Syntropianism/Relations

__NOCC____NOTC____INDEX__

{{#css:

.portable-infobox{border:10px solid #0080c0;border-radius:16px!important} .portable-infobox.pi-background{background-color:#000a0f} }


 * , a {line-height:22px;scroll-behavior:smooth;scrollbar-width:thin;scrollbar-color: #0080c0 #006080;transition:.2s ease-in-out;font-weight:600;}

body #mw-content-text {color:#ffffff;} .cosmos-button-primary {background: #0080c0} .cosmos-button-secondary {background: #0080c0} .cosmos-header {background-image: #0080c0; z-index:auto;}
 * 1) cosmos-banner {background: #0080c0!important;height:64px!important;}
 * 2) cosmos-footer {display:none!important;}
 * 3) cosmos-page-header {padding:0px!important;}
 * 1) mw-content, #catlinks {background:#000a0f;}:
 * 1) mw-content-wrapper {width:1690;max-width:100%;padding:0;}

body > #mw-content-container {padding:0}
 * 1) mw-content-wrapper {border:solid 8px #0080c0;box-shadow:0px 0px 32px #0080c0;border-radius:8px;width:1690px;max-width:100%;padding:0px;margin:160px auto;}
 * 2) mw-content {box-shadow:inset 0px 0px 64px #000000;padding:64px;}


 * 1) {text-shadow: 0px 0px 7px, 0px 0px 2px }

.cosmos-button-primary{background-color:#0080c0;color:#ffffff} td, th, table {padding:8px;box-shadow:inset 0px 0px 4px #000000;} table {background-color:#000000;width:60%;border-collapse:collapse;text-align:center;color:#ffffff;font-weight:600;} .2x2infobox {color:#ffffff;width:320px;border:solid 8px #0080c0;box-shadow:0px 0px 16px #0080c0;border-radius:8px;float:right;margin-left:16px;} }}
 * 1) cosmos-pageBody-content {padding:0px;width:100%;}
 * 1) mw-content a:not(.new) {color: #ffffff;text-decoration: none;}
 * 2) mw-content-container {padding:0px}
 * 3) CosmosRailWrapper {display:none;}

Self - Insert Ideologies will be ordert by which most prominent Anti - Matthist Viewpoint they hold.

= Tyrannical Majoritarians  Reserved for Democrats and non Command Economy Socialists  =


 * And you are the perfect example of a standard German Politician. You loudly proclaim to be a staunched Individualist, yet you want to regulate the most individualistic Structure, the Market, to Death while subjecting the Individual to Mob Rule and supporting Nationalism. Your Economy is atrocious, tyrannical and inefficient and you are a hedonistic Degenerate.


 * Your economic Policies are as good as it gets for Cooperatism, as you still support Markets, private Property and somewhat vertical Structures, but Workplace Democracy and Regulationism are tyrannical and inefficient. Same applies for your Governance, as you support as Technocracy within the democratic Framework. Socially, your Harm Principal is something like my Natural Rights Theory but Secular, so that is good, and you like Science and Technology, but otherwise to inclusive and environmentalist.


 * This is basically the same as Glencoe without the redeeming Qualities of Scientocracy, Technologism and Private Property. In Addition, you claim that two of your Core Values are "Democracy" and "Liberty", which is contradictory as Democracy is literally the Tyranny of the Majority. Generally I am really sceptical of your Overemphasis on Nature and the underlying Tone, that the Individual is not capable of managing its own economic and private Life, while allowing it to decide for others though Voting.

= Overprotective Paternalists  Reserved for Paternalists afraid the Individuals' Actions' Consequences  =


 * You claim to care for "the People", yet you strip "the People" of Freedom of Assembly, Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Choice. Either you do not care for "the People" and solely for maintaining the States Legitimacy, or you are misguided and believe that the Individual has to be overly monitored in Order to achieve Safety and Prosperity.


 * I appreciate that you have become more liberal recently, but you are a still a massive Paternalist and restrict Individual Freedoms. You also are just a Nietzschean, because it justifies your Support for State - backed Elites, like Monopolies. Also, you don't seem to understand that "Communitarian Means, Individualist Ends" is contradictory and that you can't give Individuals Rights if you don't let said Individuals appreciate/suffer the Consequences of their Actions.

= Blind Collectivists  Reserved for hardcore Socialists and tribalist - Nationalists  =


 * This is the very Definition of the Category I put you in. Cringe Economics, cringe Governance, mostly cringe Society. Christianity is a Religion of Property (Ezekiel 46:18; Deuteronomy 19:14), Autonomy (Galatians 6:5; Romans 14:12; Galatians 5:1; John 8:32; 1 Corinthians 10:23), Originality (Psalm 139:14; Jeremiah 1:5) and Curiosity (Proverbs 25:2; Proverbs 4:7; Colossians 2:2-3; Ecclesiastes 3:11; ). Seriously, I would like to know your Interpretation of the Bible.


 * An actually horrible Ideology. Your Economics are the best Part aside from Governance, but your Regulationsim, Welfareism and Nationalisation Efforts are highly immoral and negatively impact Productivity. Technocracy is based, so that is good. But your Totalitarianism and Chauvinism supress Originality, Ambition, Curiosity, the inalienable Rights of the Individual and everything else great about Individualism. Most ironically, you want to destroy Culture, because it is unfaustian, yet oppose Individualism while not seeing that Culture and Traditions form around the faustian Spirit in a truly free Society while upholding social Standards.


 * Your Overemphasis on Identity is super cringe and your understanding of Capitalism is poor. And while your Fight against Degeneracy is admirable, you don't seem to realize that Coercion and Violence is just as immoral as Homosexuality and Zoosexuality. Generally, your Allegiance is not with God and yourself, but with your identarian Group, which is retardet and quite degenerate.

= Fearful Biocentrists  Reserved for Bioconservatives and Tree Huggers  =


 * I do not get where you Obsession with Separation or you Nature Fetish come from, but your Ideals stand in the Way of Technocapital and the faustian Spirit. In Addition, I hate your overly paternal and tyrannical social Policy, but at least you see that Democracy is a Hoax.


 * I cannot get over how contradictory this is. If you destroy industrial Society, but do not implement Regulation to prevent another industrial Revolution, the Capitalists will just reinvent industrial Technology. And if you want to impose such Regulation, you are not a Laissez - Fairist. Also, many of your social Views like Ethic Nationalism, your distaste for Curiosity and Caste Society are in contrast to Christian Teaching. I also get the feeling, but I might be entirely wrong, that you do not support Reaction because you love Freedom, which would be noble Foolishness, but that you love Freedom because you think it is a consequence of Reaction.

= Lawless Anarchists  Reserved for Anarchists duh  =


 * Literally a modern Take on Utopia, cringe. Also, Gift Economy, cringe. Also, Democracy, cringe.

= Individualist Vanguardists  Reserved for the Vanguard of Freedom  =


 * Even tho we have small differences, for Example regarding Free Speech and hereditary Governance, but we are still both Christian transhumanist Austrolibertarians with a Distaste for Democracy and believe in State - Protected Liberty.


 * While our philosophical staring Points are as different as they could be, we both came to the Conclusions of rugged Individualism and Faustianism. Our political Goals are, consequently, really simmilar. The only Thing I really dislike is your rather . . . extreme Atheism.