O'Langism

Overview
O'Langism is an ' and  ' ideology inhabiting the bottom left corner of the political compass. It seeks to establish a ', and  ' society, where  ' and a  ' alongside a  . Unlike other anarchist ideologies, it accepts the fact that different environments may need different ideologies, meaning that it is fine with ' to  ' governments as long as a direct democracy is present. It believes in ' and that individuals are the most important part of society, but is opposed to  ' because it believes that a certain amount of collectivism is necessary, and putting the always putting the individual first can cause problems.

[[File:Mutualist.png]] Beliefs [[File:AnSynd.png]]
O'Langism is a far left ideology. Being an ' ideology, it seeks to abolish government and all forms of hierarchy (unless justified), replacing them with  ' inside of autonomous communes. It is a heavily ecological ideology, emphasizing  and protection of the environment. It believes in providing  via syndicates for professions. A main belief of O'Langism is ' It opposes both  ' and  , thinking the best system for ownership is for housing and businesses to be owned by those who use them or work in them. It does, however, believe in communal ownership and/or no ownership of land, thinking that humans have no right to buy and sell the earth for private gain. O'Langism believes in a ' based on  '  ' and  ' It seeks to establish gradual change on a countrywide scale by using  ' and to implement as many  ' and other  ' and seeks to establish immediate change by organizing groups of people to form  ' Then, once society is reformed enough, and syndicates control enough territory, there will be a mass strike and (hopefully) peaceful insurrection to overthrow the government, and establish complete anarchism.

[[File:Directdem.png]] Political Organization [[File:Fed.png]]
O'Langism believes in organizing society through ' with a  ' These cities would be divided into wards, which would engage in a weekly face to face meeting to discuss community issues, and vote on what to do about them. When making citywide decisions, members of wards would vote directly on the issue, but representatives would be randomly selected from each ward to meet with the other representatives to share the majority vote in each ward. When making nationwide decisions, the randomly selected councils of the cities would meet in a face to face meeting with the councils of other cities, to share the majority votes in their cities, and enact the total majority decision. Randomly selected councils would also represent purely the majority vote in diplomatic relations.

[[File:Mutualist.png]] Economic Organization [[File:GE.png]]
O'Langism would have a ' consisting of  '   The workers in these unions would be paid through community subsides and donations. People would be encouraged to, but not required to, donate. In addition to this, a strong level of  would be present (haha pun intended) to ensure that there would be more of a system of helping your neighbors.

[[File:Mutualist.png]] Mutualism or Communism? [[File:Ancom.png]]
The way I see it, the only real difference between mutualism and communism is that one has money (mutualism), and one doesn't (communism). While communism is a good ideology, that I believe could work, I personally support mutualism more, as I think that money makes exchange easy, and allows for a monetary incentive as well as an emotional one. I don't support completely laissez-faire markets, I think that some things (healthcare, education, housing, to name a few) are too important to be left to the market.

[[File:Regulationism.png]] Semi-Planned Markets [[File:Regulationism.png]]
I think that it is important for the community to democratically direct markets through community assemblies, to ensure that there is not overproduction of goods and waste. While I still think that markets are good for distributing goods and allowing people to have access to luxury goods in mass, overproduction is a big issue, and I think the community needs to come together and direct the market to make sure that there is less overproduction. I would sort of take a maybe slightly more laissez-faire Honeckerist stance to markets I guess.

[[File:Ancom.png]] Why not just get rid of money entirely? [[File:Ancom.png]]
As much as I dislike money as a concept, I think that it's helpful. I think that if devalued and completely overhauled, we could keep the good things about money. For example, there is a certain amount of fulfillment that comes with working hard and saving up your money to get something nice. In addition to this, as much as I despise capitalism, a lot of capitalist corporations to make things I think are cool, that would go away with the abolition of money. For example, (Please don't stone me to death fellow socialists) I enjoy watching Disney movies. I think they're dumb, and entertaining. I'm afraid that abolishing money would make it so that the Disney Co-op in my anarchist vision would be unable/unwilling to make movies. Another example is Musical Instrument corporations, lets take Fender as an example. Profit incentive is a main motive behind developing new instruments/equipment in this corporations, but this can often lead to new guitar designs that are really cool, and sound really good. Same as before, I feel like if money was abolished entirely, these good things that come from markets would not be able to be reinstated. I'm not opposed to abolishing money, I just don't think its the best solution, at least in the short term.

[[File:Prog-u.png]] Societal Organization [[File:Prgess.png]]
O'Langism is a very progressive ideology, supporting '  '   etc.

[[File:Fem.png]] Feminism [[File:Anfem.png]]
O'Langism supports feminism, and feminists, women definitely go through issues that men never will, and vice versa.

[[File:Menslib.png]] Men's Liberation [[File:Menslib.png]]
Pretty much same as above, just different types of isses.

[[File:Gay.png]] LGBTQ+ [[File:SJW.png]]
It is ridiculous in our society how people with sexualities and genders that are not heteronormative are considered inferior. These things are beyond people's control, and completely psychological, and it is ridiculous how our society makes it so that heterosexual is the norm.

[[File:Post-Genderism.png]] The Gender Abolitionism Question [[File:Post-Genderism.png]]
While in theory, gender abolition is good, I have a few problems with it, starting with my own gender identity. I personally identify as male, not as female or non-binary. I don't think of gender itself as an oppressive social construct, I just think we need to reform it so that people can openly identify the way they feel. That is the primary reason I'm against abolishing gender, but in addition to this, humans need to reproduce in order to survive, so therefore abolishing gender may return us to a society purely based on sex, and therefore a more transphobic/exclusionary society. You can ask me questions about this and debate me in the Q&A section.

[[File:Native.png]] Indigenous Liberation [[File:Native.png]]
We need to liberate all indigenous peoples, and dedicate land to tribes, as they were first.

[[File:Globnat.png]] Diplomacy [[File:Globnat.png]]
I think that Alter-Globalization, and cooperation between countries, but the right to self determination and anti colonial nationalism/patriotism is the best way to respect individuality and undue hierarchies. O'Langism considers himself to be Alter-Globalist.

1. Does existence have meaning?
So this is an interesting question. Is there something after death that makes life worth something, is there some divine meaning to life? Being agnostic myself, I'd say that there is no way to truly know. We don't know if life has an external meaning, we don't know if morals are real. I'd say that as far as we know, existence has no meaning, except to live, reproduce, and die. It is possible that there is some divine meaning, but we won't truly know until we've lived, reproduced, and died. While this does technically make me a nihilist, I don't like to use this term, as you will see in the next section.

2. No, but! (a response to #1)
So as I said in the last section, there is no way to truly know if there is external meaning to life until we die. You could say this is an argument for one to live life without morals, to care only about themselves, to believe that there is no meaning to them living, but I would say this is false. The fact that there is no meaning to life means that there is all the meaning to life! We just have to actually work for it. We can't say that our actions are controlled by a deity, so nothing we do matters, and at the same time we can't say that there is no deity, or meaning, so nothing we do matters. We have to live life with morals, we have to create our OWN meaning to life. We have to help others, and we have to make sure that our life has meaning, by positively impacting others, leaving a lasting legacy, so that even it is that the only thing that awaits us is the endless abyss, our actions have still influenced life, our life still has meaning. I agree with Camus that suicide is more absurd than facing the absurd because of this, because killing yourself basically ensures that your life has no meaning, and prevents your life from ever having meaning. Basically, what I'm saying is, existence has no meaning. It's absurd, so therefore, we have to create meaning for ourselves. Life and existence can only have meaning if we create meaning for ourselves, because we don't know what awaits us when we die.

[[File:Absurd.png]] My personal philosophies [[File:Existentialism.png]]
Absurdism - Life truly do be absurd don't it.

 - Existence doesn't matter unless we make it matter.

Nihilism - We will never truly know if anything matters until we die...

Agnosticism - ...So why pretend we do?

Optimism - If nothing matters than why bother being sad?

 - Buddhism has some pretty cool morality.

 - The individual is the most important part of society...

 - ...But is accountable to the community.

 - The state is not legitimate.

[[File:Synd.png]] Revolution or Reform? [[File:Dsa.png]]
The simple way to put it, is a mix of both. The primary theory behind implementing O'Langism can be summed up as, and land accumulation. Through indirect action, we would reform society to be labor oriented, while simultaneously accumulating land and forming collectives, until enough land has been accumulated for a general strike, causing the government to have to hand control over to the syndicates.

[[File:Illeg.png]] On Illegalism [[File:Illeg.png]]
, as a concept is an interesting idea. From what I know, it embraces the idea of criminality as a lifestyle, so basically, as opposed to starting a revolution to overthrow the state, you kind of just pretend it doesn't exist. As a tactic, I think that NON-VIOLENT crime, such as squatting, or shoplifting, can be a possibly useful way of taking power away from the state, but this shouldn't be a first resort, and definitely shouldn't be a lifestyle.

How to Draw
undefined
 * 1) Draw a polcompball
 * 2) Shade it in black
 * 3) Draw a red hammer

Based Points Thing
ok so like check off the ones you like and put your score below


 * 1) The idea of the state is unnecessary and hierarchical.
 * 2) We should ally with other anarcho-socialists and not fight over small ideological differences. (Synthesis Anarchism)
 * 3) We should ally for the most part with other socialists of different civic views
 * 4) Worker's unions are a useful tool in establishing socialism
 * 5) Peaceful accumulation of land, similarly to what the Zapatistas are doing in Mexico, is a good tactic in immediately establishing anarchism.
 * 6) Markets are good when regulated and directed
 * 7) Gift economics are based
 * 8) Worker owned cooperatives should make up the economy
 * 9) Violence should always a last result
 * 10) Capitalism is not good

Example: O'Langism (10/10) I agree with all of these points (who would have guessed?!?)


 * (8/10)
 * (3/10)

Personality and Behaviour
O'Langism is generally a calm ideology, but can get very riled up and angry in arguments. He is nonviolent, and wants a peaceful revolution through a mass strike, but is wiling to use more violent means if necessary.

Relations
PCB Ideologies=

Friends

 * [[File:Awaj.png]]- Apparently my mom
 * [[File:AnSynd.png]]- Literally me!
 * [[File:Zapa.png]]- Adoptive father who convinced me to become an anarchist.
 * [[File:Libsoc.png]]- Most based form of socialism.
 * [[File:Demcon.png]]- Very similar to the way my society would be organized.
 * [[File:Aneco.png]]- Save the planet!
 * [[File:Anfem.png]]- Based, but support Menslib too.
 * [[File:Menslib.png]]- Based, but support feminism too
 * [[File:AnQueer.png]]- Cool
 * [[File:Indigenous Anarchism.png]]- Landback!
 * [[File:Acol.png]] Currency and socialism are cool
 * [[File:Lpop.png]]- Useful for recruiting people
 * [[File:Libmarx.png]]- Best form of Marxism, I think that it can work in the way that [[File:NeoBlartf.png]]Neo-Blartism proposed.
 * [[File:Mutualist.png]]- Best economic system
 * [[File:Ancom.png]]- I disagree with a lot of your theory, but you're a good ally
 * [[File:Antifa.png]]- Youth against fascism!
 * [[File:Socdem.png]]- I disagree with a lot of your theory, but I accept you, and you're a good friend.
 * [[File:Synthesisanarchy.png]]- Allying with other anarchists is BASED!
 * [[File:Anin.png]]- The individual is the most important part of society!
 * [[File:Eco-Cooperativism-small.PNG]]Eco-Cooperativism - Very based, especially when socialist.
 * [[File:Dsa.png]]- Never give up on electoralism
 * [[File:Libpos.png]]- Same as above but better.

Frenemies

 * [[File:Platformism.png]]- I like you, but synthesism is better.
 * [[File:Insarch.png]] - When peace fails, insurrection is necessary. A lot of you guys are no better then those you are fighting against though.
 * [[File:Councom.png]]- Let everyone participate, and drop the hierarchies.
 * [[File:Blackan.png]]- Most of you are based, some of you are racist.
 * [[File:Ormarxf.png]]- Good theory, but using the state to fight the state doesn't seem like it would work.
 * [[File:Leftnat.png]]- Some of you are fine, some of you aren't.
 * [[File:Distributist.png]]- The best way to do land, I guess.
 * [[File:Illeg.png]]- You used to be an enemy, but I recently read something on theanarchistlibrary about you that made me agree with nonviolent crime as praxis. However, you're still a frenemy because a lot of your followers are lifesylists, and not trying to do anything productive.
 * [[File:MLM-Alt.png]]- I like left unity, and you're tolerable. Also I used to be you so that gives you points.
 * [[File:Guevara.png]]- Same as above.
 * [[File:Ego.png]]- "I too, as a socialist, believe in the rights of the individual. I think that the individual is the most important component in society, it's just so that I happen to believe that unless each individual is the recipient of collective provision, of free education, of free healthcare, of decent affordable housing, of proper pensions, of decent wages, unless each individual is the recipient of that collective provision then only the rich and the powerful will get to express their individuality, and the rest of us will be exploited." -Billy Bragg

Enemies
Self Inserts=
 * [[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]]- Too violent.
 * [[File:Posadist.png]]- Same as above.
 * [[File:Fash.png]]- OH F*CK NO!
 * [[File:Stalin.png]]- YOU KILLED MILLIONS!!!
 * [[File:Juche.png]]- You're not socialist. You're a Neo-Monarcho-Fascist.
 * [[File:Strasser.png]]- Red Fash!
 * [[File:Strans.png]]- Same as above.
 * [[File:Nazbol.png]]- Same as above.
 * [[File:ML.png]]- The Soviet Union was proof that authoritarianism is not the right way to communism!
 * [[File:Anfashf.png]]- *confused screaming*
 * [[File:Cap.png]]- Worst. Economic System. Ever.
 * [[File:Feud.png]]- I stand corrected.
 * [[File:Hoppef.png]]- Ancap but worse.
 * [[File:Ancapf.png]]- Fake anarchist.
 * [[File:Reactsoc.png]]- I really dislike you.
 * [[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]]' and [[File:Necon.png]]' - Neo-Imperialists who destroy native cultures.
 * [[File:Nazcap-Hat.png]]- WHY ARE YOU IN MY HOUSE?!?
 * [[File:Nazi.png]]- Nazi scum.
 * [[File:PolState.png]]- All cats are beautiful.
 * [[File:Radfem.png]]- You are the primary reason I consider myself an equalist not a feminist.
 * [[File:Trumpism.png]]- Honestly just dumb.
 * [[File:Pinochet-hat.png]]- NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Friends
Disclaimer: These are just my views on people's ideology, not their personality. Also, feel free to edit your icons.
 * [[File:Ashley.png]]AshleyHereism ([[File:Socan2.png]]/[[File:Aneco.png]]/[[File:Indlibsoc.png]])-most based ancom.
 * ([[File:Globnat.png]]/[[File:ClassicalSocDem.png]]/[[File:Eco-Cooperativism-small.PNG]]/[[File:Liberalsoc.png]]) - Based, literally just me with a state.
 * [[File:Rocksismicon.png]]Rocksism ([[File:Ecosoc.png]]/[[File:Bckchn.png]]/[[File:Libms.png]]/[[File:Partip.png]])- I agree with all of your ideology pretty much.
 * [[File:RefTorIcon.png]]Torontoism ([[File:Dsa.png]]/[[File:Semidirect.png]]) - Based.
 * [[File:Ioist.png]] Ego-Progressivism ([[File:Ego.png]]/[[File:Anqueer.png]]/[[File:Insarch.png]]/[[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]]) - We may have a lot of differences, and I'm not a huge fan of Egoism, but you're overall cool.
 * [[File:Ineut2.png]] INeutralicA ([[File:Dsa.png]]/[[File:Libsoc.png]]/[[File:Demcon.png]]) - Really based, one of the many people here that's basically me with a government.
 * [[File:Neokira2.png]] Neo-Kiraism ([[File:Ormarxf.png]]/[[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]]) - Anti-Revisionism is unhelpful, but other than that you're good. Left unity! Woo!
 * [[File:Atronism-icon.png]]Atronism ([[File:CPUSA(PCBA).png]]/[[File:Ormarxf.png]])- same as above

Frenemies

 * [[File:Glencoe.png]]Glencoeism ([[File:Minmut.png]]/[[File:Liberalsoc.png]]/[[File:Neotech.png]]) - Generally, you're good, but the economics are a bit too moderate and I dislike technocracy.
 * [[File:Brainrust.png]]BrainRustism ([[File:Anti-Schoolism_icon.png]]/[[File:Thar.png]]/[[File:Insarch.png]]) - I mean, it's true that the current school system is bad but armed insurrection is a bit much.
 * [[File:Panth.png]]Pantheonism ([[File:SocDist.png]]/[[File:Unimon.png]])- Socialism based, monarchism eh.

Enemies

 * [[File:Heinrich.png]]Heinrich-Cheungism ([[File:Nazcapf.png]]/[[File:Economic_Darwinism.png]])- Basically my opposite.
 * ([[File:Technocracy.png]]/[[File:Statesoc.png]])- Yeah, sorry, the authoritarianism, state socialism, nationalism, and anti anarchism make left unity with you impossible.
 * [[File:fixed autocrates.png]] Autocrateism ([[File:Captrans.png]]/[[File:Minarchist.png]])- Laissez-Faire markets don't work, also drugs and weapons being sold privately is a recipe for disaster.
 * [[File:pixil-frame-0(27).png]]New Model Of Cheesenism ([[File:Ethnonat.png]]/[[File:Fash.png]])- this guy is an unironic fascist
 * [[File:SouthIntegral.png]] Southern Integralism ([[File:Heart-Integralism.png]]/[[File:Marketsoc.png]]/[[File:Cultnat.png]]/[[File:Kingism.png]]) - Drawing the line really close to fascism there.
 * [[File:BERNHEflash.gif]] BERNHEism ([[File:Ultranat.png]]/[[File:Authcap.png]]/[[File:Posth.png]]/[[File:Eugen.png]]) - Oh my god, you are by far the person with the scariest unironic views that I know of here. At least you're not racist, but based off of the rest of your ideology I wouldn't be surprised if you were.

What Political Figure Do I Remind You Of?

 * Add if you want

Best/Worst Parts of my Ideology?

 * Feel free to add.
 * - Best: Awaj.png]]   (hard to find something I dislike)

Theory I've Read

 * [[File:Libhawk.png]] Fascism: A Warning - Madeline Albright
 * [[File:Libmarx.png]] The Communist Manifesto - Karl Marx & Friedrich Engles
 * [[File:Dsa.png]] The Socialist Manifesto: The Case for Radical Politics in an Era of Extreme Inequality - Bhaskar Sunkara
 * [[File:AnSynd.png]] On Anarchism - Noam Chomsky
 * [[File:Lpop.png]] A People's History of the United States - Howard Zinn

Theory I'm Reading

 * [[File:Absurd.png]] The Myth of Sisyphus - Albert Camus

Theory I Plan to Read

 * [[File:Ancom.png]] The Conquest of Bread - Petr Kropotkin
 * [[File:Fash.png]] The Doctrine of Fascism - Benito Mussolini

Theory I've Written

 * [[File:Awaj.png]] Why Anarchism?


 * [[File:Soc-h.png]] Why YOU Should be a Socialist

Theory Recommendations
Recommend stuff if you want

Example: : On Anarchism - Noam Chomsky





Q&A
O'Langism - Ask me stuff here if you want
 * - How do you feel about Anarcho-Nihilism?
 * [[File:O'Langism.png]] O'Langism - I don't really see the point of Nihilism in general. OK, great, nothing matters, what are you gonna do about it? It never really made sense to me.
 * - How do you feel about communalism/social ecology and bookchin as a whole?
 * [[File:O'Langism.png]] O'Langism - From what I know, it's really cool.
 * [[File:Vexism.png]] Vexism - How do you reconcile "not wanting reform" while not wanting violent insurrection? Surely not wanting reform would mean your party wouldn't engage in normal parliamentary activities, but since you don't want violent insurrection either you shun the possibility of force being used to achieve your goals. So how would your "peaceful" and "non-reformist" plan work?
 * [[File:O'Langism.png]] O'Langism - So, to straighten it up, I do think that there are certain scenarios where violence is necessary, but it should be a last resort. My party (or more realistically, since I'm an anarchist, organization) WOULD actually engage in reformism, as even though it's not a realistic way to achieve an end, it can still improve conditions for the time being, but at the same time this organization would engage in direct action, specifically with a theory I created based on the Zapatistas called Land Accumulation Theory. To put it simply, you get together a group of radicals, and buy a plot of land. You establish social-anarchism on this plot of land, and pretend the government doesn't exist. You make money collectively off of this plot of land until you can buy another plot of land and make more money to buy another plot of land until eventually these collectives control enough territory just through peaceful legal means to realistically challenge the government, limiting the amount of violence necessary.

Relations Waiting List
If you want to be added add your ideology and up to 4 icons you identify with. Example: O'Langism (///)

Comments
Rocksmanylobsters - Add me please?

Implianium - Add me

- This is Based. :)

- Based.

Glencoe- Add me

Pantheonism - Add me please?

- I made an icon based on your art if you want to use it

JacksonTheBear - Thanks for the icon! Also, sorry, but I'm not adding people for privacy reasons. Autocrateism - Add me
 * [[File:Glencoe.png]] Glencoe- I am talking about the ideology relations thing so add me there
 * [[File:O'Langism.png]]JacksonTheBear- Sure, also I didn't realize that is what everyone was talking about, I'm not good at this lol.
 * [[File:Glencoe.png]] Glencoe- its okay its take time
 * [[File:OwfBall.png]] Owfism - add me to relations
 * [[File:Brainrust.png]]BrainRustism - Thanks for adding me. Seriously, the school system damaged you too much. The damage cannot be undone. Reform only erases the pain, not the problem. Ask the succdems and Rosa.
 * [[File:O'Langism.png]]JacksonTheBear- I actually don't want reform, I just don't want violent insurrection, I'd prefer some kind of peaceful thing possibly involving students unions, or just a complete revamp of the school system after a full anarchist revolution. I generally tend to lean pacifist, but that doesn't necessary mean I'm reformist.
 * [[File:pixil-frame-0(27).png]] New Model Of Cheesenism-add me
 * [[File:Atronism-icon.png]] Atronism - Could you add me?
 * [[File:Nazcapf.png]] Lancebarnett- gross anarchist does not know the purpose of hierarchy, the state, capitalism, and order
 * [[File:O'Langism.png]]O'Langism- Says the literal homophobe
 * - Add me.
 * - "is opposed to [[File:Ego.png]]  because it believes in community cooperation as well." - Give me one quote that suggests this in Stirner's work. Just one.
 * [[File:O'Langism.png]]O'Langism- Yeah that was bad wording. I just changed that. Thanks for pointing out!
 * [[File:Ioist.png]] Io - Add me back?
 * [[File:Neokira2.png]] Neo-Kiraism - add me
 * - Wouldn’t civil disobedience and not considering yourself a pawn of the state be philosophical anarchism and less post-anarchism?
 * [[File:O'Langism.png]] O'Langism - IDK I need to read more
 * - Welcome back my friend
 * [[File:O'Langism.png]] O'Langism - Thank You! I was actually in Texas for a week, so I wasn't online, but I'm back now!
 * - That means we were in the same realm, too much concentrated power if you ask me.
 * [[File:O'Langism.png]] O'Langism - Honestly, being from the east coast, I was astounded by the amount of shooting ranges in San Antonio. Not like, anti-gun (sorta neutral on the matter) or whatever, but still it's a new experience
 * - Add me please.
 * [[File:Vexism.png]]Vexism - can you add me ([[File:Synd.png]]/[[File:JONS.png]])?