User:Chirotesla/Random ideas

NOTES: THIS IS TESTED STUFFS FROM CHIROTESLA!

{{#css: .portable-infobox{border:10px solid #ffffff;border-radius:16px!important} .portable-infobox.pi-background{background-color:#4a090c} .wikitable{border-collapse:separate;border-radius:#ec1d26!important;background:#ec1d26!important} body #mw-content-container{padding-top:3%} .cosmos-header{background-color:#ec1d26} .cosmos-header:before{background:0} body #mw-content-text{color:#c0c0c0} .cosmos-button-primary{background-color:#ec1d26;color:#ffffff} .ts-inner{padding:0} .CosmosRail{width:1200px} .portable-infobox a:link,.portable-infobox a:visited,.portable-infobox a:hover{color:#ec1d26!important} .portable-infobox{color:#c0c0c0} .portable-infobox{width:350px} img{border:0;vertical-align:middle} .spoiler{background-color:#c0c0c0};color:#c0c0c0}.spoiler:hover{background-color:transparent} }} __NOCC____NOTC____INDEX__
 * 1) cosmos-banner{background-color:#ec1d26}
 * 1) mw-content a:not(.new){color:#ec1d26;text-decoration:none}
 * 2) mw-content-wrapper{width:1690px;max-width:100%;padding:0}
 * 3) mw-content,#catlinks{background:#4a090c}:
 * 1) cosmos-pageBody-content{width:-webkit-calc(100%-320px);width:100%}
 * 1) cosmos-footer{margin-bottom:-40px;background-color:#b3151d}





Chirotesla ball by Chirotesla.png

Chirotesla explaining why he re-designs his ideology page 73739183646378191 times

is a, (leaning on  authoritarian),  (in general), , and. I have a strong focus on economics and working classes because I think that economic issues are matter. It is aiming to create a society where cooperative is based on economy, where citizens live safely and prosperous, and where productivity is valued.

I'm strongly against, , , , , , , and ideologies.


 * We must judge others based on their merits or abilities instead of their group identities (eg: genders, races, ethnics, etc), their wealth, etc. All people must have equal opportunity to fulfill their potential. Their positions should be appointed based on their merits or abilities.
 * We must judge others based on their merits or abilities instead of their group identities (eg: genders, races, ethnics, etc), their wealth, etc. All people must have equal opportunity to fulfill their potential. Their positions should be appointed based on their merits or abilities.


 * We must focus on the practical or logical response. We must address problems with logical and practical approaches and solutions. We must reject or revise ideas that are utopian, unrealistic, unlogical, and unpractical.
 * We must focus on the practical or logical response. We must address problems with logical and practical approaches and solutions. We must reject or revise ideas that are utopian, unrealistic, unlogical, and unpractical.


 * We must punish crimes based on punishments that fit on crimes with an "eye for an eye" being the guiding, but not absolute, principle behind the justice system. An individual who has injured others must be punished with the same injury.
 * We must punish crimes based on punishments that fit on crimes with an "eye for an eye" being the guiding, but not absolute, principle behind the justice system. An individual who has injured others must be punished with the same injury.


 * We must accelerate to lead people to prosperity. We must maintain our culture while progressing society to prosperity and modernity. It is important for a nation and society to develop.
 * We must accelerate to lead people to prosperity. We must maintain our culture while progressing society to prosperity and modernity. It is important for a nation and society to develop.


 * The nation should be free to govern itself and independent from outside interruption (self-determination). We should protect and promote the moral, spiritual, and humanistic values of our nation. We'll be proud of our nation for what they have achieved, but we should acknowledge our failures and mistakes. We must believe in Civnat.png CivCultNat.png that obeys to, , , and has no . Unity and integrity are important for the nation because the nation will be able to maintain its existence and support it as a state or nation. That's why we must refuse to let arbitrary , , , and  divide and tear the nation apart. People who oppose nationalism and patriotism will get recognized as self-haters or "people that are going against themselves".
 * The nation should be free to govern itself and independent from outside interruption (self-determination). We should protect and promote the moral, spiritual, and humanistic values of our nation. We'll be proud of our nation for what they have achieved, but we should acknowledge our failures and mistakes. We must believe in Civnat.png CivCultNat.png that obeys to, , , and has no . Unity and integrity are important for the nation because the nation will be able to maintain its existence and support it as a state or nation. That's why we must refuse to let arbitrary , , , and  divide and tear the nation apart. People who oppose nationalism and patriotism will get recognized as self-haters or "people that are going against themselves".


 * Marketsoc.png GeoSoc.png
 * I support economics that comprise of a fusion between, , and . I support a cooperative based economy. I believe that workers must own the means of production through workers' cooperatives in a . Employees should be hired based on merits rather than any other factors. In short terms, will be implemented. The switch to cooperative will be in the long term. The traditional business model will be eliminated, not outlawed. In a truly free market under my society, workers will be able to join/form independent co-ops, there will be a democratization of workplaces, and there will be no mega corporations that could take over the society and kill off beneficial competition. I'm a supporter of worker ownership, cooperative, georgism, strong welfare state, economic democracy, anti-trust law, fair trade, fair competition, and workers' self-management.


 * I acknowledge the flaws of and . However I believe that some good communists exist, but there are least bad capitalists I don't support. Generally speaking, I hate communism for creating a bigger government that could lead to totalitarianism, extensive bureaucracy, focusing on workers too much while not giving shit about economics, and not letting the minds of people walk free when it comes to production, and capitalism for allowing exploitative practices to exist.


 * I believe that a free market is a good way to allocate most goods. workers' ownership and Cooperatives (Co-ops) will be endorsed and encouraged within the free market. The traditional business will be eliminated and replaced by cooperatives because it is inherenly undemocratic and dictatorial in essence. Multiple versions of a product is a good thing, as it will encourage companies to create better quality products and that it will inspire innovation, which is good for the economy. Essential services such as healthcare, education, national resources, electricity, water etc will be publicized. Independent workers' owned businesses should be able to provide said services, but they are still subject to be more regulated than small/medium businesses. Market interventions are acceptable to stop monopolies to form, stop exploitation of workers, ensure workers remain in control of big businesses, and keep the market humane.
 * I believe that a free market is a good way to allocate most goods. workers' ownership and Cooperatives (Co-ops) will be endorsed and encouraged within the free market. The traditional business will be eliminated and replaced by cooperatives because it is inherenly undemocratic and dictatorial in essence. Multiple versions of a product is a good thing, as it will encourage companies to create better quality products and that it will inspire innovation, which is good for the economy. Essential services such as healthcare, education, national resources, electricity, water etc will be publicized. Independent workers' owned businesses should be able to provide said services, but they are still subject to be more regulated than small/medium businesses. Market interventions are acceptable to stop monopolies to form, stop exploitation of workers, ensure workers remain in control of big businesses, and keep the market humane.


 * I currently oppose the notion that a true free market is only economic liberalism/free market capitalism because I see how economic liberalism/free market capitalism allows megacorps to thrive and take over the society. In order to achieve a truly free market under my society, workers will be given the right to join/form independent co-ops, there will be a democratization of workplaces, and there will be an anti-trust laws that could stop corporations from taking over the society and killing off beneficial competition.


 * There will be a mix of private and public enterprises. Public enterprises will include big businesses, major industries, any essential services, education, healthcare, energies, and public transportation. Those public enterprises will be collectivized and have cooperatives formed based on which category each of them fits into. Private enterprises should exist. The government will play a bigger role in big businesses, major industries, and any essential services, there should be trust busting and ensuring workers remain in control of big businesses, major industries, and any essential services. Places like bookstores, gyms, restaurants, and small/medium businesses should be private. There will be benefits for small/medium businesses seeking to become worker owned. Energy should be public and the state will begin transitioning to green energy. All other industries that produce carbon footprint should be forced to make the transition as well. Most enterprises (either private or public) will be controlled by workers who work and have an elected workers' council.
 * There will be a mix of private and public enterprises. Public enterprises will include big businesses, major industries, any essential services, education, healthcare, energies, and public transportation. Those public enterprises will be collectivized and have cooperatives formed based on which category each of them fits into. Private enterprises should exist. The government will play a bigger role in big businesses, major industries, and any essential services, there should be trust busting and ensuring workers remain in control of big businesses, major industries, and any essential services. Places like bookstores, gyms, restaurants, and small/medium businesses should be private. There will be benefits for small/medium businesses seeking to become worker owned. Energy should be public and the state will begin transitioning to green energy. All other industries that produce carbon footprint should be forced to make the transition as well. Most enterprises (either private or public) will be controlled by workers who work and have an elected workers' council.


 * I believe that workers must own the means of production through workers' cooperatives in . Cooperatives are endorsed and promoted. Cooperatives can increase the presence of workplace democracy, economic democracy, improve the workers' rights, and bring the economy to be under the common good. Workers will be encouraged to form their own cooperative, NOT force. The workers must not have the lowest level of control and they should have a notable control via democratic economic representation. The workers must be able to decide how they are treated and how they want to operate the business. The workers also must be able to manage the enterprise through democratic assemblies. Most enterprises will be controlled by those who work here and have an elected workers' council. An elected workers' council will have its task to appoint the manager and perhaps other members. Not all management and perhaps members must have to be appointed by the state. There will be a management and perhaps other members appointed by an elected workers' council independently. The goal of the self-management is improving performance by granting workers greater autonomy in their day-to-day operations, boosting morale, and reducing alienation. That can be called a worker cooperative. I'm not fond of state-owned co-ops. The switch to a cooperative based economy will be in the long terms. In order to switch to cooperative based economy, there will be education about how cooperative based economy works, how to practice cooperative properly, how to practice workers' self-management, and slowly eliminating teaching about the traditional business model. I support cooperative, workplace democracy, and workers' self-management.
 * I believe that workers must own the means of production through workers' cooperatives in . Cooperatives are endorsed and promoted. Cooperatives can increase the presence of workplace democracy, economic democracy, improve the workers' rights, and bring the economy to be under the common good. Workers will be encouraged to form their own cooperative, NOT force. The workers must not have the lowest level of control and they should have a notable control via democratic economic representation. The workers must be able to decide how they are treated and how they want to operate the business. The workers also must be able to manage the enterprise through democratic assemblies. Most enterprises will be controlled by those who work here and have an elected workers' council. An elected workers' council will have its task to appoint the manager and perhaps other members. Not all management and perhaps members must have to be appointed by the state. There will be a management and perhaps other members appointed by an elected workers' council independently. The goal of the self-management is improving performance by granting workers greater autonomy in their day-to-day operations, boosting morale, and reducing alienation. That can be called a worker cooperative. I'm not fond of state-owned co-ops. The switch to a cooperative based economy will be in the long terms. In order to switch to cooperative based economy, there will be education about how cooperative based economy works, how to practice cooperative properly, how to practice workers' self-management, and slowly eliminating teaching about the traditional business model. I support cooperative, workplace democracy, and workers' self-management.


 * I support the right to form/join union despite having an increasingly negative view on trade unionism. I will give them credits because unions have done good for workers rights in the past, but nowadays things aren't that desirable. Firstly, Unions also can be corrupt or self-serving. I wish to stop those incidents and punish them, but see billionaires as worse offenders. The biggest issue I have with unions is that they do not go far enough. A major issue is how they only ask for "better conditions" instead of taking over the workplace. Thus, making unions a tool for social democrats and welfare capitalists in order to prevent real socialism from arising. I believe that unions should try to take over the workplace as much as possible and form cooperatives instead of "muh better conditions". I believe that unions are only to be a short term goal and being mostly replaced by cooperatives in the future. If unions aren't willing to advance to such levels, then we can't have true labor rights.
 * I support the right to form/join union despite having an increasingly negative view on trade unionism. I will give them credits because unions have done good for workers rights in the past, but nowadays things aren't that desirable. Firstly, Unions also can be corrupt or self-serving. I wish to stop those incidents and punish them, but see billionaires as worse offenders. The biggest issue I have with unions is that they do not go far enough. A major issue is how they only ask for "better conditions" instead of taking over the workplace. Thus, making unions a tool for social democrats and welfare capitalists in order to prevent real socialism from arising. I believe that unions should try to take over the workplace as much as possible and form cooperatives instead of "muh better conditions". I believe that unions are only to be a short term goal and being mostly replaced by cooperatives in the future. If unions aren't willing to advance to such levels, then we can't have true labor rights.


 * I oppose landlords because I see how landlordism puts property into the hands of a few elitists. Rent should be abolished or eliminated and land should no longer be capitalized. Rent will be seen as comparable to theft. Land Value Tax should be implemented. The practice of landlordism will be outlawed, frowned upon, and unprofitable. All landlords will get real jobs. Housing will be given via cooperatives. I'm.
 * I oppose landlords because I see how landlordism puts property into the hands of a few elitists. Rent should be abolished or eliminated and land should no longer be capitalized. Rent will be seen as comparable to theft. Land Value Tax should be implemented. The practice of landlordism will be outlawed, frowned upon, and unprofitable. All landlords will get real jobs. Housing will be given via cooperatives. I'm.


 * Welf.png Technocracy.png
 * Healthcare is a human right. It should be subject to more regulation and left to the planning. I support universal healthcare, but with multiple providers and all covered by taxes. There will be a public and private option. Public and private healthcare both will be formed via cooperatives. Private healthcares must be regulated and follow the national laws, such as anti-price gouging for the medicine. One is that people should have to pay for medicine in order to restock medicine. If surgery is needed, people should pay for the surgery cost. I believe that one should be a citizen in order to receive free healthcare. One must pay for any damages that are self-inflicted, such as drunkards, drug abusers, etc.


 * Education is a human right. I'm against tuition and wanting to turn education into a human right. I support the improvement of education programs in order to improve intelligence. Education should not be left to the market. It should be subject to more regulation and left to the planning. Most of the educational sectors will be public. Funding will be provided to ensure an increase of quality for education in public schools. That can ensure that the quality of education, schools, and intellectual capacity will be improved. WIP


 * I support the welfare state. I believe in a strong welfare state. I view that healthcare, housing, education, food, clean water, and clean environment are human rights. There will be infrastructure development, technological advancement, housing, education, healthcare, and environmental protections. Those will be supported and covered by taxpayer money for improving the living standards and improving socioeconomic conditions. I believe that one capable of working that refuses to do so should not expect society's support. I follow the quote "one who does not work, neither shall he eat" which was stated by Vladimir Lenin.
 * I support the welfare state. I believe in a strong welfare state. I view that healthcare, housing, education, food, clean water, and clean environment are human rights. There will be infrastructure development, technological advancement, housing, education, healthcare, and environmental protections. Those will be supported and covered by taxpayer money for improving the living standards and improving socioeconomic conditions. I believe that one capable of working that refuses to do so should not expect society's support. I follow the quote "one who does not work, neither shall he eat" which was stated by Vladimir Lenin.


 * I'm alright with millionaires provided that they get rich through hard work and ethical methods, but it's impossible to become a billionaire through that way. The extreme scales of both the rich and poor should be addressed and eliminated. Billionaires will have their wealth to be re-distributed. In my opinion, there will be a weath cap of around $100 million to $250 million.
 * I'm alright with millionaires provided that they get rich through hard work and ethical methods, but it's impossible to become a billionaire through that way. The extreme scales of both the rich and poor should be addressed and eliminated. Billionaires will have their wealth to be re-distributed. In my opinion, there will be a weath cap of around $100 million to $250 million.


 * I believe that the form of tax should be progressive taxation.
 * Taxes I want to implement:
 * If you own more land, then you will get more tax. It is used to prevent land hoarding and help with the process in redistributing land.
 * Tax will be higher for upper class citizens. It is used to prevent a non-horizontal and oppressive class structure from forming.
 * Carbon tax is a necessary and useful tool to protect the environment. Pollutive/non-green goods and economic energy sectors will be highly taxed. That's part of an environmentalist plan to promote renewable/green energy.
 * The sales tax is necessary and useful to promote healthy products, ensure the safety of consumers, and curb unhealthy consumption. It will not be implemented on healthy necessities (such as vegetables, meat, water, medicines, etc). It will be implemented on luxury goods, unhealthy foods/junk foods, and soft drugs.
 * Tax will be higher for upper class citizens. It is used to prevent a non-horizontal and oppressive class structure from forming.
 * Carbon tax is a necessary and useful tool to protect the environment. Pollutive/non-green goods and economic energy sectors will be highly taxed. That's part of an environmentalist plan to promote renewable/green energy.
 * The sales tax is necessary and useful to promote healthy products, ensure the safety of consumers, and curb unhealthy consumption. It will not be implemented on healthy necessities (such as vegetables, meat, water, medicines, etc). It will be implemented on luxury goods, unhealthy foods/junk foods, and soft drugs.
 * The sales tax is necessary and useful to promote healthy products, ensure the safety of consumers, and curb unhealthy consumption. It will not be implemented on healthy necessities (such as vegetables, meat, water, medicines, etc). It will be implemented on luxury goods, unhealthy foods/junk foods, and soft drugs.
 * The sales tax is necessary and useful to promote healthy products, ensure the safety of consumers, and curb unhealthy consumption. It will not be implemented on healthy necessities (such as vegetables, meat, water, medicines, etc). It will be implemented on luxury goods, unhealthy foods/junk foods, and soft drugs.


 * Markets.png Protect.png
 * I call myself a supporter of fair trade policy. I believe in a balance between free trade and protectionism. Trade is useful because it will allow us to export our products to other nations, improve our economy, and our nation to create stable relationships with other countries. I oppose both free trade and autarky (closed economy) because I acknowledge the flaws of free trade and autarky (closed economy). I see how autarky (closed economy) always leads to economic stagnation (North Korea is an example of a country that adheres to closed economy) and how free trade allows exploitative practices to exist and foreigners to dominate other countries' economy. The example of free trade is EU, many countries (mainly Eastern European countries) become economic slaves of the Western European countries (such as Germany, France, etc). Free trade will be labelled as economic imperialism. Foreign economic domination and bad foreign influences should be encountered. The kind of trade I support is beneficial trade with some tariffs on foreign goods to the interests of local producers and people.


 * A minimum wage/income is necessary to ensure that one is paid properly for their work. An amount of income should be based on the contributive labor one has made in the very hours of work, NOT on position. Position should be based on merits. Ideally, the lowest minimum wage will be around $15-20 and based on the sector and job worked on. Some jobs will have higher pay thanks to the higher expertise field, but jobs shouldn't be insufficient to provide every individual a right to live sufficiently. Cooperatives can hold negotiations by the workingmen to adjust wages and income for the betterment.
 * A minimum wage/income is necessary to ensure that one is paid properly for their work. An amount of income should be based on the contributive labor one has made in the very hours of work, NOT on position. Position should be based on merits. Ideally, the lowest minimum wage will be around $15-20 and based on the sector and job worked on. Some jobs will have higher pay thanks to the higher expertise field, but jobs shouldn't be insufficient to provide every individual a right to live sufficiently. Cooperatives can hold negotiations by the workingmen to adjust wages and income for the betterment.


 * While there will be national cooperatives (as well as all essential servies), they will have some state influences and not be government-owned. Nationalization won't bring justice and it will create a new hierarchy, but with the government on top, not a CEO. Instead of nationalization, there will be a publication. That means it belongs to the hands of the people, not the state. WIP
 * While there will be national cooperatives (as well as all essential servies), they will have some state influences and not be government-owned. Nationalization won't bring justice and it will create a new hierarchy, but with the government on top, not a CEO. Instead of nationalization, there will be a publication. That means it belongs to the hands of the people, not the state. WIP


 * WIP
 * WIP


 * Subsidies for large corporations, can be known as "socialism for the rich and capitalism for the poor should be eliminated. I support the anti-trust law and breaking up the monopolies in line with the ideas of Theodore Roosevelt. Fair competition is a must and corporate monopolies must be broken. Lobbying and usury must be outlawed. Corporate usury must be punished. All major companies will be nationalized by the government. Corporations that do heavy exploitation will be punished harsher. Corporations should have no power over society because society isn't theirs to dictate. The government should take crackdown on surveillance by tech corporations. That can achieve a truly free market under my society. There will be no mega corporations that could take over the society and kill beneficial competition under my society. The traditional business model will be eliminated, not outlawed. The idea of co-operatives and worker-owned businesses will be promoted.
 * Subsidies for large corporations, can be known as "socialism for the rich and capitalism for the poor should be eliminated. I support the anti-trust law and breaking up the monopolies in line with the ideas of Theodore Roosevelt. Fair competition is a must and corporate monopolies must be broken. Lobbying and usury must be outlawed. Corporate usury must be punished. All major companies will be nationalized by the government. Corporations that do heavy exploitation will be punished harsher. Corporations should have no power over society because society isn't theirs to dictate. The government should take crackdown on surveillance by tech corporations. That can achieve a truly free market under my society. There will be no mega corporations that could take over the society and kill beneficial competition under my society. The traditional business model will be eliminated, not outlawed. The idea of co-operatives and worker-owned businesses will be promoted.


 * WIP
 * WIP


 * I'm civically centre-authoritarian. I support direct democracy, free speech, right to bear arms, and civil liberties. The government should represent the people, fight against criminals/terrorism, and protect the nation from domestic/foreign threats.
 * I'm civically centre-authoritarian. I support direct democracy, free speech, right to bear arms, and civil liberties. The government should represent the people, fight against criminals/terrorism, and protect the nation from domestic/foreign threats.


 * Unitary.png Federal.png
 * I belive that a moderate amount of federalism is way for me. Unitary government is always frequent inefficiency in solving internal problems. I'm against over-centralization government (just unitary) because it can't representative people as well. I believe that local government should exist, but they should have to follow national laws.


 * Reform.png Revolution.png
 * Revolution. Bloodless revolution is preferable to bloody revolution. Why? Because reformism leads to abandonment of original principles. Example of that, Social democracy became welfare capitalism in the long run, instead of an ideology genuinely based on worker's control. WIP
 * And more
 * And more
 * And more
 * And more
 * And more
 * And more
 * And more
 * And more
 * And more
 * And more
 * And more
 * And more
 * And more
 * And more
 * And more
 * And more


 * Parliament is originally meant to represent the people. Now, I believe that parliament is a misrepresentation of the people, the absence of the people, and undemocratic. It is just one exercising authority, not authority by the people. It also always isolates the people from the representatives. Democracy means the authority should belong to the hands of the people. True democracy should be achieved through the participation of the people, NOT through the activity of their representatives. Therefore, parliaments will be replaced by popular assemblies and people's conferences.
 * Parliament is originally meant to represent the people. Now, I believe that parliament is a misrepresentation of the people, the absence of the people, and undemocratic. It is just one exercising authority, not authority by the people. It also always isolates the people from the representatives. Democracy means the authority should belong to the hands of the people. True democracy should be achieved through the participation of the people, NOT through the activity of their representatives. Therefore, parliaments will be replaced by popular assemblies and people's conferences.


 * The government's duty is to serve the citizens it governs. The citizens will have the right to choose their leaders, decide laws, enact laws, etc. True democracy should be achieved through the sovereignty of people, there shall be direct law through democratically elected councils. Democratic councils will have the participation of citizens and function similarly to popular conferences and people's committees proposed to Gaddafi. Said councils will range from a short level (district) to the highest level (the national level). I support direct democracy. Direct democracy is when the citizens have sovereign rule. I oppose "liberal/representative" democracy because the ideals of liberal/representative democracy are nothing but dictatorial in essence and misrepresentation of the people. I support the right to vote. I believe that voters should be adult citizens. The minimum voting age should be 17 year old.
 * The government's duty is to serve the citizens it governs. The citizens will have the right to choose their leaders, decide laws, enact laws, etc. True democracy should be achieved through the sovereignty of people, there shall be direct law through democratically elected councils. Democratic councils will have the participation of citizens and function similarly to popular conferences and people's committees proposed to Gaddafi. Said councils will range from a short level (district) to the highest level (the national level). I support direct democracy. Direct democracy is when the citizens have sovereign rule. I oppose "liberal/representative" democracy because the ideals of liberal/representative democracy are nothing but dictatorial in essence and misrepresentation of the people. I support the right to vote. I believe that voters should be adult citizens. The minimum voting age should be 17 year old.


 * I believe in preservation of civil liberties and firmly support the freedom of speech. Right to free speech shall not be infringed. I despise the anti-hate speech law because I believe that they are discriminatory in nature and they enforce the woke agenda, as hate speech laws wish to protect certain groups from harm through safe spaces, the supremacists of said groups can take advantage of this and discriminate others not affected by those laws and get off scot-free without harm. I oppose the cancel culture and see it as the violation of the right to free speech. Censorship is only necessary to stop an idea of adherents from willing to silence other opinions and oppose the free marketplace of ideas.
 * I believe in preservation of civil liberties and firmly support the freedom of speech. Right to free speech shall not be infringed. I despise the anti-hate speech law because I believe that they are discriminatory in nature and they enforce the woke agenda, as hate speech laws wish to protect certain groups from harm through safe spaces, the supremacists of said groups can take advantage of this and discriminate others not affected by those laws and get off scot-free without harm. I oppose the cancel culture and see it as the violation of the right to free speech. Censorship is only necessary to stop an idea of adherents from willing to silence other opinions and oppose the free marketplace of ideas.


 * I wish to do in order to implement freedom of speech act:
 * - Protection of online privacy (The government shouldn't be able to punish you, except you're part of an armed militant that tries to organize on Telegram or advocate violence and terrorism in general).
 * - Repealment of most online hate speech laws that prohibit insulting/mocking other sexual orientations, etc.
 * - Taking crackdown on surveillance by corporations.


 * I believe that the safety of the people is important, which is why I support the national security. I'm against current cultural liberalism and economic liberalism and seeing them as degenerate.


 * I'm culturally centrist in general. I'm lean on either side of the cultural spectrum depending on the any regions. I advocate social equality and wants lead society to prosperity and advanced. I belive that progression and tradition are both important. I support legalization of soft drugs, secularization, gender egalitarianism, anti-racism, removal of detrimental traditions, pro-family, anti-sexual "liberation", and preservation of non-detrimental traditions, etc. I support interculturalism and polyculturalism as alternative to assimilationism and multiculturalism because interculturalism allows cultural diversity. I fight against taking over the society and sees it as threat to modern society and hypocrite. SJW.png   Rwsjw.png is also threat to modern society and should be fought effectively. I reject Ultraprogressivism.png  React.png and see it as inhumane. I also oppose both  and . I support colorblind meritocracy which justifies every individual's merits rather than genders, ethnics, races, sexual orientations, etc.
 * I'm culturally centrist in general. I'm lean on either side of the cultural spectrum depending on the any regions. I advocate social equality and wants lead society to prosperity and advanced. I belive that progression and tradition are both important. I support legalization of soft drugs, secularization, gender egalitarianism, anti-racism, removal of detrimental traditions, pro-family, anti-sexual "liberation", and preservation of non-detrimental traditions, etc. I support interculturalism and polyculturalism as alternative to assimilationism and multiculturalism because interculturalism allows cultural diversity. I fight against taking over the society and sees it as threat to modern society and hypocrite. SJW.png   Rwsjw.png is also threat to modern society and should be fought effectively. I reject Ultraprogressivism.png  React.png and see it as inhumane. I also oppose both  and . I support colorblind meritocracy which justifies every individual's merits rather than genders, ethnics, races, sexual orientations, etc.


 * Mansphere.png Fem.png
 * I strongly support gender equality. I see sexism as very stupid idea. I belive that sexism should be eliminated effictively in order to secure the modern society. I strongly believe there are 2 genders (especially male and female). I believe that it should be illegal to abuse women or pay one more/less for their gender. There will be no wage gap between genders, or will be any so-called "patriarchy." I support the first and second wave of feminism.


 * I oppose the notion that women must be homemakers (unless a baby is being raised) in addition to strict gender roles (but I don't want to abolish them).


 * To me, the perfect combination is and.


 * Ethno.png RacismIcon.png
 * I strictly believe that racism and ethnocentrism are evil and unacceptable in a civilized society. People of all ethnic/race backgrounds should be treated with the same level of dignity and respect. I support racial egalitarianism and the principle of that people should not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their characters, and therefore wishes for a colorblind society.


 * I strictly oppose and, which I view as American ideologies that have spread like viruses across the world. I believe that they have worsened race relations and are themselves racist, as they attempt to categorize people based on certain characteristics rather than viewing them as individuals, and judging people by their skin color and not their character.


 * should be banned from being taught in schools or universities. I support the "colorblind" society where the people always justify other people's characters instead of their ethnic/race.


 * Gay.png Bix.png Les.png Trans.png Enby.png Straight.png
 * I approve the right to sexuality. People with different sexual orientations shouldn't be discriminated against in the society as long they are willing to keep their sexual orientations private. I view "it's right to judge people because of their sexual orientations" as unacceptable because he believes in colorblind meritocracy. They shall have civil unions. I will only strongly recognize two genders, male and female. and  will be strongly discouraged and recognized as woke ideas. I wish to ban recognition of  and  in any public places.


 * For transgender issues, Sex reassignment surgery and hormone replacement will be allowed and trans people also will be allowed to identify as the gender what they wish to. I believe that there are gender dysphoria as the result of the mismatch between gender identity and sex at birth. I feel sympathy for transgender people and people with gender dysphoria. I want to expand access to gender-affirming healthcare, like sex reassignment surgery above age 18, and as long I can think. I strongly support gender-affirming healthcare for people with gender dysphoria, due to . However, I will ban people under 18 from transitioning and believe that sexual reassignment surgery should only be done on adults with regulations. Trans people will deserve recognition in official documents as well as free treatment, in case of gender dysphoria.


 * In conclusion, I really hate people when they either treat LGBT people as Hfash.png Strans.png or Homophobia.png  Transphobia.png. I view LGBT movement as pretty toxic and subversive because I feel that LGBT community is always being infested with . I oppose the LGBT ideology and sees it as harmful to the society.  will be repealed in the western world and not to be implemented in non-western world. LGBT pride and hate rants both should be frowned upon. I only know that there are three sexual orientations, especially, , and . I believe that marriage is between one man and one woman. I believe that heterosexuality should be promoted to protect the value of traditional family.


 * I advocate total separation between religion and state. I oppose because I see it as absolutely soulless. I extremely oppose  because I see how theocratic laws can stifle progress, such as denying reproductive care for women, etc. I'm the supporter of . Freedom of religion would be granted. Every individual should be able to worship.  will be suppressed if they are a threat to modern society.  also will not be suppressed.
 * I advocate total separation between religion and state. I oppose because I see it as absolutely soulless. I extremely oppose  because I see how theocratic laws can stifle progress, such as denying reproductive care for women, etc. I'm the supporter of . Freedom of religion would be granted. Every individual should be able to worship.  will be suppressed if they are a threat to modern society.  also will not be suppressed.


 * I'm tolerant towards Christian/Buddhist/insert religion here democracy. I'm neutral over culturally religion, but I personally accept for topics regarding family, the environment, to a degree. I'm also aware of some bad religious influences from religion, especially religious fanatics, who make their beliefs a bad name. He hates some religious people deny or reject the basic of science.


 * I'm neutral towards pro-life and pro-choice views. I believe that abortion should be legal, but see hedonistic abortion or "muh abortion is human right!1!!!1!!1" as murder and calling it "infanticide". I view legalizing abortion as more practical to allow safe and legal access to abortion than to restrict it. When a mother bears a child that she can't support, that will burden the entire society.
 * I'm neutral towards pro-life and pro-choice views. I believe that abortion should be legal, but see hedonistic abortion or "muh abortion is human right!1!!!1!!1" as murder and calling it "infanticide". I view legalizing abortion as more practical to allow safe and legal access to abortion than to restrict it. When a mother bears a child that she can't support, that will burden the entire society.


 * Despite I believe that abortion should be legal, I want to reduce abortion incidence as well. Comprehensive sex education and affordable birth control are necessary for this to happen. After all, abortions should be safe, legal, and rare. Any pro-life/pro-choice people are allowed to express their pro-life/choice views.


 * Assimil.png Multicult.png
 * WIP


 * WIP
 * WIP


 * Transh.png Envi.png
 * I'm surprisingly almost far pro-technology on the technological spectrum/axis. I strongly support the progression of technology and science. I want to accelerate technology in order to make a better living standard and lead society to prosperity. I believe that technology will solve a lot of problems. I'm opposed to pseudo-science and believe that pseudo-science should be eliminated. I support environmentalism and believe that clean environment is very important for humanity.


 * Civnat.png Globnat.png
 * I'm . I want to work with other countries to build new technology and have good relations with the world. I'm also avoiding economic globalization and seeing it as harmful. I see that globalists are imperialist with a human face and seeking to destroy any independent nations by their agendas. I see how globalist organizations convert independent nations into neoliberal slaves can causing them to suffer. That's why all forms of globalism (except alter-globalization) must be opposed.

I want the cooperative to become dominant in the economy, while the traditional business model is being eliminated. There shall be no megacorps that could take over the society and kill off beneficial competition. Workers will have the right to join/form independent co-ops and join/form unions. That can achieve the truly free market under my society. I want to make society prosperous by progressing technology, supporting environmentalism, creating more new jobs, improving living standards, and encouraging them to innovate. I want to create a developed society while preserving culture and non-detrimental traditions. I want to end climate change and global warming by progressing technology, discovering new technology, and protecting the environment. I want to strive for colorblind meritocratic society where every individual's merits will be judged instead of religion, race, ethnic, gender, and any other factor.


 * -|General=
 * Literally me! Cooperatives ftw
 * Literally me! Cooperatives ftw


 * We both dislike radical MLs. We both know that anti-revisionists are almost cancerous and give the left a bad name because they always call socialists that stray even slightly from hardliner marxism-leninism a revisionist or capitalist. Though, I won't side with revisionists, such as social imperialists, leftcoms, etc if they are counted as revisionists. Resist the hardliner mls bitch!
 * We both dislike radical MLs. We both know that anti-revisionists are almost cancerous and give the left a bad name because they always call socialists that stray even slightly from hardliner marxism-leninism a revisionist or capitalist. Though, I won't side with revisionists, such as social imperialists, leftcoms, etc if they are counted as revisionists. Resist the hardliner mls bitch!






 * Your arrogant faith in your regressive echo-chamber dogmatic hyperbureaucratic "communism". You also always try to revise the history in order to explain how Stalin and Hoxha were a heroic messiah. You say "Don't read wikipedia, my mates." What? Your only source is from pro-Stalin. You also always call anything right to Stalin a capitalist and revisionist (and even it's a good thing if they do with some exceptions). You also treat your ideology like how you treat your religion. "Muh Sheikh Stalin!!!!!" or "anyone not liking your hyperbureaucratic "communism" dogmatic is haram!!!!!". You exemplify why the ideals of marxism-leninism have been a failure in the end, but you will only continue rotting as you refuse to accept your flaws. I suggest you stop being dogmatic and be more pragmatic. Leave people who disagree with your ideas alone. I rather follow my convictions. Also please leave me alone.
 * Your arrogant faith in your regressive echo-chamber dogmatic hyperbureaucratic "communism". You also always try to revise the history in order to explain how Stalin and Hoxha were a heroic messiah. You say "Don't read wikipedia, my mates." What? Your only source is from pro-Stalin. You also always call anything right to Stalin a capitalist and revisionist (and even it's a good thing if they do with some exceptions). You also treat your ideology like how you treat your religion. "Muh Sheikh Stalin!!!!!" or "anyone not liking your hyperbureaucratic "communism" dogmatic is haram!!!!!". You exemplify why the ideals of marxism-leninism have been a failure in the end, but you will only continue rotting as you refuse to accept your flaws. I suggest you stop being dogmatic and be more pragmatic. Leave people who disagree with your ideas alone. I rather follow my convictions. Also please leave me alone.


 * No
 * No


 * -|Regional=










 * -|Self-Inserts=
 * Your economics are perfect if you have strong emphasis on guilds. We both want a cooperative based economy under the common good, LVT, fair competition, universal healthcare, welfare, the right to join a union, and fair trade. Your views on taxes, foreign investors, and exploitation are very based. Those views will be my take. Your social views are based. We both want progressive conservatism, racial egalitarianism, gender egalitarianism, gun rights, secularism, environment protections. We also both are technology enthusiasts (though I may be more radical than your views on technology) and opposed individualism and mass collectivism. Your stance abortion is suprisingly different to me. Mine is neutral between pro-choice and pro-life views. Your civics are perfect as hell. I find that your views on free speech, the right to bear arms, democracy, elections, and opposition to parliaments are perfect. Your criticism of vanguardism is very agreeable. Those critics will be my take. Your foreign policies are amazing as hell. Therefore, we are pretty similar in terms of ideas.
 * Conclusion: My American counterpart
 * Conclusion: My American counterpart


 * Conclusion: Same as above, but Filipino.
 * Conclusion: Same as above, but Filipino.










 * -|Others=










 * I'm usually pretty friendly and calm. I often speak softly. I often do not care about each other's political views in real life, any PCB wikis, and other wikis. I'm pretty and rejecting ideas that are very utopian, such as,  (I think that stateless classless moneyless society seems unrealistic to get achieved), and more. I always being enraged when coming across Ultraprogressivism.png SJW.png  Rwsjw.png React.png. I have disdain for capitalism and cultural war. They have caused me no longer siding with anyone who is economically right or anyone who is Ultraprogressivism.png SJW.png  Rwsjw.png React.png. I see culturally far-left and far-right ideologies as equally bad. I dislike  and see it as degenerate. I have disdain for the current status quo. I don't hesitate to remove damn neolibs, neocons, third wayists, and anyone who is cuck to the current status quo. I strongly abhor NATO and see it as inherenly genocidal organization because it has committed several war crimes and supported genocidal US-backed dictators. That doesn't make me not to support second world imperialists. I also have disdain for second world imperialism. Honestly, I view people's character content instead of their political views (such as conservative, tankie, pink cap, etc). I usually maintain a respectful conduct towards his strangers.
 * I'm usually pretty friendly and calm. I often speak softly. I often do not care about each other's political views in real life, any PCB wikis, and other wikis. I'm pretty and rejecting ideas that are very utopian, such as,  (I think that stateless classless moneyless society seems unrealistic to get achieved), and more. I always being enraged when coming across Ultraprogressivism.png SJW.png  Rwsjw.png React.png. I have disdain for capitalism and cultural war. They have caused me no longer siding with anyone who is economically right or anyone who is Ultraprogressivism.png SJW.png  Rwsjw.png React.png. I see culturally far-left and far-right ideologies as equally bad. I dislike  and see it as degenerate. I have disdain for the current status quo. I don't hesitate to remove damn neolibs, neocons, third wayists, and anyone who is cuck to the current status quo. I strongly abhor NATO and see it as inherenly genocidal organization because it has committed several war crimes and supported genocidal US-backed dictators. That doesn't make me not to support second world imperialists. I also have disdain for second world imperialism. Honestly, I view people's character content instead of their political views (such as conservative, tankie, pink cap, etc). I usually maintain a respectful conduct towards his strangers.




 * WIP


 * -|Main=


 * -|Tests=

If you want to ask me, please talk in. It is feel free to ask Q&A :D

DO NOT COMMENT HERE! IF YOU WRITE COMMENT HERE, YOUR COMMENT WILL GET DELETED!