal Democracy
 * [[File:Korwinism-Pikselart.png]]
 * [[File:Wałęsa.png]]
 * [[File:Bidenism.png]]
 * [[File:Hindutva.png]]
 * [[File:Jacksonian_Democracy.png]]
 * [[File:Ottoman.png]]
 * [[File:Franco.png]]
 * [[File:French_Fascism.png]]
 * [[File:Fujimori.png]]
 * [[File:DemocratParty.png]]
 * [[File:FarRightTridem.png]]Far-right Tridemism
 * [[File:Evren.png]]
 * [[File:RightPeronism.png]]
 * [[File:MHP.png]]
 * [[File:China-blueshirt.png]]
 * [[File:Putin.png]]Putinism
 * [[File:Dsa.png]]
 * [[File:PRI.png]]
 * [[File:Mlmg.png]]
 * [[File:Kaypakkaya.png]]
 * [[File:Demcon.png]]
 * [[File:NajibRazak.png]]
 * [[File:Bolsonarism_-_alt.png]]
 * [[File:Zelensky.png]]Zelenskyism
 * [[File:Husák.png]]
 * [[File:LiberalParty.png]]
 * [[File:RepubUS.png]]
 * [[File:Con-t.png]]
 * [[File:UKLab.png]]
 * [[File:CDU_Party.png]]
 * [[File:Cball-FSA.png]]
 * [[File:SDAicon.png]]
 * [[File:Alternative_for_germany_ball.png]]
 * [[File:Tudman.png]]
 * [[File:TrudeauLib.png]]
 * [[File:Macron.png]]
 * [[File:Cameronism.png]]
 * [[File:BoJo.png]]
 * [[File:Clinton.png]]
 * [[File:New_Labourism.png]]

Burn in hell forever, retards:

 * [[File:Polpot.png]]
 * [[File:Ethcac.png]]
 * [[File:HKDem_icon.png]]Hong Kong Democratism
 * [[File:Grey-Wolves-icon-pcb.png]]
 * [[File:Tsar2.png]]
 * [[File:Wang_Jingwei.png]]
 * [[File:Burmasoc.png]]
 * [[File:Suharto.png]]
 * [[File:Antijap.png]]
 * [[File:Ittihad.png]]
 * [[File:Hutupower.png]]
 * [[File:Jihad.png]]
 * [[File:Khom.png]]
 * [[File:Legion.png]]
 * [[File:Milosevic.png]]
 * [[File:Ustase.png]]
 * [[File:Mobutism.png]]
 * [[File:Persondignity.png]]
 * [[File:Thatcher.png]]
 * [[File:DPP-Taiwan.png]]
 * [[File:Reagan.png]]
 * [[File:Pinochet-hat.png]]
 * [[File:BlackHundred.png]]
 * [[File:Ilminism.png]]
 * [[File:Kahan.png]]
 * [[File:Showa-kanmuri.png]]
 * [[File:Churchill.png]]Churchillism
 * [[File:Woodrow.png]]
 * [[File:Falun_Gong_Theo.png]]Falun Gong Theocracy
 * [[File:Kishi.png]]
 * [[File:Yeltsin.png]]
 * [[File:People%27s_Power_(TW).png]]
 * [[File:LiuXiaobo.png]]
 * [[File:HenryKissinger.png]]
 * [[File:Autista.png]]
 * [[File:McCarthy.png]]
 * [[File:UPA.png]]
 * [[File:Kashgar.png]]
 * [[File:4thReichEU.png]]
 * [[File:Demcr.png]]
 * [[File:Karadzic.png]]

You get your own tier Joshua Wong:
Anti-Ideologies:
 * [[File:JoshuaWong.png]]

Very Based:

 * [[File:Anticap.png]]Anti-Capitalism- Capitalism is a system based of exploitation, greed, murder, and genocide. Want examples? Compare the planned economy of Belarus and the capitalist economy of Russia during the early 1990s.
 * [[File:AntiNeoLib.png]]Anti-Neoliberalism- Neoliberalism is a poisonous, genocidal ideology that on all costs should be destroyed.
 * [[File:AntiLibIcon.png]]Anti-Liberalism- Everything I stand for. Liberals belong in the same pit that Fascists do.
 * [[File:Antiimp.png]]Anti-Imperialism- Imperialism is the ultimate face of all evil. "but muh good imperialism as long as it furthers our interests and hegemony!!!!🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓"
 * [[File:Anti-Colonial.png]]Anti-Colonialism- Long live the anti-colonial heroes that stood up against Imperialism
 * [[File:AntiAtlantic.png]]Anti-Atlanticism- Atlanticoids are genocidal. Enough said.
 * [[File:Euroscept.png]]Euroskepticism- Death to the EU 4th Reich
 * [[File:Antiwest.png]]Anti-West- Yes. The West is the objective biggest evil on earth right now. They are everything that is wrong with humanity.
 * [[File:Anti-Elitism.png]]Anti-Elitism- The Capitalist Elite deserves to die.
 * [[File:AntiAnarchy.png]]Anti-Anarchism- Without the state and the nation, you are nothing. Cope.
 * [[File:Trustbust.png]]Trust Busting- Filthy corpcucks, billionaires, etc do not deserve the right to exist.
 * [[File:Anti_Cultext.png]]Anti-Cultural Extremism-Both extremes of the Cultural Spectrum are the exact same shit.
 * [[File:AntiLibert.png]]Anti-Libertarianism- The only good thing about Lolberts is that they are anti-imperialist, nothing else.
 * [[File:Anti-Corrupt.png]]Anti-Corruption- Long live the Anti-Corruption campaign by Chairman Xi!
 * [[File:Trustbust.png]]Anti-Corporatocracy- Death to the exploitative corpcucks!
 * [[File:AntiAusterity.png]] Anti-Austerity- The only thing that fiscons conserve is the greed and the wealth of the rich.
 * [[File:Antianticom.png]]Anti-Anti-Communism- Anti-Communism is one of the most evil anti-ideologies ever created, and it just proves that you hate the workers, you hate the common people if you are an anti-communist, and a counter-revolutionary ideology. Anticoms and Fashoids belong in the same pit.
 * [[File:LeftAntiSocdem.png]]Left Anti-Social Democracy- You hate Social Democracy because it's "socialist", but I hate it because it is Capitalist. No matter how much sugarcoating you can put on capitalism and the system, it doesn't change the fact that Succdems are counterrevolutionary, borgeoise simping puppets.

Based:

 * [[File:Anti-Racism.png]]Anti-Racism- All races and people of all origins are equal
 * [[File:Antiporn.png]] Anti-Porn- Porn is a disgusting cancer that corrodes society into degeneracy.
 * [[File:AntiIndiv.png]]Anti-Individualism- Individualism should be fought against at all costs.
 * [[File:Anti-Globalism.png]]Anti-Globalism- Death to the Antichrist! I believe in Internationalism, but fuck Globalism. Death to all Globetards.
 * [[File:Antizion.png]]Anti-Zionism- Death to Israel. Note, Being against the Zionist state doesn't equate to hating Jews.
 * [[File:Anti-Revisionism.png]]Anti-Revisionism- Khrushchev is gay and so is most other revisionists, and fuck them for deviating from Marxism Leninism and causing the fall of the Communist bloc.

Basedish:

 * [[File:Antisjw.png]]Anti-Wokeism- Wokes aren't true progressives. They are actively causing the demise of Western Society. Although a lot of you tend to be supportive of Rightoid Idpol.
 * [[File:Prolife.png]]Anti-Abortion- Abortion is murder. Although with that said, I would try to prevent abortions, rather than do nothing about the reason that causes abortions, like helping poor mothers with their socioeconomic conditions. It's better to cut the root of the problem.
 * [[File:Antifash2.png]]Anti-Fascism- I despise Antifa but in World War 2, killing fashoids are based as always. Although, thanks to liberals and the neoliberals controlling the overton window, the term "fascist", "extremist" have been used as a strawman term to describe anything liberals don't like.

Neutral:

 * [[File:AntiAm.png]]Anti-Americanism- The evil American empire shall be dismantled and rebuilt again. I hate sounding like a Khomeinite but he's right about America being the "Great Satan" However, I don't literally support anything anti-USA and neither do I hate their people, but yeah, the US government is pure evil.
 * [[File:AntiPutinism.png]]Anti-Putinism- You are a shame to the international anti-atlanticist movement. You are another corrupt, right wing capitalist oligarch that bring shame to your country and people. But, what is shameful is how many of you tend to be Atlanticoids, but yeah, fuck Putin.
 * [[File:Antimon.png]]Anti-Monarchism- I hate monarchism but if some countries want to keep it due to tradition it's understandable.
 * [[File:Homophobia.png]][[File:Transphobia.png]]Anti-LGBTQ- I have nothing against them as people but their community is absolutely abhorrent, and I despise woke culture. Note, I'm against their flamboyance, against pride, and such, but I have nothing against them as people.
 * [[File:Sinophobia.png]]Anti-Dengism- While I get that China is a revisionist country especially under Deng and Jiang and China under them is anything but Socialist, China has been recently veering back on the right path under Hu and Xi abeit there still being room of improvement. Plus, I believe the CPC should still remain in power to serve as an Anti-Atlanticist stronghold. Plus, it's horrible how many of you are anti-auths, imperialists, westoid atlanticist simps, neoliberals, and so on. But either way, I hate people who defend the Dengoid reform as "socialist" and the "People's Sweatshops", "People's Billionaires", "People's Imperialism"🤓🤓🤓
 * [[File:AntiMaoid.png]]Anti-Maoism- While kind of similar to the above, I do not deny Mao made terrible mistakes in his rule, which led to catastrophe and chaos, same with being chummy with Kissinger, and later US backed tyrants in the late parts of his rule. One must not deny the contributions Mao Zedong had done to China and the International Communist Movement as a whole, plus, while I don't like Maoists, especially people like Guzman, Kaypakkaya, Sison and Shigenobu, many Anti-Maoists tend to be Chiangoids, Western Liberals and Imperialists, Antiauths, reactionary feudalists, or Dengoids, which is concerning at best, outright revolting at worst.
 * [[File:Anti-Isolationism.png]]Anti-Isolationism- I'm heavily against Globalism, and I won't get involved unless necessary, but I'm not for full on Isolationism either.
 * [[File:Antieast.png]] Anti-East- Of course social imperialism is terrible, but the fact that most of you tend to be Atlanticoids is disgusting. But either way, I love to shitpost about the invasion of Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Afghanistan, the Vietnamese imperialism against Laos and the Chinese belt and road as "The People's Imperialism", and those that defend those I mentioned are not socialists, "but muh good imperialism!!!! 🤓🤓🤓"

Cringe:

 * [[File:Anti-antirevision.png]]Anti-Anti-Revisionism- I agree not all revisionists (like Castro, Honecker, and Ho for example) are not bad, but this is just outright terrible. Simping for Social Imperialists (like Tito), and you'd rather them over some of the most progressive figures in history (like Hoxha and Stalin) is just outright proving how you Pro-Revisionists are pathetic.

YOU SHOULD KYS NOW:

 * [[File:AntiRussia.png]]Anti-Russia- I love Russia and Russian People but I'm against Putin, plus, I hate Russophobes and I see Russians as my brothers. I don't even like the Russian Government, but how many of you tend to be brainwashed by neoliberal media to hate any Russian regardless is just terrible.
 * [[File:Sinophobia.png]]Sinophobia- Cope and Seethe we're just automatically better than you. Sinophobes are jealous of our glorious 5000 year culture and the achievements we brought to the human race. Us, the Chinese are infinitely better than you Anti-China fucks.
 * [[File:Anticom.png]]Anti-Communism- Infantile Disorder with it's roots from fascism and imperialism. Anti-Communists are nothing apart from clowns, and fascist imperialists in denial. All Anti-Communists deserve to die as much as their fascist and imperialist daddies.
 * [[File:LeftAntiCom.png]] Left Anti-Communism- A true leftist cannot be an Anti-Communist. Plus, you're just about the same shit as the above. Anti-Communism is a disorder. "um akshually socialists can be anti-communists too 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓" shut the fuck up you're either a Socialist or someone with an infantile disorder (anti-communists)
 * [[File:Antisoc.png]]Anti-Socialism- Same as Anti-Communism except even worse. Those that are anti-communist and anti-socialist hate the people. Enough is said.
 * [[File:Thar.png]]Anti-Authoritarianism- You are worth nothing. You serve zero purpose. Get out of my face, Kill yourself. These Liberal fucks are everything I'm against. Authoritarianism is necessary for like, every single ideology to function??? Plus, let's not forget how many of you suck off Western Imperialists and the incoming Neoliberal dystopia.
 * [[File:AnEn.png]] Anti-Environmentalism- The Environment has to be preserved.
 * [[File:AntiNation.png]]Anti-Nationalism- Pathetic fucks. If you hate your country, your identity so much, why don't you commit suicide and hope to be born somewhere else then?
 * [[File:Anti-Stalin.png]]Anti-Stalinism- Those that deny Stalin's achievenments and Stalin's role in the liberation of millions and billions of people are either revisionist, capitalist, or an imperialist. Stalin worked for genuine worker's liberation, and that the USSR under him was a genuine People's Democracy. Stalin is a loyal pupli of Marx and Lenin. "um but akshually he's audoridarian and he isn't a liberal so he isn't a socialist"🤓🤓🤓
 * [[File:AntiNazbol.png]]Anti-Nazbol- I don't even like Nazbols (as they are larp) but this is just outright liberal seething. Keep coping Liberals.
 * [[File:Anti-Semitic.png]]Anti-Semetism- "muh judeo bolshevism jews control the world and are the antichrist 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓" I hate the state of Israel, but hating Jews as a whole is bad.
 * [[File:Anti-Marx.png]] Anti-Marxism- Why is there another page for Reactionarism here?
 * [[File:Anti-ML.png]] Anti-Marxism-Leninism- Throughout the existence of Marxism-Leninism ever since Stalin formulated the ideology, it has brought humanity forward against capitalism, liberalism and all other reactionary forces. Those that deny the role of Marxism-Leninism in the betterment of humanity is inherently reactionary.

You get your own tier:

 * [[File:Anti-SecondWorldism.png]] Anti-Third Worldism- I will fucking find you, kill you, burn your house down, and eat whatever is left of you up, Imperialist fuck. Those that use the logic "muh the third world is backwards hence why the West has the right to imperialize them and genocide them", congratulations. You just proved that you are an evil, genocidal imperialist who do not see the people of the third world as human beings. Kill yourself.

Philosophy:

Very Based:

 * [[File:Community.png]]- Without community and society, humans would've been a failed species. Likewise, Socialists care more about community, as it is the backbone of human society.
 * [[File:Utility.png]]Utilitarianism- Supporting well being is based.
 * [[File:Equality.png]]Egalitarianism- Equality is based, as people should have the same opportunities, and all these "upper-class", "lower-class" nonsense should be abolished. Cope and seethe, Capitaloids.
 * [[File:Paternalism.png]]Paternalism- A role model to guide the people to walk the positive path is needed, and that is a fact.
 * [[File:Legalism.png]]- One of the best Chinese philosophies ever created, Like Paternalism but stricter, and I don't at all see a problem with that.
 * [[File:Virtue_ethics_icon.png]]Virtue Ethics- To be a good person, one has to have virtue.
 * [[File:Col.png]]Collectivism- Collectivism is good, I don't support Hive Mind Collectivism, but humans are a collective species.

Based:

 * [[File:Humanismpix.png]]Humanism- Upholding Humanity is good, but sometimes you tend to be too liberal.
 * [[File:Moralism-icon.png]]Moralism- Morals are definitely good, that's for sure, but at times, we have to pragmatically approach things.

Basedish:

 * [[File:Mach.png]]- I understand we need to be pragmatic at times when we approach things, but Opportunism isn't, plus, some of your adherents, like Kissinger, literally disregard basic morality. Still overall good though.

Cringe:

 * [[File:Indiv.png]]Individualism-"Everything should be left to the Individual"!!!!!!!!!! You fucks are the main reason why there are so many arrogant, selfish assholes still roaming on earth. Individualism leads to chaos. Period. Borgeoise Philosophy, I don't get why anyone will follow this.

Absolute fucking worst:

 * [[File:Nihil.png]]Nihilism- This has to be the most laughable philosophy out there. Those that follow this are edgy teens who want to show how depressed they are. Seek fucking help, dammit.
 * [[File:Ego.png]]- "oH?! bAsIc MoRaLiTy??? ThAt'S a SpOoK!!!!! lEt Me Be An AbSoLuTe AsS bEcAuSe It PlEaSeS mY eGo!!!!!!!!" Kill yourself. Honestly.
 * [[File:Hedonism-cloud.png]]Hedonism- There is no problem with seeking pleasure, but this is just outright disgusting. Permissive society is cringe, plus, none of you Hedonists have any morals, you fucks are the kind that will rape people, do crime, and exploit others because of your so called "Pleasure" outright disgusting.

Anime:

Goated:

 * The Quintessential Quintuplets - This is by far the anime that I enjoyed the most, it is beautiful in every single way, the chemistry between the MC and the Quintuplet sisters is both amusing and lovely. Unlike the average Romcom anime, this anime brings it to a new level. One of the most underrated shows of all time, and I'd definitely hard recommend this. This anime belongs in a special place in my heart.

Must Watch:

 * Fate Series
 * Chainsaw Man
 * Re:Zero
 * Konosuba
 * Attack on Titan
 * Toradora
 * Kaguya Sama: Love is War
 * Horimiya
 * Steins Gate
 * Sword Art Online
 * No Game no Life
 * Bungo Stray Dogs
 * Tokyo Revengers
 * Bunny Girl Senpai
 * Classroom of the Elite
 * Your Name
 * Arknights
 * Dragon Maid
 * Assassination Classroom
 * That time I got reincarnated as a slime
 * Legend of the Shield Hero
 * Erased
 * My Dress Up Darling
 * Oregairu
 * The Detective Is Already Dead
 * Spy x Family
 * Code Geass
 * Death Note
 * Saiki K.
 * Cyberpunk: Edgerunners
 * Komi-San
 * Mushoku Tensei
 * Toilet Bound Hanako-kun

Good:

 * Rent a Girlfriend
 * Macross
 * Teasing Master Takagi San
 * Demon Slayer
 * Chunibyo
 * Senko San
 * Tonikawa
 * My Hero Academia
 * Monogatari
 * Overlord
 * Darling in the Franxx
 * Date A Live
 * Violet Evergarden
 * The Irregular at Magic High School
 * Food Wars
 * Kakegurui
 * Higehiro
 * I want to eat your pancreas
 * One Punch Man
 * Nagatoro
 * Blue Period

Neutral:

 * Net Juu no Susume
 * The Promised Neverland
 * Cells at Work
 * Azur Lane
 * Blend S
 * Watashi ga Tenshi ga Maiorita
 * Love Lab

Not that Good:

 * Imouto Sae ireba ii

Boku no Pico:

 * Boku no Pico- Why the fuck does this even exist?



Political Figures:
The Best:

Asia and Oceania:

 * Inejiro Asanuma  (99/100)- You do not deserve to be killed. If you were still here, East Asia will be Red and the West will have no place here. Plus, you're one of the few genuine revolutionary Socialists in the JCP, very based.
 * Kyuichi Tokuda  (96/100)- Spoke out against Hideki's vicious rule, fought against the US-backed Japanese puppet government and contributed to the fall of Nobusuke Kishi Indirectly. Based. You also one of the only genuine revolutionaries in the JCP, dedicating to serve your people and freeing your country, one day, the winds of history will come, and you will be the leader and hero for the people of Japan.
 * Choe Yong Gon (97/100)- North Korean Peng Dehuai/Zhu De. True gigachad.
 * Sun Yat Sen  (infinite/100)- Father of Modern China freeing China from the chains of Feudalism and aiming to liberate the Chinese people from being bullied by the Western powers. If it weren't for him China would be a feudal backwards hellhole. He is a hero aiming to unify the Chinese nation, and his ideas of Democracy, Nationalism and Social Welfare are Uberbased. 孙中山革命江山永不倒！You were a hero of your time, Dr. Sun. I will forever respect you.
 * Soong Ching Ling (95/100)- A true great woman. Fought the revolution with Sun Yat Sen, see how the KMT degraded into scum under Chiang, and proceed to join the new liberators of China, that being the CPC. Plus, you oppsed the Cultural Revolution later in your life, very based.
 * Zhou Enlai (infinite/100)-Premier Zhou is the one that did the most contributions to make China a respected country. If he were to take power instead of Mao, China would be rising much faster and China would be doing billions of times better than the modern day revisionist CPC.
 * Peng Dehuai (99/100)- The head general of the Chinese people fighting against the Japs, the KMT, and the Imperialists in Korea. He is dedicated to make China an internationally respected Proletariat State freeing the people of the world from the chains of Imperialism.
 * Zhu De (99/100)- Same as above.
 * Wang Dongxing (98/100)- Purged the Gang of Four, helped to end the Cultural Revolution, yet critical of the economic reforms and revisionism, yet also criticising the Capitalist mindset. What else can I say except based? Too loyal to Mao even if you opposed the Red Guards personally but your good makes up for all.
 * Ho Chi Minh (infinite/100)- Hero and an inspiration of global anti-imperialism. Fought a bloody war to free his people from the Japs, the French, the Americans as well as the National Traitors and had a positive view on economy, he was just unable to put it in place. He is Vietnam's Sun Yat Sen. Bac Ho forever deserves my respect. No leader has more balls than you. My eternal respects go to Uncle Ho. You never did anything wrong.
 * Vo Nguyen Giap (100/100)- Long live your victory in the battle in Dien Bien, and that is a symbol of humanity and the people's victory against evil.
 * Jose Rizal (98/100)- Gigabased man who wanted to free the Philippines and build the Philippines a great republic similar to how Sun Yat Sen and Sukarno did. You're a martyr and a hero in the cause against Imperialism.
 * Shibdas Ghosh (96/100)- One of the most heroic people of all time. Extermely based ideology and anti-imperialism, same with your Marxism-Leninism. Long live Comrade Ghosh!

Middle East:

 * Sevket Sureyya Aydemir  (100/100)- If only you won power in Turkey, combining with Turkish Nationalism and Marxism Leninism. I don't see any flaws in you. Incredibly based.
 * Dogan Avcioglu (100/100)- Incredibly based, just like the above. The Left-Kemalists of Turkey who defended Ataturk and tried to combine Marxism-Leninism, just like Liao Zhongkai and Li Dazhao. Incredible respect.

Africa:

 * Emir Abdelkader (98/100)- Algerian Sun Yat Sen, need I say more? Promoted unity among Christians, united the Country, and bravely fought the French. What else apart from based?
 * Thomas Sankara (100/100)- You can't tell me this man isn't based. You just can't. Kicked out the French imperialists, Made neoliberal westerners cope and seethe, built his country from scratch, vaccinated millions of children, lifted a lot of people out of poverty, purged corrupt officials, improved healthcare and education, and outlawed genital mutilation, polygamy, and child marriage. You also lived a simple life instead of living luxuriously. This man is the greatest person that Africa has produced, and one of the best people humanity has made. He is flawless (well, kind of since Anti-Stalinism is the only cringe thing about you, but otherwise you're one of the best).
 * Kwame Nkrumah (96/100)- Led Ghana into the path of Socialism, Nationalism, and anti-imperialism, led the global fight against colonialism and you are just overall, a hero for the liberation of Africa from the claws of the Imperialists. But you're too moderate for my liking.

Europe:

 * Georgi Dimitrov (100/100)- The very face of Prolettariat Internationalism (the based kind, not Globalism), also, kudos to how you resisted Tito's attempts to imperialize Bulgaria. Your legacies are very much appreciated in Bulgaria today, and much of Modern Bulgaria's infrastructures and things they enjoy cannot be without you. Incredibly based.
 * Valko Chervenkov (100/100)- Your rapid industrialization, anti-fascist fight, collectivization and such policies did a lot of good for Bulgaria. One of the best of Communist Eastern Europe. Infinite respect goes to you.
 * Gheorghe Georgiu Dej (97/100)- You helped free Romania from the Nazis, Industrialized Romania and had positive policies like how Chervenkov did for Bulgaria, and pushed for a independent path for Romania and almost the main person for National Communism. What else can I say apart from  ? My only problem with you is the Sov-Rom companies affair though, otherwise you're flawless. One of the best of all the early Communist leaders of Eastern Europe.
 * Andrija Hebrang (98/100)- Followed firm to the communist line, played a major role in industrializing Yugoslvia, promoted racial unity and ethnic brotherhood (until revisionist motherfucker Tito stole all your credit), and helped to chase out the fashoid scum. What else can I say but based? One of the genuinely true socialists from the SFRY.
 * Klement Gottwald (96/100)- You did good by fighting Nazism in Czechoslovakia, Nationalizing key industries, and did good solving socioeconomic issues between Czechs and Slovaks. The best leader of Communist Czechoslovakia, that is absolutely for sure. Plus, the economy of Czechoslovakia saw huge improvements and industrializations under you. The hero of Czechoslovakia.
 * Vladimir Lenin (infinite/100)- great job overthrowing the Tsarist regime, ending Russia from being an imperialist power that genocides people and starved peasants, great job bringing the necessary social changes to Russia that empowered the poor, peasants and women, and your New Economic Policy and everything you did for Russia is positive. You paved way for a great Russia. My strongest respects go to you. Barely anyone can reach how much of a gigachad you were. A great force for humanity, arguably the bravest Revolutionary in history.
 * Joseph Stalin (100/100)- Recently I've been wondering where to put you, since on one hand, you charted down one of the greatest ideologies that saw the liberation of billions from Imperialism, Fascism and Colonialism. You single-handedly had projects that turned industrialization that took the rest of Europe 200 years to do and achieved it in like two decades, helped industrialize Eastern Europe, getting rid of Nazi Germany, and your social and cultural policies were very based, but I dislike the Turkish Straits crisis (even if Molotov was more at fault for that one) and some of your distrust towards China (even then the solution you proposed wasn’t as bad either), same with the excess civilian deaths in some of your purges, while I get that a revolution can never be peaceful and people would die, you did take it too far in that aspect (though Yezhov is more at fault and he got rightfully punished for it) even if the capitalists, traitors and those who tried to sabotage the Socialist Revolution and your rule deserved it, but that's about it for your case. But thank you for being an inspiration for Marxism Leninism and being an idol for many socialist movements. You are one of the people which are overly demonized wrongly. But, I believe, the winds of history will change, and soon, you will be seen as a hero. Either way, everything you represent is all that I support. Slava Stalin!
 * Mikhail Borodin (100/100)- An international friend of ours, supported the Kuomintang revolution and the Kemalist revolution, helped them set path towards anti-imperialism, socialism, and such, and also helped to fight against warlords and imperialists. What else can I say but based? Stalin was wrong to purge you.
 * Vasily Blyukher (100/100)- Backing Chiang is cringe (even if you supported him since he was an actual left tridemist back then, shame he became one of the worst figures in Chinese history) but you did it to support us to Unite the North and get rid of the warlords. Helped us in establishing Tridemism in China too. Incredibly based, and an ML too making it even better. Like Borodin, Stalin shouldn't have god rid of you.
 * Karl Marx (infinite/100)- Your ideals are great and inspired socialism and the fight against the genocidal, murderous capitalist status quo. Your ideologies and theories inspired billions of people to fight colonialism, monarchism, imperialism and exploitative capitalism. based.
 * Frederick Engels (infinite/100)- Same as above
 * Francois Noel Babeuf (96/100)- Marx before Marx himself. You are the biggest force of progress during your time. You had solid ideas that echoed into what became known as communism, worker’s rights, progressive taxation, egalitarianism, all of these were extremely based. I can barely find flaws with you.
 * James Connolly (100/100)- Your vision of a Free Irish Republic will be realized, a true hero.

North America:

 * Jose Marti (98/100)- Martyr fighting for your country's liberation from the Spanish Imperialists. Based. You're Cuba's Jose Rizal.
 * Blas Roca Calderio (96/100)- Cuban Zhou Enlai. Helped to build the proper Cuban Socialist structure and bring it to a new height of success. Incredibly based.
 * Frantz Fanon (98/100)- Yes, this is what I call true Postcolonalism. Nothing can describe you better apart from based, really.
 * Maurice Bishop (99/100)- "Among Bishop's core principles were workers' rights, women's rights, and the struggle against racism and apartheid.[4] Under Bishop's leadership, the National Women's Organization was formed which participated in policy decisions along with other social groups. Women were given equal pay and paid maternity leave, and sex discrimination was made illegal. Organisations for education (Centre for Popular Education), health care, and youth affairs (National Youth Organization) were also established." You simply cannot tell me that this man isn't based. You just can't. Cope Neocucks.
 * Farabundo Marti (96/100)- Wanted to help the poor of your country, and fought brave wars against imperialist powers, and later against the fascist regime of Maximilliano. Maximilliano should be killed instead of you.
 * Augusto Cesar Sandino (97/100)- Wanting to liberate your country and apply your values to it is a fucking based idea. Long live the idea of Sandinismo! Sadly, Ortega is doing more stupid things in his country.

South America:
Very Positive:
 * Jose De San Martin (97/100)- Hero of Chile, Peru, and Argentina, a great, heroic anti-imperialist that fought against the barbaric Spanish Imperialists for his country's independence. He is a hero, like the Jose Marti of Argentina.

Asia and Oceania:

 * Sen Katayama (86/100)- One of the main pioneers of true Japanese Socialism. Very based. shame you didn't succeed.
 * Sanzo Nosaka  (86/100)- True man that hoped Free Japan from the chains of being an Imperialist Puppet. I like your ideals and your sympathy to my people when facing Hideki. But, reformism is not cool, but you're better than the current JCP.
 * Wataru Kaji (85/100)- Same as above. I love that you sided with my people against Showa Imperialism and supported Socialism.
 * Kazuo Aoyama (85/100)- Same as above.
 * Fukumoto Kazuo (86/100)- A genuine Marxist revolutionary who tried to build revolutionary socialism, and Stalinism in Japan. Based.
 * Michiko Kanba (87/100)- A hero for Japan’s proletarian struggle against the Americans and the Kishi regime. Long live the Anpo protests! Michiko Kanba forever lives in the hearts of the Japanese people!
 * Kiyoteru Hanada (83/100)- Inspired modern Japanese proletarian art. Incredibly based.
 * Ichiro Hariu (84/100)- Like the above, but better and more anti-revisionist.
 * Takiji Kobayashi (80/100)- Japanese Maxim Gorky and a martyr for the Japanese people in their freedom from Capitalism and the Imperialist government.
 * Hiroyoshi Hayashi (87/100)- One of the best that modern Japan has produced. One of the few, genuine true Socialists and Marxist-Leninists in Japan now.
 * Kim Jong Suk (91/100)- Brave anti-imperialist heroine that died in the cause for a free Korea. Rest in peace, hero.
 * Mu Chong (87/100)- Too close to the Maoids, but same as above, you were a great man who fought hard for Korea’s liberation.
 * Kim Il Sung (81/100)- I hope you won the Korean war and killed that US puppet Syngman Rhee. The Juche concept is based, and how you wanted the Socialist bloc to unite and supported many anti-imperialists like Nyerere and Nasser is great. You took a strong hand to build North Korea perfectly to it's material conditions, and truly understands how to rule a country. Sadly, North Korea went to shit after you. Plus, North Korea under you had genuine worker's control. My only problems with you is creating an inheritance system and being over reliant on the USSR, and backed the invasions of Hungary and Czechoslovakia were very bad too. (although you kind of had to otherwise grave concequences for the DPRK will be there)
 * Emperor Wu of Han (80/100)- Essentially the best emperor in Ancient Chinese history. You made China one hell of a modern state, one of the strongest countries in the world, and had great cultural and literary achievements. Extremely based. Though you’d be cringe from a modern viewpoint, but, back then,I would’ve been your greatest fan.
 * Tang Taizong (82/100)- Same as the above, but better.
 * Song Jiaoren (83/100)- Han Chauvinism is bad but all your other good makes up for it. You founded the most progressive force in Chinese history since the Qing and brought China to a new era of progress, shame traitor Yuan killed you.
 * Huang Xing (87/100)- Like the above but better. Fought the revolution alongside Dr. Sun and opposed Yuan’s traitorous regime.
 * Lu Haodong (87/100)- Same as above.
 * Sun Fo (80/100)- KMT Rightoid, but the only one I respect, since you did get your priorities right, and is anti-Chiang, and you put National Unity against the Japanese invaders at first, and genuinely wanted to build a coalition government and supporting socialism, very based.
 * Fang Shengdong (80/100)- Heroic anti-reactionary and anti-Qing revolutionaries that strived for the betterment of China. Rest in peace, martyr.
 * Qiu Jin (80/100)- Same as above.
 * Phuntsog Wangyal  (88/100)- The most Based Tibetan there ever is. Helped the CPC destroy the slave regime in Tibet, and had good reforms concerning Tibet Autonomous Zone. Mao shouldn't have purged you even if you're slightly sympathetic to the Dalai Lama which is cringe.
 * Peng Pai (89/100)- A hero for the Peasants of China and a loyal student of Dr. Sun to the end. A devoted Communist who tried to improve the rural conditions of China.
 * Liao Zhongkai (95/100)- A tad bit too moderate, but your State Socialism and your support to Stalinist Ussr is based, shame rightoids killed you.
 * He Xiangning (95/100)- Same as Liao. What else can I say except extremely based for you? Fuck Chiang for what he did to your husband. Long live the Legitimate Kuomintang movement!
 * Feng Yuxiang (84/100)- Helped to bring the KMT to power and smacked out Yuan Shikai and Wu Peifu, and spent your life fighting the Japanese Imperialists and Chiangist Traitors, supporting the true Left-Wing Kuomintang.
 * Li Dazhao (85/100)- The true martyr for the Chinese nation. Founded the Communist Party of China, wrote some good theories even if some were a little too moderate, and a nationalist, admired the Bolshevik revolution, alongside endorsing Sun too. Very based.
 * Yang Kaihui  (82/100)- A brave revolutionary female comrade who sacrificed herself for the cause of the Communist revolution in China.
 * Yeung Kwong (89/100)- Fighter and Hero of the People of Hong Kong to fight against the British colonialists. Great. Kill the British Colonialists. May Hong Kong rejoin the mainland. One of the least bad maoids.
 * Li Jishen (94/100)- Li Dazhao 2.0. Helped a lot to build a Communist China under the socialist ideologies of Tridemism. Very based, one of the main builders of the people's republic, and a genuine politician that loves the people and loyal to Communist principles.
 * He Long (83/100)- One of the main heroes in contributing to China’s civil war and building a People’s China.
 * Hong Xuezhi (83/100)- Same as the above.
 * Chen Geng  (84/100)- Laid the foundations to building the PLA to being a modern army.
 * Nie Rongzhen (85/100)- Responsible for moderizing the PLA, helped Mao developed the Nuclear Weapons program, and responsible for a lot of modernizations that China has been through. Very based.
 * Liu Bocheng (84/100)- Same as above. Improved the PLA and introduced great, modern tactics of war to the PLA.
 * Su Yu (87/100)- Great general that fought the Japs and the Chiangoids, and one of the most based generals of the PLA behind Zhu and Peng.
 * Chen Yi (81/100)- Against the CR, tried to ease tensions with the USSR, based.
 * Dong Biwu (85/100)- Similar to the above, but better. A committed Marxist-Leninist to the end, defended Peng and tried to fix the grave mistakes Mao made in his rule. Incredibly based.
 * Lei Feng (83/100)- 学习雷锋好榜样！忠于革命忠于党，爱恨分明不忘本，立场坚定斗志强！I don't really care if you were Maoist propaganda, but you are a role model to learn from.
 * Deng Yingchao (83/100)- A better version of Li Xiannian. Supporting Li Peng is bad but otherwise you are very good. You are a committed, true Marxist-Leninist to the end. Very based.
 * Yuan Longping (84/100)- I absolutely loved your contributions to hybrid rice, that allowed for not just people in China, but to Asia and the world to have a stable food supply, and contributed to food security. One of the greatest agronomists and scientists, ever. May god bless your soul.
 * Hu Jintao (85/100)- His rule is known as the booming 10 years of the Chinese economy, cracked down on corruption, helped improve technology until we overtook Japan, Introduced some form of reforms but not too much, Helped extend our alliances and influences, and took a firm hand against seperatism and is a true nationalist. What a fucking gigachad. The only issue I have with you is not being radical enough on economics, and way too soft in terms of economy too, and not seizing an opportunity to make a sharp, far-left turn. Plus, some of your political allies are questionable.
 * Li Minqi (85/100)- A champion in wanting to build Socialism back in China, and away from all kinds of Dengoid revisionism.
 * Yue Xin (85/100)- A true anti-revisionist activist and Marxist Feminist who fought hard for women’s rights in China and for Socialism against Dengoids. You are true socialism, Dengoids are not. Respect to you.
 * Wan Exiang (82/100)- One of the few true Tridemists at this time and age. Too chummy with the Dengoids in China, but otherwise there isn’t really many problems I have with you, and I liked how you attacked the Wongtards in Hong Kong.
 * Xu Lizhi (81/100)- A martyr who died because of corporations exploiting the people. Rest in peace. You are an icon of the exploited people by the borgeoise. Death to the corporatocuck borgeoise! Death to the revisionists!
 * Damdin Sukhbaatar (85/100)- Mongolian Lenin who fought a people’s revolution against the Qing and built a People’s Mongolia. I have eternal respect to heroes like you.
 * Khorloogjin Choibalsan (87/100)- Modernizing Mongolia, freeing it from the reactionary Beiyang Clique and fighting against Japanese Imperialists are based, as well as your rapid industrialisation, improvement in literacy, and expanded recognition of Mongolia's independence is based, but you're too reliant on the Soviets. Purging theocrats is based, though.
 * Nguyen Thi Minh Kai (88/100)- A heroic female comrade of the Vietnamese people fighting for the path for Vietnam’s liberation from French colonial imperialists.
 * Pham Van Dong (83/100)- A more moderate version of Vietnam's Molotov, followed Bac Ho's legacies to the end, and tried to purge corruption (but you did nothing later against the revisionists), but still, you're very good.
 * Hoàng Văn Hoan (90/100)- Similar to the above, and helped Bac Ho initially at first, and later protected the ethnic Chinese in Vietnam from the hands of revisionist scum Le Duan. Eternal respect to you, comrade.
 * Pham Ngoc Thao (85/100)- A brave son of the Vietnamese nation, fighting for freedom and liberation against Diem and his US imperialist masters.
 * Le Duc Anh (84/100)- Fixed relations with my country and a true anti-revisionist socialist who opposed Kiet's revisionist Dengist wannabe policies, very based.
 * Vo Thi Thang (88/100)- A symbol of female power fighting for the freedom of your people and nation. Very based. The pride of the Viet Cong.
 * Souphanouvong (85/100)- Abandoned royalty and fought the monarchy for a People's government. This is what a true man of the people should be like.
 * Phayom Chulanont (90/100)- Thai Chin Peng, a hero in the Communist struggle against the Fascistic US-backed Thai dictatorship.
 * Aung San (88/100)- Myanmar's father of independence and a hero freeing Myanmar from Britain and Japan. Your ideals of Socialism are extremely based and if you didn't die, another great anti-imperialist regime will be established. However, you don't go radical enough.
 * U Nu (88/100)- Continued the legacies of Aung San's Socialism in the country, chase the British colonialists out, and Myanmar should belong to only the Burmese and the Burmese people alone. You don't go far enough, though.
 * Than Tun (88/100)- On Par with Aung San in fighting for your country. Eternal respect to you, the hero of Myanmar.
 * Kyaw Zaw (86/100)- Similar to above, and a hero of Myanmar in fighting against Ne Win and a hero for independence.
 * Dato Maharaja Lela (80/100)- An Anti-British and Anti-Colonial hero that is one of the most prominent nationalists in early Malaya. Nobody cares what the angloids and the liberals have to say about you, you are a brave son of the Malay people.
 * Chin Peng (90/100)- Based Malayan people's war against the British Imperialists, and you should have killed all British colonialists enslaving Malaysia. Maoism is iffy but understandable in your cause.
 * Eu Chooi Yip (91/100)- An even better version of Chin Peng as you’re more pragmatic and tough as a revolutionary leader.
 * Bong Kee Chok (90/100)- Same as above.
 * Chen Tien (90/100)- Never rest the struggle against the British! Never stop resisting the Capitalists!
 * Lee Meng (90/100)- You were so tough and strong, instilling fear inside the minds of the collaborationists and traitors, and even scaring the shit out of Churchill himself. Colonial propaganda can slander you, but you never done anything wrong.
 * Abdullah CD (90/100)- The winds of history will come, and you will be recognised as a hero against colonialism and imperialism.
 * Mokhtaruddin Lasso (90/100)- Rest in power, revolutionary gigachad.
 * Rashid Maidin (90/100)- Another revolutionary hero of my people. Eternal respect.
 * SA Ganapathy  (90/100)- Indian comrade that sacrificed himself for my people's struggle against the British colonialists. Rest in peace, comrade.
 * Shamsiah Fakeh (90/100)- The true hero that all Malaysians should learn from. An iconic leader of our times.
 * Adnan Saidi (81/100)- A great, brave soldier of our people fighting against Japanese Imperialism. You showed the Imperialist Japs what the Malaysian People are really made of. May god bless your soul in heaven.
 * Juan Feleo (85/100)- A hero for the Philippine nation and people. You are a martyr who died for your people and fought resolutely for your people until the very end. Anti-Imperialist and Anti-Capitalist hero, rest in peace. A man of the people. May god bless your soul in heaven.
 * Lean Alejandro (80/100)- Like the above, but more moderate and antiauth leaning, but still, good job protesting against the vicious Marcos Tyranny.
 * Sukarno (91/100)- There are very few people in History that can be such successes like how Sukarno is. Got inspired by Nationalism and Socialism, pushed for Indonesian national unity like how Tito did in Yugoslavia, if only he lived longer. He is one of the greatest people to have ever existed. Economywise you're not that smart, but that's more or less the only problem I have with you (alongside collaborating with the Japs but similar to Bose, I kind of understand why).
 * Mohammed Hatta (92/100)- Indonesia's Zhou Enlai, very based.
 * Norm Gallagher (83/100)- One of the few good trade unionists in history. Defended worker’s rights and obstructed capitaloids and corporations from treading on workers.
 * John Pilger (83/100)- Standing up against the capitalist government in Australia, anti-imperialism, anti-americanism, and all of your anti-imperialist stances were very good.
 * Siraj Sikder (90/100)- Another one of the most based Maoists of all time. A hero of Bangladesh that genuinely tried to build a bastion of Anti-Imperialism in your country, and a true people’s hero.
 * Bhagat Singh (84/100)- National Hero for all Indians and a martyr for India's fight to independence.
 * Udham Singh (84/100)- Same as above. Great job killing that filthy British Colonialist scum.
 * B. R. Ambedkar (88/100)- One of India's bravest sons in it's fight to freedom and independence.
 * Rohana Wijeweera (85/100)- A bit too Tamil-Centric, but still very based. Rest in power, hero.  The leader of the people of Sri Lanka.
 * Afzal Bangash (90/100)- A genuine revolutionary and leader of the Pakistani people in the path of building Socialism in the country, and a true anti-imperialist as well. The bravest son of Pakistan.
 * Amanullah Khan (92/100)- Afghan Sun Yat Sen. Fought against Imperialists, friendly to the Leninist Bolshevik government, and had great positive domestic policies for Afghanistan, and purged reactionary elements. Everything you did for Afghanistan was positive. Monarchism is a problem but that's the only bad thing there, alongside not being far enough, otherwise very based.
 * Faiz Ahmad (83/100)- Another one of the few MLM’s I can get behind with. A hero and true patriot to your country against Islamist scum and Soviet Social Imperialists, yet caring about your people. Respect to men and revolutionaries like you. Screw the US puppet Islamists for killing you.
 * Zhumabay Shayakhmetov   (84/100)- Hero of Kazakhstan that resolved a lot of the chaos that Goloshchyokin created, hunted down on crime, and developed Kazakhstan under Socialism and Stalinism.

Middle East:

 * Mohammad Mossadegh (84/100)- A based leader that should never have been couped. He did a lot of good and I consider him one of the best from the Middle East. Fuck Eisenhower and the Brits for installing that batshit King Pahlavi. However, you're too soft and hasn't done too much to eradicate capitalism. Still very good, though.
 * Fuad Al Rikabi (91/100)- Iraqi version of Nasser, sadly purged by Saddam.
 * Husain Al-Radi (84/100)- The martyr and the true people's leader of Iraq. A shame the Ba'athists purged you and your party now is revisionist as hell.
 * Yusuf Salman Yusuf (91/100)- Iraqi Ernst Thalmann. The son of the brave Iraqi Proletariat in fighting for a people’s movement.
 * Michel Aflaq (91/100)-Great contributor and founder of Ba'athism, gigabased.
 * Zaki Al Arsuzi (94/100)- Same as above.
 * Salah al-Din al-Bitar  (94/100)- Like Arsuzi, one of the most based people on earth and the founder of Ba'athism. Would've been the Syrian Sun Yat Sen as you freed the country from France and wanted to modernize it using socialist and nationalist ideas. You didn't deserve to be killed. A shame Assad's cronyism ruined what you fought for. Rest in peace, hero.
 * Khalid Bakdash (90/100)- Anti-Revisionist and Anti-Perestoika father of modern Arab Communism. what else can I say but based?
 * George Habash (92/100)- May be better than Arafat as his ideals match mine more, and less radical and violent than most Palestinian groups. Long live the Palestinian Resistance!
 * Ahmad Sa’adat (87/100)- A hero that is the true future leader of the People of Palestine against the Zionist filth.
 * Abu Ali Mustafa (87/100)- Same as above. You were so based that the Israeli forces had to kill you.
 * Jamal Khashoggi (80/100)- The Saudi martyr who exposed the truth about Saudi Arabia. People like you resisting the evil Saudi Monarchy should be respected forever.
 * Salim Rubai Ali (87/100)- Hero of the Yemeni people in their heroic fight against British Colonialism and Imperialism. A shining guiding light for the Arab World. Incredibly based.
 * Mustafa Kemal Ataturk (92/100)- The only fault about him is being a bit too moderate, but otherwise you're great. Freed Turkey from the Ottoman Empire, modernized Turkey, and just had overall great ideals building the modern state of Turkey, alongside inspiring anti-imperialist leaders like Sukarno. Sadly, Erdogan is destroying everything you did to Turkey. Though backing China against Uyghur Seperatists and the Japanese is based.
 * Yakup Kadri Karaosmanoglu (82/100)- Too moderate,but a based Socialist who opposed the Atlanticist puppet Menderes. Plus, you had some good ideas too, just be more communist and radical.
 * Deniz Gezmis (91/100)- The Thalmann/Guevara of Turkey. A genuine revolutionary and socialist unlike Ocalan or Kaypakkaya. This is the kind of men I have immense respect to.
 * Vedat Nedim Tor (91/100)- Same as above, but better and more radical.
 * Ethem Nejat (80/100)- A Leninist revolutionary who worked for the worker’s cause and struggle in Turkey against the Ottoman reactionary government, but I’m not sure if you would become Proto-Kaypakkaya or not, but either way, you’re still based.
 * Mustafa Subhi (80/100)- Same as above.
 * Cemal Madanoglu (81/100)- A politician who genuinely wants to save Turkey and create a Socialist Kemalist republic in Turkey after Menderes destroyed it all. Incredibly based.

Africa:

 * Habib Borguiba (81/100)- Gave women rights, freed your country from France, modernized and made it a modern nation, had policies that cared for the common people and so on. You're one of my favourite African leaders, however state capitalism and social corporatism is gay though, embrace Socialism NOW.
 * Hamma Hammami (85/100)- The most based Tunisian there ever was. Tried to build Socialism in Tunisia, and did his absolute best in trying to further the well being of the Tunisian people, and the main force behind the ousting of corrupt dictator Ben Ali. Immense respect.
 * Ahmed Ben Bella (85/100)- This fucking gigachad made the French cope and seethe over his sheer basedness and will to liberate Algeria from the Imperialists and your domestic policies like caring for the common man is based, although a little too moderate, but you're still very based.
 * Houari Boumediene (85/100)- Fought a war against the French and freed your country from colonialism, urbanized the population, oversaw great population growth, industrialized the country and had a bunch of awesome reforms and multiplied the annual per capita income by 5 times, a true great man, despite being moderate.
 * Mehdi Ben Barka (85/100)- Based Chad who had ideas in trying to free Africa and your country from the French Imperialists and against the tyrant Hassan II, a shame the French Imperialists murdered such a great man like you.
 * Moktar Ould Daddah (88/100)- Based for freeing the country from the French and nice job promoting racial unity. You're too moderate but overall based.
 * Amilcar Cabral (93/100)- Freed Guinea Bissau from the Portuguese and inspired anti-colonial movements globally. Based.
 * Patrice Lumumba (81/100)- Long live Lumumba! A great patriot and hero that fought imperialism and is an ardent resistor of the West and their crony Mobutu. You should have lived longer. If you had lived longer, Your country might be booming and might even be richer than some parts of Europe. However, being as progressive as you were, you were still too moderate, and that led to Mobutu taking you down.
 * Pierre Mulele (91/100)- One of the most based and chad revolutionaries from Africa. I wholeheartedly support your struggle of heroism and revolutionarism, leading the Congolese people against the tyrant Mobutu. A hero to the very end. Rest in power, comrade. A hero of the Congolese people that fought to the very end for his people, and against Mobutist Tyranny.
 * Kenneth Kaunda (84/100)- Solved the problems and suppressed Tribal violence, fought Imperialism and is the biggest chad and head of Anti-Imperialism in Southern Africa, freed Zambia, and helped organize anti-apartheid movements.
 * Steve Biko (93/100)- You are the bravest Anti-Apartheid revolutionary there ever is, advocated for the oppressed Blacks to rise up in resistance against Western backed Apartheid, and a symbol of Black power. A hero for the African people in their fight.
 * Bram Fischer (86/100)- A hero in the anti-apartheid struggle. One of Mandela's dearest white comrades to the end.

Europe:

 * Nikos Zachariadis (86/100)- Fighting for national liberation from the vicious Greek Junta, the Nazis, and the British Imperialists were based no matter what, plus, Left-Wing Nationalism is and will be incredibly based. Socialist Patriotism too. Fuck the Khrushchevite Revisionists for betraying you.
 * Aris Velouchiotis (83/100)- A bit too radical, but you are a hero that tried to liberate Greece from fascism and imperialism. A brave man whom I'll always respect.
 * Enver Hoxha (84/100)- In your first years your directions were correct. Your improvement on literacy, industrialization and your reforms to the lives of the Albanian people are based, but your stance on religion is unbased, plus your isolationism (even if you're forced to, thanks a lot, Westoids and T*toites) stagnated Albania's economy. Also, thanks for helping us kick out the ROC. I only wish you aren't as overparanoid and anti-religion though, should be less radical. Leaning decent. The only problems I have with you are your stance on religion and a bit on isolationism, but otherwise your achievements, like 100% electrification in just THREE years, building the country's very first railways, massive improvement in fields like education, healthcare and eradicating multiple diseases and epidemics, how can anyone not praise your achievements? However, later funding the Kosovo Liberation Army (even if you didn't know they became terrorist after you died) was very cringe, and your isolationism and economic failures, caused by your dogmatism, was pretty bad too.
 * Hysni Milloshi (83/100)- The future of Albania lies in your hands, comrade. Just be revolutionary, that’s really all I ask.
 * Ana Pauker (82/100)- Purging liberals, fashoids and succdems are incredibly based, and you helped Georgiu Dej with a lot of programs. Not sure with some of your brutal actions (and being a little tolerant to Kulaks) but otherwise good.
 * Petru Groza (84/100)- Another great man who sought hard to build Socialist Romania to it's glory. Very based.
 * Gheorghe Apostol (92/100)- A firm defender of Stalinism and true Marxism-Leninism in Romania against Ceausescu and the current EU slave states. Romanian Molotov. Extremely based.
 * Vlado Dapcevic (84/100)- Proletarian internationalism, hoping to establish true communism instead of what Tito did in his later years, fought the fagscists in the second world war, and advocating for proletarian internationalism. What else can I say except based?
 * Matyas Rakosi (86/100)- Although it's good for you to get rid of Nazi puppet regime Szalasi, some of your policies, despite having relatively good intentions, ended up being huge failures (thanks anticoms and atlanticoids). Although not all of them are failures though, some of your industrial policies like lifting Hungary out of the legacies of fascism and poverty, were very based though. Hell, you are the founder of Socialism in Hungary, a shame the revisionists and atlanticoids have to slander your achievements. Could've had very great achievements, a pity anticoms halted all the progress you did for Hungary.
 * Antonin Zapotocky (84/100)- Adhering to collective leadership, Fighting the Nazis, and following the path that Gottwald paved despite being slightly more moderate, very based.
 * Boleslaw Bierut (84/100)- You rapidly industrialized Poland and built it up after the Nazis razed it down, a lot of domestic, social, industrial, and economic improvements. Recently however, I really liked your Left-Nationalism and your ideals. Very based. Plus, good job hunting down counterrevolutionaries, comrade Bierut. Though, your tactics were way too harsh for my liking, even if genuine counterrevolutionaries deserved it.
 * Wladyslaw Kowalski (90/100)- Greatly Improved Poland’s culture, fought the Nazis, and did a lot of contributions to Stalinist Poland along with comrade Bierut. One of the best Poles ever.
 * Kazimierz Mijal (82/100)- Too sympathetic to Maoism, but I fullheartedly support your adherence to Stalinism and against the revisionist Khrushchev puppet of Gomulka and later against Capitalism. Incredibly based, but also too dogmatic.
 * Wladyslaw Dworakowski (85/100)- Like the above but better.
 * Otto Wille Kuusinen (83/100)- Too sympathetic to Khruschev, but otherwise, you deserve my full support in establishing socialism in Finland.
 * Antanas Snieckus (85/100)- Lithuanian Stalin who built the modern state of Lithuania that the people enjoy until this very day. Got rid of fashoid scum in the region, massive progress in industrialization and modernization, social equality, etc. What else can I say apart from based?
 * Georgy Malenkov (83/100)- Killed Beria, had extremely excellent policies, and is basically like me if I were to rule the USSR. Nothing apart from , is my comment on you. However, some of your shortcomings also led to Khrushchev taking over, which is bad, and that you're too moderate, still. But, apart from Molotov, I'd back you against Khruschev.
 * Felix Dzerzhinsky (88/100)- A genuine revolutionary true to the people. Anti-communists can slander you all they want, but this man, a man and hero of the Russian people, fully deserves my respect.
 * Yakov Sverdlov (88/100)- Same as above. One of the most heroic Bolshevik leaders in Russia during that time, just like Dzerzhinsky.
 * Maxim Gorky (80/100)- I enjoyed reading your works and you are one of the few philosophists that inspired good for humanity abeit being too culturally radical. Respect to Maxim Gorky.
 * Sergei Kirov (80/100)- Rest in peace, comrade, the man who sacrificed himself to those that tried to sabotage the USSR.
 * Andrei Zhdanov (85/100)- One of the most firm Stalinists in the USSR and a politician true to the people of the World. Very based.
 * Lazar Kaganovich (86/100)- You’re responsible for overseeing a lot of good things that happened in Stalinist Russia, a bit like Molotov, I'll give you on that, and wanted to oversee great industrial development until Khruschev stopped you.
 * Lyudmila Pavlichenko (90/100)- The hero of the Soviet Union. A true patriot defending your country from the German Bandits.
 * Konstantin Rosskovsky  (81/100)- You were kind of shady early on, but later in your life your dedication to defend your country from the Nazi bandits is something very admirable. A hero of the Soviet Union, that’s for sure.
 * Nikolai Kardashev (82/100)- Soviet Nie Rongzhen. Extremely based.
 * Mikhail Kalinin (85/100)- Same as above. You did a lot to get rid of Trotskyites in Russia and helped Stalin build the USSR up.
 * Mirsaid Sultan-Galiev (83/100)- Anti-Imperialism, Anti-Colonialism, National Communism, etc. All are extremely based, and called for the unity of the third world for the fight of self-determination. Very based. Stalin was wrong to purge you. However, your advocacy for a more decentralized system isn't quite good, especially considering the situation in the USSR back then.
 * Turar Ryskulov (83/100)- Same as above.
 * Georgy Zhukov (85/100)- He is one of the toughest and bravest generals in History. His bravery against the Nazis and his non-hesitiation to crush Western backed terrorist insurrections (like the Cursed Soldiers in Poland, who got rightfully crushed) in Europe is commendable, and even resisted Khrushchev’s social imperialism. But Anti-Stalinism is just quite bad.
 * Nikita Salogor (80/100)- Irredentism is bad, and same for deporting Romanians, but otherwise, your contributions to the Moldovan SSR and the Anti-Nazi fight can never be ignored.
 * Grigory Romanov (80/100)- Things would've been so much better if you had won and purged Gorby and his band of traitours pigs... Even so, I'm honestly not sure whether you are a social imperialist or not...
 * Valery Sablin (85/100)- I wholeheartedly support you against the Brezhnevite Kleptocratic Revisionists who is destroying the USSR. Your mutiny is a people’s rebellion, and a new hope of reviving the true, popular regime led by the principles of Leninism. The way how the Brezhnev clique crushed genuine people’s movements is proof that Revisionists hate the people and the proletariat.
 * Boris Pugo (80/100)- Another one of the true patriots of the USSR that tried to save th USSR from the hands of filthy traitor Gorbachev.
 * Yegor Ligachev (83/100)- Like the above, but better, as you had very based viewpoints on how I see the USSR, and you begun to distance yourself from traitor Gorbachev. Although I'm sure whether you're not a social imperialist or not.
 * Eleanor Marx (87/100)- One of the main inspirations for Women’s liberation around the world, and one of the world’s first Marxists too. Incredibly based.
 * Clara Zetkin (85/100)- Heroine that strived for Socialism and the liberation of the German people, and women's rights. A true heroine of the German people, and the German Socialist revolution.
 * Ernst Thalmann (91/100)- Anti-Fascism, Anti-Ebert, and Wanted to create a People's state of Germany, gigabased. Purging Luxemburgists were a bad move though, but otherwise I have no problem with you.
 * Henning von Tresckow (80/100)- My absolute respect goes to you, brave hero that tried to kill Hitler.
 * Erwin von Witzleben (80/100)- Same as above.
 * Wilhelm Pieck (89/100)- Founder of the Socialist DDR and a hero against the Nazis and the Social Democrats. Incredibly based. You and Ulbricht built what should be the best, and most moral German government there ever is.
 * Alfred Klahr (83/100)- Leading Marxist fighting for Austrian Self-Determination, and later against the Fashoids. Made the Nazis cope so much that they killed you.
 * Giuseppe Garibaldi (83/100)- Too moderate, but you're Italian Sun Yat Sen. One of the first ever Socialists that deserve everyone's admiration, and fought to reunite Italy. Extremely based.
 * Antonio Gramsci (82/100)- Your theory of capitalist cultural hegemony is true and I find it something that is worth noticing, plus, your viewpoints are based and if you took over Italy, it's state will be much better. One of the most based Neo-Marxists.
 * Marco Rizzo (87/100)- All of my hopes for you for a new people’s Italy may one day come true, comrade.
 * Dom Mintoff (82/100)- Created a welfare state that cared about your people, freed your country from the Brits and had initial improvements to standards of living, however, despite economy stagnated under your rule later, you're still good in my book.
 * Jean Jacques Rousseau (95/100)- Marx before Marx himself. Incredibly based, incredibly smart and enlightened thinker that inspired modern ideas that liberated billions. You contributed a lot to human progress, and I incredibly respect you for that.
 * Victor d’ Hupay (93/100)- Quite literally, one of the earliest fathers of modern Communism. The idea that liberated billions in the 20th century couldn’t be accomplished without such a great thinker like you.
 * Louis Antoine De Saint Just (88/100)- French Dzerzhinsky. A man of the people who defended the will of the people of France in establishing a People’s government.
 * Maurice Thorez (91/100)- French Ernst Thalmann, a hero for the French people's fight to liberation. Very based. You are a proud Stalinist, and you're proud of that. You are what a true Western Communist should be.
 * Ambroise Croizat (85/100)- Essentially the French Hu Jintao (even if less based than him), you are the one who contributed the most to the social security, pensions and workers rights In France, fought the Nazis, and helped with reconstruction.
 * Thomas More (85/100)- Your ideas led to the modern development of Socialist ideas. Your book, the ‘Utopia’, was a critique of politics of your time, and a symbol of progress. Extremely based and respectable. The Marx of your time.
 * Harry Pollitt (85/100)- Supporting the invasion of Hungary was cringe but that's about the only issue I have with you. a devouted, true anti-colonialist that stood up against capitalism, imperialism and fascism, and the Thalmann of Britain. A true hero, one of the English statesmen that I respect the most.
 * Alan Winnington (85/100)- One of the true British journalists and one of the most prominent people who should be honoured for their bravery and intelligence, when exposing crimes of the Neocons in the Korean war and documenting the enormous progress that Communism in China had brought.
 * Jessica Mitford (85/100)- Same as above, but for America and the Civil Rights Movement.
 * Andy Brooks (84/100)- One of only good British politicians in the modern era.
 * Alasdair MacIntyre (82/100)- Marxism + Moralism. What else can I say apart from Based? One of the best modern Philosophers.
 * Patrick Pearse (87/100)- Another brave revolutionary that strived his life to free Ireland. Comrade, your dreams will be realised one day.
 * Ramon Mercader (86/100)-Based chad who murdered Trotsky.
 * Jose Diaz (85/100)- A heroic, people’s hero of Spain and one of the leading men against Francoist Fascism. The leader of the Spanish people. Incredibly based.

North America:

 * Louis Riel (80/100)- Rest in peace, revolutionary hero of Canada against the British Imperialists. You are demonized by Canadian propaganda, but one day, I believe the winds of History will come.
 * Hardial Bains   (83/100)- Went a bit soft in your later years, but still a very committed Marxist-Leninist throughout your life, an act which I forever respect.
 * Norman Bethune (88/100)- Worked alongside the Chinese Communists in the revolution and the Spanish people’s struggle against fascism too, and supported anti-imperialist efforts in my country, and introduced modern medicine to rural China too. Very based. One of our best international friends.
 * Douglas Tottle (83/100)- One of the only literate Western Academicians especially on Communism. I absolutely loved your defense of Stalin.
 * William Kashtan (80/100)- Canadian Harry Pollitt/Gus Hall.
 * Abraham Lincoln (83/100)- My favourite American president. Reunited the country, got rid of slavery in the South, and effectively made the Imperialists soyrage after getting rid of the Confederates. Plus, if you lived longer, America might still be a based Anti-Imperialist stronghold. However, you did have some bad points about you too, like supporting propertarianism, your affairs with the natives, too moderate reformism and tolerating prostitution.
 * William Sherman (83/100)- Brave fighter that fought for yoru country's reunification from the cuckfederates. Confederatocucks can cope and seethe about your so called "war crimes' which are falsified.
 * John Brown (84/100)- American Bhagat Singh. Your bravery of freeing slaves will be forever commended.
 * Frederick Douglass (80/100)- Wanting to negotiate with slave owners is bad but otherwise you're also one of the heroes that strived for the cause against Slavery.
 * Harriet Tubman (84/100)- Brave woman that played a huge role in freeing slaves and the abolitionist movement. Very based.
 * Helen Keller (83/100)- Pushed for anti-colonialism, anti-imperialism, opposed that genocidal maniac Woodrow Wilson, pushed for peace, women's suffrage, and labour rights, very based. One of the strongest women figures of all time.
 * Hugo Gellert (84/100)- One of the best social artists of your time in expressing Marxism in art.
 * Walter Duranty (83/100)- One of the only reporters in history that speaks the truth about the USSR, too based. Why can’t more of the media be like you?
 * Edgar Snow (81/100)- Similar to above, but for China.
 * William Z. Foster (95/100)- American Thalmann/Stalin, a hero for the American labourers, workers, and it's people in the struggle against the genocidal, Capitalistic American system. Your name will be forever remembered fondly as a hero of the American people, dear comrade. Shame that a People’s hero like you had to see the organization you spent your life building up turn to be cucks to the current status quo.
 * Bill Haywood (83/100)- Same as Foster.
 * Paul Robeson (85/100)- Empowered blacks, a genuine socialist and anti-imperialist, etc. What more is to say about based? You're so based that the maniac McCarthy tried to target you. A victim of the Borgeoise American government.
 * Jack Shulman (85/100)- One of the most based Americans to have ever lived. A revolutionary and an anti-fascist hero, and adhered to true marxism-leninism to the end. The new William Foster.
 * Angela Davis (83/100)- Pioneer of Women's rights in America, you are the kind of feminist I support, even if you are quite moderate.
 * Rosa Parks (85/100)- Mother of the civil rights movement of the US. A shame that modern day liberals ruined the so called "civil rights" you fought for.
 * Maya Angelou (85/100)- Same as above, a key person in the civil rights movement of the American people. Incredibly based.
 * Huey P. Newton (90/100)- Helped combat racism and the terrible condition of American society during that time, helped provide for the poor and helped fight for the rights of the people against McCarthyist Neocon Imperialism. You are the true definition of Socialism. Not whatever Woketards and Antifa are doing now. You are a martyr for the American people.
 * Bobby Seale (90/100)- A hero of all Black Americans in fighting for their rights, and a hero of the American people against their government.
 * Afeni Shakur (82/100)- One of the most outspoken and radical members of the Black Panthers, which is good.
 * Fred Hampton (90/100)- Same as above. Rest in power, King. Those Atlanticist Pigs will burn in hell for killing a man of the people like you.
 * Mark Clark (90/100)- Same as above.
 * Malcolm X (80/100)- As based as Martin Luther King, If not better, since he’s a r*formist and you are a true revolutionary. But some of your fundamentalist and Islamist views were iffy (even if betraying Louis Farrakhan is good)
 * Gary Webb (80/100)- An Anti-Imperialist and a victim of the CIA. You did the right thing exposing the crimes of the Americans to the world, shame you are brutally murdered by the Neocons.
 * Michael Prysner (81/100)- You are the modern day Martin Luther King, former soldier that expressed his views bravely against the imperialists in the White house, speaking up against the capitalists in the wall street, and called for the complete destruction of America's imperialistic system. What else is there to say but , I just don't like your Baizuo leanings and your sympathy to the Eastern Social Imperialists, even if I get where you're coming from.
 * Richard D. Wolff (81/100)- A champion of modern Marxist economics, especially in the field of Class Studies. Very based.
 * Fidel Castro (82/100)- Champion of Anti-Imperialism and a key figure of the Latin American people in their fight against American Imperialism and their cronies. You continued the legacies of brave anti-imperialist fighters like Jose Marti. Also, your policies on religion are just about as identical as mine.   Even if you're still very moderate for my liking, and advocating for nuking the US and supporting Eastern imperialism (even if I understand how difficult of a position you are in), same with later supporting Raul's revisionism was cringe. Nontheless, you are a great man and a great leader who did exceptionally great things.
 * Toussaint Louverture (86/100)- Father of Haiti and the country’s Sun Yat Sen. You were the people’s leader, and all you have ever done, deserves eternal respect, revolutionary hero.
 * Juan Bosch (80/100)- Your honesty is praisable and how you took care of your own people and saving your country from Trujillo makes you really deserve my respect, sadly the Americans took you down, and my only criticism of you is being too moderate, and not building a true marxist-leninist system.
 * Lazaro Cardenas (85/100)- You're fucking based. You're one of my favourite leaders in North America. Your policies are chad, gave indigenous and women rights, nationalized your industries from the Westoids and your reforms are gigabased as well. The britcucks can cope and seethe over Mexicans resisting against them. But why did you give asylum to Tr*tsky, and harboring counterrevolutionaries from the USSR, and not changing the system to socialism? Although I'd credit you for your releasing of communists and mantained good relations with them.
 * Frida Kahlo (84/100)- One of the first ever artists who inspired Marxism-Leninism globally, and an inspiration for female and indigenous equality in Mexico.
 * David Alfaro Siqueiros (87/100)- A strong, devoted Marxist-Leninist to the end, and even tried to personally kill Trotsky. Respect to people like you.
 * Rolando Moran (86/100)- I wholeheartedly support you against the US-backed genocidal dictatorship in Guatemala.
 * Carlos Fonesca (94/100)- Built schools and helped liberate the people of Nicaragua from the genocidal Somoza regime, and did a lot of good to the people of Nicaragua. A shame you had to be killed so early.
 * Omar Torrijos (80/100)- Redistributed land to peasants, nationalized the Panama Canal, treated your people greatly and your economics are wise. You should rule Panama for eternity. However, you're too moderate.

South America:

 * Walter Rodney (84/100)- One of the most heroic third world anti-colonialists and Socialists and fought hard for the self-determination of people worldwide.
 * Simon Bolivar (91/100)- Your project of Gran Colombia shall be realised and you're a heroic son of South America which fought against the filthy Spaniards. However, invading Peru is gay.
 * Federico Arango Fonnegra (81/100)- The Colombian people will never forget your heroic struggle for your country and people.
 * Augusto Lara Sanchez (81/100)- Same as above.
 * Oscar William Calvo (84/100)- Like the above. But better.
 * Yira Castro (85/100)- The hero for the oppressed women worldwide under Capitalism. Very based. The hero of Colombia.
 * Jose Carlos Mariategui  (90/100)- No Peruvian has influenced me more than you, one of the most prominent Anti Imperialist Marxists of the American continent. Based.
 * Evo Morales (82/100)- Based. Your reforms denounced neoliberalism and did a lot to increase the quality of life for the Bolivian people, reduced dependance on the IMF and world bank, improved the economy, and had policies that did great for Bolivia. Based. Neoliberals and seethe over your sheer basedness. Like Castro, you're another champion of Anti-Imperialism. However, the system of Bolivia has to be completely changed into a Socialist one.
 * Joao Goulart (82/100)- Had good social programs that lifted the poor out of poverty, expanded welfare, and improved healthcare and education systems that did good for all of Brazil, while also improving Brazil's economy. Based. Sadly, American backed fuckers have to overthrow you. However, you're a reformist, and too moderate that didn't change the system, which eventually led to your downfall, quite a shame.
 * Rafael Franco (82/100)- Improved Women's Rights and the Infrastructure of Paraguay, while also modernized the army of Paraguay, based, a shame you didn't live longer.
 * Lautaro  (91/100)- Hero of the Chilean Native's fight against the genocidal Spanish Imperialists.
 * Raul Pellegrin (80/100)- Leader of the Chilean resistance against that awful, neoliberal puppet, pedophile Nazi dictator Pinochet. You should have succeeded in killing him.
 * Miguel Enriquez Espinosa (80/100)- Same as above, You should've succeeded in killing Pinochet.
 * Pablo Neruda (82/100)- Chilean Maxim Gorky, but better, a genuine man of the people in the struggle against the Pinochet tyranny.
 * Eduardo Artes (86/100)- Your social policies that resemble the ones of Allende are based, and your support to the DPRK and your criticism of liberal "human rights" and gusanos are hella based. I prefer you over any Chilean candidate. Very based. If only you won. Reformism is cringe but you are overall very good.
 * Che Guevara (83/100)- Inspiration for the Latin American people's fight against the criminal dictatorships propped up by the American imperialists across Latin America. Based. You're an icon for international liberation, immense respect to you.
 * Mercedes Sosa (83/100)- The fighting idol of the Latin American people. The true People’s singer.

Positive:

Asia and Oceania:

 * Kan Abe (63/100)- Rightoid ideology is cringe, but you are among those that I can tolerate, since you want to end the war and opposed Hideki Tojo. Shame that your grandson is a horrible prime minister.
 * Tetsu Katayama (70/100)- Possibly the only Japanese head of state I can respect. Had good reforms and rebuilt Japan after the war, and cracked down on Child Labour and the huge Zaibatsus. However, you should've taken a strong hand to completely reform Japan's structure to a Marxist one, for that Western puppets like Yoshida and the LDPJ cannot take power.
 * Tetsuzo Fuwa (68/100)- Revisionist and Reformism definitely isn't cool, But I'm very interested in your theories of Scientific Socialism and how Socialism should be achieved through stages.
 * Hitoshi Yamakawa (70/100)- Revisionist, but at the very least you did contribute to the communist movement in Japan.
 * Kim Gu (66/100)- Fought for the independence of Korea from the Japanese and had based ideas on Nationalism, similar to Sun Yat Sen. A shame that a well-liked man like you have to be killed by that US genocidal puppet Syngman Rhee. You would've worked for an independent Korea by the people, for the people. Generalissimo Kim Il Sung admired you and he will carry out your great ideals to the end. However, Anti-Communism is very cringe and you obstructed Korean reunification, even if Kim Il Sung is willing to make consessions. Although some of your ideals are based and you are definitely better than the Revisionist North and the Capitalist South right now, at best, you'd be a right leaning socauth. Sorry.
 * Lyuh Woon Hyung (67/100)- Too moderate, but otherwise, you are very based. Strived for Socialism and worked for reunification, like the Korean Chiang Ching Kuo. I would forever back your cause. Shame the Western Backed Far-Right Anti-Communist scum killed you and your dreams for reunification.
 * O Jin U (70/100)- Too overly aggressive and backing Jong Il is soy, but I can understand that Jong Il deceived you with his lies, but otherwise, you are a revolutionary martyr that served the Korean nation and people to the very end, a true patriot and anti-imperialist hero.
 * Kim Yo Jong (65/100)- I recently liked how you stood out to the Southern Puppets and not yielding to Globalist demands of the South to destroy the DPRK's sovereignty, but the big question is, would you be the person able to solve the problem of the DPRK and return it back to it's Marxist-Leninist roots like during the cold war?
 * Wu Zetian (65/100)- One of the best rulers of Pre-Republican Chinese history. Under you, the Tang had it’s golden era of culture, economic growth, competence, and more effective bureaucracy. Based. Legalism too is good too. But, imperialism is cringe.
 * Hongwu Emperor (Zhu Yuanzhang) (70/100)- Essentially the Chiang Ching Kuo in the Ming dynasty. Your protections of peasants, rebuilding China and your positive domestic reforms are all incredibly based.
 * Huang Zongxi (73/100)- Another one of the brightest and most progressive philosophers of your time.
 * Li Hongzhang (61/100)- Failed later in your life, but you did make an effort in national reunification, trying to stop the Taiping Rebellion (even if Hong Xiuquan had some good ideas), and negotiated to stop the Unequal treaties, fought the Angloids and Japs, and modernized the army.
 * Zuo Zongtang (68/100)- Like the above but better.
 * Yan Xishan (67/100)- Supporting Chiang and being against the CPC is retarded (even then at least you know the Japs are worse unlike Chiang who doesn't know his priorities) but otherwise everything else about you is based. Protected traditions, had good land reforms, socialism, etc. all of which are based. A sad that you had to ally with a man that didn't even like you, otherwise based.
 * Li Zongren (70/100)- Worked with the already corrupted KMT government, but based fighting the Japs and tried to negotiate with the Communists for a mutually beneficial outcome. Shame Chiang had to ruin everything. At least you later turned to communism and defected from Chiang's KMT
 * Lu Xun (75/100)- Not fond of anti-auth and revprog but otherwise you are one of the best intellectuals from China at that time, plus, your Socialist leanings are good. A bit like Li Dazhao.
 * Wang Ming (63/100)- Firm Marxist-Leninist, adhered to the true principles of Marxism Leninism, against Maoist revisionism, suppressed Trotskyism, but could be more military competent and less dogmatic, and more independent from Moscow.
 * Pandatsang Rapga (67/100)- You did have very good ideas and you're quite alright for an anti-communist, since driving out British Imperialism and anti-Feudalism is good, and being against Western demands for Tibetan Independence is based, but you're still an anti-communist that allied with Chiang. Plus, Wangyal is better than you. Sure I take you over the Westerners but please drop your anti-communism. Dr. Sun Tridemism is hella based, I'll give you that.
 * Zhang Zizhong (79/100)- Rest in peace, war hero that sacrificed yourself to defend your country from the genocidal, imperialist Japanese. Also, I forgot to mention you contributed a lot to the Northern Expedition and chased the Angl*id imperialists out. Deserve my full respect.
 * Long Yun  (63/100)- You don't seem bad for a warlord. Infact, I could even consider you based. Despite being a warlord, your reforms did a lot of good for Yunnan and your improvement of infrastructure and the lives of the people in Yunnan are based, no wonder Chiang soyraged over you. However, you are no socialist, and still a warlord.
 * Chiang Wei Shui (70/100)- Federal Chinese State, fighting the Japs, supporting the Reunification of China, etc are all based. My only criticism of you is being way too liberal for my liking. Your party is wrongfully purged by that bastard Chiang. Rest in peace, chad. You are Taiwan's Gandhi.
 * Xie Xuehong (76/100)- Like the above but better. Too sympathetic to Taiwanese independence but otherwise you are completely based in my book. Taiwan’s hero against the Japs and Chiangoids, and even then, your sympathy to Taiwanese independence is for Pragmatism.
 * Soong Mei Ling (60/100)- Hate that you are Pro-Chiang but I respect you for gathering American aid for us against the Japs. You also improved women's rights and keeping the moral traditions of China too, even if more conservative than me myself.
 * Mei Ju-Ao (73/100)- Your performance in the Tokyo Trials is absolutely stunning, and the fact that you dared to stand up against Chiang was based at it’s finest.
 * Xu Xiangqian (70/100)- Good for trying to moderate the CR and did contribute to China’s civil war and the building of the PLA, but why support the Dengoid revisionists and the capitaloids in the party?
 * Luo Ruiqing (76/100)- Rest in peace, you didn’t deserve the treatment that Lin Biao gave you during the CR, and you were absolutely in the right to oppose the CR.
 * Lu Dingyi (68/100)- Tried to moderate the CR, but sadly purged.
 * Hua Guofeng (63/100)- Quite based. Cracked down and arrested the gang of four, pushed for a National Communist path for China, and had policies that favoured beneficial relations with the West but not siding with them in their foreign policies, and continuing to back anti-imperialism thoughout the world. Although, backing Pol Pot is cringe but your good makes up for it. Upholding whatever Mao did, especially your two whatevers policy was bruh, and your inspiration from Titoism (and being quite dogmatic too) but you're still good and I'd always pick you over revisionists like Deng and Jiang. Opposing the cultural revolution and the Dengoid revisionists is a massive W though.
 * Ji Dengkui (70/100)- Very based. A member of Hua's clique who contributed and tried to mitigate the damage done in the cultural revolution and avoided catastrophe in the Great Leap Forward, quite good, just way too moderate.
 * Chen Xilian (72/100)- A more moderate Wang Dongxing and one of Hua's allies, quite based, and bravely led the PLA against Chiang's forces and liberated the Yijiangshan islands. I respect you for that, just that you're still too moderate.
 * Li Xiannian (75/100)- One of few genuine socialists in the second generation of the leadership of the CPC, as you tried your best to preserve communist values, block capitalism and liberalism, etc, and purged liberals like Hu Yaobang and Zhao Ziyang (even if Deng is worse than them), but even if I get that the antiauths in Tiananmen needed to be dealt with, you chose a bad way to deal with them.
 * Song Ping (78/100)- Same as above, but slightly better.
 * Chen Yun (70/100)- Major architect of Opening up (which is cringe), moderate that criticised Mao's radical policies that brought harm to China and led China into economic recovery and yet a conservative later on in your life that opposed Deng's more radical reforms, and you had very based social policies, however, you're quite revisionist, and CPC's neoauthoritarianism is literally just Right Wing National Conservatism, but you being one of the more left leaning ones make you among the least bad of all the CPC revisionists.
 * Yang Shangkun (72/100)- Supporting Deng;s economic reform is bruh even if I feel that you think it's the only way for China to be out, but otherwise, you're very based, especially your liking to the NEP, handling of Tiananmen and being against Jiang.
 * Wen Jiabao  (66/100)- You would've been one of the best if it weren't for your corruption, otherwise your favourable policies towards farmers and your contributions to the economy (the second man behind Hu) is respectable. But you're a tad bit too liberal for my liking, plus cronyism is quite cringe, and economicswise, you're not radical enough.
 * Li Yuanchao (70/100)- Oversaw economic and social developments, Purged Corruption, and one of the few genuinely socialist politicians in the revisionist CPC. Screw Jiang for screwing over your career.
 * Peng Liyuan (62/100)- Contributed internationally to support arts, performing arts, healthcare, and education, what else can I say apart from based? But still, you're too moderate, and I'm not sure whether you're a true orthodox ML either.
 * Hu Chunhua (73/100)- Oversaw economic and social developments in both Tibet, Inner Mongolia, and later Guangdong, got rid of crony capitalism, purged corruption, abandoned neoliberalism and capitalism, very based, but you're way too moderate.
 * Zhou Qiang (68/100)- A revisionist, but you did a lot to contribute to China’s judicial system, and opposes any liberal influence in the government, kind of based.
 * Kong Qingdong (69/100)- A champion of the Chinese New Left, but go further economicwise and try to not get into hot water that much. Even then, supporting Kim Jong Il is pretty bad too, even if Anti-US imperialism is based.
 * Chiang Ching Kuo (70/100)- Recently I've been considering where to put you. Since, quite obviously I like you more than any leader of that false illegitimate state in Taipei. You did care about your people, Greatly improved Taiwan's economy, pushed for reunification and was strongly against seperatism. Plus, you did promote the Taiwanese natives after being oppressed by his father and would've had reunification with the CPC if you lived longer and that fuckers like Li Peng in the CPC didn't fuck it up. Based. My only problem with you is that you're too pro-West for my liking and did not get rid of the Baizuo Seperatist Bandits known as the DPP (alongside being too economically moderate and not killing off capitalism completely). I also kind of liked some of your autocratic stances, though. You're the only head of state in that false state which I respect.
 * Zhao Leji (63/100)- Introduced positive changes and pro-environmental growth to Shaanxi and Qinghai, but still a revisionist.
 * Eric X. Li (60/100)- One of the few and only Dengoids I can tolerate.
 * Nguyen Thai Hoc (63/100)- Rest in peace, revolutionary hero. Defeat the French, even if later your VNQDD is a party full of anticommunist parasites that had no goal to do the good industrial and positive reforms Bac Ho carried out.. Rest in peace, anti-colonial chad, just way too moderate.
 * Phan Bội Châu (60/100)- Same as above and fought for the freedom of Vietnam, but way too rightist for my liking, although later on the VNQDD that you led, despite being anti-colonialist, turned to support the South Vietnamese and your anti-communism did try to stop Bac Ho from improving Vietnam, and the VNQDD is just another degenerate party, which is sad to see, how your based potential has gone.
 * Truong Chinh (79/100)- You had some failures, but you had very based programs.
 * Nguyen Van Linh (68/100)- I seriously don't get why he's called the Vietnamese Gorbachev when Gorbachev is a retard and national traitor while Van Linh is a genius. Cracked down on corruption, and fixed the economic issues Vietnam is facing after Le Duan fucked it all. He is be one of the greatest people to have ever set foot on earth. However, Doi Moi was an awful idea even obviously it being better as it didn't bring much problems compared to China, but still, Market Socialism is gay. However, you are the least bad of all of them.
 * Nguyen Phu Trong (65/100)- Vietnamese Xi Jinping. Understands that Liberal Democracy is a corrupt concept and upholded the rule of law, purged corruption, and upgraded Vietnam's status as a rising power. You are among the best modern-day leaders, and the fact that you're seeking to fix relations with China after Deng and Le Duan fucked it all up is excellent. However, in terms of economics you're good but way too moderate and your tolerance to cultural liberalism too is quite idk, alongside being too revisionist and chummy with the west. Better than all the other Doi Moi leaders, that's for sure, but being better than shit doesn't mean anything.
 * Kaysone Phomvihane (63/100)- Fought the Lao Monarchy, Sought to improve the lives of his countrymen and proclaiming Laos a based People's Democratic Republic. He's similar to Ho Chi Minh and that's a good thing. However, not too fond of your State Capitalism, though.
 * Tou Samouth (72/100)- Too moderate but contributed to Cambodia's communist movement against the French colonialists.
 * Pen Sovan (77/100)- You're one of the best people in history. You founded an organization that created the People's Republic of Kampuchea (the best government in Cambodian History), freed your country from Pol Pot, while pushing towards a policy of National Communism for Cambodian. That alone makes you gigachad, but kind of too moderate for my liking, and still too obedient to Le Duan.
 * Pridi Banomyong (64/100)- A liberal but one of the few Liberals I can have some degree of respect to. You did fight for the genuine betterment of Thailand against the monarchy and for the people, and sympathetic to socialism and anti imperialism is also based, backing Bac Ho, Nationalism, Self-Determination, Socialism, very good.
 * Ibrahim Yaacob (70/100)- Malaysian Subhas Chandra Bose.
 * Ahmad Boestamam (72/100)- Malaysian Sukarno-Chiang Ching Kuo synthesis. I will always recognize you as the real fighter for Malaysia and our real patriots, just too moderate economically.
 * Burhanuddin al-Helmy (67/100)- A less based version of the above.
 * Abdul Razak Hussein (62/100)- Had a more non-aligned foreign policy, helped us establish relations with the PRC, solved racial issues with the very based Malaysian New Economic Policy by reducing the level of poverty, trying to get rid of Malay Identity politics, and resolved chaos after Tunku Abdul Rahman's incompetency. A shame your son and later leaders has destroyed everything. But, you aren't Socialist, Social Democracy abd Anticommunism is cringe (despite you being one of the least bad), and such.
 * Hussein Onn (60/100)- Fought against the problem of drugs and solved issues of economic imbalances between the races for a united Malaysia. Based. But, please embrace Socialism, but, you hadn't accomplished much apart from continuing the programs of Abdul Razak.
 * Sudisman (66/100)- While I can’t be completely relaxed around you and stuff, as I believe you do have involvement in the Sep 30 Movement (which is kind of justified but I doubt you want to betray Sukarno), and some shady acts, but you are indeed demonized by Suhartoist, Anti-communist, and Western propaganda.
 * BJ Habibie (66/100)- True patriot to the Indonesian people. Great man. It is he who made Indonesia's economy strong, not Suharto, plus he ended the genocide and the terrible things that Suharto did in his reign of terror and murder. Too moderate, but still good.
 * Ben Chifley (65/100)- Like John Curtin, You are one of the only Australian Prime Ministers that deserve some respect from me as your domestic reforms are very good and fought the fashoids in Japan too, but anti-communism just isn't good, even so, you opposed the Cold War and what the Atlanticoids did to Malaysia. A bit like Australia's Palme.
 * Norman Kirk (62/100)- The above, but for New Zealand, but too moderate and liberal, and also didn’t get rid of the influence of the Angloids.
 * Luis Taruc (70/100)- Fought for worker's rights and wanted to free the Philippines and build an independent, nationalist, and socialist state for the Filipino people. Based. Though, with that said, why did you turn revisionist and demsoc later in your life? Filipino France-Albert Rene.
 * Mohan Baidya (72/100)- A better version of the above as you hate the dirty r*formists and wanted to create a Socialist Republic and a DOTP in Nepal, but why support D*ngist Revisionism?
 * Subhas Chandra Bose (71/100)- Your militant nationalist ideals are what really attracts me to you, National Communism is based too, but you allied with Imperial Japan, but then again I understand you need someone to kill the brits and you had to look for protection even if it's from an evil country (even then you condemned Nazism and Imperial Japan's brutalities afaik), so, understandable.
 * Anuradha Ghandy (75/100)- The struggle you carry on for the rights of India’s women will forever be respected by people worldwide. Supporting the Naxals is bad but the rest of your good make up for it.
 * Harpal Brar  (73/100)- I really liked all your thoughts, especially your defense of Stalin, and defense of Chinese sovereignty especially in the case of Tibet and Taiwan, but I don't like how you criticized Gandhi as the "borgeoise", sure Gandhi is too moderate and I prefer Ghosh, but still.
 * E. M. S. Namboodiripad (70/100)- Indian Chiang Ching Kuo. Your Socialistic model for Kerala made Kerala one of the best states in India with high HDI, education, healthcare, and all that. A success story for India, but why are you a reformist who only limited yourself to Kerala? Sure, what you’ve done in Kerala was very good, but all of India should be liberated.
 * Zulfikar Ali Bhutto (67/100)- Great social policies and his reforms are great for the average Pakistani person. He is my favourite Pakistani leader and what he did to his country was near flawless, however, you hadn't made a drastic change to Pakistan's system to be a Marxist-Leninist one, and you had some failures too.
 * Mohammed Zahir Shah (65/100)- Made a lot of positive progressive reforms for Afghanistan and did very good things domestically, one of the few good monarchs. Don't like your anti-commmunism and support for Uyghur seperatists, though. Plus, I really don't like your economic failures.
 * Akram Yari (75/100)- Another one of the few MLM’s I can get behind as you contributed a lot to influencing the Afghan revolutionary spirit. Shame the PDPA killed you.
 * Muhammad Najibullah (62/100)- He knows what to do for a country like Afghanistan, the least bad PDPA leader of all time. Although I like how the Communists are dedicated for progressivism on Afghan society, Najibullah knows that full scale is going too far as done by Taraki, Progressivism should be done as a gradual process. However, you're too dependant on the USSR for my liking, and a revisionist. Though overseeing a huge boom in the economy despite the way was extremely impressive.

Middle East:

 * Ja’afar Pishevari (75/100)- Generally quite based, just that banning Persian Language and being too reliant on the USSR is quite bad, but I really cannot deny your role in making Iranian Azerbaijian a great place.
 * Qazi Muhammad (75/100)- Same as above.
 * Abd al-Karim Qasim (62/100)- Failure to stop political chaos and purging communists was an ass move, but your domestic social and economic reforms were very based, and so is your opposition to the West.
 * Hakim (78/100)- A bit too sympathetic to the Dengoids, but still quite based.
 * Amin al-Hafiz (70/100)- Syrian Chiang Ching Kuo, as you did implement a lot of positive socialist reforms (even if too moderate), and backed Pan-Arab Unity. Very good.
 * Yasser Arafat (66/100)- Some of your tactics are iffy and led to the unpopularity of the PLO, but, you're a symbol of Palestinian resistance against Israel, very based.
 * Leila Khaled (77/100)- A symbol of the Palestinian Women's resistance against the criminal Zionist regime. Eternal respect to people like you.
 * Mahmoud Abbas (65/100)- Doesn't advocate for radical actions, but instead chose the best way to fight against Israel, based, although thanks to Israel, Islamic fundamentalists are on the rise. But you're too moderate, despite being a progressive figure.
 * Abdul Fattah Ismail (77/100)- It's quite a shame how everything you did for Yemen went to dust after war and retarded western-backed puppets like Hadi and Ali Abdullah Saleh. You're one of the most successful leaders of the middle east. Top class women's rights, great social development, supporting Palestine's cause, etc. You're on par with Gaddafi and Nasser in terms of success.
 * Fevzi Cakmak (73/100)- Too moderate, but I respect your relentless fight against foreign imperialists in defense of Turkey against the foreign powers, and had based social views, and firmly supportive of Ataturk.
 * Grigory Arutinov  (61/100)- Anti-Stalinist agarian socialist, ally of Beria and a revisionist, but I credit you for some of the most positive developments you brought for Soviet-era Armenia.
 * Gamal Abdel Nasser (77/100)- Based chad that improved Egypt's living conditions, scared the shit out of the Imperialists, advocated for great scale development, and the head of the Non-Aligned Movement to make Imperialists piss themselves. A great man and will forever be remembered as a hero for humanity against Imperialists. However, your affairs dealing with Syria and your military incompetence against Israel is quite cringe, but overall, you quite deserve a lot of my respect.

Africa:

 * Leopold Sedar Senghor (67/100)- Great for freeing senegal and having positive policies for it. Only fault is that you're friendly to the West and being too moderate, alongside revisionism.
 * Modibo Keita (60/100)- Good for wanting a Pan-Africanist people's nation working together to fight the French imperialists, although your economics isn't perfect and you're way too moderate for my liking, you're still overall good to me.
 * Ahmed Sekou Toure (62/100)- Good ideology and based for freeing Guinea from the French, had good intentions too for wanting a Pan-African unity against Imperialists, however, Camp Boiro and some of your economic failures is what sets you down, otherwise you're based.
 * Ibrahim Abatcha (75/100)- The hero of the people of Chad fighting against Tombalbaye’s genocidal tyranny. Based. A martyr for the Chadian People.
 * Aden Adde (61/100)- Another one of Africa's greatest people and maybe my favourite leader from the Horn of Africa. Freed Somalia and promoted Somali Nationalist Unity, and wanted to wipe out the genocidal legacies of colonialism. However, you're way too moderate.
 * Barthelemy Boganda (62/100)- One of the primary figures in Africa's struggle to independence and freed your country from the French colonialists. Your party is based and your country is great until Bokassa ruined it all, even if too moderate.
 * Ruben Um Nyobe (75/100)- Cameroon's father of independence and a true Socialist, but sadly, Cameroon has been ruined nowadays and you're too moderate.
 * Osende Afana (75/100)- Same as above
 * Julius Nyerere (65/100)- Toppled Idi Amin's genocidal regime, a bastillion against imperialism and a hero for Africa's people and a great freedom fighter than inspired many Africans to rise up against colonialists. Market Socialism, being too moderate and Stagnation is retarded though, but otherwise very good.
 * Seretse Khama (64/100)- Well, you are indeed the least bad Capitalist but you still being a capitalist, which is cringe, but I have to seriously credit you with the Developments you brought to Botswana, and opposing the APartheid regimes alongside being friendly to China and North Korea, quite good.
 * Joshua Nkomo (64/100)- Your adherence to Georgism is based and a Zimbabwe under you would be extremely ideal for a country. you would be better than Mugabe and you are the best choice for the people of Zimbabwe. But still too capitalist and liberal for my liking.
 * Samora Machel (72/100)- Freed Mozambique from the Portuguese, had good social policies and nationalization of private property is based. Plus your zero-tolerance stance on crime, prostitution is mega based. Also, nice job contributing to the fall of Ian Smith's government. But you’re kind of a puppet of Soviet Social Imperialism and a Brezhnevite. One of the least bad of them though, kind of like Najibullah.
 * Sam Nujoma (63/100)- Leader of SWAPO and a warrior against the Apartheid regime. Your ideology is very based and how you ruled Namibia is a model worth following. However, later on you turned revisionist and succdem 🗿
 * France-Albert Rene (78/100)- Imo you are the best person from Southern Africa behind Seretse Khama. Makes sense since both you and him are based. Served as a bastillion to the apartheid, made education and health free, improved the lives and the conditions of your people. Your authoritarianism is alright considering how Reagan and the Apartheid threatens you and want to turn you into an imperialist puppet. Based man overall. However, going down the revisionist path later in life and abandoning Marxism-Leninism is 🗿.

Europe:

 * Mehmet Shehu (72/100)- Defended Albania and a committed Anti-Revisionist and Anti-Imperialist to the endand helped to repel any attempt of imperialism against Albania, but some of your scandals putme off from fully liking you.
 * Nexhmije Hoxha (73/100)- Did her best to support her husband's career in building Albania into a grand socialist republic and you did help a lot. Only problem is that you supported Alia later in your life. Otherwise, you're a completely based female comrade.
 * Koca Popovic (63/100)- I really hate to admit it, but you, a fucking Titoite, had done a lot of good for the people of the world, like supporting anti-imperialist movements in the third world, opposed Western and Social Imperialism, etc; but, a Titoite you are, you have some too liberal stances, and purged Stalinists, so I can't really forgive you.
 * Sreten Zujovic (63/100)- Yugoslav Wang Yang. I'd prefer you over T*to and the degenerate system that Tito had set up, but even so, you were too overly loyal to the USSR, even if siding with Stalin against Tito is based, however, despite that, you didn't deserve to be purged and forced to become a T*toite.
 * Bela Kun (72/100)- Hungarian Recabarren, you did a lot to contribute to building Socialism and such in Hungary, which I respect your cause, but sympathizing and collaborating with Succdems is not good. Even so, I don’t think you deserve to be purged.
 * Gyorgy Lukacs (66/100)- Your stances in supporting Vanguardism and Leninism was very based, but slandering Stalin and your overly moderate stances isn’t good.
 * Ludvík Svoboda (70/100)- Hero of Czech National Communism and tried to improve the country and resist Brezhnev. A shame you didn't succeed. Installing Husak was cringe even if you wanted to avoid Brezhnev's wrath. However, swhf is cringe.
 * Jozef Pilsudski (65/100)- Freed Poland from the control of the genocidal Tsarist Empire, had based internal policies like the disliking of democracy, improvement to the lives of ethnic minorities while being tolerant to Jews was a massive W, and tried to take a strong hand against Hitler (although you later tried to work with tham because "muh anti-gommunizm") unlike the cowards in Britain and France. Don't like your economic failures during the depression and signing a treaty with the Nazis (anti bolshevism and your anticommunism as well), though. Polish Inonu, but better. Ykw, despite being an anti-communist, I recognize you as one of the most progressive figures of your time, and even then, you aren’t a hardcore anti-communist either, as you opposed the National Democrats more.
 * Nadezhda Krupskaya (77/100)- Defending Bukharin, Rykov and the Revisionist M*rketsocs are bad but otherwise you’re good. Contributed a lot to the education in the USSR and fought for women’s rights and also opposes Trotsky.
 * Vladimir Mayakovsky (75/100)- Alongside Maxim Gorky, you are one of the greatest artists ever, plus, Russian Futurism is incredibly based, as well as supporting Lenin in the Russian revolution.   But, still, I don't want to associate with antiauths and mediacracy.
 * Vyacheslav Molotov (74/100)- Oversaw the collectivization in the USSR and contributed a lot to the very based and successful First Five Year Plan, and one of the key people in the USSR that still opposes Revisionism to the end. One of the most based politicians of the USSR. But still, your weird plans on Turkey, Finland (even understandable since you needed to secure borders, but still), Poland (even if Soviets only entered Poland after Pilsudski’s government collapsed) isn’t at all my cup of tea, but your other goods make up for literally everything else.
 * Mikhail Suslov (77/100)- In a revisionist dominated Party, you stayed firm to the Stalinist line, and resisted any revisionism. Absolutely admirable. You are an icon of staying firm to the people and the communist principles the USSR is built from.
 * Gennady Yanayev (66/100)- A patriot and a loyalist to the cause until the very end. My only problem with you is not executing the coup properly, but otherwise, you should've took control. You're Russia's Chen Yun, and I have always wished you to be victorious over that bastard Gorbachev and his capitalist, kleptocratic western dicksucking puppet Yeltsin. Rest in peace, Patriot. However, some of your social imperialist stances were very cringe.
 * Pyotr Masherov  (68/100)- Revisionist, but I can't deny your economic and social contributions to Belarus, that helped Belarus survive a Post-Soviet chaos.
 * Alexander Shumsky (68/100)- While supporting some degree of Marxism-Leninism and Ukrainian Self-Determination is based, you did some mistakes, and anti-Stalinism is cringe too, but even so, you didn’t deserve what you got.
 * Mykhailo Hrushevsky (63/100)- Being supportive of the SRs are bad, but your socialism and all that is good (even if not the form in which I like). But, while you did fight for Ukrainian national identity, there is no need to be Anti-Stalinist, doesn’t it?
 * Volodymyr Vynnychenko (60/100)- A less based version of the above.
 * Pope Francis   (68/100)_ Supporting Liberation Theology, Christian Socialist, supported Castro, opposed racism, opposed neoliberalism, etc. Possibly one of the few based Popes there ever is. Just a little too moderate.
 * Wilhelm Liebknecht (60/100)- At the very least Social Democracy under you is a non-corrupted, genuinely socialist movement, but reformism and moderatism still isn’t my cup of tea, really.
 * August Bebel (67/100)- Like the above, but better. The SPD under you was at the very least a Socialist and Anti-Imperialist organization, and stood up against the genocides the German Empire did. Based.
 * Karl Korsch (70/100)- Don’t really like your more liberal and moderate stances, but you do have some good theories regarding the German revolution and Marxism.
 * Otto Grotewohl (63/100)- Revisionist, but you contributed a lot to fight the Nazis and helped to found the German Socialist Unity Party.
 * Egon Krenz (65/100)- A bit like East German Xi, but much more moderate, and I'd consider you a Moderate Honeckerist (which is quite idk, I guess), but you wanted to transform the GDR into a Kadar-like revisionist market socialism (which is still cringe), and wanted to get rid of corruption in the GDR. A shame that Gorbachev had to ruin everything and sell the GDR to the Westoids, and that you're a bit too moderate and a revisionist.
 * Ulrike Meinhof (77/100)- German Leila Khaled. It’s rare to find respectable, revolutionary figures like you serving as a symbol of Communist People’s Resistance against Capitalism.
 * Sahra Wagenknecht (65/100)- Too moderate, reformist and pro-Putin (even if I can somewhat understand that Putin is the only strong force in Europe to stand up to the Atlanticoid filth), but otherwise, you're the only based politician in a Germany fucked by liberalism.
 * Palmiro Togliatti (70/100)- Italian Thalmann, but later you turned to Reformism and you're a huge opportunist, which is cringe.
 * Walter Audisio (73/100)- Same as above, but slightly better.
 * Olof Palme (61/100)- The only based Swedish politician there ever is. Under your rule, you support towards chad anti-imperialist fighters like Castro and Ho Chi Minh are based, as well as adopting a policy to support the third world, gigabased. You should rule Sweden forever, so that Sweden doesn't become a cucked liberal hellhole like now. But you did not turn Sweden's system into a Socialist one.
 * Montesquieu (73/100)- One of the most progressive philosophers of your period.
 * Jacques Duclos (70/100)- You in general are very based, since you did work for the French people, but why did you even try to negotiate reform with even the Nazi authorities in France? That harmed the reputation of the PCF in the eyes of the French common people, dammit. Although at least you later did resist them.
 * Jean-Paul Sartre (63/100)- Anarchoid leanings is extremely cringe, but your contributions to literature, post-colonialism, and support for Marxism is extremely based.
 * Alain Badiou (74/100)- One of the only maoists I can get behind on.You advocate for a return of Communism, even if I'm not sure whhat your neo-marxism is, but it is definitely better than what the status quo can offer.
 * Bernard Montgomery (62/100)- One of the most heroic anti-nazi veterans there ever is. Although you later worked for NATO, at least you oppsed the US genocide in Vietnam.
 * Tony Benn (63/100)- Inspired Corbyn and had relativelyy based policies even if you are still in Labour which is cringe, and too moderate.
 * Stephen Hawking (63/100)- A good scientist, and you also had left-leaning politics which is good, but you are way too moderate.
 * Kim Philby (70/100)- Helped to sabotage British imperialist plans of the MI6 from the interior, very based.
 * Bill Bland (72/100)- One of the most based Hoxhaists of the international stage. A committed Communist to improve Britain, a committed anti-revisionist against the social imperialists like Brezhnev and Khurshchev, and your analysis on the Chinese revolution, even if not completely wrong, is a little too dogmatic for my taste.
 * George Galloway (68/100)- One of the only modern British Politicians I somewhat like, though quit supporting Iran.
 * Juan Manuel Sanchez Gordillo (64/100)- You are one of the most based Spaniards to have ever existed. Your programs are very similar to what Sankara did in Burkina Faso and you know you're based when I compare you to a great man like Sankara. Although reform will not get you anywhere, get that in your head. You're kind of too liberal and libertarian socialism is cringe. A bit like the Zapatistas of Spain.
 * Dolores Ibarruri (66/100)- Like Togliatti, Pollitt, Foster, etc. You are a hero for Spain's liberation from Fascism and understands that Anarchoids and Trots cannot be trusted, very based, but later on, who reconciling with Tito and turning to Revisionism, and way too domatic sometimes?
 * Jesus Hernandez Tomas (71/100)- Like the above but slightly better, and why Anti-Stalinism?

North America:

 * Tim Buck (71/100)- Slandered Stalin later on in your rule and an opportunist, but I can't deny you did very good things during your time as leader of the Canadian Communists.
 * Jason Unruhe (61/100)- Probably the only based Canadian to have existed and although your views are a bit radical, you are considered as one of the best people in the West nowadays.
 * George Washington (66/100)- Liberated America from the Brits, and built a based republican system dedicated to fighting colonialism, imperialism, and genocide, sadly, shitty presidents later on made America THE IMPERIALIST. Your ideal vision of America must be re-established instead of the hegemonic power we have now. Liberalism, Capitalism and Individualism is very cringe though, despite that it being the most progressive force of your time, a bit like Sakamoto Ryoma. Freeing slaves too was very based of you.
 * Benjamin Franklin (60/100)- Cringe Capitalism, Liberalism and Confederalism (even if classical liberalism was the most progressive force back then), but at least you're a very based anti-imperialist and anti-slavery hero of the US.
 * Thomas Jefferson (62/100)- Your ideas on liberty (national liberty is based but you want individualist, liberal liberty which is cringe) and your republicanism is extremely based, abolition of slave trade too is really great of you. You're one of my favourite and one of the best American presidents. Individualism is uncool, and same for your liberalism and capitalism, but otherwise alright.
 * James Madison (63/100)- Based chad that fought against the British bravely in the War of 1812, and provided more rights to the Native American people, based. However, I don't like your stance to slavery though, and some of your way too moderate policies, otherwise 100% based.
 * James Monroe (64/100)- Vowed to free the Americas from Colonialism and Imperialism and helped provide better life for the Natives. However, your affair with Liberia is quite iffy, and you did not abolish the slave system.
 * John Quincy Adams (60/100)- Continued Monroe's legacy. You had good ideas, but failed to carry out, what a waste.
 * Ulysses S. Grant (62/100)- Continued Lincoln's legacy. But you're hella corrupt, but that's more or less one of the few problems I had with you apart from occupying Hispaniola (even if they are trying to do shady moves).
 * Daniel De Leon (62/100)- You did have some good ideas, but trade unionism is cringe (although during your times they were a force of good), and it's nice that you support revolution, but a peaceful revolution will not do. Revolution to build a true Worker's state has to spill some kind of bloodshed, and opposing Vanguardism as a whole is not a really good idea towards building socialism, but at least you're better than other liblefts since you realize that succdems and reformists are traitors.
 * Theodore Roosevelt (64/100)- Your progressive reforms, your reduction of corporate influence and your domestic policies are one of the most based things that happened to American history. You would be Lincoln-tier if you weren't an Imperialist against the Philippines, and the crimes America committed there was horrible. (even if it's somewhat for a good cause to crush Britain)
 * Henry George (64/100)- Defending free trade is cringe but everything else about your theory is based. One of the few capitalists which I will not have them face against the wall.
 * Robert M. La Follette (65/100)- Like Teddy Roosevelt without the cringe, well, yeah, kind of, since Anti-Communism is an infantile disorder, plus, despite being a socialist, you did engage in profiting off the system of capitalism. You can be hypocritical, which led you to be attacked by McCarthy.
 * Robert M. La Follette Jr. (65/100)- just like the above.
 * Franklin D. Roosevelt (64/100)- Japanese Internment Camps are cringe, and so if your support to people like Somoza Garcia, and Trujillo, and asking China to colonize Indochina is quite iffy too, but other than that you're very based. Sadly, you are the last good American president since then. Your economics too are better than most but too moderate. I liked your new deal and I respect your support to us against the Japanese imperialists (and you did somewhat support India's fight to independence, even if it seems like just words only).
 * Eleanor Roosevelt (66/100)- Like the above, but better since you take your support for the rights of African Americans even further, but the same criticisms I have for FDR remain for you.
 * W.E.B. Du Bois  (74/100)- A bit too moderate, but you're a fighter for Socialism and the rights of African Americans against the filthy Capitalist regime of the US. One of the really based figures, on par with Rosa Parks, Angelou, Foster, Newton, Shulman and Hampton. However, sympathizing with Showa Statism was just bruh.
 * Grover Furr (65/100)- Well yeah, I 100% support your analysis and defense of Stalin, but defending Beria?? Come on now, that's just not good.
 * Gus Hall (71/100)- Backing the invasion of Afghanistan was retarded, but, that's about the only problem I have with you. Bill of Rights Socialism seems good, and I definitely will back you if I were an American. But you’re kind of a revisionist.
 * Huey Long (62/100)- Don’t like your anticommunism, though, but you did do based things.
 * Martin Luther King (66/100)- Your Civil Rights movement will also be considered one of the greatest triumphs of the people in America, plus, your ideology is fucking based, even if I wish you're revolutionary, and you're way too moderate, plus supporting l*beral democracy isn’t the way, and you’re a reformtard.
 * Harry Haywood (74/100)- A very influential Marxist for the African American community, but why separatism, but even then, your other goods make up for that. Rest in power.
 * Aldous Huxley (60/100)- Warned us about the future of Neoliberalism that will turn into a Fordist society. If neoliberalism isn't destroyed, humanity is doomed to fall. Antiauth is gay and you're too liberal for my liking, though.
 * Pancho Villa (68/100)- Hero that fought a great revolution against Porfirio Diaz. However, just like Juarez, you're ideology is quite bad.
 * Benito Juarez (69/100)- Freed Mexico from the French Imperialists and made European Imperialists soyrage, made Mexico secular and had great domestic reforms and improved indigenous rights there. However, classical liberalism is cringe, even if I admit you're good.
 * Subcomandante Marcos (64/100)- Not a fan of Libertarian Marxism but the way you act and your aims to protect your own people is based. One of the few Libertarian Marxists I can respect, since you aren't a shitlib and many of your ideas are very based.
 * AMLO (61/100)- Your policies are based from the little I read about you, although recently you have been dropping lower due to Mexico's slow response to COVID and Crime, and a bit too incompetent.
 * Jacobo Arbenz (66/100)- One of the greatest persons Central America has produced. Wanting to chase out the UFC, help distribute land to the peasants, wanting to improve the country, and your social reforms on education, healthcare, etc. Those are great. My only criticism is how you're not radical enough and way too moderate to build a strong state to prevent CIA intervention. One of the few only redeemable succdems. Another lesson that soft socialists should learn from, people like Arbenz are way too soft.
 * Manuel Zelaya (62/100)- Your ideals are based and you fixed Honduras from it's mess created by Pro-Western military dictators. However, if you mean change, then show it. Do something like Allende, at the very least (or even better, transform it to become communist).

South America:

 * Timoleon Jimenez (70/100)- It’s good that you ended FARC’s viciousness, but reformism isn’t the way to go.
 * Rafael Correa (68/100)- Your policies sought to move away from Neoliberalism and your economics helped the poor people of Ecuador and reduced poverty. Chad. However, despite good, your reforms don't go far enough to establish a true socialist system in Ecuador.
 * Juan Velasco Alvarado (77/100)- Nationalism, Socialism, Helping the Peruvian Indigenous people, Nationalization, and Agarian Reform- True based chad. You are one of the best people from South America. You deserve my eternal respect. But you're too moderate, and didn't do much to kill of capitalism.
 * Pedro II (65/100)- Another one of the monarchs that I consider them good and tolerable. Abolished slavery despite the interests, vibrant economy growth, culture and social progress happened under you. The Theodore Roosevelt of Brazil. However, you should've built a Socialist structure just like Souphanouvong did, although understandable since Socialism wasn't that much a big thing under you.
 * Getulio Vargas (71/100)- You're popular among the Brazillian masses for a reason. Your policies and reforms treated them very well, and your strongman leadership is what made your policies that did good from Brazil possible as well as fighting against the fashoids. Your care for the common man should be respected regardless of what quadrant you're at. Purging Communists and your Anti-Communism was cringe but that's about the only problem I have with you, same for not building a Socialist republic. One of the least bad Anti-Communists out there, Brazilian Chiang Ching Kuo.
 * Carlos Marighella (75/100)- With theory and action, this man bravely fought against the Brazillian US-backed tyranny and fought alongside the people. one of the only MLM's I can truly get behind and respect.
 * Luis Arce (72/100)- Continuing Evo's legacy, and you oversaw a period of prosperity and growth for Bolivia. Bolivia is proof that Socialism works. However, as of now, you're too moderate and the system has very little changes.
 * Jose Mujica (63/100)- Known for your humble lifestyle and used most of your money to support the livelihood of your own people. Although I wish you moved to the direction that Chadvez and Morales did, you're still a great person in my book. However, you still didn't do anything to fight capitalism. Uruguayan Xi Jinping.
 * Luis Emilio Recabarren (75/100)- The Pioneer of the Worker's movement in Chile, and the man who is the people's leader of Chile.However, why are you way too sympathetic to the succdem and liberal filth? Liberals are not the friends of the proletariat.
 * Juan Peron (65/100)- Cared for the common man and tried to eliminate poverty, hella based. Your policies are fucking based for a country like Argentina, so I would consider you an awesome man, but harbouring nazis (even Pavelic) and anti-communism was not.
 * Arturo Illia (60/100)- Another lib that I can actually respect. You did good for the economy, cared a lot for the people, and your choice to live humbly is great, not many leaders choose to live a life similar to that of a common man. However, I don't like your liberal and succdem leanings.
 * Nestor Kirchner  (63/100)- Repaid national debt, did good for the Argentine economy, abandoned alignment with the Imperialist Americans, and helped Argentina move out of the legacy of the vicious military dictatorship, but, similar to Chavez, you didn't do much against capitalism.

Neutral:

Asia and Oceania:

 * Sakamoto Ryoma (54/100)- Modernization, and Progcon is obviously very based and trying to end the Edo era feudalism as well, but I dislike the more liberal aspects of your ideology and free market capitalism.
 * Kenji Miyamoto (40/100)- Founder of the JCP. Other than his land claims he's good. Plus, why are you a revisionist? Better than most but still, and reformism will never work, and your revisionist policies (working for the Japanese capitalist system) utterly corrupted the JCP to the core. Class collaborationist and opportunist.
 * Tomiichi Murayama (48/100)- Another one of the least bad Japanese leaders, since you did expand welfare and social programs to help the poor, improved healthcare and improved the conditions of workers and apologized for crimes that Japan did (even if not doing much to keep your word), and in general was a weak leader, and not doing much against capitalism despite being a socialist. Plus, you still allied with Suharto.
 * Takeo Miki (42/100)- The only member of the LDP and the only LDP Prime Minister which I don't hate, since you are relentlessly anti-corrupt, and you moved Japan into a more independent direction, and tried to promote Japan's role as a more moderate and peaceful power. My problem with you is that you still mantained Capitalism in Japan.
 * Qin Shi Huang (52/100)- Repelling the Northern Barbarians, reunifying China, Legalism, and building the Great Wall of China is all extremely based, but brutality and burning books isn’t good. Essentially just Mao, but in ancient times.
 * Shang Yang (55/100)- The founder of legalism, one of the most based schools in history, and some of your ideas on equality, contributing to China’s reunification, and breaking down large families were good. But enslaving peasants, privatizing farmlands, and forcing people to marry young was bad (even if during your time it was a norm)
 * Mencius (53/100)- A better version of Confucius.
 * Confucius (50/100)- Some of your views were actually retarded, but some of your cultural views on meritocracy and all that were good.
 * Sheng Shicai (56/100)- You had very good policies and marxism-leninism, anti-Japan, and anti-imperialism is surely based, but I'm not fond of your brutality against the Uyghur people and purging the CPC, still relatively based though, shame you had to be friendly to the Chiangist KMT.
 * Kangxi Emperor (42/100)- One of the best Qing Dynasty kings as you did bring wealth and stability and protected Chinese sovereignty, but still, you didn’t solve the fundamental problems under Qing society under you.
 * Emperor Guangxu (42/100)- The only Qing dynasty monarch I don't hate as much as you did try to take China into a direction that Meiji put. Shame Cixi obstructed you.
 * Chen Duxiu (44/100)- Founding the CPC is based and you do make one or two good points but why are you a filthy Trotskyite and doesn't understand communism? Plus you're a factionalist, and Demsoc is cringe too. However, in your later life you're a bit better. However, collaborating with Wang is something I won't forgive (even if he is a Left KMT member at that time, but yeah). Plus, even so, I need to thank you for sheltering the Communists from Chiang. A bit like China's Chavez.
 * Bai Chongxi (51/100)- Same as above. However, you're an anti-communist that worked with Chiang even if you oppose him.
 * Xue Yue (51/100)- Chinese George Patton, a brave man that defied Chiang's orders that fought the Japanese bravely, but yet, I cannot like you as you are a huge anti-communist filth. However, despite being anti-communist, you did rescue Soong Ching Ling from the hands of traitor Chen Jiongming.
 * Carsun Chang (51/100)- You had some positive policies, but you're way too civically moderate, and electoralism can't change anything. Although it's a shame how your party became a puppet of the KMT.
 * Bo Gu (42/100)- Dogmatic and militarily incompetent, though you did try to help the Communist Movement in China.
 * Otto Braun (Li De)  (49/100)- Same as above, but better as you also did contribute to your native homeland’s struggle well in Germany.
 * Mao Zedong (49/100)- I like how you fought the Japs, industrialized China and got rid of feudalism, Chiang, had some good theories and ideas and chasing out Imperialist influence, but to be honest, your cultural revolution is absolutely abhorrent and the Great Leap Forward is carried out horribly which led to an astronomical amount of people dead (even if you tried to solve it despite not being able to do much, but the entire shitshow could be avoided if you were more competent, but it’s really not entirely your fault and it's a culmination of many different factors, even if your Four Pests campaign did have faults too), and in your later years, you're a powerhungry, paranoid tyrant (and caused the sino soviet split too), supported the social imperialist invasion of Hungary, caused the unneeded excessive violence and destruction in the CR. Plus, you are one of the worst figures in the international communist movement, like backing Mobutu, Pinochet later on (just for the sake of anti-USSR), shaking hands with Kissinger and Pol Pot (even if you didn't know how batshit he was at that time). Your anti-imperialism is quite double sided, don't you think so? Though I agree you're overly demonized and some of your theories, like New Democracy and the Four Classes are based, but you're still not a good leader. You're overall neutral to me, as I'd rather you over Chiang, Deng, and whatever modern T*iwan is. Even so, I kind of blame you for your failed economic system that you put in place, which damaged the reputation of State Socialism and gave rise to Deng. However, your theories are something worth looking into and I do respect a number of Maoists, even if some (like Kaypakkaya) are bad. Though even then, in Yan’an you didn’t really do much to improve the lives of peasants and had something similar a caste system, which is absolutely terrible.
 * Zhou Yang (48/100)- Communism is not love, and not a dance party. How can you not get that? Yes, I agree that Humanity should be protected, but you are too utopian and idealistic.
 * Tan Zhenlin (56/100)- It’s fine to dislike what Mao did in the GLF and the CR, but regretting the revolution and condemning it as a whole is not something I’d accept.
 * Liu Shaoqi (41/100) Your revisionist tendencies are bad, but, You didn't deserve that kind of ending and you contributed to building China's economy, however, you're kind fo like the Chinese Bukharin but slightly worse, still can't like all your revisionist bs though.
 * Zhao Ziyang (44/100)- Good for being critical of radical Maoist policies and helped open up and reform China (even if your policies are too liberal and capitalist), but how you sympathized with Tiananmen Rioters is uncool. Although your proposal of an Authdem system while preserving the Communist Party doesn't seem half bad either. Although you're a revisionist, but I'd rather a revisionist like you than Deng (since at least you aren't as opportunist as Deng, even if I hate you). Basically China's Dubcek.
 * Wu De (55/100)- I'd take you over Dengoids and the Gang of Four, but nontheless, you are still a cruel motherfucker either way.
 * Peng Zhen (54/100)- You could’ve been good, but why did you uncritically support capitaloid roaders like Deng in the party? You were kind of based during Mao’s time, what happened?
 * Wan Li (48/100)- One of the least bad Dengoids as your reforms did do good for the people after Mao’s mess (even if not socialist enough) and was popular with the peasants, but still, a Dengoid, plus, allying with the liberal reformists is a bit sussy of you.
 * Wang Bingzhang (50/100)- One of the only dissident s of the PRC I can somewhat tolerate, since you are more supportive of Chiang Ching Kuo-styled tridemism, and you opposed the Dengoid revisionist regime. However, I still can't trust you whether you'd be pro-west or not, and I keep my distance with antiauths as a whole. Still take you over Dengoids, though.
 * Xi Zhongxun (44/100)- This man is one of the OG's of the CPC, starting from fighting the war of resistance against both the Japs and the Chiangist regime. You initiated economic reform and was the reason behind the great pearl area in Guangdong being very prosperous. You're a hero for all of Southern China. Your assignment of Special Economic Zones to Shenzhen turned southern china into one of the richest places in China is something that only great people will do. 习仲勋同志万岁！Supporting Hu Yaobang and being too liberal is iffy though, still a revisionist., I prefer your son.
 * Wang Huning (43/100)- You helped implement all the necessary ideologies into China based on their time and China's material conditions, like the Scientific outlook on development under Hu, and the Chinese Dream under Xi. You truly understood how politics should work. However, you rejected class struggle, betrayed marxism, and such, and also being a revisionist. Betraying the principles of Marxism is not acceptable in any context, plus, you're also another national conservatist right wing class collaborationsit revisionist in the party.
 * Wu Bangguo (48/100)- Like the above, but better, and also, thank you for helping Hong Kong to get rid of the influence and interference of the West and helping to crack down on Liberals and the Wongtards, and it's good that you're more left-leaning.
 * Bo Xilai (45/100)- Fighting against crime and wiping out the mafias in Chongqing is based and being one of the most Left-Wing people in the Communist Party is clearly very, very based and I'd prefer you over the more economically liberal ones that's for sure, but still, you're quite corrupt, had a lot of scandals, and is a crony of Jiang. The Chongqing Model is based though, a shame you had to be corrupt, dogmatic, and a Maoid, and you probably wouldn't have solved the problem of corruption, unlike Xi.
 * Xi Jinping  (50/100)- He is nothing of the sort of how the Anti-China media portrays him. He continued Hu Jintao's technological, economical and social advancements, and his program of One Belt One Road, Moderately Prosperous Society and elimination of the extreme poverty is something that only gigachads will pull off. Also, I like your firm Anti-Western stance. Destroy the West at this point. My only problem with you is the South China Sea dispute and a bit of economic stagnation, and a bit on not being left wing enough on economy. Please embrace Marxism-Leninism path now, and quit tolerating billionaires (although you seem like you are not favourable of markets and would try to push towards a socialist economy, that's good, but do something about the influence of capitalism still present in China),and try to do something to reduce the power of the private sector and try to stop Li Keqiang's capitaloid policies. (and please, have some huge achievements, or tear down Dengist State Capitalism with your very own hands, then we'll talk.), plus, what is with your treatment with Hu Jintao lately? Although getting rid of Li Keqiang and Wang Yang from the top positions is based, but not too good either. Plus, in the fight against Capitalism, we shouldn't just attack neoliberals and megacorporations, but at the same time, implement more socialistic reforms too, and I really don't like how you are putting your people, like Li Qiang, who is arguably just as bad as the Capitalist roaders in the Party, all over the place, and that you are also kind of exporting Chinese Social Imperilism too, abeit not as much as the other powers like the US, EU, Russia, Japan, Iran, etc. Plus, I don’t like your suppression of tridemists, some leftists and mishandling of zero covid, and economically incompetent, especially recent events on how it has developed into.
 * Sima Nan (53/100)- You do have some kinda based stances like anti-liberalism, Socialism and Nationalism, but your staunch support for Dengism doesn’t really make me fully support you. Though still, better than a lot of Dengoids already.
 * Yang Jiechi (44/100)- Dengoid, but I really can't deny you got balls when confronting Blinken and Pompeo.
 * Hu Xijin (48/100)- Same as above.
 * Zhao Lijian (50/100)- I admire your strength and patriotism, but still, you do have some bad takes coming out time to time.
 * Hua Chunying (50/100)- Same as above
 * Wang Wenbin (50/100)- Same as above.
 * Carrie Lam (46/100)- The only fault with you is not sending tanks to kill off all the Western-backed Self Haters and Terrorists, and a bit of mismanagements under your rule and not being radical enough. Crush them all. Kill all of those terrorists. It's good that you're moving towards patriotism. Excellent. However, quit being a capitalist.
 * Rupert Dover (46/100)- Like the above, while I don’t really like your land controversies and being a typical Dengoid, I will forever pick you over Joshua Wong, and nice job showing those cunts what patriots are made of (though you could learn a thing or two from Li Peng when dealing with them)
 * John Lee (50/100)- Helped to crush that terrorist Joshua Wong, had great ideals wanting Hong Kong to move forward and continue Lam's legacy of a Patriot-run Hong Kong loyal to their Chinese brothers. Based. A true patriot. Critically support you against traitors like Wong and their Atlanticist puppet masters. Also, good job retaliating against Pelosi, and securing the rule for Hong Kong, but embrace the Socialist path now.
 * Tung Chee Hwa (45/100)- First Chief Executive of Hong Kong that helped rebuild and save the country from the legacies of British Colonialism. Also, providing free housing is based, but, you are quite bad when handling the economy earlier on, and your style of governance led you to become unpopular (although you did try to solve things, which is good)
 * Li Kwoh-ting (52/100)- Dirigisme is good, as well as how your economics led to fantastic economic growth without giving in to Corpcucks unlike how it's seen in Korea and China, Market economy is cringe but the rest make up for it, although not doing anything to kill capitalism is bad too.
 * Yen Chia-kan (52/100)- Same as above, and built the Technocratic system ruled by experts seen in Chiang Ching Kuo's era until the DPP destroyed everything you did.
 * Sun Yun Suan (52/100)- Same as above, but slightly better as you did contribute to even Nigeria's economy too.
 * Ko Wen-Je (43/100)- Great job for realising that the DPP is a self-hating, sinopobic Japanese-American crony party who has done nothing but install corruption and fuck over Taiwan. You want to re-establish a technocratic society, get rid of Chen and Tsai as well as their cronies, based. The Pan-Green bandits can seethe all they want, but you deserve my support. As a Pan-Red, I look forward to how you will reconcile with the Mainland and eventually push for reunification, something which Chiang Ching Kuo wanted to do but died too early. However, your economics are cringe, and you don't seem to be a socialist either, and though better than the DPP and the modern KMT, I hope you won't be a dengoid capitalist roader.
 * Anandyn Amar (57/100)- Good for wanting to mantain Mongolian independence, but you're a bit too friendly with the Japanese, however, you are also too tolerant to the Buddhist Feudalist Clergy.
 * Peljidiin Genden (54/100)- Same as above, but you're way too friendly with the Japs and too defensive against Stalin.
 * Yumjaagin Tsedenbal (44/100)- Had good reforms, but you're too much of a Soviet Puppet. Plus, purging National Communists? Seriously, plus, screw you and your Brezhnevian puppet masters from trying to intervene in China and causing chaos. Although you're a less bad version of Zhivkov, that I can credit.
 * Norodom Sihanouk (40/100)- Unlike majority of monarchs, Sihanouk is true to his people. He wanted to work what's best and he knows what kind of evil Imperialism is. Not a fan of monarchism, but he is tolerable. But repressing Peasants was stupid. Still doesn't justify how repressive you are, though.
 * Than Shwe (42/100)-Possibly the only one from the Burmese Military Junta that I can like. This man softened what that man Ne Win did, and actually tried making his country better. However, you're also quite incompetent when dealing with some issues, and too pro-Eastern.
 * Mongkut (58/100)- One of the few Monarchs I don’t hate as much as your policies greatly improved the scientific and technological development in Thailand, improved your country and prevented it from being Imperialized by Angloids, even if I kind of have some issues with you, but you’re fine. The Reza Shah Pahlavi of Thailand.
 * Leong Yew Koh (50/100)- Like Tan Cheng Lok, but better.
 * Onn Jaafar (49/100)- Anti-Imperialism and Nationalism is very cool, but you're too malay-centric for my liking, although you later disliked UMNO's racial politics and tried to go against Tunku, which is good.
 * Hew Kuan Yaw (41/100)- You are one of the most confusing figures out there, you're a clown, yet you do have some good ideals. Still suspicious of your sympathies to the Dengists though
 * Kua Kia Soong (52/100)- Exposed the crimes of the American neocons and their NED and their schemes and ‘color revolutions’ they back. I’m proud to respect you as a Malaysian Chinese. Based. Even so, I don’t really trust your antiauth leanings.
 * Rafizi Ramli (46/100)- One of the only genuine and true Malaysian politicians, but still, that isn’t saying much.
 * Lee Kwan Yew (59/100)- One of the few based Capitalists and one of the few rightists that I can genuinely respect. He is one of the four asian tigers flourishing such a tiny country's economy, While not exploitative nor being the classic US-backed Neoliberal dictator. His ideals on morality and criticism of Western Democracy is based, and he is one of my main inspirations. However, being friendly with Reagan, Thatcher, and Pol Pot is cringe, Support for some degree of Eugencism and crushing Trade Unions too, I don't like unions either, but still.
 * Lee Hsien Loong (53/100)- Similar to his father, he continued his legacies of an economically powerful Singapore and his working reforms are based. During the great recession, just like Hu Jintao in China, he led Singapore through minimal impact and brought it back to being a great country once again. But still, Globalism is bad, and so is being too chummy with the West.
 * Halimah Yacob (53/100)- Helped prevent people from losing jobs, advocating for gender and racial equality in Singapore, and was very efficient when dealing with COVID and minimized it's impact. Very based. But, similar to above, don't like Capitalism, and Globalism is bad.
 * Goh Meng Seng (48/100)- Seem kind of promising, but I’m not fond of your overly moderate stances.
 * David Marshall (40/100)- I support your fight for Singapore’s self determination, but your Neocon and Antiauth sympathies really put me down (even them I’m not sure whether you are completely neocon or not).
 * Rodrigo Duterte (50/100)- Great strongman president who is drawing the Philippines away from the Americans, slaughtering terrorists and drug dealers, and dedicated to fight the problems in the Philippines with a firm hand. However, I believe that the Philippines still has to transform into a Socialist system, one which you didn't do, and did not do enough to purge corruption and resolve the entire shitty political status that the Philippines is in. Filipino Xi Jinping.
 * Tan Malaka  (46/100)- One of the only Trotskyists I don’t hate as much. You contributed a lot to building Modern Indonesia.
 * Joko Widodo (45/100)- Following the true principles of Sukarno's Pancasila, using it as the guidance to build Indonesia into a powerful country after cleaning the legacies of the Suharto regime. However, you're quite cringe economywise and the corruption in Indonesia is still relatively rampant, and you do seem kind of disappointing recently.
 * John Curtin (59/100)- Anti-Communist and not radical enough, and preserving the White Australia Policy is very cringe, but that's about all the problems I had with you. Had based reforms that improved the conditions for the common person similar to Attlee, drew away from the Angloids, and a leading fighter against fascism, and also not changing Australia into a socialist country.
 * Gough Whitlam (44/100)- May not be the smartest person in economics but still had positive social policies for Australia. But why would you betray another fellow Demsoc by supporting the Illegal Chilean Coup? Plus, you did not at all change Australia's system to be fully independent and being Socialist.
 * Malcolm Fraser (47/100)- Took down Whitlam and turned Australia the Imperialist puppet it is today. But you did have some good domestic policies, a bit like Australian Macmillan.
 * Ted Hill (48/100)- Could have potential in being a based revolutionary, but you just had to support Pol Pot.
 * Julian Assange (50/100)- Based of you to expose neolib ansd neocon plans and based being anti-imperialist, but please embrace socialism and be against neocon's capitalist system, plus, I don't like social libertarianism.
 * Sheikh Mujibur Rahman (40/100)- Liberator and the father of the freedom of the Bangladeshi people from Yahya Khan's tyranny. Nationalism, Socialism and Secularism is based, Democracy is meh, plus, you're too liberal, and Bangladesh had a lot of problems, like economic failures and corruption under you.
 * Pushpa Kamal Dahal (43/100)- Great for overthrowing the Nepali feudalist monarchy and implemented great reforms for the Nepali nation. He is possibly the only MLM that I will respect. However, you're still a revisionist and a reformist, so is being too moderate.
 * KP Sharma Oli (41/100)- Nepali Nicolae Ceausescu. Sure I like your socialist leanings and some of your leanings, but Nepal is still a mess around you, and you can be an imbecile too.
 * Mahatma Gandhi (54/100)- Praise the hero of India fighting for Indian independence and building a free India. However, rejecting industrialization is cringe, plus, how can you not get that reform doesn't and never will work??? Plus, you seem to be also too leniant to the borgeoise and too soft to the Angloids? Too moderate too soft, etc. Sure, I credit you with helping Indian Independence, but still, too moderate and reform is not the way to do it, same for being too friendly to India’s Capitalists.
 * Lal Bahadur Shastri (45/100)- Had based economic policies which led India to having great food production, had a based foreign policy of non-alignment,based secularist, and led India into victory against US puppet Pakistan. But too moderate, that's my issue, and you haven’t completely solved India’s issues regarding Nehru’s failed economics.
 * Sirimavo Bandaranaike (44/100)- Displayed the power of women and had a lot of based left-leaning policies, but I don't like your economic failures and Sinhalese ethno nationalism.
 * Solomon Bandaranaike (44/100)- Same as above.
 * Abdul Ghaffar Khan (57/100)- Like Gandhi, but better.
 * Muhammad Ali Jinnah (56/100)- Similar to Gandhi, he is a great man fighting against British colonialism and striving what's best for Indian Muslims, but sadly the British Imperialist legacies carved India apart. However, you don't seem to advocate socialism, do you?
 * Nur Muhammad Taraki (57/100)- Had good intentions and continued a lot of the Progressive policies in previous regimes. I also heard that under you, Afghanistan is similar to a Socialist utopia. But you're a tad bit too radical for my liking, and too chummy with Brezhnev.
 * Mohammad Aslam Watanjar (47/100)- You did help a lot in Afghanistan and tried to curb factionalism and based that you went against Hafizullah Amin, but why did you endorse the Soviet Invasion?
 * Babrak Karmal (47/100)- The fact that you're doing so much good to Afghanistan and would have moved Afghanistan to same way of how Daoud Khan did proved that you're a great man, sadly you are taken down by traitor Gorbachev. However, you're too much of a USSR puppet. One of the least bad Brezhnev puppets out there.
 * Ahmad Shah Massoud (41/100)- Islamism is ehh, but I will give you the credit for your bravery against the Taliban and the Social-Imperialists of Brezhnev and Gorbachev.
 * Emomali Rahmon (40/100)- Good for killing Islamic extremists and preventing their country to fall to become a den of terrorism and extremism unlike Afghanistan, Secularism too is good, and so is your left wing economics (abeit not far left enough), and anti-NATO stance (despite the fact that you're a Putin puppet), but other than that you're cringe.
 * Kassym Jomart Tokayev (55/100)- You're probably the only decent leader from Kazakhstan and maybe even Central Asia as a whole. You purged corruption (but did nothing against Nazarbayev, and your family is rich with overseas assets), and had better economic reforms to improve Kazakhstan, but nontheless, you're still a capitalist and crony capitalism is still running rampant in Kazakhstan, and while I get drawing away from Russia, being all chummy with the West isn't something I'd accept.

Middle East:

 * Reza Shah Pahlavi (58/100)- Anothher monarch which I can accept. You had based social, economic, and cultural reforms and paved way to modern Iran, and wanted to build a republic but Islamists stopped you, ethhnic nationalism, being too friendly to the Nazis and failing to mobilize peasants were bad, and so is you still being an absolute monarch, but you're overall good. Shame that your son and Khomeini ruined Iran.
 * Saddam Hussein (46/100)- Did good for Iraq and had positive ideals wanting to take down the Gulf Monarchies and his domestic policies in education and helping the people of Iraq are cool, but at the same time he's repressive as hell and too Sunni-centric, corrupt, plus invading Kuwait is a terrible choice. However, you and the Ba'athists contributed the most to modern Iraq, which needs another strongman like Saddam back. I have a lot of problems with you, yet, I cannot deny your contributions to a modern Iraq is immortal.
 * Shukri al-Quwatli (43/100)- Fought for Syria and is against Western imperialist interests, but even so, that isn't saying much, you are against leftism in Syria and is way too conservative for that period of time.
 * Carlos Latuff  (47/100)- A bit like the Palestinian Corbyn that opposed Neocons and the Arab Spring ANtiauths, that's good, but supporting Khomeini and Putin isn't acceptable, at all.
 * Suleiman the Magnificent (47/100)- One of the only Ottoman monarchs I have some respect to, since you did make your empire prosperous in culture, science, and literature and all that, but that doesn’t really amount to much.
 * Ahmet Riza (40/100)- Early on you supported the Young Turks, which is beyond cringe and unforgivable, but at least you defected to Ataturk later on.
 * Ismet Inonu (59/100)- The Turkish president that truly followed the legacies of Ataturk. However, you're a bit too liberal for my liking (although I understood you were forced by the Atlanticoid filth and their puppet, Menderes to do so, and you personally opposed it) and I'm not sure if I like your economic failures (even if WW2 was kind of responsible) and getting rid of communists was very cringe (same with oversecularization and your harsh policies on Kurds (even if repressing feudalists and Kurdish ethnonats were based), which corrupted the image of Ataturk’s Turkey). However, despite that, you are one of the most based members of the CHP. Also, good job thrwarting the plans of scheming traitors like Turkes and Atsiz. Though backing China against the Japanese Fascists is very based, I give you that.
 * Celal Bayar (55/100)- Too moderate, however, you are a faithful Kemalist and a true progcon unlike that traitor Menderes. However, the Democrat Party is cringe.
 * Cemal Gursel (47/100)- Atlanticoid filth and escalated tensions with Greece, and backing the Shah in Iran, but I credit you for your support to Hoxha, preserving Kemalism (although liberal democracy is cringe), and getting rid of Menderes. The least bad leader of Post-Kemal Turkey.
 * Qaboos Bin Said (50/100)- Tbh, you're good for a monarch as you modernized Oman, ended slavery, stopped Oman from cucking to the West and Improved Living conditions. It's rare to see good monarchs like you. However, your country is still a capitalist monarchy and too chummy with the West, which is cringe.
 * Dogu Perincek (44/100)- Clearly, Communism, Left Wing Nationalism an Kemalism is very cool that's a matter of fact, but you supported Erdogan and denied the Armenian Genocide. A worse version of Zyuganov.
 * Serzh Sargsyan (47/100)- Too friendly to Putin, and a rightoid, but you did good purging corruption and protecting Armenians from Azeri provocation, acceptable.
 * Heydar Aliyev (42/100)- Creating a cult of yourself is gay and aids, so is being a Turkish puppet, however, your technological advancements and your policies prevented Azerbaijan to fall to a post-soviet chaos. However, capitalism and corruption is cringe.
 * Samir Amin (46/100)- I do like some of your analysis and views of Marxism to be applied around the third world, but Maoism-Third Worlidsm is quite cringe and I don't like your expression to support Pol Pot.

Africa:

 * Muammar Gaddafi (53/100)- Despite your faults on backing some bad groups, you're still overall a positive figure in Libyan history. Based for overthrowing the King of Libya and having great ideas and programs that made Libya one of the best countries in Africa at that time. Deporting Jews and Italians were cringe, as well as threatening Tunisia and Chad (despite I fucking despise both Ben Ali and Habre), and in the later years your economic liberalization, as well as rejecting class struggle and being quite corrupt too but overall you're a positive figure. A progressive force for Africa and the Middle East definitely and you did good things, but not completely good. Plus, the atlanticoids were billions of times worse. Though backing Islamists and other shady groups were just awful of you. You are not the Messiah I once thought you were, but you are not a demon either, and in the later years, you have grown to be really disappointing.
 * Saif Al Islam Gaddafi (46/100)- My greatest wishes to you to restore the Gaddafist legacy in Libya. But is really Gaddafi the most suitable figure though? Plus, you’re kind of capitalist, which isn’t really what I’m fond for.
 * Dawda Jawara (45/100)- Made the Gambia and independent country and had good policies for Gambia, however, your recognition of the ROC is cringe, and not a socialist, and although progressive, effects of it are very minimal.
 * Adama Barrow (45/100)- Too liberal, but you're trying to move Gambia out of the scars of Yahya Jammeh's evil regime, and you barely did anything to change Gambia's politics.
 * Mathieu Kerekou (41/100)- Although your economics are bad and such, I shall credit you better than most leaders in Africa as you are true to helping the people and you tried your best making Benin a good country. It's kinda sad to see efforts of leaders like you go to waste. However, your incompetency is something that can't be ignored, and you're a massive opportunist too, overall very disappointing.
 * Siad Barre (47/100)- You would be based if you remained as your early reign self. However, you had to be an irredentist (even if you have a reason to take the Ogaden), you're still a genocidal and you manipulated tribal relations, better than most African tyrants though. However, despite insane, I prefer you thank Somalia now.
 * Marien Ngouabi (45/100)- Alienating some ethnic groups are cringe but everything else about you is based, like improving literacy and healthcare (abeit being too moderate), as well as fighting against Mobutu.
 * Agostinho Neto (50/100)- Man of the Angolan people and freed Angola from the savagery that the Imperialists did in Angola, and later, a stern opponent of the Apartheid and other American cronies in Africa. Although a coalition government with the UNITA doesn't seem too bad either. However, even if you're better than the UNITA and the Portuguese colonizers, you're still a Brezhnevite revisionist and backed Soviet Social Imperialism.
 * Nelson Mandela (56/100)- Ended the Apartheid Regime, did significant improvements to South African's rights and he is worshipped for a reason. He is against imperialism and his reforms for South Africa are mega based. Some of what you did when you're in opposition is quite iffy, but the Apartheid is a bigger terrorist. However, as a leader, you failed to implement good land reform and failed to implement good policies to curb AIDS. However, it's sad to see what your successors, especially that bastard Jacob Zuma, destroying what you created. One of the most tolerable Libsocs.
 * Desmond Tutu (52/100)- Like the above, but still way too moderate.
 * Didier Ratsiraka (43/100)- Made Madagascar stable and had good social reforms for the country, but just like Kerekou in Benin, your economics are terrible. However, you'll be spared by me on that because you actually cared for your people and country. However, you are a revisionist, which is very cringe.
 * Wavel Ramkalawan (42/100)- One of the better libs as you did try to continue France-Albert Rene’s reforms, but you are still a liberal who did not completely revive Ti France’s Socialist ideology.

Europe:

 * Edvard Kardelj (46/100)- Dirty reformtard and revisionist, plus too capitalist to me, but you did help set Yugoslav policy of nonalignment. One of the few people in the revisionist SFRY Titoist government which I don't hate. A shame huge revisionists like Tito purged you.
 * Joska Broz (41/100)- T*toite scum and a massive defender of Tito, but, although cringe, knowing how fucked Yugoslavia now is, you seem to be the least bad choice.
 * Nicolae Ceausescu (41/100)- I would like you a lot if you remained in your earlier self, just like Mao. Your stance on abortion, your National Communism and your initial liberalization and your independence from Brezhnev is based, as well as building lots of schools, hospitals, and such that Romanians enjoy and I see you as the builder of modern Romania, but your economic policies (especially the austerity policy and killing those that opposed your failures, so much for "Marxism-Leninism"), corruption, foreign policy and your life of extravagance is why I dislike you. You are possibly the only leader of Communist Eastern Europe that fucked your country (although Gorbachev is also to some degree responsible), although I'd rather you than Romania now, and even so, your wife is more responsible for the bad things that happened to Romania under you. You had so much potential, yet your failed policies and your nepotism ruined it all, but even if I respect your national communism, that does not at all justify your support to people, like Bokassa, the Shah (and later Khomeini), and even Pinochet of all people.
 * Janos Kadar (55/100)- Improved Hungary's living standards, had some good policies, etc. However, you're too much of a USSR puppet for my liking even if you personally opposed Brezhnev's invasion of Czechoslovakia, but even then, you're a Brezhnev/Khruschev puppet and gave into Markets and Revisionism, alongside being way too moderate. One of the least bad revisionists by far, but still.
 * Karoly Grosz (45/100)- Tried to save Communism in Hungary, but reformists stopped you, even if you aren't trying to return to Rakosi and is still a revisionist.
 * Alexander Dubcek (43/100)- Drawing away from the USSR and wanting to make Czechoslovakia more independent? Based. Sadly Brezhnev had to take such a man like you down. But you're WAY too liberal for my liking, and still a revisionist. Better than Brezhnev and Husak though, and the invasion by the Warsaw Pact was a Social Imperialist crime as I believe Czechoslovakia should seek it's own, independent Socialist path. However, sympathising with antiauth and eurocom is pretty bad too, alongside your tolerance to liberal degeneracy, the capitalist mode of production, etc, make it seem as if you're a more left-wing and liberal Deng Xiaoping, and you did turn Czechia into revisionism, and to a path of no return. I don't really like you, but I don't think the revisionist Warsaw Pact has the right to dictate what path each country chooses to pursue. Hence, the invasion was a crime.
 * Milos Jakes (40/100)- Czechoslovakian Gorbachev, though I doubt you were incompetent since Husak ruined all hope of rescuing Socialism in Czechoslovakia, but still, a dirty r*formist.
 * Catherine The Great (50/100)- One of the least bad monarchs, and one I can have at least some degree of respect to. You did improve Russia by a HUGE degree by modernizing it and bringing modern ideas in, but you ignored conscription, imperialism, and the country being still under serfdom, decent overall.
 * Peter the Great (53/100)- Like the above, but better.
 * Alexander Kerensky (40/100)- Although overthrowing the Tsars are good, you did nothing to bring Russia out of the First World War, and your land reforms were absolutely not radical enough. Sure you did improve condtions (even if the people still lived pretty much like shit), improved women's rights, gave Poland independence and gave greater autonomy to Ukraine and that's based but you did not start any industrial projects while you could, kept the agarian lifestyle and system (which was still quite feudalist) hence I think the Bolsheviks are much better. I'd take you over the Tsar but that doesn't say much.
 * Nikolai Bukharin (43/100)- Supported the based NEP (even if it's a temporary measure), Pro-Socialism in One Country, Anti-Trotsky, and so on. However, If you do seize power, I wish you had the balls to stand up to Nazism like how Stalin did in the real world, plus, your market economics probably wouldn't have succeeded to industrialize Russia (and cringe too), and you're a huge revisionist too, btw.
 * Alexei Rykov (43/100)- Same as above.
 * Mikhail Tukhachevsky (46/100)- One of the biggest mistakes Stalin did was purge you. You are an even more skilled commander (on par with Zhukov and that's based) and the Nazi reign of terror will be gone even quicker if you were there. But, why did you participate in a plot to Sabotage Stalin's socialist project, and I’ve heard that you have Fashoid connections?
 * Mykola Skrypnyk (50/100)- Ukrainazation was kinda based, and same for your contributions to Soviet Ukraine, but some of what you did did go too far.
 * Andriy Melnyk (50/100)- Anti-Nazi, and a Left nationalist later in your life, but at first you're a traitor who wanted to betray the people's Bolshevik revolution, but even so, you're still too chummy with Tito.
 * Vasyl' Shakhrai (52/100)- Similar to the above, you are a good revolutionary that fought against the Tsar, but at first you're an anti communist, which is beyond cringe. However, It's a shame that the Whites killed you.
 * Alexei Kosygin (50/100)- Basically a Bukharin 2.0, tried to reform the USSR into a true communist state instead of Brezhnev's retardation, and the only competent man inside Brezhnev's administration, and later inspired Andropov, a shame you didn't take power. Your support for the profit motive and markets is very suspicious of you, though.
 * Yuri Andropov (48/100)- During your short term, you crushed down on the corruption in the Soviet Union created by Brezhnev's retarded policies and how you did a lot of good in your foreign policies and domestic policies really makes you a good person. Mantaining the Brezhnev doctrine and supporting Gorby was kind of iffy though but that's about the only problems I have with you. You would've continued the USSR and saved it from Brezhnevian nonsense. However, supporting the Grenadian coup was very cringe, plus Social Imperialism and Market Socialism is also quite iffy (and the latter failed to rescue the USSR’s economy).
 * Vitaly Vorotnikov (42/100)- Massive revisionist and liberal, but somewhat actually competent so I can let it slide, a bit like Nagy, and I'd pick you over Gorby, billions of times.
 * Gennady Zyuganov (49/100)- Your views against wokes and lgbtoid bullshit is hella based, and your nationalism and wanting to make Russia back to it's days of glory under Socialism is fucking based. I abandoned my support for Putin for you. I wish you to win, for that Russia gets it's new hope. Supporting the war in Ukraine is retarded though, but otherwise you're 100% Based. However, you're just a little bit more moderate than me, still very good, though, however you're still revisionist, supporting Putin is cringe too, supporting Chinese revisionism and a tad bit too conservative.
 * Urho Kekkonen (45/100)- Unlike Mannerheim, you actually are kind of a positive figure for Finland, as your foreign policy you did pursue your part as a buffer between two blocs, and keep peace, even if your support for free markers and european integration is cringe, you did improve Finland's economy, and Finland had good stability under you.
 * Alexander Lukashenko (40/100)- Based chad for solving the issues that struck former soviet states in Belarus via your based economics, and the way how you mantained an anti-imperialist stance against NATO and EU are based, good, continue. But, quit supporting the war in Ukraine, and you're also a Putin puppet and I disapprove of Russification, and the corruption under your rule, better than the EU and I'd back you rather than the globalists, but you are not a good man either.
 * Edward Ochab (45/100)- Adhering to the principles that Bierut set is obviously based, for sure, however, you authorized the suppression of the workers in Poznan and allied with the Soviet Revisionists, better than later successors of yours like Gomulka, but still.
 * Jozef Cyrankiewicz (41/100)- Look, you could've handled the protests better instead of crushing them just for wanting better Worker's rights (even worse, you made Poland very reliant on the USSR), and you turned Poland into basically a Red oligarchy, and a revisionist too, although your support for an Authoritarian Democracy that preserves the power of Polish United Worker's Party is based.
 * Stanislaw Kania (50/100)- Your terms are short, but I liked how you had tried to fix the economic mistakes made by Gierek's revisionist policies, and sought for more independence from the Soviets just like Jaruzelski later, a shame the USSR had to force you down, despite your dealings with Walesa is a bit iffy.
 * Wojcieich Jaruzelski (55/100)- Although you declared martial law in Poland, I can somewhat understand why you did it. Western Influence is rising and you wanted to protect Poland from both the West and a Brezhnevian invasion like how they did with Czechoslovakia. Decent overall, and one of the least bad revisionists despite not going full-back to Bierut's Poland, even if I don't like your failures to redeem socialism's reputation in Poland, alongside being very allied and chummy with Brezhnev. One of the least bad revisionists out there, even if market socialism is cringe (despite being better than most Marketsocs), and failed to rescue the reputation of Socialism in Poland, and being quite a Brezhnevite.
 * Rosa Luxemburg  (42/100)- I hope the Spartacist uprising of 1919 succeeded and you can make a Socialist People's Regime in Germany that isn't an incompetent retard like Ebert, while also resisting Western Imperialism. Germany would be great if that had happened. However, you're way too moderate and your system is too liberal for my liking despite having some good, and you don’t really advocate for a proletariat dictatorship either, and you seem to be too idealistic and compromising, kind of like Dubcek.
 * Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (57/100)- One of the more based Western philosophers as you did inspire Marx to some degree, but the fact that your works inspired fascists too is a bit concerning.
 * Karl Liebknecht (42/100)- Same as Luxemburg.
 * Gustav Stresemann (50/100)- Although you had good intentions of making Germany recover during the 1920's, there are still some blunders that you made that led Germany into a downfall after 1929, namely your over-reliance on American loans, introduction of cultural liberalism, and the steady growth of the Nazis, same for being a borgeoise mouthpiece.
 * Karl Otto Paetel (49/100)- Nationalism is based, and your communism is what really makes me like you. You would be a far greater person than others like Strasser (and much better than the Nazis), and you did make a lot of good points and did a lot of based stuff too, but your ideology is a councilcom paganist nazbol larp.
 * Oskar Schindler (44/100)- You're a Nazi, and even worse, a Nazcap, but, honestly, I can't believe I am saying this, but you're the only member of the Nazi Party which is actually deserving of some degree of respect. You rescued your jewish workers and helped them escape death, that's a heroic move.
 * John Rabe (44/100)- I thank you from the bottom of my heart the effort you put to shelter our people from the barbaric Japanese invaders. Another one of the only based Nazis there is. Sad that your efforts gone to waste since the Japs refused to respect your efforts to help us against a genocidal imperialistic power.
 * Albert Einstein (57/100)- Another great, left-leaning scientist despite still being a little moderate for me to like your views, but why do you hate Nationalism?
 * Rudi Dutschke (55/100)- The only problem I have with you is rejecting Leninism and too decentral and liberal for my liking, but otherwise, you're quite based and your Germany will do good (kind of, although you're way too moderate for my liking). But rejecting Markets as a whole is based, I'd give you that.
 * Walter Ulbricht (46/100)- Had good intentions on Improving Germany and nice fighting Nazism, but ordering to build the Berlin Wall is an asshole move. The New Economic System and your other domestic policies was very based though, I give you that. However, despite so, you later became allied with the Khruschevite Revisionists and is kind of Brezhnevite, same with your failed economic policies that led to stagnation, and the creation of the Stasi, hence why Wilhelm Pieck is better. Kind of like a mini Ceausescu, but better.
 * Erich Honecker (55/100)- He improved living standards, rejected western neoliberalism to reunite Germany, and had a lot of good policies for industrialization and such. However, being completely supportive of Brezhnev is bad, otherwise, you're a hope for creating a beacon of based Socialism in the West, and YOU should be the model for the West to follow. But tolerating others corruption like what Mielke did and being overly chummy with Brezhnevite revisionists is bruh too, otherwise you're good in my book, although your planned model of market socialism (although being a revisionist) is bad. Even if I get that you tried your best to live in a terrible world dominated by Br*zhnevian Politics.
 * Henk Sneevliet (44/100)- Militarily incompetent and Anti-Stalinist, but you are also helping a lot in pushing for the Dutch communist cause.
 * Maximillien Robespierre (54/100)- Initially you're a smart guy with good ideals and wanted to make France a republic by the people and for the people, however, just like Mao, you turned out to be killing quite a fair amount of people that made you unpopular, and destroyed French culture and religion. Though I credit you with moving France into a new stage of it's development.
 * Jean Paul Marat (50/100)- Too radical for my liking, but prefer you over the Royalists. Plus, you inspired the French revolution, which is good.
 * Jacques Hebert (40/100)- Too damn radical, and the De-Christianization bs is terrible too, but you and the Jacobins did intend to bring France into a new stage of development, but still, I prefer Robespierre over you.
 * Georges Danton (40/100)- Corrupt, Soft, idealistic and incompetent. How could you not get, that revolutionary terror is the only way for the people of France and the nation to progress? I credit you for your role in the revolution, though.
 * Aristide Briand (42/100)- French Steresemann, and did advocate for world peace after the great war. You also had a lot of good domestic policies too, but why are you a Proto-Europoid?
 * Edouard Daladier (40/100)- You may still keep the genocidal French empire but you're the most sane among all French leaders. You rejected anti-communism that is prevalent in most of Europe, and had positive domestic policies for France. Still hate you, though, and despite rejecting anti-communism, you acted like Benes, and being cowardly when dealing with Hitler.
 * Charles Bettelheim (46/100)- A bit like Samir Amin, but quite revisionist, but you are somewhat intelligent and one of the most outspoken of your time.
 * Jean-Luc Melenchon (59/100)- Abeit a little too moderate for my likings, you're still based since your views fit for a country like France and you actually care for the well being of your own people and oppose the EU and Neoliberalism. However, reform and being too liberal is bad.
 * John Locke (53/100)- Republicanism is based, and how your works inspired America's Anti-Colonial Revolution is based. Not a fan of Classical Liberalism though
 * Adam Smith (53/100)- Not a fan of your economics but you are still one of humanity's most prominent economists. Plus, opposing landlordism is chad.
 * John Stuart Mill (58/100)- I dislike your liberal ideas and classical liberalism is very cringe, but market socialism and some of your theories seem ok for the time (still cringe though), seriously, though good for your time, your ideology is seriously mid.
 * G.D.H. Cole (48/100)- You do make some good points, but you aren't radical enough, and I don't buy your idea of guilds as a whole.
 * Samuel George Hobson (46/100)- Like the above, but more liberal.
 * Arthur Penty (47/100)- Like the above two, but more distributist, which is quite cringe,.
 * John Maynard Keynes (46/100)- Your economics are decent, and kind of matches my economics and you piss autistic Austrololberts off, based. It is not the best form of economics, but better than most other forms. However, regardless of how you are, you're still a Capitaloid filth.
 * Harold Macmillan (44/100)- Like the above, but you're still a neocon filth, though I have to thank you for some of your efforts of decolonization and empowering the NHS. The least insane British Prime Minister.
 * Princess Diana (54/100)_ British Assange/Snowden, but better. You exposed the crimes of the British royal family, helped the poor, and left the spot knowing how disgusting they are. Too moderate, but a shame the British royal family had to get rid of someone like you, who so bravely stood up.
 * Jeremy Corbyn (47/100)- You are possibly the only based British Politician in recent years, ever. You care about your people, you campaign against imperialism and neolibcucks (and being anti-EU too) destroying the third world, based. Just be revolutionary, that's all I ask, and you're way too moderate despite being better than every British modern politician, and even so, you had very cringe points, like Pro-Wokeism and supporting groups like Hamas and the PKK.
 * Bob Crow (50/100)- A better version of the above, but your champagne socialism and some of your wrong moves (like trade unionism) isn’t a viable way to establish Socialist ideology.
 * Dermot Hudson (50/100)- You have good ideals, but can be overly dogmatic in defending the Juche ideology.
 * Manuel Azana (47/100)- Better than Franco, at least. However, I dislike your alliance with the Anarchists, which is the worst side in the Spanish Civil War.

North America:

 * Thomas Paine (47/100)- A little too progressive even for your time, but your radicalism is quite good, and I cannot deny your contributions to the foundation of America. Plus, freeing Slaves too is very good.
 * John Adams (47/100)- Quite based other than the Alien and Sedition Acts (even if Classical Liberalism is very cringe). Also a founding father that fought against the Brits.
 * William Henry Harrison (55/100)- Had good intentions, but died too early.
 * James K. Polk (51/100)- An honest politician that delivered all his goals and what he intended to do in his rule, probably the only Jacksonian Democrat I respect. However, stance on Slavery and Territorial Expansion is cringe.
 * Zachary Taylor (41/100)- Stopped the expansion of slavery and helped fund quite a number of revolts against Imperialist Europe, although otherwise, you barely achieved anything, really.
 * James A. Garfield (55/100)- Your ideas were based for a country like America and you're one of my favourite presidents too, abeit very moderate. Sadly, you are assasinated.
 * Benjamin Harrison (56/100)- Did good for the country. Fought for the right for Blacks to vote, cared for the environment, wanted to modernize the army, helped fight against Britain, cared about expanding education, and wanted a meritocratic government. Not a fan of Classical Liberalism, though, same with your territorial expansion and other bs.
 * Howard Scott (43/100)- One of the better polticians in the US of your time, but still not that good.
 * Upton Sinclair (54/100)- Too moderate, but you're an actual true socialist in the US back then.
 * Eugene V. Debs (53/100)- Opposing Corporate power, opposing wilsonian internationalism, opposing Imperialism is hella based as you are a true man that cared about the people. America desperately needs another figure like Debs. Sadly, the Socialist Party USA now are feds in denial. You need to return. However, as based as you were when being against Wilson, I don't like your moderate stances (like not being a revolutionary) and being against nationalism as a whole is bad too.
 * George S. Patton (50/100)- Anti-Communist and a racist, but you are an anti-nazi war hero that bravely kicked the asses of the Nazis.
 * Anna Chenault (52/100)- Anti-communist dirt that worked with the evil Republican party and supported the genocide on Vietnam War (even if you did support those fleeing the war, but why endorse the Vietnam war in the first place? sure you are better than the neocons when it comes to Vietnam, but supporting it is just bruh), but, you did push a lot for Chinese reunification, helped the people in the famine in Mainland China (during the GLF) and you're pragmatic, despite being a filthy anti communist (and wasn't a filthy tyrant like Chiang, and neither are you a barbaric monster like McCarthy)
 * Yuri Kochiyama (56/100)- You had some very good ideas, but supporting the Japanese Red Army and Shining Path just really puts you down. Supporting people against the US government against the FBI is based though, I give you that, same for being against Neocons and supporting Communism.
 * Bob Avakian (43/100)- While you do have good ideas, I really don’t like your revisionist tendencies and inspiring some woke movements in the West while I get fighting for Social Justice is good, but identity politics and rejecting class struggle is just not the way to establish Communism.
 * Tulsi Gabbard (43/100)- You had good takes on Non-Intervention and your social policies are ok-ish, but supporting Israel and Modiist India is pretty bad, and so is your leniant take on the penal system. Plus, I honestly just doubt that you will change the corrupted US system for good.
 * Curtis Silwa (42/100)- One of the least bad US politicians so far, as you had genuinely promising reforms to be elected as govenor of NYC, but, despite being better, I highly doubt that you will go for a Socialist revolution, and change the US revolution, better than that fatass Dem Eric Adams, though.
 * Andrew Yang (41/100)- You are alright for an American politician tbh, however, your social policies are cringe. Plus, you're way too liberal for my liking. Plus, like all US politicians, you're another borgeoise mouthpiece.
 * Bernie Sanders (40/100)- Same as Yang except that you're one of the few based Dems as you reject Imperialism and genuinely care about the domestic issues (which is more important), which the evil neoliberal elite of the American state won't care about, but your social policies are not suitable for a country like America. Plus, of all people you choose, you choose to endorse fucking AOC? Plus, you gave into Baizuo Idpol, and you probably will not change the US system at all, despite being one of the least bad US politicians.
 * Ralph Nader (45/100)- One of the least bad modern US politicians since you're more radical, and that's good. But still, you sympathise with genocidal maniac Bush (even if I hate Al Gore a lot), and not radical enough to change the US system.
 * Edward Snowden (50/100)- Don't like your way too liberal stances, but one thing I can really commend you is exposing the crimes of neocons, but sadly, neocons being neocons, they made you pay the price.
 * Chelsea Manning (41/100)- Not harsh enough on the system and a filthy Dem too, but at least you oppose the crimes of interventuionists and expose the crimes of neocons.
 * Brian T. Carroll (40/100)- One of the least bad US modern politicians so far, but still, still a borgeoise mouthpiece of the corrupt American system.
 * Ramon Grau (43/100)- Like Cuba's Chavez. You are a good revolutionary and a good progressive figure, that's good, and later opposed Autista too, but you're WAY too moderate for my liking.
 * Raul Castro (50/100)- Your economic reforms opened up Cuba to market reforms (cringe) while you continued the good work that Fidel did in Cuba (based). A better version of Deng, but still revisionist and cringe. Cuban Janos Kadar, but worse since you did allow some borgeoise elites to form.
 * Miguel Diaz Canel (47/100)- Your technocratic views and you reduced radical conservatism in the Cuban government is gigabased. Also, nice job, continue suppressing the Americans and their Gusano puppets in Cuba. However, However, you're a revisionist who  did nothing to return to Socialism.
 * Jean Bertrand Aristide (50/100)- Your ideology is based for a country like Haiti and I believe you will do everything you can to develop Haiti after the Americans and their puppet, the Duvaliers, destroyed it. Although as based as you are, you're not strong and not radical enough.
 * Michael Manley (59/100)- Too moderate, but otherwise a based socialist who did a lot of good for Jamaica.
 * Ralph Gonsalves (55/100)- Quite good for a Demsoc.
 * Plutarco Elias Calles (45/100)- State Atheism, Corruption was bad, but you did bring good changes to Mexico nontheless, a bit like Ceausescu for Mexico.
 * Alvaro Colom (53/100)- Cringe for not recognizing the PRC (who helped Guatemala from Efrain Rios Montt), allying the the ROC (who backed Montt's genocide), but other than that, you're based (Despite being hella moderate). One of the least bad succdems.
 * Xiomara Castro (51/100)- A tad bit too moderate, and being supportive of the DPP illegitimate regime is cringe, but domestically, you do seem somewhat promising for now.
 * Humberto Ortega (50/100)- At the same time I prefer you over your brother since you kind of remind me of a better version of Zamyatin, and I agree, Daniel Ortega is cringe especially now that he abandoned his ML stance, and you don’t oppose the Socialist revolution in Nicaragua either, but either way, I still think you are sketchy, since I don’t want a libsoc or demsoc in power, I want a genuine Marxist Leninist rather than a Dubcek or Allende.
 * Oscar Sanchez Arias (50/100)- Helped advocate for peace in Central America, ended the Central American crisis like a boss, Improved Costa Rica's economy and boldly recognized the PRC, based. However, you're way too moderate (s*ccdem and capitaloid), and you had some cringe domestic economic policies.
 * Martin Torrijos (47/100)- Had positive economic and labour reforms and your expansion of the Panama Canal improved Panama's economy. Based. Another one of the least bad succdems. but, quit allying with the West.

South America:

 * Jaime Caycedo Turriago (43/100)- While supporting the people’s struggle in Colombia is based, but backing FARC’s horrible actions isn’t.
 * Carlos Lozano Guillen (49/100)- I can understand your good intentions, but too moderate, and try to be revolutionary.
 * Gustavo Petro (46/100)- You seem ok-ish for now, but too liberal for my liking. I'll be watching what you have for Colombia, and how would you work in such a corrupted system, plagued by problems caused by Neoliberalism.
 * Guillermo Rodriguez (50/100)- One of the least bad Latin American dictators as you did live a humble life and built a lot of infrastructure, but that isn't saying much.
 * Ciro Gomes (53/100)- Way too moderate, but you do have some good proposals, and, as I said before, achieving socialism through the system of liberal "democracy" will NEVER work. Essentially a better version of Corbyn in Brazil.
 * Lula Da Silva (45/100)- Your policies will do good for Brazil, although corruption is bad, Bolsonaro is worse and I'll only recognize you as the true head of Brazil. Free Lula! However, from what I've heard, you're corrupt too and you're a reformtard that will not do much against capitalism.
 * Fernando Lugo (41/100)- Ended the rule of the Colorado Party, and did a lot in helping the people and the poor people in Paraguay. A true chad, other than your recognition of the illegitimate Taiwanese government. However, you're way too moderate.
 * Salvador Allende (52/100)- A true politician that fought hard to serve Chile and the Chilean people, helped to improve the worker's conditions of Chile from your nationalizations and moving towards Socialism. Not the best in economics and gave rise to political instability, however, still millions of times better than neolibtards and their puppet Pinochet (who intentionally made you seem like you fuck up the country). I will continue your quest of finding the cure to homosexuality   However, you should've taken more radical and more Marxist-Leninist actions, and your softness and overly liberal stances led to your coup, a lesson that all Demsocs should learn from.
 * Michelle Bachelet (43/100)- Saw the terrors of the Pinochet regime and did a lot trying to move Chile out of the terror and the legacies left behind by that maniac (Pinochet), but, just like how I criticize most reformists and Demsocs, you did nothing to get rid of the neoliberal system, and you're a globetard too.
 * Raul Alfonsin (42/100) - Ended the vicious American-backed military dictatorship and improved Argentina. But, economically you're not smart, still good though. One of the least bad succdems but still, you did not at all change the Argentine system to a Socialist one.
 * Alberto Fernandez (40/100)- Based foreign policy and had based policies regarding COVID against the American puppet OAS, but quit being corrupt and be more radical and you'll be good.

Negative:

Asia and Oceania:

 * Tokugawa Ieyasu (20/100)- Feudalist who locked Japan up for 200 years. Although I must credit you with cultural enhancement and popuation increase.
 * Emperor Meiji (35/100)- Industrialized Japan and brought it away from Ieyasu's feudalist and isolationist policies, but your Imperialism is soy.
 * Ito Hirobumi (20/100)- Stole Taiwan from the Chinese, participated in the Opium Wars and Century of Humiliation, and begun brutal treatment towards Koreans. Destroying the Qing is good but you are no better.
 * Prince Naruhiko Higashikuni (32/100)- A technocrat that opposed Japan’s joining of the second world war is good, but you still did Horrible things in China and backed Fumimaro Konoe, though at least you are also anti-Atlanticist.
 * Akashi Motojiro (35/100)- One of the least bad Imperial Japanese politicians as you did do some contributions to Taiwan and is less genocidal compared to the others, but you are still an imperialist prick who did nothing to support the people.
 * Yamamoto Gonnohyoe (34/100)- Another one of the least bad Imperial Japanese as you did show some good leadership during the Kanto Earthquake and is anti-militarist, which is good. But still, you didn’t do shit to try to solve Japan’s trainwreck of a political system.
 * Kantaro Suzuki (23/100)- A genocidal imperialist scum, but at the very least you opposed war later in your life and negotiated for the surrender of Japan (even if you allowed Japan to become an American puppet)
 * Ikki Kita (22/100)- Delusional Imperialist that inspired the modern Japanese far-right, you do have some good ideas on Socialism, but Imperialism is absolutely unforgivable. However, supporting Sun Yat Sen was quite a rare W from you.
 * Kingoro Hashimoto (22/100)- Left Wing Socialist ideology, Nationalism, etc, are very based, but you are a vicious militarist who supported genociding Chinese people and allying with Hitler.
 * Yasuji Okamura (27/100)- One of the few Japanese bandits who aren’t war criminals who ravaged my country in the war, but still, an imperialist who caused suffering nonetheless.
 * Shigeru Yoshida (26/100)- You did rebuild Japan's lost infrasturcture and improve the economy but that doesn't mean that you're good. This piece of shit completely fucked over Japanese politics and scar it until today by implementing a Japanese version of McCarthyism in there that preyed on true people that wanted for the better of Japan, like Katayama and Tokuda. Fuck you.
 * Keizo Hayashi (31/100)- Helping the people of Japan and doing civil service is good, and fighting for Japanese status as a sovereign state is good, but you are an atlanticoid and US puppet.
 * Hayato Ikeda (27/100)- You did a lot of good domestically, like you ambitious economic policy and fixing all the shitshow that Kishi had caused, but you had to be an Asslaticist and a puppet of the US.
 * Kakuei Tanaka (33/100)- Normalized relations with my country until your successors destroyed it, negotiated regarding the Diaoyutai Islands, expanded the Welfare state, very based, obviously, but you are incompetent when dealing with the Oil Crisis and you still kept the Capitalist system.
 * Yasuo Fukuda (38/100)- You are among the least hawkish of all the recent era Japanese PM's and you tried to end the controversial visits to Yasukuni Shrine and was friendly with China in your rule. But then again, you haven't accomplished much and your bad handling of a rape scandal in Waseda University was awful.
 * Akihito (33/100)- George VI in Japan but better. You did try to draw closer to the Japanese people and boycotted Yasukuni Shrine, and did care for Japan to some degree, but you did nothing else to improve Japan’s political situation, infinitely better than your father, though.
 * Naruhito (33/100)- Same as above.
 * Kiichi Miyazawa (26/100)- Scandals happened in your rule, and you haven't achieved much. Plus, sending the Japanese army overseas is cringe. Although you did apologize about the Korean comfort women and tried to solve the economic difficulties, but failed, what a shame.
 * Yukio Hatoyama (39/100)- Despite being a short reined Prime Minister, you had a number of positive achievements. You deviated from the capitalist policies of the LDP, and you extended social services and supported the poor (but Third Way is a way to preserve the capitalist system, which is bad), abolition of high school tuition fees, and expanded welfare programs, however, I don't like your America-centric policies despite your policies regarding Asia are ok-ish (even if economic imperialism is bad), and the financial scandal in your rule is quite bad. Overall quite good for the standards of a liberal.
 * Noboru Takeshita (24/100)- Incompetent and caused the Japanese economy to fall into stagnation, plus a lot of scandals happened under your rule, and an Atlanticist too. Your first years had steady economic growth, which is good though.
 * Keizo Obuchi (23/100)- Tried to fix Japan's economy, but failed miserably, but instead, boosted the Japanese public debt.
 * Takeo Fukuda (24/100)- Liberal Hawk that created tensions between the USSR and against China (and imperialistic too), then yet again, you yielded into the demands of terrorists who hijacked a plane, however, I appreciate the co-operation you did for Southeast Asia, though.
 * Fusako Shigenobu (25/100)- I get wanting to free Japan from it's evil neoliberal government, but what your group did (terrorism, airplane hijackings, massacres, and robberies) just legitimizes the oppressor. Helping to free Palestine is the only semi-based point about you but even then you done it through terrorism, at least you regretted it later, and that you are more pragmatic now.
 * Naoto Kan  (22/100)- Unpopular due to your economic policies that created hardship for the Japanese people, and created massive tensions with it's neighbors like China. However, I appreciate the fact that you handled the Fukushima Earthquakes well even if the anti-nuclear stuff is something I disapprove of.
 * Yoshihiko Noda (20/100)- You're not as Hawkish as most other Japanese PM's, but you're still an atlanticoid, and moved Japan out of nuclear technology, yet also supported imperialist claims in Diaoyutai, although the increase in consumption tax is ok-ish, I guess. Other than that, you haven't achieved much.
 * Yoshiro Mori (20/100)- Japanese Trump, except even worse, since you practically did nothing apart from making discriminatory statements in your term.
 * Fumio Kishida (27/100)- You may not be a neoliberal, but fuck, fuck me for having hopes on you. At first I thought maybe you won't be that bad, which is true, you're better than Suga but that is a low bar. You're still a western puppet that sucks off whatever their agenda follows, although your ideology is better than whatever is in mainstream Japanese politics, it's about time that Japan finally gets a leader that cares about it's own people. Plus, why the fuck are you a NATO simp? You're drawing closer and closer to them in supporting their imperialism and that's not at all fucking acceptable you fucking dumbass. Although your soccap economics make you slightly better than most of the LDPJ despite still not being good.
 * Chang Myon (22/100)- Korean Yevgeny Zamyatin, but slightly worse as you are a typical Liberal Christian Democrat, and individualism is terrible, but still, I’d rather you than Syngman Rhee’s fascist tyranny.
 * Park Chung Hee (33/100)- Sent people into camps for being poor, oppressive as fuck, conservative as fuck and destroyed traditional Korean Buddhism in replacement of American protestantism. However you are the most decent among all South Korean dictators as you had the Miracle over the Han River, and your rapid reduction of poverty is also quite good. One of the least insane US backed dictators.
 * Roh Tae Woo (36/100)- One of the least bad South Korean leaders, as you did have positive economic growth policies and built infrastructure, as well as supporting people in rural areas, but you're a massive kleptocrat and forced North Korea into decline despite your somewhat good policies in foreign affairs, like establishing relations with the PRC. However, you're still a filthy atlanticoid.
 * Roh Moo Hyun (38/100) - The least bad president of the ROK since you actually favored a more independent approach, but Third Way is just utterly disgusting and your corruption is awful.
 * Moon Jae In (34/100)- More decent compared to his previous South Korean presidents, but still an American Cuck and don't do much solving issues facing Korean workers, moreover, you aren't that good either, since at best you're a soccap.
 * Kim Dae Jung (26/100)- the man who democraticized Korea and drew it away from being an American colony, but still, I hope you went a bit more like Roh Moo Hyun to completely resist the West. Plus, I really despise your neoliberal economics, and you did nothing to abolish capitalism, and your supposed “democratization” only turned South Korea into a Neolib Dictatorship of Capital.
 * Park Geun Hye (23/100)- Corrupt US puppet Bitch.
 * Lee Myung Bak (25/100)- Same as above.
 * Kim Jong Un (24/100)- Nuclear Weapons and defending your country from Neoliberals are based, backing Assad and the East are based, but get rid of the totalitarianism and start caring about the condition of your people. (The embargo is more of a cause to why North Korea is poor but still), plus, you're a champagne socialist and did nothing to revive socialism in the country, and pretty corrupt and revisionist too, and you did nothing about the influence of Chinese capitalists in the country.
 * Cao Cao(21/100)- A brilliant military strategist and had a very good charisma, but you are a cunning, manipulative weasel who is extremely cruel to the people and manipulated politics.
 * Laozi(20/100)- Basically a Proto-Anarchist. Nothing to say.
 * Yongzheng Emperor (34/100)- While you did have your economic and cultural achievements that improved China, you still did oppress all Non-Manchus and destroyed national sovereignty of many people, and did not solve many issues in the Qing. Qing Dynasty Chen Quanguo.
 * Qianlong Emperor (23/100)- A bit like the Mohammad Reza Shah + Louis XVI of China, while you did turn the Qing into a very prosperous era with a huge economy and had staggering culture, you are an imperialist who committed horrendous crimes in Central Asia, and in your later years, corruption, mismanagement, etc, all happened under you, and the Qing entered it’s era of downfall.
 * Hong Xiuquan (21/100)- You do have some modern Socialistic ideas which inspired Chinese communism and to a lesser extent, Sun as well, and resisting the Qing is good and you are better than them (and the Western Imperialists who tried to destroy us too), but mass genocide of civilians and war crimes, alongside theocracy and being a mad delusional fuck wasn't justifiable at all.
 * Hu Hanmin (38/100)- Ideologywise you're quite cringe, but being against Chiang and being against his corruption is based. However, your radical anticommunism is just something I cannot take, sorry, although being radically anti-japanese imperialism is based. and thanks for yelling against Chiang for killing leftists and you had relatively good social takes too.
 * Sun Li-Jen (21/100)- Similar to the above, but too chummy to the Americans. Plus, even if I don't like Chiang and Mao, your aspirations of becoming a US-backed tyrant will never be realised, cope, seethe, and mald. Plus, you are sympathetic to Taiwanese independence too after the CIA gave you money. Rightfully prosecuted.
 * Lin Biao (32/100)- Helped make the Cultural Revolution violent and is a radical in purging in the Cultural Revolution, but i'm glad you scared the Brezhnevians from turning us into a new Afghanistan, but still, it does not justify your bullshit, and contributing to ruining Mao's image.
 * Chen Boda (27/100)- A less radical Jiang Qing but that doesn't mean anything at all.
 * Wang Hongwen (35/100)- The least bad of the gang of four but that doesn't mean anything. But I do like some of your ideas.
 * Yao Wenyuan (25/100)- Supported Jiang Qing's attacks on literature and opera, fucking parasite, another man responsible for the violence in the Cultural Revolution too.
 * Zhang Chunqiao (24/100)- Repressed the workers and contributed to the violent chaos of the Cultural Revolution.
 * Kang Sheng (29/100)- Responsible too with a lot of chaos that happened in the CR, and a weasel that manipulated his way to the top. You are not a true Stalinist, and you are rightfully disgraced.
 * Xie Fuzhi (22/100)- One of the main people responsible for a lot of the Chaos of the Cultural Revolution, and empowered the red guards too. The only good thing about you is anti-revisionism, but you aren't much better than the Deng clique either.
 * Song Binbin (25/100)- Contributed to kickstaring the chaos of the Cultural Revolution.
 * Hu Shih (30/100) - Just like Soong Mei Ling, lobbying for US aid against Japan is based and being a patriot to support your country against the Japs is undoubtedly very, very based, but I'm not sure it redeems your Liberal "Democratic" views and your anti-communist stance. Prefer you over Chiang though.
 * Zhang Xueliang (35/100)- Xi'An incident and what your iron balls did to Chiang was very based. You're not scared of kidnapping him and force him into allying with the CPC to fight a bigger threat, that being the Japs, although giving out Manchuria to the Japs was cringe, Plus, I'm not very fond of your drug addiction and you being a sex addict, which I view as absolutely immoral, god fucking dammit.
 * Zhang Guotao (30/100)- Wang Ming but worse. Brutal, violent, and incompetent in Military affairs, dogmatic, and later worked with the Chiangoids to crush communism. Traitor.
 * Tsiang Tingfu (34/100)- Smarter than Hu Shih that's for sure since at least you aren't a retarded raddem unlike him, but still, I dislike your liberalism.
 * Lei Chen (24/100)- Better than Chiang and I'd pick you over that bastard for clear reasons, but still, you wanted to introduce liberal democracy which obviously is extremely uncool. Plus, why do you still support the very same man (Chiang) even after he arrested and mistreated you? Although I think arresting Liberals are based
 * Han Kuo Yu (28/100)- This man would be as retarded as Donald Trump if he were to seize power, those two motherfuckers are identical. Still better than Tsai Ing Wen though.
 * Deng Xiaoping (24/100)- I can somewhat get that economic reform and opening up is necessary, but that's more or less it. your foreign policy and deregulation of the economy too much. Then again, corruption was caused by your mass privatization and revisionist policies. Clearly less bad than the West, but please. Your foreign policy is something that I absolutely do not find appealing. Plus, crushing genuine Marxists, Seriously? Plus, Crony Capitalism, Sweatshops, a drop in worker's rights and Billionaires are absolutely uncool, man. I have to credit you for lifting a lot of people out of poverty, though. But still, you are a traitor, you are not a socialist, you are a revisionist, opportunist bastard. Your opportunistic and revisionist reforms transformed my motherland into being social imperialist and capitalist. I hate you with all I have. The only good from you is economic growth (came with concequences), reduction of poverty, dealing with the antiauths and getting rid of the Gang of four, along with reviving China's prestige (even if your methods in doing so are bad) and stopped the CR (even if Hua did a lot to that too).
 * Hu Yaobang (33/100)- I was once too harsh on you, but I realized you are nothing of the sort that Gorbachev is, nothing. At least your proposal of an authoritarian democracy withing the Chinese Communist Party is good, abeit you're still a little too liberal and capitalist for my liking, and your support for the Anti-Auths are sussy. Plus, you kind of are still a dengist, just civically more liberal.
 * Li Peng (22/100)- Your economic policies are great and I appreciate what you did for the Three Gorges Dam, but if you weren't corrupt as hell. Plus, you're a butcher and you practically is the main man behind corruption during the Deng era (and also influenced crony Capitalism) in the party, fuck you. Although at least you're at least economically left. Still, fuck you, you're basically a Dengist Putin, but slightly better.
 * Bo Yibo (36/100)- Had done a lot during Maoist China until that whore Jiang Qing purged you, and supporting the reform is kind of based, but quite iffy of you to support the anti-auths in Tiananmen, and to support Deng and Jiang, which is cringe, plus, you're a huge revisionist authcap in your later career, and embracing capitalism is cringe too.
 * Zhou Yongkang (20/100)- This corrupt fat piece of shit stole the people's money and engaged in bribery and betraying your own country. Have fun in prison.
 * Ling Jihua (25/100)- Corrupt as hell and ally of Zhou Yongkang.
 * Wang Yang (23/100)- Opposing Nepotism and Corruption is good, and so is your development programs, but you're way too capitalist and did nothing to save the common people during the financial crisis and didn't care about bankruptcies, and even resisted Wen Jiabao for trying to save the common people. What an asshole, plus, in Chongqing, you barely did anything about crime.
 * Jiang Shigong (29/100)- Being against Liberalism in China and opposing liberal values and all that is obviously very based, plus supporting Xi and the party too is very based, but what makes you iffy is your influence from fuckign Carl Schmitt of all people. Neoauthoritarianism is based though. However, you seem very suspicious of being like a Nazdeng synthesis.
 * Ma Ying Jeou  (37/100)- Economic liberalization is 💀, and not doing anything against the Pan-Green Baizuo Seperatists is bad, and I would hate you if you didn't push for National unity and want for reunification on both ends.
 * Hung Hsiu Chu (29/100)- Being pro-CPC is good but that's about it. You're not a Socialist, and you ruined the KMT and dropped it to a standard lower than ever before, plus, despite the good regarding your policies to the CPC, you advocate for revisionism.
 * Li Ao  (30/100)- One of the few based Liberals. You had based criticisms of both the Chiangoid Right KMT (which has been destroyed and ruined ever since Chiang came into the picture) and the Baizuo Atlanticoid Puppet DPP while supporting the CPC is based (even if, let me guess, you support the Dengoids, not genuine socialists), but you still helped Independentists (which are among the few people that should be executed by Chiang regardless how evil he is) and your ideals are too moderate (since even if based for a liberal, it's still liberalism)
 * Chen Quanguo (34/100)- I'm not too fond with some of the radical actions that you take currently, but I'll give you some credit where it's due. Crushing the Tibetan unrest and making both Tibet and Xinjiang develop rapidly economically, but otherwise, you're kind of like Sheng Shicai for me, but somehow even more brutal and worse, as you're still a brutal revisionist.
 * Liu Yandong (26/100)- Empowering Capitalists in a Red Coat. Deng Xiaoping was a mistake to give rise to people like you. But you do seem better than the Capitaloid Shanghai Clique, but still.
 * Li Keqiang  (28/100)- Helped to develop China's economic growth, and you have adviced both Hu and Xi on economics, and that's how we got where we are (even if I fucking despise your capitalism and your huge revisionist tendencies). Although your economics are a bit too liberal and kind of sussy. Plus, you're a massive revisionist, and quit embracing free market capitalism. Plus, I really don't like how you blocked so many of Xi's welfarist and wealth redistribution programs. You are a huge capitaloid, btw.
 * Li Zhanshu (37/100)- At least you prefer Xi over the more economically liberal ones, but still a revisionist, plus, you even clashed with Xi since you supported Putin. Being anti-West is based, but why support an invasion?
 * Cai Qi (25/100)- Xi Jinping's puppet and a crony, but at least you aren't a capitaloid.
 * Wang Lijun (28/100)- Corrupt piece of shit and a traitor that betrayed your country, but at least you did crack down on crime and expose Bo Xilai's wrongdoings, but still very bad.
 * Han Zheng (34/100)- The only person in the Shanghai Clique I don't hate as much, since you did oversee growth and cracked down on corruption, but even so, your Authcap leanings are quite bad.
 * Lu Ping (35/100)- Great job overseeing the return of HK and Macao, but you’re still a revisionist, even if I completely agree with your denounciation of Chris Patten, the genocidal imperialist.
 * Wang Qishan (37/100)- Helped to purge corruption and supported Xi rather than Jiang, butn you're still a revisionist and a capitalist, just another capitalist roader in the party, but anti-corrupt, doesn't make a difference.
 * Ye Jianying (30/100)- Supporting Deng and the economic opening up and being a bit too soft (and a gay ass revisionist) is cringe but everything else is based. However, why are you later on allowing your family in Guangdong to be cronyist?
 * Fang Binxing (39/100)- While I somewhat defend the Great Chinese Firewall to protect the local Chinese from harmful Westernersto gather infor about, but still, you made life difficult for the commonpeople. Especially on the net.
 * Wang Yi (34/100)- A patriot to your country by helping the developing world, but why are you a globetard?
 * Donald Tsang (27/100)- You had some good policies like trying to solve wealth disparity (even if the effects are minimal), and some of your massive infrastructure projects and the five year blueprints were good, but you're still a Kleptocratic Capitalist that gave into the demands of the HK "Democrats" and stole money from the people.
 * Jack Ma (21/100)- Better than most billionaires but that's a hella low bar. You're still an exploitative piece of shit and endorsed the 996 system. Xi should've treated you way harsher.
 * Ma Huateng (23/100)- Chinese Warren Buffett.
 * Zhang Gaoli (21/100)- I like some of your infrastructural developments, but you are a capitalist, Jiang Zemin crony and Li Keqiang’s ally who is basically a capitaloid dressed in Red, and not just in politics, your affair with Peng Shuai and the extramarital affairs you did was just unacceptable.
 * Lu Shaye (25/100)- Prefer you over the pro-independence scum and patriotism is good, but nonetheless, you’re still a Dengoid, and is showing tendencies to becoming like Chen Quanguo.
 * CY Leung (30/100)- Based constitutional reform proposals, Based for embracing moral and national education and trying to mantain stability is good, but you failed to curb Joshua Wong and his filthy influence from Hong Kong. But also, great job for not yielding to the Umbrella Terrorist Insurrection and crushing the Mong Kok unrest. But, what really prevents me from liking you is your capitalism, which is very cringe.
 * Regina Ip (33/100)- Like the above but slightly better, since you made Wongtards seethe and you had contributions supporting the further integration of Hong Kong with the Motherland, and you're a patriot, which i appreciate, but nothless, you're still a capitalist and a borgeoise member that hadn't done anything to improve Hong Kong's social problems apart from that.
 * Eunice Yung (33/100)- Same as above.
 * Jambyn Batmonkh (37/100)- One of the least bad of those that gave up Communist ideology (which is cringe) but that's the only problem I have with you, otherwise, wanting a rapproachment with China, improving co-operation with other Communist states, and had very based industrial projects and energy stations. However, giving up communism and doing nothing to save it is very cringe, same for your kleptocracy.
 * Tsakhiagiin Elbegdorj (24/100)- A bit of like Mongolia’s Mikheil Saakashvili as you purged corruption and had environmental protection as one of your priorities, but, that doesn’t at all justify your neoliberal capitalist economics and alliance with the Western Neocons.
 * Do Muoi (26/100) - State Capitalist revisionist who wanted to turn Vietnam into a Chaebol-led society like in South Korea.
 * Nguyen Minh Triet (32/100)- Revisionist, although at the very least you are a technocrat. Still don't like your capitalist revisionism and friendliness to the Atlanticoids.
 * Truong Tan Sang (31/100)- Revisionist and failed to get rid of corruption in Vietnam, but you had solid goals.
 * Nguyen Xuan Phuc (35/100)- To think that Vietnam finally has some hopes on getting rid of it's Revisionist legacies... Sure you are a technocrat and you did help fight COVID well, but nontheless, you are in no way socialist, moving Vietnam to it's neolib roots, and getting close to the West.
 * To Lam (31/100)- Champagne 'Socialist'. Had luxurious feasts on golden plates while the common Vietnamese people are suffering from the pandemic. Honestly, this is what not adhering to Marxism-Leninism does to a mf.
 * Luna Oi (33/100)- You do make a few good points, but you are still not a socialist and backs Vietnamese revisionism.
 * Heng Samrin (25/100)- Great man that led the revolution alongside the Vietnamese to destroy the murderous, bloodthirsty regime of Pol Pot drenched in the bloods of millions of Innocent Cambodians. However, you're too dependent and a puppet of the Vietnamese revisionists, and you hadn't done anything to improve Cambodia apart from being a puppet of the Le Duan regime, a bit like Cambodia's Husak, but better than Husak, even if just by a little bit.
 * Hun Sen (25/100)- The only reason why I might even have the slightest sympathy to this guy is because of your achievements before 1993, Pro-China stance, nationalism and your anti-western and anti-taiwan seperatist ideology, otherwise, you're a corrupt piece of shit that hasn't done shit to improve Cambodia. You're based when you're a communist, why did you have to turn into this?
 * Prajadhipok (25/100)- You did allow some form of progress for Thailand, but that doesn’t really mean much.
 * Bhumibol Adulyadej (20/100)- You're better than your retarded son but that doesn't necessarily mean good. You're still a US puppet, manipulative and killed your brother just so you can be the King, and oversaw brutalities of the Thai military dictatorship and created a huge ass cult around you.
 * Kriangsak Chamanan (33/100)- Anti-Communist scum, but you did contribute a lot to building Thailand domestically. Still can’t like you for your alliance with the West and contributing to supporting Pol Pot.
 * Prem Tinsulanonda (38/100)- Chummy with Reagan and ending the struggle of the Communists is bad, but you did restore faith in the country and you did provide some promising domestic policies, and handled the South Thailand insurgency well.
 * Abhisit Vejjajiva (22/100)- Thailand's Li Peng. Murdered your own people, severely mishandled the South Thailand Insurgency, corrupt as hell, need I say more?
 * Surayud Chulanont (22/100)- Thai Li Peng/Putin. A traitor of the Thai People that crushed the hope of establishing Socialism in Thailand (a cause which your father fought for, but you crushed it), and brutalized your own people and committed horrendous war crimes in the South Thailand Insurgency. Absolutely unforgivable. I like your economic nationalism, though.
 * Thaksin Shinawatra (38/100)- Your economics and your corruption is cringe, same for your mishandling of the crisis in Southern Thailand, and your Globalist Third Way policies, but you did do some good policies regarding saving the country from an economic crisis and healthcare. Thai Attlee.
 * Yingluck Shinawatra (39/100)- Relatively popular and more economically competent, but you are still very corrupt and your liberal economics are not good either.
 * Saw Maung (37/100)- Good for ending the ruthless military junta founded by Ne Win, but then you paved way for the NLD which was incompetent and retarded in resolving the issues Myanmar faced.
 * Aung San Soo Kyi (35/100)- Used to be a good fighter against Ne Win's regime, but you're incompetent and kinda stupid in solving Myanmar's issues. Nothing has changed since Ne Win fucked Myanmar up, even under the NLD.
 * Lai Teck  (25/100)- Revisionist, Opportunist bastard who claimed to "liberate Malaysia" yet sold himself to the Japs and later the colonial authorities to save his skin. Pathetic. You deserved the execution.
 * H. S. Lee (27/100)- I appreciate your efforts in working for Malaysia, but you are an anti-communist Anglophilic filth who crushed the People’s Movement in Malaysia.
 * Tan Cheng Lok (30/100)- I appreciate that you advocated for racial unity and you founded a modern Malaysia, but to me, your anti-communism, and your support for the British is something I do not like.
 * Abdullah Ahmad Badawi (20/100)- Introducer of the ideology known as "Ketuanan Melayu", which is basically something similar to racial supreority policies implemented by the Apartheid (not as bad but still).
 * Mahathir Mohammad (37/100)- Based 'Look East' policy, Based economics that made Malaysia develop and helped stop us from becoming another puppet state of Britain and America. Mahathir is a great man. Don't like your capitalist, and cronyist economics though, even if it did good. Plus, anticommunism and abandoning the Malaysia-Singapore railroad project is bruh, plus, why did you co-operate with fucking Shintaro Ishihara of all people??? Yes you did contributions back then (even if you are a huge capitaloid), but now it's time for you to go.
 * Wan Azizah Wan Ismail (32/100)- One of the least bad modern Malaysian politicians, but honestly, does that mean anything?
 * Rina Harun (25/100)- Another kleptocrat and a clown that brings shame to Malaysia, what a fucking bitch.
 * Ismail Saabri Yaacob (37/100)-Better than Muhyddin that's for sure, and your COVID tackling policy is good, but you had controversial statements in your cabinet and you're inefficient in taking care of the floods. Plus, the system still remained there with clown politicians, and I don't like your capitalism, and apart from COVID, there’s not many achievements there, seriously.
 * Anwar Ibrahim (34/100)- Wanting to change Malaysia's political system and fighting corruption is based, but I'm not fond of your your Pro-Americanism, at all. Plus, some of your policies like Islamization of the education system were cringe. Although opposing LGBT marriage is based, but don't go as far as to prosecute them. Though you are the least bad among all candidates, but still, a Western puppet, which is by no means acceptable.
 * Lim Guan Eng (25/100)- Malaysian Pablo Iglesias, Corrupt as hell, and practically did nothing to fullfill his promises. Typical product of liberal pluralism.
 * Omar Ali Saifuddien III (25/100)- Better than your son as you did a lot of infrastructural developments, but, to be fair, that isn’t saying anything. Repressing Leftists, and basically building the Saudi Arabia of Southeast Asia, and an Anticommunist Western puppet.
 * Hassan Bolkiah (22/100)- Absolute monarch, corrupt as hell, Islamist and just overall a classic, terrible monarch. Basically the Salman bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud of Southeast Asia (although slightly better as Bolkiah doesn't back terrorists)
 * Megawati Sukarnoputri (35/100)- Based for supporting the destruction of Suharto's legacy and supporting Pancasila, but you're a s*ccdem, and you're too moderate, and had very little contributions done.
 * Robert Menzies (22/100)- You did alot of good things and continued the reforms John Curtin did,and did a lot of positive reforms, but foreign wise, what I can't forgive you on is your Neocon Atlanticist leanings and how you supported and contributed to the Genocide the Brits committed against my country, Malaysia, and supported the US murdering millions of people in Vietnam and Korea. A bit like Kishida. But still, screw you for your anti-communist laws and sabotaging nationalizations and left-wing reforms.
 * Harold Holt (32/100)- A better version of the above since you did have one or two positive reforms and diverged Australia from the Angloids, but your crimes in Vietnam and being an American puppet is unforgivable. Australian Kennedy, basically.
 * Bob Hawke (29/100)- Expanding welfare is good and so is getting Australia away from it's white supremacist past, but you unhealthily deregulated the economy and turn unions into neoliberal organizations serving the status quo.
 * Paul Keating (33/100)- Like the above but slightly better as you're quite friendly to China, and more non-aligned compared to most other Australian presidents.
 * Kevin Rudd (33/100)- You did have a lot of good welfarist reforms like the minimum wage and such and helped Australia recover from the international crisis and was friendly with my country, but I dislike your liberal ideologies and third way is unacceptable.
 * Malcolm Turnbull (22/100)- Being one of the least bad neolibs as you aren't that much of a hawk and was quite friendly to my country, but that's about the only good things you did.
 * Anthony Albanese (30/100)- So far you seem quite decent apart from your social views, which are too liberal (even if anti-wokeism is based), and you don't go far left enough on economics (even if some of your small scale reforms seem promising for now), plus, you are an Asslaticist, which your recent actions is really getting on my nerves.
 * Jacinda Ardern (37/100)- Had good policies solving inequality and stuff like that and her domestic policies are somewhat ok-ish, but she is still a liberal, allied with the West and didn't do anything to get the British Monarchy's influence out of New Zealand. Plus, you're an Atlanticoid filth.
 * Carlos P. Garcia (24/100)- At least you're a nationalist and a protectionist of some sorts, but that's about the only good from you, otherwise, you're a corrupt, capitalist and anti-communist pig.
 * Ramon Magsaysay (35/100)- Attlee of the Philippines. Your period is one of the most-corruption free periods of the Philippines and you did have positive domestic policies, but why the anti-communism and the extremely excessive Atlanticism that you're against the Third-World? Plus, crushing Taruc is gay. A bit like the Philippine Attlee, but a puppet.
 * Diosdado Macapagal (23/100)- Gay ass capitaloid and an imperialist to Sabah, and also wanted to send troops to Vietnam to support the US genocide there. Utterly disgusting. At least you did have some development though, otherwise, you and Marcos are the two worst Filipino Presidents.
 * Jose Maria Sison (24/100)- You had solid ideas, but the methods and means you used to pursue the path for Socialism in the Philippines were not good, and that you’re hella brutal too. Like Shigenobu and the IRA, had solid ideas, but used the wrong methods. Take you over Marcos, though.
 * Corazon Aquino (35/100)- Strong woman reforming the Philippines, dedicated to helping those that suffered under American puppet Marcos. However, you didn't do much later on to change Philippines, only Duterte did, and you're also a massive cronyist. What a disappointment. Plus, why the fuck did you kill peasants?
 * Gloria Macapagal Arroyo (21/100)- Lifting Philippines out of the mess of the 2008 Asian Financial Crisis was good but that’s the only good about you. A Neocon filth, and also had a shit ton of controversies handlied terribly.
 * Benigno Aquino III (25/100)- Had like one or two basic reforms but that's about it, you are the classic and typical liberal politician, did not fullfill much of your promises, and an atlanticist puppet too, and handled the Manila Hostage crisis TERRIBLY.
 * Bongbong Marcos (24/100)- To know that a disgusting, corrupt, capitaloid like you who cares nothing about your own people came to power, all I could say is, my prayers to the Philippine people and nation.
 * Sheikh Hasina (29/100)- Another one of the least bad Capitalists, since you are an icon for the Muslim world and fighting against the Military regime is based, but privatization isn't, and your capitalist economics too, same for not doing anything to solve Bangaldesh's problems.
 * Jawaharlal Nehru (38/100)- Harbouring and backing Tibetan seperatists are bad, and so is your overly liberal politics and the economic stagnation under your rule, but still overall a great man. Plus, despite the relatively ok-ish progressive policies you take, it simply isn't enough, a bit like Raul Castro.
 * Indira Gandhi (37/100)- One of the least bad Indian prime ministers, and one of my favourite Indian politicians. She nationalized industries and had great economics as well as her industrialization of most of India, and her role in freeing Bangladesh from Yahya Khan is based. However, your nepotism and building a system of corruption (whcih fucked India after later) is quite bad, though.
 * Morarji Desai (35/100)- Pacifism is good, and trying to establish friendly relations with the world is good, but you're very incompetent with dealing with party politics and squabbles, another failure of liberal pluralism. Plus, apart from that, you didn't achieve much either.
 * PV Narasimha Rao (26/100)- Cringe economic liberalization, cringe globalization, cringe pro-west, cringe etc. I can give you credit on saving India from Bankruptcy though.
 * Charu Majumdar (39/100)- You do have some good takes and your support to peassants were also good even if it just seems like on paper, since the red corridor still had severe inequality and still had caste systems under you, and you're very unpopular among the Indian people despite having some based points.
 * Rajiv Gandhi  (23/100)- Corrupt as hell and supported Tamil Terrorist groups in Sri Lanka. Why can't you be more like your mother or grandfather?
 * Manmohan Singh (37/100)- Anti-Corrupt, had rural development and health programs to help the people in those areas, had a relatively peaceful foreign policy (despite allying with israel and the US is bad), but I dislike your liberal economics and cucking down to globalism.
 * Mahinda Rajapaksa (23/100)- Ended the Sri Lankan civil war and promoted unity, but you're still corrupt and you instigated violence.
 * Gotabaya Rajapaksa (21/100)- Corrupt as hell, nepotistic, and didn't at all care for your own people and had the money run by you and your brothers alone. What a bastard.
 * Ayub Khan (25/100)- Developing your country is based but not through excessive deregulation and your segretation policies, destroying unity and being hella corrupt is terrible.
 * Pervez Musharraf (27/100)- Bastard that gave rise to severe wealth gaps and repressed your people for simply wanting better conditions. Your ideology is alright and social liberalism in Pakistan is ok though, but you're still cringe.
 * Benazir Bhutto (30/100)- You had good ideas like improving women's rights and bringing secularism to Pakistan, but you're still pretty incompetent and didn't do much regarding corruption, and you're a liberal filth, too.
 * Imran Khan (32/100)- You did some good domestically, in your first reign like backing China and improving the economy and turning to green energy, but still, you're corrupt as hell and didn't do shit in solving Afghanistan's issue. Sure you're better than Modi and the West but that's quite low, don't you think?
 * Daoud Khan (36/100)- Possibly one of the few good irredentists and anti-communists (at least in his later years), pushed for good reforms and development trying to make Afghanistan a better place. You're similar to getulio Vargas but for Afghanistan, and both you and him are kind of based. However, anti-communism is beyond cringe.
 * Ashraf Ghani (21/100)- Incompetent and Corrupt as hell, fled your country like a motherfucking pussy just like Biden and let the Taliban take over the country. From that moment on, you are not a true representative of the Afghan people. You're a traitor, a coward, and a spineless American prostitute.
 * Nur ul-Haq Ulumi (33/100)- Afghan Anwar Ibrahim. Nothing more to add, except that you back the Soviets. Well, but yeah, at least you’re better than pretty much every modern Afghan Politician.
 * Askar Akayev (26/100)- You are just Kyrgyz Jiang Zemin. Another corrupt, kleptocratic authcap.
 * Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedow (23/100)- Better than Turkmenbashi that's for sure as you had some political reforms and continued oil wealth and is one of the biggest players against Islamic fundamentalists, but you're corrupt and more or less still mantained a totalitarian hand over Turkmenistan, is a Russian asset state, and corrupt as hell, still mantaining the Plutocratic Capitalist structure as seen in most of Central Asia.
 * Serdar Berdimuhamedow (22/100)- Like your father, but misogynistic. Why don't libfems support the women suffering in Turkmenistan instead of complaining about nonsense and supporting genocide?
 * Nursultan Nazarbayev (37/100)- Based for having great social policies that prevented Kazakhstan to fall to chaos unlike how Russia and Ukraine did fuck up after the collapse of the USSR. Although, could you cut down on the corruption? Plus, your capitalist economics is quite cringe even if it did significant good. Plus, your ban on Socialism is quite cringe too. Plus, you're also a crony capitalist that still dominate Kazakh politics, building a Plutocratic Russian asset state during your rule.

Middle East:

 * Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi (27/100)- Fuck you for overthrowing Mossadegh who is popular to the people and being a Western and Zionist puppet. This is coming from a person that isn't even fond of Khomeini. Plus, your secret police is one of the most brutal and sadistic out of all the secret police that has existed in all sorts of shit regimes. Forgot how you're a terrible King and corrupt as hell, but your economic programs and secular policies are decent at least (even if development in Iran is severely unequal under you, kind of like Tito), better than most US backed tyrants, since your white revolution did improve Iran to some degree (but still some fatal flaws remain).
 * Mohammad Khatami (25/100)- A bit like Rouhani but slightly better, since you did liberalize Iranian social policy for a bit, and did allow some leftists to exist, but still, I don't like how Capitalistic you were.
 * Mahmoud Ahmadinejad  (21/100)- Being anti-west and some of your early economic policies is good but that's all about the only things you ever did good. Isolated your country, corrupt, yet also too conservative.
 * Hassan Rouhani (22/100)- Better than Khomeini but frankly that isn't saying much. You still ruled a theocratic Islamist state threatening peace and stability over the middle east and had awful economics. Being Pro-CPC and doing some minor improvements to women's rights is the only good from you.
 * Faisal II of Iraq (24/100)- Fatass corrupt king that didn't do shit to your people other than sucking the cock of the brits and the Americans.
 * Ahmed Hassan Al Bakr (35/100)- Couped the corrupt Iraqi monarchy and replaced it with a great state, while having a lot of good reforms to bring Iraq out from the sad state that the monarchy caused, while using oil wealth to bring Iraq prosperity. If only you ruled Iraq forever. However, from what I heard, under you, Iraq was way more nepotistic and corrupt compared to Saddam, which is not good at all, and why did you purge communists?
 * Adib Shishakli (32/100)- You did have some good takes and reforms and opposing Israel is based, but an anti-communist filth that chummed up to the West and still too economically rightist.
 * Hafez Al Assad (39/100)- Based chad that turned Syria into a bastillion of Ba'athism and against Imperialism, Zionism and Wahhabism in the Middle East, your domestic policies are overall very based too, apart from corruption, nepotism, Alawitization and your authcap policies, that is.
 * Bashar Al Assad (34/100)- Allah, Syria, Bashar! Death to the Western backed Islamists, Terrorists, Wahhabists, Zionists, and Neo-Ottomanists, long live Ba'athist Syria! Although you could tone down on corruption, still prefer you than the others in the Syrian civil war, though, and cool down on the Authcap and you're brutality which arguably also is partially to blame for starting the civil war.
 * Antoun Saadeh (30/100)- Similar to Shishakli. Not the worst, but not exactly good either.
 * Hassan Nasrallah (31/100)-Look, I seriously don't care about your anti-atlanticist stances and all that bs. You're an Iranian asset in Lebanon.
 * Theodor Herzl  (26/100)- Founder of Zionism, but I don't necessary hate the idea of protecting Jews, I just hate how Zionism is carried out by Israel.
 * Yitzhak Rabin (28/100)- I could credit you for being the least insane of all Israeli leaders, but you still brutally treated Palestinians for wanting better living.
 * Shimon Peres (24/100)- Similar to the above as some of your more socialistic views are decent and wanting peace is good, but you still instigated terror against Palestinians, in the middle east, and downplayed the Armenian Genocide just to please your ally Erdogan.
 * Ismail Haniyeh (22/100)- I get Israel is terrible, but it doesn't justify your Islamic Extremism and the terrible actions Hamas has taken.
 * Amin al-Husseini (20/100)- Like the above but worse. Sure, supporting Palestinian Independence is based and I’d take you against the Brits, but you are an antisemetic scum who worked with Hitler and Pavelic.
 * David Ben Guiron (23/100)- Founder of a Settler colonial state known as Israel. That alone is bad enough. Though some form of socialistic ideals were pretty ok.
 * Isaac Herzog (20/100)- A zionist that likes welfare is still a Zionist.
 * Yair Lapid (21/100)- Better than most other Israeli politicians, but tbf, does that mean anything, really?
 * Ehud Barak (20/100)- Similar to Rabin or Shimon Peres, but more capitalist and incompetent.
 * Ibn Saud (20/100)- Reuniting Saudi Arabia was based but that’s the only thing you ever did right. A capitalist, British and American puppet that allowed the West to exploit the shit out of your country, and the man who paved way to the hell known as modern Saudi Arabia.
 * King Faisal of Saudi Arabia (27/100)- Although more decent than the rest of the Saudi Kings, my respect to you is gone after knowing that you are basically Idi Amin's primary backer.
 * Yahya Muhammad Hamid ed-Dein (31/100)- A lot of your policies failed miserably, and Yemen under you is also a backwards monarchy, though at least you do deserve some credit for some attempted modernization.
 * Aburabbuh Hadi (20/100)- Saudi Puppet and similar to Fayez Al Sarraj in Libya, this motherfucker didn't do anything to improve the country other than have it sucking the cock of Mohammed Bin Salman.
 * Abdul Hamid II (34/100) Turkish Emperor Guangxu/Tsar Alex II, you did try to modernize your country, but the Pashas blocked it, what a shame, but, the repression and rotten Ottoman system is still there, and I've said this many times, reformism. does. not. work.
 * Fethi Okyar (39/100)- Cringe liberal and cringe Liberal (since even if better than full scale industrial capitalism or laissez faire, but still bad) economics, but I do have to credit you for booming the economy of Turkey, but at least you tried to fight the Islamic fundamentalists that hijacked Ataturk's party. Still relatively bad though.
 * Kemal Kilicdaroglu (21/100)- What social democracy does to a mf. You fucking ruined whatever dreams Ataturk might have at all.
 * Meral Aksener (24/100)- Definitely better than Erdogan, that’s for sure, and your Progressive Conservatism is good, but that’s about it, a typical Libdem who simps for the EU, and is racist to Armenians.
 * Bulent Ecevit  (35/100)- Revisionist that ruined Ataturk's ideology and turned most modern kemalist parties into Social Democrats, invaded Cyprus, and did nothing to stop political violence (even if Demirel is more to blame) which paved way to Kenan Evren. Least stupid Social Democrat. Although some of your economical and social developments were quite acceptable.
 * Ilham Aliyev (24/100)- Erdogan's faithful dog and cockscuker The only good from you is your support to Lukashenko and Venezuela.
 * Mikheil Saakashvili  (25/100)- This man is a Neoliberal, Western puppet, and you didn't even bother to do anything to improve you country, of course you deserve to be hated. Resisting Russia is based but you're still a puppet of the Atlanticists, just like Zelensky.
 * Isma’il Pasha (24/100)- Imperialist scum and British Puppet that buttfucked Egypt with national debt, but one of the least bad Imperialists. You did have some positive development for Egypt and tried to reduce slavery, but still, a capitaloid you are, no amount of sugarcoating can redeem that.
 * Hosni Mubarak (31/100)- good for trying to keep Egypt from the chaos that the Arab Spring caused, but bad for corruption, brutality, and friendliness with Zionists.
 * Abdel Fattah Al Sisi (31/100)- This guy is nowhere near as bad as the three Egyptian leaders I mentioned above. I would say you're the same level as Mubarak as you are corrupt and repressive as hell. What makes you worse than Mubarak is that you're a Western puppet. Only good from you is that you supported Assad in Syria.

Africa:

 * Zine El Abidine Ben Ali  (20/100)- Corrupt as hell, and by corrupt I mean this man's corruption literally set a new definition for the word "corruption", left severe unemployment and it was so terrible that even terrorism begun to erupt under your rule, you also did drug traffiking and shit like that. I hate the Arab Spring but Tunisia is the only country that benefited from it.
 * Kais Saied (25/100)- Tunisian Menderes, need I say any more, plus, you are destroying any progress Tunisia has made ever since they took down Ben Ali. Fucking scum.
 * Abdelaziz Bouteflika (24/100)- A corrupt, Dengoid puppet who screwed over Algeria and turned the socialist FLN into a corrupt party. You are Algerian Jiang Zemin/Askar Akayev. The only W from you is anti-western imperialism, but you are a Dengoid puppet.
 * Mohammed VI (22/100)- An improvement from Hassan but not that much of one. You are still a repressive, corrupt monarch who kept Morocco as being a French puppet.
 * Mohamed Ould Abdul Aziz  (28/100)- Islamic theocrat and corrupt as hell. Nothing else.
 * Lansana Conte  (26/100)- Couped Toure and turned the country into a corrupt French puppet military dictatorship.
 * Hamani Diori (27/100)- Corrupt as hell and made your country basically independent in name only, still being enslaved by the French.
 * Patrice Talon (30/100)- Having a strong hand is good, but you're the wrong person to have it. Abused your power and drestricted the rights of workers, what more?
 * Sylvanus Olympio (30/100)- One of the least bad American and French allies, as you did do good things to Togo, but still, fuck you for being a Westoid Slave.
 * Faure Gnassingbe (23/100)- Succeeded your father's corrupt regime and repressive as fuck, the West backs you up because you're their puppet, as usual.
 * Ibrahim Babanginda (21/100)- You did help Nigeria's economy develop, but your ridiculous economic liberal policies, excessive deregulation created a lack of social needs and caused severe wealth gaps for regular Nigerians that made the people unhappy.
 * Jaafar Nimiery (36/100)- Social reforms did good and your ideology is positive for Sudan although you shouldn't have implemented Sharia Law and being too culturally traditionalist, but you're still overall based and your other goods make up for it, still not sure about your failures to prevent civil war and the economic failures and left-anticom though.
 * Salva Kiir Mayardit (32/100)- Great for freeing South Sudan from Omar Al Bashir and engaged in reconstruction of your country and you wanting to build it from nothing after Al Bashir ruined it. However, killing journalists is cringe, and it seems that you promising to build South Sudan is an empty promise, and you did nothing much.
 * Iseas Afwerki (23/100)- Backed Zionists, Corrupt as hell, and turned Eritrea into some shut down, totalitarian hellhole that may be even worse than North Korea. Although good for backing resistance against Al Bashir.
 * Meles Zenawi (22/100)- You developed the economy, true, but your brutality puts you down here and you're unpopular among Ethiopians for a true reason, because of your violence.
 * David Dacko (33/100)- Overthrowing Bokassa is based as well as your pursuit of independent path from France and alliance to the PRC, but you were quite incompetent and your system led to a lot of corruption.
 * Andre Kolingba (23/100)- Pardoned Bokassa, his reliance on the IMF and his favour towards his ethnic group drew severe tribal problems in the Central African Republic.
 * Francois Bozize (25/100)- Didn't do anything to end the civil war in Central Africa, violent, and allowed the Russian mercenaries to massacre your own people. Extremely awful.
 * Omar Bongo (27/100)- This dipshit didn't do anything to improve your country. Corrupt as hell, relied on the French, didn't care about building infrastructure, too conservative for Gabon and solving infant mortality rates. Your only good is having a high GDP growth and mantaining Gabon in order.
 * Laurent Desiree Kabila (20/100)- Had good intentions and good ideology, and thanks for taking down Mobutu, but it's easy being a better person than Mobutu. The shitty things you did include corruption, posession of child soldiers, and building a new cult around yourself.
 * Joseph Kabila (28/100)- Solved the problems in the Congo and undid the bad shit that your father did, although your corruption puts you below here, and, you did nothing to implement Socialism in the Congo.
 * Milton Obote (36/100)- Corruption and mismanagement of economy is cringe which led to the rise of Idi Amin is bad, but other than that you're ok-ish. Even so, you're incompetent in the Ugandan Bush War.
 * Yoweri Museveni (35/100)- Fought against Idi Amin's reign of terror in Uganda, semi-based foreign policy but your social policies is too conservative for my liking. Plus, you didn't do much in terms of making Uganda better.
 * Jomo Kenyatta (36/100)- Based for freeing Kenya from the Brits, but then again, your social conservative policies and your tribalism that favours the Kikuyus still scar Kenya until today, although socialism is based, and your corruption too, is quite bad and being a Western Puppet is unjustifiable later in your rule.
 * Paul Kagame (34/100)- Built the Singapore of Africa, made Rwanda a thriving country, freed his countrymen from the hands of Hutu Extremists like Kambanda and Theonoste Bagosora, plus you fought against Mobutu as well which is based. Intervention in the Congo War and supporting the uprising against Gaddafi is retarded though, and so is your capitalist economics.
 * Ali Hassan Mwinyi (22/100)- Destroyed the progress Nyerere made for Tanzania, sold the economy to neoliberals, increased debt, worsened living standards, and corrupt as hell.
 * Jonas Savimbi (27/100)- American pawn in Angola. Although he fought against the evil Portuguese colonialists, he allied with Mobutu and the Apartheid and will probably make Angola another classic US backed tyranny.
 * Edouardo Dos Santos (21/100)- Because I hate UNITA and I like the MPLA does not make you good, your corruption is the reason why Angola is a shitty country and wealth gaps are terrible. Your support to Biya and Obiang is unforgivable too.
 * Filipe Nyusi (23/100)- Same as above. THANKS FOR DESTROYING EVERYTHING SAMORA MACHEL HAD FOUGHT FOR, REVISIONIST FUCK.
 * FW De Klerk (29/100)- You are the least bad of all the Apartheid members but you're still bad, you incited racial issues between the Xhosa and Zulu people, and ignored the crimes that Botha, Malan and Vorster created. Your neoliberal economics suck ass too, although good that you abandoned the Apartheid later on.
 * Sobhuza II (39/100)- Economic developments were obviously, very, very cool, but you created a dynasty system and you allied with the imperialists. Better than your retarded son, though.

Europe:

 * Eleftherios Venizelos (27/100)- Freeing Greece and being a nationalist is based, but your irredentism and liberalism, no, not at all.
 * Ioannis Metaxas (22/100)- Built around a cult around yourself and made something similar to a fascist regime in Greece. Better than the Italians but let's face it, Literally everyone is better than the Italians.
 * Zog I (34/100)- One of the Least bad Monarchs but that doesn't mean shit. Sure, some of your actions like opening up to Jewish refugees and abolishing Islamic law are based, but you're a madman that repressed your people and made your country pretty much dependent on the Italians.
 * Koci Xoxe (24/100)- Tito's puppet in Albania, killed and arrested people just for wanting to preserving Albania's independence from Tito's imperializing attempts, and tried to sabotage Socialism in Albania. You got what you deserved.
 * Ramiz Alia (33/100)- Ended Albania's isolation, allowed the policy of Market Socialism and liberalized Is good, but you being a Gorbachev wannabe and paved way to that bastard Berisha, and allowing pluralism in general is extremely uncool, paved way to the destruction of everything Hoxha built up.
 * Peter II of Yugoslavia (20/100)- Another fatass king that didn't do anything to defend your people from the Nazis, oh well, this isn't the first.
 * Josip Broz Tito (35/100)- This man fought for a united Yugoslavia from Nazi rule, had a based religious policy, based for making Yugoslavia an industrialized country, and great job leading the NAM to piss the Imperialists off (Even if you're very chummy with the West, and helped the Soviet Revisionists take down genuine leaders of Europe like Chervenkov, and never stopped trying to sabotage Hoxha, you piece of shit.). However, cool down with the IMF loans, Macedonization, and a large unemployment that evolved under your later rule is pretty cringe. Plus, why did you try to imperialize Albania and Bulgaria? That's not what true socialists do, fucking hell. Even so, you purged genuine ML's and Socialists, making your country a degenerate revisionist state and your party is full of degenerate parasites like Djilas and Rankovic, same for beign a filthy champagne "socialist". Unacceptable. Although unlike other revisionists like Deng, you at least did try to build a welfare state and didn't create a system of corrupt political families, and killed off anyone who dared oppose your social imperialism and revisionism (unlike most marxist leninist societies where there is genuine people's criticism)
 * Alexander Rankovic (20/100)- You're such a fucking huge piece of shit. Your Serbian Chauvinism inspired Milosevic and caused the destruction of a united Socialist Nation.
 * Branko Kostic (27/100)- Revisionist and liberal "socialist" that wanted to make Yugoslavia degrade more down the market "socialist" and liberal path.
 * Stipe Suvar (35/100)- Better than Tito since you at least wanted to preserve some unity in the country, and better than Tito himself since I doubt you wanted to go on a honeymoon with the West in Tito's early years, but still, preserving that Social Imperialist and degenerate system that Tito set up is not good.
 * Robert Golob (36/100)- One of the least bad Europoids as you did make Slovenia as one of the least bad European countries, but you are still a liberal, europoid, and supported W*ng.
 * Boris III of Bulgaria (24/100)- Nazi Collaborationist and made yourself absolute monarch, I don't care if you are one one the most moderate axis leaders, those two above already made me lose respect to you.
 * Traicho Kostov (24/100)- Burn forever in hell, Traitor, Go fuck yourself, Titoite agent. Dimitrov was absolutely in the right to kill you.
 * Todor Zhivkov (38/100)- I mean, I used to see you in a very positive light and that your economic policies, industrial projects, and stuff like that are very good and market socialism is based, but you're an ethnic nationalist that repressed Bulgarian Turks, Corruption, and suffered from three recessions. Plus, you're Khrushchev puppet. Please, I used to like you, but you just proved to be quite disappointing. You certainly are better than Post-Communist Bulgaria, but, you aren't a real socialist. You're an opprtunist, revisionist Moscow puppet dressed in Red. (although you're more socialist than those of T*to despite being a revisionist)
 * Petar Mladenov (32/100)- Supported Gorbachev's reforms, took down Zhivkov (which is a good thing but you just like quickly gave into the abolishment of communism in Bulgaria), and paved way to the early 90's, which Bulgaria saw it's worst period in history. Bulgarian Alia, very cringe.
 * Alexandru Nicolschi (37/100)- Fighting Fashoids and counterrevolutionaries are undoubtedly based, but you are a fucking brute and a Soviet puppet.
 * Elena Ceausescu (30/100)- This fucking whore is such a clown. Caused the fall of what could've been a good socialist country (considering Nicolae Ceausescu's industrial and building programs) and overall turned her husband into this paranoid madman just to get what you wanted, although you did one or two contributions, but otherwise you're Romanian Li Peng.
 * Igor Smirnov (30/100)- Obviously, supporting to keep the USSR was cool (which is what you did in the 90's), but you're an opportunistic man that sucks off Putin too much, plus, you're another Putin-like right wing corrupt oligarch and an Imperialist puppet of Putin, no different from Zelensky (although slightly better as you did have noble goals in the 90's, why did you turn into this).
 * Milklos Horthy (26/100)- Irredentist, ultranationalist, fascist, and yeah, that's about it. No more for me to say here. Although less bad than ACTUAL NAZIS, you're still bad.
 * Ferenc Nagy (33/100)- A better version of Edvard Benes as you had great contributions with the Anti-Fascist struggle in Hungary and even some domestic achievements, but deporting Slovaks was bad, and trying to sabotage the popular revolution Rakosi led was terrible. Being against a dictatorship of the proletariat is terrible too.
 * Erno Gero (22/100)- Huge revisionist, betrayed Marxist Leninist principles of self-criticism, caused widespread discontent, and you indirectly gave rise to the Hungarian Revolution. Massive retard.
 * Imre Nagy (38/100)- You had some good ideas and trying to mantain the self-criticism structure of Hungarian Marxism Leninism (even if your complete rejection of communism is very bruh), and I'd prefer you over Gero, but you're way too liberal for my liking, and inciting an uprising is bad, even if your case is understandable, plus, I don't buy all these "liberal socialism" stuff. However, despite your Liberal Socialist proposals being way beyond cringe, i believe that the path to build socialism is up to the choice of each country, hence why the invasion of Hungary was not justified, and a crime in the history of humanity that everyone needs to take note of, and I’ve heard that you are quite bad when managing the economy.
 * Rezso Nyers (35/100)-A slightly better version of Alia but in Hungary. Honestly, fuck you for destroying Communism in Hungary.
 * Viktor Orban (29/100)- Your social policies and how you reject the EU on NATO's plans against Russia and China are based. Great job. However, Corruption and your economics are pretty bruh (even if your economics are welfarist at the very least, which is less bad compared to capitalism but still). Plus, you focus more on Right Wing Idpol than most rightists do, better than the EU but frankly that's a low bar.
 * Edvard Benes (30/100)- Iron balls when fighting the Nazis, opposed imperialism and advocated for equality, and promoted national unity. You seemed good at first, but later on, when you ran the coalition government, you tried to get rid of the Communists since they were getting popular support just to mantain your power, quite an ass move, isn't it? You asked for the coup. We didn't want to do this, but you forced us. Be grateful I'm assessing you kindly as I considered your anti-nazi efforts. Fuck you, traitor. You asked for the coup, and the Communists gave you one. The Czech coup is a People's coup, keep seething, anticommunist filth.
 * Rudolf Slansky (34/100)- Revisionist and Zionist sympathizing traitor who got rightfully purged by Gottwald.
 * Antonin Novotny (28/100)- Good job fighting Nazis and the Western Imperialists, and overseeing great events such as the Czechoslovak Film Miracle, and continuing the construction of Socialism in Czechoslovakia. However, you're quite unpopular, incompetent in solving many issues that hit Czechoslovakia after the death of Gottwald and caused by the Revisionist line, which is one of my main issues, and some of your policies (like revisionist Khruschevite policies and defecting away from the Gottwald line) aren't cool and allowed the USSR to rampantly exploit the shit out of your country, and widely hated by the Czechoslovakian people, Czechoslovakian Tito, but slightly better.
 * Milos Zeman (32/100)- You have to be one of the most confusing people on earth, half supportive of the EU and a capitaloid that did unhealthy mass privatization, yet also chummy with Putin, however, at least you do hold some Anti-EU points and sympathized with China.
 * Roman Dmowski (26/100)- Nationalism is based that's for sure, but I hate your economics and ND is cringe.
 * Wladyslaw Gomulka (21/100)- Revisionist, Soviet Social Imperialist puppet, your anti-intellectualism and your anti-semetism is extremely unbased, and purging the church and increasing tensions too is bad.
 * Edward Gierek (33/100)- Modernized and Industrialized Poland, But your failures in economics led to food rationing which is not based. Your promotion of housing and other policies like that are based too. Plus, your loan-based revisionist economic policies gave rise to Leech Walesa and turned Poland revisionist. Uncool.
 * Mieczyslaw Rakowski (26/100)- A traitorous Capitalist roader who betrayed Socialism and turned Poland into Capitalism. Polish Deng Xiaoping, but slightly better. Still doesn’t change the fact that you’re a capitalist roader and a revisionist, though.
 * Jaroslaw Kaczynski (30/100)- Based Chad with based social views on LGBT, opposing the EU, purged Corruption, and supported animal rights. Could be less anti-communist but understandable for the case of Poland. But right wing idpol is pretty cringe. However, on another note, kill yourself, rightoid.
 * Lech Kaczynski (27/100)- Domestic policies and clashing with the EU by wanting to re-introduce death penalty is good, but being practically a Neocuck in terms of foreign policy by allying with    the imperialists really made me lose quite a lot respect. It's all right to not like communism, but allying with the imperialists, really?
 * Janusz Korwin Mikke (24/100)- The only good parts about you is how you supported China and wanted it as a model for the west and your anti-lgbtoid stuff is good too, but otherwise, your capitalism and libertarianism is cringe.
 * Andrzej Duda (27/100)- You're better than most of Europe's leaders and definitely i'd prefer you over the EU but you're not really good. You are too pro-NATO and too Atlanticist, and despite the intentions of fighting wokes being good, you focus too much on right wing idpol, and your anti-communism is bad too, I don't care about your anti-baizuo policies and your (very little bit) of ok-ish policies in economy, you're a horrible leader.
 * Antanas Smetona (26/100)- You seem bad by the little I know about you, your racism towards the Poles are bad.
 * Vytautas Landsbergis (23/100)- Anti-Communist dirt, Neoliberal scum that Sold Lithuania to Neoliberal Globalists. Need I say more? You led Lithuania to independence but that's about the only good you did.
 * Karlis Ulmanis (34/100)- Repressed your own people, committed cultural genocide against the different ethnic groups in Latvia, etc. However, your economic growth and expansion of literacy, same for your nationalism (despite being a little too far) is commendable though
 * Konstantin Pats (22/100)- Powerhungry tyrant. That's all I will call you.
 * Tsar Alexander II (30/100)- Better thn most Tsars but still not good either, yes your minor reforms were somewhat positive, but it did little to no change to the conditions of the peasants, and, the reforms are already in place in a Rotten system, which doesn't mean shit, at all.
 * Mikhail Bakunin (35/100)- A bit like Pannekoek, since you did contribute good and is quite ok for the standards of anarchoids, but still, I don't really like you.
 * Yevgeny Zamyatin (28/100)- One of the least bad antiauths out there, as I do agree, the Russian Revolution was a force of good, and Socialism is very cool too. However, you have some very concerning viewpoints, namely your antiauth and protesting against this so called "bureaucracy", which bureaucracy is needed in literally every society, and authoritarianism is needed for such a vast country like the USSR, especially considering how there is still White Army and Menshevik prescence, but no, you ignore all that, and demonize any form of bureaucracy under socialism as this kind of Hive Mind Collectivist society which clearly isn't what any socialist state (apart from Pol Pot) is, and, individualism is bad, and you don't seem to realize that, and demonize collectivism.
 * Karl Radek (27/100)- One of the least bad Trotskyists as you did help the German and Polish socialist movements, but later, you became a massive ultroid and Trotsky simp that tried to betray the Stalin line of the revolution.
 * Trofim Lysenko (20/100)- Retard, dumbass, whatever, Your retardation is also partially the reason why the Soviet famines occurred. Burn in hell. However, i can't deny that some of your works did improve the lives of millions after the second world war.
 * Leonid Brezhnev (24/100)- Initially you were decent for your policies on Soviet Stability, improving women's rights, rehabilitated Stalin and had good religious policies, but later on, you almost caused a war with China, invaded Czechoslovakia and Afghanistan for not totally being loyal to you, and the Brezhnevian Era of Stagnantation is what also caused the fall of Socialism in Eastern Europe, alongside building a corrupt, kleptocratic gerontocracy that led to the paving of traitors like Gorby and Yakovlev. I can never forgive you, filthy Social Imperialist.
 * Viktor Grishin (34/100)- One of the better people in the later parts of the USSR, but you're a filthy Brezhnevite. Still better than Gorby, though.
 * Konstantin Chernenko (35/100)- Continuing Brezhnevian attack on Afghanistan is bad and so is returning to many policies of the Brezhnev era, and did nothing to reduce tensions, and had more or less nothing done under the USSR's gerontocracy led by you and really incompetent. However, you are better than Reagan and I support your campaigns against the West. Although helping to rehabilitate Stalin's name was quite based.
 * Petro Shelest   (24/100)- Brezhnevite Social Imperialist Dog who ordered the invasion of Czechoslovakia, and a Brezhnev puppet.
 * Volodymyr Shcherbytsky  (21/100)- Chen Quanguo of the USSR, but worse and incompetent, alongside being corrupt.
 * Andrei Gromyko (30/100)- Like the above, but why do you support G*rby? However, you do seem better than him, at least.
 * Dimitri Medvedev (34/100)- Brought Russia out from the scars that Yeltzin did to Russia and had good social reforms to the country, but, Invading Georgia was unforgivable though, plus, corruption still is a problem. Better than Putin and Yeltsin, but still. Plus, you're also way too liberal and friendly to the West.
 * Ramzan Kadyrov  (25/100)- Good for fighting against Baizuo Culture and Western Liberalism but even then you take it too far by turning Chechnya into a near-Islamic Theocracy. Plus, you're a corrupt Putin puppet.
 * Alexei Navalny (25/100)- You are just another one of those national traitors that hated your country to be strong anti-imperialist fortresses, nothing special. You shall be in prison for eternity. I say this as a person who despises Putin.
 * Symon Petliura (37/100)- You did fight for Ukrainian national liberation, and that’s kinda based, but sabotaging the Bolshevik Revolution, anti-semitism, and succdem is not.
 * Nestor Makhno (23/100)- One of the least bad anarchists but tbf that doesn't say much. Anarchism doesn't work, but at least you helped the Bolsheviks crush the White Army.
 * Greta Thunberg (22/100)- I really adored your climate and environmental activism, same to how you are able to make rightoids seethe, but even then, you are just another generic liberal who does practically nothing about the corrupt status quo. Climate issues can only be solved when capitalism and the status quo is completely torn down. Not to mention you support Joshua Wong, unacceptable.
 * Otto Von Bismarck (32/100)- Good for industrializing Germany and reunifying it but that's it. You're an imperialist and also responsible with some of the crimes that the German Empire is responsible for along with other European colonialists.
 * Paul Levi (29/100)- Pragmatism is most definitely good, but you are a traitor who betrayed the KPD and allied with the Succdem borgeoise, and a reformtard too.
 * Paul von Hindenburg (25/100)- Sympathising with the Kaiser, Rightoid, and contributed a lot to the political chaos that led the Nazis into power, and abused his own power.
 * Frederich Ebert (20/100)- Ideologically although moderate, this man is one of the most retarded people in Europe. I already hate him for using the Freikorps to crush people's movements and kill the people, as well as being responsible for buttfucking the economy so much that the Americans have to save their ass.
 * Hans von Seeckt (37/100)- Anti-Communist and supported murderous Tyrant Chiang, but I can't deny your strategies helped the ROC against Japan and Atatrukto fight the foreign imperialists
 * Hjalmar Schacht (20/100)- You did Help Germany recover but that's the only good thing you did, you're a Nazi filth that helped Hitler rise to power and allowed Hitler to repress workers. However, I have to credit you for your contributions to Anti-Nazi resistance later on, though.
 * Gregor Strasser and Otto Straser (22/100)- The least insane group of Nazis but that isn't saying much. Your socialism, conservatism and anti-capitalism is based but everything else is awful.
 * Heinz Guderian (27/100)- Worked for the Nazis, yet condemned the Holocaust. Well, understandable, but I still hate you.
 * Erwin Rommel (27/100)- Similar to the above. A shame Hitler killed you.
 * Helmut Schmidt (31/100)- Least bad of all West German chancellors as you had an ok-ish economic reform, but reform doesn't work, and you're an europoid.
 * Olaf Scholz (24/100) - Better than Merkel but that isn't saying much. You're another liberal serving the Globalist status quo. Plus, you're corrupt too.
 * Pia Kjaersgaard (22/100)- A racist, imperialist, far-rightoid bitch who wanted to continue to ruin Denmark with your rightoid policies.
 * Karl Kautsky (33/100)- An Anti-Bolshevik Ultroid who slandered Lenin while doing nothing for Socialism, need I say anything more?
 * Engelbert Dollfuss (25/100)- You did treat the workers of Austria well and opposed Nazism, but, you're still an antisemite and your antisecular policies and allying with Mussolini were bad. One of the least bad fascists out there.
 * Jorg Haider (25/100)- Like Orban but worse, since you are an Anti-Semite and Islamophobic Rightoid bastard, though at least you do make some good points on Bankers.
 * Nicola Bombacci (21/100)- Founding the Italian Communist Party is based but that’s the only good thing you ever did. You are a traitor who turned your back to the Socialist cause, betrayed Communism, and worked with the Fashoids.
 * Enrico Berlinguer (27/100)- A revisionist, opportunist traitor that ruined the Italian Communist Party and turned it to Eurocommunism.
 * Giuseppe Conte (27/100)- You did have some good things and shit like that, but you're still a Europioid and an Atlanticoid. Italy's Fumio Kishida, I would say.
 * Matteo Salvini (22/100)- Typical rightoid clown politician, although at least you are Anti-EU despite being an evil rightoid capitalist.
 * Anton Pannekoek (37/100)- Had some good ideas, but too liberal, and is an ultroid too. Plus, denouncing Lenin is cringe even if he did way more for socialism than you.
 * Albert I (24/100)- Despite the fact that I applaud you for fighting against the Kaiser’s aggression and slightly resolving the mess Leopold made, you’re still a murderous imperialist who didn’t return Congo back to their original owners, the Congolese people.
 * Louis XIV (23/100)- Like I could give a shit if you're an imperialist that made France powerful, as long as you're an imperialist and you don't give a shit about your common people, you deserve to be down here.
 * Louis Auguste Blanqui (28/100)- Probably the man who inspired all revisionists and non-marxist “socialists”. You favour an anti-people ‘dictatorship’ with elitism, and all that bullshit. The Corruptor of the revolution. Better than the French Monarchy and Modern France but that doesn’t say anything.
 * Pierre Joseph Proudhon (26/100)- Mutualism is among the least bad of Anarchist ideologies, and your socialism is good, but as stated before, Anarchism will never work.
 * Charles De Gaulle (27/100)- Sure, you're a fighter against Nazism and fighting Nazis are based, but then again, you're a disgusting Imperialist that only brought an end to Nazism in France. France is still the very same Imperialistic, Genocidal Empire it is. Although tbh, Gaullism is better compared to the libtard dominated French politics now.
 * Georges Pompidou (27/100)- Being more pragmatic and similar to Gaulle (and one of the least bad Prime Ministers of Modern France) doesn't mean you're not an imperialist piece of shit.
 * Valéry Giscard d'Estaing (24/100)- Europoid, and a borgeoise twat, and incompetent when dealing with the scandals happened in your rule (which you didn't care), supported Bokassa (then overthrowing it), and retarded when solving an economic crisis.
 * Pierre Mauroy (39/100)- One of the least bad French Prime Ministers, a bit like the French Clement Attlee. You did have a lot of radical reforms which benefitted the average French people in the short term, but that doesn’t quite say a lot.
 * Jacques Chirac (20/100)- Although bad I consider you less bad compared to most of the French leaders here on this list. You're corrupt as hell and exploitative (not as bad as Thatcher or Kohl but still), however, I must say you being more independent from NATO and opposing the Iraq War is good.
 * Napoleon Bonaparte (23/100)- Although horrible due to you being a warmonger and an Imperialist, you're the best option for France during that time tbh, however despite that, I still hate you.
 * Jean Marie Le Pen (20/100)- I heard a lot of horrible shit about you like being a Holocaust denier and being racist as fuck, which is of course, bad. However, your foreign policies in being against NATO is based and you're definitely a lot better than Macron.
 * Marine Le Pen (24/100)- Based for a rightoid tbh. Your political positions are good for a first world country and want to bring France away from being an Imperialistic NATO power. However, quit visiting Yasukuni Shrine and supporting Israel. Your economic policies are pretty bruh too although I prefer you over Macron. Plus, regardless how much I'd rather you over Macron and the Liberal Globetards, you're still a filthy rightoid and borgeoise mouthpiece.
 * Arthur Balfour (25/100)- Man that led Britain to supporting genocidal Zionists and their plans. Not a surprise.
 * David Lloyd George (25/100)- Your stance on the Treaty of Versailles is absolutely retarded. Your hypocrisy of stealing German colonies just so you can mantain superiority and justify stealing German resources is a fucking dick move. I credit you for some reforms in your rule, though.
 * Stanley Baldwin (23/100)- Built a welfare state which supported the people, but also gave rise to hitler and had bad economic growth.
 * Neville Chamberlain (23/100)- Bastard that literally appeased the Nazis and made Hitler bold enough to begin his imperialistic campaigns, fucking retard.
 * George VI (20/100)- One of the few British monarchs who cared about the hardships of the common people and you did contribute to the British War Effort against the Nazis, but still, you are still a genocidal monster who kept Bengalis and Iranians as subjects to Churchill’s genocides.
 * Nick Land (21/100)- Accelerationism is definitely good, but, to some aspects, you take it way too far.
 * Clement Attlee (38/100)- Although the least insane British Prime Ministers as you rebuilt Britain from the Second World War and your socialist economics and creating the NHS are very good, I still hate you for crushing and killing Third World Anti-Colonialist Leaders, plus, I blame you and Churchill for the situation India is now, plus, Atlanticism is horrible, and I can never forgive you for what you did to my country, Malaysia. Although recognizing the PRC and your WW2 contributions (which Churchill later stole) was commendable, still not good, though.
 * Harold Wilson (27/100)- On tier with Attlee as one of the least bad British PM's but you're way too moderate, and did nothing to reject capitalism. Plus, you're quite imperialistic against Malaya and Rhodesia as well (even if Ian Smith was beyond cringe), and led the UK to join the EU too, although at least you rejected to involve yourself in Vietnam, but still, I won’t forgive your imperialism and destroying everything Nkrumah built for Ghana.
 * James Callaghan (25/100)- Incompetent, barely did anything, and your retardation paved way to Margaret Thatcher's rise to power.
 * Theresa May (23/100)- British Obama, you did have some ok-ish reforms but that's about it. You're still an imperialist capitaloid, a tory filth, economic liberal, clearly, better than that bastard Cameron and that idiot Bojo for obvious reasons, but you still aren't good.
 * Nigel Farage (24/100)- British Trump and the Average Right Wing politician in Europe, but you're slightly better since you had one or two good takes. In the upper half of all rightoids, but still very cringe.
 * Keir Starmer (26/100)- Better than Truss but that doesn't mean anything. You're still a succdem that sucks off the system, purged the more radical ones from the Labour Party, and an atlanticoid, same with defending Israel. Although I like your more left wing economics, but that doesn't make up for your bs. At least you aren't a Baizuo.
 * David Owen (30/100)- The only good thing about you is being a Euroskeptic and opposing Thatcher, but even then, you are a succdem and way too moderate, and probably won't do anything to change the British system.
 * Rachel Reeves (22/100)- Typical labour dog that simps for Israel and doesn’t at all care about the workers of Britain. Average Succdem.
 * Michael Collins (39/100)- Why peace with the British genocidal colonialists? Plus, you betrayed your entire movement later on, so honestly, screw you for destroying Ireland's path to freedom.
 * Eamon de Valera (32/100)- You were once a based Irish republican, but later you turned to this fiscon and quasi fascist similar to Franco, of course you're better than the fashoids, but still.
 * Juan Carlos I  (27/100)- You did one or two good things like taking out Franco, but still, Spain under you wasn’t doing good either.
 * Pablo Iglesias (24/100)- Honestly not just that you're way too moderate, and your reformism will not work despite having some good ideas, what I cannot forgive, plus, you are a huge degenerate and a champagne socialist too. So much for "working for the common people" while you have a luxury villa on your own. Pathetic.
 * Pedro Sanchez (25/100)- Terrible at handling COVID during the earlier stages, and an Europoid, which contradicts your anti-neoliberal claims, but opposing prostitution is based as well, and removing Franco and throwing him into the ashpile of history where he belongs.

North America:

 * Pierre Trudeau (27/100)- The least bad Canadian President but that Isn't making any much of a difference. You did help Canada gain complete independence and had a good foreign policy but everything else ranging from domestic policies to your treatment of the Quebecois is shitty. Less retarded than your son though since at the very least you aren't a woke fatass.
 * Jagmeet Singh (27/100)- Lesser evil as compared to State liberal imperialist bastard Trudeau, but that doesn't say anything, at all.
 * Millard Fillmore (35/100)- You are one of the most confusing people to have ever lived on this earth. Signing the fugitive slave act and still wanted to end it by working with Republicans, and otherwise, you hadn't really have much achievements.
 * Rutherford B. Hayes  (38/100)- Ending reconstruction just to gain the southern vote and what you did during the railway strikes was bad, but meritocracy and georgism is based, even if way too moderate.
 * Chester A. Arthur (38/100)- Did bad for the economy and signed the Chinese Exclusion Act, although I found that you're a pretty weak president and actually personally opposed it, so you're neutral in my book, and even so, you had very little achievements, like Zachary Taylor.
 * William McKinley (25/100)- Improving the rights for African Americans and your domestic policies are very based for America at the time, but the fact that you're one of the most imperialistic drops you down here. Plus, what you did in the Philippines were absolutely unforgivable, like the human zoos, the genocide, etc, and imperializing my country and crushing an anti-imperialist rebellion in my country, fuck you.
 * William Howard Taft (33/100)- Undid Teddy Roosevelt's land reforms, Imperialistic when dealing with Latin America, deregulated the economy and mistreated workers. However, how you treated the Philippines and how you're less racist than a fuck lot of other presidents make you one of the least terrible of all the US presidents I hate.
 * Calvin Coolidge (29/100)- Your economics are terrible, and wealth gaps under you were terrible as well, but you advocated for racial equality, decreased the national debt and gave Indians citizenship, but then again, you're also a weak president that couldn't control all the shady people in your cabinet.
 * Frank B. Kellogg (32/100)- Ordered the massacre of Panamanian Protesters, and a key proponent of future globalism and American Imperialism, but you did have some good negotiations like the policies in Europe facilitating peace and helping China to get rid of the Unequal Treaties.
 * Joseph Stilwell (38/100)- The only thing I can credit you for is that you opposed Chiang and tried to approach the communists (alongside being against the Angloids butyou harmed war efforts), but otherwise, your proposal to take over the entire Chinese army seems imperialist and you're incompetent and arrogant that caused war efforts to set back.
 * Albert Coady Wedemeyer (35/100)- Anti-communist dirt and supported Chiang Kai Shek, but I cannot deny your role in fighting the Japs and restructuring the Chinese army. Still not good of you to back Chiang, though.
 * Claire Lee Chennault (38/100)- Same as above, but slightly better.
 * George C. Marshall (25/100)- Among the only things I can credit you for is your support for China against the Japs and contributing to allied victory in the Second World War, and tried to negotiate for peace in China, but nonetheless, you are an imperialist who worked with Truman and the Marshall Plan and did nothing to stop the rise of liberal hawks (the New Nazis, all started from Truman) in your country.
 * Earl Browder (38/100)- Calling Roosevelt a fascist dictator was bad, and so is your views of "a harmonious world with the imperialist powers" and your advocacy for the "abolishment of the independent political party of the working class" was cringe at many different levels, but you did represent the interests of the common American people and push for socioeconomic reforms. But still, you're also a filthy class collaborationist and revisionist.
 * Cordell Hull (36/100)- Some of your dealings were iffy, but nonetheless, you did do some good things, but still, a globetard, and soyraged at Cardenas for no reason.
 * Dwight D Eisenhower (26/100)- What you did in Asia (Vietnam to be exact) was unforgivable and abhorrent. Although I can credit you with positive domestic policies. Least insane of all the US presidents in the cold war.
 * Ted Kennedy (33/100)_ One of the least bad Western succdems out there since you wanted to expand the New Deal and opposed the genocide in Vietnam by the Neocons, but is it really enough to change America?
 * Robert F. Kennedy (29/100)- A less based version of the above, since you’re another liberal who backed Israel.
 * John F. Kennedy (24/100)- Although you're one of the least bad out of all the Cold War Era American Presidents, you're still bad as you almost caused a global nuclear war and you heightened global tensions, plus you escalated and continued the genocide in Vietnam.
 * Gerald Ford (22/100)- Pardoned Nixon and backed Suharto's genocide and unlawful invasion of East Timor. Plus, you barely accomplished much in your rule.
 * Jimmy Carter (20/100)- Sure you may be less aggressive, but you backed Pol Pot, the Contras (ISIS of Central America), Videla, as well as Suharto. Your shit is absolutely unforgivable. Your good point is only from you recognizing the PRC, that's it. Although your foreign policy is the least imperialistic of all cold war presidents, which is good.
 * Murray Bookchin (35/100)- Marxism, Anti-Globalism and some of your others are undoubtedly based, but you are a Baizuo, Lolbert, Anarchoid, and Anti-Nuclear.
 * George HW Bush (23/100)- Although just like Kennedy, you're one of the less batshit insane American presidents as you had good left leaning reforms domestically, you're still a murderous neocon and backed Mobutu, and begun doing the genocide against the Iraqi common people.
 * Al Gore (24/100)- Your environmental policies are quite based, and some others as well, but you're still a cultural liberal that will introduce cultural capitalist degeneracy and you're extremely soft. Plus, you do not get the right to interfere with Malaysian politics. I'd pick you over the genocidal war criminal Bush, though
 * Barack Obama (20/100)- Domestic policy is ok-ish, but you're still an evil imperialist and you're responsible for destroying Libya. One of the most overrated people, ever.
 * Tucker Carlson (30/100)- Typical Rightoid politician, need I say any more?
 * Noam Chomsky (24/100)- You do make some good points, but then again, Anarchism and Libertarian Socialism will not and never will work.
 * Ron DeSantis (27/100)- I used to kind of like you for fighting against Pink Ideology and liberal degeneracy, and you're better than most US politicians but you really have your share of retarded takes too, especially regarding your stupid foreign takes on Cuba and Israel, and your opposition to universal healthcare is just outright bruh.
 * Gloria La Riva (34/100)- The path to Communism has to be paved with Baizuo Idpol and simping for literally every anti-west regime!!!!🤓🤓🤓🤓
 * Gustavo Diaz Ordaz (20/100)- Repressive as hell and an American puppet, responsible for the mass murder of students for demanding better lives from your regime.
 * Luis Echeverria (23/100)- Had good economic growth and had a pretty good foreign policy, but you repressing leftists and conducting several massacres in your rule are awful.
 * Zury Rios (21/100)- No I'm not approving of you wanting to re-establish your father's demonic regime which only left a legacy of death and destruction. Not even the lightest.
 * Nayib Bukele (21/100)- Corrupt as hell and is doing an awful job in running your country. You are like the average /pol/ user when running a country.
 * Daniel Ortega (29/100)- Just because I hate the Somozas do not make you automatically good. Your brutality alienated your people from you, and even you are unpopular among your party. Although despite that, thanks for recognizing the PRC and overthrowing Somoza (who is worse)

South America:

 * Gustavo Rojas Pinilla (26/100)- Less fucked up out of all Colombian dictators, but you're still bad. You repressed your own people and carried out martial law, however, giving women rights and ending La Violencia is based.
 * Manuel Marulanda (23/100)- Look. Fighting against the evil Colombian dictatorship doesn't give you the right to engage in criminal activities and terrorism.
 * Marcos Calarca (21/100)- Would literally kidnap people for no reason. The FARC is a corrupted movement that doesn’t fight for the people.
 * Jacobo Arenas (20/100)- Like the above but worse.
 * Pastor Alape (20/100)- Main man behind the violence the FARC committed. Disgusting.
 * Illich Ramirez Sanchez (22/100)- A vicious terrorist who ruined the name of Communism and Marxism-Leninism worldwide, and a puppet of the Brezhnev Imperialists, and simps for Khomeini.
 * Hugo Chavez (35/100)- You liberated your country from the Imperialist Rightoid Puppet government and established People's Socialism in Venezuela. You're a champion for Latin America's fight against Imperialism. However, why are you a Tr*t that supported FARC and was quite bad when dealing with the economy? Plus, despite your progressive reforms for Venezuela, you didn't do much to the Capitalist class and kill off the capitalist system. Better than Maduro, though, even if also corrupt as hell, although you had huge failures that led to the failures of establishing your kind of revisionist socialism.
 * Forbes Burnham (35/100)- May not be the smartest in terms of economics and all that shit, You still deserve my respect for being the main builder of the post-colonial Guyanese state and being a strong supporter of the third world. However, corruption, and repressing the working class (despite claiming to be Socialist yourself), is not at all cool.
 * Lenin Moreno (22/100)- Evil corrupt Neoliberal that ruined Ecuador with Neoliberalism and mistreated the natives at the Galapagos. Fuck you, traitor.
 * Alan Garcia (22/100)- Corrupt as hell and screwed over the economy at first (which led Fujimori into power), but at least you kind of did redeem yourself in your later years by improving Peru’s economy and fighting Fujimori.
 * Keiko Fujimori (24/100)- Want to re-install what your father did to Peru, and we all know how fucked up he is.
 * Pedro Castillo (37/100)- Your ideals seem based for saving Peru from the scars of ultroid Gonzaloism and Fujimorite bullshit. Based. However, you later on as a president seem quite incompetent and disappointing, and later on, scandals erupted everywhere, and all your promises all seemed to have never been fulfilled. Why? Just as disappointing as people I once saw hope in.
 * Castelo Branco  (24/100)- This power tripping motherfucker made Brazil become a slave of the Neoliberal IMF, fuck you.
 * Artur Costa E Silva  (22/100)- Repressive as fuck, couped Goulart and didn't do jackshit on improving your people's lives and a neoliberal tyrant that sucks the dick of Uncle Sam.
 * Emilio Garrastazu Medici  (20/100)- The most vile out of all Brazillian Tyrants. I'm not fond of progressivism but in Brazil's case in your time, conservatism is unnecessary, and you take it one step further, repressing and torturing people for literally no fucking reason at all. The only reason why you aren't as terrible as that monster Pinoshit is because you at least had the Brazillian Miracle. Still terrible.
 * Ernesto Geisel  (31/100)- Still awful, but at least you made some great step forwards for Brazil with your pragmatic policies.
 * Joao Figueiredo  (23/100)- Assraped Brazil's economy, Reagan's puppet, and repressed your own people, what else do I say?
 * Michel Temer  (22/100)- Corrupt+Neoliberal+Caused severe social problems in Brazil+Didn't do jackshit to improve Brazil. What a great combo, isn't it?
 * Dilma Rousseff (35/100)- Had good policies and in your early years, you led a brave resistance against the Brazilian Military Dictatorship, you would be good, but you're very corrupt, incompetent, and way too moderate as a Socialist president, hence why you're here. Brazilian Castillo, but a bit worse.
 * Sebastian Pinera (21/100)- You're quite the awful guy, ain't it? You're basically a less insane version of Pinochet. Kidnapped random people, corrupt as hell, and had foreign companies exploit Chile under your rule.
 * Jose Antonio Kast (20/100)- Pinochet fanboy and had terrible economic polices that will assrape Chile once you're elected, plus, how you're nepotistic and corrupt as hell. The only good thing about you is your policy towards abortion and LGBT, but otherwise, You're Chile's Bolsonaro.
 * Gabriel Boric (32/100)- Ngl, you're leaning positive at best. Although I prefer you over majority of Chile's election candidates, I still disagree with all your progressive stances (not needed for Chile) and wanting to legalize non-binary is really cringe and your condemnation of good governments like Cuba, while in reality you have to understand the material conditions for Cuba and why they chose that path. Condemning the Americans is based though, plus, you seem to not fullfill all your promises. Big talk, no act. Seriously, just disappointing.
 * Leopoldo Galtieri (21/100)- Opposing the Brits by trying to take Falkland from them is based and it's probably the only time I will support you. However, you continued backing the Contras, didn't care (and abused your own people) and fucked over your country's economy.
 * Reynaldo Bignone (24/100)- Oh what kind of insanity is this? Kidnapping innocent people and murdered pregnant women? Then, proceeding to destroy criminal evidence of the US-backed vicious Argentine dictatorship? The fact you're the least fucked out of all the Argentine dictators really means something, eh?
 * Christina Kirchner (36/100)- Your ideology is too moderate and I'd rather you than Carlos Menem or some other rightoid, and actually opposing imperialism is based, but you're corrupt as hell. I'm not saying normal-level corrupt.

Very Negative:

South America:
Burn Forever in hell:

Political Parties:
Support:

Asia and Oceania:

 * Revolutionary Committee of the Chinese Kuomintang
 * Chinese Peasants' and Workers' Democratic Party
 * Taiwan People’s Communist Party
 * People's Democracy Party
 * Anti-Imperialist National Democratic Front
 * Japanese Communist Party (Action Faction)
 * Japanese Communist Party (Left Faction)
 * The Workers Party Aiming For Liberation of Labour
 * Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions
 * Hong Kong Youth Care Association Limited
 * Federation of Hong Kong and Kowloon Labour Unions
 * Partido Komunista ng Pilipinas-1930
 * Communist League (New Zealand)
 * Socialist Party of Aotearoa
 * Communist Party of Bangladesh
 * Socialist Party of Bangladesh (Marxist)
 * Workers Party of Bangladesh
 * Communist Ghadar Party of India
 * Socialist Unity Centre of India (Communist)
 * Nepal Workers' and Peasants' Party
 * Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna
 * Frontline Socialist Party
 * Communist Party of Pakistan
 * Communist Party of Kazakhstan
 * Tudeh Party of Iran
 * Labour Party of Iran (Toufan)
 * Iranian people's Fedai Guerrillas
 * Syrian Resistance
 * Syrian Communist Party (Bakdash)
 * Jordanian Democratic People's Party
 * Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine
 * Palestinian People's Party
 * Azerbaijan Communist Party
 * Unified Communist Party of Georgia
 * New Communist Party of Georgia
 * Communist Party of Georgia
 * Socialist Workers' Party of Turkey
 * Revolutionary Communist Party of Turkey
 * Marxist–Leninist Communist Party (Turkey)
 * Communist Workers' Party of Turkey
 * Labour Party
 * Socialist Liberation Party
 * Vatan Party

Africa:

 * Egyptian Communist Party
 * Workers' Party (Tunisia)
 * National Liberation Front (in the past)
 * Algerian Party for Democracy and Socialism
 * Sudanese Communist Party
 * Communist Party of South Sudan
 * Union for Rebirth / Sankarist Party
 * Voltaic Revolutionary Communist Party
 * Party for Democracy and Socialism/Metba
 * Marxist–Leninist Communist Party of Benin
 * Communist Party of Benin
 * Revolutionary Communist Party of Ivory Coast
 * Communist Party of Togo
 * All-Ethiopia Socialist Movement
 * Communist Party of Kenya
 * Zimbabwe African People's Union
 * Communist Party of Lesotho

Europe:

 * Communist Party of Greece
 * Movement for the Reorganization of the Communist Party of Greece 1918–1955
 * Communist Party of Macedonia
 * Reorganised Party of Labour of Albania
 * Communist Party of Albania
 * Bulgarian Communist Party (modern)
 * Bulgarian Workers' Party (Communist)
 * New Communist Party of Yugoslavia
 * Party of Labour
 * Hungarian Workers' Party
 * Communist Party of Slovakia
 * VZDOR
 * Polish Communist Party
 * Communist Party of Estonia
 * Communist Worker's Party- For Peace and Socialism
 * All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks
 * Russian Communist Workers' Party of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union
 * Communists of Russia
 * Labour Russia
 * Communist Party of the Soviet Union (2001)
 * Union of Communists
 * Union of Communists of Ukraine
 * Communist Party (Sweden)
 * Communist Party of Sweden
 * Communist Labour League of Sweden
 * Marxist–Leninist Group Revolution
 * Communist Party of Norway
 * Communist Party of Malta
 * Party of Labour of Austria
 * Communist Party (Italy)
 * CARC Party
 * Marxist–Leninist Italian Communist Party
 * Communist Platform (Italy)
 * Communist Party of Germany
 * Marxist–Leninist Party of Germany
 * Communist Party in Denmark
 * Workers' Communist Party (Denmark)
 * Communist Party of Belgium
 * Communist Party of Luxembourg
 * Communist Revolutionary Party of France
 * Pole of Communist Revival in France
 * Workers' Communist Party of France
 * Communist Revolutionary Party of France
 * Communist Party of Ireland
 * Worker’s Party
 * Irish Republican Socialist Party
 * Saoradh
 * Connolly Youth Movement
 * Workers Party of Britain
 * New Communist Party of Britain
 * Revolutionary Communist Group (UK)
 * Revolutionary Communist Party of Britain (Marxist-Leninist)
 * Communist Party of Scotland
 * Communist Party of the Peoples of Spain
 * Spanish Communist Workers' Party
 * Communist Party of Spain (Marxist–Leninist)
 * Marxist–Leninist Party (Communist Reconstruction)
 * Communist Party of Iceland (Marxist–Leninist)

North America:

 * Canadian Party of Labour
 * Marxist-Leninist Party of Quebec
 * Workers World Party
 * Progressive Labor Party
 * New Haitian Communist Party (Marxist–Leninist)
 * Communist Party of Labour
 * Communist Party of Trinidad and Tobago
 * Communist Party of Mexico
 * Popular Socialist Party of Mexico
 * Communist Party of Mexico (Marxist–Leninist)
 * Communist Party of El Salvador
 * Communist Party of Nicaragua
 * Nicaraguan Socialist Party
 * Marxist–Leninist Popular Action Movement
 * People's Vanguard Party
 * People's Party of Panama

South America:

 * Communist Party of Venezuela
 * Red Flag Party
 * Colombian Communist Party
 * Communist Party of Colombia (Marxist–Leninist)
 * Communist Party of Ecuador
 * Marxist–Leninist Communist Party of Ecuador
 * Communist Party of Peru – Red Fatherland
 * Peruvian Communist Party
 * Peruvian Communist Party (Marxist–Leninist)
 * Communist Party of Bolivia
 * Revolutionary Communist Party (Brazil)
 * Paraguayan Communist Party
 * Communist Party of Uruguay
 * Patriotic Union
 * Chilean Communist Party (Proletarian Action)
 * Revolutionary Communist Party
 * Communist Party of Argentina
 * Communist Party of Argentina (Extraordinary Congress)

Neutral:

Asia and Oceania:

 * Jiusan Society
 * China Democratic League
 * China Zhi Gong Party
 * Taiwan Democratic Self-Government League
 * Maoist Communist Party of China
 * Reiwa Shinsengumi
 * New Socialist Party of Japan
 * Taiwanese Labour Party
 * Socialist Party of Malaysia
 * People's Party of Malaysia
 * People's Action Party
 * People's Power Party
 * Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist-Leninist)
 * Communist Party of India
 * Communist Party of India (Marxist)
 * Communist Party of Sri Lanka
 * Communist (Maoist) Party of Afghanistan
 * Communist Party of Tajikistan
 * Communist Party of Kyrgyzstan
 * Party of Communists of Kyrgyzstan
 * People's Party of Kazakhstan
 * People's Mujahedin of Iran
 * Communist Party of Iran
 * Arab Democratic Union Party
 * Lebanese Communist Party
 * Jordanian Communist Party
 * Palestinian Communist Party
 * Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine
 * Israeli Communist Party (Maki)
 * National Liberation Front – Bahrain
 * Progressive Party of Working People
 * Patriotic Party
 * Communist Party of Turkey (modern)
 * Worker's Party of Turkey
 * Communist Movement of Turkey
 * Armenian Communist Party

Africa:

 * Arab Democratic Nasserist Party
 * Popular Front for the Liberation of Libya
 * Heart of Tunisia
 * National Liberation Front (current)
 * Democratic Way
 * Party of Independence and Labour
 * Democratic Party of Guinea - African Democratic Rally
 * All-African People's Revolutionary Party
 * Tanganyika African National Union
 * United National Independence Party
 * South West African People's Organization
 * Botswana Democratic Party
 * South African Communist Party
 * Communist Party of Swaziland
 * Congress Party for the Independence of Madagascar

Europe:

 * Communist Party of Bulgaria
 * Party of the Bulgarian Communists
 * Communist Party of Serbia
 * Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova
 * Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia
 * Communist Party of Belarus
 * Socialist Party of Latvia
 * Socialist People's Front
 * Communist Party of Finland
 * Communist Party of the Soviet Union
 * Union of Communist Parties – Communist Party of the Soviet Union
 * Communist Party of the Russian Federation
 * Progressive Socialist Party of Ukraine
 * Communist Party of Ukraine
 * Communist Party of Austria
 * Italian Communist Party
 * Party of Italian Communists
 * Communist Party (Switzerland)
 * German Communist Party
 * Die Linke (Aufstehen/Communist Platform)
 * Communist Party of Denmark
 * New Communist Party of the Netherlands
 * Worker's Party of Belgium
 * La France Insoumise
 * Sinn Fein
 * Worker's Party of Ireland
 * Communist Party of Britain
 * Communist Party of Great Britain (Marxist-Leninist)
 * Communist Party of Britain (Marxist–Leninist)
 * Communist Party of Spain
 * Communist Party of the Workers of Spain
 * Portuguese Communist Party

North America:

 * Socialist Worker's Party (United States)
 * Communist Party of Cuba
 * Morena
 * Liberty and Refoundation
 * Farabundo Marti National Liberation Front

South America:

 * Commons
 * United Socialist Party of Venezuela (under Chavez)
 * Citizen Revolution Movement
 * Communist Party of Brazil
 * Brazilian Communist Party
 * Movement for Socialism
 * Popular Unity
 * Communist Party of Chile
 * Socialist Party of Chile

Despise:

(Basically every non-socialist political party belongs here (and also includes MLMs and some Demsocs and Libsocs too)

Asia/Oceania:

 * Democracy Party of China
 * Young China Party
 * Union of Chinese Nationalists
 * Communist Party of China (kind of)
 * China National Democratic Construction Association
 * China Association for Promoting Democracy
 * Japanese Communist Party (kind of)
 * New Socialist Party of Japan (kind of)
 * East Turkestan Independence Movement
 * Hong Kong Pro-"Democracy"
 * Rest of Hong Kong Pro-Beijing Faction
 * Taiwan People's Party (kind of)
 * Modern Kuomintang
 * New Power Party
 * Taiwan Statebuilding Party
 * Democratic Progressive Party
 * Worker's Party of Korea (kind of)
 * Free Joseon
 * People Power Party
 * Democratic Party of Korea
 * Liberal Democratic Party of Japan
 * Progressive Party
 * Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan
 * Nippon Isshin No Kai
 * Nippon Kaigi
 * Happiness Realization Party
 * Party for Japanese Kokoro
 * Japan First Party
 * Greater Japan Patriotic Party
 * Communist Party of Vietnam (kind of)
 * Viet Tan
 * Lao People's Revolutionary Party (kind of)
 * Cambodian People's Party (since 1993)
 * Palang Pracharath Party
 * National League for Democracy
 * Union Solidarity and Development Party
 * The Tatmadaw
 * Perkasa
 * Barisan Nasional
 * Malaysian Islamic Party
 * Perikatan Nasional
 * Muafakat Nasional
 * United Malays National Organisation
 * Pakatan Harapan
 * National Development Party
 * PDI-P (kind of)
 * Berkarya Party
 * Liberal Party of Australia
 * Australian Labour Party
 * Democratic Labour Party
 * Green Party
 * Socialist Alternative
 * New Zealand Labour Party
 * National Party
 * New Zealand First Party
 * ACT New Zealand
 * Liberal Party
 * PDP-Laban (kind of)
 * Laban ng Demokratikong Pilipino
 * Communist Party of the Philippines
 * Communist Party of India (Maoist)
 * Bharatiya Janata Party
 * Indian National Congress
 * Pakistan People's Party
 * National United Party of Afghanistan
 * Taliban
 * Democratic Party of Turkmenistan
 * Islamic Coalition Party
 * Combatant Clergy Association
 * Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party
 * Kurdistan Worker's Party
 * Likud
 * All parties of  Israhell except the   Israeli Communist Party (Maki)
 * Hamas
 * Fatah
 * AKP
 * Maoist Communist Party of Turkey
 * Communist Party of Turkey (Marxist-Leninist)
 * CHP
 * iYi Party
 * HDP
 * MHP
 * Great Unity Party
 * Grey Wolves
 * Felicity Party

Africa:

 * Al-Nour Party
 * National Forces Alliance
 * Democratic Current
 * Free Destourian Party
 * Islamist Ennahda Movement Party
 * Movement of Society for Peace
 * National Rally of Independents
 * Authenticity and Modernity Party
 * National Congress Party
 * Prosperity Party
 * People's Movement for the Liberation of Angola
 * ZANU-PF
 * Namibian Economic Freedom Fighters
 * Economic Freedom Fighters
 * African National Congress

Europe:

 * New Democracy
 * Syriza
 * Serbian Progressive Party
 * National Liberal Party
 * Fidesz
 * PiS
 * Servant of the People
 * Belaya Rus
 * Belarusian Opposition
 * United Russia
 * Homeland Union
 * Liberal Democratic Party of Russia
 * Lewica
 * Austrian People's Party
 * Swiss People's Party
 * Social Democratic Party of Germany
 * Christian Democratic Union of Germany
 * The Greens
 * Christian Social Union
 * Alternative for Germany
 * Volt Europa
 * Social Democrats (Denmark)
 * Swedish Social Democratic Party
 * Labour Party
 * Conservative Party (Norway)
 * People's Party for Freedom and Democracy
 * Liberal Party
 * Forza Italia
 * Democratic Party
 * La Republique En Marche
 * Socialist Party
 * AFD
 * Reconquest
 * French Republican Party
 * National Rally
 * Vox
 * Spanish Socialist Worker's Party
 * People's Party
 * PODEMOS
 * Socialist Party
 * Conservative Party
 * Labour Party
 * Green Party
 * UK Independence Party
 * Scottish National Party
 * British Union of Fascists
 * Liberal Democrats (UK)
 * Militant Tendency Party
 * Socialist Campaign Group
 * British National Party
 * Plaid Cymru
 * Fine Gael
 * Finna Fail

North America:

 * Liberal Party of Canada
 * Conservative Party of Canada
 * New Democratic Party
 * Green Party of Canada
 * Republican Party
 * Democratic Party
 * Libertarian Party
 * American Solidarity Party
 * KKK
 * Tea Party
 * Green Party of the United States
 * Communist Party USA
 * Socialist Party USA
 * Democratic Socialists of America
 * Socialist Alternative
 * Party for Socialism and Liberation
 * American Party of Labour
 * National Action Party
 * PRI (modern)
 * Valor
 * People's United Party
 * Haitian Tèt Kale Party
 * Modern Revolutionary Party
 * Dominican Liberation Party
 * Jamaican Labour Party
 * People's National Party
 * Nuevas Ideas

South America:

 * Democratic Center
 * Colombian Liberal Party
 * Union Party for the People
 * Venezuelan Anti-Chavez Opposition
 * United Socialist Party of Venezuela (under Maduro)
 * Progressive Reform Party
 * Popular Force
 * Shining Path
 * Free Peru (kind of)
 * Creemos
 * Colorado Party
 * Authentic Radical Liberal Party
 * Workers' Party (Brazil) (kind of)
 * Brazilian Social Democracy Party
 * Liberal Party
 * Chile Vamos
 * Christian Democratic Party of Chile
 * Juntos por el Cambio
 * Avanza Libertad
 * Justicialist Party (modern)