BERNHEism

BERNHEism  is an ideology. I'm not summarizing it here, so you'll actually have to read my page.

= Economics = BERNHEism supports a complicated economic model that fuses, and a medium-sized, yet flexible. It seeks to privatize most of the market with a few regulations in order to prevent STINKY monopolies, maintain a decent standard of living for workers, and to prevent private interference in the government. However, BERNHEism also believes that a few industries should be deemed too important or too volatile to be entrusted to the whims of an autonomous market. It can best be described as a more darwinist (cut-and-dry) and less regulated version of built to function on its orthodox tenants (market prices, private property and free trade) alongside an authoritarian state and with the national interests.

[[File:Regulationism.png]] "Free" Markets Do Not Exist
Title. Laissez-Faire economics are based on a contradiction. Think about it; if a government has to intervene in a market to protect consumers, the market is considered to be controlled, to an extent, but what if, in a "free" market, where there is no government intervention whatsoever, corporations become big enough to absolutely dominate entire sectors of the economy and perhaps even extend their control across some territory? Isn't the concept of "lobbying" also a form of regulation as well, since corporations are actively influencing the laws of the state? Could the people challenging these corporations be considered tyranny of the majority? And even if you were to prevent this through government regulation, haven't you just gone full circle and began to regulate the markets again? My point is that a truly "free" market cannot exist, since if the government won't regulate, corporations (or the people themselves) will begin to institute their own forms of regulation. Thus, regulation is essential in at least SOME capacity, but that is not to say that regulation is inherently good, either. There's a healthy balance that needs to be struck.

[[File:Lib.png]] Regulationism Done Right
I believe in a system that employs regulation in the private sector and in its public sector. However, regulation is still very much a double-edged sword, and I acknowledge this. Complete and utter regulation will make us no better than Command Economies, which are catastrophic in all aspects. In contrast, no regulation whatsoever wouldn't be as bad as a complete command economy, but it would still be quite bad regardless. There is a golden ratio.

[[File:Dirigisme.png]] How Much is Too Much?
I may be a fan of limited directed capitalism to a very small extent, but this is contained within a select few industries out of necessity. Having too much regulation is worse than not having enough regulation.

[[File:Statecap.png]] Nationalized Core Industry
I believe in a core of industries, run indirectly by the state in a sort of way that prevents the use of things like full-on price controls (ICKY) and total dirigisme over certain industries (DISCUSTING), that are deemed too important for a private market to handle. And I want to make this very clear; I am not one of those state capitalists. I despise any sort of price control or quota system in 99.999999999999999...% of all cases, and in essence, these industries would function mostly like their privatized counterparts, with the only significant difference being the presence of state oversight at the highest levels (which would take its form via a state-controlled board replacing the board of directors in what would be a "normal" corporation). This would allow these industries and firms to still interact with a free market as if they were truly private. '''[Insert something about the state not being able to manage resources properly here.]

[[File:Authcap.png]] Which Industry is "Core" Industry?
The Big Seven:
 * [[File:Sun.png]] Power
 * For reasons that should be obvious. Private industry in this field has proven to be lackluster in terms of innovation and preparing for long-term scenarios. If we are at least going to weather the coming environmental storm with any hope, we need to begin researching and implementing EFFICIENT green power (nuclear, liquid thorium, fusion, etc.) ASAP. The time of natural gas and oil are over, although admittedly, it will take awhile to wean society off of them since it's interconnected with so many industries and communities already. Merely banning fossil fuels like I've seen some people unironically advocate for would result in a complete economic nightmare.
 * [[File:Scientocracy_Small.png]] Pharma (includes the manufacture of vapes and cigarettes)
 * OK, now this one is simply because y'all can't behave. I know this one, in particular, is beaten to death, but Insulin, damn it. There's no reason why Insulin costs should be this fucking high, especially when the manufacturing costs are so low (although not as low as people point them out to be, mind you), nor is there any reason whatsoever why the room & board costs for American hospitals (and even using the damn ambulance) makes people more scared of seeking healthcare than getting injured. However, the overall high cost of over-the-counter and prescription pharmaceuticals is the way it is for a reason. Manufacturing medicine is a very complex industry, and the testing phases for new medicines are very, very rigorous. Years of research could potentially be wasted on a new drug that may or may not work. Pharma companies have to account for all sorts of government regulations (even more so than your average industry). And if the drug doesn't work or has an averse side effect, the legal consequences for the company could be astronomical. And that's probably just scraping the surface. Conforming to all of this and avoiding all of these traps makes conceptualizing and producing most medicines a lot more expensive than people realize, and while some prices are indeed overblown for the sake of profit, medicine overall is costly for very good reasons. Despite this, the very nature of the pharma industry and its implications force me, with a heavy heart, to limit this industry in particular in some of the heaviest ways. There are two main things, in my opinion, that are wrong with the current American medical system;
 * Pseudo-Monopolies. Certain firms use their exclusive or almost-exclusive rights to patents (i.e Insulin, Epi-Pens, etc.) to effectively have a monopoly over a certain product. If this were a normal market, this would not be a bad thing due to the prescense of alternatives and the non-urgency of such goods, but medicine, on the other hand, is neither of those things. Firms play by the rules of the game, and they know that these patents are massive cash cows, since the consumer has very little choice or bargaining power to choose non-existent alternatives. This essentially allows firms to set whatever price they damn well please, and, armed with the knowledge that the consumers must buy their product in order to literally survive or risk catastrophe with a less-reliable alternative, they set those prices HIGH. Splitting the patents behind things like Insulin and Epi-Pens would not only be great for lowering prices and weakening the hold of some of these "dark" megacorps to allow new firms to enter the market at decent times, but would also add alternatives and competition to a normally nigh-stagnant market.
 * The Hospital Problem. Contrary to popular belief, hospitals will often charge you for stuff just because they can, mainly through doctor's fees and "surprise" medical costs. I mean, I'm fine with the hospital charging ein bisschen, since administrative fees do exist, and CAT scans don't run on magic, but most of it is ridiculous! We can solve this by cutting doctor salaries (ONLY A LITTLE BIT), disallowing doctors to unionize, bringing down drug prices using the aforementioned methods, and generally shifting the provision of hospitals from a private thing to a mixed thing. It may be inefficient, but unfortunately, until a better system is thought of, it's what we must settle for.
 * [[File:Bankocracy.png]] Banking
 * The average person is financially illiterate on the personal level. The state must step in and soft-"nationalize" (in the discount BERNHEist sense) all of the banks (this move is not done to stick it to wealthy families like the Rothschilds, as they will still be allowed to do business here, albeit with greater oversight). This would allow the state to help its people make sound financial decisions, make it harder for them to fall into economic death traps (credit card debt, etc.), and grant the state even more control over the greater economy. Another reason why I would nationalize the banks is to make any potential crisis like the '08 crisis easier to mitigate.
 * [[File:Merc.png]] Travel
 * As the recent Southwest Airlines logistical crisis proved, the entire travel industry, from Uber to Delta Airlines, needs to be implemented within the state. The state is the only entity capable of handling the logistics of travel. Sure, the state may not be able to comprehend social cost, deadweight loss and supply and demand, but it can LITERALLY keep the trains on time!
 * [[File:Krit.png]] Legal
 * The ability of richer people to afford better lawyers is absurd. Nobody should be able to weasel their way out of punishment just because they can afford better damage controls. Take the OJ Simpson case, for example. He spent a ton of money, more than many people will probably ever make in their entire lives, towards assembling one of the best teams of lawyers that the world has ever seen to combat the allegations that he killed his wife. The sad part is that he got off, despite monumental forensic evidence against him. Mind you, I could care that the lawyers OJ had were good enough to get him off the hook. I just want to make it so that everyone has access to the exact same standard of representation (or at least get as close to that ideal as realistically possible). Every person should enter the justice system equally represented by public defenders, and the state should [attempt to] make it so.
 * [[File:Ingsocf.png]] Information Technology
 * This one is more of a way to implement greater control over the content on things like computers and smartphones (essentially granting it control over the internet, with time), a way for the state to essentially take and install whatever it wants on your device, as well as a means of tracking people via GPS in case the person using it becomes wanted by the state.
 * [[File:MegaCorp.png]] Asset Management
 * Let's face it; BlackRock is HUGE. Sure, Larry Fink is a bona-fide genius in every economic capacity, but he wields far too much power. BlackRock and other asset management firms need to be INFERIOR to the state, not SUPERIOR to it (or even an entity of equivalent bearing). Also, I'm rather unpleased that Mr. Fink has decided to expand to China. Lord, I hope he's there for good reasons...

[[File:Corp.png]] Megacorporations
State-owned businesses are not known for their efficiency, so I still want to privatize them as much as possible. However, I wish to run the state-owned industry that exists in a manner that allows for as much autonomy as possible on the methods of production and other aspects of a business. I wish to fill the highest echelons of power in state-owned industries with vetted officials (so we don't have complete retards running the show) and, above all, have the leadership report directly to government committees, replacing what would normally be a board of investors. The format these state-owned industries would take would be massive megacorporations grown from modern-day giants like BlackRock, Amazon, Microsoft, etc. These megacorporations would be like the ones found in China today, except mine would be allowed to have more autonomy than their Chinese counterparts.

[[File:Markets.png]] Privatize what can be Privatized
Title. Completely state-owned industry tends to be less efficient, less adaptable, and less technocratic than an autonomous market. That being said, I am no Misestard, and I support limited state intervention for the sake of protecting the interests of the citizenry, as well as intervening directly in a sector in case of an absolute emergency. However, for the most part, I believe these markets should be left alone and the invisible hand should be allowed to do its own thing, but if the state needs to, it should be able to intervene in this sector.

[[File:Georgist.png]] The Question of Land
Land and ownership thereof should be left to the autonomous market. Landlordism is not inherently bad and is just another market, although landlords themselves should be monitored for obvious reasons. I also support instituting a land value tax instead of an income tax, although in early stages, there may be a fusion system in place (or maybe just keeping the income tax for a short while until we can successfully wean the population onto an LVT).

[[File:Synd.png]] The Individual Worker
Being a capitalist, I am not afraid to admit that I do, in fact, value the greater economy over the rights of individual workers. However, despite this sentiment, I would still grant workers greater rights than what they have in the current American system, since I also believe that the success of the economy, until fully automated, is intrinsically linked to the happiness and prosperity of those who make it run. Therefore, I believe it's worth it to give workers a few benefits for the sake of their happiness, so they may be more productive at work, become more nationalist, and actively see the state as its friend, not an enemy (think of what happened with r/antiwork rising (and eventually getting CIA'd) due to material conditions of the modern American economy).

[[File:AnSynd.png]] The Question of Unions
Unions are probably the biggest obstacle to economic efficiency that exists in the current system, yet, due to the nature of modern American capitalism, they are actually somewhat needed. I hope to not only supplant unions with state alternatives, but to render unions obsolete as a whole. Supplanting unions is a good thing because, more often than not, the union often does not truly represent workers as a whole (and the ones that do tend to become collectives of utter kooks (think of the IWW)) and instead represents the interests of those who run them, and these people often have agendas that differ from what the union is supposed to be about. This is not only a direct threat to economic efficiency, but also to state control and, sometimes, the social tranquility of the nation. Thus, I believe in abolishing unions by making them completely unnecessary, although there will be a state mechanism in place in case of loophole exploitation or unfair treatment.

[[File:Marketsoc.png]] Why Co-Ops Fail
Cooperatives are not good in my opinion because they put the worker ahead of economic production. I believe in the exact opposite mentality, although I believe in treating workers well for pragmatic reasons, as aforementioned. Thus, Cooperatives tend to be notoriously inefficient and unstable compared to a basic, hierarchal workplace's inherently technocratic and efficient nature.

[[File:3way.png]] The ESOP: The Best Compromise
However, even though the current system is great for production, it can be better if the workers were given more leeway and were offered a chance at a good life through their labor. One of the measures I would like to implement is the mass implementation of Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs). In essence, these work by having a legal entity (in this case, the state) hold shares of stock on behalf of the employees of a business. It's entirely funded by the company and operates on many of the same rules as a 401k retirement plan. Then, by either receiving money from the company or taking a loan from a bank or 3rd party and using that money to purchase most or all of a company's shares from the owner. Instead of an independent party determining the price of these shares, the state would determine the price in this case. This not only gives the workers technical ownership of the company without any risk of cash overlay or compromising the hierarchal structure of a company, but it also, by extension, directly ties things like benefits, welfare, etc. to the success of the company, thus giving the incentive to work harder while guaranteeing decent amenities.

[[File:Welf.png]] Welfare
I support a large-ish welfare state, tied directly to employment or the ability to gain it, in order to brace ourselves for the coming advent of mass automation and to keep the proles appeased and out of the damn way, essentially.

Handling the Automation Crisis
One of the biggest issues that get in the way of the inevitable ascension toward mass automation is the fact that it will leave a ton of workers completely jobless. I believe that the benefits of mass automation very much outweight both the short-term and long-term costs. However, I still support the gradual automation of the market, so the transition toward a post-industrial society and economy is as smooth as possible. Ideally, the workers left behind because of this will either be sent to a state college or trade school or, if they simply aren't smart enough for higher education, become indentured laborers to the state, for there will be work that machines simply cannot do.

The Necessity of the Useless
And then, there are those who are so unfathomably pathetic (to be frank) that they are better off leeching off of society because it keeps them out of the way. These "people" will be covered for by the state, and they will probably be hooked up to something like VR for the rest of their lives, but it isn't in the best interests of the state to keep these eaters alive for as long as possible. They will subsist on fixed quantities of sustenance (probably very close to the bare minimum), and of course, they will always have the option to escape Dreamland. Still, the point is to keep them out of the way and to create a sort of "endpoint" or "garbage dump" for economic stimulation, not to have them live long and waste even MORE taxpayer money. They also would not be able to participate in controlled elections and would effectively be second-class citizens. Ideally, the mere existence of this entire class of "people" (if you can even call them that) would remain a secret so people don't willingly follow their example.

UBI?
Perhaps, in the future, costs will be driven down enough and productive values will be raised enough to make a UBI feasible. Perhaps. There are many ways to make a UBI affordable even today, but doing so will merely change a few incentives around. If a UBI happens, it will preferably happen post-automation and will be funded through taxes (which would be increased, although not the the point of having a copious amount of discusting deadweight loss or to kill incentive). We must also think in both the short and long terms to prevent something like the long-term consequences of FDR's Social Security from happening. Social Security was a necessity back when it was implemented, but nowadays, it's doomed to collapse.

Why the Automatophilia?
Because robots aren't human. Simple as that. We have nothing to lose and everything to gain from complete, mass automation at this stage of the game. We must forsake the myth of "human value" once and for all and embrace the cold efficiency of the factory once more.

= Civics= BERNHEism is a very authoritarian ideology which seeks to expand the size and reach of the state, while reducing civil liberties as much as it needs to (ideally as little as possible) for the sake of order, progress and making civilian life less complicated and less political overall.

[[File:TotUltranat.png]] The Necessity of the State
The state is needed to ensure order and peace between its citizens by providing a coherent rule of law that works for everyone within the nation. The presence of a strong state is also needed to coordinate and execute many of my goals in an efficient manner, such as a dedicated surveillance/checkpoint/anti-crime system, state control over the media, mass automation, mass eugenics, and, eventually Post-Humanism and Algocratic Cyberocracy.

[[File:Minarchist.png]] Applied Authority
Despite being le soulless pseudo-totalitarian on paper, I do not seek a society of complete control over every facet of the individual's existence. I believe that the state should be indeed granted immense power, but should exercise restraint in using it. The only reason I resort to totalitarianism in the first place is because, as aforementioned, I need it to put some of my plans into effect. If there's no use in micromanaging how individuals do things, I will not. Even if I did want to, the very nature of the "day of the boot" type of totalitarianism makes it incompatible with my economic model. Simply put, I want the state to be able to make its own decisions and help its people, but I don't want a nation of soulless drones.

[[File:Technocracy.png]] Who Is Fit To Rule?
I believe that the state should select the most qualified (not necessarily the "best", per-se) people to make or help make decisions regarding policy, economics and law. "Qualified" in this context means the best person for the job, not necessarily the person with the most credentials or years of experience within a field. BERNHEism recognizes that the world is a variable place, and the state must be prepared for anything if it is to survive in the long run. Thus, he supports term limits for all positions within his government, emergency replacements if the need arises, and federalism to be able to adapt to any situation that may end up facing us. BERNHEism is a very big fan of technocracy, with power being concentrated in small councils of the most capable people of their kind in the nation, with this power being dispersed within a highly bureaucratic, yet efficient system.

[[File:Totdem.png]] Very Controlled Democracy
BERNHEism is federalist, as he believes that policy can be executed better if done through local executive structures that possess limited autonomy so they may make decisions that are made for and apply only to the states they serve. However, the states will be given far fewer rights than they do in the modern American system, as they will not be able to override federal policy without first challenging it through a pre-determined system. The states themselves will make up a far smaller portion of the government (with the house abolished and the senate reduced to a minor law-making apparatus within the state). However, both the governor and senators of a state will still be elected through democratic means, but the state will select candidates for the people to choose from, instead of candidates running independently. This will ensure at least some form of competence and loyalty and will prevent to rise of any more John Fetterman-s.

[[File:Mediastocracy flair.png]] The Media
Independent news media is a mistake and yet another tool for retarded celebrities and shady businessmen to impose their will upon the state and the population. People could consider the media to be an "industry," but in my opinion, the media shouldn't even be monetized in the first place. The purpose of the media is to serve news. The state shall control all news media on a few channels, and all alternative sources of news (except for things like personal blogs) will be banned.

[[File:PolState.png]] Police Reform
The police SHOULD be the primary enforcers of the state, but there is a lot of work that needs to be done with the entire department. I believe in giving the police more power than they have right now, as well as upgrading their equipment and facilities substantially (although not militarizing them). Still, they should also be given far more stringent training, especially in weapons handling, handling tense situations, and use of lethal force. In essence, I want to make the police FAR more disciplined. Uvalde could have ended a lot sooner if we had more disciplined cops.

[[File:Blacknat.png]] Repairing Race Relations...
A large part of the catastrophic race relations in America, toxic idpol aside, is the fact that police tend to sometime be a little overzealous when dealing with everyone, to be honest. Still, non-whites tend to get the shaft the most, especially with things such as the school-to-prison pipeline in place. Disproportionate media coverage and crime rates aside, most of the incidents you see in the news should not have ended the way they did. If someone has a weapon in hand or is attempting to brandish one, the cop should have every right to drop them where they stand, but merely resisting arrest is nothing to kill someone over. Mind you, certain communities of people in every race tend to be particularly belligerent towards law enforcement, and it is this behavior that contributes to why some of these officers are so finnicky. None of this is even purely racial, either. This simply goes in general.

...While Crushing [[File:Antifa.png]] Antifa
Alright, it's gaming time. Antifa is a domestic terrorist conglomerate operating on American soil, and the whole lot of them need to be annihilated with maximum prejudice. Antifa is a direct threat to the integrity and sometimes even the very authority of the state, and everyone affiliated with their little social media cells or anyone daring to wear black bloc on the streets should be either arrested or, knowing these types, uh, silenced. These people don't want to be Americans by their own admittance, and therefore, we shouldn't even give them the courtesy.

[[File:Altr-fat.png]] Right-Wing Militias
See above, except there will probably be a lesser mortality rate in this group because they appear to actually be able to follow orders sometimes.

= Diplomacy=

[[File:CivUltranat.png]] Ultranationalism in a Country
I believe in the praxis and beliefs of ultranationalism fully, except for one tenet. I wholeheartedly believe that the USA is not a true "nation" and never will be. In the past, I thought this was extremely bad and I wished to take very drastic and, frankly, quite retarded measures to create an artificial United States of American culture as fast as humanly possible (my beliefs were quite weird back then, don't question it). I believed (and still believe) that nationhood is granted through the presence of a distinct national culture in the Spenglerian sense, which America lacks, since it is essentially a patchwork of pre-existing cultures and amalgamations of the aforementioned. But now, I do not see this as a hinderance, but rather, as a strength. Cultures and customs like the ones that "nations" are built upon have no inherent worth when you boil it down to the barest machinations and definitions. "Culture" only exists to hold us back in the modern era, it needlessly impedes the Faustian spirit, and there is no use in adhering to old, outdated customs. And oftentimes, there's a noticeable ethnic tie to some of these cultures. But there's no use in actively destroying said cultures. The development of culture is one thing that can't be artificially done or even sped up (YET). That being said, as much as I dislike culture as a concept, I don't really care to remove or interfere with any culture[s] that may be present within America.

[[File:Ethnonat.png]] Why Ethnonationalism is Stupid
Title. Ethnicity and race are both completely arbitrary concepts as-is (unless you take biological adaptation into account, and there's only so far you can take that), so why devote yourself to that? Plenty of the distasteful features found within modern humans can be fixed with CRISPR, and the rest are just things we may have to deal with.

[[File:Ultranat.png]] Why Call Myself An "Ultranationalist"?

 * 1) It sounds cooler than plain-old "Chauvinism."
 * 2) A page for Chauvinism does not exist. Yet.

[[File:Globetard.png]] The Problem with Globalism
Globalism, on the other hand, is cringe for many reasons. I could write an entire page on why globalism is the shittiest ideology on the fucking planet, but I'll merely point out its biggest flaw; it assumes equality between countries. Globalism contributes absolutely nothing uniquely of value to powerful, relevant countries, and only exists to maintain a misguided sense of equality between global elites and third-world shitholes (and it even manages to fail at doing that 99% of the time!). Many of the "benefits" that globalism is given credit for can be achieved through a neo-mercantilist (albeit not with ridiculous protectionism) system and trade between the global elites in their own interest, in a (mostly) unrestricted market. I hope America ends up dominating said market. What kind of "ultranat" would I be if I didn't?

[[File:GlobeMask.png]] Intervention
An idea I'm not a really big fan of overall, but I'm willing to do if it means furthering or protecting my nation. Despite being a literal ultranationalist who will happily bully the Eurosphere with our economic influence (hehe), actual military intervention almost never ends well for the countries intervened in, with only short-term gains (or even loss) for us.

[[File:Banana Republicanism.png]] Outsourcing Labor
Labor outsourcing is a bad idea as it stands right now, but it will probably be the primary method of sustaining American economic hegemony after the advent of mass automation. As of right now, however, companies have very good reasons to outsource. The cost of doing business in America is far too high right now due to things like silly regulations and the existence of a minimum wage, so of course corporate entities are going to look for a cheaper alternative. And that's another reason why I support automation; a ton of the human cost will simply go away. Needless to say, after robots supplant the blue-collar labor in most of his entirety, it would be a great idea to build factories in third-world nations (and maybe even allies in the 2nd/1st world at that stage). There's really no drawback to that method; we stimulate local economies by buying land and paying for power and property taxes (assuming we don't just generate our own power), and we expand our industrial capacities all over the world.

[[File:Necon.png]] National Security
Let me make this absolutely clear: I AM NOT A HAWK (the neocon ball is only there because it's a joke). However, I will intervene in other countries if our national security is threatened by foreign entities. If possible, I would attempt to opt for a peaceful or cooperative solution to our problems instead of simply Lockheed Martin-ing everywhere we go.

[[File:Commie.png]] Tolerating Commies?
Yeah, NO. If a country is deemed to be a threat to the USA, it will take any action necessary in order to remove the infection. However, BERNHEism is willing to tolerate and even cooperate with essentially any ideological system as long as it doesn't threaten the USA or its allies.

= Social Views= I radiate Hitler particles.

[[File:SJW.png]] Identity Politics
I believe that social conditions and "trends" should be set by society, without state intervention. The state interfering with social fads sounds like a great idea on paper for any self-respecting totalitarian, but it can backfire. HARD. It's...just not worth it. You could describe my beliefs on idpol like this; Identity politics is found on both sides of the "social" spectrum and are both rooted in all sorts of superficial bullshit that barely has any relevance outside of what people decide it has. Partaking in identity politics damages social cohesion, and therefore, both reactionarism and radical progressivism must be robbed of their influence, which should happen naturally once the media outlets and internet are wrangled under control.

[[File:Homo.png]] The LGBT Question
Eh, I've come to a point where I don't really care anymore. The LGBT question, just like the rest of these superficial social constructs, will be set by society itself. Trends rise and die, and I have a feeling that this "new" wave of LGBT "identity" and the like will die out as soon as the fuel that feeds the mania runs out.

[[File:White_Guilt.png]] Race [[File:Blm.png]]
The modern concept of race is an arbitrary construct. Melanin content and physical differences between the races are merely an adaptation to their environments, and the median IQ in places like Africa tend to be so low because there isn't access to decent education and other things (you will find similar rates in some parts of white Appalachia as well, which speaks volumes about the current state of America as a whole). My point is that all differences between the races can be explained with either basic biology and anatomy, or merely looking at environments. Needless to say, I believe most racial conflict in America is unnecessary. I also recognize that certain policies like the school-to-prison pipeline, unfair gerrymandering and overt police violence (although that last one is seriously overblown, it's still there) exist, and I will do my best to counter those as well. I will also work to improve low-income communities everywhere, from Appalachia to Harlem, regardless of race. Another thing I despise is modern white guilt, which sometimes insinuates, at its absolute worst, that all white people are responsible for what their ancestors did in the past, or what a select few are doing right now. We may have just a small amount of privilege (not as much as most libtard ideologues would like you to think), but we as individuals are not responsible for either colonialism or what shady politicians are pulling right now.

[[File:Fem.png]] Gender [[File:Male-icon.png]]
Men and women are equal, but are by no means the same thing. Both genders have different needs and can be better equipped to do certain tasks (I mean, c'mon, men are always going to be better manual labors than your average woman due to biology), and it isn't sexist to point that out.

[[File:Laicism.png]] Religion
The church should have no influence in the state and all religious institutions should be subject to tax like any other establishment. However, other than that, I'm fine with people worshipping whatever they want, so long as it doesn't have anti-state undertones. Eventually, if God does not reveal Himself, religion shall go away on its own. It's just unwise to merely rip people away from it.

= Technology= :D

[[File:Indust.png]] Mass Automation
I support an economic policy that seeks to attain full automation in as many fields of the economy as humanly possible. Robots are more precise, quicker, more consistent, easier to coordinate and, above all, don't come with the downsides of human laborers. Robots can't unionize, don't require petty things such as benefits, wages, time off, sick leave, raises, etc., and don't stop working, provided they're powered, fueled and in good working order. Most industry can be mass-automated right now, since we have the technology, and what we can't automate right now, we should work on so ASAP. This is the way to turn the American economy into a complete powerhouse, but there's a teeny tiny problem with that; where do you put the workers displaced by automation?

[[File:Post-Industrialism.png]] Dealing with the Fallout
Dealing with the millions of displaced workers that will be the result of this whole mess will be very hard, and it's actually one of the biggest deterrents for abolishing human labor, other than some moralistic "hUmAn-MaDe 🤓" BS. To fix this, I would offer workers a way to attend free, state-owned universities. These universities would be four-year endeavors that would either springboard into higher forms of trade (jobs that can't be or can only be partially automated [yet], such as construction, software engineering, high-level electrician work, etc.) or a field in science, the humanities, etc. Alternatively, they would be able to accept a position as a State Sub-Indentured Laborer," doing odd or unusual jobs whenever the state needs them, in exchange for being hooked onto a UBI program. This would allow us to test a UBI system in a real-world scenario, as well as fill in the niche for odd jobs that can't be done by robots yet. However, all of this would cost A LOT of money, so automation would either be a gradual process (preferred), or we would have to spend time stocking precious things like gold up (think of what we have in Fort Knox, plus a little extra) so we could accelerate automation a little faster in the future, but not too fast, where we inundate the global economy with gold (which would cause a crisis).

[[File:Eugen.png]] Perfecting Our Genes
I am a massive supporter of CRISPR-based eugenics as a means to improve the next few generations of Americans by removing genetic defects within the population and giving people what are more or less biological cheat codes by manipulating certain genes to make the population more intelligent, making them stronger, give them better senses, etc. None of my eugenics is inspired by race at all, although an interesting idea worth entertaining is racially optimizing the next generations of Americans for the American environment since race is linked to the environmental impact on the human body.

[[File:POSTHUMANISMICON.png]] Transcending Biology
Eventually, when the technology is sufficient enough, I wish to transcend mere biology for the superior forms of the machine. Since this milestone is likely a century or more away, I can't say for certain what will happen, but it's bound to be good.

[[File:Artifism2.png]] This Planet Is Ours
I have a unique view when it comes to the environment. In the short term, I can be considered a bright-green environmentalist who wants to use nuclear power, a tried, proven, and unfathomably based method, to supplant fossil fuels. Since the technology has already been highly developed, it will be easier to build nuclear power plants compared to wind farms and solar panel fields. I wouldn't say I like using solar power in particular because the technology is experimental and inefficient, while other methods are available (although solar is still very much worth researching). I'm also a proponent of hydropower, as long as the impact on local environments is marginal enough. I'm not going to refuse to build a dam that could provide critical power for a region for the sake of one subspecies of unimportant, non-impactful fish. I also want to start the mass culling of invasive/out-of-control species like wild boars, coyotes, and, unfortunately, feral cats and dogs (although I would like to re-home as many of the latter as possible). When we have the technology to, however, I embrace the Artifist view on environmentalism, which states that nature is imperfect and should be supplanted by human constructs. While I agree with it 100% in the long run, for good reasons, nature is the way it is. It also has an annoying tendency to be interconnected to itself, so the implementation of Artifist technologies will be highly regulated and VERY gradual.

=Post-BERNHEism=

[[File:Chadf.png]] The Post-Labor State
Hopefully, automation and machine rule will become so influential in all facets of the state that the concept of "blue" and "white"-collar labor (among with a few other collars) will become defunct since it would reach a point in which machines automate the gathering/synthesizing, processing and manufacturing of goods, as well as power generation, agriculture and other important fields. This state, however, will probably take around a century of work to realistically attain, so there's that. We were simply born too soon.

[[File:Antwork.png]] Post-Labor ≠ Anti-Work
Now, being in the post-labor state does not mean the cessation of work. People will still be involved somewhat in politics, research and the humanities, as well as high-end machine maintenance and more technological fields. There will still be plenty of stuff to do. I never said this was post-SCARCITY, which will take even longer to achieve, probably.

[[File:Noocracy.png]] What Will We Do?
Ideally, we'll drop the pursuit of manual and paper-based labor for the sake of becoming smarter. By this point, hopefully, CRISPR-based eugenics and body modification will lead to a drastic increase in IQ (although a better system will probably be formulated by that time) among the population, which would allow us to ascend past labor itself and instead begin to think about things like philosophy, advanced science, literature, art, and even politics.

=Miscellaneous=

[[File:Zio.png]] Israel [[File:Hamas.png]]
Frankly, I believe both the Israeli side and Palestine are equally retarded. I can't justify Israel's existence outside of the effort they already put into building Israel up in the past 80-ish years. Still, other than that, I can't say I support Israel in any meaningful way outside of pure pragmatism, given the way they treat the local Palestinians, making themselves (and us, by extension) look even more terrible on the world stage. Palestinians aren't helping themselves either by electing Hamas terrorists to lead them, antagonizing Israel and its allies even further. Ideally, if possible, I would desire a two-state solution since it would be unfair to boot the Israelis outright since they already sacrificed a lot to build Israel up, but if I had to pick a side, I'm going with the Israelis for purely practical reasons. Israel would make a far worse enemy than most of the Middle East combined for one reason; their military might and the fact that they may be a nuclear power. It's better to remain allies with Israel and perhaps force them to treat the Palestinians better by withholding aid or exerting bureaucratic/diplomatic pressure, but that's all of the good that can come from that entire quagmire. Finally, and I cannot say this enough, there is no reason why we should be sending those people BILLIONS OF DOLLARS PER YEAR in aid, while they can handle themselves just fine and we have domestic problems to take care of.

[[File:Libertarian.png]] Guns, Guns, Guns!
I believe that people should be allowed to own weapons if they wish, and pistol training (after a mental evaluation) should be included in the state school curriculum. However, he does not want a free-for-all open-carry utopia in the states, but he does not want to limit a time-honored American tradition, either; SHOOTING BIG FUCKING GUNS. Therefore, he wants a compromise. Citizens should not be allowed to own any sort of automatic weapon, sniper rifles or guns with specific modifications and/or are over a specific caliber, as well as banning makeshift ammunition and barring specific other kinds of ammunition (like AP rounds) from sale. This would still leave the American population with a wide array of rifles, shotguns and pistols to choose from for hunting or self-defense purposes. However, he also wants to put some of the aforementioned bigger guns in ranges for people to be able to shoot anyways with supervision. He is also fine with most bladed or blunt weapons and non-lethals like pellet/airsoft/BB guns, tasers, and pepper spray. Of course, and this should go without saying, people can't purchase a weapon if they don't have a license/FOID card. There should also be annual health evaluations as a requisite for being allowed to own weapons legally.

[[File:DepressionMale.png]] Euthanasia
I don't see anything wrong with allowing the euthanasia of the terminally ill or extremely old if they desire it. Of course, I don't want to be like Canada and actively present it as a cure-all. Assisted suicide would only be legal with the approval of at least three medical doctors. The decision would ultimately be left up to the individual.

[[File:NarcCap.png]] Drugs
BERNHEism supports the decriminalization of most drugs, in order to do two things: first off, if someone wants to do drugs, they're going to try and do them whether or not the state wills it, so might as well make the processing and distribution of said drugs clean, efficient, and not laced with fentanyl at every turn. Legalizing drugs will also be good for the American social scene, as legalizing drugs will rob both the cartels and local kingpins of their audience through the creation of cheaper, safer and quicker alternatives. Crippling the cartels is great for national security reasons, and the presence of kingpins and the gangs they lead are one of many things that hold more impoverished neighborhoods (specifically urban ones) down. However, I don't want a nation of addicts, so drug education and programs like D.A.R.E will still be kept around to prevent children from potentially going down a bad path, strict licensing and production laws will be put in place for legal vendors and producers, and black markets and gangs that survive the commercialization of drugs will be cracked down upon extremely harshly.

[[File:Edu.png]] Education
BERNHEism is disgusted with the disgraceful current American school system. He thinks that both corrupt teacher's unions, funding discrepancies and the overcooked bureaucracy that comes with orthodox public schools are the fundamentally the reasons why the American education system is so shitty. As such, the unions need to be neutered somehow (probably by making it illegal to have "mandatory" union membership and/or robbing them of their power over the legislature by limiting their ability to do legalese), funding differences need to be accounted for, and, above all, public schools need to go. Mostly. That isn't to say that I want a system built on private schools, however (even though both private schools and homeschooling will be allowed and encouraged if the proper certifications are gained), but rather, I'm a big fan of charter schools, which balance the necessity of state funding (and therefore partial influence over the curriculum) with the adaptibility and higher quality seen in [most] private schools. Also, and I cannot stress this e-fucking-nough, REFORM OR REMOVE COMMON CORE.

[[File:Slaveism icon.png]] College Debt
Actually having a viable population of intellectuals is more important than the profits gained from college debt, in my opinion. I don't support a complete forgiveness or cessation of student debt, but I am in support of forcing the loan providers to lower their rates substantially and forgiving a large portion of most actually-existing student debt right now. However, I agree with the notion of using debt forgiveness as an incentive for people to go into useful fields like PoliSci, a Hard Science, or a high-level trade instead of fucking Theatre or Music Theory or some shit. Normally, I wouldn't be so hard on a market like this, but if you know the history of the rise of the American student debt problem, you'll know that this is a monster of our own making and also since student debt isn't necessarily linked to any other market in any way, sort of like banks, but far less functional. Sure, it may be unfair to the debt collectors, given that every person in their clutches signed the papers themselves, but this issue is more important than profit.

[[File:AntiRussia.png]] Russoids
BERNHEism is a highly Russophobic ideology that views the modern state of Russia as a net negative upon both his own country, the USA, and the entire West. USSR aside, Russia has proven even now with the whole Ukraine thing that they need to be subjugated and humiliated once again. As such, BERNHEism seeks to undermine and crush Russia and its global relevance in any way he can (without getting nuked, of course, so we can't just, uhh, INVADE them), with the end goal ideally being an involuntarily isolationist Russia that is wholly incapable of pursuing its global interests under the immense economic and diplomatic pressure thrust upon them. We did it in 1991, we'll do it again. At home, BERNHEism wants to place limitations on expressions of the Russian national identity, such as banning the usage of the Russian language in official documents or on television, making the "Z" symbol illegal, and limiting the ability to display the Russian flag.

[[File:Polyamo.png]] Polyamory and Polygamy
BERNHEism doesn't see the point in banning polyamory (having relations with more than one person), although polygamy itself (the act of being married to many people at a time) will not be recognized officially by the state.

=How To Draw= Do I really need to go too in-depth on this? My design is literally one of the more simplistic ones here.
 * 1) Take a technocracyball.
 * 2) Slap a black (or very, very dark grey)/maroon color scheme on it.
 * 3) Give it a red monocle on the right eye.

=✨AVSTHVTICS✨= Obviously, this is the most important part of my ideology.
 * Roaring 20's
 * Electro Swing
 * Cyberpunk
 * Americana
 * Nostalgiacore

=User Test= I did a thing. Follows the same format as literally every other user test on this wiki.
 * If you fully agree with a question, give yourself two (2) points.
 * If you partially agree with a question or it's close enough, give yourself one (1) point.
 * If you don't agree with a question at all, you get NOTHING (0)! You LOSE! GOOD DAY, SIR!

Economics

 * 1) Capitalism is the best, most prosperous and most efficient economic system on the planet currently.
 * 2) I support a welfare state to the extent that it does not entrap people who should be useful.
 * 3) I deem a select few industries to be too important to be run by a free market (or at least require more gov't intervention than normal industry).
 * 4) Certain veins of economic protectionism and/or nationalism are quite good, but we must not overdo it and go full autarky. Global trade is a definite good, but we must still be smart.
 * 5) I support the Chicagoan School of neoclassical economics in most cases (TL;DR: Only intervene in the markets if absolutely necessary).

Civics

 * 1) Populism is a disease which ought to be eradicated.
 * 2) Authoritarianism (and even totalitarianism) may be good, but constitutional structures are needed in order to prevent corruption and total abuse of power.
 * 3) I believe in the rule of the best for the job (not necessarily the rule of the most experienced).
 * 4) The police (and maybe even the military) should be the primary enforcers of the will of the state.
 * 5) People should ideally have as much "freedom" as possible, as long as it doesn't threaten the state or its authority in any way.

Diplomacy

 * 1) Global trade is a good thing and economic globalism is something that can be harnessed for the benefit of the country.
 * 2) We should actively attempt to assert economic dominion over the rest of the world.
 * 3) I believe in Western Chauvinism/Atlantic Supremacy (this includes friendly Asian countries like the ROC/Taiwan and Japan). I don't think this is what Mr. Yockey meant by "Imperium of the West."
 * 4) I wish to suppress aggressive nations like Russia, China, Iran and North Korea as much as possible in any and all manner of ways (without getting MAD'd, of course).
 * 5) I'm willing to work with anyone (including people like Fascists and/or Marketsocs if it comes to it), but no quarter or deals for communist or anarchist swine.

Technology

 * 1) I seek genetic purity in my population and am willing to use methods like CRISPR-based eugenics to achieve that.
 * 2) Eventually, we should push towards becoming more than human.
 * 3) In the long run, the environment and nature only exist to limit human ambition.
 * 4) I am a massive fan of automation and wholeheartedly believe it can revolutionize the economy in seriously good ways.
 * 5) We should have a large and healthy space exploration program (gotta get that Helium-3 on the moon before the Chinese do!)

Social Issues

 * 1) Race is, for all intents and purposes, an arbitrary construct of the past.
 * 2) Be gay or trans if you want to, as long as the expenses come out of YOUR OWN POCKET and you conform to basic societal norms.
 * 3) Men and women are equal, but not the same.
 * 4) Traditions and culture are of minimal or no value by themselves.
 * 5) Laicism is an ideal religious policy.

Results
Scoring:
 * 50 to 40 = Based & Goldpilled
 * 39 to 30 = Trade Partners
 * 29 to 20 = Iffy Foreign Contacts
 * 19 to 10 = Third Worldistan
 * 9 to 0 = EUGENICS PIT

Format: [Ball] [Name]: [Score (Out Of 50)/50]
 * 1) [[File:BERNHEflash.gif]] BERNHE0504: 50/50
 * 2) [[File:Nastyism Icon.png]] Nastyism 16/50
 * 3) [[File:NewMatthism3.1.png]] Matthism 27/50
 * 4) [[File:YellingLiber.png]] Neo Social Libertarianism 19/50
 * 5) [[File: iberian_commie.png]] Iberian Communism 14/50
 * 6) Central Maryland Thought on Constitutional Nationalization/Middletownianism 36-39/50
 * 7) [[File:NNGM.png]] New North German Model 13/50
 * 8) [[File:Omega1065.png]]Omega1065 31/50
 * 9) [[File:Brazlib.png]] Brazilian Liberalism 22/50
 * 10) [[File:16384ism.png]] 16384ism 31/50
 * 11) 31/50
 * 12) 30/50
 * 32/50
 * 1) [[File:GanzismIcon2.png]] Ganzism 2/50

=Relations=
 * -|Canon=

[[File:Yes.png]] Good

 * [[File:Cap.png]] : The best economic system on the planet. Third-Positionists and especially commies can't hold a candle to the sheer amount of prosperity and innovation you have brought unto the world. Thank you, Adam Smith!
 * [[File:NeoMerc.png]] : Neomercantilism is the future of economics. Alexander Hamilton was right. As long as you don't go [[File:Autarky.png]] TOO FAR, though. Autonomous markets must remain autonomous, and global trade is still a good thing !
 * [[File:Ultranat.png]] : The USA is objectively superior to all other countries, and I'm tired of pretending it's not. The world truly is our sandbox. Hail the West.
 * [[File:Civnat.png]] : The best form of nationalism. Any other form can't be realistically applied to the USA, actually.
 * [[File:Intercult.png]] : The best compromise between monoculturalism and multiculturalism. Many different cultures can coexist in tandem while still retaining what makes them special in the first place.
 * [[File:Sec.png]] : Without you, human society would be nothing. Order trumps liberty every time.
 * [[File:POSTHUMANISMICON.png]] : "Your mind is software. Program it. Your body is a shell. Change it. Death is a disease. Cure it. Extinction is approaching. Fight it."
 * [[File:Eugen.png]] : Why settle for imperfection...IF WE DON'T HAVE TO?
 * [[File:WelfChauvin.png]] : Taxpayer money should only be spent on our own citizens. Immigrants need to prove their worth.
 * [[File:PolState-Car.gif]] : People love to complain about the police all the time, so why doesn't the state allow them to do their jobs? Light the streets up!!
 * [[File:European Federalism.png]] : A united and strong Europe combined with a strong America will best ensure the continued survival and dominance of the West. Although we should probably stop causing issues in the Middle East that indirectly lead to all of you getting flooded with refugees.
 * [[File:Lib.png]] : Despite you being a total pussy when it comes to civics, you're probably the best actual system in existence. Many of the benefits that capitalism has given us can be attributed to you.

[[File:Meh.png]] OK

 * [[File:Imp.png]] : I have mixed feelings about this one. On one end, expanding our economic influence to other countries and banana republics are quite based, while on the other hand, military interventionism almost never ends well. Either way, you're quite overhated by seething commies and the conquered themselves.
 * [[File:Necon.png]] : Most critics of Neoconservatism I've met don't even understand what you are. Either way, you're definitely not for everyone, but you're aligned with my goals, mostly. You tend to be a bit trigger-happy with the intervention, but that isn't a moralist "muh self-determination" cope at all; it's more of a practicality concern. What was the point of reducing Libya to the pseudo-anarchic hellhole it is today? All it did was help prove the point of the terrorists and make us easier to hate.
 * [[File:GRights.png]] Gun Rights Advocacy: 'Tis complicated. I know that separating the American people from their arms is impossible, nor do I want to do that, but there need to be limits. I will say this, though; AR-15s are the least of our concern LMAO. Watching Democrats hilariously try and challenge you has lead to some seriously funny moments, though. Rest in Piss, Beto.
 * [[File:Totalitarian.png]] : You can be good when done absolutely right, but you have a large margin of error. We're going to need to tread carefully here.
 * [[File:Welf.png]] : What I said about Totalitarianism already. Tread carefully, or this will bite us right in the keister.
 * [[File:Market Socialist ball.png]] : This is my favorite kind of socialism because it isn't actual socialism.
 * [[File:Ancapf.png]] : This is my favorite kind of anarchism because it isn't actual anarchism.
 * [[File:Fash.png]] : You're the ideology that's probably been done the absolute dirtiest on the planet. 99% of your critics don't even know exactly what you are! Still, many parts of this ideology (especially the nationalism, palingenesis and right-leaning corporatism) are respectable, but what's with everything else?
 * [[File:Dengf.png]] : A powerful system used by a terrible country. A tragedy in the highest form.
 * [[File:Zio.png]] : Let me make this ABSOLUTELY clear; the only reason I TOLERATE you is out of pure necessity. I really don't care about what happens to the Palestinians in the long run (considering they do elect the Hamas terrorists that lead them willingly, after all), but treating them the way that you do makes us look really bad! Tone it down a notch, or you get NO aid!
 * [[File:Progress.png]] [[File:Watermelonism.png]]: This ideology is both very good and very bad at the same time. Socially, if left unchecked, this can be the biggest source of populist fuel on the planet since it tends to spontaneously generate new, meaningless social problems all by itself based on whatever unavoidable material-social conditions are there at the time (while generating new conditions that can be complained about later), riling the people up needlessly. However, in a way, I also seek to embody this ideology in the long run. I agree that traditions have no value by themselves, and that society should be pushed forward (in whatever way) as fast as possible to accommodate as much technological development as possible. For the sake of progress overall, progress must be stifled in the beginning. We can't have all of these meaningless [[File:Gay.png]][[File:Blm.png]] social constructs [[File:Trans.png]][[File:Deepe.png]] getting in the fucking way. Or perhaps we can make a market out of them. Ideally, these issues will fix themselves with time.
 * [[File:Pinochet-hat.png]] : FUNNY HELICOPTER FUNNY HELICOPTER FUNNY HELICOPTER FUNNY HELICOPTER. AYO WAIT WHAT ARE YOU DOING WTF
 * [[File:Honk.png]] : Hehe, this meme about funny physical removal is quite true. Wait, IS THAT A FUCKING BREADPANES COMIC??? REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!

[[File:No.png]] Terrible

 * [[File:Soc.png]] : Technocapital will crush you underfoot.
 * [[File:Pop.png]] : As with you. You're honestly the biggest stagnation pit that exists. There will always be people above to make decisions, and those below to be commanded. Your "equality" holds us all back.
 * [[File:Conservative.png]] [[File:Conserv.png]]: What exactly do you "conserve" nowadays? I agree that social issues should be kept in line, but when applied on a social scale, all you really do is hinder technological development and the flow of capital needlessly due to populist sentiment. Fiscally, however, you're quite based. We must be careful with our money if we're ever to recover from the fallout of '08.
 * [[File:Erga.png]] : This will DEFINITELY end well. Definitely. DEFINITELY.
 * [[File:Marx.png]] : Nasty!
 * [[File:Luxem.png]] : Icky!
 * [[File:ML.png]] : Absolutely Atrocious!
 * [[File:Mao.png]] : It takes a special ideology to get BTFO by sparrows.
 * [[File:ArmchairML.png]] "Noooo that actually didn't happen [insert "America Bad" here] nooooo!!!!!"
 * [[File:MLM.png]] : Rent is due, rentoid.
 * [[File:Mao3word.png]] : The entire existence of this ideology is the result of the collective malding from hundreds of third-world shitholes.
 * [[File:Ultroid.png]] : You will never be relevant.
 * [[File:Orthlen.png]] : You appear to be a mushroom!
 * [[File:Awaj.png]] In All Its [[File:Ancom.png]] [[File:AnSynd.png]] [[File:Mutalist.png]] Forms [[File:Anin.png]] [[File:Anfashf.png]] [[File:Anmark2.png]]: Die.
 * [[File:Anprim.png]] : Fuck you in particular.
 * [[File:NatAn.png]] : And you, with your fake nationalism. Ironic coming from a civnat.
 * [[File:Prim.png]] : What the hell is the point?
 * [[File:Native.png]] : Cope. Cope! COPE!!! YOU FUCKING LOST!
 * [[File:Anat.png]] : YOU.
 * [[File:GE-Dunce.png]] : When 12 year olds attempt to do politics.
 * [[File:NatSoc.png]] : MFW you find out you're 1% German despite the other 99% being Slavic:
 * [[File:Thar.png]] : I tread where I please.
 * [[File:Antifa.png]] : Fascism has not existed in any tangible capacity as an ideology since 1945, and it is never going to come back. You merely use the term "Anti-Fascist" as an excuse to commit soft domestic terrorism in our streets, cause unfathomable damage to both private and public property, make our police look like utter fools, and make us look like a fucking joke on the international scale by tolerating your kind's existence. Mark my words, when the time inevitably comes and you piss off the wrong people, the streets shall run red with blood.
 * [[File:Klep.png]] : We need serious term limits and actual punishment for corruption (ideally, a bullet) to prevent this from forming. The damage you've done to the legislature and our institutions has been unfathomable. This is why I want to push for [[File:Cybercr.png]] him as soon as possible.
 * [[File:AnEn.png]] : Why? Just why? You make no sense, even from an industrialist point of view!
 * [[File:Multicult.png]] : Take pizza and ice cream. When separated, they're great. When mixed together...not so much. Interculturalism is infinitely better than you despite the fact that it's a massive ideological copout (if it works, it works). "The road to hell is paved with good intentions" has never rung truer.
 * -|Self-Inserts=
 * -|Self-Inserts=

[[File:Mega Yes.png]] Vanguard of the Future

 * [[File:NeophibunV2.png]] Non-Pronouncable Neoconservatism ([[File:Necon.png]]/[[File:Post-Bert.png]]/[[File:Nrx.png]]/[[File:Arist.png]]/[[File:Reactmod.png]]): We agree with each other quite a lot, but there are a few differences. You're a little too moderate when it comes to technological development and free markets, and you're a little TOO interventionist (even though this can be forgiven because Asia is...less than stable for the moment due to China fucking everything up over there). Your social views are also very good and you're a fellow technocrat as well, but we'll never agree on authority and the like. As for eugenics, I can't see why anyone WOULDN'T want them the way I do, if it's genuinely to improve the capacities and capability of humanity. Accelerationism is a funny little idea as well (just don't tell [REDACTED]) . Also, in retrospect, our economics are a lot more similar than I previously thought. That definitely counts for something. In even further retrospect, you just keep getting better and better! Of course, I still dislike the Austrian school and we'll disagree on authority itself, but we appear to be aligned on the application of said authority now, and you've finally taken the full techpill. (95/100)
 * [[File:VEnlight.png]] Philosophical Post-Humanism ([[File:Post-Kantianism.png]]/[[File:Accel.png]]/[[File:Neorational.png]]/[[File:Neolib.png]]/[[File:Regulationism.png]]): Looks extremely based. Although I am not really a fan of implementing philosophy into my own political beliefs, we appear to align on most things, save for authority and civil liberties. Well, I can definitely make concessions for that. Perhaps interventionism will come later, but with the current state of the world right now, I'm not sure if it's a good idea. I'm definitely not held back for moral reasons, though. Your capitalism, disregard for tradition, post-humanism and philosophy, on the other hand, I can synchronize with. This can definitely work! (89/100)
 * [[File:MEAR.png]] Actual National Capitalism ([[File:Austrobert.png]]/[[File:Clib.png]]/[[File:Consti.png]]/[[File:AntiDem.png]]/[[File:Obj.png]]): You're quite based in my opinion. We're aligned on who is fit to rule, economics and being based anti-democrats (although for different reasons), but we disagree on authority and its application. Whereas you seem to be OK with "true" liberty, I'm a fan of the utilization of things like Dictablanda to appeal to my population, while a core of semi-elected experts runs things behind the scenes. However, your page explains your methodology quite well, so I can mostly forgive this small difference. What can I say? It's cool! (82/100)

[[File:Yes.png]] Partners

 * [[File:NewMatthism3.1.png]] Kraut [REDACTED]ism ([[File:PCB-Austrobert.png]]/[[File:Captrans.png]]/[[File:Technocracy.png]]/[[File:Obj.png]]/[[File:Xbert.png]]): This ideology certainly is not bad, although there could be a few changes. First off, you're a bit too laissez-faire. Laissez-faire and hyper-individualist models like your own model and that of the funny French Canadian man tend to forget that the individual's desire is not always in line with the Faustian spirit. There needs to be at least something of substance to guide them. Also, you got my economics wrong, which I don't blame you for, since they're needlessly complicated. Literally what I mean by "state-owned" is just that instead of a company reporting to a private board of directors, they'll report to state representatives instead so they can function in the free market and benefit from its fruits just as well as 100% private industry. Also, I'm not exactly sure where you got the notion where I want to "destroy" culture; just because I believe culture is outdated as a concept doesn't mean I want to destroy it by any means. Rather, I hope it will evolve into something...greater. Other than that, we're pretty much aligned, although probably for different reasons. (76/100)
 * [[File:Omega1065.png]]jREG's Worst Nightmare ([[File:Radcent.png]]/[[File: Progconf.png]]/[[File:Atlanticism.png]]/[[File:Soclib.png]]/[[File:Moder.png]]): What do we have here? A radical centrist? Seems alright, especially your atlanticism and economics, and progcon is always a massive W. Other than that, I don't really have that much else to say. (75/100)
 * [[File:2x2Master.png]] Eshay, King of the Aussies ([[File:Libcon.png]]/[[File:Neobert.png]]/[[File:Conlib.png]]/[[File:Clib.png]]/[[File:Econlib.png]]): We're not so different if you think about it, to be honest. You're essentially a more moderate version of me, but conservative and religious. I'm not too sure about giving religious institutions a platform for, at the very least, influencing state affairs, for it has been proven time and time again that religious institutions often have their own agenda and are susceptible to the same human greed that all other institutions are susceptible to. I'd advise looking at Pascal's Wager, and then applying that to whatever religious group may inevitably come to dominate the religious scene in your ideology. I don't deny that something might be out there, but it would be foolish of me to say what exactly it might be. If God does indeed exist and is truly all-powerful and all-knowing, via human variables, wouldn't He be beyond anything we could think of to "contain" Him? Would He even care about us in the first place? Christianity seems to be far too limited, far too specific and far too, uhh, wacky to truly encapsulate what an utterly omnipotent God might be, as it implies that human morals, at least the good side of them, are directly aligned with that of an omnipotent deity. So who's to say that we're special? Social conservatism is more benign than your views on religion, in my opinion, since it appears to be only limited to the social aspect of society and not its cultural side. It's also great that you oppose both reactards and revprogs alike. Other than that, as aforementioned, you're like a mini-me. Basically everything else is just what I have (except less specific), but toned down by a factor of three. And you're great to talk to on Discord, as well. Overall, it's a decent ideology, but there's room for improvement. (75/100)
 * [[File:DoesntExist.png]] Left BERNHEism ([[File:Antrans.png]]/[[File:KimIlSung.png]]/[[File:Protect.png]]/[[File:Fut2.png]]/[[File:Confucianism.png]]): Literally me, but leftist. Surely, you must see that the inherent nature of markets embodies the technocratic ideal we strive so hard for, and that chasing state-mandated altruism for the sake of a misguided quest for equality is bound to end poorly? Also, I'm glad you make concessions for my interventionism, since it's all pragmatic. (65/100)
 * [[File:Glencoe.png]] Utopian Floridian Liberalism([[File:Liberalsoc.png]]/[[File:Minmut.png]]/[[File:Leftnat.png]]/[[File:Neotech.png]]/[[File: Ectrans.png]]): Eh, you're getting better, but it's still kinda meh. Identifying as a "leftist" when you're so blatantly a run-of-the-mill radlib is quite cringe (and why would you want to associate yourself with those kinds, anyways), and your mutualist tendencies fly in the face of human nature. The current systems have worked so well for us up until recently for a reason. The Steiner-Valentine school seems to be counter-productive by adhering to more leftist models instead of just letting the markets do their thing, and, I can't ask this enough, how the hell would technoliberalism even work? Nontheless, it's not nearly as bad as it could be, and you're going in the right direction. Just cross that Y-axis into rightistan territories and you'll be on your way to becoming truly based. (64/100)
 * [[File:CLTC2.png]] Progressive BERNHEism (OLD) ([[File:Isolation.png]]/[[File:Dem.png]]/[[File:Prog-u.png]]/[[File:Welf.png]]/[[File:Cap.png]]): Literally me, except isolationist, more libertarian and slightly more socially progressive. Obviously there's a lot of room for improvement here, but your ideology appears to be built upon a similar base that I use in my own. I have a few gripes with the pointless isolationism and democracy. What purpose does isolationism serve in this modern era? It's essentially impossible for all but the biggest countries on the planet (and it is still sub-optimal at that) nowadays, and there are alternative ways to secure the integrity of our nation within the global system. We just need to be smart about it. Democracy, on the other hand, is sorta fucked in every way. The mindset needed to sustain a functional democracy nowadays is dead and gone, since the people are both extremely easily-manipulated by 3rd parties thanks to increased social capacity and connectivity, and people will also exclusively vote in their own self-interest as well, never thinking in the long term (another point: this is why direct democracy, despite sounding great on paper, is inferior in every way to representative democracy). Democracy in its controlled form is good for giving proles and the unenlightened masses their illusion of control, but continuing down the democratic path nowadays, unless something changes soon, is a recipe for disaster. (62/100)

[[File:Meh.png]] Mischungen

 * [[File:Pixil-frame-0(38).png]] BERNHE's Not-So-Fascist Friend ([[File:Tradcon.png]]/[[File:Antisin.png]] /[[File:ReactPix.png]]/[[File:Panc.png]]): You've definitely improved from your last iteration, that's for sure. You appear to be far more based civically and economically, moving away from Fascism around the same time I did and Sinophobia is based as well . However, you're still needlessly hindered by overregulationism, ethnic nationalism and overt cultural conservatism. Take the technocapital-pill and you'll be one step closer to fulfilling your destiny. (58/100)
 * [[File:Pixil-frame-0(27).png]] BERNHE's Fascist Friend ([[File:React.png]]/[[File:Islamfash.png]]/[[File:Ultranat.png]]/[[File:Totalitarian.png]]/[[File:Troll.png]]) : It's a shame you don't like where I'm going ideologically, and I can basically say the exact same things that you said about my ideology, but flip-flopped. Leftism is based on the frivolous pursuit of equality, which will never come to any meaningful fruition. Inequality is human nature, so why not embrace that? However, I freely admit that Fascism is easily 1,000x better than Communism ever will be in terms of actually having a workable system (that is, until they get a bit too greedy with the land grabs), so just don't get any more leftist! Also, I do not necessarily follow the "hurr durr le experts are never wrong" stereotype. I believe primarily in qualification, not experience, although the two usually correlate. Finally, I'm not really a fan of your right-idpol social views and theocratic tendencies, but I can make concessions for that. It's not the worst, per-se, but it's definitely not the best. I'd still be more than happy to trade with him, though. if his rates are competent, and Fascist allies tend to be good enforcers. (43/100)

[[File:No.png]] Stagnation Pits

 * [[File:Yves-nicholas.png]] Naturalized Pseudo-Salazarism ([[File:PCB-Christy.png]]/[[File:Technocracy.png]]/[[File:Totalitarian.png]]/[[File:Corptism.png]]/[[File:Georgist.png]]): We're so alike, yet so different. Economically and civically, you're eh. Third Positionism is definitely preferable to communism, and at least you have markets with market socialism, and your totalitarianism goes too far even for me. You're too dependent on religion as the "core" of your ideology as well; what if, hypothetically, people just stopped believing one day? What bearing, outside of the monopoly on power, would your government still have? I would recommend that you read Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes. It'll help you realize TRUE "ruthless efficiency." EIther way, it's not good, but it's not necessarily horrible, either. (38/100)
 * [[File:Nastyism Icon.png]] Yockey from Kaiserredux (HE'S REAL GUYS HOLY SHIT) ([[File:Nazi.png]]/[[File:Corptism.png]]/[[File:Nooc.png]]/[[File:Euronaticon.png]]/[[File:TradCath.png]]): Ah, my old [former, maybe?] friend. This ideology would be pretty inefficient. The combination of National Socialism, Traditionalist (maybe even Fundamentalist) Catholicism and European Nationalism would needlessly end up killing or deporting millions, which would lead to a surplus of jobs, which is not good indeed. Combine that with a rigid, yet fragile corporatist economy, and you're on a direct course for a NASTY (I am good at jokes) economic crisis. And you don't even seem to want to take the techpill, either? Tell me; if God didn't want us to experiment with becoming...better... in the first place, why would he give us such shitty, useless bodies? Humans are barely good at anything outside of communicating, walking on two feet, sweating and endurance hunting. We could be so much more. It seems kind of cruel to me also, with the hypothetical given that God is indeed out there and He does not approve of posthumanism (or even transhumanism), and yet He does not show Himself in any tangible or documentable capacity. Faith alone may be enough to keep some going, but certainly not everyone. So, until further notice, why hold back? (35/100)
 * [[file:Liblovsprite.png]] Least-Bad LibLeft ([[file:Marketsoc.png]]/[[file:Transh.png]]/[[file:Prog.png]]/[[file:PCB-Awaj.png]]/[[file:Indiv.png]]): Despite your anarchism being an instant turnoff in my eyes (for what is the point of having such policies outside of anarchism if you do not have the means to implement them efficiently), we agree on quite a lot, actually. Economically, Market Socialism is less than ideal, but at least there's markets, damnable worker cooperatives aside. That automatically makes you better than 99% of tankies and other communist filth, no matter how authoritarian the latter may be. Individualism is also quite good, and transhumanism is ultra-based. However, due to your anarchistic tendencies and left-leaning economics, I can't place you much further up. (28/100)
 * [[File:Panth.png]] Most Sane Distributist  ([[File:Monarch.png]]/[[File:SocDist.png]]/[[File:World_Federalism2.png]]/[[File:Antrans.png]]/[[File:Civlibert.png]]): I'm not a fan of this ideology. First off, you resort to the filthy mockery of transhumanism that is Archeofuturism. Secondly, your form of authoritarianism (monarchism) is not good, with or without an inheritance system, as concentrating power in the hands of one person is almost always a shit idea. ESPECIALLY nowadays. Thirdly, you probably already know what I'm going to say about World Federalism, so I'll say this; why cooperate when you can have HEGEMONY? Although your space imperialism is indeed mega-based (we need to get the Helium-3 on the moon before China does). On further reflection, fourthly, civil liberties aren't as antithetical to my beliefs as I once thought, but still, you take it to inefficient levels. Finally, you probably know what I'm going to say about unions and your weird form of socialism-not-socialism. Workerphilia and its consequences... But other than that, it's not nearly as bad as it could be, and even though Archeofuturism is a stagnation pit all by itself, it's better than modern passivity. You just barely saved yourself from the Eugenics Section™. (25/100)

[[File:Mega No.png]] Proof That Eugenics Is Needed

 * [[File:Yoda8soup.png]] Eco Super-Sandersism ([[File:Green Party (US).png]]/[[File:LeftSocdem-Alt.png]]/[[File:Demsocstar.png]]/[[File:Prog-u.png]]/[[File:Globnat.png]]): I'm not fond of this ideology at all. First off, it's workerphiliac to a high degree, to the point where even a market mechanism won't mitigate the sheer inefficiency of the system because it values the individual over the economy. Coops and socialist markets are only feasible (not even good) in smaller countries (think of Tito's Yugoslavia). Widespread implementation of these structures in a country with such a large economy and population as America would ruin the entire thing. Secondly, he has the right idea about environmentalism, but damn, it's the soft kind! Become a based Artifist! Thirdly, anti-interventionism is highly unworkable in this scenario anyways since the USA would lose all of its global influence and power, creating a cast-down, beaten America whose only friends are worthless third/second-world shitholes at best and a nasty power vacuum between some of the worst nations on the planet (i.e. Russia, China, etc.) at worst. Not to mention that it would naturally exclude labor outsourcing, which is a necessary evil at this stage of the game. Fourthly, there's the difference in authority, but we'll never see eye-to-eye. I've given up trying to convince people why unfettered democracy is garbage for some time now. It never sinks in because it's become a matter of morals and wanting to continue believing the illusion that your voice matters and not actual practicality or reality. My final analysis of this ideology is this; you're essentially Bernie Sanders on literal black tar heroin. Whether or not that's a good thing, I leave that to the reader. (14/100)
 * [[File:Iberian_commie.png]] Painfully Average Commie #12609374 ([[File:Mao.png]]/[[File: Orthlen.png]]/[[File: fed_ibr.png]]/[[File: ultraprogressivism.png]]/[[File: SocialistPatriot.png]]): Your ideology, like literally every other communist self-insert I've read, makes me want to puke. Despite that, it's just another painfully average variant of communism that fails to realize the inherent supremacy of the West and the market mechanism. In fact, I would endorse the actual founding of a party centered around these ideas IRL, just to add another variant of the same old system to the list of things [left] communists fight over eternally. You people do have a tendency to be each other's greatest enemies, after all. Keep it that way! (11/100)
 * [[File:Neokira2.png]] KKT (Gooder Version) ([[File:Ormarxf.png]]/[[File:ML.png]]/[[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]]/[[File:Orthlen.png]]/[[File:Globnat.png]]): Unfortunately, you've turned out to be the worst case scenario I envisioned for your more complete ideology. Your only saving graces are your limited technocratic practices and seeming support of transhumanism. Still a hell of a lot better than your OTHER ideology. (10/100)
 * [[File:MurbHat.png]] [Left] Communism With A Human Face ([[File:LeftCom.png]]/[[File:Natcom.png]]/[[File:Councom.png]]/[[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]]/[[File:Antiimp.png]]): I mean, where do you expect me to put you? You're a communist, and even worse, an ultroid, at that! Leftcoms have, on average, delved so far into dogmatism that they've become the very revisionists that they hate so much by taking literally everything they read out of context (this'll raise hell on Discord from people who stalk my page)...but you seem to be different. You appear to simply be a Bordigist with Marxist and Leninist influences, and that's not necessarily good either, but you're definitely the best ultroid I've encountered so far. At least, that's the gist I got from you, from the handful of times I've interacted with you on Jonah's server. I would pay big money to watch you interact with Nguyen and his posse. (10/100)
 * [[File:Borker_thought_pixels_4.png]] Glorious Minecraft Overlord ([[File:Acol.png]]/[[File:AntiOrmarx.png]]/[[File:Makhaevism.png]]/[[File:DemCon.png]]/[[File:Hyperborea.png]]): As a person, you're quite fine IMO. Playing Minecraft with you is a blast and the VCs are always entertaining, but ideologically? Your collectivism makes me shudder, for reasons that should hopefully be obvious. Individualism isn't "bourgeoise," it's a core part of the human spirit. In my view, radical individualism and radical collectivism are shitty because they reduce the person to a single variable in an infinite matrix, with one end being a nightmare collective and the other being a world in which self-interest reigns eternal. A delicate blend of both is necessary and analyzing your thoughts might make me write something on my page about the whole Individualism vs. Collectivism debate. So, thanks for the idea! Moving on, your whole section about the revolution disgusts me, just like every other proposed LARPvolution I see in PCBA, because it punishes success. Corporations and other "bourgeoise" elements merely play by the rules of the game that is currently ongoing, so it's foolish to want to punish them for being too good at their jobs. The markets have very little room for morality, but that's just how the game is played. Sure, I respect your desire to change them, although I think the current thing is fine, but punishing people for being successful? Sheesh! Anarchism is also anarchism and agrarianism is agrarianism, but that's a matter of a difference in basic principles between you and me. Collectivizing knowledge also won't make the Intelligentsia go away, it'll just allow more people to potentially become Intelligentsia, but I haven't read any Machajski, so I will admit I don't know what I'm talking about 100% in this regard. I also recognize that at our cores, we're diametrically opposed from an irreconcilable position because you appear to be far less materialistic than me (as is evident in your spiritual beliefs), but this isn't a philosophy wiki (despite the egoist infestation), so I won't even bother with that. Nevertheless, I do agree with your opinions about technology, actually. Just because I want to eventually work towards becoming something more than a human doesn't mean I want to rush in and sink 20% of the budget into developing cybernetics and bRain chIpS. Technology may be great for productivity, but one must also factor in the social and environmental costs that it inevitably brings. You're also admittedly one of the most structured anarchists I've ever seen, to the point that maybe, JUST maybe, it could function for longer than most anarchist ideologies here without being BTFO in a real-world scenario. That said, we fundamentally disagree on 99% of everything, but the 1% we agree on is pretty based. Also, we both hate those god damn small ass hearing aid batteries. FUCK those things. (8/100)
 * [[File:O%27Langism.png]] Most Anarchist "Anarchist" ([[File:AnSynd.png]]/[[File:GE.png]]/[[File:Indlibsoc.png]]/[[File:Native.png]]/[[File:Synthesisanarchy.png]]): Essentially my opposite in almost every way. It will probably collapse in a week when land is inevitably grabbed by their hypothetical neighbors. The economics are terrible and contradictory as hell, even if it uses markets (or at least this...version of them), and is incompatible with the global market mechanism (since it would be nigh-impossible to build a meaningful, strong economy with his restrictive, decentralized, obtrusive and workerphiliac policies). Your civics are highly unstable due to your weird desire for pseudo-anarchy, and your social views will only get in the way of true progress with your apparent idpol fetishism. There is no redeeming anything in this ideology. I drew that conclusion as soon as I saw the biggest economic abomination on the planet; the Gift Economy. The only thing that prevents you from getting 0/100 on the final score is your acceptance of the concept of markets and regulation, to a point. Still, even then, with your system, I have no idea how they'd be implemented on any reasonable scale. (2/100)
 * [[File:NNGM.png]] Jonah von Bonah Thought ([[File:Classnat.png]]/[[File:Anti-Americanism.png]]/[[File:NatRev.png]]/[[File:Farm.png]]/[[File:Dsa.png]]): Alrighty, I'll try and write an actual critique of this ideology instead of ripping on it like Dr. Occo's. Oh, man, [[File:Reddit.png]] there's a lot to unpack here. I would like to mention before diving right into this critique that I know that this is Jonah's "ideal" ideology, just as this ideology right here is mine (Practical BERNHEism 2 is coming, guys, I swear). Thus, I recognize the fact that this ideology wasn't necessarily built for IRL politics, especially the Separatism bit. Nevertheless, this ideology is, quite literally, my opposite in almost every way. We fundamentally disagree with the American question from an irreconciliable position (and that's one HELL of an understatement), so there's no point in talking about that. Collectivism is another issue entirely. Humans are naturally individualist creatures, and no amount of conditioning, education or brainwashing is going to make them naturally, authentically collectivist. Forcing people into an esoteric collectivist conglomerate merely hinders the individual from reaching his full potential. Secession itself, even the non-Tinist variety, would be nearly impossible in the first world, I'd assume. Going off of a theoretical situation, would you really think that Germany as a nation would be OK with whatever secession you wish to do? And, I know this may be a hard pill to swallow, the rest of the West isn't gonna be happy, either. Your efforts will probably be thwarted either way, and even if you succeed, you'll run into some of the same issues that you'll see in my critique of Tinism, except somewhat mitigated by the prescense of more organized structures, heavy industry and more reliable resource acquisition, probably. The only thing that would realistically save you is the fact that you aren't landlocked, but you'd need to be willing to trade. And then, finally, Agrarianism. Why? What's the point? I get it, farms are important and very cool, but that sort of lifestyle isn't worthwhile anymore! At least your Biotranshumanism balances it out...but that isn't enough. Your people are capable of so much more than what your agrarian tendencies, combined with everything else, allow them to be. This is quite literally the whole package when it comes to anti-BERNHEism, save for one thing. You aren't a total anarchist. We also by some miracle agree on the concept of what a "nation" is, and the only reason I use the "ultranationalist" moniker is because it genuinely sounds cooler than "chauvinism," which would be a more accurate label for my diplomatic stances. National Palingenesis is an interesting idea, too... Either way, superficial similarities aside, congratulations, you're only beaten by your [[File:Guard-Occo.png]] Obnoxious LARPy Ripoff, [[File:Ioist.png]] "Intellectual" Twitter Personified, and, uh, [[File:NeoLukko.png]] HER. (0/100)
 * The [[File:Tinism.png]] Tinism critique:
 * [[File:Guard-Occo.png]] Total Societal Collapse Speedrun (Any%) ([[File:Tinism.png]]/[[File:Sep.png]]/[[File:Isolationist.png]]/[[File:Tucn-EcoAuth.png]]/[[File:Socauth.png]]): We probably know exactly what we think of each other, so I'll keep it short. [wall of text wall of text] REEEEE POPULIST FILTH REEEEEE [wall of text] REEE LEFTOIDS CAN'T DO ECON LMAO [wall of text wall of text wall of text] LMAO HYPER-BALKANIZATION 😂 [wall of text]. Anyways, terrible ideology, literally Jonahism but 1,000x worse. Guaranteed collapse in 30 days or your money back (warranty void if it merges with another state)! (-100/100)
 * [[File:NeoLukko.png]] Pissed Off Lukkoism ([[File:Violentprog.png]]/[[File:AntiEconomy.png]]/[[File:PCB-Postciv.png]]/[[File:Laicism.png]]/[[File:Transh.png]]): As for you, this ideology is the single most definite example that you can find on this wiki, to be honest, that idealism is only good in small doses. Your pursuit for total equality is somewhat admirable, albeit very misguided, but your methods of attaining said equality...let's talk econ. I honestly never understood you anti-economy types, since an economy in and of itself is necessary for the production of 99.99% of things we take for granted. Assume you "abolish" the economy, horrific pre-abolition commienomics aside, and it turns out the way I think it'll turn out, that is, a bunch of people forming some sort of alternative structure(s) on a highly-decentralized community level, what comes next? It would be next-to-impossible to coordinate resource acquisition, advanced manufacturing, and all sorts of things necessary to attain your hypothetical transhumanist ideals. Seriously, what would you do? What would happen when everything runs out? What would happen if the factory machines require maintenance? Who will make more? How would you coordinate those who want to make more while still obeying the other tenets of your ideology? Relying on the good will of others, paired with seeking to abolish hierarchy, as you wish to do with your cursed decentralized mutual aid system, is stupid. Speaking of, I would like to address your notion that you believe that reliance on the market is comparable to praying to a diety for a cure to cancer. The reason markets work so well and are so comparatively efficient compared to other systems is because they respond to the needs of the people as well as factoring in the incentive to create, as well. A cure for cancer is being researched because there is a market in those willing to buy it, and money [reward/incentive] for the producers. You can't just expect your average Joe to spend a ton of time, resources and missed opportunity to produce your hypothetical cure out of the boundless kindness of his own heart. This ain't the movies. We may have our moments, but humans are NOT fundamentally altruistic creatures. Point being that the almighty invisible hand works because it's capable of functioning in and accomodating both the short and long runs, while also providing incentive for both progress and production. People will very, very rarely do something for nothing, especially when said thing boils down to large input and little to no reward. Your civics are atrocious and only impede your initial far-fetched goals even further, antiwork just makes everything even LESS functional, your social views aren't that important in this context, and I would talk about your post-civ adherence, but I think we've spent long enough, ahem, CrItIcAlLy AnAlYzInG this thing. The lesson we can all learn from the tale of Neo-Lukkoism is this; relying exclusively on good will almost never ends well. At least your Laicism is based. (-1,000/100)
 * [[File:LeonMK.png]] Postie LARP Resurgence ([[File:Egocom.png]]/[[File:Globnat.png]]/[[File:Anpostleft.png]]/[[File:Postciv.png]]/[[File:Kak-Dunce.png]]: You know it's going to be bad when an ideology unironically fuses the "theories" and "systems" of...literal PCBA self-inserts wrought by children. Nothing about this ideology can work. Your praxis is unattainable against the full fury of technocapital, revprogs will be revprogs, commies are commies, anarcucks are anarcucks, posties are posties, etc etc etc. Your definition of Egoism appears to be the "lmao spooks lmao eternal ego selfishness lmao" instead of knowing at least the basics of that philosophy. Despite this, I took this page as seriously as possible before reading that your end goal was Soulism of all things. Now I'm convinced that this is nothing but an unfunny LARP, which I hope is the case, but, being PCB, it probably isn't. (-∞/100)
 * [[File:Ioist.png]] Reality Dissonance Syndrome ([[File:Ego.png]]/[[File:Anqueer.png]]/[[File:Illeg.png]]/[[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]]/[[File:Existentialist_Anarchism.png]]): Ah, you. Personally, I think Tiberius's use of the "goober" label can be a bit overdone sometimes, but, my God, you check all of the boxes! I mean, there is LITERALLY nothing redeemable about this ideology! All of this rebellion against the system, all of this non-conformity for the sake of non-conformity...what purpose does it serve? Do you wish to feel special? Is this a desperate cry for attention? Or are you finally getting a bitter taste of society's darker side, and this is your response to it? Even the more superficial elements of this "ideology" (if I can even call it that at this point) are built on next to nothing; what has founded this idea of yours that the evul cissies are out to get you people? Are you basing your beliefs off of what people post on r/AgainstHateSubreddits? Because it sure seems that way. This belief system is probably the single most disconnected-from-reality thing I've ever seen, and I was around when Plenderplar was still relevant! [[File:Plend-icon.png]] Plenderplarism is unironically more realistically attainable than this hot mess! (-∞/100)

[[File:AAA.png]] Unclassifiable

 * [[File:Ultro.png]] A Philosophy In A Political Wiki ([[File:Ego.png]]/[[File:Postmodernicon.png]]/[[File:EgoUnion.png]]/[[File:Indiv.png]]/[[File:Ins.png]]): I don't exactly know what to say about this one. I feel like critiquing it, but there is a problem; I don't know what a lot of it is saying. So, it'll probably stay here for now while I mull this over. However, moving on to your analysis of my ideology, I would say that you've hit it spot-on, for the most part. As an ideology, the entire point of this page is to envision what I consider the perfect society. There's no denying that. But I've made my peace with that fact. Nevertheless, there is still, evidently, plenty to learn. (???/100)

=Comments= '''The only condition to be added to my self-insert is that you need to add mine first (and I will be checking). Also, if you got to this point already, please use BERNHEism.png instead of BERNHEflash.gif when writing your review.'''

Purged due to formatting hell. If you want to see your old comments, look at the archive below:

Waitlist
Add yourself if you want: [Ball] [Ideology], ([5 balls that represent your ideology the best])
 * [[File:Altem.png]] Altemism ([[File:Reactsoc.png]]/[[File:Monsoc.png]]/[[File:Guildsoc.png]]/[[File:Socialism in One Country.png]]/[[File:Lutheran Theocracy.png]])
 * ([[File:Christianright.png]]/[[File:Trad.png]]/[[File:RegCap.png]]/[[File:Reactlib.png]]/[[File:Nation.png]])
 * [[File:Brazlib.png]] Brazilian Liberalism ([[File:3way.png]]/[[File:Prog.png]]/[[File:Neoliberalism.png]]/[[File:Libhawk.png]]/[[File:Libfem.png]])
 * [[File:Iconfloofel.png]] Floofel's Thought([[File:Thar.png]]/[[File:Anpostleft.png]]/[[File:Nihil.png]]/[[File:Anti-Humanism.png]]/[[File:Insan2.png]])
 * [[File:Tsumugikotobuki8814ism.png]] MugiKotobuki8814ism([[File:Esofash.png]]/[[File:Pron.png]]/[[File:Nacionalismo.png]]/[[File:Cathnaz.png]]/[[File:WhiteNat.png]])
 * [[File:Vamp.png]] ([[File:3way.png]]/[[File:PlannedCap.png]]/[[File:Necon.png]]/[[File:Soccorp.png]]/[[File:Pinkcap.png]])
 * ([[File:clib.png]]/[[File:fiscon.png]]/[[File:world.png]]/[[File:Liberaltarianism2-icon.png]]/[[File:modprog.png]])
 * ([[File:ClassicalSocDem.png]]/[[File:Globnat.png]]/[[File:Modprog.png]]/[[File:Ectrans.png]]/[[File:Utility.png]])
 * [[File:GanzismIcon2.png]] Ganzism ([[File:Anprim.png]]/[[File:Ancom.png]]/[[File:Neolud.png]]/[[File:Pcb ethnonat icon.png]]/[[File:Anpag.png]])
 * [[File:BourgeoisieDestroyer.png]] Bourgeoisie Destroyerism[[File:Anprim.png]]/[[File:Natan.png]]/[[File:AntiEconomy.png]]/[[File:Post-Autonomism.png]]/[[file:Neoplaton.png]]
 * [[File:AryanMonarchBow.png]] Aryan Monarchism - ([[File:Nordmodel.png]] / [[File:Whitesup.png]] / [[File:Baizuo-alt.png]] / [[File: Moncap.png]] / [[File:Authprog.png]])

=Theory & Shit=

Suggestions

 * [[File:Jonah.png]] JonahF2014 - Germany Tomorrow (Otto Strasser)
 * - Killing History: The False Left-Right Political Spectrum and the Battle between the 'Free Left' and the 'Statist Left' by L.K. Samuels
 * [[File:Vamp.png]] - Big is Beautiful (Robert D. Atkinson & Michael Lind)
 * [[File:Vamp.png]] - Beyond the Left and Right (Anthony Giddens)

=Navbox=