User:Chirotesla/Chirotesla Thought (Old design 2)

is an ideology which succeeded, economically , civically (leaning on  authoritarian), culturally  (in general), , and. I have a strong focus on economics and working classes because I thinks that economic issues are matter.

I'm strongly against, , , , and ideologies.

I'm still somewhat same to. That's why I have to start refreshment of his ideology view.

Tip: Click an element to scroll to it

=   =

All people must have equal opportunity to fulfill their potential, and positions shall be appointed based on their merits rather than their identities (eg: genders, races, ethnics, etc).

We must focus on the practical or logical response. We must address problems with logical and practical approaches and solutions. We must reject or revise ideas that are utopian, unrealistic, unlogical, and unpractical.

We must punish crimes based on punishments that fit on crimes with an "eye for an eye" being the guiding, but not absolute, principle behind the justice system.

We must accelerate to lead people to prosperity. We must maintain our culture while progressing society to prosperity and modernity. It is important for a nation and society to develop.

The nation should be free to govern itself and independent from outside interruption (self-determination). We should protect and promote the moral, spiritual, and humanistic values of our nation. We'll be proud of our nation for what they have achieved, but we should acknowledge our failures and mistakes. We must believe in   that obeys to, , , and has no. Unity and integrity are important for the nation because the nation will be able to maintain its existence and support it as a state or nation. That's why we must refuse to let arbitrary, , , and divide and tear the nation apart. People who oppose nationalism and patriotism will get recognized as self-haters or "people that are going against themselves".

=   =

I'm civically centre-authoritarian. I support direct democracy and civil liberties. I believe that government is needed to represent and protect people.

I belive that a moderate amount of federalism is way for me. Unitary government is always frequent inefficiency in solving internal problems. I'm against over-centralization government (just unitary) because it can't representative people as well. I believe that local government should exist, but they should have to follow national laws.

I'm mixed between reform and revolution. In democratic society, I frequently prefer reformism. He also prefers revolution when situations is like (eg: Cuba under Batista dictatorship, etc). Bloodless revolution is preferable to bloody revolution.

I support the right to vote. I believe that voter should be citizen.

I believe in preservation of civil liberties and firmly support the freedom of speech. Free speech is almost absolute. Right to free speech shall not to get infringed. I despise the anti-hate speech law because I believe that they are discriminatory in nature and they enforce the woke agenda, as hate speech laws wish to protect certain groups from harm through safe spaces, the supremacists of said groups can take advantage of this and discriminate others not affected by those laws and get off scot-free without harm.

I wish to do in order to implement freedom of speech act:
 * Protection of online privacy. (The government shouldn't be able to punish you, except you're part of an armed militant that tries to organize on Telegram or advocate violence and terrorism in general)
 * Repealment of most online hate speech laws that prohibit insulting/mocking other sexual orientations, etc.

I also think that the safety of the people is important, which is why I support the national security. I'm against current cultural liberalism and economic liberalism and seeing them as degenerate.

I'm economically left-wing ideology that has economics that comprise of a fusion between, , , and. I believe that workers must own the means of production through workers' cooperatives in a. I'm a supporter of the cooperative, strong welfare state, trade union, economic democracy, balance between free trade and protectionism, and workers' self-management.

I prefer a market in order to be efficient. will be implemented as altenative to and. Regulations are necessary in order to keep market humane. Co-ops would be encouraged them, but not forced. He thinks that multiple versions of a product are a good thing, as it will encourage a company to create better quality of products and that it will inspire innovation, which is good for the economy.

I acknowledge see the flaws of and. However I believe that some good capitalists and some good communists exist. In generally speaking, I hate communism for creating a bigger government that could lead to totalitarianism, extensive bureaucracy, focusing on workers too much while not giving shit about economics, and not letting the minds of people walk free when it comes to production, and capitalism for allowing exploitative practices to exist.

I believe that workers must own the means of production through workers' cooperatives in. Workers will be encouraged to form their own cooperative, NOT force. The workers must not have the lowest level of control and they should have a notable control via democratic economic representation. The workers also must be able to decide how they are treated and how they want to operate the business. The workers also must be able to manage the enterprise through assemblies. The goal of the self-management is improving performance by granting workers greater autonomy in their day-to-day operations, boosting morale, and reducing alienation. That's I support workplace democracy and workers' self-management

I support the welfare state. I believe in a strong welfare state. I support free healthcare, but with multiple providers and all covered by taxes. I support welfare for the disabled people. I believe that one capable of working that refuses to do so should not expect society's support. I follow the quote "one who does not work, neither shall he eat" which was stated by Vladimir Lenin.

According private-public axis, there will be a mix of private and public enterprises. Public enterprises would include big businesses, major industries, any essential services, education, healthcare, energy, and public transportation. Those public enterprises will have guilds formed based on which category each of them fits into. Chirotesla believes that private property should be exist, but it is limited. I think that places like houses, some farms, and small/medium businesses should be private.

I believe that energy will be public and the state will begin transitioning to green energy. All other industries that produce carbon footprint should be forced to make the transition as well.

I oppose landlord because he sees how landlordism puts property into the hand of a few elitists. Housing will be given via guilds. He is.

I call myself a supporter of fair trade policy. I believe in a balance between free trade and protectionism. I oppose both free trade and autarky (closed economy) because I acknowledge the flaws of free trade and autarky (closed economy). I see how autarky (closed economy) always leads to economic stagnation (North Korea is an example of a country that adheres to closed economy) and how free trade allows exploitative practices to exist. Bad foreign influences should be encountered.

Chirotesla is culturally centrist in general. He is lean on either side of the cultural spectrum depending on the any regions. He will be culturally conservative in the west, but he also will be culturally progressive in the third world. He advocates social equality and wants lead society to prosperity and advanced. He thinks progression and tradition are important. He has progressive aspects (eg: techological progression, legalization of soft drugs, respect for LGBT individuals, secularization, gender egalitarianism, anti-racism, removal of detrimental traditions, etc) and conservative aspects (eg: pro-family, anti-LGBT ideology, anti-sexual "liberation", preservation of non-detrimental traditions, etc). He supports interculturalism as alternative to assimilationism and multiculturalism because interculturalism allows cultural diversity. He also fights against taking over the society and sees it as threat to modern society and hypocrite. ,, and are also threat modern society and should be fought effectively. He rejects   and sees it as inhumane. He also opposes both and. He supports colorblind meritocracy which justifies every individual's merits rather than genders, ethnics, races, sexual orientations, etc.

Chirotesla strongly supports gender equality. He sees sexism as very stupid idea. He believes that sexism should be eliminated effictively in order to secure the modern society. He strongly believes there are 2 genders (especially male and female). He believes that it should be illegal to abuse women or pay one more/less for their gender. There will be no wage gap between genders, or will be any so-called "patriarchy." He supports the first and second wave of feminism.

Chirotesla also opposes the notion that women must be homemakers (unless a baby is being raised) in addition to strict gender roles (but he doesn't want to abolish them).

To him, the perfect combination is (particularly in the west, without Karen style),, and.

Chirotesla strictly believes that racism is evil and totally unacceptable in a civilized society. He believes people of all ethnic/race backgrounds should be treated with the same level of dignity and respect, as well as first and foremost as fellow individuals and human beings. He extremely supports racial egalitarianism and the principle of that people should not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their characters, and therefore wishes for a colorblind society.

He strictly opposes and, which he views them as American ideologies that have spread like viruses across the world. He believes that they have worsened race relations and are of themselves racist, as they constantly attempt to categorize people based on certain characteristics rather than viewing them as individuals, and with this, are judging people by skin color and not their character.

will be banned from being taught in schools or universities. He extremely supports the "colorblind" society where the people always justify other people's characters instead of their ethnic/race.

Chirotesla supports sexual orientation equality. He approves the right to sexuality. People with different sexual orientations shouldn't be discriminated against in the society as long they should keep their sexual orientations private. He views "it's right to mistreat people because of their sexual orientations" as unacceptable. He believes that being homosexual or bisexual is just natural. They shouldn't be discriminated because he believes in colorblind meritocracy. They shall have civil unions. He will only strongly recognize two genders, male and female. and will be strongly discouraged and recognized as woke ideas. He wishes to ban recognition of and  in any public places.

For transgender issues, Sex reassignment surgery and hormone replacement will be allowed and trans people also will be allowed to identify as the gender what they wish to. He also believes that there are gender dysphoria as the result of the mismatch between gender identity and sex at birth. He feels sympathy for transgender people and wants to expand access to gender-affirming healthcare, like sex reassignment surgery above age 18, and as long he can think. He strongly supports gender-affirming healthcare for people with gender dysphoria, due to. However, he will ban people under 18 from transitioning and see that sexual reassignment surgery should only be done on adults with regulation. Trans people will deserve recognition in official documents as well as free treatment, in case of gender dysphoria.

In conclusion, He really hates people when they either treat LGBT people as   or. He views LGBT movement as pretty toxic and subversive because he feels that LGBT community is always being infested with. He opposes the LGBT ideology and sees it as harmful to the society. will be repealed in the western world and not to be implemented in non-western world. People should have right to / LGBT community. He only knows that there are three sexual orientations, especially, , and. He believes that marriage is between one man and one woman. He believes that heterosexuality should be promoted to protect the value of traditional family. He supports.

Chirotesla advocates total separation between religion and state. He also opposes because he sees it as absolutely soulless. He extremely opposes because he see how theocratic laws can stifle progress, such as denying reproductive care for women, etc. He is the supporter of. Freedom of religion would be granted. He believes that every individuals should be able to worship. will be suppressed if they are threat to the modern society. also will not be suppressed.

He is tolerant towards Christian/Buddhist/insert religion here democracy. He is neutral over culturally religion, but he personally accepts for topics regarding family, the environment, hedonism, to a degree. He is also aware of some bad religious influences from religion, especially religious fanatics, who make their beliefs a bad name. He hates some religious people deny or reject the basic of science.

He is kind of distrustful of due to its dominance by fundamentalists, and even  has often been used as a facade for the promotion of extremist beliefs. He doesn't hate Muslims. Muslims should be able to practice their faith.

Chirotesla is personally the supporter of pro-choice, but sees hedonistic abortion or "muh abortion is human right!1!!!1!!1" as murder and calling it "infanticide". He views pro-choice as more practical to allow safe and legal access to abortion than to restrict it. When a mother bears a child that she can't support, that will burden the entire society.

Despite he defends the right of mother to abort fetus, he wants to reduce abortion incidence as well. Comprehensive sex education and affordable birth control are necessary for this to happen. After all, abortions should be safe, legal, and rare. Any pro-life people are allowed to express their pro-life views.

Chirotesla supports as the alternative to  and  because  allows cultural diversity. He sees how tend to be bigoted. He believes that immigrants must learn our culture, values, and way of life, and adapt to it, but doesn't want them to abandon their previous culture, and thinks that foreign cultures can enrich ours if done in moderation.

As for very diverse countries (eg: Indonesia, India, etc), he prefers and believes that everyone has their differences and that it will be hard to please all cultures, especially making a singular one official.

Chirotesla supports legalization of soft drugs (like cannabis, etc) and illegalization of hard drugs. He wishes to reduce use of drugs by encouraging society to stop use drugs. He believes that government should provide health program for drug addicts. The drug trafficking should be fought effectively. Despite he is against hard drugs, he also believes that alcohol should be free.

Chirotesla is surprisingly far pro-technology on the technological spectrum/axis. He strongly supports the progression of technology and science. He wants to accelerate technology in order to make a better living standard and lead society to prosperity. He believes that technology will solve a lot of problems. He is opposed to pseudo-science and believes that pseudo-science should be disappeared.

Chirotesla is against the most of big tech companies, seeing them as not only exploitative, tax evading, monopolistic, data thieves, but as tools for the to gain power over the society. He believes that the power of technological advancement shouldn't belong to the elites because it can cause negative effects for society. He sees how those elites use the technology to dictate the society on their own terms as seen in big tech. They use technology to promote woke elements such as, , , , the abolishment of free speech, removal of anti-woke individuals from their workplaces, removal of individuals who don't support woke agenda, and persecution of opposing opinions from their platfroms while allowing radical liberals to thrive. Therefore can gain power over society through that.

Chirotesla is supporter of, believing that the copyright is bad and supports the freedom of internet. He belives that laws should put people before corporations, and plans on making it illegal for corporations to get and steal personal information and data.

To him, he wishes to limit the power of the corrupt big tech elites:
 * The government will break up monopolies.
 * Implement Anti-monopolization laws.
 * Implement digital service tax.
 * Create a "free speech act".
 * Create laws that protect the data of individuals.
 * Promote alternative social media platforms that counter the woke agenda and don't actively promote wokeness.
 * Create the policy of anti-corporate and pro-workers' cooperatives
 * Promote unionization and workers' cooperatives within the corporations.

Chirotesla wishes to get rid of pollutive sources and to get rid of carbon footprint by advocating technology such as solar, wind, and nuclear energy. In addition, he also supports using technology for de-extinction (like resurrecting extinct animals).

As a long term goal, Chirotesla wants to make space colonization possible by creating space city base and terraforming planets. He thinks that space colonization is important to our humanity. He thinks that human can't survive in many years from now without colonizing space because Earth will run out of space and that people will have to move elsewhere.

Chirotesla supports environmental protection. He wishes to ban littering and sanction someone who has caught littering. He wishes to keep the city clean. He believes that climate change and global warming are both real and the biggest threat to humanity. He views climate change/global warming denial as stupid. He supports environmental regulation and carbon tax. He strongly opposes fossil energy and wants to replace them with nuclear energy/electric.

Chirotesla is. He wants to work with other countries to build new technology and have good relations with the world. He is also avoiding economic globalization and seeing it as harmful.

Chirotesla is the, being proud of the country, but still respecting and taking inspiration from others. He also opposes the most forms of nationalism, especially, , , etc.

Chirotesla is the centrist on the axis between military and pacifism. He also believes that military is needed to protect the nation from any threats. He also opposes the stratocracies and the idea of military should be used to play role in invasion/unnecessarily entering foreign conflicts. He doesn't want to waste of money for military spending and dislikes conscription. If country is at very dangerous situations, he will only endorse military spending more and conscription.

He supports the national self-determination. He also wishes to get rid of in order to make humanity better. He is and opposing, but he is pro international cooperation. He also believes that intervention is only necessary in cases such as a country struggling fight against (counter-imperialism), a country commiting genocide (eg: Nazi Germany committed genocide against people Nazis consider inferior), etc.

Chirotesla wants to make society prosperous by progressing technology, supporting environmentalism, creating more new jobs, and encouraging them to innovate. He wants to create a developed society while preserving culture and non-detrimental traditions. He wants to end climate change and global warming by progressing technology, discovering new technology, and protecting the environment. He also wants to strive for colorblind meritocratic society where every individual’s merits will be judged instead of religion, race, ethnic, sexual identity, gender, and any other factor. Pre-modernist, post-modernist, pseudo-science, and tribalist elements would disappear.

=   =

Chirotesla Thought flag.png
 * WIP

=   = Chirotesla is often pretty friendly. He often speaks softly and politely. He oftens does not care about each other's political views in real life, any PCB wikis, and other wikis. He is pretty and rejecting ideas that are very utopian, such as,  (I think that stateless classless moneyless society seems unrealistic to get achieved), and more. He oftens being enraged when coming across. He sees pink ideologies (like, , etc) as degenerate and a threat to modern society. He can be more friendly towards moderate pink ideologies (like, etc). He also can accept. He is also sometimes enraged when coming across reactionary ideologies (like feudalism, anti-enlightenment, reactionarism, etc). He sees reactionary ideologies as inhumane and scary. He also sometimes gets being uncomfortable towards unironic and. He can be friendly towards when they are not extreme, but he hates traditionalism as ideologically in general. He dislikes and sees it as degenerate. Honestly, he views people's character content instead of their political views (such as conservative, fascist, tankie, pink cap, etc).

=   = WIP

=   =

=   =
 * -|General=

[[File:Monkeyzz-Enlightenment.png]] Enlightenment [[File:Enlightnenment.png]]:

 * - LITERALLY ME! my praxis economic view. I believe that planned socialism is always bounding to fail.
 * - MY IDEOLOGY TOO! a based conservative leftists against the degenerate woke imperialist capitalists and neolibs!
 * - the best form of capitalism who taught me how evil is landlords! LAND IS FOR ALL PEOPLE! YES DUDE WE SHALL GIVE ALL LANDLORDS MAO ZEDONG TREATMENTS!
 * - MY IDEOLOGY TOO! upgraded version of georgism!
 * - your economic view is very closer for my view. Cool!
 * - upgraded version of, very based.
 * - KUASA UNTUK RAKYAT!!!
 * - Based system! Long live republic!
 * Enlightnenment.png - Enlightenment is MEGABASED!
 * & - BASED! BROTHERHOOD AND UNITY! Nationalism is enlightenment ideal! I refuse to let arbitrary ethnic, racial, religious, and cultural divisions divide and tear the nation apart. YESS DUDE WE F*CK Racenat.png  Ethnonat.png!
 * - my exact social views! Progression and tradition are important! We must conserve past glory things and progress to the brighter future! Yes I lean on either side of the cultural spectrum depending on the any regions.
 * & - I defend both you! I'm an advocate for TRUE gender equality! the sexism shall perish if both man and woman respect one another like how they wish to get being respected. I feel that some of your followers take it a bit too far sometimes. Womans are human too! man are human too! They shall have equal rights and respects.
 * - socialism + environmentalism = the perfection!
 * - We should care about the climate change issues while preserving non-detrimental traditions!
 * - Free speech is based! censorship against free speech is bad! censorship against free speech by woketards is cringe!
 * - we need to separate religion from the state! but we shouldn't separate religion from the society. Plus, I'm doubtful about culturally religion, but I personally accept many Christian morals.
 * (Joke) - GAMING MOMENTO! This ideology is very based! [[File:Troll.png]]
 * (Joke) - GAMING MOMENTO! Based gamer against intellectuals and glasses! ANTI-GLASSES GANG!

[[File:Yes.png]] Based:

 * - Based for a moderatist if I'm more economically left than you.
 * - based, this is me. However, you need to be a bit more revolutionary. Revolutionary DemSoc seems interesting...
 * - meh liberal! A fellow workplace democracy enjoyer! sadly, most of this ideology followers are krinj, such as Vaush, AOC, etc. Mandela is based. This is tolerable libtard here. Don't be confused me with you.
 * - probably good form of capitalism! Shame that you are not capitalism's dominant model. Also f*cking shame that is already capitalism’s dominant model I think.
 * - Yes! Enlightenment, secularism, technological progress, and social equality are great idea. True progressiveness. it is perfect for the third world! yeah western/wokeist progressive is pseudo-progressive, not real progressive!
 * - good, but there should be an election.
 * - Positive Factual, Empiricism, Scientific Methodology!
 * - ummm interesting... but is very scary and unrealistic.
 * - umm that's good! plus, we should open market!
 * - we should use green technology to protect the environment. Bright green environmentalism is the best way to protecc the Earth!
 * - yeah I'm leaning on authoritarian left. of course we need strong state to fight against totalitarianism! yeah totalitarianism corrupts the spirit of human!

Regional

 * - based! Soekarno was based!
 * - my inspiration! me, but authoritarian. united people regardless ethnics/races, defeated fashoids and nazis in Yugoslavia, created non-aligned movement which is neutral over west and east block, market socialism, and welfarism? What can I say except "megabased"? Please cool down with the IMF loans.
 * - replaced old absolute monarchy with republic state, industrialized Turkey, secularism, populism, and science? What can I say except "megabased"?
 * - Soekarno was based against imperialism and colonialism although he is too economically left for my taste!
 * - freed Vietnam from Fr*nch Imperialists, Japs, and Americans? What can I say except "megabased"? Yes Fr*nch empire deserved to get collapsed. You've inspired the global anti-imperialism. LONG LIVE UNCLE HO! BASED!
 * - seems good economics! I'm sympathetic towards you.

[[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Kinda based:

 * - good economics if you're too moderate for me and not far enough as leftism, but MANY OF YOUR ADHERENTS are cringe. Modern Socdem is really krinj. Jacobo Arbenz and Mohammad Mosaddegh are truly based socdems. Sadly, you're fallen because many of your adherents do nothing, but serve the neoliberal elites and the wokes.
 * - ummm that's good idea. Washington and enlightenment philosophers were very based. But it's still outdated now. There is a founder of capitalism called Adam Smith who was the follower of Classical Liberalism (although Adam Smith opposes landlords which was based). Shame that modern liberalism is pretty degenerate and corrupted by wokes. Nah I'm not fan of economic liberalism. Overall it is still far better than modern liberalism.
 * - Trade unions, nationalism, and non-detrimental traditions are based. Wait! a lot of this ideology followers are mostly extreme conservative, fascist, and ultranationalist. Shame that most syndies are anarchist rather than this ideology.
 * - I agree with your economics. please stop hanging with anarchists and extreme libertarians.
 * - we should conserve non-detrimental traditions. I believe that the homosexuals and bisexuality should be 100% legal. You shouldn't be discriminated against in the society. You shall have civil unions instead of marriage. Shame that many of your adherents are . That's we SHOULD separate this ideology from.

[[File:Centrist-yellow.png]] Bringe:

 * - please don't be too flamboyant, and you have a deal. I still support the family values. plus, are tolerable except neocons.
 * - good ideas for the third world. yeah detrimental traditions need to be reformed or abolished! Plus, hard drugs should be illegal. I believe that progress is needed in order to be more open minded society and to advance. You go too far by rejecting the cultural values. Yes dude we f*ck !
 * - We should maintain some cultural values in order to keep morality, history and non-detrimental traditons, but you go too far by rejecting progress. Please stop hanging with cappies.
 * - based against totalitarians! but a lot of your followers are unironic extreme libertarians and anarchists is bad.
 * - Nazbol Gang! Nazbol Gang! Nazbol Gang! [[File:Troll.png]] Joke aside, you're too extreme for me, but you piss neolib and pinkcap off! That's based things. Literally radical version of consoc! but I still rather you against pinkcap. You're also a fellow left-nationalist as well.
 * - separating between religion and state is alright, but you go too far by separating between religion and society.
 * - still better than, but nationalism, preservation of non-detrimental traditions, and conservatism are based. I like how you denounce . However, climate change denial, anti-socialism, and extreme misogyny are cringe.

[[File:Kinda No.png]] Kinda cringe:

 * - you taught me secularism, republicanism, and egalitarianism. but please be calm down and less extreme.
 * - honestly, this is cringe as ideologically. I would give credit for you because I like how you improved conditions after ousting monarchs and right-wing dictators. but still long terms, this ideology will cause economic stagnant which is not good.

[[File:No.png]] Cringe:

 * - Sh*t exploitative system! what a sinful, globalist, elitist, and imperialist ideology that has treaded on every countless nations' self determination and caused despair to the poor of both the nation and the world through your economic globalization and mass of privatazation. I could go on and on about how retard you are, but I'll leave that to my based friends in this wiki.
 * - Stop pointless war and interventionism! almost same as neolibtard. Please read meaning of democracy in dictionary or internet.
 * - ultra leftism? ngl very cringe ultroids. You're really disgrace to chad leftists!
 * - No
 * - bruh too far! very cringe! We'll cancel you before you cancel us!
 * Christy.png Muslim 2.png Hind.png Bud.png JewTheo.png - No
 * - gtfo Islamic terrorists! stop using religion to terrorise everywhere!
 * - yeah I support civil liberties, but this ideology is abomination because it could lead society to degenerate by endorsing very individualism, etc.
 * - yes I advocate gender equality, but I found you are abomination because your very individualism. So you want to destroy the family values.
 * ,, and - No! I will never let ethnonats, racenats, or relnats to divide the unified nation!  go brrrrr!
 * - dividing nation based on ethnicities? Cringe!

Regional

 * - no! filthy reactionarist!
 * - LITERALLY SUHARTO!

[[File:DvSupremacy.png]] Megacringe:

 * - sh*t f*cker degeneracies who have ruined the good name of progressivism! you're more like pseudo-progressivist! you're also reason why people have lost respect for the LGBT. Stop thread on the freedom of speech!
 * - Very degenerate! neoliberal capitalism elitism + intersectional = ultimate abomination. You must be eradicated in order to save humanity!
 * - LITERALLY CALIFORNIA! LITERALLY CANADA!
 * - Woke + Anarchism = utterly abomination!
 * - The stuff of nightmares...
 * - I hate you! Stop holding back technology, science belongs to humanity, NOT your greedy corporate. Open source programming and public technical education are extremely important to a healthy and productive society, and removing it for your personal and unearned gain is awfully egoistic. You want to prevent people from knowing how what they use functions, on purpose, genuinely disgusts me. We need to destroy before it is too late. Technology belongs to the people! DEATH TO GAFA! You're the biggest enemy to the humanity and need to get eradicted in order to save humanity! You'll likely result in . (I agree with 's stance against it)
 * - this is absolutely dystopian 🤮. This is just hell for everyone. OMG THIS IS WAY TO KILL MYSELF AFTER READING FORDISM PAGE. Nah I'm unironically want to execute all people who want to make brave new world reality. I rather support neo-nazis against you!
 * - absolutely dystopian! I don't wanna to join your gang!
 * - what a pure selfishness...
 * - the biggest slut woman I've seen. The Soviet Union should killed her before she escape to the USA.


 * -|Self-inserts=

[[File:Yes.png]] Based:

 * - Actually me! I need to start fresh of my ideology cuz this wiki was very slow as hell that could make me have hard access to my ideology page. I've gone rebirth ngl. Now, I'm still somewhat similar to you!
 * - Megabased ideology, but I have minor different things for you, especially stance on abortion. I agreed with your stance on [[File:Cap.png]] and [[File:ML.png]].
 * - very based ideology and nice person. same as above.
 * - very based ideology. yeah we were both social democrat formerly. We are both marketsoc now :)
 * - Ummm very based ideology. almost same as above!
 * - based! Some differences are that you're too supportive of multiculturalism, agrarianism, and too culturally progressive.

[[File:Kinda Yes.png]] Kinda based:

 * - too authoritarian for me. Your social view is a bit culturally right. Anti-imperialism, market socialism, and nationalism are based.
 * - your economy view is too extreme for my taste. Communism and planned economy are not my taste. I have minor different things for you in social view, especially stance on abortion and LGBT. I will have explanation about your ideology if your page is finished. Nah, your old ideology is more based for me than your new ideology. I heard that you have gone being traditional.
 * - good economics if you're too economically right. your social view is fine (cuz you've gone more conservative, which is based for me) and your civic view is based. I believe that trans is not gender. I know you want to respect other culture. I think interculturalism is must because it allows diversity, but polyculturalism is also good for any countries which are very diversity. Utopianism, Chiang Kai Shek, Western-style progressivism, youth politic, and military interventionism are cringe ngl. At least you can accept me because I dislike Chiang Kai Shek.
 * - you're slightly better than Celfloskism, but you still like military interventionism, youth politics, and utopianism. That's cringe ngl.
 * - A bit too economically right, and too culturally left for my taste. Social Corporatism is fine. State Atheism is also cringe. Technocracy, transhumanism, technological advancement, georgism, welfarism, civic nationalism, and populism are based, however.
 * - We both have some similar beliefs. Some differences are that you're too civically liberal, anti-anti-colonialist, and economically right for my taste. Your social view is good-bringe (not much as based) if it is too anti-LGBT. Although georgism, market, environmentalism, interculturalism, gender equality, family values, and welfare are based. Of course, we both hate . well, goodbye :(
 * - Mostly good ideas regarding economics, environment and more, but you're too libertarian and culturally progressive for my taste. Your social view is rather cringish, but it has some good ideas for me.

[[File:Centrist-yellow.png]] Bringe:

 * - you have good ideas, but you're too extreme. Plus, calm the fuck down, and ochlocracy and communism are cringe
 * - Fascism, autarky, xenophobia, autocracy, ultranationalism, and imperialism are cringe. You're too authoritarian and economically right for my taste. Your economic view is bringe. Although transhumanism and science are good. At least, you dislikes racism and SJW. I know your ideology is quite old. You've turned into now...
 * - Totalitarianism, command economy, ultranationalism, and fascism are cringe. Your economic view is bringe and too right for me. I'm not fan of your social view, but gender equality, racial equality, and secularism are based. Your social view is too conservative for me. Although transhumanism and science are good. We both hate and like egalitarianism and technocracy.
 * - Too economically right for my taste, but based georgism. I don't like the concept of free market. I believe that market should be regulated in order to keep it humane. Too civically libertarian for my taste, but direct democracy is based. Social view is fine (although more feasible when it's on the third world). Transhumanism is also good. Globalism is cringe (atleast you opposed ultranationalism and interventionism). overall decent Trollsome.png trollsome economics and based anti-landlordist gang! Trollsome.png gang!
 * - glad Tony567 finally back to original ones! you're getting more based for me :D your economic view is bringe if it is too economically right for my taste. You social view is cringish if it is too culturally left/progressive for my taste because progressivism in the first world is cringe. Overall meh ideology.
 * - glad Tony567 finally back to original ones! you're getting more based for me :D your economic view is bringe if it is too economically right for my taste. You social view is cringish if it is too culturally left/progressive for my taste because progressivism in the first world is cringe. Overall meh ideology.

[[File:Kinda No.png]] Kinda cringe:

 * - Honestly, Corporatocracy is very vomiting 🤮, but you have fine social views. Also based market, environmentalism, and democracy. yes finally, you dumped your old sh*tty ideology Tony.
 * - Egoism, nihilism, illegalism, and your cultural stances are cringe ngl. Environmentalism and anti-imperialism are based.
 * Caressism.png - cringish to cringe economic view, but market is based. Anti-georgism, economic globalism, and letting big corporations do their crap? no no no! they are krinj. Scientific researchment is based. I would think that you can't have social equality using welfare while letting big corporations do their crap. Your societal view is ehhh, but it is too progreesive for my taste and cringe theocracy. I believe that every irreligious people shouldn't be forced to be religious. Atleast you respect other religions. Bruh, your identity axis is intersectional in the DozenValues, which is very cringe. I rather secularism which supports separation between religion and state. Utopianism is cringe in my opinion.
 * - Chicago school of economics and anti-populism are cringe ngl. Your social view is too progressive for my taste. Your civic view is too libertarian for my taste ngl. Civic nationalism, patriotism, semi-direct democracy, anti-imperialism, market, georgism, international co-operation, non-interventionism and anti-NATO are good. We both agree that EU needs reforms

[[File:No.png]] Cringe:

 * - your social view is cringe, but your economic view is too left for me and your civic view is also too libertarian for me. you've called me fake socialist. nah very cringe ultroid... You're also the most typical ultroid I've seen.
 * - I used to be extremely krinj, very individualist, and overly serious when I first entered Politic and studied about only economic view (eg: communism, socialism, capitalism, etc). Thank god, I transitioned out of that phase.
 * - Honeslty, your ideology is megacringe... I will not send you to the prisons because you seem cool person. Trollsome gang! Trollsome.png
 * - Syndicalism, anti-colonialism, transhumanism, and environmentalism are good, but anarchism, postgenderism, anti-humanism, xenofeminism, nihilism, egoism, and your social view are cringe. Plus, communism is not my taste. Scored 97.1% on the respectful scale on DozenValues. That's just intersectionality, which is very krinj for me. That's your ideology is really very woke and degenerate for me. You hates markets, which is sad. I will not send you to the prisons because you seem ok person.

[[File:DvSupremacy.png]] SEND THEM TO THE PRISONS:

 * - HOLY SHIT! GET OUTA FROM INTERNET! AHHH SEXIST ORWELLIAN SOYBOY! I'm sure you're 100% larper!
 * - HOLY SHIT! GO OUTSIDE AND TOUCH GRASS YOU SHITTY ORWELLIAN! HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN WITHOUT SHOWER? TAKE SHOWERS! I'm sure you're 100% plenderLARP.
 * - ewww total degenerate who like degeneracy 🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮 very cringe anarchism!
 * - very disgusting page! 🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮 what a heresy! Opressing people by your disgusting theocrat ideology. You want to push people to an absolute hell. You're just an another type of Satan. I'll destroy you. Thanks God, you were quited by your founder anymore...

=   =

NOTES: THIS TEST RESULT IS UNDER WIP!
 * -|Picture=

{|
 * -|Full Size=
 * Chirotesla SapplyValues 25 04 22.png  (leaning on )
 * Chirotesla's DozenValues 27 04 22.png Postkeynes.png
 * Chirotesla's LeftValues 05 04 22.png Leftnat.png
 * Chirotesla's ConservaValues 04 04 22.png Consocf.png
 * Chirotesla's ConservaValues 04 04 22.png Consocf.png


 * -|Picture=

{|
 * -|Full Size=
 * National Geo-MarketSoc fixed.png
 * Chirotesla killing wokeism.png
 * Chirotesla killing wokeism.png

=   =


 * A Cure for Capitalism by Richard D. Wolff (still reading)



=   =

=   = If you want to ask me, please talk in. It is feel free to ask Q&A :D

DO NOT COMMENT HERE! IF YOU WRITE COMMENT HERE, YOUR COMMENT WILL GET DELETED!