Syntropianism

{{#css:.portable-infobox{border:10px solid #ffffff;border-radius:10px!important}.portable-infobox.pi-background {background-color:#202020}.wikitable{border-collapse:separate;border-radius:#400c93!important;background:#400c93!important}body #mw-content-container {padding-top:3%}#cosmos-banner{background-color:#400c93}.cosmos-header{background-color:#400c93}.cosmos-header:before{background:0}body #mw-content-text {color:#c0c0c0}.cosmos-button-primary{background-color:#27f1ab;color:#ffffff}.ts-inner{padding:0}#mw-content a:not(.new){color:#27f1ab;text-decoration:none} {width:-webkit-calc(100%-320px);width:100%}.portable-infobox a:link,.portable-infobox a:visited,.portable-infobox a:hover{color:#27f1ab!important}.portable-infobox {color:#c0c0c0}.portable-infobox{width:350px}#cosmos-footer{margin-bottom:-40px;background-color:#27f1ab}img{border:0;vertical-align:middle;}}
 * 1) mw-content-wrapper{width:1690px;max-width:100%;padding:0}#mw-content,#catlinks{background:#202020}:.CosmosRail{width:1200px}#cosmos-pageBody-content

= Predecessors: Two kinds of Proto-Matthism=

Even though I am not old I have been through "some" ideological change (across the entire compass).

[[File:DvOwnership.png]] [[File:DvCoordination.png]] [[File:DvDominion.png]] First Stage Matthism [[File:DvRestriction.png]] [[File:DvSupremacy.png]] [[File:DvNovelty.png]]

 * [[File:PCB-Sec.png]] Authoritarianism
 * [[File:Technocracy.png]] Technocracy
 * [[File:Statecap icon.png]] State Capitalism

First Stage Matthism was invented around me being 9 years old, I was infected with a ideological innless widely spread across intelligent and educated people witch led me to the false premise that economy and society can be centrally coordinated.

At later thought it was dystopian.

The idea was formed on stretched out walks through nature with my best friend. We planned on taking over word domination and then creating a technocratic, elitist and economically left super-stat with us at the top. We thought that 85% of the population are stupid and can´t govern themselves and thus had to be forces to take there chance.

[[File:DvProperty.png]] [[File:market center.png]] [[File:DvPower.png]] Second Stage Matthism [[File:DvAutonomy.png]] [[File:DvSupremacy.png]] [[File:DvHeritage.png]]

 * [[File:PCB-Civnat.png]] Civic Nationalism
 * [[File:PCB-Christy.png]] Christianity
 * [[File:PCB-Tradcon.png]] Conservatism

Second Stage Matthism was heavily influenced by my fathers political believes when I was about 11. I later was able to make him more libertarian.

Second Stage Matthism was created as a reaction to the incompetence and ideological stupidity of the germane politics and could be described as "Capitalist Christian Conservatism" with high focus on freedom of speech, Christianity, conservative values and reason.

=  Third Stage Matthism   =

Third Stage Matthism is the latest form of Matthism and thus the one I believe in right now. It started with me discovering the germane libertarian magazine and youtube channal "Eigentümlich Frei" (eng."peculiarly free") witch made me start going into libertarian politics.

Antis

 * [[File:Antiabort.png]] Anti Abortionist
 * [[File:thar.png]] Anti Authoritarian
 * [[File:AntiAnarchy.png]] Anti Anarchist
 * [[File:Trustbust.png]] Anti Corporatocracy
 * [[File:AntiChina.png]] Anti China

[[File:DvDominion.png]] Form of Government [[File:DvAnarchy.png]]
In fact, I don´t like any form of government we have come up so far:


 * [[File:Monarch.png]] Monarchy :Will fall into detachment from reality
 * [[File:PCB-Caesar.png]] Dictatorship : Will come with terrible regimes
 * [[File:Technocracy.png]] Technocracy : Will come with central plans
 * [[File:Plutocrat.png]] Plutocracy : Will come with politicised wealth
 * [[File:PCB-Corp.png]] Corporatocracy : Will come with monopoles
 * [[File:Dem.png]] Democracy : Will strip away your freedom over time
 * [[File:PCB-Awaj.png]] Anarchy : Will descend into chaos

The only two forms of government I deme somewhat able to protect freedom over time are aristocracy and direct democracy.

[[File:DvAnarchy.png]] The semi-direct Democracy & Confederalism
Most political decisions should be made by citizens directly voting on problems in their cities/regional communities. To do this properly a great amount of regional autonomy. On the ferderal level a parlament should be elected with every citizens voting for one party and one president, the procentages for the parties are split across 300 seats proportionaly while the presidential vote folowes the "alternativ voting system". The ministers of the ferderal sub-units are directly voted along side one ferderal representant for every one milion people in the ferderal sub-unit. Ferderal Ministers are apointed by technocratic/meritocratic  means and not by popular vote. Parties and members of the conferderal council can make law proposals witch the senat and cenferderal council will vote on and need to be signed by the president.

[[File:DrugWor.png]] Drugs
Every drug, that does not make you addicted instantly, like crystal math, should be legal. Many drugs are just dangerous because of stretching, dirty equipment or other substances, by legalising drugs the first two factors vanish. Also dealers now just have two things: kids, how can´t buy drugs legaly, and the drugs that make you addicted instantly, very poor and insufficiant in everything that is not a large city.

[[File:PCB-Consti.png]] Contracts
Contracts are very important, there are tied to reliebility and property, trade and interaction. It should be the case that citizens can make contracts between each other without a notary and/or the government involved, that is an important freedom to secure privacy and prosperity.

[[File:GRights.png]] Gun ownership
Everybody should have the option to own a gun, it´s, in the end, a property right. But there should be requirements: No psychological illness, no non-rehabed criminals, no underage people. It´s also mandatory to store weapons somewhat safe and most importantly unloaded.

[[File:Sexocracy.png]] Sexwork and Pornography
I personally think that sexwork is bad, as prostitution is deemed sinful in the bible, but as long as all involved parties are consenting I see no problem with sexwork. Same for pornography, I don´t like it but:

" Pornography is objectively freedom of speech and a form of entertainment, so I oppose censorship of it just because it promotes "promiscuity" or conflicts with someone's "moral values"."

- Matteel

[[File:DvPermission.png]] Non-Contrversial

 * [[File:FreeSpeak.png]] total freedom of speech
 * [[File:Dem.png]] total freedom of assembly
 * [[File:Mediastocracy_flair.png]]total freedom of press
 * [[File:PCB-Theocrat.png]] total freedom of religion

[[File:Strato.png]] Military
Military spending should make up ~2.5% of the budged. The military must be able to defend the country. Because "nobody" wants to become a soldier, the military should derive it´s might from technological superiority rather than overwhelming manpower.

[[File:PCB-Ingsoc-icon.png]] Secret Service
The secret service is supposed to only work in counter-espionage and anti-terrorism and shall never spy on the ordinary citizens.

[[File:PCB-PolState.png]] Police
Statistical data shows, that money spend on the police is anti-proportional to the amount of homicide. Police violence is real, but a small price to pay for a safe society. In my opinion it would be best to better equip the police but stipe the police of some of it´s permissions, mostly regarding private information and property rights.

[[File:PCB-Sec.png]] Bureaucracy
With almost no welfare to coordinate, no subsidies to pay out and little regulations to enforce we finally can shrink the bureaucracy to the minimum, spearing unimaginable amounts of money.

[[File:PCB-Klep icon.png]] Prisons
Prisons should be privatised, we can´t afford housing and feeding criminals for free, prisons must be harsh and should under no circumstances be better then what the prisoners had before.

[[File:Isolationist.png]] Infrastruckture
Water, electicity, prisons, (air-)ports, public transportation and internet should be private. Only the roads are to be build and maintaind by the state. Netneutrality is still a thing.

Overview

 * [[File:PCB-Techcap.png]] Techno-Capitalist
 * [[File:Merit.png]] Meritocratic
 * [[File:PCB-Austrobert.png]] Austrian School
 * [[File:Hayek.png]] Hayekist

[[File:DvCommerce.png]] Basics [[File:DvCoordination.png]]
I believe in Austrian economics, as meme as it sounds: The invisibly hand guides us.

I believe in a market where only the barebones of employee protection are implemented forcefully. The currency should be bound to the gold standard and usage of private-, especially crypto-, currencies should be made easier. Also all subsidises and welfare should be abolished.

[[File:DvCoordination.png]] Taxation
The only tax shall be a ~15% income- and ~5% corporate- tax witch is flat in nature.

Generaly
" Economic classes are a myth. Communists will make you believe that everything can be summarized to a conflict between owner and owned, but relationships to the capital are much more complex than what they propose. In fact, the "class struggle" they are talking about is nothing but a mere distraction from real issues, to justify their economic paternalism/conservatism. No, collectively planning what the neighbour will eat for dinner is not liberating, nor is preventing businesses from forming causing any good for innovation. What communists seek is control and preservation, not liberation and progress. "

-

Incompatability of Marxist Philosophy and Democracy
In Marxist Philosophy it´s said that the individuum cannot plan for it self. If the idividuum is said to not be able of freely deciting what to produce, buy and consume. If the idividuum is said to able to decite these minor things. Than how can the individuum decite who should rule it, how could it plan it´s vote.

Immorality of Colletivist Ethics in a planed Economy
A planed economy requires a plan and to decite what should be produced there needs to priorities some things over others. The problem is, that said priorities must apply for every indviduum and thus the priorities and values the priorities are based on are economicly forced on the individuum, witch is deeply immoral.

Overview

 * [[File:PCB-Culturally Right-Trad.png]] Conservative
 * [[File:PCB-Christy.png]] Christian
 * [[File:Libertarian.png]] Libertarian
 * [[File:PCB-Accel.png]] Accelerationist
 * [[File:PNG-Individualism.png]] Individualist
 * [[File:Utility.png]] Utilitarianist
 * [[File:Modtransh.png]] Moderat Transhumanist

[[File:DvNovelty.png]] Science [[File:DvHeritage.png]]
I deeme technological progress to be the only naturally good form of progress and the little taxes collected should be R&D-reinvested. I also believe that the single most effective way to make scientific progress is the free market, in the end it´s private companies who wark on colonising Mars, not the government, in the end it was the time of unregulated markets in the industrial revolution in witch the most technological innovations were made.

[[File:Transh.png]] Transhumanism
Matthism is pro cybernetical enhancement, but opposes the total rejection of the human body, viewing it as a marvel given by god.

[[File:Spacecol.png]] Space Colonialism
As we see right now: Privat Entities are far more effective regarding this.

" Space is the final frontier, to master it means to master our destiny "

- Stellaris

And I don´t want to my lay and my peoples destiny in the hand of an inefficient, money-eating monster.

[[File:Abort.png]] Abortion
I think abortion is murder, but in case of rape or endangerment of the mothers life abortion is justified.

[[File:DvInclusion.png]] Modern Culture
I have many things to criticize about modern "Culture"

[[File:Hedonism-cloud.png]] Decadence and Decay
As a direct consequence of decay in faith, urbanisation, progressivism and centralisation our western society has slowed down in philosophical and scientific innovation and lost key elements of what made the western culture once great and prosperous now just ravelling in the endless seeming prosperity, not realising that they work against everything that gave them prosperity in the first place. This has to be combated. By embracing values like discipline, reason, competitivism and ingenuity while giving power to the market I think we can stop the decay of western civilization.

For further investigations look here

[[File:Equality.png]] Fanatic Egalitarianism
Most people will agree that equality is good and so do I, but today many people and, most detrimental, powerful people believe, that we have total equality of income and outcome, degrading the ambitious individuum to a mindless drone that can´t improve on it´s own and if it does so will be hated against. I support equal right, but what I can´t stand is the desire to level everyone out, because that degrades competition and ambition. I think we should allow everyone equally to become better than their co-worker.

Movements like Black Lives Matter, the social justice movement or third- and fourth-wave feminism are both irrational and harmful to society.

[[File:Gay.png]] LGBTQ+ Community
From a biblical standpoint it´s not good, but I don`t want to force my believes on others so I don´t have anything against gay, lesbian, asexual or bisexual persons, what I don´t like is making this so much of a problem, get your rights and shut up. To trans people: If you really believe that you are born in the false body and that has been confirmed by medical personal and it isn´t a temporary discomfort with your body, just get the gender transformation and shut up. To people with mutations regarding sex: These people aren´t diverse they can, in almost all cases, be said to have one of the two genders, just inventing a new gender for everything isn´t the right way.

[[File:Morality.png]] Values
I look at actions from two angels to consider it´s morality. First the Christian angel, second the objectivist-rationalist angel. In case of contradiction (witch almost never happens) the first angel has priority over the other.

[[File:Antinil.png]] Life
In my opinion man should strife to life the best life he can, this can be best accomplished by living a live with god.

[[File:DvProperty.png]] Self-Property
I believe in Self-Property, a concept similar to self-ownership. The concept is, that your life, your bodily autonomy, your time, etc. are your immaterial-property witch, similar to material property, shoud be protectet with only few restrictions on what to do with your self-property, like with normal property. Self-property is a natural right of the human witch can be derived both from reason as well as from god. From this it can be derived, that peronal freedom and economic freedom are deeeply interconected and almost the same.

[[File:PNG-Individualism.png]] Individuum
I see the individual as the most important part of society for two major reasons:


 * 1) God looks at the individual and individual actions, not witch group an individual belongs to.
 * 2) Individualism goes hand in hand with innovation, freedom and prosperity, tree things important to a healthy society.

For these reasons has the individual person a lot of rights and freedoms including:


 * [[File:FreeSpeak.png]] total freedom of speech
 * [[File:Dem.png]] total freedom of assembly
 * [[File:Mediastocracy_flair.png]]total freedom of press
 * [[File:Comb.png]] freedom to own most of the weapons available to mankind (excluding: Atomic-, Biological-, Chemical- and highly Explosive- Weapons)
 * etc.

[[File:Col.png]] Collectives
I separate two kinds of groups:
 * stabilizing Collectives
 * de-stabilizing Collectives



Stabilizing Collectives are those, who expand across the entire society, as being part of one of these will make you choose political options helping the entire society and securing the society from too sudden cultural change.

Kinds of these Collectives are:
 * [[File:PCB-UrbismIcon.png]] Homestead
 * [[File:PCB-Nationalism.png]] Nation
 * [[File:PCB-Trad.png]] Culture
 * [[File:PCB-Theocrat.png]] Religion

De-Stabilizing Collectives are those, who only expand horizontally across the society, making them only looking for there groups problems and solutions, witch is bad for a society. Another kind of counterproductive collective identity are those that the individual is not to freely choose like gender and race, because these allow them to take on a unjustified role of victim or oppressor.

Kinds of these Collectives are:
 * [[File:Fem.png]] Gender
 * [[File:Caste.png]] Class
 * [[File:Ethplur.png]] Ethnicity

[[File:Modnat.png]] Patriotism
To alow people to be free means to sacrefice stability, this stability can be regaind through a sense of nationality and comon culture, collectivist for sure but just a little. This sense should be aquired through two means:

[[File:TechnoNat.png]] Technological supremacy
" We can, and must, engage in national innovation projects in order to bring pride to the citizens. Things like space conquest, achievements in medicine and the general development of the nation's infrastructure have to become tightly linked with patriotism. The same way, our national identity must be consolidated via technological means, such as free internet nation-wide. It is also equally as important to achieve technological autarky, to not have to rely on foreign patents/innovation. The nation must be seen as a beacon of scientific advancement, worldwide, and become a major actor in international research programs. "

-

[[File:Globalism.png]] [[File:Pac.png]] Diplomacy [[File:Modnat.png]] [[File:Strato.png]]
I believe that diplomatic interactions and treaties are generally good, but don´t want to have my national identity and sovereignty stolen.

[[File:World Federalism2.png]] World-Government
I strives in the end for a world-federation, yet want to take it on slowly to assure that the diplomatic interactions are beneficial.

[[File:Euroscept.png]] Euro-Scepticism
I think the EU was good in the beginning, the EU made trade and research easyer and garanteed peace. Today the EU is a money-eating, complex, burocratic and souverenity stealing monster. Also the Euro is a worthless paper currency. The EU steped over it´s bounderys often, too often. The worst is that the central bank keeps printing money and the parlament keeps going in debt, inflation goes brrrrrr. The next thing is, that the EU is by no means democratic, Ursula von der Laien is in the third most powerful position after screwing up the german military, being corrupt and not standing on anyones ballot paper.

[[File:Strato.png]] War
I´m strictly against any aggressive wars.

[[File:PCB-Cball-Taiwan.png]] China or Taiwan [[File:Cball-China.png]]
Both are sovereign countries, but one is better... Tipp: it´s not China.

[[File:PCB-Cball-Russia.png]] Crimea
Crimea rightfully belongs to Ukraine

[[File:PCB-Zio.png]] Israel
The lands currently occupied by the Israeli is rightfully their land.

= Definitiones=

[[File:PCB-Nationalism.png]] Nation and State [[File:Statism.png]]
Nation and State are by no means the same. The Nation is the shared culture and language, the shared customs, traditions and rites within a region by a people, which is defined by the former. The State is a territorialy restricted monpoly on force.

In a good State the state encapsulates the <font color="#ff6600">Nation and the <font color="#ff6600">Nation alone, while representing the <font color="#ff6600">Nations values in the <font color="#91f2f5">State. That than is a coherent and homogenious <font color="#91f2f5">State. That is why assimilation is so important.

[[File:Leftpop-0.png]] <font color="#f4133c">Left vs. <font color="#00a2e8">Right [[File:PCB-RightPop.png]]
The left versus right devide has been tryed to be defined by many dipols: <font color="#f4133c">Progress vs. <font color="#00a2e8">Conservation, <font color="#f4133c">Collectivism vs. <font color="#00a2e8">Individualism , <font color="#f4133c">Socialism vs. <font color="#00a2e8">Capitalism ,

but all of these are problematic, in the context I use "<font color="#f4133c">Left " and "<font color="#00a2e8">Right " in I use them the following way:

<font color="#f4133c">Equality vs. <font color="#00a2e8">Hierarchy

This is the only dipol witch is usefull.

<font color="#f4133c">Progress vs. <font color="#00a2e8">Conservation does not care for ideologies like Pink Capitalism or Bleeding-Hart Libertarianism.

<font color="#f4133c">Collectivism vs. <font color="#00a2e8">Individualism does make Fashism look like a leftist ideology, which it is clearly not.

<font color="#f4133c">Socialism vs. <font color="#00a2e8">Capitalism does not incoperate alternative rightist Economic systems like Feudalism or Mercantilism.

[[File:PCB-Con-t.png]] <font color="#00a2e8">Conservatism and <font color="#0cc12d">Traditionalism [[File:PCB-Trad.png]]
To many people Traditionalism is just more extreme Conservatism, but I like to think of it that way:

Both are kinds of Cultural Rightism but they differ in the way that the <font color="#00a2e8">Conservativ seeks to conserve the values of the State and the <font color="#0cc12d">Traditionalist seeks to conserve the values of the nation. If the values of the nation are similar or identical to those of the state the <font color="#0cc12d">Traditionalist IS a more extreme <font color="#00a2e8">Conservativ. The <font color="#00a2e8">Conservative seeks an eternal Present wile the <font color="#0cc12d">Traditionalist seeks either preservation of the present OR a (cultural) "devulution".

By using this point of view it is finaly possible to solve the problem, that <font color="#297537">Primitivism and <font color="#18ba36">Antiquism are both culturaly far right, but one rejects the other: The <font color="#297537">Primitivist is extreamly <font color="#0cc12d">Traditionalist and the <font color="#18ba36">Antiquist is extreamly <font color="#00a2e8">Conservative.



That, by the wy, is the only thing I like about the 10groups test, as it has a <font color="#00a2e8">Conservation vs. <font color="#50ccf6">Reform and a <font color="#0cc12d">Tradition vs. <font color="#b70099">Progress axis. I myself are a <font color="#50ccf6">Reformist <font color="#0cc12d">Traditionalist.

= Behaviour=

Matthism behaves as an INTJ type character, non-conformist and individualist. He will always think he is right and likes to destroy others with facts and logic. He also is very enraged when his property rights are disregarded. Matthism speaks in a thick germen accent.

[[File:DuelValue.png]] Weapons of Choise
As a weapon of choise Matthism-Ball will, depending on the situation, either choose a Rapier or some futuristic particle gun, or both, to show his affinity for technology and fencing alike.

Relations
Self-Insert Opinions =

[[File:Mega_Yes.png]] Ultra-Based

 * [[File:SomeCrusade.png]] SomeCrusaderism -
 * [[File:Neoafun.png]] Neo-Afunhumaninterism -
 * [[File:Beryism.gif]] Beryism
 * [[File:Fallenism.png]] Fallenism

[[File:Yes.png]] Based

 * [[File:Higga.gif]] Higgardism -

[[File:Meh.png]] Neutral

 * [[File:Quark.png]] Quarkism -
 * [[File:MATTball.png]] Mattism -

[[File:No.png]] Cringe

 * [[File:Xivanism1.png]] Xivanism -

[[File:Mega_No.png]] Ultra Cringe

 * [[File:GenShrekf.png]] General Shrekretary Thought -


 * -|Canon-Opinions =

[[File:Mega_No.png]] Ultra Cringe


= Successor: Post-Matthism=

Post Matthism describes the ideas witch I will develop in the future if ever.

= Books=


 * [[File:Marx.png]] The Communist Manifesto
 * [[File:Hayek.png]] The Road to Serfdome

=Tests=

Axes
- Add me

- can you add me lol