Levathonism

Levathonism is the self-insert of the user Levathon. It is culturally Traditionalist, civically  Authoritarian to  Totalitarian, and economically centre(right-leaning).

==

To summarize my economics, I adhere to a synthesis of State Capitalism,  Social Capitalism, and  Tripartism. I believe that Capitalism is the best economic system for the people due to it tremendously expanding the economy, improving life, and bringing about innovation. However, I believe that interventionist policies should be implemented to prevent mindless consumerism from taking over the people and securing the worker's happiness and support of the government.

[[File:Regulationism.png]] Regulations [[File:Regulationism.png]]
I believe that the state should intervene in the economy heavily, but carefully. Too many regulations could interfere with economic growth and innovation, which is not good. The means of production should still be in the hands of the market, but the state should watch that production, making sure everything goes safely and smoothly, while nationalizing industries too important for the market to handle. I also think the state should have the right to correct any mistakes made by the market if there are any, break up monopolies, and implement labor laws. We should ensure that corporations are always subordinate to the state. Most regulations would be targeted at the larger corporations, but not so much with smaller businesses.

[[File:Tripartism.png]] Class Collaboration [[File:Tripartism.png]]
Marxist class warfare is just a waste of time, resources, and lives. To punish success is just ridiculous, it is natural that some will have it better than others, and that isn't a bad thing, as you have to work hard to get to this level of success. The idea that it will make them lazy is not true, as people will always strive to become better or more successful, and they must work to do that. However, separating the classes from each other is just as bad, as we would get nothing done from doing this. That being said, class collaboration should be encouraged by the state, as we would get so much more done from this, and it would promote further cooperation in the nation and healthy relations between classes.

[[File:Socdem.png]] Welfare [[File:Socdem.png]]
I support a moderate welfare state and worker benefits, as securing the support of the working people(and the common people) is probably the most important objective, as they are the needed in the nation to make it great and keep it great. Thus, the workers deserve better conditions. I also recognize that private charities aren't perfect and don't always raise money for those who are actually in need. However, there should be different social programs for specific events, like for the needs of children, healthcare, and the disabled. Welfare should be only used when actually needed, and the state should make sure no lazy people undeserving of welfare get it. Everyone should have their basic needs covered at first, but they should work to keep them.

[[File:MeritCapLogo.png]] The Wealthy [[File:MeritCapLogo.png]]
The wealthy should be allowed to be wealthy, as long as they work for it and contribute to society by doing business until they can't anymore. I also believe that Passive Wealth Accumulation should be minimized in order to ensure that wealth is gained from hard work, innovation, and talent, not just because of one's parents or luck. If any wealthy person does nothing productive with their money, then they should have their taxes raised on them until they are able to find a way to contribute to society and justify holding on to their money. The rich should not be more influential over the populace than the state itself.

[[File:Corp.png]] Corporate influence [[File:Corp.png]]
Corporations should hold no influence in the government. Their main goal is profit no matter what, even if it means creating a society of mindless consumerism, so giving them the power to influence government decisions is a really bad idea. Lobbying is also a big problem, as it is a popular form of corruption that serves the interests of private companies instead of the nation. The fair repair act only failed due to huge tech companies influencing government decisions, and they should never do that. The state should never be bribed by anyone. The state should only support big business interests when they align with the state's interests.

[[File:SyndieSam.png]] Unions [[File:SyndieSam.png]]
I support unions that are regulated by the state to ensure it actually represents all workers. The workers should negotiate with corporations for better wages, workplace safety, paid leave days, etc. Due to me supporting Tripartism, The state should be the mediator between the two sides and intervene so both sides are compromising and neither side gets the upper hand. Agreements should always include the state due to this. For example, If wages are increased, then corporate taxes should be lowered. This helps promote healthy labor relations between the workers and businesses instead of the divisive, pointless conflict to achieve worker dominance that marxists promote.

[[File:Property.png]] Property [[File:Property.png]]
Property rights are vital to a rational society. They bought it, which means they worked for it, and if they were gifted it, then they still have the right to have it, as people have the right to make choices about their own property, like who they give it to or what to put there. Taking this right away from people makes no sense. People don't deserve things they didn't work for or weren't given to them, to take away someone's earned property and give it to a bunch of lazy stoners is unfair and irrational. If someone is trespassing and they knew they were going into private property, they should be fined. Humans are not altruistic by nature, we will not be willing to give up what is rightfully ours.

[[File:Dirigisme.png]] Public Property = State Property [[File:Dirigisme.png]]
Public Property, on the contrary, is given to the people. The people have the right to walk into public spaces. However, it is not owned by them. Public property cannot have no owner either. For it to be public, whoever owns the property has to allow anybody to use it. Where I live, the public library is owned by the township. The reason for this is because all property should have someone or something to uphold the responsibility of protecting the property to ensure that people are able to use it. There are many filth who will vandalise or steal something meant for the people so they can have it for themselves. There should be something to prevent that from happening. Without that responsibility upheld, public property will be unusable. That is why a society that practices something like Anarcho-Communism is bound to fail.

[[File:Multicult.png]] Intellectual Property [[File:Multicult.png]]
Intellectual "Property" is not necessarily property, but i do think that it is important for encouraging further innovation, and one should not be leeching off of other people's ideas. I also believe that copyright laws should be put into place, as to make sure that someone's work does not get stolen, I do believe that work is owned by them. However, people should not be allowed to abuse it or charge someone just because they showed their work in a video for 2 seconds.

[[File:Timocracy.png]] Landlords [[File:Timocracy.png]]
Landlords provide an essential service, and I agree that if you are using someone else's property, they have the right to ask you for money. However, we should still implement a land value tax, as they usually laze about draining people's money, not really contributing to society enough, sure they provide people who are in need of homes places to live, but what else do they do? They should still be allowed to continue doing their landlord business, but a land value tax should still be implemented due to this.

[[File:Tax.png]] Taxes [[File:Tax.png]]
I support a progressive tax system for the rich, though for the middle and lower class, there should be a flat tax system. I support higher taxes for the rich mainly because I want to limit their influence, and because it is only fair that those who work less but have it made have to pay more than those who work more but still have to worry about their financial situation. The flat tax should be about 18%, while the wealthy tax would be at least 20% marginal rate.

[[File:Bankocracy.png]] The Banks [[File:Bankocracy.png]]
Banks should be nationalized nationwide. The state is more trustworthy in handling people's money than private businesses, and i think that the people should learn to put their trust in the state instead of these businesses. It would also be better at preventing economic crisis, as the state would respond quicker and prevent anything from going wrong in the banks to prevent any crisis from going any further. We have seen time and time again that independent banks only worsened economic situations when there is a crisis, like in the recession of '08 and the Great Depression.

[[File:Protect.png]] Trade [[File:Protect.png]]
I support minimizing imports to protect American markets from foreign influence, as to encourage self-sufficiency and local production that increases American wages. I also believe in unlimited exports, which means I support Neo-Mercantilism. This is good to increase the wealth of the nation and expand the market, thus having great economic influence over the world.

[[File:Post-Industrialism.png]] Automation [[File:Post-Industrialism.png]]
Automation can be really good for the economy, but the problem I have with it is how it threatens to take millions of jobs. I think that machines should help us with our jobs, but not take them. If automation is to become the norm in the workplace, then we should try and get the populace to move on to more important jobs or whatever cannot be done by the machines.

I am quite Authoritarian. I consider myself to be moderately totalitarian, as I believe in an absolute sovereign that asserts control over society and the people, but I believe in a constitution in order to prevent corruption and please the populace. I am also not fond of state idolatry as I see it as some cult-like shit.

[[File:Reform.png]] Praxis [[File:Revolution.png]]
Fascism is a revolutionary ideology. It was born out of a frustration against Marxism and Liberalism, which were both enshrined in the minds of the people, and these ideals would not be completely removed through a simple election. Even if a fascist party won in an election, it would not be enough to eliminate these tumors from society. That is why we need a revolution, especially now when Fascism has been beaten to the ground by liars and hijacked by , and the neoliberal order reigns supreme. We must rally the people against the beast that is neoliberalism and implement a true fascist system that will lead the people to greatness.

[[File:Mach.png]] Broad Appeal [[File:Mach.png]]
I believe in a broad appeal to get in power and keep this power. We should appeal to the left through welfare and worker benefits, the right through Anti-Communism and support of the profit motive, and libertarians... I don't know, probably gun rights or something. However, we should not give concessions to or work with Anarchist,  Communist, and  Progressive filth.

[[File:Sec.png]] Government [[File:Sec.png]]
The government should be a One-Party State in which the  most skilled & qualified people from within the party take on the responsibility as rulers of the party and the country. We should have a strongman leader elected by the senate(who is chosen by taking a test)who is to unify the nation and order the people below him, but this leader should not be an autocrat. He should have a cabinet that wields slightly more power and makes decisions with him, as well as the constitution limiting his power, as it is meant to do. He would still be the most powerful in the country, with him getting the last say in most decisions. I believe that the leadership also should use science to make better decisions.

[[File:Consti.png]] Term Limits [[File:Consti.png]]
The office of president should be for healthy men with the age range of 40-50. They should be the most skilled and best for the position, and they should serve as the president for about 8 years. Once his term is done, his cabinet should also leave the office with him. If a member of the cabinet dies, the president should choose someone from within the party who shows capability to replace them. The president should choose a member of his council to succeed him he cannot complete his term for any reason, and there should be a line of succession for who takes office like how there is in the U.S constitution just in case whoever is next in line cannot take office. If the president is found to be incompetent or  corrupt, he and his cabinet can be impeached by party leadership.

[[File:Pop.png]] The problem with Populism [[File:Pop.png]]
I believe that populist rhetoric is needed to secure power, but populism and democracy are far from ideal. The masses do not know what is best for the nation. They are nigh-illiterate when it comes to politics, and they focus on insignificant issues and don't understand the actual important ones. Democracy has proved to be a divisive force, especially now in the United States, as people will get mad over their side losing and take action, as we saw during the capitol riot. Elections are a waste of precious time and resources, so we should instead leave decisions to the experts instead of the politically illiterate masses. Through this, we will have a much more efficient government, and our citizens won't have to have politics shoved down their throat and can instead focus on more important things & be more productive. The state should never submit to the people, but instead serve the people, as in increasing national well being.

[[File:FreeSpeech.png]] Free Speech [[File:FreeSpeech.png]]
I support free speech, as long as it is aligned to my views, that is. Well, sort of. I can allow other ideologies, like socialism(to a certain extent), libertarianism(also to a certain extent), and certain variants of liberalism, as long as they are loyal to the state and do not protest or revolt in the name of their ideology. However, as I have said, Anarchism, Communism, and Progressivism(The evil three) should be censored and persecuted. I believe that people should be allowed to speak against a law and critique some aspects of the government, but speaking against the regime as a whole should be punishable, as to ensure that the position of the state is dominant and not threatened. Calling for violence in any manner, like threatening to kill or calling for insurrection should also be punishable for obvious reasons.

[[File:Mediastocracy flair.png]] Media [[File:Mediastocracy flair.png]]
Having multiple independent news organizations that hold different views and will attempt to sway those who consume it to their side is fucking dumb. We need a united nation, not a divided one. Having multiple news sources is also just plain stupid. Why do we have so many different news sources telling the same goddamn stories, especially when they could report anything but the facts? There is no point in keeping this anymore. We should have a national, state-owned news source that reports the facts only and prevents destructive ideologies from being promoted. Bloggers should be reviewed to see if their content is not promoting anything opposed by the government. Same with websites on the internet and social media. If it is, then it is to be censored, and whoever did it should be faced with a fine. All information should be put in the hands of the all-powerful state.

[[File:Ingsocf.png]] Surveillance [[File:Ingsocf.png]]
Surveillance is necessary to prevent crime or traitorous acts. The state should have access to one's emails and record phone calls. This is the best & quickest way to hold people accountable for their crimes, and we will know that they commit it because we saw it or heard it. I do believe, however, that one's house, should not be watched by the state. The people deserve to feel comfortable in their own homes instead of knowing that they are watched 24/7, though if you install a camera in your house for whatever reason, the state has access to it. Surveillance is for safety reasons, and if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.

[[File:Unitary.png]] Unitarism or Federalism? [[File:Fed.png]]
I prefer a synthesis of Unitarism and Federalism. Subdivisions are useful for executing the will of the state in multiple areas. It organizes the country and allows us to test laws in one area before implementing it nationwide. However, I believe that the federal government should hold most of the power in the country, being able to adjust laws and the decisions made in the local governments. This is to make sure that the state is still dominant nationwide and that no strong state weakens the nation. The Executive branch should be given slightly more power, as it should have to accept laws after senate passes them(House would be abolished). I also believe in a national police force.

[[File:PolState.png]] Police [[File:PolState.png]]
The police should be far more disciplined, taking training from the military. I believe that the police should be given more power to make the streets safe, but they should be more regulated in order to prevent police brutality. Police taken advantage of their authoritative position to commit crimes like rape, and that should never happen. Police should be more watched than the average civilian, having cameras on their uniforms and GPS to track them. They should not take these things off, if they do, authorities should go and arrest them. If they were found to be guilty of a crime, they should be held accountable. There should also be measures taken to prevent unjustified killings, like with George Floyd. Now, don't get me wrong, the Black Lives Matter movement is an anarchic terrorist organization that has only worsened race relations, but the policeman was not in danger at all. Policemen should only kill when they are threatened in any way. If a killing is unprovoked, and there is proof of it, then the policeman should be held accountable.

[[File:Klep.png]] Prison [[File:Klep.png]]
Prison should also be reformed. It should basically be turned into a reeducation system in which there is strong, long, rehabilitation. It would basically be like a school, except prisoners are forced to learn how to act and not act, and reflect on your past actions. There would be more restrictions than in a normal jail, and if those who were sent there are very cooperative, they should expect to get out earlier than they were sentenced, but if they are stubborn, they should expect to be out there longer than sentenced or be punished.

[[File:Civlibert.png]] Civil Liberties [[File:Civlibert.png]]
Civil liberties only hold back the nation. The state is to protect its citizens, not let them do whatever. They are a lazy excuse for the state to fail the people. However, taking away civil liberties from the people would be quite difficult, and they should be able to make their own choice, they should not be treated like children. If we appeal to the people and encourage them to make the right decisions while still giving them a choice, then there will be little problems.

It should be obvious that I am very Socially Conservative, but I believe that we need a more pragmatic approach if we are to achieve a conservative society.

[[File:Cultural Nationalism.png]] The Necessity of Preserving Culture [[File:Cultural Nationalism.png]]
Race and ethnicity are obvious constructs that have no worth, as I will explain later in this section. That means culture is the only thing that makes our nation unique. Without our culture, we are not even a nation, just a depressing mess with no shared identity. Modern America is a decadent mess of mindless consumerism and multiculturalism, hence I believe we must return to tradition and purge the country with a culture that is best for the American people, sparking national rebirth. A shared collective identity and culture achieved through integration and assimilation will truly unify the people and allow them not to fight each other because of their different backgrounds, but look at each other and stand side by side as if they were brothers in blood.

[[File:Conserv.png]] The Problem With Modern Conservatism [[File:Conserv.png]]
Modern American Conservatism is spineless. They are not fighting as hard as they should. Again and again, we just let these barbarians enact these reforms and destroy the culture that makes us who we are. Strip us of the community and purpose we feel from this and replace it with mindless, unfettered hedonism that gives us no purpose or community, just emptiness. We see children constantly getting indoctrinated by these filth, encouraging the youth to accept, or even participate in degeneracy, which is absolutely deplorable & frightening. The conservatives know this, but they won't speak up or they will just do irrational things that won't help anything. The Conservative movement in America is compromised and filled with soft Libertarians who think they can contain Progressivism through debating, which is pathetic. We must rejuvenate the Conservative movement.

[[File:Pat.png]] Gender [[File:Mat-0.png]]
Gender roles exist because after God made man and woman, us humans realized that there are some significant differences between the two genders, man and woman, so we came up with these gender roles because we realized that there are certain things that each gender is best at. These roles worked, so we kept them for thousands of years, ever since the hunter-gatherer times. Although I support First-Wave Feminism, the second wave and after is a net-negative for society, as it encourages women to not get married, start a family, or raise children, and instead leads them down a path of decadence, as well as population decline throughout many nations. People say that rejecting gender roles gets one to "act like themselves", when they aren't. They are unsatisfied, so they decide to act like another gender so they can satisfy themselves instead of accepting what is best for them. The state should, however, encourage gender roles, not necessarily enforce them, though the state should take action if they are not the norm. Women should be allowed to work, but their first duty is to be homemakers and care for children, as they are naturally more nurturing. Men should provide and protect, as they are better at manual labor. It's just basic biology. Gender roles exist because one gender is better at some tasks than the other ones. There would be certain jobs reserved mainly for women, and certain jobs for men. On the gender war, it needs to end.

[[File:Gay-2021.png]] LGBT+ [[File:Gay-2021.png]]
This movement I despise. It promotes a degenerate lifestyle and mindless hedonism. These people poison the youth and march on the streets, forcing people to accept this lifestyle or their nonsensical fantasies. They are predators with masks who want to teach young children about sexuality, which is disgusting. They only care about themselves and their feelings and don't take into consideration how their actions might affect the people around them. Therefore, The LGBTQ+ movement should be eliminated from the public and shut down due to their deplorable actions. That is about the movement, but what about the actions themselves?

[[File:Gay.png]] Homosexuality [[File:Gay.png]]
Personally, I am repulsed by homosexuality, but that does not matter. I absolutely hate dark chocolate, but other people like it. The same applies to homosexuality. The reason I oppose it is mainly because of my strong Christian beliefs. Verses like Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 say that it is detestable, and Romans 1:26-27 even states that same-sex attraction is unnatural. Also, humans are just not meant for Homosexuality. Male and Female are designed to have sexual relations with each other and reproduce. However, unlike transgenderism, It does not affect anyone as long as they are not pushing it down everyone's throat or attacking our values. I believe that these people should still be allowed to exist, as long as they act modestly in public and keep this completely private. Gay "marriage" should not be recognized, and civil unions are a better option.

[[File:Trans.png]] Transgenderism and Non-Binarism [[File:Enby.png]]
Transgenderism is honestly way worse. It preys on young impressionable children and mentally unstable people who don't feel comfortable in their own body for whatever reason. Instead of helping them overcome these feelings and embracing who they really are, these filth bombard them with gnostic nonsense, encouraging them to mutilate their bodies and not inform them about the risks they are taking. Transgenderism should be destroyed from, with people getting mandatory deconversion and the groomers behind it executed. On Non-Binarism, It is the same thing, though less of an issue. There are only two genders, that is basic biology. We must give these lost people the help that they need instead of indoctrinating them with these twisted lies. People will try to discard gender & sex, calling them "social constructs", and they try to justify that by pointing out the existence of intersex people, even though that is an extremely rare birth defect. It is not supposed to happen. If a baby is born intersex then you should automatically know that SOMETHING WENT WRONG. "B-But.. muh self-expression!" They are acting not as themselves, but as someone they aren't. People should learn to accept who they are and always will be and not deny reality to fulfill some pathetic fantasy. You are stronger when you accept the facts, and embrace the truth. It is very unhealthy to lie to people, remember that.

[[File:Race.png]] Race [[File:Race.png]]
Race, on the other hand, is a construct that has no worth whatsoever. The only differences between supposed races are the amount of melanin in somebody's skin, which has nothing to do with race at all. There are no differences between races or ethnicity either, the only things one can come up with are traits gained from adaptation to their specific environments, which happens in all species. Differences in stuff like IQ and accomplishments is because of less opportunities and the environment they settled in that does not have much things, not because of their genetics. To say otherwise is a bullshit lie. Race was created to justify the inhumane actions of slavery and ethnic cleansing. Race is a threat to the integrity of the nation, so we must repair race relations and destroy racism.

[[File:Religion.png]] Religion [[File:Religion.png]]
I adhere to Confessionalism. The church should not influence state decisions and vice versa, and the people should be free to believe whatever they want(except for Satanism), as long as it does not threaten the state. Church and State should be separate. However, I still want America to be a godly nation once again. Secularism has only led to people leaving the faith, and I don't want that, for Christianity is truth. Religion is a positive thing for society that gives people hope, purpose, and community, and the state should embrace that. Christianity should be the state religion, and the state should fund missionary work throughout the nation, as well as promote christian ethics and social teachings.

[[File:CapAnti_Clerical.png]] The Church [[File:CapAnti_Clerical.png]]
I consider myself to be anti-clerical, because I oppose church authority and influence in society. The church also has a history of twisting and perverting the message of God. We should lower the influence of the church, but not religion. Religion and church are different things and that should be recognized. I believe that the religious institution can at times be threatening and never mix well with government, but Christianity itself is a true and positive force that should have great societal influence.

[[File:Scientocracy Small.png]] Science [[File:Scientocracy Small.png]]
I strongly support science despite being very christian. Science and God are very compatible with each other, and science has helped us find many truths and can continue to help us with many things. I still believe that the Bible is infallible, but I believe that biblical text is very compatible with science, and it helped science advance and be where it is today. I do think that the scientific community is going down a bad path that fights with God. It is important that God and science coexist, as they have shown that they can. We just need to learn to embrace them both at once. Further scientific research should be promoted and funded by the state, as well as used to possibly make better decisions & justify them.

[[File:Abort.png]] Abortion [[File:Abort.png]]
Abortion. Is. Murder. To deny that fact is ignorant. You are killing a child by getting an Abortion, because it is a developing human. Just because it is in the womb does not make it any less of a human. They absorb nutrients, breathe, have a heartbeat, just like every other human. If they aren't alive, then they are dead. But they are not dead, as they can be killed, just how abortion kills them. "WeLL It'S HeR PrOpeRTy", listen here dipshit, If someone raped and then killed a child in their house, are they let off the hook because it was in their property? Well, I fucking hope not. Having difficulties with raising the child does not justify killing it, as the state will provide for you, and putting them up for adoption is always an option. In cases of rape, why should the child be punished for the father's crimes? The only time it would be allowed is if the mother is most likely going to die.

[[File:Transh.png]] Technology [[File:Anprim.png]]
I support technological advancement. When it comes to technology, I support technological advancement, though I think that we should be careful when advancing in technology so we don't end up like. I do think that further technological advancement is good, as it would increase quality of life and make things so much easier, as well as keep our nation strong. That being said, I support Reactionary Modernism, because I support modern technology and improving technology while expressing the need to respect and protect nature and tradition, rejecting  cultural progressivism. We should make sure machines don't take our jobs but help humans with doing them(Though I support automation in some parts of the economy), mainly in things such as building and productions of goods, though humans should be able to control it all. Space exploration, weaponry, and ending diseases/birth defects through gene editing should be the top priority in technological advancements. I do believe that we should not become the technology, but use technology so humans can reach their fullest genetic potential, thus creating a true superhuman.

[[File:Eugen.png]] Eugenics [[File:Eugen.png]]
This is a tricky one. I believe that we must better the human race by preventing these disabilities and defects from appearing, but I don't want to deny the disabled life because of something they can't control. We should instead use CRISPR gene editing to remove these imperfections from humans, as that is the best way, it removes these undesirable qualities from humans and later generations while not preventing them from living. No child or parent should have to go through a life like this, and people who oppose getting rid of these qualities because of "muh diversity" or "ableism" are childish and irrational.

[[File:Envi.png]] Environment [[File:Envi.png]]
The environment is God's grand gift to us humans. It is massive and beautiful, and it is something that we can connect with, something we need, an important part of the human way of life. I oppose polluting energy, so we should slowly switch to nuclear energy and solar power, as banning fossil fuels altogether would be unwise and start an economic crisis, and I oppose animal fighting, as pets are meant to be protected and cared for, not fighting to the death for entertainment. I also would like to build more national parks and implement environmental regulations. We can better protect the environment and even improve it using better technology, which would make me a bright-green environmentalist. However, Humans are still superior to nature. We have civilization, we have intelligence, we were given the dominion over earth by God himself, we are the prized creation. Despite this, we are not still here to destroy the environment, but take care of it. We should not let it hold us back either. Nature is an important part of the nation and its heritage that should be protected.

I am an American Ultranationalist, but I do not support Isolationism, as it would prevent America from keeping up with other nations and only hold back the country. I am in favor of Militarism, believing that America should expand some more and control the oceans that surround us in order to intimidate other nations and protect our nation, interests, influence, and position.

[[File:Jingoism.png]] Foreign Policy [[File:Jingoism.png]]
I seek to turn America into a Hyperpower, which is a step above a superpower. To achieve this, I would use a moderate hawkish policy. We should take action when anything seriously threatens America & its allies, but if it poses no threat to us, we will leave it alone. I am also a Militarist that wants America to conquer Canada, as well as take back territory from the pacific like micronesia. Any nation that gets in the way of America and its status as a superpower/hyperpower is an enemy that must be pacified as quickly as possible.

[[File:Atlanticism.png]] Geopolitics [[File:NeoComBall.png]]
I am pro-west for the most part, but I am not fond of the neoliberal path my country and the rest of the western bloc has chosen. I am sympathetic to the way things are handled in the east, but at the end of the day they are Soviet nostalgics that threaten America and our hegemony over the world. So, I consider myself to be western adjacent. If the west were to distance themselves from Neoliberalism, which I hope they do, then I would support them more.

[[File:Sinophobia.png]] The Chinese Question [[File:Sinophobia.png]]
China is the largest threat to America as of now, and they are increasingly threatening our positions in Taiwan and acting more hostile towards us, supporting the regimes in Iran and North Korea. We should put most of our energy into combating the Chinese. I don't believe in making any deals with them, as that does not do anything to prevent their rise and threaten our position. We must prevent the rise of China and act more aggressively towards them. We should compete with them in trade with Europe using Neo-Mercantilist methods and slowly trade less with China, cutting off trade once we are able to. I also believe that a strong Russia on our side(or at least not against us) would cripple Chinese influence, though Russia could possibly threaten our hyperpower status, so we would have to keep them at bay as well.

[[File:Isolationist.png]] Immigration Policy [[File:Isolationist.png]]
I believe in a strict immigration policy. Illegal immigration would not be tolerated at all, and legal immigration would be very hard. Immigrants with talent should be let in but these immigrants should have to go through a test and multiple checks to enter and having to go through an assimilation process when they are let in. We should also have more protection along the southern border, such as gates and guards. I do think that refugees who are coming due to a war, persecution, or natural disaster should be accepted, but they should have to go through the same test and checks in order to enter. If they do not meet the criteria, they should be deported back to the country they came from.

[[File:Neoimp.png]] Intervention [[File:Neoimp.png]]
I believe that we should not intervene too much. Historically, we have militarily intervened in conflicts that have nothing to do with us, losing countless lives and causing a mess that nobody is willing to clean up, with examples being Iraq, Libya, and Serbia. Now, if our national security is threatened in any way, then we should intervene, without a doubt. I also think that intervention in the cold war was justified to fight the spread of icky communism and Soviet influence to protect our own positions, and we should do it again if necessary, but foreign military invasions and bombings should be very rare occurrences. We should instead protect and spread foreign influence through proxy wars, coup d'etat, and rigging elections, because that is a better option than wars that do no good.

[[File:Cball-NATO.png]] Alliances [[File:Cball-NATO.png]]
NATO is useful to combat rivals of America and hold on to our great influence, but once all of our rivals are defeated and America has achieved hyperpower status, then there will be no point for the alliance, and it will probably collapse. I don't think America should be responsible for what happens to Europe anyways, unless it somehow threatens us, which would be very unlikely. We would still keep influence over Europe through the Neo-Mercantilist trade system and make them dependent on our trade, but we would not interfere with their issues, and they would not interfere with ours. Alliances are a great tool to achieve dominance, but once we have, they will only hold us back and lead to globalism. America is to stand alone.

=Relationships=

User Test
Civil Axis


 * [[File:Anego.png]] Egoist (+0)
 * [[File:Awaj.png]] Anarchist (+0)
 * [[File:Minarchist.png]] Minarchist (+1)
 * [[File:Libertarian.png]] Libertarian (+3)
 * [[File:Moder.png]] Moderate (+5)
 * [[File:Statist.png]] Statist (+7)
 * [[File:Sec.png]] Authoritarian (+10)
 * [[File:Totalitarian.png]] Totalitarian (+8)
 * [[File:Ingsocf.png]] Orwellian (0)

Type of Rule


 * [[File:Dem.png]] Representative Democracy (+3)
 * [[File:Semidirect.png]] Semi-Direct Democracy (+1)
 * [[File:Directdem.png]] Direct Democracy (+0)
 * [[File:DemML.png]] People's Democracy (+0)
 * [[File:Authdem.png]] Authoritarian Democracy (+5)
 * [[File:Technocracy.png]] Technocracy (+10)
 * [[File:AntiDem.png]] Anti-Democracy (+10)
 * [[File:Totdem.png]] Totalitarian Democracy (+8)

Economic Axis


 * [[File:Communalist.png]] Communalist (+0)
 * [[File:Commie.png]] Communist (+0)
 * [[File:Soc-h.png]] Socialist (+3)
 * [[File:Welf.png]] Welfarist (+8)
 * [[File:Moder.png]] Moderate (+10)
 * [[File:Lib.png]] Economic Liberalism (+8)
 * [[File:Cap.png]] Capitalist (+7)
 * [[File:Darwinist.png]] Darwinist (+0)

Economic Freedom


 * [[File:Anpostleft.png]] Anti-Economy (+0)
 * [[File:Dirigisme.png]] Dirigisme (+7)
 * [[File:Regulationism.png]] Regulated (+10)
 * [[File:Hayek.png]] Free Market (+5)
 * [[File:Austrobert.png]] Laissez-Faire (+0)

Diplomatic Axis


 * [[File:World Federalism2.png]] World Federalist (+0)
 * [[File:World.png]] Globalist (+0)
 * [[File:Globnat.png]] Alter-Globalist (+0)
 * [[File:Cosmo.png]] Cosmopolitan (+1)
 * [[File:Internation.png]] Internationalist (+3)
 * [[File:Moder.png]] Moderate (+5)
 * [[File:Modnat.png]] Patriotic (+8)
 * [[File:Nation.png]] Nationalist (+10)
 * [[File:Ultranat.png]] Ultranationalist (+10)
 * [[File:Ethnonat.png]] Ethnonationalist (+3)
 * [[File:Racenat.png]] Racial Nationalist (+0)

Geopolitics


 * [[File:Cball-NATO.png]] West (+10)
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] Western Adjacent (+10)
 * [[File:NAM.png]] Other/Non-Aligned (+5)
 * [[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Eastern Adjacent (+3)
 * [[File:Euras.png]] East (+1)

Cultural Axis


 * [[File:InfRevolutionaryism.png]] Revolutionary (+0)
 * [[File:Prgess.png]] Progressive (+0)
 * [[File:Rfrm.png]] Reformist (+3)
 * [[File:Progconf.png]] Centrist (+5)
 * [[File:ModTrad.png]] Conservative (+8)
 * [[File:Trad.png]] Traditionalist (+10)
 * [[File:InfReactionaryism.png]] Reactionary (+8)

Technological Axis


 * [[File:Prim.png]] Primal (+0)
 * [[File:Anprim.png]] Primitivist (+0)
 * [[File:Farm.png]] Pre-Industrial (+0)
 * [[File:Decel.png]] Deceleration (+3)
 * [[File:Moder.png]] Moderate (+5)
 * [[File:Accel.png]] Acceleration (+8)
 * [[file:Post-Industrialism.png]] Automated (+10)
 * [[File:Transh.png]] Transhumanist (+5)
 * [[File:POSTHUMANISMICON.png]] Posthumanist (+0)

Environmental Axis


 * [[File:VHMent.png]] Human Extinction (+0)
 * [[File:Ecofash.png]] Eco-Fascism (+5)
 * [[File:Deepe.png]] Deep Ecology (+1)
 * [[File:Envi.png]] Environmentalist (+10)
 * [[File:Moder.png]] Moderate (+10)
 * [[File:Indust.png]] Industrialist (+10)
 * [[File:HumanNat.png]] Anthropocentric (+5)
 * [[File:AnEn.png]] Pollution (+0)
 * [[File:Posadist.png]] Planetary Destruction (+0)

Neurological Axis


 * [[File:Utsoc.png]] Utopian (+0)
 * [[File:Hoxha.png]] Dogmatic (+0)
 * [[File:Idealist.png]] Idealist (+5)
 * [[File:Moder.png]] Moderate (+8)
 * [[File:Mach.png]] Realist (+10)
 * [[File:Pragmat.png]] Pragmatist (+10)
 * [[File:Technocracy.png]] Rational (+7)
 * [[File:Dystoball.png]] Dystopian (+0)

Results

 * - 100/100
 * - 28/100
 * - 85/100
 * [[File:NeoGlencoe.png]] Neo-Glencoeism- 68/100
 * - 69/100 (Nice)

Relations

 * -|Canon =

[[File:Mega No.png]] Cringe

 * -|Self-Inserts =

[[File:Mega Yes.png]] Revolutionaries

 * - Fellow Christian conservative nationalist. You also support capitalism with implied third positionism, which is based too. You are civically liberal, but you have disdain democracy and are auth-leaning, so that can be forgiven. I do think that you should be less isolationist though. Pretty based overall.

[[File:Meh.png]] Mixed
Neo-Glencoeism - It's a mixed bag. Your economics are pretty good, Meritocratic Capitalism is a big W, though outright abolishing PWA would be unwise, minimizing it and letting it fade away is a better idea. Nationalization of banks and core industries are also good, and so is improvement of the infrastructure, which is definitely needed. Social capitalism is also cool. Your civics are decent, Technocracy is based, and the legislature should elect the president, but there is no point in keeping the house. A national, disciplined police agency is also good, but why the fuck are you sympathetic to antifa? That is a contradiction. On to your foreign policy, it's good that you dropped the multi-polar world stuff and want to make America a hyperpower using a hawkish policy(Though I prefer a more moderate one), so that's based. On to your social views, this "Keeping America pure" shit is kind of wild. I don't want to be deported from the country I love due to standing against decadence and for reason. I would not even do that, if one is ashamed to be American, then I would happily send them somewhere else, but enemies should be reeducated instead. Overall, it really isn't not bad, but you are a liberal who champions Individualism, and your social views are pretty shitty. Thus, you get put in the mixed tier.

[[File:Mega No.png]] Abominations

 * [[File:Murb.png]] Neo-Murba - I will always respect nationalists and irredentists, but you are an ultroid, which is cringe. I see that you believe that communism best expresses humans and self-expression is of human nature, but so is trying to be the best. Communism restricts the ability to succeed, and humans will always strive to be better and succeed, that is natural for us. Capitalism better suits human nature because Communism forces us to be altruistic, prevents success, and opposes innovation and creativity, all of which do not align with human nature. Also, how can you be a cultural nationalist and a revprog at the same time? It could work with [[File:NatRev.png]] National Palingenisis, but the culture that they have had for so long forms an identity, changing it all would mean changing the identity. You can't change identity,and identity comes with culture. Overall, it's pretty bad, could be worse though.

=Comments=


 * [[File:Murb.png]] Neo-Murba - add me?
 * [[File:Levathon.png]] - Will do.
 * - Your page may not be finished, but it is still ultra-based!
 * - Ditto.
 * [[File:NeoGlencoe.png]] Neo-Glencoeism- Not very based. Decent economics though
 * - On your social section, you claim that race is a social construct, but how do you justify things such as physical differences, (Asians being shorter, whites being the only ones with blond hair and blue/green eyes, etc.) different races being more or less prone to different diseases, or the fact that bone marrow can only be donated to people of the same race? I'm just curious, because I just want to know your opinion.
 * [[File:Levathon.png]] - Hair and eye differences are because of melanin, which also determines skin color. Whether they are affected by certain diseases or not is because they have adapted to their environment and gotten used to these diseases. On the physical differences, it is most likely because of Inheritance of these, these variations exist as mutations occur, or just adapting to their environment, though I could be wrong on that one.
 * - What about bone marrow transplants, though? Although this question is mainly to discuss scientific differences with you, as I am politically pretty much the same area as you are with race, despite believing in race realism.
 * [[File:Levathon.png]] I think that it is just a very low chance, as they inherited different things.
 * - It‘s pretty Cringe from you Christian Rightists to put Jesus in the „likes“ section. The biblical Jesus is a very complicated figure, but I think it’s pretty obvious that his ideology does not align with yours. Just replace „Jesus“ with „My Christian Heritage“ or something like that.
 * [[File:Levathon.png]] - No.
 * - Add me?
 * [[File:Levathon.png]] - Will get to it.
 * [[File:NeoGlencoe.png]] Neo-Glencoeism- Add me?
 * [[File:Levathon.png]] - Will do.
 * [[File:NeoGlencoe.png]] Neo-Glencoeism- I have dropped the multi-polar world shtick and now want america to be a hyper power
 * Based. I'll update it soon. In the mean time, add me?
 * [[File:NeoGlencoe.png]] Neo-Glencoeism- will get on it
 * [[File:NeoGlencoe.png]] Neo-Glencoeism- done

=Navbox=